Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20050090902 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/987,348
Publication dateApr 28, 2005
Filing dateNov 12, 2004
Priority dateFeb 10, 2000
Also published asUS6398812, US20020151982
Publication number10987348, 987348, US 2005/0090902 A1, US 2005/090902 A1, US 20050090902 A1, US 20050090902A1, US 2005090902 A1, US 2005090902A1, US-A1-20050090902, US-A1-2005090902, US2005/0090902A1, US2005/090902A1, US20050090902 A1, US20050090902A1, US2005090902 A1, US2005090902A1
InventorsMichael Masini
Original AssigneeMasini Michael A.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Shoulder prosthesis with anatomic reattachment features
US 20050090902 A1
Abstract
A humeral prosthesis features improved anatomic attachment areas for tendon or bone. In the preferred embodiment, in contrast to existing devices, at least one set of tendon/bone attachment points are provided along a line, at least a portion of which is divergent with respect to the axis of the stem. One or more sets of attachment points may be further be provided along a line which is substantially parallel to the axis of the stem, resulting in a “T” “L” or “U” shape. Alternatively, attachment points having a changing degree of diversion with respect to the axis of the stem may be provided along a common, curved line. The attachment points may simply be apertures formed through the body of the implant though, in the preferred embodiment, the apertures are provided on raised tabs. An area of bone-ingrowth material may be provided adjacent the attachment points, and may include a separate fastening mechanism such as a threaded hole to receive a screw. A groove may also be provided in any embodiment to receive the biceps tendon. Particularly with respect to fractures, including multi- and ‘four-part’ fractures, means specifically intended for the rigid reattachment of the greater or lesser tuberosities may be provided separately or in conjunction with other sets of reattachment configurations.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(5)
1-23. (canceled)
24. A humeral prosthesis with anatomic reattachment features, comprising:
an elongated body having a proximal end with a convex surface adapted to articulate with a glenoid bone; and
a plurality of raised fins on the body, each with a plurality of suture-receiving apertures for use in attaching one or more bone fragments and tendon to the prosthesis.
25. The humeral prosthesis of claim x, including three raised fins, each with a plurality of suture-receiving apertures.
26. The humeral prosthesis of claim y, wherein at least two of the fins are parallel along the body.
27. The humeral prosthesis of claim x, wherein the convex surface forms parts of a modularly attached component.
Description
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    This invention relates generally to orthopedic surgery and, in particular, to improved shoulder prostheses featuring more anatomic rotator cuff attachment geometries facilitating enhanced fixation of tendon and/or bone.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    A typical proximal humeral prosthesis is depicted generally at 100 in FIG. 1, this particular drawing being taken in part from U.S. Pat. No. 5,282,865. The device includes a modular head attachment 106, though variations of such devices exist, including those without modularity, and designs incorporating different modular arrangements.
  • [0003]
    A tab 102 is provided on the lateral side of the prosthesis, as shown. The tab 104 is provided with two or more holes 106 disposed parallel to the length of the prosthesis; that is, parallel to the axis 108 of the stem 110. Although the stated purpose of the apertured tab 102 is to assist with installation of the device and to minimize rotation once installed, it is common practice in repairing a fracture to bring previously detached tendons together and suture them to this vertical tab on the lateral side of the prosthesis.
  • [0004]
    The tendons which are detached during the procedure may include the subscapularis tendon, the supraspinatus tendon, the infraspinatus tendon, and the teres minor tendon, the anatomy of each being well known, particularly to orthopedic surgeons. Since, in the case of a natural humerus, these tendons attach at different points of the bone to perform specific functions, vertically oriented tabs such as tab 102 in FIG. 1 does not adequately accommodate human anatomy.
  • [0005]
    More particularly, existing configurations are acceptable only with respect to the attachment of the posterior and anterior tendons. Since the supraspinatus tendon naturally lies flat along the top surface of the bone, the use of a vertical tab leads to an orientation which is perpendicular to the desired attachment configuration. This result, being anatomically incorrect, typically results in a reduced range of motion and strength following the procedure, particularly in initiating abduction; that is, in raising that arm. This is especially true in proximal humerus fractures known as ‘four-part’ fractures involving the head, shaft, greater tuberosity, and lesser tuberosity. Re-attachment to a vertical fin with sutures results in poor fixation in a non-anatomic arrangement.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0006]
    The subject invention resides in a humeral prosthesis with improved anatomic attachment areas for tendon or bone. As in prior-art devices, the invention includes an elongated body having a proximal end and a distal end terminating in a stem with an axis configured for placement within an intramedullary canal of a humerus. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, however, and in contrast to existing devices, at least one set of tendon/bone attachment points are provided along a line, at least a portion of which is divergent with respect to the axis of the stem.
  • [0007]
    One or more sets of attachment points may further be provided along a line which is substantially parallel to the axis of the stem, resulting in a “T.” “U” or “L” configuration, including inverted versions thereof. Alternatively, attachment points having a changing degree of diversion with respect to the axis of the stem may be provided along a common, curved line. The attachment points may simply be apertures formed through the body of the implant though, in the preferred embodiment, the apertures are provided on raised tabs. An area of bone-ingrowth material may be provided adjacent to or at the attachment site, and may include a separate fastening mechanism such as a threaded hole to receive a screw, or any other alternative means operative to rigidly attach the tendon or bone to the prosthesis. A groove may also be provided in any embodiment to receive the biceps tendon. In addition, a recess may be provided to accept a tendon-bone unit such as the greater or lesser tuberosities with their respective tendons attached. Particularly with respect to fractures, including multi- and ‘four-part’ fractures, means specifically intended for the rigid reattachment of the greater or lesser tuberosities may be provided separately or in conjunction with other sets of reattachment configurations.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0008]
    FIG. 1A is a drawing of a prior-art humeral prosthesis;
  • [0009]
    FIG. 1B is a drawing of proximal humerus and anatomic tendon attachments;
  • [0010]
    FIG. 1C is a drawing of a four-part fracture to which the subject invention is applicable;
  • [0011]
    FIG. 2A is a lateral view of a humeral prosthesis according to the invention having an inverted-U bone/tendon attachment configuration;
  • [0012]
    FIG. 2B is a lateral view of a humeral prosthesis according to the invention having a non-inverted-U bone/tendon attachment configuration;
  • [0013]
    FIG. 2C is a lateral view of a humeral prosthesis according to the invention having an inverted L-shaped bone/tendon attachment configuration;
  • [0014]
    FIG. 2D is a lateral view of a humeral prosthesis according to the invention having a T-shaped bone/tendon attachment configuration;
  • [0015]
    FIG. 3 is an alternative embodiment of the invention, wherein a plurality of attachment points are arranged along a common curved line;
  • [0016]
    FIG. 4 illustrates how bone-ingrowth sections are provided as localized sites along with fastening means to hold bone/tendon pieces in place; and
  • [0017]
    FIG. 5 is a drawing which shows a bone-ingrowth areas provided for greater and lesser tuberosities in conjunction with separate sets of suture points.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • [0018]
    As discussed above, this invention is directed to humeral prostheses providing more anatomical attachment configurations for bone and/or tendons, with the goal being a greater range of post-operative motion and/or strength. Before discussing the various embodiments of the invention in detail, it will be helpful to introduce aspects of the anatomy associated with procedures contemplated herein.
  • [0019]
    FIG. 1B is a drawing of a human proximal humerus showing the natural anatomic tendon attachment areas. The humerus, 120, includes a proximal portion having a head 122 with an articulating surface adapted to co-act with the glenoid bone 126 in the shoulder joint. The supraspinatus tendon 130 lies flat on the proximal humerus, and attaches at a section of bone called the greater tuberosity 132. The subscapularis tendon 140 extends across the side of the joint and attaches at the lesser tuberosity 142. A groove 144 receives the biceps tendon (not shown).
  • [0020]
    FIG. 1C is a drawing which illustrates what typically occurs during a multi-part fracture of the proximal humerus, in the case a so-called four-part fracture to which the subject invention is applicable. In particular, the bone shatters, leaving a separate head and shaft portion 150 and 152. In addition, the greater tuberosity 160 breaks off with the supraspinatus tendon attached thereto. The lesser tuberosity 162 also forms a separate piece with the subscapularis tendon attached to that piece, as shown. The infraspinatus and teres minor tendons may be attached to the greater tuberosity as well or to separate fragments.
  • [0021]
    Reference is now made to FIG. 2A, which is a lateral view of a humeral prosthesis according to the invention. Broadly, an anterior-to-posterior feature such as tab 202 is provided for attachment of the supraspinatus. Although tab 202 is shown generally transverse to the axis of the implant, the invention anticipates other orientations, described herein, with the basic premise being that one or more sets of divergent attachment points are provided for a more anatomical compliance with the rotator cuff. By ‘divergent,’ it is meant that the set of connection points tend away from a line strictly parallel to the axis of the implant which, of course, would include one or more connectors which are transverse or perpendicular to the axis of the implant, regardless of the muscular attachments.
  • [0022]
    Having provided this facility, other tabs or attachment mechanisms be added for the anterior and/or posterior tendons, resulting in the preferred inverted “U” shape of FIG. 2A. An inverted-U is not the only tab configuration providing a more anatomic bone/tendon attachment arrangement according to the invention. As shown in FIG. 2B, a non-inverted-U bone/tendon attachment configuration may alternatively be provided, or an inverted L-shaped bone/tendon attachment configuration (FIG. 2C). As a further alternative, both anterior and posterior tendons may be attached to a single substantially vertical feature, with the result being a “T” shape, as shown in FIG. 2D. Other geometries are also possible, including non-inverted and rotated L and T shapes, as long as separate and distinct regions are provided for reattachment of the greater and lesser tuberosities.
  • [0023]
    Note also that separate tab segments need not be used, in that one or more curved features may be provided, preferably with tangents 304 and 306 substantially along the axis of the implant and transverse thereto, as shown in FIG. 3. To enhance reattachment, one or more of the tabs or other features may be coated with a bone-ingrowth material or bone-ongrowth material. Biologic enhancements such as hydroxyapatite may also be provided. As a further alternative, as shown in FIG. 4, bone-ingrowth sections may be provided as localized areas 405, along with fasteners such as screws 410 to hold the bone/tendon pieces in place. In this and each of the embodiments described herein, a groove 412 may be provided in the head and/or side portions of the prosthesis to receive the biceps tendon.
  • [0024]
    The areas of bone-ingrowth material may be provided along with, or apart from, the tabs or other reattachment facilities discussed elsewhere herein. For example, as shown in FIG. 5, a bone-ingrowth area 502 for lesser tuberosity may be provided in conjunction with suture holes 504, and/or ingrowth area 512 may be provided for greater tuberosity in conjunction with suture holes 514. Note that the suture holes need not be provided on a raised tab, but may be located along a ridge or depression, as convenient to the embodiment. In all embodiments, the invention is compatible with modular head/neck attachments as discussed in the Background of the Invention. FIG. 5, for example, shows a post 530 associated with a modular head attachment. The groove 520 is optionally be provided to receive the biceps tendon, as discussed above.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5702486 *Apr 3, 1996Dec 30, 1997Kirschner Medical CorporationModular humeral prosthesis for reconstruction of the humerus
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7678150Jun 14, 2005Mar 16, 2010Tornier SasTotal shoulder prosthesis of an inverted type
US7887544Mar 8, 2004Feb 15, 2011Tornier SasAncillary tool for positioning a glenoid implant
US8080063Apr 13, 2007Dec 20, 2011Tornier SasGlenoid component with an anatomically optimized keel
US8177849Nov 13, 2009May 15, 2012Zimmer, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for attaching tissue to orthopaedic implants
US8187282Jun 28, 2007May 29, 2012Tornier SasAncillary tool for positioning a glenoid implant
US8277511Oct 21, 2008Oct 2, 2012Tornier SasShoulder or hip prosthesis and method for setting same
US8303665Jun 8, 2005Nov 6, 2012Tornier SasGlenoidal component, set of such components and shoulder prosthesis incorporating such a glenoidal component
US8579984 *May 28, 2010Nov 12, 2013Keith BorowskyShoulder joint repair
US8715356 *Apr 13, 2011May 6, 2014Biomet Manufacturing, LlcProsthetic having a modular soft tissue fixation mechanism
US8864834Jan 28, 2008Oct 21, 2014Tornier SasMethod and apparatus for fitting a shoulder prosthesis
US8974536May 25, 2010Mar 10, 2015Tornier SasIntra-articular joint replacement
US9005305Mar 26, 2012Apr 14, 2015Zimmer, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for attaching tissue to orthopaedic implants
US9089435Oct 31, 2013Jul 28, 2015Tornier SasIntra-articular joint replacement
US9345580 *May 5, 2014May 24, 2016Biomet Manufacturing, LlcProsthetic having a modular soft tissue fixation mechanism
US9408652Apr 27, 2010Aug 9, 2016Tornier SasIntra-articular joint replacement and method
US9433507Mar 21, 2007Sep 6, 2016Tornier, Inc.Non-spherical articulating surfaces in shoulder and hip replacement
US9474619Mar 21, 2007Oct 25, 2016Tornier, Inc.Glenoid component with improved fixation stability
US9545312Oct 1, 2014Jan 17, 2017Tornier SasGlenoidal component, set of such components and shoulder prosthesis incorporating such a glenoidal component
US9685849Oct 23, 2015Jun 20, 2017The University Of British ColumbiaDisplacement devices and methods for fabrication, use and control of same
US20040230197 *Mar 8, 2004Nov 18, 2004Alain TornierAncillary tool for positioning a glenoid implant
US20050049709 *Aug 25, 2004Mar 3, 2005Alain TornierGlenoid component of a shoulder prosthesis and complete shoulder prosthesis incorporating such a component
US20050165490 *Dec 15, 2004Jul 28, 2005Alain TornierShoulder or hip prosthesis and process for fitting same
US20050278032 *Jun 14, 2005Dec 15, 2005TornierGlenoidal component of a shoulder prosthesis, set of elements constituting such a component and total shoulder prosthesis incorporating such a component
US20050278033 *Jun 14, 2005Dec 15, 2005Alain TornierTotal shoulder prosthesis or inverted type
US20070225817 *Mar 21, 2007Sep 27, 2007Reubelt Leo MGlenoid component with improved fixation stability
US20070225818 *Mar 21, 2007Sep 27, 2007Axiom Orthopaedics, Inc.Non-spherical articulating surfaces in shoulder and hip replacement
US20070225821 *Mar 21, 2007Sep 27, 2007Axiom Orthopaedics, Inc.Femoral and humeral stem geometry and implantation method for orthopedic joint reconstruction
US20070244564 *Apr 13, 2007Oct 18, 2007TornierGlenoid component with an anatomically optimized keel
US20070244565 *Apr 17, 2006Oct 18, 2007Stchur Robert PProsthetic humeral device and method
US20070250174 *Jun 28, 2007Oct 25, 2007TornierAncillary tool for positioning a glenoid implant
US20080183297 *Jan 28, 2008Jul 31, 2008TornierMethod and apparatus for fitting a shoulder prosthesis
US20090112328 *Oct 21, 2008Apr 30, 2009Alain TornierShoulder or hip prosthesis and method for setting same
US20110009973 *Nov 13, 2009Jan 13, 2011Zimmer, Inc.Methods and apparatuses for attaching tissue to orthopaedic implants
US20110098822 *May 25, 2010Apr 28, 2011Gilles WalchIntra-articular joint replacement
US20120035733 *Apr 13, 2011Feb 9, 2012Biomet Manufacturing Corp.Prosthetic having a modular soft tissue fixation mechanism
US20120191202 *May 28, 2010Jul 26, 2012Keith BorowskyShoulder Joint Repair
US20140296986 *May 5, 2014Oct 2, 2014Biomet Manufacturing LlcProsthetic Having A Modular Soft Tissue Fixation Mechanism
CN103891114A *Oct 22, 2012Jun 25, 2014不列颠哥伦比亚大学Displacement device and method for fabrication, use and control of same