US 20070117234 A1
Methods are disclosed for fabricating spring structures that minimize helical twisting by reducing or eliminating stress anisotropy in the thin films from which the springs are formed through manipulation of the fabrication process parameters and/or spring material compositions. In one embodiment, isotropic internal stress is achieved by manipulating the fabrication parameters (i.e., temperature, pressure, and electrical bias) during spring material film formation to generate the tensile or compressive stress at the saturation point of the spring material. Methods are also disclosed for tuning the saturation point through the use of high temperature or the incorporation of softening metals. In other embodiments, isotropic internal stress is generated through randomized deposition (e.g., pressure homogenization) or directed deposition techniques (e.g., biased sputtering, pulse sputtering, or long throw sputtering). Cluster tools are used to separate the deposition of release and spring materials.
1. An integrated processing tool comprising:
a central transfer chamber including a robot for transferring wafers into and out of said central transfer chamber;
a first physical vapor deposition chamber directly accessible via a valve with said central transfer chamber, having a target comprising a selected release material; and
a second physical vapor deposition chamber directly accessible via a valve with said central transfer chamber, having a target comprising a selected spring material.
2. The integrated processing tool according to
3. The integrated processing tool according to
4. The integrated processing tool according to
5. The integrated processing tool according to
6. The integrated processing tool according to
7. A method for producing a spring structure on a wafer utilizing an integrated multi-chamber tool having a central transfer chamber including a robot for transferring the wafer into and out of the central transfer chamber, a first physical vapor deposition chamber directly accessible via a valve with said central transfer chamber and having a first target comprising a selected release material, and a second physical vapor deposition chamber directly accessible via a valve with said central transfer chamber and having a second target comprising a selected spring material, the method comprising:
causing the robot to position the wafer in the first physical vapor deposition chamber;
controlling the first physical vapor deposition chamber to deposit a release material layer on the wafer from the first target;
causing the robot to remove the wafer from the first physical vapor deposition chamber and to position the wafer in the second physical vapor deposition chamber; and
controlling the second physical vapor deposition chamber to deposit a spring material layer on the release material layer from the second target such that the spring material film has a stress variation in the growth direction and including at least one layer having an isotropic internal stress.
8. The method according to
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/029,618 entitled: “Sputtered Spring Films With Low Stress Anisotropy” filed Jan. 5, 2005 which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/121,644 entitled: “Sputtered Spring Films With Low Stress Anisotropy” filed Apr. 12, 2002.
This invention relates generally to methods of fabricating photolithographically patterned spring structures, and, more particularly, to methods of controlling the stress anisotropy during the deposition of spring films, and to the spring structures formed by these methods.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,914,218 (Smith et al.) describes photolithographically patterned spring structures for use in the production of low cost probe cards, to provide electrical connections between integrated circuits, or to form coils that replace surface-mount inductors. A typical spring structure includes a spring finger having an anchor portion secured to a substrate, and a free portion initially formed on a pad of release material. The spring finger is etched from a thin spring material layer (film) that is fabricated such that its lower portions have a higher internal compressive stress than its upper portions, thereby producing an internal stress gradient that causes the spring finger to bend away from the substrate when the release material is etched. The internal stress gradient is produced in the thin spring material film either by layering different materials having the desired stress characteristics, or using a single material by altering the fabrication parameters.
A problem with high-volume production of integrated circuits incorporating photolithographically patterned spring structures is that the released “free” portions of some spring structures fabricated according to conventional methods undergo helical twisting, thereby skewing (displacing) the spring structure tips from their intended position. A spring structure is typically designed to curl or bend perpendicular to the underlying substrate (i.e., in a plane passing through the spring structure's longitudinal axis) upon release such that the tip is located in a predefined position above the substrate. The tip's position is typically matched to a receiving structure (e.g., a contact pad) formed on an integrated circuit to which the spring structure is electrically connected. Helical twisting causes the spring structure to bend such that the tip is positioned away from the predefined position, thereby preventing optimal connection between the spring structure and the receiving structure. To make matters worse, the amount of skew tends to vary according to orientation of the spring structure, and spatially over the wafer upon which the spring structures are produced in high volume. That is, in one region of a wafer, spring structures oriented in a particular direction may experience a relatively small amount of twisting, while spring structures in that region oriented in another direction experience pronounced twisting. Also, similarly oriented spring structures that are located in different regions may experience different amounts of twisting. The amount of skew can even be zero in certain locations and orientations.
The amount of skew that can be tolerated in a spring structure depends critically on the application in which the spring structure is used. For the manufacture of self-assembling out-of-plane inductors, for example, the specification for the skew is the lesser of ±1% of the spring diameter or ±5 microns. For other applications, such as packaging, the specification may be a little less stringent, and will depend on the size and spacing of the pads that the springs are designed to contact.
As suggested above, one solution to problems facing high-volume production of integrated circuits incorporating photolithographically patterned spring structures is to design systems that take into account the expected range of spring structure skew (which would be determined experimentally before high-volume production is initiated). However, this solution generates inefficiencies (e.g., wider spring structure spacing and larger contact pads) that increase production costs. Another possible solution would be to identify the locations and orientations on the wafers at which zero skew occurs in a given fabrication process, and then only fabricate spring structures in these zero skew locations. However, this solution would limit the wafer area utilized to fabricate spring structures, thereby making high-volume production expensive and complicated.
What is needed is a method for fabricating spring structures that minimizes or eliminates helical twisting, thereby facilitating high-volume production.
The present invention is directed to methods for fabricating spring structures that minimize helical twisting by reducing or eliminating stress anisotropy before release, which is characteristic of conventional spring material films, through manipulation of the fabrication process parameters and/or spring material compositions. By reducing or eliminating stress anisotropy in the spring material film (i.e., before release), spring structures can be formed at any location and in any orientation on a substrate without significant helical twisting. Accordingly, the complicated and expensive design requirements of conventional spring structures are eliminated, thereby greatly simplifying high-volume production and minimizing production costs. The present invention is also directed to the spring structures fabricated using these methods.
In accordance with the present invention, spring structures are fabricated such that the spring film includes at least one layer in which the internal stress is isotropic (i.e., the internal stress essentially equal in all directions). The present inventors have determined that skew is primarily caused by stress anisotropy in the thin film from which the spring structure is formed (i.e., different stress magnitudes existing along different orthogonal directions within the spring material film). By causing the stress in this one or more layer to be isotropic, total anisotropy in the spring material film is reduced (i.e., provided the remaining layers have the same or less anisotropy as that typically produced in conventional spring material films). The resulting reduction in stress anisotropy reduces skew (helical twisting) by equalizing stress components along the principal stress axes. The one or more isotropic stress layers may include an isotropic compressive layer, an isotropic tensile layer, an isotropic neutral (zero stress) layer, or any combination thereof. When both isotropic compressive and isotropic tensile layers are formed, a capping film (e.g., Nickel or Gold) or an intermediate, non-isotropic layer may be utilized to minimize delamination.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, isotropic internal stress is generated in one or more layers of a spring material before release by saturating the internal stress of the one or more layers of the spring material film. Stress saturation causes the one or more layers to become essentially isotropic (uniform) because further applied stress pushes the spring material beyond its yield point, producing relaxation of the material that relieves the additional stress and causes the internal stress to remain at the saturated level. By forming at least one layer of the spring material film in this manner, the resulting spring structure exhibits less stress anisotropy than that produced using conventional methods, thereby reducing the magnitude of helical twisting. Stress saturation of the spring material films is achieved through various methods disclosed herein. In accordance with one disclosed method, stress saturation is achieved by manipulating the fabrication parameters (i.e., temperature, pressure, and electrical bias) formation of the spring material film to generate the saturated tensile or compressive stress. Methods are also disclosed for tuning the saturation point of the spring material by varying the deposition temperature, annealing after growth, formation on silicon and then cooling, and by adjusting the spring material composition to beneficially modify its saturation characteristics. In one embodiment, the spring material films are balanced (i.e., equal amounts of compressive and tensile stress), which produces the thickest springs for a given design radius. In an alternative embodiment, the spring material films are unbalanced (e.g., with a saturated compressive layer that is thicker or thinner than the saturated tensile layer), which produces thinner springs for a given design radius.
In accordance with other disclosed embodiments of the present invention, isotropic internal stress is generated in one or more layers of a spring material before release through randomized or directed deposition techniques. In one embodiment, the compressive anisotropy is reduced through randomized deposition caused by gas scattering homogenization. In other disclosed embodiments, anisotropy is reduced through directed deposition using biased sputtering, pulse sputtering, or long throw sputtering techniques. By controlling the direction in which the spring material is deposited using these deposition techniques, stress anisotropy is reduced or eliminated, thereby increasing spring structure yields and facilitating high-volume production and minimizing production costs.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings, where:
FIGS. 1(A) and 1(B) are top and partial front views, respectively, of a spring material stress gauge illustrating helical twisting caused by anisotropic stress variations in a conventional spring material film;
FIGS. 5(A) and 5(B) are front section views taken along line 5-5 of
FIGS. 8(A) through 8(J) are simplified cross-sectional side views showing process steps associated with the fabrication of a spring structure according to several embodiments of the present invention;
FIGS. 11(A) and 11(B) are simplified side views depicting the deposition of spring material using non-directional and directional deposition techniques, respectively;
The present inventors have determined that the cause of helical twisting during high-volume production of spring structures is anisotropic stress in the spring material film. Stress anisotropy is the inequality of magnitudes of the biaxial stress along the two orthogonal principal stress axes. The present inventors have also determined that stress anisotropy can occur at any point on a wafer, it can vary spatially over the wafer, and it can even be zero at certain locations, thereby producing the variety of helical twisting observed in high-volume spring structure production. In particular, helical twisting occurs when the longitudinal axis of a released spring structure is not aligned with one of the principal stress axes. When an isotropic stress is present, the stresses along the principal stress axes differs, thereby causing the released spring finger to twist, skewing the tip from a point that is aligned with the longitudinal axis of the spring structure.
FIGS. 1(A) and 1(B) are top and partial front views, respectively, of a spring material stress gauge (test structure) 10 utilized by the present inventors to illustrate helical twisting caused by anisotropic stress variations in a spring material film. Stress gauge 10 includes several springs 11-1 through 11-8 that extend in many directions from a central region 12. Angular positions (in degrees) are indicated around stress gauge 10 for convenience. According to the selected origin, a base portion of spring 11-1 is aligned generally along the 0 degree position.
Stress gauge 10 is etched from a conventional spring material film that is fabricated as described above. Accordingly, stress gauge 10 is subjected to biaxial stress whose principal components are aligned along two orthogonal directions (designated σP1 and σP2) The effects of stress anisotropy are quantified by measuring the skew S of a released spring, such as spring 11-1 of stress gauge 10. The skew S is defined as the displacement of the top-most part 11-T of spring 11-1 (see
Similar to prior art spring structures, spring finger 120 is etched from a thin stress-engineered film that is deposited by DC magnetron sputtering or chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques, or deposited by plating techniques. In one embodiment, the stress-engineered film includes or one or more materials suitable for forming a spring structure (e.g., one or more of molybdenum (Mo), a “moly-chrome” alloy (MoCr), tungsten (W), a titanium-tungsten alloy (Ti:W), chromium (Cr), nickel (Ni), silicon (Si), nitride, oxide, carbide, or diamond. The deposition process is performed using gas pressure variations in the deposition environment during film growth in accordance with known techniques (e.g., by varying Argon gas pressure while sputtering the spring material). Typically, this stress-engineered film includes at least one layer that has a relatively compressive (or less tensile) internal stress, and at least one layer that has a relatively tensile (or less compressive) internal stress, these different stress layers providing the upward bending bias when the underlying release material is removed, resulting in a curved, cantilever spring structure. The term “layer” is used herein to describe a cross-sectional region of the stress-engineered film that is formed during a given time period. For example,
In accordance with the present invention, spring structure 100 is fabricated in a manner that produces at least one layer (i.e., first layer 126 and/or second layer 127) of spring finger 120 having isotropic internal stress before being released from substrate 101. As utilized herein, the term “isotropic internal stress” means that the magnitude of internal stress measured along both principal stress axes of the stress-engineered film, whether compressive or tensile, is essentially the same (i.e., within 1% or less). By definition, forming one or more layers of spring finger 120 with isotropic stress produces an overall stress profile that is less anisotropic than in conventional spring structures. As pointed out above, anisotropic stress distributions are a major cause of helical twisting and spring tip skew. By forming at least one of the compressive layer or the tensile layer with isotropic internal stress, the total stress exerted on spring finger 120 upon release is typically less than in spring structures having anisotropic stresses (i.e., formed using conventional methods), thereby reducing or eliminating helical twisting. Further, the reduction of helical twisting by incorporating one or more isotropic stress layers facilitates high-volume production when the isotropic layer is extended over the entire wafer. Note that the relaxation of internal stress occurring in free portion 125 of spring structure 120 after release eliminates the pre-release stress isotropy. However, anchor portion 122, which is not released, retains the one or more layers having isotropic internal stress.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the one or more isotropic stress layers may include an isotropic compressive layer, an isotropic tensile layer, or both isotropic compressive and tensile layers. For example, referring to
In accordance with another aspect, when a spring structure includes both an isotropic compressive layer and an isotropic tensile layer, one or more optional structures may be utilized to prevent delamination of the spring finger. Referring to
FIGS. 5(A) and 5(B) are cross-sectional side views showing spring structures 100A and 100B according to alternative embodiments of the present invention, and are taken along section line 5-5 of
Note that optional conductor 105 is included to provide electrical coupling of spring structure 100 to an external electrical system (not shown). Note also that the electrical coupling between spring finger 120 and conductor 105 necessitates using an electrically conductive release material to form release material portion 110. However, electrical coupling can also be provided directly to spring finger 120 by other structures (e.g., wire bonding), thereby allowing the use of non-conducting release materials.
Several methods will now be described for generating the isotropic spring material films utilized in accordance with the present invention.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, a spring structure includes at least one layer having an internal stress that is either at the compressive saturation point or the tensile saturation point of the spring material from which the spring structure is made. The term “saturation point” in this context means a maximum value that the internal stress of the spring material (i.e., the spring material film) cannot exceed. Stress saturation causes the spring material to become essentially isotropic (uniform) because further applied stress pushes the spring material beyond its yield point, producing relaxation of the material that relieves the additional stress and causes the internal stress to remain at the saturated level. In particular, if the material is stressed (i.e., pushed) beyond its yield point, then the material is going to flow or otherwise rearrange its internal structure to relieve the excess stress, returning the material to the so-called yield point of the material. In other words, no matter how the stress is put in, if a compressive stress greater than the compressive saturation point is put into the spring material, then the spring material is going to relax back to the level of stress that is within the strength limit of the material that is grown (i.e., to the compressive saturation point). Similarly, if a tensile stress greater than the tensile saturation point is put into the spring material, then the spring material is going to relax back to the tensile saturation point. Therefore, by saturating the stress, the material is subjected to all the stress that the material can bear, and beyond the saturation point the internal structure no longer responds structurally to store the excess stress, and it undergoes plastic flow to accommodate additional strain imposed upon it.
The present inventors have observed that the compressive stress anisotropy in a spring material film tends to become smaller when the spring material has an internal stress that is at the compressive or tensile saturation point of the spring material. In particular, the present inventors formed spring gauges (similar to those described above) on several wafers utilizing the methods described below that produced saturated internal stress in at least one layer, and then measured the stress along X- and Y-axes on each wafer. The differences in stress levels were also measured at different pallet locations (each pallet of the test equipment held more than one wafer; note that other deposition tools may hold only one wafer, but the wafers referred to were not processed on a cluster tool). What the inventors observed was that anisotropy over the entire wafer (and pallet) was substantially reduced when the spring material film included a saturated compressive stress layer.
By forming at least one layer of the spring material film at the saturation point, the resulting spring structure exhibits less stress anisotropy than that produced using conventional fabrication methods, thereby reducing the magnitude of helical twisting. That is, conventional techniques do not saturate the stress beyond the yield point of the material, so that the spring material film captures different stresses in different orthogonal directions; and, because the spring material film is below the yield point, these different stresses are captured or frozen into the molecular structure of the film, thereby creating anisotropy. In contrast, because the spring material films of the present embodiment are formed using much larger stresses that are close to the yield point of the spring material, then when stress is applied in one direction that tends to produce a larger stress in that direction than in another direction, the material “refuses” to store the additional stress and relaxes in the applied direction to the yield point of the material. The anisotropy reduction makes sense from the standpoint of there being no margin left for anisotropy if the material is at its yield point. Note that the bulk yield point and the yield point of the growing film are not necessarily the same because the bulk and surface relaxation mechanisms can differ.
Ideally, anisotropy is minimized by fabricating a spring structure having a stress profile with only two levels, one formed by a compressive stress layer, and one formed by a tensile stress layer, both of which being grown at or near the stress saturation points of the spring material. For example, referring again to
As mentioned above, anisotropy is minimized when a spring finger is entirely formed from isotropic material, such as in the embodiment shown in
One alternative to producing thick balanced spring material films, such as those consistent with the stress profile shown in
In addition to the balanced and unbalanced spring structures described above with reference to
Stress saturation of spring material films is achieved through various methods. In accordance with one disclosed method, which is described with reference to FIGS. 8(A) through 8(J), stress saturation is achieved by manipulating the fabrication parameters (i.e., temperature, pressure, and RF bias) under which the spring material film is grown to generate the saturated tensile or compressive stress. Additional methods are also described below.
FIGS. 8(B) through 8(D) show the formation and optional annealing of a spring material film in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention, discussed below.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, the deposition process of FIGS. 8(B) and 8(C) is carried out at an elevated temperature that is selected to tune the saturation point of the spring material (e.g., MoCr 85/15-atomic % alloy). MoCr alloy is a very refractory spring material in that it melts above 2000° C. However, the present inventors learned through experimentation that some of the stress in the MoCr alloy may be annealed out ex-situ (e.g., during the anneal process shown in
The data shown in
Referring again to
The example described above is particularly directed to a MoCr (85-15 atomic %) alloy spring material. In accordance with yet another aspect of the present invention, the saturation point of the spring material may also tuned by adjusting the spring material composition to beneficially modify its yield point. Some metals are softer and have lower yield points than Mo and Cr, and therefore the stress of a composition including these softer metals is typically saturated at lower stress values. Preferably, materials with a ratio of elastic modulus to yield point that produces spring radii in the range desired are selected. For example, NiZr alloys have saturated stress at lower stress values than those of MoCr alloys. Other possibilities include the use of other Ni alloys, NiCu alloys (e.g., Monel®), BeCu, Phosphor Bronze, or alloys of refractory materials such as Mo, Cr, Ta, W, Nb. In yet another example, the yield point of a MoCr alloy may be tuned (reduced) by including one or more “soft” metals (e.g., In, Ag, Au, Cu).
Even with significant relaxation and/or saturation point tuning, spring material films utilizing compressive and tensile saturated stress layers produce significant stress moments, which can result in delamination of the spring structure along spring release layer or release layer/substrate interface. It is therefore desirable to deposit spring material with isotropic stress at levels continuously (gradually) ranging within the most compressive to the most tensile values sustainable in the spring material. Continuous variation of the stress is desirable because it reduces the amount of residual stored elastic energy in the spring after release. In
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, anisotropy is reduced in spring material films through variation in pressure during the deposition process. In particular, by increasing the pressure inside the deposition chamber, the arriving species are scattered by the sputtering gas (typically Ar gas). Experiments using a Wilder MV40 modular vertical magnetron deposition tool (a vertical cathode sputter system) showed the anisotropy of a MoCr alloy (85/15) film to fall almost to zero at around 20 mT.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, an isotropic spring material film is formed using directed deposition techniques. That is, the present inventors have determined that another way to make the internal stress of the spring material film uniform in is to utilize a directional deposition process in which every atom or ion that hits the growing film is moving, at least on average, normal to the substrate.
In accordance with the method depicted in
According to the present invention, various directional deposition methods that have been previously used to produce, for example, via structures in conventional integrated circuit devices are utilized to produce isotropic spring material films. Such methods include the use of biased ionized deposition, long throw sputtering, and collimated sputtering, each of which is described in more detail below. These directional deposition methods have been used to fill high aspect ratio vias, which is important for IC (integrated circuit) manufacturing in order to reduce capacitance, lower resistance and pack more circuits onto a chip. However, the present inventors do not believe these methods have been previously considered for producing spring material films, in part, because the problems addressed in spring material film formation are quite different from those of via formation. That is, in contrast to via formation in which atoms are directed into a hole, directed deposition is utilized to minimize internal stress anisotropy during the formation of spring material film. Directed deposition has two distinct advantages over material saturation in that the effect can potentially operate at any stress setpoint required for the spring design, and the stress can potentially be varied continuously to produce the compressive-to-tensile stress profile associated with the spring material films of the present invention.
In biased ion deposition, the directionality of atoms/ions is influenced using an applied RF bias. Sputter deposition is usually performed by generating a plasma in a deposition chamber containing an Argon gas atmosphere. The Argon gas and the sputtered spring material (e.g., metals) in a conventional plasma consist primarily of neutrals and positive ions. Most of the metals in a typical plasma are neutrals, and hence they will not be influenced by the applied bias. Much of the Argon bombardment that produces compressive stress is from reflected Argon neutrals. Utilizing an RF bias of 0.25 Watts/cm2 or more to orient the direction of the bombardment and the depositing flux therefore is required for producing more ions. A lot of effort has gone into making more ions in the sputter plasma in the context of via formation and the lift-off of sputtered films. For via filling, in addition to an applied bias (typically a negative self-bias resulting from an RF bias to the substrate) effort must be made to ionize the majority (i.e., greater than 50%) of the metal species in the plasma. Generating more ions can be achieved a variety of ways known in the art.
Pulsed sputtering is another method for producing more ions to form isotropic spring material films in accordance with the present invention. High current pulsed sputtering is a way to make lots of ions. There have been some recent developments in this area lead by Ulf Helmersson in Linköping Sweden. These developments use pulses of hundreds of amps, and megawatts of power, that last for 10's or 100's of microseconds (see Gudmundsson, J. T.; Alami, J.; Helmersson, U., “Evolution of the Electron Energy Distribution and Plasma Parameters in a Pulsed Magnetron Discharge”, Applied Physics Letters, 78(22), pp 3427-9 (2001); see also Helmersson, U.; Khan, Z. S.; Alami, J., “Ionized-PVD by Pulsed Sputtering of Ta for Metallization of High-Aspect-Ratio Structures in VLSI”, Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Semiconductor Devices and Microsystems (ASDAM), pp 191-5 (2000)). This results in a much denser plasma than what is achieved under continuous operating conditions. A big advantage of this technique is that it does not require placing an RF coil in the process chamber. The degree of ionization is close to 100%, which allows the use of applied electric or magnetic fields to control the direction of the spring material striking the substrate.
According to another specific embodiment, spring materials are grown using “long throw” techniques in which a wafer (substrate) is placed one diameter of the wafer or more away from the target (i.e., when the wafer is stationary). The farther away the sputter source, the more collimated the deposited material becomes. This approach to making sputter systems has also been used for filling vias. Typically, the distance between the target and the substrate in a cluster tool in about 2 inches (less than one wafer diameter). If however the distance is increased to one wafer diameter or more, the range of angles with which the flux arrives is reduced. By cutting out shallowest angles of the deposition, the stress anisotropy is believed to be reduced. Note that, if the wafer (substrate) is moving, or multiple substrates are used, to achieve the effects of long throw, the distance must be on the order of the size of the holder containing the substrates, and its range of motion, if any, relative to the target.
The present inventors have looked into various deposition geometries and wafer handling configurations. In single chamber systems with multiple targets, cross contamination has produced some unexpected results. These include metal contamination altering the stress level in the film for a given process condition, electrochemical effects during etching resulting from interface intermixing, and the presence of residues after etching due to insoluble contaminants. All of the effects occur because single chamber systems have sputter cathodes for materials that form the release, spring and cladding layers of the spring. When one cathode is sputtering and the other is exposed, the exposed cathode accumulates contamination build-up on its target.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, spring structures are produced using an integrated multi-chamber tool (“cluster tool”) that is configured such that separate chambers are utilized for each of the sputter targets and the etching function, thereby maintaining the integrity of the sputter targets throughout the production process.
Wafers 1301 are loaded into the system by two independently operated loadlock chambers 1305 configured to transfer wafers into and out of the system from wafer cassettes loaded into the respective loadlock chambers. The pressure of a first wafer transfer chamber 1304 to which the loadlocks can be selectively connected via unillustrated slit valves can be regulated. After pump down of the first transfer chamber 1304 and of the selected loadlock chamber 1303, a first robot 1306 located in the first transfer chamber 1304 transfers the wafer from the cassette to one of two wafer orienters 1308 and then to a degassing orienting chamber 1312. First robot 1306 then passes the wafer into an intermediately placed plasma preclean chamber 1314, from which a second robot 1316 transfers it to a second transfer chamber 1318, which is kept at a low pressure. Second robot 1316 selectively transfers wafers to and from reaction chambers arranged around its periphery. When materials within the substrate have a tendency to retain moisture, such as polyimide, it is common to include a dehydration chamber on the sputter tool to bake away the retained moisture prior to processing. This step usually precedes the preclean step.
In accordance with the present embodiment, a first deposition chamber 1320 is utilized to form a release material layer on each substrate according to the methods described above, one or more second deposition chambers 1322 and 1324 are used to form spring material film on the release material layer. In particular, first deposition chamber is configured with a suitable target formed from a selected release material (e.g., Titanium), and second deposition chambers 1322 and/or 1324 are configured with suitable targets formed from a selected spring material (e.g., MoCr alloy). Accordingly, as indicated in the flow diagram shown in
In yet another embodiment, a multi-chamber sputter tool with chambers arranged in a vertical inline geometry and configured as described above can be used in place of cluster tool 1300.
Although the present invention has been described with respect to certain specific embodiments, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the inventive features of the present invention are applicable to other embodiments as well, all of which are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention.