Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20080029391 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/734,266
Publication dateFeb 7, 2008
Filing dateApr 11, 2007
Priority dateMay 15, 2001
Also published asCA2447871A1, CA2447871C, CA2699247A1, CA2699247C, CN1639206A, DE60226497D1, EP1466156A2, EP1466156A4, EP1466156B1, EP1927602A1, EP1927602B1, EP2292671A1, EP2292671B1, US6932894, US7670470, US8147666, US8377271, US8380274, US8437829, US9014774, US9232916, US20030042137, US20050241957, US20080277277, US20100112613, US20100213058, US20110017595, US20110021896, US20110066019, US20130296676, US20150126835, US20150216463, WO2003085372A2, WO2003085372A3, WO2003085372A8
Publication number11734266, 734266, US 2008/0029391 A1, US 2008/029391 A1, US 20080029391 A1, US 20080029391A1, US 2008029391 A1, US 2008029391A1, US-A1-20080029391, US-A1-2008029391, US2008/0029391A1, US2008/029391A1, US20080029391 A1, US20080029391A1, US2008029391 A1, US2008029391A1
InventorsFei Mao, Hyun Cho
Original AssigneeAbbott Diabetes Care, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Biosensor Membranes Composed of Polymers Containing Heterocyclic Nitrogens
US 20080029391 A1
Abstract
Novel membranes comprising various polymers containing heterocyclic nitrogen groups are described. These membranes are usefully employed in electrochemical sensors, such as amperometric biosensors. More particularly, these membranes effectively regulate a flux of analyte to a measurement electrode in an electrochemical sensor, thereby improving the functioning of the electrochemical sensor over a significant range of analyte concentrations. Electrochemical sensors equipped wish such membranes are also described.
Images(12)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(24)
1. An analyte monitoring device having a stacked configuration, the device comprising a first electrode, a second electrode, and a substrate, wherein the first and second electrodes, and the substrate are positioned in a stacked configuration, wherein at least a portion of the device is configured for positioning below a skin surface, and further, wherein a sensing layer is disposed on at least a portion of one of the first or second electrodes.
2. The device of claim 1 further comprising an analyte responsive enzyme.
3. The device of claim 2 wherein the enzyme is a glucose responsive enzyme
4. The device of claim 2 wherein the enzyme is disposed on the device.
5. The device of claim 1 comprising a membrane.
6. The device of claim 5 wherein the membrane is formed in situ.
7. The device of claim 5 wherein the membrane is a mass transport limiting membrane
8. The device of claim 1 wherein the device includes a transcutaneous sensor.
9. The device of claim 1 wherein each of the first and the second electrodes comprise one of a working electrode, and a reference electrode or a reference/counter electrode.
10. The device of claim 1 further including a third electrode.
11. The device of claim 10 wherein the first electrode, the second electrode and the third electrode comprise a working electrode, a reference electrode, and a counter electrode.
12. The device of claim 10 wherein at least two of the first electrode, the second electrode and the third electrode comprise a first working electrode and a second working electrode.
13. The device of claim 1 wherein at least a portion of the device is connectable to a unit for monitoring one or more signals from the device.
14. A transcutaneous sensor, comprising:
a first layer;
a first conducting layer at least a portion of which is positioned in contact with at least a first portion of the first layer;
a second layer having a first surface and a second surface, at least a portion of the first surface positioned in contact with at least a first portion of the first conducting layer; and
a second conducting layer at least a portion of which is positioned in contact with at least a portion of the second surface of the second layer;
wherein a sensing layer is disposed over at least a portion of one of the first conducting layer or the second conducting layer.
15. The sensor of claim 14 wherein the first and the second layers comprise nonconducting material.
16. The sensor of claim 14 wherein at least one of the first conducting layer and the second conducting layer includes a working electrode.
17. The sensor of claim 14 wherein the second layer is substantially disposed between the first conducting layer and the second conducting layer.
18. The sensor of claim 14 comprising an analyte responsive enzyme.
19. The sensor of claim 18 wherein the enzyme is disposed on the device.
20. The sensor of claim 14 comprising a membrane.
21. The sensor of claim 20 wherein the membrane is a mass transport limiting layer
22. The sensor of claim 20 wherein the membrane is formed in situ.
23. The sensor of claim 14 wherein at least another portion of the first conducting layer is in fluid contact with an analyte of a patient.
24. The sensor of claim 14, wherein at least a portion of the device is connectable to a unit for monitoring one or more signals from the device.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of pending application Ser. No. 11/174,222 filed on Jul. 1, 2005 which is a continuation of application No. 10/146,518 filed May 14, 2002 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,932,894. and which also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent application No. 60/291,215 filed on May 15, 2001, the disclosure of each of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes, and each of which are assigned to assignee, Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc. of Alameda, Calif.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    This invention generally relates to an analyte-flux-limiting membrane. More particularly, the invention relates to such a membrane composed of polymers containing heterocyclic nitrogens. The membrane is a useful component in biosensors, and more particularly, in biosensors that can be implanted in a living body.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    Enzyme-based biosensors are devices in which an analyte-concentration-dependent biochemical reaction signal is converted into a measurable physical signal. such as an optical or electrical signal. Such biosensors are widely used in the detection of analytes in clinical, environmental, agricultural and biotechnological applications. Analytes that can be measured in clinical assays of fluids of the human body include, for example, glucose, lactate, cholesterol, bilirubin and amino acids. The detection of analytes in biological fluids, such as blood, is important in the diagnosis and the monitoring of many diseases.
  • [0004]
    Biosensors that detect analytes via electrical signals, such as current (amperometric biosensors) or charge (coulometric biosensors), are of special interest because electron transfer is involved in the biochemical reactions of many important bioanalytes. For example, the reaction Of glucose with glucose oxidase involves electron transfer from glucose to the enzyme to produce gluconoolactone and reduced enzyme. In an example of an amperometric glucose biosensor, glucose is oxidized by oxygen in the body fluid via a glucose oxidase-catalyzed reaction that generates gluconolactone and hydrogen peroxide, whereupon the hydrogen peroxide is electrooxidized and correlated to the concentration of glucose in the body fluid. (Thomé-Duret, V., et al., Anal. Chem. 68, 3822 (1996); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,494 of Van Antwerp.) In another example of an amperometric glucose biosensor, the electrooxidation of glucose to gluconolactone is mediated by a polymeric redox mediator that electrically “wires” the reaction center of the enzyme to an electrode. (Csöregi, E., et al., Anal. Chem. 66, 3131 (1994); Csöregi, E., et al., Anal. Chem. 67, 1240 (1995); Schmidtke, D. W., et al., Anal. Chem. 68, 2845 (1996); Schmidtke, D. W., et al., Anal. Chem. 70, 2149 (1998); and Schmidtke, D. W., et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 294 (1998).)
  • [0005]
    Amperometric biosensors typically employ two or three electrodes, including at least one measuring or working electrode and one reference electrode. In two-electrode systems, the reference electrode also serves as a counter-electrode. In three-electrode systems, the third electrode is a counter-electrode. The measuring or working electrode is composed of a non-corroding carbon or a metal conductor and is connected to the reference electrode via a circuit, such as a potentiostat.
  • [0006]
    Some biosensors are designed for implantation in a living animal body, such as a mammalian or a human body, merely by way of example. In an implantable amperometric biosensor, the working electrode is typically constructed of a sensing layer, which is in direct contact with the conductive material of the electrode, and a diffusion-limiting membrane layer on top of the sensing layer. The sensing layer typically consists of an enzyme, an enzyme stabilizer such as bovine serum albumin (BSA), and a crosslinker that crosslinks the sensing layer components. Alternatively, the sensing layer consists of an enzyme, a polymeric mediator, and a crosslinker that crosslinks the sensing layer components, as in the above-mentioned “wired-enzyme” biosensor.
  • [0007]
    In an implantable amperometric glucose sensor, the membrane is often beneficial or necessary for regulating or limiting the flux of glucose to the sensing layer. By way of explanation, in a glucose sensor without a membrane, the flux of glucose to the sensing layer increases linearly with the concentration of glucose. When all of the glucose arriving at the sensing layer is consumed, the measured output signal is linearly proportional to the flux of glucose and thus to the concentration of glucose. However, when the glucose consumption is limited by the kinetics of chemical or electrochemical activities in the sensing layer, the measured output signal is no longer controlled by the flux of glucose and is no longer linearly proportional to the flux or concentration of glucose. In this case, only a fraction of the glucose arriving at the sensing layer is consumed before the sensor becomes saturated, whereupon the measured signal stops increasing, or increases only slightly, with the concentration of glucose. In a glucose sensor equipped with a diffusion-limiting membrane, on the other hand, the membrane reduces the flux of glucose to the sensing layer such that the sensor does not become saturated and can therefor operate effectively within a much wider range of glucose concentration.
  • [0008]
    More particularly, in these membrane-equipped glucose sensors, the glucose consumption rate is controlled by the diffusion or flux of glucose through the membrane rather than by the kinetics of the sensing layer. The flux of glucose through the membrane is defined by the permeability of the membrane to glucose, which is usually constant, and by the concentration of glucose in the solution or biofluid being monitored. When all of the glucose arriving at the sensing layer is consumed, the flux of glucose through the membrane to the sensing layer varies linearly with the concentration of glucose in the solution, and determines the measured conversion rate or signal output such that it is also linearly proportional to the concentration of glucose concentration in the solution. Although not necessary, a linear relationship between the output signal and the concentration of glucose in the solution is ideal for the calibration of an implantable sensor.
  • [0009]
    Implantable amperometric glucose sensors based on the electrooxidation of hydrogen peroxide, as described above, require excess oxygen reactant to ensure that the sensor output is only controlled by the concentration of glucose in the body fluid or tissue being monitored. That is, the sensor is designed to be unaffected by the oxygen typically present in body fluid or tissue. In body tissue in which the glucose sensor is typically implanted, the concentration of oxygen can be very low, such as from about 0.02 mM to about 0.2 mM, while the concentration of glucose can be as high as about 30 mM or more. Without a glucose-diffusion-limiting membrane, the sensor would become saturated very quickly at very low glucose concentrations. The sensor thus benefits from having a sufficiently oxygen-permeable membrane that restricts glucose flux to the sensing layer, such that the so-called “oxygen-deficiency problem,” a condition in which there is insufficient oxygen for adequate sensing to take place, is minimized or eliminated.
  • [0010]
    In implantable amperometric glucose sensors that employ wired-enzyme electrodes, as described above, there is no oxygen-deficiency problem because oxygen is not a necessary reactant. Nonetheless, these sensors require glucose-diffusion-limiting membranes because typically, for glucose sensors that lack such membranes, the current output reaches a maximum level around or below a glucose concentration of 10 mM, which is well below 30 mM, the high end of clinically relevant glucose concentration.
  • [0011]
    A diffusion-limiting membrane is also of benefit in a biosensor that employs a wired-enzyme electrode, as the membrane significantly reduces chemical and biochemical reactivity in the sensing layer and thus reduces the production of radical species that can damage the enzyme. The diffusion-limiting membrane may also act as a mechanical protector that prevents the sensor components from leaching out of the sensor layer and reduces motion-associated noise.
  • [0012]
    There have been various attempts to develop a glucose-diffusion-limiting membrane that is mechanically strong, biocompatible, and easily manufactured. For example, a laminated microporous membrane with mechanical holes has been described (U.S. Pat. No. 4,759,828 of Young et al.) and membranes formed from polyurethane are also known (Shaw, G. W., et al., Biosensors and Bioelectronics 6, 401 (1991); Bindra, D. S., et al., Anal. Chem. 63, 1692 (1991); Shichiri, M., et al., Horm. Metab. Res., Suppl. Ser. 20, 17 (1988)). Supposedly, glucose diffuses through the mechanical holes or cracks in these various membranes. Further by way of example, a heterogeneous membrane with discrete hydrophobic and hydrophilic regions (U.S. Pat. No. 4,484,987 of Gough) and homogenous membranes with both hydrophobic and hydrophilic functionalities (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,284,140 and 5,322,063 of Allen et al.) have been described. However, all of these known membranes are difficult to manufacture and have inadequate physical properties.
  • [0013]
    An improved membrane formed from a complex mixture of a diisocyanate, a diol, a diamine and a silicone polymer has been described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,777,060 (Van Antwerp), U.S. Pat. No. 5,786,439 (Van Antwerp et al.) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,882,494 (Van Antwerp). As described therein, the membrane material is simultaneously polymerized and crosslinked in a flask; the resulting polymeric material is dissolved in a strong organic solvent, such as tetrahydroforan (THF); and the resulting solution is applied onto the sensing layer to form the membrane. Unfortunately, a very strong organic solvent, such as THF, can denature the enzyme in the sensing layer and also dissolve conductive ink materials as well as any plastic materials that may be part of the sensor. Further, since the polymerization and crosslinking reactions are completed in the reaction flask, no further bond-making reactions occur when the solution is applied to the sensing layer to form the membrane. As a result, the adhesion between the membrane layer and sensing layer may not be adequate.
  • [0014]
    In the published Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application bearing International Publication No. WO 01/57241 A2, Kelly and Schiffer describe a method for making a glucose-diffusion-limiting membrane by photolytically polymerizing small hydrophilic monomers. The sensitivities of the glucose sensors employing such membranes are widely scattered, however, indicating a lack of control in the membrane-making process. Further, as the polymerization involves very small molecules, it is quite possible that small, soluble molecules remain after polymerization, which may leach out of the sensor. Thus, glucose sensors employing such glucose-diffusion-limiting membranes may not be suitable for implantation in a living body.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0015]
    The present invention is directed to membranes composed of crosslinked polymers containing heterocyclic nitrogen groups, particularly polymers of polyvinylpyridine and polyvinylimidazole, and to electrochemical sensors equipped with such membranes. The membranes are useful in limiting the flux of an analyte to a working electrode in an electrochemical sensor so that the sensor is linearly responsive over a large range of analyte concentrations and is easily calibrated. Electrochemical sensors equipped with membranes of the present invention demonstrate considerable sensitivity and stability, and a large signal-to-noise ratio, in a variety of conditions.
  • [0016]
    According to one aspect of the invention, the membrane is formed by crosslinking in situ a polymer, modified with a zwitterionic moiety, a non-pyridine copolymer component, and optionally another moiety that is either hydrophilic or hydrophobic, and/or has other desirable properties, in an alcohol-buffer solution. The modified polymer is made from a precursor polymer containing heterocyclic nitrogen groups. Preferably, the precursor polymer is polyvinylpyridine or polyvinylimidazole. When used in an electrochemical sensor, the membrane limits the flux of an analyte reaching a sensing layer of the sensor, such as an enzyme-containing sensing layer of a “wired enzyme” electrode, and further protects the sensing layer. These qualities of the membrane significantly extend the linear detection range and the stability of the sensor.
  • [0017]
    In the membrane formation process, the non-pyridine copolymer component generally enhances the solubility of the polymer and may provide further desirable physical or chemical properties to the polymer or the resulting membrane. Optionally, hydrophilic or hydrophobic modifiers may be used to “fine-tune” the permeability of the resulting membrane to an analyte of interest. Optional hydrophilic modifiers, such as poly(ethylene glycol), hydroxyl or polyhydroxyl modifiers, may be used to enhance the biocompatibility of the polymer or the resulting membrane. In the formation of a membrane of the present invention, the zwitterionic moiety of the polymer is believed to provide an additional layer of crosslinking, via intermolecular electrostatic bonds, beyond the basic crosslinking generally attributed to covalent bonds, and is thus believed to strengthen the membrane.
  • [0018]
    Another aspect of the invention concerns the preparation of a substantially homogeneous, analyte-diffusion-limiting membrane that may be used in a biosensor, such as an implantable amperometric biosensor. The membrane is formed in situ by applying an alcohol-buffer solution of a crosslinker and a modified polymer over an enzyme-containing sensing layer and allowing the solution to cure for one to two days. The crosslinker-polymer solution may be applied to the sensing layer by placing a droplet or droplets of the solution on the sensor, by dipping the sensor into the solution, or the like. Generally, the thickness of the membrane is controlled by the concentration of the solution, by the number of droplets of the solution applied, by the number of times the sensor is dipped in the solution, or by any combination of these factors. Amperometric glucose sensors equipped with diffusion-limiting membranes of the present invention demonstrate excellent stability and fast and linear responsivity to glucose concentration over a large glucose concentration range.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0019]
    FIG. 1 is an illustration of a typical structure of a section of an analyte-diffusion-limiting membrane, according to the present invention.
  • [0020]
    FIG. 2A is a schematic, side-view illustration of a portion of a two-electrode glucose sensor having a working electrode, a combined counter/reference electrode, and a dip-coated membrane that encapsulates both electrodes, according to the present invention. FIGS. 2B and 2C are schematic top- and bottom-view illustrations, respectively, of the portion of the glucose sensor of FIG. 2A. Herein, FIGS. 2A, 2B and 2C may be collectively referred to as FIG. 2.
  • [0021]
    FIG. 3 is a graph of current versus glucose concentration for sensors having glucose-diffusion-limiting membranes, according to the present invention, and for sensors lacking such membranes, based on average values.
  • [0022]
    FIG. 4 is a graph of current output versus time at fixed glucose concentration for a sensor having a glucose-diffusion-limiting membrane, according to the present invention, and for a sensor lacking such a membrane.
  • [0023]
    FIG. 5 is a graph of current output versus time at different levels of glucose concentration for sensors having glucose-diffusion-limiting membranes, according to the present invention, based on average values.
  • [0024]
    FIG. 6 is a graph of current output versus time at different levels of glucose concentration, with and without stirring, for a sensor having a glucose-diffusion-limiting membrane, according to the present invention, and for a sensor lacking such a membrane.
  • [0025]
    FIG. 7A is a graph of current output versus glucose concentration for four separately prepared batches of sensors having glucose-diffusion-limiting membranes, according to the present invention, based on average values. FIGS. 7B-7E are graphs of current output versus glucose concentration for individual sensors in each of the four above-referenced batches of sensors having glucose-diffusion-limiting membranes, respectively, according to the present invention. Herein, FIGS. 7A, 7B, 7C, 7D and 7E may be collectively referred to as FIG. 7.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • [0026]
    When used herein, the terms in quotation marks are defined as set forth below
  • [0027]
    The term “alkyl” includes linear or branched, saturated aliphatic hydrocarbons. Examples of alkyl groups include methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, isopropyl, n-butyl, tert-butyl and the like. Unless otherwise noted, the term “alkyl” includes both alkyl and cycloalkyl groups.
  • [0028]
    The term “alkoxy” describes an alkyl group joined to the remainder of the structure by an oxygen atom. Examples of alkoxy groups include methoxy, ethoxy, n-propoxy, isopropoxy, butoxy, tert-butoxy, and the like. In addition, unless otherwise noted, the term ‘alkoxy’ includes both alkoxy and cycloalkoxy groups.
  • [0029]
    The term “alkenyl” describes an unsaturated, linear or branched aliphatic hydrocarbon having at least one carbon-carbon double bond. Examples of alkenyl groups include ethenyl, 1-propenyl, 2-propenyl, 1-butenyl, 2-methyl-1-propenyl, and the like.
  • [0030]
    A “reactive group” is a functional group of a molecule that is capable of reacting with another compound to couple at least a portion of that other compound to the molecule. Reactive groups include carboxy, activated ester, sulfonyl halide, sulfonate ester, isocyanate, isothiocyanate, epoxide, aziridine, halide, aldehyde, ketone, amine, acrylamide, thiol, acyl azide, acyl halide, hydrazine, hydroxylamine, alkyl halide, imidazole, pyridine, phenol, alkyl sulfonate, halotriazine, imido ester, maleimide, hydrazide, hydroxy, and photo-reactive azido aryl groups. Activated esters, as understood in the art, generally include esters of succinimidyl, benzotriazolyl, or aryl substituted by electron-withdrawing groups such as sulfo, nitro, cyano, or halo groups; or carboxylic acids activated by carbodiimides.
  • [0031]
    A “substituted” functional group (e.g., substituted alkyl, alkenyl, or alkoxy group) includes at least one substituent selected from the following: halogen, alkoxy, mercapto, aryl, alkoxycarbonyl, alkylaminocarbonyl, dialkylaminocarbonyl, —OH, —NH2, alkylamino, dialkylamino, trialkylammonium, alkanoylamino, arylcarboxamido, hydrazino, alkylthio, alkenyl, and reactive groups.
  • [0032]
    A “crosslinker” is a molecule that contains at least two reactive groups capable of linking at least two molecules together, or linking at least two portions of the same molecule together. Linking of at least two molecules is called intermolecular crosslinking, while linking of at least two portions of the same molecule is called intramolecular crosslinking. A crosslinker having more than two reactive groups may be capable of both intermolecular and intramolecular crosslinkings at the same time.
  • [0033]
    The term “precursor polymer” refers to the starting polymer before the various modifier groups are attached to form a modified polymer.
  • [0034]
    The term “heterocyclic nitrogen group” refers to a cyclic structure containing a sp2 hybridized nitrogen in a ring of the structure.
  • [0035]
    The term “polyvinylpyridine” refers to poly(4-vinylpyridine), poly(3-vinylpyridine), or poly(2-vinylpyridine), as well as any copolymer of vinylpyridine and a second or a third copolymer component.
  • [0036]
    The term “polyvinylimidazole” refers to poly(1-vinylimidazole), poly(2-vinylimidazole), or poly(4-vinylimidazole).
  • [0037]
    A “membrane solution” is a solution that contains all necessary components for crosslinking and forming the membrane, including a modified polymer containing heterocyclic nitrogen groups, a crosslinker and a buffer or an alcohol-buffer mixed solvent.
  • [0038]
    A “biological fluid” or “biofluid” is any body fluid or body fluid derivative in which the analyte can be measured, for example, blood, interstitial fluid, plasma, dermal fluid, sweat, and tears.
  • [0039]
    An “electrochemical sensor” is a device configured to detect the presence of or measure the concentration or amount of an analyte in a sample via electrochemical oxidation or reduction reactions. Typically, these reactions can be transduced to an electrical signal that can be correlated to an amount or concentration of analyte.
  • [0040]
    A “redox mediator” is an electron-transfer agent for carrying electrons between an analyte, an analyte-reduced or analyte-oxidized enzyme, and an electrode, either directly, or via one or more additional electron-transfer agents. A redox mediator that includes a polymeric backbone may also be referred to as a “redox polymer”.
  • [0041]
    The term “reference electrode” includes both a) reference electrodes and b) reference electrodes that also function as counter electrodes (i.e., counter/reference electrodes), unless otherwise indicated.
  • [0042]
    The term “counter electrode” includes both a) counter electrodes and b) counter electrodes that also function as reference electrodes (i.e., counter/reference electrodes), unless otherwise indicated.
  • [0043]
    In general, membrane of the present invention is formed by crosslinking a modified polymer containing heterocyclic nitrogen groups in an alcohol-buffer mixed solvent and allowing the membrane solution to cure over time. The polymer comprises poly(heterocyclic nitrogen-containing constituent) as a portion of its backbone and additional elements, including a zwitterionic moiety, a hydrophobic moiety, and optionally, a biocompatible moiety. The resulting membrane is capable of limiting the flux of an analyte from one space, such as a space associated with a biofluid, to another space, such as space associated with an enzyme-containing sensing layer. An amperometric glucose sensor constructed of a wired-enzyme sensing layer and a glucose-diffusion-limiting layer of the present invention is very stable and has a large linear detection range.
  • [0000]
    Heterocyclic-Nitrogen Containing Polymers
  • [0044]
    The polymer of the present invention has the following general formula, Formula 1a:
    wherein the horizontal line represents a polymer backbone; A is an alkyl group substituted with a water soluble group, preferably a negatively charged group, such as sulfonate, phosphate, or carboxylate, and more preferably, a strong acid group such as sulfonate, so that the quaternized heterocyclic nitrogen to which it is attached is zwitterionic; D is a copolymer component of the polymer, as further described below; each of n, l, and p is independently an average number of an associated polymer unit or polymer units shown in the closest parentheses to the left; and q is a number of a polymer unit or polymer units shown in the brackets. 100451 The heterocyclic nitrogen groups of Formula 1a include, but are not limited to, pyridine, imidazole, oxazole, thiazole, pyrazole, or any derivative thereof. Preferably, the heterocyclic nitrogen groups are independently vinylpyridine, such as 2-, 3-, or 4-vinylpyridine, or vinylimidazole, such as 1-, 2-, or 4-vinylimidazole. More preferably, the heterocyclic nitrogen groups are independently 4-vinylpyridine, such that the more preferable polymer is a derivative of poly(4-vinylpyridine). An example of such a poly(4-vinylpyridine) of the present invention has the following general formula, Formula 1b:
    wherein A, D, n, l, p and q are as described above in relation to Formula 1a.
  • [0045]
    While the polymer of the present invention has the general Formula 1a or Formula 1b above, it should be noted that when A is a strong acid, such as a stronger acid than carboxylic acid, the D component is optional, such that p may equal zero. Such a polymer of the present invention has the following general formula, Formula 1c:
    wherein A is a strong acid and the heterocyclic nitrogen groups, n, l and q are all as described above. Sulfonate and fluorinated carboxylic acid are examples of suitably strong acids. It is believed that when A is a sufficiently strong acid, the heterocyclic nitrogen to which it is attached becomes zwitterionic and thus capable of forming intermolecular electrostatic bonds with the crosslinker during membrane formation. It is believed that these intermolecular electrostatic bonds provide another level of crosslinking, beyond the covalent bonds typical of crosslinking, and thus make the resulting membrane stronger. As a result, when A is a suitably strong acid, the D component, which is often a strengthening component such as styrene, may be omitted from the polymers of Formulas 1a and 1b above. When A is a weaker acid, such that the heterocyclic nitrogen is not zwitterionic or capable of forming intermolecular electrostatic bonds, the polymer of the present invention does include D, as shown in Formulas 1a and 1b above.
  • [0046]
    Examples of A include, but are not limited to, sulfopropyl, sulfobutyl, carboxypropyl, and carboxypentyl. In one embodiment of the invention, group A has the formula -L-G, where L is a C2-C12 linear or branched alkyl linker optionally and independently substituted with an aryl, alkoxy, alkenyl, alkynyl, —F, —Cl, —OH, aldehyde, ketone, ester, or amide group, and G is a negatively charged carboxy or sulfonate group. The alkyl portion of the substituents of L have 1-6 carbons and are preferably an aryl, —OH or amide group.
  • [0047]
    A can be attached to the heterocyclic nitrogen group via quaternization with an alkylating agent that contains a suitable linker L and a negatively charged group G, or a precursor group that can be converted to a negatively charged group G at a later stage. Examples of suitable alkylating agents include, but are not limited to, 2-bromoethanesulfonate, propanesultone, butanesultone, bromoacetic acid, 4-bromobutyric acid and 6-bromohexanoic acid. Examples of alkylating agents containing a precursor group include, but are not limited to, ethyl bromoacetate and methyl 6-bromohexanoate. The ethyl and methyl ester groups of these precursors can be readily converted to a negatively charged carboxy group by standard hydrolysis.
  • [0048]
    Alternatively, A can be attached to the heterocyclic nitrogen group by quaternizing the nitrogen with an alkylating agent that contains an additional reactive group, and subsequently coupling, via standard methods, this additional reactive group to another molecule that contains a negatively charged group G and a reactive group. Typically, one of the reactive groups is an electrophile and the other reactive group is a nucleophile. Selected examples of reactive groups and the linkages formed from their interactions are shown in Table 1.
    TABLE 1
    Examples of Reactive Groups and Resulting Linkages
    First Reactive Group Second Reactive Group Resulting Linkage
    Activated ester* Amine Amide
    Acrylamide Thiol Thioether
    Acyl azide Amine Amide
    Acyl halide Amine Amide
    Carboxylic acid Amine Amide
    Aldehyde or ketone Hydrazine Hydrazone
    Aldehyde or ketone Hydroxyamine Oxime
    Alkyl halide Amine Alkylamine
    Alkyl halide Carboxylic acid Ester
    Alkyl halide Imidazole Imidazolium
    Alkyl halide Pyridine Pyridinium
    Alkyl halide Alcohol/phenol Ether
    Alkyl halide Thiol Thioether
    Alkyl sulfonate Thiol Thioether
    Alkyl sulfonate Pyridine Pyridinium
    Alkyl sulfonate Imidazole Imidazolium
    Alkyl sulfonate Alcohol/phenol Ether
    Anhydride Alcohol/phenol Ester
    Anhydride Amine Amide
    Aziridine Thiol Thioether
    Aziridine Amine Alkylamine
    Aziridine Pyridine Pyridinium
    Epoxide Thiol Thioether
    Epoxide Amine Alkylamine
    Epoxide Pyridine Pyridinium
    Halotriazine Amine Aminotriazine
    Halotriazine Alcohol Triazinyl ether
    Imido ester Amine Amidine
    Isocyanate Amine Urea
    Isocyanate Alcohol Urethane
    Isothiocyanate Amine Thiourea
    Maleimide Thiol Thioether
    Sulfonyl halide Amine Sulfonamide

    *Activated esters, as understood in the art, generally include esters of succinimidyl, benzotriazolyl, or aryl substituted by electron-withdrawing groups such as sulfo, nitro, cyano, or halo; or carboxylic acids activated by carbodiimides.

    By way of example, A may be attached to the heterocyclic nitrogen groups of the polymer by quaternizing the heterocyclic nitrogens with 6-bromohexanoic acid and subsequently coupling the carboxy group to the amine group of 3-amino-1-propanesulfonic acid in the presence of a carbodiimide coupling agent.
  • [0049]
    D is a component of a poly(heterocyclic nitrogen-co-D) polymer of Formula 1a or 1b. Examples of D include, but are not limited to, phenylalkyl, alkoxystyrene, hydroxyalkyl, alkoxyalkyl, alkoxycarbonylalkyl, and a molecule containing a poly(ethylene glycol) or polyhydroxyl group. Some poly(heterocyclic nitrogen-co-D) polymers suitable as starting materials for the present invention are commercially available. For example, poly(2-vinylpyridine-co-styrene), poly(4-vinylpyridine-co-styrene) and poly(4-vinylpyridine-co-butyl methacrylate) are available from Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc. Other poly(heterocyclic nitrogen-co-D) polymers can be readily synthesized by anyone skilled in the art of polymer chemistry using well-known methods. Preferably, D is a styrene or a C1-C18 alkyl methacrylate component of a polyvinylpyridine-poly-D, such as (4-vinylpyrine-co-styrene) or poly(4-vinylpyridine-co-butyl methacrylate), more preferably, the former. D may contribute to various desirable properties of the membrane including, but not limited to, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, solubility, biocompatibility, elasticity and strength. D may be selected to optimize or “fine-tune” a membrane made from the polymer in terms of its permeability to an analyte and its non-permeability to an undesirable, interfering component, for example.
  • [0050]
    The letters n, l, and p designate, respectively, an average number of each copolymer component in each polymer unit. The letter q is one for a block copolymer or a number greater than one for a copolymer with a number of repeating polymer units. By way of example, the q value for a polymer of the present invention may be ≧ about 950, where n, l and p are 1, 8 and 1, respectively. The letter q is thus related to the overall molecular weight of the polymer. Preferably, the average molecular weight of the polymer is above about 50,000, more preferably above about 200,000, most preferably above about 1,000,000.
  • [0051]
    The polymer of the present invention may comprise a further, optional copolymer, as shown in the following general formula, Formula 2a:
    wherein the polymer backbone, A, D, n, l, p and q are as described above in relation to Formulas 1a-1c; m is an average number of an associated polymer unit or polymer units shown in the closest parentheses to the left; and B is a modifier. When the heterocyclic nitrogen groups are 4-substituted pyridine, as is preferred, the polymer of the present invention is derivative of poly(4-vinylpyridine) and has the general formula, Formula 2b, set forth below.
    Further, when A is a suitably strong acid, as described above, the D copolymer is optional, in which case the polymer of the present invention has the general formula, Formula 2c:
  • [0052]
    In any of Formulas 2a-2c, B is a modifier group that may add any desired chemical, physical or biological properties to the membrane. Such desired properties include analyte selectivity, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, elasticity, and biocompatibility. Examples of modifiers include the following: negatively charged molecules that may minimize entrance of negatively charged, interfering chemicals into the membrane; hydrophobic hydrocarbon molecules that may increase adhesion between the membrane and sensor substrate material; hydrophilic hydroxyl or polyhydroxy molecules that may help hydrate and add biocompatibility to the membrane; silicon polymers that may add elasticity and other properties to the membrane; and poly(ethylene glycol) constituents that are known to increase biocompatibility of biomaterials (Bergstrom, K., et al., J. Biomed. Mat. Res. 26, 779 (1992)). Further examples of B include, but are not limited to, a metal chelator, such as a calcium chelator, and other biocompatible materials. A poly(ethylene glycol) suitable for biocompatibility modification of the membrane generally has a molecular weight of from about 100 to about 20,000, preferably, from about 500 to about 10,000, and more preferably, from about 1,000 to about 8,000.
  • [0053]
    The modifier B can be attached to the heterocyclic nitrogens of the polymer directly or indirectly. In direct attachment, the heterocyclic nitrogen groups may be reacted with a modifier containing an alkylating group. Suitable alkylating groups include, but are not limited to, alkyl halide, epoxide, aziridine, and sulfonate esters. In indirect attachment, the heterocyclic nitrogens of the polymer may be quaternized with an alkylating agent having an additional reactive group, and then attached to a molecule having a desired property and a suitable reactive group.
  • [0054]
    As described above, the B-containing copolymer is optional in the membrane of the present invention, such that when m of Formula 2a-2c is zero, the membrane has the general formula of Formula 1a-1c, respectively. The relative amounts of the four copolymer components, the heterocyclic nitrogen group containing A, the optional heterocyclic nitrogen group containing B, the heterocyclic nitrogen group, and D, may be expressed as percentages, as follows: [n/(n+m+l+p)]×100%, [m/(n+m+l+p)]×100%, [l/(n+m+l+p)]×100%, and [p/(n+m+l+p)]×100%, respectively. Suitable percentages are 1-25%, 0-15% (when the B-containing heterocyclic nitrogen group is optional) or 1-15%, 20-90%, and 0-50% (when D is optional) or 1-50%, respectively, and preferable percentages are 5-20%, 0-10% (when the B-containing heterocyclic nitrogen group is optional) or 1-10%, 60-90%, and 5-20%, respectively.
  • [0055]
    Specific examples of suitable polymers have the general formulas, Formulas 3-6, shown below.
  • EXAMPLES OF SYNTHESES OF POLYVINYLPYRIDINE POLYMERS
  • [0056]
    Examples showing the syntheses of various polyvinylpyridine polymers according to the present invention are provided below. Numerical figures provided are approximate.
  • Example 1 Synthesis of a Polymer of Formula 3
  • [0057]
    By way of illustration, an example of the synthesis of a polymer of Formula 3 above, is now provided. A solution of poly(4-vinylpyridine-co-styrene) (˜10% styrene content) (20 g, Aldrich) in 100 mL of dimethyl formamide (DMF) at 90° C. was stirred and 6-bromohexanoic acid (3.7 g) in 15-20 mL of DMF was added. The resulting solution was stirred at 90° C. for 24 hours and then poured into 1.5 L of ether, whereupon the solvent was decanted. The remaining, gummy solid was dissolved in MeOH (150-200 mL) and suction-filtered through a medium-pore, fritted funnel to remove any undissolved solid. The filtrate was added slowly to rapidly stirred ether (1.5 L) in a beaker. The resulting precipitate was collected by suction filtration and dried at 50° C. under high vacuum for 2 days. The polymer had the following parameters: [n/(n+l+p)]×100%≈10%; [l/(n+l+p)]×100%≈80%; and [p/(n+l+p)]×100%≈10%.
  • Example 2 Synthesis of a Polymer of Formula 5
  • [0058]
    By way of illustration, an example of the synthesis of a polymer of Formula 5 above, is now provided. A solution of poly(4-vinylpyridine-co-styrene) (˜10% styrene) (20 g, Aldrich) in 100 mL of anhydrous DMF at 90° C. was stirred, methanesulfonic acid (˜80 mg) was added, and then 2 g of methoxy-PEG-epoxide (molecular weight 5,000) (Shearwater Polymers, Inc.) in 15-20 mL of anhydrous DMF was added. The solution was stirred at 90° C. for 24 hours and 1,3-Propane sultone (2.32 g) in 10 mL of anhydrous DMF was added. The resulting solution was continuously stirred at 90° for 24 hours, and then cooled to room temperature and poured into 800 mL of ether. The solvent was decanted and the remaining precipitate was dissolved in hot MeOH (˜200 mL), suction-filtered, precipitated again from 1 L of ether, and then dried at 50° C. under high vacuum for 48 hours. The resulting polymer has the following parameters: [n/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈10%; [m/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈10%; [l/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈70%; and [p/(n+m+l+p)]×100% ≈10%.
  • Example 3 Synthesis of a Polymer Having a Polyhydroxy Modifier B
  • [0059]
    By way of illustration, an example of the synthesis of a polymer having a polyhydroxy modifier B, as schematically illustrated below, is now provided. Various polyhydroxy compounds are known for having biocompatibility properties. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,011,077.) The synthesis below illustrates how a modifier group having a desired property may be attached to the polymer backbone via a linker.
    1,3-propane sultone (0.58 g, 4.8 mmoles) and 6-bromohexanoic acid (1.85 g, 9.5 mmoles) are added to a solution of poly(4-vinylpyridine-co-styrene) (˜10% styrene) (10 g) dissolved in 60 mL of anhydrous DMF. The resulting solution is stirred at 90° C. for 24 hours and then cooled to room temperature. O-(N-succinimidyl)-N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-uronium tetrafluoroborate (TSTU) (2.86 g, 9.5 mmoles) and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (1.65 mL, 9.5 mmoles) are then added in succession to the solution. After the solution is stirred for 5 hours, N-methyl-D-glucamine (2.4 g, 12.4 mmoles) is added and the resulting solution is stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The solution is poured into 500 ml of ether and the precipitate is collected by suction filtration. The collected precipitate is then dissolved in MeOH/H2O and the resulting solution is subjected to ultra membrane filtration using the same MeOH/H2O solvent to remove small molecules. The dialyzed solution is evaporated to dryness to give a polymer with the following parameters: [n/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈10%; [m/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈10%; [l/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈70%; and [p/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈10%.
    Crosslinkers
  • [0060]
    Crosslinkers of the present invention are molecules having at least two reactive groups, such as bi-, tri-, or tetra-functional groups, capable of reacting with the heterocyclic nitrogen groups, pyridine groups, or other reactive groups contained on A, B or D of the polymer. Preferably, the reactive groups of the crosslinkers are slow-reacting alkylating groups that can quaternize the heterocyclic nitrogen groups, such as pyridine groups, of the polymer. Suitable alkylating groups include, but are not limited to, derivatives of poly(ethylene glycol) or poly(propylene glycol), epoxide (glycidyl group), aziridine, alkyl halide, and sulfonate esters. Alkylating groups of the crosslinkers are preferably glycidyl groups. Preferably, glycidyl crosslinkers have a molecular weight of from about 200 to about 2,000 and are water soluble or soluble in a water-miscible solvent, such as an alcohol. Examples of suitable crosslinkers include, but are not limited to, poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether with a molecular weight of about 200 to about 600, and N,N-diglycidyl-4-glycidyloxyaniline.
  • [0061]
    It is desirable to have a slow crosslinking reaction during the dispensing of membrane solution so that the membrane coating solution has a reasonable pot-life for large-scale manufacture. A fast crosslinking reaction results in a coating solution of rapidly changing viscosity, which renders coating difficult. Ideally, the crosslinking reaction is slow during the dispensing of the membrane solution, and accelerated during the curing of the membrane at ambient temperature, or at an elevated temperature where possible.
  • [0000]
    Membrane Formation and Sensor Fabrication
  • [0062]
    An example of a process for producing a membrane of the present invention is now described. In this example, the polymer of the present invention and a suitable crosslinker are dissolved in a buffer-containing solvent, typically a buffer-alcohol mixed solvent, to produce a membrane solution. Preferably, the buffer has a pH of about 7.5 to about 9.5 and the alcohol is ethanol. More preferably, the buffer is a 10 mM (2-(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazine)ethanesulfonate) (HEPES) buffer (pH 8) and the ethanol to buffer volume ratio is from about 95 to 5 to about 0 to 100. A minimum amount of buffer is necessary for the crosslinking chemistry, especially if an epoxide or aziridine crosslinker is used. The amount of solvent needed to dissolve the polymer and the crosslinker may vary depending on the nature of the polymer and the crosslinker. For example, a higher percentage of alcohol may be required to dissolve a relatively hydrophobic polymer and/or crosslinker.
  • [0063]
    The ratio of polymer to cross-linker is important to the nature of the final membrane. By way of example, if an inadequate amount of crosslinker or an extremely large excess of crosslinker is used, crosslinking is insufficient and the membrane is weak. Further, if a more than adequate amount of crosslinker is used, the membrane is overly crosslinked such that membrane is too brittle and/or impedes analyte diffusion. Thus, there is an optimal ratio of a given polymer to a given crosslinker that should be used to prepare a desirable or useful membrane. By way of example, the optimal polymer to crosslinker ratio by weight is typically from about 4:1 to about 32:1 for a polymer of any of Formulas 3-6 above and a poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether crosslinker, having a molecular weight of about 200 to about 400. Most preferably, this range is from about 8:1 to about 16:1. Further by way of example, the optimal polymer to crosslinker ratio by weight is typically about 16:1 for a polymer of Formula 4 above, wherein [n/(n+l+p)]×100%≈10%, [l/(n+l+p)]×100%≈80%, and [p/(n+l+p)]×100%≈10%, or for a polymer of Formula 5 above, wherein [n/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈10%, [m/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈10%, [l/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈70%, [p/(n+m+l+p)]×100%≈10%, and r≈110, and a poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether crosslinker having a molecular weight of about 200.
  • [0064]
    The membrane solution can be coated over a variety of biosensors that may benefit from having a membrane disposed over the enzyme-containing sensing layer. Examples of such biosensors include, but are not limited to, glucose sensors and lactate sensors. (See U.S. Pat. No. 6,134,461 to Heller et al., which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference.) The coating process may comprise any commonly used technique, such as spin-coating, dip-coating, or dispensing droplets of the membrane solution over the sensing layers, and the like, followed by curing under ambient conditions typically for 1 to 2 days. The particular details of the coating process (such as dip duration, dip frequency, number of dips, or the like) may vary depending on the nature (i.e., viscosity, concentration, composition, or the like) of the polymer, the crosslinker, the membrane solution, the solvent, and the buffer, for example. Conventional equipment may be used for the coating process, such as a DSG D1L-160 dip-coating or casting system of NIMA Technology in the United Kingdom.
  • Example of Sensor Fabrication
  • [0065]
    Sensor fabrication typically consists of depositing an enzyme-containing sensing layer over a working electrode and casting the diffusion-limiting membrane layer over the sensing layer, and optionally, but preferably, also over the counter and reference electrodes. The procedure below concerns the fabrication of a two-electrode sensor, such as that depicted in FIGS. 2A-2C. Sensors having other configurations such as a three-electrode design can be prepared using similar methods.
  • [0066]
    A particular example of sensor fabrication, wherein the numerical figures are approximate, is now provided. A sensing layer solution was prepared from a 7.5 mM HEPES solution (0.5 μL, pH 8), containing 1.7 μg of the polymeric osmium mediator compound L, as disclosed in Published Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Application, International Publication No. WO 01/36660 A2, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by this reference; 2.1 μg of glucose oxidase (Toyobo); and 1.3 μg of poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (molecular weight 400). Compound L is shown below.
    The sensing layer solution was deposited over carbon-ink working electrodes and cured at room temperature for two days to produce a number of sensors. A membrane solution was prepared by mixing 4 volumes of a polymer of Formula 4 above, dissolved at 64 mg/mL in 80% EtOH/20% HEPES buffer (10 mM, pH 8), and one volume of poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (molecular weight 200), dissolved at 4 mg/mL in 80% EtOH/20% HEPES buffer (10 mM, pH 8). The above-described sensors were dipped three times into the membrane solution, at about 5 seconds per dipping, with about a 10-minute time interval between consecutive dippings. The sensors were then cured at room temperature and normal humidity for 24 hours.
  • [0067]
    An approximate chemical structure of a section of a typical membrane prepared according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 1. Such a membrane may be employed in a variety of sensors, such as the two- or three-electrode sensors described previously herein. By way of example, the membrane may be used in a two-electrode amperometric glucose sensor, as shown in FIG. 2A-2C (collectively FIG. 2) and described below.
  • [0068]
    The amperometric glucose sensor 10 of FIG. 2 comprises a substrate 12 disposed between a working electrode 14 that is typically carbon-based, and a Ag/AgCl counter/reference electrode 16. A sensor or sensing layer 18 is disposed on the working electrode. A membrane or membrane layer 20 encapsulates the entire glucose sensor 10, including the Ag/AgCl counter/reference electrode.
  • [0069]
    The sensing layer 18 of the glucose sensor 10 consists of crosslinked glucose oxidase and a low potential polymeric osmium complex mediator, as disclosed in the above-mentioned Published PCT Application, International Publication No. WO 01/36660 A2. The enzyme- and mediator-containing formulation that can be used in the sensing layer, and methods for applying them to an electrode system, are known in the art, for example, from U.S. Pat. No. 6,134,461. According to the present invention, the membrane overcoat was formed by thrice dipping the sensor into a membrane solution comprising 4 mg/mL poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (molecular weight of about 200) and 64 mg/mL of a polymer of Formula 4 above, wherein [n/(n+l+p)]×100%≈10%; [l/(n+l+p)]×100%≈80%; and [p/(n+l+p)]×100%≈10%, and curing the thrice-dipped sensor at ambient temperature and normal humidity for at least 24 hours, such as for about 1 to 2 days. The q value for such a membrane overcoat may be ≧ about 950, where n, l and p are 1, 8 and 1, respectively.
  • [0000]
    Membrane Surface Modification
  • [0070]
    Polymers of the present invention have a large number of heterocyclic nitrogen groups, such as pyridine groups, only a few percent of which are used in crosslinking during membrane formation. The membrane thus has an excess of these groups present both within the membrane matrix and on the membrane surface. Optionally, the membrane can be further modified by placing another layer of material over the heterocyclic-nitrogen-group-rich or pyridine-rich membrane surface. For example, the membrane surface may be modified by adding a layer of poly(ethylene glycol) for enhanced biocompatibility. In general, modification may consist of coating the membrane surface with a modifying solution, such as a solution comprising desired molecules having an alkylating reactive group, and then washing the coating solution with a suitable solvent to remove excess molecules. This modification should result in a monolayer of desired molecules.
  • [0071]
    The membrane 20 of the glucose sensor 10 shown in FIG. 2 may be modified in the manner described above.
  • EXPERIMENTAL EXAMPLES
  • [0072]
    Examples of experiments that demonstrate the properties and/or the efficacy of sensors having diffusion-limiting membranes according to the present invention are provided below. Numerical figures provided are approximate.
  • Calibration Experiment
  • [0073]
    In a first example, a calibration experiment was conducted in which fifteen sensors lacking membranes were tested simultaneously (Set 1), and separately, eight sensors having diffusion-limiting membranes according to the present invention were tested simultaneously (Set 2), all at 37° C. In Set 2, the membranes were prepared from polymers of Formula 4 above and poly(ethylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PEGDGE) crosslinkers, having a molecular weight of about 200. In the calibration experiment for each of Set 1 and Set 2, the sensors were placed in a PBS-buffered solution (pH 7) and the output current of each of the sensors was measured as the glucose concentration was increased. The measured output currents (μA for Set 1; nA for Set 2) were then averaged for each of Set 1 and Set 2 and plotted against glucose concentration (mM), as shown in the calibration graph of FIG. 3.
  • [0074]
    As shown, the calibration curve for the Set 1 sensors lacking membranes is approximately linear over a very small range of glucose concentrations, from zero to about 3 mM, or 5 mM at most. This result indicates that the membrane-free sensors are insufficiently sensitive to glucose concentration change at elevated glucose concentrations such as 10 mM, which is well below the high end of clinically relevant glucose concentration at about 30 mM. By contrast, the calibration curve for the Set 2 sensors having diffusion-limiting membranes according to the present invention is substantially linear over a relatively large range of glucose concentrations, for example, from zero to about 30 mM, as demonstrated by the best-fit line (y=1.2502x+1.1951; R2≈0.997) also shown in FIG. 3. This result demonstrates the considerable sensitivity of the membrane-equipped membranes to glucose concentration, at low, medium, and high glucose concentrations, and of particular relevance, at the high end of clinically relevant glucose concentration at about 30 mM.
  • Stability Experiment
  • [0075]
    In a second example, a stability experiment was conducted in which a sensor lacking a membrane and a sensor having a diffusion-limiting membrane according to the present invention were tested, simultaneously, at 37° C. The membrane-equipped sensor had a membrane prepared from the same polymer and the same crosslinker as those of the sensors of Set 2 described above in the calibration experiment. In this stability experiment, each of the sensors was placed in a PBS-buffered solution (pH 7) having a fixed glucose concentration of 30 mM, and the output current of each of the sensors was measured. The measured output currents (μA for the membrane-less sensor; nA for the membrane-equipped sensor) were plotted against time (hour), as shown in the stability graph of FIG. 4.
  • [0076]
    As shown, the stability curve for the membrane-less sensor decays rapidly over time, at a decay rate of about 4.69% μA per hour. This result indicates a lack of stability in the membrane-less sensor. By contrast, the stability curve for the membrane-equipped sensor according to the present invention shows relative constancy over time, or no appreciable decay over time, the decay rate being only about 0.06% nA per hour. This result demonstrates the considerable stability and reliability of the membrane-equipped sensors of the present invention. That is, at a glucose concentration of 30 mM, while the membrane-less sensor lost sensitivity at a rate of almost 5% per hour over a period of about 20 hours, the membrane-equipped sensor according to the present invention showed virtually no loss of sensitivity over the same period.
  • Responsivity Experiment
  • [0077]
    Ideally, the membrane of an electrochemical sensor should not impede communication between the sensing layer of the sensor and fluid or biofluid containing the analyte of interest. That is, the membrane should respond rapidly to changes in analyte concentration.
  • [0078]
    In a third example, a responsivity experiment was conducted in which eight sensors having diffusion-limiting membranes according to the present invention were tested simultaneously (Set 3), all at 37° C. The sensors of Set 3 had membranes prepared from the same polymers and the same crosslinkers as those of the sensors of Set 2 described in the calibration experiment above. In this responsivity experiment, the eight sensors were placed in a PBS-buffered solution (pH 7), the glucose concentration of which was increased in a step-wise manner over time, as illustrated by the glucose concentrations shown in FIG. 5, and the output current of each of the sensors was measured. The measured output currents (nA) were then averaged for Set 3 and plotted against time (real time, hour:minute:second), as shown in the responsivity graph of FIG. 5.
  • [0079]
    The responsivity curve for the Set 3 sensors having diffusion-limiting membranes according to the present invention has discrete steps that mimic the step-wise increases in glucose concentration in a rapid fashion. As shown, the output current jumps rapidly from one plateau to the next after the glucose concentration is increased. This result demonstrates the considerable responsivity of the membrane-equipped sensors of the present invention. The responsivity of these membrane-equipped electrochemical sensors makes them ideal for analyte sensing, such as glucose sensing.
  • Motion-Sensitivity Experiment
  • [0080]
    Ideally, the membrane of an electrochemical sensor should be unaffected by motion or movement of fluid or biofluid containing the analyte of interest. This is particularly important for a sensor that is implanted in a body, such as a human body, as body movement may cause motion-associated noise and may well be quite frequent.
  • [0081]
    In this fourth example, a motion-sensitivity experiment was conducted in which a sensor A lacking a membrane was tested, and separately, a sensor B having a diffusion-limiting membrane according to the present invention was tested, all at 37° C. Sensor B had a membrane prepared from the same polymer and the same crosslinker as those of the sensors of Set 2 described in the calibration experiment above. In this experiment, for each of test, the sensor was placed in a beaker containing a PBS-buffered solution (pH 7) and a magnetic stirrer. The glucose concentration of the solution was increased in a step-wise manner over time, in much the same manner as described in the responsivity experiment above, as indicated by the various mM labels in FIG. 6. The stirrer was activated during each step-wise increase in the glucose concentration and deactivated some time thereafter, as illustrated by the “stir on” and “stir off” labels shown in FIG. 6. This activation and deactivation of the stirrer was repeated in a cyclical manner at several levels of glucose concentration and the output current of each of the sensors was measured throughout the experiment. The measured output currents (μA for sensor A; nA for sensor B) were plotted against time (minute), as shown in the motion-sensitivity graph of FIG. 6.
  • [0082]
    As shown, the output current for the membrane-less sensor A is greatly affected by the stir versus no stir conditions over the glucose concentration range used in the experiment. By contrast, the output current for sensor B, having diffusion-limiting membranes according to the present invention, is virtually unaffected by the stir versus no stir conditions up to a glucose concentration of about 10 mM, and only slightly affected by these conditions at a glucose concentration of about 15 mM. This result demonstrates the considerable stability of the membrane-equipped sensors of the present invention in both stirred and non-stirred environments. The stability of these membrane-equipped electrochemical sensors in an environment of fluid movement makes them ideal for analyte sensing within a moving body.
  • Sensor Reproducibility Experiment
  • [0083]
    Dip-coating, or casting, of membranes is typically carried out using dipping machines, such as a DSG D1L-160 of NIMA Technology of the United Kingdom. Reproducible casting of membranes has been considered quite difficult to achieve. (Chen, T., et al., In Situ Assembled Mass-Transport Controlling Micromembranes and Their Application in Implanted Amperometric Glucose Sensors, Anal. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 16, Pp. 3757-3763 (2000).) Surprisingly, sensors of the present invention can be made quite reproducibly, as demonstrated in the experiment now described.
  • [0084]
    Four batches of sensors (Batches 1-4) were prepared separately according to the present invention, by dipping the sensors in membrane solution three times using casting equipment and allowing them to cure. In each of the four batches, the membrane solutions were prepared from the polymer of Formula 4 and poly(ethylene glycol) digycidyl ether (PEDGE) crosslinker having a molecular weight of about 200 (as in Set 2 and other Sets described above) using the same procedure. The membrane solutions for Batches 1 and 2 were prepared separately from each other, and from the membrane solution used for Batches 3 and 4. The membrane solution for Batches 3 and 4 was the same, although the Batch 3 and Batch 4 sensors were dip-coated at different times using different casting equipment. That is, Batches 1, 2 and 3 were dip-coated using a non-commercial, built system and Batch 4 was dip-coated using the above-referenced DSG D1L-160 system.
  • [0085]
    Calibration tests were conducted on each batch of sensors at 37° C. For each batch, the sensors were placed in PBS-buffered solution (pH 7) and the output current (nA) of each of the sensors was measured as the glucose concentration (mM) was increased. For each sensor in each of the four batches, a calibration curve based on a plot of the current output versus glucose concentration was prepared as shown in FIG. 7B (Batch 1: 5 sensors), FIG. 7C (Batch 2: 8 sensors), FIG. 7D (Batch 3: 4 sensors) and FIG. 7E (Batch 4: 4 sensors). The average slopes of the calibration curves for each batch were the following:
  • [0086]
    Batch 1: Average Slope=1.10 nA/mM (CV=5%);
  • [0087]
    Batch 2: Average Slope=1.27 nA/mM (CV=10%);
  • [0088]
    Batch 3: Average Slope=1.15 nA/mM (CV=5%); and
  • [0089]
    Batch 4: Average Slope=1.14 nA/mM (CV=7%).
  • [0000]
    Further, for each batch, the current output for the sensors in the batch was averaged and plotted against glucose concentration, as shown in FIG. 7A. The average slope for Batches 1-4 was 1.17 nA/mM (CV=7.2%).
  • [0090]
    The slopes of the curves within each batch and from batch-to-batch are very tightly grouped, showing considerably little variation. The results demonstrate that sensors prepared according to the present invention give quite reproducible results, both within a batch and from batch-to-batch.
  • [0091]
    The foregoing examples demonstrate many of the advantages of the membranes of the present invention and the sensors employing such membranes. Particular advantages of sensors employing the membranes of the present invention include sensitivity, stability, responsivity, motion-compatibility, ease of calibration, and ease and reproducibility of manufacture.
  • [0092]
    Various aspects and features of the present invention have been explained or described in relation to beliefs or theories, although it will be understood that the invention is not bound to any particular belief or theory. Various modifications, processes, as well as numerous structures to which the present invention may be applicable will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art to which the present invention is directed upon review of the specification. Although the various aspects and features of the present invention have been described with respect to various embodiments and specific examples herein, it will be understood that the invention is entitled to protection within the full scope of the appended claims.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4340457 *Jan 28, 1980Jul 20, 1982Kater John A RIon selective electrodes
US4436094 *Jan 27, 1982Mar 13, 1984Evreka, Inc.Monitor for continuous in vivo measurement of glucose concentration
US4534355 *Oct 13, 1981Aug 13, 1985Smith And Nephew Associated Companies Inc.Electrochemical sensor employing a gas-permeable hydrophilic polyurethane membrane
US4703756 *May 6, 1986Nov 3, 1987The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaComplete glucose monitoring system with an implantable, telemetered sensor module
US4891101 *Nov 23, 1988Jan 2, 1990Arco Chemical Technology, Inc.Purification of tertiary hydroperoxides containing primary and secondary hydroperoxide contaminants
US4929313 *Jan 4, 1988May 29, 1990Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyAmperometric electrochemical ion sensors and method for determining ion concentration
US4943364 *Jun 23, 1986Jul 24, 1990Spectramed, Inc.Fiber optic CO2 sensor
US4974929 *Mar 28, 1990Dec 4, 1990Baxter International, Inc.Fiber optical probe connector for physiologic measurement devices
US5165407 *Apr 9, 1991Nov 24, 1992The University Of KansasImplantable glucose sensor
US5200051 *Nov 7, 1989Apr 6, 1993I-Stat CorporationWholly microfabricated biosensors and process for the manufacture and use thereof
US5262035 *Aug 2, 1989Nov 16, 1993E. Heller And CompanyEnzyme electrodes
US5262305 *Sep 3, 1991Nov 16, 1993E. Heller & CompanyInterferant eliminating biosensors
US5264104 *May 8, 1992Nov 23, 1993Gregg Brian AEnzyme electrodes
US5320725 *May 8, 1992Jun 14, 1994E. Heller & CompanyElectrode and method for the detection of hydrogen peroxide
US5356786 *Dec 2, 1993Oct 18, 1994E. Heller & CompanyInterferant eliminating biosensor
US5497772 *Nov 19, 1993Mar 12, 1996Alfred E. Mann Foundation For Scientific ResearchGlucose monitoring system
US5543326 *Mar 4, 1994Aug 6, 1996Heller; AdamBiosensor including chemically modified enzymes
US5593852 *Sep 1, 1994Jan 14, 1997Heller; AdamSubcutaneous glucose electrode
US5605152 *Jul 18, 1994Feb 25, 1997Minimed Inc.Optical glucose sensor
US5611900 *Jul 20, 1995Mar 18, 1997Michigan State UniversityMicrobiosensor used in-situ
US5665222 *Oct 11, 1995Sep 9, 1997E. Heller & CompanySoybean peroxidase electrochemical sensor
US5696314 *Jul 12, 1996Dec 9, 1997Chiron Diagnostics CorporationMultilayer enzyme electrode membranes and methods of making same
US5773270 *May 17, 1994Jun 30, 1998Chiron Diagnostics CorporationThree-layered membrane for use in an electrochemical sensor system
US5776324 *May 17, 1996Jul 7, 1998Encelle, Inc.Electrochemical biosensors
US5804048 *Aug 15, 1996Sep 8, 1998Via Medical CorporationElectrode assembly for assaying glucose
US5882494 *Aug 28, 1995Mar 16, 1999Minimed, Inc.Polyurethane/polyurea compositions containing silicone for biosensor membranes
US5964993 *Dec 19, 1996Oct 12, 1999Implanted Biosystems Inc.Glucose sensor
US5972199 *Feb 11, 1997Oct 26, 1999E. Heller & CompanyElectrochemical analyte sensors using thermostable peroxidase
US6015480 *Sep 4, 1997Jan 18, 2000Dade Behring Inc.Chloride ion selective membrane electrode having improved stability and selectivity
US6060176 *Sep 25, 1997May 9, 2000International Business Machines CorporationCorrosion protection for metallic features
US6103033 *Mar 4, 1998Aug 15, 2000Therasense, Inc.Process for producing an electrochemical biosensor
US6119028 *Oct 20, 1997Sep 12, 2000Alfred E. Mann FoundationImplantable enzyme-based monitoring systems having improved longevity due to improved exterior surfaces
US6120676 *Jun 4, 1999Sep 19, 2000Therasense, Inc.Method of using a small volume in vitro analyte sensor
US6134461 *Mar 4, 1998Oct 17, 2000E. Heller & CompanyElectrochemical analyte
US6143164 *Dec 16, 1998Nov 7, 2000E. Heller & CompanySmall volume in vitro analyte sensor
US6175752 *Apr 30, 1998Jan 16, 2001Therasense, Inc.Analyte monitoring device and methods of use
US6259937 *Jun 19, 1998Jul 10, 2001Alfred E. Mann FoundationImplantable substrate sensor
US6338790 *Apr 21, 1999Jan 15, 2002Therasense, Inc.Small volume in vitro analyte sensor with diffusible or non-leachable redox mediator
US6368274 *May 8, 2000Apr 9, 2002Medtronic Minimed, Inc.Reusable analyte sensor site and method of using the same
US6387048 *Jul 22, 1999May 14, 2002Alfred E. Mann FoundationImplantable sensor and integrity tests therefor
US6512939 *Jun 27, 2000Jan 28, 2003Medtronic Minimed, Inc.Implantable enzyme-based monitoring systems adapted for long term use
US6592746 *Apr 12, 1999Jul 15, 2003The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaSensor probe for determining hydrogen peroxide concentration and method of use thereof
US6642015 *Dec 29, 2000Nov 4, 2003Minimed Inc.Hydrophilic polymeric material for coating biosensors
US6746582 *May 11, 2001Jun 8, 2004Therasense, Inc.Electrodes with multilayer membranes and methods of making the electrodes
US6932894 *May 14, 2002Aug 23, 2005Therasense, Inc.Biosensor membranes composed of polymers containing heterocyclic nitrogens
US6965791 *Mar 26, 2003Nov 15, 2005Sorenson Medical, Inc.Implantable biosensor system, apparatus and method
US7666284 *Feb 23, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Electrodes with multilayer membranes and methods of using and making the electrodes
US20010039393 *Nov 5, 1997Nov 8, 2001Kenji MoriApparatus and method for in vivo delivery of therapeutic agents
US20010054219 *Mar 2, 2001Dec 27, 2001Settelmayer Joseph J.Load carrier system
US20020068860 *Jan 28, 2002Jun 6, 2002Implanted Biosystems, Inc.Implantable glucose sensor
US20020169369 *May 8, 2001Nov 14, 2002Ward W. KennethImplantable analyte sensor
US20030077772 *Dec 27, 2001Apr 24, 2003Rajiv ShahMethod for formulating and immobilizing a protein matrix and a protein matrix for use in a sensor
US20030078560 *Dec 27, 2001Apr 24, 2003Miller Michael E.Method and system for non-vascular sensor implantation
US20030199744 *Apr 17, 2003Oct 23, 2003Therasense, Inc.Small volume in vitro analyte sensor with diffusible or non-leachable redox mediator
US20040064133 *Dec 31, 2002Apr 1, 2004Medtronic-MinimedImplantable sensor method and system
US20040074785 *Oct 18, 2002Apr 22, 2004Holker James D.Analyte sensors and methods for making them
US20050031689 *May 10, 2004Feb 10, 2005Dexcom, Inc.Biointerface membranes incorporating bioactive agents
US20050033132 *May 14, 2004Feb 10, 2005Shults Mark C.Analyte measuring device
US20050241957 *Jul 1, 2005Nov 3, 2005Fei MaoBiosensor membranes composed of polymers containing heterocyclic nitrogens
US20070173710 *Jan 17, 2007Jul 26, 2007Petisce James RMembranes for an analyte sensor
US20070244379 *Apr 14, 2006Oct 18, 2007Robert BoockSilicone based membranes for use in implantable glucose sensors
US20090247855 *Mar 27, 2009Oct 1, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US20090247856 *Mar 27, 2009Oct 1, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US20090287073 *Jul 29, 2009Nov 19, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Silicone based membranes for use in implantable glucose sensors
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7653425Jan 26, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing calibration of an analyte sensor in an analyte monitoring system
US7697967Sep 28, 2006Apr 13, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor insertion
US7736310Jan 30, 2006Jun 15, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.On-body medical device securement
US7768386Jul 31, 2007Aug 3, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US7768387Apr 14, 2008Aug 3, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing dynamic multi-stage signal amplification in a medical device
US7775975Aug 17, 2010Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US7783333Mar 10, 2005Aug 24, 2010Dexcom, Inc.Transcutaneous medical device with variable stiffness
US7801582Mar 31, 2006Sep 21, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring and management system and methods therefor
US7822455Oct 26, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensors and methods of use
US7826382Nov 2, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Close proximity communication device and methods
US7826879Feb 28, 2006Nov 2, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensors and methods of use
US7857760Feb 22, 2006Dec 28, 2010Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US7883464Sep 30, 2005Feb 8, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Integrated transmitter unit and sensor introducer mechanism and methods of use
US7885698Feb 28, 2006Feb 8, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing continuous calibration of implantable analyte sensors
US7920907Jun 7, 2007Apr 5, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and method
US7928850Apr 19, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US7948369Aug 2, 2010May 24, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing dynamic multi-stage signal amplification in a medical device
US7951080May 31, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.On-body medical device securement
US7996158May 14, 2008Aug 9, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8029441Feb 28, 2006Oct 4, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor transmitter unit configuration for a data monitoring and management system
US8064977Jul 29, 2009Nov 22, 2011Dexcom, Inc.Silicone based membranes for use in implantable glucose sensors
US8066639Jun 4, 2004Nov 29, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Glucose measuring device for use in personal area network
US8086292Oct 27, 2009Dec 27, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring and management system and methods therefor
US8103471May 14, 2008Jan 24, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8112240Apr 29, 2005Feb 7, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing leak detection in data monitoring and management systems
US8116840Oct 30, 2007Feb 14, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method of calibrating of an analyte-measurement device, and associated methods, devices and systems
US8121857Feb 14, 2008Feb 21, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Device and method for automatic data acquisition and/or detection
US8123686Mar 1, 2007Feb 28, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing rolling data in communication systems
US8135548Oct 26, 2007Mar 13, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method, system and computer program product for real-time detection of sensitivity decline in analyte sensors
US8140142Apr 14, 2008Mar 20, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in medical communication system
US8140312Jan 31, 2008Mar 20, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for determining analyte levels
US8149103May 23, 2011Apr 3, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing dynamic multi-stage amplification in a medical device
US8149117Aug 29, 2009Apr 3, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US8155722Jun 2, 2008Apr 10, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Reference electrodes having an extended lifetime for use in long term amperometric sensors
US8160670Jul 3, 2008Apr 17, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring: stabilizer for subcutaneous glucose sensor with incorporated antiglycolytic agent
US8160900Apr 17, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring and management device and method to analyze the frequency of user interaction with the device
US8185181May 22, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for detecting false hypoglycemic conditions
US8211016Jul 3, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing analyte monitoring
US8216137Jul 20, 2009Jul 10, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing analyte monitoring
US8216138Jul 10, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Correlation of alternative site blood and interstitial fluid glucose concentrations to venous glucose concentration
US8219173Sep 30, 2008Jul 10, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Optimizing analyte sensor calibration
US8219174Jun 29, 2009Jul 10, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method of calibrating an analyte-measurement device, and associated methods, devices and systems
US8219175Jun 29, 2009Jul 10, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method of calibrating an analyte-measurement device, and associated methods, devices and systems
US8224415Jan 29, 2009Jul 17, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and device for providing offset model based calibration for analyte sensor
US8226891Jul 24, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring devices and methods therefor
US8239166Aug 7, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8252229Apr 10, 2009Aug 28, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for sterilizing an analyte sensor
US8260558May 14, 2008Sep 4, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8275438Sep 25, 2012Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8298142Oct 30, 2012Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8333714Sep 10, 2006Dec 18, 2012Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing an integrated analyte sensor insertion device and data processing unit
US8346335Jan 1, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor calibration management
US8362904Jan 29, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US8364229Jan 29, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensors having a signal-to-noise ratio substantially unaffected by non-constant noise
US8364230Jan 29, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8364231Jan 29, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8368556Feb 5, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing data communication in continuous glucose monitoring and management system
US8374668Oct 23, 2008Feb 12, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor with lag compensation
US8376945Nov 23, 2009Feb 19, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing calibration of an analyte sensor in an analyte monitoring system
US8377031Aug 31, 2008Feb 19, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Closed loop control system with safety parameters and methods
US8396528Mar 12, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8409093Apr 2, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Assessing measures of glycemic variability
US8417545Apr 9, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Device and method for automatic data acquisition and/or detection
US8425416Apr 23, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8425417Apr 23, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Integrated device for continuous in vivo analyte detection and simultaneous control of an infusion device
US8427298Apr 23, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing dynamic multi-stage amplification in a medical device
US8444560May 14, 2008May 21, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8447376May 21, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8449464May 28, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8456301May 8, 2008Jun 4, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US8461985May 8, 2008Jun 11, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US8473022Jan 30, 2009Jun 25, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor with time lag compensation
US8478377Nov 7, 2008Jul 2, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8478557Jul 30, 2010Jul 2, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing analyte monitoring system calibration accuracy
US8483967Apr 28, 2010Jul 9, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing real time analyte sensor calibration with retrospective backfill
US8484005Mar 19, 2012Jul 9, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for determining analyte levels
US8497777Apr 15, 2010Jul 30, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system having an alert
US8506482Feb 7, 2011Aug 13, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing continuous calibration of implantable analyte sensors
US8509107Nov 1, 2010Aug 13, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Close proximity communication device and methods
US8512239Apr 20, 2009Aug 20, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Glucose measuring device for use in personal area network
US8512243Sep 30, 2005Aug 20, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Integrated introducer and transmitter assembly and methods of use
US8514086Aug 30, 2010Aug 20, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Displays for a medical device
US8515517Sep 30, 2009Aug 20, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for dynamically updating calibration parameters for an analyte sensor
US8515518Dec 28, 2005Aug 20, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring
US8532730Oct 4, 2006Sep 10, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8532935Jul 16, 2012Sep 10, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and device for providing offset model based calibration for analyte sensor
US8543183Dec 23, 2011Sep 24, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring and management system and methods therefor
US8543184Oct 20, 2011Sep 24, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Silicone based membranes for use in implantable glucose sensors
US8545403Dec 28, 2006Oct 1, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Medical device insertion
US8560038May 14, 2008Oct 15, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8562528Nov 7, 2008Oct 22, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8562558Jun 5, 2008Oct 22, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Integrated medicament delivery device for use with continuous analyte sensor
US8571624Dec 29, 2004Oct 29, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for mounting a data transmission device in a communication system
US8571808Jan 23, 2012Oct 29, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8583204Mar 5, 2010Nov 12, 2013Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US8583205Apr 16, 2010Nov 12, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor calibration management
US8591410Jun 1, 2009Nov 26, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing glycemic control
US8593109Nov 3, 2009Nov 26, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for powering an electronic device
US8593287Jul 20, 2012Nov 26, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US8597188Jun 20, 2008Dec 3, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Health management devices and methods
US8597575Jul 23, 2012Dec 3, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring devices and methods therefor
US8600681May 14, 2008Dec 3, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8602991Jun 7, 2010Dec 10, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor introducer and methods of use
US8612163Aug 30, 2012Dec 17, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8613703May 29, 2008Dec 24, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Insertion devices and methods
US8613892Jun 30, 2009Dec 24, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte meter with a moveable head and methods of using the same
US8617069Jun 20, 2008Dec 31, 2013Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Health monitor
US8622988Aug 31, 2008Jan 7, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Variable rate closed loop control and methods
US8626257Nov 7, 2008Jan 7, 2014Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8635046Jun 22, 2011Jan 21, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for evaluating analyte sensor response characteristics
US8647269Apr 20, 2009Feb 11, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Glucose measuring device for use in personal area network
US8665091Jun 30, 2009Mar 4, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and device for determining elapsed sensor life
US8676513Jun 21, 2013Mar 18, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and device for early signal attenuation detection using blood glucose measurements
US8676601Apr 8, 2013Mar 18, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Device and method for automatic data acquisition and/or detection
US8682408Mar 5, 2010Mar 25, 2014Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US8682615Aug 4, 2012Mar 25, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US8684930Jun 29, 2009Apr 1, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method of calibrating an analyte-measurement device, and associated methods, devices and systems
US8698615Apr 22, 2013Apr 15, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing dynamic multi-stage signal amplification in a medical device
US8710993Nov 21, 2012Apr 29, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Mitigating single point failure of devices in an analyte monitoring system and methods thereof
US8718739Dec 28, 2012May 6, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor calibration management
US8718958Mar 12, 2012May 6, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method, system and computer program product for real-time detection of sensitivity decline in analyte sensors
US8718965Jun 24, 2013May 6, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing analyte monitoring system calibration accuracy
US8730058Jul 29, 2013May 20, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system having an alert
US8734422Aug 31, 2008May 27, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Closed loop control with improved alarm functions
US8737259Aug 5, 2013May 27, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Close proximity communication device and methods
US8744547Jul 9, 2012Jun 3, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Optimizing analyte sensor calibration
US8753893 *Jun 12, 2009Jun 17, 2014Ben H. LiuMulti-dimensional fluid sensors and related detectors and methods
US8764657Mar 30, 2012Jul 1, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Medical device inserters and processes of inserting and using medical devices
US8771183Feb 16, 2005Jul 8, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing data communication in continuous glucose monitoring and management system
US8774886Oct 4, 2006Jul 8, 2014Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8792956Apr 2, 2012Jul 29, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring: stabilizer for subcutaneous glucose sensor with incorporated antiglycolytic agent
US8795252Oct 16, 2009Aug 5, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Robust closed loop control and methods
US8802006Aug 27, 2012Aug 12, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for sterilizing an analyte sensor
US8816862Aug 19, 2013Aug 26, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Displays for a medical device
US8834366Jul 31, 2007Sep 16, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor calibration
US8852101Sep 30, 2009Oct 7, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor insertion
US8862198Dec 17, 2012Oct 14, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing an integrated analyte sensor insertion device and data processing unit
US8876755Jul 14, 2009Nov 4, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Closed loop control system interface and methods
US8880138Sep 30, 2005Nov 4, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Device for channeling fluid and methods of use
US8886273Nov 7, 2008Nov 11, 2014Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8911367Mar 26, 2007Dec 16, 2014Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US8924159Jun 1, 2009Dec 30, 2014Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing glycemic control
US8930203Feb 3, 2010Jan 6, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Multi-function analyte test device and methods therefor
US8933664Nov 25, 2013Jan 13, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for powering an electronic device
US8937540Feb 24, 2014Jan 20, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing dynamic multi-stage signal amplification in a medical device
US8954128Oct 18, 2013Feb 10, 2015Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US8986208Sep 30, 2008Mar 24, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor sensitivity attenuation mitigation
US8993331Aug 31, 2010Mar 31, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods for managing power and noise
US9000929Nov 22, 2013Apr 7, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US9008743Apr 14, 2008Apr 14, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in medical communication system
US9031630Nov 1, 2010May 12, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensors and methods of use
US9035767May 30, 2013May 19, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US9039975Dec 2, 2013May 26, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring devices and methods therefor
US9050041May 21, 2012Jun 9, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for detecting false hypoglycemic conditions
US9060719Dec 13, 2013Jun 23, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US9066709Mar 17, 2014Jun 30, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and device for early signal attenuation detection using blood glucose measurements
US9069536Oct 30, 2012Jun 30, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Electronic devices having integrated reset systems and methods thereof
US9088452Jan 31, 2013Jul 21, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing data communication in continuous glucose monitoring and management system
US9095290Feb 27, 2012Aug 4, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing rolling data in communication systems
US9113828Jul 9, 2012Aug 25, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing analyte monitoring
US9125548May 14, 2008Sep 8, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US9173606Jan 30, 2014Nov 3, 2015Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US9173607Jan 30, 2014Nov 3, 2015Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US9177456Jun 10, 2013Nov 3, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US9178752Apr 25, 2014Nov 3, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system having an alert
US9184875Apr 25, 2014Nov 10, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Close proximity communication device and methods
US9186098Mar 24, 2011Nov 17, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Medical device inserters and processes of inserting and using medical devices
US9186113Aug 11, 2014Nov 17, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Displays for a medical device
US9204827Apr 14, 2008Dec 8, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in medical communication system
US9215992Mar 24, 2011Dec 22, 2015Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Medical device inserters and processes of inserting and using medical devices
US9226701Apr 28, 2010Jan 5, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Error detection in critical repeating data in a wireless sensor system
US9226714Jan 8, 2015Jan 5, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Displays for a medical device
US9259175Oct 23, 2006Feb 16, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Flexible patch for fluid delivery and monitoring body analytes
US9265453Mar 24, 2011Feb 23, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Medical device inserters and processes of inserting and using medical devices
US9289179Apr 11, 2014Mar 22, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Mitigating single point failure of devices in an analyte monitoring system and methods thereof
US9310230Jun 24, 2013Apr 12, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing real time analyte sensor calibration with retrospective backfill
US9314195Aug 31, 2010Apr 19, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte signal processing device and methods
US9314198Apr 3, 2015Apr 19, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods
US9317656Nov 21, 2012Apr 19, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Compatibility mechanisms for devices in a continuous analyte monitoring system and methods thereof
US9320461Sep 29, 2010Apr 26, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing notification function in analyte monitoring systems
US9320462May 5, 2014Apr 26, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor calibration management
US9320468Jun 21, 2013Apr 26, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor with time lag compensation
US9326707Nov 10, 2009May 3, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Alarm characterization for analyte monitoring devices and systems
US9326709Mar 9, 2011May 3, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Systems, devices and methods for managing glucose levels
US9332933Sep 29, 2014May 10, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor insertion
US9332934Feb 8, 2013May 10, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor with lag compensation
US9339217Nov 21, 2012May 17, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte monitoring system and methods of use
US9351669Sep 30, 2010May 31, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Interconnect for on-body analyte monitoring device
US9357959Aug 19, 2013Jun 7, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for dynamically updating calibration parameters for an analyte sensor
US9364149Oct 3, 2011Jun 14, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor transmitter unit configuration for a data monitoring and management system
US9377434Oct 14, 2010Jun 28, 2016Schlumberger Technology CorporationElectro-chemical sensor
US9380971Dec 5, 2014Jul 5, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for powering an electronic device
US9392969Aug 31, 2008Jul 19, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Closed loop control and signal attenuation detection
US9398872Aug 28, 2014Jul 26, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor calibration
US9398882Sep 10, 2006Jul 26, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing analyte sensor and data processing device
US9402544Feb 1, 2010Aug 2, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor and apparatus for insertion of the sensor
US9402570Dec 11, 2012Aug 2, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte sensor devices, connections, and methods
US9402584Jan 14, 2015Aug 2, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and apparatus for providing dynamic multi-stage signal amplification in a medical device
US9408566Feb 13, 2013Aug 9, 2016Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and system for providing calibration of an analyte sensor in an analyte monitoring system
US20060183985 *Feb 22, 2006Aug 17, 2006Mark BristerAnalyte sensor
US20070078320 *Sep 30, 2005Apr 5, 2007Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Integrated transmitter unit and sensor introducer mechanism and methods of use
US20070203407 *Feb 28, 2006Aug 30, 2007Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Analyte sensors and methods of use
US20070249922 *Dec 28, 2006Oct 25, 2007Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Medical Device Insertion
US20080009692 *Sep 10, 2006Jan 10, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and Apparatus for Providing Analyte Sensor and Data Processing Device
US20080039702 *Aug 9, 2006Feb 14, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and System for Providing Calibration of an Analyte Sensor in an Analyte Monitoring System
US20080071157 *Jun 7, 2007Mar 20, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Analyte monitoring system and method
US20080081969 *Oct 30, 2007Apr 3, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method of calibrating of an analyte-measurement device, and associated methods, devices and systems
US20080081977 *Oct 2, 2006Apr 3, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and System for Dynamically Updating Calibration Parameters for an Analyte Sensor
US20080086042 *Mar 26, 2007Apr 10, 2008Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20080108942 *Mar 26, 2007May 8, 2008Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20080114280 *Oct 23, 2006May 15, 2008Gary Ashley StaffordVariable speed sensor insertion devices and methods of use
US20080161666 *Dec 29, 2006Jul 3, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Analyte devices and methods
US20080172205 *Oct 26, 2007Jul 17, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method, system and computer program product for real-time detection of sensitivity decline in analyte sensors
US20080197024 *Mar 25, 2008Aug 21, 2008Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20080199894 *Feb 14, 2008Aug 21, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Device and method for automatic data acquisition and/or detection
US20080200789 *Mar 25, 2008Aug 21, 2008Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20080200791 *Mar 25, 2008Aug 21, 2008Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20080201169 *Feb 14, 2008Aug 21, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Device and method for automatic data acquisition and/or detection
US20080288180 *May 14, 2008Nov 20, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US20080306435 *Jun 5, 2008Dec 11, 2008Dexcom, Inc.Integrated medicament delivery device for use with continuous analyte sensor
US20080312841 *May 14, 2008Dec 18, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US20080312842 *May 14, 2008Dec 18, 2008Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US20090018424 *Mar 25, 2008Jan 15, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20090018425 *Jul 3, 2008Jan 15, 2009Tianmei OuyangAnalyte monitoring: stabilizer for subcutaneous glucose sensor with incorporated antiglycolytic agent
US20090036747 *Jul 31, 2007Feb 5, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing data processing and control in a medical communication system
US20090054746 *Sep 30, 2005Feb 26, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Device for channeling fluid and methods of use
US20090054748 *Feb 28, 2006Feb 26, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and system for providing continuous calibration of implantable analyte sensors
US20090055149 *Jan 31, 2008Feb 26, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and system for determining analyte levels
US20090069649 *Sep 26, 2008Mar 12, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and System for Providing Analyte Monitoring
US20090076359 *Mar 31, 2006Mar 19, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Analyte monitoring and management system and methods therefor
US20090082693 *Dec 29, 2004Mar 26, 2009Therasense, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing temperature sensor module in a data communication system
US20090088614 *Jan 30, 2006Apr 2, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.On-body medical device securement
US20090105569 *Apr 28, 2006Apr 23, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Introducer Assembly and Methods of Use
US20090105570 *Mar 31, 2006Apr 23, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Analyte monitoring devices and methods therefor
US20090124964 *Nov 7, 2008May 14, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Integrated device for continuous in vivo analyte detection and simultaneous control of an infusion device
US20090131769 *Nov 7, 2008May 21, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20090131776 *Nov 7, 2008May 21, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20090131777 *Nov 7, 2008May 21, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20090137887 *Nov 7, 2008May 28, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20090143661 *Jun 26, 2008Jun 4, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, IncAnalyte monitoring and management device and method to analyze the frequency of user interaction with the device
US20090164251 *Jan 31, 2008Jun 25, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and apparatus for providing treatment profile management
US20090247855 *Mar 27, 2009Oct 1, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US20090247857 *Jan 30, 2009Oct 1, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Analyte Sensor Calibration Management
US20090257911 *Apr 10, 2009Oct 15, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and System for Sterilizing an Analyte Sensor
US20090281407 *Jul 20, 2009Nov 12, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and System for Providing Analyte Monitoring
US20090287074 *Nov 19, 2009Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20090292188 *Jul 31, 2009Nov 26, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte Sensors and Methods of Use
US20090294301 *Jun 2, 2008Dec 3, 2009Feldman Benjamin JReference Electrodes Having An Extended Lifetime for Use in Long Term Amperometric Sensors
US20090299151 *Dec 3, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and Apparatus for Providing Glycemic Control
US20090300616 *Dec 3, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Automated task execution for an analyte monitoring system
US20100049025 *Oct 30, 2009Feb 25, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.On-Body Medical Device Securement
US20100057057 *Mar 4, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Closed Loop Control And Signal Attenuation Detection
US20100076293 *Nov 30, 2009Mar 25, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Health Monitor
US20100081909 *Apr 1, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Optimizing Analyte Sensor Calibration
US20100081910 *Apr 1, 2010Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20100082364 *Apr 1, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Medical Information Management
US20100099966 *Oct 27, 2009Apr 22, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte Monitoring and Management System and Methods Therefor
US20100191085 *Jan 29, 2009Jul 29, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.Method and Device for Providing Offset Model Based Calibration for Analyte Sensor
US20100204557 *Feb 3, 2010Aug 12, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Multi-Function Analyte Test Device and Methods Therefor
US20100247775 *Mar 31, 2010Sep 30, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Precise Fluid Dispensing Method and Device
US20100274107 *Oct 28, 2010Dexcom, Inc.Polymer membranes for continuous analyte sensors
US20100295609 *Aug 2, 2010Nov 25, 2010Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and Apparatus for Providing Dynamic Multi-Stage Amplification in a Medical Device
US20100298684 *Feb 26, 2010Nov 25, 2010Dexcom, Inc.Analyte sensor
US20110046465 *Nov 1, 2010Feb 24, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Analyte Sensors and Methods of Use
US20110076783 *Jun 12, 2009Mar 31, 2011Liu Ben HMulti-dimensional fluid sensors and related detectors and methods
US20110193704 *Aug 11, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Displays for a medical device
US20110224522 *Sep 15, 2011Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Method and Apparatus for Providing Dynamic Multi-Stage Amplification in a Medical Device
WO2009148846A1 *May 21, 2009Dec 10, 2009Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.Reference electrodes having an extended lifetime for use in long term amperometric sensors
Classifications
U.S. Classification204/403.06, 204/403.01, 204/403.14
International ClassificationG01N33/66, C12Q1/00, C08F12/28, G01N27/327, A61B5/145, C08J5/22, G01N27/416, A61B5/1477, G01N27/40, G01N27/28
Cooperative ClassificationA61B5/14546, A61B5/1473, A61B5/14865, A61B5/6846, A61B5/14532, C12Q1/002, C12Q1/006
European ClassificationA61B5/1486B, A61B5/145G, A61B5/68D, C12Q1/00B2, G01N27/40
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Oct 15, 2014ASAssignment
Owner name: ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:THERASENSE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:034001/0494
Effective date: 20050725
Owner name: THERASENSE, INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MAO, FEI;CHO, HYUN;REEL/FRAME:033953/0480
Effective date: 20020516