Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20080101364 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 11/973,202
Publication dateMay 1, 2008
Filing dateOct 5, 2007
Priority dateAug 13, 2001
Also published asCA2457099A1, EP1417796A2, EP1417796A4, US7289428, US20030031124, WO2003017502A2, WO2003017502A3
Publication number11973202, 973202, US 2008/0101364 A1, US 2008/101364 A1, US 20080101364 A1, US 20080101364A1, US 2008101364 A1, US 2008101364A1, US-A1-20080101364, US-A1-2008101364, US2008/0101364A1, US2008/101364A1, US20080101364 A1, US20080101364A1, US2008101364 A1, US2008101364A1
InventorsTimothy Chow, Philip Lin, James Mills
Original AssigneeTellabs Operations, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Inter-working mesh telecommunications networks
US 20080101364 A1
Abstract
Interruptions between a source in a first network and a destination in a second network are reduced by providing first primary and secondary nodes in the first network, and second primary and secondary nodes in the second network. First primary routes in the first network facilitate delivery of a first set of the data to the first primary node; and a second set of the data to the first secondary node. Inter-network routes between the first and second networks deliver the first and second sets of the data to the second primary node and the second secondary node. Second primary routes in the second network facilitate delivery of at least one of the first and second sets of data to the destination. A selector within the second network selects one of the sets of data. Route selectors select secondary routes in the event that a primary route is disabled.
Images(5)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(25)
1. An inter-working network apparatus comprising:
first and second inter-network routes, between a first network and a second network;
a duplicator in the first network configured to duplicate a set of data provided by a source in the first network to produce a duplicate set of the data and to transmit the set of data over the first inter-network route and the duplicate set of the data over the second inter-network route; and
a data selector in the second network configured to select either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data received in the second network to provide to a destination in the second network.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first network is a ring network and the second network is a mesh network, or the first network is a mesh network and the second network is a ring network.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the first and second networks are mesh networks.
4. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising:
in the first network,
a first primary node;
a first secondary node; and
a first set of primary routes to support transmission of the set of data from the source to the first primary node and the duplicate set of the data to the first secondary node; and
in the second network,
a second primary node;
a second secondary node; and
a second set of primary routes to support transmission of either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data from the second primary node or the second secondary node to the destination, if received over the first inter-network route or the second inter-network route.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the first primary node is the duplicator and the second primary node is the data selector.
6. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein the first primary node is the duplicator and the second secondary node is the data selector.
7. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein, in the first network, the first set of primary routes includes a first primary route between the source and the first primary node and a second primary route between the first primary node and the first secondary node.
8. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein, in the second network, the second set of primary routes includes a third primary route between the second primary node and the destination and a fourth primary route between the second secondary node and the second primary node.
9. The apparatus of claim 4 further comprising:
in the first network, a first secondary route between the source and the first secondary node; and
in the second network, a second secondary route between the second secondary node and the destination.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 further comprising:
in the first network, a third secondary route between the source and the first primary node; and
in the second network, a fourth secondary route between the second primary node and the destination.
11. The apparatus of claim 9 further comprising:
a first route selector that, in the event that the first primary route between the source and the first primary node is disabled, is configured to route the set of data from the source over the first secondary route through the first secondary node and over the second primary route to the first primary node, and, in the event that the second primary route between the first primary node and the first secondary node is disabled, is configured to route the duplicate set of the data from the first primary node over the first primary route through the source and over the first secondary route to the first secondary node.
12. The apparatus of claim 9 further comprising:
a second route selector that, in the event that the third primary route between the second primary node and the destination is disabled, is configured to route either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data received from the primary node over the second primary route through the second secondary node and over the second secondary route to the destination, and in the event that the fourth primary route between the second secondary node and the second primary node is disabled, is configured to route either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data received from the second secondary node over the second secondary route through the destination and over the third primary route to the second primary node.
13. A method of inter-working networks, the method comprising:
duplicating a set of data provided by a source in a first network to provide a duplicate set of the data;
transmitting the set of data over a first inter-network route between the first network and a second network;
transmitting the duplicate set of the data over a second inter-network route between the first network and the second network; and
selecting either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data received in the second network to provide to a destination in a second network.
14. The method of claim 13 further including inter-working a ring network and a mesh network.
15. The method of claim 13 further including inter-working two respective mesh networks.
16. The method of claim 13 further comprising:
defining, in the first network, a first primary node, a first secondary node, and a first set of primary routes to support transmission of the set of data from the source to the first primary node and the duplicate set of the data to the first secondary node; and
defining, in the second network, a second primary node, a second secondary node, and a second set of primary routes to support transmission of either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data from the second primary node or the second secondary node to the destination, if received over the first inter-network route or the second inter-network route.
17. The method of claim 16 further comprising:
duplicating the set of data at the first primary node; and
selecting either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data received in the second network at the second primary node.
18. The method of claim 16 further comprising:
duplicating the set of data at the first primary node; and
selecting either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data received in the second network at the second secondary node.
19. The method of claim 16 wherein, in the first network, the first set of primary routes includes a first primary route between the source and the first primary node and a second primary route between the first primary node and the first secondary node.
20. The method of claim 16 wherein, in the second network, the second set of primary routes includes a third primary route between the second primary node and the destination and a fourth primary route between the second secondary node and the second primary node.
21. The method of claim 16 further comprising:
defining, in the first network, a first secondary route between the source and the first secondary node; and
defining, in the second network, a second secondary route between the second secondary node and the destination.
22. The method of claim 21 further comprising:
defining, in the first network, a third secondary route between the source and the first primary node; and
defining, in the second network, a fourth secondary route between the second primary node and the destination.
23. The method of claim 21 further comprising:
routing, in the event that the first primary route between the source and the first primary node is disabled, the set of data from the source over the first secondary route through the first secondary node and over the second primary route to the first primary node; and
routing, in the even that the second primary route between the first primary node and the first secondary node is disabled, the duplicate set of the data from the first primary node over the first primary route through the source and over the first secondary route to the first secondary node.
24. The method of claim 21 further comprising:
routing, in the event that the third primary route between the second primary node and the destination is disabled, either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data received from the primary node over the second primary route through the second secondary node and over the second secondary route to the destination; and
routing, in the event that the fourth primary route between the second secondary node and the second primary node is disabled, either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data received from the second secondary node over the second secondary route through the destination and over the third primary route to the second primary node.
25. A communications network comprising:
a first network;
a second network; and
first and second inter-network routes, carrying respectively a set of data provided by a source in a first network and a duplicate set of the data, either the set of data or the duplicate set of the data being provided to a destination in a second network.
Description
RELATED APPLICATION(S)

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/929,210, filed Aug. 13, 2001. The entire teachings of the above application(s) are incorporated herein by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to inter-network communications, and more particularly relates to fault-tolerant communications between networks.

The SONET standard provides for inter-working between ring networks. The SONET ring inter-working has two versions: (1) drop and continue and (2) dual transmit. SONET ring inter-working was not designed with mesh networks in mind, and therefore cannot be employed “as-is” to mesh networks. SONET ring inter-working must be substantially modified in order to provide resilience to mesh-to-mesh or mesh-to-ring or ring-to-mesh communications.

Ring-based networks in general do not consist of just one ring, but contain multiple rings. Mesh networks, on the other hand, typically are addressed as one large mesh, even though the mesh in fact comprises multiple meshes. If the mesh is perceived as one large mesh, then there is no need for mesh inter-working. Contrary to this conventional wisdom about mesh networks, the applicants have discovered that mesh inter-working is an important aspect of mesh networks. Mesh inter-working is needed for at least three reasons:

(1) Networks owned by different companies need to communicate with each other, while remaining separate entities, to avoid visibility into each other's internal workings and to avoid faults in one network from affecting another network.

(2) Sub-networks resulting from the break up of one large network to facilitate management also need to communicate with each other.

(3) As network managers migrate from ring networks to mesh networks, there will be a need to inter-work the resulting mesh networks.

None of the foregoing problems is subject to an obvious solution. The present invention addresses these problems and provides a solution.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A preferred apparatus embodiment is useful in a communication system comprising a first network including a source arranged to transmit data and a second network including a destination arranged to receive the data. At least one of the first network and the second network is a mesh network. In such an environment, interruptions in communication between the source and destination can be reduced by providing a first primary node and a first secondary node in the first network. A second primary node and a second secondary node are provided in the second network. A first set of primary routes are provided within the first network and are arranged to facilitate delivery of a first set of the data to the first primary node and a second set of the data to the first secondary node. Inter-network routes between the first and second networks are arranged to deliver the first and second sets of the data to the second primary node and the second secondary node. A second set of primary routes within the second network are arranged to facilitate delivery of at least one of the first and second sets of data to the destination node. A selector within the second network is arranged to select one of the first and second sets of data. A first secondary route is located within the first network between the source and the first secondary node. A first route selector is arranged to select the first secondary route in the event that a primary route within the first set of primary routes is disabled. A second secondary route within the second network is located between the second secondary node and the destination. A second route selector is arranged to select the second secondary route in the event that a primary route within the second set of primary routes is disabled.

A preferred method embodiment of the invention is useful in a communication system comprising a first network including a source arranged to transmit data and a second network including a destination arranged to receive the data. At least one of the first network and the second network is a mesh network. The system also comprises a first primary node in the first network, a first secondary node in the first network, a second primary node in the second network, a second secondary node in the second network, a first set of primary routes within the first network, a second set of primary routes within the second network, a first secondary route within the first network between the source and the first secondary node, and a second secondary route within the second network between the second secondary node and the destination. In such a system, interruptions in communication between the source and destination can be reduced by generating a first set of the data and a second set of the data. The first set of the data is delivered to the first primary node, and the second set of the data is delivered to the first secondary node. The first and second sets of the data are delivered to the second primary node and the second secondary node. At least one of the first and second sets of data are delivered to the destination node. One of the first and second sets of data is selected, and the first set of data is delivered to the first secondary node over the first secondary route in the event that a primary route within the first set of primary routes is disabled. At least one of the first and second sets of data is delivered to the destination over the second secondary route in the second network in the event that a primary route within the second set of primary routes is disabled.

By using the foregoing techniques, communications may be transmitted between networks involving at least one mesh network with a degree of accuracy and reliability previously unattainable.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing will be apparent from the following more particular description of example embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating embodiments of the present invention.

FIG. 1 is a schematic block diagram illustrating one form of a drop and continue embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic block diagram illustrating another form of a drop and continue embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 3 is a schematic block diagram illustrating one mode of operation of the embodiment shown in FIG. 2 when a primary data route of the embodiment is interrupted.

FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram illustrating a preferred form of a dual transmit embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, one embodiment of the invention comprises a communication system 5 that includes two telecommunications networks 10 and 30, each comprising a collection of geographically dispersed network elements called nodes. Inter-network routes 20, including routes 22 and 23, connect networks 10 and 30.

Network 10 includes a source node 11, a primary node 12 and a secondary node 13, which are connected to one another by communication links or routes (e.g., fiber, wireless links or routes). For example, a set of primary routes 14, including primary routes 15 and 16, links source node 11, primary node 12 and secondary node 13 as shown. A secondary route 18 may link source node 11 with secondary node 13. In all embodiments, a primary route is disjoint from its corresponding secondary route. Otherwise, if the primary and secondary routes intersect, a failure at the intersection point(s) would be a single failure that would disable both routes, defeating one purpose of the embodiments.

Network 30 includes a destination node 31, a primary node 32 and a secondary node 33, which are connected to one another by communication links or routes (e.g., fiber, wireless links or routes). For example, a set of primary routes 34, including primary routes 35 and 36, links destination node 31, primary node 32 and secondary node 33 as shown.

The topology of each network may be a ring or an arbitrary mesh. Traffic may be intra-network, i.e., staying entirely within network 10 or entirely within network 30, or it may be inter-network, i.e., originating in network 10 and terminating in network 30 (or vice versa). For inter-network traffic that needs to be transmitted with high reliability, it is important that the transition between networks 10 and 30 be effected in a way that has no single point of failure. In the case where networks 10 and 30 are both SONET rings, standard ring inter-working methods have been developed (see the ANSI standard T1.105.01-1998, SONET Automatic Protection Switching). The embodiment of FIG. 1 covers the case in which networks 10 and 30 are arbitrary mesh networks and the case in which one is a ring and the other is a mesh.

In the example of FIG. 1, it is assumed that source node 11 is the source of the inter-network data and that destination node 31 in network 30 is the destination for the data.

In each network, two nodes are selected to be dual-homing nodes. One dual-homing node is designated to be the primary node (i.e., nodes 12 and 32) and the other is designated to be the secondary node (i.e., nodes 13 and 33). In each node, a network element, such as a cross-connect, is configured to perform various functions that will be described.

Still referring to FIG. 1, under normal operation, source node 11 sends a first set of data to primary node 12 in network 10. Primary node 12 performs a drop-and-continue function in a well known manner: node 12 creates a copy of the data from source node 11 (i.e., a second set of the data) and “drops” (i.e., transmits) the first set of the data over to one of the dual-homing nodes in network 30, and primary node 12 “continues” (i.e., transmits) the second set of the data onto secondary node 13. (If primary node 12 drops to the primary node in network 30, this is called same-side routing; if primary node 12 drops to the secondary node in network 30, this is called opposite-side routing.) FIG. 1 illustrates opposite-side routing. There may exist intermediate nodes between source node 11 and primary node 12, and between primary node 12 and secondary node 13 (not shown). Secondary node 13 then drops the second set of the data to the other dual-homing node in network 30. The net effect is for network 10 to send two sets (1+1) of the inter-network data to network 30, one to each dual-homing node in network 30 (i.e., to nodes 32 and 33 as shown in FIG. 1).

During normal operation, secondary node 33 in network 30 sends one set of the data to primary node 32 in network 30. Primary node 32 then performs a service selection (SS) function 40: node 32 chooses one of the two incoming sets of data (i.e., the data from secondary node 33 in network 30 or the set of data coming directly from secondary node 13). Primary node 32 then forwards the chosen data set to destination node 31.

The FIG. 1 embodiment is designed to survive any single node or link failure, except for a failure of the source or the destination, which cannot be survived in any case. More specifically, if there is any failure between source 11 and primary node 12 in network 10, secondary node 13 uses a detector function to detect the failure and notify source node 11, which uses a selector function 42 to switch its data traffic to an alternate (protection) path 18 to secondary node 13. If secondary node 13 in network 10 fails, source node 11 and primary node 12 in network 10 continue to operate normally. If one of the links or routes between the two networks fails, the nodes in network 10 continue to act normally; however, if primary node 32 in network 30 was selecting the data set coming directly from network 10 and this data is lost, primary node 32 switches over to selecting the data set from secondary node 33. Similarly, if secondary node 33 in network 30 loses its data set from network 10, node 33 stops sending data traffic to primary node 32. If secondary node 33 in network 30 fails, or if any node or link between the primary and secondary nodes in network 30 fails, then all the remaining nodes will continue to act as they would under normal operation, except that if primary node 32 in network 30 was selecting the data set coming from secondary node 33 in network 30, node 32 will switch over to the data set that received directly from network 10. If there is a failure between primary node 32 in network 30 and destination node 31, then destination node 31 detects the failure and notifies secondary node 33 in network 30, which will uses a selector function 44 to switch data traffic to a protection path 38 to destination node 31. As may be seen from FIG. 1, in all these cases, the data traffic continues to be transmitted from source node 11 to destination node 31.

Referring to FIG. 2, another form of the invention using a drop and continue mode of operation is embodied in a communication system 105 including two telecommunications networks 110 and 130, each comprising a collection of geographically dispersed network elements, called nodes. Inter-network routes 120, including routes 122 and 123, connect networks 110 and 130.

Network 110 includes a source node 111, a primary node 112 and a secondary node 113, which are connected to one another by communication links or routes (e.g., fiber, wireless links or routes). For example, a set of primary routes 114, including primary routes 115-116, links source node 111, primary node 112 and secondary node 113 as shown. A secondary route 118 links source node 111 with secondary node 113, and a secondary route 118A links primary node 112 with secondary node 113.

Network 130 includes a destination node 131, a primary node 132 and a secondary node 133, which are connected to one another by communication links or routes (e.g., fiber, wireless links or routes). For example, a set of primary routes 134, including primary routes 135-136, links destination node 131, primary node 132 and secondary node 133 as shown. Secondary routes 137-138 also are provided.

The topology of each network 110 and 130 may be a ring or an arbitrary mesh. Traffic may be intra-network, i.e., staying entirely within network 110 or entirely within network 130, or it may be inter-network, i.e., originating in network 110 and terminating in network 130 (or vice versa). The embodiment of FIG. 2 covers the case in which networks 110 and 130 are arbitrary mesh networks and the case in which one is a ring and the other is a mesh.

In the example of FIG. 2, it is assumed that source node 111 is the source of the inter-network data and that destination node 131 in network 130 is the destination for the data.

In each network, two nodes are selected to be dual-homing nodes. One dual-homing node is designated to be the primary node (i.e., nodes 112 and 132) and the other is designated to be the secondary node (i.e., nodes 113 and 133). In each node, a network element, such as a cross-connect, is configured to perform various functions that will be described.

Still referring to FIG. 2, under normal operation, source node 111 sends a first set of data to primary node 112 over route 115 in network 110. Primary node 112 performs a drop-and-continue function in a well known manner: node 112 creates a copy of the data from source node 111 (i.e., a second set of the data) and “drops” (i.e., transmits) the first set of the data over to primary node 132, and primary node 112 “continues” (i.e., transmits) the second set of the data onto secondary node 113 via route 116. FIG. 2 illustrates a case of same-side routing. (There may exist intermediate nodes between source node 111 and primary node 112, and between primary node 112 and secondary node 113 (not shown).) Secondary node 113 then drops a set of the data to the other dual-homing node in network 130 (i.e., secondary node 133). The net effect is for network 110 to send two sets (1+1) of the inter-network data to network 130, one to each dual-homing node in network 130 (i.e., to nodes 132 and 133 as shown in FIG. 2).

During normal operation, secondary node 133 in network 130 sends the second set of the data to primary node 132 in network 130 via route 136. Primary node 132 then performs a service selection (SS) function 140: node 132 chooses one of the two incoming sets of data (i.e., the data from secondary node 133 in network 130 or the set of data from primary node 112). Primary node 132 then forwards the chosen data set to destination node 131.

The FIG. 2 embodiment is designed to survive any single node or link failure per network, except for a failure of the source or the destination, which cannot be survived in any case. For most failures, two sets of data continue to be sent from network 110 to network 130.

One exemplary failure is shown in FIG. 3. More specifically, if there is a failure between source 111 and primary node 112 in network 110 (indicated by the X across route 115 in FIG. 3), primary node 112 uses a detector function to detect the failure and notify source node 111. Source node 111 uses a selector function 142 to switch its data traffic to an alternate (protection) path 118 to secondary node 113. The data is routed to primary node 112 over secondary routes 118 and 118A. Primary node 112 generates a second set of the data and sends the second set to secondary node 113 over route 116. The first set of data is sent (“dropped”) by node 112 to primary node 132 over route 122, and the second set of the data is sent from secondary node 113 to secondary node 133 over route 123.

If primary node 112 fails, then secondary node 113 detects the failure and informs source 111. Source 111 sends its data along route 118 and secondary node 113 now stops receiving data from route 116 and switches over to receive data from route 118.

If secondary node 113 in network 110 fails, source node 111 and primary node 112 in network 110 continue to operate normally, and node 112 drops the first set of data across route 122 as before. If any node or link between the primary and secondary nodes in network 110 fails, then secondary node 113 detects the failure and notifies primary node 112, which switches its second set of data traffic from route 116 to secondary routes 118B and 118. Secondary node 113 switches over to receiving data from route 118 and sends this traffic to secondary node 133 over route 123 as before. If one of the links or routes between the two networks fails, the nodes in network 110 continue to act normally; however, if primary node 132 in network 130 was selecting the data set coming directly from network 110 and this data is lost, primary node 132 switches over to selecting the data set from secondary node 133. Similarly, if secondary node 133 in network 130 loses its data set from network 110, node 133 stops sending data traffic to primary node 132. If secondary node 133 in network 130 fails, then all the remaining nodes will continue to act as they would under normal operation, except that if primary node 132 in network 130 was selecting the data set coming from secondary node 133 in network 130, node 132 will switch over to the data set received directly from network 110. If any node or link between the primary and secondary nodes in network 130 fails, then primary node 132 detects the failure and notifies secondary node 133, which switches its data traffic from route 136 to secondary routes 138 and 138B. Primary node 132 switches over to receiving data from route 138B instead of route 136 and performs its service selection function on the data traffic on route 122 and the data traffic on route 138B.

If there is a failure between primary node 132 in network 130 and destination node 131 (as indicated by the X across route 135 in FIG. 3), then destination node 131 detects the failure and notifies primary node 132, which sends the first set of data along a secondary route 137 to secondary node 133 that sends a set of the data along a protection path 138 to destination node 131. As may be seen from FIG. 3, in all these cases, the data traffic continues to be transmitted from source node 111 to destination node 131.

Still referring to FIG. 3, if primary node 132 fails, then destination node 131 detects the failure and informs secondary node 133. Secondary node 133 and destination node 131 then re-establish communication along route 138.

Referring to FIG. 4, another form of the invention using a dual transmit mode of operation is embodied in a communication system 205 including two telecommunications networks 210 and 230, each comprising a collection of geographically dispersed network elements, called nodes. Inter-network routes 220, including routes 222 and 223, connect networks 210 and 230.

Network 210 may include a source node 211, a primary node 212 and a secondary node 213, which are connected to one another by communication links or routes (e.g., fiber, wireless links or routes). For example, a set of primary routes 214, including primary routes 215-216, links source node 211, primary node 212 and secondary node 213 as shown. Secondary routes 218-219 link source node 211 with primary node 212 and secondary node 213 as shown.

Network 230 includes a destination node 231, a primary node 232 and a secondary node 233, which are connected to one another by communication links or routes (e.g., fiber, wireless links or routes). For example, a set of primary routes 234, including primary routes 235-236, links destination node 231, primary node 232 and secondary node 233 as shown.

The topology of each network 210 and 230 may be a ring or an arbitrary mesh. Traffic may be intra-network, i.e., staying entirely within network 210 or entirely within network 230, or it may be inter-network, i.e., originating in network 210 and terminating in network 230 (or vice versa). The embodiment of FIG. 4 covers the case in which networks 210 and 230 are arbitrary mesh networks and the case in which one is a ring and the other is a mesh.

In the example of FIG. 4, it is assumed that source node 211 is the source of the inter-network data and that destination node 231 in network 230 is the destination for the data.

In each network, two nodes are selected to be dual-homing nodes. One dual-homing node is designated to be the primary node (i.e., nodes 212 and 232) and the other is designated to be the secondary node (i.e., nodes 213 and 233). In each node, a network element, such as a cross-connect, is configured to perform various functions that will be described.

Still referring to FIG. 4, under normal operation, source node 211 receives or generates a first set of data and generates a second set of the data. The first set of the data is sent to primary node 212 over route 215, and the second set of the data is sent to secondary node 213 over route 216. Primary node 212 transmits the first set of data to primary node 232 over route 222, and secondary node 213 sends the second set of data to secondary node 233 over route 223. Thus, the network use same-side routing. (There may exist intermediate nodes between source node 211 and primary node 212, and between primary node 212 and secondary node 213 (not shown).) The net effect is for network 210 to send two sets (1+1) of the inter-network data to network 230, one to each dual-homing node in network 230 (i.e., to nodes 232 and 233 as shown in FIG. 4).

During normal operation, secondary node 233 in network 230 sends the second set of the data to destination node 231 over route 236, and primary node 232 sends the first set of the data to destination node 231 over route 235. Destination node 231 then performs a service selection (SS) function: node 231 chooses one of the two incoming sets of data (i.e., the set of data from secondary node 233 in network 230 or the set of data from primary node 232.

The FIG. 4 embodiment is designed to survive any single node or link failure per network, except for a failure of the source or the destination, which cannot be survived in any case. For most failures, two sets of data continue to be sent from network 210 to network 230.

If there is a failure between source 211 and primary node 212 in network 210, primary node 212 uses a detector function to detect the failure and notify source node 211, which uses a selector function to switch the first set of data traffic to an alternate (protection) path 218. If there is a failure between source 211 and secondary node 213 in network 210, secondary node 213 uses a detector function to detect the failure and notify source node 211, which uses a selector function to switch the second set of data traffic to an alternate (protection) path 219. In either case, two sets of data continue to be received at nodes 212 and 213.

If secondary node 213 in network 210 fails, source node 211 and primary node 212 in network 210 continue to operate normally. If one of the links or routes between the two networks fails, the nodes in network 210 continue to act normally, and data is delivered to network 230 over the unaffected route. If secondary node 233 in network 230 fails, the first set of data is still delivered to destination node 231 over route 235. If primary node 232 fails, the second set of data is still delivered to destination node 231 over route 236. If there is a failure between primary node 232 in network 230 and destination node 231, then destination node 231 detects the failure and informs primary node 232. Primary node 232 and destination node 231 then re-establish communication along route 239. If there is a failure between secondary node 233 in network 230 and destination node 231, then destination node 231 detects the failure and informs secondary node 233. Secondary node 233 and destination node 231 then re-establish communication along route 238. As may be seen from FIG. 4, in all these cases, the data traffic continues to be transmitted from source node 211 to destination node 231.

While the invention has been described with reference to one or more preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will understand that changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular step, structure, or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7430166 *Dec 29, 2003Sep 30, 2008Fujitsu LimitedProvisioning Ethernet dual working mode
US8144587 *May 31, 2007Mar 27, 2012Embarq Holdings Company, LlcSystem and method for load balancing network resources using a connection admission control engine
US20100260042 *Dec 4, 2008Oct 14, 2010Electronics And Telecommunications Research InstituteApparatus and method for transmitting and receiving data in wireless communication system
Classifications
U.S. Classification370/390
International ClassificationH04L12/56, H04L12/46
Cooperative ClassificationH04L12/4625, H04J3/085, H04J2203/006
European ClassificationH04L12/46B7B, H04J3/08A
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Mar 4, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: TELLABS OPERATIONS, INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHOW, TIMOTHY Y.;LIN, PHILIP J.;MILLS, JAMES D.;REEL/FRAME:020600/0608
Effective date: 20010723