US20070275370A1 - Method for detecting concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells - Google Patents

Method for detecting concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070275370A1
US20070275370A1 US11/626,326 US62632607A US2007275370A1 US 20070275370 A1 US20070275370 A1 US 20070275370A1 US 62632607 A US62632607 A US 62632607A US 2007275370 A1 US2007275370 A1 US 2007275370A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
bacteriophage
target
target bacterium
present
liquid solution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/626,326
Other versions
US7972773B2 (en
Inventor
Angelo Madonna
Kent Voorhees
Jon Rees
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Colorado School of Mines
Original Assignee
Colorado School of Mines
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Colorado School of Mines filed Critical Colorado School of Mines
Priority to US11/626,326 priority Critical patent/US7972773B2/en
Assigned to COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES reassignment COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: REES, JON C., VOORHEES, KENT J., MADONNA, ANGELO J.
Publication of US20070275370A1 publication Critical patent/US20070275370A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7972773B2 publication Critical patent/US7972773B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12QMEASURING OR TESTING PROCESSES INVOLVING ENZYMES, NUCLEIC ACIDS OR MICROORGANISMS; COMPOSITIONS OR TEST PAPERS THEREFOR; PROCESSES OF PREPARING SUCH COMPOSITIONS; CONDITION-RESPONSIVE CONTROL IN MICROBIOLOGICAL OR ENZYMOLOGICAL PROCESSES
    • C12Q1/00Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions
    • C12Q1/02Measuring or testing processes involving enzymes, nucleic acids or microorganisms; Compositions therefor; Processes of preparing such compositions involving viable microorganisms
    • C12Q1/04Determining presence or kind of microorganism; Use of selective media for testing antibiotics or bacteriocides; Compositions containing a chemical indicator therefor
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/543Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor with an insoluble carrier for immobilising immunochemicals
    • G01N33/54313Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor with an insoluble carrier for immobilising immunochemicals the carrier being characterised by its particulate form
    • G01N33/54326Magnetic particles
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by groups G01N1/00 - G01N31/00
    • G01N33/48Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor
    • G01N33/569Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay; Materials therefor for microorganisms, e.g. protozoa, bacteria, viruses
    • G01N33/56911Bacteria

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium in a liquid mixture that uses bacteriophages to infect target bacterial cells.
  • Standard microbiological methods have relied on substrate-based assays to test for the presence of specific organisms (Bordner, et al. 1978). These techniques offer very high levels of selectivity but are hindered by the requirement to first grow or cultivate pure cultures of the targeted organism, which can take 24 hours or longer. This time constraint severely limits the effectiveness to provide a rapid response to the presence of virulent strains of microorganisms.
  • immunomagnetic separation involves immobilizing antibodies to spherical, micro-sized paramagnetic beads and using the antibody-coated beads to trap targeted microorganisms from liquid media.
  • the beads are easily manipulated under the influence of a magnetic field facilitating the retrieval and concentration of targeted organisms.
  • the small size and shape of the beads allow them to become evenly dispersed in the sample, accelerating the rate of interaction between bead and target.
  • Downstream detection methods previously used with IMS include ELISA (Cudjoe, et al. 1995), dot blot assay (Skjerve et al. 1990), electrochemiluminescence (Yu and Bruno 1996), and flow cytometry (Pyle, et al. 1999). Although these tests provide satisfactory results, they are laborious to perform and give binary responses (yes/no) that are highly susceptible to false-positive results due to cross-reactivity with non-target analytes. Recently reported is a rapid method for identifying specific bacteria from complex biological mixtures using IMS coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS)(Madonna et al. 2001).
  • MALDI matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization
  • TOF time-of-flight
  • MALDI-TOF-MS is a proven technique for identifying whole cellular microorganisms (Holland et al (1996); van Barr 2000; Madonna et al. 2000).
  • MALDI is a ‘fingerprinting’ technique where mass spectra featuring varying distributions of protein signals are generated.
  • the MALDI-TOF technique coupled with IMS includes, in one embodiment, mixing immunomagnetic beads specific to the target bacteria with the liquid mixture that may contain the target bacteria for a short incubation period (e.g., 20 min).
  • Any target bacteria captured by the beads are washed twice, re-suspended in deionized H 2 O, and directly applied onto a MALDI sample probe.
  • the target bacteria-bead complex is then overlaid with a micro-volume of matrix solution and dried at room temperature. Irradiation of the resulting crystalline mass with a high intensity laser promotes the liberation and ionization of intact cellular proteins that are subsequently detected by a TOF mass spectrometer.
  • the resulting mass spectrum is then interrogated for definitive mass peaks that signify the presence of the target bacteria.
  • the invention is directed to a method for determining if a target bacterium is present in a liquid solution when the target bacterium is or may be present in a low concentration that is at or near the detection limit for a particular detection technology.
  • target bacterium refers to a specie of species of bacteria.
  • the invention is applicable to situations in which it is desirable to determine whether a target bacterium (e.g., E. coli ) is present in a liquid solution when the number of target bacterium per unit volume of solution (i.e., the concentration of the target bacterium) is or may be below the detection limit for a particular detection technology.
  • a plurality of target bacterium may be referred to as the target bacteria.
  • the process comprises using a biological amplification procedure in which bacteriophages for the target bacterium are applied to the liquid solution.
  • Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria and in the process produce many progeny. Structurally, the bacteriophage consists of a protein shell (capsid) that encapsulates the viral nucleic acid. The capsid is constructed from repeating copies of the same protein. Bacteriophages are able to infect specific bacterial cells and because of the multiplication of the genetic material, the cells eventually burst releasing millions of copies of the original phage.) The bacteriophages and any of the target bacterium present in the liquid solution are allowed to incubate.
  • the bacteriophages will multiply by infecting target bacterium present in the solution. More specifically, the bacteriophage replicates numerous copies of itself in an infected target bacterium. Eventually, the infected target bacterium lyses and the replicated or progeny bacteriophages are released into the liquid solution. The solution is then analyzed to determine if a biomarker for the bacteriophage is present, thereby indirectly indicating that the target bacterium is present in the liquid solution.
  • Possible analysis techniques comprise mass spectrometry techniques, such as MALDI-MS and electro-spray ionization-MS techniques.
  • a concentration of the bacteriophage is applied to the liquid solution that is below the detection limit for the biomarker for the bacteriophage for whatever analysis technique is employed. This assures that if the biomarker for the bacteriophage is detected by the analysis technique, the detectable concentration of the biomarker is attributable to the replication of the bacteriophage by the target bacterium present in the liquid solution.
  • MOI multiplicity of infection
  • Another embodiment of the process addresses this problem by adding a very high concentration of the bacteriophage to the liquid solution, thereby assuring a high MOI.
  • the concentration of the bacteriophage added to the solution may exceed the detection limit of whatever analysis technique is employed to detect the bacteriophage or biomarker of the bacteriophage. Consequently, the process applies parent bacteriophage to the solution that can distinguished from any progeny bacteriophage resulting from the infection of target bacterium in the mixture. If the distinguishable progency bacteriophage or a distinguishable biomarker of the progeny bacteriophage are present, this indicates that the target bacterium is present in the solution
  • the parent bacteriophage i.e., the bacteriophage initially applied to the solution
  • the parent bacteriophage are “tagged” so that whatever analysis technique is employed is inherently capable of distinguishing the parent bacteriophage or parent bacteriophage biomarkers from the progeny bacteriophage or biomarkers for the progency bacteriophage.
  • the parent bacteriophage are “tagged” with a substance that alters or shifts the mass spectrum of the parent bacteriophage relative to the progeny bacteriophage, which will not inherit the “tag” from the parent bacteriophage.
  • a biotinylated bacteriophage can be employed as a parent bacteriophage and will have a different mass spectrum than the progeny bacteriophage produced by the biotinylated bacteriophage infecting target bacterium present in the solution.
  • Other “tags” can be employed for other types of analytical techniques.
  • the parent bacteriophage possesses a characteristic that allows the parent bacteriophage to be separated from the progeny bacteriophage in the liquid solution prior to analysis, thereby assuring that most, if not all of the bacteriophages present in the liquid solution after separation are progeny bacteriophage resulting from the replication of the parent bacteriophage by target bacteria present in the liquid solution.
  • the parent bacteriophages initially applied to the liquid solution are biotinylated bacteriophages. Biotinylated bacteriophages are highly attracted to strepavidin. This attraction is exploited to separate the biotinylated bacteriophage from progeny bacteriophage resulting from replication of the biotinylated bacteriophage by target bacterium present in the mixture.
  • the biotinylated bacteriophage are attached to a strepavidin coated probe. Consequently, separation of the biotinylated bacteriophage from the liquid solution after the incubation period is accomplished by removing the probe from the liquid solution.
  • strepavidin-coated magnetic beads are applied to the liquid solution. The beads are used to pick up the biotinylated bacteriophage. The beads are then separated from the liquid solution using a magnet.
  • a strepavidin coated probe e.g., a slide
  • the biotinylated bacteriophage adhere to the probe and then the probe is separated from the liquid solution.
  • the liquid solution in which the target bacterium may be present is or may be a complex mixture that includes biological material that makes the detection of the bacteriophage or biomarker for the bacteriophage more difficult or reduces the reliability of the information provided by the detection technology employed.
  • the complex mixture may produce a signal in which the biomarker associated with the bacteriophage is obscured or, stated differently, has a low signal-to-noise ratio.
  • the liquid solution is subject to a purification step in which target bacterium that are present in the liquid solution are separated from the remainder of the solution.
  • immuno-magnetic separation is utilized to separate target bacterium present in the liquid solution from the remainder of the solution.
  • magnetic beads are coated with an antibody for the target bacterium. The antibodies pick up the target bacterium present in the liquid mixture and then a magnet is used to separate the beads from the remainder of the liquid solution. The beads and any adhering target bacterium are then subjected to the biological amplification process and analysis. It should be appreciated this purification step also addresses the possibility that feral versions of the bacteriophage may be present in the liquid solution and that such versions could produce a false positive if the liquid solution was not subjected to a purification step.
  • the purification step can be implemented after the biological amplification process.
  • the purification step involves separating the bacteriophages and the liquid solution, rather than separating the target bacterium and the liquid solution.
  • an IMS is used in which magnetic beads are coated with an antibody for the bacteriophage. The beads pick up the bacteriophages present in the solution and then a magnet is used to separate the beads from the remainder of the solution.
  • the analysis step comprises using MS/MS analysis to determine if a biomarker for the target bacterium is present.
  • MS/MS analysis produces a highly reliable indication of the presence of a biomarker for a target bacterium. As a consequence, at least in some cases, the use of MS/MS analysis renders the need for a purification step unnecessary.
  • the invention is directed to a process for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium in complex mixtures.
  • the process comprises using an IMS procedure to isolate at least some of a target bacterium that may be present in a liquid mixture.
  • the process further includes employing a biological amplification procedure in which a low titer or concentration of bacteriophages for the target bacterium are applied to at least some of the target bacterium that has been isolated by the IMS procedure.
  • the mixture of bacteriophages and any of the target bacterium that has been isolated is allowed to incubate.
  • the bacteriophages will multiply during the incubation period such that a high titer or concentration of bacteriophages will be present in the mixture and detectable by MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. If no or only a small number of the target bacterium is present, there will be a low concentration of bacteriophages present in the mixture that will not be reasonably detectable by MALDI-TOF-MS analysis.
  • a MALDI-TOF-MS analysis is performed on the incubated mixture of bacteriophages and target bacterium. The resulting mass spectrum is analyzed to determine if a protein that is associated with the bacteriophages is present. If the protein for the bacteriophage is detected, then it can be concluded that at least a low concentration of the target bacterium is present in the mixture.
  • the method of the invention is capable of detecting low concentration of a target bacterium regardless of the manner in which the bacterium was grown or propogated.
  • FIG. 1 depicts, for one embodiment of the invention, an immunomagnetic bead that is used to isolate the target microorganism (antibodies not drawn to scale);
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the immunomagnetic purfication step used to isolate a target antigen ( Escherichia coli ) in one embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the bacteriophage amplification step for one embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a typical MALDI-TOF mass spectrum obtained from a high titer sample of MS2 in PBS.
  • FIGS. 5A-5C illustrate how an embodiment of the invention was able detect a biomarker of the bacteriophage indicative of presence of E. coli for decreasing concentrations of E. coli.
  • the invention relates to the use of a bacteriophage to indirectly detect the presence of a target bacterium in a liquid solution where the concentration of the target bacterium is or is likely to be near or below the detection limit for the particular detection technology employed.
  • Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria and in the process of infecting the bacteria produce many progeny. Structurally, the bacteriophage consists of a protein shell (capsid) that encapsulates the viral nucleic acid. The capsid is constructed from repeating copies of the same protein(s). Bacteriophages are able to infect specific bacterial cells and because of the multiplication of the number of progeny, the cells eventually burst releasing millions of copies of the original phage. This infection process has been utilized to serve as a biomarker amplification step for detecting low concentrations of target bacterial cells. For example, the capsid of the MS2 bacteriophage contains 180 copies of a 13 kDa protein.
  • This particular virus specifically infects strains of Escherichia coli and is able to produce between 10,000 to 20,000 copies of itself within 40 min after attachment to the target bacterial cell. Essentially, one E. coli could be infected with MS2 resulting in the replication of the capsid protein(s) by a factor of 1.8 ⁇ 10 6 .
  • MALDI/TOF matrix assisted laser desorption ionization/mass spectrometry
  • the process for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium in a complex liquid mixture that contains or is likely to contain biological material other than the target bacterium comprises processing the mixture or a portion thereof to produce a liquid mixture, solution or sample for analysis that, if at least a certain concentration of the target bacterium is present in the mixture, a discernable signal or indication thereof is produced.
  • liquid solution and “liquid mixture” refer to the original solution or mixture that is the subject of the test and any liquid solutions or mixtures that, as a result of the application of the method, contain a portion of the orignial solution or mixture.
  • the process comprises making a determination if a low concentration of a target bacterium is present in the liquid solution. This determination can be made by assuming that any of the target bacterium that are present in the liquid solution are present in a low concentration. Alternatively, an assay can be performed to determine if the target bacterium is present in a concentration that reliably exceeds the detection limit of whatever detection technology is being utilized. For instance, a mass spectrometry technique can be utilized. If the mass spectrometry technique provides a reliable signal indicative of the presence of the target bacterium in the liquid solution, no further steps needs to be taken.
  • the mass spectrometry technique does not provide a reliable signal indicative of the presence of the target bacterium in the liquid solution, then it can be concluded that the target bacterium may be present in the liquid solution but in a concentration that below or near the detection limit of the mass spectrometry technique. In this case, further steps are taken to determine whether the target bacterium is present in the liquid solution in a concentration that is under the detection limit of the mass spectrometry technique.
  • the process involves a purification step that involves capturing the target bacterium that may be present in the mixture and separating any of the captured bacterium from other biological material that may be present in the mixture. By separating any of the captured target bacterium from other biological material that may be present in the mixture, the portion of the subsequently produced mass spectrum signal associated with other biological material present in the mixture is reduced.
  • an immumomagnetic separation (IMS) technique is used to capture and separate the target bacterium.
  • the process further comprises subjecting at least some of any of the captured and separated target bacterium to an amplification step in which the target bacterium are infected with a bacteriophage that is specific to the target bacterium. If there is at least a certain concentration of the target bacterium present, the bacteriophage will multiply to a point that a biomarker associated with the bacteriophage will be detectable using an analysis technique, such as MALDI/TOF-MS. In the case of MALDI/TOF-MS, a portion of the subsequently produced mass spectral signal indicative of the presence of the bacteriophage will be increased.
  • the bacteriophage will not multiply sufficiently to be detectable in the mass spectrum produced using MALDI/TOF-MS.
  • the purification and amplification steps serve to increase the signal-to-noise ratio for the portion of the subsequently produced mass spectrum that is associated with the bacteriophage.
  • At least a portion of the amplified mixture is subjected to analysis to determine if a biomarker for the target bacterium is present.
  • analysis can be used to produce a mass spectrum.
  • the mass spectrum is analyzed to determine if one or more biomarkers for the bacteriophage are present. If such biomarkers are present, this is an indirect indication that at least a certain concentration of the target bacterium was present in the originally sampled mixture.
  • the need for the purification step may not be necessary in situations in which the portion of the signal associated with other biological materials can be filtered, eliminated or otherwise ignored and/or in situations in which the amplification step has a gain such that the portion of the mass spectrum associated with the bacteriophage is likely to exceed any background signal associated with other biological materials and/or situations in which a false positive is considered to be remote.
  • one of the other biological materials that can make it difficult to determine if the biomarker for the bacteriophage is present is a wild version of the bacteriophage that is present in the liquid solution that is being tested.
  • the purification step addresses the presence of a wild bacteriophage.
  • the presence or possible presence of a wild bacteriophage in the solution or mixture being tested is not a concern, it is also possible to perform a purification step after the amplification step. However, in this case, the bacteriophage is separated from the remainder of the liquid solution.
  • the previously noted IMS technique can be employed. However, the magnetic bead is coated with an antibody for the bacteriophage, rather than an antibody for the target bacterium.
  • MS/MS highly specific analysis technique
  • the immunomagnetic separation (IMS) technique for capturing the target bacterium in a mixture and separating any captured target bacterium from other biological material in the mixture is described.
  • Microsize beads are constructed from an iron oxide core coated with a polymeric surface.
  • Secondary antibodies raised against the Fc region of the primary antibodies are covalently attached via a linker to the polymer surface.
  • the primary antibody (raised against a targeted microorganism) is attached to the beads by strong noncovalent interactions with the secondary antibody, which holds the primary antibody in the proper orientation for reaction with the targeted antigen.
  • the immunomagnetic beads are added to the bacterial or biological mixture that is the subject of the analysis and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature.
  • the beads are then isolated to the side of the reaction tube using a magnet. This process allows the extraneous (non-targeted) material to be removed by aspiration. At this stage, the beads can be washed several times prior to re-suspending them in PBS.
  • the bead-bacterial target complex is admixed with a low titer suspension of bacteriophage specific to the targeted bacterium.
  • the titer is held low so that the mass spectrometry signal from the virus is non-detectable.
  • the bacteriophage After a 40-minute incubation, the bacteriophage have completed a propagation cycle of attachment, insertion, self-assembly, and cell lysis resulting in the production of many progeny that are released into the reaction milieu.
  • the milieu is then analyzed to determine if a biomarker for the bacteriophage is present that indirectly indicates that the target bacterium was present.
  • the milieu can be analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS using a sandwich sample preparation technique with a ferulic acid matrix.
  • MALDI matrices known in the art are also feasible.
  • the resulting mass spectrum shows the presence of the bacteriophage capsid protein, which would not have been present if the target bacterium was not also present.
  • an embodiment of the method has been used to reduce the detection limit for E. coli to less than 5.0 ⁇ 10 4 cells mL ⁇ 1 .
  • the method used immunomagnetic beads coated with antibodies against E. coli , hereinafter referred to as the target-bead complex, to isolate the bacterium from solution.
  • the target-bead complex was then re-suspended in a solution containing MS2, a bacteriophage that is specific for E. coli .
  • the MS2 bacteriophage concentration was adjusted so that the ion signal from the capsid protein of the MS2 bacteriophage was below the detection limit of the mass spectrometer.
  • the E. coli bacteria were grown in trypticase soy broth (TSB) (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) with incubation at 37° C. using standard microbial methods.
  • TLB trypticase soy broth
  • a soft-agar/host covering was prepared by overlaying agar plates (trypticase soy agar, Difco) with a 2.5 mL of melted 0.5% agar (same medium), which contained two drops of a 20 hr host in TSB.
  • the soft-agar covering was allowed to harden before the addition of a 0.5 mL overlay of a concentrated suspension of MS2, prepared by re-hydrating freeze-dried MS2 in TSB.
  • the soft agar was scraped off the surface of the agar plates and centrifuged (1000 G) for 25 min to sediment the cellular debris and agar. The supernatant was conserved, passed through 0.22 ⁇ m Millipore filters, and stored by refrigeration at 4-8° C.
  • Rabbit anti- E. coli IgG antibodies (Cortex Biochem, San Leandro, Calif.) were attached to the immunomagnetic beads (MagaBeads, Goat anti-Rabbit IgG F(c), Cortex Biochem) using the manufacturer's suggested protocol.
  • Escherichia coli were isolated from aqueous suspensions by affinity capture using the immunomagnetic beads. Suspensions of bacteria were prepared in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes (Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, N.Y.) by combining 100 ⁇ L of broth media with 900 ⁇ L of phosphate buffer saline (PBS, 0.01 M Na 2 HPO 4 , 0.15M NaCl titrated to pH 7.35 with HCl). Cell concentrations were determined using a Petroff-Hauser counting chamber (Hauser Scientific, Horsham, Pa.).
  • PBS phosphate buffer saline
  • the immunomagnetic separation (IMS) procedure developed in this investigation involved the following steps: In the first step, a 30 ⁇ L aliquot of the immunomagnetic beads were added to the bacterial sample solution and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature with continuous shaking. The second step involved concentrating the beads to the side of the sample tube using a magnetic particle concentrator (Dynal, Lake Success, N.Y.) and removing the supernatant using a 1 mL pipette. In the third step, the magnet was removed and the beads were re-suspended in 1 mL of fresh PBS with vigorous shaking for 20 sec to wash away any nonspecifically adhering components. The bead suspension was then transferred to a new tube and steps 2 and 3 repeated one more time.
  • the beads were isolated with the magnet followed by decanting the buffer wash to waste and re-suspending the beads in 500 ⁇ L of deionized water. Subsequently, the bead- E. coli complexes were admixed with a low titer (below the detection limit of the mass spectrometer) of the MS2 bacteriophage and incubated at room temperature with gentle shaking for 40 minutes. An aliquot of the suspension was then removed and analyzed for the MS2 capsid protein using a sandwich sample preparation with a ferulic acid matrix (12.5 mg of ferulic acid in 1 mL of 17% formic acid: 33% acetonitrile: 50% deionized H 2 O).
  • a concentration of “parent” bacteriophage is applied to the liquid solution that is below the detection limit for the bacteriophage or biomarker for the bacteriophage for whatever analysis technique is employed. This assures that if the bacteriophage or the biomarker for the bacteriophage is detected by the analysis technique, the detectable concentration of the bacteriophage or biomarker is attributable to progeny bacteriophage, i.e., bacteriophage resulting from the replication of the bacteriophage by the target bacterium present in the liquid solution.
  • the use of such a concentration of “parent” bacteriophage has a multiplicity of infection (“MOI”) (i.e., the ratio of the number of parent bacteriophage to the number of target bacterium) that is too low to produce a sufficient concentration of bacteriophages or biomarkers for the bacteriophage for detection.
  • MOI multiplicity of infection
  • a sufficiently high concentration of “parent” bacteriophage is added to the liquid solution.
  • the concentration of the “parent” bacteriophage added to the solution may exceed the detection limit of whatever analysis technique is employed to detect the bacteriophage or biomarker of the bacteriophage. Consequently, analysis of a liquid solution treated in this manner could detect the “parent” bacteriophages that were added to the solution, rather than the progeny bacteriophage resulting from replication by the target bacteria.
  • another embodiment of the process applies a concentration of “parent” bacteriophage to the solution that is capable of being distinguished from any progeny bacteriophage.
  • the parent bacteriophage i.e., the bacteriophage initially applied to the solution
  • the parent bacteriophage are “tagged” so that whatever analysis technique is employed is inherently capable of distinguishing the parent bacteriophage or parent bacteriophage biomarkers from the progeny bacteriophage or biomarkers for the progency bacteriophage.
  • the parent bacteriophage are “tagged” with a substance that alters or shifts the mass spectrum of the parent bacteriophage relative to the progeny bacteriophage, which will not inherit the “tag” from the parent bacteriophage.
  • a biotinylated bacteriophage is employed as a parent bacteriophage and has a different mass spectrum than the progeny bacteriophage produced by the biotinylated bacteriophage infecting target bacterium present in the solution.
  • Other “tags” can be employed for other types of analytical techniques.
  • the parent bacteriophage possesses a characteristic that allows the parent bacteriophage to be separated from any of the progeny bacteriophage in the liquid solution prior to analysis, thereby assuring that most, if not all of the bacteriophage present in the liquid solution after separation are progeny bacteriophage resulting from the replication of the parent bacteriophage by target bacteria present in the liquid solution.
  • biotinylated bacteriophage are initially applied to the liquid solution. Biotinylated bacteriophage are highly attracted to strepavidin. Consequently, to separate the biotinylated bacteriophage from the liquid solution a strepavidin probe is utilized.
  • the biotinylated bacteriophage are attached to a strepavidin coated probe and the probe is placed in the liquid solution. In this case, separation of the biotinylated bacteriophage from the liquid solution after the incubation period is accomplished by removing the probe from the liquid solution.
  • strepavidin-coated magnetic beads are applied to the liquid solution. The biotinylated bacteriophages are attached to the strepavidin-coated magnetic beads prior to the application of the beads to the solution. Alternatively, the beads are used to pick up biotinylated bacteriophages that were previously added to the solution and then separated from the liquid solution using a magnet.
  • a strepavidin coated probe e.g., a slide
  • the biotinylated bacteriophages adhere to the probe and then the probe is separated from the liquid solution.
  • at least a portion of the solution is then subjected to analysis to determine if the bacteriophage or a biomarker for the bacteriophage is present, which indirectly indicates that the target bacteria was present in the solution.

Abstract

The invention is directed to a method for detecting low concentrations of bacteria in liquid solution that may or may not be complex liquid solutions. In one embodiment, immunomagnetic separation (IMS) is used to separate target bacterium that may be in a liquid mixture from other constituents in the mixture. A low concentration of a bacteriophage for the target bacteria is subsequently used to infect target bacterial cells that have been captured using the IMS technique. If at least a certain concentration of target bacterium are present, the bacteriophage will multiply to a point that is detectable. Matrix assisted laser desorption ionization/time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (MALDI/TOF-MS) is then used to produce a mass spectrum that is analyzed to determine if one or more proteins associated with the bacteriophage are present, thereby indirectly indicating that target bacterium were present in the liquid mixture.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/319,184, entitled “METHOD OF DETECTING LOW CONCENTRATIONS OF A TARGET BACTERIA THAT USES PHAGES TO INFECT TARGET BACTERIAL CELLS” and filed by Angelo J. Madonna and Kent J. Voorhees on Apr. 12, 2002, which application is incorporated by reference into this application in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium in a liquid mixture that uses bacteriophages to infect target bacterial cells.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Standard microbiological methods have relied on substrate-based assays to test for the presence of specific organisms (Bordner, et al. 1978). These techniques offer very high levels of selectivity but are hindered by the requirement to first grow or cultivate pure cultures of the targeted organism, which can take 24 hours or longer. This time constraint severely limits the effectiveness to provide a rapid response to the presence of virulent strains of microorganisms.
  • Molecular biology techniques are quickly gaining acceptance as valuable alternatives to standard microbiological tests. In particular, serological methods have been widely employed to evaluate a host of matrices for targeted microorganisms (Kingsbury & Falkow 1985; Wyatt et al. 1992). These tests focus on using antibodies to first trap and then separate targeted organisms from other constituents in complicated biological mixtures. Once isolated, the captured organism can be concentrated and detected by a variety of different techniques that do not require cultivating the biological analyte.
  • One very popular approach, termed immunomagnetic separation (IMS), involves immobilizing antibodies to spherical, micro-sized paramagnetic beads and using the antibody-coated beads to trap targeted microorganisms from liquid media. The beads are easily manipulated under the influence of a magnetic field facilitating the retrieval and concentration of targeted organisms. Moreover, the small size and shape of the beads allow them to become evenly dispersed in the sample, accelerating the rate of interaction between bead and target. These favorable characteristics lead to reductions in assay time and help streamline the analytical procedure making it more applicable for higher sample throughput and automation.
  • Downstream detection methods previously used with IMS include ELISA (Cudjoe, et al. 1995), dot blot assay (Skjerve et al. 1990), electrochemiluminescence (Yu and Bruno 1996), and flow cytometry (Pyle, et al. 1999). Although these tests provide satisfactory results, they are laborious to perform and give binary responses (yes/no) that are highly susceptible to false-positive results due to cross-reactivity with non-target analytes. Recently reported is a rapid method for identifying specific bacteria from complex biological mixtures using IMS coupled to matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) time-of-flight (TOF) mass spectrometry (MS)(Madonna et al. 2001). This approach allowed a variety of matrices to be evaluated for the presence of a Salmonella species within a total analysis time of 1 hour. Moreover, the developed procedure required little sample processing, was relatively easy to perform, and the molecular weight information obtained made it possible to discriminate between signals from the target bacteria and signals from cross-reacted constituents.
  • MALDI-TOF-MS is a proven technique for identifying whole cellular microorganisms (Holland et al (1996); van Barr 2000; Madonna et al. 2000). In principle, MALDI is a ‘fingerprinting’ technique where mass spectra featuring varying distributions of protein signals are generated. The signature profiles that are produced, due to inherent differences in microbial proteomes, make it possible to discriminate between organisms down to the strain level (Arnold and Reilly 1998). The MALDI-TOF technique coupled with IMS includes, in one embodiment, mixing immunomagnetic beads specific to the target bacteria with the liquid mixture that may contain the target bacteria for a short incubation period (e.g., 20 min). Any target bacteria captured by the beads are washed twice, re-suspended in deionized H2O, and directly applied onto a MALDI sample probe. The target bacteria-bead complex is then overlaid with a micro-volume of matrix solution and dried at room temperature. Irradiation of the resulting crystalline mass with a high intensity laser promotes the liberation and ionization of intact cellular proteins that are subsequently detected by a TOF mass spectrometer. The resulting mass spectrum is then interrogated for definitive mass peaks that signify the presence of the target bacteria.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention is directed to a method for determining if a target bacterium is present in a liquid solution when the target bacterium is or may be present in a low concentration that is at or near the detection limit for a particular detection technology. As used herein, the term “target bacterium” refers to a specie of species of bacteria. In turn, the invention is applicable to situations in which it is desirable to determine whether a target bacterium (e.g., E. coli) is present in a liquid solution when the number of target bacterium per unit volume of solution (i.e., the concentration of the target bacterium) is or may be below the detection limit for a particular detection technology. In some instances, a plurality of target bacterium may be referred to as the target bacteria.
  • In one embodiment, the process comprises using a biological amplification procedure in which bacteriophages for the target bacterium are applied to the liquid solution. (Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria and in the process produce many progeny. Structurally, the bacteriophage consists of a protein shell (capsid) that encapsulates the viral nucleic acid. The capsid is constructed from repeating copies of the same protein. Bacteriophages are able to infect specific bacterial cells and because of the multiplication of the genetic material, the cells eventually burst releasing millions of copies of the original phage.) The bacteriophages and any of the target bacterium present in the liquid solution are allowed to incubate. During the incubation period, the bacteriophages will multiply by infecting target bacterium present in the solution. More specifically, the bacteriophage replicates numerous copies of itself in an infected target bacterium. Eventually, the infected target bacterium lyses and the replicated or progeny bacteriophages are released into the liquid solution. The solution is then analyzed to determine if a biomarker for the bacteriophage is present, thereby indirectly indicating that the target bacterium is present in the liquid solution. Possible analysis techniques comprise mass spectrometry techniques, such as MALDI-MS and electro-spray ionization-MS techniques.
  • To assure that the detection of a biomarker for the bacteriophage indicates that the target bacterium is present in the liquid solution, a concentration of the bacteriophage is applied to the liquid solution that is below the detection limit for the biomarker for the bacteriophage for whatever analysis technique is employed. This assures that if the biomarker for the bacteriophage is detected by the analysis technique, the detectable concentration of the biomarker is attributable to the replication of the bacteriophage by the target bacterium present in the liquid solution. In certain situations, the use of such a concentration of bacteriophage has a multiplicity of infection (“MOI”) (i.e., ratio of infecting bacteriophages to target bacterium) that is too low to rapidly produce a sufficient concentration of bacteriophages or biomarkers for the bacteriophage for detection.
  • Another embodiment of the process addresses this problem by adding a very high concentration of the bacteriophage to the liquid solution, thereby assuring a high MOI. In this case, the concentration of the bacteriophage added to the solution may exceed the detection limit of whatever analysis technique is employed to detect the bacteriophage or biomarker of the bacteriophage. Consequently, the process applies parent bacteriophage to the solution that can distinguished from any progeny bacteriophage resulting from the infection of target bacterium in the mixture. If the distinguishable progency bacteriophage or a distinguishable biomarker of the progeny bacteriophage are present, this indicates that the target bacterium is present in the solution
  • In one embodiment, the parent bacteriophage (i.e., the bacteriophage initially applied to the solution) are “tagged” so that whatever analysis technique is employed is inherently capable of distinguishing the parent bacteriophage or parent bacteriophage biomarkers from the progeny bacteriophage or biomarkers for the progency bacteriophage. For example, if a mass spectral analysis technique is employed, the parent bacteriophage are “tagged” with a substance that alters or shifts the mass spectrum of the parent bacteriophage relative to the progeny bacteriophage, which will not inherit the “tag” from the parent bacteriophage. For example, a biotinylated bacteriophage can be employed as a parent bacteriophage and will have a different mass spectrum than the progeny bacteriophage produced by the biotinylated bacteriophage infecting target bacterium present in the solution. Other “tags” can be employed for other types of analytical techniques.
  • In another embodiment, the parent bacteriophage possesses a characteristic that allows the parent bacteriophage to be separated from the progeny bacteriophage in the liquid solution prior to analysis, thereby assuring that most, if not all of the bacteriophages present in the liquid solution after separation are progeny bacteriophage resulting from the replication of the parent bacteriophage by target bacteria present in the liquid solution. In one embodiment, the parent bacteriophages initially applied to the liquid solution are biotinylated bacteriophages. Biotinylated bacteriophages are highly attracted to strepavidin. This attraction is exploited to separate the biotinylated bacteriophage from progeny bacteriophage resulting from replication of the biotinylated bacteriophage by target bacterium present in the mixture.
  • In one embodiment, the biotinylated bacteriophage are attached to a strepavidin coated probe. Consequently, separation of the biotinylated bacteriophage from the liquid solution after the incubation period is accomplished by removing the probe from the liquid solution. In another embodiment, strepavidin-coated magnetic beads are applied to the liquid solution. The beads are used to pick up the biotinylated bacteriophage. The beads are then separated from the liquid solution using a magnet. In yet another, embodiment a strepavidin coated probe (e.g., a slide) is applied to the liquid solution after the incubation period. The biotinylated bacteriophage adhere to the probe and then the probe is separated from the liquid solution.
  • Yet a further embodiment of the invention recognizes that the liquid solution in which the target bacterium may be present is or may be a complex mixture that includes biological material that makes the detection of the bacteriophage or biomarker for the bacteriophage more difficult or reduces the reliability of the information provided by the detection technology employed. For instance, when a mass spectrometry detection methodology is employed, the complex mixture may produce a signal in which the biomarker associated with the bacteriophage is obscured or, stated differently, has a low signal-to-noise ratio. To address this possibility, the liquid solution is subject to a purification step in which target bacterium that are present in the liquid solution are separated from the remainder of the solution. In one embodiment, immuno-magnetic separation (“IMS”) is utilized to separate target bacterium present in the liquid solution from the remainder of the solution. In one particular embodiment, magnetic beads are coated with an antibody for the target bacterium. The antibodies pick up the target bacterium present in the liquid mixture and then a magnet is used to separate the beads from the remainder of the liquid solution. The beads and any adhering target bacterium are then subjected to the biological amplification process and analysis. It should be appreciated this purification step also addresses the possibility that feral versions of the bacteriophage may be present in the liquid solution and that such versions could produce a false positive if the liquid solution was not subjected to a purification step.
  • If feral versions of the bacteriophage are not of concern, the purification step can be implemented after the biological amplification process. In this embodiment, the purification step involves separating the bacteriophages and the liquid solution, rather than separating the target bacterium and the liquid solution. In one embodiment, an IMS is used in which magnetic beads are coated with an antibody for the bacteriophage. The beads pick up the bacteriophages present in the solution and then a magnet is used to separate the beads from the remainder of the solution.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the analysis step comprises using MS/MS analysis to determine if a biomarker for the target bacterium is present. The use of MS/MS analysis produces a highly reliable indication of the presence of a biomarker for a target bacterium. As a consequence, at least in some cases, the use of MS/MS analysis renders the need for a purification step unnecessary.
  • In yet another embodiment, the invention is directed to a process for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium in complex mixtures. In one embodiment, the process comprises using an IMS procedure to isolate at least some of a target bacterium that may be present in a liquid mixture. The process further includes employing a biological amplification procedure in which a low titer or concentration of bacteriophages for the target bacterium are applied to at least some of the target bacterium that has been isolated by the IMS procedure. The mixture of bacteriophages and any of the target bacterium that has been isolated is allowed to incubate. If at least a certain concentration of the target bacterium is present, the bacteriophages will multiply during the incubation period such that a high titer or concentration of bacteriophages will be present in the mixture and detectable by MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. If no or only a small number of the target bacterium is present, there will be a low concentration of bacteriophages present in the mixture that will not be reasonably detectable by MALDI-TOF-MS analysis. Following incubation, a MALDI-TOF-MS analysis is performed on the incubated mixture of bacteriophages and target bacterium. The resulting mass spectrum is analyzed to determine if a protein that is associated with the bacteriophages is present. If the protein for the bacteriophage is detected, then it can be concluded that at least a low concentration of the target bacterium is present in the mixture.
  • It should also be appreciated that the method of the invention is capable of detecting low concentration of a target bacterium regardless of the manner in which the bacterium was grown or propogated.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 depicts, for one embodiment of the invention, an immunomagnetic bead that is used to isolate the target microorganism (antibodies not drawn to scale);
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the immunomagnetic purfication step used to isolate a target antigen (Escherichia coli) in one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the bacteriophage amplification step for one embodiment of the invention;
  • FIG. 4 shows a typical MALDI-TOF mass spectrum obtained from a high titer sample of MS2 in PBS; and
  • FIGS. 5A-5C illustrate how an embodiment of the invention was able detect a biomarker of the bacteriophage indicative of presence of E. coli for decreasing concentrations of E. coli.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Generally, the invention relates to the use of a bacteriophage to indirectly detect the presence of a target bacterium in a liquid solution where the concentration of the target bacterium is or is likely to be near or below the detection limit for the particular detection technology employed.
  • Bacteriophages are viruses that infect bacteria and in the process of infecting the bacteria produce many progeny. Structurally, the bacteriophage consists of a protein shell (capsid) that encapsulates the viral nucleic acid. The capsid is constructed from repeating copies of the same protein(s). Bacteriophages are able to infect specific bacterial cells and because of the multiplication of the number of progeny, the cells eventually burst releasing millions of copies of the original phage. This infection process has been utilized to serve as a biomarker amplification step for detecting low concentrations of target bacterial cells. For example, the capsid of the MS2 bacteriophage contains 180 copies of a 13 kDa protein. This particular virus specifically infects strains of Escherichia coli and is able to produce between 10,000 to 20,000 copies of itself within 40 min after attachment to the target bacterial cell. Essentially, one E. coli could be infected with MS2 resulting in the replication of the capsid protein(s) by a factor of 1.8×106.
  • The results from matrix assisted laser desorption ionization/mass spectrometry (MALDI/TOF) can be used to show the utility of the amplification step. MALDI-TOF-MS is a proven technique for identifying whole cellular microorganisms (Holland et al 1996; van Barr 2000; Madonna et al. 2000). In principle, MALDI is a ‘fingerprinting’ technique where mass spectra featuring varying distributions of protein signals are generated. The signature profiles are produced due to inherent differences in microbial proteomes that make it possible to discriminate between organisms down to the strain level (Arnold and Reilly 1998).
  • In an experiment where the protein MALDI signal from target bacterial cells was too weak for detection, the addition of low levels (too low to detect by MALDI) of the appropriate phage to the target bacterial cells after about thirty minutes produced a detectable protein MALDI signal attributable to the phage capsid protein. Bacteriophages specific for other bacterial species typically have capsid proteins of different molecular weight and therefore give a different MALDI signal. Therefore, the procedure is applicable to a multitude of different bacterial species. Other detection technologies, such as ion mobility spectrometry, optical spectroscopy, immuno techniques, chromatographic techniques and aptamer processes, are also feasible.
  • Generally, the process for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium in a complex liquid mixture that contains or is likely to contain biological material other than the target bacterium comprises processing the mixture or a portion thereof to produce a liquid mixture, solution or sample for analysis that, if at least a certain concentration of the target bacterium is present in the mixture, a discernable signal or indication thereof is produced. It should be understood that the terms “liquid solution” and “liquid mixture” refer to the original solution or mixture that is the subject of the test and any liquid solutions or mixtures that, as a result of the application of the method, contain a portion of the orignial solution or mixture.
  • In one embodiment, the process comprises making a determination if a low concentration of a target bacterium is present in the liquid solution. This determination can be made by assuming that any of the target bacterium that are present in the liquid solution are present in a low concentration. Alternatively, an assay can be performed to determine if the target bacterium is present in a concentration that reliably exceeds the detection limit of whatever detection technology is being utilized. For instance, a mass spectrometry technique can be utilized. If the mass spectrometry technique provides a reliable signal indicative of the presence of the target bacterium in the liquid solution, no further steps needs to be taken. If, however, the mass spectrometry technique does not provide a reliable signal indicative of the presence of the target bacterium in the liquid solution, then it can be concluded that the target bacterium may be present in the liquid solution but in a concentration that below or near the detection limit of the mass spectrometry technique. In this case, further steps are taken to determine whether the target bacterium is present in the liquid solution in a concentration that is under the detection limit of the mass spectrometry technique.
  • The process involves a purification step that involves capturing the target bacterium that may be present in the mixture and separating any of the captured bacterium from other biological material that may be present in the mixture. By separating any of the captured target bacterium from other biological material that may be present in the mixture, the portion of the subsequently produced mass spectrum signal associated with other biological material present in the mixture is reduced. In one embodiment, an immumomagnetic separation (IMS) technique is used to capture and separate the target bacterium.
  • The process further comprises subjecting at least some of any of the captured and separated target bacterium to an amplification step in which the target bacterium are infected with a bacteriophage that is specific to the target bacterium. If there is at least a certain concentration of the target bacterium present, the bacteriophage will multiply to a point that a biomarker associated with the bacteriophage will be detectable using an analysis technique, such as MALDI/TOF-MS. In the case of MALDI/TOF-MS, a portion of the subsequently produced mass spectral signal indicative of the presence of the bacteriophage will be increased. If there is less than a particular concentration of the target bacterium present, the bacteriophage will not multiply sufficiently to be detectable in the mass spectrum produced using MALDI/TOF-MS. In essence, provided there is a least a certain concentration of the target bacterium present in the mixture, the purification and amplification steps serve to increase the signal-to-noise ratio for the portion of the subsequently produced mass spectrum that is associated with the bacteriophage.
  • After amplification, at least a portion of the amplified mixture is subjected to analysis to determine if a biomarker for the target bacterium is present. For example, MALDI/TOF-MS analysis can be used to produce a mass spectrum. The mass spectrum is analyzed to determine if one or more biomarkers for the bacteriophage are present. If such biomarkers are present, this is an indirect indication that at least a certain concentration of the target bacterium was present in the originally sampled mixture.
  • It should be appreciated that the need for the purification step may not be necessary in situations in which the portion of the signal associated with other biological materials can be filtered, eliminated or otherwise ignored and/or in situations in which the amplification step has a gain such that the portion of the mass spectrum associated with the bacteriophage is likely to exceed any background signal associated with other biological materials and/or situations in which a false positive is considered to be remote. Further, it should also be appreciated that one of the other biological materials that can make it difficult to determine if the biomarker for the bacteriophage is present is a wild version of the bacteriophage that is present in the liquid solution that is being tested. The purification step addresses the presence of a wild bacteriophage.
  • If the presence or possible presence of a wild bacteriophage in the solution or mixture being tested is not a concern, it is also possible to perform a purification step after the amplification step. However, in this case, the bacteriophage is separated from the remainder of the liquid solution. The previously noted IMS technique can be employed. However, the magnetic bead is coated with an antibody for the bacteriophage, rather than an antibody for the target bacterium.
  • It is also possible in certain cases to eliminate the need for a purification step by utilizing a highly specific analysis technique, such as MS/MS, in which the biomarker for the bacteriophage is so highly specific to the bacteriophage that there is little likelihood of a false positive. Currently, the use of MS/MS is limited to capsid proteins that are less than 7000 Da.W
  • With reference to FIG. 1, the immunomagnetic separation (IMS) technique for capturing the target bacterium in a mixture and separating any captured target bacterium from other biological material in the mixture is described. Microsize beads are constructed from an iron oxide core coated with a polymeric surface. Secondary antibodies raised against the Fc region of the primary antibodies are covalently attached via a linker to the polymer surface. The primary antibody (raised against a targeted microorganism) is attached to the beads by strong noncovalent interactions with the secondary antibody, which holds the primary antibody in the proper orientation for reaction with the targeted antigen.
  • With reference to FIG. 2, the immunomagnetic beads are added to the bacterial or biological mixture that is the subject of the analysis and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature. The beads are then isolated to the side of the reaction tube using a magnet. This process allows the extraneous (non-targeted) material to be removed by aspiration. At this stage, the beads can be washed several times prior to re-suspending them in PBS.
  • With reference to FIG. 3, the bead-bacterial target complex is admixed with a low titer suspension of bacteriophage specific to the targeted bacterium. The titer is held low so that the mass spectrometry signal from the virus is non-detectable. After a 40-minute incubation, the bacteriophage have completed a propagation cycle of attachment, insertion, self-assembly, and cell lysis resulting in the production of many progeny that are released into the reaction milieu. The milieu is then analyzed to determine if a biomarker for the bacteriophage is present that indirectly indicates that the target bacterium was present. For instance, the milieu can be analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS using a sandwich sample preparation technique with a ferulic acid matrix. Other MALDI matrices known in the art are also feasible. The resulting mass spectrum shows the presence of the bacteriophage capsid protein, which would not have been present if the target bacterium was not also present.
  • An IMS technique for capturing target bacterium in a mixture and separating any captured target bacterium from other biological material in the mixture and subsequent MALDI-TOF/MS analysis are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/063,346, entitled “Method for Determining if a Type of Bacteria is Present in a Mixture,” filed on Apr. 12, 2002, which is incorporated herein, in its entirety, by reference.
  • EXAMPLE
  • As described hereinafter, an embodiment of the method has been used to reduce the detection limit for E. coli to less than 5.0×104 cells mL−1. The method used immunomagnetic beads coated with antibodies against E. coli, hereinafter referred to as the target-bead complex, to isolate the bacterium from solution. The target-bead complex was then re-suspended in a solution containing MS2, a bacteriophage that is specific for E. coli. The MS2 bacteriophage concentration was adjusted so that the ion signal from the capsid protein of the MS2 bacteriophage was below the detection limit of the mass spectrometer. After a 40-minute incubation period, an aliquot of the solution was removed and analyzed by the on-probe MALDI-TOF-MS procedure for the 13 kDa capsid protein. The [M+H]+ (m/z 13,726) and [M+2H]+’(m/z 6865) ion signals for the MS2 capsid protein were detected (FIG. 4).
  • With reference to FIG. 5A, application of the process to a mixture that contains a concentration of 5.0×106 E. coli cells mL−‘yields a mass spectrum with protein signals for both E. coli and the MS2 bacteriophage. The process was repeated for decreasing concentrations of E. coli. Specifically, with reference to FIG. 5B, the process was repeated for a concentration of ˜5.0×105 E. coli cells mL−1. In this case, the mass spectrum fails to definitively show any protein signals for the E. coli cells, but does show the protein signals for the MS2 bacteriophage capsid protein. With reference to FIG. 5C, the process was repeated for an E. coli concentration of ˜5.0×104 cells mL−1. In this case, the mass spectrum fails to definitively show any protein signals for the E. coli cells but still show protein signals for the MS2 bacteriophage capsid protein. These results indicate that E. coli was trapped by the immunomagnetic beads and then infected by the MS2 virus, which was able to multiply and increase the concentration of the capsid protein to a detectable level. Presently, target bacterium concentrations of as low as ˜1.0×103 cells mL−1 have been indirectly detected using this process.
  • The following describes various aspects of the embodiment of the method implemented with respect to the example of the detection of E. coli.
  • E. coli Preparation
  • The E. coli bacteria were grown in trypticase soy broth (TSB) (Difco, Detroit, Mich.) with incubation at 37° C. using standard microbial methods.
  • Bacteriophage Propagation
  • Bacteriophage propagation was performed in accordance to the Adams agar-overlay method as described in M. H. Adams' Bacteriophages (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1959). Briefly, a soft-agar/host covering was prepared by overlaying agar plates (trypticase soy agar, Difco) with a 2.5 mL of melted 0.5% agar (same medium), which contained two drops of a 20 hr host in TSB. The soft-agar covering was allowed to harden before the addition of a 0.5 mL overlay of a concentrated suspension of MS2, prepared by re-hydrating freeze-dried MS2 in TSB. After 24 hours, the soft agar was scraped off the surface of the agar plates and centrifuged (1000 G) for 25 min to sediment the cellular debris and agar. The supernatant was conserved, passed through 0.22 μm Millipore filters, and stored by refrigeration at 4-8° C.
  • Immunomagnetic Bead Preparation R
  • Rabbit anti-E. coli IgG antibodies (Cortex Biochem, San Leandro, Calif.) were attached to the immunomagnetic beads (MagaBeads, Goat anti-Rabbit IgG F(c), Cortex Biochem) using the manufacturer's suggested protocol.
  • Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) E. coli E
  • Escherichia coli were isolated from aqueous suspensions by affinity capture using the immunomagnetic beads. Suspensions of bacteria were prepared in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes (Brinkmann Instruments, Inc., Westbury, N.Y.) by combining 100 μL of broth media with 900 μL of phosphate buffer saline (PBS, 0.01 M Na2 HPO4, 0.15M NaCl titrated to pH 7.35 with HCl). Cell concentrations were determined using a Petroff-Hauser counting chamber (Hauser Scientific, Horsham, Pa.).
  • The immunomagnetic separation (IMS) procedure developed in this investigation involved the following steps: In the first step, a 30 μL aliquot of the immunomagnetic beads were added to the bacterial sample solution and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature with continuous shaking. The second step involved concentrating the beads to the side of the sample tube using a magnetic particle concentrator (Dynal, Lake Success, N.Y.) and removing the supernatant using a 1 mL pipette. In the third step, the magnet was removed and the beads were re-suspended in 1 mL of fresh PBS with vigorous shaking for 20 sec to wash away any nonspecifically adhering components. The bead suspension was then transferred to a new tube and steps 2 and 3 repeated one more time. In the fourth and final step, the beads were isolated with the magnet followed by decanting the buffer wash to waste and re-suspending the beads in 500 μL of deionized water. Subsequently, the bead-E. coli complexes were admixed with a low titer (below the detection limit of the mass spectrometer) of the MS2 bacteriophage and incubated at room temperature with gentle shaking for 40 minutes. An aliquot of the suspension was then removed and analyzed for the MS2 capsid protein using a sandwich sample preparation with a ferulic acid matrix (12.5 mg of ferulic acid in 1 mL of 17% formic acid: 33% acetonitrile: 50% deionized H2O).
  • MALDI-TOF MS
  • All mass spectra were generated on a Voyager-DE STR+ (AB Applied Biosystems, Framingham, Mass.) MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer, operating in the positive linear mode. The following parameters were used: accelerating voltage 25 kV, grid voltage 92% of accelerating voltage, extraction delay time of 350 nsec, and low mass ion gate set to 4 kDa. The laser intensity (N2, 337 nm) was set just above the ion generation threshold and pulsed every 300 ns. Mass spectra were acquired from each sample by accumulating 100 laser shots from five different sample spots (final spectrum average of 5×100 laser shots).
  • It should be appreciated that to assure that the detection of a biomarker for the bacteriophage indicates that the target bacterium is present in the liquid solution, a concentration of “parent” bacteriophage is applied to the liquid solution that is below the detection limit for the bacteriophage or biomarker for the bacteriophage for whatever analysis technique is employed. This assures that if the bacteriophage or the biomarker for the bacteriophage is detected by the analysis technique, the detectable concentration of the bacteriophage or biomarker is attributable to progeny bacteriophage, i.e., bacteriophage resulting from the replication of the bacteriophage by the target bacterium present in the liquid solution. In certain situations, the use of such a concentration of “parent” bacteriophage has a multiplicity of infection (“MOI”) (i.e., the ratio of the number of parent bacteriophage to the number of target bacterium) that is too low to produce a sufficient concentration of bacteriophages or biomarkers for the bacteriophage for detection.
  • To overcome the drawbacks associated with a low MOI, a sufficiently high concentration of “parent” bacteriophage is added to the liquid solution. In this case, the concentration of the “parent” bacteriophage added to the solution may exceed the detection limit of whatever analysis technique is employed to detect the bacteriophage or biomarker of the bacteriophage. Consequently, analysis of a liquid solution treated in this manner could detect the “parent” bacteriophages that were added to the solution, rather than the progeny bacteriophage resulting from replication by the target bacteria.
  • Consequently, another embodiment of the process applies a concentration of “parent” bacteriophage to the solution that is capable of being distinguished from any progeny bacteriophage. In one embodiment, the parent bacteriophage (i.e., the bacteriophage initially applied to the solution) are “tagged” so that whatever analysis technique is employed is inherently capable of distinguishing the parent bacteriophage or parent bacteriophage biomarkers from the progeny bacteriophage or biomarkers for the progency bacteriophage. For example, if a mass spectral analysis technique is employed, the parent bacteriophage are “tagged” with a substance that alters or shifts the mass spectrum of the parent bacteriophage relative to the progeny bacteriophage, which will not inherit the “tag” from the parent bacteriophage. For example, a biotinylated bacteriophage is employed as a parent bacteriophage and has a different mass spectrum than the progeny bacteriophage produced by the biotinylated bacteriophage infecting target bacterium present in the solution. Other “tags” can be employed for other types of analytical techniques.
  • In another embodiment, the parent bacteriophage possesses a characteristic that allows the parent bacteriophage to be separated from any of the progeny bacteriophage in the liquid solution prior to analysis, thereby assuring that most, if not all of the bacteriophage present in the liquid solution after separation are progeny bacteriophage resulting from the replication of the parent bacteriophage by target bacteria present in the liquid solution. In one embodiment, biotinylated bacteriophage are initially applied to the liquid solution. Biotinylated bacteriophage are highly attracted to strepavidin. Consequently, to separate the biotinylated bacteriophage from the liquid solution a strepavidin probe is utilized. In one embodiment, the biotinylated bacteriophage are attached to a strepavidin coated probe and the probe is placed in the liquid solution. In this case, separation of the biotinylated bacteriophage from the liquid solution after the incubation period is accomplished by removing the probe from the liquid solution. In another embodiment, strepavidin-coated magnetic beads are applied to the liquid solution. The biotinylated bacteriophages are attached to the strepavidin-coated magnetic beads prior to the application of the beads to the solution. Alternatively, the beads are used to pick up biotinylated bacteriophages that were previously added to the solution and then separated from the liquid solution using a magnet. In yet another, embodiment a strepavidin coated probe (e.g., a slide) is applied to the liquid solution after the incubation period. The biotinylated bacteriophages adhere to the probe and then the probe is separated from the liquid solution. Regardless of the manner in which the biotinylated bacteriophages are separated from the liquid mixture, at least a portion of the solution is then subjected to analysis to determine if the bacteriophage or a biomarker for the bacteriophage is present, which indirectly indicates that the target bacteria was present in the solution.

Claims (2)

1. A method for determining if a target bacterium is present in a liquid solution when the target bacterium is or may be present in a low concentration that is near or below the detection limit for a particular detection technology comprising:
making a determination as to whether a low concentration of a target bacterium may be present in a liquid solution;
using, following said step of making and if a determination is made that a low concentration of said target bacterium may be present, a first quantity of a bacteriophage to infect at least some of any target bacterium that are present in said liquid solution and multiply the number of bacteriophage in said liquid solution; and
analyzing, following said step of using, at least a portion of said liquid solution to determine if a biomarker for said bacteriophage is present that indirectly indicates that said target bacterium is also present in said liquid solution.
2-45. (canceled)
US11/626,326 2002-04-12 2007-01-23 Method for detecting concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells Expired - Fee Related US7972773B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/626,326 US7972773B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2007-01-23 Method for detecting concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US31918402P 2002-04-12 2002-04-12
US10/249,452 US7166425B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2003-04-10 Method for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells
US11/626,326 US7972773B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2007-01-23 Method for detecting concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/249,452 Continuation US7166425B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2003-04-10 Method for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070275370A1 true US20070275370A1 (en) 2007-11-29
US7972773B2 US7972773B2 (en) 2011-07-05

Family

ID=29250416

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/249,452 Expired - Lifetime US7166425B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2003-04-10 Method for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells
US11/612,587 Abandoned US20070148638A1 (en) 2002-04-12 2006-12-19 Method for Detecting Low Concentrations of a Target Bacterium That Uses Phages to Infect Target Bacterial Cells
US11/626,326 Expired - Fee Related US7972773B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2007-01-23 Method for detecting concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/249,452 Expired - Lifetime US7166425B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2003-04-10 Method for detecting low concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells
US11/612,587 Abandoned US20070148638A1 (en) 2002-04-12 2006-12-19 Method for Detecting Low Concentrations of a Target Bacterium That Uses Phages to Infect Target Bacterial Cells

Country Status (10)

Country Link
US (3) US7166425B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1540018B1 (en)
JP (2) JP4490112B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE469240T1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003228505B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2482173C (en)
DE (1) DE60332740D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2346424T3 (en)
HK (1) HK1082525A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2003087772A2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070059725A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-03-15 Voorhees Kent J Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic organisms using bacteriophage
US20070148638A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2007-06-28 Colorado School Of Mines Method for Detecting Low Concentrations of a Target Bacterium That Uses Phages to Infect Target Bacterial Cells
US20090117536A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2009-05-07 Blaze Venture Technologies Limited Method and device for bacterial sampling
US20090246753A1 (en) * 2008-01-11 2009-10-01 Colorado School Of Mines Detection of Phage Amplification by SERS Nanoparticles
US20090258341A1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2009-10-15 Colorado School Of Mines Compositions and Methods for Detecting Bacteria

Families Citing this family (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7329388B2 (en) 1999-11-08 2008-02-12 Princeton Biochemicals, Inc. Electrophoresis apparatus having staggered passage configuration
US6406604B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2002-06-18 Norberto A. Guzman Multi-dimensional electrophoresis apparatus
US20020192676A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2002-12-19 Madonna Angelo J. Method for determining if a type of bacteria is present in a mixture
US20050003346A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2005-01-06 Colorado School Of Mines Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic living organisms using bacteriophage
US8216780B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2012-07-10 Microphage (Tm) Incorporated Method for enhanced sensitivity in bacteriophage-based diagnostic assays
US20040137430A1 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-07-15 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Assays to detect or quantify bacterial or viral pathogens and contaminants
EP1613965A2 (en) * 2003-04-10 2006-01-11 Kent J. Voorhees Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic living organisms using bacteriophage
CA2563310A1 (en) 2003-11-07 2005-05-26 Princeton Biochemicals, Inc. Multi-dimensional electrophoresis apparatus
US8030092B2 (en) 2003-11-07 2011-10-04 Princeton Biochemicals, Inc. Controlled electrophoresis method
US20050250096A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2005-11-10 Microphage, Incorporated Microorganism detection using bacteriophage amplification
US20090286225A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2009-11-19 Microphagetm Incorporated Method and apparatus for bacteriophage-based diagnostic assays
WO2006083292A2 (en) * 2004-06-07 2006-08-10 Microphage, Incorporated Microorganism detection using bacteriophage amplification
FR2883296B1 (en) * 2005-03-15 2007-05-18 Nicolas Bara METHOD AND DEVICE FOR ISOLATING MICROORGANISMS
US20110097702A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2011-04-28 Voorhees Kent J Methods and compositions for in situ detection of microorganisms on a surface
AU2006292496B2 (en) * 2005-09-15 2011-04-14 Microphage Incorporated Method and apparatus for identification of microorganisms using bacteriophage
US20070178450A1 (en) * 2006-01-27 2007-08-02 Microphage (Tm) Incorporation Method and apparatus for determining level of microorganisms using bacteriophage
US20070292397A1 (en) * 2006-06-19 2007-12-20 Mcnulty Amy K Method for the detection and neutralization of bacteria
CA2667771A1 (en) * 2006-10-31 2008-05-29 Microphage Incorporated Method and apparatus for enhanced bacteriophage-based diagnostic assays by selective inhibition of potential cross reactive organisms
US9212383B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2015-12-15 Guild Associates, Inc. Biological detection system and method
JP5150856B2 (en) 2007-06-15 2013-02-27 マイクロファージ・インコーポレーテッド Microbial detection method with improved bacteriophage amplification
US8865418B2 (en) 2009-02-10 2014-10-21 Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation Immunoanalytical method and system using mass spectrometry technology
US20110183314A1 (en) * 2010-01-26 2011-07-28 Microphage Incorporated Bacteriophage-based microorganism diagnostic assay using speed or acceleration of bacteriophage reproduction
CN102762980B (en) * 2010-03-03 2015-11-25 株式会社日立高新技术 Analytical equipment
GB201011152D0 (en) 2010-07-02 2010-08-18 Microsens Medtech Ltd Capture of micro-organisms
FR2980213B1 (en) 2011-09-16 2013-09-06 Biomerieux Sa PROCESS FOR CHARACTERIZING BACTERIA BY DETECTION OF NON-STRUCTURAL PROTEINS OF BACTERIOPHAGES
JP2015510598A (en) * 2012-02-21 2015-04-09 ラボラトリー コーポレイション オブ アメリカ ホールディングス Method and system for detection of microorganisms
US10519483B2 (en) 2012-02-21 2019-12-31 Laboratory Corporation Of America Holdings Methods and systems for rapid detection of microorganisms using infectious agents
WO2013142003A1 (en) 2012-03-23 2013-09-26 Laboratory Corporation Of America Holdings Biologic machines for the detection of biomolecules
KR20150015531A (en) * 2012-05-29 2015-02-10 바이오디식스, 인크. Deep-MALDI TOF mass spectrometry of complex biological samples, e.g., serum, and uses thereof
US9481903B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2016-11-01 Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for detection of cells using engineered transduction particles
DK2968424T3 (en) 2013-03-13 2020-03-30 Geneweave Biosciences Inc Non-replicative transduction particles and transduction particle-based reporter systems
US9540675B2 (en) 2013-10-29 2017-01-10 GeneWeave Biosciences, Inc. Reagent cartridge and methods for detection of cells
CN104865186B (en) * 2015-05-29 2017-08-25 重庆大学 Portable pathogenic bacteria quick determination method
US10351893B2 (en) 2015-10-05 2019-07-16 GeneWeave Biosciences, Inc. Reagent cartridge for detection of cells
NL1042018B1 (en) * 2016-08-26 2018-03-06 Bacsassin B V Patent Bacteria Detection and Elimination according to SID
JP2019049455A (en) * 2017-09-08 2019-03-28 東芝テック株式会社 Sample preparation device and sample preparation method
MX2021015900A (en) 2019-06-21 2022-02-03 Laboratory Corp America Holdings Methods for producing mutant bacteriophages for the detection of listeria.
BR112022003129A2 (en) 2019-08-26 2022-05-17 Laboratory Corp America Holdings Devices and methods for the detection of microorganisms using recombinant reproductive-deficient indicator bacteriophage
EP4028540A1 (en) 2019-09-11 2022-07-20 Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Methods and systems for the rapid detection of microorganisms using recombinant infectious agents to express an indicator subunit
CN113325063A (en) * 2021-05-19 2021-08-31 宁波大学 Device and method for verifying detection result of colloidal gold immunochromatographic test paper

Citations (75)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3839175A (en) * 1973-06-28 1974-10-01 Owens Illinois Inc Electrodeposition of enzymes
US4104126A (en) * 1976-01-29 1978-08-01 Nichols Institute Of Endocrinology, Inc. Non-isotopic substrate assay employing bacteriolysis products
US4764473A (en) * 1983-05-13 1988-08-16 Kerforshungsanlage Julich Chamber for the treatment of cells in an electrical field
US4797363A (en) * 1984-03-19 1989-01-10 Board Of Trustees, University Of Illinois Bacteriophages as recognition and identification agents
US4861709A (en) * 1985-05-31 1989-08-29 Technicon Research A.G. Detection and/or identification of microorganisms in a test sample using bioluminescence or other exogenous genetically-introduced marker
US5085982A (en) * 1986-06-12 1992-02-04 City Of Hope Method of detecting specific substances by selective growth of living cells
US5101105A (en) * 1990-11-02 1992-03-31 Univeristy Of Maryland, Baltimore County Neutralization/chemical reionization tandem mass spectrometry method and apparatus therefor
US5126024A (en) * 1989-12-19 1992-06-30 Colorado School Of Mines Apparatus and method for concentrating microorganisms from a liquid medium on an electrode by electrodeposition
US5135870A (en) * 1990-06-01 1992-08-04 Arizona Board Of Regents Laser ablation/ionizaton and mass spectrometric analysis of massive polymers
US5168037A (en) * 1990-08-02 1992-12-01 Phyllis Entis Method for the preparation of a labelled virus without the inactivation of viral binding sites and method of assay utilizing said labelled virus
US5443987A (en) * 1993-09-02 1995-08-22 Decicco; Benedict T. Detection system for microbial contamination in health-care products
US5445942A (en) * 1988-08-02 1995-08-29 London Biotechnology Limited Amplification assay for hydrolase enzymes
US5469369A (en) * 1992-11-02 1995-11-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Smart sensor system and method using a surface acoustic wave vapor sensor array and pattern recognition for selective trace organic vapor detection
US5476768A (en) * 1995-03-10 1995-12-19 Becton, Dickinson And Company Mycobacteriophage DSGA specific for the mycobacterium tuberculosis complex
US5498528A (en) * 1994-06-10 1996-03-12 King; Wing Detection of helicobacter pylori
US5498525A (en) * 1990-08-09 1996-03-12 Amersham International Plc Methods for rapid microbial detection
US5550062A (en) * 1993-10-27 1996-08-27 Microsensor Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for chemical detection by pyrolysis
US5656424A (en) * 1995-02-15 1997-08-12 Albert Einstein College Of Medicine, A Division Of Yeshiva University Identification of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex species
US5658747A (en) * 1994-05-10 1997-08-19 Biocontrol System, Inc. Compositions and methods for control of reactivity between diagnostic reagents and microorganisms
US5679510A (en) * 1993-04-27 1997-10-21 Hybridon, Inc. Quantitative detection of specific nucleic acid sequences using lambdoid bacteriophages linked by oligonucleotides to solid support
US5710005A (en) * 1996-10-29 1998-01-20 Biocode, Inc. Analyte detection with a gradient lateral flow device
US5766840A (en) * 1994-05-20 1998-06-16 Genelabs Technologies, Inc. Hepatitis G virus and molecular cloning thereof
US5789174A (en) * 1996-10-11 1998-08-04 Universite Laval Detection of periodontal pathogens including bacteroides forsythus, porphyromonas gingivalis, prevotilla intermedia and prevotella nigrescens
US5824468A (en) * 1995-05-18 1998-10-20 Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankkter Haftung Detection of listeria by means of recombinant bacteriophages
US5859375A (en) * 1996-04-03 1999-01-12 Barringer Research Limited Apparatus for and method of collecting trace samples for analysis
US5874226A (en) * 1995-05-22 1999-02-23 H. Lee Browne In situ immunodetection of antigens
US5888725A (en) * 1992-09-22 1999-03-30 The Secretary Of State For The Minister Of Agriculture Fisheries And Food In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Method for identifying target bacteria
US5914240A (en) * 1993-08-18 1999-06-22 The Minister Of Agriculture Fisheries & Food In Her Brittanic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom And Northern Ireland Method and test kits for detection of bacteriophage
US5958675A (en) * 1997-04-18 1999-09-28 3M Innovative Properties Company Method for detecting bacteria using bacteriophage, contrast-coloring dye and precipitable dye
US5985596A (en) * 1995-12-15 1999-11-16 Biotec Laboratories Limited Method to detect bacteria
US6004770A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-12-21 Arizona State University Board Of Regents Sample presentation apparatus for mass spectrometry
US6037118A (en) * 1998-05-14 2000-03-14 University Of Maryland Baltimore County Viral characterization by direct detection of capsid proteins
US6093541A (en) * 1995-06-07 2000-07-25 Arizona State University Board Of Regents Mass spectrometer having a derivatized sample presentation apparatus
US6177266B1 (en) * 1996-04-29 2001-01-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Rapid identification of bacteria by mass spectrometry
US6183950B1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2001-02-06 Colorado School Of Mines Method and apparatus for detecting viruses using primary and secondary biomarkers
US6235480B1 (en) * 1998-03-13 2001-05-22 Promega Corporation Detection of nucleic acid hybrids
US6265169B1 (en) * 1997-05-22 2001-07-24 Istituto Di Richerche Di Biologia Molecolare P. Angeletti S.P.A. Method based on the use of bacteriophages for the detection biological molecules in biological samples
US6300061B1 (en) * 1992-02-07 2001-10-09 Albert Einstein College Of Medicine Of Yeshiva University Mycobacterial species-specific reporter mycobacteriophages
US6316266B1 (en) * 1995-06-07 2001-11-13 Arizona State University Board Of Regents Sample presentation apparatus for mass spectrometry
US6322783B1 (en) * 1996-08-26 2001-11-27 Seishi Takahashi Bacteriophages, method for screening same and bactericidal compositions using same, and detection kits using same
US6355445B2 (en) * 1994-08-12 2002-03-12 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National Defence Method of detecting a pathogen using a virus
US6428976B1 (en) * 1997-08-08 2002-08-06 Food Industry Research And Development Institute Rapid identification of microorganisms
US6436661B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2002-08-20 3M Innovative Properties Company Bacteria and bacteriophage detection using immobilized enzyme substrates
US6461833B1 (en) * 1995-12-15 2002-10-08 Biotec Laboratories Limited Method to detect bacteria
US20020192676A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2002-12-19 Madonna Angelo J. Method for determining if a type of bacteria is present in a mixture
US6514767B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2003-02-04 Surromed, Inc. Surface enhanced spectroscopy-active composite nanoparticles
US6514778B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2003-02-04 United Microelectronics Corp. Method for measuring effective gate channel length during C-V method
US6524809B1 (en) * 1998-06-04 2003-02-25 Microsens Biophage Limited Analytical method using multiple virus labelling
US6544729B2 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-04-08 University Of Tennessee Bioluminescent biosensor device
US6555312B1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2003-04-29 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method for detecting bacteria with bacteriaphage
US6580068B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2003-06-17 Sandia Corporation Method and apparatus for time dispersive spectroscopy
US20030175207A1 (en) * 2002-02-22 2003-09-18 Olstein Alan D. Bacteriocin-metal complexes in the detection of pathogens and other biological analytes
US6660437B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2003-12-09 Infineon Technologies Ag Alternating phase mask
US20040002126A1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2004-01-01 Michel Houde Method, device and system for detecting the presence of microorganisms
US20040121403A1 (en) * 2001-02-01 2004-06-24 Stefan Miller Detection and identification of groups of bacteria
US20040137430A1 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-07-15 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Assays to detect or quantify bacterial or viral pathogens and contaminants
US6787360B2 (en) * 1999-03-29 2004-09-07 Council Of Scientific And Industrial Research Bacteriophage, a process for the isolation thereof, and a universal growth medium useful in the process thereof
US6799119B1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2004-09-28 Colorado School Of Mines Method for detection of biological related materials using biomarkers
US6824975B2 (en) * 2000-10-13 2004-11-30 Dexall Biomedical Labs, Inc Incorporation of selective binding substances in a solid phase assay device
US20050003346A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2005-01-06 Colorado School Of Mines Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic living organisms using bacteriophage
US6913753B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-07-05 Gangagen, Inc. Incapacitated whole-cell immunogenic bacterial compositions
US20050208475A1 (en) * 2002-09-16 2005-09-22 Eric Best Process and apparatus comprising episcopic differential contrast (EDIC) microscopy plus epifluorescence microscopy (EF) for the detection or identification of biological materials on surfaces
US20050250096A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2005-11-10 Microphage, Incorporated Microorganism detection using bacteriophage amplification
US20050255043A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-11-17 Hnatowich Donald J Bacteriophage imaging of inflammation
US7087376B2 (en) * 1999-07-30 2006-08-08 Profos Ag Detection and identification of bacterial strains
US20070059725A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-03-15 Voorhees Kent J Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic organisms using bacteriophage
US7195778B2 (en) * 2001-07-10 2007-03-27 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Drug delivery system for zero order, zero order-biphasic, ascending or descending drug delivery
US20070148638A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2007-06-28 Colorado School Of Mines Method for Detecting Low Concentrations of a Target Bacterium That Uses Phages to Infect Target Bacterial Cells
US20070178450A1 (en) * 2006-01-27 2007-08-02 Microphage (Tm) Incorporation Method and apparatus for determining level of microorganisms using bacteriophage
US20070249012A1 (en) * 2003-12-16 2007-10-25 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Microbial Detection and Quantification
US20090208996A1 (en) * 2008-02-20 2009-08-20 Jagath Kadurugamuwa Method and Kit for Detecting Microorganisms On A Household Surface
US20090246753A1 (en) * 2008-01-11 2009-10-01 Colorado School Of Mines Detection of Phage Amplification by SERS Nanoparticles
US20090258341A1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2009-10-15 Colorado School Of Mines Compositions and Methods for Detecting Bacteria
US20090286232A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2009-11-19 MicroPhage™ Incorporated Method and apparatus for enhanced sensitivity in bacteriophage-based diagnostic assays
US20090286225A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2009-11-19 Microphagetm Incorporated Method and apparatus for bacteriophage-based diagnostic assays

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL8520062A (en) 1984-03-19 1986-02-03 Marius C Teodorescu BACTERIOPHAGES AS RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFIER.
CA1277931C (en) 1984-06-05 1990-12-18 Shimon Ulitzur Detection and/or identification of microorganisms in a test sample usingbioluminescence or other exogenous genetically-introduced marker
FR2590675B1 (en) * 1985-11-27 1990-10-12 Transia MIXTURE OF SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES OF LACTIC BACTERIOPHAGES AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO THE DETECTION AND NEUTRALIZATION OF SAID BACTERIOPHAGES
EP0298094A1 (en) 1986-12-01 1989-01-11 McDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION Method of identifying salmonella
US5620845A (en) * 1988-06-06 1997-04-15 Ampcor, Inc. Immunoassay diagnostic kit
JPH05219994A (en) 1990-01-24 1993-08-31 Amoco Corp Signal producing part and method for its use
GB2255561B (en) 1991-04-20 1995-06-21 Agricultural & Food Res Lysins from bacteriophages
JPH07501451A (en) 1991-11-25 1995-02-16 エンゾン・インコーポレイテッド Multivalent antigen binding protein
AU3776493A (en) 1992-02-28 1993-09-13 Paul W. Judkins Method and diagnostic kit for determination of bacteria
GB9220027D0 (en) 1992-09-22 1992-11-04 Mini Agriculture & Fisheries Method and kits for detection of bacteria
ATE199392T1 (en) 1992-12-04 2001-03-15 Medical Res Council MULTIVALENT AND MULTI-SPECIFIC BINDING PROTEINS, THEIR PRODUCTION AND USE
DE4314998A1 (en) * 1993-05-06 1994-11-10 Max Delbrueck Centrum Monoclonal antibodies against filamentous phages, their preparation and use for detecting and isolating the phages
WO1998008944A1 (en) 1996-08-26 1998-03-05 Bio Venture Bank Co., Ltd. Novel bacteriophage, method for screening the same, novel biobactericidal materials prepared with the use of the same, and reagent for detecting the same
US7153651B1 (en) 1996-10-31 2006-12-26 Inverness Medical - Biostar, Inc. Flow-through optical assay devices providing laminar flow of fluid samples, and methods of construction thereof
NZ509856A (en) 1998-08-14 2003-03-28 Biocontrol Systems Inc Composition for exposing antigenic epitopes, and its use for detecting microorganisms
US6737266B1 (en) 1999-10-01 2004-05-18 3M Innovative Properties Company Devices and methods for microorganism detection
GB0017121D0 (en) 2000-07-13 2000-08-30 Blackburn Juliet Convertible seating and bedding apparatus
CN1141318C (en) * 2001-02-28 2004-03-10 中国医学科学院血液学研究所 Human blood and blood vessel cytopoiesis hormone and its preparation
WO2003035889A2 (en) 2001-07-13 2003-05-01 Investigen, Inc. Compositions and methods for bacteria detection
EP1796784B1 (en) 2004-07-20 2010-04-28 Medtronic, Inc. Switched power using telemetry in an implantable medical device

Patent Citations (81)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3839175A (en) * 1973-06-28 1974-10-01 Owens Illinois Inc Electrodeposition of enzymes
US4104126A (en) * 1976-01-29 1978-08-01 Nichols Institute Of Endocrinology, Inc. Non-isotopic substrate assay employing bacteriolysis products
US4764473A (en) * 1983-05-13 1988-08-16 Kerforshungsanlage Julich Chamber for the treatment of cells in an electrical field
US4797363A (en) * 1984-03-19 1989-01-10 Board Of Trustees, University Of Illinois Bacteriophages as recognition and identification agents
US4861709A (en) * 1985-05-31 1989-08-29 Technicon Research A.G. Detection and/or identification of microorganisms in a test sample using bioluminescence or other exogenous genetically-introduced marker
US5085982A (en) * 1986-06-12 1992-02-04 City Of Hope Method of detecting specific substances by selective growth of living cells
US5445942A (en) * 1988-08-02 1995-08-29 London Biotechnology Limited Amplification assay for hydrolase enzymes
US5126024A (en) * 1989-12-19 1992-06-30 Colorado School Of Mines Apparatus and method for concentrating microorganisms from a liquid medium on an electrode by electrodeposition
US5135870A (en) * 1990-06-01 1992-08-04 Arizona Board Of Regents Laser ablation/ionizaton and mass spectrometric analysis of massive polymers
US5168037A (en) * 1990-08-02 1992-12-01 Phyllis Entis Method for the preparation of a labelled virus without the inactivation of viral binding sites and method of assay utilizing said labelled virus
US5723330A (en) * 1990-08-09 1998-03-03 Merck Patent Gmbh Genetically engineered reporter bacteria for the detection of bacteriophage
US5498525A (en) * 1990-08-09 1996-03-12 Amersham International Plc Methods for rapid microbial detection
US5101105A (en) * 1990-11-02 1992-03-31 Univeristy Of Maryland, Baltimore County Neutralization/chemical reionization tandem mass spectrometry method and apparatus therefor
US6300061B1 (en) * 1992-02-07 2001-10-09 Albert Einstein College Of Medicine Of Yeshiva University Mycobacterial species-specific reporter mycobacteriophages
US6660470B1 (en) * 1992-09-22 2003-12-09 The Central Science Laboratory (Csl) Representing The Secretary Of State Of Environment, Food And Rural Affairs Methods of identifying bacteria of specific bacterial genus, species or serotype
US5888725A (en) * 1992-09-22 1999-03-30 The Secretary Of State For The Minister Of Agriculture Fisheries And Food In Her Britannic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom Of Great Britain And Northern Ireland Method for identifying target bacteria
US5469369A (en) * 1992-11-02 1995-11-21 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Smart sensor system and method using a surface acoustic wave vapor sensor array and pattern recognition for selective trace organic vapor detection
US5679510A (en) * 1993-04-27 1997-10-21 Hybridon, Inc. Quantitative detection of specific nucleic acid sequences using lambdoid bacteriophages linked by oligonucleotides to solid support
US5914240A (en) * 1993-08-18 1999-06-22 The Minister Of Agriculture Fisheries & Food In Her Brittanic Majesty's Government Of The United Kingdom And Northern Ireland Method and test kits for detection of bacteriophage
US5443987A (en) * 1993-09-02 1995-08-22 Decicco; Benedict T. Detection system for microbial contamination in health-care products
US5550062A (en) * 1993-10-27 1996-08-27 Microsensor Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for chemical detection by pyrolysis
US5658747A (en) * 1994-05-10 1997-08-19 Biocontrol System, Inc. Compositions and methods for control of reactivity between diagnostic reagents and microorganisms
US5766840A (en) * 1994-05-20 1998-06-16 Genelabs Technologies, Inc. Hepatitis G virus and molecular cloning thereof
US5498528A (en) * 1994-06-10 1996-03-12 King; Wing Detection of helicobacter pylori
US6436652B1 (en) * 1994-08-12 2002-08-20 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National Defence Of Her Majesty's Canadian Government Method of detecting a pathogen using a virus
US6355445B2 (en) * 1994-08-12 2002-03-12 Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada, As Represented By The Minister Of National Defence Method of detecting a pathogen using a virus
US5656424A (en) * 1995-02-15 1997-08-12 Albert Einstein College Of Medicine, A Division Of Yeshiva University Identification of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex species
US5476768A (en) * 1995-03-10 1995-12-19 Becton, Dickinson And Company Mycobacteriophage DSGA specific for the mycobacterium tuberculosis complex
US5824468A (en) * 1995-05-18 1998-10-20 Merck Patent Gesellschaft Mit Beschrankkter Haftung Detection of listeria by means of recombinant bacteriophages
US5874226A (en) * 1995-05-22 1999-02-23 H. Lee Browne In situ immunodetection of antigens
US6316266B1 (en) * 1995-06-07 2001-11-13 Arizona State University Board Of Regents Sample presentation apparatus for mass spectrometry
US6004770A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-12-21 Arizona State University Board Of Regents Sample presentation apparatus for mass spectrometry
US6093541A (en) * 1995-06-07 2000-07-25 Arizona State University Board Of Regents Mass spectrometer having a derivatized sample presentation apparatus
US5985596A (en) * 1995-12-15 1999-11-16 Biotec Laboratories Limited Method to detect bacteria
US6461833B1 (en) * 1995-12-15 2002-10-08 Biotec Laboratories Limited Method to detect bacteria
US5859375A (en) * 1996-04-03 1999-01-12 Barringer Research Limited Apparatus for and method of collecting trace samples for analysis
US6177266B1 (en) * 1996-04-29 2001-01-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Rapid identification of bacteria by mass spectrometry
US6322783B1 (en) * 1996-08-26 2001-11-27 Seishi Takahashi Bacteriophages, method for screening same and bactericidal compositions using same, and detection kits using same
US5789174A (en) * 1996-10-11 1998-08-04 Universite Laval Detection of periodontal pathogens including bacteroides forsythus, porphyromonas gingivalis, prevotilla intermedia and prevotella nigrescens
US5710005A (en) * 1996-10-29 1998-01-20 Biocode, Inc. Analyte detection with a gradient lateral flow device
US5958675A (en) * 1997-04-18 1999-09-28 3M Innovative Properties Company Method for detecting bacteria using bacteriophage, contrast-coloring dye and precipitable dye
US6090541A (en) * 1997-04-18 2000-07-18 3M Innovative Properties Company Method and device for detecting bacteriophage using contrast-coloring and precipitable dyes
US6265169B1 (en) * 1997-05-22 2001-07-24 Istituto Di Richerche Di Biologia Molecolare P. Angeletti S.P.A. Method based on the use of bacteriophages for the detection biological molecules in biological samples
US6428976B1 (en) * 1997-08-08 2002-08-06 Food Industry Research And Development Institute Rapid identification of microorganisms
US6235480B1 (en) * 1998-03-13 2001-05-22 Promega Corporation Detection of nucleic acid hybrids
US6037118A (en) * 1998-05-14 2000-03-14 University Of Maryland Baltimore County Viral characterization by direct detection of capsid proteins
US6524809B1 (en) * 1998-06-04 2003-02-25 Microsens Biophage Limited Analytical method using multiple virus labelling
US6183950B1 (en) * 1998-07-31 2001-02-06 Colorado School Of Mines Method and apparatus for detecting viruses using primary and secondary biomarkers
US6555312B1 (en) * 1999-02-22 2003-04-29 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Method for detecting bacteria with bacteriaphage
US6787360B2 (en) * 1999-03-29 2004-09-07 Council Of Scientific And Industrial Research Bacteriophage, a process for the isolation thereof, and a universal growth medium useful in the process thereof
US6580068B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2003-06-17 Sandia Corporation Method and apparatus for time dispersive spectroscopy
US7087376B2 (en) * 1999-07-30 2006-08-08 Profos Ag Detection and identification of bacterial strains
US6514767B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2003-02-04 Surromed, Inc. Surface enhanced spectroscopy-active composite nanoparticles
US6660437B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2003-12-09 Infineon Technologies Ag Alternating phase mask
US6436661B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2002-08-20 3M Innovative Properties Company Bacteria and bacteriophage detection using immobilized enzyme substrates
US6799119B1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2004-09-28 Colorado School Of Mines Method for detection of biological related materials using biomarkers
US6824975B2 (en) * 2000-10-13 2004-11-30 Dexall Biomedical Labs, Inc Incorporation of selective binding substances in a solid phase assay device
US6514778B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2003-02-04 United Microelectronics Corp. Method for measuring effective gate channel length during C-V method
US20040121403A1 (en) * 2001-02-01 2004-06-24 Stefan Miller Detection and identification of groups of bacteria
US20020192676A1 (en) * 2001-06-18 2002-12-19 Madonna Angelo J. Method for determining if a type of bacteria is present in a mixture
US7195778B2 (en) * 2001-07-10 2007-03-27 Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Drug delivery system for zero order, zero order-biphasic, ascending or descending drug delivery
US6544729B2 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-04-08 University Of Tennessee Bioluminescent biosensor device
US6913753B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2005-07-05 Gangagen, Inc. Incapacitated whole-cell immunogenic bacterial compositions
US7034113B2 (en) * 2002-02-22 2006-04-25 Paradigm Diagnostics, Llc Bacteriocin-metal complexes in the detection of pathogens and other biological analytes
US20030175207A1 (en) * 2002-02-22 2003-09-18 Olstein Alan D. Bacteriocin-metal complexes in the detection of pathogens and other biological analytes
US20070148638A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2007-06-28 Colorado School Of Mines Method for Detecting Low Concentrations of a Target Bacterium That Uses Phages to Infect Target Bacterial Cells
US20050003346A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2005-01-06 Colorado School Of Mines Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic living organisms using bacteriophage
US20090286232A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2009-11-19 MicroPhage™ Incorporated Method and apparatus for enhanced sensitivity in bacteriophage-based diagnostic assays
US20090246752A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2009-10-01 Microphage Tm Incorporated Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic living organisms using bacteriophage
US20040002126A1 (en) * 2002-06-28 2004-01-01 Michel Houde Method, device and system for detecting the presence of microorganisms
US20050208475A1 (en) * 2002-09-16 2005-09-22 Eric Best Process and apparatus comprising episcopic differential contrast (EDIC) microscopy plus epifluorescence microscopy (EF) for the detection or identification of biological materials on surfaces
US20040137430A1 (en) * 2002-10-15 2004-07-15 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Assays to detect or quantify bacterial or viral pathogens and contaminants
US20070249012A1 (en) * 2003-12-16 2007-10-25 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Microbial Detection and Quantification
US20050250096A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2005-11-10 Microphage, Incorporated Microorganism detection using bacteriophage amplification
US20090286225A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2009-11-19 Microphagetm Incorporated Method and apparatus for bacteriophage-based diagnostic assays
US20050255043A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-11-17 Hnatowich Donald J Bacteriophage imaging of inflammation
US20070059725A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-03-15 Voorhees Kent J Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic organisms using bacteriophage
US20070178450A1 (en) * 2006-01-27 2007-08-02 Microphage (Tm) Incorporation Method and apparatus for determining level of microorganisms using bacteriophage
US20090246753A1 (en) * 2008-01-11 2009-10-01 Colorado School Of Mines Detection of Phage Amplification by SERS Nanoparticles
US20090208996A1 (en) * 2008-02-20 2009-08-20 Jagath Kadurugamuwa Method and Kit for Detecting Microorganisms On A Household Surface
US20090258341A1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2009-10-15 Colorado School Of Mines Compositions and Methods for Detecting Bacteria

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070148638A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2007-06-28 Colorado School Of Mines Method for Detecting Low Concentrations of a Target Bacterium That Uses Phages to Infect Target Bacterial Cells
US20090117536A1 (en) * 2005-03-04 2009-05-07 Blaze Venture Technologies Limited Method and device for bacterial sampling
US20070059725A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-03-15 Voorhees Kent J Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic organisms using bacteriophage
US8092990B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2012-01-10 Colorado School Of Mines Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic organisms using bacteriophage
US20090246753A1 (en) * 2008-01-11 2009-10-01 Colorado School Of Mines Detection of Phage Amplification by SERS Nanoparticles
US8697434B2 (en) 2008-01-11 2014-04-15 Colorado School Of Mines Detection of phage amplification by SERS nanoparticles
US20090258341A1 (en) * 2008-04-03 2009-10-15 Colorado School Of Mines Compositions and Methods for Detecting Bacteria
US9441204B2 (en) 2008-04-03 2016-09-13 Colorado School Of Mines Compositions and methods for detecting Yersinia pestis bacteria

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20070148638A1 (en) 2007-06-28
HK1082525A1 (en) 2006-06-09
AU2003228505B2 (en) 2009-01-08
AU2003228505A1 (en) 2003-10-27
EP1540018B1 (en) 2010-05-26
JP4490112B2 (en) 2010-06-23
CA2482173C (en) 2012-10-23
WO2003087772A2 (en) 2003-10-23
JP2005524394A (en) 2005-08-18
ES2346424T3 (en) 2010-10-15
ATE469240T1 (en) 2010-06-15
DE60332740D1 (en) 2010-07-08
EP1540018A2 (en) 2005-06-15
US20040224359A1 (en) 2004-11-11
US7972773B2 (en) 2011-07-05
US7166425B2 (en) 2007-01-23
JP2010088456A (en) 2010-04-22
CA2482173A1 (en) 2003-10-23
WO2003087772A3 (en) 2005-04-21
EP1540018A4 (en) 2006-05-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7972773B2 (en) Method for detecting concentrations of a target bacterium that uses phages to infect target bacterial cells
Madonna et al. Detection of Escherichia coli using immunomagnetic separation and bacteriophage amplification coupled with matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
Madonna et al. Detection of bacteria from biological mixtures using immunomagnetic separation combined with matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry
US8216780B2 (en) Method for enhanced sensitivity in bacteriophage-based diagnostic assays
US20090246752A1 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic living organisms using bacteriophage
US8092990B2 (en) Apparatus and method for detecting microscopic organisms using bacteriophage
US20020192676A1 (en) Method for determining if a type of bacteria is present in a mixture
JP2009508490A (en) Method and apparatus for microbial identification using bacteriophage
JP2005524394A5 (en)
US9441204B2 (en) Compositions and methods for detecting Yersinia pestis bacteria
US8455186B2 (en) Method of detection of microorganisms with enhanced bacteriophage amplification
JP6370781B2 (en) Method for detecting at least one mechanism of resistance to glycopeptides by mass spectrometry
US20050042698A1 (en) Detection of malaria parasites by mass spectrometry
Whiteaker et al. Analysis of Bacillus anthracis spores in milk using mass spectrometry
Moghtader Nanobio-approaches for the detection of bacteria by SERS
Wu Suresh Kumar Kailasa*, Vaibhavkumar N. Mehta
FR2980213A1 (en) PROCESS FOR CHARACTERIZING BACTERIA BY DETECTION OF NON-STRUCTURAL PROTEINS OF BACTERIOPHAGES

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES, COLORADO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MADONNA, ANGELO J.;VOORHEES, KENT J.;REES, JON C.;REEL/FRAME:019771/0103;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030620 TO 20030716

Owner name: COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES, COLORADO

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MADONNA, ANGELO J.;VOORHEES, KENT J.;REES, JON C.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030620 TO 20030716;REEL/FRAME:019771/0103

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YR, SMALL ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M2552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20230705