|Publication number||US20080071323 A1|
|Application number||US 11/944,259|
|Publication date||Mar 20, 2008|
|Filing date||Nov 21, 2007|
|Priority date||Nov 27, 2002|
|Also published as||US7302298, US20040102828, WO2004050175A1|
|Publication number||11944259, 944259, US 2008/0071323 A1, US 2008/071323 A1, US 20080071323 A1, US 20080071323A1, US 2008071323 A1, US 2008071323A1, US-A1-20080071323, US-A1-2008071323, US2008/0071323A1, US2008/071323A1, US20080071323 A1, US20080071323A1, US2008071323 A1, US2008071323A1|
|Inventors||David Lowry, Bradford Gliner, Kent Leyde, Ben Clopton, Jay Miazga, Chris Genau|
|Original Assignee||Lowry David W, Gliner Bradford E, Kent Leyde, Ben Clopton, Jay Miazga, Chris Genau|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Referenced by (55), Classifications (9), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present invention relates to intracranial electrodes and methods for implanting and using intracranial electrodes. These electrodes and methods are particularly well suited for neurostimulation systems and may also be used in electroencephalography and other recording systems, e.g., evoked potential recordings.
A wide variety of mental and physical processes are known to be controlled or influenced by neural activity in the central and peripheral nervous systems. For example, the neural functions in some areas of the brain (e.g., the sensory or motor cortices) are organized according to physical or cognitive functions. Several other areas of the brain also appear to have distinct functions in most individuals. In the majority of people, for example, the areas of the occipital lobes relate to vision, the regions of the left inferior frontal lobes relate to language, and the regions of the cerebral cortex appear to be involved with conscious awareness, memory, and intellect. Because of the location-specific functional organization of the brain, in which neurons at discrete locations are statistically likely to control particular mental or physical functions in normal individuals, stimulating neurons at selected locations of the central nervous system can be used to effectuate changes in cognitive and/or motor functions throughout the body.
In several existing applications, neural functions are treated or augmented by electrical or magnetic stimulation powered by a neural stimulator that has a plurality of therapy electrodes and a pulse system coupled to the therapy electrodes. The therapy electrodes can be implanted into the patient at a target site for stimulating the desired portions of the brain. For example, one existing technique for masking pain in a patient is to apply an electrical stimulus to a target stimulation site of the brain. In other applications, stimulation of an appropriate target site in the brain has shown promise for treating damage to and disease and disorders of the brain, including damage from strokes and treatment of Alzheimer's disease, depression, obsessive-compulsive behavior, and other disorders.
The brain can be stimulated in several known fashions. One type of treatment is referred to as transcranial electrical stimulation (TES), which involves placing an electrode on the exterior of the patient's scalp and delivering an electrical current to the brain through the scalp and the skull. TES, however, is not widely used because the delivery of the electrical stimulation through the scalp and the skull causes patients a great amount of pain and the electrical field is difficult to direct or focus accurately.
Another type of treatment is transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which involves using a high-powered magnetic field adjacent the exterior of the scalp over an area of the cortex. TMS does not cause the painful side effects of TES. Unfortunately, TMS is not presently effective for treating many patients because the existing delivery systems are not practical for applying stimulation over an adequate period of time. TMS systems, for example, are relatively complex and require stimulation treatments to be performed by a healthcare professional in a hospital or physician's office. The efficacy of TMS in longer-term therapies may be limited because it is difficult to (a) accurately localize the region of stimulation in a reproducible manner, (b) hold the device in the correct position over the cranium for the requisite period, and (c) provide stimulation for extended periods of time.
Another device for stimulating a region of the brain is disclosed by King in U.S. Pat. No. 5,713,922, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference. King discloses a device for cortical surface stimulation having electrodes mounted on a paddle that is implanted under the skull of the patient. These electrodes are placed in contact with the surface of the cortex to create “paresthesia,” which is a vibrating or buzzing sensation. Implanting the paddle typically requires removal of a relatively large (e.g., thumbnail-sized or larger) window in the skull via a full craniotomy. Craniotomies are performed under a general anesthetic and subject the patient to increased chances of infection.
A physician may employ electroencephalography (EEG) to monitor neural functions of a patient. Sometimes this is done alone, e.g., in diagnosing epileptic conditions, though it may also be used in conjunction with neurostimulation. Most commonly, electroencephalography involves monitoring electrical activity of the brain, manifested as potential differences at the scalp surfaces, using electrodes placed on the scalp. The electrodes are typically coupled to an electroencephalograph to generate an electroencephalogram. Diagnosis of some neurological diseases and disorders, e.g., epilepsy, may best be conducted by monitoring neural function over an extended period of time. For this reason, ambulatory electroencephalography (AEEG) monitoring is becoming more popular. In AEEG applications, disc electrodes are applied to the patient's scalp. The scalp with the attached electrodes may be wrapped in gauze and the lead wires attached to the electrodes may be taped to the patient's scalp to minimize the chance of displacement.
EEG conducted with scalp-positioned electrodes requires amplification of the signals detected by the electrodes. In some circumstances, it can be difficult to pinpoint the origin of a particular signal because of the signal dissipation attributable to the scalp and the skull. For more precise determinations, EEG may be conducted using “deep brain” electrodes. Such electrodes extend through the patient's scalp and skull to a target location within the patient's brain. Typically, these deep brain electrodes comprise lengths of relatively thin wire that are advanced through a bore through the patient's skull to the desired location. If the electrodes are to be monitored over an extended period of time, the electrodes typically are allowed to extend out of the patient's skull and scalp and are coupled to the electroencephalograph using leads clipped or otherwise attached to the electrodes outside the scalp. To avoid shifting of the electrodes over time, the electrodes typically are taped down or held in place with a biocompatible cementitious material. The patient's head typically must be wrapped in gauze to protect the exposed electrodes and the associated leads, and the patient is uncomfortable during the procedure. This may be suitable for limited testing purposes-deep brain encephalography typically is limited to tests conducted in hospital settings over a limited period of time, usually no more than a few days—but could be problematic for longer-term monitoring, particularly in nonclinical settings.
Screws have been used to attach plates or the like to patients' skulls.
Various embodiments of the present invention provide intracranial electrodes and methods for implanting and using intracranial electrodes. It will be appreciated that several of the details set forth below are provided to describe the following embodiments in a manner sufficient to enable a person skilled in the art to make and use the disclosed embodiments. Several of the details and advantages described below, however, may not be necessary to practice certain embodiments of the invention. Additionally, the invention can also include additional embodiments that are not described in detail with respect to
One embodiment of the invention provides an intracranial electrode that includes a shaft, a head, and threads. The shaft includes a distal contact surface adapted to electrically contact a surface of a patient's brain. The head is associated with the shaft and is sized to be positioned subcutaneously adjacent the patient's skull. This can ameliorate the difficulties associated with electrodes that protrude through the patient's scalp, including irritation of the skin and discomfort. The threads are carried by at least one of the head and the shaft and may be adapted to fix the electrode with respect to the patient's skull. This intracranial electrode has an adjustable length adapted to change a contact force of the distal contact surface against the surface of the brain by adjusting the length of the electrode. In one adaptation of this embodiment, the intracranial electrode includes an adjustment means that is adapted to adjust the length of the electrode.
Another embodiment of the invention provides an intracranial electrode that includes an electrically conductive member, a dielectric member, and an anchor. The electrically conductive member has a blunt contact surface and the dielectric member has an interior in which the electrically conductive member is received. The anchor may be carried by the electrically conductive member or the dielectric member. The anchor is adapted to anchor at least one of the electrically conductive member and the dielectric member with respect to a patient's skull adjacent a brain surface such that the contact surface of the electrically conductive member is in electrical contact with the brain surface and the dielectric member electrically insulates the skull from the electrically conductive member.
Another embodiment of the invention provides a neurostimulator system. This neurostimulator system includes an intracranial electrode, a lead, and a pulse system. The intracranial electrode may take the form of one of the preceding embodiments. In one particular implementation, the intracranial electrode includes a shaft including a distal contact surface adapted to electrically contact a surface of a patient's brain; a head associated with the shaft, with the head being sized to be positioned subcutaneously adjacent the patient's skull; and threads carried by at least one of the head and the shaft, with the threads being adapted to fix the electrode with respect to the patient's skull. The lead is adapted to be subcutaneously implanted beneath the patient's scalp. The lead has a first portion, which is adapted to be electrically coupled to the contact surface, and an electrically insulated implantable length. The pulse system is adapted to be implanted in the patient's body at a location spaced from the electrode. The pulse system is operatively coupled to the electrode via the lead to deliver an electrical stimulus to the brain via the electrode. If so desired, an array of such intracranial electrodes may be employed and the pulse system may be adapted to generate an electrical potential between the electrodes in the array.
A method of implanting an intracranial electrode in accordance with another embodiment of the invention involves advancing a threaded electrode through a patient's skull until a contact surface of the electrode is in atraumatic contact with a surface of the patient's brain. The threaded electrode is electrically coupled to a lead. A head of the electrode and the length of the lead are covered with the patient's scalp, thereby enclosing the electrode. An electrical stimulus is delivered to the patient's brain via the electrode. This electrical stimulus may be generated by a pulse system electrically coupled to the electrode by the lead. In one adaptation of this embodiment, the method may also include adjusting a length of the electrode, e.g., to adjust the force of the contact surface of the electrode against the surface of the brain.
For ease of understanding, the following discussion is subdivided into three areas of emphasis. The first section discusses certain intracranial electrodes; the second section relates to select embodiments of neurostimulation systems; and the third section outlines methods in accordance with other embodiments of the invention.
B. Intracranial Electrodes
FIGS. 2A-B illustrate an intracranial electrode 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. This electrode 100 includes a head 102 attached to a threaded shaft 110. The head 102 and shaft 110 may be integrally formed of an electrically conductive material, e.g., titanium or another biocompatible, electrical conductive metal. The head 102 may include one or more slots 104, an allen head recess (not shown), or other structure (e.g., a square drive or TORX™ drive recess) adapted to facilitate turning the electrode 100. As the electrode 100 is turned, the threads 112 of the threaded shaft 110 will advance a generally distally positioned contact surface 115 of the electrode 100 toward the dura mater 20. The length of the shaft 110 may be selected so that the contact surface 115 of the electrode 100 electrically engages the surface of the dura mater 20 without causing undue harm to the dura mater 20 or the underlying cerebral cortex. The contact surface 115 may comprise a relatively blunt end to reduce trauma to the dura mater and the underlying brain tissue 25.
In one embodiment, the intracranial electrode 100 is adapted to be electrically connected to a pulse system (1050 in
The head 102 of the electrode 100 is adapted to be implanted subcutaneously beneath the patient's scalp 30 (shown schematically in
The dimensions of the electrode 100 can be varied to meet various design objectives. In one embodiment, however, the electrode 100 is longer than the thickness of the patient's skull. More specifically, the head 102 is adapted to be seated at an extracranial subcutaneous site while the threaded shaft 110 is only slightly longer than the skull thickness at the intended treatment site. Lengths on the order of 4-50 mm, for example, may be appropriate in certain applications. The diameter of the head 102 and the threaded shaft 110 may also be varied. For most applications, shafts 110 having diameters (typically excluding the width of the threads 112) of no greater than 4 mm will suffice. Shaft diameters of about 1-4 mm are likely, with diameters of 1.5-2.5 mm being well suited for most applications. FIGS. 2A-B illustrate an electrode 100 having a constant diameter shaft 110, but it should be understood that the shaft diameter may vary. For example, the shaft 110 may taper distally to improve the ability of the shaft 110 to be self-tapping. The head 102 typically will have a larger diameter than an adjoining portion of the shaft 110. (It should be recognized that
The connection of the electrode 150 to the lead 160 in FIGS. 3A-B differs somewhat from the connection of the electrode 100 and lead 120 in FIGS. 2A-B, however. In FIGS. 2A-B, the electrode 100 is electrically coupled to the lead 120 by compressively engaging the electrically conductive ring 122 of the lead 120 between the electrode head 102 and the skull 10. In FIGS. 3A-B, the electrode 150 includes a head 152 including slots 154 or other structure for engaging a screwdriver, wrench, or the like. The head 152 is adapted to engage a cap 162 carried by the lead 160 that electrically couples the body 164 of the lead 160 to the head 152 of the electrode 150. In the illustrated embodiment, the cap 162 comprises a dielectric body (e.g., a dielectric plastic material with some resilience) having an electrically conductive inner surface 163, which may be provided by coating an interior surface of the cap 162 with a metal. In one embodiment, the cap 162 is adapted to resiliently deform to be press-fitted on the head 152. The body 164 of the lead 160 may be coupled to the electrically conductive inner surface 163 of the cap 162, thereby providing an electrical pathway between the electrode 150 and a pulse system (not shown) operatively coupled to the lead 160.
In one embodiment, the cap 162 is sized to be subcutaneously implanted beneath the patient's scalp 30. In the illustrated embodiment, the head 152 and the cap 162 both extend outwardly beyond the outer cortex 12 of the patient's skull 10. In another embodiment (not shown) some or all of the length of the head 152 and/or the cap 162 may be countersunk into a recess formed through the outer cortex 12 and/or an outer portion of the cancellous 18. This can improve patient comfort, which can be useful if the intracranial electrode 150 is intended to be implanted permanently or for an extended period of time.
FIGS. 4A-B schematically illustrate aspects of an intracranial electrode 200 in accordance with another embodiment. The electrode 200 may comprise an electrically conductive inner portion 205 and an electrically insulative outer portion 206. In the illustrated embodiment, the electrically conductive portion 205 of the electrode 200 includes a head 202 and a threaded shaft 210 defining a contact surface 215 for electrically contacting the patient's dura mater 20. These elements of the electrode 200 and their electrical connection to the lead 120 are directly analogous to the electrode 100 shown in FIGS. 2A-B. The electrically insulative outer portion 206 of the electrode 200 shown in
When implanted in a skull 10 as shown in
In one particular embodiment, the dielectric layer 280 comprises an electrically insulative ceramic material. In another embodiment, the dielectric layer 280 comprises an electrically insulative plastic or other biocompatible polymer that has sufficient structural integrity to adequately anchor the electrode 250 to the skull 10 for the duration of its intended use. If so desired, the dielectric layer 280 may be porous or textured to promote osseointegration of long-term implants. For shorter-term applications, the dielectric layer 280 may be formed of or covered with a material that will limit osseointegration.
In each of the preceding embodiments, the intracranial electrode 100, 150, 200, or 250 has a fixed length. In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 2A-B, for example, the distance between the base of the head 102 and the contact surface 115 remains fixed. When the threaded shaft 110 is sunk into the skull 10 to a depth sufficient to compress the conductive ring 122 of the lead 120 between the head 102 and the skull 10, this will also fix the distance from the exterior surface of the outer cortex 12 of the skull 10 to the contact surface 115. The thickness of the skull 10 can vary from patient to patient and from site to site on a given patient's skull. Hence, the pressure exerted by the contact surface 115 against the dura mater 20 will vary depending on the thickness of the skull. If the electrode 100 is selected to be long enough to make adequate electrical contact with the dura mater adjacent the thickest site on a skull, the pressure exerted by the contact surface 115 against the dura mater 20 may cause undue damage at sites where the skull is thinner. Consequently, it can be advantageous to provide a selection of electrode sizes from which the physician can choose in selecting an electrode 100 for a particular site of a specific patient's skull.
The intracranial electrode 300 of
The head 320 of the electrode 300 comprises a body 322 and a tubular length 324 that extends from the body 322. The body 322 may be adapted to be rotated by hand or by an installation tool. In one embodiment the body 322 is generally hexagonal to facilitate rotation with an appropriately sized wrench. In the particular embodiment shown in FIGS. 6A-B, the body 322 has a pair of recesses 323 in its outer face sized and shaped to interface with a dedicated installation tool (not shown) having projections adapted to fit in the recesses 323. If so desired, the installation tool may be a torque wrench or other tool adapted to limit the amount of torque an operator may apply to the head 320 of the electrode 300 during installation. The tubular length 324 may be externally threaded so the head 320 may be anchored to the skull 10 by screwing the tubular length 324 into the skull 10.
The head 320 includes an internally threaded bore 326 that extends through the thickness of the body 322 and the tubular length 324. The bore 326 has threads sized to mate with the external threads on the shaft 310. If so desired, a biocompatible sealant (e.g., a length of polytetrafluoroethylene tape) may be provided between the threads of the bore 326 and the threads of the shaft 310 to limit passage of fluids or infectious agents through the bore 326.
Rotation of the shaft 310 with respect to the head 320 will, therefore, selectively advance or retract the shaft 310 with respect to the head 320. This will, in turn, increase or decrease, respectively, the distance between the lower face 323 of the head body 322 and the contact surface 315 of the shaft 310. As suggested in
If so desired, the torque driver 340 may include graduations 342 to inform the physician how far the shaft 310 has been advanced with respect to the head 320. As noted below, in certain methods of the invention, the thickness of the skull at the particular treatment site may be gauged before the electrode 300 is implanted. Using this information and the graduations 342 on the torque driver 340, the physician can fairly reliably select an appropriate length for the electrode 300 to meet the conditions present at that particular site.
In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 6A-B, the head 320 and the shaft 310 are both formed of an electrically conductive material. The conductive ring 122 of the lead 120 may be received in a slot formed in the lower face 323 of the body 322. Alternatively, the ring 122 may be internally threaded, permitting it to be threaded over the external threads of the tubular length 324 before the head 320 is implanted. If so desired, the ring 122 can instead be compressively engaged by the lower face 323 of the head 320 in a manner analogous to the engagement of the head 102 with the ring 122 in
In another embodiment, the head 320 is formed of a dielectric material, such as a dielectric ceramic or plastic. This may necessitate a different connection between the lead 120 and the shaft 310, such as by electrically contacting the lead 120 to the proximal end 312 of the shaft 310. Employing a dielectric head 320 can help electrically insulate the skull 10 from the electrodes 300, improving signal quality and reducing interference between the various electrodes 300 in an array, as noted above.
The intracranial electrode 350 of this embodiment also includes a head 370 having an internally threaded bore 376 extending through its thickness. The threads of the bore 376 are adapted to mate with the threads of the first threaded portion 360 a. By rotating the shaft 360 with respect to the head 370 (e.g., with a screwdriver 340), the distance between the head 370 and the contact surface 365 can be adjusted in much the same manner described above in connection with FIGS. 6A-B.
The head 320 of the electrode 300 in FIGS. 6A-B has an externally threaded tubular length 324 that extends into the skull 10 and helps anchor the electrode 300 to the skull 10. The shaft 310 may then move with respect to the skull by rotating the shaft 310 with respect to the head 320. In the embodiment shown in
In the embodiment of
In the preceding embodiments, some or a majority of the head of the electrode extends outwardly beyond the outer surface of the skull 10. In the particular implementation shown in
The head 420 includes a base 430 and an actuator 422. The base 430 includes an externally threaded body 432 and a tubular length 434 that extends from the body 432. A portion of the tubular length 434 carries external threads 436. The tubular length 434 may also include one or more locking tabs 440, each of which includes an actuating surface 442.
The actuator 422 has an internally threaded bore 424 that is adapted to matingly engage the threads 436 on the base 430. Rotating the actuator 422 with respect to the base 430 in a first direction will advance the actuator 422 toward the actuating surface 442 of each of the tabs 440. The actuator 422 may urge against the actuating surfaces 442, pushing the tabs 440 inwardly into engagement with the shaft 410. This will help lock the shaft 410 in place with respect to the base 430. Rotating the actuator 422 in the opposite direction will allow the tabs 440 to resiliently return toward a rest position wherein they do not brake movement of the shaft 410. The force with which the shaft 410 engages the dura mater 20 (not shown) then can be adjusted to a desired level by moving the shaft 410 with respect to the base 430. When the shaft 410 is in the desired position, the actuator 422 may be moved into engagement with the tabs 440 to hold the shaft 410 in the desired position.
The contact surface 455 of the shaft 452 is pushed against the surface of the dura mater 20 with a predictable force by means of a spring 454 received in the recess 466. In
In another embodiment (not shown), the spring 454 comprises a compressed elastomer, which may take the form of a column that fills some or all of the diameter of the recess 466. The elastomer may comprise a biocompatible polymeric material, for example. In such an embodiment, the elastomer may be electrically conductive, e.g., by filling a polymeric material with a suitable quantity of a conductive metal powder or the like. In another embodiment, one or more wires may be embedded in the elastomeric material to conduct an electrical signal across the elastomer to the shaft 452.
In the illustrated embodiment and the alternative embodiment wherein the spring 454 comprises an elastomer, the head 460 may be formed of a dielectric material, helping electrically insulate the skull 10 from the shaft 452. In an alternative embodiment, the head 460 may be formed of an electrically conductive material. Even though the other structural elements of the electrode 450 may remain largely the same, this would avoid the necessity of having the lead 468 extend through the head 460; an electrically conducive ring 122 or the like instead may be employed in a manner analogous to that shown in
The contact surface 481 of the shaft 480 is pushed against the surface of the dura mater 20 with a predictable force by means of a spring 486. The spring 486 may be substantially the same as the spring 454 shown in
The electrode 475 of
To implant the electrode 500 in the skull 10, the shaft 510 may be advanced into a bore in the skull until the contact surface 515 exerts the desired contact force against the dura mater 20. Once the shaft 510 is in the desired position, the compressive force F on the collar 540 may be released, allowing the collar 540 to expand outwardly into compressive engagement with the lumen of the bore in the skull 10. This will help hold the electrode 500 in place with respect to the skull without requiring permanent anchoring of the shaft 510 to the skull 10.
The shaft 510 may be electrically coupled to a pulse system (not shown) by a lead 520. The lead 520 may include a cap 522 having an electrically conductive inner surface 524 coupled to a body 526 of the lead. The lead 520 may be analogous to the lead 160 shown in FIGS. 3A-B. Any other suitable electrical connection between the shaft 510 and the pulse system may be employed.
In one embodiment, the collar 540 comprises a dielectric material. This will help electrically insulate the skull 10 from the shaft 510. In another embodiment, the collar 540 is electrically conductive and the lead 520 may be electrically coupled to the shaft 510 via the collar 540.
In the embodiment shown in
In use, the conductive member 570 may be slid freely through a pilot hole 11 formed through the skull to position the tip 574 at the target site 28 in a known manner. The pilot hole 11 may be larger than the conductive member 570 or be tapped to receive the threads of the shaft 560. With the conductive member 570 in place, the shaft 560 may be threaded into the pilot hole 11, crimping the conductive member 570 against an interior of the pilot hole 11. This will fix the conductive member 570 in place. If so desired, a proximal length 572 of the conductive member 570 may extend outwardly of the skull and be held in place by the head 562. The threads of the threaded shaft 560 may also cut through the dielectric sheath of the conductive member 570 as the shaft 560 is screwed into place, making electrical contact with the conductive wire therein.
The gimbal fitting 630 is adapted to allow an operator greater control over the placement of the electrically conductive tip 574 of the conductive member 570. In use, the tip 574 of the conductive member 570 will be threaded through an opening in the gimbal fitting 630. By pivoting the gimbal fitting 630 with respect to the threaded shaft 620 of the head 610, the angular orientation of the conductive member 570 with respect to the pilot hole 11 in the skull 10 can be accurately controlled. Once the operator determines that the conductive member 570 is at the appropriate angle, e.g., using a surgical navigation system such as that noted below, the operator may advance the conductive member 570 to position the conductive tip 574 at the target site 28. Once the tip 574 is in position, the cap 162 of a lead 160 may be press-fitted on the body 610 of the electrode 600. This will crimp the proximal length 572 of the connective member 570 between the body 610 and the conductive inner surface 163 of the cap 162, providing an effective electrical connection between the conductive member 570 and the body 164 of the lead 160.
C. Systems Employing Intracranial Electrodes
The pulse system 1050 may be implanted in the body of the patient P at a location remote from the array 1010 of electrodes 100. In the embodiment shown in
In one embodiment, the controller 1060 includes a processor, a memory, and a programmable computer medium. The controller 1060, for example, can be a computer, and the programmable computer medium can be software loaded into the memory of the computer and/or hardware that performs the requisite control functions. In an alternative embodiment suggested by dashed lines in
The controller 1060 is operatively coupled to and provides control signals to the pulse generator 1065, which may include a plurality of channels that send appropriate electrical pulses to the pulse transmitter 1070. The pulse generator 1065 may have N channels, with at least one channel associated with each of N electrodes 100 in the array 1010. The pulse generator 1065 sends appropriate electrical pulses to the pulse transmitter 1070, which is coupled to a plurality of electrodes 1080. In one embodiment, each of these electrodes is adapted to be physically connected to the body 124 of a separate lead, allowing each electrode 1080 to electrically communicate with a single electrode 100 in the array 1010 on a dedicated channel of the pulse generator 1065. Suitable components for the power supply 1055, the integrated controller 1060, the pulse generator 1065, and the pulse transmitter 1070 are known to persons skilled in the art of implantable medical devices.
As shown in
The electrodes 100 of these arrays 1010 may be provided with electrical signals in a variety of different manners. In some circumstances, one electrode 100 or a subset of the electrodes 100 may have one electrical potential and a different electrode 100 or subset of the electrodes 100 (or, in some embodiments, the housing 1052 of the pulse system 1050) may have a different electrical potential. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/978,134, entitled “Systems and Methods for Automatically Optimizing Stimulus Parameters and Electrode Configurations for Neuro-Stimulators” and filed 15 Oct. 2001 (the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference), suggests ways for optimizing the control of the electrical pulses delivered to the electrodes 100 in an array 1010. The methods and apparatus disclosed therein may be used to automatically determine the configuration of therapy electrodes and/or the parameters for the stimulus to treat or otherwise effectuate a change in neural function of a patient.
The preceding discussion focuses on use of intracranial electrodes (e.g., electrodes 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, 400, 450, 475, 500, 550, or 600) in neurostimulation systems. In an alternative application, the intracranial electrodes may be used to monitor electrical potentials in electroencephalography. A suitable electroencephalograph may incorporate a system similar to the neurostimulation system 1000 shown in
As noted above, other embodiments of the invention provide methods of implanting an intracranial electrode and/or methods of installing a neurostimulation system including an implantable intracranial electrode. In the following discussion, reference is made to the particular intracranial electrode 100 illustrated in FIGS. 2A-B and to the neurostimulation system 1000 shown in
As noted above, implanting conventional cortical electrodes typically requires a full craniotomy under general anesthesia to remove a relatively large (e.g., thumbnail-sized or larger) window in the skull. Craniotomies are performed under a general anesthetic and subject the patient to increased chances of infection.
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, however, the diameter of the electrode shaft 110 is sufficiently small to permit implantation under local anesthetic without requiring a craniotomy. In this embodiment, a relatively small (e.g., 4 mm or smaller) pilot hole may be formed through at least part of the thickness of the patient's skull adjacent a selected stimulation or monitoring site of the brain. When implanting the electrode 100 of FIGS. 2A-B, it may be advantageous to extend the pilot hole through the entire thickness of the skull. Care should be taken to avoid undue trauma to the brain in forming the pilot hole. In one embodiment, an initial estimate of skull thickness can be made from MRI, CT, or other imaging information. A hand-held drill may be used to form a bore shallow enough to avoid extending through the entire skull. A stylus may be inserted into the pilot hole to confirm that it strikes relatively rigid bone. The drill may then be used to deepen the pilot hole in small increments, checking with the stylus after each increment to detect when the hole passes through the thickness of the inner cortex 14 of the skull 10. If so desired, the stylus may be graduated to allow a physician to measure the distance to the springy dura mater and this information can be used to select an electrode 100 of appropriate length or, if an adjustable-length electrode (e.g., electrode 300 of FIGS. 6A-B) is used, to adjust the electrode to an appropriate length.
The location of the pilot hole (and, ultimately the electrode 100 received therein) can be selected in a variety of fashions. U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0087201 and U.S. application Ser. No. 09/978,134 (both of which are incorporated hereinabove), for example, suggest approaches for selecting an appropriate stimulation site. When the desired site has been identified, the physician can bore the pilot hole to guide the contact surface 115 of the electrode 100 to that site. In one embodiment, the physician may use anatomical landmarks, e.g., cranial landmarks such as the bregma or the sagittal suture, to guide placement and orientation of the pilot hole. In another embodiment, a surgical navigation system may be employed to inform the physician during the procedure. Briefly, such systems may employ real-time imaging and/or proximity detection to guide a physician in placing the pilot hole and in placing the electrode 100 in the pilot hole. In some systems, fiducials are positioned on the patient's scalp or skull prior to imaging and those fiducials are used as reference points in subsequent implantation. In other systems, real-time MRI or the like may be employed instead of or in conjunction with such fiducials. A number of suitable navigation systems are commercially available, such as the STEALTHSTATION TREON TGS sold by Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies of Louisville, Colorado, US.
Once the pilot hole is formed, the threaded electrode 100 may be advanced along the pilot hole until the contact surface 115 electrically contacts a desired portion of the patient's brain. If the electrode 100 is intended to be positioned epidurally, this may comprise relatively atraumatically contacting the dura mater 20; if the electrode is to contact a site on the cerebral cortex, the electrode will be advanced to extend through the dura mater. The electrodes 100 may also be implanted to a selected depth within the cerebral cortex or at a deeper location in the brain.
In one embodiment, the length of the electrode 100 is selected (or adjusted for electrode 300, for example) to achieve the desired level of contact and the electrode will be advanced until a known relationship with the skull is achieved, e.g., when the head 102 compresses the contact ring 122 of the lead 120 against the exterior of the skull 10. In another embodiment, the thickness of the skull 10 need not be known to any significant accuracy before the electrode 100 is implanted. Instead, the electrode 100 may be connected, e.g., via the lead 120, to an impedance monitor and the impedance may be monitored as the electrode 100 is being implanted. It is anticipated that the measured impedance will change when the electrode 100 contacts the dura mater 20. Once this contact is detected, the physician may advance the electrode a small, fixed distance to ensure reliable electrical contact over time.
As noted above, the electrode 100 may be coupled to a lead 120. The timing of this coupling may vary with the nature of the coupling. For a lead 120 employing a contact ring 122 or the like positioned below the head 102, the lead may be coupled to the electrode before the electrode is introduced into the skull. In other embodiments, the lead (e.g., lead 160 of FIGS. 3A-B) may be coupled to the electrode after the electrode is properly positioned with respect to the selected site of the brain. The lead, or at least a length thereof, may be implanted subcutaneously, e.g., by guiding it through a tunnel formed between the implant site and the intended site of a subclavicularly implanted pulse system 1050. The patient's scalp may then be closed over the head 102 of the electrode 100 so the electrode is completely enclosed. This can materially improve patient comfort compared to more convention systems wherein epilepsy monitoring electrodes or the like extend through the scalp to an extracorporeal connection.
Once the electrode is in place, an electrical stimulus may be delivered from a pulse system 1050 to the patient's brain via the lead 120 and the electrode 100. In certain embodiments of the invention discussed previously, a plurality of electrodes 100 may be implanted in an array (e.g., array 1010, 1010 a, 1010 b, or 1010 c) in the patient's skull and each of the electrodes 100 may be coupled to the pulse system 1050 by an electrically separate lead 120. The precise nature of the stimulus delivered via the electrode(s) 100 can be varied as desired to diagnose or treat any particular condition. The type and frequency of stimulus may be selected as outlined in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0087201, for example, and also may be optimized as taught in U.S. application Ser. No. 09/978,134.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense, that is to say, in a sense of “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or plural number also include the plural or singular number, respectively. When the claims use the word “or” in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above-detailed descriptions of embodiments of the invention are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize. For example, whereas steps are presented in a given order, alternative embodiments may perform steps in a different order. The various embodiments described herein can be combined to provide further embodiments.
In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above-detailed description explicitly defines such terms. While certain aspects of the invention are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the invention in any number of claim forms. Accordingly, the inventors reserve the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the invention.
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7833253 *||Jan 17, 2006||Nov 16, 2010||Biodynamics Llc||Craniotomy closures and plugs|
|US7869867||Oct 27, 2006||Jan 11, 2011||Cyberonics, Inc.||Implantable neurostimulator with refractory stimulation|
|US7869885||Apr 28, 2006||Jan 11, 2011||Cyberonics, Inc||Threshold optimization for tissue stimulation therapy|
|US7962220||Apr 28, 2006||Jun 14, 2011||Cyberonics, Inc.||Compensation reduction in tissue stimulation therapy|
|US7974701||Apr 27, 2007||Jul 5, 2011||Cyberonics, Inc.||Dosing limitation for an implantable medical device|
|US7974707||Jan 26, 2007||Jul 5, 2011||Cyberonics, Inc.||Electrode assembly with fibers for a medical device|
|US7996079||Jan 24, 2006||Aug 9, 2011||Cyberonics, Inc.||Input response override for an implantable medical device|
|US8080042||Feb 23, 2010||Dec 20, 2011||Biodynamics, Llc||Craniotomy closures and plugs|
|US8083782||Feb 23, 2010||Dec 27, 2011||Biodynamics Llc||Craniotomy closures and plugs|
|US8150508||Mar 29, 2007||Apr 3, 2012||Catholic Healthcare West||Vagus nerve stimulation method|
|US8180462||Apr 18, 2006||May 15, 2012||Cyberonics, Inc.||Heat dissipation for a lead assembly|
|US8204603||Apr 25, 2008||Jun 19, 2012||Cyberonics, Inc.||Blocking exogenous action potentials by an implantable medical device|
|US8219188||Mar 29, 2007||Jul 10, 2012||Catholic Healthcare West||Synchronization of vagus nerve stimulation with the cardiac cycle of a patient|
|US8239028||Apr 24, 2009||Aug 7, 2012||Cyberonics, Inc.||Use of cardiac parameters in methods and systems for treating a chronic medical condition|
|US8260426||Jan 25, 2008||Sep 4, 2012||Cyberonics, Inc.||Method, apparatus and system for bipolar charge utilization during stimulation by an implantable medical device|
|US8280505||Mar 10, 2009||Oct 2, 2012||Catholic Healthcare West||Vagus nerve stimulation method|
|US8295946||May 23, 2011||Oct 23, 2012||Cyberonics, Inc.||Electrode assembly with fibers for a medical device|
|US8306627||May 23, 2011||Nov 6, 2012||Cyberonics, Inc.||Dosing limitation for an implantable medical device|
|US8337404||Oct 1, 2010||Dec 25, 2012||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Detecting, quantifying, and/or classifying seizures using multimodal data|
|US8382667||Apr 29, 2011||Feb 26, 2013||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Detecting, quantifying, and/or classifying seizures using multimodal data|
|US8417344||Oct 24, 2008||Apr 9, 2013||Cyberonics, Inc.||Dynamic cranial nerve stimulation based on brain state determination from cardiac data|
|US8452387||Sep 20, 2010||May 28, 2013||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Detecting or validating a detection of a state change from a template of heart rate derivative shape or heart beat wave complex|
|US8457747||Oct 20, 2008||Jun 4, 2013||Cyberonics, Inc.||Neurostimulation with signal duration determined by a cardiac cycle|
|US8460346||Oct 10, 2008||Jun 11, 2013||Biodynamics Llc||Craniotomy closures|
|US8478420||Jul 12, 2006||Jul 2, 2013||Cyberonics, Inc.||Implantable medical device charge balance assessment|
|US8478428||Apr 23, 2010||Jul 2, 2013||Cyberonics, Inc.||Helical electrode for nerve stimulation|
|US8483846||Apr 8, 2010||Jul 9, 2013||Cyberonics, Inc.||Multi-electrode assembly for an implantable medical device|
|US8562536||Apr 29, 2010||Oct 22, 2013||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Algorithm for detecting a seizure from cardiac data|
|US8565867||Jan 25, 2008||Oct 22, 2013||Cyberonics, Inc.||Changeable electrode polarity stimulation by an implantable medical device|
|US8571643||Sep 16, 2010||Oct 29, 2013||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Detecting or validating a detection of a state change from a template of heart rate derivative shape or heart beat wave complex|
|US8597335||Nov 29, 2011||Dec 3, 2013||Biodynamics Llc||Craniotomy closures and plugs|
|US8615309||Mar 29, 2007||Dec 24, 2013||Catholic Healthcare West||Microburst electrical stimulation of cranial nerves for the treatment of medical conditions|
|US8641646||Jul 30, 2010||Feb 4, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Seizure detection using coordinate data|
|US8649871||Apr 30, 2010||Feb 11, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Validity test adaptive constraint modification for cardiac data used for detection of state changes|
|US8660666||Mar 10, 2009||Feb 25, 2014||Catholic Healthcare West||Microburst electrical stimulation of cranial nerves for the treatment of medical conditions|
|US8679009||Jun 15, 2010||Mar 25, 2014||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Systems approach to comorbidity assessment|
|US8684921||May 15, 2012||Apr 1, 2014||Flint Hills Scientific Llc||Detecting, assessing and managing epilepsy using a multi-variate, metric-based classification analysis|
|US8725239||Apr 25, 2011||May 13, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Identifying seizures using heart rate decrease|
|US8738126||Mar 10, 2009||May 27, 2014||Catholic Healthcare West||Synchronization of vagus nerve stimulation with the cardiac cycle of a patient|
|US8768471||Mar 3, 2013||Jul 1, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Dynamic cranial nerve stimulation based on brain state determination from cardiac data|
|US8827912||Apr 27, 2010||Sep 9, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Methods and systems for detecting epileptic events using NNXX, optionally with nonlinear analysis parameters|
|US8831732||Apr 30, 2010||Sep 9, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Method, apparatus and system for validating and quantifying cardiac beat data quality|
|US8849409||Mar 3, 2013||Sep 30, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Dynamic cranial nerve stimulation based on brain state determination from cardiac data|
|US8852100||Feb 25, 2013||Oct 7, 2014||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Detecting, quantifying, and/or classifying seizures using multimodal data|
|US8868203||Oct 26, 2007||Oct 21, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Dynamic lead condition detection for an implantable medical device|
|US8874218||Apr 23, 2013||Oct 28, 2014||Cyberonics, Inc.||Neurostimulation with signal duration determined by a cardiac cycle|
|US8888702||Dec 3, 2012||Nov 18, 2014||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Detecting, quantifying, and/or classifying seizures using multimodal data|
|US8942798||Oct 26, 2007||Jan 27, 2015||Cyberonics, Inc.||Alternative operation mode for an implantable medical device based upon lead condition|
|US8945006||Feb 24, 2014||Feb 3, 2015||Flunt Hills Scientific, LLC||Detecting, assessing and managing epilepsy using a multi-variate, metric-based classification analysis|
|US8948855||May 21, 2013||Feb 3, 2015||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Detecting and validating a detection of a state change from a template of heart rate derivative shape or heart beat wave complex|
|US9020582||Sep 30, 2013||Apr 28, 2015||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Detecting or validating a detection of a state change from a template of heart rate derivative shape or heart beat wave complex|
|US9050469||Nov 24, 2004||Jun 9, 2015||Flint Hills Scientific, Llc||Method and system for logging quantitative seizure information and assessing efficacy of therapy using cardiac signals|
|US9108041||Nov 25, 2013||Aug 18, 2015||Dignity Health||Microburst electrical stimulation of cranial nerves for the treatment of medical conditions|
|US20120046531 *||Dec 21, 2010||Feb 23, 2012||Sherwin Hua||Insertion of medical devices through non-orthogonal and orthogonal trajectories within the cranium and methods of using|
|US20120253164 *||Apr 28, 2010||Oct 4, 2012||M.I.Tech Co., Ltd.||Electrode system for cranial nerve stimulation|
|International Classification||A61N1/04, A61N1/05|
|Cooperative Classification||A61N1/0534, A61N1/0531, A61N1/0539|
|European Classification||A61N1/05K1C, A61N1/05K1S, A61N1/05K1D|
|Jun 12, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: ADVANCED NEUROMODULATION SYSTEMS, INC.,TEXAS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NORTHSTAR NEUROSCIENCE, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022813/0542
Effective date: 20090521