Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20060123960 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/353,423
Publication dateJun 15, 2006
Filing dateFeb 13, 2006
Priority dateAug 13, 2001
Also published asUS6997090, US20030037651, US20040163514
Publication number11353423, 353423, US 2006/0123960 A1, US 2006/123960 A1, US 20060123960 A1, US 20060123960A1, US 2006123960 A1, US 2006123960A1, US-A1-20060123960, US-A1-2006123960, US2006/0123960A1, US2006/123960A1, US20060123960 A1, US20060123960A1, US2006123960 A1, US2006123960A1
InventorsStephen Gass, David Fanning, J. Fulmer, David D'Ascenzo, Jonathan Betts-LaCroix, Robert Chamberlain, Joel Jensen, Andrew Johnston, Sung Kim, Anwyl McDonald, Benjamin Schramm
Original AssigneeGass Stephen F, Fanning David A, Fulmer J D, D Ascenzo David S, Betts-Lacroix Jonathan N, Chamberlain Robert L, Jensen Joel F, Johnston Andrew L, Kim Sung H, Mcdonald Anwyl M, Schramm Benjamin B
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Safety systems for power equipment
US 20060123960 A1
Abstract
A saw with a safety system is disclosed. The safety system includes a detection system adapted to detect contact between a person and a blade while the blade is moving. The safety system further includes a brake system adapted to engage the blade and to stop the blade when the detection system detects contact between the person and the blade.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
1. A method of operating a saw comprising:
providing a blade configured to move to cut a work piece, where the blade includes a cutting edge;
providing a motor adapted to move the blade;
providing a detection system adapted to detect a dangerous condition between a person and the blade while the blade is moving and to distinguish that dangerous condition from proximity between green wood and the blade by imparting a signal to the blade and monitoring that signal for a predetermined change indicative of the dangerous condition;
providing a reaction system adapted to take some action to mitigate possible injury if the detection system detects the dangerous condition; and
moving the blade to cut a work piece while the detection and reaction systems are active.
2. The method of claim 1, where the dangerous condition is contact between a person and the blade.
3. The method of claim 1, where the dangerous condition is proximity between a person and the blade.
4. The method of claim 1, where the predetermined change indicative of the dangerous condition is a predetermined rate of change.
5. The method of claim 1, where the reaction system includes a retraction mechanism to retract the blade.
6. The method of claim 1, where the reaction system includes a brake to decelerate the blade.
7. The method of claim 6, where the brake includes a pawl and a system to move the pawl into contact with the blade.
8. The method of claim 7, where the system to move the pawl into contact with the blade causes the pawl to contact the blade within 10 milliseconds after the detection system detects the dangerous condition.
9. The method of claim 1, where the saw is a table saw.
10. The method of claim 1, where the saw is a miter saw.
11. The method of claim 1, where the saw is a hand-held circular saw.
12. A method of operating a saw comprising:
providing a blade configured to move to cut a work piece, where the blade includes a cutting edge;
providing a motor adapted to move the blade;
providing a detection system adapted to detect a dangerous condition between a person and the blade while the blade is moving and to distinguish that dangerous condition from contact between green wood and the blade by imparting a signal to the blade and monitoring that signal for a predetermined change indicative of the dangerous condition;
providing a reaction system adapted to take some action to mitigate possible injury if the detection system detects the dangerous condition; and
moving the blade to cut a work piece while the detection and reaction systems are active.
13. The method of claim 12, where the dangerous condition is contact between a person and the blade.
14. The method of claim 12, where the dangerous condition is proximity between a person and the blade.
15. The method of claim 12, where the predetermined change indicative of the dangerous condition is a predetermined rate of change.
16. The method of claim 12, where the reaction system includes a retraction mechanism to retract the blade.
17. The method of claim 12, where the reaction system includes a brake to decelerate the blade.
18. The method of claim 12, where the saw is a table saw.
19. The method of claim 12, where the saw is a miter saw.
20. The method of claim 12, where the saw is a hand-held circular saw.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/785,361, issuing as U.S. Pat. No. 6,997,090 on Feb. 14, 2006, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/215,929, filed Aug. 9, 2002, which claimed the benefit of and priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/312,141, filed Aug. 13, 2001. All of the above applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0002]
    Beginning with the industrial revolution and continuing to the present, mechanized equipment has allowed workers to produce goods with greater speed and less effort than possible with manually-powered tools. Unfortunately, the power and high operating speeds of mechanized equipment creates a risk for those operating such machinery. Each year thousands of people are maimed or killed by accidents involving power equipment.
  • [0003]
    As might be expected, many systems have been developed to minimize the risk of injury when using power equipment. Probably the most common safety feature is a guard that physically blocks an operator from making contact with dangerous components of machinery, such as belts, shafts or blades. In many cases, guards are effective to reduce the risk of injury, however, there are many instances where the nature of the operations to be performed precludes using a guard that completely blocks access to hazardous machine parts.
  • [0004]
    Various systems have been proposed to prevent accidental injury where guards cannot effectively be employed. For instance, U.S. Pat. Nos. 941,726, 2,978,084, 3,011,610, 3,047,116, 4,195,722 and 4,321,841, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, all disclose safety systems for use with power presses. These systems utilize cables attached to the wrists of the operator that either pull back a user's hands from the work zone upon operation or prevent operation until the user's hands are outside the danger zone. U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,953,770, 4,075,961, 4,470,046, 4,532,501 and 5,212,621, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference, disclose radio-frequency safety systems which utilize radio-frequency signals to detect the presence of a user's hand in a dangerous area of the machine and thereupon prevent or interrupt operation of the machine.
  • [0005]
    U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,959,909, 5,025,175, 5,122,091, 5,198,702, 5,201,684, 5,272,946, and 5,510,685 disclose safety systems for use with meat-skinning equipment, and are incorporated herein by reference. These systems interrupt or reverse power to the motor, or disengage a clutch, upon contact with a user's hand by any dangerous portion of the machine. Typically, contact between the user and the machine is detected by monitoring for electrical contact between a fine wire mesh in a glove worn by the user and some metal component in the dangerous area of the machine. Although such systems are suitable for use with meat skinning machines, they are relatively slow to stop the motion of the cutting element because they rely on the operation of solenoids or must overcome the inertia of the motor. However, because these systems operate at relatively low speeds, the blade does not need to be stopped rapidly to prevent serious injury to the user.
  • [0006]
    U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,785,230 and 4,026,177, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference, disclose a safety system for use on circular saws to stop the blade when a user's hand approaches the blade. The system uses the blade as an antenna in an electromagnetic proximity detector to detect the approach of a user's hand prior to actual contact with the blade. Upon detection of a user's hand, the system engages a brake using a standard solenoid. Unfortunately, such a system is prone to false triggers and is relatively slow acting because of the solenoid. U.S. Pat. No. 4,117,752, which is herein incorporated by reference, discloses a similar braking system for use with a band saw, where the brake is triggered by actual contact between the user's hand and the blade. However, the system described for detecting blade contact does not appear to be functional to accurately and reliably detect contact. Furthermore, the system relies on standard electromagnetic brakes operating off of line voltage to stop the blade and pulleys of the band saw. It is believed that such brakes would take 50 ms-1 s to stop the blade. Therefore, the system is too slow to stop the blade quickly enough to avoid serious injury.
  • [0007]
    None of these existing systems have operated with sufficient speed and/or reliability to prevent serious injury with many types of commonly used power tools. Although proximity-type sensors can be used with some equipment to increase the time available to stop the moving pieces, in many cases the user's hands must be brought into relatively close proximity to the cutting element in the normal course of operation. For example, many types of woodworking equipment require that the user's hands pass relatively close to the cutting tools. As a result, existing proximity-type sensors, which are relatively imprecise, have not proven effective with this type of equipment. Even where proximity sensors are practical, existing brake systems have not operated quickly enough to prevent serious injury in many cases.
  • [0008]
    In equipment where proximity-type detection have not proven effective, the cutting tool must stop very quickly in the event of user contact to avoid serious injury. By way of example, a user may feed a piece of wood through a table saw at a rate of approximately one foot per second. Assuming an average reaction time of approximately one-tenth of a second, the hand may have moved well over an inch before the user even detects the contact. This distance is more than sufficient to result in the loss of several digits, severing of vital vessels and tendons, or even complete severing of a hand. If a brake is triggered immediately upon contact with the saw's blade, the blade must be stopped within approximately one-hundredth of a second to limit the depth of injury to one-eighth of an inch. Standard solenoids or other electromagnetic devices are generally not designed to act in this time scale, particularly where significant force must be generated. For instance, in the case of solenoids or electromagnetic brakes that operate on 60 hz electrical power, it is possible that the power line will be at a phase that has low voltage at the time the brake is triggered and several milliseconds may elapse before the voltage reaches a sufficient level even to begin physical displacement of the brake, much less achieve a complete stoppage of the blade or cutting tool.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0009]
    FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram of a machine with a fast-acting safety system according to the present invention.
  • [0010]
    FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an exemplary safety system in the context of a machine having a circular blade.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0011]
    A machine according to the present invention is shown schematically in FIG. 1 and indicated generally at 10. Machine 10 may be any of a variety of different machines adapted for cutting workpieces, such as wood, including a table saw, miter saw (chop saw), radial arm saw, circular saw, band saw, jointer, planer, etc. Machine 10 includes an operative structure 12 having a cutting tool 14 and a motor assembly 16 adapted to drive the cutting tool. Machine 10 also includes a safety system 18 configured to minimize the potential of a serious injury to a person using machine 10. Safety system 18 is adapted to detect the occurrence of one or more dangerous conditions during use of machine 10. If such a dangerous condition is detected, safety system 18 is adapted to engage operative structure 12 to limit any injury to the user caused by the dangerous condition.
  • [0012]
    Machine 10 also includes a suitable power source 20 to provide power to operative structure 12 and safety system 18. Power source 20 may be an external power source such as line current, or an internal power source such as a battery. Alternatively, power source 20 may include a combination of both external and internal power sources. Furthermore, power source 20 may include two or more separate power sources, each adapted to power different portions of machine 10.
  • [0013]
    It will be appreciated that operative structure 12 may take any one of many different forms, depending on the type of machine 10. For example, operative structure 12 may include a stationary housing configured to support motor assembly 16 in driving engagement with cutting tool 14. Alternatively, operative structure 12 may include a movable structure configured to carry cutting tool 14 between multiple operating positions. As a further alternative, operative structure 12 may include one or more transport mechanisms adapted to convey a workpiece toward and/or away from cutting tool 14.
  • [0014]
    Motor assembly 16 includes one or more motors adapted to drive cutting tool 14. The motors may be either directly or indirectly coupled to the cutting tool, and may also be adapted to drive workpiece transport mechanisms. Cutting tool 14 typically includes one or more blades or other suitable cutting implements that are adapted to cut or remove portions from the workpieces. The particular form of cutting tool 14 will vary depending upon the various embodiments of machine 10. For example, in table saws, miter saws, circular saws and radial arm saws, cutting tool 14 will typically include one or more circular rotating blades having a plurality of teeth disposed along the perimetrical edge of the blade. For a jointer or planer, the cutting tool typically includes a plurality of radially spaced-apart blades. For a band saw, the cutting tool includes an elongate, circuitous tooth-edged band.
  • [0015]
    Safety system 18 includes a detection subsystem 22, a reaction subsystem 24 and a control subsystem 26. Control subsystem 26 may be adapted to receive inputs from a variety of sources including detection subsystem 22, reaction subsystem 24, operative structure 12 and motor assembly 16. The control subsystem may also include one or more sensors adapted to monitor selected parameters of machine 10. In addition, control subsystem 26 typically includes one or more instruments operable by a user to control the machine. The control subsystem is configured to control machine 10 in response to the inputs it receives.
  • [0016]
    Detection subsystem 22 is configured to detect one or more dangerous, or triggering, conditions during use of machine 10. For example, the detection subsystem may be configured to detect that a portion of the user's body is dangerously close to, or in contact with, a portion of cutting tool 14. As another example, the detection subsystem may be configured to detect the rapid movement of a workpiece due to kickback by the cutting tool, such as is described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/182,866, filed Feb. 16, 2000, and U.S. Pat. No. 4,267,914, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference. In some embodiments, detection subsystem 22 may inform control subsystem 26 of the dangerous condition, which then activates reaction subsystem 24. In other embodiments, the detection subsystem may be adapted to activate the reaction subsystem directly.
  • [0017]
    Once activated in response to a dangerous condition, reaction subsystem 24 is configured to engage operative structure 12 quickly to prevent serious injury to the user. It will be appreciated that the particular action to be taken by reaction subsystem 24 will vary depending on the type of machine 10 and/or the dangerous condition that is detected. For example, reaction subsystem 24 may be configured to do one or more of the following: stop the movement of cutting tool 14, disconnect motor assembly 16 from power source 20, place a barrier between the cutting tool and the user, or retract the cutting tool from its operating position, etc. The reaction subsystem may be configured to take a combination of steps to protect the user from serious injury. Placement of a barrier between the cutting tool and teeth is described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,206, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Cutting Tool Safety System,” the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. Retraction of the cutting tool from its operating position and/or the stopping of translational motion of the cutting tool are described in more detail in the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications, all the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference: Ser. No. 60/225,089, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Retraction System For Use In Power Equipment,” Ser. No. 60/270,941, filed Feb. 22, 2001, entitled “Power Saw with Improved Safety System,” Ser. No. 60/270,942, filed Feb. 22, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw with Improved Safety System,” Ser. No. 60/273,177, filed Mar. 2, 2001, entitled “Table Saw With Improved Safety System,” Ser. No. 60/273,178, filed Mar. 2, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw with Improved Safety System,” Ser. No. 60/273,902, filed Mar. 6, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw with Improved Safety System,” Ser. No. 60/275,594, filed Mar. 13, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw with Improved Safety System,” Ser. No. 60/275,595, filed Mar. 13, 2001, entitled “Safety Systems for Power Equipment,” Ser. No. 60/279,313, filed Mar. 27, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw with Improved Safety System,” and Ser. No. 60/292,081, filed May 17, 2001, entitled “Translation Stop for Use in Power Equipment.”
  • [0018]
    The configuration of reaction subsystem 24 typically will vary depending on which action(s) are taken. In the exemplary embodiment depicted in FIG. 1, reaction subsystem 24 is configured to stop the movement of cutting tool 14 and includes a brake mechanism 28, a biasing mechanism 30, a restraining mechanism 32, and a release mechanism 34. Brake mechanism 28 is adapted to engage operative structure 12 under the urging of biasing mechanism 30. During normal operation of machine 10, restraining mechanism 32 holds the brake mechanism out of engagement with the operative structure. However, upon receipt of an activation signal by reaction subsystem 24, the brake mechanism is released from the restraining mechanism by release mechanism 34, whereupon, the brake mechanism quickly engages at least a portion of the operative structure to bring the cutting tool to a stop.
  • [0019]
    It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the exemplary embodiment depicted in FIG. 1 and described above may be implemented in a variety of ways depending on the type and configuration of operative structure 12. Turning attention to FIG. 2, one example of the many possible implementations of safety system 18 is shown. System 18 is configured to engage an operative structure having a cutting tool in the form of a circular blade 40 mounted on a rotating shaft or arbor 42. Blade 40 includes a plurality of cutting teeth (not shown) disposed around the outer edge of the blade. As described in more detail below, braking mechanism 28 is adapted to engage the teeth of blade 40 and stop the rotation of the blade. U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,210, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Translation Stop For Use In Power Equipment,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/233,459, filed Sep. 18, 2000, entitled “Translation Stop For Use In Power Equipment,” the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference, describe other systems for stopping the movement of the cutting tool. Although the embodiment depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2 schematically illustrate machine 10 as a generic woodworking machine, it will be appreciated that safety system 18 may be incorporated into virtually any specific type of woodworking machine. For example, the following U.S. Provisional Patent Applications, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference, describe safety system 18 in the context of various specific types of machines such as table saws, miter saws, radial arm saws, band saws, pneumatic up-cut saws, routers, etc.: U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,058, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Table Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,057, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/233,459, filed Sep. 18, 2000, entitled “Translation Stop For Use In Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/270,941, filed Feb. 22, 2001, entitled “Power Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/270,942, filed Feb. 22, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/273,177, filed Mar. 2, 2001, entitled “Fable Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/273,178, filed Mar. 2, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/273,902, filed Mar. 6, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/275,594, filed Mar. 13, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/275,595, filed Mar. 13, 2001, entitled “Safety Systems For Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/279,313, filed Mar. 27, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/292,081, filed May 17, 2001, entitled “Translation Stop For Use In Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/292,100, filed May 17, 2001, entitled “Band Saw with Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/298,207, filed Jun. 13, 2001, entitled “Apparatus And Method For Detecting Dangerous Conditions In Power Equipment,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/306,202, filed Jul. 18, 2001, entitled “Router With Improved Safety System.”
  • [0020]
    In the exemplary implementation, detection subsystem 22 is adapted to detect the dangerous condition of the user coming into contact with blade 40. The detection subsystem includes a sensor assembly, such as contact detection plates 44 and 46, configured to detect any contact between the user's body and the blade. The detection subsystem is adapted to transmit a signal to control subsystem 26 when contact between the user and the blade is detected. Various exemplary embodiments and implementations of detection subsystem 22 are described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,200, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Contact Detection System For Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,211, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Apparatus And Method For Detecting Dangerous Conditions In Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/270,011, filed Feb. 20, 2001, entitled “Contact Detection System for Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/292,100, filed May 17, 2001, entitled “Band Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/298,207, filed Jun. 13, 2001, entitled “Apparatus And Method For Detecting Dangerous Conditions In Power Equipment,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/302,937, filed Jul. 2, 2001, entitled “Discrete Proximity Detection System,” the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • [0021]
    Control subsystem 26 includes one or more instruments 48 that are operable by a user to control the motion of blade 40. Instruments 48 may include start/stop switches, speed controls, direction controls, etc. Control subsystem 26 also includes a logic controller 50 connected to receive the user's inputs via instruments 48. Logic controller 50 is also connected to receive a contact detection signal from detection subsystem 22. Further, the logic controller may be configured to receive inputs from other sources (not shown) such as blade motion sensors, workpiece sensors, etc. In any event, the logic controller is configured to control operative structure 12 in response to the user's inputs through instruments 48. However, upon receipt of a contact detection signal from detection subsystem 22, the logic controller overrides the control inputs from the user and activates reaction subsystem 24 to stop the motion of the blade. Various exemplary embodiments and implementations of control subsystem 26 are described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,059, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Logic Control For Fast Acting Safety System,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,094, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Motion Detecting System For Use In Safety System For Power Equipment,” the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • [0022]
    In the exemplary implementation, brake mechanism 28 includes a pawl 60 mounted adjacent the edge of blade 40 and selectively moveable to engage and grip the teeth of the blade. Pawl 60 may be constructed of any suitable material adapted to engage and stop the blade. As one example, the pawl may be constructed of a relatively high strength thermoplastic material such as polycarbonate, ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMW) or Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS), etc., or a metal such as aluminum, etc. It will be appreciated that the construction of pawl 60 will vary depending on the configuration of blade 40. In any event, the pawl is urged into the blade by a biasing mechanism in the form of a spring 66. In the illustrative embodiment shown in FIG. 2, pawl 60 is pivoted into the teeth of blade 40. It should be understood that sliding or rotary movement of pawl 60 may also be used. The spring is adapted to urge pawl 60 into the teeth of the blade with sufficient force to grip the blade and quickly bring it to a stop.
  • [0023]
    The pawl is held away from the edge of the blade by a restraining mechanism in the form of a fusible member 70. The fusible member is constructed of a suitable material adapted to restrain the pawl against the bias of spring 66, and also adapted to melt under a determined electrical current density. Examples of suitable materials for fusible member 70 include NiChrome wire, stainless steel wire, etc. The fusible member is connected between the pawl and a contact mount 72. Preferably member 70 holds the pawl relatively close to the edge of the blade to reduce the distance the pawl must travel to engage the blade. Positioning the pawl relatively close to the edge of the blade reduces the time required for the pawl to engage and stop the blade. Typically, the pawl is held approximately 1/32-inch to -inch from the edge of the blade by fusible member 70, however other pawl-to-blade spacings may also be used within the scope of the invention.
  • [0024]
    Pawl 60 is released from its unactuated, or cocked, position to engage blade 40 by a release mechanism in the form of a firing subsystem 76. The firing subsystem is coupled to contact mount 72, and is configured to melt fusible member 70 by passing a surge of electrical current through the fusible member. Firing subsystem 76 is coupled to logic controller 50 and activated by a signal from the logic controller. When the logic controller receives a contact detection signal from detection subsystem 22, the logic controller sends an activation signal to firing subsystem 76, which melts fusible member 70, thereby releasing the pawl to stop the blade. Various exemplary embodiments and implementations of reaction subsystem 24 are described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,056, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Firing Subsystem For Use In Fast Acting Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,170, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Spring-Biased Brake Mechanism for Power Equipment,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,169, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Brake Mechanism For Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/279,313, filed Mar. 27, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/292,081, filed May 17, 2001, entitled “Translation Stop For Use In Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/292,100, filed May 17, 2001, entitled “Band Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/302,916, filed Jul. 3, 2001, entitled “Actuators For Use With Fast-Acting Safety Systems,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/307,756, filed Jul. 25, 2001, entitled “Actuators For Use With Fast-Acting Safety Systems,” the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • [0025]
    It will be appreciated that activation of the brake mechanism will require the replacement of one or more portions of safety system 18. For example, pawl 60 and fusible member 70 typically must be replaced before the safety system is ready to be used again. Thus, it may be desirable to construct one or more portions of safety system 18 in a cartridge that can be easily replaced. For example, in the exemplary implementation depicted in FIG. 2, safety system 18 includes a replaceable cartridge 80 having a housing 82. Pawl 60, spring 66, fusible member 70 and contact mount 72 are all mounted within housing 82. Alternatively, other portions of safety system 18 may be mounted within the housing. In any event, after the reaction system has been activated, the safety system can be reset by replacing cartridge 80. The portions of safety system 18 not mounted within the cartridge may be replaced separately or reused as appropriate. Various exemplary embodiments and implementations of a safety system using a replaceable cartridge are described in more detail in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,201, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Replaceable Brake Mechanism For Power Equipment,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/225,212, filed Aug. 14, 2000, entitled “Brake Positioning System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/279,313, filed Mar. 27, 2001, entitled “Miter Saw With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/306,202, filed Jul. 18, 2001, entitled “Router With Improved Safety System,” U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/302,916, filed Jul. 3, 2001, entitled “Actuators For Use With Fast-Acting Safety Systems,” and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/307,756, filed Jul. 25, 2001, entitled “Actuators For Use With Fast-Acting Safety Systems,” the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • [0026]
    Additional variations and modifications of safety system 18 are described in U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 60/182,866, filed Feb. 16, 2000, and 60/157,340, filed Oct. 1, 1999, both entitled “Fast-Acting Safety Stop,” the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.
  • [0027]
    It is believed that the disclosure set forth above encompasses multiple distinct inventions with independent utility. While each of these inventions has been disclosed in its preferred form, the specific embodiments thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein are not to be considered in a limiting sense as numerous variations are possible. The subject matter of the inventions includes all novel and non-obvious combinations and sub-combinations of the various elements, features, functions and/or properties disclosed herein. No single feature, function, element or property of the disclosed embodiments is essential to all of the disclosed inventions. Similarly, where the claims recite “a” or “a first” element or the equivalent thereof, such claims should be understood to include incorporation of one or more such elements, neither requiring nor excluding two or more such elements.
  • [0028]
    It is believed that the following claims particularly point out certain combinations and sub-combinations that are directed to one of the disclosed inventions and are novel and non-obvious. Inventions embodied in other combinations and sub-combinations of features, functions, elements and/or properties may be claimed through amendment of the present claims or presentation of new claims in this or a related application. Such amended or new claims, whether they are directed to a different invention or directed to the same invention, whether different, broader, narrower or equal in scope to the original claims, are also regarded as included within the subject matter of the inventions of the present disclosure.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US146886 *Nov 13, 1873Jan 27, 1874 Improvement in sawing-machines
US162814 *Jan 18, 1875May 4, 1875 Improvement in saw-guards
US261090 *Mar 22, 1882Jul 11, 1882 Circular-saw guard
US264412 *Jun 21, 1882Sep 12, 1882 Half to john h
US299480 *May 27, 1884 Saw-guard
US302041 *Aug 21, 1883Jul 15, 1884 Saw-guard
US307112 *Apr 14, 1884Oct 28, 1884 Saw-guard
US509253 *Nov 21, 1893 Safety-guard for rip-saws
US545504 *Apr 29, 1895Sep 3, 1895 Saw-guard
US869513 *Jun 17, 1907Oct 29, 1907Frederick C PfeilSaw-guard.
US941726 *Oct 15, 1907Nov 30, 1909Charles F PfalzgrafSafety trip device for power-operated machines.
US997720 *May 25, 1910Jul 11, 1911Othon TroupenatSafety device for saws.
US1037843 *Oct 30, 1911Sep 10, 1912David S AckleySaw-guard
US1050649 *May 28, 1910Jan 14, 1913Crescent Machine CompanySaw-guard.
US1054558 *Jul 29, 1912Feb 25, 1913Nye CompanySelf-adjusting support for circular-saw and shaper guards.
US1074198 *Mar 21, 1913Sep 30, 1913Francis Vosburgh PhillipsSaw-guard.
US1082870 *Nov 20, 1912Dec 30, 1913John W HumasonSaw-guard.
US1101515 *Jun 27, 1913Jun 30, 1914 Safety saw-guard.
US1126970 *Feb 10, 1913Feb 2, 1915Eastman Kodak CoSaw-guard.
US1132129 *Jun 15, 1914Mar 16, 1915Fred M StevensSafety-grip for circular saws.
US1148169 *Jan 6, 1913Jul 27, 1915Andrew F HoweSaw-guard.
US1154209 *Aug 11, 1914Sep 21, 1915John L RushtonSaw-guard.
US1205246 *Oct 27, 1913Nov 21, 1916Int Harvester CanadaShipping-package.
US1228047 *Dec 18, 1916May 29, 1917Darwin O ReinholdSelf-adjusting spreader for saws.
US1240430 *Jul 22, 1916Sep 18, 1917Peter EricksonCutter-guard.
US1244187 *Feb 17, 1917Oct 23, 1917Warren M FrisbieCircular-saw guard.
US1255886 *Nov 23, 1915Feb 12, 1918 Saw-guard.
US1258961 *Mar 9, 1916Mar 12, 1918James G TattersallSaw-guard and splitter.
US1311508 *Feb 18, 1916Jul 29, 1919 Planooraph co
US1324136 *Mar 28, 1917Dec 9, 1919 Tool-operating machine
US1381612 *Oct 24, 1919Jun 14, 1921Anderson George ASaw-guard
US1397606 *Jul 29, 1918Nov 22, 1921Smith Christian NSafety-shield for circular saws
US1427005 *Dec 26, 1919Aug 22, 1922Mcmichael James DSaw guard
US1430983 *Oct 5, 1921Oct 3, 1922Wilhelm GranbergGuard for sawing machines
US1450906 *Jul 28, 1919Apr 10, 1923Anderson Charles WPower control for saw tables and the like
US1464924 *Jun 20, 1922Aug 14, 1923Drummond William DSaw guard
US1465224 *Jul 22, 1921Aug 14, 1923Edward Lantz JosephAutomatic shield for circular saws
US1496212 *Feb 6, 1923Jun 3, 1924James F SullivanCircular-saw guard
US1511797 *Feb 15, 1924Oct 14, 1924Berghold Frank ESaw guard
US1526128 *Oct 20, 1923Feb 10, 1925Andrew FlohrSaw guard
US1527587 *Dec 7, 1923Feb 24, 1925Frank HutchinsonSaw guard
US1551900 *Dec 5, 1924Sep 1, 1925Robert L MorrowSafety device
US1553996 *Apr 19, 1924Sep 15, 1925Joseph FedererSafety saw guard
US1582483 *Jan 13, 1925Apr 27, 1926Runyan Geniah BMeat cutter
US1590988 *Sep 24, 1924Jun 29, 1926Wheland CompanyCombined setwork and recede for sawmill carriages
US1600604 *Mar 6, 1926Sep 21, 1926Andrew SorlienBoard holder for sawing machines
US1616478 *Jan 19, 1926Feb 8, 1927Clarence E CatesGuard for circular saws
US1640517 *Apr 17, 1924Aug 30, 1927Paine Lumber Company LtdSaw guard
US1662372 *Apr 26, 1926Mar 13, 1928Ward Abraham DSaw guard
US1701948 *Apr 2, 1925Feb 12, 1929Crowe Mfg CorpPortable saw
US1711490 *Sep 12, 1927May 7, 1929Drummond William DSaw guard
US1712828 *Feb 14, 1927May 14, 1929Klehm Henry JSaw guard
US1774521 *Oct 31, 1928Sep 2, 1930Neighbour Wilbur SSaw guard
US1807120 *Mar 11, 1929May 26, 1931Hall & Brown Wood Working MachSaw
US1811066 *Feb 23, 1929Jun 23, 1931Tannewitz Carl ESawing machine
US1879280 *Aug 30, 1930Sep 27, 1932James George VGuard for circular saws
US1896924 *Feb 1, 1932Feb 7, 1933 Table fob saws ob the like
US1902270 *Jun 2, 1932Mar 21, 1933Delta Mfg CoMiter gauge
US1904005 *Feb 3, 1932Apr 18, 1933Edward MassetSaw guard
US1910651 *Dec 5, 1932May 23, 1933Delta Mfg CoTrunnion table mounting
US1938548 *Feb 4, 1933Dec 5, 1933Delts Mfg CompanyMachine table extension
US1938549 *Jul 22, 1933Dec 5, 1933Delta Mfg CoMachine table
US1963688 *Feb 15, 1933Jun 19, 1934Delta Mfg CoHollow fence bar and process of making the same
US1988102 *Apr 2, 1932Jan 15, 1935William H WoodwardCircular saw machine
US1993219 *Jul 12, 1933Mar 5, 1935Herberts Machinery Company LtdCircular saw
US2007887 *Sep 20, 1933Jul 9, 1935Delta Mfg CoSaw guard
US2010851 *Jul 2, 1934Aug 13, 1935Drummond William DAutomatic hood guard
US2020222 *Apr 8, 1935Nov 5, 1935Delta Mfg CoMachine table insert
US2038810 *Sep 6, 1934Apr 28, 1936Delta Mfg CoCircular-saw machine
US2075282 *May 27, 1935Mar 30, 1937Duro Metal Prod CoBench saw
US2095330 *Jul 25, 1936Oct 12, 1937Duro Metal Prod CoBench saw
US2106288 *Sep 27, 1934Jan 25, 1938Tautz Herbert ECircular saw apparatus
US2106321 *Feb 16, 1937Jan 25, 1938Gilles GuertinSaw guard
US2121069 *Jun 14, 1937Jun 21, 1938Atlas Press CompanyCircular saw
US2131492 *Nov 28, 1936Sep 27, 1938Walker Turner Company IncTilting arbor table saw
US2163320 *May 1, 1937Jun 20, 1939William P MorganSawing appliance
US2168282 *Dec 18, 1936Aug 1, 1939Delta Mfg CoCircular saw
US2241556 *Jun 20, 1938May 13, 1941Hydraulic Dev Corp IncPhotoelectrically controlled press
US2261696 *Mar 15, 1939Nov 4, 1941Walker Turner Co IncTilting saw
US2265407 *Jan 25, 1939Dec 9, 1941Delta Mfg CoTilting arbor saw
US2286589 *Oct 28, 1940Jun 16, 1942Tannewitz Carl EBlade grabber for band saws
US2292872 *Jul 10, 1940Aug 11, 1942Eastman Elwyn ADouble hinge tilting arbor saw
US2299262 *Apr 29, 1940Oct 20, 1942Mark UremovichPower-driven bench saw
US2312118 *Jul 31, 1940Feb 23, 1943Neisewander Ray HAdjustable woodworking machine
US2313686 *Mar 17, 1941Mar 9, 1943Mark UremovichSaw guard
US2328244 *Feb 24, 1941Aug 31, 1943Woodward William HCircular saw machine
US2352235 *Sep 10, 1941Jun 27, 1944Delta Mfg CoSaw guard
US2377265 *Jan 9, 1942May 29, 1945Gen Motors CorpSealed-in regulator
US2392486 *Oct 20, 1943Jan 8, 1946Larsen Melvin JMachine tool
US2402232 *Mar 6, 1943Jun 18, 1946Automatic Elect LabAutomatic telephone system
US2425331 *Dec 13, 1945Aug 12, 1947Kramer Linzie FGuard device for circular-saw table sawing machines
US2434174 *Jun 19, 1944Jan 6, 1948Morgan Joseph PSafety brake for band-saw blades
US2452589 *Jan 14, 1944Nov 2, 1948Standard Telephones Cables LtdElectric remote control and indication system
US2466325 *Jul 18, 1945Apr 5, 1949Kearney & Trecker CorpSaw guard for adjustable-saw saw tables
US2496613 *May 30, 1944Feb 7, 1950Woodward William HGuard for rotary disks
US2509813 *Sep 29, 1947May 30, 1950Stratos CorpEmergency disconnect means for auxiliaries
US2517649 *Apr 9, 1949Aug 8, 1950Jean FrechtmannBlade guard
US2518684 *Apr 21, 1949Aug 15, 1950Harris Hyman MDuplex bench saw
US2530290 *Dec 12, 1946Nov 14, 1950Atlas Press CompanyTable saw with tiltable and vertically adjustable arbor
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7628101Dec 8, 2009Power Tool InstitutePyrotechnic drop mechanism for power tools
US7712403Jul 2, 2002May 11, 2010Sd3, LlcActuators for use in fast-acting safety systems
US7739934Jun 22, 2010Power Tool InstituteDetection system for power tool
US7788999Apr 10, 2006Sep 7, 2010Sd3, LlcBrake mechanism for power equipment
US7827890Nov 9, 2010Sd3, LlcTable saws with safety systems and systems to mount and index attachments
US7827893Mar 14, 2007Nov 9, 2010Sd3, LlcElevation mechanism for table saws
US7832314Nov 16, 2010Sd3, LlcBrake positioning system
US7836804Dec 29, 2006Nov 23, 2010Sd3, LlcWoodworking machines with overmolded arbors
US7866239Mar 14, 2007Jan 11, 2011Sd3, LlcElevation mechanism for table saws
US7895927May 19, 2010Mar 1, 2011Sd3, LlcPower equipment with detection and reaction systems
US7921754Apr 12, 2011Sd3, LlcLogic control for fast-acting safety system
US7991503May 18, 2009Aug 2, 2011Sd3, LlcDetection systems for power equipment
US8061245Nov 22, 2011Sd3, LlcSafety methods for use in power equipment
US8074546Nov 23, 2009Dec 13, 2011Power Tool InstitutePyrotechnic drop mechanism for power tools
US8122798Jun 4, 2009Feb 28, 2012Power Tool InstitutePower cutting tool with proximity sensing system
US8151675Mar 31, 2011Apr 10, 2012Sd3, LlcLogic control for fast-acting safety system
US8186253May 29, 2012Power Tool InstituteDetection system for power tool
US8191450Aug 20, 2010Jun 5, 2012Sd3, LlcPower equipment with detection and reaction systems
US8196499Aug 20, 2010Jun 12, 2012Sd3, LlcPower equipment with detection and reaction systems
US8408106Apr 2, 2013Sd3, LlcMethod of operating power equipment with detection and reaction systems
US8505424Nov 8, 2010Aug 13, 2013Sd3, LlcTable saws with safety systems and systems to mount and index attachments
US8522655Apr 9, 2012Sep 3, 2013Sd3, LlcLogic control for fast-acting safety system
US8534174Sep 27, 2010Sep 17, 2013Power Tool InstitutePyrotechnic actuator and power cutting tool with safety reaction system having such pyrotechnic actuator
US8919231Nov 19, 2009Dec 30, 2014Power Tool InstituteSafety mechanisms for power tools
US9038515Aug 29, 2013May 26, 2015Sd3, LlcLogic control for fast-acting safety system
US20020020261 *Aug 13, 2001Feb 21, 2002Gass Stephen F.Replaceable brake mechanism for power equipment
US20050039822 *Aug 20, 2004Feb 24, 2005Gass Stephen F.Woodworking machines with overmolded arbors
US20080245200 *Jul 18, 2006Oct 9, 2008Bladestop Pty LimitedElectric Saw with Operator Protection System
US20100023137 *May 18, 2009Jan 28, 2010Gass Stephen FDetection systems for power equipment
US20100059144 *Oct 3, 2008Mar 11, 2010Power Tool InstituteDetection system for power tool
US20100206145 *Apr 28, 2010Aug 19, 2010Power Tool InstituteDetection system for power tool
US20100269654 *Oct 28, 2010Needel Gregory EDust Collection System for a Power Tool
Classifications
U.S. Classification83/13, 83/62.1, 83/477.2
International ClassificationF16P3/12, B23D59/00, B27B5/38, B27B13/14, B27B13/00, B26D1/00, B27B27/04
Cooperative ClassificationY10T83/7697, Y10T83/778, Y10T83/089, Y10T83/141, Y10T83/773, Y10T83/04, Y10T83/7726, Y10T83/8773, Y10T83/7788, Y10T83/081, Y10T83/7705, Y10S83/01, F16P3/12, B27B13/14, B23D59/001, B27B5/38, B27G19/02
European ClassificationB27B13/14, B23D59/00B, B27B5/38, F16P3/12, B27G19/02
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Mar 17, 2006ASAssignment
Owner name: SD3, LLC, OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GASS, STEPHEN F.;FANNING, DAVID A.;FULMER, J. DAVID;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017351/0001;SIGNING DATES FROM 20020809 TO 20021011