|Publication number||US20050111613 A1|
|Application number||US 10/718,339|
|Publication date||May 26, 2005|
|Filing date||Nov 20, 2003|
|Priority date||Nov 20, 2003|
|Also published as||CN1654976A, CN1654976B, US6898265|
|Publication number||10718339, 718339, US 2005/0111613 A1, US 2005/111613 A1, US 20050111613 A1, US 20050111613A1, US 2005111613 A1, US 2005111613A1, US-A1-20050111613, US-A1-2005111613, US2005/0111613A1, US2005/111613A1, US20050111613 A1, US20050111613A1, US2005111613 A1, US2005111613A1|
|Inventors||David Mliner, Haochuan Jiang, Richard Hart, Chang Wei, Jaime Echeverry|
|Original Assignee||Mliner David G., Haochuan Jiang, Hart Richard L., Chang Wei, Echeverry Jaime A.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (19), Referenced by (5), Classifications (11), Legal Events (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This invention relates generally to methods and apparatus for detecting radiation in CT imaging and other radiation imaging systems, and more particularly to scintillator arrays having increased reflectivity.
In at least some computed tomography (CT) imaging system configurations, an x-ray source projects a fan-shaped beam which is collimated to lie within an X-Y plane of a Cartesian coordinate system and generally referred to as the “imaging plane”. The x-ray beam passes through the object being imaged, such as a patient. The beam, after being attenuated by the object, impinges upon an array of radiation detectors. The intensity of the attenuated beam radiation received at the detector array is dependent upon the attenuation of the x-ray beam by the object. Each detector element of the array produces a separate electrical signal that is a measurement of the beam attenuation at the detector location. The attenuation measurements from all the detectors are acquired separately to produce a transmission profile.
In some known CT systems, the x-ray source and the detector array are rotated with a gantry within the imaging plane and around the object to be imaged so that the angle at which the x-ray beam intersects the object constantly changes. X-ray sources typically include x-ray tubes, which emit the x-ray beam at a focal spot. X-ray detectors typically include a collimator for collimating x-ray beams received at the detector, a scintillator adjacent the collimator, and photodetectors adjacent the scintillator.
One or more rows of scintillator cells or scintillator pixels are provided in a detector array configured to acquire projection data from which one or more image slices of an object are reconstructed. One known detector array includes a two-dimensional array of scintillator cells, with each scintillator cell having an associated photodetector. An epoxy material is used to cast the scintillator cells into a block having specified dimensions for easier handling. To maximize reflectivity and to prevent cross-talk between adjacent detector cells, the cast reflector mixture includes a material having a high refractive index, such as TiO2. Thus, light generated in the scintillating material by impinging x-rays is confined to the detector cell in which it is generated. However, neither the epoxy, the TiO2, nor their mixture are particularly absorptive of x-rays. Thus, neither the photodetectors nor the cast reflector mixture itself is protected from damage caused by impinging x-rays.
In one known cast reflector mixture, a small amount of an oxide of chromium is also incorporated in the cast reflector mixture to further reduce cross-talk between cells. However, inclusion of this material reduces the efficiency of the detector, because the absorbed portion of the generated visible light is never detected by the photodetectors. Chrome is used to reduce the cross-talk by absorbing the light transmitting through the cast walls between pixels. This dopant significantly reduces the reflectivity from 98% to 82%, thus leading to very low light output. The introduction of chrome can reduce the light output by as much as 60% or higher. Also, the ability to reduce the cross-talk is limited. Newer CT applications require higher and higher resolution which means that the new design will require smaller pixels. The light output is further reduced as the pixel size become smaller because the relative opportunity of losing light on the surface is higher. The light output will be reduced by 20 to 25% when the pixel size is reduced by 50%. The low light output can cause image quality problems because of the low signal to noise ratio.
In one aspect, a pixilated scintillator array for a radiation detector of an imaging system is provided. The scintillator array includes a plurality of scintillator pixels arranged side by side in an array. The scintillator pixels are separated from adjacent scintillator pixels by gaps. Each scintillator pixel includes a top surface, a plurality of side surfaces, and a first layer covering the top surface and the side surfaces of each scintillator pixel. The first layer is formed from a smoothing coating. A second layer formed from a reflective metal coating covers the first layer, and a third layer formed from a barrier coating covers the second layer.
In another aspect, a computed tomographic imaging system that includes a rotating gantry, a detector array on the rotating gantry, and a radiation source on the rotating gantry opposite the detector array and configured to direct a radiation beam through an object towards the detector array. The detector array includes a scintillator array optically coupled to a plurality of diodes. The scintillator array cincludes a plurality of scintillator pixels arranged side by side in an array. The scintillator pixels are separated from adjacent scintillator pixels by gaps. Each scintillator pixel includes a top surface, a plurality of side surfaces, and a first layer covering the top surface and the side surfaces of each scintillator pixel. The first layer is formed from a smoothing coating. A second layer formed from a reflective metal coating covers the first layer, and a third layer formed from a barrier coating covers the second layer.
In another aspect, a method of making a scintillator array is provided. The method includes providing a pixilated scintillator pack preform including a plurality of scintillator pixels arranged side by side in an array and separated by a gap, with each pixel having a top surface and a plurality of side surfaces. The method also includes applying a smoothing coating on the top surface and the side surface of each scintillator pixel to form a smoothing layer, applying a reflective metal coating on top of the smoothing layer to form a reflective metal layer, and applying a barrier coating on top of the reflective metal layer to form a barrier layer.
A pixilated scintillator array for a radiation detector of an imaging system is described below in detail. The scintillator array includes a polymer smoothing coating on the top and side surfaces of the pixels of the scintillator array. The smoothing coating has a low refractive index of less than 1.5 and improves adhesion and reflectance of a reflective metal coating that is deposited on top of the smoothing coating on the top and side surfaces of the pixels of the array. A barrier coating is applied on top of the reflective metal coating and provides for protection of the reflective coating which increases the durability of the scintillator array. The design of the pixilated scintillator array provides for an increase in output of between about 50 percent to about 100 percent over current commercial scintillator arrays. The pixilated scintillator array is described below in relation to a computed tomography (CT) imaging system. However, the pixilated scintillator array can be used in other imaging systems, including imaging systems that utilize radiation sources other than an x-ray source, for example, a gamma ray source.
Turning now to the drawings, and referring to
Rotation of gantry 12 and the operation of x-ray source 14 are governed by a control mechanism 26 of CT system 10. Control mechanism 26 includes an x-ray controller 28 that provides power and timing signals to x-ray source 14 and a gantry motor controller 30 that controls the rotational speed and position of gantry 12. A data acquisition system (DAS) 32 in control mechanism 26 samples analog data from detector elements 20 and converts the data to digital signals for subsequent processing. An image reconstructor 34 receives sampled and digitized x-ray data from DAS 32 and performs high speed image reconstruction. The reconstructed image is applied as an input to a computer 36 which stores the image in a mass storage device 38.
Computer 36 also receives commands and scanning parameters from an operator via console 40 that has a keyboard. An associated cathode ray tube display 42 allows the operator to observe the reconstructed image and other data from computer 36. The operator supplied commands and parameters are used by computer 36 to provide control signals and information to DAS 32, x-ray controller 28 and gantry motor controller 30. In addition, computer 36 operates a table motor controller 44 which controls a motorized table 46 to position patient 22 in gantry 12. Particularly, table 46 moves portions of patient 22 through gantry opening 48.
As explained above, each detector element 20 of array 18 produces a separate electrical signal that is a measurement of the beam attenuation at the detector location. Particularly, and referring to
Referring also to
A reflective metal layer 70 is formed on top of smoothing layer 68. Metal layer 70 is formed by depositing a metal coating on to top surface 62 and side surfaces 64 that have been previously coated with a smoothing coating that forms smoothing layer 68. Reflective metal layer 70 has a high reflective surface that is capable of reflecting greater than about 95 percent of the light produced by scintillator pixel 50 back from all incident angles to be detected by photo-detector 54 (shown in
To protect reflective metal layer 70, a barrier layer 72 is formed by the deposition of a barrier coating material on top of metal layer 70. The barrier coating material is applied in one or more coats in sufficient quantity so that in one embodiment, the dry film thickness of the coating material, and thus, of barrier layer 72 is about 0.5 μm to about 15.0 μm. In another embodiment, the thickness of barrier layer 72 is about 2.0 μm to about 10.0 μm. The barrier coating is applied by any suitable coating technique, for example, dip and spin coating. Suitable barrier coating materials include, but are not limited to, silicone hard coatings, including UV curable silicone hard coatings, for example, UVHC8558 commercially available from General Electric Company, and epoxy coatings, for example, EpoTek 301 commercially available from Epoxy Technology, Inc.
After smoothing layer 68, reflective metal layer 70 and barrier layer 72 have been formed on each scintillator pixel 50, an adhesive material 74 (shown in
To make a finished scintillator array 53, pixilated scintillator preform 60 is cleaned, for example with an acid cleaning solution, and then dried. A smoothing coating composition is applied to top surface 62 and side surfaces 64 of scintillator pixels 50. The deposited smoothing coating is cured to form smoothing layer 68. Next a reflective metal coating is applied on top of smoothing layer 68, covering all surfaces of pixels 50 to form reflective metal layer 70. Then a barrier coating is applied on top of metal layer 70 and cured to form barrier layer 72. Adhesive material 74 is then cast onto preform 60 filling all gaps 52 and covering all surfaces of scintillator pixels 50. Adhesive material is then cured and preform 60 is then machined to its final dimensions.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US3749920 *||Dec 3, 1971||Jul 31, 1973||Sheldon E||System for x-ray image intensification|
|US4069355 *||Aug 20, 1976||Jan 17, 1978||General Electric Company||Process of making structured x-ray phosphor screen|
|US4316092 *||Aug 25, 1980||Feb 16, 1982||General Electric Company||X-Ray image converters utilizing rare earth admixtures|
|US4491732 *||Aug 25, 1982||Jan 1, 1985||General Electric Company||Optical potting of solid-state detector cells|
|US4560877 *||Dec 29, 1982||Dec 24, 1985||General Electric Company||Solid state detector module|
|US4563584 *||Dec 29, 1982||Jan 7, 1986||General Electric Company||Solid state detector|
|US4720426 *||Jun 30, 1986||Jan 19, 1988||General Electric Company||Reflective coating for solid-state scintillator bar|
|US5179284 *||Aug 21, 1991||Jan 12, 1993||General Electric Company||Solid state radiation imager having a reflective and protective coating|
|US5440129 *||Aug 4, 1994||Aug 8, 1995||Siemens Aktiengesellschaft||Detector for high-energy radiation|
|US5519227 *||Aug 8, 1994||May 21, 1996||The University Of Massachusetts Medical Center||Structured scintillation screens|
|US5585280 *||Jun 2, 1995||Dec 17, 1996||General Electric Company||Method of fabricating solid state radiation imager with high integrity barrier layer|
|US6013723 *||Dec 2, 1997||Jan 11, 2000||Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.||Injection molded article used with a photosensitive material|
|US6087665 *||Nov 26, 1997||Jul 11, 2000||General Electric Company||Multi-layered scintillators for computed tomograph systems|
|US6173031 *||Nov 26, 1997||Jan 9, 2001||General Electric Company||Detector modules for computed tomograph system|
|US6252231 *||Jan 25, 1999||Jun 26, 2001||Analogic Corporation||X-ray absorbing, light reflective medium for x-ray detector array|
|US6348693 *||Sep 16, 1999||Feb 19, 2002||Xerox Corporation||X-ray imager and its method of fabrication|
|US6448566 *||Mar 15, 2001||Sep 10, 2002||Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc||Scintillator arrays for radiation detectors and methods for making same|
|US6479824 *||Nov 8, 2000||Nov 12, 2002||Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc||Scintillator arrays for CT imaging and other applications|
|US20010045522 *||Jun 29, 2001||Nov 29, 2001||Hamamatsu Photonics K.K.||Radiation detection device and method of making the same|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7046763 *||Dec 23, 2003||May 16, 2006||General Electric Company||Field and factory testable imaging detector|
|US7329875 *||Nov 23, 2004||Feb 12, 2008||General Electric Company||Detector array for imaging system and method of making same|
|US7932499 *||Mar 13, 2006||Apr 26, 2011||Hitachi Metals, Ltd.||Radiation detector and method for producing the same|
|US9012857||May 7, 2012||Apr 21, 2015||Koninklijke Philips N.V.||Multi-layer horizontal computed tomography (CT) detector array with at least one thin photosensor array layer disposed between at least two scintillator array layers|
|US20050135552 *||Dec 23, 2003||Jun 23, 2005||Ge Medical Systems Global Technology Company, Llc||Field and factory testable imaging detector|
|U.S. Classification||378/19, 250/370.11|
|International Classification||G01T1/202, A61B6/03, G01T1/20|
|Cooperative Classification||G01T1/2002, A61B6/032, G01T1/202|
|European Classification||A61B6/03B, G01T1/202, G01T1/20A|
|Nov 20, 2003||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LLC,
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MLINER, DAVID GERARD;JIANG, HAOCHUAN;HART, RICHARD LOUIS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014740/0427;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030923 TO 20031110
|Oct 30, 2008||FPAY||Fee payment|
Year of fee payment: 4
|Jan 7, 2013||REMI||Maintenance fee reminder mailed|
|May 24, 2013||LAPS||Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees|
|Jul 16, 2013||FP||Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee|
Effective date: 20130524