Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20080015641 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/457,033
Publication dateJan 17, 2008
Filing dateJul 12, 2006
Priority dateJul 12, 2006
Also published asUS8478420
Publication number11457033, 457033, US 2008/0015641 A1, US 2008/015641 A1, US 20080015641 A1, US 20080015641A1, US 2008015641 A1, US 2008015641A1, US-A1-20080015641, US-A1-2008015641, US2008/0015641A1, US2008/015641A1, US20080015641 A1, US20080015641A1, US2008015641 A1, US2008015641A1
InventorsRandolph K. Armstrong, Scott A. Armstrong
Original AssigneeCyberonics, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Implantable Medical Device Charge Balance Assessment
US 20080015641 A1
Abstract
A method is provided including delivering at least one electrical signal to tissue of a patient through an electrode. The method further includes assessing whether a net charge remains on the electrode a predetermined period of time after the delivery of the electrical signal. Systems for delivering such a signal, and assessing whether a net charge remains on the electrode providing the signal, are also provided.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(20)
1. A method for charge balance assessment in an implantable medical device, the method comprising:
delivering at least one electrical signal to tissue of a patient through an electrode; and
assessing whether a net charge remains on the electrode a predetermined period of time after the delivery of the electrical signal.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein assessing whether a net charge remains on the electrode comprises measuring a voltage differential between a charge balancing capacitor associated with the electrode and a reference voltage, and estimating the net charge remaining based on the measured voltage differential.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein measuring the voltage differential comprises measuring a voltage differential across a resistor coupled to a charge balancing capacitor associated with the electrode and a reference voltage, and estimating the charge balance based on the measured voltage differential.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein measuring the voltage differential between a charge balancing capacity and a reference voltage comprises measuring said differential from at least one of:
a) the proximal side of the charge balancing capacitor; and
b) the distal side of the charge balancing capacitor.
5. The method of claim 2, wherein said reference voltage is selected from the group consisting of:
a) another electrode;
b) a common conductor of the implantable medical device; and
c) ground.
6. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a response based on the step of assessing whether a net charge imbalance remains on the electrode.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein generating a response comprises at least one of:
a) generating a notification to one of the patient and a physician that a net charge remains on the electrode when the predetermined period of time has elapsed;
b) changing the electrical signal delivered by the electrode;
c) modifying a path by which the electrical signal is delivered such that an electrode other than the electrode carrying a net charge is used for delivering the electrical signal;
d) disabling delivery of the electrical signal by way of the electrode carrying a net charge;
e) switching from passive charge balancing to active charge balancing; and
f) increasing the active charge balancing to eliminate the net charge.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein delivering at least one electrical signal comprises delivering said at least one electrical signal via a plurality of electrodes, and the method further comprising assessing whether a net charge remains on each of said plurality of electrodes.
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising selecting at least one electrode from among a plurality of electrodes through which to deliver the at least one electrical signal to tissue, and assessing whether a net charge remains on each said selected electrode.
10. The method of claim 1, further comprising transmitting from the implantable medical device to an external programming device a signal indicative of whether a net charge remains on the electrode.
11. A system comprising:
a current source that generates an electrical signal;
an electrode that delivers the electrical signal generated by the current source to tissue;
a charge balancing unit coupled to the electrode; and
a charge balance determination unit that detects whether a net charge remains on the electrode a predetermined period of time after the electrical signal is delivered.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the charge balancing unit comprises one of:
a passive charge balancing capacitor; and
an active charge balancing unit that provides an electrical balancing signal of an opposite polarity to the electrical signal generated by the current source.
13. The system of claim 11, wherein the charge balance determination unit comprises a switch for coupling the electrode to a voltage meter to measure a voltage differential between the electrode and a reference voltage to determine whether a net charge remains on the electrode.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the reference voltage is selected from the group consisting of:
a) another electrode;
b) a common conductor of the system; and
c) ground.
15. The system of claim 11, wherein the charge balance determination unit comprises:
a resistance coupling the electrode to a reference voltage; and
a voltage meter to measure a voltage differential across the resistance as an indication of the net charge remaining on the electrode.
16. The system of claim 11, further comprising a response module that generates a response based on whether the charge balance determination unit detects a net charge remaining on the electrode.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein the response comprises one of:
a) a notification to one of the patient and a physician that a net charge remains on the electrode;
b) changing the electrical signal generated by the current source;
c) modifying the path by which the electrical signal is delivered such that an electrode other than the electrode carrying a net charge is used for delivering the electrical signal;
d) disabling delivery of the electrical signal by way of the electrode carrying a net charge;
e) switching from passive charge balancing to active charge balancing; and
f) increasing the active charge balancing to eliminate the net charge on the electrode.
18. The system of claim 11, further comprising a plurality of electrodes that may be selected to deliver the electrical signal generated by the current source to tissue; wherein the charge balance determination unit determines whether a net charge remains on each electrode of said plurality of electrodes a predetermined period of time after the electrical signal is delivered.
19. The system of claim 11, further comprising an external programming device operable to display a notification to one of the patient and a physician that a net charge remains on the electrode.
20. The system of claim 11, further comprising an external programming device, wherein the charge balance determination unit transmits a signal indicative of whether a net charge remains on the electrode to the external programming device, and the external programming device is operable to alter the electrical signal generated by the current source based on the signal transmitted by the charge balance determination unit.
Description
    BACKGROUND
  • [0001]
    1. Technical Field
  • [0002]
    This disclosure relates generally to implantable medical devices, and more particularly to methods, apparatus, and systems for assessing charge imbalance in implantable medical devices.
  • [0003]
    2. Background Information
  • [0004]
    There have been many improvements over the last several decades in medical treatments for disorders of the nervous system, such as epilepsy and other motor disorders, and abnormal neural discharge disorders. One of the more recently available treatments involves the application of an electrical signal to a patient's tissue to reduce various symptoms or effects of such neural disorders. For example, electrical signals have been successfully applied at strategic locations in the human body to provide various benefits, including reducing occurrences of seizures and/or improving or ameliorating other conditions. A particular example of such a treatment regimen involves applying an electrical signal to the vagus nerve of the human body to reduce or eliminate epileptic seizures, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,702,254 to Dr. Jacob Zabara, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety in this specification. Electrical signals may be applied to the vagus nerve by implanting an electrical device underneath the skin of a patient and electrically stimulating tissue, organ(s) or nerves of the patient. The system may operate without a detection system if the patient has been diagnosed with epilepsy, periodically applying a prophylactic series of electrical pulses to the vagus (or other cranial) nerve intermittently throughout the day, or over another predetermined time interval. Alternatively, the system may include a detection system to detect one or more physiological parameters associated with a disorder (e.g., changes in brain activity as evidenced by EEG signals). When the physiological parameter is detected, the electrical signal is then applied to a target body location in response.
  • [0005]
    Typically, implantable medical devices (IMDs) involving the delivery of electrical signals to, or the sensing of electrical activity in, body tissues (e.g., pacemakers for sensing and applying a signal to heart tissue, and vagus nerve stimulators for similarly sensing or applying a signal to a vagus nerve) comprise a pulse generator for generating the electrical signal and a lead assembly coupled at its proximal end to the pulse generator terminals and at its distal end to one or more electrodes that interface with the body tissue to which the signal is applied. As used herein “stimulation” refers to the application of an electrical signal to a target body tissue, regardless of the effect that signal is intended to produce.
  • [0006]
    In providing a stimulation signal to a target body tissue, a continuous or net charge at the electrode/tissue interface is undesirable. Because stimulation involves applying an electrical charge to body tissue, IMDs are required to ensure that the net charge at the electrode/tissue interface is approximately zero, i.e., that the stimulation is charge balanced. IMD manufacturers use output coupling capacitors between the output circuits of the pulse generator and the electrodes to block errant continuous direct current (“DC”) and serve as “passive” charge balancing components for the electrical signals being applied to the tissue. Charge built up on the electrodes during stimulation is offset by use of these output coupling capacitors, and discharged when delivery of a portion of the electrical signal is completed—typically after delivery of an individual pulse in a pulsed electrical signal. A “discharge phase” may be observed for a period, for example, after a monophasic stimulation phase. The stimulation phase and the discharge phase taken together may be considered a charge-balanced pulse in a signal comprising a plurality of such pulses.
  • [0007]
    Additionally, some IMDs may employ additional “active” charge balancing to reduce (or eliminate altogether) the workload on the passive charge balancing components (i.e., the output coupling capacitors). For active charge balancing, a stimulation of opposite polarity is applied at the electrode/tissue interface in a second phase after the initial stimulation. In such IMDs, active stimulation is set “a priori” based upon the programmed stimulation therapy. For example, a 1 mA pulse of 500 μS would be actively charge balanced by an opposite-polarity pulse of equal charge (Q=I*T) such as 1 mA for 500 μS or 0.25 mA for 2 mS. Since active charge balancing schemes are setup “a priori,” and without examination and assessment of the actual amount of net charge remaining on the electrodes, active charge balancing units may not account for system problems.
  • [0008]
    In many IMDs that deliver an electrical signal, two electrodes (i.e., one cathode and one anode) are used to deliver the signal. However, some IMDs, such as pain neurostimulators, deliver electrical signals through multiple electrodes (e.g., 3 or more electrodes), and given the dynamic variation associated with delivery of the electrical signal and electrode switching to deliver that signal, the likelihood of residual charge at any electrode/tissue interface is increased in multi-electrode IMDs.
  • [0009]
    The present disclosure is directed to assessing when an undesirable net charge exists on at least one electrode, and preferably on each, electrode of an IMD, despite passive or active charge balancing efforts, such as when the output capacitors have failed, or the stimulation therapy being delivered is driven too hard for the particular output capacitors used.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY
  • [0010]
    In accordance with various embodiments, a method is provided for assessing charge imbalance on the electrodes of an implantable medical device. The method includes delivering at least one electrical signal, such as an electrical pulse, to tissue of a patient through an electrode. The method further includes assessing whether a net charge remains on the electrode a predetermined period of time after the electrical signal.
  • [0011]
    Still further embodiments are directed to a system for assessing whether a net charge remains on the electrodes of an implantable medical device. The system comprises a current source and an electrode that delivers an electrical signal generated by the current source to body tissue of a patient. The system further includes a charge balancing unit coupling the current source and the electrode. Additionally, the system includes a charge balance determination unit that detects a net charge remaining on the electrode a predetermined period of time after the electrical signal is delivered.
  • [0012]
    The preferred embodiments described herein do not limit the scope of this disclosure.
  • NOTATION AND NOMENCLATURE
  • [0013]
    Certain terms are used throughout the following description and claims to refer to particular system components. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, IMD manufacturers may refer to a component or groups of components by different names. This document does not intend to distinguish between components or groups thereof that differ in name but not function. In the following discussion and in the claims, the terms “including” and “comprising” are used in an open-ended fashion, and thus should be interpreted to mean “including, but not limited to . . . .”
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0014]
    The disclosure may be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals identify like elements, and in which:
  • [0015]
    FIG. 1 is a stylized diagram of an implantable medical device suitable for use in the present disclosure implanted into a patient's body and an external programming device for programming the IMD;
  • [0016]
    FIG. 2 is a circuit diagram of an embodiment of the present disclosure for charge imbalance assessment; and
  • [0017]
    FIG. 3 is a flowchart representation of a method of assessing the presence of a net charge balance on an electrode of an IMD, in accordance with one illustrative embodiment of the present disclosure.
  • [0018]
    While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the disclosure to the particular forms disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the appended claims.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0019]
    Illustrative embodiments of the disclosure are described herein. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. In the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the design-specific goals, which will vary from one implementation to another. It will be appreciated that such a development effort, while possibly complex and time-consuming, would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for persons of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
  • [0020]
    Embodiments of the present disclosure provide methods and apparatus for assessing presence of a net charge on one or more electrodes of an implantable medical device. A more detailed description of an IMD suitable for use in the present disclosure is provided in various figures and the accompanying description below.
  • [0021]
    FIG. 1 illustrates an implantable medical device (“IMD”) 110 having a main body 112 comprising a case or shell 121 with a header 114 for connecting to leads 122. The IMD 110 is implanted in the patient's chest in a pocket or cavity formed by the implanting surgeon just below the skin, similar to the implantation procedure for a pacemaker pulse generator. A nerve electrode assembly 125, preferably comprising an electrode pair, is conductively connected to the distal end of an insulated electrically conductive lead assembly 122, which preferably comprises a pair of lead wires (one wire for each electrode of an electrode pair). Lead assembly 122 is attached at its proximal end to the header 114 on case 121. The electrode assembly is surgically coupled to a vagus nerve 127, e.g. in the patient's neck (FIG. 1) or abdomen (not shown). The electrode assembly 125 preferably comprises a bipolar electrode pair, such as the electrode pair described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,481 issued Mar. 4, 1986 to Bullara. Persons of skill in the art will appreciate that many electrode designs could be used in the present disclosure. The two electrodes are preferably wrapped about the vagus nerve, and the electrode assembly 125 is preferably secured to the nerve 127 by a spiral anchoring tether such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,979,511 issued Dec. 25, 1990 to Reese S. Terry, Jr. and commonly owned by the assignee of the instant application. Lead assembly 122 may be secured, while retaining the ability to flex with movement of the chest and neck, by a suture connection to nearby tissue.
  • [0022]
    The IMD 110 may be controlled or programmed with an external programming device 150 (e.g., a desktop, laptop, or handheld computer, or a PDA) and a programming wand 155 to facilitate radio frequency (RF) communication between the external programming device 150 and the IMD 110. The wand 155 and software permit noninvasive communication with the IMD 110 after the latter is implanted.
  • [0023]
    FIG. 2 illustrates a circuit diagram of an embodiment of the IMD 110 in greater detail. In various embodiments, the IMD 110 comprises a current source 200 that generates electrical stimulation pulses delivered to target tissue of the patient when switch 202 and switch 206 are closed to complete a circuit through the charge balancing capacitors (C1-C4) 204 and to the electrodes 125. Where the IMD is a neurostimulation device, the current source may comprise a constant current source, such as a programmable constant current source. Alternatively, the current source may comprise a constant voltage source where the IMD is a pacemakers or a defibrillator. In one embodiment, switches 202 and 206 may be synchronized to select a desired electrical signal path, e.g., switch 202 may select a first electrode as a cathode and switch 206 may selected a second electrode as an anode, thus defining, together with the target tissue of the patient, an electrical signal path. Any number of electrodes may be used individually or collectively as cathodes and/or anodes in the system, and the IMD 110 programming selects an output electrode (i.e., the cathode) using switch 202, and a return electrode (i.e., the anode) using switch 206. Persons of skill in the art will appreciate that multiple switches 202 or 206 may be provided where multiple electrodes are simultaneously used as a collective cathode or anode, respectively.
  • [0024]
    The charge balancing capacitors 204 (C1-C4) couple each respective electrode 125 to the switched circuitry to block errant continuous direct current and, when functioning properly as designed and not subject to too intense an electrical signal, discharge any charge built up on the electrodes 125 during application of the electrical signal to the electrodes and the tissues of the patient. For example, electrode 125-1 may be connected to C1, electrode 125-2 may be connected to C2, and housing 112 may be connected to C3. A fourth electrode (not depicted in FIG. 1), may also be connected to capacitor C4. During the application of a therapeutic electrical signal in such an example, switch 202 would connect current source 200 to charge balancing capacitor C1 and switch 206 would connect to charge balancing capacitor C2, producing a therapeutic electrical signal through electrodes 125-1 and 125-2. In at least some embodiments, the charge balancing capacitors are passive charge balancing components. By comparison, the circuitry may optionally comprise an active charge balancing unit (not shown) to reduce the workload on the charge balancing capacitors (or replace them altogether) by applying a second electrical signal of opposite polarity after the initial electrical signal is applied to tissue. In one embodiment, the active charge balancing unit comprises a current source.
  • [0025]
    Following delivery of the electrical signal, switches 202 and 206 may thereafter be used to assess whether an appreciable, undesirable net charge is present on an electrode. As referred to herein, assessing charge remaining on an electrode involves taking an actual measurement of the circuitry from which charge may be estimated or calculated based on other known system values, such as resistance, capacitance, voltage, and the like. In one embodiment, switch 202 may be left open or unconnected, and switch 206 may be connected to one of a plurality of electrodes for which assessment of the presence (or absence) of a net charge is desired. A resistor 208 is coupled to the output coupling capacitors via switch 206 and to ground. As shown in FIG. 2, the resistor 208 may, in one embodiment, be coupled to the proximal side (i.e., the same side as the current source 200) of the capacitors 204. In alternative embodiments, the resistor 208 may be coupled to the distal side of the capacitors 204, and in a still further embodiment, the resistor 208 may be coupled to both sides of the capacitors 204. The resistor 208 may be any value suitable for measuring voltage. If the resistor remains in path during delivery of the therapeutic electrical signal (i.e., both switches 202 and 206 are closed), resistor 208 should be small enough so as not to impede current delivery and waste energy. In certain embodiments (not shown), the resistor 208 is out-of-circuit during application of the therapeutic electrical signal to the electrodes 125, and therefore may be of relatively high impedance during the net charge assessment measurement. In one embodiment, resistor 208 is implemented with a value of 100 k ohms, although many variations on impedance are contemplated within the scope of this disclosure. A voltage differential 210 across the resistor 208 is measured by a charge balance determination unit 212, and used to estimate any existing net charge on the electrode. In one embodiment, the charge balance determination unit includes a voltage meter to measure the voltage differential 210 across the resistor 208.
  • [0026]
    Alternatively, in contrast to a voltage differential between a capacitor and ground, the charge balance determination unit 212 may sample the voltage differential 210 on the charge balancing capacitor 204 relative to another of the capacitors, or relative to a common conductor (such as the can 121). As previously noted, the charge balance determination unit 212 may sample voltage differential 210 using 1) the proximal side of the capacitors 204 (C1-C4) relative to the programmable constant current source, 2) the distal side, or 3) both sides of the capacitor. The voltage differential 210 may then be used by the charge balance determination unit 212 or the external programming device 150 to estimate any existing net charge balance on the electrode.
  • [0027]
    If the voltage differential 210 is equal to zero volts, there is no undesirable net charge remaining on the electrode(s). If the voltage differential 210 is greater than zero volts, net charge remains on the electrode(s), indicating that an undesirable condition may exist on the electrode(s) or the stimulated tissue. Alternatively, a voltage threshold may be set at an appropriately low value, sufficient to avoid undesirable conditions, such as 0.3 mV for a 100 nA current limit into a 3000 ohm lead. The voltage differential 210 may be compared to the voltage threshold to determine whether an undesirable net charge remains on the electrode. In such embodiments, such a voltage threshold may be adjusted according to the known lead impedance of the electrode. In order to implement a safety margin, the voltage threshold may be set lower than necessary to avoid an undesirable condition.
  • [0028]
    In various embodiments, the measurement of the voltage differential 210 by the charge balance determination unit 212 may be performed instantaneously. Alternatively, the voltage differential 210 may be evaluated over time. In general, no electrical signal is provided when measuring voltage differential 210 to check for a charge imbalance. The presence (or absence) of a net charge may simply be measured during the period following application of a regular therapeutic electrical signal. In one embodiment, the measurement by the charge balance determination unit 212 may be performed at routine intervals, such as once every hour, once every 24 hours or the like, to generate a response, such as an indicator or flag, the next time that the external programming device 150 communicates with the IMD 110.
  • [0029]
    The charge balance determination unit 212 may perform various activities based on the differential voltage 210 which is measured after the discharge phase of the capacitors (or the active charge-balancing signal, where active charge-balancing is employed) has ended. In an embodiment, the charge balance determination unit 212 converts the voltage differential 210 to net charge, and may either report the amount of the net charge on the electrodes to the external programming device 150 or store the net charge value, with a time-stamp, for later reporting. The IMD 110 may, in some embodiments, adjust the delivered electrical signal to reduce net charge without user input or programming from external programming device 150. In an alternative embodiment, the charge balance determination unit 212 transmits the voltage differential 210 to the external programming device 150, and the external programming device 150 may display a response and/or reprogram the IMD 110 as needed to reduce net charge on the electrode. In a further alternative embodiment, the IMD 110 may adjust the delivered therapeutic electrical signal to reduce net charge on the electrode without immediately reporting the adjustment to the external programming device 150.
  • [0030]
    In still another alternative embodiment, the charge balance determination unit 212 and/or the external programming device 150 may use the voltage differential 210 as a proxy for a measurement of net charge on the electrodes, and thus the generated response is a result of the comparison of the measured voltage to a threshold value, which may be programmably or otherwise predetermined. Such an embodiment provides a simplified alternative having a lower calculation burden on the IMD than previously described embodiments in which the measured voltage differential is converted to net charge.
  • [0031]
    Once an assessment of net charge and/or voltage differential 210 has been made, a response may be generated by a response module (not shown), which may generally be located either in the charge balance determination unit 212, in another part of the IMD 110 operatively connected to the charge balance determination unit 212, or in the external programming device 150. The response may include, for example, a patient notification or a physician notification generated on the display of the external programming device 150. Such a notification may be a sensory, textual or graphical alert that a charge imbalance has been detected, and the patient may notify the physician, or the physician may use the information to alter the delivered therapy or schedule surgery to replace the IMD 110, the electrodes 125, or both. A response may also include a change in the therapeutic electrical signal to be delivered, implemented without interaction by a patient or physician, such as a reduction in one or more parameters defining the electrical signal that is delivered (i.e., reducing the duration or intensity of the signal), an increase in active charge balancing (i.e., increasing the duration or intensity of a charge balancing signal), a modification to the signal path (i.e., by switching which electrodes among a plurality of electrodes are used to deliver the electrical signal), and disabling the stimulation entirely.
  • [0032]
    In multi-electrode stimulators, the techniques of the present disclosure are particularly valuable given that the dynamic variation of stimulation and electrode switching result in an increased likelihood of residual net charge remaining on the electrodes. The assessment of charge imbalance in a multi-electrode pulse generator may be performed by comparing the differential voltage for multiple electrodes with respect to one another or with respect to a common conductor (such as, in various embodiments, the can 121).
  • [0033]
    The presently disclosed method of detecting net charge and assessing charge imbalance may be implemented entirely in the IMD 110 in various embodiments, or alternatively, in a combination of the IMD 110 and the external programming device 150.
  • [0034]
    Utilizing embodiments of the present disclosure, an accurate assessment of the function and operation of the charge balancing circuitry may be performed, thereby providing better warnings to the user and/or to a healthcare provider assessing the operations of the IMD 110.
  • [0035]
    FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method of assessing the presence or absence of a net charge in accordance with an embodiment of the present disclosure. The method begins as the IMD 110 applies an electrical signal to tissue (block 300). Specifically, in an embodiment, a therapeutic electrical signal is delivered by selecting an output electrode (one of electrodes 125) with switch 202 and a return electrode (another of electrodes 125) with switch 206. After delivery of the electrical signal is complete, a discharge period for the electrode may be provided, in which any residual charge on an electrode is drained to ground. In one embodiment of this discharge period, after application of the therapeutic electrical signal, switch 206 is switched to the same electrode as switch 202, and switch 202 is then opened.
  • [0036]
    Because the charge balancing unit is designed to effectively discharge any net charge remaining on the electrode within a predetermined period of time (i.e., the discharge period), in block 302 the method includes waiting until the discharge period has elapsed. The length of time for the discharge period may be a characteristic of the particular capacitors used in passive charge balancing or the minimum amount of time necessary to apply an active charge balancing, opposite polarity electrical signal to the electrode. More generally, a “predetermined period of time” can be any time period subsequent to the completion of delivery of the electrical signal, and desirably is a sufficient time thereafter to permit all (or nearly all) residual electrical charge to drain from the electrode 125 to ground. The period may be predetermined by a user, the external programmer 150, or one or more subsystems within the IMD 110 itself. The drainage characteristics for the electrode 125 will be known, depending upon such parameters as whether active or passive charge balancing is used, the circuit components, the amplitude and duration of the therapeutic electrical signal, and other factors known to persons of skill in the art. In particular, the period may constant or variable, and may be shorter than or longer than the complete discharge period for the residual charge, as long as the measured value of residual charge is interpreted and compared with regard to the charge expected to remain on the electrode based upon the known parameters and period of time used for that measurement.
  • [0037]
    In block 304, the method includes measuring a voltage differential 210 to detect whether any net charge remains on the electrode after the discharge period has elapsed. Specifically, in an embodiment, switch 206 is switched to any desired electrode in order to see if any net charge remains on that electrode by evaluating the voltage differential 210. In one embodiment, the method includes detecting residual net charge remaining on the electrode by measuring an instantaneous voltage differential 210 on the proximal side of the charge balancing capacitor. Alternatively, wires on the distal side of the capacitor may be the inputs to switch 206 such that the method includes detecting residual charge on the electrode by measuring the instantaneous voltage differential 210 at the distal side of the capacitor.
  • [0038]
    In block 306, the method includes determining whether a remaining net charge is present across the electrode based on the measured differential voltage 210. The residual voltage (measured as voltage differential 210) on a capacitor after a predetermined period should be no more than the amount of current that will result in an undesirable condition times the electrode/tissue resistance Re at the electrode (i.e., V=T*Re). In one embodiment, 100 nA is a threshold limit on current after the discharge period for the capacitors. While charge is not directly measured, it may be calculated from the direct measurement of voltage differential 210 as C*Vmeasure, where C is the capacitance of the charge balancing capacitor 204, and Vmeasure is the measured voltage differential 210. In one illustrative implementation, Re would be 3000 ohms, so the voltage threshold would be 0.3 mV. For a 10 μF coupling capacitor, the limit on tolerable net charge would equate to 3 nCoulombs.
  • [0039]
    An appropriate response is generated based on whether a net charge exists across the electrode (block 308). In certain embodiments, the response may be determined by the magnitude of the net charge. As noted previously, an appropriate response may range from doing nothing if no charge remains on the electrode to notification of either the patient or the physician, to changing the electrical signal delivered. Specifically, an appropriate response could be reducing the therapeutic electrical signal that is delivered such that the electrode is not driven as hard, increasing the active charge balancing electrical signal if used, modifying the stimulation path used in delivering the therapeutic electrical signal (i.e., by switching which electrode of a plurality of electrodes is used to deliver the signal), or disabling the therapeutic electrical signal entirely, such as until the charge balancing capacitors and/or electrode can be surgically replaced.
  • [0040]
    The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the disclosure may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. The particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the disclosure. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3421511 *Dec 10, 1965Jan 14, 1969Medtronic IncImplantable electrode for nerve stimulation
US3796221 *Jul 7, 1971Mar 12, 1974Hagfors NApparatus for delivering electrical stimulation energy to body-implanted apparatus with signal-receiving means
US4384926 *Mar 25, 1982May 24, 1983Amp IncorporatedPlating interior surfaces of electrical terminals
US4573481 *Jun 25, 1984Mar 4, 1986Huntington Institute Of Applied ResearchImplantable electrode array
US4590946 *Jun 14, 1984May 27, 1986Biomed Concepts, Inc.Surgically implantable electrode for nerve bundles
US4592359 *Apr 2, 1985Jun 3, 1986The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior UniversityMulti-channel implantable neural stimulator
US4649936 *Oct 11, 1984Mar 17, 1987Case Western Reserve UniversityAsymmetric single electrode cuff for generation of unidirectionally propagating action potentials for collision blocking
US4821724 *Aug 1, 1986Apr 18, 1989Telectronics N.V.Pacing pulse compensation
US4827932 *Feb 27, 1987May 9, 1989Intermedics Inc.Implantable defibrillation electrodes
US4899750 *Apr 19, 1988Feb 13, 1990Siemens-Pacesetter, Inc.Lead impedance scanning system for pacemakers
US4903700 *Dec 13, 1988Feb 27, 1990Telectronics N.V.Pacing pulse compensation
US4920979 *Oct 12, 1988May 1, 1990Huntington Medical Research InstituteBidirectional helical electrode for nerve stimulation
US5003975 *Oct 17, 1989Apr 2, 1991Siemens-Pacesetter, Inc.Automatic electrode configuration of an implantable pacemaker
US5025807 *Jan 25, 1989Jun 25, 1991Jacob ZabaraNeurocybernetic prosthesis
US5095905 *Jun 7, 1990Mar 17, 1992Medtronic, Inc.Implantable neural electrode
US5111815 *Oct 15, 1990May 12, 1992Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.Method and apparatus for cardioverter/pacer utilizing neurosensing
US5179950 *Dec 5, 1991Jan 19, 1993Cyberonics, Inc.Implanted apparatus having micro processor controlled current and voltage sources with reduced voltage levels when not providing stimulation
US5186170 *Dec 5, 1991Feb 16, 1993Cyberonics, Inc.Simultaneous radio frequency and magnetic field microprocessor reset circuit
US5188104 *Feb 1, 1991Feb 23, 1993Cyberonics, Inc.Treatment of eating disorders by nerve stimulation
US5201808 *Feb 10, 1992Apr 13, 1993Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.Minute volume rate-responsive pacemaker employing impedance sensing on a unipolar lead
US5201865 *Oct 28, 1991Apr 13, 1993Medtronic, Inc.Medical lead impedance measurement system
US5205285 *Jun 14, 1991Apr 27, 1993Cyberonics, Inc.Voice suppression of vagal stimulation
US5299569 *May 3, 1991Apr 5, 1994Cyberonics, Inc.Treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders by nerve stimulation
US5304206 *Nov 18, 1991Apr 19, 1994Cyberonics, Inc.Activation techniques for implantable medical device
US5411528 *Nov 19, 1992May 2, 1995Pacesetter, Inc.Electrically programmable polarity connector for an implantable body tissue stimulator
US5501702 *Jul 19, 1994Mar 26, 1996Medtronic, Inc.Time sharing multipolar rheography apparatus and method
US5507786 *Apr 14, 1994Apr 16, 1996Pacesetter, Inc.System and method for measuring and storing parametric data pertaining to operating characteristics of an implantable medical device
US5620474 *Apr 24, 1995Apr 15, 1997Vitatron Medical, B.V.System and method for determining indicated pacemaker replacement time based upon battery impedance measurement
US5707400 *Sep 19, 1995Jan 13, 1998Cyberonics, Inc.Treating refractory hypertension by nerve stimulation
US5713936 *Jan 23, 1996Feb 3, 1998Litronik Batterietechnologie Gmbh & Co.Implantable medical device with end-of-life battery detection circuit
US5741311 *Jun 27, 1996Apr 21, 1998Medtronic, Inc.Implantable medical device system with method for determining lead condition
US5743860 *Mar 20, 1996Apr 28, 1998Lockheed Martin Energy Systems, Inc.Apparatus and method for epileptic seizure detection using non-linear techniques
US5755742 *Nov 5, 1996May 26, 1998Medtronic, Inc.Cardioversion/defibrillation lead impedance measurement system
US5755747 *Mar 22, 1996May 26, 1998Daly; ChristopherCochlear implant system with soft turn on electrodes
US5876425 *Sep 19, 1997Mar 2, 1999Advanced Bionics CorporationPower control loop for implantable tissue stimulator
US5891179 *Nov 20, 1997Apr 6, 1999Paceseter, Inc.Method and apparatus for monitoring and displaying lead impedance in real-time for an implantable medical device
US5897577 *Nov 7, 1997Apr 27, 1999Medtronic, Inc.Pacing lead impedance monitoring circuit and method
US6035237 *May 23, 1995Mar 7, 2000Alfred E. Mann FoundationImplantable stimulator that prevents DC current flow without the use of discrete output coupling capacitors
US6052624 *Jan 7, 1999Apr 18, 2000Advanced Bionics CorporationDirectional programming for implantable electrode arrays
US6171239 *Aug 17, 1998Jan 9, 2001Emory UniversitySystems, methods, and devices for controlling external devices by signals derived directly from the nervous system
US6181969 *Jun 23, 1999Jan 30, 2001Advanced Bionics CorporationProgrammable current output stimulus stage for implantable device
US6208902 *Oct 26, 1998Mar 27, 2001Birinder Bob BovejaApparatus and method for adjunct (add-on) therapy for pain syndromes utilizing an implantable lead and an external stimulator
US6212431 *Aug 18, 1999Apr 3, 2001Advanced Bionics CorporationPower transfer circuit for implanted devices
US6216045 *Apr 26, 1999Apr 10, 2001Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.Implantable lead and method of manufacture
US6339725 *Jul 10, 2000Jan 15, 2002The Board Of Trustees Of Southern Illinois UniversityMethods of modulating aspects of brain neural plasticity by vagus nerve stimulation
US6341236 *Apr 30, 1999Jan 22, 2002Ivan OsorioVagal nerve stimulation techniques for treatment of epileptic seizures
US6393325 *Apr 17, 2000May 21, 2002Advanced Bionics CorporationDirectional programming for implantable electrode arrays
US6411844 *Oct 19, 1999Jun 25, 2002Pacesetter, Inc.Fast recovery sensor amplifier circuit for implantable medical device
US6505074 *Dec 29, 2000Jan 7, 2003Birinder R. BovejaMethod and apparatus for electrical stimulation adjunct (add-on) treatment of urinary incontinence and urological disorders using an external stimulator
US6510332 *Aug 16, 2000Jan 21, 2003Transneuronix, Inc.Electrode leads for use in laparoscopic surgery
US6529774 *Nov 9, 2000Mar 4, 2003Neuropace, Inc.Extradural leads, neurostimulator assemblies, and processes of using them for somatosensory and brain stimulation
US6553263 *Jul 28, 2000Apr 22, 2003Advanced Bionics CorporationImplantable pulse generators using rechargeable zero-volt technology lithium-ion batteries
US6556868 *Jan 14, 2002Apr 29, 2003The Board Of Trustees Of Southern Illinois UniversityMethods for improving learning or memory by vagus nerve stimulation
US6684105 *Aug 31, 2001Jan 27, 2004Biocontrol Medical, Ltd.Treatment of disorders by unidirectional nerve stimulation
US6687538 *Jun 19, 2000Feb 3, 2004Medtronic, Inc.Trial neuro stimulator with lead diagnostics
US6690974 *Sep 11, 2001Feb 10, 2004Neuropace, Inc.Stimulation signal generator for an implantable device
US6711440 *Apr 11, 2002Mar 23, 2004Biophan Technologies, Inc.MRI-compatible medical device with passive generation of optical sensing signals
US6718203 *Feb 19, 2002Apr 6, 2004Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US6718207 *Feb 19, 2002Apr 6, 2004Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US6721600 *Dec 31, 2001Apr 13, 2004Medtronic, Inc.Implantable lead functional status monitor and method
US6721603 *Jan 25, 2002Apr 13, 2004Cyberonics, Inc.Nerve stimulation as a treatment for pain
US6725092 *Apr 25, 2002Apr 20, 2004Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic radiation immune medical assist device adapter
US6731979 *Aug 30, 2001May 4, 2004Biophan Technologies Inc.Pulse width cardiac pacing apparatus
US6843870 *Jul 22, 2003Jan 18, 2005Epic Biosonics Inc.Implantable electrical cable and method of making
US6845266 *Feb 19, 2002Jan 18, 2005Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US6850805 *Feb 19, 2002Feb 1, 2005Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US6875180 *Feb 19, 2002Apr 5, 2005Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US6901290 *Feb 19, 2002May 31, 2005Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US6985775 *Jan 29, 2002Jan 10, 2006Medtronic, Inc.Method and apparatus for shunting induced currents in an electrical lead
US6993387 *Feb 19, 2002Jan 31, 2006Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US7006859 *Jul 18, 2003Feb 28, 2006Flint Hills Scientific, L.L.C.Unitized electrode with three-dimensional multi-site, multi-modal capabilities for detection and control of brain state changes
US7010357 *Feb 19, 2002Mar 7, 2006Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US7013174 *Feb 19, 2002Mar 14, 2006Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US7015393 *Mar 8, 2004Mar 21, 2006Biophan Technologies, Inc.Device and method for preventing magnetic-resonance imaging induced damage
US7047074 *Feb 19, 2002May 16, 2006Biophan Technologies, Inc.Electromagnetic interference immune tissue invasive system
US7054686 *Sep 13, 2002May 30, 2006Biophan Technologies, Inc.Pulsewidth electrical stimulation
US7171166 *Oct 21, 2005Jan 30, 2007Motorola Inc.Programmable wireless electrode system for medical monitoring
US7174219 *Nov 3, 2004Feb 6, 2007Medtronic, Inc.Lead electrode for use in an MRI-safe implantable medical device
US7212869 *Feb 4, 2004May 1, 2007Medtronic, Inc.Lead retention means
US7221981 *Mar 28, 2002May 22, 2007Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Electrode geometries for efficient neural stimulation
US20030083726 *Jan 29, 2002May 1, 2003Medtronic, Inc.Method and apparatus for shunting induced currents in an electrical lead
US20030208244 *Apr 26, 2002Nov 6, 2003Medtronic, Inc.Voltage/current regulator improvements for an implantable medical device
US20040015205 *Jun 20, 2002Jan 22, 2004Whitehurst Todd K.Implantable microstimulators with programmable multielectrode configuration and uses thereof
US20040059396 *Sep 25, 2002Mar 25, 2004Reinke James D.Implantable medical device communication system
US20040127953 *Feb 20, 2002Jul 1, 2004Kilgore Kevin L.Systems and methods for reversibly blocking nerve activity
US20040172092 *Jan 31, 2003Sep 2, 2004Greenberg Robert J.Field focusing and mapping in an electrode array
US20050015128 *Dec 30, 2003Jan 20, 2005Rezai Ali R.Excess lead retaining and management devices and methods of using same
US20050016657 *Jul 22, 2003Jan 27, 2005Epic Biosonics Inc.Implantable electrical cable and method of making
US20050055056 *Nov 19, 2003Mar 10, 2005Olson Walter H.Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter/defibrillator
US20050107858 *Dec 14, 2004May 19, 2005Epic Biosonics Inc.Implantable electrical cable and method of making
US20060058597 *Sep 12, 2005Mar 16, 2006Andre MachadoIntraluminal electrode assembly
US20060106430 *Nov 12, 2004May 18, 2006Brad FowlerElectrode configurations for reducing invasiveness and/or enhancing neural stimulation efficacy, and associated methods
US20070027497 *Jul 27, 2005Feb 1, 2007Cyberonics, Inc.Nerve stimulation for treatment of syncope
US20070027498 *Jul 29, 2005Feb 1, 2007Cyberonics, Inc.Selective nerve stimulation for the treatment of eating disorders
US20070027500 *Jul 29, 2005Feb 1, 2007Cyberonics, Inc.Selective neurostimulation for treating mood disorders
US20070032834 *Apr 20, 2006Feb 8, 2007Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Systems and methods for automatically optimizing stimulus parameters and electrode configurations for neuro-stimulators
US20070060991 *Apr 13, 2006Mar 15, 2007North Richard BElectrical stimulation lead, system, and method
US20070073150 *Jul 31, 2006Mar 29, 2007University Of ChicagoSurface acoustic wave probe implant for predicting epileptic seizures
US20070100392 *Oct 28, 2005May 3, 2007Cyberonics, Inc.Selective neurostimulation for treating epilepsy
US20080033503 *Aug 24, 2007Feb 7, 2008Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Electrode configurations for reducing invasiveness and/or enhancing neural stimulation efficacy, and associated methods
US20080046035 *Aug 24, 2007Feb 21, 2008Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Electrode configurations for reducing invasiveness and/or enhancing neural stimulation efficacy, and associated methods
US20080071323 *Nov 21, 2007Mar 20, 2008Lowry David WMethods and Systems Employing Intracranial Electrodes for Neurostimulation and/or Electroencephalography
US20090076567 *Sep 19, 2008Mar 19, 2009Northstar Neuroscience, Inc.Electrode Configurations for Reducing Invasiveness and/or Enhancing Neural Stimulation Efficacy, and Associated Methods
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7809437 *Nov 13, 2006Oct 5, 2010Advanced Bionics, LlcMethods and systems for removing accumulated charge from one or more electrodes
US8068918Nov 29, 2011Enteromedics Inc.Remote monitoring and control of implantable devices
US8140167Nov 20, 2007Mar 20, 2012Enteromedics, Inc.Implantable therapy system with external component having multiple operating modes
US8326426Dec 4, 2012Enteromedics, Inc.Implantable device with heat storage
US8521299Nov 9, 2011Aug 27, 2013Enteromedics Inc.Remote monitoring and control of implantable devices
US8532787Nov 20, 2007Sep 10, 2013Enteromedics Inc.Implantable therapy system having multiple operating modes
US8588928Oct 10, 2008Nov 19, 2013Cochlear LimitedActive electrode state control system with current compensation to reduce residual DC/LF voltage
US9008787Apr 30, 2010Apr 14, 2015Cochlear LimitedActive electrode state control system
US20080114405 *Nov 13, 2006May 15, 2008Palmer Logan PMethods and systems for removing accumulated charge from one or more electrodes
US20080300654 *Nov 20, 2007Dec 4, 2008Scott Anthony LambertImplantable therapy system
US20080300656 *Nov 20, 2007Dec 4, 2008Adrianus DondersImplantable therapy system
US20080300657 *Nov 20, 2007Dec 4, 2008Mark Raymond StultzTherapy system
US20100256708 *Apr 3, 2009Oct 7, 2010Thornton Arnold WImplantable device with heat storage
US20110178579 *Oct 10, 2008Jul 21, 2011Cochlear LimitedActive electrode state control system
US20150217122 *Feb 2, 2015Aug 6, 2015James Andrew LeskosekMedical device for heart stimulations
WO2009046502A1 *Oct 10, 2008Apr 16, 2009Cochlear LimitedActive electrode state control system
WO2010114428A1 *Mar 31, 2009Oct 7, 2010St. Jude Medical AbImplanted heart-stimulation device enabling charge balance after stimulation sequence
WO2014134075A1 *Feb 25, 2014Sep 4, 2014The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaElectrical charge balancing method for functional stimulation using precision pulse width compensation
Classifications
U.S. Classification607/2
International ClassificationA61N1/00
Cooperative ClassificationA61N1/08, A61N1/36153, A61N1/36142, A61N1/3704
European ClassificationA61N1/36Z, A61N1/08, A61N1/36
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jul 13, 2006ASAssignment
Owner name: CYBERONICS, INC., TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ARMSTRONG, RANDOLPH K.;ARMSTRONG, SCOTT A.;REEL/FRAME:017925/0609
Effective date: 20060711