Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20070228593 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/694,017
Publication dateOct 4, 2007
Filing dateMar 30, 2007
Priority dateApr 3, 2006
Also published asUS8647554, US20100286811, WO2008066562A2, WO2008066562A3
Publication number11694017, 694017, US 2007/0228593 A1, US 2007/228593 A1, US 20070228593 A1, US 20070228593A1, US 2007228593 A1, US 2007228593A1, US-A1-20070228593, US-A1-2007228593, US2007/0228593A1, US2007/228593A1, US20070228593 A1, US20070228593A1, US2007228593 A1, US2007228593A1
InventorsChristopher Jones, Niyaz Khusnatdinov, Stephen Johnson, Philip Schumaker, Pankaj Lad
Original AssigneeMolecular Imprints, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Residual Layer Thickness Measurement and Correction
US 20070228593 A1
Abstract
In nano-imprint lithography it is important to detect thickness non-uniformity of a residual layer formed on a substrate. Such non-uniformity is compensated such that a uniform residual layer may be formed. Compensation is performed by calculating a corrected fluid drop pattern.
Images(9)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(4)
1. In an imprint lithography system, a method comprising:
a) depositing a plurality of drops of imprint fluid on a substrate, the plurality of drops having a drop pattern in which each of the plurality of drops has an assigned size and position on the substrate;
b) performing an imprint of the plurality of drops of imprint fluid by patterning the imprint fluid between a mold and the substrate resulting in an imprinted layer;
c) measuring a thickness of a residual layer of the imprinted layer;
d) calculating a new drop pattern that compensates for nonuniformities in the thickness of the residual layer by adjusting the assigned size and position of certain ones of the plurality of drops; and
e) repeating step b).
2. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising repeating step c) after step e).
3. The method as recited in claim 2, wherein steps b), c), and d) are repeated until a desired uniformity of the thickness of the residual layer is achieved.
4. An imprint lithography system, comprising:
a fluid dispense system for depositing a plurality of drops of imprint fluid on a substrate, the plurality of drops having a drop pattern in which each of the plurality of drops has an assigned size and position on the substrate;
an imprint mold for performing an imprint of the plurality of drops of imprint fluid by patterning the imprint fluid between the imprint mold and the substrate resulting in an imprinted layer;
a film thickness measurement tool for measuring a thickness of a residual layer of the imprinted layer;
circuitry for calculating a new drop pattern that compensates for nonuniformities in the thickness of the residual layer by adjusting the assigned size and position of certain ones of the plurality of drops.
Description
  • [0001]
    This application for patent claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/788,808, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0002]
    Nano-fabrication involves the fabrication of very small structures, e.g., having features on the order of nanometers or smaller. One area in which nano-fabrication has had a sizeable impact is in the processing of integrated circuits. As the semiconductor processing industry continues to strive for larger production yields while increasing the circuits per unit area formed on a substrate, nano-fabrication becomes increasingly important. Nano-fabrication provides greater process control while allowing increased reduction of the minimum feature dimension of the structures formed. Other areas of development in which nano-fabrication has been employed include biotechnology, optical technology, mechanical systems and the like.
  • [0003]
    An exemplary nano-fabrication technique is commonly referred to as imprint lithography. Exemplary imprint lithography processes are described in detail in numerous publications, such as United States patent application publication 2004/0065976 filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/264,960, entitled, “Method and a Mold to Arrange Features on a Substrate to Replicate Features having Minimal Dimensional Variability”; United States patent application publication 2004/0065252 filed as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/264,926, entitled “Method of Forming a Layer on a Substrate to Facilitate Fabrication of Metrology Standards”; and U.S. Pat. No. 6,936,194, entitled “Functional Patterning Material for Imprint Lithography Processes,” all of which are assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
  • [0004]
    Imprint lithography disclosed in each of the aforementioned United States patent application publications and United States patent includes formation of a relief pattern in a polymerizable layer and transferring a pattern corresponding to the relief pattern into an underlying substrate. The substrate may be positioned upon a motion stage to obtain a desired position to facilitate patterning thereof. To that end, a template is employed spaced-apart from the substrate with a formable liquid present between the template and the substrate. The liquid is solidified to form a solidified layer that has a pattern recorded therein that is conforming to a shape of the surface of the template in contact with the liquid. The template is then separated from the solidified layer such that the template and the substrate are spaced-apart. The substrate and the solidified layer are then subjected to processes to transfer, into the substrate, a relief image that corresponds to the pattern in the solidified layer.
  • [0005]
    The solidified layer may comprise a residual layer of material, i.e., a contiguous layer. Residual layer thickness (RLT) and residual layer thickness uniformity are key metrics for evaluating the quality of imprinted wafers. For many applications, a plasma etch step directly follows imprinting. Film thickness uniformity requirements for plasma etching are well known in the field. RLT uniformity determines the film thickness uniformity of imprinted samples to be etched. Presently, residual layer thickness uniformity is evaluated using the unaided eye to look at fringe patterns. To that end, there is no quantitative feedback to improve the residual layer uniformity once the liquid is positioned between the template and the substrate.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
  • [0006]
    FIG. 1 is a simplified side view of a lithographic system having a template spaced-apart from a substrate;
  • [0007]
    FIG. 2 illustrates a residual layer;
  • [0008]
    FIG. 3 is a simplified elevation view of a film thickness measurement tool proximate the substrate, shown in FIG. 1;
  • [0009]
    FIG. 4 illustrates an image taken by the thickness measurement tool, shown in FIG. 3;
  • [0010]
    FIG. 5 is simplified three dimensional representation of the image, shown in FIG. 4;
  • [0011]
    FIG. 6 is a top down view of the substrate having a drop pattern positioned thereon;
  • [0012]
    FIGS. 7A-7D illustrate exemplary steps for addressing a non-uniform residual layer; and
  • [0013]
    FIG. 8 illustrates a process for compensating for a non-uniform residual layer.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0014]
    Referring to FIG. 1, a system 8 to form a relief pattern on a substrate 12 includes a stage 10 upon which substrate 12 is supported and a template 14, having a patterning surface 18 thereon. In a further embodiment, substrate 12 may be coupled to a substrate chuck (not shown), the substrate chuck (not shown) being any chuck including, but not limited to, vacuum and electromagnetic.
  • [0015]
    Template 14 and/or mold 16 may be formed from such materials including but not limited to, fused-silica, quartz, silicon, organic polymers, siloxane polymers, borosilicate glass, fluorocarbon polymers, metal, and hardened sapphire. As shown, patterning surface 18 comprises features defined by a plurality of spaced-apart recesses 17 and protrusions 19. However, in a further embodiment, patterning surface 18 may be substantially smooth and/or planar. Patterning surface 18 may define an original pattern that forms the basis of a pattern to be formed on substrate 12.
  • [0016]
    Template 14 may be coupled to an imprint head 20 to facilitate movement of template 14, and therefore, mold 16. In a further embodiment, template 14 may be coupled to a template chuck (not shown), the template chuck (not shown) being any chuck including, but not limited to, vacuum and electromagnetic. A fluid dispense system 22 is coupled to be selectively placed in fluid communication with substrate 12 so as to deposit polymeric material 24 thereon. It should be understood that polymeric material 24 may be deposited using any known technique, e.g., drop dispense, spin-coating, dip coating, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), and the like.
  • [0017]
    A source 26 of energy 28 is coupled to direct energy 28 along a path 30. Imprint head 20 and stage 10 are configured to arrange mold 16 and substrate 12, respectively, to be in superimposition and disposed in path 30. Either imprint head 20, stage 10, or both vary a distance between mold 16 and substrate 12 to define a desired volume therebetween that is filled by polymeric material 24.
  • [0018]
    Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, typically, polymeric material 24 is disposed upon substrate 12 before the desired volume is defined between mold 16 and substrate 12. However, polymeric material 24 may fill the volume after the desired volume has been obtained. After the desired volume is filled with polymeric material 24, source 26 produces energy 28, e.g., broadband energy that causes polymeric material 24 to solidify and/or cross-link conforming to the shape of a surface 25 of substrate 12 and patterning surface 18, defining a patterned layer 50 on substrate 12 having a contiguous formation of polymeric material 24 over surface 25. More specifically, patterned layer 50 comprises sub-portions 34 a and 34 b, with sub-portions 34 b being in superimposition with protrusions 19, with sub-portions 34 a having a thickness t1 and sub-portions 34 b having a thickness t2, with sub-portions 34 b commonly referred to as the residual layer. Thicknesses t1 and t2 may be any thickness desired, dependent upon the application.
  • [0019]
    Referring to FIGS. 1, 2, and 3, the broadband energy may comprise an actinic component including, but not limited to, ultraviolet wavelengths, thermal energy, electromagnetic energy, visible light and the like. The actinic component employed is known to one skilled in the art and typically depends on the material from which imprinting layer 12 is formed. Control of this process is regulated by a processor 32 that is in data communication with stage 10, imprint head 20, fluid dispense system 22, source 26, operating on a computer readable program stored in memory 34. System 8 may further include a film thickness measurement tool 60 coupled with the substrate chuck (not shown), described further below. Film thickness measurement tool 60 may comprise an optical detection system, and further may be in data communication with processor 32. Film thickness measurement tool 60 may be a stand alone tool commonly used in semiconductor fabrication. Such tools are commercially available from Metrosol, Inc., Filmetrics, Rudolph Technologies, and J. A. Woolam.
  • [0020]
    Patterned layer 50 may have variations among thicknesses t2, which may be undesirable. More specifically, minimizing, if not preventing, variations among sub-portions 34 b, and thus, the residual layer may result in improved control of the critical dimension of pattered layer 50, which may be desired. In an example, it may be desirable to reduce variations among sub-portions 34 b below the approximately 30 nm level seen in typical imprints in order to minimize, if not prevent, the impact to etched feature critical dimension.
  • [0021]
    To that end, variations in thicknesses t2 of sub-portions 34 b may be measured generating measured data, with the measured data facilitating a design in positioning of polymeric material 24 upon substrate 12. In the present embodiment, polymeric material 24 is positioned as a plurality of droplets upon substrate 12, and thus, the measured data facilitates a design in the drop pattern of polymeric material 24. As a result, uniformity in thicknesses t2 of the sub-portions 34 b may be achieved.
  • [0022]
    The variations in thicknesses t2 of sub-portions 34 b may be measured at a plurality of points employing film thickness measurement tool 60, with the optical detection system digitizing imprinted fields, i.e., patterned layer 50, and subsequently employing processor 32 operating on a computer readable program stored in memory 34 to analyze said imprinted fields to construct a map of the thickness t2 of sub-portions 34 b across patterned layer 50. To that end, the drop pattern of polymeric material 24 may be varied, i.e., droplets may be added or subtracted, the drop offset may be varied, individual drop volumes of the plurality of drops, based upon the variations in thickness t2 of sub-portions 34 b to generate a drop pattern that may facilitate patterned layer 50 comprising sub-portions 34 b having a desired thickness uniformity.
  • [0023]
    Referring to FIGS. 1 and 3, to that end, film thickness measurement tool 60 may be positioned at a fixed angle and distance from substrate 12, with the distance from the imprint field, i.e., patterned layer 50, to film thickness measurement tool 60 being calculated. A calibration process may be required to obtain accurate dimensions of the imprint field. An alternative method for measuring the residual layer thickness measures the optical properties of the film, such as reflected intensity versus wavelength or circular versus elliptical polarization of light reflected from the field. These spectroscopic measurements are then fit to a model of the film stack to determine parameters of interest such as film thickness. Such a process can be implemented using the commercially available film thickness measurement tools noted above.
  • [0024]
    Referring to FIGS. 1 and 4, after an image of the imprint field is taken by film thickness measurement tool 60, processor 32 operating on a computer readable program stored in memory 34 may employ an algorithm to convert the image into a square (or, rectangle, circular, etc.) imprint area. Subsequently, processor 32 may convert differences in color and shade grades into a Z-height profile of the imprint field. FIG. 5 shows an example of a three-dimensional representation of the field shown in FIG. 4. Furthermore, the computer readable program stored in memory 34 may comprise a program entitled ImageJ available from http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/.
  • [0025]
    Further analysis of the imprinted filed is performed to map surface 25 of substrate 12 with a polynomial two-dimensional function, f(x,y). In this way, we can assign a specific thickness to each (x,y) point. Further, an average g(x,y) may be calculated, as well as deviation from this average: w(x,y)=g(x,y)−f(x,y).
  • [0026]
    The slope g(x,y) will be used to calculate the offsets in X and Y directions of the drop pattern. Deviation function w(x,y) will be used to control local unit fluid volume; number of drops, position of drops and drop volume itself.
  • [0027]
    FIG. 6 shows an exemplary drop pattern of polymeric material 24 used for imprinting that produced a desired thickness profile shown on FIG. 5. Using a multi-nozzle dispensing unit, various drop patterns can be generated on the substrate, such as a uniform grid superimposed with localized compensating drops.
  • [0028]
    Furthermore, the drop pattern on FIG. 6 corresponds to the following drop matrix, M(x,y):
    • 1: (0,0) 3.3113E-4 uL (microliters)×29 drops (0,0) refers to the center of the template
    • 2: (−0.95, 0.95) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 3: (−0.65, 0.95) 3.3113E-4 uL×15
    • 4: (−0.95, 0.65) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 5: (−0.73, 0.73) 3.3113E-4 uL×15
    • 6: (−0.56, 0.56) 3.3113E-4 uL×16
    • 7: (−0.4, 0.4) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 8: (−0.24, 0.26) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 9: (0, 0.32) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 10: (0, 0.52) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 11: (−0.15, 1) 3.3113E-4 uL×7
    • 12: (0, 0.8) 3.3113E-4 uL×20
    • 13: (0.15, 1) 3.3113E-4 uL×7
    • 14: (0.65, 0.95) 3.3113E-4 uL×15
    • 15: (0.95, 0.95) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 16: (0.95, 0.65) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 17: (0.73, 0.73) 3.3113E-4 uL×15
    • 18: (0.56, 0.56) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 19: (0.4, 0.4) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 20: (0.24, 0.26) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 21: (0.3, 0) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 22: (0.5, 0) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 23: (1, 0.15) 3.3113E-4 uL×7
    • 24: (0.8, 0) 3.3113E-4 uL×15
    • 25: (1, −0.15) 3.3113E-4 uL×7
    • 26: (0.95, −0.65) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 27: (0.95, −0.95) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 28: (0.65, −0.95) 3.3113E-4 uL×10
    • 29: (0.73, −0.73) 3.3113E-4 uL×15
    • 30: (0.56, −0.56) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 31: (0.4, −0.4) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 32: (0.24, −0.26) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 33: (0, −0.32) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 34: (0, −0.52) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 35: (0.15, −1) 3.3113E-4 uL×7
    • 36: (0, −0.8) 3.3113E-4 uL×15
    • 37: (−0.15, −1) 3.3113E-4 uL×7
    • 38: (−0.24, −0.26) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 39: (−0.4, −0.4) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 40: (−0.56, −0.56) 3.3113E-4 uL×19
    • 41: (−0.73, −0.73) 3.3113E-4 uL×15
    • 42: (−0.65, −0.95) 3.3113E-4 uL×10
    • 43: (−0.95, −0.95) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 44: (−0.95, −0.65) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
    • 45: (−1, −0.15) 3.3113E-4 uL×7
    • 46: (−0.8, 0) 3.3113E-4 uL×20
    • 47: (−1, 0.15) 3.3113E-4 uL×7
    • 48: (−0.5, 0) 3.3113E-4 uL×13
    • 49: (−0.3, 0) 3.3113E-4 uL×6
  • [0078]
    To that end, to compensate for variations among thicknesses t2 of sub-portions 34 b, the following may be employed:
      • 1. Use function g(x,y) to calculate drop pattern offset represented as a vector S:
        S−Agrad(g(x,y))i−Bgrad(g(x,y))j,
      •  where i and j are the unit vectors along X and Y axes. A, B are the proportionality coefficients that need to be determined experimentally, for instance, using a blank mesa template. Imprint new field and measure g(x,y) again. Verify that the slope in X and Y is near zero.
      • 2. After gradient of function g(x,y) is minimized, individual drop volumes are addressed. Multiply the drop pattern matrix M(x,y) by function w′(x,y), where:
        w′(x,y)=w(x,y)/(max(w(x,y))−min(w(x,y)))
      • So new drop pattern M′(x,y) will be:
        M′(x,y)=M(x,y)*w′(x,y)
      • 3. Verify that the new imprint has uniform thickness by measuring the slope of g(x,y) and minimizing function w(x,y).
  • [0084]
    A process for obtaining a uniform residual layer thickness (RLT) is illustrated in FIGS. 7A-7D and 8. In step 801, the imprint tool is calibrated to determine how much fluid to dispense to make an imprint with a desired thickness. In step 802, a uniform distribution of fluid is deposited on the substrate as illustrated in FIG. 7A. An imprint is performed. Evaporation and other non-uniformities may cause the RLT to be non-uniform. In step 803, RLT uniformity is measured across a dense array of points in the imprinted field using the film thickness measurement tool 60. In step 804, if a desired uniformity is achieved, then the process may end in step 805. If not (see FIG. 7B), then the process proceeds to step 806, where one of the above algorithms is employed, such as in software running in processor 32, to calculate a new corrected drop pattern, which will add drops, or increase drop size, to thin areas and/or remove drops, or decrease drop size, from thick areas to achieve improved RLT uniformity. The process then returns to step 802 to make a new imprint using the corrected drop pattern (see FIG. 7C), and steps 803 and 804 are performed again. This process may be repeated as needed until a desired uniformity RLT is achieved, as illustrated in FIG. 7D.
  • [0085]
    This above-mentioned method may be employed to obtain a desired volume of polymeric fluid 24 positioned upon substrate 12 to the volume of features (protrusions 17 and recesses 19) in mold 16. In a further embodiment, the above-mentioned method may be employed to compensate for evaporation in the plurality of droplets of polymeric material 24 after positioning the same upon substrate 12 and prior to contact with mold 16. In both cases, matching a volume of polymeric material 24 upon substrate 12 to the volume of features in mold 16 result in improved residual layer uniformity, i.e., variations among thicknesses t2 of sub-portions 34 b. This improved residual layer uniformity enables better control of feature CDs across imprinted and etched wafers. Furthermore, the above-mentioned may also minimize, if not reduce, and impact of faceting during a breakthrough etch of the residual layer.
  • [0086]
    The embodiments of the present invention described above are exemplary. Many changes and modifications may be made to the disclosure recited above, while remaining within the scope of the invention. Therefore, the scope of the invention should not be limited by the above description, but instead should be determined with reference to the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US1236304 *Feb 3, 1917Aug 7, 1917Riley L HowellCushioned hand-stamp.
US3503538 *Nov 9, 1967Mar 31, 1970Bp Chem Int LtdMetering process and apparatus
US4512848 *Feb 6, 1984Apr 23, 1985Exxon Research And Engineering Co.Procedure for fabrication of microstructures over large areas using physical replication
US4731155 *Apr 15, 1987Mar 15, 1988General Electric CompanyProcess for forming a lithographic mask
US4848911 *Jun 11, 1987Jul 18, 1989Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod for aligning first and second objects, relative to each other, and apparatus for practicing this method
US4936465 *Sep 15, 1989Jun 26, 1990Zoeld TiborMethod and apparatus for fast, reliable, and environmentally safe dispensing of fluids, gases and individual particles of a suspension through pressure control at well defined parts of a closed flow-through system
US4959252 *Oct 10, 1989Sep 25, 1990Rhone-Poulenc ChimieHighly oriented thermotropic optical disc member
US5028366 *Jan 12, 1988Jul 2, 1991Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.Water based mold release compositions for making molded polyurethane foam
US5094533 *Feb 21, 1991Mar 10, 1992Fujitsu LimitedOptoelectrical particle detection apparatus
US5110514 *May 1, 1989May 5, 1992Soane Technologies, Inc.Controlled casting of a shrinkable material
US5148037 *Mar 26, 1991Sep 15, 1992Canon Kabushiki KaishaPosition detecting method and apparatus
US5151754 *Oct 5, 1990Sep 29, 1992Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod and an apparatus for measuring a displacement between two objects and a method and an apparatus for measuring a gap distance between two objects
US5179863 *Mar 5, 1991Jan 19, 1993Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMethod and apparatus for setting the gap distance between a mask and a wafer at a predetermined distance
US5240550 *Sep 10, 1991Aug 31, 1993U.S. Philips Corp.Method of forming at least one groove in a substrate layer
US5392123 *Feb 22, 1994Feb 21, 1995Eastman Kodak CompanyOptical monitor for measuring a gap between two rollers
US5425848 *Mar 15, 1994Jun 20, 1995U.S. Philips CorporationMethod of providing a patterned relief of cured photoresist on a flat substrate surface and device for carrying out such a method
US5445195 *Jul 15, 1992Aug 29, 1995Kim; Dae S.Automatic computer-controlled liquid dispenser
US5480047 *May 12, 1994Jan 2, 1996Sharp Kabushiki KaishaMethod for forming a fine resist pattern
US5512131 *Oct 4, 1993Apr 30, 1996President And Fellows Of Harvard CollegeFormation of microstamped patterns on surfaces and derivative articles
US5542605 *Apr 7, 1994Aug 6, 1996Flow-Rite Controls, Ltd.Automatic liquid dispenser
US5545367 *May 27, 1993Aug 13, 1996Soane Technologies, Inc.Rapid prototype three dimensional stereolithography
US5601641 *Dec 15, 1995Feb 11, 1997Tse Industries, Inc.Mold release composition with polybutadiene and method of coating a mold core
US5723176 *Jul 8, 1996Mar 3, 1998Telecommunications Research LaboratoriesMethod and apparatus for making optical components by direct dispensing of curable liquid
US5772905 *Nov 15, 1995Jun 30, 1998Regents Of The University Of MinnesotaNanoimprint lithography
US5776748 *Jun 6, 1996Jul 7, 1998President And Fellows Of Harvard CollegeMethod of formation of microstamped patterns on plates for adhesion of cells and other biological materials, devices and uses therefor
US5858580 *Sep 17, 1997Jan 12, 1999Numerical Technologies, Inc.Phase shifting circuit manufacture method and apparatus
US5888650 *Jun 3, 1996Mar 30, 1999Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing CompanyTemperature-responsive adhesive article
US6027595 *Jul 2, 1998Feb 22, 2000Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Method of making optical replicas by stamping in photoresist and replicas formed thereby
US6046056 *Dec 6, 1996Apr 4, 2000Caliper Technologies CorporationHigh throughput screening assay systems in microscale fluidic devices
US6048623 *Dec 18, 1996Apr 11, 2000Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc.Method of contact printing on gold coated films
US6074827 *Feb 5, 1998Jun 13, 2000Aclara Biosciences, Inc.Microfluidic method for nucleic acid purification and processing
US6089853 *Dec 24, 1997Jul 18, 2000International Business Machines CorporationPatterning device for patterning a substrate with patterning cavities fed by service cavities
US6218316 *Oct 22, 1998Apr 17, 2001Micron Technology, Inc.Planarization of non-planar surfaces in device fabrication
US6274294 *Feb 3, 1999Aug 14, 2001Electroformed Stents, Inc.Cylindrical photolithography exposure process and apparatus
US6279474 *Oct 13, 1999Aug 28, 2001Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AgMethod and device for transferring ink in a printing unit of an offset printing press
US6334960 *Mar 11, 1999Jan 1, 2002Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemStep and flash imprint lithography
US6348999 *May 8, 1996Feb 19, 2002Epigem LimitedMicro relief element and preparation thereof
US6355198 *Jan 8, 1998Mar 12, 2002President And Fellows Of Harvard CollegeMethod of forming articles including waveguides via capillary micromolding and microtransfer molding
US6387330 *Apr 12, 2000May 14, 2002George Steven BovaMethod and apparatus for storing and dispensing reagents
US6391217 *Dec 22, 2000May 21, 2002University Of MassachusettsMethods and apparatus for forming submicron patterns on films
US6411010 *May 11, 2000Jun 25, 2002Seiko Instruments Inc.Piezoelectric actuator
US6517977 *Mar 28, 2001Feb 11, 2003Motorola, Inc.Lithographic template and method of formation and use
US6517995 *Mar 14, 2000Feb 11, 2003Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyFabrication of finely featured devices by liquid embossing
US6518189 *Oct 29, 1999Feb 11, 2003Regents Of The University Of MinnesotaMethod and apparatus for high density nanostructures
US6580172 *Mar 21, 2002Jun 17, 2003Motorola, Inc.Lithographic template and method of formation and use
US6678038 *Aug 3, 2001Jan 13, 2004Nikon CorporationApparatus and methods for detecting tool-induced shift in microlithography apparatus
US6696220 *Oct 12, 2001Feb 24, 2004Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemTemplate for room temperature, low pressure micro-and nano-imprint lithography
US6713238 *Oct 8, 1999Mar 30, 2004Stephen Y. ChouMicroscale patterning and articles formed thereby
US6776094 *Oct 1, 1998Aug 17, 2004President & Fellows Of Harvard CollegeKit For Microcontact Printing
US6846360 *Jan 13, 2003Jan 25, 2005Aptos CorporationApparatus and method for bubble-free application of a resin to a substrate
US6849558 *Sep 17, 2002Feb 1, 2005The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityReplication and transfer of microstructures and nanostructures
US6855293 *Mar 22, 2000Feb 15, 2005Hahn-Schickard-Gesellschaft Fuer Angewandte Forschung E.V.Fluids manipulation device with format conversion
US6870584 *Jul 1, 2002Mar 22, 2005Seiko Epson CorporationColor filter substrate, method for manufacturing color filter substrate, liquid crystal display device, electro-optical device, method for manufacturing electro-optical device, and electronic apparatus
US6873087 *Oct 27, 2000Mar 29, 2005Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemHigh precision orientation alignment and gap control stages for imprint lithography processes
US6879162 *Oct 31, 2002Apr 12, 2005Sri InternationalSystem and method of micro-fluidic handling and dispensing using micro-nozzle structures
US6900881 *Jul 11, 2002May 31, 2005Molecular Imprints, Inc.Step and repeat imprint lithography systems
US6908861 *Jul 11, 2002Jun 21, 2005Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method for imprint lithography using an electric field
US6916584 *Aug 1, 2002Jul 12, 2005Molecular Imprints, Inc.Alignment methods for imprint lithography
US6916585 *May 27, 2003Jul 12, 2005Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemsMethod of varying template dimensions to achieve alignment during imprint lithography
US6921615 *Jul 16, 2001Jul 26, 2005Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemHigh-resolution overlay alignment methods for imprint lithography
US6932934 *Jul 11, 2002Aug 23, 2005Molecular Imprints, Inc.Formation of discontinuous films during an imprint lithography process
US6936194 *Sep 5, 2002Aug 30, 2005Molecular Imprints, Inc.Functional patterning material for imprint lithography processes
US7019835 *Feb 19, 2004Mar 28, 2006Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method and system to measure characteristics of a film disposed on a substrate
US7027156 *Aug 1, 2002Apr 11, 2006Molecular Imprints, Inc.Scatterometry alignment for imprint lithography
US7060402 *Feb 27, 2004Jun 13, 2006Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemMethod of orientating a template with respect to a substrate in response to a force exerted on the template
US7077992 *Jul 11, 2002Jul 18, 2006Molecular Imprints, Inc.Step and repeat imprint lithography processes
US7360851 *Feb 15, 2006Apr 22, 2008Kla-Tencor Technologies CorporationAutomated pattern recognition of imprint technology
US20020042027 *Sep 24, 2001Apr 11, 2002Chou Stephen Y.Microscale patterning and articles formed thereby
US20020094496 *Feb 12, 2002Jul 18, 2002Choi Byung J.Method and system of automatic fluid dispensing for imprint lithography processes
US20030025895 *Aug 3, 2001Feb 6, 2003Michael BinnardApparatus and methods for detecting tool-induced shift in microlithography apparatus
US20030034329 *Sep 16, 2002Feb 20, 2003Chou Stephen Y.Lithographic method for molding pattern with nanoscale depth
US20030062334 *Sep 28, 2001Apr 3, 2003Lee Hong HieMethod for forming a micro-pattern on a substrate by using capillary force
US20030080471 *Sep 16, 2002May 1, 2003Chou Stephen Y.Lithographic method for molding pattern with nanoscale features
US20030080472 *Sep 16, 2002May 1, 2003Chou Stephen Y.Lithographic method with bonded release layer for molding small patterns
US20030081193 *Jun 3, 2002May 1, 2003White Donald L.Holder, system, and process for improving overlay in lithography
US20030137494 *May 1, 2000Jul 24, 2003Tulbert David J.Human-machine interface
US20040021866 *Aug 1, 2002Feb 5, 2004Watts Michael P.C.Scatterometry alignment for imprint lithography
US20040029041 *Feb 24, 2003Feb 12, 2004Brewer Science, Inc.Novel planarization method for multi-layer lithography processing
US20040036201 *May 27, 2003Feb 26, 2004Princeton UniversityMethods and apparatus of field-induced pressure imprint lithography
US20040046288 *Mar 17, 2003Mar 11, 2004Chou Stephen Y.Laset assisted direct imprint lithography
US20040058067 *Sep 19, 2002Mar 25, 2004Law Kam S.Method and apparatus for metallization of large area substrates
US20040065976 *Oct 4, 2002Apr 8, 2004Sreenivasan Sidlgata V.Method and a mold to arrange features on a substrate to replicate features having minimal dimensional variability
US20040110856 *Dec 4, 2002Jun 10, 2004Young Jung GunPolymer solution for nanoimprint lithography to reduce imprint temperature and pressure
US20040118809 *Dec 9, 2003Jun 24, 2004Chou Stephen Y.Microscale patterning and articles formed thereby
US20040131718 *Aug 8, 2003Jul 8, 2004Princeton UniversityLithographic apparatus for fluid pressure imprint lithography
US20040137734 *Nov 12, 2003Jul 15, 2004Princeton UniversityCompositions and processes for nanoimprinting
US20050037143 *Jun 9, 2004Feb 17, 2005Chou Stephen Y.Imprint lithography with improved monitoring and control and apparatus therefor
US20050106321 *Nov 14, 2003May 19, 2005Molecular Imprints, Inc.Dispense geometery to achieve high-speed filling and throughput
US20050145119 *Aug 25, 2004Jul 7, 2005Hua TanApparatus for fluid pressure imprint lithography
US20050156353 *Jan 15, 2004Jul 21, 2005Watts Michael P.Method to improve the flow rate of imprinting material
US20050156357 *Dec 30, 2004Jul 21, 2005Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemPlanarization method of patterning a substrate
US20050160011 *Jan 20, 2004Jul 21, 2005Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method for concurrently employing differing materials to form a layer on a substrate
US20050170670 *Nov 17, 2004Aug 4, 2005King William P.Patterning of sacrificial materials
US20050176242 *Jul 22, 2003Aug 11, 2005Seiko Epson CorporationPatterning method
US20060062867 *May 11, 2005Mar 23, 2006Molecular Imprints, Inc.Formation of discontinuous films during an imprint lithography process
US20060076717 *May 11, 2005Apr 13, 2006Molecular Imprints, Inc.Step and repeat imprint lithography processes
US20060077374 *May 11, 2005Apr 13, 2006Molecular Imprints, Inc.Step and repeat imprint lithography systems
US20060121728 *Apr 7, 2005Jun 8, 2006Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method for fast filling of templates for imprint lithography using on template dispense
US20060125154 *Feb 3, 2006Jun 15, 2006Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method to improve the flow rate of imprinting material employing an absorption layer
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7670529Nov 30, 2006Mar 2, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method and system for double-sided patterning of substrates
US7670530Jan 19, 2007Mar 2, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Patterning substrates employing multiple chucks
US7691313Nov 30, 2006Apr 6, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method for expelling gas positioned between a substrate and a mold
US7708926Feb 5, 2008May 4, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Capillary imprinting technique
US7854867Apr 19, 2007Dec 21, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method for detecting a particle in a nanoimprint lithography system
US7856288 *Sep 25, 2008Dec 21, 2010Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaImprint system and imprint method
US7981481Dec 8, 2006Jul 19, 2011Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method for controlling distribution of fluid components on a body
US8019462Nov 12, 2010Sep 13, 2011Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaImprint system and imprint method
US8119052 *Oct 31, 2008Feb 21, 2012Molecular Imprints, Inc.Drop pattern generation for imprint lithography
US8142850Mar 28, 2007Mar 27, 2012Molecular Imprints, Inc.Patterning a plurality of fields on a substrate to compensate for differing evaporation times
US8211214Feb 5, 2008Jul 3, 2012Molecular Imprints, Inc.Single phase fluid imprint lithography method
US8215946Oct 20, 2009Jul 10, 2012Molecular Imprints, Inc.Imprint lithography system and method
US8361371Feb 6, 2009Jan 29, 2013Molecular Imprints, Inc.Extrusion reduction in imprint lithography
US8394282 *Jun 5, 2009Mar 12, 2013Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas SystemAdaptive nanotopography sculpting
US8512797Oct 16, 2009Aug 20, 2013Molecular Imprints, Inc.Drop pattern generation with edge weighting
US8586126Oct 15, 2009Nov 19, 2013Molecular Imprints, Inc.Robust optimization to generate drop patterns in imprint lithography which are tolerant of variations in drop volume and drop placement
US8679357Mar 21, 2013Mar 25, 2014Fujifilm CorporationNanoimprinting method and method for producing substrates utilizing the nanoimprinting method
US8826847Sep 15, 2011Sep 9, 2014Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaImprinting apparatus, imprinting method, and manufacturing method of uneven plate
US9023432Mar 20, 2012May 5, 2015Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaResist material for imprinting, pattern formation method, and imprinting apparatus
US9046763Mar 18, 2010Jun 2, 2015Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaPattern forming method
US9216539Aug 14, 2014Dec 22, 2015Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaImprinting apparatus, imprinting method, and manufacturing method of uneven plate
US9381540Apr 27, 2015Jul 5, 2016Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaPattern forming method
US20070231981 *Mar 28, 2007Oct 4, 2007Molecular Imprints, Inc.Patterning a Plurality of Fields on a Substrate to Compensate for Differing Evaporation Times
US20070246850 *Apr 19, 2007Oct 25, 2007Molecular Imprints, Inc.Method for Detecting a Particle in a Nanoimprint Lithography System
US20080174046 *Feb 5, 2008Jul 24, 2008Molecular Imprints Inc.Capillary Imprinting Technique
US20090014917 *Jul 9, 2008Jan 15, 2009Molecular Imprints, Inc.Drop Pattern Generation for Imprint Lithography
US20090115110 *Oct 31, 2008May 7, 2009Molecular Imprints, Inc.Drop Pattern Generation for Imprint Lithography
US20090148619 *Dec 4, 2008Jun 11, 2009Molecular Imprints, Inc.Controlling Thickness of Residual Layer
US20090200710 *Feb 6, 2009Aug 13, 2009Molecular Imprints, Inc.Extrusion reduction in imprint lithography
US20090267268 *Sep 25, 2008Oct 29, 2009Ikuo YonedaImprint system and imprint method
US20100012622 *Jun 5, 2009Jan 21, 2010Board Of Regents, The University Of TexasAdaptive Nanotopography Sculpting
US20100072667 *Sep 22, 2009Mar 25, 2010Canon Kabushiki KaishaImprinting method
US20100098859 *Oct 16, 2009Apr 22, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Drop Pattern Generation with Edge Weighting
US20100101493 *Oct 26, 2009Apr 29, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Dispense System
US20100104747 *Oct 15, 2009Apr 29, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Drop Deposition Control
US20100112220 *Oct 29, 2009May 6, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Dispense system set-up and characterization
US20100237045 *Mar 18, 2010Sep 23, 2010Takeshi KoshibaPattern forming method
US20100264560 *Dec 19, 2007Oct 21, 2010Zhuqing ZhangImprint lithography apparatus and method
US20110066273 *Nov 12, 2010Mar 17, 2011Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaImprint system and imprint method
US20130020281 *Mar 30, 2011Jan 24, 2013Fujifilm CorporationNanoimprinting method, method for producing a droplet arrangement pattern, and method for fabricating substrates
US20150116687 *May 23, 2014Apr 30, 2015Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaMicroprocessing system, microprocessing apparatus, and microprocessing method
US20150234287 *Jun 16, 2014Aug 20, 2015Kabushiki Kaisha ToshibaResist placing method and resist placing program
WO2009075793A3 *Dec 5, 2008Oct 7, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Controlling thickness of residual layer
WO2010047758A1 *Oct 19, 2009Apr 29, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Robust optimization to generate drop patterns in imprint lithography
WO2010047766A1 *Oct 20, 2009Apr 29, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Drop pattern generation with edge weighting
WO2010062328A2 *Oct 27, 2009Jun 3, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Dispense system
WO2010062328A3 *Oct 27, 2009Sep 23, 2010Molecular Imprints, Inc.Dispense system
WO2012039517A1Sep 22, 2011Mar 29, 2012Fujifilm CorporationNanoimprinting method and method for producing substrates utilizing the nanoimprinting method
Classifications
U.S. Classification264/40.4, 425/385, 264/319, 425/141, 425/375
International ClassificationB29C43/02
Cooperative ClassificationB29C43/021, B29C43/58, B29C2043/5891, B29C2043/025, G03F7/0002, B82Y40/00, B29C43/003, B82Y10/00, B29C2043/5825
European ClassificationB29C43/00B, B82Y10/00, B82Y40/00, B29C43/02B, B29C43/58, G03F7/00A
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jun 12, 2007ASAssignment
Owner name: MOLECULAR IMPRINTS, INC., TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:JONES, CHRISTOPHER E., MR.;KHUSNATDINOV, NIYAZ, MR.;JOHNSON, STEPHEN C., MR.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:019413/0766;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070418 TO 20070611