Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20080117025 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/016,900
Publication dateMay 22, 2008
Filing dateJan 18, 2008
Priority dateDec 15, 1992
Also published asUS6097301, US6842121, US20120274450
Publication number016900, 12016900, US 2008/0117025 A1, US 2008/117025 A1, US 20080117025 A1, US 20080117025A1, US 2008117025 A1, US 2008117025A1, US-A1-20080117025, US-A1-2008117025, US2008/0117025A1, US2008/117025A1, US20080117025 A1, US20080117025A1, US2008117025 A1, US2008117025A1
InventorsJohn Tuttle
Original AssigneeTuttle John R
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
RFID System and Method for Wirelessly Interfacing With an Interrogator
US 20080117025 A1
Abstract
A method of adjusting the 2-way communication range of an RFID system to assist a human operator to individually handle and interrogate a plurality of tagged objects, such as suitcases, that each include an RFID tag transceiver. An RFID interrogator transceiver is mounted on the human operator. The 2-way communication range between the interrogator transceiver and the tag transceivers is adjusted to only slightly exceed the closest distance between the interrogator and the tag while the operator is handling the tagged object. Preferably, the 2-way communication range is short enough that other tagged objects will remain outside the communication range and will not respond to messages from the interrogator. Another aspect of the invention is a method of verifying whether an object to be transported has reached its intended destination. In this aspect, an interrogator transceiver at a first destination interrogates an RFID tag transceiver on the object, and in response the tag transmits its intended destination.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(42)
1-27. (canceled)
28: A method of adjusting the two-way communication range of an RFID system to permit a person to individually handle and interrogate each one of a plurality of tagged objects, each tagged object having an RFID tag transceiver, the method comprising:
mounting on the person an RFID interrogator transceiver having an antenna configured to be worn by the person;
mounting on each tagged object an RFID tag transceiver, wherein
each tag transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control a reliable two-way communications range between that tag transceiver and the interrogator transceiver, and
the interrogator transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and any of the tag transceivers; and
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters so that the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and the tag transceiver of each of the tagged objects only slightly exceeds the closest distance, during times when the person handles that tagged object, between the antenna of the interrogator and the tag transceiver mounted on that tagged object.
29: A method in accordance with claim 28 wherein adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters comprises adjusting interrogator transmitter output power.
30: A method in accordance with claim 29 wherein interrogator transmitter output power is selectable from among at least three different possible power levels.
31: A method in accordance with claim 28, wherein:
the performance parameters of each tag transceiver include a receiver sensitivity of the tag transceiver;
the performance parameters of the interrogator transceiver include a receiver sensitivity of the interrogator transceiver and a transmitter output power of the interrogator transceiver; and
the adjusting step includes adjusting at least one of the receiver sensitivity of the tag transceiver, the receiver sensitivity of the interrogator transceiver, and the transmitter output power of the interrogator transceiver.
32: A method in accordance with claim 28, wherein each tag transceiver is a modulated backscatter transceiver.
33: A method in accordance with claim 28, further comprising the steps of:
the interrogator transceiver transmitting an interrogation message while the person is close enough to a tagged object for the antenna of the interrogator transceiver and that transceiver of the tagged object to be within the communications range;
the transceiver of that tagged object transmitting, in response to the interrogation message, an identification message containing data identifying that tagged object; and
the interrogator transceiver receiving the identification message and presenting the data to said person.
34: A method of adjusting the two-way communication range of an RFID system to permit a person to individually handle and interrogate each one of a plurality of tagged objects, each tagged object having an RFID tag transceiver, comprising:
supporting on the person a portable RFID interrogator transceiver;
mounting on each tagged object an RFID tag transceiver, wherein
each tag transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control a reliable two-way communications range between that tag transceiver and the interrogator transceiver, and
the interrogator transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and any of the tag transceivers;
iteratively
transmitting an interrogation signal via the RFID interrogator;
determining at the RFID interrogator, based either on one or more response messages sent by the RFID tag transceivers to the interrogator in response to the interrogation signal or on the absence of a response to the interrogation signal, which of the tagged objects are within the reliable two-way communications range; and
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters or the transceiver performance parameters;
until the RFID tag transceiver of one of the tagged objects being individually handled by the person is within the reliable two-way communications range and the tag transceivers of the tagged objects not being individually handled are not within the reliable two-way communications range; and
wherein, in operation, the interrogator presents to the person an audio indication of data received from an interrogated tag.
35: A method in accordance with claim 34 wherein adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters comprises adjusting interrogator transmitter output power.
36: A method in accordance with claim 35 wherein interrogator transmitter output power is selectable from among at least three different possible power levels.
37: A method of adjusting the two-way communication range of an RFID system to permit a person to individually handle and interrogate each one of a plurality of tagged objects, each tagged object having an RFID tag transceiver, comprising the steps of:
mounting on the person an RFID interrogator transceiver having an antenna, with the antenna being configured to be worn by the person;
mounting on each tagged object an RFID tag transceiver, wherein
each tag transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control a reliable two-way communications range between that tag transceiver and the interrogator transceiver, and
the interrogator transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and any of the tag transceivers, and
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters so that the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and the tag transceiver of each of the tagged objects exceeds the closest distance, during times when the person handles that tagged object, between the antenna of the interrogator and the tag transceiver mounted on that tagged object;
wherein the adjusting step further comprises adjusting said at least one of the performance parameters so that said reliable two-way communications range is short enough so that, when the person handles a tagged object, no other tagged object is within reliable two-way communication range of the interrogator.
38: A method in accordance with claim 37 wherein adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters comprises adjusting interrogator transmitter output power.
39: A method in accordance with claim 38 wherein interrogator transmitter output power is selectable from among at least three different possible power levels.
40: A method of adjusting the two-way communication range of an RFID system to permit a person to individually handle and interrogate each one of a plurality of tagged objects, each tagged object having an RFID tag transceiver, comprising the steps of:
mounting adjacent the person an RFID interrogator transceiver having an antenna;
mounting on each tagged object an RFID tag transceiver, wherein
each tag transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control a reliable two-way communications range between that tag transceiver and the interrogator transceiver, and
the interrogator transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and any of the tag transceivers; and
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters so that the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and the tag transceiver of each of the tagged objects only slightly exceeds the closest distance, during times when the person handles that tagged object, between the antenna of the interrogator and that tagged object.
41: A method in accordance with claim 40, wherein the step of mounting the interrogator transceiver further comprises:
mounting the interrogator transceiver on the person so as to leave the hands of the person free to grasp objects other than the interrogator transceiver.
42: An RFID interrogator apparatus having an adjustable reliable two-way communication range so as to permit a person to individually interrogate the closest one of a plurality of nearby tagged objects, wherein each tagged object has a respective RFID tag transceiver attached thereto, comprising:
an RFID interrogator transceiver, configured to communicate with any of the RFID tag transmitters, including a transmitter and receiver and having adjustable transmitter power and adjustable receiver sensitivity;
an antenna coupled to the interrogator transceiver and which is adapted to be worn by a person, on the person's torso; and
a control logic circuit, connected to the interrogator transceiver, for iteratively transmitting an interrogation signal via the transmitter;
determining, based either on one or more response messages sent by the RFID tag transceivers to the RFID interrogator transceiver in response to the interrogation signal or on the absence of a response to the interrogation signal, which of the tagged objects are within the reliable two-way communications range; and
adjusting the transmitter power or receiver sensitivity;
until the RFID tag transceiver of the closest one of the tagged objects is within the reliable two-way communications range and the tag transceivers of the other tagged objects are not within the reliable two-way communications range.
43: The apparatus of claim 42 wherein the adjusting the transmitter power or receiver sensitivity comprises adjusting the transmitter power.
44: The apparatus of claim 43 wherein the control logic circuit is configured to select the transmitter power from among at least three different possible power levels.
45: An RFID interrogator apparatus having an adjustable two-way communication range so as to permit a person to individually interrogate the closest one of a plurality of nearby tagged objects, wherein each tagged object has a respective RFID tag transceiver attached thereto, comprising:
an RFID interrogator transceiver characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control a reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and any of the RFID tag transceivers;
an antenna coupled to the interrogator transceiver and which is adapted to be worn by a person; and
a control logic circuit, connected to the interrogator transceiver, for adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters so that the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and the tag transceivers exceeds the closest distance, during times when said person handles a tagged object, between the antenna and the tag transceiver attached to that tagged object;
wherein the interrogator transceiver includes circuitry for detecting signal strength and circuitry for rejecting a signal whose strength is below a threshold signal strength.
46: The apparatus of claim 45 wherein the adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters comprises adjusting interrogator transmitter output power.
47: The apparatus of claim 46 wherein the interrogator transmitter output power is selectable from among at least three different possible power levels.
48: A method in accordance with claim 50 wherein adjusting interrogator power comprises adjusting interrogator transmitter output power.
49: A method in accordance with claim 48 wherein interrogator transmitter output power is selectable from among at least three different possible power levels.
50: A method comprising:
mounting on an airplane cargo door an RFID interrogator transceiver;
mounting on pieces of luggage respective RFID tag transceivers, wherein
each tag transceiver has adjustable sensitivity, and
the interrogator transceiver has adjustable power output; and iteratively
transmitting an interrogation signal via the RFID interrogator transceiver;
determining at the RFID interrogator transceiver, based either on one or more response messages sent by the RFID tag transceivers to the interrogator in response to the interrogation signal or on the absence of a response to the interrogation signal, which of the pieces of luggage are within a reliable two-way communications range; and
adjusting the RFID interrogator transceiver power output or the sensitivity of the tag transceiver;
until the RFID tag transceiver of one of the pieces of luggage passing through the cargo door is within the reliable two-way communications range and the pieces of luggage not passing through the cargo door are not within the reliable two-way communications range.
51: A method of adjusting the two-way communication range of an RFID system to permit a baggage handler to individually handle and interrogate each one of a plurality of tagged luggage items, each tagged luggage item having an RFID tag transceiver, the method comprising:
mounting on the baggage handler an RFID interrogator transceiver having an antenna configured to be worn by the person;
mounting on multiple tagged luggage items an RFID tag transceiver, wherein
respective tag transceivers are characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control a reliable two-way communications range between that tag transceiver and the interrogator transceiver;
tag transceivers respectively include memory configured to store data representing the intended destination of the luggage item to which the tag is mounted; and
the interrogator transceiver is characterized by a set of one or more performance parameters which control the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and any of the tag transceivers;
the interrogator transceiver includes a memory configured to store data representing the airport at which the interrogator is being used;
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters so that the reliable two-way communications range between the interrogator transceiver and the tag transceiver of each of the tagged objects only slightly exceeds the closest distance, during times when the person handles that tagged object, between the antenna of the interrogator and the tag transceiver mounted on that tagged object; and
comparing the data stored in the interrogator transceiver with data stored in a tag transceiver to determine if an item of luggage is at its destination.
52: A method in accordance with claim 51 wherein adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters comprises adjusting interrogator transmitter output power.
53: A method in accordance with claim 52 wherein interrogator transmitter output power is selectable from among at least three different possible power levels.
54: The method of claim 28 wherein the antenna is configured to be worn by the person.
55: The method of claim 28 wherein adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters comprises successively transmitting interrogation signals via the interrogator transceiver until the interrogator transceiver, in response to one of the interrogation signals, receives a response from the tagged object being handled by the person, the first interrogation signal being transmitted at a minimum power level and the subsequent interrogation signals being transmitted at successively higher power levels.
56: The method of claim 28 wherein adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters comprises successively transmitting interrogation signals via the interrogator transceiver until the reliable two-way communications range only slightly exceeds the closest distance between the antenna of the interrogator and the tag transceiver mounted on the tagged object being handled by the person, the interrogator transceiver operating at a first level of receive sensitivity subsequent to the first interrogation signal being transmitted and operating at successively reduced levels of receive sensitivity subsequent to the transmission of each successive interrogation signal.
57: The method of claim 28 wherein the adjusting comprises iteratively
transmitting an interrogation signal via the RFID interrogator;
determining at the RFID interrogator, based either on one or more response messages sent by the RFID tag transceivers to the interrogator in response to the interrogation signal or on the absence of a response to the interrogation signal, which of the tagged objects are within the reliable two-way communications range; and
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters or the transceiver performance parameters;
until the RFID tag transceiver of one of the tagged objects being individually handled by the person is within the reliable two-way communications range and the tag transceivers of the tagged objects not being individually handled are not within the reliable two-way communications range.
58: The method of claim 37 wherein the interrogator transceiver includes memory storing data indicative of a location of the interrogator transceiver, the interrogator transceiver selectively receiving data indicative of an intended destination location of one of the tagged objects from the tag transceiver mounted on the one tagged object.
59: The method of claim 37 wherein the adjusting comprises iteratively
transmitting an interrogation signal via the RFID interrogator;
determining at the RFID interrogator, based either on one or more response messages sent by the RFID tag transceivers to the interrogator in response to the interrogation signal or on the absence of a response to the interrogation signal, which of the tagged objects are within the reliable two-way communications range; and
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters or the transceiver performance parameters;
until the RFID tag transceiver of one of the tagged objects being individually handled by the person is within the reliable two-way communications range and the tag transceivers of the tagged objects not being individually handled are not within the reliable two-way communications range.
60: The method of claim 40 wherein the adjusting comprises iteratively
transmitting an interrogation signal via the RFID interrogator;
determining at the RFID interrogator, based either on one or more response messages sent by the RFID tag transceivers to the interrogator in response to the interrogation signal or on the absence of a response to the interrogation signal, which of the tagged objects are within the reliable two-way communications range; and
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters or the transceiver performance parameters;
until the RFID tag transceiver of one of the tagged objects being individually handled by the person is within the reliable two-way communications range and the tag transceivers of the tagged objects not being individually handled are not within the reliable two-way communications range.
61: The apparatus of claim 42 wherein the RFID tag transceivers are modulated backscatter transceivers configured to reflect RF energy received by the respective RFID tag transceivers.
62: The apparatus of claim 45 wherein the control logic circuit is further configured for iteratively
transmitting an interrogation signal via the transceiver;
determining, based either on one or more response messages sent by the RFID tag transceivers to the RFID interrogator transceiver in response to the interrogation signal or on the absence of a response to the interrogation signal, which of the tagged objects are within the reliable two-way communications range; and
adjusting at least one of the performance parameters;
until the RFID tag transceiver of the closest one of the tagged objects is within the reliable two-way communications range and the tag transceivers of the tagged objects are not within the reliable two-way communications range.
63: The method of claim 51 further comprising:
receiving, at the interrogator, the data representing the intended destination of the luggage item to which the tag is mounted from at least one of the tag transceivers and comparing, at the interrogator, the data representing the airport at which the interrogator is being used with the data representing the intended destination of the luggage item; and
if the data representing the airport at which the interrogator is being used and the data representing the intended destination of the luggage item both refer to a same location, notifying the baggage handler.
64: The method of claim 51 wherein the adjusting comprises iteratively
transmitting an interrogation signal via the interrogator;
determining at the interrogator, based either on one or more response messages sent by the tag transceivers to the interrogator in response to the interrogation signal or on the absence of a response to the interrogation signal, which of the tagged luggage items are within the reliable two-way communications range; and
adjusting at least one of the interrogator performance parameters or the tag transceiver performance parameters;
until the RFID tag transceiver of one of the luggage items being individually handled by the baggage handler is within the reliable two-way communications range and the tag transceivers of the luggage not being individually handled are not within the reliable two-way communications range.
65: The method of claim 57 further comprising:
comparing, at the interrogator transceiver, the data indicative of the location of the interrogator transceiver with the data indicative of the intended destination location of the one tagged object; and
if the data indicative of the location of the interrogator transceiver and the data indicative of the intended destination location of the one tagged object both refer to a same location, notifying the person.
66: The method of claim 58 wherein at least one of the tag transceivers is a modulated backscatter transceiver configured to selectively reflect a continuous wave signal having a first frequency, the selectively reflected signal having a second frequency substantially the same as the first frequency.
67: The method of claim 63 wherein at least one of the tag transceivers is a modulated backscatter transceiver.
68: The method of claim 63 wherein the notifying the baggage handler comprises displaying an identifier associated with the baggage handler using a control center, the control center being configured to display identifiers of a plurality of other baggage handlers in addition to the notified baggage handler and to display an identifier associated with the intended destination of the luggage item as well as other identifiers associated with intended destinations of other luggage items handled by the plurality of other baggage handlers, the other identifiers being retrieved by the other baggage handlers using other interrogators.
Description
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The invention relates generally to RF identification tags and interrogators, that is, to systems for identifying objects by communication between a radio frequency transceiver mounted on each object (RF identification “tag”) and a radio frequency transceiver “interrogator”. More specifically, the invention relates to such a system in which one or more human operators each has his own interrogator, and in which the 2-way communication range between each operator's interrogator transceiver and the tags is adjusted so as to prevent communications between the interrogator and more distant tags.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    Radio frequency identification (RFID) systems have been proposed for identifying tagged objects for such purposes as taking inventory or tracking movements of objects being transported. Examples are described in commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,300,875; 5,365,551; and 5,448,110.
  • [0003]
    RFID systems generally employ a passive or active RF transceiver, called a “tag”, mounted on each object to be identified or tracked. An interrogator transceiver periodically transmits RF interrogation signals. Upon receiving an interrogation signal, a tag responds by transmitting a response signal containing data which identifies the object and contains any other information which may have been stored or programmed in the tag.
  • [0004]
    Conventional RFID systems provide little or no interactive feedback in response to actions performed by handling personnel. Specifically, conventional RFID systems lack any means for discriminating in favor of an individual tagged object a human operator is working with at any given moment; instead, conventional RFID systems generally would confuse the operator by providing information regarding all the tagged objects in the vicinity. Furthermore, if a number of personnel are working close to each other, conventional RFID systems cannot direct information about a tag to the specific individual who is handling the tagged object.
  • [0005]
    For example, suppose a number of airport baggage handler personnel are sorting or routing tagged suitcases according to the airline flight destination encoded in a tag attached to each suitcase. Conventional RFID systems lack any means for detecting which individual suitcase a human operator or baggage handler is about to pick up so as to provide to the operator only the destination or routing information for the suitcase that person currently is handling, to the exclusion of information about other nearby suitcases. Presumably because of this and other shortcomings of conventional RFID systems, RFID tags never entered commercial use for tagging airline baggage.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0006]
    The present invention is a method of adjusting the 2-way communication range of an RFID system to assist a human operator to individually handle and interrogate a plurality of tagged objects, such as suitcases, which each include an RFID tag transceiver. An RFID interrogator transceiver, preferably mounted on the operator, periodically broadcasts interrogation messages. Any tag transceiver which is within 2-way communication range of the interrogator receives the broadcasted message and responds by transmitting an identifying message containing data identifying the tagged object. The interrogator transceiver receives the response message from the tag and presents to the operator the identifying data contained in the response message, typically via an aural transducer or visual display.
  • [0007]
    In a first embodiment of the present invention, the 2-way communication range between the interrogator transceiver and the tag transceivers is adjusted to only slightly exceed the closest distance between the interrogator and the tag while the operator is handling the tagged object. Consequently, other tagged objects will remain outside the communication range and will not respond to interrogation messages. Therefore, the operator can be confident that the identifying information he receives from the interrogator pertains to the individual tagged object which the operator currently is handling, rather than pertaining to other tagged objects nearby.
  • [0008]
    The interrogator transceiver can be mounted anywhere on the operator's person so as to leave both of the operator's hands free for handling the tagged objects. For example, the interrogator can be mounted on the person's belt. Furthermore, the interrogator can have an antenna mounted separately, preferably on the operator's wrist band or similarly near the person's hand, so that the operator can extend his hand toward a tagged object to bring the antenna within close communication range of the RFID tag on the object. This allows reducing the communication range so as to minimize the possibility of responses from RFID tags other than the one associated with the individual tagged object which the operator currently is handling.
  • [0009]
    A second embodiment of the invention does not necessarily limit the interrogator to communicating with a single tag as in the first embodiment. Instead, an objective of the second embodiment is to prevent one operator's interrogator from communicating with tagged objects being handled by other operators working nearby in the same facility. In this embodiment, the 2-way communication range between one operator's interrogator and the tags is adjusted so that all tagged objects being handled by other operator personnel are outside the range. Unlike the first embodiment, the 2-way communication range between the interrogator and the tags need not be so short that only one tagged object at a time can be within the range.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0010]
    FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of an airport baggage sorting facility employing the present invention.
  • [0011]
    FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an REID tag transceiver used in the present invention.
  • [0012]
    FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an RFID interrogator transceiver used in the present invention.
  • [0013]
    FIG. 4 is a schematic depiction of the reliable, unreliable, and zero two-way communications zones surrounding an interrogator transceiver.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 1. Overview
  • [0014]
    The invention will be described in the context of an exemplary implementation, depicted in FIG. 1, in which the human operators 10 are baggage handler personnel working in an airport baggage sorting facility, and the tagged objects 12 are airline baggage. However, the invention is equally applicable to any other objects to which RFID tags may be attached.
  • [0015]
    In the airport example, a number of baggage handler personnel 10, hereinafter called “operators”, are responsible for loading a large number of suitcases 12 and other baggage pieces into various freight containers 14, where each freight container has been designated to be loaded on a specific aircraft flight. An operator's job is to read the designated flight number and/or destination from a tag 16 attached to each suitcase and then to load the suitcase in the correct freight container.
  • [0016]
    Personnel at the airport passenger check-in counter attach an RFID tag 16 to each suitcase 12. Preferably, the RFID tag is mounted near a handle 18 of the suitcase so that an operator's hand will be as close as possible to the tag when the operator grasps the handle to pick up the suitcase. For example, the tag may be attached to the handle by a strap 19, as shown in FIG. 4.
  • [0017]
    A semiconductor memory 38 within the tag is programmed to store information on the itinerary of the suitcase, such as flight number, time, and destination. Optionally, the tag's memory may be programmed with additional information such as the name of the owner and special handling instructions.
  • [0018]
    The tag's memory can be programmed by any conventional means for storing data in a memory device connected to an RF transceiver. For example, the RF communications protocol used by the tag transceiver can include commands for storing data, so that such commands could be transmitted to the tag's transceiver by a transmitter used by airport check-in personnel. Alternatively, the tag may include physical connectors for connecting the tag to a conventional memory programming apparatus used by airport check-in personnel.
  • [0019]
    After mounting an RFID tag on the suitcase, the check-in counter personnel place the suitcase on a conveyor belt 24 which carries the suitcase to a large baggage sorting facility such as the sorting facility shown in FIG. 1. The sorting facility includes a plurality of freight containers 14, each container being labelled with the flight number of an aircraft whose baggage is to be loaded into that container by the baggage handler personnel (i.e., the operators). After the operators load the appropriate baggage into a container, the container is wheeled from the baggage sorting facility to the aircraft, where other baggage handler personnel transfer the baggage from the container to the aircraft. The process is performed in reverse when the aircraft reaches its destination.
  • [0020]
    Each baggage handling operator 10 in the sorting facility carries a battery-powered RFID interrogator transceiver 20, the interrogator preferably being attached to the operator's body or clothing so as to leave the operator's hands free and not obstruct the operator's movements. For example, the interrogator may be attached to a belt 22 worn around the operator's waist. (Alternatively, the interrogator may be attached to a strap or belt worn around the operator's leg, arm, or wrist.) As the operator moves within a certain proximity of an individual suitcase 12, the tag 16 on the suitcase receives an interrogation signal transmitted periodically from the operator's interrogator 20. The tag 16 responds by transmitting a message containing the itinerary information stored in the tag's memory. The interrogator 20 receives the message and conveys the itinerary information to the operator, preferably either visually or aurally. The operator uses the itinerary information to decide which freight container 14 the suitcase should be loaded into.
  • [0021]
    When the aircraft reaches its destination, each of the personnel who unload baggage from the airplane preferably also carries an RFID interrogator 20 attached as described above. Each interrogator carried by the unloading personnel would include memory in which a code representing the city (or airport) in which the interrogator is actually located. The interrogator periodically broadcasts interrogation messages and receives a response from each tagged object picked up by the person carrying the interrogator. The control logic 56 in the interrogator is programmed to compare the intended destination city transmitted by each tag with the interrogator's actual location city stored in memory 58. If the intended and actual destinations do not match, the interrogator presents a warning signal to the unloading person to alert him that the piece of baggage he currently is unloading does not belong in that city.
  • [0022]
    For baggage unloading, an alternative to each unloading person carrying an interrogator is to mount a single RFID interrogator 20 at each aircraft door through which baggage is unloaded. As described in the preceding paragraph, the interrogator should announce a warning if a piece of baggage exiting the door has an intended destination different from the actual destination stored in the interrogator. The interrogator can be battery-powered for portability, and can be mounted near the aircraft cargo door by any means. Since the interrogator only needs to be mounted during the short time baggage is being unloaded, the mounting means can be temporary. A presently preferred mounting means is a suction cup affixed to the interrogator, allowing it to be temporarily attached to the aircraft skin or door panel.
  • [0023]
    Mounting an interrogator transceiver adjacent to a cargo door, as described in the preceding paragraph, also is useful when first loading baggage on an aircraft to verify that no baggage is loaded which was intended for a different flight. For purposes of loading rather than unloading, the airplane flight number or similar identification should be stored in the interrogator's memory 58. The control logic 56 in the interrogator should be programmed to compare the intended flight number transmitted by each tag to the flight number stored in the interrogator memory, and then signal human personnel in the event of a discrepancy.
  • [0024]
    Any of the interrogator transceivers described above can re-transmit data received from tags to a central computer 80. The central computer should include an RF receiver for receiving the data and a memory for storing it. The data stored in the central computer is useful for tracking the progress of baggage in case of an inquiry or a lost object.
  • [0025]
    The RFID tag transceivers 16 and RFID interrogator transceiver 20 used in the present invention can be any conventional RFID (radio frequency identification) transceivers, examples of which are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,075,632 to Baldwin et al.; 4,857,893 to Carroll; 4,862,160 to Ekchian et al.; 5,055,659 to Hendrick et al; 5,144,314 to Malmberg et al.; and 5,245,346 to Nishimura et al. The entire contents of each of these patents is hereby incorporated into this patent application.
  • [0026]
    A preferred physical implementation of an RFID tag transceiver 16 is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,406,263; 5,448,110; and 5,497,140. A preferred protocol for communications between the interrogator 20 and the tags 16 is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,500,650. The entire contents of each of these patents is hereby incorporated into this patent application.
  • [0027]
    FIG. 2 shows an RFID tag transceiver 16 suitable for use with the present invention. An antenna 30 connects to the output of a transmitter 32 and to the input of a receiver 34. A control logic circuit 36, such as a programmable microcomputer, receives data which has been received and demodulated by the receiver 34, provides data to the transmitter 32 with which the transmitter is to modulate the transmitted RF signal, and provides control signals to both the receiver and the transmitter. The control logic circuit 36 also exchanges data with a memory 38. All the components just described are conventionally included in an RFID tag transceiver. As described below, the tag transceiver optionally includes an RF signal amplitude detector 40. Such amplitude detectors are well known, but are not conventionally included in RFID transceivers.
  • [0028]
    FIG. 3 shows an RFID interrogator transceiver 20 suitable for use with the present invention. The interrogator has the same components as the tag, namely, an antenna 50, transmitter 52, receiver 54, control logic circuit 56, memory 58, and optional RF signal amplitude detector 60.
  • 2. Excluding Nearby Tags from Communication Range
  • [0029]
    When the operator 10 receives itinerary information for a suitcase 12, it is important for the operator to know which suitcase the information pertains to. In the present invention, this is accomplished by limiting the transmitter power and/or the receiver sensitivity of the operator's interrogator, of the tags, or of both so that 2-way communication between the interrogator and the tags is possible only over a very short range. Specifically, the maximum range or distance across which the interrogator 20 and tags 16 can reliably communicate should be adjusted so that it is only slightly greater than the distance between the antenna of the operator's interrogator and the tag attached to the single suitcase the operator is handling. All other suitcases 12′ in the baggage handling facility should be outside this range.
  • [0030]
    More specifically (see FIG. 4), depending on the transmitter power, receiver sensitivity, and antenna radiation pattern of the RFID tags 16 and the interrogator 20, there will be a “reliable 2-way communication” inner zone 70 surrounding the antenna 50 of the operator's interrogator within which an RFID tag 16 will be close enough to reliably communicate with the interrogator, and a “zero 2-way communication” outer zone 72, defined by a boundary 73 surrounding the inner zone, beyond which boundary 73 an RFID tag cannot successfully communicate with the operator's interrogator. Between the respective boundaries 71 and 73 of the inner and outer zones 70 and 72 is an “unreliable 2-way communication” intermediate zone 74 within which a tag can communicate with the interrogator with uncertain reliability.
  • [0031]
    The distance between the antenna 50 of the operator's interrogator and the tag 16 on a suitcase will be minimum when the operator 10 grasps the suitcase 12 to move it to the container 14 for the appropriate aircraft. The reliable 2-way communication range 70 between an operator's interrogator and the nearby tags should be adjusted to only slightly exceed this minimum distance. Specifically, the reliable 2-way communication range should be adjusted so that (i) a suitcase being grasped or otherwise handled by the baggage handling operator is within the “reliable 2-way communication inner zone” surrounding the interrogator's antenna, and (ii) all other nearby suitcases 12′ are outside this inner zone, and preferably are outside the boundary of the “zero 2-way communication” outer zone. If the 2-way communications range is adjusted according to these criteria, only the tag on the single suitcase currently being handled will be close enough for 2-way communication with the operator's interrogator. Therefore, the operator can be confident that the identifying information he receives from the interrogator pertains to the individual suitcase 12 the operator currently is handling, rather than pertaining to other suitcases 12′ nearby.
  • [0032]
    An interrogator and tag are considered to be within reliable 2-way communication range of each other only if the tag can reliably receive RF signals from the interrogator and the interrogator can reliably receive RF signals from the tag. If RF signals can be reliably received by the interrogator from the tag, but not by the tag from the interrogator—or vice versa—then only one-way reliable communication is possible, and the interrogator and tag are not considered within reliable 2-way communication range. In other words, the reliable 2-way communication range is the lesser of (a) the maximum distance over which the interrogator can reliably receive RF signals from the tag, and (b) the maximum distance over which the tag can reliably receive RF signals from the interrogator.
  • [0033]
    Consequently, the reliable 2-way communication range can be reduced by reducing the reliable one-way communication range in either direction, that is, by reducing either the tag-to-interrogator one-way range “a” or the interrogator-to-tag one-way range “b” defined in the preceding paragraph.
  • [0034]
    The one-way communication range from the tags to the operator's interrogator (range “a” defined above) can be reduced either by reducing the transmitter power of all the tags which otherwise could be within communication range of the interrogator or by reducing the receiver sensitivity of the interrogator. Conversely, the one-way communication range from the operator's interrogator to the tags (range “b” defined above) can be reduced either by reducing the transmitter power of the interrogator or by reducing the receiver sensitivity of all the tags which otherwise could be within communication range of the interrogator.
  • [0035]
    There are various conventional circuit designs for adjusting transmitter output power or receiver sensitivity. For example, to permit adjusting the sensitivity of the receiver section of each tag and/or the interrogator, the receiver section can include a conventional circuit 40, 60 for detecting the amplitude of the received signal (i.e., the signal strength), and a comparator which rejects any received signal whose strength is below a certain threshold. The threshold can be adjusted to adjust the communications range. Preferably, the comparator and threshold are implemented by suitable programming of the control logic circuit 36, 56.
  • [0036]
    The adjustments to the transmitter power and/or receiver sensitivity of the tags and interrogators can be made at the time of their manufacture. The adjustments to an interrogator also can be performed when the interrogator is placed in service in a given facility, thereby permitting customization of the communication range based on the actual distances between the interrogator and the tagged objects in that facility. Alternatively, the interrogator can include circuitry for automatically adjusting its transmitter output power and/or receiver sensitivity to achieve 2-way communication with only the single tagged object being handled at a given time.
  • [0037]
    A particularly preferred embodiment of the interrogator transceiver automatically adjusts the 2-way communication range by reducing its transmitter RF output power, thereby attaining the additional advantage of reducing its battery consumption. In this embodiment, the interrogator transceiver initially broadcasts an interrogation signal at a very low transmitter RF output power level. If no tag responds, the interrogator broadcasts the interrogation signal again at a higher power level. If again no tag responds, the interrogator broadcasts the interrogation signal at progressively higher power levels until either a tag responds or the interrogator reaches its maximum transmitter output power. In the latter case, the interrogator waits a certain period of time (for example, 0.2 second), then repeats the process starting with the lowest power level.
  • [0038]
    When a tag does respond to an interrogation signal which the interrogator transmitted at a given power level, the interrogator maintains that power level for all subsequent transmissions to that tag. Thus, the interrogator employs the lowest transmitter power needed to communicate with the tag, thereby minimizing power drain from the interrogator's battery. Furthermore, when the interrogator or its antenna is close to a tag (as when the operator is grasping or handling a tagged object), this embodiment of the interrogator inherently adjusts its transmitter output power to a level just high enough to reliably communicate with the closest tag, but not high enough to communicate with other, more distant tags. Therefore, this embodiment of the interrogator performs automatically the adjustment of 2-way communication range described earlier. The adjustment steps preferably are implemented by programming the control logic circuit 56.
  • [0039]
    In a preferred embodiment of the RFID tags, which advantageously limits the 2-way communication range between the tags and the interrogator, each tag is a passive RF transceiver, also called a modulated backscatter RF transceiver. Such a transceiver responds to an interrogator signal by modulating the RF carrier of the interrogator signal with the itinerary information and reflecting or re-radiating the modulated signal back toward the interrogator. Examples of modulated backscatter transceivers are described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,832,530 issued Aug. 27, 1974 to Reitboeck et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,075,632 issued Feb. 21, 1978 to Baldwin et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 4,857,893 issued Aug. 15, 1989 to Carroll; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,313,211 issued May 17, 1994 to Tokuda et al.; the entire contents of each of which are hereby incorporated into this patent specification. The amplitude of the RF signal received by the interrogator from a modulated backscatter tag will decline approximately in proportion to the fourth power of the distance between the respective antennas of the tag and the interrogator, assuming both antennas are fairly omnidirectional. In contrast, if the tags had active transmitters with fixed output power, the amplitude would decline only in proportion to the square of the distance.
  • [0040]
    Using the just described RFID tags with modulated backscatter RF transceivers in combination with the previously described preferred interrogator with automatically adjusting transmitter power, I have found that the interrogator reliably communicates with a tagged suitcase 12 when it is grasped by a human operator, while reliably ignoring the tags on other suitcases 12′ nearby.
  • 3. Antenna Location
  • [0041]
    The mounting location of the antenna 50 of the interrogator also affects the ability of the interrogator to discriminate against suitcases other than the one currently being handled by the operator. The most convenient and unobtrusive location of the antenna typically is in the same housing as the interrogator transceiver 20, which, as described above, may be attached to the operator's clothing such as a belt 22 worn around the operator's waist. With the interrogator and its antenna mounted on the operator's torso, the required 2-way communication range between the interrogator and the tag depends on how close the operator's torso approaches the suitcase during normal handling.
  • [0042]
    To prevent tags on adjacent suitcases from responding to the interrogator, the distance from the operator's torso to the suitcase being handled should be much smaller than the distance from the operator's torso to any nearby suitcases. If the suitcases are too close together to satisfy this condition, then it is preferable to mount the antenna of the interrogator transceiver on the operator's hand, wrist, or forearm so that the operator can extend his arm toward the tag mounted on the individual suitcase the operator currently is handling, thereby reducing the distance between interrogator antenna and the tag.
  • [0043]
    For example, the antenna 50 of the interrogator transceiver can be mounted in a wrist strap worn on the operator's wrist (see FIG. 4). If the tag is attached to the handle of a suitcase, then the interrogator antenna will be closest to the tag (a distance of only two or three inches) when the operator grasps the suitcase handle. The 2-way communication range between the interrogator and tags should be adjusted, as described above, so that the “reliable 2-way communications inner zone” is only slightly greater than this closest distance (i.e., a few inches). Preferably, a consequence of this adjustment is that the “zero 2-way communication outer zone” boundary is on the order of one foot from the interrogator antenna, whereby the suitcase being handled will be within the inner zone and all other suitcases will be outside the boundary of the outer zone.
  • [0044]
    The antenna and interrogator can be fabricated as an integral unit which is mounted on the operator's hand, wrist, or forearm, if the interrogator is small enough to be worn comfortably in this manner.
  • 4. Interrogator Presentation of Information to Operator
  • [0045]
    As described above, when a human operator approaches close enough to a tagged suitcase for the operator's interrogator and the tag to be within 2-way communication range, the tag will receive an interrogation signal from the interrogator and will respond with a message identifying itself to the interrogator. The interrogator then should present to the operator relevant portions of the identifying information, such as airline flight number or destination. The information can be presented aurally or visually.
  • [0046]
    Specifically, the identifying information can be presented aurally through a loudspeaker mounted in the same enclosure as the interrogator. More preferably, to prevent operators in the same vicinity from disturbing each other, the information can be presented through headphones or similar sound transducers worn or in or adjacent to the operator's ears. Alternatively, the information can be presented visually by a small video display panel mounted on the same enclosure as the interrogator or, more preferably, by a conventional heads-up display incorporated in eye goggles or eyeglasses worn by the operator.
  • [0047]
    In the previously described example of an aircraft baggage sorting facility for loading baggage onto departing aircraft, the information the interrogator presents to the baggage handling operator when he picks up a suitcase typically would be the flight number of the aircraft on which the suitcase belongs and the destination city of the suitcase. Using this information, the operator then loads the suitcase into the container or truck designated for that flight number.
  • [0048]
    The invention also is useful for baggage handling operators who unload suitcases from an arriving aircraft. Because a given flight typically stops in several destination cities, the baggage unloading operators in a given destination city must ensure they only unload baggage whose intended destination is that city. For this application, the name or identification code for the current city should be stored in a semiconductor memory in each operator's interrogator. The interrogator should be programmed to compare the stored city code with the destination city information transmitted by each tagged object handled by the operator. In case the intended destination transmitted by a tag differs from the actual destination stored in the interrogator's memory, the interrogator should present an audible or visual error warning to the operator. For example, the interrogator might contain a green light which flashes when the operator picks up a suitcase whose tag designates the same destination stored in the interrogator, and a red light which flashes when the tag designates a different destination.
  • [0049]
    As an alternative to each operator's carrying or wearing an audio transducer or video display as just described, several operators working in the same area or facility can share a central control center 80 located in their work area. The interrogator of each operator can transmit RF signals to the central control center using the same transceiver which the interrogator uses to communicate with the tags. Specifically, each interrogator should transmit to the control center RF message signals containing the identifying information received from tags plus the interrogator's own identification number. The control center can display the information received from all the operators' interrogators on a single video display 82, or the control center can present the information in audible form over a loudspeaker 84 which all the operators in the vicinity can hear.
  • [0050]
    If multiple operator personnel share a central audio transducer or visual display, the presentation of information from each tag should be accompanied by the name or other identification of the operator who is handling the tagged suitcase, that is, the operator whose interrogator received the information from the tag. For example, in a video display, each operator's name 86 should be displayed next to the identifying information 88 from the tag of the suitcase he currently is handling. With an audio transducer, each operator's name should be pronounced immediately before presenting the identifying information for the suitcase that operator currently is handling.
  • [0051]
    Whether or not a shared control center presents information to the operators as just described, the control center 80 can include a computer which functions as a central database which stores a record of which suitcases have been handled and by which operators. The central database can be used to track the progress of the suitcases from one location to another. In case a suitcase is misdirected, the database can help identify which operator was responsible for the error.
  • 5. Embodiment for Discriminating Among Operator Personnel
  • [0052]
    An alternative embodiment of the invention does not necessarily limit the interrogator to communicating with a single tag as in the preceding embodiments. Instead, the objective of this alternative embodiment is to prevent one operator's interrogator from communicating with tagged objects being handled by other operators working nearby in the same facility. In this embodiment, the 2-way communication range between one operator's interrogator and the tags is adjusted so that all tagged objects being handled by other operator personnel are outside the range. As in the preceding embodiments, the adjustment may be performed by adjusting the transmitter output power and/or the receiver sensitivity in the interrogator transceiver, in the RFID tags, or in both. Unlike the preceding embodiments, the 2-way communication range between the interrogator and the tags need not be so short that only one tagged object at a time can be within the range.
  • 6. Conclusion
  • [0053]
    The invention has been described in the context of an aircraft baggage handling facility. Nevertheless, the invention is equally useful in other transportation facilities for sorting or handling cargo or goods to be transported in vehicles other than airplanes. More generally, the invention is equally useful in any facility in which human operators handle or monitor any type of objects to which conventional RFID tags can be affixed.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3679874 *Jul 6, 1970Jul 25, 1972Bendix CorpAutomatic baggage handling system
US3689885 *Sep 15, 1970Sep 5, 1972Transitag CorpInductively coupled passive responder and interrogator unit having multidimension electromagnetic field capabilities
US3832530 *Jul 19, 1973Aug 27, 1974Westinghouse Electric CorpObject identifying apparatus
US3986119 *Dec 28, 1973Oct 12, 1976International Business Machines CorporationEmergency communication system
US4075632 *May 24, 1976Feb 21, 1978The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of EnergyInterrogation, and detection system
US4354189 *Feb 15, 1980Oct 12, 1982Lemelson Jerome HSwitch and lock activating system and method
US4684933 *May 15, 1986Aug 4, 1987Rita Ann GrayUnauthorized personnel detection system
US4750197 *Jul 2, 1987Jun 7, 1988Denekamp Mark LIntegrated cargo security system
US4761778 *Apr 11, 1985Aug 2, 1988Massachusetts Institute Of TechnologyCoder-packetizer for random accessing in digital communication with multiple accessing
US4766299 *Mar 28, 1986Aug 23, 1988Spectra-Physics, Inc.Hand-mounted bar code reader
US4776464 *Jun 17, 1985Oct 11, 1988Bae Automated Systems, Inc.Automated article handling system and process
US4799059 *Mar 14, 1986Jan 17, 1989Enscan, Inc.Automatic/remote RF instrument monitoring system
US4811421 *Mar 12, 1987Mar 7, 1989Christophe HavelTransmission power control device in a radio communication transmitting/receiving station
US4837575 *Nov 14, 1988Jun 6, 1989Motorola, Inc.Identification system
US4845504 *Apr 8, 1987Jul 4, 1989M/A-Com, Inc.Mobile radio network for nationwide communications
US4850009 *May 31, 1988Jul 18, 1989Clinicom IncorporatedPortable handheld terminal including optical bar code reader and electromagnetic transceiver means for interactive wireless communication with a base communications station
US4857893 *Feb 8, 1988Aug 15, 1989Bi Inc.Single chip transponder device
US4862160 *Mar 20, 1987Aug 29, 1989Revlon, Inc.Item identification tag for rapid inventory data acquisition system
US4955018 *Nov 8, 1988Sep 4, 1990Echelon Systems CorporationProtocol for network having plurality of intelligent cells
US4969146 *Nov 8, 1988Nov 6, 1990Echelon Systems CorporationProtocol for network having a plurality of intelligent cells
US4999636 *Feb 17, 1989Mar 12, 1991Amtech Technology CorporationRange limiting system
US5003619 *Jan 31, 1989Mar 26, 1991Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for adjusting the power of a transmitter
US5008661 *Jan 4, 1989Apr 16, 1991Raj Phani KElectronic remote chemical identification system
US5019813 *Apr 12, 1988May 28, 1991N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek NedapSystem for the contactless exchange of data
US5025486 *Dec 9, 1988Jun 18, 1991Dallas Semiconductor CorporationWireless communication system with parallel polling
US5030807 *Jan 16, 1990Jul 9, 1991Amtech CorporationSystem for reading and writing data from and into remote tags
US5046066 *Feb 12, 1987Sep 3, 1991Telesystems Slw Inc.Wireless local area network
US5055659 *Feb 6, 1990Oct 8, 1991Amtech Technology Corp.High speed system for reading and writing data from and into remote tags
US5055968 *Jul 3, 1989Oct 8, 1991Sony CorporationThin electronic device having an integrated circuit chip and a power battery and a method for producing same
US5121407 *Sep 27, 1990Jun 9, 1992Pittway CorporationSpread spectrum communications system
US5124697 *Oct 16, 1989Jun 23, 1992Motorola, Inc.Acknowledge-back pager
US5144313 *Apr 24, 1991Sep 1, 1992Steffen KirknesMethod for processing transmitted and reflected signals for removing unwanted signals and noise from wanted signals
US5144314 *Dec 11, 1991Sep 1, 1992Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.Programmable object identification transponder system
US5144668 *Jan 25, 1991Sep 1, 1992Motorola, Inc.Signal overlap detection in a communication system
US5148618 *Oct 18, 1991Sep 22, 1992Brewster Blair MSealed tag
US5150114 *Nov 6, 1990Sep 22, 1992U.S. Philips CorporationPolling-type information transmission system
US5150310 *Aug 30, 1989Sep 22, 1992Consolve, Inc.Method and apparatus for position detection
US5164985 *Oct 26, 1988Nov 17, 1992Nysen Paul APassive universal communicator system
US5168510 *Apr 5, 1989Dec 1, 1992Comsource SystemsSpread spectrum-time diversity communications systems and transceivers for multidrop area networks
US5194860 *Nov 15, 1990Mar 16, 1993The General Electric Company, P.L.C.Radio telemetry systems with channel selection
US5214410 *Jul 9, 1990May 25, 1993CsirLocation of objects
US5220678 *Aug 12, 1991Jun 15, 1993Motorola, Inc.Method and apparatus for adjusting the power of a transmitter
US5231646 *Mar 16, 1992Jul 27, 1993Kyros CorporationCommunications system
US5245346 *Sep 28, 1990Sep 14, 1993Kabushiki Kaisha Toyota Chuo KenyushoInterrogator/transponder system and mobile transponder device
US5272324 *Oct 9, 1992Dec 21, 1993Interlink Technologies, Inc.Portable scanner system with transceiver for two-way radio frequency communication
US5278992 *Nov 8, 1991Jan 11, 1994Teknekron Communications Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for controlling transmission power of a remote unit communicating with a base unit over a common frequency channel
US5307463 *Dec 7, 1992Apr 26, 1994Allen-Bradley Company, Inc.Programmable controller communication module
US5313211 *Aug 7, 1991May 17, 1994Sharp Kabushiki KaishaPortable data processing device capable of transmitting processed data on a radio by reflection of unmodulated carrier signal externally applied
US5326652 *Jan 25, 1993Jul 5, 1994Micron Semiconductor, Inc.Battery package and method using flexible polymer films having a deposited layer of an inorganic material
US5340968 *May 5, 1992Aug 23, 1994Nippondenso Company, Ltd.Information storage medium with electronic and visual areas
US5347274 *Sep 16, 1992Sep 13, 1994At/Comm IncorporatedHazardous waste transport management system
US5365551 *Dec 15, 1992Nov 15, 1994Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication transceiver using identification protocol
US5373503 *Apr 30, 1993Dec 13, 1994Information Technology, Inc.Group randomly addressed polling method
US5382784 *Feb 8, 1993Jan 17, 1995Indala CorporationHand-held dual technology identification tag reading head
US5406263 *Nov 12, 1993Apr 11, 1995Micron Communications, Inc.Anti-theft method for detecting the unauthorized opening of containers and baggage
US5416310 *May 28, 1993May 16, 1995Symbol Technologies, Inc.Computer and/or scanner system incorporated into a garment
US5448110 *Sep 14, 1993Sep 5, 1995Micron Communications, Inc.Enclosed transceiver
US5497140 *Dec 17, 1993Mar 5, 1996Micron Technology, Inc.Electrically powered postage stamp or mailing or shipping label operative with radio frequency (RF) communication
US5500650 *Dec 15, 1992Mar 19, 1996Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication method using identification protocol
US5500651 *Jun 24, 1994Mar 19, 1996Texas Instruments IncorporatedSystem and method for reading multiple RF-ID transponders
US5521600 *Sep 6, 1994May 28, 1996The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaRange-gated field disturbance sensor with range-sensitivity compensation
US5534847 *Nov 23, 1994Jul 9, 1996Mcgregor; Gerald C.Bicycle alarm system
US5560970 *Jul 14, 1994Oct 1, 1996Esselte Meto International GmbhDisplay marking tag, such as a display marking tag having an adhesive fastening strip
US5583850 *Jun 21, 1994Dec 10, 1996Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication system using identification protocol
US5602535 *Jul 15, 1994Feb 11, 1997The Friedkin CorporationVehicle security system based on two step communication range between transmitter and receiver
US5610387 *Apr 24, 1996Mar 11, 1997Symbol Technologies, Inc.Portable optical scanning system worn by a user for reading indicia of differing light reflectivity
US5613228 *Apr 27, 1995Mar 18, 1997Micron Technology, Inc.Gain adjustment method in two-way communication systems
US5627517 *Nov 1, 1995May 6, 1997Xerox CorporationDecentralized tracking and routing system wherein packages are associated with active tags
US5627544 *Mar 18, 1996May 6, 1997Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication method using identification protocol
US5640002 *Aug 15, 1995Jun 17, 1997Ruppert; Jonathan PaulPortable RF ID tag and barcode reader
US5671362 *Apr 4, 1995Sep 23, 1997Cowe; Alan B.Materials monitoring systems, materials management systems and related methods
US5751227 *Jun 24, 1997May 12, 1998Nippondenso Co., Ltd.Communication system for vehicles
US5751256 *Jan 31, 1995May 12, 1998Flexcon Company Inc.Resonant tag labels and method of making same
US5785181 *Nov 2, 1995Jul 28, 1998Clothestrak, Inc.Permanent RFID garment tracking system
US5793305 *Sep 29, 1995Aug 11, 1998Turner; Leigh HolbrookArticle sorting system
US5798693 *Jun 7, 1995Aug 25, 1998Engellenner; Thomas J.Electronic locating systems
US5828693 *Mar 21, 1996Oct 27, 1998Amtech CorporationSpread spectrum frequency hopping reader system
US5841770 *Oct 7, 1996Nov 24, 1998Micron Technology, Inc.Data communication system using indentification protocol
US5850187 *Mar 27, 1996Dec 15, 1998Amtech CorporationIntegrated electronic tag reader and wireless communication link
US5855988 *Nov 27, 1996Jan 5, 1999Nippon Paint Co., Ltd.Electromagnetic wave absorbing shielding material
US5887176 *Jun 28, 1996Mar 23, 1999Randtec, Inc.Method and system for remote monitoring and tracking of inventory
US5920287 *Jan 21, 1997Jul 6, 1999Widata CorporationRadio location system for precisely tracking objects by RF transceiver tags which randomly and repetitively emit wideband identification signals
US5963927 *Jan 30, 1997Oct 5, 1999Neopost LimitedMailing system
US5971587 *Aug 1, 1997Oct 26, 1999Kato; KirokuPackage and mail delivery system
US6097301 *Apr 4, 1996Aug 1, 2000Micron Communications, Inc.RF identification system with restricted range
US6121544 *Jan 15, 1998Sep 19, 2000Petsinger; Julie AnnElectromagnetic shield to prevent surreptitious access to contactless smartcards
US6144301 *Feb 10, 1997Nov 7, 2000Safetrac Control Systems, Inc.Electronic tracking tag
US6538564 *Jan 16, 1998Mar 25, 2003Integrated Silicon Design Pty LtdMultiple tag reading system
US6842121 *Aug 1, 2000Jan 11, 2005Micron Technology, Inc.RF identification system for determining whether object has reached destination
US7163152 *Dec 15, 2004Jan 16, 2007Osborn Warren RProtective container for readable cards
US7175084 *May 3, 2001Feb 13, 2007Axalto SaIntegrated circuit card and case therefor
US7482925 *Jun 24, 2005Jan 27, 2009Visa U.S.A.Apparatus and method to electromagnetically shield portable consumer devices
US20060187061 *Feb 7, 2006Aug 24, 2006Colby Steven MRadio frequency shielding
US20070040653 *Aug 15, 2006Feb 22, 2007Potts Kevin LRfid shielding devices
USH1606 *Jul 22, 1994Nov 5, 1996The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The ArmyElectronic quasi-passive identification system
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7546137 *Feb 27, 2006Jun 9, 2009Sirit Technologies Inc.Power control loop and LO generation method
US7639141Jul 16, 2007Dec 29, 2009Keystone Technology Solutions, LlcSystems and methods for identifying lost or stolen devices
US7671721 *May 11, 2004Mar 2, 2010Valtion Teknillinen TutkimuskesusRemote sensor, device and method for activating selected remote sensor components
US7755490Aug 29, 2007Jul 13, 2010Round Rock Research, LlcSystems and methods for identifying missing items
US7808367Aug 28, 2002Oct 5, 2010Round Rock Research, LlcRFID material tracking method and apparatus
US7982608 *Jun 7, 2007Jul 19, 2011Round Rock Research, LlcMethod and system for identifying missing items
US8000674 *Jul 31, 2007Aug 16, 2011Intel CorporationCanceling self-jammer and interfering signals in an RFID system
US8125316Aug 28, 2002Feb 28, 2012Round Rock Research, LlcRFID material tracking method and apparatus
US8269605Aug 31, 2007Sep 18, 2012Round Rock Research, LlcRFID material tracking method and apparatus
US8289164Jul 29, 2010Oct 16, 2012Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.Semiconductor device and manufacturing method thereof
US8378789Aug 31, 2007Feb 19, 2013Round Rock Research, LlcRFID material tracking method and apparatus
US8395506 *Jul 18, 2011Mar 12, 2013Round Rock Research, LlcMethod and system for identifying missing items
US9171448 *Jun 11, 2014Oct 27, 2015Target Brands, Inc.RFID tags for locating products
US20060202802 *May 11, 2004Sep 14, 2006Seppae HeikkiRemote sensor, device and method for activating selected remote sensor components
US20070066223 *Feb 27, 2006Mar 22, 2007Sirit, Inc.Power control loop and LO generation method
US20070252697 *Jun 7, 2007Nov 1, 2007Micron Technology, Inc.Method and system for identifying missing items
US20080012711 *Jul 16, 2007Jan 17, 2008Micron Technology, Inc.Systems and methods for identifying lost or stolen devices
US20080024303 *Aug 29, 2007Jan 31, 2008Micron Technology, Inc.Systems and methods for identifying missing items
US20090036082 *Jul 31, 2007Feb 5, 2009Mohammed SajidCanceling self-jammer and interfering signals in an rfid system
US20090210517 *Mar 31, 2009Aug 20, 2009Sony CorporationInformation management device and method, information processing device and method recording medium, and program
US20110082810 *Jan 10, 2008Apr 7, 2011Walt-Task, LlcHuman-readable baggage and cargo routing identification system
US20130257618 *Mar 11, 2013Oct 3, 2013Round Rock Research, LlcMethods and system for identifying lost or stolen RFID devices
Classifications
U.S. Classification340/10.3
International ClassificationG01S13/74, G06K7/00, G06K17/00, H04Q5/22
Cooperative ClassificationG08B21/023, H04W28/18, H04W84/18, G08B21/0266, G06K2017/0048, G08B21/0258, G06K7/10079, G01S13/74, G06K7/0008
European ClassificationG06K7/00E, G06K7/10A1E, G08B21/02A7, G08B21/02A20, G08B21/02A11R, H04W28/18
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jan 4, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC,NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023786/0416
Effective date: 20091223
Owner name: ROUND ROCK RESEARCH, LLC, NEW YORK
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.;REEL/FRAME:023786/0416
Effective date: 20091223
Jan 26, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., IDAHO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KEYSTONE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:023839/0881
Effective date: 20091222
Owner name: MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,IDAHO
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KEYSTONE TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:023839/0881
Effective date: 20091222