|Publication number||US20050011849 A1|
|Application number||US 10/621,475|
|Publication date||Jan 20, 2005|
|Filing date||Jul 17, 2003|
|Priority date||Jul 17, 2003|
|Also published as||DE602004031861D1, EP1680350A1, EP1680350A4, EP1680350B1, US6845873, WO2005009886A1|
|Publication number||10621475, 621475, US 2005/0011849 A1, US 2005/011849 A1, US 20050011849 A1, US 20050011849A1, US 2005011849 A1, US 2005011849A1, US-A1-20050011849, US-A1-2005011849, US2005/0011849A1, US2005/011849A1, US20050011849 A1, US20050011849A1, US2005011849 A1, US2005011849A1|
|Original Assignee||Nigel Chattey|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (7), Referenced by (20), Classifications (8), Legal Events (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates generally to container cranes, and more particularly to a crane apparatus equipped with a container security scanning system for scanning containers during transshipment thereof between transportation modes.
Three major problems are increasingly plaguing older marine container terminals in densely populated regions:
Containers entering seaports now represent a security risk. Most, if not all, incoming containers now need to pass through detection devices in order to determine if they are radioactive: Specifically to detect for radioactive material, such as may be in “dirty” bombs or nuclear devices. It may already be too late, however, if radioactivity is only detected after a container has been unloaded, especially in a densely populated seaport such as Los Angeles, Seattle or New York.
For this reason, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security is now attempting to solve the problem by installing detection systems at container origin shipment locations overseas, such as in China, Malaysia, etc. At best, this type of solution can address only a small percentage of the seven million containers coming into the U.S. in any one year. In addition, there is no way that the reliability of these overseas origin detection centers can be adequately monitored. The risk of non-compliance is great indeed.
One solution to the problem would be to scan or screen inbound containers at locations away from densely populated seaports and consumption areas. This can be done in one of two ways: Firstly at locations on land, away from such population centers; or secondly, where such locations are not readily available, which is generally the case, at offshore locations including man-made islands.
Congestion Due to Limited Terminal Space
The volume of worldwide containerized cargo is increasing faster than is the capacity of many of the world's conventional marine container terminals. The problem is being compounded by a shortage of terminal space and increasing congestion caused by standard type terminal operations, i.e., the six or more separate container handling operations required for the movement of containers within and around the terminal from ship to stacks, within stacks, and from stacks to trailer-trucks. One solution to this problem can come from eliminating, to the maximum extent possible some of these six or more separate handlings of containers traditionally performed within terminals.
Environmental Problems Caused by Diesel Emissions
The problem of diesel powered emissions from terminal yard equipment and truck-trailers serving container terminals, and compounded by traffic congestion, has reached an expensive level. A marine container terminal under construction in Los Angeles, for China Shipping Corporation, has been ordered by the courts to pay $50 million in additional costs to retrofit the terminal in order to reduce its diesel emissions.
Standard marine container terminals rely to a great extent on diesel powered equipment of all kinds, i.e., trailer-trucks, rubber-tired gantries (RTG's), straddle carriers, reach-stackers, top-picks, etc. A significant reduction in diesel emissions can be achieved by:
One object of the present invention is to provide a crane apparatus that overcomes the aforementioned problems prevalent at existing marine container terminals.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a crane apparatus having a container security scanning system for performing security scanning of containers during transshipment thereof between transportation modes and without ground placement of the containers.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a crane apparatus having a container security scanning system that is efficient, rapid, accurate and highly reliable.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a crane apparatus equipped with a container handling and security scanning system and powered by electric motors thereby significantly reducing, or possibly eliminating, diesel emissions at the marine container terminal.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a crane apparatus having a container security scanning system for performing security scanning of containers during direct transshipment thereof from marine vessels to rail-cars without ground placement of the containers.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a crane apparatus equipped with state-of-the-art scanning/detecting technology for performing security scanning of containers to determine the presence of radioactive material.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a crane apparatus equipped with a container security scanning system that minimizes the transfer time of containers during transshipment thereof between transportation modes by provision of fixed scanning units mounted on a scanning deck and platform constructed at the portal girder level of the crane apparatus.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a method for the security scanning of containers and their direct transshipment between transportation modes without the need for ground placement.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a container security scanning system that can be retrofitted to existing ship-to-shore container cranes and/or installed to upgrade similar newly manufactured cranes.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a method by which any existing ship-to-shore container crane can be retrofitted, and/or any similar newly manufactured crane can be upgraded, by the installation of the container security scanning system according to this invention.
The present invention provides unique solutions to the three major problems facing container terminal operations. It enables:
To be efficient and effective, from a port and terminal security standpoint, any radioactivity and/or gamma ray scanning of inbound containers has to be undertaken:
The present invention encompasses a method whereby the radioactivity and/or gamma ray scanning of containers can be undertaken in marine terminals in the quickest, most cost-efficient and most reliable manner.
This invention minimizes the time the container is being transferred, from its position within the ship's hold to the position where it can be scanned, by the introduction of a scanning deck and fixed scanning units constructed, at the portal girder level, of ship-to-shore container gantry cranes.
A container security scanning system (subsequently described and designated S1) according to the present invention can be installed in any type of ship-to-shore container gantry crane, not only in single boom, single trolley/hoist cranes, but also in multi-boom and/or multi-trolley/hoist cranes.
Within the general arrangement of all types of ship-to-shore container cranes, the portal girder level is the optimum location for any weight addition to the cranes. At this location, the new center of gravity of a crane, and the additional static and dynamic loading resulting from the security function, do not compromise the stability of the crane, even when operating at maximum unloading rates.
The security scanning deck according to the present invention comprises one or more, and preferably four, individual scanning units. Each scanning unit is equipped with a radioactivity and/or gamma ray scanning device configured to move completely, from end to end, under each container placed upon it. The scanning device is also wide enough so that the entire volume of cargo in a container can be scanned to determine if the cargo in any particular container is “clean” or “dirty”.
The scanning units in the present invention also provide for additional container buffer slots in the overall container handling system. This is an important advantage as the need to provide for as much buffer capacity as possible is already well established in the design of new and efficient marine container terminals.
The scanning deck and scanning units, according to the present invention, are preferably installed at the portal girder level of any standard type container ship-to-shore gantry crane. The scanning deck is designed to be large enough to not only accommodate personnel who monitor the container security scanning system, but also large enough to allow these same personnel to undertake two other important marine terminal functions at the same location, i.e., checking container documentation and, when necessary, unlocking/locking twist-locks.
In addition, the container security scanning system of the present invention is designed so that it can be installed also in direct intermodal transshipment cranes such as those disclosed and described in detail in my copending patent application Ser. No. 09/992,704 filed Nov. 14, 2001, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Several embodiments of container security scanning systems according to the present invention, installed in such direct transshipment cranes, are described in detail in the subsequent disclosure and drawings. In these embodiments, the location and method of operation of the scanning deck and scanning units eliminates the need for ground placement of containers. Thus, the time otherwise required to place containers at ground level before they can be scanned is also eliminated.
The present invention provides a method by which any ship-to-shore container gantry crane can be made to scan, within seconds, the contents of any container placed on any of its scanning units. By use of the unique container security scanning system (S1) embodied in the present invention, all a vessel's containers can be scanned within the shortest possible time from when they leave the ship. With all cranes servicing a vessel so equipped, a ship's complete cargo of containers can be scanned quickly, reliably, and under controlled conditions while, at the same time, significantly reducing the time that vessel would otherwise have to remain in port.
Direct Transshipment of Containers Between Transportation Modes Without the Need for Ground Placement
As important as security scanning, is the need to reduce the congestion problems being encountered by many container terminals. Current logistics methods that require the handling of a single container six or more times before it leaves the terminal are inefficient both from a time and cost standpoint.
The crane apparatus embodied in the present invention eliminates such excessive time and cost in handling containers. It achieves this by the direct intermodal transshipment of containers between transportation modes. Further, it achieves this without the need for ground placement before the containers leave the terminal.
For example, embodiments of the crane apparatus according to the present invention enable direct transshipment between:
In order to achieve these direct transshipment functions, the embodiments of crane apparatus according to the present invention are of a new and unique design in that they incorporate, as integral parts within the structure of the crane, multiple hoists, multiple booms, and multiple platforms.
Thus this crane apparatus, with its unique methods of container handling, can achieve both the direct intermodal transshipment of containers and their security scanning.
Further, by eliminating the need for ground placement in either instance, the overall unloading and terminal functions can be executed within the shortest possible time cycle.
Because of the importance being attributed to two particular applications of this crane apparatus, they are subsequently described in greater detail: Specifically, applications that refer to direct intermodal container transshipment and security scanning:
One important aspect of the crane apparatus of the present invention, and of its methods of operation and container handling, is that it achieves all its direct intermodal transshipment and container security scanning functions without generating any diesel emissions. This significant environmental benefit is achieved because all equipment operations are electrical and thus devoid of any diesel power generation.
All crane functions are powered by electric motors, i.e., crane drive motors that drive the cranes back and forth along their rails, trolley motors (whether for rope or machinery trolleys), spreader winch hoist motors, scanning device motors that drive the scanning devices back and forth under the scanning units, boom hoist motors, and personnel elevator hoist motors. Thus, all direct transshipment and security scanning functions are powered by electric motors.
The main electricity supply to these motors is supplied by underground live wires. These live wires are buried and laid adjacent to the grade level rails on which the cranes run. The electrical connection between the cranes and the live wires is maintained by electrical contacts fixed to the cranes, which provide constant contact with the live wires as the cranes move back and forth along their rails.
In the instances where over-the-ground vehicles have to be used in conjunction with the cranes, these are preferably 1-over-1 shuttle carriers. Unlike other diesel powered over-the-ground terminal equipment, 1-over-1 shuttle carriers can lend themselves, most economically, to conversion to an all electrical operation.
In summary, the various embodiments of the present invention each constitute an integrated, container logistics unloading, security scanning, and direct transshipment system that is not only cost and time efficient, but also in one that is environmentally friendly in that it generates no diesel emissions.
The foregoing as well as other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon a reading of the following detailed description of the invention when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The container security scanning system S1 of the present invention enables the radioactivity and/or gamma ray scanning of cargo containers to be undertaken as soon as possible after they are lifted out of the container ship or vessel. This is achieved by the placement of one or more scanning units on a scanning deck constructed at the portal girder level of the ship-to-shore gantry crane. At such a location, the time interval between the container being in the ship and being placed in a position ready for scanning is minimized.
In accordance with the present invention, the container security scanning system S1 consists of one or more scanning units, the number of which will depend primarily on the size of the crane apparatus and the volume of containers it is designed to handle. The scanning units are preferably arranged in side-by-side relation on a scanning deck of the crane apparatus, and each scanning unit is designed to accommodate any single 40 foot or 40+foot standard-sized containers (or two end-to-end 20 foot containers).
Each of the scanning units comprises one or more scanning platforms disposed in end-to-end relation for receiving thereon single 40 foot or 40+foot containers (or two end-to-end 20 foot containers), and a scanning device mounted on a trolley that rides along rails mounted by supports beneath the scanning platforms. The scanning device rides along the rails beneath the scanning platforms to scan the contents of a container situated on the scanning platforms. The scanning units will be described in more detail hereinafter with reference to
Additionally, the structure must be strong enough to absorb, without failure, the static and dynamic loads from fully loaded containers being placed on the structure in quick succession, under sustained operating conditions. Additionally, the structure must be strong enough to absorb the impact load of a loaded container possibly being dropped onto the scanning deck 4 from above by a trolley/hoist/spreader of the ship-to-shore gantry crane.
The need to provide a minimum number of two scanning platforms 5 within each scanning unit now becomes apparent. Such a configuration, as shown in
The scanning platforms 5, as best shown in
The scanning platforms 5 are designed in such a manner that the distance d is sufficient to permit the unimpeded passage of radioactivity and/or gamma ray scanning devices 9 mounted on rails 10 beneath the scanning platforms 5. The rails 10 are mounted on support members 11 and are designed to enable the scanning devices 9 to move in either direction along the rails 10 under the entire length of, and extending beyond the ends of, the scanning platforms 5 and beyond the ends of any containers 6 a, or 6 b or 6 c placed on them. Such a configuration (as will be discussed in more detail later) allows for the scanning devices 9 to be removed for maintenance, even if containers still remain above them in scanning position on their scanning platforms 5. The scanning platforms 5 can be built as a single, integral, structure, or can be built in sections that can be arranged so as to form scanning platforms 5.
One important design function of this invention should also be noted. As shown in
The movable radioactivity and/or gamma ray scanning devices 9 are powered to move in both directions along the rails 10. The power systems used in order to achieve such movement can be any one of several systems available, including the linear induction or maglev type. However, the best suited, most reliable, and most easily serviced and maintained power system, is one that involves standard electric motor drives integral with each scanning device 9.
The scanning device 9 may be of known construction and comprises one or more detectors for detecting gamma ray and/or neutron emissions characteristic of radioactive materials and converting the detected emissions into corresponding electrical impulses during rapid scanning by the detectors beneath a container. Preferably, the detectors are designed to detect any one of five specific radioactive isotopes which are enumerated in Senate Bill 193 and in directives from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The scanning device 9 preferably has two detectors, a gamma ray detector for detecting gamma ray emissions and a neutron detector for detecting neutron emissions. Typical examples of such detectors are the gamma ray detector Model No. JPM-12A Gamma available from Canberra, and neutron detector Model No. JPM-31A Neutron also available from Canberra. These two detectors were developed by Los Alamos National Laboratory in collaboration with Canberra (a private group) and meet the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) guidelines for establishing the performance of portal detectors as provided for by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Agency. One advantage of using such detectors, which can be modified to meet the scanning requirements of the present invention, is that suitable electronics and software have already been developed that enable both the gamma ray and neutron detection results to be viewed on the same display monitor. Thus these two detectors provide a commercially available detection system for portal screening of containers at ports of entry that enables for simultaneous dual-scanning and detection and thus provides for maximum detection capability.
These design functions thus encompass an important method for security scanning purposes whereby any scanning device 9 can scan the entire cargo volume within any container placed on the scanning unit 5 above it. Each scanning device 9 can be electronically connected by readily available, state-of-the art equipment to a system operating console 12 and a radioactivity and/or gamma ray display monitor 13 located on the scanning deck 4, behind each scanning unit. As the scanning devices 9 are operated by operators at the consoles 12 to pass in one or both directions under the containers 6 a, 6 b or 6 c on their scanning platforms 5, the operators can, from the same position, read the display monitors 13 and determine whether the containers 6 a, 6 b or 6 c being scanned are “clean” or “dirty” in radioactive terms. Each scanning unit includes not only the scanning platforms 5 and the movable, rail-mounted scanning devices 9 but also the electronic consoles 12 and visual display monitors 13 which are connected electrically to the scanning devices 9.
Rapid and effective maintenance and repair (M&R) capability for the sensitive, high-technology equipment involved in scanning operations must also be an essential part of any container security scanning system. Such maintenance and repair must be capable of being undertaken from both above, and below, the equipment. To enable maintenance and repair to be rapidly and efficiently undertaken from below the equipment, corridor walkways 14 are shown in
Major maintenance and repair of the equipment and/or its replacement also requires open access to the equipment from above so that, when necessary, each of the scanning devices 9 can be lifted directly off its rails, even when containers remain in scanning position on the scanning units. For this purpose, as shown in
As shown in
One important design function of the container security scanning system S1 should also be noted. As shown in
This will be especially important during times of a “red alert” at the terminal. For example, at such times, one side of the scanning deck 4 on each crane servicing a vessel, as well as the wharf, quay or pier area immediately below it, can be designated exclusively for dirty container handling and dispatch.
With plural in-line cranes simultaneously serving a vessel, a “red alert transportation corridor” S2 can be created along the wharf, quay or pier enabling any dirty containers to be dispatched as quickly as possible to a secure area on, or off, the terminal assigned to receive and further process such dirty containers. By way of example, this red alert transportation corridor is shown as S2 in all relevant figures. The “red alert vehicle” used in such instances will need such a clear corridor, unimpeded by other terminal ground equipment (such as shuttle or straddle carriers, or other ground-level container handling equipment or systems) in order to move any dirty containers expeditiously to the terminal's secure area.
During a red alert, with one side of the scanning decks 4 so designated, the other side of the scanning decks 4, as well as the wharf, quay or pier area immediately below it, can be designated as a “clean transportation corridor” S3. The necessary directions, as to which side of the scanning decks 4 should be used in a particular case, can be given by the operating personnel on the scanning decks 4 to the crane operator(s) in the control cabin(s) on the crane boom(s) above. By way of example, this clean transportation corridor is shown as S3 in all relevant figures.
This arrangement still enables clean containers to be unloaded from the vessel as quickly as possible, and clean containers can be lifted from any of the scanning units and dropped to the wharf, quay or pier level from the “clean” side of the scanning decks 4.
The operation of the crane apparatus of the present invention requires highly-trained technician-operators to work the scanning decks 4, scanning units, scanning devices 9, consoles 12 and display monitors 13. The relatively high wages of such operators can be offset, in part, if they are also responsible for the two other functions generally performed at this first stage of container terminal operations, i.e, checking the documentation and numbering of the inbound containers against the ship's manifest and customs documentation, etc., and, when and if required, also handling any twist-lock operations. From an operational standpoint, both these additional functions can be undertaken just as readily on the scanning deck 4, and any such multi-function operations becomes a matter for discussion between the terminal operators and labor at the terminal involved.
In the event a container is designated a “maverick” (because of faulty manifest or customs data, etc.) or for “re-stow” back aboard the vessel, the necessary information can be transmitted by the multi-function operators on the scanning deck 4, to a trolley/hoist/spreader operator(s) in the crane(s) above. The crane operator(s) can then move the container to a designated position (on the wharf, quay or pier below the crane), or directly onto a vehicle or other ground-level container handling system positioned under the crane and designated to receive such containers for subsequent movement to those terminal areas designated for further processing and handling of such maverick or re-stow containers.
Both of these types of container handling require a different configuration of scanning platforms.
When the ship-to-shore container gantry crane apparatus is expected to handle 20 foot containers as singles, this can be achieved as follows: Any scanning unit can be comprised of four (or more) shorter scanning platforms. The overall length of the scanning unit, however, will not be changed. No other design changes are necessary for the effective operation of this invention and its container security scanning system S1 as relates to the scanning of single 20 foot containers.
The effective scanning of two 40 foot or 40+foot containers being handled in tandem requires a different solution. The different configuration of the scanning platforms necessary in order to handle such a situation is technically possible with this invention. However, the overall throughput capacity of the crane and its scanning units (in terms of containers per hour) will be negatively impacted. In practice, this could be to the point where any time savings gained by lifting 40 foot or 40+foot containers in tandem will be more than offset by time losses resulting from the required different configuration of the platforms on the scanning deck 4. In summary, such different configuration will result in a more inflexible and time-consuming overall scanning process. For this reason, while a technical solution to scanning 40 foot or 40+foot containers lifted in tandem is indeed possible with this invention, the need to show detailed drawings of such a solution does not appear to be warranted.
The scanning units together with their scanning platforms 5 are designed so that the scanning devices 9 (mounted on the rails 10 and supported by the support members 11) are enabled to move in either direction under the full length of, and extending beyond the ends of, any container placed upon them. The scanning platforms 5 are configured and dimensioned to enable the use of the widest possible scanning systems 9, i.e., ones that cover the entire width of any container being scanned. Thus the entire volume of cargo in any container can be scanned.
In the embodiment of
As shown in
Rapid and effective maintenance and repair capability for the sensitive, high-technology equipment involved in scanning operations is essential. Such maintenance and repair must be capable of being undertaken from both above, and below, the equipment. To enable maintenance and repair to be rapidly and efficiently undertaken from below the equipment, corridor walkways 14 are mounted below all of the scanning platforms 5. In
As shown in
The sibling RMG crane 104 is mounted on its own set of rails, independent of the rails upon which the mobile parent quayside container crane 101 is mounted. As such, the sibling RMG crane 104 can travel back and forth along the pier 114, under any position of its mobile parent crane 101 as, for example, while the parent crane 101 is in a fixed position unloading or loading a particular cell of a container ship. The actual distance that the sibling RMG crane 104 can travel along the pier 114, under and on either side of its parent crane 101, when the crane 101 is in a fixed position, however, is determined by the distance that similar sibling RMG cranes 104 are also working along the same pier 114 on either side under their respective parent cranes 101.
The parent crane 101 has a fixed receiving platform 112 for containers 108 on one side of, and fixed to the structure of, the crane 101. The platform 112 is also designed to enable twist-lock crews to unlock and lock the twist-locks on the containers 108 when necessary.
In the enlarged explanatory view of
Each mobile parent crane 101, and each mobile sibling RMG crane 104 associated with it, together with their rails and power systems, are capable of being mounted on either offshore island docks or inshore piers, constructed as either standard type island docks or piers, for example, of the slab, plinth and piling type 114 as shown in
In the embodiments of the invention shown in
It should be noted that the raised platform 115 is a stand-alone fixed structure running along the pier 114, or the caisson 119, and is in no way connected to the mobile parent crane 101, or to the mobile sibling RMG crane 104, both of which must be free to move past the platform 115, up and down the pier 114, or the caisson 119.
It should be noted that, in all embodiments of this invention, the container security scanning function takes place without the need for ground placement of the containers being scanned. As such it is compatible within the overall direct intermodal container transshipment function of the cranes of which it is an integral part because these cranes also execute their direct intermodal container transshipment functions without the need for ground placement of the containers.
The cycle time for unloading a container is made up of basically two movements, vertical and horizontal. Over the same travel distance, and when acceleration and de-acceleration times are taken into account, vertical movements of containers take approximately twice as long as horizontal movements. As container ships have increased in size, the vertical movements over which a container has to move have also increased. When working such large vessels, the cycle time of a single-hoist dock-side container crane is now too long, i.e., at between 120 and 150 seconds on average in the United States.
If the cycle time is to be shortened, multiple hoists must cycle concurrently within the crane and, as importantly, these multiple hoists must operate with platforms within the crane. For example, in
The overall cycle time for transshipping a container 108 is shortened by the fact that the first trolley/hoist/spreader 105 a on the boom 102 has only to move the container 108 out of the ship A to the platform 109, high up in the crane, for the container to be scanned. The travel distance thus being considerably shortened when compared to the distance that containers requiring ground placement would have to travel (when handled by standard single-hoist cranes of similar outreach).
From the container security scanning system S1 on the platform 109, the machinery trolley/hoist/spreader 106 a on the boom 103 only has to move a container 108 (once it has been scanned) to the marine vessel B moored on the inside face of the pier. This movement is undertaken while the first trolley/hoist/spreader 105 a on the boom 102 is returning to lift another container 108, from the container ship A, for placement on the container security scanning system S1.
When the crane apparatus in
The combination of the two trolley/hoist/spreaders 105 a and 106 a working in concert under the above-described sequence indicates that the mobile parent quayside container crane 101 (when directly transshipping containers 108 between a container ship A and other marine vessels B) should achieve a sustained lift rate in excess of 60 lifts an hour. For comparison purposes, 24 lifts an hour is considered a standard sustained rate in the United States for single-hoist ship-to-shore container cranes.
When the time for container security scanning is added to both systems, the time advantage is even greater in favor of the crane apparatus of this invention.
This increase in lift rate, and decrease in overall cycle time (especially when security scanning time is added) in the intermodal transshipping of containers, is of considerable economic and operational importance. This is especially true as it relates to the time taken in the management of the overall container supply chain. For example, deployment of a Maersk Class “S” or “K” container vessel, nominally rated at 6,800 TEU capacity, between Kaohsiung, Taiwan and the Port of New York, could see unloading/loading the entire cargo of such a vessel using the crane apparatus of the present invention in 48 hours or less, compared to 96 hours when using standard, single trolley/hoist/spreader cranes.
For a given annual supply chain volume of say 500,000 containers or more a year, the savings in this example, in port time each voyage, can result in being able to eliminate one entire vessel in the supply chain. At a $100+million capital cost per vessel (in addition to ship crew costs, fuel costs, port fees, etc.) the economic and operational incentives become very real in favor of multiple hoist/multiple platform cranes, and even more so in favor of the crane apparatus of the present invention.
In summary, it can be said that this invention encompasses a method by which both the security scanning and direct intermodal transshipment of containers between ocean carriers and other transportation modes can be undertaken in the shortest possible time frame because, in both instances it can be executed without the need for ground placement of the containers.
An additional, and important, consideration has to be taken into account. The initial position of the mobile parent cranes 101 over respective cells in the container ship A is not necessarily in alignment with the container cells in container feeder vessels or costal tug-barge systems B moored on the other side of the pier 114. If misalignment is under 2.5 feet or 0.75 meters on either side, a standard trolley/hoist/spreader can be designed to adjust for such transverse distances. When misalignment is greater that 2.5 feet or 0.75 meters in either direction, additional alternatives have to be considered:
The optimum solution to the problem of misalignment between cells on either side of the pier 114 comes from making the width of the boom 103 wide enough to accommodate the machinery trolley/hoist/spreader 106 a. Specifically, the boom 103 should be wide enough to accommodate a machinery trolley/hoist/spreader 106 a capable of moving the containers 108 both in a transverse direction across the axis of the pier 114, and also longitudinally (parallel) to the axis of the pier 114. A further design option, inherent in this invention, is to make the longitudinal traverse of the machinery trolley/hoist/spreader 106 a capable of loading/unloading containers 108 to/from two adjacent cells of the feeder vessels or tug-barge systems B.
As shown in
In this embodiment of the invention, part of the container unloading/loading cycle is shown in
The on-going part of the unloading/loading cycle is shown in the enlarged view in
The reason that only an independent sibling RMG crane 104 can properly execute this last transfer now becomes apparent and will be explained with reference to
More specifically, as shown in
For this reason, only the independent sibling RMG cranes 104 have the full longitudinal and transversal range to reach all drop-off positions under their parent cranes 101. By their independence, the sibling RMG cranes 104 can transfer the containers 108 longitudinally, and transversally, along and across the pier 114 to any position of the rail-cars C1 and C2, independently of any fixed position of their parent cranes 101.
The sibling RMG cranes 104 operating from under, and out to the sides of, their mobile parent quayside container cranes 101, however, must be controllable so that they do not collide with either containers 108 being lowered to (or raised from) the platform 112 by their parent cranes 101 or other sibling RMG cranes 104 working under, and out to the sides of, their mobile parent quayside container cranes 101. This can be achieved by standard state-of-the-art automated control systems controlling the position of each sibling RMG crane 104 as it must relate to the position of its parent crane 101 and the cranes 101 and 104 on either side of it.
From an operational standpoint, the following trend in container terminal logistics is important. Specifically, as container ships continue to increase in size, the need also increases to unload and load these vessels as quickly as possible. Direct loading of containers onto other modes is the most efficient and cost-effective way to do this. However such direct loading dictates that each on-going mode is loaded randomly. For example, all rail-bound containers should be loaded randomly, and as quickly as possible after scanning, on any available vacant rail-car immediately under the cranes. Sorting by ultimate destination should not be attempted at the dock-side. Once cuts of rail-car unit-trains are loaded they should be moved as quickly as possible to a point within, or near, the terminal, where the cuts can be formed into container unit-trains. Once these unit-trains are formed they should be moved, also as quickly as possibly, away from the terminal area to the nearest interior marshalling yard. It is at these key interior marshalling yards where consolidation of the containers by ultimate destination should take place.
At least five of the world's largest container ports are already building rail systems and marshalling yards back from their main container terminals to achieve essential parts of the needed new ship-to-rail container logistics systems—Rotterdam and Antwerp in Europe, Los Angeles and Long Beach in the United States and Deltaport (Vancouver) in Canada.
The drive to do this is coming largely from the increasing truck congestion in and around these port cities. These new rail systems are multi-billion dollar investments, as attested to by the Alameda Rail Corridor project in California at $2.0 billion, and the equally ambitious rail line and tunnels project being built to connect the Ruhr with the port of Rotterdam via the interior container marshalling yard at Barendrecht in the Netherlands.
Once these, and similar, rail systems are completed, the only missing link will be to provide the direct loading and unloading of containers to and from cuts of rail-car unit-trains positioned immediately under the dockside cranes. An object of the present invention is to provide this essential final link in the new container supply-chain logistics systems that, of necessity, are having to be developed.
The heavy loads, both static and dynamic, created by, for example, five mobile parent quayside container cranes 101 operating at maximum cycle speed while unloading/loading a large container ship A, under certain conditions, may be better compensated for by a crane platform comprised of large, demountable, ballastable, trimmable, concrete caissons 119. Such caisson platforms 119, and their use, are described in detail in my U.S. Pat. No. 6,017,617, which is incorporated herein by reference.
One difference between the embodiments of the invention shown in
Also with added backland being available with a wharf or bulkhead wharf installation 120, and as shown in
All the scanning and direct transshipment functions that the parent quayside container cranes 101 and their sibling RMG cranes 104 are described as being able to execute in the embodiments of
Ideally, as shown in
This embodiment of the invention can also be installed on piers 114, as shown in
While the present invention has been described with reference to presently preferred embodiments thereof, other embodiments as well as obvious variations and modifications to all the embodiments will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. The present invention is intended to cover all such embodiments, variations and modifications that fall within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5838759 *||Jun 5, 1997||Nov 17, 1998||Advanced Research And Applications Corporation||Single beam photoneutron probe and X-ray imaging system for contraband detection and identification|
|US5910973 *||Jul 22, 1997||Jun 8, 1999||American Science And Engineering, Inc.||Rapid X-ray inspection system|
|US6058158 *||Jul 2, 1998||May 2, 2000||Eiler; Peter||X-ray device for checking the contents of closed cargo carriers|
|US6192104 *||Nov 24, 1999||Feb 20, 2001||American Science And Engineering, Inc.||Fan and pencil beams from a common source for x-ray inspection|
|US6542580 *||Jan 15, 2002||Apr 1, 2003||Rapiscan Security Products (Usa), Inc.||Relocatable X-ray imaging system and method for inspecting vehicles and containers|
|US20030108150 *||Jun 27, 2002||Jun 12, 2003||Noell Crane Systems Gmbh||Device and method for controlling cargo on crane equipment without contact|
|US20030201394 *||Apr 25, 2003||Oct 30, 2003||Bartlett Support Services, Inc.||Crane mounted cargo container inspection apparatus and method|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7759649 *||Oct 31, 2007||Jul 20, 2010||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||Multi-stage system for verification of container contents|
|US7760103||Oct 31, 2007||Jul 20, 2010||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||Multi-stage system for verification of container contents|
|US7820977||Mar 23, 2007||Oct 26, 2010||Steve Beer||Methods and apparatus for improved gamma spectra generation|
|US7847260||Aug 8, 2006||Dec 7, 2010||Dan Inbar||Nuclear threat detection|
|US7851766||Nov 28, 2006||Dec 14, 2010||Innovative American Technology Inc.||Multi-stage system for verification of container contents|
|US7864061||Jul 19, 2010||Jan 4, 2011||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||Multi-stage system for verification of container contents|
|US7868295||Jan 5, 2008||Jan 11, 2011||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||Advanced calorimetric spectroscopy for commercial applications of chemical and biological sensors|
|US7994482||May 19, 2009||Aug 9, 2011||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||Radiation directional finder and isotope identification system|
|US8110808||May 27, 2009||Feb 7, 2012||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||Floating intelligent perimeter sensor system|
|US8183032||Aug 28, 2009||May 22, 2012||Innovative American Technology Inc.||Semi-closed loop alga-diesel fuel photobioreactor using waste water|
|US8183538||Jul 20, 2010||May 22, 2012||Innovative American Technology Inc.||Sensor interface system|
|US8247781||Feb 25, 2010||Aug 21, 2012||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||Fabrication of a high performance neutron detector with near zero gamma cross talk|
|US8304740||May 19, 2009||Nov 6, 2012||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||Mobile frame structure with passive/active sensor arrays for non-invasive identification of hazardous materials|
|US8330115||Feb 25, 2010||Dec 11, 2012||Innovative American Technology, Inc.||High performance neutron detector with near zero gamma cross talk|
|US8466426||Aug 21, 2012||Jun 18, 2013||Innovative American Technology Inc.||Fabrication of a high performance neutron detector with near zero gamma cross talk|
|US8960461 *||Oct 26, 2012||Feb 24, 2015||Kobelco Cranes Co., Ltd.||Crane equipped with travelable counterweight unit|
|US20130105429 *||Oct 26, 2012||May 2, 2013||Kobelco Cranes Co., Ltd.||Crane equipped with travelable counterweight unit|
|WO2007065004A2 *||Nov 30, 2006||Jun 7, 2007||Innovative American Technology||Container verification system for non-invasive detection of contents|
|WO2007065004A3 *||Nov 30, 2006||Dec 21, 2007||Innovative American Technology||Container verification system for non-invasive detection of contents|
|WO2010091003A2 *||Feb 2, 2010||Aug 12, 2010||Innovative American Technology Inc.||Various arrangements of radiation and fissile materials detection systems using sensor arrays in spreader bars, gantry cranes, self-propelled frame structures, and transport vehicles|
|U.S. Classification||212/270, 378/57|
|International Classification||B66C19/00, G01V5/00|
|Cooperative Classification||B66C19/002, G01V5/0075|
|European Classification||G01V5/00D4, B66C19/00B|
|Aug 4, 2008||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Sep 23, 2008||SULP||Surcharge for late payment|
|Sep 23, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Sep 10, 2012||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|Jan 25, 2013||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Mar 19, 2013||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20130125