Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20050038573 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/638,798
Publication dateFeb 17, 2005
Filing dateAug 11, 2003
Priority dateAug 11, 2003
Also published asUS7831350, US20060142917
Publication number10638798, 638798, US 2005/0038573 A1, US 2005/038573 A1, US 20050038573 A1, US 20050038573A1, US 2005038573 A1, US 2005038573A1, US-A1-20050038573, US-A1-2005038573, US2005/0038573A1, US2005/038573A1, US20050038573 A1, US20050038573A1, US2005038573 A1, US2005038573A1
InventorsRoy Goudy
Original AssigneeGoudy Roy Wesley
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Vehicle information/task manager
US 20050038573 A1
Abstract
The present invention is operative to disable at least one infotainment device under certain conditions relative to the current driving environment of the user. The system uses a weighted matrix to assign risk to certain sensed conditions while driving. A changed condition is assigned a weight and the weighted risks are summed to calculate risk level information. The risk level information is thereafter compared to priority level information associated with at least one infotainment device. When the risk level information exceeds or is equal to the priority level information of the at least one infotainment device the system temporarily disables the infotainment device until the driving environment changes to a condition where it is safe to operate the infotainment device.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(23)
1. An apparatus to measure and manage information for the purpose of facilitating the safe operation of a vehicle in relation to a driver's use of at least one infotainment device disposed in the vehicle, said apparatus comprising:
an electronic device having memory and operative to receive information from at least one information source and output risk level information;
an information interface in data communication with said electronic device and the at least one infotainment device wherein said information interface is operative to receive said risk level information and transmit a trigger signal to the at least one infotainment device;
a computer program disposed within the electronic device operative to calculate said risk level information based on the information received from the at least one information source and information disposed in said memory, and wherein said apparatus is operative to compare said risk level information with priority level information relative to the at least one infotainment device, and wherein the apparatus generates the trigger signal that causes the at least one infotainment device to be disabled when said risk level information exceeds said priority level information and enabled when said risk level information returns to a value less than said priority level information; and
a user interface in communication with the electronic device, said user interface operative to allow the user to input user-defined priority information relative to at least one function of the at least one infotainment device wherein the at least one function will not be disabled by the apparatus.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the infotainment device is a phone or audio system component.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the at least one information source is a vehicle sensor operative to monitor the external driving environment.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the at least one information source is a global positioning system.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the at least one information source is at least one driver input.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the at least one information source monitors at least one vehicle dynamic parameter.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein calculating the risk level comprises grading the information received from the at least one information source and combining the graded information to determine the risk level information.
8. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the information interface includes at least one timer device.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the at least one infotainment device is enabled after the expiration of a predetermined time period that follows said signal generated when said risk level information is less than said priority level information.
10. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said comparison between the risk level information and the priority level information is accomplished by the information interface.
11. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the user interface further comprises a visual indicator operative to notify the user that the device has been disabled.
12. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the user defined priority information comprises a list of incoming call phone numbers.
13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the at least one function that will not be disabled is an incoming call made from an incoming call phone number that matches a phone number in the user defined priority information.
14. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein a portion of the information disposed in the memory is information learned from previous experience.
15. A method for facilitating the safe operation of a vehicle in relation to a driver's use of at least one infotainment device disposed in the vehicle, said method comprising the steps of:
providing an electronic device having memory in communication with the at least one infotainment device wherein the electronic device is operative to disable some or all functions of the at least one infotainment device;
providing information relative to an external driving environment of the vehicle to said electronic device;
calculating risk level information using said electronic device wherein said risk level information is calculated using said information relative to the external driving environment and information disposed in said memory of the electronic device;
comparing said risk level information with priority level information relative to the at least one infotainment device;
disabling the at least one infotainment device when said priority level information is less than or equal to said risk level information; and
re-enabling the at least one infotainment device when said priority level information is higher than said risk level information.
16. The method of claim 15 further comprising the step of providing a user interface operative to allow the user to define at least one infotainment function that will not be disabled.
17. The method of claim 16 wherein the at least one infotainment function is an incoming call.
18. The method of claim 16 further comprising providing the user a visual indication at said user interface operative to notify the driver that the at least one infotainment device has been disabled or re-enabled.
19. The method of claim 15 further comprising the step of providing a timer in the electronic device.
20. The method of claim 19 wherein re-enabling the at least one infotainment device occurs after the expiration of a predetermined period of time.
21. The method of claim 15 wherein a portion of the information disposed in the memory of the electronic device is information learned from previous experiences.
22. The method of claim 21 wherein the information learned from previous experiences is updated during operation of the vehicle.
23. The method of claim 22 further comprising the step of comparing the information learned from previous experience to the information relative to said external driving environment.
Description
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The present invention relates to vehicle safety and management of vehicle infotainment systems. More particularly, the invention relates to a vehicle information and task manager that reduces the probability of vehicle crashes due to distractions caused by the driver operating communication/multimedia devices while driving.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    To drive safely, a driver needs to give priority attention to the driving task. Even a momentary distraction can lead to a crash. The distraction can be caused by anything that draws the driver's attention away from the road.
  • [0003]
    Most people are limited in the amount of information that they can process during any given period of time. To cope with the multiple demands that occur during driving, drivers have to shift their attention back and forth to attend to each of them. Most of the time, drivers are able to do this quite well, but, if a distraction occurs at an inappropriate time or if it is prolonged, attention to driving is reduced and safety can be jeopardized.
  • [0004]
    There have always been distractions while driving; tuning a radio, eating, or attending to a child, and most recently, and most commonly, talking on a cellular or mobile phone. Additionally, a new set of distractions are associated with the ever-growing array of new in vehicle electronic devices, sometimes referred to as infotainment systems. These types of devices are rapidly being developed by the electronics and automobile industries.
  • [0005]
    Many of these new devices provide safety benefits and, in some cases, have been attributed to saving lives. However, lawmakers have been weighing the benefits of this new technology of infotainment devices in cars against the growing evidence of their potential to increase driver distraction and the risk to driver's safety.
  • [0006]
    In light of the above circumstances, the present invention seeks to provide an apparatus that reduces the probability of vehicle crashes due to distraction caused by the driver operating infotainment devices while driving.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    The present invention provides an infotainment device disabling system and method which is activated when the driver's work load is large in relation to the external driving environment and the drivers use of at least one of the infotainment devices disposed in the vehicle.
  • [0008]
    The apparatus comprises an electronic device having memory wherein the electronic device is operative to receive information from at least one information source disposed on the vehicle and output risk level information relative to the present driving environment.
  • [0009]
    An information interface is in data communication with the electronic device and at least one infotainment device disposed in a vehicle wherein the information interface is operative to receive the risk the level information from the electronic device and transmit the information to the at least one infotainment device disposed in the vehicle.
  • [0010]
    A computer program is disposed within the electronic device and operates to calculate the risk level information based on the information received from the at least one information source. It is appreciated that the at least one information source provides information to the electronic device that is relative to driver's external driving environment in addition to other information, such as, vehicle dynamics relative to speed, vehicle location and information learned from previous experience by the system while the vehicle is being driven.
  • [0011]
    The apparatus is operative to compare the risk level information calculated with priority level information associated with the at least one infotainment device and thereafter generates a signal that causes the at least one infotainment device to be disabled when the risk level information calculated by the electronic device exceeds the priority level information of the at least one infotainment device. Likewise, the apparatus is operative to re-enable the at least one infotainment device when the risk level information returns to a value less than the priority level information associated with the infotainment device.
  • [0012]
    A user interface is in communication with the electronic device that is operative to allow the user to input user-defined priority information relative to at least one function of the at least one infotainment device. In this manner, the at least one function designated by the user will not be disabled by the apparatus when the risk level information exceeds the priority level information associated with the infotainment device.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0013]
    A better understanding of the present invention will be added upon reference to the following detailed description. When read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like parts are given like reference numerals and wherein:
  • [0014]
    FIG. 1 is a system block diagram of the information task manager as according to the invention; and
  • [0015]
    FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram of the information task manager and communication with information sources and infotainment devices as accorded to the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • [0016]
    By implementing the present invention in vehicles, it may be possible to avoid restrictive regulations covering the use of some types of infotainment devices upon driving in vehicles. This is because the system can judge such situations when devices could be used and when drivers need to maintain their undivided attention to the road, and for this reason, the system will temporarily disable use of the some devices.
  • [0017]
    The proposed system focuses on the external driving environment to determine the level of risk that the driving environment poses to the driver in the event the driver does not have their full attention directed toward the road.
  • [0018]
    With reference to FIG. 1, the apparatus provides an information task manager system 12 operative to disable at least one infotainment device under certain driving conditions. The system 12 uses a weighting matrix to assign a risk level to certain sensed conditions such as the external driving environment, vehicle position, driver actions and vehicle dynamics. Each changed condition is assigned a weight and each of the weighted risks is summed together to comprise risk level information.
  • [0019]
    The risk level information is thereafter compared against a priority level information associated with the at least one infotainment device and a disable signal is generated to disable those infotainment devices that have priority level information that is less than or equal to the risk level information calculated by the system 12.
  • [0020]
    Under certain conditions, the user is allowed to define a priority level for at least one function associated with at least one infotainment device such that the at least one function defined will not be disabled by the system 12 as it normally would be under the circumstances when the priority level information associated with a particular infotainment device is less than or equal to the current risk level information.
  • [0021]
    With reference to FIG. 1, the system 12 includes an electronic device 14 or information task manager that is operative to receive information from at least one information source 30 and calculate risk level information relative to the information received from the at least one information source 30.
  • [0022]
    The system 12 includes an information interface 16 in data communication with information task manager 14 and at least infotainment device 20. The information interface 16 is operative to receive information from the at least one information source 30 and transmit risk level information to the at least one infotainment device 20. The information interface 16 may be in the form of a data router having memory and data processing capability.
  • [0023]
    Preferably, priority level information relative to at least one infotainment device 20 is disposed in the memory of the information interface 16. The priority level information is indicative of the level of importance of sustaining the activation of the at least one infotainment device 20 during high-risk level situations. Illustratively, a navigation system may have a priority of one, an audio system component such as a radio may have a priority level of three, and a cell phone may have a priority level of five. In this fashion, risk level information equivalent to a value a four would disable both the audio system component and the navigation system while the cell phone will remain active.
  • [0024]
    It is appreciated that the above example is merely illustrative of an assignment of priority level information to the above-described infotainment devices and that the priority levels and devices may vary from the values and components described. The priority level information may be pre-set at pre-defined levels or may be selectively changed as desired by a system user.
  • [0025]
    The processing capability of the information interface 16 is preferably operative to receive risk level information from the electronic device 14 or information task manager and compare the risk level information to priority level information associated with at least one of the infotainment devices 20. When the information interface 16 receives risk level information from the information task manager 14 that is higher than the priority level information relative to the at least one infotainment device 20, the at least one infotainment device 20 will be disabled by the system 12. Thereafter, when the information task manager 14 transmits risk level information to the information interface 16 that is less than the priority level information of the at least one infotainment device 20, the infotainment device will be re-enabled to normal operation.
  • [0026]
    A computer program is disposed within the information task manager 14 and is operative to calculate the risk level information based on the information received from the at least one information source 30 and information disposed in memory of the information task manager 14.
  • [0027]
    The at least one information source may be a sensing device that senses the driving environment. Illustratively, the sensing devices may include forward, rear, side or blind spot looking optic sensors, road condition sensors, proximity detection sensors, external temperature sensors and rain detection sensors. Other information sources may include GPS, vehicle electronic systems, such as ABS, engine controller, throttle position sensor, steering position sensor, vehicle speed sensor, longitudinal acceleration, steering angle, yaw rate or the like.
  • [0028]
    Most importantly, the information task manager 14 preferably utilizes learned information derived from previous experiences relative to the driving environment. The system 12 can compare previous experiences with a current situation to modify the system response to a given set of inputs from the at least one information sources 30.
  • [0029]
    The present invention utilizes the at least one information source 30 to accomplish a form of artificial learning. The at least one information source 30 constantly provides the information task manager 14 with information concerning the external driving environment surrounding the vehicle. The system 12 uses the information from the at least one information source 30 to assess the driving environment and select the best course of action based on current conditions and previously learned behavior. In this manner, the computer is constantly updated or learns from previous experiences, and as such, the information task manager 14 provides the basis for an efficient and flexible system and method of decision-making compared to more traditional methods that utilize look-up tables.
  • [0030]
    With look-up tables, a traditional system conducts a search until it finds results that best fit current circumstances in the driving environment. The look-up table is predefined and updating the table requires a software change, and as such, the decision-making process of conventional systems does not change until the system has been reprogrammed.
  • [0031]
    With artificial learning, the system 12 of the present invention can essentially make decisions on its own as to the best course of action to take in terms of disabling the at least one infotainment device 30 under various circumstances encountered in the ever-changing driving environment.
  • [0032]
    Referring again to FIG. 1, a user interface 22 is provided in communication with the system 12 and is operative to allow the user to input user defined priority information relative to at least one function of the least one infotainment device 30. In this manner, the user is allowed to access certain functions that will otherwise be inhibited under normal circumstances.
  • [0033]
    Illustratively, for some devices such as cell phones, the user interface allows the user to define at least one incoming call phone number as critical and not to be disabled by the system 12. Accordingly, when a call comes from one of the user-defined critical numbers, the system 12 allows the call to come through despite the current circumstances of the driving environment. For all other numbers, the system 12 disables the cell phone. Conversely, the user-defined priority information may include outgoing phone numbers such as 911 or other emergency contact phone numbers.
  • [0034]
    The system 12 is also programmable to recognize a driver's use of at least one of the infotainment devices 20 such that when a high-risk condition exists, the system 12 will prompt the driver to complete his or her usage of the least one infotainment device 20 as soon as possible, but will not disable the device until the current use is completed. As an example, when a driver is on a call in progress and the state of the driving environment changes to a high-risk state, the system 12 will prompt the driver to complete the call as soon as possible but will not disable the cell phone until the call is completed.
  • [0035]
    The information task manager 14 calculates risk level information by first combining data relative to information received from the least one information source 30 with a weighted value or grade. Thereafter, all of the weighted data is combined to define the risk level information associated with the condition of the driving environment at the particular instant in time. This risk level information is thereafter used by the system 12 to disable the at least one infotainment device 20 that has an assigned priority level information that is lower than the calculated risk level information. The information task manager 14 does this by sending the risk level information to the information interface 16. The information interface 16 output a trigger signal to each infotainment device 20 such that any infotainment device 20 having priority level information that is less than or equal to the risk level information will be disabled.
  • [0036]
    With reference to FIG. 2, a schematic illustration of the inventive apparatus 10 as provided. It is appreciated that the system 12 may be a single unit that comprises both the information task manger 14 and the information interface 16 in a single unit. Alternatively, the information task manager 14 and information interface 16 may be provided as separate units as best illustrated in FIG. 2.
  • [0037]
    FIG. 2 is exemplary of the components and process whereby the unique apparatus 10 is provided for reducing the probability of vehicle crashes due to distractions caused by the driver operating infotainment devices while driving. However, it is appreciated that other component architectures and processes may become apparent to those skilled in the art without exceeding the scope of the present invention.
  • [0038]
    Referring again to FIG. 1, the apparatus 10 preferably includes a user interface 20 that is operative to provide the user a visual indicator to notify the user that a device has been temporarily disabled due to the present driving conditions or that the use of such device should be discontinued as soon as possible. Other indicators may be incorporated into the user interface such as audible alarms, tactile indicators, verbal indicators or other types of indicators suitable for such purpose.
  • [0039]
    Preferably, the information interface 16 includes at least one timing device wherein the at least one infotainment device 20 that has disabled will only be re-enabled after the expiration of a predetermined time period following the trigger signal that is generated when the risk level information returns to a value less than the priority level information associated with the particular infotainment device 20.
  • [0040]
    As illustrated in FIG. 2 the risk level information is calculated by the information task manager 14, and the priority level information is calculated by the information interface 16. However, is it appreciated that these tasks may be allocated to either one or both of the information task manager 14 and information interface 16 without exceeding the scope of the invention. It is also appreciated that these tasks may be allocated to some other device having the capability to perform such function.
  • [0041]
    A method for facilitating a safe operation of a vehicle in relation to a driver's use of at least one infotainment device 20 disposed in a vehicle as according to an invention may be described as a process comprising the steps of providing an electronic device having memory in communication with at least one infotainment device 20 whereas the electronic device is operative to disable some or all of the functions of the least one infotainment device.
  • [0042]
    The process continues by providing information relative to the external driving environment of the vehicle to the electronic device for calculating risk level information as described above. Wherein the risk level information is preferably calculated using the information received relative to the external driving environment and the information learned from previous experience.
  • [0043]
    Thereafter, the process continues by comparing the risk level information with priority level information associated with the least one infotainment device 20, such that, the infotainment device 20 is disabled when the priority level information is less than or equal to the calculated risk level information.
  • [0044]
    Finally, the process ends with the system re-enabling the at least one infotainment device 20 when the priority level information of the infotainment device is higher than the present risk level information.
  • [0045]
    The foregoing figures and descriptions thereof are provided as illustrated of a preferred embodiment of this invention and are not intended to be all-inclusive. It is understood that various changes to essential components and additions to the system and/or method may be resorted to without departing from the spirit of the invention or scope of the claims as presented.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6580973 *Oct 12, 2001Jun 17, 2003Robert H. LeivianMethod of response synthesis in a driver assistance system
US20030191568 *Aug 9, 2002Oct 9, 2003Breed David S.Method and system for controlling a vehicle
US20030227395 *Jun 6, 2002Dec 11, 2003Advanced American Enterprises, LlcVehicular safety system and method
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7579942Oct 9, 2006Aug 25, 2009Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.Extra-vehicular threat predictor
US7880621Dec 22, 2006Feb 1, 2011Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.Distraction estimator
US8081209Jun 26, 2008Dec 20, 2011Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.Method and system of sparse code based object classification with sensor fusion
US8160811Jun 26, 2008Apr 17, 2012Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.Method and system to estimate driving risk based on a hierarchical index of driving
US8432267 *Dec 19, 2008Apr 30, 2013Apple Inc.Method and apparatus to remotely set alarms on a mobile device
US8682524 *Jun 22, 2009Mar 25, 2014Fujitsu LimitedView control system and view control method
US8982781Mar 31, 2010Mar 17, 2015Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.Control of a mobile device
US9264888Mar 16, 2015Feb 16, 2016Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd.Control of a mobile device
US9610893 *Mar 18, 2015Apr 4, 2017Car1St Technologies, LlcMethods and systems for providing alerts to a driver of a vehicle via condition detection and wireless communications
US20060172780 *Nov 2, 2005Aug 3, 2006Thomas KrippgansVehicle audio system capable of playing wireless audio data received from a mobile audio player
US20080154438 *Dec 22, 2006Jun 26, 2008Toyota Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.Distraction estimator
US20090303066 *Dec 19, 2008Dec 10, 2009Michael LeeMethod and apparatus to remotely set alarms on a mobile device
US20090322871 *Jun 26, 2008Dec 31, 2009Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.Method and system of sparse code based object classification with sensor fusion
US20090326796 *Jun 26, 2008Dec 31, 2009Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc.Method and system to estimate driving risk based on a heirarchical index of driving
US20100011367 *Jul 11, 2008Jan 14, 2010Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc.Methods and systems for allocating a resource of a vehicle among a plurality of uses for the resource
US20100030424 *Jun 22, 2009Feb 4, 2010Fujitsu LimitedView control system and view control method
US20100057306 *Jun 30, 2008Mar 4, 2010Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki KaishaVehicle-mounted device control system
US20100210254 *Feb 10, 2010Aug 19, 2010Charles KellySystem and Method for Regulating Mobile Communications Use by Drivers
US20110185390 *Jan 27, 2010Jul 28, 2011Robert Bosch GmbhMobile phone integration into driver information systems
US20160152240 *Feb 9, 2016Jun 2, 2016Google Inc.Attention and event management
CN102725610A *Dec 20, 2010Oct 10, 2012罗伯特博世有限公司Driver assistance system and method for driver assistance
DE102007034719A1Jul 23, 2007Jan 29, 2009Robert Bosch GmbhVerfahren zur dynamischen Anpassung des Kommunikationsverhaltens einer Kommunikationsinfrastruktur sowie System
DE102010001579A1Feb 4, 2010Aug 4, 2011Robert Bosch GmbH, 70469Fahrerassistenzsystem und Verfahren zur Fahrerassistenz
EP2149473A3 *Jun 24, 2009Jan 12, 2011Fujitsu LimitedView control system and view control method
EP3034349A1 *Dec 18, 2014Jun 22, 2016Seat, S.A.Procedure and system for managing information between devices in an automative vehicle
WO2011095254A1Dec 20, 2010Aug 11, 2011Robert Bosch GmbhDriver assistance system and method for driver assistance
WO2015088426A1 *Dec 5, 2014Jun 18, 2015Scania Cv AbMethod and system for facilitating the selection of control devices from a set of control devices for vehicle functions
Classifications
U.S. Classification701/1
International ClassificationB60R16/02, B60R16/023, B60K35/00
Cooperative ClassificationB60K35/00, B60K2350/906, B60R16/0231, B60K2350/962
European ClassificationB60K35/00, B60R16/023D
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Aug 11, 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: TOYOTA TECHNICAL CENTER USA, INC., MICHIGAN
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GOUDY, ROY WESLEY;REEL/FRAME:014390/0117
Effective date: 20030716