Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20060217780 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/249,034
Publication dateSep 28, 2006
Filing dateOct 11, 2005
Priority dateDec 9, 2002
Also published asUS6959215, US20040111129, WO2004058347A1
Publication number11249034, 249034, US 2006/0217780 A1, US 2006/217780 A1, US 20060217780 A1, US 20060217780A1, US 2006217780 A1, US 2006217780A1, US-A1-20060217780, US-A1-2006217780, US2006/0217780A1, US2006/217780A1, US20060217780 A1, US20060217780A1, US2006217780 A1, US2006217780A1
InventorsBradford Gliner, Allen Wyler
Original AssigneeGliner Bradford E, Allen Wyler
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Methods for treating essential tremor
US 20060217780 A1
Abstract
Methods for treating essential tremor are disclosed. A method in accordance with one embodiment of the invention includes directing a patient to perform a muscle action, for example, a postural or kinetic muscle action. The method can further include directing information to be collected, with the information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain while the patient performs the muscle action. The essential tremor motion of the patient can then be at least reduced by applying an electrical stimulation at least proximate to a stimulation site, with the location of the stimulation site being based at least in part on the collected information. The information can include visual images, such as are generated by MRI, fMRI, or CT techniques, or the information can be non-visual. In particular embodiments, the location of the stimulation site can be determined by comparing two pieces of information, for example, neural activities before and after drug intake, or neural activities at the left and right hemispheres of the brain.
Images(10)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
1. A method for treating essential tremor, comprising:
directing a patient to perform a muscle action;
directing information to be collected, the information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain while the patient performs the muscle action; and
at least reducing an essential tremor motion of the patient by applying an electrical stimulation at least proximate to a stimulation site, the location of the stimulation site being based at least in part on the information.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein at least reducing an essential tremor motion includes eliminating the essential tremor motion.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein directing information to be collected includes directing a computer-based routine to collect the information.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising directing the formation of an image of at least a portion of the patient's brain, with at least a portion of the image having features representative of the information.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein directing information to be collected includes directing the formation an image of at least a portion of the patient's brain, the image including a first region with a characteristic of the first region having a first value, the image further including a second region with the characteristic of the second region having a second value different than the first value.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein directing information to be collected includes directing information to be collected on blood oxygen levels in the brain.
7. The method of claim, 1 further comprising locating the stimulation site relative to an anatomical feature of the patient.
8. The method of claim 1 further comprising locating the stimulation site relative to a fiducial having a fixed location relative to the patient's skull.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising implanting at least one electrode at least proximate to the stimulation site, and wherein applying an electrical stimulation includes applying an electrical signal to the at least one electrode.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein directing information to be collected while the patient performs a muscle action includes directing first information to be collected while the patient performs the muscle action a first time, and wherein the method further comprises:
affecting the patient's motor nerves by introducing a drug into the patient's body;
directing second information to be collected while the patient performs the muscle action a second time and while the patient is under the influence of the drug; and
directing a comparison of the first information with the second information to identify the stimulation site of the brain.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein at least reducing the patient's essential tremor further includes administering drugs to the patient.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein applying an electrical stimulation includes applying a varying electrical stimulation signal having a frequency of from about 5 Hz to about 200 Hz.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein applying an electrical stimulation includes applying a varying electrical stimulation signal having an electrical potential of from about 0.25 volts to about 5.0 volts.
14. The method of claim 1 wherein directing the patient to perform a muscle action includes directing the patient to move the muscle.
15. The method of claim 1 wherein directing the patient to perform a muscle action includes directing the patient to maintain a muscle in a particular position.
16. The method of claim 1, further comprising placing an electrode at least proximate to the stimulation site.
17. The method of claim 1 wherein the information includes second information and applying an electrical stimulation at least proximate to a stimulation site includes applying an electrical stimulation to a stimulation site having a location based on a comparison of the second information with first information, the first information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain while the patient does not perform the muscle action.
18. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
directing the patient to undergo a plurality of muscle actions; and
selecting from the plurality of muscle actions a muscle action that produces a selected level of essential tremor motion, and wherein directing the patient to perform a muscle action includes directing the patient to perform the muscle action producing the selected level of essential tremor motion.
19. A method for treating essential tremor, comprising:
identifying a muscle action subject to essential tremor;
monitoring a first image of the patient's brain function while the patient is not performing the muscle action;
monitoring a second image of the patient's brain function while the patient performs the muscle action;
comparing the first and second images to identify a stimulation site of the brain;
placing at least one electrode at least proximate to the stimulation site;
at least reducing the patient's essential tremor motion by applying an electrical stimulation at least proximate to the stimulation site.
20-50. (canceled)
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    The present application claims priority to pending U.S. Provisional Application 60/432,073, entitled “System and Method for Treating Parkinson's Disease and other Movement Disorders,” filed December 9, 2002.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • [0002]
    The present invention is directed toward systems and methods for treating essential tremor, associated with abnormal neural activity in the brain.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0003]
    A wide variety of mental and physical processes are controlled or influenced by neural activity in particular regions of the brain. For example, various physical or cognitive functions are directed or affected by neural activity within the sensory or motor cortices. Across most individuals, particular areas of the brain appear to have distinct functions. In the majority of people, for example, the areas of the occipital lobes relate to vision; the regions of the left interior frontal lobes relate to language; portions of the cerebral cortex appear to be consistently involved with conscious awareness, memory, and intellect; and particular regions of the cerebral cortex as well as the basal ganglia, the thalamus, and the motor cortex cooperatively interact to facilitate motor function control.
  • [0004]
    Essential tremor is a frequently occurring, complex neurologic movement disorder. At this time, the causes of essential tremor are not well understood.
  • [0005]
    Essential tremor (or ET) typically affects the hands, but it can also affect the head and neck (causing shaking), the face, jaw, tongue, voice, trunk, and, on occasion, the legs and feet. The tremor can take the form of a rhythmic lateral motion or forward and aft motion produced by involuntary muscle contractions. The duration and intensity of the tremors can vary substantially from one day to the next and during the course of a given day. ET typically has two forms: postural tremor, which occurs when the patient holds the affected muscle in a particular position, and kinetic tremor, which occurs when the patient moves the affected muscle in a particular way. Most patients affected by ET have both postural and kinetic tremor symptoms.
  • [0006]
    Effectively treating ET can be very difficult. Current treatments for ET symptoms include drugs, surgical intervention, and/or neural stimulation. Drug treatments or therapies may involve the administration of a beta-adrenergic blocker or anticonvulsant medication to the patient. Drug therapies may involve propanolol, mysoline, primidone, benzodiazepine, or a weak solution of botulinum toxin A. Unfortunately, many patients cannot tolerate or fail to adequately respond to drug therapies.
  • [0007]
    Surgical intervention for ET typically includes a thalamotomy, a procedure that involves ablating or destroying a selected portion of the thalamus. Unfortunately, surgical intervention is a very time consuming and highly invasive procedure. Potential complications associated with the procedure include risk of hemorrhage, stroke, and/or paralysis. Furthermore, because the procedures permanently destroy neural tissue, the effects of such intervention cannot be readily adjusted or “fine tuned” over time.
  • [0008]
    Neural stimulation treatments have shown promising results for reducing some of the symptoms associated with ET. Neural activity is governed by electrical impulses or “action potentials” generated in and propagated by neurons. While in a quiescent state, a neuron is negatively polarized and exhibits a resting membrane potential that is typically between −70 and −60 mV. Through chemical connections known as synapses, any given neuron receives excitatory and inhibitory input signals or stimuli from other neurons. A neuron integrates the excitatory and inhibitory input signals it receives, and generates or fires a series of action potentials in the event that the integration exceeds a threshold potential. A neural firing threshold, for example, may be approximately −55 mV. Action potentials propagate to the neuron's synapses and are then conveyed to other synaptically connected neurons.
  • [0009]
    Neural activity in the brain can be influenced by neural stimulation, which involves the application of electrical and/or magnetic stimuli to one or more target neural populations within a patient using a waveform generator or other type of device. Various neural functions can thus be promoted or disrupted by applying an electrical current to one or more regions of the brain. As a result, researchers have attempted to treat certain neurological conditions, including ET, using electrical or magnetic stimulation signals to control or affect brain functions.
  • [0010]
    Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a neural stimulation therapy that has been used as an alternative to drug treatments and ablative surgical therapies. In DBS, one or more electrodes are surgically implanted into the brain proximate to deep brain or subcortical neural structures. For treating ET, an electrode is typically positioned in or proximate to the ventrointermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus. In a typical DBS system, a pulse generator delivers a continuous or essentially continuous electrical stimulation signal having a pulse repetition frequency of approximately 150 Hz to each of two deep brain electrodes. U.S. Pat. No. 5,883,709 discloses one conventional DBS system for treating movement disorders.
  • [0011]
    Although DBS therapies may significantly reduce ET symptoms, particularly when combined with drug treatments, they are highly invasive procedures. In general, configuring a DBS system to properly function within a patient requires a time consuming, highly invasive surgical procedure for implanting at least one, and possibly two, DBS electrodes. DBS surgical procedures have essentially the same risks as those described above for ablative surgical intervention.
  • [0012]
    Motor Cortex Stimulation (MCS) is another type of brain stimulation treatment that has been proposed for treating movement disorders, such as ET and Parkinson's disease. MCS involves the application of stimulation signals to the motor cortex of a patient. One MCS system includes a pulse generator connected to a strip electrode that is surgically implanted over a portion of only the motor cortex (precentral gyrus). The use of MCS to treat symptoms associated with Parkinson's Disease is described in Canavero, Sergio, “Extradural Motor Cortex Stimulation for Advanced Parkinson's Disease: Case Report,” Movement Disorders (Vol. 15, No. 1, 2000).
  • [0013]
    Because MCS involves the application of stimulation signals to surface regions of the brain rather than deep neural structures, electrode implantation procedures for MCS are significantly less invasive and time consuming than those for DBS. As a result, MCS may be a safer and simpler alternative to DBS for treating ET symptoms. Present MCS techniques, however, fail to address or adequately consider a variety of factors that may enhance or optimize the extent to which a patient experiences short term and/or long term relief from ET symptoms.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0014]
    FIGS. 1A-1B are flow charts illustrating methods for treating essential tremor in accordance with several embodiments of the invention.
  • [0015]
    FIG. 2A is an image showing a mid saggital section of a brain of a patient.
  • [0016]
    FIG. 2B is an image showing an axial view of a portion of the cerebral cortex of the brain of the patient.
  • [0017]
    FIG. 3A is a side view of a brain of a patient with an electrode array implanted in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.
  • [0018]
    FIG. 3B is a side view of a brain of a patient with an electrode array implanted in accordance with another embodiment of the invention.
  • [0019]
    FIG. 4 is a side view of a brain of a patient showing one arrangement for applying neural stimulation to treat essential tremor.
  • [0020]
    FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the cerebral cortex of a patient illustrating an arrangement for treating essential tremor in accordance with another embodiment of the invention.
  • [0021]
    FIG. 6 is a schematic view illustrating a system for treating essential tremor in accordance with still another embodiment of the invention.
  • [0022]
    FIG. 7A-7B are flow charts illustrating methods for treating essential tremor in accordance with yet further embodiments of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0023]
    The following disclosure describes several embodiments and systems for treating essential tremor and other movement disorders using cortical stimulation. Several features of methods and systems in accordance with embodiments of the invention are set forth and described in FIGS. 1A-7B. It will be appreciated that methods and systems in accordance with other embodiments of the invention can include additional procedures or features different than those shown in FIGS. 1A-78. Additionally, methods and systems in accordance with several embodiments of the invention may not include all of the features shown in these Figures. Throughout the Figures, like reference numbers refer to similar or identical components or procedures.
  • [0024]
    FIG. 1A is a flow chart illustrating a method for treating essential tremor in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In one embodiment, a method 100 a for treating essential tremor includes directing a patient to perform a muscle action (method portion 102). The muscle action can include maintaining the muscle in a certain position, and/or moving the muscle in a certain manner. The method 100 a can further include directing the collection of information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain while the patient performs the muscle action (method portion 104). In one aspect of this embodiment, method portion 104 can be performed at least in part by a human operator, for example, a technician or doctor who operates an imaging system. In another aspect of this embodiment, the process of directing the collection of information can be performed partially or entirely by a computer, for example, by a hardware and/or software based routine that collects the information corresponding to the level of neural activity. In either embodiment, the information can take several forms, and/or can correspond to the level of neural activity in the patient's brain by way of several techniques, as described in greater detail below with reference to FIG. 1B.
  • [0025]
    In process portion 106, the method 100 a includes at least reducing an essential tremor motion of the patient by applying an electrical stimulation at least proximate to a stimulation site, with the location of the stimulation site based at least in part on the information collected in method portion 104. For example, an operator and/or a computer-based set of instructions can apply an electrical stimulation to one or more electrodes or electrical contacts placed within the patient's brain. Further aspects of this and other embodiments of process portion 106 are also described in greater detail below with reference to FIG. 1B.
  • [0026]
    FIG. 1B is a flow chart illustrating a method 100 b for treating essential tremor in accordance with another embodiment of the invention. The method 100 b includes further details of collecting information (method portion 104, FIG. 1A) and reducing essential tremor motion (method portion 106, FIG. 1A) associated with this embodiment. In one aspect of this embodiment, the method 100 b can include identifying a muscle action subject to essential tremor (method portion 110). For example, a practitioner can direct the patient to perform a variety of movements, (e.g., for kinetic tremor) and/or assume a variety of positions (e.g., for postural tremor) while the practitioner observes the patient for an indication of essential tremor motion. Based on the results of this activity, the practitioner can single out one or more muscle actions that manifest essential tremor behavior or motion.
  • [0027]
    In method portion 112, the practitioner can monitor a first or baseline image of the patient's brain function while the patient is not performing the muscle action identified in method portion 110 (e.g., while the patient or relevant patient muscles are generally at rest, or the patient avoids performing the muscle action). In one embodiment, the first image can be generated using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) techniques, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques, or computed tomography (CT) techniques. In a particular aspect of this embodiment, the first image can be generated by fMRI techniques that determine the level of the patient's brain function based on a measurement of blood oxygen levels in the patient's brain. In other embodiments, the level of the patient's brain function is ascertained by other techniques. In any of these embodiments, the first image can include an image of a portion of the patient's brain upon which is superimposed some indication of the brain activity level. For example, the image can be color-coded to distinguish parts of the brain having a high level of activity (e.g., presented in one color) from portions of the brain having a relatively low level of activity (e.g., presented in another color). The image can include an image of the relative position between external markers and at least one of the central sulcus, precentral gyrus, and/or the postcentral gyrus of a patient. The external markers can be anatomical features of the patient (e.g., the patient's nose bridge or ear canal) or fiducials that are attached to the patient. For example, the external markers can be fiducials that are attached to the skull of the patient.
  • [0028]
    In method portion 114, the practitioner can monitor a second image of the patient's brain function while the patient performs the muscle action identified in method portion 110. In a particular aspect of this embodiment, the technique used to generate the second image is at least approximately identical to the technique used to produce the first image. Accordingly, the two images can be easily compared.
  • [0029]
    In method portion 116, the first and second images are compared to identify a stimulation site of the brain. For example, if a particular portion of the brain shows activity when the patient executes an essential tremor motion or assumes an essential tremor posture, this region can be identified by comparing the first image with the second image. In some cases, a portion of the brain responsible for coordinating the muscle movement required to execute the motion or assume the posture may also be a portion of the brain responsible for generating the tremor motion itself. In other embodiments, the correlation between the portions of the brain responsible for these two functions may be less clear. In these situations, the practitioner may use additional techniques (described in greater detail below with reference to FIGS. 7A-7B) to isolate the site responsible for tremor motion. In any of these embodiments, the stimulation site can be generally proximate to the dura of the patient and can be positioned over at least the precentral gyrus of the cortex. In particular embodiments, the stimulation site can also be located over the central sulcus and/or the postcentral gyrus of the patient. In any of these embodiments, the methods 100 a and 100 b result in an accurate determination of the location of the underlying cortical features relative to external landmarks on the patient. As explained in more detail below, this is expected to significantly improve the efficacy of stimulation therapies for treating ET.
  • [0030]
    In method portion 118, the practitioner can place at least one electrode at least proximate to the stimulation site determined in method portion 116. In method portion 120, the patient's essential tremor motion is reduced or eliminated by applying an electrical stimulation at least proximate to the stimulation site. The neural stimulation can be an electrical current applied epidurally or subdurally to the stimulation site. When the neural stimulation is an electrical current applied directly to the cerebral cortex proximate to the dura, the method 100 b can include implanting an electrode at least proximate to the dura at the stimulation site. In other embodiments, the neural stimulation can be transcutaneous magnetic stimulation. Several aspects of electrodes, placement techniques, and stimulation techniques in accordance with particular embodiments of the invention are described in more detail below with respect to FIGS. 2A-7B.
  • [0031]
    FIGS. 2A and 2B are examples of images corresponding to method portions 104, 112 and 114 (FIG. 1B). FIG. 2A is a magnetic resonance image 200 a showing a view of the brain 210 of a patient P taken along a mid saggital section. The image 200 a shows the location of various features of the cerebral cortex 220 relative to fiducial markers 230 attached to the skull of the patient P. In one embodiment, the pars marginalis sulcus 240 of the cortex 220 is located using the image 200 a of the mid saggital section. This particular image is useful because the pars marginalis sulcus is the only sulcus that can be followed into the interhemispheric fissure in this view. Based on the location of the pars marginalis sulcus shown in image 200 a, this position can be extrapolated to an axial image to determine the location of the central sulcus, the postcentral gyrus, and the precentral gyrus on the cortex 220 relative to the external markers.
  • [0032]
    In a further aspect of an embodiment of the methods 100 a, 100 b described above, an axial image of the cortex 220 is generated. FIG. 2B is a magnetic resonance image 200 b of a brain of a patient taken along an axial section. Referring to FIG. 2B, the pars marginalis sulcus 240 appears as a small, symmetrical sulcus extending bilaterally out from the interhemispheric fissure. Based upon the position of the pars marginalis sulcus 240, the position of the postcentral sulcus 242 can be determined by moving laterally (i.e., outward) from the pars marginalis sulcus 240. The postcentral sulcus 242 forms the posterior boundary of the postcentral gyrus 260, and thus the central sulcus 244 can be identified as the anterior boundary of the postcentral gyrus 260. Similarly, the central sulcus 244 forms the posterior boundary of the precentral gyrus 250 and the precentral sulcus 246 forms the anterior boundary of the precentral gyrus 250.
  • [0033]
    Identifying a stimulation site of the brain (method portion 116, FIG. 1B) can also include identifying an external region on the patient relative to the location of the central sulcus 244. After identifying the location of the central sulcus 244 on the image 200 b, the location of the central sulcus 244 is noted relative to the external markers 230. Using standard neuronavigational MRI techniques, the data from the images can be transferred into an intraoperative navigational station that locates the external position on the scalp of the patient overlying the central sulcus 244 relative to the position of the fiducial markers 230. The external position accordingly defines the general area where stimulation will be applied. The actual stimulation site is generally under the scalp at an area that is proximate to the dura of the patient and aligned with the external position identified on the patient.
  • [0034]
    FIGS. 2A-2B refer to specific process portions (e.g., process portion 112 and 114) described above with reference to FIG. 1B that include monitoring images of the patient's brain. In other embodiments, the method portion of directing the collection of information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain while the patient performs a muscle action (e.g., method portion 104, FIG. 1A) can be completed without generating an image. For example, fMRI, MRI, or CT techniques can be used to generate a digital representation of brain activity without necessarily generating a visible image. In a particular aspect of this embodiment, an algorithm or other computer-based method can be used to determine the stimulation site, based upon the digital representation described above. In either of these embodiments, the patient can receive electrical stimulation at the stimulation site via implanted electrodes. Techniques for placing the electrodes at the stimulation site are described in greater detail below with reference to FIGS. 3A-3C.
  • [0035]
    FIGS. 3A-3B illustrate several embodiments of the process portion 118 (FIG. 1B) which includes placing at least one electrode at least proximate to a stimulation site. FIG. 3A, more specifically, is a schematic side view of the brain 200 illustrating a technique for implanting a linear electrode array 310 at a stimulation site 300 a proximate to the dura and over the precentral gyrus 250, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. In one aspect of this embodiment, the linear electrode array 310 has a plurality of electrodes 320 arranged along a single row. In other embodiments the linear electrode array 310 may have only one electrode 320. The electrodes 320 can be circular contacts each having a surface area of approximately 5 mm2 and being spaced apart by about 7.5 mm. In other embodiments, the electrodes can be other shapes and have other configurations, for example, those disclosed in pending U.S. application Ser. No. ______, entitled “Apparatuses and Systems for Applying Electrical Stimulation to a Patient,” (attorney docket no. 33734.8047US), filed ______ and incorporated herein by reference. In one aspect of an embodiment shown in FIG. 3A, the linear electrode array 310 has a lead 322 coupled to the electrodes 320 and an implanted pulse generator implanted above the neck or at a subclavicular location. The lead 322 is tunneled through the patient using standard techniques.
  • [0036]
    The linear electrode array 310 can be positioned so that the row of electrodes 320 extends in a medial to lateral direction generally parallel with the central sulcus 244. The electrodes 320 are also superimposed over the precentral gyrus 250. The linear electrode array 310 generally has a plurality of electrodes 320 to provide extensive coverage over the precentral gyrus 250 and thus activate a large number of neurons in the motor cortex (e.g., use all of the electrodes) or only discrete populations of neurons in the motor cortex with only a single implantation of an electrode array (e.g., activate only selected electrodes). The electrode array 310 can be implanted so that the electrodes are proximate to the dura such as at an epidural or subdural location.
  • [0037]
    FIG. 3B is a side-view of the brain 200 illustrating another embodiment for implanting an electrode array proximate to the dura at the stimulation site. In this embodiment, the stimulation site 300 b is located over the precentral gyrus 250 and the postcentral gyrus 260. A grid electrode array 330 is implanted at the stimulation site 300 b proximate to the dura. The grid electrode array 330 can include a plurality of first electrodes 340 a arranged along a first row and a plurality of second electrodes 340 b arranged along a second row. The first and second rows of electrodes 340 a-b can extend generally at an oblique angle relative to the central sulcus 244. The grid electrode array 330 also has a lead 342 coupled to the electrodes 340 a-b and an implanted pulse generator. As with the linear electrode array 310, the grid electrode array 330 can be implanted so that the electrodes are proximate to the dura.
  • [0038]
    One aspect of several embodiments of the invention is that the stimulation sites 300 a and 300 b shown on FIGS. 3A and 3B may be located relative to the precentral gyrus 250, the central sulcus 244, and/or the postcentral gyrus 260 using the information collection and site selection procedures described above with reference to FIGS. 1A-2B. This enables the stimulation to be applied to desired locations on the cortex with much greater accuracy than previous methods that rely solely on the external anatomical features of the patient. The greater precision of locating the stimulation sites 300 a-b for implanting the electrode arrays is expected to enhance the efficacy of stimulation treatments for treating essential tremor.
  • [0039]
    FIG. 4 is a side view illustrating several embodiments of applying neural stimulation directly to the stimulation site. More specifically, FIG. 4 illustrates the grid electrode array 330 positioned at the stimulation site 300 b over the precentral gyrus 250, the central sulcus 244, and the postcentral gyrus 260. The neural stimulation can include passing an electrical current through the electrodes 340 a-b to the stimulation site 300 b. In one embodiment, the electrical current can be applied to a single one of the electrodes 340 a or 340 b to provide a monopolar pulse of current to a small area of the cortex 220. A return electrode can be positioned elsewhere in the patient, such as on the other side of the patient's brain or at a subclavicular location. The return electrode can be a portion of a pulse generator or another electrode implanted elsewhere in the patient. In other embodiments, electrical current can be passed through all of the electrodes 340 a-b or only a subset of these electrodes to activate larger or different populations of neurons. In these embodiments, the potential applied to the electrodes 340 a-b can be the same across all of the activated electrodes to provide monopolar stimulation at the stimulation site. This embodiment also typically has a return electrode implanted elsewhere in the patient as explained above. In other embodiments, some of the electrodes can be biased with a positive polarity and other electrodes can be biased with a negative polarity. For example, the first electrodes 340 a can be biased with one polarity and the second electrodes 340 b can be biased with an opposite polarity. This embodiment provides a bipolar stimulation to the cortex 220. The particular configuration of the electrodes can be optimized after implantation to provide the most efficacious therapy for the patient.
  • [0040]
    The particular waveform of the stimuli depends upon the symptoms of the particular patients. In one embodiment, the stimulus can have a waveform with a voltage of approximately 0.25 V-5.0 V, a pulse duration of approximately 20 microseconds-500 milliseconds, and a frequency of approximately 10 Hz-200 Hz. In other embodiments, the electrical stimulus can have a voltage of 0.5 V-3.5 V, a pulse duration of 100 microseconds-200 microseconds, and a frequency of approximately 20 Hz-50 Hz. In still other embodiments, the voltage of the waveform can be approximately 2.0-3.5 V, and more particularly approximately around 3 V. Additionally, the pulse duration can be in the range of 90-180 microseconds. The stimulus can be applied for a period of 0.5 hour-4.0 hours, and in many applications the therapy is applied for a period of approximately 0.5 hour-1.5 hours. In other embodiments, the stimulation can be applied continuously, or only during waking periods but not sleeping periods. Examples of specific stimulation protocols for use with an electrode array at an epidural stimulation site over the precentral gyrus are as follows:
  • EXAMPLE 1
  • [0041]
    An electrical stimulus having a voltage of approximately 2.1 V, an impedance of 600 to 1000 Ohms, a pulse duration of 160 microseconds, and a frequency of approximately 130 Hz. The therapy is not applied continuously, but rather during 30-60 minute intervals.
  • EXAMPLE 2
  • [0042]
    The stimulus has a voltage amplitude of approximately 3 V-3.5 V, a pulse duration of approximately 150-180 microseconds, and a frequency of approximately 25 Hz-31 Hz. The stimulus is applied continuously during waking periods, but it is discontinued during sleeping periods to conserve battery life of the implanted pulse generator.
  • EXAMPLE 3
  • [0043]
    The stimulus has a voltage of approximately 3.0 V, a pulse duration of approximately 90 microseconds, and a frequency of approximately 30 Hz. This stimulus is applied continuously during waking and sleeping periods, but it can be discontinued during sleeping periods.
  • [0044]
    FIG. 5 illustrates another aspect of an embodiment of the invention. In many cases of essential tremor, the symptoms are manifested to a greater extent on one side of the body than the other. For example, a patient may have a tremor in both hands, but usually one hand will have a tremor worse than the other hand. In this embodiment, the patient's body is divided into a first side and a second side opposite the first side relative to a medial axis (e.g., right side-left side), and only one side of the cortex is stimulated to treat the disorder on both sides of the body. This embodiment can be carried out by implanting the electrode array 330 (or 310) at a stimulation site on only the first side of the patient when the disorder of a motor function is greater on the second side of the patient. The single electrode array can provide a bilateral affect that not only treats the disorder associated with the second side of the patient, but also treats the disorder associated with the first side of the patient. For example, if the patient experiences a bilateral tremor that is worse on the right side compared to the left side, then an electrode array can be implanted proximate to the dura over only the left hemisphere of the cortex 220. The bilateral effect of the single-side stimulation may be enhanced using unipolar, monopolar, or isopolar stimulation techniques in which one or more nonfloating electrodes 320 are biased at an identical polarity. The bilateral effect may be caused by activation of commissural neurons (large pyramidal cells) in the deep portion of layer III of the motor cortex. Subsequent to activation, these neurons can depolarize complimentary cell groups in the contralateral hemisphere via the corpus callosum. By accurately locating the electrodes over the precentral gyrus using the information collection and site selection procedures described above, the electrode may maximally affect the contralateral lower extremity musculature and also the ipsilateral muscle groups. It is expected that the placement should be sufficiently remote from the interhemispheric fissure to avoid venous damage or occlusion. As a result, the single-side stimulation site may be particularly advantageous in certain situations because it requires only a single electrode array to be planted relative to a single hemisphere of the cortex 220 of the patient. This reduces the invasiveness and the risk associated with surgery.
  • [0045]
    FIG. 6 is a schematic view illustrating a system for treating essential tremor in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The system can include the linear electrode array 310 coupled to an implanted pulse generator 600 a implanted at a subclavicular location in the patient P. The grid electrode array 330 can be substituted for the linear electrode array 310. In either of these embodiments, a lead 322/342 is tunneled between the implanted pulse generator 600 a and the electrode array. In another embodiment, the system has an implanted above-neck pulse generator 600 b that is smaller and configured to be implanted at a location above the neck of the patient P. The above-neck implanted pulse generator 600 b can be planted posteriorly of the ear of the patient P. In each of these embodiments, the electrode arrays 310 or 330 (not shown in FIG. 6) are implanted underneath the skull S of the patient P at an epidural or subdural stimulation site as set forth above.
  • [0046]
    FIGS. 7A-7B illustrate methods for treating essential tremor in accordance with further embodiments of the invention. Beginning with FIG. 7A, a method 700 a includes directing a patient to perform an action with a first muscle on a first side of the patient's body, with the first muscle being controlled by a second hemisphere of the patient's brain (method portion 702). The action can include holding the muscle at a particular position or moving the muscle in a particular manner. The method further includes (while the patient performs the action with the first muscle) directing the collection of first information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain (method portion 704). The patient is then directed to perform an action with a second muscle on a second side of the patient's body, the second muscle mirroring the first muscle and being controlled by the first hemisphere of the patient's brain (method portion 706). While the patient performs an action with the second muscle, the method 700 a can include directing the collection of second information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain (method portion 708). In method portion 710, an essential tremor motion of the patient is reduced or eliminated by applying an electrical stimulation at least proximate to a stimulation site. The stimulation site is located based at least in part on a comparison of the first information with the second information.
  • [0047]
    In a particular aspect of an embodiment of the method 700 a described above, a practitioner can make use of the frequent tendency of the patient to manifest essential tremor symptoms on one side of the body more than on the other. For example, if the patient has more essential tremor motion associated with movement of the left hand than with the right hand, the practitioner can ask the patient to move the left hand and then view an image of the right side of the patient's brain while the patient undergoes the directed movement. The practitioner can then direct the patient to move the right hand while viewing an image of the left hemisphere of the patient's brain. By comparing the two images, the practitioner can attribute common aspects of the active areas of the images to brain activity associated with non-essential tremor movement, and differences between active areas of the images with motion related to essential tremor. For example, in a particular embodiment, the common aspects of the images can include common areas or volumes indicated to have heightened neural activity. In other embodiments, the common aspects can include areas or volumes that have the same level of heightened neural activity. In either embodiment, the practitioner can compare the two images to more accurately identify the portion of the brain associated with the essential tremor motion and can therefore more accurately target this portion of the brain with electrical stimulation. In still further embodiments, (as described above), some or all of the foregoing method portions can be executed automatically by a computer and without generating a visual image.
  • [0048]
    Referring now to FIG. 7B, a method 700 b in accordance with another embodiment of the invention includes directing the collection of first information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain while the patient performs a muscle action (method portion 720). In method portion 722, the patient's motor nerves are affected by introducing a drug into the patient's body. The method 700 b further includes directing the collection of second information corresponding to a level of neural activity in the patient's brain while the patient performs the muscle action and while the patient is under the influence of the drug (method portion 724). In method portion 726, the patient's essential tremor motion is at least reduced by applying an electrical stimulation at least proximate to a stimulation site, with a location of the stimulation site being based at least in part on a comparison of the first information with the second information. For example, it has been observed that a patient normally subject to essential tremor motion experiences a reduction in essential tremor motion when under the influence of alcohol or other drugs such as propanolol, mysoline, primidone, benzodiazepine or botulinum toxin A. A practitioner can compare neural information associated with muscle action before and after the influence of the drug to more readily determine the location of the patient's brain responsible for the essential tremor motion alone. Accordingly, the practitioner can more accurately target electrical stimulation to this location.
  • [0049]
    In any of the embodiments described above with reference to FIGS. 1A-7B, the patient can receive drug therapy in conjunction with the electrical stimulation. For example, in a particular embodiment, the drug is administered to the patient so as to be active in the patient's system during electrical stimulation treatment. In a particular aspect of this embodiment, the drug can include alcohol, propanolol, mysoline, primidone, benzodiazepine or botulinum toxin A. In other embodiments, the drug can have other constituents.
  • [0050]
    From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the leads of the electrode arrays may be coupled to an external pulse generator instead of an implanted pulse generator. Methods and systems in accordance with other embodiments of the invention are included in pending U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/432,073, (attorney docket no. 33734.8040US) entitled “System and Method for Treating Parkinson's Disease and other Movement Disorders,” filed Dec. 9, 2002 and pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/317,002 (attorney docket no. 33734.8048US), entitled “Systems and Methods for Enhancing or Optimizing Neural Stimulation Therapy for Treating Symptoms of Parkinson's Disease and/or Other Movement Disorders,” filed Dec. 10, 2002, both incorporated herein by reference. Accordingly, the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3024702 *Apr 27, 1959Mar 13, 1962Reinholdt FriedrichEmergency warning device
US3650276 *Mar 25, 1969Mar 21, 1972Inst Demedicina Si FarmacieMethod and apparatus, including a flexible electrode, for the electric neurostimulation of the neurogenic bladder
US4019518 *Aug 11, 1975Apr 26, 1977Medtronic, Inc.Electrical stimulation system
US4140133 *Apr 26, 1977Feb 20, 1979Moskovsky Oblastnoi Nauchno-Issledovatelsky Institut Akusherstva I Ginekolog IiDevice for pulse current action on central nervous system
US4245645 *Jul 20, 1978Jan 20, 1981Arseneault Pierre MichelSelf-locking cerebral electrical probe
US4308868 *May 27, 1980Jan 5, 1982The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space AdministrationImplantable electrical device
US4431000 *May 23, 1980Feb 14, 1984Gatron CorporationTranscutaneous nerve stimulator with pseusorandom pulse generator
US4646744 *Jun 29, 1984Mar 3, 1987Zion FoundationMethod and treatment with transcranially applied electrical signals
US4817634 *Jun 18, 1987Apr 4, 1989Medtronic, Inc.Epicardial patch electrode
US4903702 *Oct 17, 1988Feb 27, 1990Ad-Tech Medical Instrument CorporationBrain-contact for sensing epileptogenic foci with improved accuracy
US5002053 *Apr 21, 1989Mar 26, 1991University Of ArkansasMethod of and device for inducing locomotion by electrical stimulation of the spinal cord
US5092835 *Jul 6, 1990Mar 3, 1992Schurig Janet L SBrain and nerve healing power apparatus and method
US5184620 *Dec 26, 1991Feb 9, 1993Marquette Electronics, Inc.Method of using a multiple electrode pad assembly
US5193540 *Dec 18, 1991Mar 16, 1993Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific ResearchStructure and method of manufacture of an implantable microstimulator
US5282468 *Jan 8, 1992Feb 1, 1994Medtronic, Inc.Implantable neural electrode
US5299569 *May 3, 1991Apr 5, 1994Cyberonics, Inc.Treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders by nerve stimulation
US5303705 *May 1, 1992Apr 19, 1994Nenov Valeriy IEvoked 23NA MR imaging of sodium currents in the brain
US5304206 *Nov 18, 1991Apr 19, 1994Cyberonics, Inc.Activation techniques for implantable medical device
US5405375 *Jan 21, 1994Apr 11, 1995Incontrol, Inc.Combined mapping, pacing, and defibrillating catheter
US5406957 *Sep 14, 1993Apr 18, 1995Tansey; Michael A.Electroencephalic neurofeedback apparatus for training and tracking of cognitive states
US5591216 *May 19, 1995Jan 7, 1997Medtronic, Inc.Method for treatment of sleep apnea by electrical stimulation
US5593432 *Jun 23, 1993Jan 14, 1997Neuroware Therapy International, Inc.Method for neurostimulation for pain alleviation
US5601611 *Aug 5, 1994Feb 11, 1997Ventritex, Inc.Optical blood flow measurement apparatus and method and implantable defibrillator incorporating same
US5611350 *Feb 8, 1996Mar 18, 1997John; Michael S.Method and apparatus for facilitating recovery of patients in deep coma
US5618531 *Jul 13, 1993Apr 8, 1997New York UniversityMethod for increasing the viability of cells which are administered to the brain or spinal cord
US5707334 *Aug 21, 1995Jan 13, 1998Young; Robert B.Method of treating amygdala related transitory disorders
US5711316 *Apr 30, 1996Jan 27, 1998Medtronic, Inc.Method of treating movement disorders by brain infusion
US5713922 *Apr 25, 1996Feb 3, 1998Medtronic, Inc.Techniques for adjusting the locus of excitation of neural tissue in the spinal cord or brain
US5713923 *May 13, 1996Feb 3, 1998Medtronic, Inc.Techniques for treating epilepsy by brain stimulation and drug infusion
US5722401 *Nov 13, 1995Mar 3, 1998Cardiac Pathways CorporationEndocardial mapping and/or ablation catheter probe
US5735814 *Apr 30, 1996Apr 7, 1998Medtronic, Inc.Techniques of treating neurodegenerative disorders by brain infusion
US5865842 *Aug 29, 1996Feb 2, 1999Medtronic, Inc.System and method for anchoring brain stimulation lead or catheter
US5871517 *Jan 15, 1997Feb 16, 1999Somatics, Inc.Convulsive therapy apparatus to stimulate and monitor the extent of therapeutic value of the treatment
US5885976 *Nov 25, 1997Mar 23, 1999Sandyk; ReuvenMethods useful for the treatment of neurological and mental disorders related to deficient serotonin neurotransmission and impaired pineal melatonin functions
US5886769 *May 18, 1998Mar 23, 1999Zolten; A. J.Method of training and rehabilitating brain function using hemi-lenses
US5896883 *Jan 31, 1996Apr 27, 1999Khalatbari; BijanPortable liquid mud plant
US6011996 *Jan 20, 1998Jan 4, 2000Medtronic, IncDual electrode lead and method for brain target localization in functional stereotactic brain surgery
US6016449 *Oct 27, 1997Jan 18, 2000Neuropace, Inc.System for treatment of neurological disorders
US6018682 *Apr 30, 1998Jan 25, 2000Medtronic, Inc.Implantable seizure warning system
US6021352 *Jun 26, 1996Feb 1, 2000Medtronic, Inc,Diagnostic testing methods and apparatus for implantable therapy devices
US6026326 *Jan 13, 1997Feb 15, 2000Medtronic, Inc.Apparatus and method for treating chronic constipation
US6035236 *Jul 13, 1998Mar 7, 2000Bionergy Therapeutics, Inc.Methods and apparatus for electrical microcurrent stimulation therapy
US6038480 *Feb 17, 1998Mar 14, 2000Medtronic, Inc.Living tissue stimulation and recording techniques with local control of active sites
US6040180 *May 7, 1997Mar 21, 2000Neuralstem Biopharmaceuticals, Ltd.In vitro generation of differentiated neurons from cultures of mammalian multipotential CNS stem cells
US6042579 *Apr 30, 1997Mar 28, 2000Medtronic, Inc.Techniques for treating neurodegenerative disorders by infusion of nerve growth factors into the brain
US6052624 *Jan 7, 1999Apr 18, 2000Advanced Bionics CorporationDirectional programming for implantable electrode arrays
US6055456 *Apr 29, 1999Apr 25, 2000Medtronic, Inc.Single and multi-polar implantable lead for sacral nerve electrical stimulation
US6176242 *Apr 30, 1999Jan 23, 2001Medtronic IncMethod of treating manic depression by brain infusion
US6190893 *Sep 18, 1998Feb 20, 2001Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyElectroactive materials for stimulation of biological activity of bone marrow stromal cells
US6198958 *Jun 11, 1998Mar 6, 2001Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Inc.Method and apparatus for monitoring a magnetic resonance image during transcranial magnetic stimulation
US6205360 *Sep 6, 1996Mar 20, 2001Cochlear LimitedApparatus and method for automatically determining stimulation parameters
US6205361 *Jan 28, 1999Mar 20, 2001Advanced Bionics CorporationImplantable expandable multicontact electrodes
US6210417 *Apr 29, 1999Apr 3, 2001Medtronic, Inc.Medical lead positioning and anchoring system
US6339725 *Jul 10, 2000Jan 15, 2002The Board Of Trustees Of Southern Illinois UniversityMethods of modulating aspects of brain neural plasticity by vagus nerve stimulation
US6353754 *Apr 24, 2000Mar 5, 2002Neuropace, Inc.System for the creation of patient specific templates for epileptiform activity detection
US6353762 *Apr 30, 1999Mar 5, 2002Medtronic, Inc.Techniques for selective activation of neurons in the brain, spinal cord parenchyma or peripheral nerve
US6354299 *Jun 30, 2000Mar 12, 2002Neuropace, Inc.Implantable device for patient communication
US6356786 *Jan 20, 2000Mar 12, 2002Electrocore Techniques, LlcMethod of treating palmar hyperhydrosis by electrical stimulation of the sympathetic nervous chain
US6356792 *Jan 20, 2000Mar 12, 2002Electro Core Technologies, LlcSkull mounted electrode lead securing assembly
US6360122 *Aug 2, 2000Mar 19, 2002Neuropace, Inc.Data recording methods for an implantable device
US6505075 *May 22, 2000Jan 7, 2003Richard L. WeinerPeripheral nerve stimulation method
US6507755 *Mar 3, 1999Jan 14, 2003Neurometrix, Inc.Apparatus and method for stimulating human tissue
US6529774 *Nov 9, 2000Mar 4, 2003Neuropace, Inc.Extradural leads, neurostimulator assemblies, and processes of using them for somatosensory and brain stimulation
US6539263 *Jun 7, 2000Mar 25, 2003Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.Feedback mechanism for deep brain stimulation
US6684105 *Aug 31, 2001Jan 27, 2004Biocontrol Medical, Ltd.Treatment of disorders by unidirectional nerve stimulation
US6687525 *Jun 7, 2001Feb 3, 2004New York UniversityMethod and system for diagnosing and treating thalamocortical dysrhythmia
US6690974 *Sep 11, 2001Feb 10, 2004Neuropace, Inc.Stimulation signal generator for an implantable device
US6708064 *Dec 24, 2001Mar 16, 2004Ali R. RezaiModulation of the brain to affect psychiatric disorders
US6839594 *Apr 26, 2001Jan 4, 2005Biocontrol Medical LtdActuation and control of limbs through motor nerve stimulation
US6850802 *Mar 20, 2003Feb 1, 2005Medtronic, Inc.Selective brain stimulation using conditioning pulses
US6873872 *Oct 11, 2002Mar 29, 2005George Mason UniversityAdaptive electric field modulation of neural systems
US6990377 *Apr 26, 2004Jan 24, 2006Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Systems and methods for facilitating and/or effectuating development, rehabilitation, restoration, and/or recovery of visual function through neural stimulation
US7006859 *Jul 18, 2003Feb 28, 2006Flint Hills Scientific, L.L.C.Unitized electrode with three-dimensional multi-site, multi-modal capabilities for detection and control of brain state changes
US7010351 *Mar 8, 2001Mar 7, 2006Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient
US7015816 *Oct 31, 2003Mar 21, 2006Hill-Rom Services, Inc.Hygiene monitoring system
US7184840 *Apr 22, 2002Feb 27, 2007Medtronic, Inc.Implantable lead with isolated contact coupling
US7187968 *Oct 23, 2003Mar 6, 2007Duke UniversityApparatus for acquiring and transmitting neural signals and related methods
US7187977 *Jun 10, 2003Mar 6, 2007Atlantic Medical, Inc.Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation device and method using microcurrent
US7191018 *Jun 30, 2004Mar 13, 2007Medtronic, Inc.Techniques for positioning therapy delivery elements within a spinal cord or brain
US20030028072 *Sep 17, 2002Feb 6, 2003Neuropace, Inc.Low frequency magnetic neurostimulator for the treatment of neurological disorders
US20050004620 *Apr 30, 2004Jan 6, 2005Medtronic, Inc.Implantable medical device with anti-infection agent
US20050013310 *Aug 12, 2004Jan 20, 2005Broadcom CorporationApparatus and method for unilateral topology discovery in network management
US20050015129 *May 11, 2004Jan 20, 2005Mische Hans A.Methods and devices for the treatment of neurological and physiological disorders
US20050021104 *Apr 5, 2004Jan 27, 2005Dilorenzo Daniel JohnApparatus and method for closed-loop intracranial stimulation for optimal control of neurological disease
US20050021105 *Aug 6, 2004Jan 27, 2005Firlik Andrew D.Methods and apparatus for effectuating a change in a neural-function of a patient
US20050021106 *Aug 6, 2004Jan 27, 2005Firlik Andrew D.Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient
US20050021107 *Aug 6, 2004Jan 27, 2005Firlik Andrew D.Methods and apparatus for effectuating a lasting change in a neural-function of a patient
US20050021118 *Jun 25, 2004Jan 27, 2005Chris GenauApparatuses and systems for applying electrical stimulation to a patient
US20050027284 *Jun 18, 2004Feb 3, 2005Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.Method of treating depression, mood disorders and anxiety disorders using neuromodulation
US20050033378 *Dec 9, 2003Feb 10, 2005Sheffield Warren DouglasMethods for treating and/or collecting information regarding neurological disorders, including language disorders
US20050070971 *Aug 2, 2004Mar 31, 2005Brad FowlerApparatus and methods for applying neural stimulation to a patient
US20060004422 *Mar 11, 2005Jan 5, 2006Dirk De RidderElectrical stimulation system and method for stimulating tissue in the brain to treat a neurological condition
US20060004423 *Sep 9, 2005Jan 5, 2006Boveja Birinder RMethods and systems to provide therapy or alleviate symptoms of chronic headache, transformed migraine, and occipital neuralgia by providing rectangular and/or complex electrical pulses to occipital nerves
US20060015153 *Jul 15, 2005Jan 19, 2006Gliner Bradford ESystems and methods for enhancing or affecting neural stimulation efficiency and/or efficacy
US20060020297 *Oct 29, 2004Jan 26, 2006Gerber Martin TNeurostimulation system with distributed stimulators
US20070032834 *Apr 20, 2006Feb 8, 2007Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators
US20070055320 *Sep 7, 2006Mar 8, 2007Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Methods for treating temporal lobe epilepsy, associated neurological disorders, and other patient functions
US20080039895 *Apr 6, 2007Feb 14, 2008Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Electromagnetic signal delivery for tissue affected by neuronal dysfunction, degradation, damage, and/or necrosis, and associated systems and methods
US20080045775 *Dec 22, 2004Feb 21, 2008Andres M LozanoMethod and Apparatus for Affecting Neurologic Function and/or Treating Neurologic Dysfunction Through Timed Neural Stimulation
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7869867Jan 11, 2011Cyberonics, Inc.Implantable neurostimulator with refractory stimulation
US7869884Jan 11, 2011Cyberonics, Inc.Non-surgical device and methods for trans-esophageal vagus nerve stimulation
US7869885Apr 28, 2006Jan 11, 2011Cyberonics, IncThreshold optimization for tissue stimulation therapy
US7904175Apr 26, 2007Mar 8, 2011Cyberonics, Inc.Trans-esophageal vagus nerve stimulation
US7962214Jun 14, 2011Cyberonics, Inc.Non-surgical device and methods for trans-esophageal vagus nerve stimulation
US7962220Apr 28, 2006Jun 14, 2011Cyberonics, Inc.Compensation reduction in tissue stimulation therapy
US7974701Apr 27, 2007Jul 5, 2011Cyberonics, Inc.Dosing limitation for an implantable medical device
US7996079Jan 24, 2006Aug 9, 2011Cyberonics, Inc.Input response override for an implantable medical device
US8150508Mar 29, 2007Apr 3, 2012Catholic Healthcare WestVagus nerve stimulation method
US8204603Jun 19, 2012Cyberonics, Inc.Blocking exogenous action potentials by an implantable medical device
US8219188Jul 10, 2012Catholic Healthcare WestSynchronization of vagus nerve stimulation with the cardiac cycle of a patient
US8260426Sep 4, 2012Cyberonics, Inc.Method, apparatus and system for bipolar charge utilization during stimulation by an implantable medical device
US8280505Oct 2, 2012Catholic Healthcare WestVagus nerve stimulation method
US8306627Nov 6, 2012Cyberonics, Inc.Dosing limitation for an implantable medical device
US8457747Oct 20, 2008Jun 4, 2013Cyberonics, Inc.Neurostimulation with signal duration determined by a cardiac cycle
US8565867Jan 25, 2008Oct 22, 2013Cyberonics, Inc.Changeable electrode polarity stimulation by an implantable medical device
US8600513 *Dec 7, 2011Dec 3, 2013The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversitySeizure prediction and neurological disorder treatment
US8615309Mar 29, 2007Dec 24, 2013Catholic Healthcare WestMicroburst electrical stimulation of cranial nerves for the treatment of medical conditions
US8660666Mar 10, 2009Feb 25, 2014Catholic Healthcare WestMicroburst electrical stimulation of cranial nerves for the treatment of medical conditions
US8738126Mar 10, 2009May 27, 2014Catholic Healthcare WestSynchronization of vagus nerve stimulation with the cardiac cycle of a patient
US8874218Apr 23, 2013Oct 28, 2014Cyberonics, Inc.Neurostimulation with signal duration determined by a cardiac cycle
US9108041Nov 25, 2013Aug 18, 2015Dignity HealthMicroburst electrical stimulation of cranial nerves for the treatment of medical conditions
US9289599Apr 3, 2012Mar 22, 2016Dignity HealthVagus nerve stimulation method
US9314633Aug 31, 2012Apr 19, 2016Cyberonics, Inc.Contingent cardio-protection for epilepsy patients
US20120150257 *Jun 14, 2012Dorian AurSeizure prediction and neurological disorder treatment
Classifications
U.S. Classification607/45
International ClassificationA61N1/32, A61N1/18, A61N1/05, A61N1/36, A61N1/08
Cooperative ClassificationA61N1/36135, A61N1/36067, A61N1/0531, A61N1/08, A61N1/32
European ClassificationA61N1/05K1C, A61N1/36Z, A61N1/32, A61N1/36, A61N1/08
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jun 12, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: ADVANCED NEUROMODULATION SYSTEMS, INC., TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHSTAR NEUROSCIENCE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022813/0542
Effective date: 20090521
Owner name: ADVANCED NEUROMODULATION SYSTEMS, INC.,TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHSTAR NEUROSCIENCE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022813/0542
Effective date: 20090521