|Publication number||US20050039508 A1|
|Application number||US 10/854,677|
|Publication date||Feb 24, 2005|
|Filing date||May 27, 2004|
|Priority date||May 27, 2003|
|Also published as||CA2527494A1, EP1663911A2, US7789931, US8057569, US20080034822, US20100288003, WO2004106267A2, WO2004106267A3|
|Publication number||10854677, 854677, US 2005/0039508 A1, US 2005/039508 A1, US 20050039508 A1, US 20050039508A1, US 2005039508 A1, US 2005039508A1, US-A1-20050039508, US-A1-2005039508, US2005/0039508A1, US2005/039508A1, US20050039508 A1, US20050039508A1, US2005039508 A1, US2005039508A1|
|Inventors||Jeffrey Burnham, Gary Dahms|
|Original Assignee||Burnham Jeffrey C., Dahms Gary L.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (8), Referenced by (25), Classifications (5), Legal Events (2)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/473,197 entitled “Organic Recycling with Metal Addition,” and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/473,198 entitled “Liquid Fertilizer Incorporating Biosolids and High Concentrations of Ammonia,” the entirety of which are both hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
This invention is directed to systems, devices and methods for converting organic material into fertilizer. More specifically, the invention relates to adding iron sulfate or other metallic salts to organic material prior to producing fertilizer from the organic material.
2. Description of the Background
The disposal of sewage sludge is a significant world-wide problem. Current methods of disposing of sewage sludge include incineration, direct land or ocean application, heating and drying the sludge for sterilization and then applying it to land, depositing it in a landfill, or granulating the sludge with a standard rotary granulator with heating and drying being provided by exogenous heat sources (e.g. by burning purchased fuel). While some of these methods result in a fertilizer, such fertilizers are of relatively low analysis with regard to their plant nutrient value.
Methods of expressing a fertilizer's plant nutrient value involve identifying the fertilizer's NPK value, wherein N relates to the amount of nitrogen, P relates to the amount of phosphorus (expressed as P2O5), and K relates to the amount of potassium (expressed as K2O). Thus, as reported in U.S. Pat. No. 3,050,383, sewage sludge with a 2.5/2.5/0 value contains two and a half percent nitrogen, two and a half percent phosphorous as P2O5, and zero percent potassium as K2O. Except as otherwise indicated by usage, all percentage values herein are weight-based percentages (i.e. w/w).
Fortunately, methods exist for enhancing the nutrient value of relatively low analysis organic waste material. For instance, in the aforementioned Wilson patent (the contents of which are entirely incorporated herein by reference), a method is disclosed for treating dried animal manure and sewage sludge with controlled amounts of an acid, such as sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid (or an equivalent phosphorous compound, the strength of which is expressed as phosphoric acid), or mixtures thereof, and an aqueous ammoniacal solution, such as aqueous ammonia or ammoniacal nitrogen salt-containing solutions and tumbling the resulting reaction mass to form fertilizer granules having an upgraded or enhanced plant nutrient value.
Other methods of enhancing the plant nutrient value of relatively low analysis organic waste material with acids, bases, or mixtures thereof have also been described (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 4,743,287, U.S. Defensive Publication T955,002, Norton et al. (Feb. 1, 1977), U.S. Pat. No. 5,466,273, U.S. Pat. No. 5,125,951, U.S. Pat. No. 5,118,337, U.S. Pat. No. 5,393,317, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,422,015.
Tubular reactors are known in the art for producing ammonia salts (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,406, U.S. Pat. No. 2,902,342, U.S. Pat. No. 2,755,176, and U.S. Pat. No. 2,568,901, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference). Exothermic reactions are carried out in the tubular reactors by reacting a base with an acid in the reactor tube. European Patent Publication 770,586A1 also discloses that tubular reactors may be used for the treatment of relatively low analysis organic waste material. This European Patent Publication generally describes a process of treating such organic waste by introducing the organic waste, ammonia, and an acid into a tubular reactor, carrying out an exothermic reaction, separating vapor from sludge, and then further processing the sludge.
A component typically associated with tubular reactors is a preneutralizer. The preneutralizer is typically used in conjunction with tubular reactors to effect partial neutralization of the acid prior to its introduction into the reactor. However, the use of a preneutralizer poses various disadvantages including difficulty in obtaining accurate control of flow rates. Additionally, operating and equipment costs associated with the use of a preneutralizer often represent a significant expense.
A reactor similar to the tubular reactor is the pipe-cross reactor. Pipe-cross reactors similarly allow for an exothermic reaction to take place, but typically involve the introduction of one or two different acid solutions for reaction with a base in a method to thoroughly mix the reagents. This is an important feature of pipe-cross reactors as it eliminates the need for a preneutralizer. At the first stage of the cross pipe reactor, the base and/or scrubber water and organic material solution are premixed. At the second step, pipe-cross reactors are formed with up to two acid inlets configured such that the acid solutions are introduced perpendicular to the pipe cross reactor as substantially opposing streams. The perpendicular entry and opposing streams allow for thorough mixing of the acids within the reactor, thus eliminating the need for extraneous equipment such as a preneutralizer.
Pipe-cross reactors are well-known and have been used in the past to produce granular NPKS fertilizers from liquid chemicals (e.g. Energy Efficient Fertilizer Production with the Pipe-Cross Reactor (U.S. Dept. of Energy, 1982) (a pipe-cross reactor fit into the granulator drum of a conventional ammoniation-granulation system); Achorn et al., “Optimizing Use of Energy in the Production of Granular Ammonium Phosphate Fertilizer” (1982 Technical Conference of ISMA, Pallini Beach, Greece); British Sulfur Corp. Ltd., “TVA modifies its pipe reactor for increased versatility”, Phosphorus & Potassium, No. 90, pp. 25-30 (1977); Achorn et al., “Efficient Use of Energy in Production of Granular and Fluid Ammonium Phosphate Fertilizers” (1982 Fertilization Association of India Seminar, New Dehli, India); Salladay et al. “Commercialization of the TVA Pipe-Cross Reactor in Regional NPKS and DAP Granulation Plants in the United States” (1980 Fertilization Association of India Seminar, New Dehli, India); U.S. Pat. No. 4,619,684; U.S. Pat. No. 4,377,406; U.S. Pat. No. 4,134,750; U.S. Defensive Publication T969,002 (Apr. 4, 1978) to Norton et al.; and Salladay et al., “Status of NPKS Ammoniation-Granulation Plants and TVA Pipe-Cross Reactor” (1980 Fertilizer Industry Round Table, Atlanta, Ga., US)). More recently, pipe-cross reactors have been successfully used to enhance the plant nutrient value of relatively low analysis organic waste material (e.g. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,984,992 and 6,159,263, the entirety of both of which is incorporated by reference herein).
One potential drawback of exothermically treating relatively low analysis organic waste material with reactors, such as a pipe cross reactor or tubular reactor, is the potential for exhausting noxious odors during the process. The use of cross-pipe reactors for treating such waste has helped to reduce the odors typically associated with the treatment thereof. However, a need exists to provide greater assurance that such potential odors are eliminated, or at least reduced beyond current emission levels.
Additionally, a continued desire exists to improve the efficiency of sludge treatment, both in terms of capital expenditure as well as in operating costs.
There is a need in the art for relatively simple and efficient processes for processing relatively low analysis organic waste material to an enhanced plant nutrient value composition without substantial emission of noxious odors. Preferably, such processes would produce products that were sized and shaped to be spread by commercially available commercial spreaders.
The present invention overcomes the problems and disadvantages associated with current strategies and designs, and provides new methods for the production of fertilizer from organic materials such as, but not limited to biosolids. The invention further provided fertilizers produced by methods of the invention.
One embodiment of the invention is directed to methods for producing a granular nitrogen fertilizer from an organic material comprising adding a metallic salt to said organic material to form a slurry. Preferably the organic material comprises dewatered biosolids and contains water from a scrubber. Metallic salts that can be used comprise a salt of iron, zinc, or a mixture thereof. Preferred iron salts comprises ferric sulfate or ferric oxide, and preferred zinc salts comprises zinc sulfate or zinc oxide. Preferably, the metallic salt is mixed with an acid such as sulfuric acid to form an acidified metal salt. Slurry pH ranges from approximately 2-2.5. The acidified metal salt is added to the organic material in sufficient quantity to lower viscosity of the slurry such that the resulting fluid does not hinder fluid flow during operation. When the metallic salt comprises acidified ferric sulfate or ferrous sulfate, sufficient iron can be present to produce a fertilizer product with 0.1 weight percent to 10 weight percent iron sulfate calculated on a dry weight basis. When sulfuric acid is added to the organic material, it is preferably added prior to reaching a mix tank and at a rate of approximately 1.75 percent of a total feed rate to result in a pH range of 3.0 to 3.5.
Preferably the slurry is pumped into a shear mix tank that contains a high shear rotary agitator which turns at a speed sufficient to produce high shear. Slurry is passed from said shear mix tank to a holding or equilibrium tank containing an agitator. The agitator may provide approximately 2 hours or more of storage for the slurry. Holding or equilibrium tanks can be operated to maintain a pH of 3.0 to 4.0 with a solids content of between 15 percent and 28 percent solids. Metallic salt may chemically bonds with one or more elements of the slurry. When using an iron salt, the iron can bond with ammonium sulfate or ammonium phosphate present in the slurry. This can enhance granulation formation, and reduce sulfur compounds in the slurry, and odor and dust formation during operation.
Preferably the metallic salt initiates chemical hydrolysis of organic molecules in the slurry. This can drive sulfur compounds out of the organic material reducing odorant sources in a resulting fertilizer product.
Preferably the metallic salt is added to the organic material in a pipe-cross reactor or a tubular reactor. The metallic salt enhances reaction kinetics of the pipe-cross reactor and lowers viscosity of the slurry such that operation of the pipe-cross reactor is more controllable that without the metallic salt.
Another embodiment of the invention is directed to fertilizer products made by the methods of the invention. Preferred products are granules and the metallic salt increases product hardness. Product may have a crush weight of greater than 6 pounds or preferably greater than 7 pounds. Granules of fertilizer preferably contain metal that is bioavailable to a plant when used as a fertilizer. Solubility of the metal of the product in water is enhanced, and the product is low staining.
Other embodiments and advantages of the invention are set forth in part in the description, which follows, and in part, may be obvious from this description, or may be learned from the practice of the invention.
As embodied and broadly described herein, the present invention is directed to systems and methods for treating organic material. More specifically, the present invention relates to systems and methods for treating sludge and converting sludge into fertilizer.
As depicted in
As depicted in
Amounts of acid and base used in the exothermic process can be determined by one of skill in the art. However, for guidance in the neutralization of ammonia, approximately one mole of sulfuric acid, or two moles of phosphoric compounds expressed as phosphoric acid, is used for each two moles of ammonia. Concerning the concentration of phosphoric acid, typical molar ratios of N:P in the pipe-cross reactor are between 0.4:1 to 0.7:1, preferably 0.55 to 0.65:1, concerning the concentration of sulfuric acid, typical molar ratios of N:S in the pipe cross reactor are between 0.5:1 and 0.8:1 preferably 0:65:1 to 0.72:1. The molar amount of nitrogen should take into consideration not only the amount of ammonia being added but the typical amount of ammoniacal nitrogen contained in the particular organic waste material.
Other acids which may be used with the invention comprise nitric acid, acetic acid, citric acid and mixtures thereof, all of which are well know to those skilled in the art (e.g, nitric acid and an ammonia compound which might form ammonium nitrate in the presence of organic materials which is explosive). Whatever the acid or acids chosen, the strength of one of the acids used in the process will preferably be equivalent to 90% sulfuric acid (e.g. 93 to 100 percent sulfuric acid).
As depicted in
A typical pipe-cross reactor for use with the invention has a diameter of about three to ten inches, is from about seven to about fifty feet long, and terminates in, for example, a two to eight inch discharge pipe (or a slot of equivalent cross-sectional area), preferably with a stainless steel insert or TEFLON™ lining. The discharge pipe preferably discharges into a standard rotating drum granulator 14, and is preferably made of a steel pipe (e.g. HASTELLOY C-276 or 316L stainless steel (with HASTELLOY C or B for the reaction tube)). A TEFLON™, ceramic, or other corrosion-resistant lining may also be used in the pipe-cross reactor. The temperature is preferably maintained below 204° C. (400° F.).
The orifice plate 33, as shown in
The optimum placement of the protuberance(s) in many embodiments is between 0.1 to 3 flow stream diameters upstream of the average position of the cross reactor outlets (i.e. mean of the cross reactor outlets, which may be staggered down the length of the flow stream). More preferably the protuberances are located between 0.3 to 1.5 diameters ahead of the cross pipe reactors. Optimum placement will vary depending on the flow rate. For a very high flow rate the protuberance(s) should be set further away or the degree of protuberance into the flow path should be limited. This embodiment may be carried out by an adjustable annular ring or adjustable bumps that provide the ability to control the distance away and the degree of flow path entry of the protuberance. An annular ring may be adjusted for opening size and may be mounted at alternative locations, for example. Multiple sonic vibrators, if used may be placed at different locations and individually switched to accommodate slower (vibrate closer to the cross pipes) or faster (further away location) flow rate and/or lowered viscosity.
Adjustment of the cross pipe reactor itself may be optimized for a given viscosity and flow rate. In many embodiments the cross reactor pipes advantageously are exactly opposite each other, as shown in
Yet another embodiment provides an automatic system that constantly monitors temperature of mixed material at some point downstream of the cross pipe reactor and adjusts protuberance positioning, flow rate of sludge, flow rate of base, flow rate of added water, flow rate of one or more acids, and switching of cross reactor outlets for optimum effect. In a desirable embodiment flow rate of base, and/or dilution water and/or an acid and/or a second acid and/or sludge is adjusted up or down to obtain a higher temperature. In another embodiment a switch selects between two or more cross pipes to obtain a more desirable temperature. In yet another embodiment some of the released heat is transferred in a controllable way back to an input stream to obtain a more desirable viscosity for adequate mixing. A control system may adjust heat transfer up or down depending on the heat recovered, or depending on another monitored variable, such as back pressure to the sludge pump(s) or back pressure measured at a pipe-cross reactor gauge.
Without wishing to be bound by any one theory of this embodiment of the invention, a protuberance such as an orifice plate or other mechanism or device allows greater mixing of the slurry by inducing a zone of turbulence downstream of the orifice plate 33 and generally in the vicinity of the first and second cross pipes 26 and 28. The increased turbulence generated in many cases increases heat production as measured as a higher melt temperature. The temperature also can be measured at or downstream of the last cross pipe addition of reagent, such as for example, 1 or 2 pipe diameters further downstream of the last cross pipe. It has been observed that use of an orifice plate has effected an increase of heat recovery, as much as approximately 30%, over similar pipe-cross reactors lacking an orifice plate. An orifice plate 33 may be changed for another orifice plate exhibiting a different diameter orifice 35 if desired.
A hot melt discharges from the pipe-cross reactor 12 into the granulator 14, while water flashes from the reactor product as it issues into the granulator 14. Steam is generated by the exothermic reaction conducted within the pipe-cross reactor 12.
A preferred granulator (e.g. an ammoniator-granulator), depicted in
In the depicted process, the granulator 14 includes an ammonia sparger 20 operably positioned within the granulator 14 for the addition of ammonia to the melt to complete the reaction of acid and base for the final product. The melt is rolled onto recycled fine particles within the granulator 14 to form granulated particles, thus causing the granulated particles to grow to a desired size. Afterwards, as depicted in
Passing such vapors directly into the dryer 16 is an alternative process as compared to that of U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,984,992 and 6,159,263. Previous processes associated with pipe-cross reactors have typically separated the granulated particles from the vapor for independent processing prior to the drying of the granulated particles. The presently depicted process eliminates the need for additional particulate separation equipment and processing of the air and ultimately results in a simpler and more efficient process.
A preferred dryer for use with the invention is a two to four meter diameter rotating drum dryer having a length of from about seventeen to about thirty three meters, and having a heating capacity of 30 to 70 million BTU/hour, with a lump crusher at the discharge end.
The process further includes passing the dried granulated particles to a granule separation apparatus, such as a screen 18, and separating the dried granulated material into fines, product and oversized material. Oversized material is reduced in size to be incorporated, as a fine, back into the process. The fines are returned to the granulator 14 (along with potash or any micronutrients required for the desired final product analysis) for incorporation into the process.
During the process, fumes, which may contain ammonia, particulates, and water vapor above its dew point, are collected from the dryer 16 and passed through particulate separating equipment, such as a dust cyclone 34. The dust cyclone 34 removes a portion of the particulates from the air and recycles these particulates (e.g. dust) with the fines and ground material. The resultant fumes leave the dust cyclone 34 and are processed through additional particulate separating equipment, such as a baghouse filter 36. The baghouse filter serves to remove an additional amount of particulates, particularly particulates which exhibit a smaller size than those removed by the dust cyclone 34. Particulates removed from the baghouse filter 36 are similarly recycled with the fines and ground material for use in the granulator 14.
The fumes leaving the baghouse filter 36 are subsequently processed through a scrubber 38, such as a venturi scrubber or packed bed scrubber, which includes water separation chambers for collecting ammonia fumes and small dust particles. The invention uses low pH water in the scrubber 38 to collect unreacted ammonia vapors escaping the granulator 14. In one embodiment, small amounts of sulfuric or phosphoric acid are added to the scrubber 38 to maintain a low pH (e.g. 2 to 3) for proper ammonia vapor scrubbing.
The process further includes oxidizing the air exiting the scrubber, such as in a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) 40. The RTO 40 is used to destroy volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and other gaseous hydrocarbon pollutants that would otherwise be released into the atmosphere. The RTO 40 destroys such VOCs and hydrocarbon fumes through a process of high temperature thermal oxidation, converting the VOCs and fumes to carbon dioxide and water vapor. The oxidation of the air further serves to substantially eliminate any noxious odors that would otherwise be exhausted into the atmosphere. Energy released from the oxidation process can be recycled to reduce operating costs.
Air is drawn from the RTO 40 and exhausted into the atmosphere through a stack 42. The process may advantageously include using heat from the exhaust in the stack 42 to preheat the base (e.g. ammonia) prior to its introduction into the pipe-cross reactor 12 and/or the granulator 14 via the sparger 20.
Another aspect of the ventilation for the depicted process includes collecting air from the screens 18. The process contemplates two options, both of which involve particulate removal and recycling of both particulates and air. The first option includes processing the air through a dust cyclone 34 and recycling both the particulates and the air back to the granulator 14. The second option includes utilizing the dust cyclone 34, but further includes processing the air through a baghouse filter 36, again collecting the particulates for recycling in the granulator. The air leaving the baghouse filter 36 is advanced to the dryer 16 instead of the granulator 14.
Other aspects of a ventilation system for use with the invention preferably include fans for moving the air to and from the various processing stages described above herein. Volume of air moved is determined by the amount of moisture to be removed (above dew point) and the melting point or disassociation temperature of the fertilizer product.
NPK fertilizers preferably include the micronutrients iron and zinc. In a preferred embodiment, spent acid from a hot dip galvanizing or steel pickling process is used to maintain the low pH of the scrubber water. These spent acids commonly are sulfuric acid of five to ten percent strength, containing three to eight percent iron. Galvanizing spent acid contains three to eight percent zinc along with iron. The iron and zinc are fed with the ammonia-laden scrubber water from scrubbing to the sludge slurry tank and on to the pipe-cross reactor for incorporation as iron and zinc micronutrients in the final NPK fertilizer. In the case of spent sulfuric acid, the sulfur also becomes a nutrient in the resulting fertilizer, since it reacts in the pipe-cross reactor to form ammonium sulfate.
Other micronutrients or additional ingredients may be incorporated into the resulting fertilizer by adding them with a weigh feeder as a dry solid to the fines recycle stream. Micronutrients or additional ingredients preferably include lime, dolomite, calcite, hydrobiotite, gypsum, phosphates (e.g. rock phosphate or ammonium phosphate), potash, urea, soil clays, calcium peroxide, ammonium nitrate, vermiculite, humic acid, and trace minerals such as iron, manganese, magnesium, boron, copper, and zinc, and combinations thereof.
Although the invention has been most particularly described for the processing of municipal sewage sludge, the inventive process may also be used to enhance the plant nutrient value of other relatively low analysis organic waste material such as poultry manure, food processing wastes, wastes from paper manufacturing, swine manure sludge, environmental or industrial biological materials, mixtures thereof, and the like. In such a case, the particular relatively low analysis organic waste material is substituted for the sewage sludge in the process, and the process parameters are accordingly modified.
The following examples are offered to illustrate embodiments of the present invention, but should not be viewed as limiting the scope of the invention.
In an agitation tank, 6700 kilograms/hour (7.4 tons/hour) of sewage sludge were mixed with 37 liters per minute (ten gallons/minute (gpm)) of scrubber water to form a slurry. The slurry was of such a consistency (a solids content varying between 10% and 27%) that it can be pumped with a positive displacement pump or other suitable pump to a pipe-cross reactor equipped to receive ammonia, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, sewage sludge, and water. The pipe-cross reactor had a diameter of approximately four inches and was forty feet long. The pipe-cross reactor terminated in a rotating drum granulator. The rotating drum granulator was six feet in diameter and twenty feet long.
The slurry was added to the pipe-cross reactor and reacted with 8.6 gpm 99.5% ammonia, 8.6 gpm sulfuric acid (93%), and 2.6 gpm phosphoric acid (54% P2O5). The temperature of the pipe-cross reactor (due to the exothermic reaction between the acid and the base) was maintained at about 149° C. (300° F.) with moisture in the sludge. This temperature (above minimum sterilization temperature) acts to kill Salmonella, E. coli, and other pathogens which may be found in the slurry. This temperature also acts to deodorize the material somewhat.
The resulting melt from the pipe-cross reactor is sprayed onto a recycling bed of fines, along with 2000 pounds of added potassium chloride (60% K2O) while the water contained in the melt flashed off as steam. An ammonia sparger is provided in the granulator to add small amounts of ammonia to the granulation mixture for reaction completion and final hardening of granules.
Operating the pipe-cross reactor in such a manner incorporated approximately 14.8 tons per hour of 20% solid sewage sludge at a ten ton per hour production rate.
Granulated material exits the granulator at about 93° C. (200° F.) and at about a five to fifteen percent moisture content into a rotary dryer. The rotary dryer was approximately two meters in diameter and has a length of about twenty meters. It has a heating capacity of 30 million BTU/hour and is associated with a lump crusher or lump breaker at the discharge end. The moisture in the material was reduced to less than three percent by heated forced air in the dryer.
Materials exiting the rotary dryer were run through the lump crusher to reduce oversized material to less than one inch in size.
Screens are used to separate the material into (a) fines, (b) product and (c) oversized material. Fines are returned to the granulator. Product went to a two meter diameter, twenty meter long cooler and then on to storage, while the oversized material is passed through a grinding mill and reduced to fines for recycling to the granulator. About two tons (1800 kg) of fine material per ton of product were required in the recycle stream.
Fumes from the granulator containing steam, ammonia and particulate were collected by maintaining a negative pressure inside the granulator with a fan pulling the fumes into the rotary dryer to reduce the moisture content thereof. The air was drawn from the granulator at a rate of 20,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm) at a temperature of 92° C. (198° F.) and at 100% relative humidity. This is roughly equivalent to conveying 34,200 pounds per hour (lbs/hr) of water and 296 pounds per minute (lbs/min) of dry air.
The air from the rotary dryer was directed to a dust cyclone, a baghouse filter, and then a scrubber. Air was drawn from the dryer at a rate of 70,000 cfm at 45% relative humidity. The air leaving the dryer had a dry bulb temperature of approximately 93° C. (200° F.) and a wet bulb temperature of 74° C. (165° F.). This is roughly equivalent of conveying 56,100 lbs/hr water and 2,711 lbs/min of dry air. Air entering the scrubber is scrubbed with low pH water (water at a pH lowered by the addition of spent acid from a hot dip galvanizing process). If galvanizing acid is unavailable, the pH may be controlled with phosphoric or sulfuric acid. The low pH water collects ammonia vapor present in the fumes, as well as dust particles.
Air was directed from the scrubber to a regenerative thermal oxidizer at a rate of 67,100 cfm at a temperature of 165° F. and at 100% relative humidity. Oxidized air was then drawn from the regenerative thermal oxidizer and is exhausted through a stack approximately one hundred (100) feet tall at a temperature of 93° C. (200° F.).
Dust-laden air is collected from the grinding mills and screens by a fan maintaining negative pressure on the equipment. The air is pulled through a cyclone system that removes about 97% of the dust. From the cyclones, the air was passed back to the rotary granulator and the dust added to the recycled fines.
The resulting fertilizer had an NPK value of 12-3-6 (12% nitrogen, 3% phosphate, and 6% potash). It was also homogenous and properly sized for standard application equipment.
The process of Example 1 is repeated in a tubular reactor rather than a pipe cross reactor. In an agitation tank, 6700 kilograms/hour (7.4 tons/hour) of sewage sludge are mixed with 37 liters per minute (ten gallons/minute (gpm)) of scrubber water to form a slurry. The slurry is of such a consistency that it can be pumped with a positive displacement pump or other suitable pump to a tubular reactor equipped to receive ammonia, sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, sewage sludge, and water. The tubular reactor preferably has a diameter of approximately 1.5 to 30 cm and a length of 2 to 10 meters, preferably 5 to 8 meters. The reactor terminates in a rotating drum granulator. The rotating drum granulator is six feet in diameter and twenty feet long.
The slurry is added to the reactor and reacted with 8.6 gpm 99.5% ammonia, and an acid solution containing 8.6 gpm sulfuric acid (93%) and 2.6 gpm phosphoric acid (54% P2O5). The temperature of the reactor (due to the exothermic reaction between the acid solution and the base) is maintained at about 149° C. (300° F.) with moisture in the sludge.
The resulting melt from the reactor is sprayed onto a recycling bed of fines, along with 2000 pounds of added potassium chloride (60% K2O) while the water contained in the melt flashes off as steam. An ammonia sparger is provided in the granulator to add small amounts of ammonia to the granulation mixture for reaction completion and final hardening of the granules.
Granulated material exits the granulator at about with a moisture content into a rotary dryer. The rotary dryer is approximately two meters in diameter and has a length of about twenty meters. It has a heating capacity of 30 million BTU/hour and is associated with a lump crusher or lump breaker at the discharge end. The moisture in the material is reduced to less than three percent by heated forced air in the dryer.
Materials exiting the rotary dryer are run through the lump crusher to reduce oversized material to less than one inch in size.
Screens are used to separate the material into (a) fines, (b) product and (c) oversized material. Fines are returned to the granulator. Product goes to a two meter diameter, twenty meter long cooler and then on to storage, while the oversized material is passed through a grinding mill and reduced to fines for recycling to the granulator. About two tons (1800 kg) of fine material per ton of product are required in the recycle stream.
Fumes from the granulator containing steam, ammonia and particulate are collected by maintaining a negative pressure inside the granulator with a fan pulling the fumes into the rotary dryer to reduce the moisture content thereof. Air is drawn from the granulator at a rate of 20,000 cubic feet per minute (cfm) at a temperature of 92° C. (198° F.) and at 100% relative humidity. This is roughly equivalent of conveying 34,200 pounds per hour (lbs/hr) of water and 296 pounds per minute (lbs/min) of dry air.
The air from the rotary dryer is conveyed to a dust cyclone, a baghouse filter, and then a scrubber. Air is drawn from the dryer at a rate of 70,000 cfm at 45% relative humidity. The air leaving the dryer has a dry bulb temperature of 93° C. (200° F.) and a wet bulb temperature of 74° C. (165° F.). This is roughly equivalent of conveying 56,100 lbs/hr water and 2,711 lbs/min of dry air. Air entering the scrubber is scrubbed with low pH water. The low pH water collects ammonia vapor present in the fumes, as well as dust particles.
Air is conveyed from the scrubber to a regenerative thermal oxidizer at a rate of 67,100 cfm at a temperature of (165° F.) and at 100% relative humidity. Oxidized air is then drawn from the regenerative thermal oxidizer and is exhausted through a stack approximately one hundred feet tall at a temperature of 93° C. (200° F.).
Dust-laden air is collected from the grinding mills and screens by a fan maintaining negative pressure on the equipment. The air is pulled through a cyclone system that removes about 97% of the dust. From the cyclones, the air is passed back to the rotary granulator and the dust is added to the recycled fines. The resulting fertilizer is determined to have an NPK value.
Sludge 620 passes through the grating into the bottom of the hopper 622. At the bottom of hopper 622, horizontal double helix screws 624 are used. The double helix screws initiate the transport of the sludge 620 from the hopper 622 to the transfer pumps 626. The number, size and arrangement of the screws are dictated by the geometry of the hopper 622. In one embodiment, four screws are used in an alternating manner to control the feed rate of the sludge 620. A variety of screws can be used. The screws are preferably driven by direct drive gear motors operated at a speed sufficient to provide the required quantity of sludge 620 for the process. The delivery rate of sludge 20 can be further controlled by sequencing the operation of the screws and controlling the operating versus non-operating time for each.
The screws in the bottom of the hopper 620 discharge into a horizontal, perpendicular collection screw 624 at one end of the hopper. The collection screw 24 is used to collect the sludge 620 from the transport screws and transfer it to one of two sludge pumps 626. This screw 624 can be of similar construction and motor arrangement as the transport screws. The collection screw 624 is preferably sized to provide the maximum required sludge delivery rate. The collection screw 624 is preferably designed to operate in either direction to provide movement of the sludge to different pump suction locations. Ports are installed in the bottom of the screw housing to direct the sludge to the currently operating sludge pump 626.
Vertical piping (24″) is preferably installed from the collection screw 24 housing to the suction of the sludge pumps 626. Preferably, a rotary lump breaker 628 is installed in this piping. The lump breaker 628 is a rotary blade and grating system operated at a speed suitable to facilitate the flow of the semi-solid sludge 620 to the pumps 626. The lump breaker has two primary functions: 1) to break any large lumps in the sludge 620 into smaller, more manageable pieces and 2) to capture any small tramp materials before they can reach the pumps 626. The lump breaker 628 has the added benefit of imparting shear force to the sludge 620 to begin the breakdown of polymeric binders in the sludge cake.
Water 630 is preferably injected into the sludge flow 620 prior to the lump breaker. This water 630 aids in the liquefaction of the sludge 620 and is controlled so as to provide the final sludge concentration desired. Preferably water 630 includes recycle water the process venturi scrubber having a pH of about 2.5 to 4.0. The water 630 is preferably added at a rate equal to at least 10% of the desired reactor flow, more preferably at least 15%, and most preferably at least 20%. In one embodiment the flow rate is approximately 22.9% of the desired reactor flow.
In another embodiment, preferably, ferrous oxide 632 and sulfuric acid 634 is also added to the water stream 630 in the process sump 636. Such additions minimize the amount of water that needs to be added to the sludge such that the slurry that is created will not clog or block the pipe-cross or tubular reactor. In one embodiment, process sump 636 is a stainless steel lined concrete tank with dimensions of approximately 11′×11′×11′. In the sump 636, the sulfuric acid 634 reacts with the ferrous oxide 632 to produce ferrous sulfate such that the mixture has a resultant pH of approximately 2.0 to 2.5 prior to its being added to the biosolids. Alternatively, ferric oxide is used and reacts with the sulfuric acid to produce ferric sulfate such that the mixture has a resultant pH of approximately 2.0 to 2.5 prior to its being added to the biosolids. The mixture in the sump is agitated with a vertical agitator 638.
The sheared sludge discharges from the lump breaker 628 into the suction of the sludge transfer pump 42. The sludge pumps 40 discharge into an 8″ stainless steel header that flows to a high speed mix tank 42. Prior to reaching the mix tank 644, sulfuric acid 646 is injected into the flow stream to control the pH of the final sludge mix at a range of 3.0 to 3.5. The sulfuric addition rate is approximately 1.75% of the total reactor feed rate.
The sludge/acid mix flows into the bottom of the shear mix tank 642. In one embodiment, tank shear mix tank 642 is an 890 gallon vertical cylindrical tank with a high speed, high shear rotary agitator 648 sufficient to produce significant shear of the acidified biosolids mixture.
In one embodiment, the slurry holding tank is a tank with a volume of 14,800 gallons and is of stainless steel construction. It contains a vertical agitator 650 with two sets of blades. The holding tank 650 is designed to provide approximately 2 hours of storage for the slurry feed, at maximum feed rates. It is operated to maintain a pH of 3.0 to 4.0 with a solids content of between 15 percent and 28 percent solids and preferably at 20 percent to 23 percent.
Reactor feed is drawn continuously from the bottom of the holding tank 50 into the suction of the slurry feed pump 652. The sludge feed rate to the reactor is controlled by adjusting the slurry feed pump 652 motor speed.
In one embodiment the iron (ferric) oxide is added as a powder to a mixing tank containing water and sulfuric acid. The water and sulfuric acid can include of the blowdown water from the air emission scrubbing system which contains water, sulfuric acid and ammonium sulfate. The addition of the sulfuric acid in this mixing tank converts the iron oxide to an iron (ferric) sulfate. This mixture of iron sulfate in water and ammonium sulfate is then added to the biosolids slurry to facilitate product hardness and odor.
In addition to iron, other metallic salts, for example zinc oxide, can be added to the slurry prior to reaction to achieve similar benefits as described herein.
It has been surprisingly discovered that by adding a metal salt such as iron sulfate or zinc sulfate or magnesium sulfate, into the sludge, a significant improvement to the sludge to fertilizer process can be produced. Preferably, enough metal salt, such as ferrous salt or ferric salt, is added to the sludge to produce a fertilizer product with 0.1 wt % to 10 wt % metal salt, such as iron sulfate. More preferably, the finished fertilizer product has between 0.5 wt % and 5 wt % metal salt, such as iron sulfate. Most preferably, 1 wt % to 3 wt % metal salt such as ferrous or ferric sulfate. The addition of iron makes it easier to control the process and provides a variety of other improvements to the process. These improvements include:
Other embodiments and uses of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. All references cited herein, including all U.S. and foreign patents and patent applications, including U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/473,198 and the corresponding non-provisional application being filed contemporaneously herewith and U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 08/852,663, 09/735,768 and 09/416,370, are specifically and entirely incorporated herein by reference. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered exemplary only.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2074082 *||Feb 9, 1935||Mar 16, 1937||Domogalla Bernhard P||Sewage treating process|
|US3877920 *||Jan 31, 1973||Apr 15, 1975||George Carlberg||Method of reclaiming wastes and products therefrom|
|US3961078 *||Mar 21, 1975||Jun 1, 1976||Stitt Paul A||Soluble waste conversion process and pasteurized proteinaceous products|
|US4110212 *||Apr 21, 1977||Aug 29, 1978||David Krofchak||Method of treating a waste liquid containing polluting compounds|
|US5217625 *||Oct 2, 1992||Jun 8, 1993||Texaco Inc.||Process for disposing of sewage sludge|
|US5916448 *||Aug 22, 1997||Jun 29, 1999||Hazen & Sawyer P.C.||Chemical conditioning of liquid and semi-liquid sludge for dewatering, odor control, pathogen control, nutrient enhancement of the residual, and handling characteristics|
|US6159263 *||Oct 12, 1999||Dec 12, 2000||Unity, Inc.||Sewage sludge recycling with a pipe cross-reactor|
|US6406510 *||Nov 17, 2000||Jun 18, 2002||Unified Environmental Services Group, Llc||Methods for treating wastewater sludge|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7128880 *||Dec 19, 2002||Oct 31, 2006||Environmental Technologies Capital Partners Llc||Organic recycling with a pipe-cross or tubular reactor|
|US7513927||Dec 19, 2003||Apr 7, 2009||Vitag, Llc||Methods of controlling chemical self-heating of organic-containing materials|
|US7662205||Mar 9, 2006||Feb 16, 2010||Vitag Corporation||Processes to beneficiate heat-dried biosolid pellets|
|US7662206||Sep 15, 2006||Feb 16, 2010||Vitag Corporation||Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process|
|US7776124||Oct 29, 2007||Aug 17, 2010||Archer-Daniels-Midland Company||Fertilizer compositions and methods of using|
|US7811352||Oct 13, 2006||Oct 12, 2010||Archer-Daniels-Midland Company||Fertilizer compositions and methods of using|
|US7947104||Feb 19, 2008||May 24, 2011||Vitag Corp.||Process for treating sludge and manufacturing bioorganically-augmented high nitrogen-containing inorganic fertilizer|
|US7947105||Feb 15, 2010||May 24, 2011||Vitag Corp.||Organic fertilizer made by alkaline conversion process|
|US8105413||Feb 23, 2006||Jan 31, 2012||Vitag Corporation||Manufacturing of bioorganic-augmented high nitrogen-containing inorganic fertilizer|
|US8192519||Feb 15, 2010||Jun 5, 2012||Vitag Corporation||Beneficiated, heat-dried biosolid pellets|
|US8202342||May 9, 2011||Jun 19, 2012||Vitag Corporation||Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process|
|US8470065||Jan 13, 2012||Jun 25, 2013||Vitag Corporation||Manufacturing of bioorganic-augmented high nitrogen-containing inorganic fertilizer|
|US8491693||May 16, 2012||Jul 23, 2013||Vitag Corporation||Process to beneficiate heat-dried biosolid pellets|
|US8545777 *||Aug 13, 2012||Oct 1, 2013||Abdullah A. Al-Yateem||Method of making an acid-absorbing biosolid composition|
|US8557013||Dec 30, 2010||Oct 15, 2013||Vitag Holdings, Llc||Bioorganically-augmented high value fertilizer|
|US8597394||May 16, 2012||Dec 3, 2013||Vitag Corporation||Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process|
|US8864868||Nov 20, 2013||Oct 21, 2014||Vitag Corporation||Organic containing sludge to fertilizer alkaline conversion process|
|US8920733||Oct 9, 2013||Dec 30, 2014||Vitag Corporation||Bioorganically-augmented high value fertilizer|
|US8992654||Mar 28, 2012||Mar 31, 2015||Vitag Corporation||High value organic-enhanced inorganic fertilizers|
|US20040120867 *||Dec 19, 2002||Jun 24, 2004||Dahms Gary L.||Organic recycling with a pipe-cross or tubular reactor|
|US20060228231 *||Feb 22, 2006||Oct 12, 2006||Winzeler Dennis D||Method and apparatus for extracting contaminants from soil and from animal manure|
|US20060254331 *||Mar 9, 2006||Nov 16, 2006||Burnham Jeffrey C||Processes to beneficiate heat-dried biosolid pellets|
|CN102060335A *||Oct 29, 2010||May 18, 2011||华南理工大学||Method for preparing ammonium ferrous sulfate from waste ferrous slag in sulfuric acid process titanium dioxide industry|
|WO2006038002A1 *||Oct 5, 2005||Apr 13, 2006||Geoffrey Michael Whiteley||Stabilisation of iron-impregnated biomass in storage|
|WO2006100483A2 *||Mar 22, 2006||Sep 28, 2006||Geoffrey Michael Whiteley||Stabilisation of iron-impregnated biomass in storage|
|International Classification||C05C3/00, C05F1/00|
|Nov 8, 2004||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: UNIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES GROUP LLC, NEW JERS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BURNHAM, JEFFREY C.;DAHMS, GARY L.;REEL/FRAME:015977/0671;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040820 TO 20041025
|Sep 9, 2005||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC,
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BAKST, MICHAEL R., CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR UNIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES GROUP, LLC;REEL/FRAME:016968/0580
Effective date: 20050823