Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20050060235 A2
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/416,901
Publication dateMar 17, 2005
Filing dateAug 27, 2003
Priority dateNov 15, 2000
Also published asUS7478058, US8195518, US20040030611, US20090240595, WO2002041197A1
Publication number10416901, 416901, US 2005/0060235 A2, US 2005/060235 A2, US 20050060235 A2, US 20050060235A2, US 2005060235 A2, US 2005060235A2, US-A2-20050060235, US-A2-2005060235, US2005/0060235A2, US2005/060235A2, US20050060235 A2, US20050060235A2, US2005060235 A2, US2005060235A2
InventorsPatrick Byrne
Original AssigneeVirtual Supply Logic Pty Limited
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Collaborative commerce hub
US 20050060235 A2
Abstract
Abstract of the Disclosure
A server acts as the hub of a collaborative commerce system. Suppliers of goods or services self publish information to the hub. Buyers are able to query the hub for product and service availability, price etc. Buyers are able to integrate real time multi product and multi service orders from multiple suppliers, carriers and field serve providers and thus secure available goods as well as the delivery and installation of those goods from the records available on the hub. Once an order is complete to the buyer's satisfaction, the order is transmitted to the hub. The hub then transmits the appropriate information to the relevant suppliers, carriers and installers as required. The system also provides for a system of virtual partitioning of a supplier's inventory.
Images(11)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(122)
1. 1. (Canceled).
2. 2. (Canceled).
3. 3. (Canceled).
4. 4. (Canceled).
5. 5. (Canceled).
6. 6. (Canceled).
7. 7. (Canceled).
8. 8. (Canceled).
9. 9. (Canceled).
10. 10. (Canceled).
11. 11. (Canceled).
12. 12. (Canceled).
13. 13. (Canceled).
14. 14. (Canceled).
15. 15. (Canceled).
16. 16. (Canceled).
17. 17. (Canceled).
18. 18. (Canceled).
19. 19. (Canceled).
20. 20. (Canceled).
21. 21. (Canceled).
22. 22. (Canceled).
23. 23. (Canceled).
24. 24. (Canceled).
25. 25. (Canceled).
26. 26. (Canceled).
27. 27. (Canceled).
28. 28. (Canceled).
29. 29. (Canceled).
30. 30. (Canceled).
31. 31. (Canceled).
32. 32. (Canceled).
33. 33. (Canceled).
34. 34. (Canceled).
35. 35. (Canceled).
36. 36. (Canceled).
37. 37. (Canceled).
38. 38. (Canceled).
39. 39. (Canceled).
40. 40. A method of executing an order on behalf of a buyer or many buyers comprising the steps of:
compiling self published real-time information from one or many product suppliers and/or one or many service suppliers onto a common transaction platform on a central server;
granting a buyer or many buyers simultaneous access utilizing the same real-time functionality on the common transaction platform over a network;
using the common transaction platform to accept from the buyer or many buyers, simultaneous queries as to the real-time availability of goods and/or services from one or many suppliers;
using the self published information on the common transaction platform to respond to simultaneous queries over the network, as to the real-time availability of the goods and/or services; and
using the common transaction platform to accept an order or simultaneous multiple orders for goods and services for one or many suppliers in real-time, from a buyer or many buyers, automatically transmitting that order or many orders concurrently to a supplier or many suppliers of those goods and services.
41. 41. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the server is also used to compile self published information from one or more providers of services related to the order;
using the server to accept from the buyer, a second query as to the availability of services related to the order;
using the self published information from the one or more providers of services related to the order to respond to the query, over the network, as to whether or not the services are available; then
using the server to accept an order for those services from the buyer and transmit that order concurrently to a selected provider of services and a supplier of the goods or services.
42. 42. The method of claim 41, wherein:
a first provider of services related to the order is a carrier and the self published information includes information regarding availability, capacity, service area and price.
43. 43. The method of claim 42, wherein:
a second provider of services related to the order is a field service provider and the self published information includes information regarding availability, capability, service area and price.
44. 44. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the server processes, over the network, the order from the buyer and without further prompting forwards, portions of that order which are relevant to the supplier to the supplier.
45. 45. The method of claim 44, wherein:
the forwarding is done by an e-mail message from the server to the supplier.
46. 46. The method of claim 42, wherein:
the server processes, over the network, the order from the buyer and without further prompting forwards, portions of that order which are relevant to the carrier to the carrier and also forward portions of that order which are relevant to the supplier to the supplier.
47. 47. The method of claim 46, wherein:
the forwarding is done by an e-mail message from the server to the carrier and supplier.
48. 48. The method of claim 43, wherein:
the server processes, over the network, the order from the buyer and without further prompting forwards, portions of that order which are relevant to the field service provider to the field service provider and forwards, portions of that order which are relevant to the carrier to the carrier and also forward portions of that order which are relevant to the supplier to the supplier.
49. 49. The method of claim 46, wherein:
the forwarding is done by an e-mail message from the server to the carrier, the supplier and the installer.
50. 50. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which facilitates the generation of invoices and the settlement of accounts over the network.
51. 51. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which facilitates the coordination of returns in real time.
52. 52. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which facilitates the registration of warranty information and automation of a warranty claims process.
53. 53. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which facilitates the supply of spare parts and provides for the self publication of spares information selected from the group comprising spare parts inventory, availability, pricing, shipping status, multi supplier integrated ordering, or fulfilment.
54. 54. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which enables a supplier to supply or multicast product information to one or more buyers.
55. 55. The method of claim 40, wherein:
multiple customers, multiple products, and/or services from multiple suppliers and service providers are integrated into a single system, in a many to many to many relationship.
56. 56. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the length of the supply chain is longer than two (2) nodes, and each node may have a depth of one (1) or many entities.
57. 57. The method of claim 40, wherein:
at each node of the chain there may be multiple entities independently operating either collaboratively, co-operatively or competitively.
58. 58. The method of claim 40, wherein:
a particular entity at a particular node may adopt an operating model or structure (i.e. sub-contracting) which is different from other entities on that same node.
59. 59. The method of claim 40, wherein:
the transaction processing occurs on the server not on the entities server.
60. 60. The method of claim 40, wherein:
an entity or many entities may choose to participate selectively.
61. 61. The method of claim 40, wherein:
a multiplicity of entities, each of whom may have a different legacy system, can export data into the server and receive data from the server through a common transaction platform and common adaptors.
62. 62. The method of claim 38, wherein:
the entities within a supply chain can participate without the need for middleware applications or point to point messaging.
63. 63. The method of claim 47, wherein:
the alert to the supplier or many suppliers, and/or service provider or many service providers, across many nodes, may include short message service (SMS) text message to a mobile phone, or to another WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) device.
64. 64. The method of claim 60, wherein:
an entities participation and the transactions allowed for that entity are governed by a set of business rules which are codified in the software and can be selectively applied.
65. 65. The method of claim 60, wherein:
the business rules are applied to both the transaction and to the process of execution of that transaction.
66. 66. The method of claim 65, wherein:
the business rules can be changed to accommodate the needs of specific supply chain entities, while still preserving a common structure in the transaction processing.
67. 67. The method of claim 66, wherein:
multiple supply chains can be integrated into a network of supply chains.
68. 68. The method of claim 67, wherein:
a single entity or a group of entities may participate in many supply chains, each of which is operating on a different server.
69. 69. The method of claim 40, wherein:
entities may bulk upload data from an existing system into the server without the need to re-key data.
70. 70. The method of claim 65, wherein:
business rules can be applied to bulk data being exported from a legacy system and intended to be published or imported into the server.
71. 71. The method of claim 65, wherein:
completed transactions can have business rules applied to the data which in turn is exported back to a particular entities legacy system as input data to that system.
72. 72. The method of claim 40, wherein:
an entity may offer all of its products and services, or a part thereof, or all of its capability or part thereof, and may change these dynamically at any time.
73. 73. A method for a supplier or many suppliers of goods and/or services to create real-time inventory available to order or promise across a supply chain comprising the steps of:
a supplier or many suppliers creating a virtual partition within legacy warehouse management systems;
a supplier or many suppliers consigning inventory into those partitions to create partitioned inventories;
a supplier or many suppliers publishing the partitioned inventory to a collaborative commerce hub, whereupon the inventory is simultaneously accessible to one or many buyers in real-time;
a supplier or many suppliers dynamically allocating part or all of the partitioned inventory to a buyer or many buyers in real-time or batch; the partitioned inventory being decremented in real-time when a buyer or many buyers accesses the same inventory functionality to place orders for goods and/or services in real-time.
74. 74. The method of claim 73, wherein:
the length of the supply chain is longer than two (2) nodes, and each node may have a depth of one (1) or many entities.
75. 75. The method of claim 73, wherein:
at each node of the chain there may be multiple entities independently operating either collaboratively, co-operatively or competitively.
76. 76. The method of claim 73, wherein:
a particular entity at a particular node may adopt an operating model or structure (i.e. sub-contracting) which is different from other entities on that same node.
77. 77. The method of claim 73, wherein:
a multiplicity of entities each of whom may have a different legacy system, can export data into the server and receive data from the server through a common transaction platform and common adaptors.
78. 78. A system for executing an order on behalf of a buyer or many buyers, comprising:
a central server coupled to a network;
a common transaction platform on said central server;
means for compiling self published real-time information from one or many product suppliers and/or one or many service suppliers onto said common transaction platform on said central server;
means for granting a buyer or many buyers simultaneous access utilizing the same real-time functionality on the common transaction platform over said network;
means for, using the common transaction platform, accepting from the buyer or many buyers, simultaneous queries as to the real-time availability of goods and/or services from one or many suppliers;
means for, using the self published information on the common transaction platform, responding to simultaneous queries over the network, as to the real-time availability of the goods and/or services; and
means for, using the common transaction platform to accept an order or simultaneous multiple orders for goods and services for one or many suppliers in real-time, from a buyer or many buyers, automatically transmitting that order or many orders concurrently to a supplier or many suppliers of those goods and services.
79. 79. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the central server is also used to compile self published information from one or more providers of services related to the order;
means for, using the server to accept from the buyer, a second query as to the availability of services related to the order;
means for, using the self published information from the one or more providers of services related to the order, responding to the query, over the network, as to whether or not the services are available; and
means for, using the server, accepting an order for those services from the buyer and transmitting that order concurrently to a selected provider of services and a supplier of the goods or services.
80. 80. The system of claim 79, wherein:
a first provider of services related to the order is a carrier and the self published information includes information regarding availability, capacity, service area and price.
81. 81. The system of claim 80, wherein:
a second provider of services related to the order is a field service provider and the self published information includes information regarding availability, capability, service area and price.
82. 82. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the server processes, over the network, the order from the buyer and without further prompting forwards, portions of that order which are relevant to the supplier to the supplier.
83. 83. The system of claim 82, wherein:
an e-mail message performs forwarding from the server to the supplier.
84. 84. The system of claim 83, wherein:
the server processes, over the network, the order from the buyer and without further prompting forwards, portions of that order which are relevant to the carrier to the carrier and also forward portions of that order which are relevant to the supplier to the supplier.
85. 85. The system of claim 84, wherein:
the forwarding is done by an e-mail message from the server to the carrier and supplier.
86. 86. The system of claim 83, wherein:
the server processes, over the network, the order from the buyer and without further prompting forwards, portions of that order which are relevant to the field service provider to the field service provider and forwards, portions of that order which are relevant to the carrier to the carrier and also forward portions of that order which are relevant to the supplier to the supplier.
87. 87. The system of claim 84, wherein:
the forwarding is done by an e-mail message from the server to the carrier, the supplier and the installer.
88. 88. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which facilitates the generation of invoices and the settlement of accounts over the network.
89. 89. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which facilitates the coordination of returns in real time.
90. 90. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which facilitates the registration of warranty information and automation of a warranty claims process.
91. 91. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which facilitates the supply of spare parts and provides for the self publication of spares information selected from the group comprising spare parts inventory, availability, pricing, shipping status, multi supplier integrated ordering, or fulfilment.
92. 92. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the central server further comprises a software module which enables a supplier to supply or multicast product information to one or more buyers.
93. 93. The system of claim 78, wherein:
multiple customers, multiple products, and/or services from multiple suppliers and service providers are integrated into a single system, in a many to many to many relationship.
94. 94. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the length of the supply chain is longer than two (2) nodes, and each node may have a depth of one (1) or many entities.
95. 95. The system of claim 78, wherein:
at each node of the chain there may be multiple entities independently operating either collaboratively, co-operatively or competitively.
96. 96. The system of claim 78, wherein:
a particular entity at a particular node may adopt an operating model or structure (i.e. sub-contracting) which is different from other entities on that same node.
97. 97. The system of claim 78, wherein:
the transaction processing occurs on the server not on the entities server.
98. 98. The system of claim 78, wherein:
an entity or many entities may choose to participate selectively.
99. 99. The system of claim 78, wherein:
a multiplicity of entities, each of whom may have a different legacy system, can export data into the server and receive data from the server through a common transaction platform and common adaptors.
100. 100. The system of claim 98, wherein:
the entities within a supply chain can participate without the need for middleware applications or point to point messaging.
101. 101. The system of claim 85, wherein:
the alert to the supplier or many suppliers, and/or service provider or many service providers, across many nodes, may include short message service (SMS) text message to a mobile phone, or to another WAP (Wireless Application Protocol) device.
102. 102. The system of claim 78, wherein:
an entities participation and the transactions allowed for that entity are governed by a set of business rules which are codified in the software and can be selectively applied.
103. 103. The system of claim 98, wherein:
the business rules are applied to both the transaction and to the process of execution of that transaction.
104. 104. The system of claim 103, wherein:
the business rules can be changed to accommodate the needs of specific supply chain entities, while still preserving a common structure in the transaction processing.
105. 105. The system of claim 104, wherein:
multiple supply chains can be integrated into a network of supply chains.
106. 106. The system of claim 105, wherein:
a single entity or a group of entities may participate in many supply chains, each of which is operating on a different server.
107. 107. The system of claim 78, wherein:
entities may bulk upload data from an existing system into the server without the need to re-key data.
108. 108. The system of claim 103, wherein:
business rules can be applied to bulk data being exported from a legacy system and intended to be published or imported into the server.
109. 109. The system of claim 103, wherein:
completed transactions can have business rules applied to the data which in turn is exported back to a particular entities legacy system as input data to that system.
110. 110. The system of claim 78, wherein:
an entity may offer all of its products and services, or a part thereof, or all of its capability or part thereof, and may change these dynamically at any time.
111. 111. A system for a supplier or many suppliers of goods and/or services to create real-time inventory available to order or promise across a supply chain, said system comprising:
a virtual partition within legacy warehouse management systems created by a supplier or many suppliers;
means for consigning inventory by a supplier or many suppliers into those partitions to create partitioned inventories;
means for publishing the partitioned inventory by a supplier or many suppliers to a collaborative commerce hub, whereupon the inventory is simultaneously accessible to one or many buyers in real-time;
means for dynamically allocating part or all of the partitioned inventory by a supplier or many suppliers to a buyer or many buyers in real-time or batch; the partitioned inventory being decremented in real-time when a buyer or many buyers accesses the same inventory functionality to place orders for goods and/or services in real-time.
112. 112. The system of claim 111, wherein:
the length of the supply chain is longer than two (2) nodes, and each node may have a depth of one (1) or many entities.
113. 113. The system of claim 111, wherein:
at each node of the chain there may be multiple entities independently operating either collaboratively, co-operatively or competitively.
114. 114. The system of claim 111, wherein:
a particular entity at a particular node may adopt an operating model or structure (i.e. sub-contracting) which is different from other entities on that same node.
115. 115. The system of claim 111, wherein:
a multiplicity of entities, each of whom may have a different legacy system, can export data into the server and receive data from the server through a common transaction platform and common adaptors.
116. 116. Software stored on a medium readable by a computer for executing an order on behalf of a buyer or many buyers, comprising:
a software module for compiling self published real-time information from one or many product suppliers and/or one or many service suppliers onto a common transaction platform on a central server;
a software module for granting a buyer or many buyers simultaneous access utilizing the same real-time functionality on the common transaction platform over a network;
a software module for, using the common transaction platform, accepting from the buyer or many buyers, simultaneous queries as to the real-time availability of goods and/or services from one or many suppliers;
a software module for, using the self published information on the common transaction platform, responding to simultaneous queries over the network, as to the real-time availability of the goods and/or services; and
a software module for, using the common transaction platform, accepting an order or simultaneous multiple orders for goods and services for one or many suppliers in real-time, from a buyer or many buyers, automatically transmitting that order or many orders concurrently to a supplier or many suppliers of those goods and services.
117. 117. The software of claim 116, wherein:
a software module for, using the server, compiling self published information from one or more providers of services related to the order;
a software module for, using the server, accepting from the buyer a second query as to the availability of services related to the order;
a software module for, using the self published information from the one or more providers of services related to the order, responding to the query, over the network, as to whether or not the services are available;
a software module for, using the server, accepting an order for those services from the buyer and transmit that order concurrently to a selected provider of services and a supplier of the goods or services.
118. 118. Software stored on a medium readable by a computer for a supplier or many suppliers of goods and/or services to create real-time inventory available to order or promise across a supply chain, comprising:
a software module for creating by a supplier or many suppliers a virtual partition within legacy warehouse management systems;
a software module for consigning by a supplier or many suppliers inventory into those partitions to create partitioned inventories;
a software module for publishing by a supplier or many suppliers the partitioned inventory to a collaborative commerce hub, whereupon the inventory is simultaneously accessible to one or many buyers in real-time;
a software module for dynamically allocating by a supplier or many suppliers part or all of the partitioned inventory to a buyer or many buyers in real-time or batch; the partitioned inventory being decremented in real-time when a buyer or many buyers accesses the same inventory functionality to place orders for goods and/or services in real-time.
119. 119. The software of claim 118, wherein:
the length of the supply chain is longer than two (2) nodes, and each node may have a depth of one (1) or many entities.
120. 120. The software of claim 118, wherein:
at each node of the chain there may be multiple entities independently operating either collaboratively, co-operatively or competitively.
121. 121. The software of claim 118, wherein:
a particular entity at a particular node may adopt an operating model or structure (i.e. sub-contracting) which is different from other entities on that same node.
122. 122. The software of claim 118, wherein:
a multiplicity of entities each of whom may have a different legacy system, can export data into the server and receive data from the server through a common transaction platform and common adaptors.
Description
    Detailed Description of the Invention TECHNICAL FIELD
  • [0001]
    The invention pertains to the management, distribution and supply of goods and services, and to software and business methods which facilitate and integrate the co-ordination of suppliers, buyers, carriers and service providers (installer, field service warranty, call centres, third party warehousing) of goods/services with respect to a customer (end user).
  • BACKGROUND ART
  • [0002]
    A single conventional order for goods or services may comprise the purchase of a variety of different kinds of goods or services. Several different suppliers may be required to fulfil a particular order. Accordingly, several different carriers may be required to transport the goods from supplier through to the final delivery address or addresses. The final delivery addresses might be the same as or different than an installation address. In some situations, no delivery or installation is required.
  • DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    The present invention provides methods, business methods, hardware and software for collecting, integrating, and interpreting order information, then multicasting orders to one or more suppliers, shipping advices to one or more carriers and installation advices to one or more service providers.
  • [0004]
    In preferred embodiments, the orders and advices are multicast to the appropriate parties according to a combination of self-published product supply factors including product data, category data, class data, capability data, capacity data, availability data and geographic service area or any combination of these factors.
  • [0005]
    In other embodiments, supplier data (including stock availability by product, warehouse location and buyers), carrier data (such as capability, capacity and availability by product, category, class, geographic area, quality of service and buyer), and service provider data (such as capability, capacity and availability by product, category, class, geographic area, quality of service and buyer) are published to buyers from an interactive searchable database, over a network such as the Internet.
  • [0006]
    In some embodiments, the execution of a single or multi supplier, carrier and service provider final order is completed and actioned, once compiled, with a single instruction, from a single mouse click in a graphical user interface.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0007]
    FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the type of prior art message switching is alleviated by the present invention;
  • [0008]
    FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram illustrating an overview of the methods associated with the present invention;
  • [0009]
    FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating the current supplier single order process;
  • [0010]
    FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating the methods of the present invention;
  • [0011]
    FIG. 5 is a work order form with integrated customer care questionnaire;
  • [0012]
    FIG. 6 is a web based submission form for customer responses gathered in the questionnaire depicted in FIG. 3;
  • [0013]
    FIG. 7 is a web based service provider viewable quality assurance rating;
  • [0014]
    FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram illustrating a multi-process integrated order;
  • [0015]
    FIG. 9 is a schematic diagram illustrating rejected order processing; and
  • [0016]
    FIG. 10 is a schematic diagram illustrating real time inventory.
  • MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
  • [0017]
    The invention provides an end-to-end supply chain management system and business methods designed to deliver financial benefits in real time to trading partners that operate in diverse vertical industries. Together and loosely defined, the presently discloses methods, software and hardware and is referred to, for convenience, as a system. The system coordinates cross-trading partners processes via a suite of software solutions.
  • [0018]
    The methods can be used simultaneously by multiple trading partners, on a many to many basis, allowing users to access the same functionality in real time. This allows multiple buyers to enter multi product--multi supplier integrated orders to coordinate the fulfilment of 3rd party field services (where applicable).
  • [0019]
    The present system does not rely on trading partner application-to-application message-switching systems to complete business transactions. As shown in FIG. 1, message switching comprises a sequence of messages which are exchanged between a buyer 300 and the other participants in the supply chain such as the seller 301, carrier 302 and Service Provider 303. The first message 304 passes between the buyer and the seller and request whether or not a particular product is available. The seller responds with a message 305, for example indicating that the product is available. Next the buyer places an order for the product 306. The seller confirms receipt of the product order with a separate message 307. The process continues with a series of exchanges between the buyer and the carrier 308. An exchange of messages is also conducted with the service provider 309. The process finishes with the carrier 302 sending proof of delivery 310 to the buyer and with the service provider forwarding proof of service 311 to the buyer. By eliminating the need for message switching:
  • [0020]
    The system does not require expensive, technically complex IT communications support traditionally required for applications message switching and backend integration.
  • [0021]
    The system handles multiple transaction volumes in comparison to individual point-to-point message switching/middleware solutions.
  • [0022]
    The system present trading partners with a major competitive advantage.
  • [0023]
    The system software is written in Cold Fusion and currently running in a SQL 7.0/2000 environment, though could equally run, for example, on an Oracle or DB2 platform as the applications business logic is database independent.
  • [0024]
    As shown in FIG. 2, the system enables participants to self publish real time information via dynamic catalogues. The system then processes the transaction (in real time) and systematically notifies the relevant users of the resulting supply chain events. The system allows all supply chain partners to securely integrate and process their transactions in a shared environment.
  • [0025]
    The system enables incremental implementation by each trading partner, with the system capable of being customised to suit individual users. The system currently comprises 10 individual software modules.
  • [0026]
    Inventory Enables suppliers, in real time, to publish their stock availability to order or promise (e.g. advance shipping notice)--by product, sub product, category, class, location and buyer, on a 24×7 day basis, and receive orders electronically.
  • [0027]
    Ordering Enables buyers to integrate in one order--multi product, multi supplier, multi carrier, multi service provider, multi sub orders in real time; then multicast only the relevant information to each supply chain partner.
  • [0028]
    Scheduling Enables carriers and service providers to publish their capabilities, capacities, availability and pricing by product, category, class, service area (e.g. postal or zip code) and buyer. Automated work orders are then dynamically generated at the point of sale and received by the relevant supply chain partner.
  • [0029]
    Settlement Enables trading partners to receive orders, generate invoices and settle accounts on line.
  • [0030]
    Returns Enables buyers, suppliers carriers and service providers to coordinate the returns process (in real time), including management of return authorities, product disposition and test and repair facilities.
  • [0031]
    Warranty Enables end user registration on line, establishing ownership, location and purchase dates. Links the end user, service centre and supplier automating the warranty claims process.
  • [0032]
    Build Enables build to order, configure to order and ship to order at buyers point of sale; linking buyers, suppliers, carriers and 3rd party installers (in real time), to customise client orders, deliver and install them directly without intermediaries.
  • [0033]
    Spares Brings inter-operability to suppliers and their service network in the areas of spare parts inventory, availability, pricing, shipping status, multi supplier integrated ordering, fulfilment and warranty/sales reconciliation. Also allows suppliers to broadcast service literature, service tips, product modifications, assembly delays/variations.
  • [0034]
    Forward Enables one time data capture, dynamic concurrent workflows, and track and trace for freight forwarders, suppliers, manufacturers, domestic carriers, 3rd party warehousing and customs clearance agents.
  • [0035]
    Marketing Enables suppliers to video stream, multicast product information, training promotion and product launches to individual or many buyers. Buyers can issue request for catalogue inclusions and suppliers can respond.
  • [0036]
    The system's software platform contains all of the above specified business processes and work flows within its core. Members need only self publish their data to specific modules within the core. As shown in FIG. 2, the Hub or central server 320 integrates and co-ordinates the actions of a buyer 321 a product supplier 322, a carrier or deliverer 323 and installer or other service provider 324 and ultimately the consumer 325. Using FIG. 2 as an overview, it can be seen that the supplier 322 self publishes dynamic product catalogues and real time inventory availability 326 electronically and into the Hub 320. This allows the seller or buyer 321 to access the self published catalogues in real time and place a confirmed order or multi order 327 with the Hub 320. This same multi product order may be accompanied by a multiple delivery and installation orders and instructions. The Hub forwards the appropriate delivery instructions 328 to the appropriate carrier and simultaneously provides work orders for installations 329 to the appropriate service providers 324. Service providers is intended to refer to installers or other field service providers. Ultimately, the Hub co-ordinates the delivery schedule of the carrier 323 with the installation schedule of the service provider 324 so that the ultimate consumer 325 receives the appropriate products and service at the correct time.
  • [0037]
    Further small freight forwarding company, using the system, can combine the services of other members within the network, offering an end-to-end fulfilment service to their customer. In effect, providing all of the benefits of a large multinational freight forwarder, but without the unwelcome financial overhead. The freight forwarder, when combined with other clustered networked partners, is then able to present as a virtual organisation to the marketplace.
  • [0038]
    The system's software modules are based upon open systems technology. The system offers the user increased flexibility and easy integration to other networks. As a network centric system, users can choose to connect to the system via intranet, Internet or Virtual Private Network (VPN).
  • [0039]
    The system provides for self-registration, self-regulation and end user management, which allows for rapid implementation of any supply chain strategy. The system scales from a thin client (browser based PC) requiring no data mapping, through to full back end legacy systems integration. Thus, the system facilitates high-speed scalability for-any supply chain network participants.
  • [0040]
    The system is network centric and customer centric (at its presentation layer); there are no geographic or industry impediments to the global reach and usefulness of the system.
  • [0041]
    As shown in FIG. 3, the prior art single order process 10, as seen from the buyer's perspective, commences with a buyer querying the internal computer system for the status of the selected goods 11, that is, whether or not the selected goods are in stock. If the goods are in stock/store 12, the next step 14 is to arrange delivery with the store driver or other delivery company and contact the customer to advise of a delivery date and supply the customers with the identity of the installer(s), if required. At this point, the customer would arrange the installation themselves directly with the service provider 14. Finally, the goods are delivered to the customer 15. Installation occurs 16 some time after delivery is effected.
  • [0042]
    If the goods are out of stock, then the buyer's query 11 is followed by multiple phone calls and faxes to suppliers 17. Enquiries to suppliers will generally be restricted to normal business hours (e.g. Monday-Friday 9-5 pm) however in the case of late night or weekend trading, it is expected that the supplier will respond on the next business day, perhaps later. A negative response from the supplier will require the selection of an alternate supplier, which further delays the delivery of stock. Once the relevant enquiries are made 17, the buyer awaits confirmation from the supplier of stock availability by telephone or facsimile 18.
  • [0043]
    Upon confirmation, the buyer advises the customer of the status by telephone or facsimile and receives a customer decision 19. If the customer decides not to proceed, the sale is lost and the order is cancelled 20. If the order is to proceed, it is placed by telephone or facsimile 21. Eventually, the stock is delivered to the buyer store 22 and from this point on, the process follows the same path as an order which is in stock 12, that is, proceeding to eventual delivery to the customer 15 and installation 16 of product, if required.
  • [0044]
    It is worth noting that the above referenced conventional method requires stock delivery to the buyer store/warehouse prior to customer delivery. Further, the prior method is relatively inflexible as to the timing of matter such as delivery and installation, old product removal, and packaging removal.
  • [0045]
    As shown in FIG. 4, the present invention proposes methods which are available at all times of the day and night, every day of the year. This is because all parties to the system can connect to a 24 hours×7-day central hub of a network and interact with the scalable system using either an Internet browser or systems integrated software.
  • [0046]
    The method commences with a buyer querying a remote database with regard to stock availability, as dynamically self published by the goods suppliers 100 in advance. The database is accessible over the Internet and uses a conventional browser, based on the entry of the appropriate user ID and password. In the alternative, the system may be systems integrated into a buyer, supplier, carrier, or service provider's enterprise resource system (ERP). If a particular product is out of stock, the buyer is notified on-line immediately 101 and proceeds to re-enter a new query based on other goods and/or suppliers. If the database indicates that the selected goods are in stock then the buyer proceeds to the next step 102. This next step requires the buyer to input the customer selections, that is, the suppliers and models of the selected goods as well as the times and dates for delivery, installation, removal of packaging and the removal or disposal of the old product. Once this data is entered and integrated on one screen, the buyer proceeds to the next and final step 103. The buyer presses a single "button" in a graphical user interface, which initiates a multicast. The multicast comprises of orders which are issued to multiple appropriate suppliers, as well as multiple shipping advices to the appropriate carriers required to transport the goods directly to the customer or agent, as well as multiple installation advices to the one or more appropriate service providers which may be required to complete the order, by customer defined date and time schedules at the point of sale.
  • [0047]
    A distinguishing feature of the invention is the way that suppliers, carriers and service providers are selected (capability, capacity, availability, area, product, category, class and quality) to complete an order once the customer related data is entered into the system. With respect to installations, each service provider will be provided with a work order 110 (FIG. 5), which is a physical form, which is carried into each installation. In order to get paid, the service provider must obtain a quality report in the form of a customer care questionnaire 111 (FIG. 5) from the appropriate customer. The customer is presented with a form and asked to rate the service provider according to the quality of the job performed. Factors which might be considered include promptness, tidiness, quality of installation, courteousness etc. The service provider is then required to fax a copy of the quality report 110 and 111 to a central place of reporting. The service provider also inputs the data from the customer's report into an electronic form 112 (FIG. 6) or Internet based system with the proviso that the hard copy also be faxed as mentioned above. A service provider is thereby rated according to the quality of his work by the customer. A service provider may log onto the system and view their own quality rating 113 (FIG. 7) as evaluated by their various customers. Where the order data entry step 102 (FIG. 4) determines that two or more service providers are suitable for a particular order, the one with the highest quality rating may be selected to fulfil the order.
  • [0048]
    Selection of the appropriate carrier may be performed in much the same way. A carrier may be selected according to their capability, capacity or price but a carrier may also be selected according to their quality as it is evaluated by their customers and input to a central record keeping location as mentioned above.
  • [0049]
    Selection of a suitable supplier of goods may also be performed on a quality-rating basis. A supplier can be rated according to their consistency and timeliness of supply, rate of product returns or other factors, which form a reasonable basis for performing a quality evaluation. In this way, a supplier with a higher quality rating can be selected over a supplier with a lower quality rating with regard to the fulfilment of any particular order.
  • [0050]
    From the above description it will be appreciated that the ability to search a database of real time multi supplier published available inventory information coupled with the ability to integrate multi supplier, multi carrier and multi service provider orders, with customer defined date and time schedules in one screen and then generate various multicasts to suppliers, carriers and service providers in a one click process, provides a process transformation with enormous flexibility and streamlined operation when compared to prior methods. The business processes outlined are applicable to any industry, for example, Information Technology & Telecommunications (ITT), Automobile, Insurance, Freight Forwarding etc., where facilitation, integration and co-ordination of suppliers, buyers, carriers, and service providers (Installer, Field Service Warranty, Call Centres, Third Party Warehousing) of goods/services with respect to the customer (end user).
  • [0051]
    FIG. 8 illustrates particular examples and specific details of the methods associated with the present invention. As previously described, the process of initiating a multi-process integrated order may be seen as beginning at the point of sale 201 to a one with the buyer logging into a central server from, for example, conventional PC running conventional browser software. The buyer then enters the order number 202 and the customer details 203. At this point, and using the browser software, the buyer can confirm (from existing published information) in real time the multi product and multi supplier product availability 204. The buyer is then able to define single or multi deliver point instructions, single or multi carrier service instructions and single or multi service provider service instructions 205. Once these details are entered through the browser interface, the buyer clicks a single button, for example, a "next" button 206 and this causes the processing of the order in real time 207. The result of the order processing is that carriers and service providers are selected automatically on the basis of self published capability, capacity, availability, service area, category, class, price, and quality of service 208. Once the order has been fully processed and prepared (206, 207 and 208) the pressing of a single confirmation type button 209 causes the execution of the order in its entirety. Once the order is confirmed 209 this causes the execution, dynamically and in real time of a concurrent series of supply chain events, particularly the multicasting of the relevant details to the relevant participants in the supply chain 210. Confirmation 209 and the subsequent execution 210 causes the relevant product orders to be multicast to each applicable supplier, the relevant consignment notes to be multicast to each applicable carrier, the relevant service work orders to each applicable service provider.
  • [0052]
    As further shown in FIG. 8, confirmation 209 causes, for example, the suppliers to receive email notifications 211 with hyper links to log into the system to retrieve orders. Consequently, the orders are retrieved 212 whereupon the supplier accept purchaser orders and makes products available for dispatch to end users 213. The order is acknowledged by email, the date and time stamp being recorded 214.
  • [0053]
    Similarly, upon confirmation, 209 service providers receive email notification with hyper links to log into the system to retrieve orders 215. The service provider retrieves orders and where applicable, special job instructions 216. The service providers then accept and print orders 217. When installation is physically completed, the service provider confirms by completing electronically the quality assurance sheet which is provided by the system 218.
  • [0054]
    As further shown in FIG. 8, upon confirmation 209, carriers receive email notification with hyper links to log into the system to retrieve orders 219. This causes the retrieving of orders and where applicable, special job instructions 220. The carrier accepts orders 221 (or rejects them 222) and when accepted, picks up products and delivers them to the end users 223. The carriers confirm delivery by completing electronically, a quality assurance form provided by the system 224.
  • [0055]
    As shown in FIG. 9, the rejection of an order by a service provider or carrier 222 causes the system to re-allocate the order to the next available service provider 225 or next available carrier 226.
  • [0056]
    As shown in FIG. 10, the implementation of the software and methods of the present invention provide a process of electronically managing, presenting and dynamically allocating real time inventory availability to an order or a promise (Advance Shipping Notice) across a supply chain network with multi suppliers and multi buyers utilising the same functionality, simultaneously. In order to do this, a supplier creates a virtual partition within their Legacy Warehouse Management System 230. The supplier then consigns inventory into that partition ready to be loaded into the system of the present invention 231. As part of the real time inventory process, the systems administrator defines categories and classes by industry and/or supply chain 232, 233. Consequently when a supplier logs in 234 they are able to add new products including product characteristics 235. The supplier may also add a new warehouse, including warehouse characteristics 236 and a warehouse service area 237 and warehouse opening hours 238. This gives the supplier the ability to dynamically consign and allocate products to each buyer 239. Thus, when a buyer logs into the system 240 they are able to allocate an internal product code and resale price 241 which enables the placement of an order 242 (see FIG. 8). The placement of an order 242 causes the inventory to be decremented by the system whereupon the supplier is notified of an electronic order 243. Accordingly, the supplier receives the order and is able to pick the order from the virtual partition within their legacy warehouse management system 244. When a supplier receives an order and dynamically consigns or allocates a product to a buyer 239 the process proceeds according to a business rule for dynamically decrementing stock 245. To decrement stock, a supplier dynamically decrements stock within the system, whereupon stock is decremented within the virtual partition 230. Similarly, a business rule applies to the incrementing of stock 246. To increment stock, suppliers consign stock into the virtual partition 231 whereupon stock is dynamically consigned and allocated within the system.
  • [0057]
    The present invention provides numerous benefits to customers-when compared to existing processes. From the preceding description it will be appreciated that customers are able to check and confirm the availability of products on-line. Unlike existing processes customers are able to arrange delivery and installation, on the spot, at the point of sale. Thus customers are able to, at one time, shop for, complete a purchase, arrange for delivery and installation and arrange for disposal of no longer needed goods and packaging. From the customers perspective, delivery is scheduled at the point of sale to suit the customers time schedule as the date and time of scheduling of delivery and installation are accomplished at the point of sale. Because both the old product and the packaging disposal can be arranged at the point of sale to occur when the new product is delivered, the customer is removed from the disposal process. This helps ensure that large appliances like fridges, washing machines and stove, etc are removed and disposed of according to environmental standards.
  • [0058]
    The retailer, buyer or commercial buyer also is delivered benefits by practicing the methods and teachings of the present invention. Productivity is enhanced because stock availability is immediately available on-line from suppliers. The system also allows for multi-supplier order integration, multi-service provider advice integration and multi-delivery point shipping advice to carriers, all on one screen. Further, the system provides for the multi-cast of all orders and advice notes in a "one click" process. The buyer is also able to participate in the system using only a web browser and can therefore trial the system on a risk free basis. The trial system is fully scalable to a full systems integration utilising the buyers ERP systems. Further, store inventory orders can be scheduled (date and time slot) to suit buyers and then reconciled electronically. From a storage perspective, the invention results in a reduction of inventory, associated overheads and working capital requirements. The system boosts sales productivity by providing on-line supplier stock availability, on-line supplier ordering at the point of sale and is fully traceable if anything goes wrong with ordering or delivery.
  • [0059]
    For the supplier of goods (or services) there are numerous advantages. The supplier can forecast dynamically against actual sales, rather than the "just in case" model being used today. Risks are produced by providing a large reduction in excess inventory, and price protection for buyers and inventory right-downs. Warehousing and distribution productivity are improved by providing dynamic inventory availability which is published to all participating buyers. Accordingly, the warehouse is open to buyers on a 24 hour come 7 day a week basis. The system also provides the aforementioned dynamic allocation of inventory to buyers. The system also provides suppliers with a digital record of purchase date and quality of product at the time of delivery for warranty purposes. Suppliers are also provided with on-line instant access to a warranty database. As for the sellers, systems integration can be implemented after the system has been tried, tested and proven to be cost effective, trials being conducted with a conventional browser. Delivery schedules for buyers are pre-booked reducing the instances of refused deliveries at the buyer store or distribution centre level. Further, all returns can be sorted, classified and disposed of without the supplier being involved in the handling of the product.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5592375 *Mar 11, 1994Jan 7, 1997Eagleview, Inc.Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers
US5710887 *Aug 29, 1995Jan 20, 1998BroadvisionComputer system and method for electronic commerce
US5974395 *Aug 21, 1996Oct 26, 1999I2 Technologies, Inc.System and method for extended enterprise planning across a supply chain
US6202517 *Aug 13, 1999Mar 20, 2001Michael DolanSelf opening line of pliers
US6282517 *Jan 14, 1999Aug 28, 2001Autobytel.Com, Inc.Real time communication of purchase requests
US6351738 *May 24, 1999Feb 26, 2002Douglas W. ClarkCollective business system
US6606744 *Nov 22, 1999Aug 12, 2003Accenture, LlpProviding collaborative installation management in a network-based supply chain environment
US6934692 *Jul 6, 2000Aug 23, 2005Dana B. DuncanOn-line interactive system and method for transacting business
US20010034622 *Apr 9, 2001Oct 25, 2001Davis Mark A.Hub based service delivery method and system
US20030069922 *May 23, 2001Apr 10, 2003Lakshmi ArunachalamNetwork transaction portal to control multi-service provider transactions
US20030172002 *Mar 15, 2001Sep 11, 2003Spira Mario CosmasMenu driven management and operation technique
US20030177026 *Feb 11, 2003Sep 18, 2003Purcell Daniel S.Automated and independently accessible inventory information exchange system
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7657534 *Jun 10, 2004Feb 2, 2010Jon KirkegaardOrder commitment method and system
US7788149 *Jun 30, 2006Aug 31, 2010Demand Aggregation Solution LlcMethod and computer program for the acquisition of capital equipment using web-based purchase pooling
US7822792Dec 15, 2006Oct 26, 2010Sap AgAdministration of planning file entries in planning systems with concurrent transactions
US8175930Feb 16, 2006May 8, 2012Shopmedia Inc.Apparatus for selling shipping services through a mediator's web site
US8311904Dec 3, 2008Nov 13, 2012Sap AgArchitectural design for intra-company stock transfer application software
US8312416Apr 13, 2006Nov 13, 2012Sap AgSoftware model business process variant types
US8315900Dec 31, 2007Nov 20, 2012Sap AgArchitectural design for self-service procurement application software
US8315926Sep 18, 2008Nov 20, 2012Sap AgArchitectural design for tax declaration application software
US8316344Dec 30, 2005Nov 20, 2012Sap AgSoftware model deployment units
US8321250Sep 18, 2008Nov 27, 2012Sap AgArchitectural design for sell from stock application software
US8321306 *Dec 3, 2008Nov 27, 2012Sap AgArchitectural design for selling project-based services application software
US8321308Dec 3, 2008Nov 27, 2012Sap AgArchitectural design for manual invoicing application software
US8321831Dec 30, 2005Nov 27, 2012Sap AgArchitectural design for internal projects application software
US8321832Mar 31, 2006Nov 27, 2012Sap AgComposite application modeling
US8326702Mar 30, 2006Dec 4, 2012Sap AgProviding supplier relationship management software application as enterprise services
US8326703Dec 30, 2005Dec 4, 2012Sap AgArchitectural design for product catalog management application software
US8326706Sep 18, 2008Dec 4, 2012Sap AgProviding logistics execution application as enterprise services
US8327319Dec 30, 2005Dec 4, 2012Sap AgSoftware model process interaction
US8352338Sep 18, 2008Jan 8, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for time recording application software
US8359218Sep 18, 2008Jan 22, 2013Sap AgComputer readable medium for implementing supply chain control using service-oriented methodology
US8370794Dec 30, 2005Feb 5, 2013Sap AgSoftware model process component
US8374896Feb 12, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for opportunity management application software
US8380549Sep 18, 2008Feb 19, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for embedded support application software
US8380553Dec 30, 2005Feb 19, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for plan-driven procurement application software
US8386325Sep 18, 2008Feb 26, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for plan-driven procurement application software
US8396731Mar 12, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for service procurement application software
US8396749 *Mar 30, 2006Mar 12, 2013Sap AgProviding customer relationship management application as enterprise services
US8396761Mar 30, 2006Mar 12, 2013Sap AgProviding product catalog software application as enterprise services
US8401908Dec 3, 2008Mar 19, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for make-to-specification application software
US8401928Sep 18, 2008Mar 19, 2013Sap AgProviding supplier relationship management software application as enterprise services
US8401936Dec 31, 2007Mar 19, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for expense reimbursement application software
US8402426Dec 30, 2005Mar 19, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for make to stock application software
US8407664Dec 30, 2005Mar 26, 2013Sap AgSoftware model business objects
US8438119Mar 30, 2006May 7, 2013Sap AgFoundation layer for services based enterprise software architecture
US8442850Mar 30, 2006May 14, 2013Sap AgProviding accounting software application as enterprise services
US8447657Dec 31, 2007May 21, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for service procurement application software
US8448137Dec 30, 2005May 21, 2013Sap AgSoftware model integration scenarios
US8510143Dec 31, 2007Aug 13, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for ad-hoc goods movement software
US8522194Dec 30, 2005Aug 27, 2013Sap AgSoftware modeling
US8538864Mar 30, 2006Sep 17, 2013Sap AgProviding payment software application as enterprise services
US8595077Sep 18, 2008Nov 26, 2013Sap AgArchitectural design for service request and order management application software
US8660904Dec 30, 2005Feb 25, 2014Sap AgArchitectural design for service request and order management application software
US8671032Dec 31, 2007Mar 11, 2014Sap AgProviding payment software application as enterprise services
US8671033Dec 31, 2007Mar 11, 2014Sap AgArchitectural design for personnel events application software
US8671034Dec 31, 2007Mar 11, 2014Sap AgProviding human capital management software application as enterprise services
US8671035Dec 11, 2008Mar 11, 2014Sap AgProviding payroll software application as enterprise services
US8676617Dec 30, 2005Mar 18, 2014Sap AgArchitectural design for self-service procurement application software
US8738476Dec 3, 2008May 27, 2014Sap AgArchitectural design for selling standardized services application software
US8818884Sep 18, 2008Aug 26, 2014Sap AgArchitectural design for customer returns handling application software
US20040254842 *Jun 10, 2004Dec 16, 2004Jon KirkegaardOrder commitment method and system
US20050144082 *Dec 30, 2003Jun 30, 2005Coolman Jeron W.Systems and methods for ordering from multiple vendors
US20060085327 *Oct 15, 2004Apr 20, 2006Green Gary FSystems and methods for using credit card in government purchasing transactions
US20070156430 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 5, 2007Stefan KaetkerSoftware model deployment units
US20070156475 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 5, 2007Arthur BergerArchitectural design for plan-driven procurement application software
US20070156476 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 5, 2007Alexander KoeglerArchitectural design for service request and order management application software
US20070156489 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 5, 2007Arthur BergerArchitectural design for service procurement application software
US20070156499 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 5, 2007Arthur BergerArchitectural design for self-service procurement application software
US20070156500 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 5, 2007Wilfried MerkelArchitectural design for sell from stock application software
US20070156550 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 5, 2007Der Emde Martin VArchitectural design for cash and liquidity management application software
US20070162893 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 12, 2007Gerd MoosmannSoftware model process component
US20070168240 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 19, 2007Shai AlfandaryArchitectural design for make to stock application software
US20070168303 *Dec 30, 2005Jul 19, 2007Gerd MoosmannSoftware model process interaction
US20070233541 *Mar 30, 2006Oct 4, 2007Martin SchorrProviding accounting software application as enterprise services
US20070233581 *Mar 30, 2006Oct 4, 2007Markus PeterProviding product catalog software application as enterprise services
US20070233598 *Mar 30, 2006Oct 4, 2007Martin Von Der EmdeProviding payment software application as enterprise services
US20070233728 *Mar 30, 2006Oct 4, 2007Joachim PuteickFoundation layer for services based enterprise software architecture
US20070234282 *Mar 31, 2006Oct 4, 2007Uta PriggeComposite application modeling
US20070265860 *Mar 30, 2006Nov 15, 2007Karina HerrmannProviding supplier relationship management software application as enterprise services
US20070265862 *Apr 13, 2006Nov 15, 2007Jens FreundSoftware model business process variant types
US20080004976 *Jun 30, 2006Jan 3, 2008Beachum Graham CMethod and computer program for the acquisition of capital equipment using web-based purchase pooling
US20080109332 *May 11, 2007May 8, 2008Thomas MargaridoMethods, systems, and computer program products for implementing global exchange services
US20080147666 *Dec 15, 2006Jun 19, 2008Hans-Georg ReuschAdministration of planning file entries in planning systems with concurrent transactions
US20080162304 *Feb 16, 2006Jul 3, 2008Shopmedia Inc.Methods and Apparatus for Selling Shipping Services Through a Mediator's Web Site
US20090171698 *Dec 31, 2007Jul 2, 2009Sap AgProviding human capital management software application as enterprise services
US20090171712 *Dec 31, 2007Jul 2, 2009Matthias HeinrichsArchitectural Design for Ad-Hoc Goods Movement Software
US20090171713 *Dec 31, 2007Jul 2, 2009Armin SchwarzArchitectural Design for Self-Service Procurement Application Software
US20090171758 *Dec 31, 2007Jul 2, 2009Shai AlfandaryArchitectural design for physical inventory application software
US20090172699 *Dec 31, 2007Jul 2, 2009Christoph JungkindArchitectural Design for Service Procurement Application Software
US20100070289 *Mar 18, 2010Sap AgArchitectural Design for Embedded Support Application Software
US20100070317 *Sep 18, 2008Mar 18, 2010Nir PachterArchitectural design for sell from stock application software
US20100070318 *Mar 18, 2010Achim ClemensProviding logistics execution application as enterprise services
US20100070324 *Sep 18, 2008Mar 18, 2010Sap AgArchitectural Design for Plan-Driven Procurement Application Software
US20100070330 *Sep 18, 2008Mar 18, 2010Peer MarschallArchitectural design for customer returns handling application software
US20100070331 *Mar 18, 2010Alexander KoeglerArchitectural design for service request and order management application software
US20100070336 *Sep 18, 2008Mar 18, 2010Sap AgProviding Customer Relationship Management Application as Enterprise Services
US20100070391 *Mar 18, 2010Sap AgArchitectural Design for Tax Declaration Application Software
US20100070395 *Sep 18, 2008Mar 18, 2010Andreas ElkelesArchitectural design for payroll processing application software
US20100070555 *Sep 18, 2008Mar 18, 2010Jacques DuparcArchitectural design for time recording application software
US20100082497 *Sep 18, 2008Apr 1, 2010Sap AgProviding Foundation Application as Enterprise Services
US20100114955 *Jul 31, 2008May 6, 2010Marine Dealer Trader, LlcMethod For Sharing Inventory
US20100138255 *Dec 3, 2008Jun 3, 2010Sap AgArchitectural design for manual invoicing application software
US20100138258 *Dec 3, 2008Jun 3, 2010Sap AgArchitectural design for intra-company stock transfer application software
US20100138269 *Dec 3, 2008Jun 3, 2010Sap AgArchitectural design for selling project-based services application software
US20100138276 *Dec 3, 2008Jun 3, 2010Sap AgArchitectural design for make-to-specification application software
US20100153239 *Dec 11, 2008Jun 17, 2010Sap AgProviding accounting software application as enterprise services
US20100153240 *Dec 11, 2008Jun 17, 2010Andreas BoldProviding Payroll Software Application as Enterprise Services
Classifications
U.S. Classification705/26.2
International ClassificationG06Q30/06, G06Q30/02, G06Q20/20, G06Q10/08
Cooperative ClassificationG06Q10/087, G06Q30/0605, G06Q30/06, G06Q20/203, G06Q30/0601, G06Q30/0635, G06Q30/0617, G06Q30/02
European ClassificationG06Q30/02, G06Q30/06, G06Q10/087, G06Q30/0635, G06Q30/0605, G06Q20/203, G06Q30/0601, G06Q30/0617
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Aug 27, 2003ASAssignment
Owner name: VIRTUAL SUPPLY LOGIC PTY LIMITED, AUSTRALIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BYRNE, PATRICK;REEL/FRAME:014481/0053
Effective date: 20030805
Mar 22, 2005ASAssignment
Owner name: SPC HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED, AUSTRALIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VIRTUAL SUPPLY LOGIC PTY LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:015940/0172
Effective date: 20041223
Jun 13, 2012FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4