Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20060165036 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/236,895
Publication dateJul 27, 2006
Filing dateSep 28, 2005
Priority dateJan 25, 2005
Also published asUS7599340, WO2006081091A2, WO2006081091A3
Publication number11236895, 236895, US 2006/0165036 A1, US 2006/165036 A1, US 20060165036 A1, US 20060165036A1, US 2006165036 A1, US 2006165036A1, US-A1-20060165036, US-A1-2006165036, US2006/0165036A1, US2006/165036A1, US20060165036 A1, US20060165036A1, US2006165036 A1, US2006165036A1
InventorsArty Chandra, Sudheer Grandhi, Eldad Zeira, Joseph Levy, Sintayehu Dehnie, Mohammed Sammour
Original AssigneeInterdigital Technology Corporation
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Method and system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes
US 20060165036 A1
Abstract
A method and system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes is disclosed. An initiator control message is defined for an initiator, (typically a wireless station (STA)), in order to begin an aggregate frame exchange with at least one responder. The initiator control message includes information on the queue sizes at the initiator. A responder, (typically an access point (AP)), sets up the required protection for the transmission of data by the initiator based on information on the queue sizes indicated in a field of the initiator control message using a responder control message. Other STAs that receive the responder control message set parameters for a wireless medium access accordingly. In another embodiment, multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP) and power save aggregation descriptor (PSAD) control frames are configured for transmission by a non-AP STA to provide enhanced scheduling and mitigate hidden node problems.
Images(6)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(68)
1. In a wireless communication system including a plurality of mobile stations (STAs), wherein each STA may communicate the other STAs either directly or through an access point (AP), a method for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes in the wireless communication system, the method comprising:
an initiator that has data to transmit in a queue sending an initiator control message in order to initiate an aggregate frame exchange with one or more responders, the initiator control message including a queue size field containing information of the queue size;
a responder generating and transmitting a responder control message in response to the initiator control message; and
all STAs receiving the responder control message setting a parameter for accessing a wireless medium in accordance with the responder control message.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the responder control message includes a bandwidth allocation field containing information on bandwidth allocation corresponding to the queue size.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the bandwidth allocation field is set to a specific value indicating that the responder control message does not carry bandwidth allocation information.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the responder control message is a positive acknowledgement (ACK) message without bandwidth allocation information and the bandwidth allocation information is transmitted by a separate message.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the responder is an AP.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the STAs update a network allocation vector (NAV) in accordance with the responder control message.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein spoofing is utilized to place STAs in a receiving mode for a spoofed duration in accordance with the responder control message.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the spoofing is a pair-wise spoofing.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the initiator control message is a special packet dedicated to provide queue size information and the responder control message is a special packet dedicated to provide bandwidth allocation information.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein the queue size field contains information of two or more queues.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the initiator control message further provides information for control of at least one of a modulation and coding scheme (MCS), a size, duration, training, and any reverse flow of aggregates in an exchange of aggregates.
12. A wireless communication system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the system comprising:
an initiator configured to send an initiator control message in order to initiate an aggregate frame exchange when the initiator has a data to transmit in a queue, the initiator control message including information of the queue size;
a responder configured to generate and transmit a responder control message in response to the initiator control message, whereby all other nodes in the wireless communication system that received the responder control message set a parameter for accessing a wireless medium in accordance with the responder control message.
13. The system of claim 12 wherein the responder control message includes a bandwidth allocation field containing information on bandwidth allocation corresponding to the queue size.
14. The system of claim 13 wherein the bandwidth allocation field is set to a specific value indicating that the responder control message does not carry bandwidth allocation information.
15. The system of claim 12 wherein the responder control message is a positive acknowledgement (ACK) message without bandwidth allocation information and the bandwidth allocation information is transmitted by a separate message.
16. The system of claim 12 wherein the responder is an access point (AP).
17. The system of claim 12 wherein the nodes update a network allocation vector (NAV) in accordance with the responder control message.
18. The system of claim 12 wherein spoofing is utilized to place the nodes in a receiving mode for a spoofed duration in accordance with the responder control message.
19. The system of claim 18 wherein the spoofing is a pair-wise spoofing.
20. The system of claim 12 wherein the initiator control message is a special packet dedicated to provide queue size information and the responder control message is a special packet dedicated to provide bandwidth allocation information.
21. The system of claim 12 wherein the queue size field contains information of two or more queues.
22. The system of claim 12 wherein the initiator control message further provides information for control of at least one of a modulation and coding scheme (MCS), a size, duration, training, and any reverse flow of aggregates in an exchange of aggregates.
23. In a wireless communication system including at least one access point (AP) and a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), a method for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the method comprising:
at least one of the non-AP STAs transmitting a multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP) control frame to the AP, the MMP control frame including (i) a transmit address (TA) field having an AP response duration field which indicates a duration within which the at least one AP is required to respond to the MMP control frame, and (ii) a receive address (RA) field indicating that a broadcast function has been set.
24. The method of claim 23 further comprising:
the AP broadcasting an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the MMP control frame within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of the MMP control frame; and
if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasting the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of an MMP schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
25. The method of claim 24 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the MMP schedule.
26. The method of claim 24 further comprising:
if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of the MMP control frame, the non-AP STA waiting a period of time equal to a short inter-frame spacing (SIFS) before retransmitting the MMP control frame to the AP.
27. In a wireless communication system including at least one access point (AP) and a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), a method for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the method comprising:
at least one of the non-AP STAs transmitting a power save aggregate descriptor (PSAD) control frame to the AP, the PSAD control frame including (i) a transmit address (TA) field having an AP response duration field which indicates a duration within which the at least one AP is required to response to the PSAD control frame, and (ii) a receive address (RA) field indicating that a broadcast function has been set.
28. The method of claim 27 further comprising:
the AP broadcasting an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the PSAD control frame within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of the PSAD control frame; and
if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasting the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of a PSAD schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
29. The method of claim 28 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the PSAD schedule.
30. The method of claim 28 further comprising:
if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of the PSAD control frame, the non-AP STA waiting a period of time equal to a short inter-frame spacing (SIFS) before retransmitting the PSAD control frame to the AP.
31. In a wireless communication system including at least one access point (AP) and a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), a method for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the method comprising:
at least one of the non-AP STAs transmitting a multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP)/power save aggregate descriptor (PSAD) control frame sequence to the AP, each of the MMP and PSAD control frames in the sequence including (i) a transmit address (TA) field having an AP response duration field which indicates a duration within which the at least one AP is required to respond to the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence, and (ii) a receive address (RA) field indicating that a broadcast function has been set.
32. The method of claim 31 further comprising:
the AP broadcasting an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of at least one of the MMP and PSAD control frames; and
if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasting the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of an MMP/PSAD sequence schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
33. The method of claim 32 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the MMP/PSAD schedule.
34. The method of claim 32 further comprising:
if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of at least one of the MMP and PSAD control frames, the non-AP STA waiting a period of time equal to a short inter-frame spacing (SIFS) before retransmitting the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence to the AP.
35. In a wireless communication system including at least one access point (AP) and a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), a method for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the method comprising:
at least one of the non-AP STAs transmitting a multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP) control frame to the AP;
the AP broadcasting an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the MMP control frame; and
if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasting the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of an MMP schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
36. The method of claim 35 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the MMP schedule.
37. The method of claim 35 further comprising:
if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within a predetermined duration, the non-AP STA retransmitting the MMP control frame sequence to the AP.
38. In a wireless communication system including at least one access point (AP) and a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), a method for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the method comprising:
at least one of the non-AP STAs transmitting a power save aggregate descriptor (PSAD) control frame to the AP;
the AP broadcasting an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the PSAD control frame; and
if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasting the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of a PSAD schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
39. The method of claim 38 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the PSAD schedule.
40. The method of claim 38 further comprising:
if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within a predetermined duration, the non-AP STA retransmitting the PSAD control frame to the AP.
41. In a wireless communication system including at least one access point (AP) and a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), a method for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the method comprising:
at least one of the non-AP STAs transmitting a multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP)/power save aggregate descriptor (PSAD) control frame sequence to the AP;
the AP broadcasting an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence; and
if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasting the ACK message to all of the other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of an MMP/PSAD sequence schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
42. The method of claim 41 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the MMP/PSAD sequence schedule.
43. The method of claim 41 further comprising:
if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within a predetermined duration, the non-AP STA retransmitting the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence to the AP.
44. The method of 41 wherein the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence is used to support a direct link protocol (DLP) such that at least two of the non-AP STAs may transfer data with each other without having the data relayed by the AP.
45. The method of 41 wherein the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence is used to support a direct link setup (DLS) such that at least two of the non-AP STAs may transfer data with each other without having the data relayed by the AP.
46. A wireless communication system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the system comprising:
at least one access point (AP); and
a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), wherein at least one of the non-AP STAs transmits a multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP) control frame to the AP, the MMP control frame including: (i) a transmit address (TA) field having an AP response duration field which indicates a duration within which the at least one AP is required to respond to the MMP control frame, and (ii) a receive address (RA) field indicating that a broadcast function has been set.
47. The system of claim 46 wherein the AP broadcasts an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the MMP control frame within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of the MMP control frame and, if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasts the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of an MMP schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
48. The system of claim 47 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the MMP schedule.
49. The system of claim 47 wherein if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of the MMP control frame, the non-AP STA waits a period of time equal to a short inter-frame spacing (SIFS) before retransmitting the MMP control frame to the AP.
50. A wireless communication system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the system comprising:
at least one access point (AP); and
a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), wherein at least one of the non-AP STAs transmits a power save aggregate descriptor (PSAD) control frame to the AP, the PSAD control frame including: (i) a transmit address (TA) field having an AP response duration field which indicates a duration within which the at least one AP is required to response to the PSAD control frame, and (ii) a receive address (RA) field indicating that a broadcast function has been set.
51. The system of claim 50 wherein the AP broadcasts an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the PSAD control frame within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of the PSAD control frame and, if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasts the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of a PSAD schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
52. The system of claim 51 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the PSAD schedule.
53. The system of claim 51 wherein if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of the PSAD control frame, the non-AP STA waits a period of time equal to a short inter-frame spacing (SIFS) before retransmitting the PSAD control frame to the AP.
54. A wireless communication system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the system comprising:
at least one access point (AP); and
a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), wherein at least one of the non-AP STAs transmits a multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP)/power save aggregate descriptor (PSAD) control frame sequence to the AP, each of the MMP and PSAD control frames in the sequence including: (i) a transmit address (TA) field having an AP response duration field which indicates a duration within which the at least one AP is required to respond to the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence, and (ii) a receive address (RA) field indicating that a broadcast function has been set.
55. The system of claim 54 wherein the AP broadcasts an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of at least one of the MMP and PSAD control frames and, if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasts the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of an MMP/PSAD sequence schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
56. The system of claim 55 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the MMP/PSAD sequence schedule.
57. The system of claim 55 wherein if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within the duration indicated by the AP response duration field in the TA field of at least one of the MMP and PSAD control frames, the non-AP STA waits a period of time equal to a short inter-frame spacing (SIFS) before retransmitting the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence to the AP.
58. A wireless communication system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the system comprising:
at least one access point (AP); and
a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), wherein at least one of the non-AP STAs transmits a multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP) control frame to the AP, the AP broadcasts an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the MMP control frame and, if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasts the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of an MMP schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
59. The system of claim 58 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the MMP schedule.
60. The system of claim 58 wherein if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within a predetermined duration, the non-AP STA retransmits the MMP control frame sequence to the AP.
61. A wireless communication system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the system comprising:
at least one access point (AP); and
a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), wherein at least one of the non-AP STAs transmits a power save aggregate descriptor (PSAD) control frame to the AP, the AP broadcasts an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the PSAD control frame and, if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasts the ACK message to all other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of a PSAD schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
62. The system of claim 61 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the PSAD schedule.
63. The system of claim 61 wherein if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within a predetermined duration, the non-AP STA retransmits the PSAD control frame to the AP.
64. A wireless communication system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes, the system comprising:
at least one access point (AP); and
a plurality of non-AP stations (STAs), wherein at least one of the non-AP STAs transmits a multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP)/power save aggregate descriptor (PSAD) control frame sequence to the AP, the AP broadcasts an acknowledgement (ACK) message in response to the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence and, if the ACK message is received by the non-AP STA, the non-AP STA broadcasts the ACK message to all of the other ones of the non-AP STAs in the vicinity of the AP to inform the other non-AP STAs of a medium reservation for a duration of an MMP/PSAD sequence schedule to avoid collisions due to hidden nodes.
65. The system of claim 64 wherein the ACK message broadcast by the AP is used to set a network allocation vector (NAV) or extended physical layer protection (EPP) for the entire duration of the MMP/PSAD sequence schedule.
66. The system of claim 64 wherein if the ACK message is not received by the non-AP STA from the AP within a predetermined duration, the non-AP STA retransmits the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence to the AP.
67. The system of 64 wherein the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence is used to support a direct link protocol (DLP) such that at least two of the non-AP STAs may transfer data with each other without having the data relayed by the AP.
68. The system of 64 wherein the MMP/PSAD control frame sequence is used to support a direct link setup (DLS) such that at least two of the non-AP STAs may transfer data with each other without having the data relayed by the AP.
Description
    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • [0001]
    This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application No. 60/646,794 filed Jan. 25, 2005, which is incorporated by reference as if fully set forth.
  • FIELD OF INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention relates to wireless communication systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0003]
    A wireless communication system, such as a wireless local area network (WLAN), can achieve high throughput by means of aggregation. Aggregation refers to the process of grouping several medium access control (MAC) protocol data units (MPDUs) for transmission in a single frame by a wireless station (STA). The aggregation enables a reduction of overheads due to headers of the MPDUs and inter-frame spacing (IFS) between data transmissions. Moreover, aggregation of MPDUs with different rates has an advantage of reducing overhead due to preambles. Typically aggregation is an optional feature and is triggered under traffic conditions where it may provide efficiency and high throughput in data transfer.
  • [0004]
    Frame aggregation that allows aggregation of multiple data and control MPDUs in one physical layer convergence procedure (PLCP) protocol data unit (PPDU) is known in prior art. The prior art also includes control of MPDUs and frame exchange rules for the exchange of aggregate frames between a single initiating STA and potentially multiple responding STAs. Protection of frame exchange sequences are provided using one of two mechanisms: a MAC-level mechanism using network allocation vector (NAV) settings, and a physical layer (PHY)-level mechanism based on appropriately setting the legacy PLCP rate/length information, which is known as spoofing.
  • [0005]
    An initial packet from an initiator for an aggregate packet exchange is an initiator aggregate control (IAC) packet and the response to the IAC packet from the responder is a responder aggregate control (RAC) packet. The initiator does not provide information regarding a queue size of its transmitter in its initial IAC packet so that the responder in its response packet can set the required protection for the transmission by either NAV setting or spoofing. The queue size information from the initiator comes only in its second packet transmission.
  • [0006]
    Multiple receiver aggregate multi-poll (MMP) and power save aggregation descriptor (PSAD) control frames were introduced to implement power saving and scheduling of the channel for multiple transmission opportunities (TXOPs). The MMP/PSAD frames are used to define multiple response periods, in combination with multiple receiver aggregation.
  • [0007]
    While the conventional wireless communication systems mitigate the hidden node problem to a large extent, total hidden node elimination is not provided.
  • SUMMARY
  • [0008]
    The present invention is related to a method and system for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes is disclosed. The present invention defines an initiator control message for an initiator, (typically a STA), in order to begin an aggregate frame exchange at least one responder. The initiator control message includes information on the queue sizes at the initiator. A responder, (typically an access point (AP)), sets up the required protection for the transmission of data by the initiator based on information on the queue sizes indicated by a field in the initiator control message using a responder control message. Other STAs that receive the responder control message set parameters for a wireless medium access in accordance with the responder control message. In addition, bandwidth allocation information is included in a field of the responder control message to assist in resource management for data transmission at the initiator.
  • [0009]
    In another embodiment, interference caused by hidden nodes may also be mitigated in MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequences. The present invention provides a method for transmitting the MMP/PSAD control frame from a non-AP STA. Since the MMP sequence is protected using NAV and extended PHY protection (EPP), the MMP sequence is used to schedule multiple TXOPs.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0010]
    A more detailed understanding of the invention may be had from the following description of a preferred embodiment, given by way of example and to be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
  • [0011]
    FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a wireless communication system in which the present invention is implemented;
  • [0012]
    FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a process for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0013]
    FIG. 3 shows an initiator control MPDU in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0014]
    FIG. 4 shows a responder control MPDU in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0015]
    FIG. 5 shows a conventional MMP control frame format;
  • [0016]
    FIG. 6 shows a conventional PSAD control frame format;
  • [0017]
    FIG. 7 shows a modified MMP control frame format in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0018]
    FIG. 8 shows a modified PSAD control frame format in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0019]
    FIG. 9 shows conventional downlink allocations in an uplink (non-AP STA) MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequence;
  • [0020]
    FIG. 10 shows uplink allocations in an uplink (non-AP STA) MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequence in a case of an AP responding with an ACK in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0021]
    FIG. 11 shows conventional uplink allocations in an uplink (non-AP STA) MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequence;
  • [0022]
    FIG. 12 shows uplink allocations in an uplink (non-AP STA) MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequence in a case of an AP responding with an ACK in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0023]
    FIG. 13 shows a conventional MMP/PSAD downlink frame sequence; and
  • [0024]
    FIG. 14 shows an MMP/PSAD downlink frame sequence which includes RTS functionality in a case of an AP responding with a CTS in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0025]
    Hereafter, the terminology “STA” includes but is not limited to a wireless transmit/receive unit (WTRU), a user equipment, a mobile station, a fixed or mobile subscriber unit, a pager, or any other type of device capable of operating in a wireless environment. When referred to hereafter, the terminology “AP” includes but is not limited to a base station, a Node-B, a site controller or any other type of interfacing device in a wireless environment.
  • [0026]
    The features of the present invention may be incorporated into an integrated circuit or be configured in a circuit comprising a multitude of interconnecting components.
  • [0027]
    The present invention provides a method for use in a wireless communication system, such as a WLAN, to support aggregate frame exchanges between an initiator and one or more responders using an initiator control message and a responder control message, which provide protection from all other STAs including hidden nodes. Although the present invention will be explained with reference to aggregate frame exchanges, the present invention is applicable to any type of frame exchange between an initiator and one or more responders, and is not limited to aggregate frame exchanges.
  • [0028]
    FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a wireless communication system 100, such as a WLAN, in which the present invention is implemented. The present invention will be explained with reference to the infrastructure WLAN hereinafter. However, it should be noted that the present invention is applicable to an Ad hoc network, a mesh network, or any other type of wireless communication system.
  • [0029]
    The system 100 includes a plurality of STAs 102 a, 102 b, . . . , 102 n and at least one AP 104. As an example, the STA 102 a intends to transfer data, and thus the STA 102 a will be referred as “initiator” hereinafter. Typically, but not necessarily, an initiator 102 a is not an AP, (nor a STA functioning as an AP), and may not be heard by all of the STAs in the coverage area. Therefore, the transmission of the initiator 102 a can result in a collision with transmissions by the other STAs 102 b-102 n, which is hidden from the initiator 102 a. In an infrastructure network, the AP 104 controls transmission of the STAs 102 a-102 n in the coverage area and will be referred to as “responder” hereinafter. In an Ad hoc network, any STA 102 a-102 n can be an initiator or a responder. The responder can be heard by all of the STAs 102 a-102 n in the coverage area.
  • [0030]
    FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of a process 200 including method steps for eliminating interference caused by hidden nodes in accordance with the present invention. In step 202, an initiator 102 a that has queued data to transmit, sends an initiator control message, (i.e., packet), 106 to the AP 104 to initiate transmission between the STAs 102 a-102 n and/or the AP 104 of the wireless communication system 100 of FIG. 1. The initiator control message 106 may be sent to begin an aggregate exchange with one or more responders. An aggregate MPDU is a packet aggregated with a plurality of MAC service data units (MSDUs) destined to one or more receivers. Control and/or data MPDUs may be aggregated.
  • [0031]
    Referring to FIG. 3, the initiator control message 106 includes a field 302 containing information on the queue size. The queue size field 302 may include information of multiple queues for multiple applications. For example, the initiator 102 a may run four applications simultaneously and may have four queues for the four applications. In such a case, the queue size field 302 may have information for all of the four queue sizes. The initiator control message 106 also provides information for control of at least one of a modulation and coding scheme (MCS), a size, duration, training, and any reverse flow of aggregates in an exchange of aggregates between STAs or APs.
  • [0032]
    Referring to FIG. 2, in step 204, a responder 104 generates and transmits a responder control message 108 in response to the initiator control message 106. The purpose of the responder control message 108 is to set an appropriate protection for transmission of an aggregate frame exchange. The responder 104 sets up the required protection for the transmission of data by the initiator 102 a based on information on the queue size.
  • [0033]
    The responder control message 108 may further include a bandwidth allocation field containing information on bandwidth allocation corresponding to the queue sizes in the initiator control message 106. The information on bandwidth allocation facilitates resource management at the initiator 102 a.
  • [0034]
    Referring to FIG. 2, in step 206, all of the STAs 102 b-102 n in the coverage area that received the responder control message 108 set a parameter for accessing a wireless medium in accordance with the information included in the responder control message 108. For example, the STAs 102 b-102 n set a network allocation vector (NAV) for the duration set for transmission of the aggregate packets. Alternatively, single-ended spoofing or pair-wise spoofing may be used. The spoofing is a physical layer protection of a frame exchange that places STAs into a receiving mode for the spoofed duration.
  • [0035]
    The initiator control message 106 should be small in size so as to minimize the possibility of collision. The responder control message 108 should also be small in size so that the responder control message 108 can be efficiently transmitted at a low rate enough to be successfully received by all STAs in the coverage and thereby update their NAV setting or spoofing.
  • [0036]
    FIG. 3 shows an exemplary initiator control message 106 in accordance with the present invention. The initiator control message 106 shown in FIG. 3 is provided as an example, not as a limitation, and more or less fields or information elements and different size may be utilized. As stated above, a queue size field 302 is included in the initiator control message 106 to provide information of the queue size at the initiator. The initiator control message 106 may set the NAV by setting the duration field 304 in its MAC header, (i.e., MAC level protection), which is read by all of the STAs 102 monitoring the channel which may, in turn, set their own NAV. Spoofing is achieved by setting the packet length and data rate fields in the PHY header appropriately, (i.e., spoofed or protection duration=packet length/data rate), which will place the STAs 102 in a receiving mode for the spoofed duration.
  • [0037]
    The fields of the initiator control message 106 are described in Table 1.
    TABLE 1
    Size
    Field (bytes) Purpose
    Frame 2 Type is control, subtype is initiator control
    Control (IC)
    Duration 2
    Receiver 6
    Address
    (RA)
    Trans- 6
    mitter
    Address
    (TA)
    IC Mask 2 A bitmask indicating which IC elements are
    present in the message.
    Next 2 Size in bytes of following PPDU that will be
    PPDU sent by the initiator. This is interpreted
    Size along with the Next PPDU default MCS to
    determine the duration of the next PPDU.
    Present when FPD in the IC Mask is indicated,
    otherwise undefined.
    Next 2 Default MCS that will be used in the absence
    PPDU of any updated training information to send
    Default next PPDU. Present when FPD in the IC Mask is
    MCS indicated, otherwise undefined.
    Reverse 2 Indicates the amount of time in microseconds
    direction that is the maximum amount of time that will
    limit be granted in a RDG. Present when RDL in the
    (RDL) IC Mask is indicated, otherwise undefined.
    Reverse 2 Indicates the amount of time in microseconds
    direction that is available for a reverse direction
    grant PPDU including any expected response MPDUs
    (RDG) and a responder control (RC) MPDU.
    Present when RDG in the IC Mask is indicated,
    otherwise undefined.
    Response 2 Indicates the delay in microseconds between
    Period the end of the PPDU containing the IC MPDU
    Offset and the start of the response PPDU. This
    (RPO) value shall be no less than SIFS. Present
    when RDG in the IC Mask is indicated,
    otherwise undefined.
    Reverse 1 Indicates one of:
    Direction 1) An AC for which reverse direction grant is
    Traffic valid A TSID indicating a specific TS for
    Identifier which the reverse direction grant is valid
    (RDTID) 2) Unconstrained
    3) Present when RDG is indicated, otherwise
    undefined.
    MCS 1 Contains a recommended MCS value. Present when
    Feedback MFB in the IC Mask is indicated, otherwise
    undefined.
    Queue Up to Allows specification of up to 4 queue sizes
    Sizes 8 corresponding to 4 applications (2 bytes for
    each queue size)
    FCS 4
  • [0038]
    FIG. 4 shows an exemplary responder control message 108 in accordance with the present invention. As stated above, the responder control message 108 includes a field 402 containing bandwidth allocation information corresponding to the queue sizes indicated in field 302 of the initiator control message 106. The responder control message 108 may set protection time based on the queue size by setting a duration field 404 in its MAC header, (i.e., MAC level protection), and/or by setting appropriately the packet length and data rate fields in its PHY header, (i.e., PHY level protection).
  • [0039]
    The fields of the responder control message 108 are described in Table 2.
    TABLE 2
    Size
    Field (bytes) Purpose
    Frame 2 Type is control, subtype is responder
    Control control (RC)
    Duration 2
    RA 6
    TA 6
    RC Mask 2 A bitmask indicating which RC elements are
    present in the message.
    RDR Size 2 Size in bytes of requested reverse direc-
    tion flow. This is interpreted along with
    the Next PPDU default MCS to determine the
    duration of the next PPDU. Present when
    RDR in the RC Mask is indicated, otherwise
    undefined.
    Next PPDU 2 Default MCS that will be used in the
    Default MCS absence of any updated training infor-
    mation to send next PPDU. Present when
    RDR in the RC Mask is indicated, otherwise
    undefined.
    MCS 1 Contains a recommended MCS value. Present
    Feedback when MFB in the RC Mask is indicated,
    otherwise undefined.
    Bandwidth 2 Contains bandwidth allocation information
    Allocation in response to the Queue Sizes in the IC
    MPDU
    FCS 4
  • [0040]
    When the bandwidth allocation can be made only at a later time, (not at the time the responder control message 108 is sent), the responder control message 108 may be a simple positive acknowledgement (ACK) message. Alternatively, the responder control message 108 may include a special reserved number in the bandwidth allocation field 402 to indicate that the bandwidth allocation will be made later.
  • [0041]
    The initiator control message 106 may be a packet dedicated for the purpose of sending the transmitter queue sizes, and the responder control message 108 may also be a packet dedicated for the purpose of sending the bandwidth allocation information. The advantage of using the dedicated packets is that they can be used independently.
  • [0042]
    The initiator control message 106 includes an IC mask field 306 which is a bitmask indicating which elements are present in the initiator control message 106. The IC mask field 306 preferably comprises two bytes and the description of each bit position of the IC mask field 306 is shown in Table 3. It should be noted that the IC mask field 306 shown in FIG. 3 is provided as an example and more or less elements may be implemented and any variances are possible.
    TABLE 3
    IC Mask
    Field bit Position Description
    RTS B0 When set, indicates this is a request-to-send
    (RTS). The receiver should not generate any
    response if its NAV is non-zero.
    TRQ B1 When set, indicates a request to train the
    channel. Used for multiple-input multiple-
    output (MIMO) with implicit feedback.
    MRQ B2 When set, indicates a request for MCS feedback.
    MFB B3 When set, indicates an MFB training response is
    present as defined by the MCS Feedback field.
    FPD B4 When set, indicates that the next PPDU duration
    may be determined from the next PPDU length
    and default MCS fields. FPD is set only when
    using Pairwise Spoofing rules.
    RDG B5 When set, indicates a reverse direction grant is
    present.
    RDL B6 When set, indicates that a reverse direction
    limit is present
    Queue B7 When set, indicates that Queue Size 1 is present
    Size1
    Queue B8 When set, indicates that Queue Size 2 is present
    Size2
    Queue B9 When set, indicates that Queue Size 3 is present
    Size3
    Queue B10 When set, indicates that Queue Size 4 is present
    Size4
  • [0043]
    The responder control message 108 includes an RC Mask field 406 which is a bitmask indicating which logical elements are carried in the responder control message 108. The RC Mask field 406 preferably comprises two bytes and the description of each bit position of the RC Mask field 406 is shown in Table 4. It should be noted that the RC mask field 406 in FIG. 4 is provided as an example and more or less elements may be implemented and any variances are possible.
    TABLE 4
    RC Mask
    Field bit Position Description
    CTS B0 When set, indicates this is a clear-to-send (CTS).
    TRQ B1 When set, indicates a request to train the
    channel. Used for MIMO with implicit Feedback.
    MRQ B2 When set, indicates a request for MCS feedback.
    MFB B3 When set, indicates an MFB training response is
    present as defined by the MCS Feedback field.
    RDR B4 When set, indicates a request for reverse
    direction dataflow is present as described by the
    RDR Size and Next PPDU Default MCS fields.
    Bandwidth B5 When set, indicates a bandwidth allocation infor-
    Allocation mation field is present in response to the Queue
    Sizes in the IC MPDU
  • [0044]
    In another embodiment, MMP/PSAD is implemented to mitigate problems caused by hidden nodes. In conventional wireless communication systems, an MMP control frame may only be transmitted from an AP, whereas a PSAD control frame may be transmitted from any STA. In accordance with the present invention, the MMP and the PSAD control frames are modified such that non-AP STAs are able to transmit MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequences without collisions due to hidden nodes occurring. These sequences generally refer to the data frame sequences that follow the MMP/PSAD frame. An MMP/PSAD frame is a control frame that specifies that data will be transmitted to and from certain STAs at certain subsequent times.
  • [0045]
    Furthermore, an RTS/CTS mechanism may be used to reserve the medium for MMP/PSAD type TXOP scheduling for multiple STAs. However, the RTS/CTS mechanism involves the following sequence: RTS, SIFS, CTS, SIFS, MMP/PSAD. In accordance with the present invention, the following sequence is used: MMP/PSAD, SIFS, CTS/ACK. This sequence is more efficient in the sense that it involves one less frame and one less SIFS duration.
  • [0046]
    FIG. 5 shows the format of a conventional MMP control frame 500. FIG. 6 shows the format of a conventional PSAD control frame 600. Since non-AP STAs are allowed to send the MMP, a transmitter field (TA) 502 in the conventional MMP control frame 500 is modified, as shown in FIG. 7, to include non-AP STAs by adding a new AP response duration field 704 to a TA field 702 in a modified MMP control frame 700. The AP response duration field 704 indicates the duration within which the AP ends its response transmission. Furthermore, a TA 602 in the conventional PSAD control frame 600 is modified, as shown in FIG. 8, to include non-AP STAs by adding a new AP response duration field 804 to a TA field 802 in a modified PSAD control frame 800.
  • [0047]
    In accordance with the present invention, a non-AP STA transmits the modified MMP and PSAD control frames 700, 800 to the AP and STAs that are within its range.
  • [0048]
    During the AP response duration 704, 804, the AP broadcasts its acknowledgment (ACK) of receiving the MMP/PSAD sequence from the non-AP STA in accordance with respective RA fields 706, 806 of the MMP and PSAD control frames 700, 800, whereby the RA fields 706, 806 are each set to broadcast. The purpose of broadcasting the ACK is to inform all of the other STAs in the vicinity of the AP of the medium reservation for the duration of the MMP schedule, and thus collisions due to hidden nodes are avoided. The ACK from the AP is used to set NAV or EPP for the entire duration of the MMP schedule. If the transmitting non-AP STA does not receive an ACK within the AP Response Duration, it waits for a period of time equal to a short inter-frame spacing (SIFS) before retransmitting the MMP/PSAD sequence.
  • [0049]
    The response from the AP to the MMP/PSAD from a non-AP STA can be any other frame or frames that fit within the AP response duration specified in the fields 704, 804. The AP response duration 704, 804 is set to 0 when the AP sends the MMP/PSAD sequence.
  • [0050]
    In another alternative embodiment, a MMP/PSAD Tx/uplink transmit (ULT) offset field is used instead of the AP response duration fields 704, 804 to achieve the same objective by reusing the Tx/ULT offset field. The conventional MMP/PSAD frames shown in FIGS. 5 and 6 already contains offset and duration fields, which specify the time offset at which a particular station shall respond, and the time duration that the response shall last for.
  • [0051]
    Furthermore, the conventional MMP control frame 500 and the conventional PSAD control frame 600 may be modified such that the AP is the only receiver. Even though it adds overhead, the AP duplicates the MMP/PSAD control frames 500, 600 and broadcasts it for the purpose of providing protection for the duration of the MMP/PSAD schedule. In the modified MMP/PSAD control frames shown in FIGS. 7 and 8, the RA=Broadcast field 706, 806 indicates that the transmitter of the MMP/PSAD frame is telling all receivers that they should interpret and act on the information that the MMP/PSAD frame contains. However, the transmitter will send the MMP/PSAD with an RA=AP address only, and when the AP receives it, it will duplicate the MMP/PSAD frame and broadcast it to all receivers.
  • [0052]
    FIGS. 9-14 show the MMP/PSAD frame, and the information it specifies.
  • [0053]
    FIG. 9 shows conventional downlink allocations in an uplink (non-AP STA) MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequence.
  • [0054]
    FIG. 10 shows downlink allocations in an uplink (non-AP STA) MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequence including a Rx/downlink transmit (DLT) offset field is used in a case of an AP responding with an ACK in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 10 shows that following the MMP/PSAD frame, the AP response frame is transmitted first. The MMP/PSAD frame specifies the start offset at which the AP will transmit data to each station. There are also frames being transmitted starting at such start offsets. For example, the Rx1 offset/DLT1 start offset specifies the time at which data destined to a first STA will be transmitted, while the Rx2 offset/DLT2 start offset specifies the time at which data destined to a second STA will be transmitted. When the Rx2 offset time starts, data transmission to the first STA should be complete, (i.e., there should be no overlapping transmissions).
  • [0055]
    FIG. 11 shows conventional uplink allocations in an uplink (non-AP STA) MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequence.
  • [0056]
    FIG. 12 shows uplink allocations in an uplink (non-AP STA) MMP/PSAD frame exchange sequence in a case of an AP responding with an ACK in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. The uplink MMP/PSAD may be used in a DLP-like transmission. Direct link protocol (DLP) or direct link setup (DLS) are features specified in the IEEE 802.11e standard. These features allow two non-AP stations to communicate directly with each other without having their data being relayed by the AP, (i.e., STA1→STA2 instead of STA1→AP→STA2). The TA and RA fields are set according to the STAs involved in DLP/DLS.
  • [0057]
    FIG. 13 shows a conventional MMP/PSAD downlink frame sequence in a case of AP responding with CTS.
  • [0058]
    FIG. 14 shows an MMP/PSAD downlink frame sequence which includes RTS functionality in a case of an AP responding with a CTS in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention.
  • [0059]
    The frame exchange sequence in case of AP responding with CTS is shown in FIGS. 13 and 14.
  • [0060]
    Although the features and elements of the present invention are described in the preferred embodiments in particular combinations, each feature or element can be used alone without the other features and elements of the preferred embodiments or in various combinations with or without other features and elements of the present invention.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5661727 *Jun 12, 1996Aug 26, 1997International Business Machines CorporationSchemes to determine presence of hidden terminals in wireless networks environment and to switch between them
US7305004 *Jan 15, 2002Dec 4, 2007At&T Corp.Interference suppression methods for 802.11
US20020159411 *Mar 23, 2001Oct 31, 2002Manish AiryMethod and system for scheduling the transmission of wireless data
US20040042421 *Aug 26, 2003Mar 4, 2004Intermec Technologies CorporationLocal area network having multiple channel wireless access
US20040193886 *Mar 24, 2003Sep 30, 2004Goldman Stuart O.Differential authentication entity validation scheme for international emergency telephone service
US20050041622 *Oct 3, 2003Feb 24, 2005Nortel Networks LimitedChannel quality indicator for OFDM
US20050215197 *Mar 29, 2004Sep 29, 2005Chen Camille CApparatus and methods for coexistence of collocated wireless local area network and bluetooth based on dynamic fragmentation of WLAN packets
US20050250511 *Mar 15, 2005Nov 10, 2005Weimin XiaoMethod for rate control signaling to facilitate UE uplink data transfer
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7639658 *Mar 18, 2006Dec 29, 2009Qualcomm IncorporatedEfficient wireless transmission opportunity handoff
US7656832 *Oct 16, 2006Feb 2, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7660274 *Feb 9, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7668130 *Oct 17, 2006Feb 23, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7668131 *Oct 17, 2006Feb 23, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7672259 *Mar 2, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Wireless communication system for allocating transmission period
US7688176 *Oct 17, 2006Mar 30, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Wireless communication system for allocating transmission period
US7688767 *Mar 30, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7688768 *Oct 17, 2006Mar 30, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7688769 *Mar 30, 2010Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7688770 *Oct 17, 2006Mar 30, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7688831 *Mar 30, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Wireless communication system for allocating transmission period
US7701888 *Oct 16, 2006Apr 20, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7701889 *Oct 17, 2006Apr 20, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7706816 *Oct 17, 2006Apr 27, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US7773570 *Aug 10, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method and system for transmitting/receiving signal in wireless local network mesh communication system
US7817616 *Oct 19, 2010Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Time synchronization method in wireless sensor network
US7818018Oct 19, 2010Qualcomm IncorporatedDistributed hierarchical scheduling in an AD hoc network
US7864796 *Apr 4, 2006Jan 4, 2011Avaya Inc.Start-to-finish reservations in distributed MAC protocols for wireless LANs
US7894538Jun 19, 2006Feb 22, 2011Qualcomm IncorporatedFrequency-independent spatial processing for wideband MISO and MIMO systems
US8068476 *Oct 17, 2006Nov 29, 2011Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US8233462Oct 13, 2004Jul 31, 2012Qualcomm IncorporatedHigh speed media access control and direct link protocol
US8233469 *Mar 8, 2006Jul 31, 2012Panasonic CorporationRelay device
US8284752Oct 9, 2012Qualcomm IncorporatedMethod, apparatus, and system for medium access control
US8315271Nov 20, 2012Qualcomm IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for an ad-hoc wireless communications system
US8355372May 8, 2009Jan 15, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedTransmission mode and rate selection for a wireless communication system
US8385193 *Oct 17, 2006Feb 26, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for admission control of data in a mesh network
US8401018Mar 21, 2005Mar 19, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for scheduling in a wireless network
US8462817Jun 11, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedMethod, apparatus, and system for multiplexing protocol data units
US8483105Oct 13, 2004Jul 9, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedHigh speed media access control
US8582430Apr 30, 2008Nov 12, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for wireless LAN (WLAN) data multiplexing
US8600336 *Dec 19, 2005Dec 3, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedScheduling with reverse direction grant in wireless communication systems
US8687611Dec 22, 2009Apr 1, 2014Intel CorporationMethods and apparatus for weighted queuing in DL MU MIMO
US8767541Feb 14, 2008Jul 1, 2014Qualcomm IncorporatedScheduling policy-based traffic management
US8842657Oct 13, 2004Sep 23, 2014Qualcomm IncorporatedHigh speed media access control with legacy system interoperability
US8855088 *Dec 22, 2010Oct 7, 2014Intel CorporationReverse protocol for low latency wireless applications
US8867467Jun 8, 2012Oct 21, 2014Marvell World Trade LtdEfficient transmission for low data rate WLAN
US8902771 *Sep 30, 2011Dec 2, 2014Qualcomm IncorporatedMethods and apparatus for use in peer to peer communications devices and/or systems relating to rate scheduling, traffic scheduling, rate control, and/or power control
US8964651Feb 14, 2008Feb 24, 2015Qualcomm IncorporatedTraffic management employing interference management messages
US8995367Jun 8, 2012Mar 31, 2015Marvell World Trade Ltd.Efficient transmission for low data rate WLAN
US9019914 *Jun 8, 2012Apr 28, 2015Marvell World Trade Ltd.Efficient transmission for low data rate WLAN
US9088908Jun 8, 2012Jul 21, 2015Marvell World Trade Ltd.Efficient transmission for low data rate WLAN
US9125163 *Oct 31, 2008Sep 1, 2015Qualcomm IncorporatedPersistent interference mitigation in a wireless communication
US9137087Jun 18, 2013Sep 15, 2015Qualcomm IncorporatedHigh speed media access control
US9179476 *Oct 10, 2012Nov 3, 2015Qualcomm IncorporatedMulti-user transmission during reverse direction grant
US9198052 *Oct 24, 2012Nov 24, 2015Fujitsu LimitedApparatus and method for transmitting data to a wireless communication device to minimize congestion and interference from undetectable devices through carrier sensing
US9258788Oct 20, 2014Feb 9, 2016Qualcomm IncorporatedMethods and apparatus for use in peer to peer communications devices and/or systems relating to rate scheduling, traffic scheduling, rate control, and/or power control
US9357566Aug 26, 2015May 31, 2016Qualcomm IncorporatedPersistent interference mitigation in a wireless communication system
US20050192037 *Jan 26, 2005Sep 1, 2005Qualcomm IncorporatedDistributed hierarchical scheduling in an AD hoc network
US20060227733 *Mar 18, 2006Oct 12, 2006Airgo Networks, Inc.Efficient wireless transmission opportunity handoff
US20060274844 *Jun 19, 2006Dec 7, 2006Walton J RFrequency-independent spatial processing for wideband MISO and MIMO systems
US20070058605 *Dec 19, 2005Mar 15, 2007Arnaud MeylanScheduling with reverse direction grant in wireless communication systems
US20070086370 *Oct 17, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070086374 *Oct 17, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070086404 *Oct 17, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Wireless communication system for allocating transmission period
US20070086414 *Oct 16, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070086415 *Oct 16, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070086416 *Oct 16, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070086417 *Oct 16, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Wireless communication system for allocating transmission period
US20070086418 *Oct 17, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Wireless communication system for allocating transmission period
US20070086419 *Oct 17, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070087724 *Oct 17, 2006Apr 19, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070097984 *Oct 17, 2006May 3, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070115970 *Oct 17, 2006May 24, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Apparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070115971 *Oct 17, 2006May 24, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070115972 *Oct 17, 2006May 24, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., LtdApparatus for allocating transmission period in a wireless communication system
US20070127428 *Nov 22, 2006Jun 7, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method and system for transmitting/receiving signal in wireless local network mesh communication system
US20070147241 *Oct 17, 2006Jun 28, 2007Qualcomm, IncorporatedMethod and apparatus for admission control of data in a mesh network
US20070177574 *Jan 9, 2007Aug 2, 2007Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Time synchronization method in wireless sensor network
US20070218938 *Mar 20, 2007Sep 20, 2007Conexant Systems, Inc.Sleep Mode Systems and Methods
US20090130980 *Oct 31, 2008May 21, 2009Qualcomm IncorporatedPersistent interference mitigation in a wireless communication system
US20090207730 *Feb 14, 2008Aug 20, 2009Qualcomm IncorporatedScheduling policy-based traffic management
US20090209262 *Feb 14, 2008Aug 20, 2009Qualcomm IncorporatedTraffic management employing interference management messages
US20090238108 *Mar 8, 2006Sep 24, 2009Hironori NakaeRelay device
US20110149881 *Dec 22, 2009Jun 23, 2011Gong Michelle XMethods and apparatus for weighted queuing in DL MU MIMO
US20120020234 *Jan 26, 2012Qualcomm IncorporatedMethods and apparatus for use in peer to peer communications devices and/or systems relating to rate scheduling, traffic scheduling, rate control, and/or power control
US20120163353 *Jun 28, 2012Carlos CordeiroReverse protocol for low latency wireless applications
US20120314636 *Dec 13, 2012Yong LiuEfficient Transmission for Low Data Rate WLAN
US20130089047 *Apr 11, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedMulti-user transmission during reverse direction grant
US20130148507 *Jun 13, 2013Fujitsu LimitedApparatus and method for transmitting data to a wireless communication device
US20130242916 *Apr 30, 2013Sep 19, 2013Qualcomm IncorporatedScheduling with reverse direction grant in wireless communication systems
CN102118308A *Dec 21, 2010Jul 6, 2011英特尔公司Methods and means for weighted queuing in downlink multiple-user multiple input multiple output
EP2091282A1Mar 31, 2008Aug 19, 2009Qualcomm IncorporatedTraffic management employing interference management messages
EP2192803A1Mar 31, 2008Jun 2, 2010Qualcom IncorporatedTraffic management employing interference management messages
WO2009103013A1 *Feb 13, 2009Aug 20, 2009Qualcomm IncorporatedTraffic management employing interference management messages
WO2011087593A2 *Nov 29, 2010Jul 21, 2011Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus for weighted queuing in downlink multiple-user multiple input multiple output
WO2011087593A3 *Nov 29, 2010Oct 27, 2011Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus for weighted queuing in downlink multiple-user multiple input multiple output
WO2012088347A2 *Dec 21, 2011Jun 28, 2012Intel CorporationReverse protocol for low latency wireless applications
WO2012088347A3 *Dec 21, 2011Dec 6, 2012Intel CorporationReverse protocol for low latency wireless applications
Classifications
U.S. Classification370/329, 370/395.2
International ClassificationH04L12/56, H04W74/08
Cooperative ClassificationH04W74/08, H04W74/002, H04L47/26, Y02B60/50, H04L47/30
European ClassificationH04L47/30, H04L47/26, H04W74/08, H04W74/00C
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Mar 22, 2006ASAssignment
Owner name: INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, DELAWARE
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHANDRA, ARTY;GRANDHI, SUDHEER A.;ZEIRA, ELDAD;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:017343/0851;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060213 TO 20060314
Feb 9, 2010CCCertificate of correction
Sep 28, 2010CCCertificate of correction
Mar 6, 2013FPAYFee payment
Year of fee payment: 4