|Publication number||US20050282570 A1|
|Application number||US 11/212,698|
|Publication date||Dec 22, 2005|
|Filing date||Aug 29, 2005|
|Priority date||Oct 23, 1998|
|Also published as||DE69936872D1, DE69936872T2, DE69940836D1, EP1123589A1, EP1123589B1, EP1835639A2, EP1835639A3, EP1835639B1, US6954439, US20010014083, WO2000025449A1|
|Publication number||11212698, 212698, US 2005/0282570 A1, US 2005/282570 A1, US 20050282570 A1, US 20050282570A1, US 2005282570 A1, US 2005282570A1, US-A1-20050282570, US-A1-2005282570, US2005/0282570A1, US2005/282570A1, US20050282570 A1, US20050282570A1, US2005282570 A1, US2005282570A1|
|Inventors||Otto Pulkkinen, Jarmo Makinen, Lauri Kuru|
|Original Assignee||Nokia Networks Oy|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (10), Referenced by (5), Classifications (12), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 09/817,886 filed May 26, 2001, which in turn is a Continuation Application of International Application No. PCT/FI99/00845, filed Oct. 11, 1999. The disclosure of the prior application(s) is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a method of synchronizing transmit periods of terminals in a radio link system operating in time division duplex mode. Particularly, the terminals can share a common single carrier.
Modern terrestrial microwave radio systems provide a feasible technical solution for telecommunications transmission links at distances from some hundreds of meters to up to 80 km. Such systems are increasingly being developed in both cellular and fixed telecommunications networks. A radio link system is a particularly good solution in urban areas for wireless based networks in fixed telecommunications, and for base station interconnections and base station-base station controller in cellular communication. Unlike fiber, which can require several months for right-of-way and permits, microwave can be put into immediate operation. In addition, microwave easily goes over difficult terrain where cable cannot be laid, and microwave does not require trenching or pulling through duct work, which can take weeks or months, and which increases installation costs.
A typical microwave radio site consists of an indoor mounted base band unit, an indoor or outdoor mounted radio frequency transceiver, and an parabolic antenna.
Basically there are two types of radio link network topologies in use, namely star networks and ring networks. Of course, it is common for hybrid ring and star network as well as tree network to be deployed.
As mentioned above, radio link network provides one solution for realizing a cellular telecommunications network. Then, with reference to
One hop carrier between the base station and the base station controller can transfer four 2 Mbits channels each of them being divided into 16 kbits channels. Thus, one 2 Mbits channel can transfer 128 calls. Typical hop length is only 500 meters in the case the network is of the micro cell type.
A message, be it audio, video, or data is modulated on the microwave signal, which is often referred to as a carrier. The maximum distance between sites, also called a hop distance, is mainly determined by propagation characteristics of electromagnetic waves. The higher the carrier frequency the greater free space loss, or attenuation due to the atmosphere, i.e. the shorter the achievable distances. However, this also means that frequency re-use distances are shorter: the distance between links operating on the same frequency can be shorter without fear of interference.
There are three types of interference which should be considered in any terrestrial radio link network: 1) intrasystem interference occurs when a radio signal within a multi-hop network interferes with the receiver of a different hop, 2) external disturbance occurs when a foreign system affects a signal, 3) reflection—from anything that has a reflective surface can deflect other signals into the path of the transmitted signal and the stronger signal will interfere with the weaker signal.
Radio links have traditionally operated on regulated frequency bands which are further divided into frequency channels. The use of radio channels is regulated by local authorities and based on coordinated planning. Hence, in a predetermined local area in which radio links are to be established, only a predetermined overall bandwidth and then a predetermined number of channels are available for the radio links.
When a plurality of radio links or so-called hops are present within a given area, in the regulated radio environment, the channel choice is based on coordinated frequency planning. That is, the channel to be used for a specific radio link at a time is predetermined.
The objective of frequency planning is to assign frequencies to the radio links in order to avoid interference. Prior to the planning, it is essential to determine, at the earliest opportunity, what band are locally available for fixed link systems, and what the local “link policy” is. The majority of national frequency management administrations have some form of link policy regarding link lengths and net output power.
Recent developments in telecommunications have, however, lead to changes with regard to frequency allocations and have thus created possibilities to operate radio links and/or hops in non-coordinated frequency bands. These specific bands are left unregulated in the sense that selection of a working channel for an individual radio terminal inside the band is not controlled by the local authorities. Instead, the channel can be selected freely as long as the general requirements associated with the band are not violated.
As an example, European Telecommunication Standard ETS 300408 specifies the minimum performance parameters for radio equipment operating at frequencies around 58 GHz and not requiring coordinated frequency planning. Recently, the frequency band has been widened by ETSI to cover the band from 57 GHz to 58 GHz. Hence, it is possible to obtain 20 channels with the channel separation of 100 MHz. Within this band it is of interest to share the bandwidth among different links efficiently.
However, unlike the above described traditional radio links within a regulated (or coordinated) radio environment, those systems operating in an non-coordinated band will operate in an interference limited environment. That is, the signal quality of received signals may be deteriorated due to interference phenomena caused by neighboring radio links. Therefore, it is of increasing interest to consider how to share available bandwidthS among various systems efficiently.
The most common way to avoid interference is to use different frequencies in the hops located near each other and reuse the frequencies at a distance. Hence, a great majority of the terrestrial radio link systems are based on the frequency division duplex (FDD) concept in which hops having a common site i.e. the hub site, are using different frequencies. Referring to
A plurality of hops can use the same frequency if the system is based on a time division duplex mode of operation (TDD). In that case terminals in the hub site are transmitting only during predetermined transmit periods which are called time slots. The carrier frequency of each of the transmitters in the hub is the same but each of the transmitters has its own transmit time slot. Consequently, the interfering signal generated by the terminal varies greatly.
A straightforward implementation of the TDD principle in the radio link system would to allow each transceiver in a hub to use its own timing. This could be done if each hop uses a frequency which differs from frequencies of another hops. In that case, a transmission signal from a transmitter in the hub does not interfere with reception in the receiver of a neighboring transceiver due to the different frequencies.
However, a problem would arise if all the hops in a hub were using the same frequency. The reason for that is clearly comprehensible from
The situation is remarkable worse if the aerials are facing in the same direction. Then radiating power from the sending aerial could leak to the receiving aerial causing high interference there. Therefore, due to its very high signal strength, the received interference signal could either saturate the receiver or even damage it. In case each terminal in a hub site uses its own burst rate and timing in transmission, the probability that one terminal is transmitting at the same time another terminal is receiving is very high.
The problem mentioned above leads to the fact that the interfering signal generated by a terminal is greatly varying with time. The hop density of radio links operating in a time division duplex mode in a frequency band, especially in the non-coordinated 58 GHz band, is limited not only by interference caused by the remote links, but also by considerable interference caused by the terminals located in the same hub site.
The objective of the present invention is to increase the potential hop density of single frequency TDD radio links by allowing a set of closely located terminals to use a single channel. This is possible when transmission and reception periods of the terminals are synchronized so that the transmit period of any of the terminals in a terminal group does not overlap with the receive period of any of the terminals in the group. The terminal group can contain all the terminals in the hub or a part of them. Synchronization prevents the direct interference from a transmitting radio to a receiving radio in the same hub. Synchronization by the invention effectively removes the mutual co-channel interference of terminals. Thus, the terminals are potentially able to use the same transmission channel, which in turn increases maximum hop density in a given geographic area.
Synchronization is achieved by selecting one terminal in a hub site as a super master terminal. This terminal gives timing to the rest of the terminals in the hub. These terminals use the received timing signal as a reference signal for adjusting their own timing i.e. for adjusting the starting moment and ending moment of the transmission and reception periods in such a manner that no terminal is sending a burst while one terminal is receiving.
The rest of the terminals give, in turn, timing to the terminals which are located at the opposite end of the hop. For that reason they are named as master terminals. Hence, a hub contains one super master terminal and one or more master terminals. Both the super master terminal and the master terminals are connected to the common bus. Via this synchronization bus the master terminals receive the timing signal sent by the super master terminal.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the super master terminal also sends through the synchronization bus information about the channel number which shall be used by the master terminals, in addition to the timing signal,. This information can be used during commissioning of the other terminals in the hub. The other terminals have to use this channel with the exception of when some external interference from the direction of their aerials makes this channel unusable.
The invention is described more closely with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
As the name indicates, the super master gives timing not only to its own transceiver but also to the other transceivers. For that purpose, the super master and the masters are connected to a common bus through which they share information.
The Information which the super master sends to the bus could be the clock signal only, but preferably, it also would contain knowledge about transmit and receive periods of the super master. Hence, the timing might contain the starting and ending moments of said periods. In addition, information could also include the number of the channel that the masters have to use. This is very useful in case a new radio link is to be commissioned and one end of that link is located in the hub.
The masters receive information from the bus and the transceivers in the masters adjust their own transmit and receive periods so that the transmit periods do not overlap with the receive period of any of the masters and with that of the transceiver connected to the super master. Moreover, each master also acts as a hop master dictating the TDD burst rate used by the transceiver at the opposite end of the link. In other words, the master terminal is on the one hand a slave to the super master and on the other hand a master to the transceiver at the opposite end of the hop.
Let us assume that a radio link between the base station controller which is the hub site and base station BTS 5 is being commissioned. Then terminal C at the hub site, after it has been set up, receives information from the common bus, whereupon its transceiver automatically turns to the frequency used by the transceiver of the super master terminal and starts to transmit and receive, guided by the super master's timing signal. The master sends a timing and the channel information on the channel it has to use to base station 5 which adjusts its transmission burst rate accordingly.
In normal operation the clocks of the master terminals need not be phase locked with the clock of the super master terminal. This will be explained with reference to
If the radio link system includes two adjacent hub sites both provided with several terminals, each hub site contains only one super master terminal the rest of the terminals being masters. Thus, the timing which the super master gives is used not only by the master terminals in the same hub but also a plurality of terminals in hubs at a distance of one hop. In addition, one or more terminals can be slave terminals. This will be explained later on.
The meaning of the paragraph above will be clarified with reference to
All the terminals in the same hub site do not need to share the common bus. Depending on geographical directions of the aerial beams it is, in certain cases, advantageous to form two or more terminal groups from the terminals. Terminals within the same group are connected to the same common bus and one terminal of the group is the super master the rest being masters. In consequence, one hub site can include several super master terminals.
This is explained with reference to
Despite the number of groups, the selection of the super master terminal among master terminals connected to the same bus can take place either automatically or manually in the commissioning phase of the link hops. The channel number that the super master transmits over the common bus can be used during commissioning of the other terminals connected to the bus. In this case the other terminals will use the same channel expect if some external interference from the direction of their aerials prohibits using this channel. Then a terminal has to use a different TDD channel i.e. the carrier frequency must be changed.
Although the groups of the aerials radiate substantially to the different directions, it is, in practice, very likely that the different directions alone do not guarantee a good signal separation in reception. A signal from a group leaks to a receiver of a adjacent group so causing high interference. For that reason it is recommendable that the frequencies among the groups differ from each other.
One embodiment of the invention is that the super master terminal uses its internal burst phase oscillator to generate a frame containing the channel number. The master terminals connected to the same bus use a phase lock technique to synchronize their burst timing with the super master. The start of the N bit frame is used as a synchronization reference. The bus and its interface implement a wired-or or a wired-and operation. The physical bus medium might be a coaxial cable.
The invention enables the TDD terminals at a hub site to use the same radio channel, thus enhancing spectrum economy. The interference level is limited to the level generated during the receive bursts of the nearby terminals. Even in the case of the same radio channel not being used the invention reduces the danger of blocking the receivers of the other terminals in the hub.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US4646291 *||Apr 26, 1983||Feb 24, 1987||Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson||Synchronization apparatus in transmitting information on a simplex bus|
|US5272694 *||Mar 20, 1992||Dec 21, 1993||France Telecom||Synchronization of terminal stations in a multirate half-duplex tree-structured network|
|US5448570 *||Mar 16, 1994||Sep 5, 1995||Kyocera Corporation||System for mutual synchronization and monitoring between base stations|
|US5758287 *||Aug 29, 1996||May 26, 1998||Airtouch Communications, Inc.||Hub and remote cellular telephone system|
|US5875179 *||Oct 29, 1996||Feb 23, 1999||Proxim, Inc.||Method and apparatus for synchronized communication over wireless backbone architecture|
|US5987099 *||Oct 7, 1994||Nov 16, 1999||Northern Telecom Limited||Low-power wireless system for telephone services|
|US6014376 *||Sep 18, 1996||Jan 11, 2000||Motorola, Inc.||Method for over-the-air synchronization adjustment in a communication system|
|US6016331 *||Aug 5, 1997||Jan 18, 2000||Vlsi Technology, Inc.||Methods of synchronization, personal handy-phone system stations and phase lock loops|
|US6125138 *||Jan 16, 1998||Sep 26, 2000||Fujitsu Limited||Base station transmitter-receiver|
|US20070217325 *||Feb 12, 2007||Sep 20, 2007||Adc Telecommunications, Inc.||Distributed control in synchronizing remote units to host unit|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7751823 *||Feb 27, 2007||Jul 6, 2010||Atc Technologies, Llc||Systems and methods for controlling a level of interference to a wireless receiver responsive to an activity factor associated with a wireless transmitter|
|US8971470 *||Feb 25, 2011||Mar 3, 2015||Intel Corporation||System, method, and device to distribute accurate synchronization timestamps in an expandable and timing critical system|
|US9049078||Aug 31, 2012||Jun 2, 2015||Eneroc, Inc.||NOC-oriented control of a demand coordination network|
|US9082294||Sep 14, 2012||Jul 14, 2015||Enernoc, Inc.||Apparatus and method for receiving and transporting real time energy data|
|US20120219099 *||Aug 30, 2012||Dmitrii Loukianov||System, method, and device to distribute accurate synchronization timestamps in an expandable and timing critical system|
|International Classification||H04W92/10, H04W56/00, H04L12/28, H04B7/26, H04L7/00, H04J3/06|
|Cooperative Classification||H04W92/10, H04B7/2678, H04W56/0015|
|European Classification||H04B7/26V6D, H04W56/00D2|
|Jan 22, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: NOKIA CORPORATION, FINLAND
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:NOKIA NETWORKS OY;REEL/FRAME:022140/0997
Effective date: 20061228