Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20050132080 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 10/961,516
Publication dateJun 16, 2005
Filing dateOct 8, 2004
Priority dateOct 31, 2000
Also published asDE60143707D1, EP1330699A1, EP1330699A4, EP1330699B1, US6804790, US20020091954, WO2002039242A1
Publication number10961516, 961516, US 2005/0132080 A1, US 2005/132080 A1, US 20050132080 A1, US 20050132080A1, US 2005132080 A1, US 2005132080A1, US-A1-20050132080, US-A1-2005132080, US2005/0132080A1, US2005/132080A1, US20050132080 A1, US20050132080A1, US2005132080 A1, US2005132080A1
InventorsSokwoo Rhee, Sheng Liu
Original AssigneeMillennial Net, A Massachusetts Corporation
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Coordinating protocol for a multi-processor system
US 20050132080 A1
Abstract
A multi-processor computing system included a plurality of processing units is provided in which each of the plurality of processing units operates at clock frequency and a coordinating protocol is used to assign tasks and operations to any of the plurality of processing units in a manner such that the power efficiency of the system is optimized.
Images(7)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(2)
1. A networked computing system with improved power consumption comprising:
a plurality of processing units including at least first and second processing units, said first processing unit including a coordinating protocol,
wherein the first processing unit utilizes the coordinating protocol to control the operation of the system such that the power consumption of the system is minimized.
2-33. (Canceled).
Description
    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/244,502 filed Oct. 31, 2000 and entitled I-BEAN: AN INTEGRATED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTING DEVICE USING NOVEL POWER SAVING ALGORITHMS FOR MINIMAL ENERGY OPERATIONS.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    This invention relates to a networked processing system with an optimized power efficiency.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    Power efficiency and minimizing power usage are important issues in networked systems, such as communications systems and computing systems. Programs which monitor the usage of various components of a computer system and shut down or minimize some of those components have been used in the past.
  • [0004]
    However, one area in which such power conservation has not been utilized is with respect to processing units. Whether in networked computer systems or communications systems, optimizing the power efficiency of processing units has not been previously addressed. For example, computer systems with multiple processors operate all processors in parallel at the same time to improve overall system performance without consideration to the power usage involved.
  • [0005]
    In multiple processor systems, specific tasks such as disk operations, display operations and keyboard input may be assigned to each processor. Another method of improving performance is to assign specific programs, such as word processing and spreadsheet programs, to separate processors. What these systems fail to address is the power used when the processor units are idling. Even when idling, processors are using power with every tick of the processor clock. For high speed processors, this can result in a substantial power usage.
  • [0006]
    This problem is particularly evident in portable units where the power is limited to that which is available from batteries. One solution used in laptop computers is to slow the processor speed when the laptop computer is running on battery. For example, a processor chip may operate at 1 GHz when the computer is connected to an AC power outlet and at 500 MHz when running on the internal battery. This results in a significant impact on the performance of the system.
  • [0007]
    Likewise, communications systems such as cellular phones experience considerable idle time during which power continues to be used in order to keep the system ready to transmit or receive signals. This use of power even when idling causes portable, battery-powered units to require frequent recharging.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0008]
    It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a networked processing system in which power usage is minimized.
  • [0009]
    It is a further object of this invention to provide a networked processing system in which performance is optimized.
  • [0010]
    It is a further object of this invention to provide a multi-tasking, multiple processor system in which the power efficiency is optimized.
  • [0011]
    It is a further object of this invention to provide a self-contained, miniaturized computer with a built in power source, flash memory, digital I/O interface and radio frequency (RF) transceiver for bi-directional communication.
  • [0012]
    The invention results from the realization that, in a multi-tasking, multi-processor environment, the power efficiency of the system can be optimized by coordinating the usage of processing units such that tasks are run on the appropriate speed processing unit and unused processing units are placed in sleep mode.
  • [0013]
    This invention features a networked computing system with improved power consumption comprising a plurality of processing units including at least first and second processing units. A coordinating protocol is operative on the first and second processing units and controls the operation of the system such that the power consumption of the system is minimized.
  • [0014]
    In a preferred embodiment, the first and second processing units are interconnected. The first processing unit operates at a first clock frequency, and the second processing unit operates at a second clock frequency. The first clock frequency may be lower than the second clock frequency.
  • [0015]
    The first processing unit assigns a task to the first or second processing units based on the clock frequency required to run the task such that the minimum power is used. The first processing unit may instruct the second processing unit to enter a minimum power usage mode. The first processing may activate the second processing unit from the minimum power usage mode when a task is to performed by the second processing unit. The first processing unit may transfer the coordinating protocol to the second processing unit.
  • [0016]
    The processing units may be communications device which may be bi-directional communications devices. The first processing unit may instruct the second processing unit to enter a minimum power usage mode for a preprogrammed time. The second processing unit may poll the first processing unit after the preprogrammed time. The preprogrammed time may be variable.
  • [0017]
    This inventions also provides a multiple processor computer system comprising a plurality of processing units, each of the plurality of processing units operating at a clock frequency. A first processing unit operates at a clock frequency lower than the remaining processing units. A coordinating protocol is operable on the first processing unit and coordinates the operation of the system such that the power efficiency is optimized.
  • [0018]
    In a preferred embodiment, each of the plurality of processing units operates at a different clock frequency. The first processing unit may transfer the coordinating protocol to a second processing unit of the plurality of processing units. The second processing unit may transfer the coordinating protocol to any of the plurality of processing units.
  • [0019]
    This invention also features a wireless communication system comprising a base unit and a plurality of terminal units in communication with the base unit. Each of the plurality of terminal units has a duty cycle. The base unit controls the duty cycle of each of the plurality of terminal units to optimize the power efficiency of the system.
  • [0020]
    In a preferred embodiment, the base unit may instruct at least one of the terminal units to enter a minimum power consumption mode for a preprogrammed time. The base unit and the plurality of terminal units may be bi-directional. The terminal unit may poll the base unit after the preprogrammed time.
  • [0021]
    This invention also features a method for optimizing the power efficiency of a multi-processor computer system including the steps of providing a plurality of processing units including at least first and second processing units, each processing unit operating at a clock frequency, and operating a coordinating protocol on the first processing unit. The coordinating protocol is operative to receive a request to perform a task, determine to which of the processing units to assign the task, and assign the task to one of the plurality of processing units. The coordinating protocol determines which processing unit to which a task is to be assigned based on optimizing the power efficiency of the system.
  • [0022]
    The method may also include the steps of transferring the coordinating protocol from the first processing unit to the second processing unit based on the speed required to run the coordinating protocol. The coordinating protocol may be further transferred from the second processing unit to any of the plurality of processing units based on the speed required to run the coordinating protocol.
  • [0023]
    This invention also features a self-contained, miniaturized computer system including first and second processing units, the first processing unit including a coordinating protocol operable to coordinate the operation of the first and second processing units, a power source, a flash memory module and a RF transceiver, wherein the coordinating protocol assigns tasks to the first and second processing units to optimize the power efficiency of the system.
  • [0024]
    In a preferred embodiment, the first processing unit operates at a clock frequency of 32 kHz and the second processing unit operates at a clock frequency of 4 MHz. The power source may be a battery.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0025]
    Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • [0026]
    FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a networked processing system according to the subject invention;
  • [0027]
    FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a bi-directional wireless communication system according to the subject invention;
  • [0028]
    FIG. 3 is a timing diagram illustrating the transfer of the coordinating protocol among processing units according to the subject invention;
  • [0029]
    FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the method of the subject invention; and
  • [0030]
    FIGS. 5A, 5B and 5C are block schematic diagrams of a self-contained computer according to the subject invention.
  • PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0031]
    Networked processing system 10, FIG. 1, includes a number of interconnected processing units 12, 14, 16, 18, and 20. There should be at least two interconnected processing units, and there may be any number N of these processing units in system 10. Each processing unit operates at a given clock frequency, f1, f2, f3, f4, . . . fN, respectively. The clock frequencies may all be the same, one or more of the clock frequencies may be the same, or all of the clock frequencies may be different. In a preferred embodiment, each processing unit operates at a different clock frequency, with f1,<f2<f3<f4< . . . fN.
  • [0032]
    Processing units 12, 14, 16, 18 and 20 may be central processing units (CPUs) used in many desktop and portable computers today. These processing units may be networked externally, i.e., one or more processing unit may be located in a separate enclosure, or they may be networked internally, i.e., the processing units may be located on a single circuit board or interconnected via an internal data bus in the same computer enclosure.
  • [0033]
    In operation, processing unit 12 includes a coordinating protocol 15 which is used to control the operation of system 10 by assigning tasks and operations to various processing units based upon the speed required to perform a given task of function. Coordinating protocol 15 is designed to assign tasks to the various processing units with the result being the optimization of the power efficiency of system 10.
  • [0034]
    For example, the coordinating protocol will allow processing unit 12 to assign a given task or operation to itself or to any other processing unit 14, 16, 18 or 20 based upon the speed requirements of the task or operation and the clock frequencies of the various processing units. Tasks and operations which require lower clock frequencies, which may include such tasks as refreshing a display or operations such as processing keyboard entries, will be assigned to processing units with lower clock frequencies. Because those processing units operate at lower clock frequencies, the power efficiency of the system as a whole will be optimized. When the task load of the system is low enough, processing units may even be shut off or placed into a “sleep” mode to further optimize the power efficiency of the system. One processing unit will always need to remain active to run the coordinating protocol so it may reactivate any processing units which have been shut down.
  • [0035]
    In a preferred embodiment, the coordinating protocol may be transferred from one processing unit to another processing unit. As shown in FIG. 3, there are N processing units 50, 52, 54, each operating at a respective clock frequency of f1, f2, . . . fN, with f1<fs< . . . fN. Processing unit 50 is the “watchdog”, i.e., the processing unit that runs the coordinating protocol, from time T0 to time T4. During that period, processing unit 50 activates processing unit 52 at time T1, deactivates processing unit 52 at time T2, and activates processing unit 54 at time T3. At time T4, processing unit 50 activates processing unit 52 and transfers the coordinating protocol to processing unit 52 which then becomes the “watchdog.” Processing unit 52 deactivates processing units 50 and 54 at time T5, reactivates processing unit 54 at time T6, and reactivates processing unit 50 at time T7. Processing unit 52 transfers the coordinating protocol back to processing unit 50 time at T7, whereby processing unit 50 resumes the “watchdog” responsibility. Finally, processing unit 50 deactivates processing units 52 and 54 at time T8.
  • [0036]
    Transferring the coordinating protocol between processing units is useful when the coordinating protocol itself requires a higher clock frequency than that of the lowest clock frequency available. For example, if the number of tasks requested is high enough, the coordinating protocol may require a clock frequency higher than that of the lowest clock frequency available to efficiently and effectively handle the assignment of the tasks to various processing units. Normally, the power efficiency is generally optimized when the coordinating protocol is run by the processing unit with the lowest clock frequency as this processing unit uses the minimum power when idling due to the low clock frequency.
  • [0037]
    One application of a computing system where this invention is particularly useful is laptop, or other portable, computers. By using multiple processing units in a laptop combined with the coordinating protocol of this invention, it is possible to optimize the power consumption of the laptop computer such that the battery life is maximized.
  • [0038]
    In another embodiment, communications system 30, FIG. 2, includes base station 32 and at least one portable communications device 34. System 30 may include a plurality of M portable communications devices 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, and 44. Base station 32 is usually connected to a continuous power supply (not shown) such that the power efficiency of base station 32 is not relevant. However, portable communications device 34 (and 36, 38, 40, 42, and 44 in a multi-point system) are usually powered by batteries which have a finite amount of power. Therefore, optimizing the power efficiency of the system, and particularly of the portable communications device(s), is important. Even so, such optimization must also allow for the communications system to operate effectively, i.e., to be able to send and/or receive signals without significant delay.
  • [0039]
    In one embodiment, base station 32 is bi-directional and portable communications devices 34, 36, 38, 40, 42 and 44 are receive only devices. Base station 32 includes a coordinating protocol which controls the operation of the portable communications devices. For example, base station 32 controls the duty cycle of the portable communications devices by placing one or more of the portable communications devices in a minimum power usage mode for a preprogrammed time. After the preprogrammed time, the portable communications device automatically returns to the standby mode awaiting another signal. The minimum power usage mode uses less power than the standby mode. By placing a portable communications devices into the minimum power usage mode, the power efficiency of that portable communications device is optimized.
  • [0040]
    The preprogrammed time may be variable. For example, if a particular portable communications device is required to be active very infrequently, the preprogrammed time is longer than for a portable communications device that is required to be used more frequently. This allows for the maximum efficiency in the power consumption of the system as a whole. Also, if a particular task is run less frequently, the preprogrammed time for a portable communications device on which that task is to be run may be longer than for a portable communications device on which a task that is run more frequently.
  • [0041]
    In another embodiment, portable communications devices 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, and 44 are also bi-directional. In this embodiment, base station 32 may put a portable communications device into minimum power mode for a preprogrammed time. However, because the portable communications device is bi-directional, after the preprogrammed time, the portable communications device may poll base station 32 to notify the base station that the portable communications device is once again in the standby mode. This allows base station 32 to transmit any signals which may have been queued up during the preprogrammed time.
  • [0042]
    In another embodiment, computer 60, FIGS. 5A-5C, is a self-contained, miniaturized computer. Computer 60 includes first processing unit 62, RF transceiver 64, second processing unit 66 (FIG. 5B), low clock frequency crystal 68, high clock frequency crystal 70 and I/O connector 72 all mounted on circuit board 74. Power source 76, FIG. 5C, for example a battery, may be attached to circuit board 74.
  • [0043]
    The small size and low power consumption of computer 60 allows computer 60 to operate from battery 70 for its entire life span. In a preferred embodiment, first processing unit 62 operates at a clock frequency of 32 kHz, and second processing unit 66 operates at a clock frequency of 4 MHz. A coordinating protocol operates so that computer 60 may perform signal processing and RF transmission with optimum power efficiency. Such self-contained, miniaturized computers are useful in communications systems and locally networked computer systems.
  • [0044]
    A method for optimizing the power efficiency of a multi-processor computer system is also provided. Step 80 of providing a plurality of processing units, FIG. 4, includes providing at least first and second processing units. Each of the processing units operates at a clock frequency. In a preferred embodiment, the clock frequencies of each of the plurality of processing units is different, although this is not a necessary limitation. Step 82 of operating a coordinating protocol on the first processing unit includes receiving a request to perform a task, determining to which processing unit to assign the task, and assigning the task to a processing unit. In a preferred embodiment, step 84 of transferring the coordinating protocol from the first processing unit to the second processing unit may be included. In a further embodiment, step 86 of transferring the coordinating protocol from the second processing unit to any of the plurality of processing units may be included. Optional steps 84 and 86 provide for transferring the coordinating protocol based on the speed required to operate the coordinating protocol. For example, if the number of task requested is high, a higher clock speed processing unit may be required to run the coordinating protocol.
  • [0045]
    Although specific features of the invention are shown in some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features in accordance with the invention. The words “including”, “comprising”, “having”, and “with” as used herein are to be interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible embodiments.
  • [0046]
    Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the art and are within the following claims:
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4358823 *Apr 12, 1979Nov 9, 1982Trw, Inc.Double redundant processor
US5128928 *Oct 31, 1990Jul 7, 1992Rose Communications, Inc.Digital radio telephone system
US5194860 *Nov 15, 1990Mar 16, 1993The General Electric Company, P.L.C.Radio telemetry systems with channel selection
US5257372 *Dec 19, 1990Oct 26, 1993Cray Research, Inc.Methods for efficient distribution of parallel tasks to slave processes in a multiprocessing system
US5355371 *Jun 18, 1982Oct 11, 1994International Business Machines Corp.Multicast communication tree creation and control method and apparatus
US5428636 *May 7, 1993Jun 27, 1995Norand CorporationRadio frequency local area network
US5491787 *Aug 25, 1994Feb 13, 1996Unisys CorporationFault tolerant digital computer system having two processors which periodically alternate as master and slave
US5497368 *Aug 15, 1994Mar 5, 1996Koninklijke Ptt Nederland N.V.Routing method for a hierarchical communications network, and a hierarchical communications network having improved routing
US5608721 *Apr 3, 1995Mar 4, 1997Motorola, Inc.Communications network and method which implement diversified routing
US5654959 *Jul 24, 1995Aug 5, 1997International Business Machines CorporationAccess point for mobile wireless network node
US5719861 *Jun 14, 1996Feb 17, 1998Nec CorporationAutomatic route determination method
US5729680 *May 11, 1995Mar 17, 1998Netwave Technologies LimitedAd hoc initialization for wireless local area network
US5790817 *Sep 25, 1996Aug 4, 1998Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Configurable digital wireless and wired communications system architecture for implementing baseband functionality
US5809222 *Sep 11, 1996Sep 15, 1998Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod and apparatus for controlling continuous data server using more than one central control devices
US5815692 *Dec 15, 1995Sep 29, 1998National Semiconductor CorporationDistributed clock generator
US5854994 *Aug 23, 1996Dec 29, 1998Csi Technology, Inc.Vibration monitor and transmission system
US6028857 *Jul 25, 1997Feb 22, 2000Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologySelf-organizing network
US6058106 *Oct 20, 1997May 2, 2000Motorola, Inc.Network protocol method, access point device and peripheral devices for providing for an efficient centrally coordinated peer-to-peer wireless communications network
US6192230 *Sep 27, 1993Feb 20, 2001Lucent Technologies, Inc.Wireless data communication system having power saving function
US6208247 *Aug 18, 1998Mar 27, 2001Rockwell Science Center, LlcWireless integrated sensor network using multiple relayed communications
US6272537 *Nov 17, 1997Aug 7, 2001Fujitsu LimitedMethod for building element manager for a computer network element using a visual element manager builder process
US6275477 *May 3, 1996Aug 14, 2001Telxon CorporationCampus area pager system
US6285892 *Nov 24, 1998Sep 4, 2001Philips Electronics North America Corp.Data transmission system for reducing terminal power consumption in a wireless network
US6330250 *Jun 1, 2000Dec 11, 2001Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc.Telecommunications network
US6381250 *Jan 22, 1999Apr 30, 2002Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.Capacity allocation system using semi-autonomous network elements to implement and control a transmission schedule
US6408395 *Jul 22, 1998Jun 18, 2002Fujitsu LimitedPower save function remote control method, information processing apparatus and storage medium which perform central management and control of power save mode for plural apparatuses
US6414955 *Mar 23, 1999Jul 2, 2002Innovative Technology Licensing, LlcDistributed topology learning method and apparatus for wireless networks
US6415330 *Apr 27, 2000Jul 2, 2002Nec CorporationMethod of setting up AD HOC local area network, method of communicating using said network, and terminal for use with said network
US6426959 *Feb 18, 1999Jul 30, 2002Innovative Communications Technologies, Inc.System and method for facilitating component management in a multiple vendor satellite communications network
US6501999 *Dec 22, 1999Dec 31, 2002Intel CorporationMulti-processor mobile computer system having one processor integrated with a chipset
US6502206 *Jun 7, 1999Dec 31, 2002Fujitsu LimitedMulti-processor switch and main processor switching method
US6804790 *Oct 31, 2001Oct 12, 2004Millennial NetCoordinating protocol for a multi-processor system
US20010003191 *Dec 1, 2000Jun 7, 2001Kovacs Ern?Ouml;Communication device and software for operating multimedia applications
US20020012320 *Dec 1, 2000Jan 31, 2002Ogier Richard G.Mobile ad hoc extensions for the internet
US20020018448 *Apr 24, 2001Feb 14, 2002Amis Alan DewayneClusterhead selection in wireless ad hoc networks
US20020027894 *Apr 12, 2001Mar 7, 2002Jori ArrakoskiGeneration broadband wireless internet, and associated method, therefor
US20020036987 *Jun 15, 2001Mar 28, 2002The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaBandwidth efficient source tracing (BEST) routing protocol for wireless networks
US20020059434 *May 25, 2001May 16, 2002Jeyhan KaraoguzMulti-mode controller
US20020061001 *Aug 24, 2001May 23, 2002The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaDynamic source tracing (DST) routing protocol for wireless networks
US20020061009 *Sep 14, 2001May 23, 2002Johan SorensenAdministrative domains for personal area networks
US20020067736 *Sep 28, 2001Jun 6, 2002The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaSystem and method for ad hoc network access employing the distributed election of a shared transmission schedule
US20020075941 *Dec 14, 2000Jun 20, 2002Motorola, Inc.Multiple access frequency hopping network with interference anticipation
US20020080768 *Aug 10, 2001Jun 27, 2002The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaReceiver-initiated multiple access for AD-HOC networks (RIMA)
US20020085503 *Feb 20, 2002Jul 4, 2002Philips Electronics North America CorporationApparatus and method for peer-to-peer link monitoring of a wireless network with centralized control
US20020085526 *May 3, 2001Jul 4, 2002Belcea John M.Time division protocol for an ad-hoc, peer-to-peer radio network having coordinating channel access to shared parallel data channels with separate reservation channel
US20020089945 *May 2, 2001Jul 11, 2002Belcea John M.Time division protocol for an ad-hoc, peer-to-peer radio network having coordinating channel access to shared parallel data channels with separate reservation channel
US20020090979 *Oct 30, 2001Jul 11, 2002Sydor John T.Method and wireless communication hub for data communications
US20020101869 *Oct 9, 2001Aug 1, 2002The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaOn-demand loop-free multipath routing (ROAM)
US20020110105 *May 17, 2001Aug 15, 2002Awater Geert ArnoutWireless LAN with load balancing
US20020150075 *May 2, 2001Oct 17, 2002Belcea John M.Time division protocol for an ad-hoc, peer-to-peer radio network having coordinating channel access to shared parallel data channels with separate reservation channel
US20020167960 *Feb 28, 2002Nov 14, 2002Garcia-Luna-Aceves Jose J.System and method for transmission scheduling using network membership information and neighborhood information
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7251570May 4, 2005Jul 31, 2007Power Measurement Ltd.Data integrity in a mesh network
US7321316May 4, 2005Jan 22, 2008Power Measurement, Ltd.Grouping mesh clusters
US7522563Nov 26, 2002Apr 21, 2009Millennial Net, Inc.Network protocol
US7948930Nov 4, 2008May 24, 2011Millennial Net, Inc.Network protocol
US8098615Apr 15, 2011Jan 17, 2012Millennial Net, Inc.Network protocol
US8829821Mar 1, 2013Sep 9, 2014Cree, Inc.Auto commissioning lighting fixture
US8912735Mar 1, 2013Dec 16, 2014Cree, Inc.Commissioning for a lighting network
US8975827Mar 1, 2013Mar 10, 2015Cree, Inc.Lighting fixture for distributed control
US9155165Mar 1, 2013Oct 6, 2015Cree, Inc.Lighting fixture for automated grouping
US9155166Mar 1, 2013Oct 6, 2015Cree, Inc.Efficient routing tables for lighting networks
US9338858Mar 1, 2013May 10, 2016Cree, Inc.Handheld device for communicating with lighting fixtures
US9433061Mar 1, 2013Aug 30, 2016Cree, Inc.Handheld device for communicating with lighting fixtures
US9456482Apr 8, 2015Sep 27, 2016Cree, Inc.Daylighting for different groups of lighting fixtures
US9549448May 30, 2014Jan 17, 2017Cree, Inc.Wall controller controlling CCT
US9572226Mar 1, 2013Feb 14, 2017Cree, Inc.Master/slave arrangement for lighting fixture modules
US9622321Oct 11, 2013Apr 11, 2017Cree, Inc.Systems, devices and methods for controlling one or more lights
US9706617Sep 26, 2014Jul 11, 2017Cree, Inc.Handheld device that is capable of interacting with a lighting fixture
US20030099221 *Nov 26, 2002May 29, 2003Sokwoo RheeNetwork protocol
US20060056370 *May 4, 2005Mar 16, 2006Hancock Martin AData integrity in a mesh network
US20060066455 *May 4, 2005Mar 30, 2006Hancock Martin AGrouping mesh clusters
US20080271035 *Apr 25, 2008Oct 30, 2008Kabubhiki Kaisha ToshibaControl Device and Method for Multiprocessor
US20090092069 *Nov 4, 2008Apr 9, 2009Millennial Net, Inc.Network protocol
USD744669Apr 22, 2013Dec 1, 2015Cree, Inc.Module for a lighting fixture
USRE46430Oct 11, 2013Jun 6, 2017Cree, Inc.Illumination control network
Classifications
U.S. Classification709/230
International ClassificationG06F15/177, G06F9/50, G06F9/46, G06F1/28, G06F1/32, G06F1/30, G06F1/26, G06F15/00
Cooperative ClassificationG06F9/5094, Y02B60/1217, G06F9/5044, Y02B60/144, G06F1/3203, Y02B60/142, G06F1/329
European ClassificationG06F1/32P, G06F9/50P, G06F1/32P5T, G06F9/50A6H
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Dec 2, 2014ASAssignment
Owner name: III HOLDINGS 3, LLC, DELAWARE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MILLENNIAL NET, INC.;REEL/FRAME:034313/0093
Effective date: 20140919