Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20070155462 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/598,917
Publication dateJul 5, 2007
Filing dateNov 13, 2006
Priority dateJul 22, 2003
Publication number11598917, 598917, US 2007/0155462 A1, US 2007/155462 A1, US 20070155462 A1, US 20070155462A1, US 2007155462 A1, US 2007155462A1, US-A1-20070155462, US-A1-2007155462, US2007/0155462A1, US2007/155462A1, US20070155462 A1, US20070155462A1, US2007155462 A1, US2007155462A1
InventorsTerry O'Halloran, Philip Smith
Original AssigneeO'halloran Terry, Smith Philip S
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Side bets in casino wagering "war" game
US 20070155462 A1
Abstract
A casino game is played with playing cards in a live or electronic virtual format. A player places at least an ante wager. The ante wager for each player is resolved on the basis of the relative rank of a first playing card dealt to the player and a first playing card dealt to the dealer. The player wins on the ante wager if the player's first card relative rank is higher than the dealer's first card rank, the player loses the ante wager if the player's first card relative rank is lower than the dealer's first card rank, and the player enters a tie hand competition event if the player's first card rank and the dealer's first card rank are the same. The player has the ability to place at least one side bet wager before seeing both the dealer's first card and the player's first card on an event in which: a) the total point count for the player's first card and the dealer's first card are within a player selected range of at least three total point count ranges from which the player may select; and b) that the point spread between the dealer's first card and the player's first card will exceed a minimum difference.
Images(3)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(22)
1. A method of playing a casino game with playing cards comprising:
a player placing at least an ante wager;
the ante wager for each player being resolved on the basis of the relative rank of a first playing card dealt to the player and a first playing card dealt to the dealer;
the player winning on the ante wager if the player's first card rank is higher than the dealer's first card rank, the player losing the ante wager if the player's first card relative rank is lower than the dealer's first card rank, and entering a tie hand competition event if the player's first card rank and the dealer's first card rank are the same;
wherein the player has the ability to place at least one side bet wager before seeing both the dealer's first card and the player's first card on an event selected from the group consisting of:
a) the total combined point count for the player's first card and the dealer's first card is within a player selected range of at least two total point count ranges from which the player may select; and
b) that the spread in point count between the dealer's first card and the player's first card will exceed a minimum difference.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the player places a side bet that the total point count for the player's first card and the dealer's first card are within a player selected range of at least three total point count ranges from which the player may select.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the player places a side bet that the spread in point count between the dealer's first card and the player's first card will exceed a minimum difference.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein multiple decks of playing cards are used to provide the player's cards and the dealer's cards and a side bet is available that includes a winning outcome if the player's card and the dealer's card have the same rank and suit.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein in the tie event the player places an additional wager at risk in the game and a second card is provided to the player and a second card is provided to the dealer and the player winning on the additional wager and the ante wager if the player's second card relative rank is higher than the dealer's second card rank, the player losing the additional wager and the ante wager if the player's second card relative rank is lower than the dealer's second card rank, and entering a tie hand competition event if the player's second card rank and the dealer's second card rank are the same.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein a tie event on the player's second card is resolved by allowing the player to surrender at most 50% of total player wagers.
7. The method of claim 5 wherein the tie event on the second player's card is resolved by declaring a push on all wagers.
8. The method of claim 5 wherein the tie event on the second player's card is resolved by allowing the player to surrender less than 50% of total player wagers.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein a player has another side bet available in which a wager may be made that the player's card and the dealer's card will be the same rank, and the wager offering odds on the wager of at least 6:1.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the another side bet available includes an award when the player's first card and the dealer's first card are the same rank and suit.
11. A method of playing a wagering game between a player or a group of respective players and a dealer whose outcome is determined by randomly generated playing cards having various values comprising the steps of:
arranging only one single stack of playing cards;
wagering an ante bet by the or each player;
dealing of only one card successively from the single stack of playing cards only to the or each player and to the dealer by the dealer;
determining whether the card of the dealer has a greater value, a lesser value or an equal value to that of the or each player;
paying off of the ante bet to (a) the or each player if the value of the card of the or each player is greater than the value of the card of the dealer, or (b) the dealer if the value of the card of the dealer is greater than or equal to the value of the card of the or each player; and
if the value of the card of the dealer equals that of any player,
wagering of a further bet by the or each tied player,
dealing successively from the stack at least one further card only to the or each tied player and to the dealer, and
determining whether the further card of the dealer has a greater value, a lesser value or an equal value to the further card of the or each tied player, and
paying off of the further bet to (a) the or each tied player if the value of the further card of the or each tied player is greater than the value of the card of the dealer, or (b) the dealer if the value of the card of the dealer is greater than the value of the card of the or each tied player;
wherein the player has the ability to place at least one side bet wager before seeing both the dealer's first card and the player's first card on an event selected from the group consisting of:
a) the total point count for the player's first card and the dealer's first card are within a player selected range of at least two total point count ranges from which the player may select; and
b) that the spread in point count between the dealer's first card and the player's first card will exceed a minimum difference.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the player places a side bet that the total point count for the player's first card and the dealer's first card are within a player selected range of at least three total point count ranges from which the player may select.
13. The method of claim 11 wherein the player places a side bet that the margin of difference in point count between the dealer's first card and the player's first card will exceed a minimum difference.
14. The method of claim 111 wherein multiple decks of playing cards are used to provide the player's cards and the dealer's cards and a side bet is available that includes a winning outcome if the player's card and the dealer's card have the same rank and suit.
15. The method of claim 11 wherein in the tie event the player places an additional wager at risk in the game and a second card is provided to the player and a second card is provided to the dealer and the player winning on the additional wager and the ante wager if the player's second card rank is higher than the dealer's second card rank, the player losing the additional wager and the ante wager if the player's second card rank is lower than the dealer's second card rank, and entering a tie hand competition event if the player's second card rank and the dealer's second card rank are the same.
16. The method of claim 1 wherein available playing cards include at least one joker and the presence of a joker as the player's first card or the dealer's first card can cause a game ending result.
17. The method of claim 1 wherein available playing cards include at least one joker and the presence of a joker as the player's first card or the dealer's first card can cause a game ending result.
18. The method of claim 1 played on an electronic system using a processor to determine cards dealt and winning outcomes.
19. The method of claim 1 played on a casino table with physical cards and a live dealer.
20. A gaming apparatus comprising a processor, video monitor and player input controls wherein the processor enables play of a method comprising
a player placing at least an ante wager;
the ante wager for each player being resolved on the basis of the relative rank of a first playing card dealt to the player and a first playing card dealt to a dealer hand;
the player winning on the ante wager if the player's first card relative rank is higher than the dealer's hand first card rank, the player losing the ante wager if the player's first card relative rank is lower than the dealer's hand first card rank, and entering a tie hand competition event if the player's first card rank and the dealer's hand first card rank are the same;
wherein the player has the ability to input at least one side bet wager through the player input controls before seeing both the dealer's first card and the player's first card on the monitor in an event selected from the group consisting of:
a) the total point count for the player's first card and the dealer's first card are within a player selected range of at least two total point count ranges from which the player may select; and
b) that spread in point count between the dealer's first card and the player's first card will exceed a minimum difference.
21. A multi-player platform that provides multiple player positions for live players to engage in an interactive casino table card game with a virtual dealer and virtual cards comprising at least two player positions that enable live players to place wagers on an underlying card game, a display system for showing a virtual dealer, a display system for showing at least the virtual cards used in play of the underlying card game, and a processor that contains the rules of the underlying card game, the processor enabling play for each player on the underlying card game according to the method of play of claim 1.
22. A multi-player platform that provides multiple player positions for live players to engage in a casino table card game with a virtual dealer and virtual cards comprising at least two player positions that enable live players to place wagers on an underlying card game, a display system for showing a virtual dealer, a display system for showing at least the virtual cards used in play of the underlying poker-type game, and a processor that contains the rules of the underlying card game, the processor enabling play for each player on the underlying card game according to the following rules with a virtual single, typical fifty-two card poker deck, the cards having standard rank and value, said game played according to the method of claim 1.
Description
    RELATED APPLICATIONS DATA
  • [0001]
    This application is a Continuation-In-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 10/764,827; 10/624,994; and 10/624,995, all filed on Jan. 26, 2004.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE ART
  • [0002]
    1. Field of the Invention
  • [0003]
    The present invention relates generally to a wagering card game and more particularly to a wagering “war” type game in which ties are possible and the ties result in further wagering. The present invention also relates to video gaming systems that support play of the wagering card game.
  • [0004]
    2. Background of the Art
  • [0005]
    The card game “war” is a well known parlor game. Players divide a standard deck of cards in two and play head-to-head, one card at a time; until the players run out of cards. This form of the game is not suitable as a casino game since the outcome is generally not determined until completion of a set of cards or until one competitor has possession of all the cards. Further, the game is not suited for use as a casino type game which requires a house advantage and which also generally requires fast-paced action and frequent betting.
  • [0006]
    U.S. Pat. No. 5,324,041 (Boylan) describes a casino variant of the game of war in which there are defined rules of play, including at least a method of playing a wagering game between a player or a group of respective players and a dealer. The outcome of the game is determined by randomly generated playing cards having various values. The game begins by providing a set of playing cards. Each player makes an ante bet. The player(s) and the dealer are each dealt one card successively from the set of the playing cards. The player cards and dealer cards are compared individually to determine whether the card of the dealer has a greater rank, a lesser rank or an equal rank to that of the or each player. The antes are paid off to each player if the value of the player card is greater than the value of the card of the dealer, or (b) the dealer if the value of the card of the dealer is greater than or equal to the value of the card of the or each player. If the value of the card of the dealer equals that of any player, and a “war” is played, there may be wagering of a war bet by the tied player. The war game proceeds by dealing successively from the stack at least one further card only to tied player(s) and to the dealer. The last cards are compared to determine whether the further card of the dealer has a greater value, a lesser value or an equal value to the further card of the or each tied player. The war is resolved by paying off of the war bet to (a) the or each tied player if the value of the further card of the tied player is greater than the value of the card of the dealer, or (b) the dealer if the value of the card of the dealer is greater than the value of the card of the or each tied player. Boylan also teaches a side bet wager on the occurrence of a tie, much like the tie bet wager in the game of Baccarat.
  • [0007]
    In many non-war games, alternative side bet events are known. U.S. Pat. No. 5,895,047 teaches a game with a range of value bet. Wagering in non-war games on a range of point values is also taught in U.S. Pat. No. 6,644,666.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0008]
    In accordance with the present technology and game rules described herein, a method of playing a wagering game based broadly on the “war” card game is provided. The game is efficiently provided on a stand-alone video gaming format, multi-player bank of terminals, on the internet in a live game format and in other electronic formats. The wagering game is played between a player or a group of respective players and a dealer, with the outcome determined by randomly generated playing cards having various values (i.e., a standard deck or a plurality of decks of playing cards with ranks of 2 through Ace). In the method, an ante bet is first made by each of one or more players and a card is then dealt to each individual player and to the dealer by the dealer (or by an electronic virtual card system making random selections from a virtual deck of cards). It is then determined whether the card of the dealer has a greater value (rank), a lesser value (rank) or an equal value (rank) to that of each player. The ante bet is then immediately paid off to (a) each player if the value (rank) of the card of the player is greater than the value (rank) of the card of the dealer, or (b) the dealer if the value (rank) of the card of the dealer is greater than or equal to the value (rank) of the card of each player. Additional side bets are provided, and additional tie events games are provided that may allow for additional wagers.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0009]
    FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a typical video gaming system that can support play of the novel game disclosed herein.
  • [0010]
    FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a betting display surface for a live or simulated live wagering game according to the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • [0011]
    With reference now to the drawings in which like numerals represent like elements, the wagering game of the present invention is preferably played on the video gaming terminal of FIG. 1 or the casino type display table layout 10 as depicted in FIG. 2. However, while the present invention is explained in the context of a casino game hereinbelow, it will be appreciated that the wagering game is adaptable for home use, as an electronic game or in a multiplayer casino wagering format using the principles discussed. It will also be appreciated that although the wagering game is designed to have the highest rank card designated the winner, it could instead be the lowest card or there could be other means of designating the winning card besides rank.
  • [0012]
    FIG. 1 illustrates the front of a traditional video poker machine, including a screen display 1, draw/deal button 5, side bet buttons, surrender buttons, and other event specific buttons 12, credit card or ticket or player card reader 15, coin slot 20, bet maximum coins button 25 and bet one coin button 30. In addition to the external features illustrated in FIG. 1, the present invention requires a processor (not shown) with game logic, game rules, random number generator, and where there is external monitoring, and external I/O port as to a central processor or financial data bank or comping system for players. Although a touch screen is the preferred means of selection for player data and game input, other means, including selection buttons, joy sticks, mouse, and he like may be used.
  • [0013]
    The table top layout display 10 of FIG. 2 includes, for each of a plurality of players (in this case 7), an area 12 for placing an ante bet and an area 14 for placing of a tie bet. The dealer is located adjacent a settling means or bank 16, with a shoe 18 containing a plurality of decks (such as eight) of regular playing cards located adjacent thereto. Of course, special cards or a different mechanism for displaying regular cards (such as electronic) could be used if desired. A similar player position could be virtually displayed on a touch screen in the terminal system of FIG. 1, and the player enters amounts and positions of wagers and selections by contacting appropriate regions on the screen.
  • [0014]
    To play a round of the wagering game, each player initially makes an ante bet by placing a suitable token (chip, money, etc.) or tokens on area 12. Obviously, each player participating must place some ante bet, with a minimum (and possible maximum) ante bet or set ante bet typically designated. At the same time, or alternatively, each player may also choose to place a tie bet on area 14, also as designated in the Figure. Additional side bet wagering areas 18, 20 are shown, for convenience, at only one players area. An alternative format for placing the available side bets is shown as areas 22, 24, 26, again at a single player position for convenience in presenting the figure.
  • [0015]
    After all (mandatory) ante bets and (optional) tie bets or other side bets are placed by the players, the dealer then deals one card, face up, to each of the players as well as a face up card to himself. Taking each player in turn, the dealer then determines whether the numerical rank of the card of the player is greater than, less than, or equal to the rank of the dealer's card. If the rank of the card of the player is less than or equal to that of the dealer, the player loses the ante bet which is immediately collected from area 12 by the dealer. In other words, all ties are won by the house. On the other hand, if the rank of the card of the player is greater than that of the dealer, the player wins and the dealer immediately pays the player an amount which in this embodiment is equal to the ante bet of that player. In other embodiments, greater than or less than a 1:1 payout is made. Using eight decks in shoe 18, it will be appreciated that the dealer hold percentage on ante bets (the amount the dealer will be expected to win in view of the odds being in his favor, due to the dealer winning all ties) will be about 7.47%.
  • [0016]
    Additionally, if the value of the card of the dealer equals that of any player, or as an option after the ante wager is lost, the tied player then (optionally) may wager a further “war” bet that is followed by the dealing of at least one further card to the tied player making the additional or further bet and at least one further card to the dealer. Then, as before with the originally dealt card, it is determined whether the further card of the dealer has a greater value (rank), a lesser value (rank) or an equal value (rank) to the further card of each tied player making a further wager. Depending on this relative rank determination, the further bet is paid off to (a) the tied player if the value (rank) of the further card of the tied player is greater than the value (rank) of the card of the dealer, or (b) the dealer if the value (rank) of the card of the dealer is greater than the value (rank) of the card of the tied player who has made the further wager.
  • [0017]
    The paying off of the further bet (after the tie or war event) also preferably includes one of the following steps, depending on the method of play desired for the wagering game where the rank of the further card of the player is equal in rank to that of the dealer further card. In one embodiment, there is the further step of dealing additional further cards to each tied player who has made the further wager and dealer until one or the other has a card of greater rank than the other in a deal and therefore wins the further bet. In a second embodiment, favoring the player, there is the step of paying off of the further bet to each tied player so that each tied player therefore wins the further bet when the further cards tie. As a third embodiment, favoring the dealer, there is the step of paying off of the further bet to the dealer so that the dealer therefore wins the further bet when the further cards tie.
  • [0018]
    In one embodiment of playing the wagering game of the present disclosure, the wagering of the further bet step includes the step of accepting only further wagers of equal or lesser value than the ante wager of the particular player. With such a step, the paying off of the ante bet to the player step preferably includes the step of paying back to the player an amount equal to the ante bet of that player and the paying back to the player a payoff of at least 1.5:1 of any further bet which is won by the player.
  • [0019]
    To provide for further betting, the method of the present game may also include the step of wagering a tie bet by the player at the same time that the ante bet is wagered. Then, after the first determining step, the tie bet is paid off to the player if the rank of the card of the dealer is equal to the rank of the card of the player making the tie bet. Preferably, the paying off of the tie bet includes the step of paying back to the player a payoff of at least 8:1 of the tie bet.
  • [0020]
    To add more suspense to the game, the dealing of at least one further card step includes the step of dealing at least one burn or face down card before dealing the further card to each player and the dealer. In addition, the dealing of at least one further card step includes the step of selecting the number of burn cards to deal by use of a chance generating mechanism, such as the randomly displayed numbers generated for Pai Gow poker by an automated system disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,275,411 (Breeding). That format can be used, with fewer numbers than 7 numbers preferred, such as 0, 1, 2, 3 or 4) to indicate how many cards will be burned before dealing the at least one further card to the player and/or the at least one further card to the dealer.
  • [0021]
    If desired, the wagering game could also include the step of wagering an association bet (either a mandatory or optional bet) by any player at the same time that the ante bet is wagered. Then, after the first determining step, there would be a step of paying off of the association bet to the player if there is a predetermined association between the card of the dealer and the card of the player making the association bet, such as the same suit, the same rank, a straight, a pair, a 2-card 20 or 21 or a straight flush. It is an aspect of the present game to provide additional opportunities for new wagers in addition to those found in the existing Casino WarŽ games.
  • [0022]
    In addition, as the dealer determines whether the player wins or loses the ante bet, the dealer also determines if the player made a tie bet. If a tie bet was made and the rank of the card of the player and dealer are equal (note that the player loses the ante bet as described above), the player wins the tie bet and the dealer immediately pays off the tie bet. The payoff of the tie bet is preferably set at a relatively high amount in view of the low odds of winning such a bet by the player, with a minimum of about 8:1 and preferably about 10:1 used in accordance with the present invention. With odds of 10:1, the dealer hold percentage on tie bets would be about 17.83%, as ties would only occur about 7.47% of the time.
  • [0023]
    When a tie does occur, and after all of the ante bets and tie bets are paid off, the dealer will then also offer the tying player(s) the option of making a further bet in area 12 (now cleared). This offer of a further bet is made regardless of whether a tie bet was made by the tying player. The further bet is limited to an amount equal to or less than the ante bet, and has a payoff at least equal to about 1.5:1. It will be appreciated that any payoff greater than 1:1 (or 1:0747:1 if ties go to the dealer) on the further bet will mean that the odds are in the favor of the player. Thus, a payoff of at least 1.5:1 significantly encourages the players to make further bets and stimulates interest in the game.
  • [0024]
    The player may be prompted to make a selection between SURRENDER and WAR, adding wagered amounts, if desired, on the second event. The system may default to a continued bet on the amount originally wagered after the time period has elapsed, or default to a SURRENDER or WAR at a fixed additional amount (an increase of one more of the initial wager or more) and the game automatically continues. The amount of time for wagering may be set by the house, or the player may have control within limits (e.g., 5 to 20 seconds) for setting the time between events. Less time is likely too short a time period and longer times decrease house revenues.
  • [0025]
    To determine the winner of the further bet, the dealer then deals an additional face up card to each player making such a further bet and to himself. As is traditional with the “war” game, the face up card can be dealt after first “burning” or dealing three (or some other predetermined number) face down cards. After dealing the further cards, the dealer then determines whether the further card of each player has a rank greater than, less than, or equal to that of the dealer. If the rank of the further card of the player is less than that of the dealer, the player loses and the dealer collects the further bet from area 12. On the other hand, if the rank of the card of the player is greater than that of the dealer, the player wins and the dealer immediately pays the player an amount which in this embodiment is equal to at least 1.5 times the further bet of that player.
  • [0026]
    It will be appreciated that it is also possible for the further cards of the player and the dealer to be tied. In such situations, three choices are possible and the one chosen will depend on how the dealer (or casino owner) wants to have the method of the game proceed. If it is desired to speed up play, the tie of the further cards can be designated as a win to the player (to increase the odds for the player winning a further bet), or to the dealer (to lower the odds for the player winning the further bet, but with the overall odds still much in the player's favor). As a third option, another round of further cards could be dealt and the winner determined by that round, or succeeding rounds (in case of further ties) until either the player or dealer is a winner. While accommodations could be made for receiving further bets after a tie on a first further bet, this would probably complicate the game to a greater degree than desired and also slow up play that would not be desired. Therefore, the preferred embodiment of the wagering game of the present invention would provide for only one further bet. After more than one tie, the player may elect to surrender his cards and withdraw an amount of his wager that is less than the entire wager. Ordinarily, a surrender bet in blackjack must always be exactly one-half the total wager originally placed, but the mathematics are different in Casino WarŽ games. It would be advantageous to the house to allow the player to surrender and forfeit less than half, but at least some of the original ante wager or the total wager can be made at that point, such as 51%-99% of those wagers. Most likely, the player may be allowed to withdraw percentages in steps of 5% such as 95%, 90%, 85%, 80%, 75%, 70%, 65%, 60% 55% or 50% of the wager, leaving the reminder for the house to collect. This surrender, or any surrender wager, must be made before the dealer's card and/or the player's card is exposed.
  • [0027]
    As the odds are in the favor of the player when a further bet is made (due to the increased payoff), this will lower the overall dealer hold percentage. However, as the opportunity for further bets will be available only infrequently (i.e., about 7.47% of the time) and even though such further bets will almost always be made when the opportunity presents itself (in view of the odds being in favor of the player for that wager), there is only a relatively small reduction in the overall dealer hold percentage for the dealer. For example, in the situation where the further bet payoff is 2:1 and the dealer wins and/or ties on the further bet, the player hold percentage for the further bet itself is about 38.9%. However, as this occurs only infrequently, the overall dealer hold percentage is only reduced by about 2.9% (i.e., 38.9% times 7.47%). Therefore, using the dealer hold percentage of 7.47% mentioned above, there is obviously still a definite advantage of about 4.6% to the dealer.
  • [0028]
    Depending on the desires of the dealer, or if used in a casino the casino owner (or gaming commission which controls the overall hold percentage of the casino), the odds can be adjusted as desired. For example, while the minimum payoffs for the tie wager have been suggested as 8:1, and preferably 10:1, this payoff could be made as high as desired (even positive for the player, such as 15:1). Similarly, the payoffs for the further bets could be some other ratio, besides the 1.5:1 or 2:1 mentioned, such as or 2.5:1. The only limiting factor would have to be that the payoffs for all bets remains in the favor of the dealer or house (assuming that having an overall winning amount is desired).
  • [0029]
    While the determination of the number of face down cards dealt for each further bet can be predetermined, it would also be possible for the number to be determined each time a further bet (or round of further bets) is made. For example, some suitable chance generating mechanism such as a six-faced die could be used to chose between zero to five face down cards or between one to three (with each number appearing on two faces). If desired, there could even be a separately colored die for the tied player or players each round and one for the dealer so that the number of face down cards of the players could be different from those of the dealer. In such a situation, the first tied player would throw both dies to determine the number of face down cards for the player(s) and the dealer. Such a chance generating mechanism also adds an additional security feature into the play of the game which may be important for casino operators.
  • [0030]
    In addition to the bets noted above, it would also be possible to provide additional no-rank cards to the shoe so that a separate wager could also be made on whether a (or two) no-rank card would be dealt (to a player, to any player, to the dealer, or to any participant). Such a wagering method is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,098,107, which is hereby incorporated by reference. This patent also discloses the use of an association wager that could be used with the present game where the bet would be that there would be some predetermined association of the cards between the player and the dealer. For example, that the cards would be of the same suit or in order. Similarly, the use of a progressive jackpot as disclosed in the patent could also be adapted to the present wagering game if desired.
  • [0031]
    As another variation, the present wagering game could also be played as a player banked card game with a kind of poker betting. In this embodiment, each player would initially wager an ante and the dealer (chosen on a rotating basis) would deal each player one card face down. Then, the first player to the dealer's left for example, would have the option of making an initial wager. If an initial wager were not made, then each player in turn would have the option of making an initial wager. After an initial wager is made, each succeeding player would then either call, fold or raise the previous wager in the same manner as in poker games. At the conclusion of the betting, the remaining players would disclose their cards with the highest rank card being the winner. Any ties for the highest rank (winning) card would be played out in a further deal or “war” between the tied players, including further betting in the same manner as noted above for the initial deal.
  • [0032]
    There are side bet features additionally provided herein to increase the interest in the Casino WarŽ game that are not disclosed in the prior art. Those features are:
      • 1) Surrender feature on at least the first cards—either upon seeing one of the dealer's card and the player's card or after a tie.
      • 2) Victory Bonus wager—A bet that a player will win by a significant margin. If the player making the wager beats the dealer by at least a predetermined minimum spread (e.g., at least 5 or at least 6 or more points) without going to war then the player making the wager wins this side bet. The larger the spread, the more the player wins.
      • 3) Fortune of War™ bet—that the total point count of the first player and dealer cards are within a specific range of ranks. This may be played without regard to a player winning, losing or tying, or odds may be adjusted to apply only when winning, only when losing, only when tying, or specific combinations of these.
        These side bets may be mandatory but in one example are optional, and are in addition to the possibility of wagering on the basic game and on tie events. It is also possible to use specialty cards or jokers for additional side events such as described herein. For example, with one or more jokers inserted into a set of cards, a joker dealt to the dealer as a first card may immediately result in a dealer win, while a joker on the first player or dealer card will always result in a tie game in which the player is required to place an additional wager for the tie event. In the tie competition, a joker to either player or dealer may automatically result in a push or another tie event. If both the dealer and player receive jokers, it may be declared a win for the player at any stage of competition and even require a 3/2 payout to the player on at least the ante wager and possibly all wagers at that stage of play, or some other event outcome required as a game rule.
  • [0036]
    The following information on the play of this game could be provided in the following format as a rack card or rule sheet for the game. The odds provided may be varied to adjust the house advantage or player advantage in the game, and minor variations in the rules may be made for a like result.
  • [0000]
    Casino WarŽ Casino Game
  • [0037]
    Casino WarŽ casino game is an exciting card game which is fast and easy to understand. Simply place a bet and if your card is higher than the dealer's you win even money. It also comes with a variety of interesting side bets, some paying as much as 50:1. You can bet that you'll win by a significant margin with Victory Bonus™ wagers, that the dealer's card and your own will be a pair with “Bet the Set” wagers, and on the total of those two cards with Fortunes of War side bet wager.
  • [0038]
    The Return to Player for Casino WarŽ casino game and its side bets range from 86.743% to 97.123%.
  • [0039]
    Playing the Game
      • 1. Casino War is played with 1 to 6 or more standard decks, shuffled before each game.
      • 2. The player places at least an ante bet to begin the game.
      • 3. The player and the dealer each receive a face up card. If the player's card is higher than the dealer's then the player wins even money. If the dealer's card is higher then the player loses the ante bet.
      • 4. If the cards tie then the player has the following options:
      • Surrender—Forfeit half or less than half the player's Ante bet.
      • Go to War—Double (or otherwise increase, within a predefined range, such as 0.5 to 5×) the player's ante bet. The player places the additional war wager and the dealer and player will each receive another card.
      • If the new card is higher than or ties with the dealer's new card, the player recovers the ante bet and additional wager at 1:1 odds (or other special adjusted odds for tie events pre-established by the casino) wins an amount equal to the original bet. If the dealer's new card is higher than the player's new card, then the player loses both the Ante and War bets.
        Because the player wins on a tie after going to war, the player will win more often than he loses. The overall Return to Players for Casino War with these rules ranges from about 96.302% to 97.123%.
        Victory Bonus
  • [0047]
    This is a side bet that the player will win (or alternatively, that the dealer will win) by a significant, predefined margin or spread. If the player beats the dealer by 6 or more points without going to war, then the player wins this side bet. The larger the spread, the more the player wins.
  • [0048]
    To determine the margin, an Ace is equal to 14, a King is equal to 13, a Queen is equal to 12, and a Jack is equal to 11.
    Won by Pays
    6 1:1
    7 2:1
    8 4:1
    6:1
    10 or more 10:1 

    The Return to Player of this bet is 89.636%
    “Bet the Set” Side Bet Wager
  • [0049]
    This is a side bet that the dealer's card and the player's card will be a pair (i.e., will tie). A pair of the same suit receives a higher prize. This bet does not apply to cards received after going to war.
    Hand Pay
    Pair 10:1
    Pair of same suit 15:1

    The Return to Player of this bet is 89.389%
    “Fortunes of War” Side Bet Wager
  • [0050]
    This side bet wager adds the ranks of the first card the player and the dealer receive together and the player selects a range from among a number of ranges covering a total range of at least a total point number between 4 and 28. The player places a bet on one of the ranges below to win the corresponding prize if the total rank of the two cards falls in that range. To determine the total rank or total point count, the following ranks are used: Ace=14, King=13, Queen=12, and Jack=11. If a joker or specialty card is used, that card may be given any predetermined value, with 0, 7 or 14, being preferred values for the joker or specialty card.
    Total rank Pays
    4-5 50:1
    6-7 20:1
    8-9 13:1
    10-11  9:1
    12-14  4:1
    15-17  3:1
    18-20  4:1
    21-22  9:1
    23-24 13:1
    25-26 20:1
    27-28 50:1

    The Return to Player on these bets ranges from 86.743% to 91.071% with the ranges applying to all game outcomes, such as wins, losses, ties and war events. This side bet may be played without regard to a player winning, losing or tying, or odds may be adjusted to apply only when winning, only when losing, only when tying, or specific combinations of these. For example, the ranges may apply to only tying and winning (Player) events, and in this instance, the odds could be increased. Odds would be adjusted for each type of combination event allowed within the definition of winning events.
  • [0051]
    The games of the present invention may be implemented as a live table game, as a television or cable game show game, as a video poker gaming machine game, as a hand-held game for play, as a game executed on a multiple player interactive wagering platform game (with kiosk formats, single player screens, community screens, and/or banks of seats for players with a common dealer screen), as a cell phone game, as a game downloadable from the internet, as a parlor game, as a game executed on a personal computer, as a palm pilot game, as a play station game, and the like. Each of the above game applications is contemplated by the present invention.
  • [0052]
    An alternative electronic gaming system that can be used to practice the method of the present invention comprises a table and a dealer “virtual” video display system positioned for view by players seated at the table. One such system is marketed under the name Table Master™. The table may seat at least two players up to the amount of players that can be configured about the table and have a view of the dealer video display system. Typically each gaming system will have at least four player available positions, with space determinations considered as to whether there would be 4, 5, 6 or 7 player positions. It is possible to have a completely circular dealer display (e.g., holographic display in a cylindrical centerpiece) and have players distributed around the entire periphery, but this is too dissimilar to standard play arrangements and could slow the game down, as play should approximate that of a live game, with players playing in sequence. A surface of the table will include a common display surface for showing all player hands, community cards, dealer hands and any other cards used to play the game for any purpose. The common display may also include credits wagered, side bet wager placement, betting limits, and the like. A large portion of the table surface comprises a video monitor in one example of the invention. The table surface may also include individual player screens with touch screen controls and/or player control panels at each player station near the common display surface. Cards on the common display surface may be readily viewed by other players at a table, which is standard in table games and adds to player enjoyment. The use of a large common display screen display also allows for better animation to be provided, such as displaying virtual images of cards moving to the player and “virtual” chips being placed on the table when wagers are indicated. For purposes of this disclosure, the term “virtual” means a graphical video representation of a real object or person, such as a dealer, cards and chips, for example.
  • [0053]
    The individual player positions preferably have a separate intelligence at each player position that accepts player input and communicates directly with a game engine (main game computer or processor). The intelligence is preferably an intelligent board that can process information. For purposes of this disclosure the term “intelligent” refers to the ability to execute code, either provided in the form of software or hardware circuits. Such processing may at least comprise some of signal converting (e.g., signals from player card readers, credit deposit, currency readers, coin readers, touch screen signals, control panel signals) into a signal that can be included in an information packet and interpreted by the main game computer when the signal is sent. Communication between the intelligence at each player position is direct to the main game computer and may be by self-initiated signal sending, sequenced polling by the main game computer (e.g., each position communicates directly to the main game computer in turn), timed communication, or any other order of communication that is direct between the intelligence and the main game computer.
  • [0054]
    One preferred form of communication between the main game computer and player station computers is by means of self-initiated signal sending. There is essentially a single main game computer that contains video display controls and programs for both the dealer display and the table top display, audio controls and programs, game rules (including storage of multiple games if intended to be available on the machine), random number generator, graphic images, game sequence controls, security systems, wager accounting programs, external signaling and audit functions, and the like. In other forms of the invention, the above functions are divided between a main processor and one or more additional processors. The intelligence at each player position speeds up the performance of all aspects of the game by being able to communicate directly with the main game computer and being able to process information at the player position rather than merely forwarding the information in raw form to the main game computer. Processing player information at player positions frees up resources for use by the main processor or processors.
  • [0055]
    A card game system may also include a suitable data and control processing subsystem that is largely contained within a main control module supported beneath the tabletop. The control and data processing subsystem includes a suitable power supply for converting alternating current from the power main as controlled by a main power switch. The power supply transforms the alternating line current to a suitable voltage and to a direct current supply. Power is supplied to a power distribution and sensor/activity electronics control circuit. Commercially available power switching and control circuits may be provided in the form of a circuit board which is detachable, and plugs into a board receptacle of a computer mother board or an expansion slot board receptacle. A main game controller motherboard may include a central microprocessor and related components well-known in the industry as computers using Intel brand PentiumŽ microprocessors and related memory or intelligence from any other manufacturing source. A variety of different configurations and types of memory devices can be connected to the motherboard as is well known in the art. Of particular interest is the inclusion of two flat panel display control boards connected in expansion slots of the motherboard. Display control boards are each capable of controlling the images displayed for the dealer video display and for each of the player position display areas on the continuous display screen on the table and other operational parameters of the video displays used in the gaming system. More specifically, the display control boards are connected to player bet interfaces circuits for the player stations. This arrangement also allows the display control boards to provide necessary image display data to the display electronic drive circuits associated with the dealing event program displays and the dealer display.
  • [0056]
    The motherboard and/or the individual player intelligent boards also includes a serial port that allows stored data to be downloaded from the motherboard to a central casino computer or other additional storage device. In one example, each player board communicates directly with the casino computer system. This allows card game action data to be analyzed in various ways using added detail, or by providing integration with data from multiple tables so that cheating schemes can be identified and eliminated, and player tracking can be maintained. Player performance and/or skill can be tracked at one table or as a compilation from gaming at multiple tables, as by using Bloodhound™ security software marketed by Shuffle Master, Inc., which may be incorporated into this automated gaming system. Additionally, player hand analysis can be performed. The motherboard and/or individual player intelligent boards may also have a keyboard connection port that can be used to connect a larger format keyboard to the system to facilitate programming and servicing of the system.
  • [0057]
    Although the preferred system shown does not require features illustrated for receiving automated player identification information, such features can alternatively be provided. Card readers such as used with credit cards, or other identification code reading devices can be added in the system to allow or require player identification in connection with play of the card game and associated recording of game action by one of the processors. Such a user identification interface, for example a card reader located at each player station, can be implemented in the form of a variety of magnetic card readers commercially available for reading user-specific identification information. The user-specific information can be provided on specially constructed magnetic cards issued by a casino, or magnetically coded credit cards or debit cards frequently used with national credit organizations such as VISA, MASTERCARD, AMERICAN EXPRESS, casino player card registry, banks and other institutions. The information could also be provided on other writable media, such as an RFID chip with writable memory, or bar coding, as just a few examples.
  • [0058]
    Alternatively, it is possible to use so-called smart cards to provide added processing or data storage functions in addition to mere identification data. For example, the user identification could include coding for available credit amounts purchased from a casino. As further example, the identification card or other user-specific instrument may include specially coded data indicating security information such as would allow accessing or identifying stored security information which must be confirmed by the user after scanning the user identification card through a card reader. Such security information might include such things as file access numbers which allow the central processor to access a stored security clearance code which the user must indicate using input options provided on displays using touch screen displays. A still further possibility is to have participant identification using a fingerprint image, eye blood vessel image reader, or other suitable biological information to confirm identity of the user that can be built into the table. Still further it is possible to provide such participant identification information by having the pit personnel manually code in the information in response to the player indicating his or her code name or real name. Such additional identification could also be used to confirm credit use of a smart card or transponder. All or part of the functions dedicated to a particular player station are controlled by the player station intelligence in one form of the invention. Additionally, each player station intelligence may be in communication with a casino accounting system.
  • [0059]
    It should also be understood that the continuous screen can alternatively be provided with suitable display cowlings or covers that can be used to shield display of card images from viewing by anyone other than the player in games where that is desirable. This shielding can also be effected by having light-orientation elements in the panel, and some of these light-orientation elements are electronically controllable. In this manner, the processor can allow general viewing of cards in games where that is desirable or tolerated, and then alter the screen where desired. These types of features can be provided by nanometer, micrometer or other small particulate or flake elements within a panel on the viewing area that are reoriented by signals from the processor. Alternatively, liquid crystal or photo chromatic displays can be used to create a screening effect that would allow only viewers at specific angles of view from the screen area to view the images of cards. Such an alternative construction may be desired in systems designed for card games different from blackjack, where some or all of the player or dealer cards are not presented for viewing by other participants or onlookers. Such display covers or cowlings can be in various shapes and configurations as needed to prevent viewing access. It may alternatively be acceptable to use a player-controlled switch that allows the display to be momentarily viewed and then turned off. The display can be shielded using a cover or merely by using the player's hands. Still further it is possible to use a touch screen display that would be controlled by touch to turn on and turn off. Similar shielding can be used to prevent others from viewing the display.
  • [0060]
    While the present invention has been described with respect to exemplary embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that other variations and modifications can be effected within the scope and spirit of the invention.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3595987 *Feb 20, 1969Jul 27, 1971Ass Motion Picture Tv ProdElectronic composite photography
US4007487 *Sep 25, 1975Feb 8, 1977The Association Of Motion Picture And Television Producers Inc.Electronic composite photography with color control
US4026555 *Mar 12, 1975May 31, 1977Alpex Computer CorporationTelevision display control apparatus
US4100569 *Sep 30, 1977Jul 11, 1978Petro VlahosComprehensive electronic compositing system
US4344085 *Dec 4, 1980Aug 10, 1982Vlahos-Gottschalk Research Corp.Comprehensive electronic compositing system
US4397509 *Mar 26, 1981Aug 9, 1983Universal Research Laboratories, IncorporatedArcade game housing
US4445114 *Oct 3, 1980Apr 24, 1984Atari, Inc.Apparatus for scrolling a video display
US4530499 *Sep 30, 1982Jul 23, 1985Marvin Glass & AssociatesDomino, or the like, placing video game
US4614342 *Nov 7, 1984Sep 30, 1986Doyle DavisElectronic game machine suitable for chance and gambling card games
US4643421 *Aug 31, 1984Feb 17, 1987Marvin Glass & AssociatesVideo game in which a host image repels ravenous images by serving filled vessels
US4658247 *Jul 30, 1984Apr 14, 1987Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.Pipelined, line buffered real-time color graphics display system
US4687200 *Aug 9, 1985Aug 18, 1987Nintendo Co., Ltd.Multi-directional switch
US4724307 *Apr 29, 1986Feb 9, 1988Gtech CorporationMarked card reader
US4738451 *May 20, 1986Apr 19, 1988Atari Games CorporationMulti-player, multi-character cooperative play video game with independent player entry and departure
US4837728 *Jan 25, 1984Jun 6, 1989IgtMultiple progressive gaming system that freezes payouts at start of game
US4926327 *Mar 29, 1988May 15, 1990Sidley Joseph D HComputerized gaming system
US4995615 *Jul 10, 1989Feb 26, 1991Cheng Kuan HMethod and apparatus for performing fair card play
US5090708 *Dec 12, 1990Feb 25, 1992Yonatan GerlitzNon hand-held toy
US5098107 *Mar 11, 1991Mar 24, 1992Bet Technology Inc.Method and apparatus for playing a wagering game
US5116055 *Jul 2, 1991May 26, 1992Mikohn, Inc.Progressive jackpot gaming system linking gaming machines with different hit frequencies and denominations
US5120057 *Jan 26, 1990Jun 9, 1992Konami Co., Ltd.Hand held video game with simulated battle against aliens
US5125671 *Jun 7, 1990Jun 30, 1992Ricoh Co., Ltd.T.V. game system having reduced memory needs
US5149104 *Feb 6, 1991Sep 22, 1992Elissa EdelsteinVideo game having audio player interation with real time video synchronization
US5150899 *Jan 26, 1990Sep 29, 1992Konami Co., Ltd.Hand held video game with simulated rescue
US5159549 *Apr 16, 1987Oct 27, 1992Poker Pot, Inc.Multiple player game data processing system with wager accounting
US5221083 *Oct 5, 1990Jun 22, 1993Sega Enterprises, Ltd.Medal game machine
US5275411 *Jan 14, 1993Jan 4, 1994Shuffle Master, Inc.Pai gow poker machine
US5280909 *Feb 6, 1992Jan 25, 1994Mikohn, Inc.Gaming system with progressive jackpot
US5288078 *Jul 16, 1992Feb 22, 1994David G. CapperControl interface apparatus
US5317505 *Dec 19, 1990May 31, 1994Raznik KarabedGame controller capable of storing and executing stored sequences of user playing button settings
US5324041 *Apr 26, 1993Jun 28, 1994Bet Technology, Inc.High card wagering game
US5414256 *Jan 6, 1994May 9, 1995Interactive Light, Inc.Apparatus for and method of controlling a device by sensing radiation having an emission space and a sensing space
US5453758 *Jul 29, 1993Sep 26, 1995Sony CorporationInput apparatus
US5470080 *Nov 18, 1993Nov 28, 1995Sega Of America, Inc.Multi-player video game apparatus with single screen mode and split screen mode
US5521616 *Feb 18, 1994May 28, 1996Capper; David G.Control interface apparatus
US5564700 *Feb 10, 1995Oct 15, 1996Trump Taj Mahal AssociatesProportional payout method for progressive linked gaming machines
US5605334 *Apr 11, 1995Feb 25, 1997Mccrea, Jr.; Charles H.Secure multi-site progressive jackpot system for live card games
US5616078 *Dec 27, 1994Apr 1, 1997Konami Co., Ltd.Motion-controlled video entertainment system
US5669816 *Jul 25, 1996Sep 23, 1997Peripheral Dynamics, Inc.Blackjack scanner apparatus and method
US5676372 *Apr 18, 1994Oct 14, 1997Casinovations, Inc.Playing card shuffler
US5681039 *Nov 4, 1994Oct 28, 1997Tech Art, Inc.Card reader for blackjack table
US5722893 *Oct 17, 1995Mar 3, 1998Smart Shoes, Inc.Card dispensing shoe with scanner
US5726706 *Jun 19, 1995Mar 10, 1998Tivoli Industries, Inc.Tubular lighting security system
US5735742 *Sep 20, 1995Apr 7, 1998Chip Track InternationalGaming table tracking system and method
US5745166 *Jul 28, 1995Apr 28, 1998Maxpro Systems Pty LtdVideo security system field of the invention
US5779546 *Jan 27, 1997Jul 14, 1998Fm Gaming Electronics L.P.Automated gaming system and method of automated gaming
US5781647 *Oct 27, 1997Jul 14, 1998Digital Biometrics, Inc.Gambling chip recognition system
US5803453 *Apr 29, 1997Sep 8, 1998International Game TechnologyGaming machine light handle and associated circuitry
US5808353 *Jun 20, 1996Sep 15, 1998Harris CorporationRadiation hardened dielectric for EEPROM
US5879235 *Sep 10, 1996Mar 9, 1999Sega Enterprises, Ltd.Ball game machine with a roulette-type rotary disk and a display located in the central area therein
US5883085 *Apr 20, 1998Mar 16, 1999The Procter & Gamble CompanyCompositions for regulating skin wrinkles and/or skin atrophy
US5895047 *Oct 10, 1997Apr 20, 1999Callahan; Paul E.Method for a novel card game
US5897235 *Jun 21, 1996Apr 27, 1999Canon Kabushiki KaishaAdministrating apparatus and method for administrating a status of an image forming apparatus
US5919090 *Dec 15, 1995Jul 6, 1999Grips Electronic GmbhApparatus and method for data gathering in games of chance
US5923364 *Apr 17, 1998Jul 13, 1999Maxpro Systems Pty LtdVideo security system
US5934998 *Oct 13, 1995Aug 10, 1999Forte; Steven L.Blackjack game system and methods
US5941769 *Oct 5, 1995Aug 24, 1999Order; MichailGaming equipment for professional use of table games with playing cards and gaming chips, in particular for the game of "black jack"
US5961121 *Mar 19, 1998Oct 5, 1999Steven R. PyykkonenGame machine wager sensor
US6039650 *Feb 26, 1998Mar 21, 2000Smart Shoes, Inc.Card dispensing shoe with scanner apparatus, system and method therefor
US6068258 *Sep 18, 1997May 30, 2000Shuffle Master, Inc.Method and apparatus for automatically cutting and shuffling playing cards
US6077162 *Jan 22, 1997Jun 20, 2000Casino Data SystemsCooperative group gaming system: apparatus and method
US6093103 *Apr 2, 1998Jul 25, 2000Mccrea, Jr.; Charles H.Secure multi-site progressive jackpot system for live card games
US6117012 *Mar 1, 1999Sep 12, 2000Mccrea, Jr.; Charles H.Jackpot system for live card games based upon game play wagering and method
US6126166 *Oct 24, 1997Oct 3, 2000Advanced Casino Technologies, Inc.Card-recognition and gaming-control device
US6139014 *Jul 15, 1997Oct 31, 2000Shuffle Master, Inc.Method and apparatus for automatically cutting and shuffling playing cards
US6217447 *Jan 31, 1997Apr 17, 2001Dp Stud, Inc.Method and system for generating displays in relation to the play of baccarat
US6254096 *Apr 15, 1998Jul 3, 2001Shuffle Master, Inc.Device and method for continuously shuffling cards
US6270404 *Dec 26, 2000Aug 7, 2001Digideal CorporationAutomated system for playing live casino table games having tabletop changeable playing card displays and play monitoring security features
US6299536 *Mar 20, 2000Oct 9, 2001Smart Shoes, Inc.Card dispensing shoe with scanner apparatus, system and method therefor
US6361044 *Feb 23, 2000Mar 26, 2002Lawrence M. BlockCard dealer for a table game
US6394898 *Aug 1, 1997May 28, 2002Sega Enterprises Ltd.Race game device
US6403908 *Dec 22, 2000Jun 11, 2002Bob StardustAutomated method and apparatus for playing card sequencing, with optional defect detection
US6460848 *Dec 30, 1999Oct 8, 2002Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6466220 *Mar 5, 1999Oct 15, 2002Teralogic, Inc.Graphics engine architecture
US6469747 *Sep 2, 1999Oct 22, 2002Da Vinco Systems, Inc.Parabolic mixer for video signals
US6517435 *Jan 22, 2002Feb 11, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6517436 *Dec 13, 2001Feb 11, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6519283 *Jun 9, 1999Feb 11, 2003International Business Machines CorporationIntegrated video processing system having multiple video sources and implementing picture-in-picture with on-screen display graphics
US6520857 *Dec 13, 2001Feb 18, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6527271 *Jan 22, 2002Mar 4, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6530836 *Dec 13, 2001Mar 11, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6530837 *Dec 13, 2001Mar 11, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6532297 *Jul 14, 1998Mar 11, 2003Digital Biometrics, Inc.Gambling chip recognition system
US6533276 *Feb 13, 2002Mar 18, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6533662 *Jan 18, 2002Mar 18, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6568678 *Nov 16, 2001May 27, 2003Shuffle Master, Inc.Method and apparatus for automatically cutting and shuffling playing cards
US6579180 *Dec 13, 2001Jun 17, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6579181 *Jan 22, 2002Jun 17, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6588751 *Oct 16, 2000Jul 8, 2003Shuffle Master, Inc.Device and method for continuously shuffling and monitoring cards
US6595857 *Feb 13, 2002Jul 22, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod and apparatus for monitoring casinos and gaming
US6607443 *Oct 28, 1998Aug 19, 2003Kabushiki Kaisha Sega EnterprisesGame device
US6638161 *Dec 13, 2001Oct 28, 2003Mindplay LlcMethod, apparatus and article for verifying card games, such as playing card distribution
US6808174 *Sep 15, 2003Oct 26, 2004Full House Gaming Inc.Card game
US7222854 *Jul 2, 2004May 29, 2007Nicholas SorgeModified blackjack game
US20030199316 *Jun 9, 2003Oct 23, 2003Kabushiki Kaisha Sega EnterprisesGame device
US20040038741 *Aug 22, 2002Feb 26, 2004Michael GauselmannProgressive jackpot gaming system
US20040108656 *Dec 4, 2002Jun 10, 2004Shuffle Master, Inc.Baccarat side wager game
US20050164759 *Jan 26, 2004Jul 28, 2005Shuffle Master, Inc.Electronic gaming machine with architecture supporting a virtual dealer and virtual cards
US20050164762 *Jan 26, 2004Jul 28, 2005Shuffle Master, Inc.Automated multiplayer game table with unique image feed of dealer
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7472908 *May 18, 2004Jan 6, 2009Harris Stephen MPlaying card wagering game and method therefor
US8105141Apr 3, 2006Jan 31, 2012Cantor Index LimitedSystem and method for adding a skill aspect to games of chance
US8192267Jul 3, 2008Jun 5, 2012Patent Investment & Licensing CompanyShared game play on gaming device
US8235783 *Jan 15, 2008Aug 7, 2012Wms Gaming Inc.Wagering games utilizing a play or pass methodology related application data
US8287348Mar 31, 2009Oct 16, 2012Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty LimitedGaming system for a poker-style game
US8313366Mar 29, 2012Nov 20, 2012Score Gaming LLCCard game
US8342924Apr 14, 2010Jan 1, 2013Cantor Index LimitedSystem and method for providing enhanced services to a user of a gaming application
US8342946Jul 4, 2009Jan 1, 2013Bgc Partners, Inc.Computer graphics processing and display of selectable items
US8342966Oct 24, 2008Jan 1, 2013Cfph, LlcWager market creation and management
US8371918Mar 14, 2011Feb 12, 2013Shfl Entertainment, Inc.Special multiplier bonus game in Pai Gow poker variant
US8475254Dec 28, 2009Jul 2, 2013Patent Investment & Licensing CompanyLinked game play on gaming devices
US8556691Jan 30, 2012Oct 15, 2013Cantor Gaming LimitedSystem and method for adding a skill aspect to games of chance
US8672751Jul 12, 2002Mar 18, 2014Cantor Index LimitedSystem and method for providing enhanced services to a user of a gaming application
US8734227Jan 18, 2006May 27, 2014Cantor Gaming LimitedMethod for establishing a wager for a game
US8814166 *Dec 2, 2013Aug 26, 2014Casino War Blackjack, Inc.Method, system, and device for conducting a game
US8821269Sep 12, 2012Sep 2, 2014Anthony StormWager market creation and management
US8858326Sep 12, 2012Oct 14, 2014Lee AmaitisComputer graphics processing and display of selectable items
US9005016Feb 9, 2011Apr 14, 2015Lee AmaitisWagering on event outcomes during the event
US9076305Sep 12, 2012Jul 7, 2015Lee AmaitisWagering on event outcomes during the event
US9111417Sep 14, 2012Aug 18, 2015Cantor Index LimitedSystem and method for providing enhanced services to a user of a gaming application
US9530279 *Oct 13, 2011Dec 27, 2016Ray SmithThree-card war game with wagers
US9530283May 8, 2012Dec 27, 2016Patent Investment & Licensing CompanyMethod for sharing game play on an electronic gaming device
US9558630 *Jul 14, 2015Jan 31, 2017IgtGaming system and method for enabling a player to select progressive awards to try for and chances of winning progressive awards
US20050261045 *May 18, 2004Nov 24, 2005Harris Stephen MPlaying card wagering game and method therefor
US20060116200 *Jan 18, 2006Jun 1, 2006Gameaccount LimitedMethod for establishing a wager for a game
US20080171585 *Jan 15, 2008Jul 17, 2008Precedent Gaming, IncorporatedWagering games utilizing a play or pass methodology related application data
US20090186688 *Jan 22, 2008Jul 23, 2009Raphael MouradWagering game using dice or electronically simulated dice
US20090247252 *Mar 31, 2009Oct 1, 2009Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty LimitedGaming system for a poker-style game
US20100004054 *Jul 3, 2008Jan 7, 2010Acres-Fiore, Inc.Method of allocating credits for gaming devices
US20100004058 *Jul 3, 2008Jan 7, 2010Acres-FioreShared bonus on gaming device
US20100123288 *Oct 22, 2009May 20, 2010Merrill SparagoCard game
US20130095902 *Oct 13, 2011Apr 18, 2013Ray SmithThree-card war game with wagers
US20140357337 *Jun 2, 2014Dec 4, 2014Pockaj D.O.O. (d.b.a Alfastreet)Dual hand wagering game with secondary wagers
US20140364196 *Aug 25, 2014Dec 11, 2014David NizgodaMethod, system, and device for conducting a game
US20150038206 *Jun 30, 2014Feb 5, 2015Shfl Entertainment, Inc.Methods of administering wagering games including trading cards and related systems
US20150317879 *Jul 14, 2015Nov 5, 2015IgtGaming system and method for enabling a player to select progressive awards to try for and chances of winning progressive awards
US20160364949 *Jun 11, 2015Dec 15, 2016Big Bet Gaming LlcWagering event using multiple card rank comparison
WO2015084439A1 *Aug 25, 2014Jun 11, 2015Casino War Blackjack, Inc.Method, system, and device for conducting a game
Classifications
U.S. Classification463/16
International ClassificationA63F9/24
Cooperative ClassificationG07F17/3293, G07F17/32, G07F17/322
European ClassificationG07F17/32P6, G07F17/32C4D, G07F17/32
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Feb 21, 2007ASAssignment
Owner name: STARGAMES CORPORATION PARTY LIMITED, AUSTRALIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:O HALLORAN, TERRY;SMITH, PHILIP S.;REEL/FRAME:018953/0649;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070207 TO 20070209
Oct 27, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: SHUFFLE MASTER AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED, AUSTRALIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:STARGAMES CORPORATION PTY LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:025205/0380
Effective date: 20100209