US 20070073110 A1
The present invention provides methods and apparatus in which a surgical retractor comprises a plurality of mechanically coupled tissue retaining walls that are guided into position along one or more guides previously implanted into the patient. The walls are preferably coupled by pivots, so that separating some of the walls from one another opens an operating space. There are preferably two guides, which are driven or screwed into the pedicles of vertebrae, or other bone. Oversized channels are best disposed in a frame, which also serves to hold lock the walls apart. Various convenience features are contemplated including a web disposed between the walls, which expands as the walls are separated. Also contemplated are projections from near the bottoms of one or more of the walls, which can alternatively or additionally help to hold the underlying tissue in place.
1. A retractor system comprising:
first and second retractor walls forming a first opening;
first and second bone fasteners; and
first and second guides associated with the first and second bone fasteners, respectively;
wherein the first and second guides pass through the first opening; and
wherein the orientation of least the first guide is configured to be manipulated.
2. The retractor system of
3. The retractor system of
4. The retractor system of
5. The retractor system of
6. The retractor system of
7. The retractor system of
8. The retractor system of
9. The retractor system of
10. The retractor system of
11. The retractor system of
12. The retractor system of
13. The retractor system of
14. The retractor system of
15. The retractor system of
16. The retractor system of
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/992,260, filed Nov. 18, 2004, which claims priority to under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/525,732, filed Nov. 26, 2003, the contents of both are incorporated by reference herein. This application further claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/645,136, filed Aug. 20, 2003, which claims priority to under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/433,343, filed Dec. 13, 2002, the contents of both are incorporated by reference herein.
The field of the invention is surgical retractors.
Many types of surgical retractors are known. The simplest devices are tubular probes, or probes adapted with a paddle or other somewhat flatter surface. Recent embodiments of that concept are depicted in US 6206826 to Mathews et al. (March 2001). More complicated retractors utilize scissors, bow string, or screw-jack expanders that operate against mating paddles. Those retractors have the advantage of being able to lock the paddles in place, leaving at least one of the surgeon's hands free for other actions. See e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,471,644 to Sidor (October 2002). Still other retractors are self opening, including Cosgrove et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,162,172 (December 2000). All cited patents herein are incorporated herein by reference.
While undoubtedly useful in many respects, none of the above-mentioned retractors are readily fixed in position relative to one or more bones. U.S. Pat. No. 5,027,793 to Engelhardt et al. (July 1991) addresses that need to some extent, by providing spikes on the bottom of a retractor wall, and further providing spikes that can be driven into the bone. The contemplated use is to resect the operating area down to the bone, position the retractor, and then pound both the retractor and the spikes into place.
A problem remains, however, in that the resection required to properly position the retractor can cause considerable trauma to the overlying and surrounding tissues. Another problem is that multiple retractors are needed to retain tissue pushing into the operating area from different directions. The Engelhardt et al. retractor, for example, did not have to address that issue because the preferred application was acetabular surgery, in which the major encroachment was from gluteus muscles that are all substantially superior to the operating site.
In spinal and some other surgeries these problems can be especially severe. Thus, there is still a need to provide methods and apparatus in which an operating space can be positioned and opened with respect to specific areas of bone, while reducing trauma to surrounding tissue.
To that end the present invention provides methods and apparatus in which a surgical retractor comprises a plurality of mechanically coupled tissue retaining walls, which are guided into position along one or more guides previously implanted into the patient.
Preferred embodiments utilize two main walls, and four smaller walls, one on each of the ends of the two main walls. In such embodiments all of the walls are coupled by pivots, such that the faces of the two main walls can be moved towards or apart from each other to open or close an operating space. The faces of at least the main walls are preferably flat, but can be any other suitable shape, including convex. The invention is particularly suited for operating on or near curved bony surfaces, and the bottoms of the walls can be compliant (i.e., advantageously adapted to fit and/or conform to the bone surface below).
There are preferably two guides, which are driven or screwed into the pedicles of vertebrae, or other bone. The various guides can be implanted into different bones, or different areas of the same bone. Since practical considerations will usually mean that the guides are parallel to one another, the retractor has oversized channels to receive the guides. The channels can be circular in cross section, but are more preferably elongated into an oblong or other slotted shape.
The channels are best disposed in a frame, which also serves to hold lock the walls apart. Any suitable devices can be used to move apart the main walls to open the operating space, including for example a simple wedge or T-bar, or a mechanism disposed on the frame. The frame can be held in place relative to the guides by wires, nuts, clamps, and so forth.
Various convenience features are contemplated including a web disposed between the walls, which expands as the walls are separated. The web can be cut, torn, bent away, or otherwise manipulated to expose the tissue below. Also contemplated are projections from near the bottoms of one or more of the walls, which can alternatively or additionally help to hold the underlying tissue in place, and can similarly be removed in any suitable manner from the corresponding wall. The frame or other portion of the retractor can be transparent to aid in surgeon visualization.
Various objects, features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments of the invention, along with the accompanying drawings in which like numerals represent like components.
The frame 20 can be any suitable size and shape according to the particular applications, with larger frames being generally more useful for larger incisions. For posterior lumber surgery on adult humans, the overall dimensions of an especially preferred frame are about 5.5 cm in depth, 3.5 cm in length, 3 cm in width. Frame 20 is preferably made from Delrin®, but can be made of any suitable material, especially a nontoxic polymer such as polyethylene. The frame 20 can advantageously be colored to reduce glare from operating room lighting, and some or all of the frame can be relatively transparent.
Frame 20 generally comprises a handle portion 22 that includes the locking mechanism 40, and a perimeter 24 around the operating space 50. The locking mechanism 40 is shown as a ratchet, but all other suitable locking mechanisms are also contemplated, especially those that provide for a high degree of reliability and ease of operation. At least one of the walls 32A, 32B, 34 is preferably coupled to the perimeter 24 using a pin (not shown).
Channels 26 are located on opposite sides of the perimeter 24, and are each sized to receive one of the guides 172 (see
As with other components, the various walls 32A, 32B, 34 are preferably made of a biocompatible material, and here again they can have any suitable sizes and shapes, depending on the surgical site or sites for which they are intended. The currently preferred material for retractor walls is polypropylene. Walls 32A, 32B, 34, for example, can be mostly rectangular in vertical cross-section as shown, with bottoms of at least the major walls 32A, 32B curved to accommodate specific bone shapes, such as that of the spinous processes of the vertebrae in spinal surgery. It is also contemplated that the bottoms of at least the major walls 32A, 32B can be pliable, to conform at least partially to projections and depressions of the underling bone. Walls 32A, 32B, 34 are depicted in the figures as having flat sides, but alternatives can be bowed outwardly (convex), inwardly (concave), or may have any other suitable horizontal cross-section.
One or more of the walls (not shown) can even be inflatable, made out of balloons that define the opening. Of course, the walls 32A, 32B, 34 must be sturdy enough, and therefore thick enough, to withstand the expected forces placed upon them. On the other hand the walls 32A, 32B, 34 are preferably not so thin that they would cut into the tissue below during deployment. On the other hand, the walls 32A, 32B, 34 should not be so thick as to significantly interfere with the size of the operating area. Preferred thickness is from about 3.5 mm to about 5 mm at the thickest point, tapering down to a thickness of 1.5 mm-3 mm at the bottom of each wall. The walls can also be nested in any suitable manner, which simply means that a portion of one wall extends around a portion of another wall.
The hinges 36 are shown as continuations of the walls 32A, 32B, 34. Indeed all of the walls and hinges can be molded as a single piece, with each of the hinges 36 being formed as an especially thin edge of a wall. This is effectively a “living hinge” that can handle multiple openings, using material properties of polypropylene. All other suitable configurations of hinges are also contemplated. For example, instead of four minor walls 34, the major walls 32A, 32B could be coupled by only a single outwardly bowed, flexible piece (not shown) at each end. Certainly the total number of walls can be greater or less than 6.
The term “wall” is used herein in a very broad sense, to mean any sort of tissue retaining barrier, generally longer than tall, and considerably taller than thick. Retractor 10 could thus be termed a “linear retractor” to distinguish it from point retractors that are basically pen-shaped probes. But neither the retractor as a whole nor any of the walls are necessarily linear. The term certainly does not require that the wall be so thin as to constitute a cutting blade. Nor does the term “wall” require that the sides thereof be completely patent. The sides of the walls can be pitted or indented as would occur if the sides had a mesh coating (not shown), and the sides may even have through holes (not shown).
Locking/opening mechanism 40 is shown as a typical ratcheting type mechanism, with teeth 44, and having a release 46. Frame 20 can have both a locking mechanism and an opening mechanism (not shown), or either one by itself. There are numerous other locking and/or opening mechanisms known to the field, and presumably others will become known in the future. It is contemplated that any suitable locking and/or opening mechanisms can be used.
Operating space 50 will be larger or smaller depending on the sizes and shapes of the walls, and the extent to which the walls are separated out from one another. Preferred area of the operating space 50 is between 7 cm2 and 14 cm2.
In preferred methods, the awl 152 is withdrawn, and a longer, thinner probe (not shown) is inserted through the pedicle 126 into the softer medulla 128 of the body 129 of the vertebra 120. The longer pin is then withdrawn, and in
Also shown in
Although the most preferred embodiments accommodate alignment discrepancies between the guides and the channels with the use of oversized channels, it should be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the disclosure herein that any suitable mechanism can be used to make that accommodation.
Logically, one can modify the guides, the openings or both. The guides can be modified by introducing polyaxial motion at one or more than one location. Thus, contemplated guides could include a ball and socket, hinge, elbow, or other joint at a juncture between the screw portion of the guide and the elongated part of the guide.
Additionally or alternatively, contemplated guides can accommodate alignment discrepancies by including a second, third, or other joint higher up (more distally) on the guide. Thus, multiple joints can be utilized to articulate the guides. Any desired combination of types of joints can be used. For example, a first hinge joint which provides for movement of the distal end of a guide in a first direction can be used in combination with a second hinge joint that provides for movement of a distal end of the guide in a perpendicular or other, second direction.
Portions or the entirety the guides could also be made flexible, and thereby introduce polyaxial movement by virtue of bending as opposed to movement at a joint. If only a portion of the guide is made bendable, it is preferred that the bendable portion be relatively close to the screw end because minimal bending movements near the screw (proximal) end are leveraged or exaggerated at the distal end. Certainly, any desired combination of joints and bendable portions of a guide can be utilized to facilitate the required alignment of the guide relative to the guide receiving openings.
The openings of the retractor can be made to accommodate a degree of misalignment with respect to the guides in any suitable manner. It is especially contemplated that such accommodations can involve an oversized opening, an opening that translates (moves) with respect to a guide or another portion of the frame, and an opening that changes size or shape.
With respect to oversized openings, contemplated opening shapes include circles, ellipses, squares, rectangles, stars, crosses, and indeed any combination of linear and/or curved elements.
Openings can be made moveable by including the opening in a portion of the frame that is articulated with respect to the remainder of the frame. For example, an opening that receives a guide can be disposed on a movable arm, or on a portion of the frame that moves with respect to another portion of the frame. The arms or other protrusions can be attached to the retractor via bolts which pass through slots formed in the retractor and/or the arms, such that the position of the arms with respect to the retractor is adjustable. One or more portions of the frame proper can also be bent or otherwise deformed to accommodate alignment of the guides.
Openings can also be “effectively” moved providing an initially large opening, and then constricting the opening by blocking off one or more portions of the opening, or by providing a sliding shuttle within the opening. The opening can also be effectively moved by forming the opening within a material that is subsequently quick cured (perhaps using ultra-violet light) to determine the position of the opening relative to the frame.
Openings can change size or shape by, among other things, being positioned adjacent an elastomeric material. For example, an opening could be disposed in an elastomeric insert in the frame.
Articulation of the opening can be achieved via the use of a sleeve mounted to the frame, wherein the sleeve slidably receives a rod which as the opening formed upon a distal end thereof.
It is important to appreciate that any desired combination of alignment structures and methods can be used upon one or more of the guides and/or guide receiving openings of the retractor. That is, a single guide or guide receiving opening may utilize one or more of these methods and/or two different guides or guide receiving openings may utilize different methods.
As best shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Preferred methods of inserting a tissue retractor 10 into a patient involve the steps of providing a retractor 10 having paired tissue retracting surfaces (such as on walls 32A, 32B, 34) and first and second guide receiving areas (such as channels 26); percutaneously or otherwise implanting first and second guides (such as guides 172) into different areas of bone in the patient; then positioning upper ends of the first and second guides through the first and second guide receiving areas, respectively, then fully inserting the retractor down the guides and into the patient, effectively splitting the muscle; and finally moving the tissue retracting surfaces apart from one another to open the operating space. These methods are especially useful where one or more of the guides are screws, which are implanted into very specific anatomical structures such as the pedicles of vertebrae. The contemplated methods are also extremely useful in opening operating spaces overlying adjacent bones. Especially preferred methods optionally employ nuts, clamps, or other readily attachable and tightenable mechanisms to stabilize the retractor 10 on the guides.
From the description above, it should now be apparent that the novel methods and apparatus disclosed herein turn the normal retracting procedure on its head. Instead of positioning the retaining wall or walls and then holding them in place by implanting spikes or posts into the bone, the present procedure implants the spikes or posts, and then uses them as guides to position the retaining wall(s).
The advantages of turning the procedure around are significant. Among other things, this new procedure allows the surgeon to exactly position the retractor 10 at the intended operative site because the positioning can be done precisely with respect to underlying bony structures (e.g., the pedicle 126 of a vertebra). The screws are implanted where the surgeon wants them, and the guides 172, being attached to the top of the screws guide the retractor down into the desired anatomy, splitting the muscles, and defining a operating site 50 within the walls 32A, 32B and 34. After that the operating site 50 is opened, giving the surgeon the desired exposure needed to conduct the surgery, without excess retraction and resulting tissue destruction.
Another advantage is that these new methods and apparatus speed up the procedure and makes more efficient use of resources relative to the prior art. Among other things, after the guides 172 and screws 174 are placed and the retractor 10 is attached and opened, there is no more need for fluoroscopy, which can be moved along to a different room.
Still other advantages involve convenience and reduction in surgeon stress. The novel methods and apparatus make it mentally easier on the surgeon. After the screws 174 are in, in the first part of the procedure, everything else in terms of opening the operating site is fairly straightforward. This helps the surgeon relax mentally and physically.
Thus, specific embodiments and applications of novel retractors have been disclosed. It should be apparent, however, to those skilled in the art that many more modifications besides those already described are possible without departing from the inventive concepts herein. The inventive subject matter, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims. Moreover, in interpreting both the specification and the claims, all terms should be interpreted in the broadest possible manner consistent with the context. In particular, the terms “comprises” and “comprising” should be interpreted as referring to elements, components, or steps in a non-exclusive manner, indicating that the referenced elements, components, or steps can be present, or utilized, or combined with other elements, components, or steps that are not expressly referenced.