US 20050107721 A1
A diagnostic urethral assembly is provided. The assembly includes an elongate body having a fluid passageway and an elongate support member selectively positionable within the fluid passageway of the elongate body. The elongate body has a radially responsive wall segment, the elongate body being positionable within a lower urinary tract such that the radially responsive wall segment is adjacent a prostatic urethra. The elongate body is adapted to be in fluid communication with a bladder. The assembly has a first operably selective condition wherein the elongate support member is translatable relative to the elongate body so as to permit sequential and incremental radial compression of the radially responsive wall segment by the prostatic urethra in furtherance of defining architecture associated with the prostatic urethra. The assembly further has a second operably selective condition wherein fluid distally introduced into the elongate body radially expands the radially responsive wall segment into conforming engagement with the prostatic urethra in furtherance of obtaining a mold of same.
30. A lower urinary tract symptoms diagnostic method comprising the steps of:
a. supporting a prostatic urethra;
b. sequentially and incrementally returning portions of the prostatic urethra to an unsupported condition during a bladder voiding event; and,
c. visually assessing fluid flow associated with said sequential and incremental return of portions of the prostatic urethra to an unsupported condition.
31. The method of
32. The method of
33. The method of
34. A bladder outlet obstruction diagnostic methodology comprising the steps of:
a. positioning an indwelling device for selective support of a prostatic urethra; and,
b. manipulating a portion of said indwelling device so as to permit a prostate to physiologically act upon a prostatic responsive segment of said indwelling device.
35. The method of
36. The method of
37. The method of
38. The method of
39. The method of
40. The method of
41. The method of
42. The method of
This is a regular application filed under 35 U.S.C. §111(a) claiming priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) (1), of provisional application Ser. No. 60/229,143 having a filing date of Aug. 31, 2000, filed under 35 U.S.C. §111(b), as well as provisional application Ser. No. 60/264,700 having a filing date of Jan. 30, 2001, filed under 35 U.S.C. §111(b).
The present invention generally relates to medical devices, more particularly to a diagnostic urethral assembly and attendant methodology for assessing lower urinary tract symptoms.
A diagram of the male urinary bladder and urinary passage (i.e., the lower urinary tract) is presented in
Presently, millions of men in the United States alone exhibit some form of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), with bladder outlet obstructions (BOOs) being a major subgroup of LUTS. BOOs are primarily caused by the enlargement of the prostate gland (e.g., benign prostate hyperplasia (BHP)) which results in radial compression of the urethra surrounded thereby (i.e., the prostatic urethra), thus obstructing (i.e., constricting) urine flow, resulting in incomplete emptying of the bladder (i.e., there being what is clinically referred to as a “post void residual” (PVR) remaining in the bladder). Persons exhibiting an abnormal PVR will often need to urinate more frequently, and are likely to experience other physical discomfort, such as frequent urges to urinate, and physical exhaustion due to sleep deprivation, a condition clinically referred to as nocturia. Heretofore, such symptoms would be treated using surgical procedures such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), or non-surgical procedures such as thermal treatment of the prostate.
As bladder outlet obstruction patients are a subgroup of patients with LUTS, proper treatment of the specific problem requires a knowledge of complete urodynamic status of the patient in order determine the cause of the symptoms. Causes may include bladder deficiencies such as bladder decompensation or hypertrophy, sphincter dysnergia, prostatic obstruction, urethral lesions and others.
There are diagnostic procedures available to clinical urologists, the purpose of which is to assess the physiologic properties of the lower urinary tract and symptoms related thereto. Such tests, which address the filling/emptying conditions (i.e., dynamics) of the bladder, include, but are not limited to, the use of video fluoroscopy simultaneously with the holding and release of urine, cystometry, urethral pressure profiling, ultrasonic volume assessments, and uroflowmetry. The subject invention provides additional heretofore unknown diagnostic options which allow for relatively simple and increased understanding of the urinary tract by assessing the elements (i.e., structures or architecture) thereof, more particularly the prostatic urethra and their influence on urine flows.
One of the urodynamic tests frequently performed in urodynamic investigations is cystometry, a test of bladder function in which pressure and volume of fluid in the bladder is measured during filling, storage, and voiding. A cystometry study is performed to diagnose problems with urination, including incontinence, urinary retention, and recurrent urinary tract infections. Urinary difficulties may occur because of weak or hyperactive sphincter or detrusor (i.e., the main muscle of the bladder wall), or incoordination of their two activities. Infection of the bladder or urethra may cause incontinence, as can obstruction of the urethra from scar tissue, prostate enlargement, or other benign or cancerous growths. Loss of sensation due to nerve damage can lead to chronic overfilling.
This test of detrusor muscle function generally consists of distending the bladder with a known volume of a fluid (i.e., liquid (e.g., water, saline, etc.) or gas (e.g., air, carbon dioxide, etc.)) while recording the intravesical pressure. The desired fluid may be introduced either through the urethra or suprapubically, in most cases the fluid is instilled through a double lumen catheter at a rate of approximately 10 cc/min, with the catheter employed permitting both filling of the bladder and recording of bladder pressure. As the bladder is composed mostly of small muscles, which are to a large degree under voluntary control, and muscle bundles which run in different directions and from layer to layer, adaptation of the bladder to changing fluid volume is primarily due to the viscal-elastic property of the organ. The bladder wall, in a healthy individual, is able to expand without any significant increase in tension as the bladder fills with fluid.
When the bladder is artificially filled, the pressure which is required to fill that bladder will provide for clinical characterization of the bladder and its general health. If a bladder is non-compliant, the pressure to fill the bladder will increase prematurely. If it is decompensated, meaning it has lost some of its tone, the filling pressure will be minimal while the bladder volume may be large. When the bladder is becoming full, the patient will experience a strong sensation of needing to urinate.
In a typical cystometric study, the filling phase looks at the bladder's ability to comply to increased volume. The detrusor muscle normally expands as volume increases so that the bladder initially rises very little in pressure to the time the patient voids (i.e., in a plot of pressure against volume of contents during filling (i.e., a “cystometrogram” (CMG)), the early portion of this graph is substantially flat for a healthy individual). The normal bladder should not begin contractions during filling and should initially expand without resistance. A feeling of fullness occurs with a volume of about 100-200 ml, with an adult bladder capacity on the order of about 300-500 ml. The sphincter should relax and open when the patient wills it, accompanied by detrusor contractions. During voiding, detrusor contraction should be smooth and lead to a steady urine stream.
If bladder pressure continually rises during filling, it can be due to a number of factors which would bear further investigation. For instance, inability of the bladder to relax during filling, or low bladder volume, may indicate interstitial cystitis, prostate enlargement, or bladder cancer. Contraction of the bladder during filling (i.e., any rise in bladder pressure that is not accompanied by a rise in abdominal pressure) may be due to irritation from infection or cysts, obstruction of the bladder outlet, or neurological disease such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, or spinal cord injury. Diminished sensation may occur with nerve lesions, peripheral neuropathy, or chronic overfilling.
A procedure generically referred to as “bedside cystometry” is used to determine, at a basic level, whether the bladder appears decompensated. This is accomplished by simply filling the bladder through a catheter with a known fluid volume, often ranging from about 250-400 ml. The patient is ask to inform the physician when he or she has a strong urge to urinate. Should the patient lack such urge, even when the bladder accommodates the introduced fluid volume, it is likely that some degree of bladder decompensation is present. As the bladder capacities increase, the probability of decompensation increases.
Whether monitoring filling pressures and volumes for the purpose of bladder characterization, or at a bedside procedure which only monitors initiation of flows, information with regard to bladder emptying is typically not acquired. Even if such information were acquired, meaningful diagnosis of BOOs is not possible.
Another standard urodynamic test is called the urethral pressure profile (UPP), (i.e., perfusion urethral profilometry), a procedure which assesses urethral integrity by determining the inward pressure of the urethra continuously along its length (i.e., a measure of the urethra's response to distention). This test is especially pertinent with respect to patients with incontinence or obstructive symptomatology. Usually a profile of urethral pressure may be obtained by the withdrawal of a pressure recording catheter from the bladder through the urethra. Several methods of profilometry exist including measurement of pressure inside of a balloon which traverses the urethra and also the measurement of the urethral pressure that is transmitted against a fluid or gas that is infused through a small catheter traversing the urethra.
The UPP is typically carried out by inserting a catheter having a side opening and a lumen communicating with that opening. A dilute saline solution is pumped into the lumen and out through the side opening at a fixed rate, while the catheter is steadily withdrawn from the urethra at a substantially constant speed. A plot of the back pressure in the line between the pump and the side opening, against the physical distance of the opening along the urethra, yields the UPP. Typically, as the opening passes a location of constriction, whether normal or abnormal, the back pressure rises, and appears as a spike or hump in the graphical representation of pressure as a function of distance. A further parameter derived from UPP testing is what is called the maximum urethral closure pressure, which is the difference between the maximum pressure derived by the UPP test and the intravesical pressure of the bladder.
What are known in the art as membrane catheters are closed systems also used in obtaining UPPs. Here, the liquid that enters the catheter under pressure serves to expand a thin balloon or elastic element which is located adjacent the end of the catheter. The fluid is captive in the balloon and cannot flow out of the catheter. Single or double membrane catheters are frequently used for recording such urethral pressure profiles. As they are manually or mechanically withdrawn from the bladder cavity, the balloons will traverse the entire length of the urethra and serve to transmit pressure through the liquid with which they are inflated back to a chart recorder or other type of recording device.
A high pressure point in a UPP may be due to poor compliance or obstruction. As UPP procedures rely on very sensitive and indirect measurement, which is not always repeatable, perfusion profilometry is often replaced by the use of catheter micro-tip transducers that record pressure directly. Despite methodology, the diagnostic value of static UPP is limited because it is a study that is performed neither during filling and/or storage, nor during emptying. Static infusion profilometry does have value in evaluating artificial sphincter function, or a potential site of obstruction.
In the paper of Schafer et al. “Obstructed and Unobstructed Prostatic Obstruction: A Plea for Urodynamic Objectivation of Bladder Outflow Obstruction in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Urology, [month] 1989, Vol. _, No. 6, pp. 198-203, the following assessment is noted in the summary: “The pathophysiological concept for transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy centers around “prostatic obstruction.” This blind study using advanced computer-assisted analysis of urodynamic pressure/flow studies confirms previous reports to the effect that a significant number (>25%) of patients undergoing prostatectomy objectively have no obstruction.” Schaefer et. al conducted a trial on 39 patients who later went on to have a TURP. During the trial advanced level pressure flow studies were conducted on all the patients suspected to have prostatic obstructions. These patients were divided into three groups with all receiving a TURP. The urodynamic outcomes were then measured following recovery. The table below illustrates the urodynamic improvements according to the minimal urethral opening pressure (pmuo). These patients were arbitrarily referred to as “unobstructed,” “obstructed,” or “severely obstructed” according to the measured pmuo.
Urologists specializing in this field would recognize that only the severely obstructed patients had good urodynamic improvement and significant reduction in the PVR. The “obstructed” patients experienced slight improvement in urine flow rates, however, this improvement was arguably so minimal that the TURP procedure may not have been considered sufficiently beneficial to justify the discomfort and attendant risks of the procedure. The result of this study illustrate that in 20 of the 39 patients who received the TURP benefitted greatly. These patients were those with minimal urethral opening pressures of >40 cm H2O.
Due to the fact that BOO patients are only a subgroup of patients with LUTS, proper treatment of the specific problem requires complete knowledge of the urodynamic status of the patient in order determine whether the patient's symptoms are caused by BOO, or from bladder deficiencies (e.g., bladder decompensation), or sphincter dysnergia. While comprehensive knowledge of the bladder-urethra interaction during urination may be obtained using complex urodynamic procedures, and UPP, most urologists are currently reluctant to perform such procedures prior to invasive, or minimally invasive, procedures directed to debulking the prostatic urethra. Furthermore, from the aforementioned discussion of cystometry, UPP, and pmuo, it may be appreciated that assessing the likelihood of improvement of the patients urine flow parameters following a dis-obstruction therapy such as TURP is possible, it is not however straight forward, without risk, and subject to a great deal of uncertainty.
It is the objective of the assembly and attendant methodology of the subject invention to provide the urologist additional clinical diagnostic information. The diagnostic assembly of the subject invention provides core information which are at least in part being sought by both the cystometry and UPP, however, unlike either of these procedures, the subject invention provides for dynamic fluid assessment, and further provides for the profiling of the urethra at a specific contact pressure, and simultaneously permits assessment of the effect of pressure on the entire prostatic urethra which may optionally include the external sphincter region.
The subject invention, whether it be the assembly, or the attendant methodology, provides for the easy acquisition of reliable diagnostic information by allowing the patient's true urination patterns to be observed and the physiologically workings of the prostatic urethra ascertained in association therewith.
A diagnostic urethral assembly, preferably in the form of a kit, is generally provided. The assembly includes an elongate body having a fluid passageway and an elongate support member selectively positionable within the fluid passageway of the elongate body. The elongate body has a radially responsive wall segment, the elongate body being positionable within a lower urinary tract such that the radially responsive wall segment is adjacent a prostatic urethra. The elongate body is adapted to be in fluid communication with a bladder. The assembly has a first operably selective condition wherein the elongate support member is translatable relative to the elongate body so as to permit sequential and incremental radial compression of the radially responsive wall segment by the prostatic urethra in furtherance of defining architecture associated with the prostatic urethra. The assembly further has a second operably selective condition wherein fluid distally introduced into the elongate body radially expands the radially responsive wall segment into conforming engagement with the prostatic urethra in furtherance of obtaining a mold of same.
The subject invention seeks to provide the urologist with first, the ability to assess the flow of urine in an actual urination cycle to determine the contribution of flow rate/pressure irregularities on bladder outlet, prostatic urethra, and external sphincter. This is accomplished by the selective movement of an elongate support member within a body of the assembly which will receive the flowing urine at any point along these regions of the urethra while allowing the natural anatomic restrictions to effect the flow by providing a collapsible region in the catheter which is easily responsible to any restrictive regions.
The subject invention further seeks to provide for the assessment of the compressive regions of the urethra by forming a mold, casting or impression of the interior of the urethra at specific pressure conditions. Similar to a UPP, the measurement provides useful information about the compliance of the urethra along its length, however, in contradistinction to a UPP, it provides the ability to ascertain the opening pressure of the urethra while simultaneously identifying the exact location of the obstruction which is effecting the flow.
The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent with reference to the figures, the DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION, and the claims hereinafter. The figures are not necessarily to dimensional or geometric scale, nor do they necessarily represent structures in accurate or representative relative scale. Emphasis rather is placed upon illustrating principals of the invention in a clear manner.
The male urinary bladder, the urinary passage therefrom, and the structures associated therewith, hereinafter the lower urinary tract, are diagrammatically depicted in
Referring again to the drawings, wherein like elements are assigned identical reference characters, and more particularly to
The assembly 10 generally has a first operably selective condition (e.g.,
Referring now to
The resiliently linked elements of the diagnostic urethral assembly 10 permit fluid (e.g., urine, saline, etc.) to distally drain from the bladder 200 while simultaneously monitoring fluid flow rate and/or pressure. The reversibly retractable graduated support member 12 may be sequentially and incrementally shifted along the longitudinal axis of the assembly body 14 by grasping the distal extremity 22 of the graduated support member, and by further grasping the assembly body 14, while slowing separating the support member 12 from the body 14 (i.e., distally translating the elongate support member 12 relative to the assembly body 14). When this incremental shift occurs, the external pressure applied by the bladder outlet 225, prostate 240, or external sphincter 260 forces the pliable or placid segment (e.g., thin walled segment or diaphragm) 16 of the assembly body 14 radially inward, at least that portion of the radially responsive segment 16 adjacent (i.e., proximally adjacent) the proximal extremity 24 of the elongate support member 12. In a sense, a stenting function for the support member 12 is selectively “deactivated” to permit a step wise physiological response in the radially response segment 16 of the assembly body 14.
Any significant change in the rate of the fluid flow is readily and easily observed, either via the non-opaque sleeve 26 and/or via a fluid discharge port as will be later described. As the support member 12 is provided with incremental gradient markings 36, monitoring of the movement of the support member 12 with respect to the distal extremity 18 of the assembly body 14, simultaneously with the changes in the flow rates of discharged fluid, it may be easily differentiated whether an obstruction of fluid flow is being introduced by the bladder outlet 225, prostate 240, external sphincter 260, or a lesion elsewhere along the urethra 270.
Referring now to
Adjacent the proximal extremity 20 of the body 14, an orifice 40 provides a pathway for fluid communication (i.e., ingress) into the interior of the body 14 of the assembly 10. The assembly body 14 further has a passageway or lumen 30 which extends from the proximal 20 to distal 18 extremity thereof. The wall 42 traversing the proximal 20 and distal 18 extremities of the body 14 includes a radially responsive or pliable segment 16, and less pliable (i.e., more rigid) portions 44 adjacent thereto. The pliable segment 16 is characterized as being easily collapsed beneath any obstruction within the prostatic urethra 230. The fluid receiving orifice 40 of the body 14 is positioned near the proximal extremity 20 thereof, and is in communication with the fluid passageway 30.
Referring now to
Following the filling of the balloon 28, the assembly 10 is gently pulled distally by placing tension on the body 14. A slight tensile resistance experienced by the clinician acknowledges that the distal surface of the balloon 28 is gently pressing against the bladder neck 220, and that the body 14, and assembly thereby, is anchored in place. This is the intended location for the assembly 10, the radially responsive segment 16 of the body 14 substantially traversing the prostatic urethra 230.
Once the physician or clinician is satisfied that the diagnostic urethral assembly 10 is properly positioned, the support probe 12 may be selectively removed by simply sliding it out of the interior 30 of the body 14 via manipulation of the compression fitting assembly 46. Cooperative linkage of the support member 12 to the assembly body 14 is preferably, but not necessarily, completed at this point. The distal ends 22, 18 of the support member 12 and the body 14 are adapted to receive each of the opposing ends of the sleeve 26, more particularly, the receptive recess 32 of the body 14 and the receptive recess 34 of the support probe 12 receive the ends of the sleeve 26.
The sleeve 26, which is sufficiently dimensioned and resilient, respondingly elongates to accommodate the longitudinal movement of the support probe 12 relative to the body 14. Furthermore, the sleeve 26, in combination with the compression fitting assembly 46, form a distal most fluid boundary (i.e., delimit a variable fluid volume for the body of the assembly) for fluid sealing of the annular space existing between the support member and the body.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
To perform a first differential diagnostic procedure, the bladder 200 needs to contain either urine or be filled with fluid. A minimum bladder volume to initiate a micturition cycle is about 200 cc, and in some patients with decompensated bladders, as much as 400 or even 600 cc may be required. The volume of fluid required in the filling of the bladder is significant and essential information in any bladder diagnostic procedure. Once bladder 200 is filled, the patient is ask to stand or sit up and urinate. The urination is either performed into a portable urinal, or a uroflowmetry machine which will record the rate of flow and volume collected. As the patient voids the body 14 of the assembly 10 is held stationary while the graduated support member 12 is gradually retracted. By observing the appearance of the fluid flow as the graduated support member 12 is moved longitudinally, any obstruction within the urethra 270, more particularly, in that region (i.e., length) proximally adjacent the free end 24 of the support member 12, will compress the radially responsive segment 16 of the body 14. As may be appreciated, the relatively radially rigid surface of the graduated support member serves a function of selectively supporting (i.e., stenting) at least the radially responsive segment 16 of the body 14 of the assembly 10.
An understanding of the differential diagnosis is best explained by examination of
For instance, if the fluid flow discharge rate is 14 cubic centimeters per second (cc/s), in the location shown in
Prostatic obstructions are frequently within the proximal most portion of the prostatic urethra, very near the bladder outlet. It may be appreciated that through the procedures outlined, and by the assembly components so far detailed, one may clinically determine the level of discharge flow reduction relative to the anatomical location. Pressure and flow reductions during longitudinal movements of the support member may be a step function if there are abrupt resistance due to the any of the three primary structures.
It is appreciated by urologists who diagnose bladder outlet difficulties that often inability to satisfactorily empty the bladder is often the result from multiple problems. It is possible for a weak bladder to be the cause of low flow rate, alternately, a ledge at the bladder outlet is known to interfere with discharge flow. Since the bladder outlet twists and collapses simultaneously as it closes, the urethra in this part of the anatomy is often referred to as an internal sphincter. This language is common, though use of this term is usually qualified with the clarification that it is really the bladder outlet and that technically it is not a sphincter.
By observing the flow patterns throughout the complete available movement of the calibrated support member within the body, the urologist is able to get a reasonably good assessment of the anatomical origins of the detected discharge flow problem. The driving pressure range during the micturition cycle of the bladder for a competent bladder should range from 8 to 20 cm H2O. In the event that the bladder is producing pressures substantially below this, the flow rate of urine will be quite low. These patients would be candidates for further evaluation to determine if their difficulties in urination may be attributed to decompensated bladders. Patients with static pressures far in excess of this may have non-compliant bladders. For non-compliant bladders, the flow rates may be substantially large when the prostate is stented. In this circumstance, the volume of urine that the bladder can store is very small. For this reason, when the bladder is being filled, observing the volume and the pressure may be very useful in assessing the urodynamic status of the patient.
Patients undergoing these pressure profile assessments such as those introduced in the previous discussions are being considered primarily for dis-obstruction intervention for what is suspected of BPH. This emphasizes the importance of understanding the actual effect on discharge flow rate that the urethra has throughout and along its length. When the procedures of complex urodynamic assessments are not performed, the level of uncertainty in the diagnosis may be as great as 50% depending on the factors considered and screening procedures used in arriving at the diagnosis. The current American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines do not recommend use the complex urodynamic assessments in diagnosing BPH prior to performing TURP. As may be appreciated from the background discussion, this level of understanding leaves a substantial percentage of patients without urodynamic improvements following surgery, while still participating in the co-morbidities of that procedure which include impotence, retrograde ejaculation (i.e., semen goes to the bladder), infection, hematuria, incontinence and others.
The use of these differential diagnosis steps to evaluate the urine flow study is very useful and desirable. This information provides an increased confidence level in identifying the source of the flow resistance. It should be apparent that it is very important to understand exactly where the calibrated support member is within the interior of the body, as this provides an understanding of the pressure-flow characteristics at a given location. Since prostate length varies substantially, it is difficult to know when the support member is satisfactorily positioned in the prostate or urethra. The length of the prostatic urethra is normally assessed using either cystoscopy which involves inserting a large fiberoptic into the interior the urethra for measurement, or using trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) which involves placing a large ultrasound probe into the rectum and measuring the prostate from a posterior projection. Measurement of lengths with TRUS is of relatively low accuracy and repeatability, thus, for this reason it will be clear why the further features of this invention are important.
In order to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the lengths of the prostatic urethra and the level of obstruction which may be effecting the urine flow, another feature of this differential diagnosis procedure involves the use of a quick setting rubber-like compound to make a flexible three dimensional cast of the select segments of the urethra. As will be discussed shortly, the analysis of the casting provides the necessary understanding of the lengths and mechanical nature of the prostatic urethra, an understanding which diminishes the uncertainty of the underlaying source of the symptom(s).
Referring now to
Following re-insertion, the calibrated support probe 12 may be gradually shifted along the longitudinal axis of the body 14 by holding the body 14 in one hand and a syringe 84 in the other. The syringe 84 is filled with a low viscosity impression material 82 and is conducted to the proximal extremity 20 of the body 14 by the support probe 12. As the impression material 82 fills the interior 30 of the body 14 in the placid segment 16, the support probe 12 is slowly withdrawn therefrom. This results in the filling of the body 14, namely the fluid passageway 30, with impression material 82. At this point of “deactivation”, the external pressure applied by the bladder outlet 225, the prostate 240, and the external sphincter 260 may force the radially responsive segment 16 of the body 14 radially inward. The saline within the pressure isolation coupling 68 prevents the impression material 82 from entering pressure indicator 70. During filling of the interior of the placid segment 16 of the body 14, the compression nut 48 is left slightly loose to allow for the air, saline, or urine with which the interior was flushed with or had present therein, to exit the interior 30 of the body 14 as it is displaced by the introduced casting agent 82. When filling is completed, the compression nut 48 is tightened. Pressure is sustained with the syringe 84, or other suitable pressure apparatus such as a compression bulb or the like.
The impression material 82, vis-a-vis the “closed” assembly 10, is sustained at a specific pressure which is intended to place an outward pressure on the body 14 for a preselected time, consistent with curing requirements of the impression material 82, so as to conform the placid segment 16 of the body 14 to the urethral segment 230 adjacent thereto. A sustained pressure of approximately 40 cm H2O during curing will give a good indicator of the opening pressure of the urethra to indicate severity of obstruction. The impression material will then cure at that pressure, with the shape of the cured impression material (i.e., the casting resulting therefrom) providing the urologist with critical information about the characteristics of the urethra in the vital regions. The observance of the incremental gradient marks 36 of the support member 12 assist in uniform filling of the assembly body 12. An intact competent external sphincter will sustain bladder pressures of approximately 80 cm H2O or more. Due to the strength of the external sphincter and the broad flaring out within the urethra distal of that landmark, the external sphincter should normally be very visible on the casting. Furthermore, with the balloon 28 positioned at the outlet of the bladder 220 so as to properly position and anchor the diagnostic assembly 10, the casting accurately reflects and memorializes the length of the prostatic urethra and the positions of both the bladder outlet and the external sphincter. The casting further provides a three dimensional model of the area available for urine flow along the impression length.
The casting is obtained by extraction or withdrawal of the diagnostic assembly 10, namely the integrated support member 12 and body 14, while in an assembled or disassembled condition (i.e., together or individually), with the pressure sensing apparatus 60 and impression apparatus 80 having been previously removed from the assembly 10. Fluid from the balloon 28 is released by withdrawal via syringe (not show) at the balloon filling port 38 positioned at the distal extremity 18 of the body 14, with the body 14 removed as easily as known urinary catheters. As the impression material is sufficiently compliant to allow easy flexure within the urethra during removal, no trauma is thereby caused. The preferred impression material is a two part vinyl poly-siloxane having a set-up time of approximately 4 minutes at body temperature and a set durometer of only 30 Shore A. Curing is not inhibited by the presence of water based fluids such as urine or saline. The firmness of the cured material or casting is roughly equivalent to standard urinary catheters made of latex rubber or silicone. The casting is finally retrieved from the body of the assembly, as by cutting it therefrom or generally withdrawing it, inspected, measured and retained as part of the patient's medical record.
The body of the assembly may be sized from 8 to 24 French, however, the preferable size is 14 or 18 French, with the pliable segment or diaphragm easily expandable to up to 24 French. For most patients this is adequate expansion to determine prospective urodynamic influences. The relatively large expansion size in the radially responsive segment is selected to reflect the nature of the prostatic urethra. The purpose of this diagnostic procedure is to provide information specifically about the effects of bladder outlet obstructions which occupy the length extending from the bladder outlet to the bulbous urethra. It may be appreciated that the pliable segment may be lengthened in order to assess the presence of lesions within the urethra distal of the bulbous urethra, or otherwise modified to ascertain the nature and relationships among other lower urinary tract structures. The preferred length for the radially responsive segment is 15 cm or less, this length being generally sufficient to span from the bladder outlet to the bulbous urethra in most, if not all, males.
Referring now to
Referring now to
It is intuitive that when the three dimensional urethral impression proves that a minimal obstruction is present, such as is the circumstance with the casting of
The impression system of the diagnostic urethral assembly of the subject invention provides for a new approach to determining if the sphincters, or prostate, or lower urethral strictures are the underlying cause of the flow restrictions that some patients suffer from. The assembly, and attendant methodologies outlined herein, provide a more straight forward and accurate alternative to diagnostic and procedural options heretofore known, namely complex urodynamic assessments such as the use of video fluoroscopy simultaneously with the holding and release of urine, cystometry, urethral pressure profiling, ultrasonic volume assessments (PVR), and uroflowmetry, some of which the urological community are currently hesitant to perform on a broad spectrum basis. Due to the fact that the diagnostic assembly and attendant methodology of the subject invention are specifically for differentiation of sources of obstructions, it is beneficial and highly desirable for the urologist to use a body which is sized to the patients anatomy to insure that data obtained reflects true urethral dynamics, whether in flow/pressure outcomes, or cast geometry.
The objective of the invention is to provide the urologist with simple and gentle diagnostic urethral assembly and methodology for gaining a higher confidence in the diagnosis of BPH prior to or in lieu of aggressive clinical correction. The assembly of this invention allows for relatively simple flow examinations which aid obstruction detection, and location. Using the actual flow motivation of the bladder, the competency of the bladder is examined. The assembly, namely the combination of the body and the calibrated support probe, allows for data acquisition regarding the functionality of the entire proximal urinary tract. It should be further appreciated that, although there is an inherent value to the acquired flow information, like all urology flow information, some inconclusiveness about the cause of the insufficiencies or anomalies remains. The electrical activity relating the micturition cycle often varies widely between cycles, and the strength of the detrusor function of the bladder and relaxation of the sphincters also vary. For this reason, the second function that is enabled by the assembly of the subject invention, namely that of producing an impression of the urethra at specific conditions, is very important. The impressions are formed without the necessity of a full bladder, or active micturition. The impressions allow a valuable feature as either an adjunct to the flow differential diagnosis procedure, or independently, as does the flow differential diagnosis procedure.