|Publication number||US20060175059 A1|
|Application number||US 11/336,344|
|Publication date||Aug 10, 2006|
|Filing date||Jan 20, 2006|
|Priority date||Jan 21, 2005|
|Also published as||CA2595686A1, CA2595686C, CN101146888A, CN101146888B, WO2006088603A1|
|Publication number||11336344, 336344, US 2006/0175059 A1, US 2006/175059 A1, US 20060175059 A1, US 20060175059A1, US 2006175059 A1, US 2006175059A1, US-A1-20060175059, US-A1-2006175059, US2006/0175059A1, US2006/175059A1, US20060175059 A1, US20060175059A1, US2006175059 A1, US2006175059A1|
|Inventors||A. Sinclair, Patrick Okell, Syed Akbar|
|Original Assignee||Sinclair A R, Okell Patrick R, Syed Akbar|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (4), Referenced by (65), Classifications (10), Legal Events (3)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application claims priority benefit to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/646,231 filed Jan. 21, 2005, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
The present invention provides methods and compositions for treating subterranean wells and, more specifically, provides methods and compositions for stimulating multiple intervals in subterranean wells. In particular, this invention provides methods and compositions for diverting well treatment fluids into multiple intervals by introducing propping materials coated with a water soluble polymer e.g. collagen, polyvinyl acetate/polyvinyl alcohol, polyalkyl oxides, poly(lactic acid), periodic chart elements of group I or II (alkali metal or alkaline earth metal) silicate polymer, or combinations thereof with materials that are slowly water soluble for use in redirecting the flow of stimulation fluids from a tubing string into the subterranean environment.
Well treatments, such as acid and fracture treatments of subterranean formations are routinely used to improve or stimulate the recovery of hydrocarbons. In many cases, a subterranean formation may include two or more intervals having varying permeability and/or injectivity. Some intervals may possess relatively low injectivity, or ability to accept injected fluids, due to relatively low permeability, high in-situ stress, and/or formation damage. Such intervals may be completed through preparations in a cased wellbore and/or may be completed open hole. In some cases, such formation intervals may be present in a highly deviated or horizontal section of a wellbore, for example, a lateral open hole section. In any case, when treating multiple intervals having variable injectivity it is often the case that most, if not all, of the introduced well treatment fluid will be displaced into one, or only a few, of the intervals having the highest injectivity. Even if there is only one interval to be treated, the tendency for the growth of the fracture can be either up or down. This depends on the in situ formation stress and the permeability variation in the formation layer. Below the created fracture can be a water zone. If the created fracture breaks into this zone, the well can be ruined due to excess water and a cut off of the petroleum components of the productive interval. Above the created fracture zone a gas cap may exist which would cause harm to the production of the well because of gas bypassing the liquid petroleum components of the well.
In an effort to more evenly distribute displaced well treatment fluids into each of the multiple intervals being treated, methods and materials for diverting treatment fluids into intervals of lower permeability and/or injectivity have been developed. However, conventional diversion techniques may be costly and/or may achieve only limited success. In this regard, mechanical diversion techniques are typically complicated and costly. Furthermore, mechanical diversion methods are typically limited to cased hole environments and depend upon adequate cement and tool isolation for achieving diversion.
The efficient and simultaneous treatment of multiple sets of perforations over an extended vertical section has thus been a problem in well stimulation for numerous years. Numerous treatment diversion methods, such as oil-soluble calcium soap, sulfuric acid, and Dowell's “Fixafrac” (a mixture of lime, kerosene, a graded calcium chloride soap, and a gelling agent, and Dowell's FLAX-2™ as described by Harrison in his comprehensive review Journal of Petroleum Technology, pp. 593-598 (1972), have been used to treat multiple zones with a wide variety of effectiveness. A great variety of chemical based diverting agents have been used in attempts to plug formation openings and divert treating fluids to other zones of the formation. For example, wax beads have been used as diverting agents. However, the wax beads have limited melting points, from about 138° F. to about 192° F., making them useless if the formation temperature exceeds their melting point.
Naphthalene (moth balls) and sodium chloride particles have also been described to be useful as effective diverting agents. Naphthalene particles are readily soluble in oil, but melt at about 180° F., thereby limiting their use to applications in lower-temperature formations. Sodium chloride, having a melting point of about 1,470° F., while useful at high temperatures, requires that the well be cleaned with water or dilute acid after the formation has been treated in order to fully remove the sodium chloride particles. Furthermore, sodium chloride cannot be used with hydrofluoric acid to treat subterranean wells due to the formation of insoluble precipitates which can problematically block the wellbore.
Alternatively, diversion agents such as polymers, suspended solid materials and/or foam have been employed when simultaneously treating multiple intervals of variable injectivity. Such diversion agents are typically pumped into a subterranean formation prior to a well treatment fluid in order to seal off intervals of higher permeability and divert the well treatment fluid to intervals of lower permeability. However, the diverting action of such diversion agents is often difficult to predict and monitor, and may not be successful in diverting treatment fluid into all desired intervals. These problems may be further aggravated in open hole completions, especially in highly deviated completions having large areas of a formation open to the wellbore. The presence of natural fractures may also make diversion more difficult.
Several attempts to address the issues of areas of differing permeability within a wellbore have been addressed over the years. U.S. Pat. No. 2,803,306 to Hower offers a process for increasing the permeability of an underground formation having several zones of varying permeability. The steps described include introducing into a well bore a treatment fluid containing hydrochloric acid which has oil-soluble particles dispersed therein, the material being selected from gilsonite, naphthalene, para-dichlorobenzene, anthracene, and β-naphthol. Upon treatment, the particles provide a partial blockage of the more permeable zones of the subterranean formation, allowing the treatment fluid to enter the less-permeable zones.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,797,575 assigned to Halliburton discloses diverting-forming additives comprised of relatively water insoluble solid material dissolved in a solvent such as methanol or isopropanol. When the additive is combined with an aqueous treatment fluid, the solid material, dissolved in the additive, is precipitated in the aqueous treating fluid into a finally divided form, which then act as a diverting agent. U.S. Pat. No. 3,724,549, also assigned to Halliburton, describes a diverting agent material for diverting aqueous treatment fluids into progressively less permeable subterranean formations. The material is composed of a carrier liquid and graded particles of cyclic or linear hydrocarbon resins having between about 20 and about 1,400 carbon atoms, and a melting point of about 200° F. This material is described as being largely water and acid insoluble, but soluble in oil, such that the resin can be removed by the produced oil after the completion of the oil treatment operation.
The use of radiation-induced polymers as either temporary or permanent diverting agents has been described by Knight, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 3,872,923. According to the specification, temporary or permanent reductions in permeability can be obtained by injecting an aqueous solution containing a water-soluble polymer obtained by radiation-induced polymerization of acrylamide and/or methacrylamide and acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, and/or alkali metal salts of such acids. The resultant polymeric diverting agent has properties, such as temperature and pH stability, so as to effect a reduction of permeability of the porous medium. Permeability within the formation can be restored by subsequent treatment with a chemical to break down the polymer, such as hydrazine hypochlorite solution or strong mineral acids.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,954,629 and 4,005,753 to Scheffel, et al., offer polymeric diverting agents, and methods of treating subterranean formations with such polymeric diverting agents, respectively. The polymeric composition is described to comprise solid particles of a homogenous mixture of polyethylene, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer, a polyamide, and a softening agent such as long chain aliphatic diamides. These polymeric diverting agents are reported to be suitable for use in subterranean formations where formation temperatures are 350° F. or greater.
Methods of temporarily plugging a subterranean formation using a diverting material comprising an aqueous carrier liquid and a diverting agent comprising a solid azo component and a methylenic component are described by Dill, et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 4,527,628. The diverting agent is preferably Hansa Yellow G (Fanchon Yellow YH-5707 pigment) or Fast Yellow 4RLF dye, both of which have an azo component and a methylenic component and are further characterized as having a melting point of at least 332.6° F., a degree of solubility in water at a temperature of water from about 200 to about 425° F., and a degree of solubility in kerosene at a temperature of from about 200° F. to about 425° F.
In U.S. Pat. No. 6,367,548, Purvis, et al. describes methods and compositions for stimulating multiple intervals in subterranean wells by diverting well treatment fluids into multiple intervals. According to the specification, this is accomplished by alternately displacing diverting agent from the annulus of the wellbore into a subterranean formation and displacing treatment fluid from a tubing string into the subterranean formation.
Other methods for diverting a fracture treatment include the limited-entry technique described by LaGrone, et al., SPE 530, pp. 695-702 (1963), and the Technique of Multi-Fracture Fracturing Using a Diverting Agent (TMFUD) suggested by Dingxiang, et al., SPE 30816, pp. 80-86 (1988), the latter of which has shown an average oil production improvement of 15.0 t/d for each well, and a cumulative production improvement of 340.3×104 tons. A viscoelastic surfactant-based diverting agent for use in acid stimulations has also been described (Alleman, D., et al., SPE 80222 (2003)), which is a VES gel (polyQuat) characterized by a distinctive vesicle structure stable at high pH and a thermal stability of about 250° F. This gel-type diversion agent is typically pumped into a subterranean formation prior to a well stimulation fluid in order to seal off intervals of high permeability and divert the well treatment fluid to intervals of low permeability.
In light of all these advances and new techniques, the diverting action of diverting agents is often difficult to predict and monitor, and may not be successful in diverting treatment fluid into all the desired intervals, thereby failing to allow maximum benefit from the fracture procedure. These problems can be further aggravated in open hole completions, especially in highly-deviated completions having large areas of a formation open to the wellbore. The presence of natural fractures within the subterranean formation can also serve to make diversion more challenging. Thus, there exists a need for new compositions and methods for diverting well treatment fluids into multiple intervals of varying permeability within a subterranean formation.
The present invention provides a method of using particles having a soluble outer coating as diverting agents in subterranean formations. The soluble outer coating will dissolve after a desired period of time at downhole temperatures and pressures in the presence of standard downhole fracturing fluids and breaker compositions. Examples of the soluble outer coating include collagen, poly(alkylene) oxides, poly(lactic acid), polyvinylacetate, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylacetate/polyvinylalcohol, polylactone, polyacrylate, latex, polyester, group I or II silicate polymer or mixtures thereof.
The present invention provides water soluble polymer coated proppants as diverting agents and methods of using such diverting agents for treating a subterranean formation. The diverting agent together with a carrier liquid is introduced into a subterranean formation. The liquid carrier flows into fractures and/or intervals within the subterranean formation. The fractures or intervals present varying degrees of permeability. In accordance with the methods of the present invention, the liquid carrier with diverting agent will flow to the most permeable interval first. The temperature of the formation will cause the water soluble polymer coating of the diverting agent to soften and swell, thereby plugging the fracture.
In one embodiment, a diverting agent suitable for diverting well treatment fluids into a single or a multiple interval is described, wherein the diverting agent is comprised of a particulate substrate and a water-soluble outer layer. Such water soluble outer layer polymer is exemplified, without limitation, by collagen, poly(alkylene) oxides, poly(lactic acid) polyvinylacetate, polyvinylalcohols, polyvinylacetate/polyvinylalcohol, polymeric lactones, water-soluble acrylics, latex, polyester, group I or II silicate polymer, and admixtures thereof.
In a further embodiment, a diverting agent suitable for diverting well treatment fluids into a single or a multiple interval is described, wherein the diverting agent is comprised of a particulate substrate an intermediate water insoluble layer and a water soluble polymer outer layer. The water soluble outer layer polymer is exemplified, without limitation, by collagen, poly(alkylene) oxides, poly(lactic acid), polyvinylacetate, polyvinylalcohols, polyvinylacetate/polyvinylalcohol, polymeric lactones, water-soluble acrylics, latex, polyester, group I or II silicate polymer and admixtures thereof. The water insoluble intermediate layer is exemplified by phenol-aldehyde novolac polymers and phenol-aldehyde resole polymers.
In yet another embodiment, a diverting agent suitable for diverting well treatment fluids into a single or a multiple interval within a wellbore is described, wherein the diverting agent is substantially a water-soluble polymer particle such as a collagen bead or granular particles of poly(alkylene) oxide, poly(lactic acid), polyvinylacetate, polyvinylalcohol, polyvinylacetate/polyvinylalcohol, polymeric lactones, water-soluble acrylics, latex, polyester, group I or II silicate polymer, or mixtures thereof.
In a further embodiment, a method of stimulating individual intervals of a subterranean formation is disclosed, the method including the steps of introducing a diverting agent having a water-soluble component on its outer layer into an inner pipe of a wellbore in combination with a low viscosity fluid or a fracturing fluid; displacing the diverting agent and fracturing fluid into the subterranean formation, allowing the diverting agent to progressively plug portions of the formation being treated; and repeating the process as necessary, adding the diverting agent to the carrier fluid in slugs during the fracturing operation.
The following figures form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these figures in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein.
The following definitions are provided in order to aid those skilled in the art in understanding the detailed description of the present invention.
The term “carrier liquid” as used herein refers to oil or water based liquids that are capable of moving particles (e.g., proppants) that are in suspension. Low viscosity carrier fluid have less carrying capacity and the particles can be affected by gravity so that they either rise if they are less dense than the liquid or sink if they are more dense than the liquid. High viscosity liquids can carry particles with less settling or rising since the viscosity overcomes gravity effects.
The term “crosslinker” or “cross-linking agent”, as used herein, refers to those compounds used to covalently modify proteins, such as collagen, and includes both homobifunctional crosslinkers that contain two identical reactive groups, and heterobifunctional crosslinkers which contain two different reactive groups.
The term “diverting agent”, as used herein, means and refers generally to an agent that functions to prevent, either temporarily or permanently, the flow of a liquid into a particular location, usually located in a subterranean formation, wherein the agent serves to seal the location and thereby cause the liquid to “divert” to a different location.
The term “proppant”, as used herein, refers to those sized particles that are used in well work-overs and treatments, such as hydraulic fracturing operations, to hold fractures open following the treatment. Such sized particles are often mixed with fracturing fluid(s) to hold fractures open after a hydraulic fracturing treatment or similar downhole well treatment. In addition to naturally occurring sand grains and nut hulls, the term “proppant” includes man-made or specially engineered proppants, such as resin-coated sand or high-strength ceramic materials like sintered bauxite. Resin coated proppants are typified by those that are coated with phenol-aldehyde novolac polymers or phenol-aldehyde resole polymers. Typically, but not necessarily, proppant materials are carefully sorted for size and sphericity to provide an efficient conduit for production of fluid from the reservoir to the wellbore.
In embodiments described and disclosed herein, the use of the term “introducing” includes pumping, injecting, pouring, releasing, displacing, spotting, circulating, or otherwise placing a fluid or material within a well, wellbore, or subterranean formation using any suitable manner known in the art. Similarly, as used herein, the terms “combining”, “contacting”, and “applying” include any known suitable methods for admixing, exposing, or otherwise causing two or more materials, compounds, or components to come together in a manner sufficient to cause at least partial reaction or other interaction to occur between the materials, compounds, or components.
The term “water soluble” as used herein refers to resins, polymers, or coatings which are stable (do not dissolve) under ambient, surface conditions, but which become soluble after a given time (usually over several hours or several days) when placed in a subterranean environment.
The term “treatment”, as used herein, refers to any of numerous operations on or within the downhole well, wellbore, or reservoir, including but not limited to a workover type of treatment, a stimulation type of treatment, such as a hydraulic fracturing treatment or an acid treatment, isolation treatments, control of reservoir fluid treatments, or other remedial types of treatments performed to improve the overall well operation and productivity.
The term “stimulation”, as used herein, refers to productivity improvement or restoration operations on a well as a result of a hydraulic fracturing, acid fracturing, matrix acidizing, sand treatment, or other type of treatment intended to increase and/or maximize the well's production rate or its longevity, often by creating highly conductive reservoir flow paths.
In embodiments of the disclosed diverting agent, single and multiple intervals of a subterranean formation can be treated or stimulated in stages by successively introducing the diverting agent comprising a particulate substrate and a slowly water-soluble outer coating comprising collagen or a combination of collagen and a slowly water-soluble, non-collagenous material.
The invention provides particle compositions comprising soluble material coatings comprising collagen, as well as processes for preparing such compositions. These compositions are useful in subterranean formations for diverting well treatment fluids in a single interval to increase the fracture length or in multiple intervals of a subterranean formation having varying permeability and/or injectivity during a hydraulic fracturing operation. In using the diverting agents of the present invention in fracturing processes, the proppant (or particulate substrate) coated with a slowly water-soluble coating such as a collagen alone or in combination with a non-collagenic water-soluble, plastic coating material acts to divert the fracture, as the coatings on the proppants act as the defining boundaries of the initial fracture. Following the fracturing treatment, the coating can be removed due to the slow-dissolution characteristics of the coating, leaving standard propping agents with high permeability to flow into the fracture and act as proppants.
While compositions and methods are described in terms of “comprising” various components or steps, the compositions and methods can also “consist essentially of” or “consist of” the various components and steps.
Particulate material, also referred to herein as substrate material, suitable for use with the present invention includes a variety of particulate materials known to be suitable or potentially suitable propping agents which can be employed in downhole operations. In accordance with the present invention, the particulate material (or substrate material) which can be used include any propping agent suitable for hydraulic fracturing known in the art. Examples of such particulate materials include, but are not limited to, natural materials, silica proppants, ceramic proppants, metallic proppants, synthetic organic proppants, mixtures thereof, and the like.
Natural products suitable for use as proppants include, but are not limited to, nut shells such as walnut, brazil nut, and macadamia nut, as well as fruit pits such as peach pits, apricot pits, olive pits, and any resin impregnated or resin coated version of these. Typical resin coatings or impregnations include bisphenols, bisphenol homopolymers, blends of bisphenol homopolymers with phenol-aldehyde polymer, bisphenol-aldehyde resins and/or polymers, phenol-aldehyde polymers and homopolymers, modified and unmodified resoles, phenolic materials including arylphenols, alkylphenols, alkoxyphenols, and aryloxyphenols, resorcinol resins, epoxy resins, novolak polymer resins, novolak bisphenol-aldehyde polymers, and waxes, as well as the precured or curable versions of such resin coatings.
Silica proppants suitable for use with the present invention include, but are not limited to, glass spheres and glass microspheres, glass beads, silica quartz sand, and sands of all types such as white or brown. Typical silica sands suitable for use include Northern White Sands (Fairmount Minerals, Chardon, Ohio), Ottawa, Jordan, Brady, Hickory, Arizona, St. Peter, Wonowoc, and Chalfort, as well as any resin coated version of these sands. In the case of silica fibers being used, the fibers can be straight, curved, crimped, or spiral shaped, and can be of any grade, such as E-grade, S-grade, and AR-grade. Examples of suitable resin-coated silica proppants for use with the present invention include deformable proppants such as FLEXSAND LS™ and FLEXSAND MS™ (available from BJ Services, Inc., Houston, Tex.) and Tempered HS®, Tempered LC®, Tempered DC®, and Tempered TF® tempered proppants, all available from Santrol, Fresno, Tex.
Ceramic proppants suitable for use with the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, ceramic beads; spent fluid-cracking catalysts (FCC) such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,372,378, which is incorporated herein in its entirety; ultra lightweight porous ceramics; economy lightweight ceramics such as “ECONOPROP™” (Carbo Ceramics, Inc., Irving, Tex.); lightweight ceramics such as “CARBOLITE™”; intermediate strength ceramics such as “CARBOPROP™” (available from Carbo Ceramics, Inc., Irving, Tex.); high strength ceramics such as “CARBOHSP™” and “Sintered Bauxite” (Carbo Ceramics, Inc., Irving, Tex.), and HYPERPROP G2™, DYNAPROP G2™, or OPTIPROP G2™ encapsulated, curable ceramic proppants (available from Santrol, Fresno, Tex.) as well as any resin coated or resin impregnated versions of these, such as described above.
Metallic proppants suitable for use with the embodiments of the present invention include, but are not limited to, aluminum shot, aluminum pellets, aluminum needles, aluminum wire, iron shot, steel shot, and the like, as well as any resin coated versions of these metallic proppants.
Synthetic proppants are also suitable for use with the present invention. Examples of suitable synthetic proppants include, but are not limited to, plastic particles or beads, nylon beads, nylon pellets, SDVB (styrene divinyl benzene) beads, carbon fibers such as PANEX™ carbon fibers from Zoltek Corporation (Van Nuys, Calif.), and resin agglomerate particles similar to “FLEXSAND MS™” (BJ Services Company, Houston, Tex.), as well as resin coated versions thereof.
Additionally, soluble materials suitable for use as proppants are also envisioned to be useful with the methods of the present invention. For example, soluble proppants which are placed in the channels of the created perforations include, but are not limited to, marble or limestone chips or any other suitable carbonate particulates. Additionally, wax, plastic, or resin particles, either coated or uncoated, which are either soluble through contact with a treatment chemical or can melt and flowback from the fracture are suitable for use as proppants with the present invention.
Suitable with the present invention, propping agents are typically used in concentrations from about 1 to about 18 pounds per gallon (about 120 g/L to about 2,160 g/L) of fracturing fluid composition, but higher or lower concentrations may also be used as required.
Similarly, the particulate substrate suitable for use with the present invention has a particle size in the range of USA Standard Testing screen numbers from about 4 to about 200 (i.e., screen openings of about 0.18 inch to about 0.003 inch). More particularly, particulate substrate sizes suitable for use with the present invention include size ranges from about 4 mesh (4750 microns) to about 200 mesh (75 microns). Also suitable for use with the present invention are particulate materials or proppants having size-designations of 6/12, 8/16, 12/18, 12/20, 16/20, 16/30, 20/40, 30/50, 40/70 and 70/140, although any desired size distribution can be used, such as 10/40, 14/20, 14/30, 14/40, 18/40, and the like, as well as any combination thereof (e.g., a mixture of 10/40 and 14/40). The preferred mesh size, in accordance with the present invention, is 20/40 mesh.
B. Soluble Coating
The soluble coatings used in accordance with the present invention can be any number of known soluble agents that are slowly soluble in downhole, subterranean formations over a period of time. Soluble polymer materials used in accordance with the present invention should be soluble (that is, capable of dissolving in) in brines, water, oil, organic solvents, acid or acidic media, and/or in fluids having a pH in the range from about 1 to about 14, as well as mixtures thereof under the conditions found in downhole, subterranean formation.
Preferably, the soluble coating is a structural protein such as collagen or atelocollagen, a vegetable protein such as found in wheat, maize, oat or almonds, or a collgen originating from a marine environment. The latter type of collagen can be extracted from fish, algae, plankton, micro-plankton, and the like. More preferably, the soluble coating is collagen, including Type I collagen, Type II collagen, Type III collagen, Type IV, or Type V collagen, as well as combinations thereof. Most preferably, in accordance with the present invention, the soluble coating is a Type I collagen or an atelocollagen.
Type I collagens or atelocollagens suitable for use as soluble coatings in accordance with the present invention are those collagens containing at least one hydroxyproline residue. Such Type I collagens or atelocollagens include collagens found in tendons, skin, bone, scar tissue, and the like, such as tropocollagens, as well as products derived from the controlled, enzymatic or chemical reduction of collagen proteins. Such collagens preferably have a molecular weight from about 10,000 Daltons to about 500,000 Daltons, and more preferably from about 100,000 Daltons to about 300,000 Daltons. Suitable molecular weights of about 100,000 daltons, 125,000 daltons, 150,000 daltons, 175,000 daltons, 200,000 daltons, 225,000 daltons, 250,000 daltons, 275,000 daltons, 300,000 daltons, as well as molecular weights between any two of these values, e.g., collagens having a molecular weight from about 225,000 to about 275,000 daltons. For example, a preferred Type I collagen suitable for use with the present invention is tropocollagen with a molecular weight of about 250,000 as supplied by Milligans and Higgins, Inc. (Johnstown, N.Y.).
Collagens suitable for use within the present invention have Bloom strengths from about 100 psi to about 900 psi, and more preferably from about 300 psi to about 700 psi. Most preferably, collagens suitable for use with the present invention have Bloom strengths from about 400 psi to about 600 psi. Suitable Bloom strengths, in accordance with the present invention, are about 400 psi, about 410 psi, about 420 psi, about 430 psi, about 440 psi, about 450 psi, about 460 psi, about 470 psi, about 480 psi, about 490 psi, about 500 psi, about 510 psi, about 520 psi, about 530 psi, about 540 psi, about 550 psi, about 560 psi, about 570 psi, about 580 psi, about 590 psi, and about 600 psi, as well as Bloom strengths between any two of these values, e.g., from about 400 psi to about 520 psi, such as 512 psi.
Bloom strength, as used herein, refers to the measured value of the strength and/or rigidity of a gelatinous substance, such as collagen, formed by a standard solution of definite concentration that has been retained at a constant temperature for a specified period of time, in accordance with standardized bloom testing procedures, such as BS757:1975, GMIA Testing Standard B5757, International Standard ISO9665 for testing adhesive animal glues, or similar standards as described in “Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC INTERNATIONAL (OAM)”, 17th Edition, Volume II; AOAC International Publications (2003). Bloom strength values are typically given in “pounds per square inch” (psi) or grams, reflecting the force required to depress a chosen area of the surface of the sample a distance of 4 mm. In a typical procedure, a gel product, such as collagen or gelatin, is formed to a specified consistency (e.g., 6 and ⅔% solution) and kept at a constant temperature in a constant temperature bath at 10 C. for 18 hours. A device called a Texture Analyzer (e.g., the TA.XT2i Texture Analyzer, Scarsdale, N.Y.) then measures the weight in grams (or the pressure, in psi) required to depress a standard AOAC® [Associateion of Official Analytical Chemists] gelometer plunger having a sharp, lower edge 4 mm into the gel; alternatively, a BS plunger which has a bottom edge rounded to a radius of 0.4 mm can be used as the plunger. For example, if this procedure requires 200 grams to depress the plunger, then the gelatin has a Bloom strength of 200.
Type I collagens suitable for use within the present invention have a sieve distribution/size designation of 6/12, 8/16, 12/1.8, 12/20, 16/20, 16/30, 20/40, 30/50, 40/70 and 70/140, as well as sieve distributions between any two of these designations, although any desired size distribution can be used, such as 8/40, 10/40, 14/20, 14/30, 14/40, 18/40, and the like, as well as any combination thereof (e.g., a mixture of 10/40 and 14/40). The preferred mesh size, in accordance with the present invention, is 8/40 mesh.
Collagens, as used herein as soluble coatings, can be either cross-linked, uncross-linked, or a combination of both, and the type and degree of cross-linking will depend upon the specific application of the collagen-based soluble coating. There are four fundamental strategies for fixing collagenous materials and materials constructed of processed collagen fibers or purified collagen. These include exogenous chemical cross-linking using agents that covalently couple neighboring collagen fibrils using targeted reactive moieties in the collagen fibrillar system and the cross-linking molecules themselves; physiochemical cross-linking techniques such as photo-oxidation, microwave irradiation, dehydration and dehydrothermal treatment, that covalently join collagen fibrils via the naturally occurring reactive amino acid side chains; chemical catalysis of intramolecular cross-links between amino acid side chains on the collagen fibrils; and polymerizing compounds mixed with collagenous assemblies and forming polymeric non-covalent or covalent interactions that do not chemically react with collagen fibrils [Koob, T. J., “Collagen Fixation”, in Encyclopedia of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, Wnek, G. E., Bowlin, G. L., Eds., 2004]. In accordance with the present invention, the collagen used as a soluble coating is preferably cross-linked using chemical cross-linking techniques. These include, but are not limited to, aldehyde-based cross-linking techniques, polyepoxy compound-based cross-linking techniques, the use of isocyanates, carbodiimide cross-linking, and acyl azide based crosslinking. More preferably, the collagen is cross-linked using aldehyde-based cross-linking techniques, such as by using glutaraldehyde or formaldehyde.
Aldehyde-based cross-linking techniques includes those techniques using a reagent containing two reactive aldehyde groups to form covalent cross-links between neighboring collagen proteins, especially the e-amino groups of lysine residues in collagen [Khor, E., Biomaterials, Vol. 18: pp. 95-105 (1997)]. Aldehydes suitable for use with the present invention include but are not limited to glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, propionaldehyde, and butyraldehyde.
Polyepoxy based cross-linking techniques and agents include the use of compounds, such as short, branched polymers, terminating in reactive epoxy functionalities. Polyepoxy compounds suitable for use as cross-linking agents in the present invention include but are not limited to glycerol ethers, glycol, and glycerol polyglycidyl ethers.
Isocyanates are also suitable for use as cross-linking agents in the present invention. Generally, the isocyanates (R-NCO) react with primary amines to form a urea bond (R—H—CO—NH—R); difunctional isocyanates therefore have the ability to cross-link collagen via its lysine side chains. Isocyanates suitable for use as cross-linking agents in the present invention are preferably diisocyanates, including biphenyl diisocyanate, dimethoxy-4,4′-biphenyl diisocyanante, dimethyl-4,4′-biphenyl diisocyanate, 1,3-bis(isocyanatomethyl)benzene, phenyl diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate, tolylene diisocyanate, diisocyanato hexane, diisocyanato octane, diisocyanato butane, isophorone diisocyanante, xylene diisocyanate, hexamethylene diisocyanante, octamethylene diisocyanante, phenylene diisocyanate, and poly(hexamethylene diisocyanate). Preferably, the isocyanate used as a cross-linking agent of the collagen molecules of the present invention is hexamethylene diisocyanate.
Carbodiimide cross-linking agents and techniques can also be used within the scope of the present invention. These agents react with the carboxyl groups of aspartic and glutamic acid side chains within the collagen to form isoacylurea derivatives/iso-peptide bonds [Khor, E., ibid.]. Carbodiimides suitable for use as cross-linking agents with the collagen of the present invention include but are not limited to N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC); N,N′-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC); N,N′-di-tert-butylcarbodiimide; 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC; EDAC); water-soluble EDC (WSC); 1-tert-butyl-3-ethylcarbodiimide; 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide; bis(trimethylsilyl)carbodiimide; 1,3-bis(2,2-dimethyl- 1,3-dioxolan-4-ylmethyl)carbodiimide (BDDC, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,602,264); N-cyclohexyl-N′-(2-morpholinoethyl) carbodiimide; N,N′-diethylcarbodiimide (DEC); 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl)carbodiimide methyl-p-toluenesulfonate [e.g., Sheehan, J. C., et al., J Org. Chem., Vol. 21: pp. 439-441 (1956)]; oligomeric alkyl cyclohexylcarbodiimides, such as those described by Zhang, et al. [J. Org. Chem., Vol. 69: pp. 8340-8344 (2004)]; polymer bound DCC; and polymer bound EDC, such as cross-linked N-ethyl-N′-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide on JANDAJEL™. Additionally, N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS), 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole (HOAt), or similar reagents can be utilized in conjunction with the carbodiimide to minimize internal rearrangement of the activated isoacylurea derivative and provide more efficient cross-linking.
As with carbodiimide treatment, acyl azide crosslinking agents produce covalent bonds between the carboxylic acid side chains of aspartic acid and glutamic acids and the ε-amino groups of the lysines of collagen [Petit, H., et al., J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Vol. 24: pp. 179-187 (1990)]. Following esterification of the carboxyl groups in which a methyl group is added to the acid, the biomaterial is treated with hydrazine to form the corresponding hydrazide; sodium nitride is then added to react with the hydrazide and form the acyl azide. Any number of hydrazines known in the art can be used in this method, including maleimidopropionic acid hydrazide (MPH).
Other chemical cross-linking agents suitable for use in the present invention to provide cross-linked collagen molecules which act as soluble coatings on proppant particles include but are not limited to homobifunctional cross-linkers such as BMME, BSOCOES, DSP (a thio-cleavable cross-linker), DSS, EGS, water-soluble EGS, and SATA, as well as heterobifunctional cross-linking agents including GMB, MBS, PMPI, SMCC, SPDP, and MPH (maleimidopropionic acid hydrazide), MCH, EMCH (maleimidocaprionic acid hydrazide), KMUH (N-(k-Maleimidoundecanoic acid)hydrazide), and MPBH (4-(4-N-MaleimidoPhenyl)butyric acid hydrazide), all available from Interchim (Cedex, France).
Other techniques suitable for crosslinking the collagen fibers for use as soluble proppant coatings include but are not limited to dehydration, UV irradiation at 254 nm, glucose-mediated cross-linking (glycation) in conjunction with UV irradiation, and biological cross-linking. The latter technique includes using natural products such as genipin and its related iridoid compounds which are isolated from the fruits of the gardenia plant (Gardenia jasminoides), which are dialdehydes in aqueous solution and thereby can react with the ε-amino groups on lysine side chains of neighboring collagen molecules to provide a cross-link. Other biological cross-linking systems suitable for use with the present invention include catechol-quinone tanning systems, such as 3,4-dihydroxytyramine, and nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), isolated from the creosote bush, which acts as a cross-linking agent via the two catechols on NDGA [Koob, T. J., Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Part A, Vol. 133: pp. 1171-1192 (2002)].
The slowly water-soluble coatings on the particulate substrates, in accordance with the present disclosure, can also be non-collagenic materials such as synthetic polymers that are slowly water soluble. Such non-collagenic materials include but are not limited to: polyethylene oxides, polypropylene oxides, polycaprolactones; grafts of polyethylene/polypropylene and polycaprolenes; grafts of polyethylene/polypropylene oxides and polycaprolactones; water soluble or water reducible acrylics; water reducible phenoxy resin; latex; polyesters; soluble block copolymers; grafts of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polyvinyl acetates; polyactides and derivatives of polylactic acid; polyglycolic acid (PGA); polyglycoliclactic acid (PGLA). Also useful for a water soluble coating are periodic chart elements of group I or II (alkali metal or alkaline earth metal) silicate polymers, e.g. SOLOSIL™ (Foseco International, Ltd., Great Britain), a sodium silicate polymer.
C. Method of Using
In embodiments of the disclosed method, single or multiple intervals of a subterranean formation may be treated or stimulated in stages by successively introducing diverting agent of the present invention into the formation followed by introduction of well treatment fluid into the formation. As used herein, “wellbore” includes cased and/or open hole sections of a well, it being understood that a wellbore may be vertical, horizontal, or a combination thereof. The term “pipe string” refers to any conduit suitable for placement and transportation of fluids into a wellbore including, but not limited to, tubing, work string, drill pipe, coil tubing, etc. Furthermore, it will be understood with benefit of this disclosure that the disclosed diversion agents and diversion treatment techniques are suitable for use with any type of well treatment fluid including, but not limited to, acid treatments, condensate treatments, hydraulic fracture treatments, and the like. Furthermore, it will be understood that the benefits of the disclosed methods and compositions may be realized with well treatments performed below, at, or above a fracturing pressure of a formation.
First: WELLBORE USE: In this aspect of the invention, the use of fully soluble particles in the wellbore (such as collagen or other water soluble polymer plastics or mixtures of these) to divert fluid flow from one zone to another and then dissolve is disclosed. The use of collagen (in both the uncrosslinked and crosslinked form) and soluble plastics are useful in diverting the flow of fluids in the well. These diverting materials should be in the range of 1 to 100 mesh size, preferably 4 to 50 mesh size and can be used in combination with other additives or plastic materials to enhance performance by diverting the flow of fluids from one zone to another.
These materials have been used as diverting ball sealers but recent tests have shown that the material could be used as a diverting agent to block fluid from flowing into one zone and into another of either higher pore pressure or lower permeability.
The present invention provides a method treating a cased wellbore to divert flow of fluids from one zone to another. The method involves pumping into a wellbore a diverting fluid that is made up of an aqueous carrier liquid having dispersed therein a particulate form of a water soluble polymer and wherein the particulate polymer has a density greater than or less than the density of the carrier liquid. As the diverting fluid is pumped into the wellbore the particulate polymer settles into zones of the wellbore and thereby diverts flow of a treating fluid from one zone to another. Generally the treating fluid is diverted or blocked from flowing into a zone of higher pore pressure or lower permeability.
In the methods of this invention relating to wellbore use, the water-soluble particulate polymer is collagen, poly(alkylene) oxide, poly(lactic acid), polyvinylacetate, polyvinylalcohol, polyvinylacetate/polyvinylalcohol, polylactone, polyacrylate, latex, polyester, periodic chart elements of group I or II (alkali metal or alkaline-earth metal) silicate polymer or mixtures thereof. Typically the particulate polymer is present in the carrier liquid in an amount from about 0.001 pounds per gallon to about 10 pounds per gallon of the carrier liquid. Advantageously, the particulate polymer is comprised of varying densities greater or less than the density of the carrier fluid. Typically, the carrier liquid is water, brine, aqueous acid solutions, or gelled acid solutions.
Second: GENERATED FRACTURE USE: In this aspect of the invention, the use of coated particles of various propping agents (coated with either fully soluble or a mix of soluble and insoluble collagen or polymeric plastic materials) can be pumped into the fractured formations to prevent fractures from diverting out of the producing zone. For example, a dense sintered bauxite particle with a soluble or partially soluble coating would fall to the bottom of the fracture and divert the fracture from the lower strata or a water zone. Also, a low-density walnut shell with a soluble or partially soluble coating would tend to rise inside the fracture to divert the fracture from upward growth into a gas or water zone. The coating can be either fully or partially soluble since the proppant will remain in place in the fracture and provide conductivity in the fracture after the frac job is completed. Some of the coating on the proppant should be soluble but a mixture of both soluble and insoluble plastics or collagen is desirable to prevent movement of the propping agent in the fracture.
The use of diverting agents in fractures is that a proppant or propping agent would be coated with a soluble or partially soluble coating—using a collagen and/or polymeric plastic coating material or any mixture of these. The fracture would be diverted by using these soluble coatings on proppants as the defining boundaries of the initial fracture. After the fracturing treatment, the coating would disappear and the previously coated particles would return to normal propping agents, which have high permeability. Coatings on various density proppants could cause the fracture boundaries to be set early in the fracture process since a low viscosity fluid would allow a high density coated proppant to settle or fall inside the fracture to make a lower boundary on the fracture and divert it out from the wellbore to make a longer fracture and increase the productivity of the well. Likewise, a low density coated proppant would tend to rise to the top part of the growing fracture to form a top boundary and divert the growing fracture away from upper zones that may harm the production of the well. With the fracture contained at top and bottom the fracture could grow outward and a longer contained fracture would improve the well potential productivity.
The hydrocarbons flowing out of the producing strata 18 through the perforations 15 and into the interior of the casing 12 can be transported to the surface through a production tubing 20. A production packer, 22, can optionally be installed near the lower end of the production tubing 20 and above the highest perforation 15 in order to achieve a pressure seal between the production tubing 20 and the casing 12. Optionally, and equally acceptable in accordance with the present invention, production tubings 20 need not be used, in which case the entire volume of casing 12 is used to conduct the hydrocarbons to the surface of the earth.
When diversion is needed during a well treatment operation, heavy weight proppant diverting agents 26 a and/or light weight proppant diverting agents 26 b, both of which are substantially coated with a soluble coating in accordance with the present invention (i.e., have a collagen-containing coating), are used to substantially seal the upper and lower sections of the producing strata 18. This substantial sealing, or border formation, occurs when the temporary diverting agents 26 a and/or 26 b are introduced into the casing 12 at a predetermined time during the treatment. When the diverting agents 26 a and/or 26 b are introduced into the fluid upstream of the perforated parts of the casing 12, they are carried down the production tubing 20 or casing 12 by the treating fluid 24 flow. Once the treating fluid 24 arrives at the perforated interval in the casing, it flows outwardly through the perforations 15 and into the strata 18 being treated. The flow of the treating fluid 24 through the perforations 15 carries the temporary diverting agents 26 a and/or 26 b through the perforations and out into the strata 18. At this point, the heavy weight proppant diverting agents 26 a, having a density greater than that of the treating fluid 24, settle to the bottom of the created fracture (as indicated by the arrows), forming a temporary “lower border” between the fracture and, for example a sand, shale or clay layer 19 or other area to which it is desirable to seal off from the producing strata. Similarly, light weight proppant diverting agents 26 a, having a density less than that of treating fluid 24, rise to the top of the created fracture (as indicated by the arrows), thereby forming another temporary “upper border” between the fracture and an undesirable layer, such as a shale or clay band of strata.
The hydrocarbons flowing out of the producing strata in treatment intervals 58, 60 and 62 through the perforations 66 and into the interior of the casing can be transported to the surface through a production tubing, 64. Further, and as illustrated in
When diversion is needed during a well treatment, diverting agents 72 are used to substantially seal some of the perforations 66. Substantial sealing occurs when flow through a perforation 66 is significantly reduced, as often indicated by an increase in wellbore pressure as a diverting agent 72 blocks off one or more perforations 66. In accordance with this aspect of the present invention, diverting agents 72 are preferred to be substantially spherical in shape, although other geometries can be used. Using diverting agents 72 of the present invention to plug some of the perforations 66 is accomplished by introducing the diverting agents 72 into the casing 12 at a pre-determined time during the treatment. When the diverting agents 72 are introduced into the fluid upstream of the perforated parts (66) of the casing 12, they are carried down the production tubing 64 or casing 12 by a flowing fracturing fluid 70. Once the fracturing fluid 70 arrives at the perforated interval in the casing, it flows outwardly through perforations 66 and into the treatment intervals 58, 60, and 62 being treated. The flow of the fracturing fluid 70 through the perforations 66 carries the diverting agents 72 toward the perforations 66, causing them to seat on the perforations 66. Once seated on the perforations 66, diverting agents 72 are held onto the perforations 66 by the fluid pressure differential which exists between the inside of the casing 54 and the treatment intervals 58, 60 and 62 on the outside of casing 54. The diverting agents 72 are preferentially sized to substantially seal the perforations 66 when seated upon them. The seated diverting agents 72 thereby serve to effectively close those perforations 66 until such time as the pressure differential is reversed and the diverting agents released, or the diverting agents 72 dissolve over a period of time due to changes in their environment (e.g., the introduction of water).
The diverting agents 72 will tend to first seal the perforations 66 through which the fracturing fluid 70 is flowing most rapidly. The preferential closing of the high flow rate perforations 66 tends to equalize treatment of the treatment intervals 58, 60 and 62 over the entire, perforated interval. For maximum effectiveness in seating on perforations 66, the diverting agents 72 should have a density less than the density of the treating fluid 70 in the wellbore at the temperature and pressure conditions encountered in the perforated area downhole. Generally, and in accordance with this aspect of the present invention, the diverting agent 72 will have at least a substantial outer surface comprised of collagen or a mixture of collagens. The number of diverting agents 72 needed during a workover or well treatment depends upon the objectives and characteristics of the individual well and the stimulation treatment to be used, and can be determined by one skilled in the art.
In the practice of disclosed methods, the diverting agent or medium suitable for achieving diversion of fluids into the identified treatment intervals that is employed is the diverting agent of the present invention comprising a particulate substrate and a slowly water-soluble collagen outer layer. In one embodiment, a neutrally buoyant variation of this collagen-containing diverting system can be employed, so as to reduce the chance of segregation of the diverting agent and particulate diverting agent carrier fluid. A “neutrally buoyant” diverting system is a system in which a particulate diverting agent is suspended in a carrier fluid having sufficiently close density or specific gravities to result in a mixture in which solid components of the diverting agent do not substantially settle or rise in the system under static conditions. Such segregation can result in, for example, accumulation of diverting agent at one or more locations in the wellbore and sticking of the pipe string within wellbore sections. Furthermore, segregation can result in loss of diversion action due to movement of the diverting agent away from the intervals to be treated. Neutrally buoyant diverting systems may be of particular advantage in highly deviated or horizontal wells, where gravity segregation of a non-neutrally buoyant diverting system may prevent efficient blockage or reduction in permeability of the entire circumference of formation face exposed in the wellbore due, for example, to migration of diverting agent upwards or downwards in the highly deviated or horizontal section of the wellbore.
Diverting agents which may be employed include the diverting agents of the present invention, having a slowly water-soluble outer coating, alone or in combination with any diverting agent (e.g., oil soluble, acid soluble, etc.) suitable for diverting subsequent treatment fluids into intervals having lower injectivity. One suitable diverting agent in accordance with the present invention is a diverting agent that is substantially collagen. Examples of suitable diverting agents which can be combined with the diverting agent of the present invention include, but are not limited to, benzoic acid flakes, wax (such as “Divert VI” available from BJ Services), cement grade gilsonite or unitaite, polymers (including, but not limited to, natural polymers such as guar, or synthetic polymers such as polyacrylate), rock salt, and the like. Other types of suitable diverting agents that can be employed include, but are not limited to, acid soluble diverting agents such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,353,874, and phtalimide particles such as those as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,444,264.
In one embodiment of the present invention, any type of carrier fluid having a density suitable for forming a neutrally buoyant diverter system may be employed, including natural or synthetic brines (such as KCl water, etc.) and carrier fluids including gelling agents (such as normal or synthetic polymers) or other weighting materials known in the art. Cement grade gilsonite (also known as “Uintate”) is a natural variety of asphalt that is crushed and sorted into multiple-size particles. This diverting agent composition may be blended at the well site with specific chemically-modified fresh water (water containing for example, about 0.05% to about 1% of a wetting surfactant) to disperse the gilsonite and optionally, a weighting agent (including but not limited to salts such as KCl, NH4Cl, NaCl, CaCl2, etc.) for density adjustment and/or formation-clay control, and a gelling agent (a polymer such as guar gum, hydroxy propylguar, carboxy methylhydroxy proprylguar, carboxy methyl hydroxyethyl cellulose, xanthan gum, carboxy methyl cellulose, etc.) for viscosity adjustment and/or drag reduction.
The diverting agent of the present invention is preferably present in the carrier fluid in concentrations of from about 0.001 pounds per gallon to about 10 pounds per gallon of carrier liquid but concentrations outside this range can also be used. The most preferred concentrations of diverting agents are from about 0.01 to about 6 pounds per gallon of carrier fluid. Diverting agent concentrations of less than about 0.001 pound per gallon will not as readily plug formations when used in carrier fluids volumes which are normally available at an oil well site. A progressively large volume of carrier fluid would be required to create adequate formation plugs at concentrations of less than 0.001 pounds per gallon.
Concentrations of diverting agent greater than about 10 pounds per gallon would not increase the diverting of the treating fluid to an appreciable extent and therefore are not particularly desirable in carrying out the present invention.
The carrier liquid is typically composed of water, brine, aqueous acid solutions, or gelled acid solutions. The acid solutions can be gelled with a celluloses, gums, polysaccharides, polyacrylamides, alkoxylated fatty amines and mixtures thereof.
The diverting agent may be added to the carrier fluid as the treatment is started, continuously as the treating fluid is pumped into the well bore or may be added in intervals in the carrier fluid between stages of the treatment. For instance, in acidizing procedures the diverting agent may be added to the acidizing fluid continuously. Thus, the diverting agent will progressively plug portions of the formation being treated, thereby frustrating the tendency of the acid to flow only into the most permeable portions of the formation and, instead, creating an evenly acidized formation. When the treating fluid is pumped in stages, the first stage is followed by a volume of the diverting material composed of a carrier fluid, usually gelled or emulsified water or acid, containing the bridging agent. The diverting agent seals off the portion of the formation penetrated by the first stage of treating fluid. The second stage of treating fluid is then pumped into another portion of the formation. Alternating volumes of treating fluid and diverting material may be continued to provide a uniformly acidized formation. Although the same technique of continuously introducing the diverting agent in the carrier fluid may be used for fracturing treatments, it is usual for the diverting agent to be added to the carrier fluid in slugs during fracturing operations.
A fracturing liquid is known to preferentially flow into the portion of the subterranean formation which most readily accepts the liquid. After this portion of the formation is fractured, the bridging agent may be added to the fracturing liquid so that it will plug the already fractured portion of the formation. Because the fracturing fluid is preferentially flowing into the fracture zone, it will carry the bridging agent with it. The fractured zone is thereby plugged and the fracturing fluid is diverted to the most permeable portion of the formation that is still accepting fluids.
This method of fracturing and diverting can, in one aspect of the present invention, be repeated to obtain multiple fractures.
The diverting agent is removed from the formation by means of sublimation of the diverting agent or by solubilization of the diverting agent by the produced fluids. Increasing formation temperatures result in a greater rate of dissolution or sublimation of the diverting agent. For instance, it has been found that at about 250° F., approximately 80 percent by weight of the slightly water-soluble collagen sublimates in 24 hours, while at 300° F., about 95 percent by weight sublimates in 24 hours, and at a temperature of about 400° F., about 99% of the slightly water-soluble collagen sublimates/dissolves in about 24 hours. This shows that the rate of sublimation/dissolution of the diverting agent increases with increasing formation temperature.
The following examples are included to demonstrate preferred embodiments of the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples which follow represent techniques discovered by the inventors to function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments which are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the scope of the invention.
The following prophetic example describes a method of how the soluble coating on the propping agent or agents of the present invention can be used to divert fracture growth and extend the fractures into the productive zone of an oil or gas well. The primary purpose of the soluble coated proppant is to define an upper and lower boundary in the hydraulically generated vertical fracture so that the main direction of growth continues to extend outward in length away from the wellbore. This additional length of the conductive fracture aids in draining additional areas of the productive formation, allowing oil, gas, and/or water recovery production to be improved and greater flow rates to be established as a result of longer fracture length.
The following steps can be followed, using the soluble coated proppant materials of the present invention.
1. A fracture injection rate is established with a low viscosity fracturing fluid.
2. A soluble coated proppant, such as walnut hulls coated with a cross-linked collagen, bauxite coated with cross-linked collagen, or a combination of both, is added at the blender tub in order to form a slurry in the fracturing fluid.
3. The fracturing fluid containing the soluble coated proppant is pumped downhole.
The first part of the slurry enters the initial crack, taking the most fluid. In doing so, it slowly plugs the borders of the created fracture due to the use of a soluble diverting agent, such as collagen, that slowly softens and swells in the fluid.
4. Once the flow rate is slowed or substantially reduced in the first crack, pressure builds up until another flow path, crack, or zone begins to take the soluble coated proppant-containing slurry.
5. In the instance that both the top and the bottom of the fracture need to be contained by the soluble coated proppant, two different proppant densities are preferably used. For example, a high density bauxite particle is coated with a soluble, collagen coating that slowly softens and swells as it falls in the fracture to the bottom of the vertically-created fracture. To slow the growth upwards in the vertical fracture, a second proppant of low density, such as a soluble-coated walnut hull, is added to the injection fluid. As the injection fluid enters the formation, the low-density, soluble-material coated proppant rises in the vertical fracture and slows down fluid loss and growth in an upward direction.
6. As the fracture is still being injected with fluid above the fracture rate and pressure, the fracture continues to grow away from the wellbore and control of the fracture growth is maintained by controlling the flow rate of the fracturing fluid. Injection is continued until the regular proppant fills the fracture, pressure reaches a pre-set limit, or until the total planned volume is injected.
7. Standard, non-soluble coated proppants, such as Ottawa Sand (20/40), ceramic, or any number of resin-coated proppants, are injected into the formation, once the top and bottom growth is diminished. Pumping is continued until the full amount of designated proppant (or proppants) are placed in the created fractures.
8. The well is shut in, and the pumping equipment is removed.
9. The well is returned to production, and the soluble collagen-coating on the walnut hulls or bauxite is removed as the water in the formation dissolves the soluble coating on the proppant over time.
Sand substrate was coated with various water-soluble polymers:
Chemical Name Trade Name Supplier Poly(ethylene) oxide WSR 80 Dow Chemicals Poly(propylene) oxide WSRN 750 Dow Chemicals Poly(proplylene) oxide UCAR309 Dow Chemicals Poly(lactic acid) PLA6551-D E&M specialties Poly(lactic acid) PLA5600 E&M specialties Poly(vinylacetate/alcohol) PVA/Hydrolene Idroplax Inc. Collagen 1 Glue 512 Milligans and Higgins Collagen 2 GM Bond Hormel foods
Thereafter, the following test procedure was used to determine rate and degree of solubility:
Determine the total mass of the polymer on the sand by regular LOI procedure. Add 500 grams of coated sand in 1 liter of water. Take a 400 mm filter paper and weight it on an analytical balance up to 4 decimal places. Prepare vacuum filtration apparatus by using 400 mm filter paper, perforated ceramic funnel, 2 liters Erlenmeyer flask with side opening connected to the vacuum pump by a rubber tube. Filter the coated sand and water slurry through 400 mm filter paper after each one-minute interval. Remember to add coated sand back in the “filtered” water. Remove the filter paper from the perforated funnel after filtration is complete, and allow it to dry by keeping it in desiccators. Weigh the filter paper. This is the combined weight of dissolved polymer and filter paper, and thus it should be greater than the weight of the filter paper before it was used in filtration process. Calculate the % of dissolved polymer by using the following formula:
C=mass (gms) of the filter after filtration process
Particles that swell Particles that dissolve and then dissolve without swelling UCAR309 WSR 80 COLLAGEN 1 WSRN750 COLLAGEN 2 PLA 6551-D PLA 5600
The results of this test procedure were that a polyethylene oxide(WSR 80 from Dow Chemical) reach full dissolution at 80° F. in about 300 minutes, at 150° F. it required about 180 minutes, and at 200° F. it required about 90 minutes.
The same test was run using another polymer. These results showed that the polypropylene oxide polymer(WSRN 750 from Dow Chemicals) reached full dissolution at 80° F. in about 390 minutes, at 150° F. it required about 320 minutes, and at 200° F. it required about 245 minutes to fully dissolve.
Polymers that swell show 100% solubility within 30 minutes, but microscopic analysis shows retention on the filter paper due to swelling instead of dissolution. Formation of gelatinous mass and noticeable increase in the volume of the sand/water slurry indicate polymer swelling instead of polymer dissolution.
All of the compositions, methods, and/or processes disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions, methods, and/or processes and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the methods described herein without departing from the concept and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents which are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the scope and concept of the invention.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US20040261995 *||Jun 27, 2003||Dec 30, 2004||Nguyen Philip D.||Compositions and methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well|
|US20050006095 *||Jul 8, 2003||Jan 13, 2005||Donald Justus||Reduced-density proppants and methods of using reduced-density proppants to enhance their transport in well bores and fractures|
|US20050034865 *||Aug 14, 2003||Feb 17, 2005||Todd Bradley L.||Compositions and methods for degrading filter cake|
|US20050059558 *||Sep 20, 2004||Mar 17, 2005||Blauch Matthew E.||Methods for improving proppant pack permeability and fracture conductivity in a subterranean well|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7490667||Oct 2, 2006||Feb 17, 2009||Fairmount Minerals, Inc.||Proppants with soluble composite coatings|
|US7580796 *||Jul 31, 2007||Aug 25, 2009||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Methods and systems for evaluating and treating previously-fractured subterranean formations|
|US7637320 *||Dec 18, 2006||Dec 29, 2009||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Differential filters for stopping water during oil production|
|US7678723||May 19, 2008||Mar 16, 2010||Carbo Ceramics, Inc.||Sintered spherical pellets|
|US7708069 *||Jul 24, 2007||May 4, 2010||Superior Energy Services, L.L.C.||Method to enhance proppant conductivity from hydraulically fractured wells|
|US7721804||Jul 2, 2008||May 25, 2010||Carbo Ceramics Inc.||Proppants for gel clean-up|
|US7784541||Jul 16, 2008||Aug 31, 2010||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||System and method for low damage fracturing|
|US7825053 *||Jan 25, 2010||Nov 2, 2010||Carbo Ceramics Inc.||Sintered spherical pellets|
|US7828998||Jul 10, 2007||Nov 9, 2010||Carbo Ceramics, Inc.||Material having a controlled microstructure, core-shell macrostructure, and method for its fabrication|
|US7833947||Jun 25, 2009||Nov 16, 2010||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Method for treatment of a well using high solid content fluid delivery|
|US7923415||Aug 31, 2009||Apr 12, 2011||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Methods to reduce settling rate of solids in a treatment fluid|
|US7934556||May 21, 2007||May 3, 2011||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Method and system for treating a subterranean formation using diversion|
|US8006760 *||Apr 10, 2008||Aug 30, 2011||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Clean fluid systems for partial monolayer fracturing|
|US8016034 *||Sep 1, 2009||Sep 13, 2011||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Methods of fluid placement and diversion in subterranean formations|
|US8062997 *||Apr 24, 2009||Nov 22, 2011||Halliburton Energy Services Inc.||Method for enhancing stability of oil based drilling fluids at high temperatures|
|US8109335||Jul 13, 2009||Feb 7, 2012||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Degradable diverting agents and associated methods|
|US8119574||Jun 30, 2010||Feb 21, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||High solids content slurries and methods|
|US8122950||Apr 8, 2009||Feb 28, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Microwave-based downhole activation method for wellbore consolidation applications|
|US8205673||Dec 21, 2009||Jun 26, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Differential filters for removing water during oil production|
|US8211247||Jun 28, 2006||Jul 3, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Degradable compositions, apparatus comprising same, and method of use|
|US8211248||Feb 16, 2009||Jul 3, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Aged-hardenable aluminum alloy with environmental degradability, methods of use and making|
|US8220543||Mar 10, 2011||Jul 17, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Method and system for treating a subterranean formation using diversion|
|US8220554||Nov 16, 2007||Jul 17, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Degradable whipstock apparatus and method of use|
|US8231947||Jun 30, 2006||Jul 31, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Oilfield elements having controlled solubility and methods of use|
|US8496056||Aug 30, 2010||Jul 30, 2013||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||System and method for low damage fracturing|
|US8561696||Nov 18, 2008||Oct 22, 2013||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Method of placing ball sealers for fluid diversion|
|US8567494 *||Aug 31, 2005||Oct 29, 2013||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Well operating elements comprising a soluble component and methods of use|
|US8586507 *||Sep 28, 2011||Nov 19, 2013||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Oil based drilling fluids with enhanced stability at high temperatures|
|US8646529||Jul 12, 2012||Feb 11, 2014||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Method and system for treating a subterranean formation using diversion|
|US8646530 *||Dec 21, 2009||Feb 11, 2014||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Chemical diversion technique|
|US8663401||Nov 21, 2011||Mar 4, 2014||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Degradable compositions, apparatus comprising same, and methods of use|
|US8714250 *||Oct 15, 2008||May 6, 2014||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Multilayered ball sealer and method of use thereof|
|US8752627||Jun 6, 2013||Jun 17, 2014||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||System and method for low damage fracturing|
|US8765646||Feb 14, 2012||Jul 1, 2014||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||High solids content slurries and methods|
|US8833452||Dec 16, 2010||Sep 16, 2014||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Chemical diversion technique|
|US8905133||May 11, 2011||Dec 9, 2014||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Methods of zonal isolation and treatment diversion|
|US8936085||Apr 15, 2008||Jan 20, 2015||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Sealing by ball sealers|
|US8936095||May 28, 2010||Jan 20, 2015||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Methods of magnetic particle delivery for oil and gas wells|
|US8950476 *||Mar 4, 2011||Feb 10, 2015||Accessesp Uk Limited||Coiled tubing deployed ESP|
|US9040468||Nov 11, 2011||May 26, 2015||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Hydrolyzable particle compositions, treatment fluids and methods|
|US9080440||Mar 28, 2011||Jul 14, 2015||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Proppant pillar placement in a fracture with high solid content fluid|
|US20090101334 *||Oct 15, 2008||Apr 23, 2009||Belgin Baser||Multilayered ball sealer and method of use thereof|
|US20100051274 *||Mar 4, 2010||Tommy Johnson||Methods, apparatus and products for drilling wells|
|US20110048697 *||Aug 25, 2009||Mar 3, 2011||Sam Lewis||Sonically activating settable compositions|
|US20110146987 *||Dec 21, 2009||Jun 23, 2011||Don Williamson||Chemical diversion technique|
|US20110186297 *||Aug 4, 2011||Trican Well Service Ltd.||Applications of smart fluids in well service operations|
|US20120222856 *||Mar 4, 2011||Sep 6, 2012||Artificial Lift Company||Coiled tubing deployed esp|
|US20120285695 *||May 11, 2011||Nov 15, 2012||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Destructible containers for downhole material and chemical delivery|
|US20130126242 *||May 23, 2013||Tommy Johnson||Methods and apparatus for drilling wells|
|US20130292112 *||Sep 14, 2012||Nov 7, 2013||Los Alamos National Security, Llc||Composition and method for locating productive rock fractures for fluid flow|
|US20140135237 *||Nov 15, 2012||May 15, 2014||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Expandable Coating for Solid Particles and Associated Methods of Use in Subterranean Treatments|
|US20140262231 *||Mar 13, 2013||Sep 18, 2014||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Methods for treatment of a subterranean formation|
|US20150060069 *||Aug 27, 2013||Mar 5, 2015||Schlumberger Technology Corporation||Swellable ball sealers|
|CN102399549A *||Sep 15, 2010||Apr 4, 2012||中国石油天然气集团公司||Rock breaking agent for stabilizing well walls and preparation method thereof|
|CN102561989A *||Feb 21, 2012||Jul 11, 2012||重庆市能源投资集团科技有限责任公司||Coal mine underground hydraulic fracturing hole sealing method|
|EP2110508A1 *||Apr 16, 2008||Oct 21, 2009||Schlumberger Holdings Limited||microwave-based downhole activation method for wellbore consolidation applications|
|EP2179132A1 *||Apr 30, 2008||Apr 28, 2010||Superior Energy Services, L.L.C.||A method to enhance proppant conductivity from hydraulically fractured wells|
|EP2179132A4 *||Apr 30, 2008||Oct 8, 2014||Csi Technologies Llc||A method to enhance proppant conductivity from hydraulically fractured wells|
|WO2008001310A1 *||Jun 26, 2007||Jan 3, 2008||Schlumberger Ca Ltd||Method and system for treating a subterraean formation using diversion|
|WO2009009370A1 *||Jul 2, 2008||Jan 15, 2009||Carbo Ceramics Inc||Proppants for gel clean-up|
|WO2011143639A2 *||May 13, 2011||Nov 17, 2011||Chemical Delivery Systems, Inc.||Materials and methods for temporarily obstructing portions of drilled wells|
|WO2012024498A2 *||Aug 18, 2011||Feb 23, 2012||Prad Research And Development Ltd||Wellbore service fluid and methods of use|
|WO2014037707A1 *||Sep 2, 2013||Mar 13, 2014||Oilflow Solutions Holdings Limited||Methods for treating subterranean formations|
|WO2014172711A1 *||Apr 21, 2014||Oct 23, 2014||Clearwater International, Llc||Hydraulic diversion systems to enhance matrix treatments and methods for using same|
|WO2015038146A1 *||Sep 13, 2013||Mar 19, 2015||Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.||Compositions for treating subterranean formations|
|U.S. Classification||166/283, 166/313|
|International Classification||E21B43/26, E21B43/14|
|Cooperative Classification||E21B43/261, E21B43/14, C09K8/805|
|European Classification||C09K8/80B, E21B43/26P, E21B43/14|
|Apr 18, 2006||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: FAIRMOUNT MINERALS, LTD., OHIO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SINCLAIR, A. RICHARD;OKELL, PATRICK R.;AKBAR, SYED;REEL/FRAME:017499/0490;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060217 TO 20060308
|Aug 9, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: BARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NEW YORK
Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:FAIRMOUNT MINERALS, LTD.;REEL/FRAME:024804/0940
Effective date: 20100805
|Oct 17, 2014||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: FAIRMOUNT SANTROL INC., OHIO
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:FAIRMOUNT MINERALS, LTD.;REEL/FRAME:034013/0803
Effective date: 20140814