Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20050038434 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/933,155
Publication dateFeb 17, 2005
Filing dateSep 2, 2004
Priority dateMar 17, 1992
Also published asCA2109077A1, CN1076851A, EP0584293A1, EP0584293A4, US5171279, US5357983, US5496322, US5569248, US5728097, US6033406, US6793656, WO1993018722A1
Publication number10933155, 933155, US 2005/0038434 A1, US 2005/038434 A1, US 20050038434 A1, US 20050038434A1, US 2005038434 A1, US 2005038434A1, US-A1-20050038434, US-A1-2005038434, US2005/0038434A1, US2005/038434A1, US20050038434 A1, US20050038434A1, US2005038434 A1, US2005038434A1
InventorsHallett Mathews
Original AssigneeMathews Hallett H.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Systems and methods for fixation of adjacent vertebrae
US 20050038434 A1
Abstract
A method for internal fixation of vertebra of the spine to facilitate graft fusion includes steps for excising the nucleus of an affected disc, preparing a bone graft, instrumenting the vertebrae for fixation, and introducing the bone graft into the resected nuclear space. Disc resection is conducted through two portals through the annulus, with one portal supporting resection instruments and the other supporting a viewing device. The fixation hardware is inserted through small incisions aligned with each pedicle to be instrumented. The hardware includes bone screws, fixation plates, engagement nuts, and linking members. In an important aspect of the method, the fixation plates, engagement nuts and linking members are supported suprafascially but subcutaneously so that the fascia and muscle tissue are not damaged. The bone screw is configured to support the fixation hardware above the fascia. In a further aspect of the invention, a three component dilator system is provided for use during the bone screw implantation steps of the method.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(19)
1. A method for internal fixation of the spine comprising the steps of:
a) inserting a guide pin into a pedicle of at least two vertebrae to be instrumented for internal fixation;
b) making an incision in the skin at the entry site for each guide pin;
c) dissecting subcutaneous suprafascial tissue between each entry site;
d) initially advancing a bone screw over each guide pin through each incision and into each pedicle, the bone screw having bone engaging threads and machine threads for engaging a nut;
e) elevating the skin between each entry site;
f) inserting a fixation plate into the subcutaneous suprafascial space and supporting the plate on and between at least two bone screws with the machine threaded portion projecting above the plate; and
g) clamping the fixation plate to the bone screws using nuts engaging the machine threaded portions of the bone screws with the fixation plate supported above the fascia and muscle tissue but beneath the skin of the patient.
2. The method for internal fixation of the spine of claim 1, further comprising the following steps between the plate insertion and clamping steps:
loosely engaging a nut on the nut threaded portion of each of the bone screws; and
further advancing each bone screw deeper into the respective pedicle until the fixation plate lies immediately adjacent the fascia.
3. The method for internal fixation of the spine of claim 1, wherein:
each of the steps (a)-(g) is repeated on opposite sides of the spinous process for bilateral instrumentation of each pedicle of each vertebrae.
4. The method for internal fixation of the spine of claim 3, further comprising the steps of:
dissecting subcutaneous suprafascial tissue between the ipsilateral and contralateral bone screws at each level of instrumentation of the vertebrae; and
after the step of inserting the fixation plate, inserting a linking member between bilateral bone screws at the same level of instrumentation with the machine threaded portion of the bone screws projecting above the linking member.
5. The method for internal fixation of the spine of claim 1, wherein the step of advancing the bone screw includes the steps of:
advancing a cannulated drill bit over each guide pin; and
using the drill bit, drilling into the pedicle to a predetermined depth less than the length of the bone engaging threads of the bone screw.
6. The method for internal fixation of the spine of claim 6, wherein:
in the drilling step the predetermined depth is about one-third of the pedicle depth; and
in the step of initially advancing the bone screw, the bone screw is advanced into at least one-half of the pedicle depth.
7. The method for internal fixation of the spine of claim 1, wherein the step of advancing the bone screw includes the steps of:.
dilating the tissue at each entry site using three dilators having successively larger diameters;
removing the smallest dilator;
advancing a cannulated drill bit over each guide pin through an intermediate dilator; and
using the drill bit, drilling into the pedicle to a predetermined depth less than the length of the bone engaging threads of the bone screw.
8. The method for internal fixation of the spine of claim 7, wherein the step of advancing the bone screw further includes the subsequent steps of:
removing the intermediate dilator, leaving the largest diameter dilator; and
advancing the bone screw over the guide pin and through the largest dilator.
9. A method for percutaneously resecting the nucleus of a spinal disc, comprising the steps of:
a) introducing a pair of cannulae bilaterally into the disc space of the affected disc;
b) perforating the disc annulus at each cannula insertion site;
c) inserting a cutting instrument into one cannula and a viewing instrument into the other cannula;
d) resecting the disc nuclear material through the one cannula under direct vision through the other cannula;
e) transposing the cutting instrument and viewing instrument between cannulae and resecting the remaining disc nuclear material through the other cannula.
10. The method for percutaneously resecting the nucleus of a spinal disc of claim 9, wherein, in the step of introducing the pair of cannulae the entry points for the cannulae are nominally ten centimeters bilaterally from the midline of the spinous process and the cannulae are introduced below the transverse processes of the adjacent vertebra.
11. The method for percutaneously resecting the nucleus of a spinal disc of claim 9, further comprising the step of verifying the anatomy under each cannulae using a visualization scope prior to perforating the disc annulus.
12. The method for percutaneously resecting the nucleus of a spinal disc of claim 9, wherein the step of resecting the disc material includes terminating resection through the one cannula when the cutting instrument can be seen under direct vision through the other cannula.
13. The method for percutaneously resecting the nucleus of a spinal disc of claim 9, wherein the step of resecting the disc material includes ablating the disc end plates using an ablating instrument introduced through the cannula.
14. A method for introducing bone graft material into an intervertebral disc space comprising the steps of:
a) creating bilateral cannulated portals into an affected disc;
b) removing the nucleus of the disc;
c) inserting a viewing instrument into the first portal;
d) introducing bone graft material into the second portal;
e) advancing the graft material through the second portal into the empty disc space; and
f) verifying the entry of the graft material through the viewing instrument in the first portal.
15. The method for introducing bone graft material into an intervertebral disc space of claim 14, wherein the step of advancing the graft material includes using an obturator to push the material through the portal into the empty disc space.
16. The method for introducing bone graft material into an intervertebral disc space of claim 14, comprising the additional subsequent steps of:
g) removing the viewing instrument from the first portal; and
h) advancing graft material through the first portal into the disc space.
17. A bone screw for internal fixation of the spine, comprising:
a distal threaded shank having threads for engagement within a vertebra;
a proximal threaded stem having machine threads for engagement with a threaded nut; and
a smooth shank intermediate said threaded shank and said threaded stem, said smooth shank having a hub near said threaded stem, said hub defining a support surface for supporting a fixation plate engaged to the bone screw over said proximal stem,
wherein said smooth shank has a length from said threaded shank to said hub that is approximately equal to distance from the pedicle to the the muscle fascia of a patient, so that said hub is situated above the muscle fascia when said distal threaded shank is engaged in a vertebra of the patient.
18. A three component dilator system for use in implantation of a bone screw into a vertebra, comprising:
a first tubular dilator having a tapered end, a first length and a first diameter;
a second tubular dilator having a tapered end, a second length and a second diameter;
a third tubular dilator having a tapered end, a third length and a third diameter;
wherein said first diameter is greater than said second diameter which is greater than said third diameter, and
wherein said first length is shorter than said second length which is shorter than said third length.
19. The three component dilator system of claim 18, wherein:
said second tubular dilator has a second end opposite said tapered end, said second dilator having a knurled outer surface adjacent said second end; and
said third tubular dilator has a second end opposite said tapered end, said third dilator having a knurled outer surface adjacent said second end.
Description
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The present invention concerns a method for internal fixation of vertebra of the spine.
  • [0002]
    It has long been known that internal fixation is an adjunct to fusion, such as a transverse process fusion. In early prior art techniques, a surgeon made an incision in the patient's back and separated tissue and muscle in order to expose a wide area of the spine in which the procedure was to take place. The fusion and fixation in one prior art process is by grafting bone segments between opposing transverse processes of adjacent vertebrae. However, this technique resulted in gross destruction of normal anatomy as well as high blood loss. Moreover, this surgical technique did not completely stabilize the vertebra since there was no direct connection between the vertebral bodies.
  • [0003]
    In more recent times, a surgical technique known as dowel interbody fusion has been developed. In this technique, bores are formed in disc tissue through either open surgery or percutaneous surgery. A dowel is made to fit into the bores formed in the disc tissue in still a further technique, all disc tissue is removed between adjacent vertebrae, as well as the disc plates. Large surface area bone grafts are then placed within the clean space to form a graft between the opposing vertebral bodies. In each of these latter two prior art processes it still remains necessary to provide some means for fixation to facilitate fusion of the large area bone graft or the dowel to the vertebrae.
  • [0004]
    Many types of instrumentation for performing spinal fixation are known in the art. For instance, spine instrumentation developed by Harrington incorporates a hook and rod configuration. Implantation of the Harrington spinal instrumentation requires subperiosteal stripping of the spine to avoid injury to the muscular nerves and vessels. Dissection of the muscle tissue is also required. In some aspects of the early Harrington techniques, the spine was stripped clean of the supraspinous and intraspinous ligaments.
  • [0005]
    Later developed techniques involve hardware which is placed through the skin and through the muscle into the bone. Some of the fixation hardware remains outside the body, but is removed after the fusion has been completed. Techniques of this sort are characterized by high risk of pin tract infection and incisional morbidity.
  • [0006]
    Thus far, each of the prior art spinal fixation and/or fusion techniques have been characterized by excessive invasion into the patients spine and back region, What is needed is a technique which allows for adequate stabilization of the spine, yet decreases the chance of infection as well as patient morbidity. There is further a need for such a method which permits percutaneous removal of the fixation hardware as an outpatient procedure after fusion has been completed.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    The present invention contemplates a percutaneous fusion technique using subcutaneous suprafascial internal fixation. More particularly, the minimally invasive technique of the present invention permits anterior fusion of the disc space of the lumbar spine following appropriate disc resection and bone grafting. The fixation process is suprafascial, that is above the muscle fascia, but subcutaneous, that is beneath the surface of the skin. Thus, none of the muscle tissue is destroyed and the subcutaneous nature of the procedure greatly decreases the risk of pin tract secretions or infections, or the potential of osteomyelitis.
  • [0008]
    In more specific aspects of the invention, the technique contemplates first resecting the intranuclear cavity of a damaged disc, including ablation of the superior and inferior end plates. Bone graft material is prepared for introduction into the vacated disc space. Prior to introduction of the bone graft into the empty disc nuclear space, fixation instrumentation is implanted. In general, this fixation hardware can include self-tapping cannulated bone screws, fixation plates and linking members for laterally fixing plates on opposite sides of the spinous process.
  • [0009]
    In the preferred method, guide wires are inserted bilaterally in line with and into the pedicle. Pedicle screws are advanced over the guide wire and engaged into a predrilled bore in the pedicle. After the guide wire is removed, the skin is elevated and tissue in the suprafascial subcutaneous space is dissected to permit insertion of the fixation plates. The appropriate plates are first engaged over the ipsilateral screws and then the procedure is repeated for the contralateral bone screws at each level of hardware, that is at each vertebra to be stabilized. The bilateral fixation plates can be laterally connected by dissecting across the midline between corresponding screws and then positioning a linking member between the screws using a top-loading insertion mechanism. A nut is also top-loaded on to each successive screw to secure the linking members to the plate and to secure the plate to the pedicle screws.
  • [0010]
    In the inventive method, the nuts engaging the pedicle screws are initially loosely threaded onto the screws. The bone screws are then advanced into the vertebral body until the hardware resides below the level of the skin, but suprafascially in the subcutaneous space at each level of the instrumentation. The nuts are then tightened when they fixation hardware is in its final resting spot. Once the fixation instrumentation is in position, the bone graft material is introduced through a cannula to the disc space and moved into position by an obturator. With the bone graft in place and the spinal fixation hardware engaged to the appropriate vertebrae, the subcutaneous tissue is then irrigated and closed.
  • [0011]
    In another aspect of the invention, a cannulated fixation or bone screw is provided which is well suited for use with the inventive method. More specifically, the screw includes a distal threaded shank and a proximal nut threaded stem which terminates in a driving hub. The distal threaded shank includes self-tapping bone engaging threads. Intermediate the threaded shank and the stem is a smooth shank of sufficient length so that only the smooth shank contacts muscle tissue when the fixation instrumentation is in place. Near the stem end of the smooth shank is a mounting hub which supports the fixation plate before the nut is engaged on the threaded stem. The smooth shank preferably accounts for about one-half of the length of the screw as measured from the tip of the bone engaging threaded shank to the underside of the mounting hub.
  • [0012]
    In a further aspect of the invention, a three component dilator system is provided to facilitate instrumentation of the vertebrae. In particular, the dilator system includes three concentrically disposed hollow dilator tubes, each tapered at its respective end for atraumatic introduction into the patient. Each of the three dilators is successively smaller in diameter but larger in length. The intermediate and smallest dilator tubes have knurled ends to grasp for removal during steps of the method.
  • [0013]
    It is one object of the present invention to provide a method for internal fixation of the spinal column which is minimally invasive and which poses a minimal health risk to the patient. Another object is to provide such a technique which further permits subcutaneous removal of the temporarily implanted hardware in an out-patient procedure.
  • [0014]
    A further object of the invention is realized by the present technique which contemplates subcutaneous but suprafascial fixation to avoid damage to the spinal musculature and ligaments. Further objects and certain advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0015]
    FIG. 1. is a section view through the spinal column of a patient shown after implantation of fixation instrumentation using the method of the present invention.
  • [0016]
    FIG. 2 is a side view of a bone strew adapted for use in the method of the present invention.
  • [0017]
    FIG. 3 is a posterior view of the spinal column of the patient after implantation of fixation instrumentation using the method of the present invention, showing bilateral fixation with linking members across the spinal midline, as viewed beneath the skin but with the muscle tissue removed to expose details of the underlying vertebrae.
  • [0018]
    FIGS. 4A-C are side views of the components of a three component dilator system for use with the method of the present invention during steps for implanting the bone screw into a vertebra.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • [0019]
    For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the invention, reference will now be made to the embodiment illustrated in the drawings and. specific language will be used to describe the same. It will nevertheless be understood that no limitation of the scope of the invention is thereby intended, such alterations and further modifications in the illustrated device, and such further applications of the principles of the invention as illustrated therein being contemplated as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which the invention relates.
  • [0020]
    The present invention first contemplates steps for a percutaneous fusion technique, such as may be used to fuse adjacent vertebrae after disc tissue has been removed. According to the preferred embodiment of the invention, the method is conducted on lumbar vertebrae, although it is believed to be adaptable to other portions of the spine. The patient, after appropriate preparation, is positioned prone on a radiolucent padded frame which allows for both AP (anterior/posterior) and lateral fluoroscopic visualization during the entire procedure. An initial AP fluoroscopic view is taken with an external guide pin placed parallel to the plane of the end-plates of the affected disc to assure the proper orientation of the procedure relative to the disc space. A guideline is drawn on the AP radiograph along the guidepin image to demarcate the plane of entry.
  • [0021]
    In the preferred embodiment of the fusion technique of the present method, a bi-portal approach is utilized to clean out the disc nuclear space. Entry points for local anesthesia are located bilaterally from the midline, nominally about tell centimeters bilaterally from the radiograph guideline (varying between 8 centimeters for a smaller patient to 12 centimeters for a larger patient).
  • [0022]
    After the fascia and intrafascia musculature are appropriately anesthetized, discography is performed using a two-needle technique bilaterally. Pursuant to the preferred method, the initial needle entry point to the disc annulus is located on the mid-pedicle line on the AP radiograph, which is defined by the line created by the midportion of the pedicle above and below the disc space being instrumented. Both needles are advanced into the posterior central portion of the nucleus and triangulation is begun. The discography is performed to confirm the nature of the disc disease and the contained verses the uncontained condition of the involved disc structure. (An uncontained disc is a disc which has ruptured through the posterior longitudinal ligament and/or annulus, which therefore allows a free flow of dye from the intranuclear space into the epidural space.)
  • [0023]
    The procedure of the preferred method continues with the introduction of cannulae into the disc space. The hubs of the discogram needles can be removed and then serve as guide wires for the cannulae. Dilating probes are place over the guide wires bilaterally into the annulus of the disc. Sheaths are placed over the probes over which progressively larger cannulae can then be advanced to dilate the annulus to an appropriate diameter for intradiscal work. Again, this prior procedure is performed bilaterally at the two entry points described above, and is repeated for each affected disc.
  • [0024]
    In one aspect of the method, a visualization scope is place through each cannula to verify the annulus and to confirm the anatomy under the cannula. If no nerve tissue is observed and the annular tissue is present, a trephine is introduced after the visualization scope has been removed. The annulus is perforated and successively sized trephines are used to open an annular hole of adequate dimension for the purpose of disc removal and extra-discal visualization.
  • [0025]
    Once the trephine operation is complete at each bilateral entry point, two portals are provided. Disc resection can be conducted through one portal while a verifying scope can be placed at the other portal. Triangulation of the disc material through one portal is considered achieved when direct visualization of the disc resecting instrument occurs through the viewing portal. The intranuclear cavity of the affected disc is completely resected and the superior and inferior end-plates are ablated using cutting and sucking instruments or through the use of laser-assisted probes. The instruments may be removed from each portal and transposed for complete resection of the disc nucleus. Rapid disc removal instruments for the nucleus and rapid burring devices for the end-plates can be used to resect the tissues in preparation for fusion. The instruments may also be used to resect the posterior ligamentus structures and the interannular ring to create an adequate cavity for introduction of the bone graft. Acceptable devices include burrs, laser, curettes and gauges for the ablation of the end-plate tissues to the state of bleeding bone. Both rigid and flexible scopes can be used for the verification of the complete resection of the intranuclear cavity. Once the disc material has been completely cleared out of the cavity and the end-plates completely ablated, and obturator is placed in each cannula to prevent contamination during this succeeding portions of the procedure.
  • [0026]
    At this point of the preferred technique of the present invention, bone graft harvesting is undertaken. The bone graft harvesting can be accomplished according to any known techniques suitable for this purpose. In one specific embodiment of the inventive method, after appropriate anesthesia and analgesia, a small incision is made over either posterior superior iliac crest to expose the outer crest for bone harvesting. The bone is procured from the corticocancellous table and prepared for the grafting process. The bone graft is fashioned to be accommodated within the inner diameter of the largest outer cannula employed during the disc resection described above. The bone may be mixed with other components, including osteoinductive proteins or morphogenic materials. The bone harvest cite is then irrigated, dried and closed over a small drain.
  • [0027]
    The next step of the inventive process, the instrumentation step, occurs under direct fluoroscopy. Under AP fluoroscopic view, a guide wire (preferably a 0.062 guide wire is introduced with the sharp end of the guide wire being inserted into the skin at a position slightly offset from the area to be cannulated. In one specific embodiment, the guide wire is introduced one centimeter lateral to the area to be cannulated. The position of the guide pin is verified by fluoroscopy angled to 15 degrees in line with the pedicle. The guide pin is used to palpate the cortex over the pedicle and is then secured by tapping with a mallet to prevent movement of the pin until further advancement is desired. After the guide pin has been locked into the cortex, tissue dilators are applied to protect the surrounding muscle tissue. The guide pin is then advanced, under lateral fluoroscopic view, into the pedicle and within the vertebral body. The position of the pin is confirmed using both AP and fluoroscopy views. This procedure is repeated for each pedicle o the vertebra. Thus, for each vertebra to be instrumented, a pair of guide pins are positioned at about a 15 angle from the midline and along each pedicle of the vertebra.
  • [0028]
    After the guide pin insertion process is complete, an incision is made at the guide pin insertion site, which, in one specific embodiment, is about 2.0 cm. in length. Then, using pick-ups and Metzenbaum scissors, subcutaneous tissue is dissected suprafascially. Metzenbaum scissors are also used to dissect the suprafascial subcutaneous tissues from the ipsilateral pin across the midline to the contralateral guide pin. Dissection of this tissue provides space for connection of pedicle screws in subsequent steps of the method.
  • [0029]
    In the next step of the inventive method, a three component tissue dilator system is used to dilate the tissue at each guide pin to accept first a cannulated drill bit and then a larger diameter cannulated self-tapping bone screw. The dilator system comprises three tapered tubes of increasing diameter and decreasing length. The tubes are introduced successively from smallest diameter to largest diameter to provide adequate access through the tissue for later steps of the method. After the three component tissue dilator system has been inserted, the smallest of the internal dilators is removed allowing for insertion of the drill bit along the guide pin. The bit is used to drill into the initial one-third of the pedicle. The bit is removed and the intermediate tissue dilator is then removed, leaving the largest dilator still in place. The self-tapping bone screw is inserted through the largest dilator over the guide wire until it is advanced to at least 50% depth of the pedicle. After the position of the bone screw has been confirmed by lateral fluoroscopy, the guide wire is removed and the screw advanced until the proximal tip of the screw is at the level of the skin incision. This procedure is repeated for each pedicle in each successive vertebra until all the bone screws are in place for the final internal fixation instrumentation.
  • [0030]
    In one specific embodiment, the cannulated drill bit has an outer diameter of 4.5 mm, while, the cannulated bone screw can have a diameter between 5.5-8.5 mm. Thus, in this specific embodiment, the intermediate dilator of the three component dilator system has an internal diameter of at least 4.5 mm, and preferably 5.2 mm to receive the drill bit therethrough. Likewise, the largest dilator has an internal diameter at least larger than the bone screw, and preferably 9.6 mm to accommodate a range of bone screw diameters.
  • [0031]
    Pick-ups are again used to elevate the skin and Metzenbaum scissors arc used to dissect any remaining subcutaneous suprafascial tissue as required to accommodate insertion of an elongated fixation plate. An appropriately sized fixation plate is inserted using forceps through the 2.0 cm. incisions. It is understood that the fixation plates are sized to fit over bone screws engaged in the pedicles of adjacent vertebrae to provide adequate fixation at each side of the spinous process. The fixation plates for tie ipsilateral screws are first inserted by forceps and then the procedure is repeated for the contralateral side at each vertebral level requiring instrumentation. In addition, linking members are inserted through the incision at the ipsilateral guide pin and passed across the midline in the subcutaneous space to engage the ipsi- and contra-lateral bone screws to accomplish trans-lateral linkage. The linking member can be of the type sold by Danek Medical, Inc., assignee of the present invention, as its CROSSLINK™ product. Once each of the fixation plates and linking members have been engaged over the appropriate bone screws, a nut is applied in a top-loaded fashion to loosely secure the hardware together.
  • [0032]
    After each nut is initially threaded onto its corresponding screw, the bone screws are advanced as necessary so that all of the fixation hardware lies subcutaneously, but suprafascially, at each level of the instrumentation. Once each of the bone screws has reached its final resting place within the vertebra, and once all the instrumentation, including the fixation plates and linking members, is within the appropriate suprafascial subcutaneous space, the nuts are tightened, while the bone screws are held, at each successive level, thus creating a firm interlock between all of the components of the fixation system. AP and lateral fluoroscopic views can document the final position of the hardware to the satisfaction of the operating surgeon.
  • [0033]
    Once the fixation instrumentation has been inserted, each bone screw insertion cite is thoroughly irrigated as well as the subcutaneous space which has accepted the fixation components. The incisions are dried and hemostasis verified followed by closure of the incision with subcutaneous absorbable sutures.
  • [0034]
    With the fixation hardware in place, attention is returned to the prior portals through which the disc resection was conducted. In this step of the method of the present invention, the obturator are removed from the portals and the previously harvested bone graft material is introduced through one cannula into the disc space. A visualizing scope is extended through the cannula in the other portal for confirmation of entry of the bone graft into the disc space. A smooth obturator is inserted into the cannula to facilitate advancement of the bone graft material through the cannula into the empty disc nuclear space. After the ipsilateral portal has been completely filled with bone graft material, the same procedure is performed at the contralateral portal. Visual verification of the grafting procedure in the contralateral portal is not possible because the first portal has been filled by graft material. However, fluoroscopy can be used to identify the introduction of the obturator into the disc nuclear cavity, thereby confirming the location of the bone graft material. Upon completion of the grafting process, the cannulae are removed, the subcutaneous tissue irrigated and the discography entry points are closed with absorbable sutures.
  • [0035]
    With the foregoing description of the inventive method in mind, attention is directed to the figures. In FIG. 1, a cross-sectional view of a vertebral region of a patient shows a vertebra 10 having pedicle portions 11. In this superior section view, a disc is shown with its annulus 15 intact but with an empty nuclear space 16 after the disc tissue has been resected. Fixation hardware is shown at only one side of the midline ML defined by the spinous process of the vertebra 10. However, as depicted in FIG. 3, fixation instrumentation is implanted on either side of the midline ML. FIG. 3 further shows fixation between adjacent vertebrae, identified as vertebra 10 and 10′, with corresponding body portions. 10 a, transverse processes 10 b and 10 c, spinous processes 10 d, and laminae 10 e.
  • [0036]
    The entry sites 25 a and 25 b shown in FIG. 1 are used in the disc resection steps of the method. FIGS. 1 and 3 show the location of the portals 26 a and 26 b through which the disc annulus is removed and the bone graft material introduced. As described above, the entry sites 25 a and 25 b are nominally 10.0 cm bilaterally from the midline ML. The portals 26 a and 26 b are oriented so that the disc resection tools can be inserted below the transverse processes 10 c of the vertebra at the level of the nerve root.
  • [0037]
    Referring again to FIG. 1, the skin 20 of the patient is shown dissected from the fascia 22 protecting muscle tissue 23 to provide a suprafascial subcutaneous space 25. An incision 27 is shown through which the fixation hardware is inserted in accordance with the method described above. The fixation hardware includes a bone screw 30, which is preferably a pedicle screw. A fixation plate 40 is mounted on the screw 30, held in place by a nut 42. In the posterior view of FIG. 3, the fixation hardware is also shown as including linking members 44 spanning across the midline between corresponding bone screws 30.
  • [0038]
    As can be seen most clearly in FIG. 1, the method of the present invention provides a technique for instrumenting adjacent vertebra to facilitate fusion. Implantation of the fixation instrumentation according to the inventive method causes minimal invasion to the patient, with the insertion occurring through a single incision, like incision 27, aligned with each pedicle. Most significantly, the hardware resides within the suprafascial subcutaneous space 25 so that destruction of muscle tissue is not required. With this method, patient morbidity rates are reduces, while healing rates are improved. Since the fixation hardware resides above the muscle layer, removal can be conducted in an out-patient procedure under a local anesthetic.
  • [0039]
    Referring now to FIG. 2, the details of a bone screw particularly adapted for the present method is shown. The screw 30 includes a distal threaded shank 31, which in the preferred embodiment is configured as a self-tapping pedicle screw in accordance with known technology. The proximal end of the screw 30 includes a machine threaded stem 34, which is threaded for engagement with the nut 42 used to fix the fixation plate 40 and linking member 44. The stem 34 terminates in a driving hex recess 35 which is engaged by an appropriate screw driving tool as known in the art. (Alternatively, a hex projection can be used in lieu of the recess 35, with an appropriate change in the screw driving tool.)
  • [0040]
    Intermediate the distal shank 31 and proximal stem 34 is a smooth shank portion 32. The smooth shank portion 32 defines a hub 33 near the proximal threaded stem 34. The hub 33 includes a surface 33 a configured to support the fixation plate 40. When the nut 42 is tightened onto the proximal stem 34, the fixation plate 40 is locked between the nut and the hub surface 33 a. The hub 33 supports the fixation plate to keep it within the suprafascial space 25. The surface 33 a is preferably slightly curved to fit within a scalloped fixation plate of known design in the art. The screw 30 is cannulated along its entire length, as represented by the bore 36 provided for guidewire insertion.
  • [0041]
    The smooth shank portion 32 provides a non-irritating surface for contacting the fascia and muscle tissue. The length of the smooth shank portion 32 is determined by the muscle thickness around the instrumented vertebra, and is generally equal in length to the length of the bone engaging threaded shank 31. In one specific embodiment, the screw 30 has a length measured from the tip of tie bone engaging shank 31 to the underside of the mounting hub 33 of 65-75 mm. The bone engaging distal shank 31 has a nominal length of 35 mm which provides optimum engagement with the vertebra. The smooth shank portion 32 accounts for the remainder of the 65-75 mm length, or between 30-40 mm. The machine threaded stem 34 has a length, as measured from surface 33 a of the mounting hub 33, that is sufficient to accommodate the fixation plate 40, a nut 42 and a linking member 44. In the specific embodiment, the length of the machine threaded stem 34 is 10-15 mm so that very little of the stem projects beyond the nut. The bone screw 30 can have a diameter of between 5.5-8.5 mm as required for the patient and fixation procedure. It is understood, of course, that the specific dimensions are illustrative of a nominal bone screw configuration. These dimensions can be varied as required for a particular patient or procedure, while still adhering to the basic concepts of the present invention.
  • [0042]
    Referring now to FIGS. 4A-C, the components of a three component dilator system 50 are shown. As described above, the dilator system is used to facilate implantation of the bone screw 30 into the vertebrae of the patient. The system 50 includes three successively smaller and longer dilator tubes 51, 56 and 61. Each dilator tube is tapered at its respective tip 53, 58 and 63 for atraumatic introduction of the tubes through the skin and tissue of the patient. Each of the tubes is cannulated or hollow as represented by respective bores 52, 57 and 62 therethrough. The bore 52 in the thinnest dilator tube 51 has a diameter sufficient to accept a guidewire therethrough. The bore 57 in the intermediate diameter dilator tube 56 has a diameter slightly larger than the outer diameter of the dilator tube 51. Likewise, the bore 62 in the largest diameter dilator tube 61 is slightly larger than the outer diameter of the dilator tube 56.
  • [0043]
    The ends of the smallest and intermediate diameter tubes 51 and 56, ends 54 and 59 respectively, are knurled to provide a gripping surface for removal of the tubes. The lengths of the tubes are graduated so that the smallest diameter tube 51 has the greatest length, while the intermediate tube 56 has is longer than the outermost larger diameter dilator tube 61. This length differential also facilitates sequential removal of The tubes 51 and 56, just prior to and just after the vertebra has been drilled in the instrumentation step of the method.
  • [0044]
    In one specific embodiment of the three component dilator system 50 of the present invention, the smallest diameter dilator tube 51 has an outer diameter of about 5 mm, a length of 152.5 mm, and a cannulated bore diameter of about 2 mm. The intermediate dilator tube 56 has an outer diameter of 9.4 mm, a length of about 140.0 mm, and a cannulated bore diameter of 5.15 mm (leaving 0.15 mm clearance for insertion of the tube 51). The final dilator tube 61, through which the bone screw 30 is inserted has an outer diameter of 11.1 mm, a length of 127.0 mm and a cannulated bore diameter of 9.58 mm to receive the intermediate dilator tube 56, as wed as the bone screw 30, therethrough.
  • [0045]
    While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character, it being understood that only the preferred embodiment has been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention are desired to be protected.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3486505 *May 22, 1967Dec 30, 1969Gordon M MorrisonOrthopedic surgical instrument
US3892232 *Sep 24, 1973Jul 1, 1975Alonzo J NeufeldMethod and apparatus for performing percutaneous bone surgery
US3964480 *Apr 21, 1975Jun 22, 1976Froning Edward CApparatus for sterotaxic lateral extradural disc puncture
US4175555 *Feb 22, 1978Nov 27, 1979Interfix LimitedBone screw
US4545374 *Sep 3, 1982Oct 8, 1985Jacobson Robert EMethod and instruments for performing a percutaneous lumbar diskectomy
US4573448 *Oct 5, 1983Mar 4, 1986Pilling Co.Method for decompressing herniated intervertebral discs
US4611581 *Dec 16, 1983Sep 16, 1986Acromed CorporationApparatus for straightening spinal columns
US4616638 *Nov 28, 1984Oct 14, 1986Richards Medical CompanyCompression screw assembly
US4771767 *Feb 3, 1986Sep 20, 1988Acromed CorporationApparatus and method for maintaining vertebrae in a desired relationship
US4777287 *Oct 29, 1984Oct 11, 1988Amoco CorporationRecycle of vaporized solvent in liquid phase oxidation of an alkyl aromatic
US4790297 *Jul 24, 1987Dec 13, 1988Biotechnology, Inc.Spinal fixation method and system
US4836196 *Jan 11, 1988Jun 6, 1989Acromed CorporationSurgically implantable spinal correction system
US4854311 *Jan 21, 1988Aug 8, 1989Acro Med CorporationBone screw
US4862891 *Mar 14, 1988Sep 5, 1989Canyon Medical ProductsDevice for sequential percutaneous dilation
US5015247 *Jun 13, 1988May 14, 1991Michelson Gary KThreaded spinal implant
US5019079 *Nov 20, 1989May 28, 1991Zimmer, Inc.Bone screw
US5062845 *May 10, 1989Nov 5, 1991Spine-Tech, Inc.Method of making an intervertebral reamer
US5092893 *Sep 4, 1990Mar 3, 1992Smith Thomas EHuman orthopedic vertebra implant
US5098435 *Nov 21, 1990Mar 24, 1992Alphatec Manufacturing Inc.Cannula
US5129900 *Jul 24, 1990Jul 14, 1992Acromed CorporationSpinal column retaining method and apparatus
US5147363 *Dec 19, 1990Sep 15, 1992Haerle AntonScrew for use in osteosynthesis
US5171279 *Mar 17, 1992Dec 15, 1992Danek MedicalMethod for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation
US5242443 *Aug 15, 1991Sep 7, 1993Smith & Nephew Dyonics, Inc.Percutaneous fixation of vertebrae
US5269797 *Sep 12, 1991Dec 14, 1993Meditron Devices, Inc.Cervical discectomy instruments
US5357983 *Jan 4, 1993Oct 25, 1994Danek Medical, Inc.Method for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation
US5472426 *Aug 17, 1993Dec 5, 1995B.E.I. MedicalCervical discectomy instruments
US5480440 *Jul 7, 1993Jan 2, 1996Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc.Open surgical technique for vertebral fixation with subcutaneous fixators positioned between the skin and the lumbar fascia of a patient
US5496322 *Jul 22, 1994Mar 5, 1996Danek Medical Inc.Method for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation
US5522899 *Jun 7, 1995Jun 4, 1996Sofamor Danek Properties, Inc.Artificial spinal fusion implants
US5569248 *May 9, 1995Oct 29, 1996Danek Medical, Inc.Apparatus for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation
US5728097 *Jul 9, 1996Mar 17, 1998Sdgi Holding, Inc.Method for subcutaneous suprafascial internal fixation
US6033406 *Mar 17, 1998Mar 7, 2000Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Method for subcutaneous suprafascial pedicular internal fixation
US6848601 *Mar 14, 2003Feb 1, 2005Homax Products, Inc.Aerosol systems and methods for mixing and dispensing two-part materials
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7524323Apr 16, 2004Apr 28, 2009Kyphon SarlSubcutaneous support
US7527638Dec 16, 2003May 5, 2009Depuy Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement
US7547318Mar 19, 2004Jun 16, 2009Depuy Spine, Inc.Spinal fixation element and methods
US7618418Nov 17, 2009Kyphon SarlPlate system for minimally invasive support of the spine
US7648520Apr 16, 2004Jan 19, 2010Kyphon SarlPedicle screw assembly
US7651496Jul 19, 2005Jan 26, 2010Zimmer Spine, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for percutaneous implant delivery
US7666188Dec 16, 2003Feb 23, 2010Depuy Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for spinal fixation element placement
US7708763Sep 30, 2004May 4, 2010Depuy Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement
US7789899Sep 7, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Bone anchorage screw with built-in hinged plate
US7811311Oct 12, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Screw with deployable interlaced dual rods
US7918857Apr 5, 2011Depuy Spine, Inc.Minimally invasive bone anchor extensions
US7918858Apr 5, 2011Depuy Spine, Inc.Minimally invasive bone anchor extensions
US7955355Jun 7, 2011Stryker SpineMethods and devices for improving percutaneous access in minimally invasive surgeries
US7967821Jun 28, 2011Depuy Spine, Inc.Break-off screw extension removal tools
US8002798Aug 23, 2011Stryker SpineSystem and method for spinal implant placement
US8034081Feb 6, 2007Oct 11, 2011CollabComl, LLCInterspinous dynamic stabilization implant and method of implanting
US8043334Oct 25, 2011Depuy Spine, Inc.Articulating facet fusion screw
US8105361Feb 4, 2009Jan 31, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement
US8133261Aug 22, 2007Mar 13, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Intra-facet fixation device and method of use
US8197513Jun 12, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Facet fixation and fusion wedge and method of use
US8257355Sep 4, 2012Spinefrontier Inc.Methods and devices for static or dynamic spine stabilization
US8262662Sep 11, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Break-off screw extensions
US8277491Oct 2, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement
US8414588Apr 9, 2013Depuy Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal connection element delivery
US8523916Feb 4, 2010Sep 3, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCMethods and devices for spinal fixation element placement
US8685063May 4, 2011Apr 1, 2014Stryker SpineMethods and devices for improving percutaneous access in minimally invasive surgeries
US8721692Aug 2, 2013May 13, 2014Depuy Synthes Products LlcMethods and devices for spinal fixation element placement
US8734490Dec 2, 2011May 27, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCMethods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement
US8828005May 11, 2009Sep 9, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCSpinal fixation element and methods
US8828007Feb 15, 2011Sep 9, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCMinimally invasive bone anchor extensions
US8894655Sep 25, 2006Nov 25, 2014Stryker SpineRod contouring apparatus and method for percutaneous pedicle screw extension
US8894685Apr 13, 2007Nov 25, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCFacet fixation and fusion screw and washer assembly and method of use
US8979851Sep 25, 2013Mar 17, 2015Stryker SpineRod contouring apparatus for percutaneous pedicle screw extension
US9044277Jul 12, 2010Jun 2, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Pedicular facet fusion screw with plate
US9089372Jul 12, 2010Jul 28, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Pedicular facet fusion screw with plate
US9119684Sep 25, 2013Sep 1, 2015Stryker SpineRod contouring method for percutaneous pedicle screw extension
US9161786Apr 11, 2014Oct 20, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement
US9216040Apr 7, 2014Dec 22, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Methods and devices for spinal fixation element placement
US9247977Dec 15, 2008Feb 2, 2016Stryker European Holdings I, LlcRod contouring apparatus for percutaneous pedicle screw extension
US20050065517 *Jun 15, 2004Mar 24, 2005Chin Kingsley RichardMethods and devices for improving percutaneous access in minimally invasive surgeries
US20050131421 *Dec 16, 2003Jun 16, 2005Anderson David G.Methods and devices for minimally invasive spinal fixation element placement
US20050131422 *Dec 16, 2003Jun 16, 2005Anderson David G.Methods and devices for spinal fixation element placement
US20050215999 *Mar 19, 2004Sep 29, 2005Depuy Spine, Inc.Spinal fixation element and methods
US20050234452 *Apr 16, 2004Oct 20, 2005Malandain Hugues FSubcutaneous support
US20050234456 *Dec 20, 2004Oct 20, 2005Malandain Hugues FPlate system for minimally invasive support of the spine
US20060030850 *Jul 19, 2005Feb 9, 2006Keegan Thomas EMethods and apparatuses for percutaneous implant delivery
US20060149237 *Dec 30, 2004Jul 6, 2006Markworth Aaron DScrew with deployable interlaced dual rods
US20060149252 *Dec 30, 2004Jul 6, 2006Markworth Aaron DBone anchorage screw with built-in hinged plate
US20070299448 *Jun 6, 2007Dec 27, 2007Spinefrontier LlsMethods and devices for static or dynamic spine stabilization
US20080177333 *Oct 24, 2006Jul 24, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Adjustable jacking implant
US20080255618 *Apr 13, 2007Oct 16, 2008Depuy Spine, Inc.Articulating facet fusion screw
US20080300638 *Aug 8, 2008Dec 4, 2008Depuy Spine, Inc.Break-off screw extensions
US20090105755 *Oct 22, 2007Apr 23, 2009Warsaw Orthopedics, Inc.Apparatus and method for connecting spinal fixation systems together
US20090112261 *Oct 29, 2007Apr 30, 2009Barry Richard JMinimally invasive spine internal fixation system
US20090143828 *Oct 2, 2008Jun 4, 2009Shawn StadMethods and Devices For Minimally Invasive Spinal Connection Element Delivery
US20090228052 *May 13, 2009Sep 10, 2009Depuy Spine, Inc.Break-off screw extensions
US20100076494 *Mar 25, 2010Kyphon SarlPedicle screw assembly
US20120029570 *Feb 2, 2012ClarianceFacet arthroplasty device
USRE45338Aug 21, 2013Jan 13, 2015Stryker SpineSystem and method for spinal implant placement
USRE45676Aug 22, 2013Sep 29, 2015Stryker SpineSystem and method for spinal implant placement
Classifications
U.S. Classification606/86.00A, 606/53, 606/916, 606/60, 606/301, 606/247, 606/279
International ClassificationA61F2/44, A61B17/60, A61B17/86, A61F2/00, A61B17/70, A61F2/28
Cooperative ClassificationA61F2002/30329, A61B17/70, A61F2220/0025, A61F2/4455, A61F2002/449, A61F2002/2839, A61F2002/448, A61B17/86, A61B17/7049, A61F2002/2835, A61F2/442, A61B17/7059, A61B17/7007
European ClassificationA61B17/70, A61F2/44F