Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20060036641 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/193,015
Publication dateFeb 16, 2006
Filing dateJul 28, 2005
Priority dateJul 28, 2004
Also published asUS7877266, US20060026033, WO2006015237A2, WO2006015237A3, WO2006015238A2, WO2006015238A3
Publication number11193015, 193015, US 2006/0036641 A1, US 2006/036641 A1, US 20060036641 A1, US 20060036641A1, US 2006036641 A1, US 2006036641A1, US-A1-20060036641, US-A1-2006036641, US2006/0036641A1, US2006/036641A1, US20060036641 A1, US20060036641A1, US2006036641 A1, US2006036641A1
InventorsAntony Brydon, Jeff Patterson
Original AssigneeAntony Brydon, Jeff Patterson
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
System and method for using social networks for the distribution of communications
US 20060036641 A1
Abstract
The present invention provides methods and systems for facilitating the distribution of a communication, for example, using one or more enterprise applications. According to one embodiment, the method comprises obtaining information regarding one or more entities. Using a software application, hardware device or combination thereof, a given entity is selected from the one or more entities. A given member of the enterprise is selected based on a path between the given member of the enterprise and a given entity, the path identified by the information regarding the given entity. A communication is addressed from the given member of the enterprise to the given entity.
Images(31)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(16)
1. A method for facilitating the distribution of a communication using a social network, the method comprising:
obtaining information regarding one or more entities;
selecting a given entity from the one or more entities;
selecting a given member of the enterprise based on a path between the given member of the enterprise and a given entity, the path identified by the information regarding the given entity;
addressing a communication from the given member of the enterprise to the given entity; and
transmitting the communication to the given entity.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein a given entity includes an entity selected from the group comprising an individual and an organization.
3. The method of claim 1 comprising prioritizing the information regarding the one or more entities.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein prioritizing comprises prioritizing according to the path between the one or more entities and the one or more members of the enterprise.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein prioritizing comprising prioritizing according to a strength of the path between the one or more entities and the one or more members of the enterprise.
6. The method of claim 1 comprising generating a visual indication of the path between the one or more entities and the one or more members of the enterprise.
7. The method of claim 6 comprising generating a visual indication of a strength of the path between the one or more members of the enterprise and the one or more entities.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting a given member of the enterprise comprises selecting based on a strength of the path between the given member and the given entity.
9. The method of claim 1 comprising allowing the communication to be personalized by the given member.
10. The method of claim 1 comprising providing the communication to the given member for approval.
11. The method of claim 10 comprising:
determining if the given member approves the communication;
if the given member does not approve the communication, selecting a second given member of the enterprise based on the a path between the second given member and the given entity;
addressing the communication from the second given member to the given entity; and
transmitting the communication to the given entity.
12. The method of claim 11 comprising:
if no member approves the communication, addressing the communication from the enterprise to the given entity; and
transmitting the communication to the given entity.
13. The method of claim 1 comprising tracking a response to the communication from the given entity.
14. The method of claim 13 comprising determining the effectiveness of a campaign based on the tracked response to the communication from the given entity.
15. The method of claim 1 comprising displaying the path between the one or more entities and the or more members of the enterprise in conjunction with an application selected from the group comprising a CRM application, an SFA application, an HRM application and a messaging application.
16. A method for facilitating the distribution of a communication using a social network, the method comprising:
obtaining information regarding one or more entities;
selecting a given entity from the one or more entities;
identifying a path between one or more members of the enterprise and the given entity; and
transmitting a communication through the one or more members of the enterprise to the given entity according to the path.
Description
  • [0001]
    Applicants hereby claim the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/592,294 entitled, “SALES FACILITATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS IN AN ENTERPRISE RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEM,” filed Jul. 28, 2004, attorney docket number 6613/1C, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Applicants hereby further claim the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/592,295 entitled, “MARKETING FACILITATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS IN AN ENTERPRISE RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT SYSTEM”, filed Jul. 28, 2004, attorney docket number 6613/1D, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0002]
    This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/132,159 entitled, “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENFORCING PRIVACY IN SOCIAL NETWORKS,” filed May 17, 2005, attorney docket number 6613/1US, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety (the “RCM software system”).
  • COPYRIGHT NOTICE
  • [0003]
    A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0004]
    The present invention generally provides methods and systems for facilitating the distribution of communications, such as marketing and marketing related communications, in conjunction with enterprise software for the end goals of increased productivity, increased revenues, reduced cost of customer acquisition, higher profitability, etc. Particularly, the present invention provides methods and systems that facilitate the distribution of communications by leveraging relationship information of both an enterprise and members of an enterprise, both alone and in combination with other enterprise software applications.
  • [0005]
    An enterprise typically uses one or more Enterprise Relationship Management (“ERM”) software applications to allow employees to manage personal and professional relationships and information. Messaging software applications (“messaging”) typically provide comprehensive automation packages for contact management, note and information sharing, calendaring, email, instant messaging, to-do lists, etc. One example of a messaging application is Outlook sold by MICROSOFT CORPORATION® as part of its Office suite of applications. Other communications systems and software (“communications”) found in the enterprise include instant messaging applications, as well as telephone and Voice over IP (“VoIP”) applications.
  • [0006]
    In addition to ERM, messaging and communications applications, enterprises typically employ other software applications to manage relationships both inside and outside the enterprise. For example, Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”) software helps a company manage existing and developing customer relationships in an efficient and organized manner, Sales Force Automation (“SFA”) software increases a sales team's efficiency and effectiveness by automating, organizing and tracking the sales process, Partner Relationship Management (“PRM”) software facilitates and automates the sales processes across distributors and external sales channels, and Employee Relationship Management (“eRM”) improves the management of internal employees. Other applications assist the enterprise in organizing and managing the workflow of different business processes and automating the presentation of information to users are well known to those of skill in the art.
  • [0007]
    For clarity, the above-described applications are collectively referred to herein as “enterprise applications.” Enterprise applications store information that may be used to deduce the existence of a relationship or the strength of a relationship. This information, and the relationships and relationship networks that this information describes, is generally referred to herein as “relationship capital”.
  • [0008]
    The relationships and relationship networks in enterprise software, however, can be difficult to access in an efficient manner. These relationships are often documented, but the relationship capital that identifies these relationships is often distributed across many disparate enterprise applications, with data that is often redundant, outdated or incomplete. Furthermore, the relationships and relationship capital are often not weighted, fail to indicate the strength of a given relationship or piece of relationship capital and do not dynamically adjust weights in response to changing data and events. Some employees, such as sales persons and other executives may also be reluctant to share relationship capital that they own, such as information regarding their personal relationships, with other employees or outside parties without retaining any control with regard to how these parties use the relationship capital. Finally, the relationship capital and relationships identified thereby are rarely aggregated, analyzed, and integrated into a relationship network that describes the full breadth of interconnections between individuals and enterprises.
  • [0009]
    These issues and concerns generally limit the amount of relationship capital that is made available and accessible through enterprise software, which negatively impacts the efficiency and productivity of an organization. Thus, business processes that the organization conducts using enterprise software, such as selling, marketing, hiring, etc., can be ineffective, uncoordinated or inefficient.
  • [0010]
    In order to overcome shortcomings and problems associated with enterprise software, embodiments of the present invention provides systems and methods for using Relationship Capital Management (“RCM”) software systems and the social networks they provide to facilitate the distribution of communications.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0011]
    The present invention provides methods and systems for facilitating the distribution of communications using enterprise applications, such as RCM software systems that may operate both alone and in conjunction with other enterprise applications. In some embodiments, the invention provides systems and methods, such as computer applications or solutions, which utilize or are built upon RCM software systems, as described in the previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/132,159 entitled, “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ENFORCING PRIVACY IN SOCIAL NETWORKS,” filed May 17, 2005. Specific details regarding the RCM software system may be obtained by reference to such application, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
  • [0012]
    According to one embodiment, a method is provided for facilitating the distribution of communications in an enterprise application. The method comprises obtaining information regarding one or more entities and selecting a given entity from the one or more entities. A given member of the enterprise is selected based on a path between the given member of the enterprise and a given entity, the path identified by the information regarding the given entity. The path may be provided by an RCM software system. A communication is addressed from the given member of the enterprise to the given entity, which may be an individual or an organization, and transmitted to the given entity. The given member of the enterprise may be selected based on a strength of the path between the given member and the given entity, and the given member may be provided with the communication to personalize the communication.
  • [0013]
    Members of the enterprise and entities are related according to one or more social networks. These social networks may identify paths or relationships between members and entities, as well as between members. According to one embodiment, a social, or relationship, network may extend beyond the members of an enterprise to entities outside the enterprise, which is referred to as an extranet portion of the social network. It should be noted that distribution of information regarding the one or more entities to the one or more members of the enterprise may also include distribution to entities in an extranet portion of a given social network.
  • [0014]
    The entities may be prioritized, which may include prioritizing according to the one or more paths between the one or more members of the enterprise and the one or more entities. Similarly, prioritization may comprise prioritizing according to a strength for the one or more paths between the one or more members of the enterprise and the one or more entities.
  • [0015]
    The method may further comprise presenting a visual representation of the one or more entities, which may be obtained in response to a search. According to one embodiment, the visual representation is based on the information regarding the one or more entities. Relationships between members of the enterprise and entities may be provided as part of the visual representation, which is presented as paths between the members and the entities. The visual representation may also comprise presenting a strength of the one or more paths between the one or more members of the enterprise and the one or more entities. Information regarding the one or more entities may be displayed in conjunction with an enterprise application including, but not limited to, a CRM application, a SFA application, an HRM application, etc.
  • [0016]
    According to some embodiments, the method comprises providing a communication to the given member of an enterprise for approval and a determination is made whether the given member approves the communication. Where the given member does not approve the communication, a second given member of the enterprise is selected based on a path between the second given member and the given entity. The communication is addressed from the second given member to the given entity. A check may also be made to determine if the second given member approves the communication. Where the second given member does not approve the communication, the communication may be addressed from the enterprise to the given entity.
  • [0017]
    The method may comprise tracking responses to the communication from the given entity, e.g., as part of a calculating metrics regarding a marketing campaign. Accordingly, the effectiveness of a marketing campaign may be based on the tracked response to the marketing message from the given entity.
  • [0018]
    In some embodiments, the invention provides systems and methods for facilitating marketing or marketing-related tasks by utilizing the capability of an RCM software system to determine individual and business relationships, which may include strength for a given relationship. For example, an analysis of marketing contacts may include information about, ranking of, or a depiction of the strength or nature of relationships between members of enterprise and other entities, such as individual (person) or business contacts (group, organization, corporation, etc.). Information regarding one or more of these entities may be utilized, for example, in identifying a member of the enterprise from whom a marketing or marketing-related message to an entity may be addressed. A member of the enterprise may be selected based on a determination that the sender has a strong or the strongest relationship with a marketing contact or target. Visualization tools, performance assessment tools, and management tools are also provided.
  • [0019]
    In some embodiments, systems and methods are provided that facilitate marketing campaigns, such as campaigns in which a particular marketing message is desired to be sent to many different entities. Lists of entities for a particular marketing campaign may be generated. Information about the entities may be obtained, or may be visually displayed, including relationship information. Draft marketing messages may be generated automatically as being from individuals with a determined strongest relationship with each entity provided the relationship owner approves distribution of the message. The draft messages may be presented to the proposed sender or relationship owner for modification, approval, or sending. Efficiency and effectiveness of tasks are increased as compared, for example, to typical mass messaging by leveraging relationships between senders and contacts, causing messaging to appear more personal, and at least partially automatizing the process.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0020]
    The invention is illustrated in the figures of the accompanying drawings which are meant to be exemplary and not limiting, in which like references are intended to refer to like or corresponding parts, and in which:
  • [0021]
    FIG. 1 is a system diagram presenting a method for utilizing social networks for the distribution of communications according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0022]
    FIG. 2 is a flow diagram presenting a method for creating a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0023]
    FIG. 3 is a flow diagram presenting a method of adding content to a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0024]
    FIG. 4 is a flow diagram presenting a method for determining recipients of a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0025]
    FIG. 5 is a flow diagram presenting a method for determining distributors of a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0026]
    FIG. 6 is a flow diagram presenting a method for creating distribution rules for a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0027]
    FIG. 7 is a flow diagram presenting a method for determining performance metrics for one or more campaigns for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0028]
    FIG. 8 is a user interface illustrating a home page for access to controls for creating and managing a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0029]
    FIG. 9 is a user interface for creating a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0030]
    FIG. 10 is a user interface for managing a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0031]
    FIG. 11 is a user interface for designing a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0032]
    FIG. 12 is a user interface for managing a distribution list for a campaign according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0033]
    FIG. 13A is a user interface illustrating a pop-up window for one by one selection of recipients of a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0034]
    FIG. 13B is a user interface illustrating a pop-up window for uploading a list of recipients from a data source according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0035]
    FIG. 13C is a user interface illustrating a pop-up window for selecting recipients from saved prospecting searches according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0036]
    FIG. 14 is a user interface for defining rules of a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0037]
    FIG. 14A is a graphical display illustrating the order of rule processing in an outcome tree according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0038]
    FIG. 15 is a user interface display for circulating a list of recipients to members of an enterprise according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0039]
    FIG. 16 is an electronic mail message for communicating to a member of the enterprise that maintains a path to a recipient of a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0040]
    FIG. 17 is a user interface for a member of an enterprise to approve sending a communication to a recipient according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0041]
    FIG. 18 is a user interface for distributing communications according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0042]
    FIG. 19 is a user interface for displaying performance metrics for a campaign for distributing a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0043]
    FIG. 20 is a user interface for displaying detailed performance metrics according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0044]
    FIG. 21 is a user interface for the distribution of communications according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0045]
    FIG. 22 is a user interface for selecting content for inclusion in a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0046]
    FIG. 23 is a user interface for selecting entities to receive a communication according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0047]
    FIG. 24 is a user interface for prospecting for potential recipients of a marketing campaign according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0048]
    FIG. 25 is a user interface for selecting members of an enterprise from which communications to entities originate according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0049]
    FIG. 26 is a user interface for setting rules for the distribution of communications according to one embodiment of the present invention; and
  • [0050]
    FIG. 27 is a user interface for displaying performance metrics according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • [0051]
    In the following description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration a specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
  • [0052]
    FIG. 1 presents one embodiment of a system for distributing communications using an RCM software system, such as for performing marketing campaigns. A campaign management component 102, which may be embodied in hardware, software or combinations thereof, presents user interfaces from which tools and methods for the distribution of communications may be selected or to which a user may navigate. According to one embodiment, the campaign management component 102 presents one or more web pages through which a user may access tools and methods for the distribution of communications. Functional modules or components are provided that allow for the creation of a new campaign 108 for the distribution of communications, such as a marketing campaign, which may include the distribution or sending of one or more marketing or marketing-related messages to a number of entities, such as individual and business contacts. The campaign management component 102 also provides components for the management of a specific campaign 114 or a group of campaigns 110, as well as editing of an existing campaign 112 and calculating value metrics regarding one or more campaigns 140.
  • [0053]
    A component for management of a specific campaign 114 provides a number of functions that allow for the creation, distribution and review of communication distribution campaigns, e.g., marketing campaigns. According to the present embodiment, the component 114 provides functions, each of which may comprise one or more steps or actions, including designing a campaign 116, building a distribution list 120, defining rules 124, finding the visible path to a given recipient 128, distributing in accordance with a campaign 136, and reviewing performance of a campaign or group of campaigns 144.
  • [0054]
    Designing a campaign 116 includes functions that allow a user to provide data describing a campaign, which may include setting performance targets for one or more campaign metrics, as well as preview campaign information or the content of the campaign 118. Building a recipient list 116 may include functions that include 1-by-1 building of a recipient list 122 a, in which entities are added individually to a list, uploading of a list of one or more entities 122 b, and conducting searches 122 c to identify recipients of a communication, which is also referred to herein as prospecting. Uploading a list 122 b may include, for example, uploading list information from a source file or database maintained by an enterprise software application. Prospecting 122 c may include searching for recipients or loading saved searches though the use of the RCM software system, which may be a system or platform as described in the RCM application incorporated herein by reference or other RCM systems known to those of skill in the art.
  • [0055]
    Rules determine how communications are sent to entities on a recipient list. Defining rules 124 may include setting or specifying rules or parameters governing one or more aspects of a campaign, such as rules governing formulation of communications according to different circumstances with respect to individual entities to which communications are to be delivered. Similarly, when a given member of the enterprise refuses to be an addressee on a communication to one or more entities, rules may be used to identify alternate members of the enterprise from which the communication may be addressed. Controls and sub-routines are also provided for applying the rules to a campaign 126, as well as for graphically displaying one or more rules as a tree or graph 127 to provide the user with a visual representation of the potential origination addresses for a given communication on the basis of one or more rules. This is referred to as an outcome tree.
  • [0056]
    The process of finding a path to an entity that is a recipient of a communication 128 may include distributing messages to members of the enterprise with the best path to an entity that is identified to receive a communication 130, e.g., a recipient of a marketing campaign. Distributing according to best path may include, for example, determining, for a given entity in a recipient list, a best path or strongest path with a member of the enterprise. Draft messages may be sent, which may be automatically or partially automatically generated, to such members for review and distribution. Details regarding determining best paths and relationship strength can be found by reference to the incorporated RCM software system.
  • [0057]
    Finding a path 128 may include sending a draft of the communication 132, such as by email, to a member of the enterprise with the best path to the given entity. The member of the enterprise previews the communication 134, which may include modification or revision of the communication. Where a given member of the enterprise receives the communication 132 and refuses to be identified as the sender of the communication, the member of the enterprise with the next best path to the recipient is determined 128 and 130. When a member of the enterprise agrees to be identified as an originating address of the communication or other information to the entity, the member is provided with functionality that allows for the selection of the desired contact information 134, e.g., selecting an electronic mail address from a plurality of addresses associated with an entity. As is explained herein, when no relationship owner assents to sending the marketing campaign, the information may be addressed as coming from the organization itself, as opposed to an individual member of the organization. Presenting a draft communication to be sent from a best path member of the enterprise to an entity provides an effective, efficient marketing campaign technique because communications appear to be personal and originate from members of the enterprise with the strongest relationship with a given entity. Draft messages may be automatically generated and presented to members of the enterprise from which a communication is to be sent, e.g., through the use of templates.
  • [0058]
    Distributing a communication 136 according to the present system and method, such as a marketing campaign, includes a review of all entities identified to receive the communication and the members of the enterprise from which the communication is identified as originating, which may include a communication originating from the enterprise. Testing 138 is provided to ensure the campaign for distribution of the communication is functioning as desired, e.g., proper content, formatting, etc. Testing 138 may include sending the communication from a random sampling of electronic mail addresses to the campaign owner for review; thereby allowing review prior to distribution. After ensuring that the campaign is set up as intended, e.g., by performing a test 138, the communication is distributed to the entities on the recipient list 140. A confirmation interface 142 may also be presented to prior to distribution 140 to confirm the action.
  • [0059]
    Performance reviewing functions 144 may include functions for reviewing statistics and analyses regarding the distribution of a campaign or its effectiveness. An exporting function 146 provides for exporting of campaign performance metrics to an external application or file. Exporting 146 may include, for example, exporting campaign performance information to a file, other data store or enterprise application that the enterprise maintains, such as a data file to be uploaded into a spreadsheet or database program. Finally, functionality is provided for generating a response report 148 for one or more campaigns on the basis of the one or more campaigns' performance, e.g., views, click-through rates, etc., which may also include reporting aggregate information across a plurality of campaigns using statistical techniques known to those of skill in the art.
  • [0060]
    Also presented in FIG. 1 are functional modules that provide processes for conducting searches 160 (also referred to as prospecting) to identify entities for the receipt of communications, such as marketing messages transmitted as part of a marketing campaign. According to one embodiment, the prospecting process 160 may be used for traversing relationship networks provided by an RCM software system to identify prospective recipients for a marketing campaign. The prospecting process 160 is described in greater detail in U.S. patent Ser. No. ______, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR USING SOCIAL NETWORKS TO FACILITATE BUSINESS PROCESSES,” Attorney Docket No. 6613/1C, filed on even date herewith, which application is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • [0061]
    It should be apparent to those of skill in the art that the system diagram presented in FIG. 1, along with the accompanying flow and user interface diagrams presented in the following figures, are functions that may be implemented in software, hardware and combinations thereof for utilizing the functionality provided by an RCM software system, alone or in conjunction with other enterprise applications, to facilitate the distribution of communications. Preferably, the system of the present invention is executed on a server computer and accessed by clients, either running on the same server computer or on remote terminals connected to, and communicating with the server over, a computer network, e.g., a LAN or the Internet.
  • [0062]
    One embodiment of a method for campaign creation and distribution is illustrated in the flow diagram of FIG. 2. Processing begins with a user accessing the communication distribution system, step 202, e.g., a home page where the system exposes its functions via a web based interface that may be accessed using a web browser, as is known to those of skill in the art. Where a new campaign for the distribution of a communication is being created, step 212, processing proceeds to step 214 where a process collects information describing a campaign to be created. Regardless of whether or not a new campaign is being created, step 212, processing may continue to one or more campaign management processes, step 216.
  • [0063]
    The campaign management processes, step 216, allow for the creation of substantive content for a communication to be distributed according to the campaign, step 218, the selection of or otherwise obtaining information regarding entities to receive communications, step 220, the determination of members of the enterprise from which communications should be sent to given entities, step 222, rules for the distribution of communications, step 224, and performance management, step 226. After performing a given campaign management process, step 216, processing may flow to any other campaign management process, step 216.
  • [0064]
    After completing a given campaign management process, step 216, processing may return to a central process for accessing the communication distribution system, step 202. From a central point of access, step 202, a check may be performed to determine if a communication that is the subject of a campaign should be sent to one or more entities, step 204. Where the check evaluates to true, step 204, the campaign is previewed, e.g., presented to a member of the enterprise who “owns” the campaign for approval prior to transmission to the one or more entities, step 206. Where the campaign is approved, it is transmitted to the one or more entities, step 210. The transmission process, step 204, may be canceled if the campaign is not approved, step 208. In both instances, processing returns to the central process for accessing the communication distribution system, step 202.
  • [0065]
    FIG. 3 presents a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the content selection process. Content selection, step 302, allows a user to select one or more items of content for inclusion in a communication, which may include the generation of text, graphics, audio, video, etc. for inclusion in the communication. A check is performed to determine whether the user wishes to upload a file for inclusion with the communication, step 304. Where the user wishes to upload or otherwise add content to a communication, step 304, the user identifies one or more pieces of content for uploading to the communication distribution system, step 306. The user may identify local content from a data store on a local client, remote content located on a network, e.g., by providing a URL address for a location on a network, such as a LAN or the Internet, as well as manually enter text and graphics for inclusion as part of a campaign.
  • [0066]
    FIG. 4 illustrates a flow diagram of the recipient list creation process according to one embodiment of the invention. The process begins with the presentation to the user of an interface that provides access to recipient list creation control function, step 402. A check is performed to determine if the user wishes to add entities to a recipient list on a 1×1 basis, step 404, e.g., select individual entities to include in a recipient list. If the check at step 404 evaluates to true, the user is presented with an interface to browse information regarding one or more entities as well as controls to select individual entities for inclusion in a recipient list, step 406, such as potential targets for a marketing campaign
  • [0067]
    Processing returns to the recipient list creation control function step 404, when the user completes adding entities to the recipient list, step 406. A check is performed to determine whether the user wishes to upload a list of entities for receipt of a communication, step 408. If the check at step 408 evaluates to true, the user is presented with an interface to browse for information regarding one or more entities located on a data store on a local client or located remotely on a network, e.g., by providing a URL address for a location on a network, such as a LAN or the Internet. In addition to checking for commands to identify entities according to 1×1 selection and uploading data, steps 404 and 408, respectively, a check is performed to determine if the user wishes to search, or prospect, for entities to receive a communication, step 412. Where the check evaluates to true, step 412, search processes are executed, step 414. Searching for entities is described in the patent applications previously incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. For example, controls may be provided for performing searches or loading saved searches of one or more relationship networks maintained by the RCM software system whereby entities responsive to the search are added to a list, table, database or other data store of information regarding one or more entities.
  • [0068]
    FIG. 5 illustrates a flow diagram of the distribution list creation process according to one embodiment of the invention. The process begins with the presentation to the user of an interface that provides access to a distribution list creation control function, step 502. A check is performed to determine whether the user wishes to add members of an enterprise from which a communication is to be sent to one or more receiving entities, step 508. Where the check at step 508 evaluates to true, the method presents an interface comprising controls that allow the user to manually select members of the enterprise from which a communication is to be sent to a receiving entity. The process of selecting relationship owners may be automated by the present invention by analyzing recipient information in the recipient list with relationship information in the relationship network maintained by the RCM software system.
  • [0069]
    Access to distribution list creation control function, step 502, allows users to distribute the communication to members of the enterprise from which the communication to one or more entities is to originate. A check is performed to determine whether the user wishes to distribute the communication to members of the enterprise, step 504. Where the check performed at step 504 evaluates to true, members of the enterprise from which communications are to originate are provided with the communication for previewing purposes, as well as an option to decline to send the communication, step 506. The communications are previewed by the relevant members of the enterprise and, where approved, the communications are sent from the members of the enterprise to the appropriate entities, step 508.
  • [0070]
    FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating the rule creation process according to one embodiment of the invention. The process begins with the presentation to the user of an interface that provides access to rule creation control function, step 602. A check is performed to determine whether the user wishes to edit or apply a rule to the distribution of a communication, which may also include the creation of new rules, step 604. Where the user wishes to edit or apply one or more rules to a campaign, e.g., the distribution of a communication, step 604, a rule creation or editing interface is presented to the user. The user creates new rules or edits existing rules regarding the manner in which communications are to be addressed to receiving entities in the event that one or more members of the enterprise refuse to be an addressee on the communication to one or more receiving entities, step 606. After rules are created or edited, step 606, processing returns to the rule creation function, step 602.
  • [0071]
    FIG. 7 is a flow diagram of the performance metric process according to one embodiment of the invention. The process begins with the presentation to the user of an interface that provides access to performance control function, step 702, which allows the user to calculate performance and value metrics for a given campaign for the distribution of a communication. A check is performed to determine if the user wishes to export information regarding the performance or value of a campaign, step 704, such as to a file, data structure or data store maintained by the enterprise. If exporting of the information is indicated, the information is exported, step 706. After the information is exported, step 706, processing returns to the performance control function, step 702.
  • [0072]
    FIGS. 8 through 27 provide examples of interface display formats, such as Web pages, according to embodiments of the invention.
  • [0073]
    FIG. 8 is a user interface illustrating a home page 800 for access to controls for creating and managing a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. Options or links or are provided to allow for the creation of a new campaign and managing campaigns, 804 and 806, respectively. Options are provided with respect to managing a selection of existing campaigns 808, including viewing a campaign list from which a campaign is selected, or selecting a campaign from recently edited campaigns. Selection of a given option, 804, 806, 808, presents the user with an appropriate interface that provides controls for the performance of the selected option. A panel 802 that is presented as part of the user interface 800 provides overall or aggregate campaign management metrics, which may take into account all existing campaigns. According to the present embodiment a graphical representation 803 of the metrics is presented to the user, such as in bar graph format, and an option or link 810 is provided to obtain detailed metrics information regarding specific campaigns.
  • [0074]
    FIG. 9 is a user interface for creating a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. An interface display 900 comprises controls that allow the user to provide information describing the campaign, as well as goals regarding the campaign. Using text entry controls provided as part of a panel 902, the user may provide a campaign name 904, a textual description of the objective of the campaign 908, as well as percentage values for metrics that the campaign is intended to meet or surpass, 910 and 912, respectively. According to the present embodiment, information regarding the owner of the campaign may be auto-populated with user information 906. Controls are provided to cancel the creation of the new campaign 914, in addition to creating the new campaign 916.
  • [0075]
    FIG. 10 is a user interface for managing a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. A panel 1004 provided as part of the interface 1000 provides information regarding existing campaigns. The panel 1004 provides detailed information regarding existing campaigns, including, but not limited to, the campaign owner 1006, the campaign name 1008, the campaign objective 1010, the creation date of the campaign 1012, where the communication that is being distributed according to a campaign has been sent, the date of the transmission of the communication is indicated 1016, the campaign status 1018 and response metrics for the campaign 1022. To provide a visual indication of the status of a given campaign, graphical indicators are provided in the status column 1018 or the panel 1004. The interface 1000 provides a status legend 1002 that allows a user to decipher the status of a given campaign from the graphics 1020 in the status column 1018.
  • [0076]
    FIG. 11 is a user interface for designing a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. The interface 1100 presents a number of tabs 1104 in which each tab corresponds and provides access to a given step in the process of creating and distributing a communication according to a campaign. According to the present embodiment, options or links 1104 are provided to allow or facilitate designing a campaign, building a distribution list, defining rules, finding a best path to a recipient, distributing messages of the campaign, and reviewing campaign performance. A campaign design may be manually specified 1706, or selected by browsing campaign designs 1706. Campaign design designs, such as code specifying campaigns or parameters, e.g., XML or HTML code, may be previewed 1108 by the user or submitted 1110 for selection in creating a campaign for the distribution of a communication.
  • [0077]
    Another step in the process of creating a campaign for the distribution of a communication involves building a recipient list that identifies one or more entities to which a communication is to be transmitted. FIG. 12 is a user interface for managing a distribution list for a campaign according to one embodiment of the invention. A user may navigate to the present interface 1200 using the build distribution list tab 1208, or may navigate to other interfaces using the appropriate tab. Options or links are provided to allow selection of recipients through 1×1 selection 1206, list importation 1204, and prospecting 1202.
  • [0078]
    Entities that are selected for inclusion in a distribution list are presented in a panel that provides an entry for each of the one or more entities. Information presented includes, but is not limited to, best path information 1210, which may be a graphic representing the strength of a path, the name of the entity 1212, title 1214, company 1216, a electronic mail address 1218 and the number of paths that connect a given entity to an enterprise 1220, e.g., the number of members of the enterprise that maintain a relationship with the given entity. Using the controls that the interface provides 1200, a user may create a list of entities to receive a communication according to a campaign.
  • [0079]
    As indicated, a list of entities to receive a communication may be created by selecting individual entities, uploading a list of entities or retrieving a list of entities from a search. FIG. 13A is a user interface illustrating a pop-up window for one by one selection of recipients of a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. Form fields are displayed within a window 1302 for providing information regarding a given entity. Information collected regarding a given entity includes, but is not limited to, the name of the entity 1304, title 1306, company 1308 and electronic mail address 1310. Upon entering the information, the form may be canceled 1312 or submitted 1314 for inclusion as an entry on a distribution list.
  • [0080]
    FIG. 13B is a user interface illustrating a pop-up window for uploading a list of recipients from a data source according to one embodiment of the invention. An entry field 1316 is provided in the pop-up window 1324 for inputting the location on a file system where the recipient list is maintained, which may be locally or remotely located. A control 1318 is also provided that allows the user to browse for the file to be uploaded. Uploading the identified list may be canceled 1320 or submitted 1322 as part of a distribution list by selection of an appropriate control.
  • [0081]
    FIG. 13C is a user interface illustrating a pop-up window for selecting recipients from saved prospecting searches according to one embodiment of the invention. A pop-up window 1326 is provided listing the entries from saved searches from which a user may select individual entries 1328 for inclusion in the distribution list. Each entry presents information that includes, but is not limited to, an owner of the search 1330, search name 1332, the date the search was created 1334, the last time the search was viewed 1336 and the number of entities falling within the scope of a search 1338. Upon selecting entries from the saved prospecting search, the selection may be canceled 1340 or submitted 1342 as part of a distribution list.
  • [0082]
    Another step in the process of creating a campaign for the distribution of a communication involves defining rules for the distribution. FIG. 14 is a user interface 1400 for defining rules of a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. According to the present embodiment, the interface 1400 presents templates 1408 and 1412 that may be used according to a given rules. One template 1408 may be used for an individual, such as a member of the enterprise, who may own a relationship with an entity, and another template may be used where the enterprise itself owns the relationship or a member of the enterprise refuses to be an addressee for a communication 1412. An individual template 1408 contains text fields to identify to addressee of the communication 1404, a subject 1406 and the body of the communication 1410. Similarly, a template for communications from the enterprise 1412 may also include text fields to identify the addressee of the communication 1414, a subject 1416 and the body of the communication 1418. According to the present embodiment, message rules are set by selection of radio buttons to determine to appropriate course of action where a member of the enterprise refuses to be identified as the originator of the communication, which may include, but is not limited to, not sending the communication 1420 or sending the communication from an alternate sender 1422.
  • [0083]
    The rules for a given campaign may be visually presented to the user in the form of an outcome tree to provide the user with a visual indication of how communications are to be processed in view of actions by members of the enterprise. FIG. 14A presents an outcome tree illustrating the processing of communication according to one embodiment of the present invention. The graphical illustration 1430 of the rules for a given campaign according to the present embodiment depicts ownership of information regarding one or more entities, which may be owned by a member of the enterprise 1432, jointly owned by a member and the enterprise 1434 and solely owned by the enterprise 1436. The distribution of ownership of information regarding the one or more entities is depicted as a Venn diagram, with circles representing information regarding an entity owned by a member of the enterprise 1432 a, jointly owned by a member and the enterprise 1434 a and solely owned by the enterprise 1436 a.
  • [0084]
    Rules, which may consist of conditions and actions to be taken, are graphically presented for each of the ownership classes depicted by the Venn diagram. According to the rule governing information regarding entities that is owned by a member of the enterprise 1432 a, a check is performed to determine if the member approves to be identified as the originator of the communication 1438. Where the member approves of being identified as the sending address of the communication 1438, the communication is addressed to appear as if it originated from the member 1440. According to the rule, however, where the member does not approve no message is sent 1442.
  • [0085]
    According to the embodiment of the outcome tree illustrated, processing of communications takes places according to a compound rule where information regarding an entity is jointly owned by a member and the enterprise 1434 a. According to the rule, a check is performed to determine whether the member agrees to be identified as the originator of the communication 1444. Where the member approves of being identified as the sending address of the communication 1444, the communication is addressed to appear as if it originated from the member 1446. According to the rule, however, where the member does not approve, a check is performed to determine whether the enterprise approves of being identified as the originator of the communication 1448. Where the enterprises approves, the communication is sent identifying the enterprise as the source 1450 and where the enterprise does not approve, no communication is sent 1452. Also according to the rules illustrated in the present embodiment of an outcome tree, all entities that are solely owned by the enterprise 1436 a are sent communications identifying the enterprise as the source of the communication 1454.
  • [0086]
    Another step in the process of creating a campaign for the distribution of a communication involves identifying paths between entities identified on a recipient list and members of an enterprise. FIG. 15 is a user interface display for circulating a list of recipients to members of an enterprise that maintain a path to one or more entities according to one embodiment of the invention. Using the RCM software system that is incorporated by reference herein, a campaign owner may determine those members of an enterprise with paths to or relationships with one or more entities that are identified on a recipient list to receive communications as part of a campaign for the distribution of communications. A table 1508 is provided that lists members of the enterprise with paths to one or more entities that are intended recipients of the communication, e.g., a marketing message.
  • [0087]
    The 1508 table provides a number of columns of information regarding members of the enterprise and their relationships. A column 1504 is provided to track whether a communication has been circulated to the relationship owner, as well as the number of paths connecting entities that are intended recipients of a communication and a given member of the enterprise. Another column 1506 is provided to track the number of entities that a given member of the enterprise with a path to a given entity has approved to receive the communication, which information may be stored in and retrieved from a database tailored to maintain such information. A control 1510 allows a user to gather approval of members of the enterprise for given members to be identified as the addressee on one or more communications to entities, e.g., by sending approval emails to members of the enterprise.
  • [0088]
    FIG. 16 is an electronic mail message for communicating to the owner of a path to a recipient of a campaign for the distribution of a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. According to one embodiment, an electronic mail message 1600 is sent to members of the enterprise that maintain a path to one or more given entities on a distribution list, which may be a best or strongest path. The electronic mail message 1600 informs the given member of the enterprise that the campaign owner wishes to send a communication to one or more entities on behalf of the member of the enterprise 1602. By selecting a link or other control 1604 contained within the message 1600, the member of the enterprise is presented with an interface that allows the member of the enterprise to select those entities to which they wish to forward the communication.
  • [0089]
    A user interface for a member of the enterprise to approve sending a communication to a recipient according to one embodiment of the invention is illustrated at FIG. 17. The entities on a distribution list with a path to the member of the enterprise who received the electronic mail message presented in FIG. 16 are presented in the interface 1702. The member of the enterprise may select a check box or similar selection control to designate those entities to which the member wishes to transmit the communication 1704, including a control 1706 for designating the desired electronic mail address of the entity that should be used to send the communication to a given entity. The member of the enterprise may also preview the communication 1708 that is to be sent to the entity prior to submitting approval. Advantageously, the relationship owner is provided a mechanism 1710 through which communication to the one or more entities may be personalized, thereby enhancing recipient responsiveness.
  • [0090]
    Communications are distributed to entities according to a completed campaign. FIG. 18 is a user interface 1800 for distributing communications according to one embodiment of the invention. Options or links 1802 and 1804 are provided to allow for testing and distribution of the marketing campaign, respectively. Testing a campaign 1802 involves sending a random sampling of communications intended for transmission to receiving entities to the campaign owner for review. The campaign owner, however, may still make changes to a given campaign after testing. Once the campaign is set up as intended, the campaign may be distributed 1804 to the entities on a distribution list.
  • [0091]
    FIG. 19 is a user interface for displaying performance metrics for a campaign for distributing a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. A table 1902 provides information regarding metrics for given campaigns, including, but not limited to, an indication 1904 of whether campaign information has been viewed by entities (e.g., by tracking delivery information for the communication) and an indication of whether communications have been clicked on by receiving entities 1906, where appropriate. Campaign aggregate information 1908 information may also be provided, including cumulative percentage viewed, and cumulative percentage clicked on over a plurality of campaigns. Additionally, the display 1900 presents statistics regarding the campaign view rate 1910 and click through 1912 metrics set against their respective industry averages.
  • [0092]
    A user may also view detailed aggregate performance metrics for a plurality of campaigns. FIG. 20 is a user interface for displaying detailed performance metrics according to one embodiment of the invention. The interface display 2000 presents aggregate industry response rates 2008, as well as aggregate view 2002 and click-through 2004 metrics for active marketing campaigns. Industry response rates may be obtained, for example, from third party industry reporting sources. More specifically, metrics are provided for view 2002 and click-through 2004 rates for active campaigns. Industry average information 2006 may be presented overlaying aggregate campaign metrics to provide the campaign owner with an indication regarding how campaigns are performing vis-ą-vis industry averages.
  • [0093]
    FIG. 21 is a user interface for selecting content for inclusion in a communication accessing functions for the distribution of communications according to one embodiment of the invention. The relationship graphic 2102 represents a depiction of relationship information within a user's relationship network as provided by an enterprise application, such as an RCM software system. A tabular display 2104 provides a list of campaigns that have been previously created. Columns 2106 within the tabular display 2104 provide information regarding the one or more campaigns, such as an indication of the status of the transmission of communications according to a given campaign, as well as a percentage of completion of sending of messages.
  • [0094]
    FIG. 22 is a user interface for selecting content for inclusion in a communication to be transmitted as part of a campaign according to one embodiment of the invention. General campaign information 2202 provides information about the campaign and provides controls to select content for inclusion as part of a communication sent in accordance with the campaign. Controls are provided that allow a campaign owner to browse 2204 and submit 2206 content for a given campaign. A preview pane 2208 provides a control that allows content that comprises a campaign to be viewed by the user, as well as manually add text and graphics, e.g., by cutting and pasting content from other sources or enterprise applications.
  • [0095]
    FIG. 23 is a user interface for selecting entities to receive a communication according to one embodiment of the invention. Controls 2302 provides a user with options including prospecting for targets, as described above, and importing a list of targets, for example, from a file or other data structure maintained by an enterprise software application. Display window 2304 provides an option to publish a recipient list, which may include making the list available to other users.
  • [0096]
    FIG. 24 is a user interface for prospecting for potential recipients of a marketing campaign according to one embodiment of the invention. In some embodiments, prospecting searches may be performed to identify entities for the receipt of communication according to a campaign. Search visualization tools may be provided, including a graphical representation relating to search results in connection with a campaign. For example, as depicted in the embodiment illustrated at FIG. 24, results of a search are displayed using a Venn diagram 2402. Circles of the Venn diagram 2402 represent groups of entities filtered by specified search criteria. Size of the circles may vary, for example, with the size of the group that is responsive to one of the given search criteria. Overlap between the circles may be used to represent entities in common between the various search criteria after searching using different filter information or criteria. An exterior circle may represent an entire relationship network. Other embodiments and manners of depictions, filtering, presentation, etc, such as bar diagrams, are known to those skilled in the art and may also be used. Filtering criteria can be specified by a user on all fields available from relationship networks maintained by the RCM software system. Also depicted in FIG. 24 is a table 2406, including information about entities that are identified to receive communications. A button 2404 is provided to allow additional entities to be added to a recipient list for a given campaign.
  • [0097]
    FIG. 25 is a user interface for selecting members of an enterprise from which communications to entities originate according to one embodiment of the invention. A table 2502 provides information regarding members of an enterprise that maintain paths to entities on a recipient list defined using the interface provided by FIG. 24. The recipient list is cross-referenced against one or more relationship networks that the RCM software system maintains to identify members of the enterprise that maintain a path to or relationship with entities on the recipient list, and therefore are a preferred originator for the communication. According to embodiments of the invention, the member of the enterprise who owns information regarding a given entity must be consulted before the relationship is utilized. Members of the enterprise that maintain a path to or relationship with one or more entities on the recipient list are presented in a table 2502. The table 2502 includes columns with entries indicating whether a communication according to the campaign has been sent to the member of the enterprise, and whether each member of the enterprise has responded to the request to act as an originator of the communication.
  • [0098]
    FIG. 26 is a user interface for setting rules for the distribution of communications according to one embodiment of the invention. As depicted, message templates are provided according to a rule that specifies one template 2604 to be used if an individual is the originator of a communication, and a different template 2602 to be used if the company itself owns the relationship. The templates 2602 and 2604 may be used to provide draft messages to be approved or modified before sending to entities, such as by a member of the enterprise that maintains a path to a given entity. In some embodiments, if the member of the enterprise with the strongest path to a given entity does not approve sending the communication, then the draft message may be sent to the member of the enterprise with the next strongest path to the given entity and re-drafted to indicate that the member of the enterprise with the next strongest path is the sender. Alternatively, where no member of the enterprise maintains a path to a given entity or approves of the transmission of the communication, the communication may be sent to the entity indicating that the communication is originating from the enterprise as opposed to an individual member of the enterprise.
  • [0099]
    FIG. 27 is a user interface for displaying performance metrics according to one embodiment of the invention. Performance metrics are presented in tabular format 2702 and may include information relating to the performance of one or more campaigns, such as information regarding number or percentage of communication that were clicked on or viewed by entities in the recipient list receiving the communication.
  • [0100]
    While the invention has been described and illustrated in connection with preferred embodiments, many variations and modifications as will be evident to those skilled in this art may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, and the invention is thus not to be limited to the precise details of methodology or construction set forth above as such variations and modification are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5628011 *Jan 4, 1993May 6, 1997At&TNetwork-based intelligent information-sourcing arrangement
US5715371 *May 31, 1996Feb 3, 1998Lucent Technologies Inc.Personal computer-based intelligent networks
US5715443 *Jul 25, 1994Feb 3, 1998Apple Computer, Inc.Method and apparatus for searching for information in a data processing system and for providing scheduled search reports in a summary format
US5727201 *Jun 3, 1994Mar 10, 1998Phonelink PlcOnline data retrieval system
US5761662 *May 8, 1997Jun 2, 1998Sun Microsystems, Inc.Personalized information retrieval using user-defined profile
US5890162 *Dec 18, 1996Mar 30, 1999Intel CorporationRemote streaming of semantics for varied multimedia output
US5895471 *Dec 22, 1997Apr 20, 1999Unwired Planet, Inc.Providing a directory of frequently used hyperlinks on a remote server
US5903890 *May 15, 1998May 11, 1999Sofmap Future Design, Inc.Database systems having single-association structures
US5905862 *Sep 4, 1996May 18, 1999Intel CorporationAutomatic web site registration with multiple search engines
US6038566 *Dec 2, 1997Mar 14, 2000Tsai; Daniel E.Method and apparatus for navigation of relational databases on distributed networks
US6052122 *Jun 13, 1997Apr 18, 2000Tele-Publishing, Inc.Method and apparatus for matching registered profiles
US6061680 *Jul 16, 1999May 9, 2000Cddb, Inc.Method and system for finding approximate matches in database
US6073105 *Jun 13, 1997Jun 6, 2000Tele-Publishing, Inc.Interactive personals online network method and apparatus
US6175831 *Jan 17, 1997Jan 16, 2001Six Degrees, Inc.Method and apparatus for constructing a networking database and system
US6182067 *May 29, 1998Jan 30, 2001Knowledge Horizons Pty Ltd.Methods and systems for knowledge management
US6182118 *Oct 27, 1997Jan 30, 2001Cranberry Properties LlcSystem and method for distributing electronic messages in accordance with rules
US6189101 *Oct 24, 1997Feb 13, 2001Richard G. Dusenbury, Jr.Secure network architecture method and apparatus
US6192362 *Dec 15, 1997Feb 20, 2001International Business Machines CorporationSystem and method for creating a search form for accessing directory information
US6195654 *Nov 18, 1996Feb 27, 2001Edward I WachtelSystem and method for obtaining improved search results and for decreasing network loading
US6205472 *Mar 17, 1999Mar 20, 2001Tacit Knowledge System, Inc.Method and apparatus for querying a user knowledge profile
US6216122 *Nov 19, 1997Apr 10, 2001Netscape Communications CorporationElectronic mail indexing folder having a search scope and interval
US6226649 *Sep 3, 1999May 1, 2001Oracle CorporationApparatus and method for transparent access of foreign databases in a heterogeneous database system
US6230156 *Jul 7, 1998May 8, 2001Microsoft CorporationElectronic mail interface for a network server
US6345268 *Aug 7, 1998Feb 5, 2002Carlos De La HuergaMethod and system for resolving temporal descriptors of data records in a computer system
US6349307 *Dec 28, 1998Feb 19, 2002U.S. Philips CorporationCooperative topical servers with automatic prefiltering and routing
US6351747 *Apr 12, 1999Feb 26, 2002Multex.Com, Inc.Method and system for providing data to a user based on a user's query
US6353878 *Aug 13, 1998Mar 5, 2002Emc CorporationRemote control of backup media in a secondary storage subsystem through access to a primary storage subsystem
US6356893 *Nov 10, 1998Mar 12, 2002Yuichiro ItakuraMessage searching system and terminal
US6363415 *Aug 11, 2000Mar 26, 2002Cranberry Properties LlcSystem and method for distributing electronic messages in accordance with rules
US6366907 *Dec 15, 1999Apr 2, 2002Napster, Inc.Real-time search engine
US6370541 *Sep 21, 1999Apr 9, 2002International Business Machines CorporationDesign and implementation of a client/server framework for federated multi-search and update across heterogeneous datastores
US6370542 *Oct 23, 1998Apr 9, 2002Qwest Communications International, Inc.Method and apparatus for knowledge acquisition and management
US6370575 *Jan 8, 1999Apr 9, 2002Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Web-based status/issue tracking system based on parameterized definition
US6374237 *Dec 24, 1996Apr 16, 2002Intel CorporationData set selection based upon user profile
US6377948 *Sep 16, 1998Apr 23, 2002Hitachi, Ltd.Directory access method
US6377949 *Sep 18, 1998Apr 23, 2002Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a term within a user knowledge profile
US6377961 *Jan 21, 1999Apr 23, 2002Samsung Electronics, Co., Ltd.Method for displaying internet search results
US6381593 *May 6, 1999Apr 30, 2002Ricoh Company, Ltd.Document information management system
US6381640 *Feb 19, 1999Apr 30, 2002Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc.Method and apparatus for automated personalization and presentation of workload assignments to agents within a multimedia communication center
US6385604 *Aug 9, 2000May 7, 2002Hyperroll, Israel LimitedRelational database management system having integrated non-relational multi-dimensional data store of aggregated data elements
US6385644 *Sep 24, 1998May 7, 2002Mci Worldcom, Inc.Multi-threaded web based user inbox for report management
US6389422 *Jan 27, 1999May 14, 2002Sharp Kabushiki KaishaMethod of relaying file object, distributed file system, computer readable medium recording a program of file object relay method and gateway computer, allowing reference of one same file object among networks
US6392669 *Jul 30, 1999May 21, 2002International Business Machines CorporationSchedule management system and method for displaying, managing, and changing a schedule and recording medium for storing the same
US6393417 *Oct 15, 1999May 21, 2002De Le Fevre Patrick Y.Method for providing a rapid internet search
US6505211 *Jan 20, 2000Jan 7, 2003International Business Machines CorporationMethod for providing for persistence of java classes where the persistence semantics may be orthogonal to the class definition
US6510454 *Apr 8, 1999Jan 21, 2003Intel CorporationNetwork device monitoring with E-mail reporting
US6519606 *Feb 1, 2002Feb 11, 2003Inroads Technology, IncMethod and apparatus for a commercial network system designed to facilitate, manage and support the implementation and integration of technology systems
US6529908 *May 28, 1998Mar 4, 2003Netspan CorporationWeb-updated database with record distribution by email
US6529914 *Apr 30, 1998Mar 4, 2003International Business Machines CorporationObject-oriented programming model for accessing hierarchical databases
US6532473 *Dec 7, 2000Mar 11, 2003Oracle CorporationData file processing
US6535887 *Oct 6, 1999Mar 18, 2003Fujitsu LimitedObject-oriented type information managing system and a method for controlling messages between objects in the system
US6535916 *Oct 28, 1999Mar 18, 2003International Business Machines CorporationSystems, methods and computer program products for linking transactions by multiple web site servers to web site visitors
US6539232 *Jun 8, 2001Mar 25, 2003TelcontarMethod and system for connecting mobile users based on degree of separation
US6539396 *Aug 31, 1999Mar 25, 2003Accenture LlpMulti-object identifier system and method for information service pattern environment
US6539420 *Jun 4, 1999Mar 25, 2003International Business Machines CorporationDistribution mechanism for reuse of web based image data
US6542749 *Jun 8, 2001Apr 1, 2003TelcontarMethod and system for connecting proximately located mobile users based on compatible attributes
US6542900 *Oct 4, 1999Apr 1, 2003Sun Microsystems, Inc.Method and apparatus for distributed object mapping in a java language environment
US6546398 *Oct 23, 2000Apr 8, 2003Aryo GmbhProcess for producing a selection mask for accessing data on a database by way of programmable information objects
US6549933 *Aug 4, 1998Apr 15, 2003International Business Machines CorporationManaging, accessing, and retrieving networked information using physical objects associated with the networked information
US6549939 *Aug 31, 1999Apr 15, 2003International Business Machines CorporationProactive calendar notification agent
US6549941 *Nov 22, 1999Apr 15, 2003Alexa InternetSoftware system and methods for resubmitting form data to related web sites
US6553368 *Mar 3, 1998Apr 22, 2003Sun Microsystems, Inc.Network directory access mechanism
US6557004 *May 2, 2000Apr 29, 2003Microsoft CorporationMethod and apparatus for fast searching of hand-held contacts lists
US6557036 *Mar 7, 2000Apr 29, 2003Sun Microsystems, Inc.Methods and apparatus for site wide monitoring of electronic mail systems
US6697807 *Jun 15, 2001Feb 24, 2004Orions Belt, Inc.Method of and system for comparing database records to determine connections between parties over a network
US7019753 *Dec 17, 2001Mar 28, 2006Wireless Valley Communications, Inc.Textual and graphical demarcation of location from an environmental database, and interpretation of measurements including descriptive metrics and qualitative values
US7509649 *Mar 3, 2005Mar 24, 2009Research In Motion LimitedSystem and method for conversion of generic services' applications into component based applications for devices
US20020010747 *Jul 17, 2001Jan 24, 2002Ableclick Corp.Method for acquiring on-line information regarding customer preferences and a target advertising method using e-mail based on customer preferences
US20020023230 *Apr 11, 2001Feb 21, 2002Bolnick David A.System, method and computer program product for gathering and delivering personalized user information
US20020035634 *Jun 22, 2001Mar 21, 2002Nadine Smolarski-KoffData exchange method and communication protocol used during same
US20020035643 *Apr 25, 2001Mar 21, 2002Fujio MoritaSearch support device and method, and recording medium storing program for computer to carry out operation with said search support device
US20020052858 *Dec 4, 2001May 2, 2002Insyst Ltd.Method and tool for data mining in automatic decision making systems
US20020059201 *May 8, 2001May 16, 2002Work James DuncanMethod and apparatus for internet-based human network brokering
US20020059387 *Sep 25, 2001May 16, 2002Wolfe Robert L.Method and apparatus for identifying user characteristics and device characteristics using a communication network
US20020059418 *Jul 16, 2001May 16, 2002Alan BirdMethod of and system for recording and displaying electronic mail statistics
US20020062368 *Mar 1, 2001May 23, 2002David HoltzmanSystem and method for establishing and evaluating cross community identities in electronic forums
US20030014491 *Jun 28, 2001Jan 16, 2003Horvitz Eric J.Methods for and applications of learning and inferring the periods of time until people are available or unavailable for different forms of communication, collaboration, and information access
US20030018726 *Apr 29, 2002Jan 23, 2003Low Sydney GordonInstant messaging
US20030041042 *Aug 21, 2002Feb 27, 2003Insyst LtdMethod and apparatus for knowledge-driven data mining used for predictions
US20030041071 *Aug 21, 2002Feb 27, 2003Komatsu Ltd.Database Management system and database
US20030046097 *Aug 30, 2001Mar 6, 2003Lasalle Ryan MatthewTransitive trust network
US20030050924 *Mar 26, 2002Mar 13, 2003Yaroslav FaybishenkoSystem and method for resolving distributed network search queries to information providers
US20030050977 *Sep 10, 2001Mar 13, 2003Puthenkulam Jose P.Peer discovery and connection management based on context sensitive social networks
US20030050983 *Sep 12, 2001Mar 13, 2003Johnson Paul A.External event processor system and method
US20030063072 *Apr 4, 2001Apr 3, 2003Brandenberg Carl BrockMethod and apparatus for scheduling presentation of digital content on a personal communication device
US20030069892 *Oct 10, 2001Apr 10, 2003International Business Machines CorporationRelational view of electronic objects
US20030074409 *Oct 16, 2001Apr 17, 2003Xerox CorporationMethod and apparatus for generating a user interest profile
US20030088458 *Nov 9, 2001May 8, 2003Afeyan Noubar B.Method and apparatus for dynamic, real-time market segmentation
US20030088627 *Jul 26, 2001May 8, 2003Rothwell Anton C.Intelligent SPAM detection system using an updateable neural analysis engine
US20030093420 *Oct 1, 2002May 15, 2003Ramme Kay P.Method and system for retrieving sharable information using a hierarchically dependent directory structure
US20030093478 *Nov 13, 2002May 15, 2003The Procter & Gamble CompanyCollaboration and innovation system
US20030093483 *Nov 13, 2001May 15, 2003Allen Kram HenrySystem and method for facilitating email communications by providing convenient access to most recently and/or frequently used email addresses
US20030101024 *Nov 2, 2001May 29, 2003Eytan AdarUser profile classification by web usage analysis
US20040137886 *Nov 21, 2003Jul 15, 2004Monte RossMethod and system for delivering electronic coupons to wireless mobile terminals
US20050028086 *Aug 31, 2004Feb 3, 2005Nokia Mobile Phones, Ltd.Viewing Web Pages On Small Screen Devices Using A Keypad For Navigation
US20050097458 *Dec 19, 2002May 5, 2005Eric WilsonDocument display system and method
US20060004869 *Apr 20, 2005Jan 5, 2006Branchit, Inc.System and method for mapping relationship management intelligence
US20060031411 *Feb 17, 2005Feb 9, 2006Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Document delivery
US20060077439 *Sep 22, 2005Apr 13, 2006Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc.Methods and systems for distributing localized display elements to an imaging device
US20060112123 *Sep 8, 2005May 25, 2006Macnica, Inc.Spreadsheet user-interfaced business data visualization and publishing system
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7698380Dec 14, 2006Apr 13, 2010Qurio Holdings, Inc.System and method of optimizing social networks and user levels based on prior network interactions
US7730216Dec 14, 2006Jun 1, 2010Qurio Holdings, Inc.System and method of sharing content among multiple social network nodes using an aggregation node
US7764701Feb 22, 2006Jul 27, 2010Qurio Holdings, Inc.Methods, systems, and products for classifying peer systems
US7779004Feb 22, 2006Aug 17, 2010Qurio Holdings, Inc.Methods, systems, and products for characterizing target systems
US7782866Sep 29, 2006Aug 24, 2010Qurio Holdings, Inc.Virtual peer in a peer-to-peer network
US7801971Sep 26, 2006Sep 21, 2010Qurio Holdings, Inc.Systems and methods for discovering, creating, using, and managing social network circuits
US7873988Sep 6, 2006Jan 18, 2011Qurio Holdings, Inc.System and method for rights propagation and license management in conjunction with distribution of digital content in a social network
US7925592Sep 27, 2006Apr 12, 2011Qurio Holdings, Inc.System and method of using a proxy server to manage lazy content distribution in a social network
US7992171Sep 6, 2006Aug 2, 2011Qurio Holdings, Inc.System and method for controlled viral distribution of digital content in a social network
US8014806Sep 29, 2006Sep 6, 2011Motorola Mobility, Inc.Dynamic creation of a communication group that includes contacts identified in one or more contact levels
US8276207Jan 18, 2011Sep 25, 2012Qurio Holdings, Inc.System and method for social network trust assessment
US8346864Dec 13, 2006Jan 1, 2013Qurio Holdings, Inc.Systems and methods for social network based conferencing
US8533238Apr 30, 2008Sep 10, 2013Microsoft CorporationSharing information about a document across a private computer network
US8554827Sep 29, 2006Oct 8, 2013Qurio Holdings, Inc.Virtual peer for a content sharing system
US8739296Jul 30, 2012May 27, 2014Qurio Holdings, Inc.System and method for social network trust assessment
US8745087Oct 1, 2007Jun 3, 2014Eka Labs, LlcSystem and method for defining and manipulating roles and the relationship of roles to other system entities
US8856019 *May 22, 2007Oct 7, 2014True[X] Media Inc.System and method of storing data related to social publishers and associating the data with electronic brand data
US9195996Dec 27, 2006Nov 24, 2015Qurio Holdings, Inc.System and method for classification of communication sessions in a social network
US20080033776 *May 22, 2007Feb 7, 2008Archetype Media, Inc.System and method of storing data related to social publishers and associating the data with electronic brand data
US20080081653 *Sep 29, 2006Apr 3, 2008Motorola, Inc.Dynamic creation of a communication group that includes contacts identified in one or more contact levels
US20080224883 *Mar 15, 2007Sep 18, 2008Motorola, Inc.Selection of mobile station alert based on social context
US20080300979 *May 31, 2007Dec 4, 2008Fatdoor, Inc.Method and apparatus of customer relationship management and maketing
US20090089291 *Oct 1, 2007Apr 2, 2009Eka Labs, LlcSystem and Method for Defining and Manipulating Roles and the Relationship of Roles to Other System Entities
US20090276455 *Nov 5, 2009Microsoft CorporationSharing information about a document across a private compuer network
US20100223351 *May 14, 2009Sep 2, 2010Ryan SteelbergSystem and method for on-demand delivery of audio content for use with entertainment creatives
US20100257113 *Apr 6, 2009Oct 7, 2010Microsoft CorporationMetric-based events for social networks
US20110004671 *Jul 9, 2010Jan 6, 2011Ryan SteelbergSystem and Method for Secure Delivery of Creatives
US20110167085 *Sep 14, 2009Jul 7, 2011Haschek Hans MSystem and Method for Searching for a Target Contact and for Generating a Contact Path
US20140108091 *Apr 19, 2013Apr 17, 2014FullCircle CRMMethod and System for Attributing Metrics in a CRM System
US20140108398 *Apr 19, 2013Apr 17, 2014FullCircle CRMMethod and System for Recording Responses in a CRM System
WO2010029437A1 *Sep 14, 2009Mar 18, 2010Hans Michael HaschekSystem and method for searching for a target contact and for generating a contact path
Classifications
U.S. Classification1/1, 707/999.102
International ClassificationG06F7/00
Cooperative ClassificationG06Q10/107, G06Q30/02, G06Q10/063, G06Q30/06, G06Q50/01
European ClassificationG06Q10/107, G06Q30/02, G06Q30/06, G06Q10/063, G06Q50/01
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Feb 5, 2007ASAssignment
Owner name: VISIBLE PATH CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BRYDON, ANTONY;PATTERSON, JEFF;REEL/FRAME:018869/0431;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070117 TO 20070118
Nov 13, 2007ASAssignment
Owner name: TRIPLEPOINT CAPITAL LLC, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:VISIBLE PATH CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020106/0523
Effective date: 20071026
May 2, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: HOOVER S, INC., NEW JERSEY
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VISIBLE PATH CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020920/0339
Effective date: 20080128