|Publication number||US20050024069 A1|
|Application number||US 10/928,688|
|Publication date||Feb 3, 2005|
|Filing date||Aug 26, 2004|
|Priority date||Nov 13, 2002|
|Also published as||DE10393724B4, DE10393724T5, US6724205, US6806724, US7046023, US7075320, US7205784, US7285969, US7417446, US7453276, US20040090238, US20040095156, US20050151548, US20060214677, US20070159196, US20080042673, US20080074129, WO2004044604A1|
|Publication number||10928688, 928688, US 2005/0024069 A1, US 2005/024069 A1, US 20050024069 A1, US 20050024069A1, US 2005024069 A1, US 2005024069A1, US-A1-20050024069, US-A1-2005024069, US2005/0024069A1, US2005/024069A1, US20050024069 A1, US20050024069A1, US2005024069 A1, US2005024069A1|
|Inventors||Leonard Hayden, Scott Rumbaugh, Mike Andrews|
|Original Assignee||Leonard Hayden, Scott Rumbaugh, Mike Andrews|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (28), Classifications (8), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/712,579 which is a division of application Ser. No. 10/294,130, filed Nov. 13, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,724,205 B1.
The present invention relates to probe measurement systems for measuring the electrical characteristics of integrated circuits and other microelectronic devices tested by simultaneously applying a direct current and a modulation signal to the device-under-test.
There are many types of probing assemblies that have been developed for measuring the characteristics of integrated circuits and other forms of microelectronic devices. One representative type of assembly uses a circuit card on which are formed elongate conductive traces that serve as signal and ground lines. A central opening is formed in the card, and a needle-like probe tip is attached to the end of each trace adjacent the opening so that a radially extending array of downwardly converging needle-like tips is presented by the assembly for selective connection with the closely spaced contact pads of the microelectronic device being tested. A probe assembly of this type is shown, for example, in Harmon U.S. Pat. No. 3,445,770. This type of probing assembly, however, is unsuitable for use at higher frequencies, including microwave frequencies in the gigahertz range, because at such frequencies the needle-like tips act as inductive elements and because there are no adjoining elements present to suitably counteract this inductance with a capacitive effect in a manner that would create a broadband characteristic of more or less resistive effect. Accordingly, a probing assembly of the type just described is unsuitable for use at microwave frequencies due to the high levels of signal reflection and substantial inductive losses that occur at the needle-like probe tips.
One type of probing assembly that is capable of providing a controlled-impedance low-loss path between its input terminal and the probe tips is illustrated in Godshalk et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,506,515. The probe has a tip assembly including a semi-rigid coaxial cable with a Teflon™ dielectric and a freely-suspended end. An inner finger and an outer pair of fingers are mounted on the freely-suspended end of the cable. Each of the fingers is made of resilient conductive material, so as to form a coplanar transmission line. Cantilevered portions of the fingers extend past the end of the cable to form an air-dielectric transmission path of uniform and stable characteristics despite exposure to numerous contact cycles. The fingers provide a suitable means for probing nonplanar wafer contact pads while promoting good visibility in the area of the contact pads. The characteristic impedance of typical microwave probes and cables is approximately 50 ohms closely matching the impedance of the typical microwave device-under-test (DUT) so broadband signals can travel through the probe with minimal loss.
However, when testing certain devices, such as laser diodes, the use of a typical microwave probe is problematic. Laser diode testing requires simultaneous application of a modulation signal and a DC electrical current to a contact pad of the device to generate a modulated light output. For testing, the modulation signal is typically a swept frequency sinusoid (AC) or a wide bandwidth pulsed waveform. The DC and modulation signals are superimposed and the combined signals are conducted to a contact tip of a probe in selective engagement with the contact pad of the DUT. Typically, the impedance seen by the modulation signal, the dynamic resistance of an active laser diode, for example, is on the order of five ohms. As a result, there is a significant impedance mismatch with the typical microwave probe and cable and the mismatched impedance distorts the modulation signal measured by the test instrumentation. While some instrumentation, such as a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA), can be calibrated to correct for distortion, the distortion can substantially affect measurements made with other instrumentation. Further, the distortion can have a magnitude sufficient to attenuate the modulation signal at some frequencies, causing a loss of dynamic range and accuracy for the measurements, even when made with a VNA.
To improve the impedance matching and reduce distortion of the modulation signal, an impedance matching resistor can be installed in series with the contact tip of a microwave probe. For testing laser diodes, the typical series impedance matching resistor has a value of 45 ohms, which in series with the five ohm dynamic resistance of a typical laser diode, provides a satisfactory impedance match with the probes and cables (=50 ohms) to substantially reduce distortion of the test signals. Resistors with other values can be incorporated into the probe to match impedance when testing other types of devices. However, since the modulation signal and the DC current are superimposed on the same conductor, both signals must pass through the series impedance-matching resistor which dissipates power equal to the product of the resistance and the square of the current. For DUTs requiring higher current levels, the power that must be dissipated by the resistor is substantial. On the other hand, to pass high frequency signals, the resistor must small in size and the distance between the resistor and the contact tip must be short to minimize parasitic series inductance and shunt capacitance. The performance of a probe with a series impedance matching resistor is compromised by the competing necessities of sufficient resistance to match the impedance of the probe and cables and minimized resistance to minimize the voltage drop and the power dissipated by the resistor.
What is desired, therefore, is a probing system and method having minimal resistance to minimize voltage drop and power dissipation combined with adequate resistance to match the impedance of the probe and cables to minimize modulation signal distortion when a direct current and a modulated signal are simultaneously applied to a DUT.
On-wafer testing of certain devices requires the simultaneous application of direct current and a modulated signal to conductive contact pads on the wafer that correspond to the device-under-test (DUT). For example, to test a laser diode on a wafer, a DC current and a modulation signal are simultaneously applied to a contact pad for the diode. The DC current provides the power for generating light and the modulation signal varies lasing intensity to produce a modulated light output. For testing, the modulation signal is typically a swept frequency sinusoid (AC) or a wide bandwidth pulsed waveform. When testing a laser diode, the dynamic resistance of the operating diode which is typically on the order of five ohms is the impedance seen by the modulation signal. On the other hand, the typical microwave probe and cable has an impedance of approximately 50 ohms. As a result of the significant impedance mismatch, the modulation signal will be distorted. Some test instrumentation, such as a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA), can compensate for some signal distortion, but distortion compensation is not possible with other instrumentation. Further, the distortion may cause attenuation of the signal at certain frequencies adversely affecting the dynamic range and accuracy of measurements even when performed with a VNA.
To improve the impedance matching and reduce distortion of the modulation signal, a resistor can be incorporated into the tip of the probe. For example, an impedance matching resistor with a value of 45 ohms in series with the five ohm dynamic resistance of a typical operating laser diode provides a satisfactory impedance match with typical microwave probes and cables and substantially reduces signal distortion. However, since the modulation signal and the DC current are superimposed on the same conductor, both signals must pass through the series impedance-matching resistor resulting in a voltage drop and dissipation of power substantially equal to the product of the resistance and the square of the DC current. For devices requiring high current levels, the power that is dissipated by the resistor is substantial. However, to minimize parasitic series inductance and shunt capacitance of the probe, the size of the resistor must be minimized, limiting its capacity to dissipate power. Probe performance must be compromised to satisfy the competing requirements imposed on the impedance-matching resistor. Decreasing the resistance reduces the amount of power that is dissipated by the resistor but increases the impedance mismatch and the signal distortion. On the other hand, increasing the size of the resistor increases its capacity to dissipate power but also increases its inductance and capacitance and, consequently, the distortion of the modulation signal. The present inventor concluded that the performance of a probe applying a combined DC current and modulation signal to a DUT could be improved if the signal paths could be separated so that the modulated signal was transmitted over a signal path having a matched impedance while the DC current flow was transmitted over a signal path with minimal resistance to minimize loss and power dissipation.
Referring in detail to the drawings wherein similar parts of the invention are identified by like reference numerals, and more particularly to
On the other hand, the modulation signal, generated by the instrumentation 26 of the probing system 20, is transmitted to a DC block 50. The DC block 50 comprises, generally, series capacitance that blocks the flow of DC current into the instrumentation 26 over the conductor that connects the instrumentation 26 to the combined signal probe 40. From the DC block 50 the modulation signal is transmitted to the second input port 48 of the combined signal probe 40 which is conductively connected to a first port 53 of an impedance-matching resistor 52. The second port 54 of the impedance matching resistor 52 is conductively connected to the signal contact tip 44 of the probe. A second contact pad 56 of the DUT 22 is grounded 58 through a ground contact tip 45 of the combined signal probe 40. The signal contact tip 44 and the ground contact tip 45 are arranged to simultaneously selectively engage, respectively, the signal contact pad 46 and the ground contact pad 56 of the DUT 22.
In the probing system 20, the modulation signal sees a termination comprising the impedance-matching resistor 52 in series with the parallel combination of the dynamic resistance of the DUT and the impedance seen looking from the first input port 42 back toward the bias tee 30. If the termination resistor 34 has a resistance matching the impedance of the connection between the bias tee 30 and the combined signal probe 40 then the impedance at the DUT is equal to the impedance of the connection between the bias tee and the combined signal probe. Typically, the connection between the bias tee 30 and the combined signal probe 40 comprises coaxial cable with an impedance of approximately 50 ohms. Since the impedance of the DUT is typically substantially less (typically, five ohms for a laser diode) than the impedance looking into the coaxial cable connection toward the bias tee 30, the parallel combination of impedances is dominated by the smaller impedance and the modulation signal path is approximately match terminated, minimizing distortion of the modulation signal. On the other hand, the signal path of the DC current powering the DUT does not pass through the impedance-matching resistor 52 so losses in the impedance-matching resistor are minimized. The probing system 20 permits a modulation signal to be transmitted to the DUT 22 over a first signal path that includes an impedance matching resistor 52 while a direct current is simultaneously transmitted to the DUT over a second signal path that does not traverse the impedance matching resistor.
The DC current is transmitted from the first bias tee 64 to a second bias tee 66. The combined signal (DC/RF) port of the second bias tee 66 is connected to the second input port of the probe 42 which is conductively connected to a DC signal probe 76 arranged to engage the signal contact pad 46 of the DUT 22 when the modulation signal probe 72 is in engagement with the signal contact pad. An impedance matched termination for the modulation signal imposed on the conductor connecting the second bias tee 66 to the DC signal probe 76 is provided by a termination resistor 74 connected to the RF port of the second bias tee 66. As in the first embodiment, the modulation signal is applied to the signal contact pad 46 of the DUT 22 over a distortion minimizing impedance matched signal path while the DC current is simultaneously applied to the signal contact pad over a signal path that does not include the impedance matching resistor and, therefore, minimizes power dissipation.
With respect to its overall construction, the wafer probe 100 includes a primary support block 112 which, in the illustrated embodiment, is made of brass and which is suitably constructed for connection to the probe-supporting member 102. To effect this connection, a round opening 114 that is formed on the block is snugly fitted slidably onto an alignment pin (not shown) that upwardly projects from the probe-supporting member, and a pair of fastening screws 116 are inserted into a corresponding pair of countersunk openings 118 provided on the block for screwing engagement with the probe-supporting member, each within a respective threaded opening formed on that member.
As illustrated in
In the preferred embodiment shown in
To prepare the rearward ends of the cables 124, 150 for connection to the appropriate K-connector, the rearward end is stripped to expose the inner conductor, and this inner conductor is temporarily held inside a dummy connector while the adjacent outer conductor is soldered within a bore 140, 152 formed in the primary support block 112. A recess 142 that is formed in the block below this bore provides access to facilitate the soldering process. The dummy connector is then removed and the K-connectors are screwably installed in threaded openings 144 formed on the block above the bore so as to effect electrical connection between the connectors and the coaxial cables 124, 150. A thread locking compound may be applied to the threads of the K-connectors prior to their installation to ensure a tight physical connection.
As illustrated in
Prior to its connection to the K-connector of the input port 120, a semicylindrical recess 202 is formed in each of the cables 124, 150 adjacent their forward ends as shown in
To a certain extent, the spacing between the respective fingers 252 a, 252 b, and 250 is determined by the geometry of the device contact pads and the cable. For example, in relation to the distal ends of the respective fingers, the pitch or centerline-to-centerline spacing 270 between adjacent pairs of the fingers is selected in order to match the pitch 270 of the contact pads on the device-under-test. The distal ends of the pair of fingers may be set apart at a pitch of 6 mils in order to match the 6 mil pitch of 2 mil square contact pads on a device-under-test. (It is also customary for the pad-to-pad pitch to be set at other values such as 4, 5, 8 or 10 mils). On the other hand, proximate the back face 204 of the cable 124, the pitch between adjacent fingers is selected to correspond with the pitch between the exposed face of the inner conductor 126 and the adjacent exposed face of the outer conductor 130 of the cable 124.
Aside from the dimensions just mentioned, the principal criteria used in selecting the respective dimensions and relative spacing of the fingers 250, 252 a,252 b is the desired establishment of a low-loss transmission line between the respective conductors 126 and 130 of the cable and the respective pads on the DUT.
The distal end 272 of the central finger 250 comprises the signal contact tip 44 and the distal ends of the outer fingers 252 a, 252 b are connected to ground through the outer conductor 130 of the coaxial cable 124. The three fingers are attached to the cable near the end of the cable 124 by a non-conductive adhesive 276, such as an epoxy adhesive. At the end of the fingers remote from the contact tips, the center finger 250 is affixed to the center conductor 126 and the outer contact tips 252 a, 252 b are affixed to the outer conductor 130 of the coaxial cable. Referring to
As illustrated in
The combined signal probe, probe system, and the method of probing permits a DC current and a modulation signal to be transmitted in parallel for combination at the probe signal contact tip so that impedance matching can be applied to the modulation signal path to reduce signal distortion while resistance is minimized in the path of the DC signal to minimize voltage drop and power dissipation.
The detailed description, above, sets forth numerous specific details to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuitry have not been described in detail to avoid obscuring the present invention.
All the references cited herein are incorporated by reference.
The terms and expressions that have been employed in the foregoing specification are used as terms of description and not of limitation, and there is no intention, in the use of such terms and expressions, of excluding equivalents of the features shown and described or portions thereof, it being recognized that the scope of the invention is defined and limited only by the claims that follow.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4687143 *||Jan 10, 1986||Aug 18, 1987||Naan Mechanical Works||Drip irrigation apparatus|
|US4891584 *||Mar 21, 1988||Jan 2, 1990||Semitest, Inc.||Apparatus for making surface photovoltage measurements of a semiconductor|
|US5506515 *||Jul 20, 1994||Apr 9, 1996||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||High-frequency probe tip assembly|
|US6211663 *||May 28, 1999||Apr 3, 2001||The Aerospace Corporation||Baseband time-domain waveform measurement method|
|US6215295 *||Jul 24, 1998||Apr 10, 2001||Smith, Iii Richard S.||Photonic field probe and calibration means thereof|
|US6218910 *||Feb 25, 1999||Apr 17, 2001||Formfactor, Inc.||High bandwidth passive integrated circuit tester probe card assembly|
|US6275043 *||Aug 18, 1999||Aug 14, 2001||U.S. Philips Corporation||Test device for testing a module for a data carrier intended for contactless communication|
|US6605941 *||Mar 20, 2001||Aug 12, 2003||Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba||Method and apparatus for measuring characteristic of specimen and its application to high frequency response measurement with scanning probe microscopes|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7332923 *||Mar 6, 2006||Feb 19, 2008||Suss Microtec Test Systems Gmbh||Test probe for high-frequency measurement|
|US7656172||Jan 18, 2006||Feb 2, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||System for testing semiconductors|
|US7681312||Jul 31, 2007||Mar 23, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Membrane probing system|
|US7688062||Oct 18, 2007||Mar 30, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Probe station|
|US7688091||Mar 10, 2008||Mar 30, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Chuck with integrated wafer support|
|US7688097||Apr 26, 2007||Mar 30, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Wafer probe|
|US7723999||Feb 22, 2007||May 25, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Calibration structures for differential signal probing|
|US7750652||Jun 11, 2008||Jul 6, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Test structure and probe for differential signals|
|US7759953||Aug 14, 2008||Jul 20, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Active wafer probe|
|US7761983||Oct 18, 2007||Jul 27, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Method of assembling a wafer probe|
|US7761986||Nov 10, 2003||Jul 27, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Membrane probing method using improved contact|
|US7764072||Feb 22, 2007||Jul 27, 2010||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Differential signal probing system|
|US7876114||Aug 7, 2008||Jan 25, 2011||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Differential waveguide probe|
|US7876115||Feb 17, 2009||Jan 25, 2011||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Chuck for holding a device under test|
|US7888957||Oct 6, 2008||Feb 15, 2011||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Probing apparatus with impedance optimized interface|
|US7893704||Mar 20, 2009||Feb 22, 2011||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Membrane probing structure with laterally scrubbing contacts|
|US7898273||Feb 17, 2009||Mar 1, 2011||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Probe for testing a device under test|
|US7898281||Dec 12, 2008||Mar 1, 2011||Cascade Mircotech, Inc.||Interface for testing semiconductors|
|US7940069||Dec 15, 2009||May 10, 2011||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||System for testing semiconductors|
|US20040150416 *||Jul 25, 2003||Aug 5, 2004||Cowan Clarence E.||Probe station thermal chuck with shielding for capacitive current|
|US20040222807 *||Mar 5, 2004||Nov 11, 2004||John Dunklee||Switched suspended conductor and connection|
|US20050007581 *||Aug 6, 2004||Jan 13, 2005||Harris Daniel L.||Optical testing device|
|US20050088191 *||Mar 5, 2004||Apr 28, 2005||Lesher Timothy E.||Probe testing structure|
|US20050099192 *||Sep 25, 2003||May 12, 2005||John Dunklee||Probe station with low inductance path|
|US20050140384 *||Aug 26, 2004||Jun 30, 2005||Peter Andrews||Chuck with integrated wafer support|
|US20050156610 *||Jan 16, 2004||Jul 21, 2005||Peter Navratil||Probe station|
|US20050179427 *||Mar 16, 2005||Aug 18, 2005||Cascade Microtech, Inc.||Probe station|
|US20050287685 *||Mar 21, 2005||Dec 29, 2005||Mcfadden Bruce||Localizing a temperature of a device for testing|
|Cooperative Classification||G01R1/06738, G01R1/06772, G01R1/06766|
|European Classification||G01R1/067D, G01R1/067C3A, G01R1/067H|
|Aug 26, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CASCADE MICROTECH, INC., OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HAYDEN, LEONARD;RUMBAUGH, SCOTT;ANDREWS, MIKE;REEL/FRAME:015745/0532;SIGNING DATES FROM 20021101 TO 20021104
|Apr 1, 2008||CC||Certificate of correction|
|Dec 21, 2009||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|May 16, 2010||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jul 6, 2010||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20100516