Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20050049708 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/967,042
Publication dateMar 3, 2005
Filing dateOct 15, 2004
Priority dateApr 4, 2000
Also published asUS6402750, US6835205, US20020095154, US20060084994, US20070225814, US20080255616, US20090112267
Publication number10967042, 967042, US 2005/0049708 A1, US 2005/049708 A1, US 20050049708 A1, US 20050049708A1, US 2005049708 A1, US 2005049708A1, US-A1-20050049708, US-A1-2005049708, US2005/0049708A1, US2005/049708A1, US20050049708 A1, US20050049708A1, US2005049708 A1, US2005049708A1
InventorsRobert Atkinson, Peter Keith
Original AssigneeAtkinson Robert E., Keith Peter T.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders
US 20050049708 A1
Abstract
Devices and methods for treating a damaged intervertebral disc to reduce or eliminate associated back pain. Dynamic bias devices and reinforcement devices are disclosed, which may be used individually or in combination, to eliminate nerve impingement associated with the damaged disc, and/or to reinforce the damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae adjacent the damaged disc.
Images(25)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
1. A method of treating pain associated an intervertebral disc disposed between a first vertebra and a second vertebra in an adult human spine having a median plane and an axis of curvature, the method comprising the steps of:
identifying the intervertebral disc causing pain;
providing one or more implantable devices, each having a first vertebral attachment member, a second vertebral attachment member, and a bias force member applying a bias force therebetween while permitting near normal relative motion therebetween;
attaching the first attachment member of each implantable device to the first vertebra; and
attaching the second attachment member of each implantable device to the second vertebra such that the bias force members exert a net bias force balanced about the median plane to increase separation of the first and second vertebrae.
2. A method as in claim 1, wherein the first and second vertebrae have spinous processes, and wherein the implantable device is disposed posterior of the spinous processes.
3. A method as in claim 1, wherein the first and second vertebrae have spinous processes, and wherein the implantable devices are disposed lateral of the spinous processes.
4. A method as in claim 1, wherein the bias force member of each implantable device is pre-loaded with a compression load prior to the step of attaching the second attachment member.
5. A method as in claim 1, wherein the first and second vertebrae are partially separated prior to the step of attaching the second attachment member.
6. A method as in claim 1, wherein the intervertebral disc has a protrusion, further comprising the step of cutting away at least a portion of the protrusion.
7. A method as in claim 1, wherein the intervertebral disc has an annulus, further comprising the steps of:
providing an implantable reinforcement member; and
implanting the reinforcement member into the annulus of the intervertebral disc.
8. An implantable system for treating an intervertebral disc disposed between a first vertebra and a second vertebra in an adult human spine having a median plane and an axis of curvature, the system comprising:
a first vertebral attachment member;
a second vertebral attachment member; and
a bias member applying a net bias force between the first vertebral attachment member and the second vertebra attachment member, wherein the bias member permits near normal relative motion between the first and second vertebrae, and the net bias force is substantially symmetric about the median plane.
9. An implantable system as in claim 8, wherein the bias member has a substantially linear displacement.
10. An implantable system as in claim 9, wherein the displacement is substantially parallel to the axis of curvature of the first and second vertebrae.
11. An implantable system as in claim 8, wherein the bias member has a range of displacement and the bias member applies substantially no force over a portion of the range of displacement.
12. An implantable system as in claim 8, wherein the bias member has a range of displacement greater than 1.0 cm.
13. An implantable system as in claim 8, wherein the bias member includes a spring.
14. An implantable system as in claim 8, further including a bushing to isolate movement of the attachment members from the vertebrae.
15. A method of reinforcing an annulus of an intervertebral disc disposed between a first vertebra and a second vertebra in an adult human spine, the method comprising the steps of:
providing an implantable reinforcement member; and
implanting the reinforcement member into the annulus of the intervertebral disc.
16. A method as in claim 15, further comprising the step of partially separating the adjacent vertebrae prior to the step of implantation.
17. A method as in claim 15, wherein a plurality of implantable reinforcement members are provided, and wherein the plurality of reinforcement members are implanted substantially parallel in the annulus.
18. A method as in claim 15, wherein the reinforcement member is expandable, further comprising the step of expanding the reinforcement member.
19. A method as in claim 15, further comprising the steps of:
providing a tubular member having a curved tip and a lumen extending therethrough;
inserting the tip of the tubular member into the annulus; and
inserting the reinforcement member through the lumen of the tubular member and into the annulus.
20. A method as in claim 15, further comprising the steps of:
providing one or more implantable bias devices, each having a first vertebral attachment member, a second vertebral attachment member, and a bias force member applying a bias force therebetween while permitting near normal relative motion therebetween;
attaching the first attachment member of each implantable bias device to the first vertebra; and
attaching the second attachment member of each implantable bias device to the second vertebra.
Description
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The present invention generally relates to spinal implants. Specifically, the present invention relates to implantable devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders associated with the intervertebral disc.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    Back pain is one of the most common and often debilitating conditions affecting millions of people in all walks of life. Today, it is estimated that over ten million people in the United States alone suffer from persistent back pain. Approximately half of those suffering from persistent back pain are afflicted with chronic disabling pain, which seriously compromises a person's quality of life and is the second most common cause of worker absenteeism. Further, the cost of treating chronic back pain is very high, even though the majority of sufferers do not receive treatment due to health risks, limited treatment options and inadequate therapeutic results. Thus, chronic back pain has a significantly adverse effect on a person's quality of life, on industrial productivity, and on heath care expenditures.
  • [0003]
    Some forms of back pain are not chronic and may be simply treated by rest, posture adjustments and painkillers. For example, some forms of lower back pain (LBP) are very common and may be caused by unusual exertion or injury. Unusual exertion such has heavy lifting or strenuous exercise may result in back strain such as a pulled muscle, sprained muscle, sprained ligament, muscle spasm, or a combination thereof. An injury caused by falling down or a blow to the back may cause bruising. These forms of back pain are typically non-chronic and may be self-treated and cured in a few days or weeks.
  • [0004]
    Other types of non-chronic back pain may be treated by improvements in physical condition, posture and/or work conditions. For example, being pregnant, obese or otherwise significantly overweight may cause LBP. A mattress that does not provide adequate support may cause back pain in the morning. Working in an environment lacking good ergonomic design may also cause back pain. In these instances, the back pain may be cured by eliminating the culprit cause. Whether it is excess body weight, a bad mattress, or a bad office chair, these forms of back pain are readily treated.
  • [0005]
    However, some forms of back pain are chronic and are the result of spinal disorders which are not readily treated. Such spinal disorders may cause severe back pain, the origin of which may or may not be certain. A prevalent clinical theory is that pain arises from physical impingement of the nerve roots or the spinal cord. Such nerve impingement may have of a number of different causes, but generally results from either a disc protrusion or from narrowing of the intervertebral foramina which surround the nerve roots. Another clinical theory is that damage to the disc, either from injury, degradation or otherwise, causes physical impingement of the disc nerves, which are primarily disposed about the periphery of the annulus, but may grow into fissures of a damaged disc.
  • [0006]
    Disc protrusions may be caused by a physical injury to the disc or by natural degradation of the disc such as by degenerative disc disease (DDD). Physical injury may cause damage to the annulus fibrosus which allows a portion of the disc, such as the nucleus pulposus, to protrude from the normal disc space. DDD may cause the entire disc to degenerate to such a degree that the annulus fibrosus bulges outward, delaminates or otherwise separates such that a portion of the disc protrudes from the normal disc space. In either case, the disc protrusion may impinge on a spinal nerve root causing severe pain. Impingement on the nerve root may also be caused by conditions unrelated to the disc such as by a spinal tumor or spinal stenosis (abnormal bone growth), but disc protrusions are the most common cause. Depending on the cause and nature of the disc protrusion, the condition may be referred to as a disc stenosis, a disc bulge, a herniated disc, a slipped disc, a prolapsed disc or, if the protrusion separates from the disc, a sequestered disc.
  • [0007]
    Nerve root impingement most often occurs in the lumbar region of the spinal column since the lumbar discs bear significant vertical loads relative to discs in other regions of the spine. In addition, disc protrusions in the lumbar region typically occur posteriorly because the annulus fibrosus is thinner on the posterior side than on the anterior side and because normal posture places more compression on the posterior side. Posterior protrusions are particularly problematic since the nerve roots are posteriorly positioned relative to the intervertebral discs. When a posterior disc protrusion presses against a nerve root, the pain is often severe and radiating, and may be aggravated by such subtle movements as coughing, bending over, or remaining in a sitting position for an extended period of time.
  • [0008]
    A common treatment for disc protrusion is discectomy, which is a procedure wherein the protruding portion of the disc is surgically removed. However, discectomy procedures have an inherent risk since the portion of the disc to be removed is immediately adjacent the nerve root and any damage to the nerve root is clearly undesirable. Furthermore, discectomy procedures are not always successful long term because scar tissue may form and/or additional disc material may subsequently protrude from the disc space as the disc deteriorates further. The recurrence of a disc protrusion may necessitate a repeat discectomy procedure, along with its inherent clinical risks and less than perfect long term success rate. Thus, a discectomy procedure, at least as a stand-alone procedure, is clearly not an optimal solution.
  • [0009]
    Discectomy is also not a viable solution for DDD when no disc protrusion is involved. As mentioned above, DDD causes the entire disc to degenerate, narrowing of the intervertebral space, and shifting of the load to the facet joints. If the facet joints carry a substantial load, the joints may degrade over time and be a different cause of back pain. Furthermore, the narrowed disc space can result in the intervertebral foramina surrounding the nerve roots to directly impinge on one or more nerve roots. Such nerve impingement is very painful and cannot be corrected by a discectomy procedure.
  • [0010]
    As a result, spinal fusion, particularly with the assistance of interbody fusion cages, has become a preferred secondary procedure, and in some instances, a preferred primary procedure. Spinal fusion involves permanently fusing or fixing adjacent vertebrae. Hardware in the form of bars, plates, screws and cages may be utilized in combination with bone graft material to fuse adjacent vertebrae. Spinal fusion may be performed as a stand-alone procedure or may be performed in combination with a discectomy procedure. By placing the adjacent vertebrae in their nominal position and fixing them in place, relative movement therebetween may be significantly reduced and the disc space may be restored to its normal condition. Thus, theoretically, aggravation caused by relative movement between adjacent vertebrae (and thus impingement on the nerve root by a disc protrusion and/or impingement from bone may be reduced if not eliminated.
  • [0011]
    However, the success rate of spinal fusion procedures is certainly less than perfect for a number of different reasons, none of which are well understood. In addition, even if spinal fusion procedures are initially successful, they may cause accelerated degeneration of adjacent discs since the adjacent discs must accommodate a greater degree of motion. The degeneration of adjacent discs simply leads to the same problem at a different anatomical location, which is clearly not an optimal solution. Furthermore, spinal fusion procedures are invasive to the disc, risk nerve damage and, depending on the procedural approach, either technically complicated (endoscopic anterior approach), invasive to the bowel (surgical anterior approach), or invasive to the musculature of the back (surgical posterior approach).
  • [0012]
    Another procedure that has been less than clinically successful is total disc replacement with a prosthetic disc. This procedure is also very invasive to the disc and, depending on the procedural approach, either invasive to the bowel (surgical anterior approach) or invasive to the musculature of the back (surgical posterior approach). In addition, the procedure may actually complicate matters by creating instability in the spine, and the long term mechanical reliability of prosthetic discs has yet to be demonstrated.
  • [0013]
    Many other medical procedures have been proposed to solve the problems associated with disc protrusions. However, many of the proposed procedures have not been clinically proven and some of the allegedly beneficial procedures have controversial clinical data. From the foregoing, it should be apparent that there is a substantial need for improvements in the treatment of spinal disorders, particularly in the treatment of nerve impingement as the result of damage to the disc, whether by injury, degradation, or the like.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0014]
    The present invention addresses this need by providing improved devices and methods for the treatment of spinal disorders. As used herein, the term spinal disorder generally refers to a degradation in spinal condition as the result of injury, aging or the like, as opposed to a spinal deformity resulting from growth defects. The improved devices and methods of the present invention specifically address nerve impingement as the result of damage to the disc, particularly in the lumbar region, but may have other significant applications not specifically mentioned herein. For purposes of illustration only, and without limitation, the present invention is discussed in detail with reference to the treatment of damaged discs in the lumbar region of the adult human spinal column.
  • [0015]
    As will become apparent from the following description, the improved devices and methods of the present invention reduce if not eliminate back pain while maintaining near normal anatomical motion. Specifically, the present invention provides dynamic bias devices and reinforcement devices, which may be used individually or in combination, to eliminate nerve impingement associated with a damaged disc, and/or to reinforce a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae adjacent the damaged disc. The devices of the present invention are particularly well suited for minimally invasive methods of implantation.
  • [0016]
    The dynamic bias devices of the present invention basically apply a bias force to adjacent vertebrae on either side of a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae. By applying a bias force, disc height may be restored, thereby reducing nerve impingement. Specifically, by restoring disc height, the dynamic bias devices of the present invention: retract disc protrusions into the normal disc space thereby reducing nerve impingement by the protrusions; reduce the load carried by the facet joints thereby eliminating nerve impingement originating at the joint; restore intervertebral spacing thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the intervertebral foramina; and reduce pressure on portions of the annulus thereby alleviating nerve impingement in disc fissures.
  • [0017]
    The reinforcement devices of the present invention basically reinforce a damaged disc, restore disc height and/or bear some or all of the load normally carried by a healthy disc, thereby reducing nerve impingement. Some embodiments of the reinforcement members of the present invention have a relatively small profile when implanted, but are very rigid, and thus serve to reinforce the disc, particularly the annulus. By reinforcing the disc, and particularly the annulus, disc protrusions may reduced or prevented, thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the protrusions. Other embodiments have a relatively large profile when implanted, and thus serve to increase disc height and/or to bear load. By increasing disc height, the advantages discussed previously may be obtained. By bearing some of the load normally carried by a healthy disc, the load may be redistributed as needed, such as when a dynamic bias device is used.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0018]
    FIGS. 1A and 1B illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of a portion of the adult human vertebral (spinal) column;
  • [0019]
    FIG. 2A illustrates a left lateral view of an intervertebral disc disposed between adjacent vertebrae, wherein the disc is partially protruding from the normal disc space and the disc height is reduced;
  • [0020]
    FIG. 2B illustrates a left lateral view of an intervertebral disc disposed between adjacent vertebrae as in FIG. 2A, wherein dynamic bias devices and reinforcement devices of the present invention, which are illustrated schematically, restore normal disc height and eliminate the disc protrusion;
  • [0021]
    FIGS. 3A-3C schematically illustrate a dynamic bias device 100 in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0022]
    FIGS. 4A-4B schematically illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of dynamic bias devices of the present invention mounted to adjacent vertebrae equidistant from the median plane;
  • [0023]
    FIGS. 5A-5B schematically illustrate left lateral and posterior views, respectively, of a dynamic bias device of the present invention mounted to adjacent vertebrae in the median plane;
  • [0024]
    FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0025]
    FIG. 6C illustrates a posterior view of the bushing shown in FIGS. 6A-6B mounted to a spinous process;
  • [0026]
    FIG. 6D illustrates a posterior view of the spinous process shown in FIG. 6C, detailing the counter-bore;
  • [0027]
    FIGS. 7A-7B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0028]
    FIGS. 8A-8B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0029]
    FIGS. 9A-9B illustrate end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0030]
    FIG. 10A illustrates a side view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a first embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0031]
    FIG. 10B illustrates a side view of the dynamic bias device shown in FIG. 10A subjected to a compression load;
  • [0032]
    FIG. 10C illustrates a cross-sectional view of the dynamic bias device shown in FIG. 10A;
  • [0033]
    FIG. 11A illustrates a cross-sectional view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0034]
    FIG. 11B illustrates a cross-sectional view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0035]
    FIGS. 12A-12B illustrate rear and side views, respectively, of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a fourth embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0036]
    FIG. 12C illustrates the dynamic bias device shown in FIGS. 12A-12B subjected to a compression load;
  • [0037]
    FIG. 13A illustrates a side view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a fifth embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0038]
    FIG. 13B illustrates a side or rear view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a sixth embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0039]
    FIG. 13C illustrates a rear view of a dynamic bias device in accordance with a seventh embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0040]
    FIGS. 14A-14D illustrate tools of the present invention for implanting the reinforcement members;
  • [0041]
    FIGS. 15A-15J illustrate steps for implanting a self-expanding reinforcement member;
  • [0042]
    FIGS. 15K-15L illustrate steps for implanting an inflatable reinforcement member;
  • [0043]
    FIGS. 15M-1SR illustrate steps for implanting reinforcement bars; AND
  • [0044]
    FIG. 16 illustrates a bias force v. displacement curve for the dynamic bias device.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0045]
    The following detailed description should be read with reference to the drawings in which similar elements in different drawings are numbered the same. The drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, depict illustrative embodiments and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
  • [0046]
    With reference to FIGS. 1A and 1B, the lower portion of an adult human vertebral column 10 is illustrated in left lateral and posterior views, respectively. The upper portion of the vertebral column 10 includes the thoracic region and the cervical region, which are not shown for purposes of simplified illustration only. The lower portion of the vertebral column 10 includes the lumbar region 12, the sacrum 14 and the coccyx 16. The sacrum 14 and the coccyx 16 are sometimes collectively referred to as the pelvic curvature.
  • [0047]
    The vertebral column 10 includes an axis of curvature 60 which generally forms a double-S shape when viewed laterally. The vertebral column 10 also includes a median plane 70 which is a sagittal plane bisecting the vertebral column 10 into symmetrical left lateral and right lateral portions. In posterior views, the median plane 70 appears as a line.
  • [0048]
    The lumbar region 12 of the vertebral column 10 includes five (5) vertebrae 20 (labeled L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5) separated by intervertebral discs 50. The sacrum 14, which includes five (5) fused vertebrae 30 (superior vertebra 30 labeled S1), is separated by a single disc 50 from the coccyx 16, which includes four (4) fused vertebrae 40. Although not labeled, the intervertebral discs 50 may be referenced by their respective adjacent vertebrae. For example, the disc 50 between the L4 and L5 lumbar vertebrae 20 may be referred to as the L4L5 disc. Similarly, the disc 50 between the L5 lumbar vertebra 20 and the S1 sacral vertebra 30 may be referred to as the L5S1 disc.
  • [0049]
    Although each vertebra 20/30/40 is a unique and irregular bone structure, the vertebrae 20 of the lumbar region 12 (in addition to the thoracic and cervical regions) have common structures. Each vertebra 20 of the lumbar region 12 generally includes a body portion 21 and a vertebral arch portion 22/23 which encloses the vertebral foramen (not visible) in which the spinal cord is disposed. The vertebral arch 22/23 includes two pedicles 22 and two laminae 23. A spinous process 24 extends posteriorly from the juncture of the two laminae 23, and two transverse processes 25 extend laterally from each lamina 23. Four articular processes 26/27 extend inferiorly 26 and superiorly 27 from the laminae 23. The inferior articular process 26 rests in the superior articular process 27 of the adjacent vertebra to form a facet joint 28.
  • [0050]
    The five (5) vertebrae 30 of the sacrum 14 are fused together to form a single rigid structure. The sacrum 14 includes a median sacral crest 31 which roughly corresponds to the spinous processes of the vertebrae 30, and two intermediate sacral crests 32 which roughly correspond to the articular processes of the vertebrae 30. The sacral laminae 33 are disposed between the median 31 and intermediate 32 sacral crests. Two lateral sacral crests 34 are disposed on either side of the sacral foraminae 35. The sacrum 14 also includes a pair of sacral wings 36 which define auricular surfaces 39. The superior (S1) sacral vertebra 30 includes two superior articular processes 37 which engage the inferior articular processes 26 of the L5 lumber vertebra 20 to form a facet joint, and the base 38 of the superior sacral vertebra S1 is joined to the L5S1 disc 50.
  • [0051]
    Each intervertebral disc 50 includes an annulus fibrosus 52 surrounding a nucleus pulposus 54, which are more clearly visible in FIG. 15A. The posterior annulus 52 is generally thinner than the anterior annulus 52, which may account for the higher incidence of posterior disc protrusions. As used herein, a disc protrusion generically refers to any portion of the disc that protrudes from the normal disc space. Common clinical conditions that may be characterized as a disc protrusion include a disc stenosis, a disc bulge, a herniated or sequestered disc, a slipped disc, and a prolapsed disc. Generally, a disc protrusion results in a decrease in disc height proportional to the volume of the protrusion. A degenerative disc may sometimes only involve the loss of disc height, and may or may not involve any significant protrusion. However, both degenerative discs and a disc protrusions usually involve some loss in disc height.
  • [0052]
    A common theory is that each intervertebral disc 50 forms one support point and the facet joints form two support points of what may be characterized as a three point support structure between adjacent vertebrae. However, in the lumbar region 12, the facet joints 28 are substantially vertical, leaving the disc 50 to carry the vast majority of the load. As between the annulus fibrosus 52 and the nucleus pulposus 54 of the disc 50, it is commonly believed that the nucleus 54 bears the majority of the load. This belief is based on the theory that the disc 50 behaves much like a balloon or tire, wherein the annulus 22 merely serves to contain the pressurized nucleus 54, and the nucleus 54 bears all the load.
  • [0053]
    However, this theory is questionable since the annulus fibrosus 52 comprises 60% of the total disc 50 cross-section, and the nucleus pulposus 54 only comprises 40% of the total disc 50 cross-section. In addition, the annulus fibrosus 52 is made of 40-60% organized collagen in the form of a laminated structure, whereas the nucleus pulposus 54 is made of 18-30% collagen in the form of a relatively homogenous gel. It seems a more plausible theory is that the annulus fibrosus 52 is the primary load bearing portion of the disc 50.
  • [0054]
    With reference to FIG. 2A, a left lateral view of an intervertebral disc 50 disposed between adjacent vertebrae 20 S (superior) and 20 I (inferior) is illustrated, wherein the disc 50 is partially protruding 56 from the normal disc space and the disc height is reduced. Although the disc 50 is shown to include a protrusion 56, the reduction in disc height may or may not be accompanied with a protrusion 56 as discussed previously. For example, if the disc 50 is degenerated, the disc height may be reduced with or without a corresponding protrusion 56.
  • [0055]
    It should be understood that the vertebrae shown in FIGS. 2A and 2B generically refer to any two adjacent vertebrae or any series of adjacent vertebrae, and that lumbar vertebrae 20 S and 20 I are specifically shown for purposes of illustration only. This generic method of illustrating vertebrae also applies to the remainder of the Figures.
  • [0056]
    With reference to FIG. 2B, a left lateral view of the intervertebral disc 50 disposed between adjacent vertebrae 20 S and 20 I is illustrated as in FIG. 2A. However, in this Figure, devices 100 and 200 of the present invention, which are illustrated schematically, eliminate the disc protrusion 56 and restore normal disc height. Specifically, one or more dynamic bias devices 100 and one or more reinforcement members 200 are utilized, either in combination or individually.
  • [0057]
    The dynamic bias device 100 restores disc height and, by conservation of disc volume, retracts the protrusion into the normal disc space thereby reducing nerve impingement by the protrusion. Restoring disc height also reduces the load carried by the facet joints thereby eliminating nerve impingement originating at the joint, restores intervertebral spacing thereby eliminating nerve impingement by the intervertebral foramina, and reduces pressure on portions of the annulus thereby alleviating nerve impingement in disc fissures.
  • [0058]
    The dynamic bias device 100 basically applies a bias force to the adjacent vertebrae 20 S and 20 I to which it is connected, but allows relative movement of the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I. The dynamic bias device 100 is conceptually similar to a spring attached to the adjacent vertebrae 20 S and 20 I. The dynamic bias device 100 applies a bias force (usually repulsive) between the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I when the disc height is normal or less than normal. The bias force is preferably set such that the disc height is normal with normal posture and loading, and increases with posterior flexure and/or added vertical load. The details of the design and use of the dynamic bias device 100 will be discussed in greater detail hereinafter, particularly with reference to FIGS. 3A-3C, 4A-4B, 5A-5B, 10A-10C, 11A-11B, 12A-12C, and 13A-13C.
  • [0059]
    Because most protrusions 56 are posterior, the dynamic bias device 100 is preferably mounted posterior to the axis of curvature 60. Locating the dynamic bias device 100 posterior to the axis of curvature 60 shifts the load carried by the disc 50 from the posterior portion of the disc to the anterior portion of the disc 50. Locating the dynamic bias device 100 posterior to the axis of curvature 60 also reduces the load carried by the facet joints. Preferably, the dynamic bias device 100 applies a substantially vertical bias force, with the direction independent of displacement.
  • [0060]
    Because more load will be shifted to the anterior portion of the disc 50 with a posterior mounted dynamic bias device 100, reinforcement members 200 may be placed in the anterior annulus 52, to effectively bolster the anterior portion of the disc. The reinforcement members 200 may be used to reinforce the disc, restore disc height and/or bear the load normally carried by annulus. The reinforcement members 200 are relatively rigid and thus serve to reinforce the disc 50 where inserted. In addition, the reinforcement members 200 may have a relatively large profile when implanted and thus increase disc height. The reinforcement members 200 are particularly beneficial if the disc 50 is degenerated, or if the disc 50 will likely become degenerated with the change in load distribution. The details of the design and use of the reinforcement members 200 will be discussed in greater detail hereinafter, particularly with reference to FIGS. 14A-14D and 15A-15R.
  • [0061]
    As mentioned previously, one or more dynamic bias devices 100 and one or more reinforcement members 200 may be utilized, either alone or in combination. Specifically: one or more dynamic bias devices 100 may be used alone; one or more spacer devices 200 may be used alone; and one or more dynamic bias devices 100 and one or more reinforcement members 200 may be used in combination. If a combination of devices 100/200 is used, it is believed that the use of one or more posterior dynamic bias devices 100 in combination with one or more anterior reinforcement members 200 is most effective in treating posterior protrusions 56, facet joint degradation, and nerve impingement by intervertebral foraminae, which are believed to be the most common culprits of chronic LBP.
  • [0062]
    As an alternative to the arrangement shown in FIG. 2B, two or more dynamic bias devices 100 may be attached to the vertebrae on opposite sides of vertebrae 20 S and 20 I. Specifically, one or more dynamic bias devices 100 is connected to vertebra 20 S and the vertebra immediately superior to vertebra 20 S, and one or more dynamic bias devices 100 is connected to vertebra 20 I and the vertebra immediately inferior to vertebra 201. With this arrangement, the dynamic bias devices 100 are primarily applying a traction force to effectively pull vertebrae 20 S and 20 I apart, thereby eliminating the disc protrusion 56 and restoring normal disc height.
  • [0063]
    With reference to FIGS. 3A-3C, the dynamic bias device 100 is schematically illustrated under conditions of no-load, compression load (LC), and traction load (LT), respectively. The dynamic bias device 100 includes a pair of attachment members 102, a bias member 104, and a housing 106. Attachment members 102 facilitate attachment of the dynamic bias device 100 to vertebrae 20 S and 20 I, as shown in FIG. 2B. Bias member 104 functions to apply a bias force between the attachment members 102. Housing 106 functions to separate the moving portions of dynamic bias device 100 from the surrounding muscle, ligaments and other tissue when the dynamic bias device 100 is implanted.
  • [0064]
    Attachment members 102 may comprise a wide variety of mechanical connection designs, and may incorporate into their design, or be used in combination with, other machine elements not specifically mentioned herein. For purposes of illustration only, the each attachment member 102 is shown as loop which may be connected to the vertebrae by fasteners and bushings, specific examples of which are described in detail with reference to FIGS. 6A-6D, 7A-7B, 8A-8B and 9A-9B. These specific examples are provided by way of example, not limitation. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the attachment members 102 may comprise or include screws, rivets, spikes, keys, pins, cotters, splines, couplings, bushings, washers, and the like, without departing from the scope or spirit of the present invention.
  • [0065]
    The primary function of the attachment members 102 is to fixedly secure the ends of the bias member 104 to the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I. Preferably, the attachment members 102 are secured to the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I such that translational movement is minimized or eliminated, and such that rotational movement is permitted between each attachment member 102 and each vertebrae 20 S and 20 I. Providing attachment members 102 with these functional attributes permits the dynamic bias device 100 to effectively transmit a bias force to each vertebrae 20 S and 20 I, allow relative movement therebetween, and minimize stress on the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I at the attachment points.
  • [0066]
    Bias member 104 functions to apply a bias force, either attraction or repulsion, between the attachment members 102. The bias force generally increases or decreases with displacement of the ends of the bias member 104, as with a conventional spring. In addition, the bias force may increase or decrease with the time derivative of displacement (i.e., velocity) of the ends of the bias member 104, as with a conventional damper or shock absorber. As shown in FIG. 3B, the bias member 104 compresses in response to a compression load (LC), thereby increasing or decreasing the bias force. Similarly, as shown in FIG. 3C, the bias member 104 extends in response to a traction load (LT), thereby increasing or decreasing the bias force.
  • [0067]
    If the dynamic bias devices 100 are attached to vertebrae 20 S and 20 I (compression embodiment), as shown in FIG. 2B, the bias force of the bias member 104 increases in response to a compression load (LC), and decreases in response to a traction load (LT). In addition, the bias member 104 normally operates in compression. Preferably, the bias force of the bias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when the dynamic bias device 100 is implanted. Because the disc height is usually initially less than normal, the dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the vertebrae with the bias member 104 preloaded in compression or with the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I in traction or otherwise spread apart. In this manner, for a given posture, the disc height will be larger following implantation of the dynamic bias device 100 than prior to implantation.
  • [0068]
    If the dynamic bias devices 100 are attached to the vertebrae on opposite sides of vertebrae 20 S and 20 I (traction embodiment), as discussed as an alternative to the arrangement shown in FIG. 2B, the bias force of the bias member 104 decreases in response to a compression load (LC), and increases in response to a traction load (LT). With this latter arrangement, the bias member 104 normally operates in tension. Because the bias member 104 normally operates in tension with this arrangement, the bias member 104 may simply comprise a member that is rigid or semi-rigid in tension, such as a cable. Also with this arrangement, the bias force of the bias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when the dynamic bias device 100 is implanted. Further with this arrangement, because the disc height is usually initially less than normal, the dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the vertebrae with the bias member 104 preloaded in tension or with the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I in traction or otherwise spread apart.
  • [0069]
    With either arrangement, the dynamic bias device 100 preferably operates with substantially linear displacement substantially parallel to the axis of curvature 60. However, the amount of displacement will be evenly shared between the dynamic bias devices 100 in the traction embodiment, whereas the compression embodiment requires the full displacement to be assumed by each dynamic bias device 100. The following ranges of displacement are given with reference to the compression embodiment. When mounted near the posterior portion of adjacent spinous processes, the dynamic bias device 100 may have a total (i.e., maximum) displacement preferably in the range of 1.0 to 3.0 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L5-S1 region, 0.5 to 1.5 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L4-L5 region, and 0.25 to 1.0 cm to accommodate full posterior to anterior flexure in the L1-L4 region.
  • [0070]
    Within these ranges of displacement, it is preferable that bias member 104 operate within its elastic limit, as dictated by the chosen material and geometry of the bias member 104. In addition, because the bias member preferably should be able to withstand 1.0 to 10 million fatigue cycles, it is preferable that bias member 104 operate within its fatigue limit, as dictated by the chosen material and geometry, for the full range of displacement.
  • [0071]
    As mentioned previously, the bias force may generally increase or decrease with displacement of the ends of the bias member 104, as with a conventional spring. In this situation, the bias force (FB) is generally governed by Hooke's Law where FB=KΔX, wherein FB is linearly proportional to the displacement (ΔX) as dictated by the spring constant (K) of the bias member 104. Also as mentioned previously, the bias force may increase or decrease with the time derivative of displacement (i.e., velocity) of the ends of the bias member 104, as with a conventional damper or shock absorber. In this situation, the bias force (FB) is generally linearly proportional to the derivative of displacement (ΔX/ΔT) as dictated by the damper constant (P) of the bias member 104. Preferably, the bias force FB Of the bias member 104 is adjusted such that the disc is restored to a more normal height when the dynamic bias device 100 is implanted. The bias force FB may be adjusted by selecting the spring constant (K) and/or damper constant (P) of the bias member 104 and by pre-loading (compressing) the bias member 104 an initial displacement ΔXi.
  • [0072]
    The necessary bias force FB may be roughly calculated as a function of body weight (BW), the distance of the mounted dynamic bias device 100 from the axis of curvature 60, and the mechanical properties of the surrounding tissues (muscle tissue, connective tissue, joints). The normal net load carried by the lumbar region 12 is roughly 30% BW when laying down, 140% BW when standing, 185% BW when sitting, 215% BW when bending forward, and 250% BW when slouching.
  • [0073]
    With reference to FIG. 16, a bias force versus attachment point displacement curve for the dynamic bias device 100 is shown. The bias force is intended to be sufficiently high to spread the attachment points (e.g., processes of adjacent vertebrae) and restore normal disc height in all postures. For example, in normal standing posture, the bias force is sufficiently high to spread the attachment points as shown in FIG. 16, such that more normal disc size and shape is obtained. As the spine is placed in flexion and extension, the amount of force carried by the dynamic bias device 100 will change as a function of the spring properties, including the spring constant (K) and the compression length of the spring.
  • [0074]
    In a preferred embodiment, the bias force is sufficient to shift the pre-implant (normal posture) distance to the post-implant (normal posture) distance. To prevent excessive compression of the disc, particularly the posterior disc, it is also preferred that the bias force increase significantly as the attachment points come closer, as by extension, lifting and/or poor posture. This is facilitated by the natural increase in bias force of the spring as the distance decreases, and is aided by the damper pad and the compression limit (bottomed out) of the spring. In addition, because the dynamic bias device is intended to limit excessive compression of the posterior disc, and not necessarily intended to limit flexion of the spine, it is also preferable that the bias force approach zero (spring fully extended) at a distance which is less than the extension limit of the dynamic bias device.
  • [0075]
    Thus, by way of example, not limitation, the bias force may be in the range of 1% to 30% BW when laying down. With other postures after implantation, the bias force may be estimated by subtracting the contribution of body weight from the load carried by lumbar region 12, which is approximately 50% BW (head=5% BW; arms=9% BW; trunk=36% BW). As such, the bias force may be in the range of 10% to 90% BW when standing.
  • [0076]
    With reference to FIGS. 4A-4B and 5A-5B, left lateral and posterior views of dynamic bias devices 100 are schematically illustrated as being mounted to adjacent spinous processes 24 S and 24 I of adjacent vertebrae 20 S and 20 I. When two or more dynamic bias devices 100 are utilized per pair of vertebrae as shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B, the dynamic bias devices 100 are preferably mounted substantially equidistant from the median plane 70, or otherwise symmetric about the median plane 70, in order to avoid causing lateral bias or curvature of the spine 10. Note that the dynamic bias devices 100 may be mounted substantially vertical as shown or at an angle to the median plane 70 and satisfy these criteria. When only one dynamic bias device 100 is utilized per pair of vertebrae as shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, the dynamic bias device 100 is preferably mounted in or near the median plane 70 for the same reason.
  • [0077]
    Although it is preferable to have the dynamic bias device(s) 100 near the median plane 70, substantially equidistant from the median plane 70, or otherwise symmetric about the median plane 70, it is possible to have multiple dynamic bias devices 100 mounted asymmetrically while maintaining balanced bias forces about the median plane 70. The objective is to avoid causing lateral bias or curvature of the spine 10, which is a function of balancing bias forces and moments about the median plane 70.
  • [0078]
    The bias forces are vectors which have a magnitude governed by the properties of the bias member 104, and a direction dictated by the mounting position of the dynamic bias device 100. Each dynamic bias device 100 has two bias force vectors, one for each attachment member 102 at each attachment point. Each bias force vector has a moment arm equal to the distance from the attachment point to the median plane 70. For each attachment point, the product of the moment arm and the vertical component of the bias force vector is the moment or torque applied to the spine 10, and the horizontal component of the bias force vector is the shear applied to the spine 10. Thus, in order to minimize curvature of the spine 10, all of the moments are balanced about the median plane 70 In order to minimize lateral bias on the spine 10, all of the horizontal components of the bias force vectors are balanced about the median plane 70. The easiest way to accomplish this result, of course, is to mount the dynamic bias devices 100 symmetrically about the median plane 70. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that asymmetric mounting arrangements that substantially meet these criteria are also possible.
  • [0079]
    Further, because most protrusions 56 are posterior, the dynamic bias device(s) 100 is/are preferably mounted posterior to the axis of curvature 60. This is advantageous because loss of disc height is most common in the posterior disc 50, the largest amount of mechanical advantage about the anterior disc is obtained posterior to the axis of curvature 60, and the posterior portions of the vertebrae are easiest to access less invasively. However, the dynamic bias device(s) 100 may be mounted at any position relative to the axis of curvature 60 depending on the location of the protrusion 56, as long as the dynamic bias device(s) 100 is/are near the median plane 70, substantially equidistant from the median plane 70, or otherwise symmetric about the median plane 70 as discussed above.
  • [0080]
    Given these criteria, there are many suitable mounting locations or attachment points for the dynamic bias device 100. Some of the possible attachment points are labeled A-N in FIGS. 1A and 1B. Attachment points A-G refer to the lumbar vertebrae 20 (L1-L5), and attachment points H-N refer to the sacral vertebrae 30 (particularly S1). The attachment points A-G of the lumbar region 12 are equally applicable to the thoracic and cervical regions of the spine 10, which are not illustrated for purposes of simplicity only.
  • [0081]
    In the lumbar region 12, attachment points A and B refer to the left lateral and right lateral surfaces of the spinous process 24; attachment point C refers to the posterior surface of the spinous process 24; attachment points D and E refer to the posterior surfaces of the left and right laminae 23; and attachment points F and G refer to the distal ends of the left and right transverse processes 25.
  • [0082]
    In the sacrum 14, attachment points H and I refer to the left lateral and right lateral surfaces of the superior median sacral crest 31; attachment points K and L refer to the posterior surfaces of the sacral laminae 33 between the median sacral crest 31 and the intermediate sacral crests 32; and attachment points M and N refer to posterior surface between the intermediate sacral crests 32 and the lateral sacral crests 34.
  • [0083]
    A wide variety of sets of attachment points are possible, a non-exhaustive list of which is set forth herein. For single dynamic bias device 100 mounting, the nomenclature is (X1Y1) where X1 is the attachment point on vertebra X, and Y1 is the attachment point on vertebra Y. For double dynamic bias device 100 mounting, the nomenclature is (X1Y1, X2Y2) where X1 is the attachment point of the first dynamic bias device 100 on vertebra X, Y1 is the attachment point of the first dynamic bias device 100 on vertebra Y, X2 is the attachment point of the second dynamic bias device 100 on vertebra X, and Y2 is the attachment point of the second dynamic bias device 100 on vertebra Y. Vertebrae X and Y refer to any two different vertebrae, which are usually, but not necessarily, adjacent. In addition, vertebrae X and Y may be superior and inferior, respectively, or vice-versa.
  • [0084]
    To illustrate the attachment point nomenclature, reference may be made to FIGS. 4B and 5B. In FIG. 4B, a first dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the left lateral surface of the two spinous processes, and a second dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the right lateral surface of the two spinous processes. Thus, the set of attachment points for the arrangement of FIG. 4B is (AA, BB). In FIG. 5B, only one dynamic bias device 100 is attached to the posterior surface of the two spinous processes. Thus, the set of attachment points for the arrangement of FIG. 5B is (CC).
  • [0085]
    By way of example, not limitation, the following sets of attachment points may be used to satisfy the above-referenced criteria with regard to balancing moments and forces about the median plane 70. For single dynamic bias device 100 mounting: (CC); and (CJ) are preferred. For double dynamic bias device 100 mounting: (AA, BB); (DD, EE); (FF, GG); (AH, BI); (DK, EL); (FK, GL); (DM, EN); and (FM, GN) are preferred. Also for double dynamic bias device 100 mounting: (AD, BE); (AF, BG); (AK, BL); (AM, BN); (DH, El); (DF, EG); (FH, GI); (CA, CB); (CH, CI); (CD, CE); (CF, CG); (CK, CL); (CM, CN); (JA, JB); (JH, JI); (JD, JE); and (JF, JG) are possible. For more than double mounting, any combination of these sets may be used. Generally, the more posterior the attachment points, the less invasive the procedure will be. Attachment points A, B, C, H and I are preferred for this reason. In addition, to avoid interfering with the motion of the vertebrae, the dynamic bias device 140 is preferably disposed laterally or posteriorly of the spinous processes 24, as opposed to under and between the spinous processes 24.
  • [0086]
    The dynamic bias device 100 may be attached to these points by conventional surgical techniques, except as described herein. The posterior musculature and connective tissues may be dissected to expose the desired attachment points. If desired, any disc protrusions 56 may be removed, in whole or in part, using a conventional discectomy procedure. Also if desired, any other abnormal spinal growths or protrusions may be removed. However, for many disc protrusions 56, it is anticipated that conventional traction or separation techniques may be employed to temporarily retract the protrusion 56 into the normal disc space until the dynamic bias devices are implanted.
  • [0087]
    In order to establish separation of the vertebrae, the spine may be placed in traction or conventional intervertebral separation tools may be used. Alternatively, the dynamic bias device 100 may be preloaded such that when the device is released after attachment, the bias force establishes the desired amount of separation.
  • [0088]
    Pilot holes are drilled as needed, such as for the use of bushings 330, 340 and/or 350 (described with reference to FIGS. 7A-7B, 8A-8B and 9A-9B hereinafter). If attachment points A, B, H and I are to be used, such as with the use of bushing 320 (described with reference to FIGS. 6A-6D hereinafter), a hole 90 and counter-bore 92 may be drilled into the spinous process 24. The device(s) 100 are then attached to the desired attachment points in accordance with the hardware being used, and the site is subsequently surgically closed.
  • [0089]
    With reference to FIGS. 6A-6D, 7A-7B, 8A-8B and 9A-9B, various embodiments of bushings 320, 330, 340, and 350, respectively, are illustrated. As mentioned previously, the attachment members 102 may comprise a wide variety of mechanical connection designs, and may incorporate into their design, or be used in combination with, other machine elements such as bushings 320, 330, 340, and 350. Bushings 320, 330, 340, and 350 are adapted to mount one or two dynamic bias devices 100. As illustrated, bushings 320, 330, 340, and 350 are adapted to receive attachment members 102 in the form of loops or the like, but may be modified to receive other structures. A primary function of bushings 320, 330, 340, and 350 is to isolate movement of the attachment members 102 from the vertebrae to which they are attached. Thus, the bushing to bone (vertebrae) interface is static, while the bushing to attachment member interface is dynamic. This reduces if not eliminates the abrasive degradation of the vertebrae due to the attachment of the dynamic bias device 100. The orientation of the vertebral surface at the attachment points will determine the best bushing scheme.
  • [0090]
    With reference to FIGS. 6A-6B, end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing 320 are illustrated. Bushing 320 is particularly suitable for attachment to the spinous process 24 as shown in FIG. 6C, or attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated in FIG. 1A. Bushing 320 may be attached to the spinous process 24 utilizing a conventional fastener 300, which includes bolt 302, nut 304 and washers 306 and 308. Preferably, the fastener 300 is a lock fastener such that it will not have a tendency to unscrew with relative motion of the attachment members 102. However, the nut 304 is not tightened so much as to inhibit rotational movement of the attachment members 102. Fastener 300 may alternatively comprise a key and pin (e.g., cotter pin). When fully assembled, the attachment members 102 are disposed around the shaft of the bolt 302 on either side of the bushing 320 and between the washers 306 and 308.
  • [0091]
    Bushing 320 includes a male fitting 321 which fits into a female fitting 324. The male fitting 321 includes a shank portion 322 and a head portion 323. Similarly, the female fitting 324 includes a shank portion 325 and a head portion 326. The female fitting 324 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the shank 322 of the male fitting 321, and the male fitting 321 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the bolt 302 of the fastener 300. The outside surface of the shank 322 of the male fitting 321 and the inside surface of the shank 325 of the female fitting 324 may include mating threads.
  • [0092]
    The size of the head 323/326 to bone interface is preferably maximized to minimize stress concentration and to distribute torsional loads over a large surface area. The size of the female shank 25 and the corresponding size of the hole 90 drilled through the spinous process 24 are chosen to minimize stress concentration and minimize the loss of bone integrity. A counter-bore 92 may be used to flatten and thereby maximize the contact surface area of the head 323/326 to bone interface, as illustrated in FIG. 6D.
  • [0093]
    The materials of the fastener 300 and bushing 320 may comprise any suitable implantable material capable of withstanding high fatigue. For example, all components could be comprised of 300 or 400 series stainless steel, titanium alloy 6-4, or MP35N alloy. Preferably, all components would be made of the same or similar material to reduce galvanic corrosion. The surfaces of the fastener 300 and bushing 320 that engage the attachment members 102 of the dynamic bias device 100 are preferably smooth to reduce friction and wear. The surfaces of the bushing 320 that engage the vertebrae may have a roughened surface (e.g., knurled) to reduce the likelihood of relative movement therebetween. In addition, the surfaces of the bushing 320 that engage the vertebrae may have a porous sintered surface to facilitate solid bone growth, thereby further securing the bushing 320. Coatings and surface treatments may be utilized to reduce or increase friction where desired, and biological response where tissue interface is likely.
  • [0094]
    With reference to FIGS. 7A-7B, end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing 330 are illustrated. Except as described herein, bushing 330 is substantially the same in design, function and use as bushing 320. Bushing 330 is adapted to mount one or (preferably) two dynamic bias devices 100. Bushing 330 is particularly suitable for attachment points C and J as illustrated in FIG. 1B. Bushing 330 may be attached to the vertebrae 20/30 utilizing a conventional bone screw 310, which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition.
  • [0095]
    Bushing 330 includes two male fittings 331 which fit into a female fitting 334. The male fittings 331 each include a shank portion 332 and a head portion 333. Similarly, the female fitting 334 includes two shank portions 335 and two head portions 336. The female fitting 334 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the shanks 332 of the male fittings 331, and the male fittings 331 have an inside diameter sized to accommodate the bolt 302 of the fastener 300. The outside surfaces of the shanks 332 of the male fittings 331 and the inside surfaces of the shanks 335 of the female fitting 334 may include mating threads. When fully assembled, the attachment members 102 are disposed around the shanks 335 on either side of heads 336 of the female fitting 334 and between the heads 333 of the male fittings 331.
  • [0096]
    With reference to FIGS. 8A-8B, end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing 340 are illustrated. Except as described herein, bushing 340 is substantially the same in design, function and use as bushing 330. Bushing 340 is adapted to mount one dynamic bias device 100. Bushing 340 is particularly suitable for attachment points C, D, E, F, G, J, K, L, M and N, but may also be used for attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B. Bushing 340 may be attached to the vertebrae 20/30 utilizing a conventional bone screw 310, which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition.
  • [0097]
    Bushing 340 includes a male fitting 341 which fits into a female fitting 344. The male fitting 341 includes a shank portion 342 and a head portion 343. Similarly, the female fitting 344 includes a shank portion 345 and a head portion 346. The female fitting 344 also includes a flange 347 connecting the bone screw 310 to the bushing 340. The female fitting 344 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the shank 342 of the male fitting 341, and the male fitting 341 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the bolt 302 of the fastener 300. The outside surface of the shank 342 of the male fitting 341 and the inside surface of the shank 345 of the female fitting 344 may include mating threads. When fully assembled, the attachment member 102 is disposed around the shank 345 on the female fitting 344 and between the heads 343/346 of the fittings 341/344. When mounted, the axis of the shank 345 of bushing 340 is oriented parallel to the mounting surface.
  • [0098]
    With reference to FIGS. 9A-9B, end and exploded views, respectively, of a bushing 350 are illustrated. Except as described herein, bushing 350 is substantially the same in design, function and use as bushing 340. Bushing 350 is adapted to mount one dynamic bias device 100. Bushing 350 is particularly suitable for attachment points C, D, E, F, G, J, K, L, M and N, but may also be used for attachment points A, B, H and I as illustrated in FIGS. 1A and 1B. Bushing 350 may be attached to the vertebrae 20/30 utilizing a conventional bone screw 310, which may be modified in diameter, length and thread type for the particular attachment site and condition. In this particular embodiment, the fastener 300 is formed integrally with the bone screw 310.
  • [0099]
    Bushing 350 includes a male fitting 351 which fits into a female fitting 354. The male fitting 351 includes a shank portion 352 and a head portion 353. Similarly, the female fitting 354 includes a shank portion 355 and a head portion 356. The female fitting 354 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the shank 352 of the male fitting 351, and the male fitting 351 has an inside diameter sized to accommodate the bolt 302, which is integral with the bone screw 310. The outside surface of the shank 352 of the male fitting 351 and the inside surface of the shank 355 of the female fitting 354 may include mating threads. When fully assembled, the attachment member 102 is disposed around the shank 355 on the female fitting 354 and between the heads 353/356 of the fittings 351/354. When mounted, the axis of the shank 355 of bushing 350 is oriented perpendicular to the mounting surface.
  • [0100]
    With reference to FIGS. 10A-10C, side views of a dynamic bias device 110 are illustrated in a no-load condition, in a compression load condition, and in cross-section, respectively. Except as described herein, dynamic bias device 110 is substantially the same in design, function and use as the generic device 100 described previously. Dynamic bias device 110 includes a barrel 111 in which piston 112 is slidably disposed. A bias member in the form of a spring 113 is disposed in the barrel 111. Longitudinal displacement of the barrel 111 relative to the piston 112 causes compression (or extension) of the spring 113. The spring 113 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) linearly with displacement as discussed previously. A flexible housing (not shown) may be placed about the dynamic bias device 110 to isolate the moving parts 111/112 from the surrounding tissue when implanted.
  • [0101]
    An adjustable arm 114 may be connected to the piston 112. The arm 114 and the barrel 111 include holes 115 or other suitable attachment members, which may be used in combination bushings 320, 330, 340 and 350, to attach the dynamic bias device 110 to the vertebrae. The adjustable arm 114 and the piston 112 may include mating threads such that rotation of the arm 114 causes the arm 114 to effectively lengthen or shorten the piston 112. This allows the distance between the holes 115 to be varied to accommodate different attachment locations and different anatomies. This also allows the dynamic bias device to be preloaded by extending the effective length of the piston 112 beyond the distance between attachment points.
  • [0102]
    A collar 116 is provided to limit the extended length of the dynamic bias device 110. The collar 116 may include threads that mate with threads inside the barrel 111 such that the collar 116 is adjustable, and thus the extended length is adjustable. The collar 116 may also include an elastomeric bumper pad to dampen impact between the piston 112 and the collar when the device 110 is filly extended. Similarly, a elastomeric bumper pad 117 may be provided in the barrel 111 to dampen impact between the piston 112 and the barrel 111 when the device 110 is filly collapsed.
  • [0103]
    With reference to FIG. 11A, a cross-sectional view of a dynamic bias device 120 is illustrated. Except as described herein, dynamic bias device 120 is substantially the same in design, function and use as dynamic bias device 110 discussed with reference to FIGS. 10A-10C. Dynamic bias device 120 includes a barrel 121 in which piston 122 is slidably disposed. A bias member 123 in the form of a compressed or evacuated fluid (liquid or gas or a combination of both) is disposed in the barrel 121 and sealed relative to the piston 122 by piston ring 128. The barrel 121 and piston 122 may define a closed volume or an exhaust reservoir 129 may be used as shown. The bias fluid 123 is in fluid communication with the exhaust reservoir 129 by way of an exhaust port through the wall of the barrel 121. The exhaust reservoir 129 may comprise an expandable annular bag as shown, or other suitable structure. If a closed volume is used, longitudinal displacement of the barrel 121 relative to the piston 122 simply causes a change in pressure of the fluid 123. If an exhaust reservoir 129 is used as shown, longitudinal displacement of the barrel 121 relative to the piston 122 causes a change in pressure of the fluid 123 and flow of fluid 123 into the exhaust reservoir 129 via the exhaust port. The pressure of the fluid 123 and the size of the exhaust hole dictates the bias force which increases (or decreases) with the time derivative of displacement as discussed previously.
  • [0104]
    A flexible housing (not shown) may be placed about the dynamic bias device 130 to isolate the moving parts 121/122 from the surrounding tissue when implanted. The housing may be used to define the exhaust reservoir 129. An adjustable arm 124 may be connected to the piston 122. The arm 124 and the barrel 121 include holes 125 or other suitable attachment members to attach the dynamic bias device 120 to the vertebrae. The adjustable arm 124 and the piston 122 may include mating threads to effectively lengthen or shorten the piston 122. An adjustable collar 126 may be provided including mating threads such that the collar 126 is adjustable, and thus the extended length of the dynamic bias device 120 is adjustable. The collar 126 may include an elastomeric bumper pad (not shown) and an elastomeric bumper pad 127 may be provided in the barrel 121 to dampen impact between the piston 122 and the barrel 121.
  • [0105]
    With reference to FIG. 11B, a cross-sectional view of a dynamic bias device 130 is illustrated. Except as described herein, dynamic bias device 130 is substantially the same in design, function and use as the combination of dynamic bias device 110 discussed with reference to FIGS. 10A-10C and dynamic bias device 120 described with reference to FIG. 11A.
  • [0106]
    Dynamic bias device 130 includes a barrel 131 in which piston 132 is slidably disposed. A bias member is the form of a spring 133A is disposed in the barrel 131. Longitudinal displacement of the barrel 131 relative to the piston 132 causes compression (or extension) of the spring 133. The spring 133 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) linearly with displacement as discussed previously. In addition, a bias member 133B in the form of a compressed or evacuated fluid (liquid or gas) is disposed in the barrel 131 and sealed relative to the piston 132 by piston ring 138.
  • [0107]
    The barrel 131 and piston 132 may define a closed volume or an exhaust reservoir 129 may be used as shown. The bias fluid 133 is in fluid communication with the exhaust reservoir 139 by way of an exhaust port through the wall of the barrel 131. The exhaust reservoir 139 may comprise an expandable annular bag as shown, or other suitable structure. If a closed volume is used, longitudinal displacement of the barrel 131 relative to the piston 132 simply causes a change in pressure of the fluid 133. If an exhaust reservoir 139 is used as shown, longitudinal displacement of the barrel 131 relative to the piston 132 causes a change in pressure of the fluid 133 and flow of fluid 133 into the exhaust reservoir 139 via the exhaust port. The pressure of the fluid 133 and the size of the exhaust hole dictates the bias force which increases (or decreases) with the time derivative of displacement as discussed previously. Thus, the bias members 133A/133B effectively act as a combined spring and damper.
  • [0108]
    A flexible housing (not shown) may be placed about the dynamic bias device 130 to isolate the moving parts 131/132 from the surrounding tissue when implanted. The housing may be used to define the exhaust reservoir 139. An adjustable arm 134 may be connected to the piston 132. The arm 134 and the barrel 131 include holes 135 or other suitable attachment members to attach the dynamic bias device 130 to the vertebrae. The adjustable arm 134 and the piston 132 may include mating threads to effectively lengthen or shorten the piston 132. An adjustable collar 136 may be provided including mating threads such that the collar 136 is adjustable, and thus the extended length of the dynamic bias device 130 is adjustable. The collar 136 may include an elastomeric bumper pad (not shown) and an elastomeric bumper pad 137 may be provided in the barrel 131 to dampen impact between the piston 132 and the barrel 131.
  • [0109]
    With reference to FIGS. 12A-12B, rear and side views of dynamic bias device 140 are illustrated in no-load condition. FIG. 12C illustrates the dynamic bias device 140 subjected to a compression load. Except as described herein, dynamic bias device 140 is substantially the same in design, function and use as the generic device 100 described previously. Although movement of the dynamic bias device 140 in compression and extension is substantially linear and parallel to the axis of curvature 60, as with dynamic bias device 100, some lateral or posterior-anterior motion is present, but preferably minimized. Dynamic bias device 140 includes bias member 142 and loops 144 or other suitable attachment members, which may be used in combination bushings 320, 330, 340 and 350, to attach the dynamic bias device 140 to the vertebrae. The bias member 142 is may be a semi-circular or semi-elliptical leaf spring, which may be a single plate as shown or a series of laminated plates. Relative longitudinal displacement of the attachment members 144 causes compression (or extension) of the leaf spring 142. The leaf spring 142 provides a bias force which increases (or decreases) with displacement as discussed previously.
  • [0110]
    The radius or axis of curvature of the leaf spring 142 is preferably maximized such that displacement of the attachment members 144 is substantially linear, but should not be so high as to result in buckling or inversion in compression. By way of example, not limitation, the radius or axis of curvature may range from half the distance between the attachment points to approximately 10 cm. Of course, half the distance between attachment points will vary depending on the location of each attachment point, but will likely be in the range of 1.0 to 3.0 cm for attachment points between adjacent processes.
  • [0111]
    The displacement of the apex 143 is preferably of the leaf spring 142 minimized to minimize disturbance of and interference from surrounding tissue (bone, muscle, connective tissue, nerves, etc.). The apex 143 may face anteriorly, but preferably faces posteriorly or laterally to reduce interference with tissue close to the spinal column. The dynamic bias device 140, and particularly the leaf spring 142, is preferably disposed laterally or posteriorly of the spinous processes 24 to avoid interference with movement of the vertebrae.
  • [0112]
    With reference to FIGS. 13A-13C, various alternative dynamic bias devices 150, 160 and 170 are illustrated in side and posterior views. Except as described herein, dynamic bias devices 150, 160 and 170 are substantially the same in design, function and use as the dynamic bias device 140 discussed with reference to FIGS. 12A-12C.
  • [0113]
    Dynamic bias device 150 as seen in FIG. 13A includes bias member 152 in the form of an articulated leaf spring, and attachment members 154. Articulated leaf spring 152 reduces the horizontal range of movement by utilizing a plurality of articulations 153 having a smaller radius or axis of curvature. The reduced horizontal range of movement of the bias member 152 reduces the amount of disturbance and interference from surrounding tissue (bone, muscle, connective tissue, nerves, etc.).
  • [0114]
    Dynamic bias device 160 as seen in FIG. 13B includes a plurality of bias members 162 in the form of leaf springs (shown) or articulated leaf springs (not shown), and attachment members 164. Utilizing a plurality of leaf springs 162 increases stability of the dynamic bias device 160 and allows for greater net bias forces to be delivered to the attachment members 164 and the vertebrae attached thereto.
  • [0115]
    Dynamic bias device 170 as seen in FIG. 13C includes a plurality of bias members 172 in the form of leaf springs (shown) or articulated leaf springs (not shown). The dynamic bias device 170 also includes attachment members 174 in the form of inverted semi-circular loops. The inverted semi-circular loops 174 permit the device 170 to be attached to the inferior and superior sides spinous processes of adjacent vertebrae, such that the attachment members 174 are disposed between adjacent spinous processes but the bias members 172 are disposed laterally of the spinous processes to avoid interference with movement of the vertebrae.
  • [0116]
    Dynamic bias devices 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160 and 170 may be used (i.e., implanted) substantially as described with reference to generic dynamic bias device 100. As mentioned previously, one or more reinforcement members 200 may be used in combination with one or more dynamic bias devices 100. The reinforcement members 200 may be used to reinforce the disc, restore disc height and/or bear some or all of the load normally carried by the annulus. The reinforcement members 200 are relatively rigid and thus serve to reinforce the disc 50, and particularly the annulus 52, where inserted. In addition, the reinforcement members 200 may have a relatively large profile when implanted and thus increase disc height.
  • [0117]
    The reinforcing members 200 may be used singularly or in groups, depending on the increase in disc 50 height desired and/or the amount of reinforcement of the annulus 52 desired. For example, the reinforcing members 200 may be stacked as illustrated in FIG. 2B or inserted side-by-side as illustrated in FIG. 15R. In addition, the reinforcing members 200 may be located in virtually any portion of the annulus 52. Preferably, the reinforcing members 200 are substantially symmetrically disposed about the median plane 70 to avoid causing curvature of the spine 10. Although the reinforcing members 200 may be inserted, in part or in whole, into the nucleus 54, it is preferable to insert them into the annulus 52 for purposes of stability and load carrying. Specifically, to provide stability, it is desirable to symmetrically locate the reinforcing members 200 as far as reasonably possible from the median plane 70, or to span as great a distance as possible across the median plane 70. In addition, because the annulus 52 of the disc 50 is believed to carry the majority of the load, particularly in the lumbar region 12, the reinforcing members 200 are preferably placed in the annulus 52 to assume the load normally carried thereby, and reinforce the load bearing capacity of the annulus 52, without hindering the normal mobility function of the disc 50.
  • [0118]
    The reinforcing members 200 may comprise expandable members such as self-expanding members 210 or inflatable members 220. Alternatively, the reinforcing members 200 may comprise unexpandable members such as reinforcement bars 230. When implanting each type of reinforcement member 210/220/230, it is preferable to maintain the integrity of the annulus 52. Accordingly, space in the annulus 52 for the reinforcing members 200 is preferably established by dilation or the like, although some amount of tissue removal may be used.
  • [0119]
    The expandable reinforcement members 210/220 are useful because they may be delivered in a low profile, unexpanded condition making it easier to traverse the very tough and fibrous collagen tissue of the annulus 52. For similar reasons, the reinforcement bars 230 are useful because they may have a small diameter and a sharpened tip. Although it is possible to insert the expandable reinforcing members 210/220 into the annulus 52 in their final expanded state, it is desirable to deliver the expandable reinforcing members 210/220 into the annulus 52 in an unexpanded state and subsequently expand them in order to minimize invasiveness and resistance to insertion.
  • [0120]
    The self-expanding reinforcing member 210 may comprise a solid or semi-solid member that self-expands (e.g., by hydration) after insertion into the annulus. Examples of suitable materials for such solid or semi-solid members include solid fibrous collagen or other suitable hard hydrophilic biocompatible material. If the selected material is degradable, the material may induce the formation of fibrous scar tissue which is favorable. If non-degradable material is selected, the material must be rigid and bio-inert. The self-expanding reinforcing member 210 preferably has an initial diameter that is minimized, but may be in the range of 25% to 75% of the final expanded diameter, which may be in the range of 0.3 to 0.75 cm, or 10% to 75% of the nominal disc height. The length of the self-expanding member 210 may be in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm.
  • [0121]
    The inflatable reinforcing member 220 may comprise an expandable hollow membrane capable of inflation after insertion into the annulus. An example of a suitable inflatable structure is detachable balloon membrane filled with a curable material. The membrane may consist of a biocompatible and bio-inert polymer material, such as polyurethane, silicone, or polycarbonate-polyurethane (e.g., Corethane). The curable filler material may consist of a curable silicone or polyurethane. The filler material may be curable by chemical reaction (e.g., moisture), photo-activation (e.g., UV light) or the like. The cure time is preferably sufficiently long to enable activation just prior to insertion (i.e., outside the body) and permit sufficient time for navigation and positioning of the member 220 in the disc. However, activation may also take place inside the body after implantation. The inflatable reinforcing member 220 preferably has an initial deflated diameter that is minimized, but may be in the range of 25% to 75% of the final inflated diameter, which may be in the range of 0.3 to 0.75 cm, or 10% to 75% of the nominal disc height. The length of the inflatable member 220 may be in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm.
  • [0122]
    The reinforcement bars 230 may comprise a rigid, solid or hollow bar having a sharpened tip. The reinforcement bars 230 may comprises stainless steel mandrels, for example, having a diameter in the range of 0.005 to 0.100 inches, preferably in the range of 0.010 to 0.050 inches, and most preferably in the range of 0.020 to 0.040 inches, and a length in the range of 1.0 to 6.0 cm, and preferably in the range of 2.0 to 4.0 cm. The reinforcement bars 230 may be straight for linear insertion, or curved to gently wrap with the curvature of the annulus during insertion. In addition, the outer surface of the reinforcement bars 230 may have circular ridges or the like that the permit easy insertion into the annulus 52 but resist withdrawal and motion in the annulus following implantation. Other suitable materials for reinforcement bars 230 include titanium alloy 6-4, MP35N alloy, or super-elastic nickel-titanium alloy.
  • [0123]
    Referring now to FIGS. 14A-14D, various tools 410, 420 and 430 are shown individually and assembled. The tools 410, 420 and 430 may be used to implant the reinforcement devices 210/220/230 discussed above. The tools include a rigid, sharpened, hollow needle 410, a semi-rigid, sharpened, hollow curved needle 420, and a sharpened stylet 430. As seen in FIG. 14D, the sharpened stylet 430 fits into the semi-rigid needle 420 which fits into the rigid needle 410.
  • [0124]
    With specific reference to FIG. 14A, the rigid hollow needle 410 includes a hollow shaft 412 and a grip or handle 414. The shaft 412 includes a sharpened tip 413 to facilitate insertion into and pass through the surrounding tissue. The shaft 412 is preferably made of a rigid metal such as a stainless steel hypodermic tube. The grip 414 may comprise a polymer and may be formed by insert injection molding with the shaft 412 inserted into the mold.
  • [0125]
    With specific reference to FIG. 14B, the semi-rigid curved needle 420 includes a hollow shaft 422 a hub 424. The shaft 422, which includes a sharpened tip 423, is longer than the rigid needle 410 and has an outside diameter sufficiently small to fit into the rigid needle 410. The shaft 422 is preferably made of a semi-rigid polymer or composite. The shaft 422 includes a curved distal portion 426 that may be straightened (shown in phantom) upon insertion of the semi-rigid needle 420 into the lumen of the rigid needle 410. The hub 424 may include a fitting 425 to facilitate connection to a fluid source or a pressure source (e.g., a syringe).
  • [0126]
    With specific reference to FIG. 14C, the sharpened stylet 430 includes a flexible shaft 432 and a sharpened distal end 433. The shaft 432 is longer than the both the rigid needle 410 and the semi-rigid needle 420, and may have a length on the order of 10 to 60 cm. The shaft 432 also has an outside diameter sufficiently small to fit into the semi-rigid needle 420. The shaft 422 preferably has a flexible but pushable construction incorporating a rigid metal such as stainless steel, or super-elastic nickel-titanium alloy. The sharpened stylet 430 is preferably highly elastic, to resist permanent set upon insertion into the curved portion 426 of the semi-rigid needle 420.
  • [0127]
    With general reference to FIGS. 15A-15J, the steps for implanting a self-expanding reinforcement member 210 are illustrated. It should be understood that the procedure for implanting a single member 210 in the anterior annulus 52 is shown for purposes of illustration, not limitation. All of the variables with regard to quantity, location, orientation, etc. discussed previously may be implemented by varying the generic procedure described hereinafter.
  • [0128]
    Initially, the sharpened stylet 430, semi-rigid needle 420 and rigid needle 410 are assembled as shown in FIG. 14D. As shown in FIG. 15A, the distal portion of the assembly 410/420/430 is inserted into the disc 50 as in a conventional discogram procedure. The assembly 410/420/430 is advanced until the distal tip 413 of the rigid needle is proximate the anterior curvature of the annulus 52, near the anterior side of the nucleus 54, as seen in FIG. 15B. The semi-rigid needle 420 (alone or with stylet 430) is advanced relative to the rigid needle 410 until the curved portion 426 of the semi-rigid needle exits the distal tip 413 of the rigid needle 410 and the desired amount of curvature is established, as seen in FIG. 15C. The curved portion 426 may be advanced until the tip 423 is substantially parallel to the tangent of the anterior annulus 52 curvature. The sharpened stylet 430 is advanced relative to the semi-rigid needle 420 to the desired position within the anterior annulus 52, as shown in FIG. 15D. The semi-rigid needle 420 and the rigid needle 410 are completely withdrawn from the stylet 430, leaving the stylet in position as shown in FIG. 15E.
  • [0129]
    A flexible dilator 440 is advanced over the stylet 430 to dilate the annulus 52, as seen in FIG. 15F. The flexible dilator 440 is similar to semi-rigid needle 420 except that the dilator includes a blunt distal tip and is relatively more flexible, and has larger inner and outer diameters. Note that one or more dilators 440 may be advanced co-axially about the stylet 430 until the annulus is sufficiently dilated to accept the self-expandable member 210. The stylet 430 is then withdrawn from the flexible dilator 440 and the self-expandable member 210 is introduced into the lumen of the flexible dilator 440 using a push bar 450, as shown in FIG. 15G. Alternatively, the dilator 440 may be removed in favor of a flexible hollow catheter with a large inner diameter to facilitate delivery of member 210. The push bar 450 is similar to stylet 430 except that the distal tip of the push bar 450 is blunt. Alternatively, the push bar 450 may simply comprise the stylet 430 turned around, thus using the proximal blunt end of the stylet 430 as the push bar 450. The push bar 450 is advanced until the member 210 is in the desired position, as seen in FIG. 15H. To facilitate positioning the member 210, radiographic visualization may be used to visualize the distal end of the push bar 450, which is formed of radiopaque material and may include radiopaque markers. In addition, the member may be loaded with a radiopaque material to facilitate radiographic visualization thereof.
  • [0130]
    After the member 210 is in the desired position, the flexible dilator 440 is retracted from the push bar 450 while maintaining position of the member 210 with the push bar. The push bar 450 is then removed leaving the member 210 in place. If necessary, the procedure may be repeated for additional member implants 210. The member 210 is then allowed to expand over time, perhaps augmented by placing the spine 10 in traction. Alternatively, the spine 10 may be placed in traction prior to beginning the procedure as discussed with reference to the procedure for implanting dynamic bias device 100.
  • [0131]
    With reference to FIGS. 15K-15L, the steps for implanting an inflatable reinforcement member 220 are illustrated. In this procedure, the steps outlined with reference to FIGS. 15A- 15F are followed. Specifically, the same steps are followed up to and including the step of advancing the flexible dilator 440 over the stylet 430 to dilate the annulus 52, and thereafter removing the stylet 430 from the flexible dilator 440. Using a catheter 460, the inflatable member 220 is introduced into the dilator 440 and advanced until the member 220 is in the desired position, as shown in FIG. 15K. The inflatable member 220 is connected to the distal end of the catheter 460, which includes a flexible but pushable shaft 462 and an inflation port 464. The flexible dilator 440 is retracted from the catheter 460 while maintaining position of the member 220.
  • [0132]
    With the member 220 in the desired position, which may be confirmed using radiographic visualization as described above, the proximal inflation port 464 is connected to a syringe (not shown) or other suitable inflation apparatus for injection of the curable filler material. The filler material is then activated and the desired volume is injected into the catheter 460 via the inflation port 464, as seen if FIG. 15L. The filler material is allowed to cure and the catheter 460 is gently torqued to break the catheter 460 from the solid member 220. This break-away step may be facilitated by an area of weakness at the juncture between the distal end of the catheter 460 and the proximal end of the member 220. The catheter 460 is then removed leaving the member 220 in place. If necessary, the procedure may be repeated for additional member implants 220.
  • [0133]
    With reference to FIGS. 15M-15R, the steps for implanting a reinforcement bar 230 are illustrated. As seen in FIG. 15M, the disc 50 includes a protrusion or bulge 56, which is preferably, but not necessarily, reduced or eliminated before insertion of the reinforcement bar 230. This may be done by separating the adjacent vertebrae 20. In order to establish separation of the vertebrae 20, the spine 10 may be placed in traction or conventional intervertebral separation tools may be used. After the bulge 56 is reduced or eliminated, similar steps are followed as outlined with reference to FIGS. 15A-15C.
  • [0134]
    Delivery of a single reinforcement bar 230 into the posterior annulus 52 is illustrated. Specifically, the distal portion of the assembly 410/420/450 is inserted into the disc 50 as in a conventional discogram procedure. The assembly 410/420/450 is advanced until the distal tip 413 of the rigid needle 410 just penetrates the posterior side of the annulus 52, as seen in FIG. 15N. The semi-rigid needle 420 (alone or with bar 230) is advanced relative to the rigid needle 410 until the curved portion 426 of the semi-rigid needle 420 exits the distal tip 413 of the rigid needle 410 and the desired amount of curvature is established, as shown in FIG. 15N. The curved portion 426 may be advanced until the tip 423 is substantially parallel to the posterior annulus 52.
  • [0135]
    Using the push bar 450, the reinforcement bar 230 with its sharpened tip is pushed into the annulus 52 as seen in FIG. 150. The reinforcement bar 230 is advanced into the annulus 52 with the push bar 450 until the bar 230 is in the desired position, as seen in FIG. 15P, which may be confirmed using radiographic visualization as described above. The push bar 450 is then retracted, leaving the reinforcement bar 230 in place, as shown in FIG. 15P. The semi-rigid needle 420 and the rigid needle 410 are then removed, as shown in FIG. 15Q, or, if necessary, the procedure may be repeated for additional reinforcement bar implants 230, as shown in FIG. 15R. Presence of the reinforcement bars 230 serves to keep the disc 50, and particularly the bulge 56, in a more normal condition, and to protect against continued bulging, thus easing nerve impingement.
  • [0136]
    From the foregoing, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention provides dynamic bias devices 100, 110, 120, 130, 140, 150, 160, and 170, in addition to reinforcement devices 210, 220, and 230, which may be used individually or in combination, to eliminate nerve impingement associated with a damaged disc 50, and/or to reinforce a damaged disc, while permitting relative movement of the vertebrae 20 S and 20 I adjacent the damaged disc. The present invention also provides minimally invasive methods of implanting such devices as described above.
  • [0137]
    Those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention may be manifested in a variety of forms other than the specific embodiments described and contemplated herein. Accordingly, departures in form and detail may be made without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention as described in the appended claims.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3426364 *Aug 25, 1966Feb 11, 1969Colorado State Univ Research FProsthetic appliance for replacing one or more natural vertebrae
US3648691 *Feb 24, 1970Mar 14, 1972Univ Colorado State Res FoundMethod of applying vertebral appliance
US5423816 *Jul 29, 1993Jun 13, 1995Lin; Chih I.Intervertebral locking device
US5458642 *Jan 18, 1994Oct 17, 1995Beer; John C.Synthetic intervertebral disc
US6610093 *Jul 28, 2000Aug 26, 2003Perumala CorporationMethod and apparatus for stabilizing adjacent vertebrae
US6626916 *Dec 1, 1999Sep 30, 2003Teresa T. YeungTissue fastening devices and methods for sustained holding strength
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7335200 *Mar 25, 2003Feb 26, 2008Scient'xDynamic intervertebral connection device with controlled multidirectional deflection
US7458981Mar 9, 2005Dec 2, 2008The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySpinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion
US7476238Mar 24, 2005Jan 13, 2009Yale UniversityDynamic spine stabilizer
US7556639Jan 4, 2006Jul 7, 2009Accelerated Innovation, LlcMethods and apparatus for vertebral stabilization using sleeved springs
US7578849Jan 27, 2006Aug 25, 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral implants and methods of use
US7588592Oct 2, 2007Sep 15, 2009Kyphon SarlSystem and method for immobilizing adjacent spinous processes
US7632293Mar 29, 2006Dec 15, 2009Synthes Usa, LlcDynamic damping element for two bones
US7635377Apr 27, 2007Dec 22, 2009Kyphon SarlSpine distraction implant and method
US7655041Jul 9, 2007Feb 2, 2010Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems and implantation method
US7662187Jun 29, 2007Feb 16, 2010Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US7666209Mar 28, 2007Feb 23, 2010Kyphon SarlSpine distraction implant and method
US7678147Jul 9, 2007Mar 16, 2010Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems and implantation method
US7682376Jan 27, 2006Mar 23, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous devices and methods of use
US7691130Jan 27, 2006Apr 6, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal implants including a sensor and methods of use
US7695513May 20, 2004Apr 13, 2010Kyphon SarlDistractible interspinous process implant and method of implantation
US7713287May 19, 2005May 11, 2010Applied Spine Technologies, Inc.Dynamic spine stabilizer
US7727233Apr 29, 2005Jun 1, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinous process stabilization devices and methods
US7749252Mar 17, 2006Jul 6, 2010Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant having deployable wing and method of implantation
US7749253Apr 27, 2007Jul 6, 2010Kyphon SĀRLSpine distraction implant and method
US7758619Mar 1, 2004Jul 20, 2010Kyphon SĀRLSpinous process implant with tethers
US7763020Sep 25, 2003Jul 27, 2010Moximed, Inc.Bone fixated, articulated joint load control device
US7763052Mar 10, 2004Jul 27, 2010N Spine, Inc.Method and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine
US7766915Aug 3, 2010Jackson Roger PDynamic fixation assemblies with inner core and outer coil-like member
US7766940Dec 30, 2004Aug 3, 2010Depuy Spine, Inc.Posterior stabilization system
US7776069Sep 3, 2003Aug 17, 2010Kyphon SĀRLPosterior vertebral support assembly
US7780709Apr 12, 2005Aug 24, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implants and methods for inter-transverse process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment
US7789898Apr 15, 2005Sep 7, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Transverse process/laminar spacer
US7799054May 31, 2005Sep 21, 2010Depuy Spine, Inc.Facet joint replacement
US7803190Nov 9, 2006Sep 28, 2010Kyphon SĀRLInterspinous process apparatus and method with a selectably expandable spacer
US7811309Jul 26, 2005Oct 12, 2010Applied Spine Technologies, Inc.Dynamic spine stabilization device with travel-limiting functionality
US7815663Jan 27, 2006Oct 19, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Vertebral rods and methods of use
US7815665Oct 19, 2010N Spine, Inc.Adjustable spinal stabilization system
US7828822Apr 27, 2006Nov 9, 2010Kyphon SĀRLSpinous process implant
US7833246Oct 14, 2003Nov 16, 2010Kyphon SĀRLInterspinous process and sacrum implant and method
US7837711Jan 27, 2006Nov 23, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Artificial spinous process for the sacrum and methods of use
US7846185Apr 28, 2006Dec 7, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Expandable interspinous process implant and method of installing same
US7846186Jun 20, 2006Dec 7, 2010Kyphon SĀRLEquipment for surgical treatment of two vertebrae
US7854752Aug 9, 2004Dec 21, 2010Theken Spine, LlcSystem and method for dynamic skeletal stabilization
US7862587Jan 9, 2006Jan 4, 2011Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization assemblies, tool set and method
US7862590Apr 8, 2005Jan 4, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous process spacer
US7862591Nov 10, 2005Jan 4, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US7867256Apr 9, 2007Jan 11, 2011Synthes Usa, LlcDevice for dynamic stabilization of bones or bone fragments
US7879104Nov 15, 2006Feb 1, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal implant system
US7896906Dec 30, 2004Mar 1, 2011Depuy Spine, Inc.Artificial facet joint
US7901432Mar 1, 2004Mar 8, 2011Kyphon SarlMethod for lateral implantation of spinous process spacer
US7901437Mar 8, 2011Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization member with molded connection
US7905906Nov 8, 2006Mar 15, 2011Disc Motion Technologies, Inc.System and method for lumbar arthroplasty
US7909853Mar 31, 2005Mar 22, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation
US7918877Feb 28, 2005Apr 5, 2011Kyphon SarlLateral insertion method for spinous process spacer with deployable member
US7927354Feb 17, 2006Apr 19, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US7931674Mar 17, 2006Apr 26, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant having deployable wing and method of implantation
US7935134Jun 29, 2006May 3, 2011Exactech, Inc.Systems and methods for stabilization of bone structures
US7942905 *Apr 20, 2006May 17, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Vertebral stabilizer
US7951170May 30, 2008May 31, 2011Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization connecting member with pre-tensioned solid core
US7955356Feb 28, 2005Jun 7, 2011Kyphon SarlLaterally insertable interspinous process implant
US7955392Dec 14, 2006Jun 7, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous process devices and methods
US7959652Mar 24, 2006Jun 14, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation
US7976549Mar 23, 2007Jul 12, 2011Theken Spine, LlcInstruments for delivering spinal implants
US7985244Sep 27, 2005Jul 26, 2011Depuy Spine, Inc.Posterior dynamic stabilizer devices
US7985246Mar 31, 2006Jul 26, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Methods and instruments for delivering interspinous process spacers
US7988707Jan 7, 2009Aug 2, 2011Yale UniversityDynamic spine stabilizer
US7988709Feb 17, 2006Aug 2, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US7988710Feb 13, 2007Aug 2, 2011N Spine, Inc.Spinal stabilization device
US7993342Jun 16, 2006Aug 9, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US7993370Mar 2, 2005Aug 9, 2011N Spine, Inc.Method and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine
US7993374Oct 30, 2007Aug 9, 2011Kyphon SarlSupplemental spine fixation device and method
US7998174Jun 16, 2006Aug 16, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US7998175Jan 10, 2005Aug 16, 2011The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US7998208Mar 29, 2007Aug 16, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8007521Jan 22, 2007Aug 30, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8007537Jun 29, 2007Aug 30, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US8012177Jun 19, 2009Sep 6, 2011Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization assembly with frusto-conical connection
US8012180Oct 18, 2007Sep 6, 2011Synthes Usa, LlcDamping element and device for stabilization of adjacent vertebral bodies
US8012207Mar 10, 2005Sep 6, 2011Vertiflex, Inc.Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8012209Jan 29, 2007Sep 6, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant including a binder, binder aligner and method of implantation
US8021395May 21, 2008Sep 20, 2011Eden Spine, LlcInterspinous vertebral implant
US8025680May 17, 2006Sep 27, 2011Exactech, Inc.Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8025681Mar 29, 2007Sep 27, 2011Theken Spine, LlcDynamic motion spinal stabilization system
US8029541Oct 4, 2011Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes
US8029542Oct 31, 2007Oct 4, 2011Kyphon SarlSupplemental spine fixation device and method
US8029545Feb 7, 2006Oct 4, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic Inc.Articulating connecting member and anchor systems for spinal stabilization
US8029548Oct 4, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Flexible spinal stabilization element and system
US8029549Oct 30, 2007Oct 4, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8029550Oct 5, 2009Oct 4, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US8029567Feb 17, 2006Oct 4, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8034079Apr 12, 2005Oct 11, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implants and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment
US8034080Jan 22, 2007Oct 11, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8034081 *Feb 6, 2007Oct 11, 2011CollabComl, LLCInterspinous dynamic stabilization implant and method of implanting
US8038698Oct 19, 2005Oct 18, 2011Kphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8043335Oct 30, 2007Oct 25, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8043336Jan 21, 2010Oct 25, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Posterior vertebral support assembly
US8043378May 26, 2009Oct 25, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intercostal spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity
US8048117Sep 23, 2005Nov 1, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant and method of implantation
US8048118Apr 28, 2006Nov 1, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Adjustable interspinous process brace
US8048119Jul 20, 2006Nov 1, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Apparatus for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same
US8057513Feb 17, 2006Nov 15, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8062337May 4, 2006Nov 22, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same
US8066739Nov 29, 2011Jackson Roger PTool system for dynamic spinal implants
US8066742Mar 31, 2005Nov 29, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US8070778Mar 17, 2006Dec 6, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant with slide-in distraction piece and method of implantation
US8070783Aug 18, 2010Dec 6, 2011Depuy Spine, Inc.Facet joint replacement
US8075595Dec 6, 2004Dec 13, 2011The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8075596Jan 12, 2007Dec 13, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal prosthesis systems
US8083795Jan 18, 2006Dec 27, 2011Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same
US8088166Apr 30, 2008Jan 3, 2012Moximed, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US8092459May 24, 2007Jan 10, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8092496Jun 21, 2005Jan 10, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for posterior stabilization
US8092500Sep 15, 2009Jan 10, 2012Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization connecting member with floating core, compression spacer and over-mold
US8092502Oct 5, 2007Jan 10, 2012Jackson Roger PPolyaxial bone screw with uploaded threaded shank and method of assembly and use
US8092533Oct 3, 2006Jan 10, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Dynamic devices and methods for stabilizing vertebral members
US8092535Jun 26, 2007Jan 10, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US8096994Mar 29, 2007Jan 17, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8096995Mar 29, 2007Jan 17, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8096996Mar 19, 2008Jan 17, 2012Exactech, Inc.Rod reducer
US8097018May 24, 2007Jan 17, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8097019Oct 18, 2007Jan 17, 2012Kyphon SarlSystems and methods for in situ assembly of an interspinous process distraction implant
US8100915Jan 24, 2012Jackson Roger POrthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method
US8100943Jun 16, 2006Jan 24, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8100967Apr 30, 2008Jan 24, 2012Moximed, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US8105357Apr 28, 2006Jan 31, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous process brace
US8105358Jul 30, 2008Jan 31, 2012Kyphon SarlMedical implants and methods
US8105363Feb 2, 2009Jan 31, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySpinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion
US8105368Aug 1, 2007Jan 31, 2012Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization connecting member with slitted core and outer sleeve
US8109972Oct 25, 2007Feb 7, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation
US8109973Oct 30, 2006Feb 7, 2012Stryker SpineMethod for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US8114131Nov 5, 2008Feb 14, 2012Kyphon SarlExtension limiting devices and methods of use for the spine
US8114132Jan 13, 2010Feb 14, 2012Kyphon SarlDynamic interspinous process device
US8114135Jan 16, 2009Feb 14, 2012Kyphon SarlAdjustable surgical cables and methods for treating spinal stenosis
US8114136Mar 18, 2008Feb 14, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implants and methods for inter-spinous process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment
US8118839Nov 7, 2007Feb 21, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous implant
US8118840Feb 27, 2009Feb 21, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Vertebral rod and related method of manufacture
US8118844Apr 24, 2006Feb 21, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same
US8123782Sep 5, 2008Feb 28, 2012Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US8123805Apr 30, 2008Feb 28, 2012Moximed, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US8123807Dec 6, 2004Feb 28, 2012Vertiflex, Inc.Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8128661Sep 14, 2009Mar 6, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process distraction system and method with positionable wing and method
US8128662Oct 18, 2006Mar 6, 2012Vertiflex, Inc.Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer
US8128663Jun 27, 2007Mar 6, 2012Kyphon SarlSpine distraction implant
US8128698Oct 14, 2008Mar 6, 2012Anulex Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus
US8128702Oct 25, 2007Mar 6, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation
US8137385Oct 30, 2006Mar 20, 2012Stryker SpineSystem and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US8147516Oct 30, 2007Apr 3, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8147517May 23, 2006Apr 3, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Systems and methods for adjusting properties of a spinal implant
US8147518May 21, 2008Apr 3, 2012Spinadyne, Inc.Dynamic connector for spinal device
US8147526Feb 26, 2010Apr 3, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process spacer diagnostic parallel balloon catheter and methods of use
US8147548Mar 17, 2006Apr 3, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant having a thread-shaped wing and method of implantation
US8152810Nov 23, 2004Apr 10, 2012Jackson Roger PSpinal fixation tool set and method
US8152837Dec 20, 2005Apr 10, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8157840Jun 28, 2007Apr 17, 2012Kyphon SarlSpine distraction implant and method
US8157841May 24, 2007Apr 17, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8157842Jun 12, 2009Apr 17, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous implant and methods of use
US8162948Apr 24, 2012Jackson Roger POrthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method
US8162982Apr 17, 2009Apr 24, 2012Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments
US8162985Oct 20, 2004Apr 24, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8163022Sep 3, 2009Apr 24, 2012Anulex Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus
US8167890Oct 30, 2007May 1, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8167944May 1, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8172880Nov 5, 2007May 8, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral stabilising device
US8187305Jun 5, 2009May 29, 2012Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and apparatus for deploying spinous process constraints
US8187307Apr 17, 2009May 29, 2012Simpirica Spine, Inc.Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector
US8216275Oct 31, 2008Jul 10, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySpinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion
US8216276Jul 29, 2009Jul 10, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US8216277Dec 7, 2009Jul 10, 2012Kyphon SarlSpine distraction implant and method
US8216279Feb 18, 2010Jul 10, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal implant kits with multiple interchangeable modules
US8221458Oct 30, 2007Jul 17, 2012Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8221463May 31, 2007Jul 17, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US8221465Jun 8, 2010Jul 17, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Multi-chamber expandable interspinous process spacer
US8226653May 3, 2010Jul 24, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinous process stabilization devices and methods
US8226687Jul 24, 2012Stryker SpineApparatus and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US8226690Feb 23, 2006Jul 24, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for stabilization of bone structures
US8252028Dec 19, 2007Aug 28, 2012Depuy Spine, Inc.Posterior dynamic stabilization device
US8252031Apr 28, 2006Aug 28, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Molding device for an expandable interspinous process implant
US8262698Mar 16, 2006Sep 11, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same
US8267969Mar 20, 2007Sep 18, 2012Exactech, Inc.Screw systems and methods for use in stabilization of bone structures
US8273089Sep 25, 2012Jackson Roger PSpinal fixation tool set and method
US8273107Oct 25, 2007Sep 25, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant having a thread-shaped wing and method of implantation
US8273108Jul 8, 2008Sep 25, 2012Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US8277488Jul 24, 2008Oct 2, 2012Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US8292892May 13, 2009Oct 23, 2012Jackson Roger POrthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method
US8292922Apr 16, 2008Oct 23, 2012Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US8292926Aug 17, 2007Oct 23, 2012Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization connecting member with elastic core and outer sleeve
US8292927Apr 24, 2009Oct 23, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Flexible articulating spinal rod
US8308771Jun 5, 2009Nov 13, 2012Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and apparatus for locking a band
US8317831Jan 13, 2010Nov 27, 2012Kyphon SarlInterspinous process spacer diagnostic balloon catheter and methods of use
US8317832Feb 9, 2012Nov 27, 2012Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implants and methods for inter-spinous process dynamic stabilization of spinal motion segment
US8317864Nov 27, 2012The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8333790Mar 1, 2010Dec 18, 2012Yale UniversityDynamic spine stabilizer
US8348976Aug 27, 2007Jan 8, 2013Kyphon SarlSpinous-process implants and methods of using the same
US8348977Jun 30, 2010Jan 8, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Artificial spinous process for the sacrum and methods of use
US8348978Apr 28, 2006Jan 8, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interosteotic implant
US8349013Jun 22, 2010Jan 8, 2013Kyphon SarlSpine distraction implant
US8353932Aug 20, 2008Jan 15, 2013Jackson Roger PPolyaxial bone anchor assembly with one-piece closure, pressure insert and plastic elongate member
US8357181Oct 27, 2005Jan 22, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US8361118 *Oct 5, 2009Jan 29, 2013Biedermann Technologies Gmbh & Co. KgElongated implant device and bone stabilization device including the same
US8366745Jul 1, 2009Feb 5, 2013Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization assembly having pre-compressed spacers with differential displacements
US8372117Jun 5, 2009Feb 12, 2013Kyphon SarlMulti-level interspinous implants and methods of use
US8377067Feb 19, 2013Roger P. JacksonOrthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method
US8394133Jul 23, 2010Mar 12, 2013Roger P. JacksonDynamic fixation assemblies with inner core and outer coil-like member
US8403961 *Apr 18, 2008Mar 26, 2013Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for controlled flexion restriction of spinal segments
US8403964Aug 8, 2011Mar 26, 2013Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness and constraining the spreading of a spinal segment
US8409281Apr 30, 2008Apr 2, 2013Moximed, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US8409282Jul 26, 2005Apr 2, 2013Vertiflex, Inc.Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8414619Apr 9, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Vertebral rods and methods of use
US8425559Nov 7, 2006Apr 23, 2013Vertiflex, Inc.Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8444681Apr 13, 2012May 21, 2013Roger P. JacksonPolyaxial bone anchor with pop-on shank, friction fit retainer and winged insert
US8449576Jun 28, 2007May 28, 2013DePuy Synthes Products, LLCDynamic fixation system
US8454659Jun 29, 2007Jun 4, 2013Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US8454660Jun 4, 2013Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes
US8454693Feb 24, 2011Jun 4, 2013Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8454697Apr 5, 2012Jun 4, 2013Anulex Technologies, Inc.Method and apparatus for the treatment of tissue
US8460319Aug 10, 2010Jun 11, 2013Anulex Technologies, Inc.Intervertebral disc annulus repair system and method
US8475498Jan 3, 2008Jul 2, 2013Roger P. JacksonDynamic stabilization connecting member with cord connection
US8486110Dec 29, 2011Jul 16, 2013The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySpinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion
US8506599Aug 5, 2011Aug 13, 2013Roger P. JacksonDynamic stabilization assembly with frusto-conical connection
US8506636Jun 25, 2007Aug 13, 2013Theken Spine, LlcOffset radius lordosis
US8523865Jan 16, 2009Sep 3, 2013Exactech, Inc.Tissue splitter
US8523904Jul 13, 2007Sep 3, 2013The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityMethods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment
US8523948 *Oct 20, 2009Sep 3, 2013Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing assemblies having a tension member, and methods
US8529603Jan 24, 2012Sep 10, 2013Stryker SpineSystem and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US8529606Mar 10, 2010Sep 10, 2013Simpirica Spine, Inc.Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use
US8529607Jul 28, 2011Sep 10, 2013Simpirica Spine, Inc.Sacral tether anchor and methods of use
US8540751Feb 21, 2007Sep 24, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8540753Oct 5, 2004Sep 24, 2013Roger P. JacksonPolyaxial bone screw with uploaded threaded shank and method of assembly and use
US8545538Apr 26, 2010Oct 1, 2013M. Samy AbdouDevices and methods for inter-vertebral orthopedic device placement
US8551142Dec 13, 2010Oct 8, 2013Exactech, Inc.Methods for stabilization of bone structures
US8556938Oct 5, 2010Oct 15, 2013Roger P. JacksonPolyaxial bone anchor with non-pivotable retainer and pop-on shank, some with friction fit
US8556977Nov 12, 2010Oct 15, 2013Anulex Technologies, Inc.Tissue anchoring system and method
US8562650Mar 1, 2011Oct 22, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Percutaneous spinous process fusion plate assembly and method
US8562653Mar 10, 2010Oct 22, 2013Simpirica Spine, Inc.Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use
US8568454Apr 27, 2007Oct 29, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8568455Oct 26, 2007Oct 29, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8568460Apr 27, 2007Oct 29, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8591515Aug 26, 2009Nov 26, 2013Roger P. JacksonSpinal fixation tool set and method
US8591546Dec 7, 2011Nov 26, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous process implant having a thread-shaped wing and method of implantation
US8591548Mar 31, 2011Nov 26, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinous process fusion plate assembly
US8591549Apr 8, 2011Nov 26, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Variable durometer lumbar-sacral implant
US8591560Aug 2, 2012Nov 26, 2013Roger P. JacksonDynamic stabilization connecting member with elastic core and outer sleeve
US8597362Aug 27, 2010Dec 3, 2013Cotera, Inc.Method and apparatus for force redistribution in articular joints
US8613747Dec 18, 2008Dec 24, 2013Vertiflex, Inc.Spacer insertion instrument
US8613760Dec 14, 2011Dec 24, 2013Roger P. JacksonDynamic stabilization connecting member with slitted core and outer sleeve
US8617211Mar 28, 2007Dec 31, 2013Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8623057Jun 17, 2011Jan 7, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCSpinal stabilization device
US8623059Jan 13, 2012Jan 7, 2014Stryker SpineSystem and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US8628574Jul 27, 2010Jan 14, 2014Vertiflex, Inc.Systems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8632590Sep 26, 2006Jan 21, 2014Anulex Technologies, Inc.Apparatus and methods for the treatment of the intervertebral disc
US8641734Apr 29, 2009Feb 4, 2014DePuy Synthes Products, LLCDual spring posterior dynamic stabilization device with elongation limiting elastomers
US8641762Jan 9, 2012Feb 4, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Systems and methods for in situ assembly of an interspinous process distraction implant
US8652153Aug 10, 2010Feb 18, 2014Anulex Technologies, Inc.Intervertebral disc annulus repair system and bone anchor delivery tool
US8652175Dec 31, 2004Feb 18, 2014Rachiotek, LlcSurgical implant devices and systems including a sheath member
US8668719Mar 30, 2010Mar 11, 2014Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and apparatus for improving shear loading capacity of a spinal segment
US8672974Feb 21, 2007Mar 18, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8672975Oct 26, 2007Mar 18, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, IncSpine distraction implant and method
US8673008Jan 10, 2012Mar 18, 2014Spinadyne, Inc.Posterior spinal arthroplasty system
US8673009Jan 10, 2012Mar 18, 2014Spinadyne, Inc.Spinal prosthesis and facet joint prosthesis
US8679161Oct 30, 2007Mar 25, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Percutaneous spinal implants and methods
US8690919Dec 30, 2009Apr 8, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Surgical spacer with shape control
US8696710Oct 6, 2011Apr 15, 2014Simpirica Spine, Inc.Device and accessories for limiting flexion
US8696711Jul 30, 2012Apr 15, 2014Roger P. JacksonPolyaxial bone anchor assembly with one-piece closure, pressure insert and plastic elongate member
US8709043Jan 18, 2011Apr 29, 2014Depuy Spine, Inc.Artificial facet joint
US8709090Apr 30, 2008Apr 29, 2014Moximed, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US8740943Oct 20, 2009Jun 3, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8740948Dec 15, 2010Jun 3, 2014Vertiflex, Inc.Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods
US8771317Oct 28, 2009Jul 8, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous process implant and method of implantation
US8790372Mar 22, 2012Jul 29, 2014Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments
US8801795Oct 14, 2009Aug 12, 2014Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems
US8814908Jul 26, 2010Aug 26, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Injectable flexible interspinous process device system
US8814913Sep 3, 2013Aug 26, 2014Roger P JacksonHelical guide and advancement flange with break-off extensions
US8821548Apr 27, 2007Sep 2, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8828017Jun 28, 2007Sep 9, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US8840617Feb 2, 2012Sep 23, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous process spacer diagnostic parallel balloon catheter and methods of use
US8840646May 10, 2007Sep 23, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinous process implants and methods
US8845649May 13, 2009Sep 30, 2014Roger P. JacksonSpinal fixation tool set and method for rod reduction and fastener insertion
US8845724Feb 7, 2014Sep 30, 2014Cotera, Inc.Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the articular joints
US8845726Jan 22, 2009Sep 30, 2014Vertiflex, Inc.Dilator
US8852235Sep 11, 2007Oct 7, 2014Spinadyne, Inc.Posteriorly inserted artificial disc and an artificial facet joint
US8858600Apr 15, 2008Oct 14, 2014Spinadyne, Inc.Dynamic spinal stabilization device
US8864828Jan 15, 2009Oct 21, 2014Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US8888816Mar 16, 2010Nov 18, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Distractible interspinous process implant and method of implantation
US8894657Nov 28, 2011Nov 25, 2014Roger P. JacksonTool system for dynamic spinal implants
US8894686Jun 29, 2007Nov 25, 2014Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous process implants and methods of use
US8894714May 19, 2011Nov 25, 2014Moximed, Inc.Unlinked implantable knee unloading device
US8900271May 1, 2012Dec 2, 2014The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US8900272Jan 28, 2013Dec 2, 2014Roger P JacksonDynamic fixation assemblies with inner core and outer coil-like member
US8911477Oct 21, 2008Dec 16, 2014Roger P. JacksonDynamic stabilization member with end plate support and cable core extension
US8945183Mar 9, 2009Feb 3, 2015Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator
US8968366Jan 4, 2007Mar 3, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, LLCMethod and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine
US8974499 *Sep 16, 2009Mar 10, 2015Stryker SpineApparatus and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US8979900 *Feb 13, 2007Mar 17, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, LLCSpinal stabilization device
US8979904Sep 7, 2012Mar 17, 2015Roger P JacksonConnecting member with tensioned cord, low profile rigid sleeve and spacer with torsion control
US8992576Dec 17, 2009Mar 31, 2015DePuy Synthes Products, LLCPosterior spine dynamic stabilizer
US9005298Jan 6, 2010Apr 14, 2015Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems
US9011494Sep 24, 2009Apr 21, 2015Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Composite vertebral rod system and methods of use
US9023084Dec 6, 2004May 5, 2015The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine
US9034016Jul 26, 2011May 19, 2015Yale UniversityDynamic spine stabilizer
US9034049 *Aug 1, 2013May 19, 2015Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing assemblies having a tension member, and methods
US9039742Apr 9, 2012May 26, 2015The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US9044270Mar 29, 2011Jun 2, 2015Moximed, Inc.Apparatus for controlling a load on a hip joint
US9050139Mar 15, 2013Jun 9, 2015Roger P. JacksonOrthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method
US9055978Oct 2, 2012Jun 16, 2015Roger P. JacksonOrthopedic implant rod reduction tool set and method
US9060867 *Aug 1, 2013Jun 23, 2015Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing assemblies having a tension member, and methods
US9095442Jan 23, 2012Aug 4, 2015Krt Investors, Inc.Method and apparatus for the treatment of the intervertebral disc annulus
US9101404Jan 26, 2011Aug 11, 2015Roger P. JacksonDynamic stabilization connecting member with molded connection
US9107706Sep 11, 2013Aug 18, 2015Simpirica Spine, Inc.Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use
US9114016Feb 7, 2014Aug 25, 2015Cotera, Inc.Method and apparatus for altering biomechanics of the articular joints
US9114025Jun 29, 2011Aug 25, 2015Krt Investors, Inc.Methods and devices for spinal disc annulus reconstruction and repair
US9119680Feb 27, 2012Sep 1, 2015Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US9125692Feb 25, 2013Sep 8, 2015The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US9125746Feb 4, 2011Sep 8, 2015Moximed, Inc.Methods of implanting extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems
US9144439Mar 26, 2013Sep 29, 2015Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Vertebral rods and methods of use
US9149304Aug 2, 2013Oct 6, 2015The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Sanford Junior UniversityMethods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment
US9155570Sep 14, 2012Oct 13, 2015Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US9155572Mar 6, 2012Oct 13, 2015Vertiflex, Inc.Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer
US9161783Sep 14, 2012Oct 20, 2015Vertiflex, Inc.Interspinous spacer
US9186186Apr 18, 2014Nov 17, 2015Vertiflex, Inc.Spinal spacer for cervical and other vertebra, and associated systems and methods
US9192372Jun 3, 2013Nov 24, 2015Krt Investors, Inc.Method for the treatment of tissue
US9211146Feb 27, 2012Dec 15, 2015The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US9211150Sep 23, 2010Dec 15, 2015Roger P. JacksonSpinal fixation tool set and method
US9216039Nov 19, 2010Dec 22, 2015Roger P. JacksonDynamic spinal stabilization assemblies, tool set and method
US9216041Feb 8, 2012Dec 22, 2015Roger P. JacksonSpinal connecting members with tensioned cords and rigid sleeves for engaging compression inserts
US9232968Sep 19, 2008Jan 12, 2016DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.Polymeric pedicle rods and methods of manufacturing
US20040073215 *Mar 25, 2003Apr 15, 2004Scient ' XDynamic intervertebral connection device with controlled multidirectional deflection
US20040097931 *Oct 14, 2003May 20, 2004Steve MitchellInterspinous process and sacrum implant and method
US20040143264 *Aug 21, 2003Jul 22, 2004Mcafee Paul C.Metal-backed UHMWPE rod sleeve system preserving spinal motion
US20040153071 *Dec 29, 2003Aug 5, 2004St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process distraction system and method with positionable wing and method
US20040167520 *Mar 1, 2004Aug 26, 2004St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Spinous process implant with tethers
US20040220568 *Mar 1, 2004Nov 4, 2004St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Method for lateral implantation of spinous process spacer
US20050075634 *Oct 27, 2003Apr 7, 2005Zucherman James F.Interspinous process implant with radiolucent spacer and lead-in tissue expander
US20050124991 *Mar 10, 2004Jun 9, 2005Tae-Ahn JahngMethod and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine
US20050171543 *Dec 31, 2004Aug 4, 2005Timm Jens P.Spine stabilization systems and associated devices, assemblies and methods
US20050177156 *Dec 31, 2004Aug 11, 2005Timm Jens P.Surgical implant devices and systems including a sheath member
US20050177157 *Mar 2, 2005Aug 11, 2005N Spine, Inc.Method and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine
US20050203514 *Dec 27, 2004Sep 15, 2005Tae-Ahn JahngAdjustable spinal stabilization system
US20050216017 *Mar 9, 2005Sep 29, 2005Louie FieldingSpinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion
US20050222569 *Mar 24, 2005Oct 6, 2005Panjabi Manohar MDynamic spine stabilizer
US20050228383 *Feb 28, 2005Oct 13, 2005St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Lateral insertion method for spinous process spacer with deployable member
US20050228384 *Feb 28, 2005Oct 13, 2005St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Spinous process implant with tethers
US20050245930 *May 19, 2005Nov 3, 2005Timm Jens PDynamic spine stabilizer
US20050251170 *Mar 30, 2005Nov 10, 2005Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.Instrument for effecting anastomosis of respective tissues defining two body lumens
US20050261680 *Sep 25, 2003Nov 24, 2005Imperial College Innovations Ltd.Bone fixated, articulated joint load control device
US20050261768 *May 21, 2004Nov 24, 2005Trieu Hai HInterspinous spacer
US20060064165 *Mar 31, 2005Mar 23, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation
US20060064166 *Mar 31, 2005Mar 23, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation
US20060084976 *Sep 30, 2004Apr 20, 2006Depuy Spine, Inc.Posterior stabilization systems and methods
US20060084982 *Oct 20, 2004Apr 20, 2006The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US20060084983 *Oct 20, 2004Apr 20, 2006The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US20060084984 *Dec 6, 2004Apr 20, 2006The Board Of Trustees For The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US20060084985 *Dec 6, 2004Apr 20, 2006The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US20060084987 *Jan 10, 2005Apr 20, 2006Kim Daniel HSystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US20060085076 *Oct 21, 2004Apr 20, 2006Manoj KrishnaPosterior spinal arthroplasty-development of a new posteriorly inserted artificial disc and an artificial facet joint
US20060089717 *Aug 12, 2005Apr 27, 2006Manoj KrishnaSpinal prosthesis and facet joint prosthesis
US20060111715 *Jan 9, 2006May 25, 2006Jackson Roger PDynamic stabilization assemblies, tool set and method
US20060122620 *Dec 6, 2004Jun 8, 2006The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for stabilizing the motion or adjusting the position of the spine
US20060136060 *Sep 3, 2003Jun 22, 2006Jean TaylorPosterior vertebral support assembly
US20060149229 *Dec 30, 2004Jul 6, 2006Kwak Seungkyu DanielArtificial facet joint
US20060155279 *Oct 26, 2005Jul 13, 2006Axial Biotech, Inc.Apparatus and method for concave scoliosis expansion
US20060184247 *Oct 19, 2005Aug 17, 2006Edidin Avram APercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20060184248 *Oct 19, 2005Aug 17, 2006Edidin Avram APercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20060189984 *Mar 22, 2005Aug 24, 2006Medicinelodge, Inc.Apparatus and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US20060195093 *Nov 22, 2005Aug 31, 2006Tae-Ahn JahngMethod and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine
US20060202242 *Mar 2, 2006Sep 14, 2006Sony CorporationSolid-state imaging device
US20060212033 *Jul 21, 2005Sep 21, 2006Accin CorporationVertebral stabilization using flexible rods
US20060224159 *Mar 31, 2005Oct 5, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US20060229612 *Jan 4, 2006Oct 12, 2006Accin CorporationMethods and apparatus for vertebral stabilization using sleeved springs
US20060235387 *Apr 15, 2005Oct 19, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Transverse process/laminar spacer
US20060235521 *Apr 27, 2006Oct 19, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Spinous process implant with tethers
US20060241613 *Apr 12, 2005Oct 26, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Implants and methods for inter-transverse process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment
US20060241614 *Apr 12, 2005Oct 26, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Implants and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment
US20060241757 *Mar 31, 2005Oct 26, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same
US20060247637 *May 30, 2006Nov 2, 2006Dennis ColleranSystem and method for dynamic skeletal stabilization
US20060247640 *Apr 29, 2005Nov 2, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Spinous process stabilization devices and methods
US20060264938 *Mar 17, 2006Nov 23, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process implant having deployable wing and method of implantation
US20060264939 *Mar 17, 2006Nov 23, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process implant with slide-in distraction piece and method of implantation
US20060264940 *Mar 29, 2006Nov 23, 2006Stephan HartmannDynamic damping element for two bones
US20060265066 *Mar 17, 2006Nov 23, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process implant having a thread-shaped wing and method of implantation
US20060265074 *Apr 4, 2006Nov 23, 2006Manoj KrishnaPosterior spinal arthroplasty-development of a new posteriorly inserted artificial disc, a new anteriorly inserted artifical disc and an artificial facet joint
US20060271046 *May 31, 2005Nov 30, 2006Kwak Seungkyu DanielFacet joint replacement
US20060271049 *Mar 24, 2006Nov 30, 2006St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation
US20060282080 *May 30, 2006Dec 14, 2006Accin CorporationVertebral facet stabilizer
US20070010813 *Mar 17, 2006Jan 11, 2007St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process implant having deployable wing and method of implantation
US20070043356 *Jul 26, 2005Feb 22, 2007Timm Jens PDynamic spine stabilization device with travel-limiting functionality
US20070043359 *Feb 23, 2006Feb 22, 2007Moti AltaracSystems and methods for stabilization of bone structures
US20070049934 *Feb 17, 2006Mar 1, 2007Edidin Avram APercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20070049935 *Feb 17, 2006Mar 1, 2007Edidin Avram APercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20070055237 *Feb 17, 2006Mar 8, 2007Edidin Avram APercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20070055246 *Nov 3, 2006Mar 8, 2007St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Spine distraction implant and method
US20070093813 *Oct 11, 2005Apr 26, 2007Callahan Ronald IiDynamic spinal stabilizer
US20070093814 *Oct 11, 2005Apr 26, 2007Callahan Ronald IiDynamic spinal stabilization systems
US20070093815 *Oct 11, 2005Apr 26, 2007Callahan Ronald IiDynamic spinal stabilizer
US20070100340 *Oct 27, 2005May 3, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US20070100341 *Jun 29, 2006May 3, 2007Reglos Joey CSystems and methods for stabilization of bone structures
US20070123861 *Nov 10, 2005May 31, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US20070123871 *Jan 4, 2007May 31, 2007Tae-Ahn JahngMethod and apparatus for flexible fixation of a spine
US20070167945 *Jan 18, 2006Jul 19, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same
US20070167949 *Mar 20, 2007Jul 19, 2007Moti AltaracScrew systems and methods for use in stabilization of bone structures
US20070168038 *Jan 13, 2006Jul 19, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Materials, devices and methods for treating multiple spinal regions including the interbody region
US20070173820 *Jan 13, 2006Jul 26, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Materials, devices, and methods for treating multiple spinal regions including the anterior region
US20070173823 *Jan 18, 2006Jul 26, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US20070191832 *Jan 27, 2006Aug 16, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Vertebral rods and methods of use
US20070191834 *Jan 27, 2006Aug 16, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Artificial spinous process for the sacrum and methods of use
US20070191837 *Jan 27, 2006Aug 16, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interspinous devices and methods of use
US20070191838 *Jan 27, 2006Aug 16, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interspinous devices and methods of use
US20070191953 *Jan 27, 2006Aug 16, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral implants and methods of use
US20070198014 *Feb 7, 2006Aug 23, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Articulating connecting member and anchor systems for spinal stabilization
US20070203490 *Apr 27, 2007Aug 30, 2007Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20070203493 *Feb 21, 2007Aug 30, 2007Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20070203495 *Apr 27, 2007Aug 30, 2007Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20070203497 *Apr 27, 2007Aug 30, 2007Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20070203501 *Apr 27, 2007Aug 30, 2007Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20070208347 *Apr 27, 2007Sep 6, 2007Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20070225706 *Feb 17, 2006Sep 27, 2007Clark Janna GPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20070225710 *Feb 13, 2007Sep 27, 2007Tae-Ahn JahngSpinal stabilization device
US20070225810 *Mar 23, 2007Sep 27, 2007Dennis ColleranFlexible cage spinal implant
US20070233068 *Feb 22, 2006Oct 4, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic assembly for spinal stabilization and method of implanting same
US20070233074 *Mar 16, 2006Oct 4, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same
US20070233076 *Mar 31, 2006Oct 4, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Methods and instruments for delivering interspinous process spacers
US20070233094 *Mar 29, 2007Oct 4, 2007Dennis ColleranDynamic motion spinal stabilization system
US20070233095 *Apr 9, 2007Oct 4, 2007Schlaepfer Fridolin JDevice for dynamic stabilization of bones or bone fragments
US20070239159 *Oct 25, 2006Oct 11, 2007Vertiflex, Inc.Systems and methods for stabilization of bone structures
US20070265623 *Jan 22, 2007Nov 15, 2007Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods
US20070265624 *Feb 21, 2007Nov 15, 2007Zucherman Jamesq FSpine distraction implant and method
US20070270814 *Apr 20, 2006Nov 22, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Vertebral stabilizer
US20070270823 *Apr 28, 2006Nov 22, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Multi-chamber expandable interspinous process brace
US20070270824 *Apr 28, 2006Nov 22, 2007Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Interspinous process brace
US20070270825 *Apr 28, 2006Nov 22, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Expandable interspinous process implant and method of installing same
US20070270826 *Apr 28, 2006Nov 22, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interosteotic implant
US20070270828 *Apr 28, 2006Nov 22, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Interspinous process brace
US20070270829 *Apr 28, 2006Nov 22, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Molding device for an expandable interspinous process implant
US20070270834 *May 4, 2006Nov 22, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Expandable device for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same
US20070270959 *Apr 18, 2006Nov 22, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Arthroplasty device
US20070276368 *May 23, 2006Nov 29, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Systems and methods for adjusting properties of a spinal implant
US20070276369 *May 26, 2006Nov 29, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.In vivo-customizable implant
US20070276370 *Oct 18, 2006Nov 29, 2007Vertiflex, Inc.Minimally invasive tooling for delivery of interspinous spacer
US20070276372 *Jan 22, 2007Nov 29, 2007Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods
US20070276373 *Jan 22, 2007Nov 29, 2007Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods
US20070276380 *Feb 13, 2007Nov 29, 2007Tae-Ahn JahngSpinal stabilization device
US20070276493 *May 24, 2007Nov 29, 2007Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20070276496 *May 23, 2006Nov 29, 2007Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Surgical spacer with shape control
US20070276500 *Jan 29, 2007Nov 29, 2007St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Interspinous process implant including a binder, binder aligner and method of implantation
US20070282340 *May 24, 2007Dec 6, 2007Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20070282442 *May 24, 2007Dec 6, 2007Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20070288009 *Mar 23, 2007Dec 13, 2007Steven BrownDynamic spinal stabilization device
US20070288012 *Apr 23, 2007Dec 13, 2007Dennis ColleranDynamic motion spinal stabilization system and device
US20070288094 *Nov 8, 2006Dec 13, 2007Manoj KrishnaSystem and method for lumbar arthroplasty
US20070299526 *Jun 14, 2007Dec 27, 2007Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080009866 *Jul 13, 2007Jan 10, 2008Todd AlaminMethods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment
US20080015700 *Mar 28, 2007Jan 17, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080021460 *Jul 20, 2006Jan 24, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic Inc.Apparatus for insertion between anatomical structures and a procedure utilizing same
US20080021468 *May 31, 2007Jan 24, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080021471 *Oct 2, 2007Jan 24, 2008Kyphon Inc.System and Method for Immobilizing Adjacent Spinous Processes
US20080021560 *Mar 28, 2007Jan 24, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080027433 *Mar 29, 2007Jan 31, 2008Kohm Andrew CPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080027545 *May 31, 2007Jan 31, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080027552 *Jun 28, 2007Jan 31, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080027553 *Jun 28, 2007Jan 31, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080033435 *Oct 18, 2007Feb 7, 2008Armin StuderDamping element and device for stabilization of adjacent vertebral bodies
US20080033445 *Jun 27, 2007Feb 7, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080033558 *Jun 29, 2007Feb 7, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080033559 *Jun 29, 2007Feb 7, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080033560 *Jun 29, 2007Feb 7, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080033562 *Sep 11, 2007Feb 7, 2008Disc Motion Technologies, Inc.Posteriorly inserted artificial disc and an artificial facet joint
US20080039853 *Jun 27, 2007Feb 14, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080039858 *Jun 28, 2007Feb 14, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080039859 *May 31, 2007Feb 14, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080039944 *Jan 22, 2007Feb 14, 2008Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous Spinal Implants and Methods
US20080039947 *Jun 29, 2007Feb 14, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080045958 *Oct 25, 2007Feb 21, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation
US20080045959 *Oct 26, 2007Feb 21, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080046085 *Oct 25, 2007Feb 21, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implant having deployable wings and method of implantation
US20080046086 *Oct 25, 2007Feb 21, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implant having a thread-shaped wing and method of implantation
US20080046087 *Oct 25, 2007Feb 21, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implant including a binder and method of implantation
US20080046088 *Oct 26, 2007Feb 21, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080046089 *Oct 26, 2007Feb 21, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080051785 *Feb 21, 2007Feb 28, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080051893 *Oct 30, 2007Feb 28, 2008Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080051894 *Oct 30, 2007Feb 28, 2008Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080051899 *Jun 29, 2007Feb 28, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080051905 *Oct 30, 2007Feb 28, 2008Zucherman James FSupplemental spine fixation device and method
US20080058934 *Oct 30, 2007Mar 6, 2008Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080058935 *Oct 30, 2007Mar 6, 2008Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080058936 *Oct 30, 2007Mar 6, 2008Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080058937 *Oct 30, 2007Mar 6, 2008Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080058941 *Oct 30, 2007Mar 6, 2008Zucherman James FSupplemental spine fixation device and method
US20080065078 *Nov 5, 2007Mar 13, 2008Henry GrafIntervertebral stabilising device
US20080065086 *Jun 27, 2007Mar 13, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080065212 *Jun 26, 2007Mar 13, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080065213 *Jun 26, 2007Mar 13, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implants and methods of use
US20080065219 *Jun 25, 2007Mar 13, 2008Justin DyeOffset radius lordosis
US20080071376 *Mar 29, 2007Mar 20, 2008Kohm Andrew CPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080071378 *Jun 28, 2007Mar 20, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080077241 *Sep 24, 2007Mar 27, 2008Linh NguyenRemovable rasp/trial member insert, kit and method of use
US20080091213 *Dec 6, 2007Apr 17, 2008Jackson Roger PTool system for dynamic spinal implants
US20080108993 *Oct 19, 2007May 8, 2008Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for deploying spinous process constraints
US20080114357 *Nov 15, 2006May 15, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Inter-transverse process spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity
US20080114455 *Nov 15, 2006May 15, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Rotating Interspinous Process Devices and Methods of Use
US20080114456 *Nov 15, 2006May 15, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal implant system
US20080132952 *May 24, 2007Jun 5, 2008Malandain Hugues FPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080161919 *Oct 3, 2006Jul 3, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Dynamic Devices and Methods for Stabilizing Vertebral Members
US20080161920 *Oct 3, 2006Jul 3, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Dynamizing Interbody Implant and Methods for Stabilizing Vertebral Members
US20080172057 *Mar 28, 2007Jul 17, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080172090 *Jan 12, 2007Jul 17, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal Prosthesis Systems
US20080177264 *Jul 13, 2007Jul 24, 2008Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for laterally stabilized constraint of spinous processes
US20080177272 *Jul 3, 2007Jul 24, 2008Zucherman James FInterspinous process implant having deployable wing and method of implantation
US20080177298 *Oct 18, 2007Jul 24, 2008St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Tensioner Tool and Method for Implanting an Interspinous Process Implant Including a Binder
US20080177333 *Oct 24, 2006Jul 24, 2008Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Adjustable jacking implant
US20080177391 *Oct 18, 2007Jul 24, 2008St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Systems and Methods for In Situ Assembly of an Interspinous Process Distraction Implant
US20080183210 *Oct 31, 2007Jul 31, 2008Zucherman James FSupplemental spine fixation device and method
US20080195154 *Apr 15, 2008Aug 14, 2008Disc Motion Technologies, Inc.Dynamic spinal stabilization device
US20080228227 *May 21, 2008Sep 18, 2008Disc Motion Technologies, Inc.Dynamic connector for spinal device
US20080234746 *Feb 13, 2007Sep 25, 2008N Spine, Inc.Spinal stabilization device
US20080234824 *Feb 6, 2007Sep 25, 2008Youssef Jim AInterspinous dynamic stabilization implant and method of implanting
US20080262549 *Apr 18, 2008Oct 23, 2008Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for deploying spinous process constraints
US20080275552 *Apr 30, 2008Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US20080275555 *May 2, 2007Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Extra-Articular Implantable Mechanical Energy Absorbing Systems
US20080275556 *Apr 30, 2008Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US20080275557 *Apr 30, 2008Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US20080275558 *Jul 9, 2007Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems and implantation method
US20080275559 *Apr 30, 2008Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US20080275560 *Apr 30, 2008Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Femoral and tibial base components
US20080275561 *Jul 9, 2007Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems and implantation method
US20080275562 *Apr 30, 2008Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Femoral and tibial base components
US20080275565 *Apr 30, 2008Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US20080275567 *May 1, 2007Nov 6, 2008Exploramed Nc4, Inc.Extra-Articular Implantable Mechanical Energy Absorbing Systems
US20080281361 *May 10, 2007Nov 13, 2008Shannon Marlece VitturPosterior stabilization and spinous process systems and methods
US20080287997 *Jul 8, 2008Nov 20, 2008Moti AltaracInterspinous spacer
US20080288075 *Jun 27, 2007Nov 20, 2008Zucherman James FSpine distraction implant and method
US20080288078 *May 27, 2008Nov 20, 2008Kohm Andrew CPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20080294199 *May 25, 2007Nov 27, 2008Andrew KohmSpinous process implants and methods of using the same
US20080294263 *Jul 24, 2008Nov 27, 2008Moti AltaracInterspinous spacer
US20080319487 *Apr 18, 2008Dec 25, 2008Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and Devices for Controlled Flexion Restriction of Spinal Segments
US20090005819 *May 21, 2008Jan 1, 2009Eden Spine, LlcInterspinous vertebral implant
US20090030523 *Oct 9, 2008Jan 29, 2009Jean TaylorVeretebra Stabilizing Assembly
US20090062915 *Aug 27, 2007Mar 5, 2009Andrew KohmSpinous-process implants and methods of using the same
US20090088782 *Sep 28, 2007Apr 2, 2009Missoum MoumeneFlexible Spinal Rod With Elastomeric Jacket
US20090099607 *Feb 15, 2008Apr 16, 2009Stryker SpineApparatus and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US20090125030 *Jan 22, 2009May 14, 2009Shawn TebbeDilator
US20090163955 *Sep 19, 2008Jun 25, 2009Missoum MoumenePolymeric Pedicle Rods and Methods of Manufacturing
US20090198241 *Jul 30, 2008Aug 6, 2009Phan Christopher USpine distraction tools and methods of use
US20090198245 *Jul 30, 2008Aug 6, 2009Phan Christopher UTools and methods for insertion and removal of medical implants
US20090198282 *Feb 2, 2009Aug 6, 2009Louis FieldingSpinal implant and method for restricting spinal flexion
US20090198337 *Jul 30, 2008Aug 6, 2009Phan Christopher UMedical implants and methods
US20090222043 *Mar 9, 2009Sep 3, 2009Moti AltaracInterspinous process spacer instrument system with deployment indicator
US20090227990 *May 26, 2009Sep 10, 2009Stoklund OleIntercostal spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity
US20090240283 *Mar 18, 2008Sep 24, 2009Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implants and methods for inter-spinous process dynamic stabilization of a spinal motion segment
US20090248026 *Apr 17, 2009Oct 1, 2009Moximed, Inc.Bone fixated, articulated joint load control device
US20090264932 *Oct 22, 2009Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments
US20090275982 *Apr 3, 2007Nov 5, 2009Jean TaylorDevice for treating vertebrae, including an interspinous implant
US20090326583 *Jun 25, 2008Dec 31, 2009Missoum MoumenePosterior Dynamic Stabilization System With Flexible Ligament
US20090326584 *Jun 27, 2008Dec 31, 2009Michael Andrew SlivkaSpinal Dynamic Stabilization Rods Having Interior Bumpers
US20100004744 *Sep 14, 2009Jan 7, 2010Kyphon SarlInterspinous process distraction system and method with positionable wing and method
US20100010544 *Sep 16, 2009Jan 14, 2010Stryker SpineApparatus and method for dynamic vertebral stabilization
US20100023060 *Jun 5, 2009Jan 28, 2010Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and apparatus for locking a band
US20100030269 *Sep 5, 2007Feb 4, 2010Jean TaylorInterspinous spinal prosthesis
US20100030549 *Feb 4, 2010Lee Michael MMobile device having human language translation capability with positional feedback
US20100036424 *Feb 11, 2010Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness and constraining the spreading of a spinal segment
US20100042150 *Feb 18, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic device for spinal stabilization and method of manufacturing same
US20100069964 *Jun 28, 2007Mar 18, 2010Beat LechmannDynamic fixation system
US20100070038 *Nov 7, 2007Mar 18, 2010Jean TaylorInterspinous implant
US20100082108 *Dec 7, 2009Apr 1, 2010Kyphon SarlSpine distraction implant and method
US20100087862 *Oct 5, 2009Apr 8, 2010Lutz BiedermannElongated implant device and bone stabilization device including the same
US20100094344 *Oct 14, 2008Apr 15, 2010Kyphon SarlPedicle-Based Posterior Stabilization Members and Methods of Use
US20100106247 *Oct 14, 2009Apr 29, 2010Moximed, Inc.Extra-Articular Implantable Mechanical Energy Absorbing Systems
US20100106248 *Jan 6, 2010Apr 29, 2010Moximed, Inc.Extra-Articular Implantable Mechanical Energy Absorbing Systems
US20100106252 *Oct 29, 2008Apr 29, 2010Kohm Andrew CSpinal implants having multiple movable members
US20100114166 *Nov 5, 2008May 6, 2010Andrew KohmExtension limiting devices and methods of use for the spine
US20100114320 *Dec 30, 2009May 6, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc., An Indiana CorporationSurgical spacer with shape control
US20100121456 *Jan 21, 2010May 13, 2010Kyphon SarlPosterior vertebral support assembly
US20100121457 *Jan 20, 2010May 13, 2010Moximed, Inc.Extra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing systems and implantation method
US20100137996 *Feb 9, 2010Jun 3, 2010Moximed, Inc.Femoral and tibial base components
US20100145336 *Dec 1, 2009Jun 10, 2010Moximed, Inc.Bone fixated, articulated joint load control device
US20100145387 *Feb 18, 2010Jun 10, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinal implants including a sensor and methods of use
US20100145449 *Feb 5, 2010Jun 10, 2010Moximed, Inc.Adjustable absorber designs for implantable device
US20100152776 *Dec 17, 2009Jun 17, 2010Synthes Usa, LlcPosterior spine dynamic stabilizer
US20100152779 *Feb 25, 2010Jun 17, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Inter-transverse process spacer device and method for use in correcting a spinal deformity
US20100174316 *Jul 8, 2010Kyphon SarlDistractible interspinous process implant and method of implantation
US20100174317 *Mar 1, 2010Jul 8, 2010Applied Spine Technologies, Inc.Dynamic Spine Stabilizer
US20100185241 *Jul 22, 2010Malandain Hugues FAdjustable surgical cables and methods for treating spinal stenosis
US20100211101 *May 3, 2010Aug 19, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Spinous Process Stabilization Devices and Methods
US20100211104 *Apr 29, 2009Aug 19, 2010Missoum MoumeneDual Spring Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Device With Elongation Limiting Elastomers
US20100217320 *May 3, 2006Aug 26, 2010Tutogen Medical GmbhVertebral implant made from bone material for relief of a narrowed vertebral channel
US20100234894 *Sep 16, 2010Simpirica Spine, Inc.Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use
US20100249841 *Jun 8, 2010Sep 30, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Multi-chamber expandable interspinous process spacer
US20100262243 *Jun 22, 2010Oct 14, 2010Kyphon SarlSpine distraction implant
US20100268277 *Jun 30, 2010Oct 21, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Artificial spinous process for the sacrum and methods of use
US20100274287 *Apr 24, 2009Oct 28, 2010Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Flexible Articulating Spinal Rod
US20100286701 *May 8, 2009Nov 11, 2010Kyphon SarlDistraction tool for distracting an interspinous space
US20100305611 *Dec 2, 2010Kyphon SarlInterspinous process apparatus and method with a selectably expandable spacer
US20100312277 *Jun 5, 2009Dec 9, 2010Kyphon SarlMulti-level interspinous implants and methods of use
US20100318127 *Dec 16, 2010Kyphon SarlInterspinous implant and methods of use
US20100318130 *Dec 2, 2008Dec 16, 2010Parlato Brian DFlexible rod assembly for spinal fixation
US20100331886 *Oct 27, 2009Dec 30, 2010Jonathan FangerPosterior Dynamic Stabilization Device Having A Mobile Anchor
US20110040331 *May 20, 2010Feb 17, 2011Jose FernandezPosterior stabilizer
US20110077686 *Sep 29, 2009Mar 31, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant having a compliant spacer
US20110077692 *Mar 31, 2011Jackson Roger PDynamic spinal stabilization assemblies, tool set and method
US20110087290 *Apr 14, 2011Fridolin Johannes SchlaepferDevice for dynamic stabilization of bones or bone fragments
US20110093079 *Apr 21, 2011Slone Clinton NExtra-articular implantable mechanical energy absorbing assemblies having a tension member, and methods
US20110098745 *Oct 28, 2009Apr 28, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process implant and method of implantation
US20110106160 *May 5, 2011The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySystems and methods for posterior dynamic stabilization of the spine
US20110106167 *Oct 18, 2010May 5, 2011Tae-Ahn JahngAdjustable spinal stabilization system
US20110144697 *Jun 16, 2011Kyphon SarlPercutaneous spinal implants and methods
US20110144701 *Dec 13, 2010Jun 16, 2011Exactech, Inc.Methods for stabilization of bone structures
US20110153022 *May 29, 2009Jun 23, 2011Synthes Usa, LlcBalloon-assisted annulus repair
US20110172596 *Jan 13, 2010Jul 14, 2011Kyphon SarlInterspinous process spacer diagnostic balloon catheter and methods of use
US20110172708 *Jul 14, 2011Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness of a spinal segment with elongation limit
US20110172720 *Jul 14, 2011Kyphon SarlArticulating interspinous process clamp
US20110213301 *Feb 26, 2010Sep 1, 2011Kyphon SĀRLInterspinous process spacer diagnostic parallel balloon catheter and methods of use
US20110230914 *Aug 7, 2008Sep 22, 2011Synthes (U.S.A.)Dynamic cable system
US20110238119 *Mar 24, 2010Sep 29, 2011Missoum MoumeneComposite Material Posterior Dynamic Stabilization Spring Rod
US20120004727 *Jan 5, 2012Eden Spine, LlcMethod Of Implanting An Interspinous Vertebral Implant
US20120109201 *Apr 29, 2011May 3, 2012Neuraxis LlcIntersegmental motion preservation system for use in the spine and methods for use thereof
US20120109202 *May 3, 2012Neuraxis LlcIntersegmental motion preservation system for use in the spine and methods for use thereof
US20130338782 *Aug 1, 2013Dec 19, 2013Moximed, Inc.Extra-Articular Implantable Mechanical Energy Absorbing Assemblies Having a Tension Member, and Methods
US20130338783 *Aug 1, 2013Dec 19, 2013Moximed, Inc.Extra-Articular Implantable Mechanical Energy Absorbing Assemblies Having a Tension Member, and Methods
EP1994900A1 *May 22, 2007Nov 26, 2008Flexismed SAInterspinous vertebral implant
EP2182864A1 *Apr 18, 2008May 12, 2010Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and devices for controlled flexion restriction of spinal segments
EP2182864A4 *Apr 18, 2008Jan 2, 2013Simpirica Spine IncMethods and devices for controlled flexion restriction of spinal segments
EP2770927A4 *Oct 26, 2012Nov 4, 2015Univ Johns HopkinsIntersegmental motion preservation system for use in the spine and methods for use thereof
WO2007019894A1 *May 3, 2006Feb 22, 2007Tutogen Medical GmbhVertebral implant made from bone material for relief of a narrowed vertebral channel
WO2008051423A1Oct 18, 2007May 2, 2008Univ Leland Stanford JuniorMethods and systems for constraint of spinous processes with attachment
WO2008051801A2Oct 18, 2007May 2, 2008Simpirica Spine IncStructures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector
WO2008051802A2Oct 18, 2007May 2, 2008Simpirica Spine IncMethods and systems for constraint of multiple spine segments
WO2009146428A1 *May 29, 2009Dec 3, 2009Synthes Usa, LlcBalloon-assisted annulus repair
WO2009149407A1Jun 5, 2009Dec 10, 2009Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and apparatus for locking a band
WO2009149414A1Jun 5, 2009Dec 10, 2009Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and apparatus for locking a band
WO2010088621A1Feb 1, 2010Aug 5, 2010Simpirica Spine, Inc.Sacral tether anchor and methods of use
WO2010104975A1Mar 10, 2010Sep 16, 2010Simpirica Spine, Inc.Surgical tether apparatus and methods of use
WO2010121256A1Apr 19, 2010Oct 21, 2010Simpirica Spine, Inc.Structures and methods for constraining spinal processes with single connector
WO2011017363A1Aug 3, 2010Feb 10, 2011Simpirica Spine, Inc.Methods and systems for increasing the bending stiffness and constraining the spreading of a spinal segment
Classifications
U.S. Classification623/17.16, 623/17.13, 606/279, 606/257
International ClassificationA61F2/44, A61B17/70, A61B17/00
Cooperative ClassificationA61F2002/4435, A61B17/7026, A61B2017/00557, A61B17/7062, A61B17/70, A61B17/7025, A61B17/7011
European ClassificationA61B17/70B1R10, A61B17/70B1R8, A61B17/70P, A61B17/70
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Feb 24, 2005ASAssignment