Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20060282328 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/451,995
Publication dateDec 14, 2006
Filing dateJun 12, 2006
Priority dateJun 13, 2005
Also published asEP1969543A2, EP2242012A1, EP2244220A1, US20070118802, WO2007056378A2, WO2007056378A3
Publication number11451995, 451995, US 2006/0282328 A1, US 2006/282328 A1, US 20060282328 A1, US 20060282328A1, US 2006282328 A1, US 2006282328A1, US-A1-20060282328, US-A1-2006282328, US2006/0282328A1, US2006/282328A1, US20060282328 A1, US20060282328A1, US2006282328 A1, US2006282328A1
InventorsThomas Gerace, Russell Barbour
Original AssigneeGather Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Computer method and apparatus for targeting advertising
US 20060282328 A1
Abstract
In a global network of computers, a method ad system of profiling a user for targeting advertisements is disclosed. The method and system obtains and/or infers demographic information from end-users using on-line means. The invention next monitors end user activity and determines keywords therefrom. The system and method profiles an end user as a function of the determined end-user activity keywords and obtained/inferred end-user demographic information. Profiles of end-users are matched against targeted profiles of advertisements which are defined by the respective advertisers. This results in targeting advertisements to end-users based on end user profiles. Advertisers bid for advertisement placement with the system. In some embodiments, the system employs Vickrey auction type bidding. Using observed user behavior and the auction results, ads are prioritized for selection and viewing placement in a manner that provides the greatest potential value to the system.
Images(26)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(46)
1. In a global network of computers, a method of profiling a user for targeting advertisements, comprising the computer implemented steps of:
obtaining demographic information from end-users using on-line means;
monitoring end user activity and determining keywords therefrom; and
profiling an end user as a function of determined end-user activity keywords and obtained end-user demographic information so as to enable a matching of profiles of end-users to advertisements and thus targeting advertisements to end-users based on end user profiles.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of obtaining demographic information includes providing an on-line form completed by end-users.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of obtaining demographic information includes inferring demographics of an end-user.
4. A method as claimed in claim 3 wherein inferring demographics includes:
assuming a Zip Code for the end-user based on Zip Codes detected in end-user activity,
assuming age of the end-user based on ages of others detected in end-user activity,
assuming gender of end-user based on gender of others detected in end-user activity.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of obtaining demographic information includes soliciting from one end-user demographic data of another end-user.
6. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of determining keywords includes any combination of:
determining keywords read by an end-user,
determining keywords written by an end-user,
determining keywords searched on by an end-user,
determining keywords browsed by an end-user,
determining keywords forwarded by an end-user,
determining keywords bookmarked by an end-user,
determining keywords in comments of an end-user,
determining keywords received or sent in email messages of the end-user,
recency of a keyword being read or written by an end user, and
frequency of a keyword being read or written by an end user.
7. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the step of determining keywords includes any combination of:
determining keywords of categories of content browsed by an end-user;
determining keywords of categories of content read by an end-user;
determining keywords of categories of content written by an end-user;
recency of keyword of category read or written by an end-user;
frequency of keyword of category read or written by an end-user;
determining keywords of tags of content browsed, read or written by an end-user;
frequence of keywords of tags read or written by an end-user; and
recency of keywords of tags read or written by an end-user.
8. A method as claimed in claim 7 further comprising any combination of the steps of: expiring category keywords based on respective recency or frequency; and expiring tag keywords based on respective recency or frequency.
9. In a global network of computers, a method of targeting advertisements, comprising the computer implemented steps of:
obtaining demographic information from end-users using on-line means;
monitoring end user activity and determining keywords therefrom;
receiving a subject advertisement having keywords associated therewith; and
determining end user to target the subject advertisement to based on a comparison of (i) a combination of determined end user activity keywords and obtained end-user demographic information to (ii) the subject advertisement keywords.
10. A method as claimed in claim 9 wherein the combination is advertiser defined.
11. A method as claimed in claim 9 further comprising the step of
obtaining bid amounts for projected audience reach where audience reach is estimated number of end-users the subject advertisement is determined to be targeted for.
12. A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the step of obtaining bid amounts includes utilizing a graphical user interface having a user-controlled sliding view of estimated number of end-users viewing or selecting per day as graphed against cost per view.
13. A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the step of obtaining bid amounts includes:
receiving input dollar amount per number of views, and
in response, indicating likely number of impressions resulting and average placement of the subject advertisement for the input dollar amount.
14. A method as claimed in claim 13 wherein the step of receiving input dollar amount is per number of sales completed or per registration completed.
15. A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the step of obtaining bid amounts includes:
receiving input dollar amount per click-through, and
in response, indicating likely number of click-throughs resulting, average placement of the subject advertisement and total cost of the subject advertisement.
16. A method as claimed in claim 11 further comprising the step of prioritizing the subject advertisement relative to other advertisements in a manner based on financial reward to a hosting web site or ad serving network that makes determination of end-users to target advertisements to.
17. A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the step of obtaining bid amounts employs a Vickrey style auction.
18. A method as claimed in claim 17 wherein the bid amounts are one of cost per click, cost per view or cost per acquisition made of item being advertised.
19. A method as claimed in claim 11 wherein the step of obtaining bid amounts includes focusing on a certain author or specific story for higher bid amounts.
20. In a global network of computers, a method of targeting and displaying advertisements to end-users comprising the computer implemented steps of:
obtaining demographic information from end-users;
monitoring end-user activity and determining keywords therefrom;
providing one or more advertisements having respective keywords associated therewith; and
displaying to a given end-user a subset of the advertisements as a function of advertisement keywords compared to any of the demographic information of the given end-user and/or given end-user activity keywords.
21. A method as claimed in claim 20 wherein the step of displaying includes selecting and ordering advertisements of the subset based on respective bid amounts of said advertisements.
22. A method as claimed in claim 20 further comprising the step of projecting respective likelihood of the given end-user selecting the advertisements in the subset, and
the step of displaying includes displaying said advertisements as a function of respective projected likelihood.
23. A method as claimed in claim 22 wherein the step of displaying includes ranking said advertisements as a function of respective projected likelihood multiplied by respective bid amount, and displaying to the given end user the advertisements in the subset according to said ranking.
24. A method as claimed in claim 23 wherein said ranking further includes degrading the respective projected likelihood of the given end-user selecting the advertisements in the subset every N times one of the advertisements is viewed by the given end-user and not selected by the end-user, N being greater than zero.
25. A method as claimed in claim 20 further comprising the step of reporting to advertisers indications of the advertisements displayed and selected by end-users.
26. A method as claimed in claim 25 wherein the step of reporting includes reporting to advertisers any combination of number of sales, number of subscriptions, number of registrations made by end-users through respective advertisements.
27. A method as claimed in claim 25 wherein the step of reporting includes filtering reports by demographics, keywords, category, context and/or end-user behavior.
28. A method as claimed in claim 25 wherein the step of reporting includes showing a breakdown on reports by demographics, keywords/phrase, category, context and/or end-user behavior.
29. A method as claimed in claim 20 further comprising the step of obtaining end-user ratings of the displayed advertisements.
30. A method as claimed in claim 29 wherein the step of obtaining is only from end-users who selected the displayed advertisement or end-users who made a purchase through the displayed advertisement.
31. A method as claimed in claim 20 wherein the advertisements are categorized by any of: advertiser type, product type, geographic region, product cost range, language and keywords.
32. A method as claimed in claim 31 wherein the step of displaying includes displaying to the given end-user an option to view other similar advertisements based on categorization of the advertisements in the subset.
33. A method as claimed in claim 32 wherein upon end-user selection of the option, one or more similar advertisements are displayed and at least one advertisement of the subset of advertisements remains visible.
34. A method as claimed in claim 32 wherein said displaying an option includes
(i) enabling the end-user to respond to the other similar advertisements, or
(ii) for each similar advertisement, providing a respective option to display more advertisements similarly categorized.
35. A method as claimed in claim 32 further comprising the step of enabling advertisers to (i) bid additional money to prevent display of the option or (ii) pay a fee to remove display of the option.
36. A method as claimed in claim 20 wherein the subset of advertisements include advertisements that the given end-user has previously seen, advertisements that the given end user has responded to in the past being identified and having indications thereof recorded.
37. A method as claimed in claim 36 wherein the step of displaying includes providing to the given end user an option to see advertisements previously viewed or responded to by the him.
38. A method as claimed in claim 36 wherein the step of displaying advertisements that the given end-user has previously seen includes displaying indications of those advertisements that he has previously responded to.
39. A method as claimed in claim 36 further comprising enabling other users to see the advertisements that the given end-user has responded to in the past.
40. A method as claimed in claim 36 further comprising the step of enabling the given end-user to see advertisements that his friends, colleagues or other connections have responded to in the past.
41. A method as claimed in claim 36 further comprising enabling a user to see, aggregated in a single place, advertisements recently viewed by those linking to the user.
42. A method as claimed in claim 36 further comprising the step of sorting advertisements by popularity.
43. A method as claimed in claim 36 further comprising the step of enabling a user to sort advertisements previously viewed by another user or group, said sorting being by advertiser, product type, recency or frequency of viewing, or advertiser ranking or rating.
44. A method as claimed in claim 43 wherein a default sorting for the user is applied.
45. A method as claimed in claim 36 further comprising the step of enabling the given end-user to determine whether other users can see what advertisements he has viewed.
46. A method as claimed in claim 36 wherein the identified advertisements omit advertisements of a certain type.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/690,005, filed Jun. 13, 2005 and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/734,690, filed Nov. 8, 2005. This application is also a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/371,462, entitled “User-Driven Media System in a Computer Network” filed on Mar. 9, 2006. The entire teachings of the foregoing applications are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A global computer network (e.g., the Internet) provides a marketplace for advertisers based on keywords. More specifically, an end user commonly uses a search engine to browse for content on the global computer network or browses content including articles and emails that contain keywords or keyword sets. Typically the search engine operates on keywords entered by the end user as search terms or encountered in content viewed by the user. In cooperation, an ad engine provides, from a depository of advertisements, ads targeted for the same keywords as those used by the search engine on the content in response to the end user's search query. The provided corresponding targeted ads of the ad engine are displayed to the end user along with the search results (content) of the search engine. Ads are displayed in many forms including lists of textual ads, banners, pop up windows and sponsor or other columns.

Thus ad delivery services, ad engines and depositories typically charge per search term or keyword that a subject ad is targeted for. For example, the advertisement rate may be

    • 83¢ for a given ad to be selected and displayed in a top (first) grouping based on the search term “Vegas”;
    • $2.00 for the given ad to be similarly selected and displayed based on the search term “hotels”’ and
    • $4.50 for the given ad to be selected and displayed based on the search term “Vegas hotels”.
      These rates are often set by a persistent auction, allowing advertisers to bid for placement adjacent a keyword or keyword set against other advertisers seeking similar placement. This keyword bidding creates a marketplace around the keyword or keyword set, setting the price for this advertising dynamically for each keyword or keyword set. Further, the ad owner pays these rates (or the accumulation thereof) for an end user clicking on (selecting) the ad as displayed. Thus a “cost per click” accounting is common in the industry.

There are other cost structures for advertising on the Internet, for example cost per acquisition or cost per 1000 impressions (“views”). Generally the greater visability (e.g. pop up ads, top of page banners, first item on a sponsor list displayed next to search results, etc.) the higher the price for the ad.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is not focused on keywords appearing on a Web page as in the prior art. Instead embodiments of the present invention create a respective user profile for each end-user. The respective profile includes key words and key phrases encountered by that user. The invention differentiates between key words/phrases read by the end-user and key words/phrases written by the end-user. The system records the recency and/or frequency of a key word/phrase being read or written by the end-user. In one embodiment, the system removes certain terms from an end-user's profile if the recency or frequency of a key word/phrase being read or written by the end-user falls below a certain threshold.

In some embodiments, the system creates a profile of an end-user looking at the content of Web pages being browsed by the end-user and the content that the end-user publishes. The system records the categories and/or classification tags of the browsed/published content differentiating between content that is read by the end-user, written/published by the end-user and recency/frequency thereof. The system expires some categories based on recency and/or frequency of end-user reading or writing content in the category/class. The system also differentiates between classification tags created by this user versus tags created by the community.

In a preferred embodiment, the system adds to the end-user's respective profile the user-provided demographic information. When not provided by the user, the system may forecast demographic information for a user based on relationships with other users and/or group membership (e.g. Zipcode is forecast as the average or most common Zipcode of friends, average age of friends is assumed to be the end-user's age, dominant gender of friends is assumed to be gender of the end-user, and so on). The system further forecasts demographic information based on system usage (e.g., end-user checking of weather or reading of content for Boston indicates end-user's region, or consuming content for parents indicates the end-user has children). Preferably the system differentiates between user expressed demographic characteristics and forecasted characteristics in the profile.

In another feature of the present invention, the system creates a behavioral profile of a subject end-user. The behavioral profile includes indications of frequency of different activities (checking weather, checking stock quotes, sending email, using instant messenger, moving from location to location or PC to PC) through observed behavior. The behavioral profile of the end-user may further include indications of the advertisements that the end-user has seen. The system may record indications of (i) whether the end-user has responded to those advertisements (clicked on or otherwise selected), whether the end-user made a purchase as a result of those advertisements (bought/subscribed), and (iii) the categories of products that the end-user responds to. The system records recency of these end-user activities/interactions with advertisements and frequency and/or recently of end-user response with regard to product, advertiser and/or category of advertisement.

Preferably the system combines keywords, key phrases, categories, tags, demographics, and the above behavioral characteristics into a single targeting profile of the end-user. In turn, advertisers target end-users based on their respective profiles defined above. In some embodiments, an advertiser selects one method/focus of targeting (e.g., content interest, category interest, and so on). In other embodiments, the advertiser selects multiple methods/focuses of targeting, e.g. the intersection of certain demographics (say males between 25 and 44) AND content interests (for example, city of Boston and real estate).

In turn, each time the advertiser selects targeting criteria, the system calculates or forecasts the number of end-users that fall within the prescribed target area. Further, based on advertiser selected targeting criteria, the system forecasts the advertising response (clicks/selections by end-users) and the purchasing (revenue or products) that will result from the campaign.

In some embodiments, the system displays an advertisement to an end-user no more than a set number of times each day.

The system enables advertisers to bid to reach a certain size audience indicated as an estimated number of click throughs and/or estimated sales. The advertiser enters a bid per end-user reached with their advertisements. This is a fee charged based on the number of times an end-user views the advertisement. The advertiser may enter a bid per view (or thousand views) and the system returns a likely number of impressions resulting and their average placement in the ad results. In one embodiment, the system-user interface employs a “slider” for the advertiser to enter his bid. The system may display a graph showing users viewing per day on one axis and cost per view on another axis.

In a preferred embodiment, advertisers bid to achieve a certain number of click-throughs within a specified time period based on their targeting criteria. The advertiser enters a bid per click (or thousand clicks) and the system returns indications of:

    • (i) a likely number of clicks resulting,
    • (ii) the estimated average placement in the ad results, and
    • (iii) the total the advertiser could spend at that bid.
      In one embodiment, this is accomplished by the advertisers user using a “slider” in the graphical user interface. A graph illustrates number of users viewing/day on one axis and cost/view on another axis.

In another embodiment, advertisers can bid per view or bid per click. In turn, the system forecasts advertisement views or clicks based on the combined targeting, and prioritizes ads singular selection based on financial reward to the host (system) site.

Another embodiment provides advertisements targeting a user organized in a list for that user, regardless of how they are targeted to that user (by demographic, content interest, category being viewed, etc). The system selects which advertisements to show to a user based on the bid amount showing the advertisements with the highest bids first. The system projects the likelihood of the user clicking on the advertisement and then ranks the advertisements in order of said likelihood and displays them in ranked order. The system may rank each advertisement based on the bid amount for the ad multiplied by the likelihood of user selecting (clicking on) it and then displays the ads in ranked order.

In some embodiments, ad preference degrades as selection potential decreases.

In embodiments of the invention an ad selection engine disables further display of an advertisement for a specific user after it has been seen a set number of times or clicked on a set number of times by that user.

In another feature, the invention system provides reports to the advertisers reporting on the advertisements shown and clicked on (selected by viewer users). The system may report sales, subscriptions, registrations and the like to the advertiser. Advertisers may filter these reports by any of the advertising targeting characteristics to see varied responses. The advertisers may break-down reports by demographic category, keyword/phrase, category, or similar user or content categories and see totals across these categories.

The system may identify the most successful user categories. The system may identify the most successful keyword/phrase or content categories and may recommend them to the advertiser user. The advertiser may select these recommendations or a combination of them and automatically target a campaign with them or retarget a campaign with them.

In some embodiments the system enables users that see advertisements to rate the advertiser by selecting a numeric performance rating. This feature may be limited to only those users clicking on an advertisement, or to only users purchasing from the advertiser. In one embodiment, the system enables users to provide multiple performance ratings on different advertiser characteristics (e.g. price, shipping costs, customer service, etc). The system displays, advertiser ranking adjacent to advertisements to assist consumers in selecting the best advertiser for their purposes

The system may add advertiser ranking to consumer user profiles, determining which characteristics of an advertiser matter to consumers (good price or good service). This information is then used to target future advertisements to a user.

Accordingly in some embodiments, advertisers receive reports on their different rankings as part of the advertising system. The reports may be broken-down by the demographic and content categories described above.

In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, the system enables advertisers to give points to users for purchasing, either in the form of points or cash-back. The system allows fixed reward amounts (e.g. 5000 points for a subscription to cell phone service) or scaled reward amounts (e.g. 1 point for every $1 spent) or combinations of these. The points are a common currency across all advertisers (like an online version of S&H Greenstamps). The points may be combined with points earned for other purposes such as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/371,462 herein incorporated by reference. In the system, advertisements from advertisers offering customers rewards for purchasing are called-out to viewer-users by any combination of visual cues and audio cues. The cues may differentiate the reward type (e.g. 1 point/$1 or fixed fee or similar).

The invention system may prioritize advertisement based on the likelihood of user response (as above) and the estimated response of a given user is increased because of the call-out. In turn, the selection engine moves an advertisement higher in the display priority or shows it more frequently. The system may prioritize advertisements based on the combination of estimated user response time, ad value to the company (also as above) and increase in particular user response due to the call-out. In turn, the effective cost of the advertisement is decreased. Where the user response goes higher, the advertiser does not need to bid as much to achieve the same advertising results.

In some embodiments, the system calculates the value of the points (total retail value or margin earned) to the company displaying the advertisement and includes that total in the calculation of the value of the ad when determining ad placement. For example: PlacementRank=(bid+PointsValue) for advertisements ranked and displayed just on bid value or PlacementRank=(bid+PointsValue)×ResponseLikelihoodProjection for ads ranked and displayed on economic value to the company. The preferred embodiment is the latter of these two.

In embodiment of the present invention, the advertisements are categorized by advertiser type, product type, region of availability, currency, language, keywords and other factors. The advertisements are displayed offering the consumer (viewer-user) the option (a link, e.g., “More Ads Like These” link) to other similar advertisements based on the categorizations deemed important for this advertisement. The link generates for the user a page or pages displaying similar advertisements. The initial advertisement may remain visible (simultaneously displayed). The user may directly respond to competitive advertisements, by clicking on or otherwise selecting them, for example. Likewise, the competitive advertisements each also offer the opportunity to see similar advertisements. In some embodiments, the system allows advertisers to bid additional money, or pay a flat fee to remove the “more” link to competitive ads.

In some embodiments, the system maintains an indication of the advertisements a viewer user has seen. The system identifies and records the advertisements that a user has responded to. The system provides to the viewer-user the option to see advertisements that he has previously viewed or previously responded to. The system displays to the user a list of advertisements that he has previously viewed with those he has previously responded to highlighted or otherwise called-out.

In some embodiments, the system not only enables a subject user to view advertisements that he has previously responded to but enables others to view those advertisements (or lists thereof) of the subject user. The system thus enables an advertiser to see, aggregated in a single place, all of the advertisements (or lists thereof) viewed recently by those viewers-users who have linked to the advertiser website. In some embodiments, the system displays the subject advertisement lists, but not the names of the people who have responded to the advertisements, especially when there is less than a threshold minimum number of such people. Then ensures protection of privacy. The system enables the advertiser-user to sort or filter the list of advertisements seen by a viewer-user or by a group of people by advertiser type, product type, recency or frequency of viewing, or advertiser ranking/rating (mentioned above). Embodiments enable a default sorting or filtering to be applied for an advertiser-user prior to his viewing the list.

In some embodiments, the system enables the individual viewer-user to determine whether others (advertisers) can see indications of the advertisements that he has viewed.

Further, in some embodiments, advertisements of a certain type (adult matter, alcohol, etc) are not shown in a user's viewed advertisements list.

In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, presented is an online advertising system with an integrated direct marketing system to attract new advertisers. The invention system allows a company to offer an advertising credit to a prospect advertiser-user. The credit may be recorded in the advertiser-user's account prior to the advertiser being contacted. The system allows a list of advertiser-users to be added to the system, including contact information and advertising credit. The system generates emails that allow the advertiser-user to link directly back to the advertising system and create an account. The account may have the credit balance in it when created. The system may require the prospect to set-up billing for future advertisements (once the credit is used) prior to the credit becoming available.

Alternatively or additionally traditional direct mail with a unique code on it for the advertiser may be employed instead of or similar to the email system described above. The email and direct mail pieces contain respective codes that link to a single account allowing the sending of different types of marketing materials to the same person, but preventing the creation of duplicate accounts with duplicate credits. The system searches for existing advertisers based on contact information, email address and company name and alerts the user to the fact that a prospect may already be a registered system user or prevents the sending of those messages.

The system may report on the total credits issued, the total credits used and percentage of credits used where the credits expire on some schedule. Further the system may report on the success of each mailing. For example the system shows what percentage of advertisers that use their credits then proceed to spend more advertising revenue with the company. The system may report the total advertising revenue received in a period as well as the total credits issued or spent in that period. The reporting system further filters the reports based on the primary targeting used for the credits or based on the category of advertisers using the credits.

In other embodiments, the invention system splits or otherwise shares advertising revenue with the advertiser-users for their content (authored works). The share in revenue is in the form of a credit used to buy advertising space. Where an advertiser uses this credit to buy advertising space adjacent his authored works, the system compensates him for these ads (“credit-ads”) as authored works (content contributions in a user driven media system). In some embodiments, compensation for credit ads is at a different rate than if cash had been used to place the ad.

More generally, in some embodiments the individual or company placing an advertisement receives compensation for the ad placement in the form of points or cash-back. To that end, the system records advertising placed with a media company or across several sites with a placement service. The system records the total amount spent on that advertisement. The system contains a ratio of points or cash back given for every advertiser dollar spent, and the system calculates the amount earned by the person placing an advertisement periodically. The system stores indications of the calculated amount (such as in a database) and enables reporting of the same to the advertiser user. Further the system may record a total spent from multiple advertising campaigns for an advertiser-user, and the system may allow the aggregate balance to be used to purchase items or to be converted to cash and transferred from the system to a different financial account.

The advertiser-user may decline points if his company does not allow him to receive incentives or gifts for work-related activities. In other embodiments, the invention system is connected to a central points/compensation system that allows rewards for other activities.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.

FIG. 1 a is a schematic diagram of a global computer network environment in which embodiments of the present invention operate.

FIG. 1 b is a block diagram of the different components of a computer node in the network of FIG. 1 a embodying the present invention.

FIGS. 2 a-2 d are system diagrams of a website hosted by a server computer in a preferred embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 2 e-2 g are block and schematic diagrams of group interface pages in the system of FIGS. 2 a-2 d.

FIG. 2 h is a block diagram of database tables supporting the system of FIGS. 2 a-2 g.

FIG. 3 is an illustration of the reader-user interface, including a list of content prioritized based on the reader's expressed interests, the relationships that reader has with various writers and the recency and quality of the materials being presented.

FIGS. 4 and 5 are block diagrams of an ad subsystem (member) in the system of FIGS. 2 a-2 h and embodying the present invention.

FIGS. 6 a-6 k are schematic views of the advertiser-user interface in one embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

A description of preferred embodiments of the invention follows.

The present invention starts from a user-driven media system 100 such as that described and disclosed in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/371,462 (incorporated herein by reference). That system is summarized below in FIGS. 1-3.

Briefly, a web site or host server 60 provides the user-driven media system 100 to reader-users, writer-users and members of a group. An end-user can be any combination of a reader-user, writer-user and member of one or more groups. The system 100 enables writer-users who frequently produce authored works 29 to be compensated (i.e., a frequent writer compensation program). Authored works 29 include any combination of text, photos/images, audio, multimedia and the like. The system 100 enables reader-users to rate authors and/or authored works 29, to comment on the same, to create a list of works 29 and/or comments to visit again or suggest to others (i.e. “bookmarks”), to tip (pay gratuity to) authors and categorize or tag (or recategorize/retag) authored works 29. End-users communicate to each other and among groups in system 100 using user-defined relations or connections (e.g., friends, colleagues, private group, etc.). Communications center around the various content (authored works 29, comments, bookmarks, tags) made available and maintained on the system 100. In system 100, bookmarks may have properties of user-defined ratings, comments, tags, title/body, author, publication status, URL, Date/time of creation and date/time of use.

Given the foregoing, the present invention adds a targeted advertising component/dimension to system 100. The present invention forms and maintains user profiles 17 (FIG. 2 h) based on information received from end-users and information deduced by end-user activity as users of system 100. The present invention employs the user profiles 17 in targeting ad campaigns. Advertisers bid on the invention suggested ad targets and invention predicted/projected end-user effect (selection or click through or purchase). This and further features will be made clear by the following description of embodiments of the present invention system 100 with targeted advertising component 99 (FIG. 4).

Illustrated in FIG. 1 a is a global computer network environment in which embodiments 100 of the present invention are implemented. Client computer(s) 50 and server computer(s) 60 provide processing, storage, and input/output devices executing application programs and the like. Client computer(s) 50 can also be linked through communications network 70 to other computing devices, including other client computer(s) 50 and server computer(s) 60. Communications network 70 can be part of the Internet, a worldwide collection of computers, networks, and gateways that currently use the TCP/IP suite of protocols to communicate with one another. The Internet provides a backbone of high-speed data communication lines between major nodes or host computers, consisting of thousands of commercial, government, educational, and other computer networks, that route data and messages. Other global computer networks 70 are suitable.

FIG. 1 b is a diagram of the internal structure of a computer 50, 60 in the network of FIG. 1 a that implements the present invention system 100. The computer 50, 60 contains system bus 79, where a bus is a set of hardware lines used for data transfer among the components of a computer. Bus 79 is essentially a shared conduit that connects different elements of a computer system (e.g., processor, disk storage, memory, input/output ports, network ports, etc.) that enables the transfer of information between the elements. Attached to system bus 79 is I/O device interface 82 for connecting various input and output devices (e.g., displays, printers, speakers, etc.) to the computer. Network interface 86 allows the computer to connect to various other devices attached to a network (e.g., network 70 of FIG. 1 a). Memory 90 provides volatile storage for computer software instructions used to implement an embodiment of the present invention (e.g., Program Routines 92 and Data 94). Disk storage 95 provides non-volatile storage for computer software instructions and data used to implement an embodiment of the present invention. Central processor unit 84 is also attached to system bus 79 and provides for the execution of computer instructions.

In one embodiment, computer program product 80, including a computer readable medium (e.g., a removable storage medium such as one or more DVD-ROM's, CD-ROM's, diskettes, tapes, etc.) provides at least a portion of the present invention software instructions. Computer program product 80 can be installed by any suitable software installation procedure, as is well known in the art. In another embodiment, at least a portion of the software instructions may also be downloaded over a wireless connection. Computer program propagated signal product 102 embodied on a propagated signal on a propagation medium (e.g., a radio wave, an infrared wave, a laser wave, a sound wave, or an electrical wave propagated over a global network such as the Internet, or other networks) provides at least a portion of the present invention software instructions.

In alternate embodiments, the propagated signal 102 is an analog carrier wave or digital signal carried on the propagated medium. For example, the propagated signal may be a digitized signal propagated over a global network (e.g., the Internet), a telecommunications network, or other network. In one embodiment, the propagated signal is a signal that is transmitted over the propagation medium over a period of time, such as the instructions for a software application sent in packets over a network. In another embodiment, the computer readable medium of computer program product 80 is a propagation medium that the computer system 100 may receive and read, such as by receiving the propagation medium and identifying a propagated signal embodied in the propagation medium, as described above for computer program propagated signal product 102.

In one embodiment, software instructions 92 executed on server computer 60 (the Web host machine) includes code for (1) supporting a contributor (frequent writer) compensation Web site in which content is accessed through searching, sorting and classifying content/authored works 29 (comments, bookmarks, etc.) by author and/or keyword tags, (2) forming user groups and connections and using relationships to organize content and browse the system 100 for content, and (3) targeting advertisements based on end-user profiles formed by end-user activity on the Web site 60 (system 100). In the embodiment of FIGS. 4 and 5 (detailed later), software instructions 92 include ad system 99, ad engine 87 and corresponding bid management instructions as will be made clear later.

FIGS. 2 a-2 h provide an illustration of the computer software code 92 executed on a server computer 60. Server 60 code provides a Home Page 21 of the invention system 100. At the Home Page 21, the operations of General Information/Help 23, Search 25, View 27, Publish 11, Connect 31, Communicate 33, My Content 35, My Profile 37 and various accounting 39, 41 are provided.

Through registration process 45 a, b (FIGS. 2 b and 2 d), a user (an individual, a company or other entity) becomes a member to the invention Website/company (or registered user of the invention system 100). In one embodiment, during registration 45, users enter profile and other information, including a user name, email address and login confirmation. My Profile 37 is a set of aspects and settings that results from such user input in registration process 45. In one embodiment, My Profile 37 includes (i) general information, (ii) demographic information, (iii) school/college information, (iv) indications of hobbies, entertainment and TV/media likes/interests, (v) personal biographical data, (vi) political affiliation, (vii) other affiliations, (viii) companies and (ix) photos, for example. Other categories of information are suitable. Each category of information is stored in one or more profile entry tables or the like as illustrated at 38 in FIG. 2 c. Advertiser users (business affiliates) use a different process 47 (FIG. 2 b) to register with the invention system 100 as further detailed later in FIGS. 6 a-6 k.

Example data sets supporting the user registration process 45 and My Profile 37 in a preferred embodiment are as follows. Database tables for storing and relating user data (e.g., My Profile 37, etc.) and other system data are illustrated in FIG. 2 h and discussed later.

About Me

The system 100 provides members the ability to publish information about themselves. There are two types of profile information: basic and extended. The basic profile is preferably always public to every one where the extended one can be customized. The member can however specify if his basic profile should be shown to non-members (default is to show in one embodiment).

The extended profile of a member-user is divided into blocks of information. The user may set the audience who can see each or respective blocks of information.

The user is able to enter extra or additional information that is not already an offered standard area of information of system 100.

Connection Management 31

Members are able to build a social network of friends, family members and coworker. In one embodiment, connection management 31 follows the operations and parameters outlined in Table 1.

TABLE 1
Connection Management
Feature Description
Three connection classes One embodiment of the system 100 provides three connection
classes:
Friend connection
Family connection
Work (colleague) connection
Connection classes distinct Friends can only see other friend connections (similarly for
work/colleague and family connections).
Connections are reflexive If person B is person A's connection then person A is person
B's connection too. If person B is NOT person A's
connection, then person A is not person B's connection
either.
Connection invitation Establishment of a connection between two members is made
by one user sending a connection invitation to another
member (or non member).
Connection acknowledgement New connection must be acknowledged by both parties tied
in the connection. When acknowledging, the member has the
option to “also subscribe to this member . . . ”.
Invite non members A member is able to send an invitation to a non member
without implying a connection between the two. If the
invitation was sent to a non-system member (invitee), the
invitee is able to join system 100 or a group that the inviting
member has invitation priviledges to (invitor). Note that
requirement “connection acknowledgement” must be
satisfied.
View “who's online” The member is able to know who among his connections is
currently online. User can control his presence knowledge per
friend class.
Show prior invitations after Let's say that a person has 2 email addresses, one which he
registration rarely checks. Let's also assume that 5 different members
sent him registration invitations to his “less watched” address
and 1 to the one he monitors more. After the registration
process 45 (where he input his 2 email addresses), the system
100 automatically creates 6 connections with other members.
Deleted connections A user can delete a connection at any time

External Contact

The system 100 provides the user the ability to enter contact information of people that are not system members. In one embodiment, operations and parameters supporting this ability (functionality) are outlined in Table 2.

TABLE 2
External Contact
Feature Description
External contact A member's external contact information is held
are private private. No one but the member can see this
information
Easily send A member must be able to easily send an invitation
invitation to to an external contact.
external contact
Ability to import/ A member is able to import/export/sync his contact
export/sync list. This feature mimics PLAXO ™ or similar.
Support mailing The member can create mailing lists. The number of
lists email addresses in the mailing list has a limit which is
customizable in system 100 (set by the system
administrator).

When a member sees another member's profile information, the system 100 (connect module 31) shows him if he is connected to that member and how he is connected to this member by showing the shortest connection path from him to the other member optionally and for each connection class. The system 100 preferably shows multiple paths of network relation, up to three levels or degrees of separation. Me>User 1>User 2>You. A subject user sees his closest connection. Beyond three levels, the system 100 indicates that the subject user is not closely connected in one embodiment. The number of people connected between a given user and a subject target person (including the target person) is termed the ‘degrees of separation’ with respect to the user.

System to Confirm Email Addresses (FIG. 2 d)

In some embodiments, the system 100 makes a distinction between confirmed email addresses and unconfirmed ones. Operations supporting this are outlined in Table 3.

TABLE 3
Confirm Email Addresses
Feature Description
Login with any Any confirmed email addresses can be used to login
confirmed email. to the system site 60
Lookup Confirmed email addresses can only be used to
unconfirmed lookup a member. The system 100 warns a user
email when attempting to use it (such as trying to send
an email to an unconfirmed email address)
Steal unconfirmed If user A has an unconfirmed email address of
emails a@a.com and users B confirms the email a@a.com,
then the system 100 removes this email from A's
list of unconfirmed email addresses.
Unconfirmed Any email that is unconfirmed is flagged as such.
emails flagged

Groups

There are two types of groups: “personal groups” and “shared groups”. A Personal group is a private list of other members and contacts. Techniques similar to address book groups in email systems are employed to support this feature.

A shared group is a place holder where articles (authored works) 29 can be published and group members notified when a new publication occurs or when someone posts a comment on an article that is part of the group. Shared groups allow their members to have a common location where they can communicate (e.g., via messaging component 33) and membership of the group is generally viewable by all group members.

Turning briefly to FIG. 2 g, to create a group, a user provides to system 100 (connect module 31, group function): his name, a description, group profile information 112, such as group URL name, group name, group icon and location of the group (city/state/country), group type 114 (auto-join of new group members, moderation of group members manually, invite only), default member permissions 116 (post, invite, moderate content, moderate members, send broadcast private message, post on behalf of group, feature content), common group “signature” for articles posted by group contributor and various viewable metadata such as create date, number of members, etc. Further, system 100 has the group creator indicate 114 who may view the group's content (e.g., group members only or the public).

Groups may be categorized or tagged within the group profile page by the owner. In addition, system 100 uses the tags of the top percentage of viewed articles (for example top 25%) for tagging the group.

User specific permissions (permission settings 114) may be set as a default for new group users when the group is created. Invites issued for the group inherit these permissions, but the member issuing the invite (if they themselves are authorized) may add additional privileges, such as inviting a new user to have moderation privileges. Those members with user administration privileges may modify user permissions at any given time.

Below is a table of what permissions may be assigned in one embodiment.

TABLE 4
Group Privileges
Who can be granted it
Privilege (by group owner) Default
Read Group Public, Individual group Public
articles members
Post Group Individual group members All Group
Articles Members
Delete Group Individual group members Owner only
Articles
Invite Members to Individual group members Owner only
Group
See Group's Public, all group members Public
Name/Profile
See Group Public, All group members Public, All
members Group
Members
Moderate Individual group members Owner only
submitted articles
Remove member Individual group members Owner Only
Send Broadcast Individual group members Owner
private messages
to the group
Post on behalf of Owner, Individual group Owner
group members
Feature Content Owner, Individual group Owner
members
Join group (w/o Public Public
moderation/auto-
join)

Viewing of Group Content

Seeing content within groups is dependent on several factors. Essentially, it is the culmination of the viewing permissions set on the group, the content, and the author. FIGS. 2 e-2 f are illustrative.

Group content can be found in a group in a variety of ways. In one way, if the group is not visible, the group name does not show up in a global site search on any of its content, categories, or tags, or browsing by any of those criteria. The group name also does not appear on any user pages unless one is a user in that same hidden group.

Otherwise, groups are integrated with the search system 25 (both a search within a group as well as a global site search) and accessible through the user interface under the View 27 menu or something as appropriate. As shown in FIG. 2 e, groups can be found by browsing for category 200, tag (keyword) 201, or a general group directory 203 by group name. Other embodiments of system 100 include a group keyword search 204 and various filtering group listings 205 for presenting to a user for selection of a group of interest. Groups may be searched by authored works 29 of the group, number of members, publishing rate and/or commenting rate on authored works 29 as well as other parameters/factors as supported by master table 120, publication table 124 and tagging table 126 (FIG. 2 h).

FIG. 2 f illustrates an example group homepage 210. Based on group creator input (at connect module 31 as previously described), group homepage 210 displays the creator given group name and icon, and other group information. The illustrated group homepage 210 displays group announcements, a listing of recent authored works 29 posted to the group, a listing of recently joined group members and a listing of the user's recent works 29 in this group. Navigation indicators (e.g., “By Tag,” “By Category”) are also displayed. This enables a user to have the system 100 display indications of (i) group members writing the most on a user-selected tag (keyword), (ii) other groups related to the subject tag (keyword) and (iii) authored works 29 of the group on that keyword. With the latter, system 100 can further display the group's top authored works 29 per keyword, top other media types (e.g., images, photos . . . ) per keyword and recently tagged works 29 of the subject keyword. System 100 also displays a list (preferably an ordered list) of related tags for further user selection (e.g., drill down manner) and navigation at the group home page 210. Other information may similarly be displayed on group home page 210 as supported by publication table 124, user tables 122 and tagging table 126.

Thus, authored works 29 in a group are searchable and viewable by group members according to: tag or keyword, rank in quality, rank in popularity or rank in number of subscriptions, rank in author quality, rank in author popularity and/or rank in number of subscriptions to author.

The content with groups may have a certain version for content syndication out onto other sites. Also, groups may have content syndicated into them via a pertinent feed such as an RSS feed, wire service or other automated technology that allows publishing content. Thus, authored works 29 for groups as well as individual users include works originated in system 100 or elsewhere.

Continuing with FIGS. 2 a-2 d, the system 100 further profiles the known/registered user based on material he writes and reads, what he clicks on (group, article, etc.), the query he enters and the ads he clicks, etc. This profile information is used to better target the known user with advertisement. The system 100 deduces demographic information (city, state, etc.) from a user's IP address, the type of article the user reads, search query he enters, shared behavior with other users (behavior or activities in common with) or shared relationships to other users. In one embodiment, the system 100 (a) assumes a zip code for a given user based on zip codes detected in the user's activities, (b) assumes age of the given user based on ages of others detected in the user's activities, and (c) assumes gender of the given user based on gender of others detected in the user's activities. In addition, known/registered users can browse all other members' profiles 37. They can browse only the members' public profile information and the members' articles/connections/groups/categories or tags that are flagged as public. In some embodiments, demographic data of a user is solicited from other users.

Information about unregistered users is preferably kept in the system 100 for a given amount of time (in days). If the unregistered user does not visit the invention website 60 within this period of time, any profiling information kept about this user may be discarded and the next time this user accesses the website he will be seen as an unknown user.

Referring to FIG. 2 a, General Information 23 includes website company general information, website company contact information, site help, privacy and other policies and terms of service.

Search operation 25 is the interface to a search engine for processing user queries and generating search results 43 thereto. A relational database search engine or other data search engine may be employed. In a preferred embodiment, search facets 63 are used to filter candidate search data/results. This has the effect of narrowing available content. In one embodiment, search facets include quality rating (of authors, authored works 29, tags, comments and/or bookmarks), date, topic, time, recency of publication, length of publication, author rating (in popularity and/or quality), authored work rating (in popularity and/or quality), media type, authors per media type, reader rating, amount of tips received by the authored work 29, association with an organization or membership in a group and degrees of separation between author and user. In other embodiments, different facet options or sets are made available after use of an individual facet, and/or facets change with each drill down by the user. In some embodiments, these facets 63 are used to order contents (authored works 29) for search results but not filter the contents. System 100 displays to a user a list of authored works 29 or summaries of authored works 29 organized by any combination of user's interests, relationships, expressed or inferred interest in certain authors and expressed or inferred interest in certain topic areas or keywords.

Initial areas 65 (FIG. 2 a) of search include the global network 70, the invention website 100, users of (registered with) the invention system 100, articles (authored works 29), reviews (other authored works 29), groups and schools.

View operation 27 generates screen views for display by client computer 50 to end users. An end user (individual or company/organization) may be a reader-user at times and a writer-user (or author-user) at other times. FIG. 3 illustrates the initial screen view 51 generated by view operation 27 in response to log in by a subject user.

The particular user's home page 51 in system 100 indicates articles (authored works 29) and reviews 67, 69 (FIG. 2 a) respectively. The articles may be featured articles of system 100, the user's own articles, friends' articles, family articles, connections articles 76 (FIG. 3), neighborhood articles and recently read ones. Reviews 69 may be of subcategories such as products, entertainment, travel, arts and culture and happenings.

The user's home page 51 (or initial screen view by view operation 27) may also include indications of subscriptions 71 (FIGS. 2 a, 3) by the user as supported by user tables 122 of FIG. 2 h (discussed later). The system 100 preferably allows a user to subscribe to other people, other users of system 100, topics, groups, authored works 29 and tags or taxonomy categories and the like. Based on user input, system 100 records subscriptions 71 in respective user tables 122.

The user's home page 51 includes an indication of groups 73 (FIG. 3) the user belongs to, displays photos 75 of interest to the user, provides podcasts 77 (FIG. 2 a) and user file uploads 72 (FIG. 2 a). User tables 122 support display of this data.

The system 100 automatically refreshes home page 51 of users on a preset frequency (after a preset period of time has elapsed). Refreshing the screen view 51 brings in new content and advertisements.

Table 5a is the supporting data organization and structure of home page 51 in a preferred embodiment.

TABLE 5a
Representative Member home page 51
Members have a home page 51. This home page displays all
member information to the member himself and all public
information to other members determined by their privileges.
Feature Description
Display information based on The home page shows the member's information to the
privileges. respective member while other members can only see of this
member what fit their privileges.
Customizable content and layout The member is able to customize his home page 51. He is
able to set what information he want to display and where on
the page. However, he cannot prevent certain items from
being displayed (e.g, navigational elements and advertising).
The middle (content) pane display order and display location
can be customized.
Home viewed by owner The following information can be shown on the member's
home page:
Top 4 latest articles published by the member with the newest
at the top
Report summary on article viewing
User's connections that are currently online
Users connections
Articles recommended to the member by the system.
People subscribed to by the member with the ones that have
the most recent articles (not red by the member) at the top
Groups the member belongs to with the ones that have the
most recent articles (not red by the member) at the top
The members' contacts.
The members' bookmarks.
Member's recently read articles
Categories subscribed to with ones that have the most recent
articles (not red by the member) at the top.
Account balance
Home viewed by other member The following information can be shown on the member's
home page when viewed by someone else. Clearly, this
information depends on who views the page and the
information view properties:
The members' connections
Latest articles published by the member and not red by the
viewer.
Shared groups the member belongs to.
Public bookmarks.
Public subscriptions.
Recently read articles
Category published under Member should be able to specify the “categories under
which I publish” and the viewers can click on them which
shows the articles written by the member in that category.
Tags published under Member should be able to specify the “tags under which I
publish” and the viewers can click on them which shows the
articles written by member in that keyword/tag.
URL for home page Members home page can be accessed via simplified URL's
containing both member name and system name.

Continuing with FIGS. 2 a-2 d, publish operation/module 11 enables a writer-user to create a piece (authored work) 29 formed of any one or combination of text, images, audio, video, files to download, XML descriptions of any of these items, comments and/or bookmarks. Further details are given below in FIGS. 3 a-3 d.

Connect operation 31 (FIG. 2 b) is an address book of sorts which enables a user to specify categories and relations of people. Preferably each entry indicates one of the categories of ‘family’, ‘friend’, and ‘work’, and may thereby define subsets or groupings of people similarly related to the subject user. Connect operation 31 also enables users to organize groups, make a school grouping, find people and add contacts. Table 1 and the groups configuration discussed above support connect operation 31. Preferably communicate operation 33 (FIG. 2 b) is an email service. Any of the known email software applications is suitable here.

Continuing with FIG. 2 c, My Content 35 stores a given user's published content 29 (e.g., labeled ‘My Articles’ and ‘My Reviews’) or elements for use in composing authored works 29. Included are images, audio files, multimedia clips, video clips, bookmarks, comments, download files and the like. Also My Content 35 includes comments the user has made on other's articles (works).

Accounting settings 41 (FIG. 2 d) also result from the user profiling (registration) process 45. The present invention system 100 is preferably a point based system. Known users can earn points. However, the points can not be debited from a user's account until the user becomes a member of system 100. Known users cannot redeem points unless they have subscribed to the system 100. If they subscribe using the same browser used when browsing, their accumulated points are transferred in their newly created account (because the points will be in the cookie for example).

A user's points and other related accounting is provided by points operation 39 (FIG. 2 c). Withdrawal of points, points accrual and points transactions are recorded or otherwise provided at 53 in FIG. 2 c. A report generator may provide various displays and output of data from points operation 39.

Turning to FIG. 2 h, a master database table 120, user tables 122, publication table 124 and tagging table 126 support the foregoing and other features of the invention system 100. Briefly, system 100 assigns a unique identifier to each group. Master database table 120 lists groups by unique identifier. For a given group, the corresponding entity in master database table 120 lists the members (user names) of the group, lists invitations (names of invitees) to the group, lists blocked users names from the group and group settings (as described above in FIG. 2 g).

Each user has attributes and a profile 17 stored in a respective user table 122. This profile 17 is the combination of (a) user specified information stored in profile entry tables 38 and (b) inferred or observed user characteristics discussed above in FIGS. 2 a-2 d. System 100 records or indicates in user profile 17, the ads viewed and/or selected (or otherwise responded to) by the user. Other outcome of these ads (sale completed, subscription made, etc.) and the user's activity therewith may also be recorded here. For a given user, the respective user table 122 includes the groups (e.g., by respective group identifier) to which the user belongs and subscriptions 71 to other users (author users). Certain user attributes and activity are also recorded in and/or tracked by respective user tables 122. For example, in one embodiment, the user profile 17 includes an indication of authored works 29 read by the subject user and comments he has made on respective authored works 29. A pointer, link or reference or the like to a comment entry in publication table 124 provides the comment contents (text). This enables system 100 to determine and display most commenting user, most commented on user or authored work 29, commenting rates of groups and other statistics/standings or similar information. This may be done dynamically or for static stored data 94.

The publication table 124 relates who (user or group) created what authored works 29. For each authored work 29, publication table 124 indicates authored works' 29 composition or content including any one or combination of text, images, video, audio, graphics and/or multimedia, as well as users' comments on the work and/or bookmarks to the work 29. An indication of user responsible for a comment is by pointer or similar reference to the respective user table 122. Publication table 124 supports display of comments during display of corresponding authored work 29. The comments are visible to the author and/or other users. The publication table 124 entry also stores or indicates the amount of tips given to the author user for this authored work 29.

Publication table 124 also enables reports to an author showing names of reader-users who have read authored works 29 by the author and allows the author to browse profiles of the reader users. In some embodiments, the reports aggregate the profiles 17 of reader users showing aggregated data for those users. The author is then able to substantially automatically target advertising based on profiles of reader users. In a similar manner using tagging tables 126 (discussed below) with publication table 124 data, authors can see keywords most often used by reader users of their authored works 29. Indications of authored works 29 or comments are shown on a reader user's profile 17 in user tables 122 such that others can see what that user has read. System 100 further enables users to subscribe to the comments of other users to see what people they like or have an interest in are reading most frequently.

Each bookmark and each comment has a respective entry (or record) in publication table 124. In one embodiment, each bookmark entry has a URL or pointer like reference, a title, a synopsis and/or indication of author. The bookmark entry may also provide a snapshot (summary) of the respective bookmark or be reproduced in its entirety (full text/graphics data). The bookmark entry also stores any additional annotations or comments by the creator of the respective bookmark. The bookmark record includes popularity and/or quality ratings similar to those employed for authored works 29 described above. A counter or similar mechanism keeps track of number of bookmarks a given work 29 has. The bookmark records and entries in publication table 124 enable system 100 to determine and display to a user his bookmarks, other user's bookmarks and/or all system bookmarks, as well as display an indication of popularly bookmarked authored works 29 and the like.

In one embodiment, the bookmarking means enables the user to selectably make visible to other users and authors each bookmark. System 100 then enables users to comment on and rate quality of bookmarks. As such, system 100 further displays (i) lists of bookmarks based on popularity and/or quality rating, (ii) an indication of bookmarks having greatest increase in popularity and/or quality rank, and (iii) an indication of bookmarks having greatest decline in popularity and/or quality rank.

Each comment entry (record) in publication table 124 indicates author of the respective comment, authored work 29 (or bookmark) and/or author of work/bookmark to which the comment is aimed, and text of the respective comment. Common relational database techniques are employed to organize the comment records by and display lists of most prolific author of comments (most commenting author user), by author user or authored work 29 most commented on and/or by best comments on a given work 29 or bookmark.

The publication table 124 entry for a given authored work 29 also links to or otherwise references through tagging table 126 keywords or tags that users (author user as well as reader users) have assigned to the authored work 29. Similarly, tags may be associated with bookmark or comment entries/records in publication table 124. In some embodiments, the publication table 124 entry for a given authored work 29 also indicates categories/subcategory (topic areas) that users (author user, reader users) have assigned to the authored work 29.

The tagging table 126 indicates particular tags or keywords applied respectively to authored works 29, bookmarks and comments in publication table 124. In particular, for a given keyword, tagging table 126 lists content items/authored works 29, bookmarks and/or comments that have been assigned that keyword. Using common cross-indexing (cross-referencing) techniques between tagging table 126 and publication table 124, system 100 provides lists (hierarchy orderings) of related tags per authored work 29 or topic area. For example, in response to a user using a keyword in operations of system 100, the system utilizes tagging table 126 and presents a list of additional keywords that often appear together with the keyword. The additional keywords are user selectable for further specifying operations of the system 100. Upon user selection of one of the listed additional keywords, the system 100, through tagging table 126, presents further additional keywords for additional user selection.

In some embodiments, each tag (keyword) has a respective record in tagging table 126. For a given tag, the respective table entry (record) indicates number of times the tag has been bookmarked, commented on, included in an email message in communication subsystem 33 or cited in other works in system 100. This counting enables system 100 to make a popularity determination of the tag. Separate popularity measures and indications may be made for reading purposes, writing purposes and/or discussion. System 100 determines quality of the tag based on responses/feedback from users indicating alternative tags or indicating that a tag is being incorrectly used (deceptive, inaccurate, inappropriate, etc.) The foregoing allows system 100 to indicate various quality and/or popularity ratings of the tag, e.g., fastest increase in popularity rank and fastest decrease in popularity rank.

Based on the above ratings, system 100 also ranks the tags. The records in tagging table 126 indicate rank of a tag over a period or time or within a certain time frame (for example, the prior week or the current week). System 100/tagging table 126 also tracks rate of change in rank of tags so that a display of fastest incline in rank and/or fastest decline in rank may be made.

In one embodiment, the top certain number of keywords most frequently suggested are displayed in ranked lists for navigational purposes. The ranked lists include a list of keywords most often published by, a list of keywords most often commented on, a list of keywords most often selected by readers, a list of keywords most often searched on and/or a list of keywords most often forwarded in email messages. Tagging table 126 may also record, cross reference or otherwise indicate tags most commonly used together. The system 100 further identifies multiple different spellings of a word including misspellings. The system means links each identified different spelling to a most frequently used, properly spelled term for that word and displays that term instead of the other spellings in system screen views. In response to reader users selected or suggested keywords for an authored work, the system means provides additional keywords for selectable use as tags to the subject authored work 29. For each additional keyword, when not selected by a reader user or author, the system marks the additional keywords in tagging table 126 as negatively correlated to the authored work 29. The negative correlation grows stronger each time the system means suggests additional keywords to an author or reader user and the additional keywords are not selected by the user.

Reader-users (or an end-user in general) log into the invention Web site system 100 hosted by server 60 and search for specific content or browse for various content through invention software 92, 94 (search operation 25, view operation 27). As mentioned above, FIG. 3 is illustrative of initial screen views 51 rendered by view operation 27 and displayed to the end-user. In a preferred embodiment, the reader-user subscribes 71 to content offered through the Web site/system 100 by any combination of author, topic, related people and/or groups/organizations. Users are also allowed to establish connections of different types with their family, friends and work colleagues that allow them to see (at 55, 76, FIG. 3) material written by and/or read by these connections. Connection operation 31 through user tables 122 supports this function. Additionally, end-users may choose to see content published for their local area or regions to which they might travel.

Ad Targeting

An ad service subsystem (member) 99 (a) filters and selects ads based on end-user browsing history and profile 17 characteristics, and (b) scores candidate ads in combination with expected click through rate and an advertiser's bid in a manner that maximizes host site 60's expected revenue from ad clicks (user selections of ads). As illustrated in FIG. 4, the ad member's 99 main task is to match advertiser-specified targeting criteria with characteristics of users being served ads (step 91). In general, a request 56 from a Web page server or other requester (i.e., in response to user interaction, searches and the like) is considered to match an ad if the request contains all properties that the ad is targeted to. For instance, if the ad is targeted to end-users who are males looking at political pages, it will match a male aged 40 living in Arizona viewing a political page. In other words, the extra characteristics of the end-user do not count against the ad as a match. However, an ad that matches more of these characteristics will be considered a better ad than one that only matches one or two characteristics and will tend to be scored higher by member 99.

If any targeting characteristic of the ad does not match the current end-user, the ad is ineligible to be shown. So an ad targeted to males aged 35-45 will under no circumstances be served to a male aged 50. Also, being gender specific, it will not be shown to an end-user of an unspecified gender, even if that end-user is in the proper age range. Only if the request contains all the characteristics the ad is targeted to will the ad be shown to the subject end-user. However, the user's keyword history may allow an ad to be shown even if the ad does not match the current page.

Even when the ad system matching routine 91 has selected a set of ads that are eligible 93 to be shown to a given end-user, some ads may be more pertinent than others. For instance, an ad targeted to a keyword recently seen by the end-user should be and is given preference over one targeted to a much more distant keyword. Also, ads that have high click through rates are preferred to ones that have low rates, and ads that the advertiser has bid a higher amount are preferred to ones that have a minimal bid.

At steps 195 and 96, the ad system 99 attempts to balance these possibly competing factors by using them as multiplicative factors in an ad's overall score. The following are the types of factors that are applied. More details about the scoring are given below.

Keywords are scored higher if they have been encountered recently, or if they are encountered frequently. These scoring criteria are given relatively high weight, as these are likely to be the best way to keep the ads being shown a user “fresh”.

Continuing with step 96, an ad that is more specifically targeted to an end-user is given higher priority than a less specifically targeted general ad. So an ad that is targeted toward gay males, ages 25-34, income over $75,000 will be given higher priority over an ad simply targeted toward males, if both match the same user. Of course, the less specifically targeted ad is eligible for display to a wider audience.

To maximize expected revenue to host 60, ad system 99 displays ads that are proving themselves successful by showing high click through rates. Therefore, at step 97 the ad's score is multiplied by the click through rate. In order to give a new ad a “fair chance”, its actual click through rate is calculated as a weighted average against a configurable number of impressions at the advertiser's overall click through rate. A similar balancing mechanism is used to infer an assumed click through rate for a new advertiser.

An advertiser is allowed to place a bid on his ad, for example the maximum he would be willing to pay for a click through (though for any click, i.e. user selection, he may pay a smaller actual amount). An ad with a higher bid is ranked higher by simply multiplying the ad's score due to other factors by its bid (step 98). Next ad system 99 determines the greater of the calculated amounts of steps 97 and 98. On output, ad system 99 provides an ordered set (by priority) 89 of qualifying ads in response to host system 100 request.

In one embodiment, the following types of ad targeting criteria are used.

Keywords

A set of keywords or key phrases may be provided with every ad request, representing keywords associated with the current page the user is on. The ad system 99 is provided these keywords as input. In other embodiments, ad system 99 may attempt to extract keywords from the current page context.

Keyword History

Every keyword is stored as part of a user profile 17. The profile 17 contains the user's history of keywords viewed, though it may be pruned if the history grows too large. The keywords are organized by recency and frequency. The keywords that are viewed more recently or more frequently are given preference or weighted in various calculations and determinations of ad system 99. Ads may be targeted to keywords. Ad system 99 enables display of a keyword targeted ad for end-users who have those keywords in their history. End-users that have not viewed those keywords will not see such ads.

In one embodiment, system 100 stores in the user profile 17 keywords read by the user, keywords written by the user, keywords searched (in search queries) by the user, keywords browsed by the user, keywords forwarded, received or sent in email messages by the user, and keywords in bookmarks or comments by the user. Also included in various combinations are keywords of tags and categories of content read or written by the user, recency of these keywords and frequency of these keywords. In some embodiments, tag keywords and/or category keywords are expired in the user profile 17 based on recency or frequency. Thus profile 17 records or otherwise tracks date and time of keywords of the user.

Static User Properties

Unlike behavioral properties such as keywords visited, end-users also have many relatively static properties, such as age, income range, and so on. Some of these properties may change over time and others once noted never change, but in general they are thought to be static properties of the end-user. System 100 and ad member 99 expect these properties to be explicitly supplied by the end-user as part of entering their registration profile 37. Both demographic and geographic properties fall into this general category and in one embodiment include the following criteria: Age, gender, income level, state of residence, NPR listener, relationship status, sexual orientation. The system 100, 99 is designed so that this list is flexible, and can be added to or modified with relative ease. In one embodiment, the properties of gender, age and residence exist directly in the user table 122 and the remaining properties are in the profile entry table(s) 38, FIG. 2 c. Also, some information must be passed through a filter before it is usable. For instance, in some embodiments host system 100 infers age from date of birth and residence from IP address. Other properties may be inferred.

Architecture

Turning to FIG. 5, the ad system 99 is preferably formed of three main components, namely a user interface (described below in FIGS. 6 a-6 k), an indexer 85 and an ad engine 87. The user interface allows advertisers to enter ads into the system 99 and assigns targeting criteria to the ads. In particular, the ad system 99 prompts the advertiser-user for targeting criteria and in turn assigns raw targeting criteria to ads.

The indexer 85 component periodically scans the database 110 of current ads and creates an index 81 that permits easy searching and retrieval of relevant ads when a request 56 is made in real time. Preferably, Lucene (by the Apache Software Foundation) is used as the indexing and searching engine/subsystem. Other indexing and searching techniques may be employed.

In the indexing phase, all ads that are currently eligible to be displayed are selected and placed into the index 81. Filters are applied by campaign start and stop dates, and a series of statuses on the ad, campaign, and advertiser. Additionally, campaigns that have expended their budgets for the day are shut off.

For each ad, its targeting criteria are indexed to it, so an ad that is targeted to keyword “software” will be assigned a value “keyword:software” in the index. The same is done for all such properties, such as “gender:male”. Multiple values for a property may be used, such as “state: IL IN OH MI”. If a target is not specified for a given criterion type, a field value such as “income:null” is created.

Additionally, a boost is added to the ad based on the effective click through rate (as described above, a formula to assume a click through rate for an ad that is new to the system is used) and its bid. These factors are multiplied together and assigned as a “boost” to the ad in the index. Lucene has limitations in the precision with which a boost is stored, so indexer 85 also assigns an adjustment factor to the ad in the index. Because ad system 99 relies on the score of the ad to determine the actual cost of a click, ad engine 87 multiplies by this adjustment factor when computing the ad's score.

The ad engine 87 receives requests 56 to display ads. Each request 56 includes criteria (such as keywords, user keyword history characteristics and static user properties/profile characteristics) as working parameters. For a given request 56, the ad engine 87 considers the criteria/characteristics of the request 56, such as the keyword history and profile 17 characteristics of the desired end-user, and searches the index 81 for relevant ads, scoring them by relevance. Preferably ad engine 87 employs the routine of FIG. 4 for searching and selecting an ad to serve in response to the request 56. In turn, host system 100 displays to the end-user the ad chosen by ad engine 87/ad system 99. If the end-user selects (clicks on) the displayed ad, ad system 99 compares the ad's score with the score of the next lower ad in the display order 89 to determine how much the click should be billed/charged out to the advertiser, as described below.

Since the index 81 is a resource shared between the indexer 85 and the ad engine 87, a synchronization mechanism exists to prevent contention. The indexer 85 works on a separate instance of the index 81 from the ad engine 87. When the indexer 85 is finished, it sets a flag to indicate the newly created index 81 is ready to use. The ad engine 87 begins to use it 81, freeing the previous index to be refreshed when the indexer 85 starts up again.

When the ad system 99 receives an ad request 56, it creates a query that retrieves appropriate ads from the index 81 (through ad engine 87). The query is constructed based on the current page keywords, past keywords seen by the user, and static user properties.

The current page keywords are supplied in the URL of the ad request 56. They are entered into the user's keyword history for future retrieval. They are date stamped so that recency can be tracked, and if they are encountered in the user's history already, a counter is incremented so that frequency can be tracked. Based on the recency and frequency score, a boost factor is assigned to the keyword. At the end of this process, a query of the following form is created: “keyword:word1ˆboost1 word2ˆboost2 word3ˆboost3 . . . null”. The final factor of null is required to retrieve ads that are not targeted to any keywords at all.

Additionally, a viewer-user profile 17 is created from all the static properties determined (inferred) of the viewer-user. For any property type in which one or more values is found, ad member 99 constructs a query clause of the form “property:(value1 value2 value3 . . . nullˆ0.5)”. The final null insures that ads not specifically targeted to this property are also retrieved, but not scored as well as any that match one of the values. For any property that the viewer-user has not specified, ad system 99 adds a criterion of the form “property:null”.

The foregoing clauses are appended together in a conjunctive manner so that the final query looks something like this: “+(keyword:mathematicsˆ10 gamesˆ5 null)+(state:ny pa va nj nullˆ0.5)+(gender:male nullˆ0.5)+(income:null) . . . ”.

Ad engine 87 retrieves ads from the index 81 by means of this query. The retrieved ads are then ordered by decreasing score (preferably after an adjustment is applied to work around precision limitations in Lucene's scoring system) and displayed to the end-user (viewer-user). If an ad is clicked on (selected by the end-user), an adjusted bid is computed based on the ad's relative score to the next ad beneath it in the display priority 89. The adjusted bid is such that it is just enough for the ad to maintain its position against the next lower ad, assuming that ad were at its full bid, i.e. such that (Adjusted bid)1*score1>(Actual bid)2*score2. In one embodiment, a minimum of $0.05 per 1000 impressions is charged per ad regardless of this score.

In some embodiments, ad system 99 provides a “more ads like these” option or link to the viewer-user. This is accomplished by ad system 99 searching ad database 110 to find similar ads based on targeting type, product type, geographic region, product cost range, language and keywords. The system 100 may display to the viewer-user an option to view other similar ads based on categorization of a currently displayed set of ads. Upon viewer-user selection of this option, system 100 displays one or more similar ads while maintaining display of at least one of the originally displayed ads. Further system 100 enables the viewer-user to respond to the other similar ads and/or for each similar ad, provides a respective option to display more ads similarly categorized.

In one embodiment, system 100 enables the advertiser user to (i) bid additional money to prevent display of the above-described option, or (ii) pay a fee to remove display of the option. In this case, during the ad creation and set up (budgeting and bidding part), upon the advertiser-user indicating such additional amounts/fee, system 100 is responsive and sets a flag or attribute value/parameter of the ad accordingly. The ad with its display and other attributes including a “do not display more like these option” is stored in database 110.

In other embodiments, ad system 99 displays ads from index 81 including ads that the given viewer-user has previously seen. Using user profile 17 of the given viewer-user, system 100 identifies the ads that this user has responded to in the past. System 100 provides the viewer-user an option to see ads (or lists thereof) that he has previously viewed or responded to. In one embodiment, system 100 displays ads (or lists thereof) that the given viewer-user has previously viewed and highlights or otherwise indicates which of these he has previously responded to. Certain ads may be omitted.

In addition, using user profiles 17, system 100 enables other users (such as advertiser-users) to see the ads that a given end user has responded to in the past. This enables a given end-user to see ads that his friends, colleagues or other connections 31 have responded to in the past. This also enables a user (company) to see, aggregated in a single place, ads that have been viewed by those who have linked to that user's home page 51 or effective website. In some embodiments, system 100 enables the given end-user to determine whether other users can see what ads he has viewed. The system 100 sets an appropriate variable or attribute in user profile 17 to accomplish this.

Using user profile 17, system 100 sorts ads by popularity. Similarly using user profiles 17 and ad database 110, system 100 enables a user to sort ads previously viewed by another user or group. Sorting may be by advertiser, product type, recency of viewing, frequency of viewing and/or advertiser rating or ranking. A default sorting for a user may be applied.

CPC (Cost Per Click) Bid Management

Overview

The host company 60 ad service algorithm may charge the advertiser a flat fee for every click through. For example, the fee charged is the bid that the advertiser entered for the ad. The bid is relevant to the placement of the ad, so it is reasonable to charge a higher price for having an ad placed higher, but an advertiser might vastly overbid and thus spend much more money than is necessary to guarantee his ad placement.

Other ad engines, such as Google, institute bid management functions that mitigate this problem for advertisers. Suppose that ads A-D are to be shown to a user, with the following bids:

Ad Bid
A $.50
B $.25
C $.15
D $.10

Google would rank the ads as shown, but instead of charging the advertisers per click by the amount of the bid, they'd charge for each ad at $0.01 more than the bid of the ad beneath it, in other words, just enough to maintain its position. So ad A would be charged at $0.26, and so on. Ad D would still be assessed a cost per click (CPC) of $0.10.
Details of Invention Bid Management

Unlike Google, Applicants take other factors into account in ordering ads besides bid amount. Applicants do not use the simple bid management algorithm outlined above, because the ads might be out of order from the standpoint of the simple bid. Instead, Applicants order ads by an estimate of their expected value to host site (company) or ad network 60. The bid factors into this, but Applicants also incorporate the likelihood that the ad will be clicked upon (selected by a viewing end-user). The product of (i) the bid amount and (ii) the likelihood of the ad being end-user selected (clicked on) defines the invention expected value, which is used as the ordering criterion in ad subsystem 99.

Estimating the click likelihood is a complex task. A very rough estimate may be obtained by the past click through rate of the ad or similar ads. For the purposes of simplicity in description of the preferred embodiment, what is necessary is that one has some way of calculating an estimated probability of clicking (a number between 0 and 1). This number is multiplied by the bid amount to determine an expected value.

Click likelihood may be set fairly high (close to 1) when the ad is focused on a certain author or specific story (content) for example.

Consider the same situation as above, but now with the estimate of click probability included:

Ad Bid Click probability (%) Expected value
A $.50 1 .5
B $.25 2.5 .625
C $.15 0.5 .075
D $.10 1 .1

Notice now that the ads should be ordered differently. B should be ordered before A and D before C.

This also means that the bid adjustment should be different. If one used the Google mechanism, a click for ad B would cost $0.01 more than A's bid, or $0.51. Obviously this is wrong, because it's more than B's maximum bid amount. Instead, one needs to find the bid that makes the expected value just exceed the next lower ad's. If B's bid were $0.20, its expected value would be 0.5 (=$0.20×2.5) and it would be tied with A for rank. Therefore, B should be charged $0.21 (which is $0.01 more than the $0.20 bid amount that made the expected value just exceed that of ad A). Similarly, if D's bid were $0.075, it would tie with C in expected value and thus in rank. Therefore, D's bid should be $0.08 (=$0.01+$0.075).

The formula for a tie bid is y=(Expected value of next lower ad)/(Click probability of the subject ad). The adjusted bid for the subject ad is then (y+$0.01), or in the case of a fractional cent, the calculated sum rounded up.

Ordering the above table properly and filling in the adjusted bids, one gets the following:

Click
probability Expected
Ad Maximum bid (%) value Adjusted bid
B $.25 2.5 .625 $.21
A $.50 1 .5 $.11
D $.10 1 .1 $.08
C $.15 0.5 .075 $.15

In one embodiment, a combination of the ad's current click rate, along with keyword recency and frequency for the end-user is utilized. If an ad is just getting into rotation, the click through rate (CTR) cannot be accurately calculated immediately. In order to give the ad a “fair shake”, Applicants assume some rate until there is enough data to estimate the actual rate (CTR). One way to do this is to “blend” the assumed click through rate with the real rate using a weighted average until enough impressions are received. Suppose one assumes a 1% click through rate, and wish this to be effective until about the 10,000th impression, at which point one wishes the real click through rate to be considered. Then one can use the formula [(1%*10,000)+# actual clicks]/(10,000+# actual impressions) to give an adjusted click rate. If the actual click rate were 0.5%, this function would behave as follows:

# Impressions Adjusted CTR
0   1%
1,000 0.95%
5,000 0.83%
10,000 0.75%
20,000 0.67%
50,000 0.58%
100,000 0.54%

As the number of impressions increases, the adjusted click rate approaches the actual click rate, but gives the ad a fair chance to be displayed before the ad targeting system 99 has any data about it.

The 1% and 10,000 used as constants in the example formula above are only used to make the mathematics look simpler. In actual application, an embodiment begins with 3,000 as the assumed number of impressions (though this may be an adjustable parameter). The click through percentage serves as the advertisers' average click through rate across all their ads. If it's a new advertiser, it will be the average overall click through rate.

It is understood that different embodiments may employ different units for bid amounts and may display different responses in them. For example, one embodiment receives input dollar amount per number of views (impressions) and in response indicates likely number of impressions resulting and average placement of the subject ad for the input dollar amount. In other embodiments, the input dollar amount is cost per click-through or cost per sale completed or cost per registration completed. And the response indicates likely number of click-throughs resulting, average placement of the subject ad and total cost of the subject ad.

The foregoing ranking 89 (based on projected likelihood of end user selection of the subject ad multiplied by respective bid amount) may include subsequently degrading the projected likelihood of the end-user selecting the subject ad every N times one of the ads is viewed by the end-user but not selected by him. N is greater than zero. Other schemes for degrading rank of an ad or effectively expiring an ad are suitable.

Accordingly, the present invention ad targeting system uses a bid technique that is akin to a Vickrey auction where the highest bidder wins but pays at the price of the second highest bid. FIGS. 6 a-6 k illustrate the user interface for advertiser users of invention system 100.

Illustrated in FIG. 6 a is a first screen view or web page 132 of module (47 (FIG. 2 b) for registering as an advertiser-user of a system 100. The advertiser-user enters company name, his name and contact information in respective fields. Continuing with advertiser-user registration 47, FIG. 6 b illustrates the next step 134 in this process in which the advertiser-user creates a first advertisement for placement in system 100. The module 47 prompts the advertiser-user to name the subject advertisement and to name the campaign to associate the subject advertisement. A campaign may have many advertisements and the advertiser-user may subsequently add ads to a campaign. Working web page/screen view 134 further prompts the advertiser-user to provide a headline and description of the subject ad, as well as a display URL and destination URL (hyperlink) among other parts of the ad.

FIG. 6 c illustrates the screen view 136 in which the advertiser-user indicates keywords for the newly created subject ad. As previously described, the keywords indicated here (and hence defined for the subject ad) are used to match keywords on a web page that a system 100 user is viewing or keywords in a user profile 17 to determine applicable placement of the ad. Thus the number of keywords specified by the advertiser-user in screen view 136 impacts the reach of the subject ad. Using fewer keywords makes the ad very focused while using more keywords increases the frequency that the ad is shown/displayed in system 100. Module 47 stores the newly created (subject) ad and corresponding keywords in ad database 110 accordingly.

FIG. 6 d-1 and FIG. 6 d-2 illustrate the screen view/web page 138 in which the advertiser-user creates the profile of an ideal customer for the item being advertised in the subject ad. Screen view/working page 138 prompts the advertiser-user to name the profile (for identification purposes) and to specify pertinent gender, age group, household income, marital status and the like for the ad targeting profile. Ad targeting profiles are stored in ad database 110 and appropriately associated with respective ads.

Continuing the first ad and registration process 47 with FIG. 6 e, the advertiser-user establishes a budget for the newly created ad. Screen view/web page 140 enables this by providing a “maximum CPC Bid” (cost per click) field 130 and a “Daily Campaign Budget” field 131 for the advertiser-user to insert respective values. The maximum cost-per-click bid is the maximum amount that the advertiser-user is willing to pay per viewer-user selection (click) of the subject ad. The higher this bid amount the more frequent the ad will be displayed in system 100. Recall that the ad system 99 optimizes the ad billing by charging one cent more than the next highest ad bid, up to the maximum CPC bid. These field values 130, 131 are stored with or otherwise indicated for the subject ad in ad database 110.

The “Daily Campaign Budget” settings 131 allow the advertiser-user to control his budget and to set how much he is willing to spend on each campaign in a day. For this purpose, system 100 calculates cost as the number of clicks multiplied by the amount of actual CPC (cost per click) for the subject ad. When the allotment (as set by the value entered by the advertiser-user into the “Daily Campaign Budget” field 131) is reached, system 100 pauses placement (display) activity of the subject ad and resumes such activity the following day.

In one embodiment, screen view 140 includes a graphical illustration of the change in projected number of users viewing (impressions) the subject ad per day with a change in bid amount. A slider or other graphical interface element 142 enables the advertiser-user to indicate a bid (CPC) amount, and in response system 100 (ad system 99) generates graph 144 showing number of impressions per day versus cost per number of impression for the subject ad, or projected number of user click throughs per day versus cost per click (user selection). This serves as a forecast of the effectiveness of specific bids in terms of the number of clicks projected per impression. The user profiles 17 in user tables 122, the records of ads stored in database 110 and the customer (ad targeting) profile and keywords defined for the subject ad support system 100 in making these projections and generating graphs 144.

System 100 stores each of the aspects of the newly created ad as specified by the advertiser-user throughout screen views 132, 134, 136, 138, 140 (including bid and budget fields 130 and 131) of FIGS. 6 a-6 e in ad database 110 or supporting tables thereof. Included are ad attributes of advertiser type, product type, geographic region, product cost range, language, do not display “more like these” option start/stop campaigns and keywords.

A last screen (web page) 146 in the advertiser registration process/module 47 is illustrated in FIG. 6 f. The working screen view 146 establishes information for billing the advertiser-user. Included are billing address and charge account (e.g. credit card) information or the like.

After the advertiser-user has successfully become a registered member (advertiser-user) of system 100, he can take advantage of the various features and aspects of system 100 as a reader-user and/or writer-user (as described in related U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/371,462) as well as being an advertiser-business affiliate of host site (company) 60. In that respect, the advertisements he places in system 100 may be treated like authored works 29 which other users rate and rank and for which he is compensated following the writer-compensation program detailed in the related patent application. In one embodiment, the rate of compensation differs depending on whether the ad placement was paid by cash or system 100 credit. Publication Table 124 and ad database 110 records support this. In another embodiment, only users who selected the displayed ad or who made a purchase through the displayed ad rate the displayed ad as an authored work 29.

Turning to FIGS. 6 g-6 k, the user-interface for a registered advertiser-user of system 100 is illustrated. Subsequent to registering and placing a first ad, the advertiser-user may view, edit and add campaigns, ads and customer (ad targeting) profiles. FIG. 6 g illustrates the screen view/web page 148 that enables the advertiser-user to obtain various reports of campaigns, advertisements and the like. In one embodiment, the reporting function enables reporting to advertiser-users indications of ads currently or actively being displayed and those selected by end-users. Reports include any combination of number of sales, number of subscriptions and number of registrations made by end-users through respective ads. Subscriptions here may be to company (advertiser) website, etc.

System 100 enables reports to be filtered by demographics, keywords, category, context and/or end-user behavior. This is supported by the user profiles 17, customer (ad targeting) profiles, corresponding keywords and other attributes recorded for ads in database 110. In a same light, system 100 enables reports to show a breakdown or groupings by demographics, keywords/phrase, category, context and/or end-user behavior.

FIG. 6 h illustrates the web page 150 enabling the advertiser-user to manage campaigns. Campaigns are listed by name, status, daily budget, number of clicks to date, click through rate (CTR %), average cost and total cost. Operational elements (e.g., “buttons”) enable the advertiser-user to start and stop campaigns as desired. The starting and stopping of campaigns as instructed here by the advertiser-user is effected through ad records in database 110. In particular, setting of variables, flags and any of various known techniques for handling ad records may be employed. Web page 150 also lists customer profiles by name. This allows the advertiser-user to view and edit a Customer Profile as well as to add (create) a new Customer (ad targeting) Profile as further illustrated in FIG. 6 j discussed below.

To create additional ads, system 100 displays web page 152 to the advertiser-user as illustrated in FIG. 6 i. Web page 152 provides campaign name, subject advertisement name and subject ad information fields similar to screen/page 134 for creating a first ad in FIG. 6 b. Also the steps of targeting an audience for the ad and establishing a budget follow (are similar to) those described in FIGS. 6 c and 6 e.

In FIG. 6 j, the web page 154 enables the advertiser-user to review previously created customer (ad targeting) profiles and to create new ones. Web page 154 lists customer profiles by name and displays a summary of each as supported by corresponding recorded data in ad database 110.

FIG. 6 k illustrates the web page 156 that enables an advertiser-user to review his ads. Each ad is listed by name with an indication of corresponding campaign, ad status, CPC bid and actual cost-per-click being charged for this ad as supported by corresponding stored ad data in database 110. Advertiser-user selection of an ad listed on this screen view/page 156 enables the advertiser-user to modify the ad and its corresponding budget CPC amounts and the like. For each of the advertiser-user entered edits throughout screen views 148, 150, 152, 154 and 156, system 100 updates corresponding attributes and records in database 110. Moreover, data used in reports and screen views of FIGS. 6 g-6 k are tracked by system 100 and/or ad system 99 and are stored (updated) in ad database 110, supporting tables and/or user profiles 17.

While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.

For example, the foregoing states exemplary code and algorithms for implementing an embodiment of the present invention. These are by way of illustration and not limitation. Other code language and equivalent computations are suitable.

Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US6275811 *May 6, 1998Aug 14, 2001Michael R. GinnSystem and method for facilitating interactive electronic communication through acknowledgment of positive contributive
US6411950 *Nov 30, 1998Jun 25, 2002Compaq Information Technologies Group, LpDynamic query expansion
US7797345 *Apr 7, 2005Sep 14, 2010Cisco Technology, Inc.Restricting hierarchical posts with social network metrics methods and apparatus
US20020059201 *May 8, 2001May 16, 2002Work James DuncanMethod and apparatus for internet-based human network brokering
US20040103024 *Nov 22, 2002May 27, 2004Matchcraft, Inc.Online media exchange
US20050131894 *Dec 10, 2004Jun 16, 2005Vuong Chau M.System and method for providing identification and search information
US20050171832 *Jun 14, 2004Aug 4, 2005Yahoo! Inc.Method and system for sharing portal subscriber information in an online social network
US20050201290 *Mar 11, 2004Sep 15, 2005Yahoo! Inc.Method and system for finding a friend in a social network
US20050203801 *Jan 27, 2005Sep 15, 2005Jared MorgensternMethod and system for collecting, sharing and tracking user or group associates content via a communications network
US20050203809 *Mar 9, 2004Sep 15, 2005Lowe's Companies, Inc.Systems, methods and computer program products for implementing processes relating to retail sales
US20060095281 *Nov 30, 2004May 4, 2006Microsoft CorporationSystems and methods for estimating click-through-rates of content items on a rendered page
US20060143068 *Dec 23, 2004Jun 29, 2006Hermann CalabriaVendor-driven, social-network enabled review collection system
US20060212355 *May 23, 2006Sep 21, 2006Brian TeagueSocial information and promotional offer management and distribution systems and methods
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7529797 *Jul 27, 2007May 5, 2009Tagged, Inc.User created tags for online social networking
US7631332Feb 7, 2003Dec 8, 2009Decisionmark Corp.Method and system for providing household level television programming information
US7702813Jun 8, 2007Apr 20, 2010Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AbUsing personal data for advertisements
US7725464Sep 27, 2006May 25, 2010Looksmart, Ltd.Collection and delivery of internet ads
US7734641May 25, 2007Jun 8, 2010Peerset, Inc.Recommendation systems and methods using interest correlation
US7756855Aug 28, 2007Jul 13, 2010Collarity, Inc.Search phrase refinement by search term replacement
US7756926 *Apr 10, 2009Jul 13, 2010Tagged, Inc.User created tags for online social networking
US7853622Nov 1, 2007Dec 14, 2010Google Inc.Video-related recommendations using link structure
US7856433 *Apr 6, 2007Dec 21, 2010Yahoo! Inc.Dynamic bid pricing for sponsored search
US7860928Mar 22, 2007Dec 28, 2010Google Inc.Voting in chat system without topic-specific rooms
US7865553Mar 22, 2007Jan 4, 2011Google Inc.Chat system without topic-specific rooms
US7870026 *Jun 8, 2007Jan 11, 2011Yahoo! Inc.Selecting and displaying advertisement in a personal media space
US7873641Aug 1, 2006Jan 18, 2011Bea Systems, Inc.Using tags in an enterprise search system
US7886226 *Apr 24, 2007Feb 8, 2011Adobe Systems IncorporatedContent based Ad display control
US7890592Feb 29, 2008Feb 15, 2011Microsoft CorporationProcessing data obtained from a presence-based system
US7895127 *Sep 29, 2006Feb 22, 2011Weiser Anatoly SRating-based sorting and displaying of reviews
US7899869Mar 22, 2007Mar 1, 2011Google Inc.Broadcasting in chat system without topic-specific rooms
US7904461 *May 1, 2007Mar 8, 2011Google Inc.Advertiser and user association
US7904500 *Mar 22, 2007Mar 8, 2011Google Inc.Advertising in chat system without topic-specific rooms
US7913287Feb 12, 2003Mar 22, 2011Decisionmark Corp.System and method for delivering data over an HDTV digital television spectrum
US7930208 *Mar 27, 2008Apr 19, 2011Wmode IncorporatedMethod and system for delivery of advertising content in short message service (SMS) messages
US7933899Oct 5, 2010Apr 26, 2011Yahoo! Inc.Dynamic bid pricing for sponsored search
US7949672 *Jun 10, 2008May 24, 2011Yahoo! Inc.Identifying regional sensitive queries in web search
US7961986Jun 30, 2008Jun 14, 2011Google Inc.Ranking of images and image labels
US7974868Nov 30, 2004Jul 5, 2011Tagged, Inc.Enhancing virally-marketed facilities
US8006191Mar 21, 2007Aug 23, 2011Google Inc.Chat room with thin walls
US8010981Aug 23, 2006Aug 30, 2011Decisionmark Corp.Method and system for creating television programming guide
US8019642May 6, 2008Sep 13, 2011Richrelevance, Inc.System and process for receiving boosting recommendations for use in providing personalized advertisements to retail customers
US8019772 *Dec 5, 2007Sep 13, 2011International Business Machines CorporationComputer method and apparatus for tag pre-search in social software
US8036926 *Mar 12, 2007Oct 11, 2011International Business Machines CorporationTechniques for selecting calendar events by examining content of user's recent e-mail activity
US8041082Nov 2, 2007Oct 18, 2011Google Inc.Inferring the gender of a face in an image
US8055664May 1, 2007Nov 8, 2011Google Inc.Inferring user interests
US8103544 *Aug 21, 2008Jan 24, 2012Google Inc.Competitive advertising server
US8108329May 6, 2008Jan 31, 2012Richrelevance, Inc.System and process for boosting recommendations for use in providing personalized advertisements to retail customers
US8122047May 17, 2010Feb 21, 2012Kit Digital Inc.Recommendation systems and methods using interest correlation
US8135706Aug 12, 2010Mar 13, 2012Brightedge Technologies, Inc.Operationalizing search engine optimization
US8140384 *Jun 9, 2011Mar 20, 2012Unoweb, Inc.Advertising revenue sharing
US8145679Dec 13, 2010Mar 27, 2012Google Inc.Video-related recommendations using link structure
US8160923 *Jan 18, 2008Apr 17, 2012Google Inc.Video advertisements
US8185431 *Sep 29, 2009May 22, 2012Kwabena Benoni Abboa-OffeiSystem and method for forecasting and pairing advertising with popular web-based media
US8190594 *May 6, 2009May 29, 2012Brightedge Technologies, Inc.Collecting and scoring online references
US8204888Dec 7, 2010Jun 19, 2012Oracle International CorporationUsing tags in an enterprise search system
US8209715Nov 14, 2008Jun 26, 2012Google Inc.Video play through rates
US8224788Jan 15, 2009Jul 17, 2012Yahoo! Inc.System and method for bookmarking and auto-tagging a content item based on file type
US8239418Feb 15, 2012Aug 7, 2012Google Inc.Video-related recommendations using link structure
US8249912Feb 20, 2008Aug 21, 2012Sebastian ElliotMethod for determining, correlating and examining the causal relationships between media program and commercial content with response rates to advertising and product placement
US8275771Jun 7, 2010Sep 25, 2012Google Inc.Non-text content item search
US8280882 *Apr 20, 2006Oct 2, 2012Case Western Reserve UniversityAutomatic expert identification, ranking and literature search based on authorship in large document collections
US8301698Dec 14, 2010Oct 30, 2012Google Inc.Voting in chat system without topic-specific rooms
US8301709Dec 14, 2010Oct 30, 2012Google Inc.Chat system without topic-specific rooms
US8301710Jan 6, 2011Oct 30, 2012Microsoft CorporationProcessing data obtained from a presence-based system
US8306922Oct 1, 2009Nov 6, 2012Google Inc.Detecting content on a social network using links
US8311950Oct 1, 2009Nov 13, 2012Google Inc.Detecting content on a social network using browsing patterns
US8312090Mar 1, 2011Nov 13, 2012Google Inc.Broadcasting in chat system without topic-specific rooms
US8326091May 9, 2011Dec 4, 2012Google Inc.Ranking of images and image labels
US8332269 *Jun 27, 2006Dec 11, 2012Adchemy, Inc.System and method for generating target bids for advertisement group keywords
US8356035Apr 10, 2007Jan 15, 2013Google Inc.Association of terms with images using image similarity
US8364528May 6, 2008Jan 29, 2013Richrelevance, Inc.System and process for improving product recommendations for use in providing personalized advertisements to retail customers
US8380691 *Jan 4, 2008Feb 19, 2013Google Inc.Social network user data advertising
US8386576Sep 6, 2011Feb 26, 2013Google Inc.Graphical user interface for messaging system
US8402025Dec 19, 2007Mar 19, 2013Google Inc.Video quality measures
US8417226Jan 9, 2008Apr 9, 2013Apple Inc.Advertisement scheduling
US8438155 *Nov 10, 2011May 7, 2013Google Inc.Impressions-weighted coverage monitoring for search results
US8468145Nov 10, 2011Jun 18, 2013Google Inc.Indexing of URLs with fragments
US8473500Nov 7, 2011Jun 25, 2013Google Inc.Inferring user interests
US8478746Feb 8, 2012Jul 2, 2013Brightedge Technologies, Inc.Operationalizing search engine optimization
US8484083 *Dec 17, 2007Jul 9, 2013Sri InternationalMethod and apparatus for targeting messages to users in a social network
US8504550May 17, 2010Aug 6, 2013Citizennet Inc.Social network message categorization systems and methods
US8527352Oct 30, 2006Sep 3, 2013Adchemy, Inc.System and method for generating optimized bids for advertisement keywords
US8527594Apr 25, 2007Sep 3, 2013Ecairn, Inc.Blog advertising
US8554602Apr 16, 2010Oct 8, 2013Exelate, Inc.System and method for behavioral segment optimization based on data exchange
US8554854Dec 13, 2010Oct 8, 2013Citizennet Inc.Systems and methods for identifying terms relevant to web pages using social network messages
US8566747Sep 29, 2010Oct 22, 2013Copia Interactive, LlcMethod of and system for browsing and displaying items from a collection
US8572099 *Jan 14, 2011Oct 29, 2013Google Inc.Advertiser and user association
US8583524 *May 6, 2008Nov 12, 2013Richrelevance, Inc.System and process for improving recommendations for use in providing personalized advertisements to retail customers
US8606870Aug 16, 2012Dec 10, 2013Google Inc.Chat system without topic-specific rooms
US8612293Oct 19, 2011Dec 17, 2013Citizennet Inc.Generation of advertising targeting information based upon affinity information obtained from an online social network
US8615434 *Dec 20, 2011Dec 24, 2013Citizennet Inc.Systems and methods for automatically generating campaigns using advertising targeting information based upon affinity information obtained from an online social network
US8615524Jan 26, 2012Dec 24, 2013Piksel, Inc.Item recommendations using keyword expansion
US8620892 *Apr 27, 2012Dec 31, 2013Brightedge Technologies, Inc.Collecting and scoring online references
US8621068Aug 19, 2010Dec 31, 2013Exelate Media Ltd.System and method for monitoring advertisement assignment
US8635102 *Feb 13, 2012Jan 21, 2014Unoweb, Inc.Assigning an internet domain to a user as the user registers with a server
US8666810 *Feb 17, 2012Mar 4, 2014Google Inc.System and method for online unique users and frequency estimation for advertisements on a video sharing website based on auction history results
US8712985Feb 8, 2013Apr 29, 2014Google Inc.Social network user data advertising
US8751418 *Oct 17, 2011Jun 10, 2014Quantcast CorporationUsing proxy behaviors for audience selection
US8756163May 17, 2011Jun 17, 2014Tagged, Inc.System and method of selecting a relevant user for introduction to a user in an online environment
US8756510May 21, 2007Jun 17, 2014Cooliris, Inc.Method and system for displaying photos, videos, RSS and other media content in full-screen immersive view and grid-view using a browser feature
US8762302Feb 20, 2014Jun 24, 2014Bottlenose, Inc.System and method for revealing correlations between data streams
US8768772 *Nov 14, 2005Jul 1, 2014Yahoo! Inc.System and method for selecting advertising in a social bookmarking system
US8768922Feb 8, 2008Jul 1, 2014Microsoft CorporationAd retrieval for user search on social network sites
US8769029Sep 14, 2012Jul 1, 2014Google Inc.Voting in chat system without topic-specific rooms
US8775283 *Feb 28, 2014Jul 8, 2014Causam Energy, Inc.System, method, and apparatus for settlement for participation in an electric power grid
US8782155Aug 29, 2012Jul 15, 2014Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc.Methods and apparatus for inserting content into conversations in on-line and digital environments
US8793155Oct 1, 2007Jul 29, 2014The Invention Science Fund I, LlcCollecting influence information
US8793252Sep 23, 2011Jul 29, 2014Aol Advertising Inc.Systems and methods for contextual analysis and segmentation using dynamically-derived topics
US8799078 *Oct 28, 2009Aug 5, 2014Google Inc.Advertising value tools
US8812494Jan 4, 2013Aug 19, 2014Apple Inc.Predicting content and context performance based on performance history of users
US8818842 *Dec 21, 2011Aug 26, 2014Rmg Networks, Inc.Method and apparatus for defining, distributing and redeeming SMS and MMS coupons
US8825763Dec 9, 2011Sep 2, 2014Facebook, Inc.Bookmarking social networking system content
US8831973Oct 31, 2008Sep 9, 2014The Invention Science Fund I, LlcSystems for rewarding influencers
US8832092Feb 19, 2013Sep 9, 2014Bottlenose, Inc.Natural language processing optimized for micro content
US20060248076 *Apr 20, 2006Nov 2, 2006Case Western Reserve UniversityAutomatic expert identification, ranking and literature search based on authorship in large document collections
US20080010144 *Jun 27, 2006Jan 10, 2008Adchemy, Inc.System and method for generating target bids for advertisement group keywords
US20080140508 *Dec 12, 2006Jun 12, 2008Shubhasheesh AnandSystem for optimizing the performance of a smart advertisement
US20090063284 *Sep 9, 2008Mar 5, 2009Enliven Marketing Technologies CorporationSystem and method for implementing advertising in an online social network
US20090132368 *Oct 20, 2008May 21, 2009Paul CotterSystems and Methods for Providing Personalized Advertisement
US20090198711 *Feb 4, 2008Aug 6, 2009Google Inc.User-targeted advertising
US20090281895 *May 6, 2008Nov 12, 2009David SelingerSystem and process for improving recommendations for use in providing personalized advertisements to retail customers
US20090307003 *May 18, 2009Dec 10, 2009Daniel BenyaminSocial advertisement network
US20090307056 *May 6, 2009Dec 10, 2009Optiweber, Inc.Collecting and scoring online references
US20090327072 *Jun 25, 2008Dec 31, 2009Yahoo! Inc.Presentation of sequential advertisements
US20100017432 *Jul 17, 2009Jan 21, 2010LifeSpeed CorporationSystems and methods for community exchange
US20100082438 *Sep 28, 2009Apr 1, 2010Ronnie Jack GarmonMethods and systems for customer performance scoring
US20100121682 *Sep 29, 2009May 13, 2010Kwabena Benoni Abboa-OffeiSystem and method for forecasting and pairing advertising with popular web-based media
US20100146042 *May 9, 2008Jun 10, 2010Douglas Paul KruhoefferInteractive customizable broadcast
US20100205024 *Oct 29, 2009Aug 12, 2010Haggai ShacharSystem and method for applying in-depth data mining tools for participating websites
US20100211464 *Nov 6, 2008Aug 19, 2010Baojin ZhuTargeted Online Advertising
US20100287050 *May 7, 2010Nov 11, 2010Chacha Search Inc.Method and system for personally targeted search messages
US20110035277 *Aug 5, 2009Feb 10, 2011Muralidharan KodialamSystem for scheduling advertisements and method thereof
US20110047028 *Aug 30, 2009Feb 24, 2011Company 100, Inc.Target advertisement system and method in mobile communication terminal
US20110238501 *Jun 9, 2011Sep 29, 2011John AlmeidaAdvertising revenue sharing
US20110295997 *May 28, 2010Dec 1, 2011Apple Inc.Presenting content packages based on audience retargeting
US20110314089 *Nov 7, 2008Dec 22, 2011Karl QuinnProvisioning of Content Items in Mobile Communications Networks
US20120041822 *Aug 5, 2011Feb 16, 2012Focused Labs, Inc.Methods and systems for processing metadata
US20120089446 *Oct 7, 2010Apr 12, 2012Microsoft CorporationPublishing Commercial Information in a Social Network
US20120089459 *Oct 7, 2011Apr 12, 2012Google Inc.Hybrid advertising campaign
US20120095814 *Dec 21, 2011Apr 19, 2012Liu David WanqianMethod and apparatus for defining, distributing and redeeming sms and mms coupons
US20120109758 *Oct 24, 2011May 3, 2012Vanessa MurdockMethod For Matching Electronic Advertisements To Surrounding Context Based On Their Advertisement Content
US20120109956 *Oct 29, 2010May 3, 2012Yahoo! Inc.Profile prediction for shared computers
US20120122554 *Nov 12, 2010May 17, 2012Disney Enterprises, Inc.System and method for in-game interactive advertising
US20120158518 *Dec 20, 2011Jun 21, 2012Citizennet Inc.Systems and methods for automatically generating campaigns using advertising targeting information based upon affinity information obtained from an online social network
US20120158875 *Feb 13, 2012Jun 21, 2012John AlmeidaAssigning an Internet domain to a user as the user registers with a server
US20120173414 *Jan 3, 2012Jul 5, 2012Marc Erfani HoagMethod and system for computer-based bidirectional pay-per-click bidding and matching between two complementary population groups
US20120215760 *Apr 27, 2012Aug 23, 2012Brightedge Technologies, Inc.Collecting and scoring online references
US20120303415 *Apr 18, 2012Nov 29, 2012Ari EdelsonSystem and method of providing recommendations
US20120316968 *Jun 8, 2011Dec 13, 2012Estilo Hacienda, Inc.Culinary food and related culinary products method and educational teaching system
US20130006758 *Jun 28, 2011Jan 3, 2013John HegemanUser feedback-based selection of online advertisements using normalized cost modifiers
US20130080439 *Sep 23, 2011Mar 28, 2013Aol Advertising Inc.Systems and Methods for Contextual Analysis and Segmentation of Information Objects
US20130091520 *Oct 11, 2011Apr 11, 2013Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.Targeted advertising
US20130110642 *Jun 29, 2012May 2, 2013Wei Yeh LeeMethod and apparatus for providing personalized advertisements
US20130124303 *Nov 14, 2011May 16, 2013Google Inc.Advertising Keyword Generation Using an Image Search
US20130185143 *Apr 1, 2013Jul 18, 2013Xavier DammanAmplification of a social object through automatic republishing of the social object on curated content pages based on relevancy
US20130290118 *Jun 27, 2013Oct 31, 2013Linkedin CorporationPromoting content
US20130309649 *Nov 23, 2012Nov 21, 2013Yingqida Information Co., Ltd.Method for rating electronic book
US20130311505 *Aug 31, 2011Nov 21, 2013Daniel A. McCallumMethods and Apparatus for Automated Keyword Refinement
US20140095545 *Sep 30, 2013Apr 3, 2014Salesforce.Com, Inc.Methods and systems for controlling access to custom objects in a database
US20140180885 *Feb 28, 2014Jun 26, 2014Causam Energy, Inc.System, method, and apparatus for settlement for participation in an electric power grid
USRE44905 *Jul 13, 2012May 20, 2014Tagged, Inc.User created tags for online social networking
EP2380310A2 *Dec 16, 2009Oct 26, 2011Nortel Networks LimitedTargeted advertising system and method
EP2678784A2 *Feb 23, 2012Jan 1, 2014Bottlenose, Inc.Adaptive system architecture for identifying popular topics from messages
EP2678822A2 *Feb 23, 2012Jan 1, 2014Bottlenose, Inc.System and method for analyzing messages in a network or across networks
EP2747013A1 *Feb 23, 2012Jun 25, 2014Bottlenose, Inc.System and Method for Analyzing Messages in a Network or Across Networks
EP2747014A1 *Feb 23, 2012Jun 25, 2014Bottlenose, Inc.Adaptive system architecture for identifying popular topics from messages
WO2008094660A1 *Jan 31, 2008Aug 7, 2008Enliven Marketing TechnologiesSystem and method for implementing advertising in an online social network
WO2008149185A1 *Dec 6, 2007Dec 11, 2008Sony Ericsson Mobile Comm AbUsing personal data for advertisements
WO2008149368A2 *Jun 5, 2008Dec 11, 2008Oded Har-TalSystem and method for selecting a message to play from a playlist
WO2008153625A2 *Apr 24, 2008Dec 18, 2008Ontogenix IncRecommendation systems and methods
WO2009002564A1 *Jun 27, 2008Dec 31, 2008Andrew MarcuvitzA profile based advertising method for out-of-line advertising delivery
WO2009026395A1 *Aug 20, 2008Feb 26, 2009Facebook IncTargeting advertisements in a social network
WO2009061914A1 *Nov 6, 2008May 14, 2009Alibaba Group Holding LtdTargeted online advertising
WO2009082784A1 *Jan 5, 2009Jul 9, 2009Stephen MenziesContent management and delivery method, system and apparatus
WO2009137152A1 *Mar 3, 2009Nov 12, 2009Richrelevance, Inc.System and process for receiving boosting recommendations for use in providing personalized advertisements to retail customers
WO2010024922A2 *Aug 28, 2009Mar 4, 2010Yahoo! Inc.System and method for online advertising using user social information
WO2010028111A2 *Sep 3, 2009Mar 11, 2010Singular Logic, LlcSystem and method for delivering preference-based content and advertising
WO2010034336A1 *Nov 7, 2008Apr 1, 2010Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)Provisioning of content items in mobile communications networks
WO2011056388A1 *Oct 15, 2010May 12, 2011Facebook, Inc.User feedback-based selection and prioritizing of online advertisements
WO2011100094A2 *Jan 19, 2011Aug 18, 2011Yahoo! Inc.Online and offline integrated profile in advertisement targeting
WO2012018358A1 *Sep 29, 2010Feb 9, 2012Copia Interactive, LlcMethod of and system for browsing and displaying items from a collection
WO2012024066A2 *Jul 26, 2011Feb 23, 2012Yahoo! Inc.Contextual advertising with user features
WO2012030848A2 *Aug 30, 2011Mar 8, 2012Google Inc.User list generation and identification
WO2012116241A2 *Feb 23, 2012Aug 30, 2012Nova SpivackAdaptive system architecture for identifying popular topics from messages
WO2013009470A2 *Jun 27, 2012Jan 17, 2013Magnetify CorporationSystem and method for distribution of digital offers
WO2013085677A1 *Nov 13, 2012Jun 13, 2013Facebook, Inc.Bookmarking social networking system content
WO2013123462A1 *Feb 15, 2013Aug 22, 2013Bottlenose, Inc.Systems and methods for recommending advertisement placement based on cross network online activity analysis
WO2014035704A2 *Aug 19, 2013Mar 6, 2014Microsoft CorporationIdentifying user-specific services that are associated with user-presented entities
Classifications
U.S. Classification705/14.66, 707/E17.109, 705/14.69, 707/999.003, 705/7.33
International ClassificationG07G1/00, G06F17/30, G07G1/14
Cooperative ClassificationG06Q30/0269, G06Q30/0204, G06Q30/02, G06Q10/10, G06F17/30867, G06Q30/0273
European ClassificationG06Q30/02, G06Q10/10, G06Q30/0269, G06Q30/0204, G06Q30/0273, G06F17/30W1F
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
May 4, 2011ASAssignment
Effective date: 20101210
Owner name: SKYWORD INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GATHER, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026226/0142
Jun 12, 2006ASAssignment
Owner name: GATHER INC., MASSACHUSETTS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GERACE, THOMAS A.;BARBOUR, RUSSELL G.;REEL/FRAME:017970/0567
Effective date: 20060612