|Publication number||US20050096117 A1|
|Application number||US 10/980,003|
|Publication date||May 5, 2005|
|Filing date||Nov 2, 2004|
|Priority date||Sep 26, 2001|
|Also published as||US6811484, US20030060257|
|Publication number||10980003, 980003, US 2005/0096117 A1, US 2005/096117 A1, US 20050096117 A1, US 20050096117A1, US 2005096117 A1, US 2005096117A1, US-A1-20050096117, US-A1-2005096117, US2005/0096117A1, US2005/096117A1, US20050096117 A1, US20050096117A1, US2005096117 A1, US2005096117A1|
|Inventors||Randall Katz, Gary Dawson|
|Original Assignee||Katz Randall M., Gary Dawson|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (89), Referenced by (20), Classifications (11)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/965,620, filed Sep. 26, 2001, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,811,484, entitled “Novel Game, and Methods and Apparatus for Game Play in Games of Chance”, and is related to application Ser. No. 09/672,179, filed Sep. 27, 2000, entitled “Novel Games, and Methods and Apparatus for Game Play in Games of chance” and to application Ser. No. 09/585,987, filed Jun. 2, 2000, entitled “Novel Games, and Methods for Improved Game Play in Games of Chance and Games of Skill”, which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
These inventions relate to methods, an apparatus for their implementation, of unique player participation games, and for improved methods of play for games of chance. More particularly, these inventions relate to new and improved games involving player participation in a broadcast medium, such as television, and in other communication media, such as over the Internet or other communications network.
Player participation games fall broadly under the categories of games of chance and games of skill. One of the main forms of games of chance is lotteries, which by definition, involve the three elements of: 1) prize, 2) chance and 3) consideration. If these three elements are present, then the game is considered to be a lottery, and is typically then run by a governmental entity. In the United States, lotteries are typically run by the individual states, or collectively by a group of states. In other countries, it is typically the national government that runs the lottery. Countries and states attempt to strictly limit the game play to their geographic boundaries. For example, in Austria, while electronic access to the game may be available over the Internet, or in order to play, the person must have a bank account in Austria, and be able to navigate the non-english menu.
Games have been conducted in any of a number of formats. Certainly, live, in person games have been performed. Yet other games have been played and broadcast over a broadcast medium, such as radio or television. Yet other games have been played through active communication media, such as the telephone, or over a communication network such as the Internet.
Various attempts have been made to provide game play over the Internet. By way of example, the game show Jeopardy has been placed on the web at http://www.sony.com.
Various other attempts have been made to extend the general concept of gambling to broad communication media, such as the Internet. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,268 entitled, “Method of Participating in a Live Casino Game from a Remote Location” has been asserted in a litigation in against an off shore corporation. The '268 patent discloses a system in which a player may participate in a live casino game from a location remote from the casino. A player interface station, such as a computer terminal or other special input device, is connected by a communication line to the casino. A second communication line is established from the casino to the player's financial institution. The player is presented with an image of an actual “live” game. The player then participates directly as if they were physically present at the casino. A wager is cleared with the player's financial institution to insure adequate resources to cover the bet.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,845,739 to Ronald A. Katz is entitled, “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System”. The patent describes various operating formats, including a format to be performed in association with television media. Specifically, in one embodiment, a real-time format is provided in which television viewers participate on a real-time basis in a game show for prizes. Expanded audience participation is achieved. Various levels of qualification are provided, such as for a child's television game format is utilized, parental clearance may be required. The use of personal identification numbers (pin numbers) is disclosed. In one implementation, the caller is prompted to identify which of the actual studio of audience participants the caller will be aligned with. Additionally, the caller may be instructed to indicate the extent of a wager. As the game progresses, the individual player's accounts are credited or debited, thereby providing on-going accounting data. In yet another implementation, a non real-time operation is provided. Such a show might involve a quiz for callers based on their ability to perceive and remember occurrences within the show. Pre-registration is optionally utilized. In this implementation, a sequence or time clock would be utilized in order to limit or control individual interfaces to a specific time or geographic “window”. In this way, the caller questions may be utilized across various time zones without the caller having obtained the question earlier than other callers within a given time zone.
Berman, U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,115 discloses a game show and method entitled “Interactive Game Show and Method for Achieving Interactive Communication Therewith”. An interactive communication system is provided which permits individuals to electronically select at least one possible outcome of a plurality of outcomes of a future event. Successful contestants possibly share in a prize which is associated with the event. A home audience of a televised game show may electronically communicate a series of random numbers using their touch tone telephone to participate in the show.
Recently, various governmental entities and trade organization have addressed the issue of game play over the Internet. Congressman Kye has introduced a bill which would preclude the offering of Internet based gaming, though permitting states to offer Internet gambling. Consideration has been given to requiring that the states sponsored gaming be limited to an intranet, in an effort to limit those participating to persons physically resident within the states boundaries. Various international lottery organizations have promoted similar restrictions, namely, precluding the individuals offering of games of chance, and reserving that option exclusively to the state.
Various lottery formats are known to the art. In one classic format, a pre-determined number of tickets are provided with certain printed matter, such as numbers or other indicia, where the information is then obscured by a scratch off layer. By removing the layer and revealing the underlying information, the ticket holder may determine whether they have won or not. Various extensions have been made to a “virtual” scratch off ticket where no physical product is provided.
A conventional lottery proceeds as follows. First, a series of numbers are selected, either by the player or by some automated selection system, such as by computer. Upon the occurrence of a pre-determined event, such as on a set date and time, numbers are randomly chosen. Both mechanical methods, such as selection of ping-pong balls bearing numeric designations, or electronic means such as through a random number generator, may be utilized. The selected numbers are then provided to the participants, such as through a broadcast medium like newspapers, radio and television. Finally, the holder or holders of winning the tickets then present their ticket for payment.
In yet another aspect of game play, a typical television presented game show lasts on the order of one half hour. Various shorter format games or shows have been utilized, for example, a football based advertisement or game has been presented by IBM during televised football games under the name “you make the call”. Yet other shorter version games have been presented over web TV or on the game show network.
The television game show “Who Wants to be a Millionaire” is believed to have originated in Britain, and has become extremely popular in the United States. The game is a trivia game. While being principally a game of skill, the nature of the questions, or the contestants knowledge of the potential answers, makes the game at times a guessing game or game of chance. The format consists of one contestant and one host. The contestant is presented with a question and four possible answers. If the contestant answers the question correctly, they advance to a next level, each level being associated with a higher monetary prize amount, which is roughly twice the amount of the preceding level. A contestant is given three “life lines”: a “50/50” where in two incorrect answers are removed, thereby leaving the correct answer and one incorrect answer, the “phone a friend”, wherein the contestant may call a friend by telephone and solicit their response to the question, subject to a 30 second time limit, and an “ask the audience” option where the audience is polled regarding their view of the correct answer to the question. Various safe levels are established, such as at $1,000.00 such that the contestant would be awarded that amount of money in the even that they fail to correctly answer a question. Finally, after a question is posed, the contestant may elect to discontinue play, and to receive that amount of money won at the preceding level.
Despite the wide spread participation in various forms of game play, as well as the suggestions for implementing those games on a mass communication network, such as through the telephone or Internet, the possibility for new games, or improved game play exists. In particular, there is a need for improved games of chance, which provide excitement for the player, and optionally a viewer audience.
This invention relates to methods and associated apparatus for novel game play. In the preferred embodiment, the games are game of chance.
A first game comprises the steps of randomly selecting a target number from a first range of numbers having a minimum and a maximum, e.g., from 20 to 50. The number may be selected by the house, or by a player, or by an alternate method of number selection. After presenting the indication of the target number to the player, the player selects numbers from a second range, having a minimum and a maximum, where the maximum is equal to or less than ½ of the minimum of the first range. For example, the second range may be from 1 through 10. The player elects whether or not to draw another number from the second range. The player continues to draw, and the total number of the various graphical depictions being summed, until the player declines to draw further. At that point, the system then draws repeatedly, and randomly, from the second range. The player wins if the system draws numbers which total in excess of the target number. The system wins if the drawn numbers exceed the player's total. Optionally, the system may provide an indication of the odds that the player would go over the target with a subsequent draw. This game is arbitrarily termed Jack-O.
In yet another game, arbitrarily termed POKO, the system receives a buy-in from the player. Multiple indicia are randomly selected from a predefined set, e.g., the numbers from 1 to 10. The system may select a predefined number of numbers, such as 5 numbers. A graphical depiction of the randomly selected indicia are displayed to the player. Optionally, the display may consist of a depiction of a ball, such as the type of ball used in a lottery drawing. Next, a second group of multiple indicia are randomly selected from the predefined set. The number of indicia selected is the same for both the player and the house or system. The first and second sets of numbers are then compared under predefined sets of rules to establish a winner. Payment is then provided to those winning under the rules. By way of example, the system may define a rule for an automatic winner where the player receives five of a kind, e.g., five 7's. Other rules may be utilized, including those from conventional games, such as Poker.
In yet another game format, a second or ancillary game is played in parallel with a first or primary game. By way of example, in association with a first game comprising a lottery number ball draw, a second game may involve a selected player's guessing whether the next ball draw will be of a higher or lower number, or odd or even or the like. For example, during the real time ball draw for a lottery, the improved game play would involve running a parallel or ancillary game along with the ball draw. One implementation would involve a first ball draw, followed then by game play by a contestant such as predicting whether the next ball drawn would be of a higher or lower number, or would be odd or even.
In one implementation, the master of ceremonies would advise the player which of these options had a better probability of being the outcome, thereby making the ancillary game more a game of chance as opposed to a game of skill. Optionally, scoring may be done, such as where one player or audience participant is scored or ranked relative to another player or participant. Optionally, this game may be played through a quick pick format, or through an online or other real time communication network format.
Yet another game format is arbitrarily termed The Zone. In this game, a number is randomly selected from a first range of numbers preferably having a minimum equal to the sum of the lowest numbers to be drawn and a maximum equal to the sum of the highest numbers to be drawn. The game proceeds with sequential drawing of numbers until the player has a total of the draws approaching a predefined zone away from the target number. For example, the target zone may be numbers within 10 of the target. Payment amounts are based upon the player's proximity to the target number, preferably without going over the target number.
Yet another game is one played at a multiple number of levels. At each level, the contestant is presented with multiple options, such as a depiction of four uniquely labeled boxes, amongst which the contestant may choose. The options would include at least one positive outcome and at least one negative outcome. In the case of four boxes, e.g., one could include a strike, two could include a monetary amount, which may be either the same or different and optionally, the fourth box could comprise a mystery box, described below. The contestant selects, at random, one of the options. If the option selected is one of the positive options, such as a monetary amount, they proceed to the next level and the winnings are added to the prior winnings total. If a negative option is selected, such as a strike, in the preferred embodiment, the level is reset and play continues at that level. Preferably, the player is allowed a predetermined number of negative events, such as three strikes, prior to discontinuing play.
The ‘mystery box’ consists of a decision within a decision. A first decision was to select that option, which then was revealed as comprising a mystery box. The player is then given the option of whether to reveal that option. The option within the mystery box would include at least one positive result and at least one negative result. In the preferred embodiment, there would be three results possible with a mystery box, a positive result such as a multiplier for the money, such as a doubler of the contestant' prior winnings, an updating of the safe level for the player or an additional monetary amount. Alternatively, other positive results such as a free play or a reduction in the number of negative events is possible. Preferably, the probability of a negative result from the opening of the mystery box should be equal to the probability of a negative event if the mystery box were not selected.
In yet another aspect, game play utilizes the real time data compiled during a lottery ball draw. Most particularly, the data regarding the number of potential lottery winners is utilized for companion game play. The data may be used directly, such as where the absolute number is guessed or by counting the number of times a give digit appears, or indirectly, such as where the game determines if a digit of the next number will be higher or lower than the last. The data may be used as a secondary random number generator.
The prizes at the various levels may be set as desired to result in a predetermined pay out for the game. Optionally, guaranteed low end prize structures (GLEPS) may require payment of predetermined prize amounts, and possibly payment of a minimum amount of a prize e.g., $500.00. The monetary spacing between various levels may be set as desired, either as an arithmetic progression or as a multiplicative progression, e.g., a substantial doubling of the prize amount at every level. Optionally, when a maximum game level is reached a jackpot or other proportionally large prize may be awarded. If the jackpot is not won in a given game, it may then roll over to a subsequent game. Alternative forms of progressive play may be utilized.
In another aspect of this invention, game play in a first game may require progression through a plurality of levels, leading to game play on a second game for those who have reached the maximum level on the first game. In one implementation, the maximum prize level in the first game may be equal to the minimum prize level in the second game.
Various modes of play are contemplated. In studio game play may be utilized with a broadcast, either live or for taped replay. Yet another mode of game play involves playing at a gaming venue, such as where other games of chance, e.g., slot machines, are played. Yet another venue may consist of game play by the player from their hotel room in a venue which allows gambling. In yet another mode of game play, a network, such as the internet, may be utilized to permit game play, whether for a monetary amount or to provide other points or indications of score. The game may be played in any venue where not prohibited, whether on land or in an airplane or ship, and may be played in any form of wired or wireless environment, such as via hand-held web enabled communication devices.
The game may be played by a single individual, or may be played with multiple players. The multiple players may play against one another, for scoring, or may merely play in parallel without further interaction.
In yet another aspect, methods and apparatus are provided for participating in on-line or other electronic access games, especially lottery games played over a network, such as the Internet. A player would obtain a lottery product, either scratch-off or on-line directed to playing an electronic game, such as a game on the Internet or played through a telecommunication network, either wired or wireless. By utilizing the conventional sales and distribution channels, the traditional safeguards regarding sales of gaming tickets to under aged players can be maintained. Having obtained the ticket containing a participation number, the player may then enter that number electronically, which would enable play for the amount of money purchased. Winnings may be paid out by presenting the ticket to a retailer, who could verify the winnings via a conventional on-line system. Optionally, the ticket may contain variable information regarding the electronic play, such as the amount to be won, the level of difficulty of a game or what game could be played.
In yet another aspect, the games described herein may be played either as a probability game or as a predetermined outcome game. In the case of a probability game, the outcome is determined based upon the actions of the player. In a predetermined outcome scenario, the system has determined which ticket or tickets are winners, or at what level the win will be paid, and the action of the player has no impact on the outcome of the game play. While the appearance of selection may still appear to be “random” to the player, the system may select the required number or other indicia in order to force the predetermined outcome.
Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide an improved game of chance having a higher level of audience interest and potential participation.
It is yet another object of this invention to provide for an improved Internet game of chance.
It is yet a further object of this invention to provide for enhanced modes of game play in association with existing forms of game play.
Display region 26 shows the possible outcomes from the selection of the mystery box or other denominated decision within a decision. As shown in display 10, the outcomes of the mystery box include a multiplier for the monetary amount previously won by the player, here shown to be a multiplicative doubler of the monetary amount (shown at 26 a), or a negative result, such as a strike (shown at 26 b) or an updating of the safe level (as shown at 26 c).
Returning now to the flowchart, the multiple options 40 are displayed to the contestant. As shown in
As shown in
The negative result box 50 may be of various types. In the preferred embodiment, the negative result 50 may comprise a strike. Preferably, the game is structured as to permit a predetermined number of strikes, such as 3 strikes, prior to the player losing the game. In such a system, the system would update the negative result tally at box 52, and perform a comparison 54 of the totaled number of negative events to the maximum number of negative events allowed. If the comparison 54 indicates that the maximum number has been reached, then program flow proceeds to box 74 where the player is awarded the last existing safe level amount, or if no such safe level amount exists, then whatever minimum prize is indicated according to the rules. That minimum amount may be 0 or some other guaranteed amount. Certain lottery systems require guaranteed low-end prize structure (GLEPS) which guarantee a certain prize or result for certain contestants.
The fourth option shown in
If the safe level update box 70 is selected, the safe level is updated at box 72. In this way, when the player has reached the maximum number of events at box 54, the safe level amount 72 is then provided. After the update of the positive result 48, and optionally, an update of the safe level 72, program flow returns to the level selection 32, at which time the next higher level is selected.
In the preferred embodiment if the number of negative results is less than the maximum number of negative results (box 54), then the decision flows to path A, which returns the player to the decision to select among the available options 42. In the preferred embodiment, when the player has received a strike at a given level, the level is reset and played again. Alternatively, in the event of a negative event, the negative event could be tallied and the player advanced to the next level.
The displays of
In addition to visual displays, voice prompts may be provided, such as where the contestant is prompted to enter information or is otherwise cued to provide a responsive action. Voice input to the system is also feasible.
The images 104 and game play associated therewith may be in addition to the game play of a lottery, such as designated by the numbers 108. Thus, if a player purchases a ticket and receives numbers 108, they may be additionally entitled to play the game depicted by the graphics 104 for possible play on a future lottery game show. In this way, interest in a future lottery game may be created through game play on an existing lottery.
As shown, the ticket 100 optionally includes a bar code 112. As shown, the bar code 112 is disposed on the backside of the lottery ticket. The bar code 112 may be placed wherever desired. In operation, the machine readable bar code may be utilized for tracking or other monitoring purposes.
The games of this invention may be adapted to an on-line selection format, such as where a potential player purchases a lottery or lotto ticket at a retail vending location. The player may be prompted to provide their selection of numbers, such as where they provide one of four numbers for each level. That information may then be passed in an on-line manner to the lottery system. Optionally, game play on the television or other broadcast media may be used for game play by the viewing audience. For example, the game play of successful game play at a given level may be compared to the player's selections previously made through the on-line process. Improved audience viewing levels of a game of chance would result.
The game described herein may be played in any variety of formats. For example, the game may be played in a 30 minute or 1 hour television broadcast type format. Alternatively, the game is adaptable to a short, e.g., 60 second, format. Game play may be done in a broadcast mode, such as through in studio participation, either live or taped. Alternate modes may be utilized, such as in a gaming or gambling establishment. Game play may be over a network, such as the Internet or an Intranet. In an Internet game the player may provide credit card information or otherwise have an account with a monetary stake, and that amount may be increased or decreased as the player wins or loses. Alternatively, instead of money, the player may play for points.
Contestant selection may be done by any number of modes or modalities. For example, as described in connection with
After having received the player's buy-in, the system randomly selects multiple indicia from a predefined set. In one embodiment, the predefined set may comprise a set of numbers, such as 1 through 10, and the number of indicia selected may be 5. As shown in
After the various indicia, e.g., a set of first numbers, is selected, they are provided to the player in some graphical depiction. The mode of presentation of the graphics may vary, and the mode of presentation may be selected consistent with the communication bandwidth available. For example, if the game is played over a wireless device, especially one using a text messaging service, such as SMS or equivalent service, the graphical depiction may be merely of the number of other alpha numeric character supported by the display set of the device. For example, when playing POKO, the display may show 77777 indicating the player's numbers, or may optionally also include the display for the house. Characters may be displayed all at once or over some period of time. In a relatively higher bandwidth environment, the graphical depiction may constitute an image of the indicia, such as a number, on a ball, such as a ping-pong ball. The indicia may be displayed to the user on a screen, such as when the game is played over a computer network (wired or wireless), or may be printed on paper or other support media such as when a player purchases a ticket from a business establishment utilizing an on-line ticket dispensing system. Alternatively, the numbers may have been picked beforehand, printed onto a support medium and obscured, such as through the use of a scratch off layer.
The player now having received their numbers or indicia, the game proceeds to the random selection of a second group of multiple indicia from the same predefined set. Thus, in one embodiment, the “house” (also variously referred to as the system or equivalent terminology) would select an equal number of indicia, such as by selecting five numbers. Preferably, the mode of display of the second group of numbers is similar to the first. Thus, as shown in
Finally based upon the outcome of the winner determination, payment is provided, as appropriate. In one implementation, any POKO winner would share the overall jackpot. Other winning hands may be paid out with a fixed amount. For example, those having five a of a kind may receive $100, those having four of a kind receiving a smaller amount, e.g., $50, and so on.
While the foregoing description utilize the winning hand determination of poker as the defined set of rules, other existing game rules may be utilized as desired. By utilizing a truly random mechanism for selecting the indicia, the game becomes one of chance, as opposed to having a component based upon skill. Further, by utilizing a graphical depiction drawn from the conventional images associated with a random draw in a lottery, the game achieves more of a look and feel of a lottery, as opposed to a game of skill.
While described, above, for one player, the game may be expanded to an arbitrarily large number of players. When the game is played in a real time environment, such as over the television or other communication network (wired or wireless) the game may be played at predetermined times. For example, the game may be played every 15 minutes on the hour, once a day, etc. Optionally, a portion of the collective monies being wagered may go into the pot. In this way, there is the possibility of a carry-over amount, and the possibility of a “lottery fever”. In yet another aspect, the game permits multiple purchases of entries. For example, a player buying tickets at a retail establishment may purchase a first ticket and only receive a “pair” of matching numbers. The player may continue to purchase additional tickets until receiving one that the player believes may be sufficiently valuable to have a acceptable chance of success. Such an arrangement may be performed either through a standard quick pick arrangement or via a scratch off. In contrast to a conventional lottery number selection scheme, the player must be precluded from selecting their own numbers in this game.
In yet another aspect, a push/pull system may be utilized. In such a system, the main system initiates the contact with the prospective players, such as by sending an SMS message or email. The player may then elect to participate, or not. In the event that the system provides information to the prospective player about their possible numbers, then the system may require a variable level of payment, such as where the system charges a first amount if the player elects to pass, in a second, higher amount, if the player elects to participate in the game.
Next, a number is randomly selected for the player, where the number is selected from a second range, the range having a minimum and a maximum number. The maximum of the second range is equal to or less than ½ of the minimum of the first range. By way of example, if the second range is from 1 to 10, the first range is at least 20. Game play continues by receiving an indication from the player as to whether to draw again. If the player elects to do so, a next randomly selected number from the second range is presented to the user. The cumulative amount of the draws is titled. This step is repeated either until the player declines to draw further or the title exceeds the target number. In the event that the player declines to draw, the system randomly selects numbers from the second range, accumulating those numbers and comparing the total to the player's accumulated total amount. The winner is the one who has the highest total closest to or equal to, but not exceeding, the target number.
In yet another aspect of this invention, the player may be advised upon the option for a draw that there is a possibility going over the target number. Further, the system may optionally provide an indication of the odds of exceeding the target number.
In one implementation, this game would be played in an interactive mode. Computer or other communication access would permit effective game play. Multiple players may play in parallel against the house, with the display for the other players being included upon all player's screens. While the main implementation contemplated includes a graphical display, yet other forms of conveying information to a player may be utilized, e.g., by providing the information audibly to the player, such as via the telephone or other speaker arrangement on a communications device.
Various aspects of enhanced game play and novel game are disclosed. In a first aspect, the game play method and system provides for the playing or running of a parallel game or ancillary game along with a first or primary game. For example, during the real time ball draw for a lottery, the improved game play would involve running a parallel or ancillary game along with the ball draw. One implementation would involve a first ball draw, followed then by game play by a contestant such as predicting whether the next ball drawn would be of a higher or lower number, or would be odd or even.
In one implementation, the master of ceremonies would advise the player which of these options had a better probability of being the outcome, thereby making the ancillary game more a game of chance as opposed to a game of skill. Optionally, scoring may be done, such as where one player or audience participant is scored or ranked relative to another player or participant.
In one implementation, the monetary award to the player may be based upon the number drawn in the base lottery. For example, if the first ball drawn in the lottery is 17, the potential prize award amount could be some multiple thereof, such as $17,000.00. If the next number drawn in the base lottery is 35, and the player as guessed “higher”, then the 35×the multiplier, e.g., $35,000.00, may be added to the prior total, raising the potential winnings to $52,000.00.
The game may be played in real time, that is, simultaneously with the base game, where the input mode permits essentially real time input. For example, input via a computer system or other communication system (wired or wireless) may be utilized. Alternatively, the selection of high/low may be made prior to the selection of the base numbers. The selection of the high/low may be made affirmatively by the player or may be done by a quick pick method. As shown in
In addition to monetary awards, the result of the game play may result in other opportunities or prizes. For example, the winner of the corollary or ancillary game may be placed in a pool for a drawing to be on a subsequent television or other broadcast show, such as a subsequent base ball draw. Systems and software currently exist, such as those supplied by Gtech, which permit the real time monitoring of the number of players holding tickets or participation interests which are still potential winners. In connection with the high/low game, the system may also monitor in real time the number of players of the high/low game who remain as potential winners.
The random selection of a series of numbers for the base lottery then proceeds. The numbers for the base lottery are then tallied. Prizes are assigned or awarded to players based upon a schedule. For example, if the player's number equals the lottery total, the maximum prize would be awarded, e.g., $100,000.00. If the player's number is 1 away from, preferably 1 less than, the lottery total, a lesser prize is awarded, e.g., $5,000.00. The prize amounts continue to decrease as the difference between the player's number and the lottery total increase. Optionally, no further prizes are awarded once the difference between the player's number and the lottery total exceeds a certain number, e.g., 10 away. In the preferred mode of play, prizes are awarded only to those who have a player's number not exceeding the lottery total.
Current lottery systems are often implemented in an “on-line” environment. That is, the sale of a lottery ticket, and the numbers corresponding to that ticket are, received by and stored in the overall system prior to the actual drawing of the lottery numbers. Thus, prior to the drawing of the lottery numbers, the system may determine how many tickets have certain combinations of numbers. That information may then be utilized for ancillary game play or for another purpose, such as for a secondary, random number generator. The following table provides exemplary numbers. For example, if the #1 ball is 28, there may be 22,316,429 people remaining. After the second ball draw of 15, there may be 6,562,156 remaining. The table then continues on through the sixth ball draw whereupon only two people remain.
Ball Number # of Players with Numbers 1 28 22,316,429 2 15 6,562,156 3 9 171,025 4 25 3,790 5 49 83 6 31 2
The absolute number of players remaining may be utilized directly. For example, either the absolute number may be utilized, for example, is the number higher or lower than a predetermined number, or some portion of the number may be used. For example, the last digit may be compared to the prior last digit as to whether it is higher or lower. For at least the first number of ball draws, the last digit should be substantially random. In this way, a secondary random number generator is provided. The data regarding the number of players remaining may be used indirectly. For example, the contestants may indicate the number of occurrences of a given digit, such as the number of occurrences of a given digit, such as the number of 9's in a given number. Thus, those who had wagered that there would be one 9 in the number of players with the given number would be winners as to ball draw #1. In this way, game play is based upon the numbers of remaining players as determined in substantially real time. In yet another mode of game play, players may be awarded a certain amount of money for every predetermined digit. For example, a player may select a 4 and then for every 4 being revealed during the game, the contestant wins a predetermined amount, e.g., $25,000.00 for each occurrence. Thus, utilizing the data in the table above, the contestant would win $25,000.00 after the first ball draw because of the occurrence of one 4, but would not win further in this aspect as no further 4's arose. Viewer interest in the underlying lottery draw may be maintained as the players continue to potentially win through to the end. Thus, even if the viewer has “lost” on the underlying lottery, they may still be incentivized to watch where each new ball draw generates an event which may lead to a further win. In yet another implementation, the numerical data relating to the number of players remaining may be categorized for the number of draws which ended up with numbers that were odd or even.
In yet another aspect, the game play includes the use of contestant game play to determine lottery numbers. For example, a contestant may be blind folded or otherwise be made unable to see various options. The person then selects from among the various options as the means by which the random lottery numbers are drawn. One example could comprise a blind folded contestant selecting objects.
In yet another aspect, this invention relates to an interstitial game show. Main or regular programming, such as is broadcast on a given evening during prime time on a broadcast network would additionally include multiple interspersed, typically short, segments relating to game play. In the preferred embodiment, the game play would be for a relatively short period of time, for example, 1 to 2 minutes. For example, at 8:00 an initial round may be played prior to the beginning of prime time programming. Normal programming would then resume through the remainder of the 8:00 hour. At 9:00, a second short segment may be played. The play may continue at later times, such as to culminate at a show at 11:00. Preferably, the short segments would not necessarily be shown at a predetermined or predeterminable time as far as the audience was concerned. In that way, viewers who wish to see the progression of the game segments would need to continue viewing that channel, or at least, return to the channel fairly frequently. Optionally, the game play my be progressive from one interstitial game segment to another. Players may be presented with the option of stopping play or continuing.
In yet another game format, the show would include a display having an underlying image, with that image being at least partially obscured by overlying image regions which differ from the underlying image region. A contestant would be given a time limit in which they would be presented with information relating to a suggestion or a clue relating to an overlying image region, which if the player responded correctly, would be removed so as to reveal that portion of the underlying image which was below the overlying image. The suggestion or clues may be related to the underlying image or may merely be unrelated suggestions or clues with respect to that particular overlying image region.
Yet another embodiment of game play provides for the repurposing of an existing taped game show. The previously recorded game show would be segmented into subsets of issues, for example, presentation of questions or answers (as in the case of Jeopardy), those issues would be presented to one or more players, a response would be received from those players, and the answer would be compared to the correct answer. Scoring would then rank players relative to one another or to indicate the amount of the prize. In yet another game play implementation, one or more contestants would be presented with multiple images upon which predetermined data had been assembled. For example, images of five actresses may be presented to the player and the associated data would comprise opinion polling information as to whom the audience thought was the most attractive. The players would then play against each other to eliminate the images which they believe do not correspond to the most popular or number one response. The players would alternate until one player remained. In a second round, individual play, as opposed to play between contestants is utilized. Again, the player attempts to eliminate those answers which were other than the most popular answer of the audience.
In yet another aspect of enhanced game play, audience participation via an interactive video display, such as a computer connected over the Internet, or via an interactive television arrangement, may participate in the program.
The advent of electronic access to games has raised the serious issue of under-aged player participation. Controlling access by under-age players accessing a game over the Internet or other communication device, e.g., pager, cell phone, wireless application protocol device, SMS device, etc., has proved to be difficult. The inventive method and apparatus may be understood in connection with
In one aspect of this invention, the entertainment value of the retail purchase may be increased. For example, the tickets may contain variable information, either obscured or not obscured, regarding the electronic play. In one aspect, the amount of prize that the player can win could be presented. In the case of on-line ticket distribution, this amount would not need to be obscured, but would be obscured such as by a scratch-off strip in the case of a preprinted ticket. Yet another variable which could be utilized relates to the level of difficulty of game play. Yet another variable could be an indication of which of a plurality of games could be played by the player, e.g., POKO, LOTTO, The Zone, etc.
The system also preferably includes a connection to a physical vending location for providing tickets. Preferably, the system includes an electronic communication between the system, e.g., the processor, and a on-line retail vendor. Preferably, the vendor possesses a ticket printing system which can print the tickets based upon input from the processor. The processor in turn potentially communicates with a number of databases. A ticket database would contain at least information regarding the tickets sold and the associated information (e.g., the numbers selected for a lottery game, the amount of value associated with a ticket purchased, the amount associated with a prize, information regarding a game to be played or the level of difficulty of the game). In order to permit real time game play, the system would have a input path permitting entry of data from a live event, such as a televised ball draw. Optionally, the system also couples to a substantially real-time lottery information system, such as the fast-track system whereby ancillary games based upon the fast-track data may be played.
In yet another aspect of this invention, the previously described games may be played either as probability games (where the outcome of the game is determined based upon the actions of the player) or as a predetermined game (where the “winning” status of a particular game play is determined prior to the player's participation or other game play). As described previously, the game JACK-O was a probability game in that the user's election of whether or not to draw was a factor in determining the outcome of the game. JACK-O could be implemented as a predetermined win game. The system would determine whether, and in what amount, the player would win. The system could then force that outcome, such as by presenting a certain number to the player based upon the ball draw. Thus, while game play may appear “random” to the player, the system would act in a manner so as to cause the predetermined outcome. Optionally, game play may include steps which aid in achieving the desired outcome, such as by requiring the player to draw when their tally is within a predefined number (e.g., less than 5 away) from a target number.
Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art in light of the teachings of this invention that certain changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3873092 *||Mar 5, 1973||Mar 25, 1975||Richard D Fagan||Method of playing a keno-zodiac game|
|US4348027 *||May 26, 1981||Sep 7, 1982||Escamilla Kelly Ricardo||Multi-level game board apparatus|
|US4582324 *||Jan 4, 1984||Apr 15, 1986||Bally Manufacturing Corporation||Illusion of skill game machine for a gaming system|
|US4772025 *||Sep 21, 1987||Sep 20, 1988||James Jimmie J||Lottery ticket reviewing device|
|US4836546 *||Jul 8, 1988||Jun 6, 1989||Dire Felix M||Game with multiple winning ways|
|US4883276 *||Aug 2, 1988||Nov 28, 1989||Brown Len T||Golf aid|
|US5035422 *||Dec 7, 1989||Jul 30, 1991||Robert Berman||Interactive game show and method for achieving interactive communication therewith|
|US5074566 *||Aug 7, 1990||Dec 24, 1991||Les Technologies Babn Inc.||Two level scratch game|
|US5112050 *||Jan 5, 1990||May 12, 1992||John R. Koza||Broadcast lottery|
|US5157602 *||Feb 6, 1990||Oct 20, 1992||Fields Scott J||Apparatus and method for generating number sets|
|US5158293 *||Sep 27, 1991||Oct 27, 1992||Mullins Wayne L||Lottery game and method for playing same|
|US5269521 *||Dec 13, 1991||Dec 14, 1993||Rossides Michael T||Expected value payment method and system for reducing the expected per unit costs of paying and/or receiving a given amount of a commodity|
|US5317135 *||May 24, 1991||May 31, 1994||Richard Finocchio||Method and apparatus for validating instant-win lottery tickets|
|US5407199 *||May 28, 1993||Apr 18, 1995||Vegas Pull Tabs, Inc.||Interactive games and method of playing|
|US5409234 *||Nov 1, 1993||Apr 25, 1995||Bechter; Frank||Multi-level game apparatus, interfacing pieces, and method of play|
|US5417424 *||Sep 28, 1993||May 23, 1995||Gtech Corporation||Player operated win checker appended to lottery agent terminal|
|US5472196 *||Mar 31, 1994||Dec 5, 1995||Bar Code Promotions, Inc.||Distribution of entry pieces for lottery games or the like|
|US5475205 *||Jun 22, 1994||Dec 12, 1995||Scientific Games Inc.||Document verification system|
|US5513852 *||Jul 7, 1995||May 7, 1996||Robinson; Natalie F. G.||Time to win|
|US5518253 *||Mar 16, 1994||May 21, 1996||Pocock; Terrence||Televised bingo game system|
|US5569082 *||Apr 6, 1995||Oct 29, 1996||Kaye; Perry||Personal computer lottery game|
|US5620182 *||Dec 13, 1993||Apr 15, 1997||Rossides; Michael T.||Expected value payment method and system for reducing the expected per unit costs of paying and/or receiving a given ammount of a commodity|
|US5628684 *||Jan 19, 1995||May 13, 1997||La Francaise Des Jeux||Game system including an instant win game and a second game initialized by a winning instant win game ticket|
|US5643088 *||May 31, 1995||Jul 1, 1997||Interactive Network, Inc.||Game of skill or chance playable by remote participants in conjunction with a common game event including inserted interactive advertising|
|US5651735 *||Nov 1, 1994||Jul 29, 1997||Sega Enterprises, Ltd.||Keno machine with two separate plays|
|US5685541 *||Mar 26, 1996||Nov 11, 1997||Stuart Entertainment, Inc.||Multiple-field game card having removable coating|
|US5709603 *||Oct 25, 1996||Jan 20, 1998||Kaye; Perry||Personal computer lottery game|
|US5721583 *||Nov 26, 1996||Feb 24, 1998||Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.||Interactive television system for implementing electronic polling or providing user-requested services based on identification of users or of remote control apparatuses which are employed by respective users to communicate with the system|
|US5772510 *||Oct 26, 1995||Jun 30, 1998||Loto Mark Incorporated||Lottery ticket and system|
|US5772511 *||May 8, 1996||Jun 30, 1998||Webcraft Games, Inc.||Method for the conduct of lotteries|
|US5785315 *||Apr 22, 1997||Jul 28, 1998||Eiteneer; Nikolai N.||Multi-layered gaming device|
|US5791990 *||Dec 3, 1996||Aug 11, 1998||Dittler Brothers Incorporated||Lottery system|
|US5813913 *||May 30, 1995||Sep 29, 1998||Interactive Network, Inc.||Game of skill playable by remote participants in conjunction with a common game event where participants are grouped as to skill level|
|US5855514 *||May 16, 1997||Jan 5, 1999||Stuart J. Kamille||Probability game with insured winning|
|US5857175 *||Aug 11, 1995||Jan 5, 1999||Micro Enhancement International||System and method for offering targeted discounts to customers|
|US5871398 *||Mar 29, 1996||Feb 16, 1999||Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership||Off-line remote system for lotteries and games of skill|
|US5909875 *||Sep 26, 1997||Jun 8, 1999||Weingardt; Gary||Keno game|
|US5931467 *||May 16, 1997||Aug 3, 1999||Stuart J. Kamille||Probability game|
|US5935001 *||Apr 3, 1997||Aug 10, 1999||Sega Enterprises, Ltd.||Keno machine with two separate plays|
|US5936661 *||Nov 19, 1996||Aug 10, 1999||U.S. Philips Corporation||Interactive television game system|
|US5949042 *||Jan 21, 1997||Sep 7, 1999||Dietz, Ii; Michael J.||Instant, multiple play gaming ticket and validation system|
|US6024641 *||Nov 16, 1998||Feb 15, 2000||Sarno; Robert A.||Method, apparatus and system for lottery gaming|
|US6048268 *||Apr 2, 1992||Apr 11, 2000||Advanced Promotion Technologies||Electronic promotional game|
|US6086477 *||Mar 31, 1998||Jul 11, 2000||Walker Digital, Llc||Methods and apparatus wherein a lottery entry is entered into lottery drawings until the lottery entry is identified as a winner|
|US6102395 *||May 6, 1998||Aug 15, 2000||D. Allan Such & Associates, Inc.||Method for conducting a lottery game|
|US6102400 *||Oct 14, 1998||Aug 15, 2000||Bad Beat Gaming, Llc||Method of playing a keno game with a bonus payout|
|US6193610 *||Sep 29, 1997||Feb 27, 2001||William Junkin Trust||Interactive television system and methodology|
|US6203011 *||Mar 30, 1999||Mar 20, 2001||Scientific Games, Inc.||System for administering an interactive transaction in a lottery game|
|US6234896 *||Apr 11, 1997||May 22, 2001||Walker Digital, Llc||Slot driven video story|
|US6238288 *||Dec 31, 1997||May 29, 2001||Walker Digital, Llc||Method and apparatus for directing a game in accordance with speed of play|
|US6241246 *||Oct 13, 1999||Jun 5, 2001||Oberthur Gaming Technologies, Inc.||Lottery ticket and word game played thereby|
|US6241606 *||Feb 12, 1999||Jun 5, 2001||Gtech Rhode Island Corporation||Electronic instant ticket lottery system and method|
|US6250685 *||Dec 31, 1997||Jun 26, 2001||Walker Digital, Llc||Ticket for instant lottery game and method of playing same|
|US6251017 *||Apr 21, 1999||Jun 26, 2001||David Leason||Game or lottery with a reward validated and/or redeemed online|
|US6267376 *||May 11, 1999||Jul 31, 2001||Brett C. Jenkins||Trivia game|
|US6273817 *||May 26, 1999||Aug 14, 2001||Hashem Sultan||Type of instant scratch-off lottery games|
|US6273820 *||Jun 22, 1999||Aug 14, 2001||Haste, Iii Thomas E.||Virtual player gaming method|
|US6277026 *||May 27, 1998||Aug 21, 2001||Mci Communications Corporation||System and method for facilitating the purchase and sale of lottery tickets online|
|US6290600 *||Sep 8, 1999||Sep 18, 2001||Naomi Glasson||Electronic game with moving bonus symbol|
|US6309298 *||Aug 5, 1999||Oct 30, 2001||Zdi Gaming, Inc.||Method, apparatus and gaming set for use in a progressive game|
|US6312334 *||Sep 21, 1998||Nov 6, 2001||Shuffle Master Inc||Method of playing a multi-stage video wagering game|
|US6322446 *||Dec 10, 1999||Nov 27, 2001||Elot, Inc.||System and a method for operating on-line state lottery games|
|US6354593 *||Nov 10, 1999||Mar 12, 2002||Dror Frommer||Multi-level matching game and method|
|US6382627 *||Feb 6, 2001||May 7, 2002||James R. Lundberg||Multi-level game board apparatus|
|US6475085 *||Jan 10, 2001||Nov 5, 2002||Ernest W. Moody||Numerical total high/low lottery game|
|US6488280 *||Sep 27, 2000||Dec 3, 2002||Milestone Entertainment||Games, and methods and apparatus for game play in games of chance|
|US6491215 *||Oct 1, 1999||Dec 10, 2002||Panda Eng., Inc||Electronic verification machine for documents|
|US6497408 *||Mar 20, 2000||Dec 24, 2002||Walker Digital, Llc||System and method for conducting and playing a supplemental lottery game|
|US6514144 *||Jun 1, 2001||Feb 4, 2003||Gtech Corporation||Online game of chance providing a multi-player extension of a single-player virtual scratch ticket game and a method of playing the game|
|US6547242 *||Oct 17, 2000||Apr 15, 2003||Konami Gaming, Inc.||Game of chance method and apparatus|
|US6565084 *||Jun 2, 2000||May 20, 2003||Milestone Entertainment||Games, and methods for improved game play in games of chance and games of skill|
|US6607439 *||May 14, 2002||Aug 19, 2003||Walker Digital, Llc||Off-line remote system for lotteries and games of skill|
|US6663105 *||Apr 21, 2000||Dec 16, 2003||Scott L. Sullivan||Game or lottery with a reward validated and/or redeemed online|
|US6749500 *||Jul 23, 2001||Jun 15, 2004||Sierra Design Group||Simulated poker for use with predetermined outcomes|
|US20010019193 *||May 3, 2001||Sep 6, 2001||Anthony Gumina||Interactive games and method of playing|
|US20020090986 *||Jun 25, 2001||Jul 11, 2002||Ingenio, Filiale De Loto-Quebec Inc.||Computer gambling game|
|US20020151344 *||Mar 6, 2002||Oct 17, 2002||Erkki Tanskanen||Mobile lotto|
|US20030045340 *||Sep 6, 2002||Mar 6, 2003||Interlott Technologies, Inc.||Lottery game, ticket and interactive method of play|
|US20030060257 *||Sep 26, 2001||Mar 27, 2003||Milestone Entertainment Llc||Novel games, and methods and apparatus for game play in games of chance|
|US20030060261 *||Apr 15, 2002||Mar 27, 2003||Milestone Entertainment Llc||Apparatus and method for game play in an electronic environment|
|US20030060276 *||Jul 24, 2002||Mar 27, 2003||Walker Jay S.||Method and apparatus for offering a guaranteed win|
|US20030102625 *||Nov 4, 2002||Jun 5, 2003||Milestone Entertainment Llc||Novel games, and methods and apparatus for game play in games of chance|
|US20040029630 *||Jul 18, 2003||Feb 12, 2004||Walker Jay S.||Method and apparatus for operating lotteries and for generating and processing lottery entries|
|US20040259631 *||Sep 2, 2003||Dec 23, 2004||Milestone Entertainment Llc||Apparatus, systems and methods for implementing enhanced gaming and prizing parameters in an electronic environment|
|US20090011812 *||Sep 8, 2008||Jan 8, 2009||Randall Mark Katz||Novel Games, and Methods and Apparatus for Game Play in Games of Chance|
|USD387390 *||Feb 12, 1996||Dec 9, 1997||Multi-level game board|
|USD420057 *||Jan 13, 1999||Feb 1, 2000||Multi-level game board|
|USD444507 *||Jun 28, 2000||Jul 3, 2001||James R. Lundberg||Multi-level game board|
|USRE37371 *||Jun 3, 1999||Sep 18, 2001||Jay E. Gerow||Method, apparatus and gaming set for use in a progressive game|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7637809 *||Apr 8, 2005||Dec 29, 2009||Sharad A Ghosh||Systems and methods for providing a player's ticket|
|US7654529 *||May 17, 2006||Feb 2, 2010||Scientific Games International, Inc.||Combination scratch ticket and on-line game ticket|
|US7758425 *||Jun 21, 2004||Jul 20, 2010||Weike (S) Ptd Ltd||Virtual card gaming system|
|US7762881||Jun 13, 2006||Jul 27, 2010||Ghosh Sharad A||Systems and methods for providing match-up player's ticket features|
|US7798896||Sep 2, 2003||Sep 21, 2010||Milestone Entertainment Llc||Apparatus, systems and methods for implementing enhanced gaming and prizing parameters in an electronic environment|
|US7831452||Jan 24, 2006||Nov 9, 2010||Sharad A Ghosh||Systems and methods for providing enhanced player's ticket features|
|US7850523||Dec 22, 2009||Dec 14, 2010||Ghosh Sharad A||Systems and methods for providing a player's ticket|
|US8225380||Oct 31, 2007||Jul 17, 2012||Celltrust Corporation||Methods to authenticate access and alarm as to proximity to location|
|US8260274||Oct 31, 2007||Sep 4, 2012||Celltrust Corporation||Extraction of information from e-mails and delivery to mobile phones, system and method|
|US8280359||Oct 31, 2007||Oct 2, 2012||Celltrust Corporation||Methods of authorizing actions|
|US8287351 *||Aug 11, 2008||Oct 16, 2012||Scientific Games International, Inc.||System and method for a terminal-based lottery game with subsequent interactive component|
|US8308162 *||Dec 29, 2009||Nov 13, 2012||Scientific Games International, Inc.||Combination scratch ticket and on-line game ticket|
|US8376826||Aug 13, 2012||Feb 19, 2013||Mileston Entertainment LLC||Methods and apparatus for enhanced interactive game play in lottery and gaming environments|
|US8393946||Apr 15, 2002||Mar 12, 2013||Milestone Entertainment Llc||Apparatus and method for game play in an electronic environment|
|US8444489||Jun 15, 2010||May 21, 2013||Weike (S) Pte Ltd||Virtual card gaming system|
|US8965416 *||Mar 21, 2008||Feb 24, 2015||Celltrust Corporation||Distribution of lottery tickets through mobile devices|
|US9007189||Apr 11, 2013||Apr 14, 2015||Kabam, Inc.||Providing leaderboard based upon in-game events|
|US20040259631 *||Sep 2, 2003||Dec 23, 2004||Milestone Entertainment Llc||Apparatus, systems and methods for implementing enhanced gaming and prizing parameters in an electronic environment|
|US20100102546 *||Dec 29, 2009||Apr 29, 2010||Scientific Games International, Inc.||Combination scratch ticket and on-line game ticket|
|WO2007087286A2 *||Jan 23, 2007||Aug 2, 2007||Gamelogic Inc||Method and apparatus for conducting a game of chance|
|International Classification||A63F3/08, A63F3/06, A63F3/00|
|Cooperative Classification||A63F3/00157, A63F3/081, G07F17/3262, A63F3/06|
|European Classification||G07F17/32M2, A63F3/00A32, A63F3/06|