Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20080186389 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/035,416
Publication dateAug 7, 2008
Filing dateFeb 21, 2008
Priority dateOct 9, 1997
Also published asUS7352394, US7474341, US20080002060
Publication number035416, 12035416, US 2008/0186389 A1, US 2008/186389 A1, US 20080186389 A1, US 20080186389A1, US 2008186389 A1, US 2008186389A1, US-A1-20080186389, US-A1-2008186389, US2008/0186389A1, US2008/186389A1, US20080186389 A1, US20080186389A1, US2008186389 A1, US2008186389A1
InventorsMichael J. DeLuca, Yury Prilutsky, Eran Steinberg, Peter Corcoran, Alexei Pososin, Petronel Bigioi, Alexandru Drimbarean, Adrian Capata, Florin Nanu
Original AssigneeFotonation Vision Limited
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Image Modification Based on Red-Eye Filter Analysis
US 20080186389 A1
Abstract
A digital camera has an integral flash and stores and displays a digital image. Under certain conditions, a flash photograph taken with the camera may result in a red-eye phenomenon due to a reflection within an eye of a subject of the photograph. A digital apparatus has a red-eye filter which analyzes the stored image for the red-eye phenomenon and modifies the stored image to eliminate the red-eye phenomenon by changing the red area to black. The modification of the image is enabled when a photograph is taken under conditions indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The modification is subject to anti-falsing analysis which further examines the area around the red-eye area for indicia of the eye of the subject. The detection and correction can be optimized for performance and quality by operating on subsample versions of the image when appropriate.
Images(7)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(1)
1. A portable digital camera having no photographic film, comprising:
(a) an integral flash for providing illumination during image acquisition;
(b) a digital image capturing apparatus for acquiring an image; and
(c) a red-eye filter for modifying an area within the image indicative of a red-eye phenomenon based on an analysis of a subsample representation of selected regions of the image.
Description
    PRIORITY
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation-in-part application which claims the benefit of priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/635,862, filed Aug. 5, 2003, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/170,511, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/947,603, filed Oct. 9, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,407,777, which are each hereby incorporated by reference. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/635,918, filed Aug. 5, 2003 and a continuation-in-part of the '918 application filed contemporaneously with the present application.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The invention relates generally to the area of flash photography, and more specifically to filtering “red-eye” from a digital camera image.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    “Red-eye” is a phenomenon in flash photography where a flash is reflected within a subject's eye and appears in a photograph as a red dot where the black pupil of the subject's eye would normally appear. The unnatural glowing red of an eye is due to internal reflections from the vascular membrane behind the retina, which is rich in blood vessels. This objectionable phenomenon is well understood to be caused in part by a small angle between the flash of the camera and the lens of the camera. This angle has decreased with the miniaturization of cameras with integral flash capabilities. Additional contributors include the relative closeness of the subject to the camera and ambient light levels.
  • [0004]
    The red-eye phenomenon can be minimized by causing the iris to reduce the opening of the pupil. This is typically done with a “pre-flash”, a flash or illumination of light shortly before a flash photograph is taken. This causes the iris to close. Unfortunately, the pre-flash is an objectionable 0.2 to 0.6 seconds prior to the flash photograph. This delay is readily discernible and easily within the reaction time of a human subject. Consequently the subject may believe the pre-flash is the actual photograph and be in a less than desirable position at the time of the actual photograph. Alternately, the subject must be informed of the pre-flash, typically loosing any spontaneity of the subject captured in the photograph.
  • [0005]
    Those familiar with the art have developed complex analysis processes operating within a camera prior to invoking a pre-flash. Various conditions are monitored prior to the photograph before the pre-flash is generated, the conditions include the ambient light level and the distance of the subject from the camera. Such a system is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,070,355 to Inoue et al. Although that invention minimizes the occurrences where a pre-flash is used, it does not eliminate the need for a pre-flash. What is needed is a method of eliminating the red-eye phenomenon with a miniature camera having an integral without the distraction of a pre-flash.
  • [0006]
    Digital cameras are becoming more popular and smaller in size. Digital cameras have several advantages over film cameras. Digital cameras eliminate the need for film as the image is digitally captured and stored in a memory array for display on a display screen on the camera itself. This allows photographs to be viewed and enjoyed virtually instantaneously as opposed to waiting for film processing. Furthermore, the digitally captured image may be downloaded to another display device such as a personal computer or color printer for further enhanced viewing. Digital cameras include microprocessors for image processing and compression and camera systems control. Nevertheless, without a pre-flash, both digital and film cameras can capture the red-eye phenomenon as the flash reflects within a subject's eye. Thus, what is needed is a method of eliminating red-eye phenomenon within a miniature digital camera having a flash without the distraction of a pre-flash.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    A portable digital camera having no photographic film includes an integral flash for providing illumination during image acquisition and/or recording, a digital image capturing apparatus for acquiring and/or recording an image, and a red-eye filter. The red eye filter is for modifying an area within the image indicative of a red-eye phenomenon based on an analysis of a subsample representation of selected regions of the image.
  • [0008]
    The analysis may be performed at least in part for determining the area, and/or may be performed at least in part for determining the modifying. The selected regions of the digitized image may include the entire image or one or more regions may be excluded. The selected regions may include multi resolution encoding of the image. The analysis may be performed in part on a full resolution image and in part on a subsample resolution of the digital image.
  • [0009]
    The apparatus may include a module for changing the degree of said subsampling. This changing the degree of the subsampling may be determined empirically, and/or based on a size of the image or selected regions thereof, and/or based on data obtained from the camera relating to the settings of the camera at the time of image capture. In the latter case, the data obtained from the camera may include an aperture setting, focus of the camera, distance of the subject from the camera, or a combination of these. The changing the degree of the subsampling may also be determined based digitized image metadata information and/or a complexity of calculation for the red eye filter.
  • [0010]
    The modifying of the area may be performed including the full resolution of the digital image. The red-eye filter may include multiple sub filters. The subsampling for the sub filters operating on selected regions of the image may be determined by one or more of the image size, suspected as red eye region size, filter computation complexity, empirical success rate of said sub filter, empirical false detection rate of said sub filter, falsing probability of said sub filter, relations between said suspected regions as red eye, results of previous analysis of other said sub filters.
  • [0011]
    The apparatus may include a memory for saving the digitized image after applying the filter for modifying pixels as a modified image, and/or a memory for saving the subsample representation of the image. The subsample representation of selected regions of the image may be determined in hardware. The analysis may be performed in part on the full resolution image and in part on a subsample resolution of the image.
  • [0012]
    The subsample representation may be determined using spline interpolation, and may be determined using bi-cubic interpolation.
  • [0013]
    According to another aspect, a portable digital camera having no photographic film includes an integral flash for providing illumination during image acquisition and/or recording, a digital image capturing apparatus for acquiring and/or recording an image, an image store and a red-eye filter. The image store is for holding a temporary copy of an unprocessed image known as a pre-capture image, a permanent copy of a digitally processed, captured image, and a subsample representation of selected regions of at least one of the images, e.g., the pre-capture image. The red-eye filter is for modifying an area within at least one of the images indicative of a red-eye phenomenon based on an analysis of the subsample representation. Preferably, the at least one of the images includes the digitally processed, captured image. This further aspect may also include one or more features in accordance with the first aspect.
  • [0014]
    In addition, the changing the degree of the subsampling may be determined based on data obtained from the camera relating to image processing analysis of said precapture images. The image processing analysis may be based on histogram data or color correlogram data, or both, obtained from the pre-capture image. The image processing analysis may also be based on global luminance or white balance image data, or both, obtained from the pre-capture image. The image processing analysis may also be based on a face detection analysis of the pre-capture image, or on determining pixel regions with a color characteristic indicative of redeye, or both. The image processing analysis may be performed in hardware. The changing of the degree of the subsampling may be determined based on image metadata information.
  • [0015]
    The red eye filter of a camera in accordance with either aspect may include a pixel locator, a shape analyzer and/or a pixel modifier. The pixel locator is for locating pixels having a color indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The shape analyzer is for determining if a grouping of at least a portion of the pixels located by the pixel locator comprise a shape indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The pixel modifier is for modifying the color of the pixels within the grouping. The camera may further include a falsing analyzer for further processing the image in a vicinity of the grouping for details indicative of an eye, and for enabling the pixel modifier in response thereto. The camera may also include an exposure analyzer for determining if the image was acquired and/or recorded in a condition indicative of the red-eye phenomenon.
  • [0016]
    A method of filtering a red eye phenomenon from an acquired and/or recorded image is also provided in accordance with another aspect, wherein the image includes a multiplicity of pixels indicative of color. The method includes determining whether one or more regions within a subsample representation of the acquired and/or recorded image are suspected as including red eye artifact.
  • [0017]
    The method may include varying a degree of the subsample representation for each region of the one or more regions based on the image, and/or generating a subsample representation based on the image. The subsample representation may be generated or the degree varied, or both, utilizing a hardware-implemented subsampling engine. One or more regions within said subsample representation determined as including red eye artifact may be tested for determining any false redeye groupings.
  • [0018]
    The method may further include associating the one or more regions within the subsample presentation of the image with one or more corresponding regions within the acquired and/or recorded image, and modifying the one or more corresponding regions within the acquired and/or recorded image. The determining may include analyzing meta-data information including image acquisition device-specific information.
  • [0019]
    The method may include analyzing the subsample representation of selected regions of the acquired and/or recorded image, and modifying an area determined to include red eye artifact. The analysis may be performed at least in part for determining said area and/or the modifying. The selected regions of the image may include the entire image or may exclude one or more regions. The selected regions of the image may include multi resolution encoding of the image. The analyzing may be performed in part on a full resolution image and in part on a subsample resolution of the image.
  • [0020]
    The method may include changing the degree of the subsampling. This changing of the degree of subsampling may be determined empirically, and/or based on a size of the image or selected regions thereof.
  • [0021]
    The method may include saving the image after applying the filter for modifying pixels as a modified image, and/or saving the subsample representation of the image. The method may include determining the subsample representation of the image in hardware, and/or using a spline or bi-cubic interpolation.
  • [0022]
    The modifying of the area may be performed including the full resolution of the image. The method may include determining the subsample representation utilizing a plurality of sub-filters. The determining of the plurality of sub-filters may be based on one or more of the image size, a suspected red eye region size, filter computation complexity, empirical success rate of the sub-filter, empirical false detection rate of the sub-filter, falsing probability of the sub-filter, relations between said suspected red eye regions, or results of previous analysis of one or more other sub-filters.
  • [0023]
    The method may further include locating pixels, analyzer pixel shapes and/or modifying pixels, each in accordance with identifying and removing a red eye phenomenon form an acquired and/or recorded digital image. That is, the method may include locating pixels having a color indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The method may further include determining if a grouping of at least a portion of the located pixels comprise a shape indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. The method may further include modifying the color of the pixels within the grouping. The method may further include processing the image in a vicinity of the grouping for details indicative of an eye, and enabling the pixel modifier in response thereto. The method may further include determining if the image was acquired and/or recorded in a condition indicative of the red-eye phenomenon.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0024]
    FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a camera apparatus operating in accordance with the present invention.
  • [0025]
    FIG. 2 shows a pixel grid upon which an image of an eye is focused.
  • [0026]
    FIG. 3 shows pixel coordinates of the pupil of FIG. 2.
  • [0027]
    FIG. 4 shows pixel coordinates of the iris of FIG. 2.
  • [0028]
    FIG. 5 shows pixel coordinates which contain a combination of iris and pupil colors of FIG. 2.
  • [0029]
    FIG. 6 shows pixel coordinates of the white eye area of FIG. 2.
  • [0030]
    FIG. 7 shows pixel coordinates of the eyebrow area of FIG. 2.
  • [0031]
    FIG. 8 shows a flow chart of a method operating in accordance with the present invention.
  • [0032]
    FIG. 9 shows a flow chart for testing if conditions indicate the possibility of a red-eye phenomenon photograph.
  • [0033]
    FIG. 10 shows a flow chart for testing if conditions indicate a false red-eye grouping.
  • [0034]
    FIG. 11 illustrates in block form an exemplary arrangement in accordance with a precapture image utilization aspect.
  • DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • [0035]
    FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a camera apparatus operating in accordance with the present invention. The camera 20 includes an exposure control 30 that, in response to a user input, initiates and controls the digital photographic process. Ambient light is determined using light sensor 40 in order to automatically determine if a flash is to be used. The distance to the subject is determined using focusing means 50 which also focuses the image on image capture means 60. The image capture means digitally records the image in color. The image capture means is known to those familiar with the art and may include a CCD (charge coupled device) to facilitate digital recording. If a flash is to be used, exposure control means 30 causes the flash means 70 to generate a photographic flash in substantial coincidence with the recording of the image by image capture means 60. The flash may be selectively generated either in response to the light sensor 40 or a manual input from the user of the camera. The image recorded by image capture means 60 is stored in image store means 80 which may comprise computer memory such a dynamic random access memory or a nonvolatile memory. The red-eye filter 90 then analyzes the stored image for characteristics of red-eye, and if found, modifies the image and removes the red-eye phenomenon from the photograph as will be describe in more detail. The red-eye filter includes a pixel locator 92 for locating pixels having a color indicative of red-eye; a shape analyzer 94 for determining if a grouping of at least a portion of the pixels located by the pixel locator comprise a shape indicative of red-eye; a pixel modifier 96 for modifying the color of pixels within the grouping; and an falsing analyzer 98 for further processing the image around the grouping for details indicative of an image of an eye. The modified image may be either displayed on image display 100 or downloaded to another display device, such as a personal computer or printer via image output means 110. It can be appreciated that many of the processes implemented in the digital camera may be implemented in or controlled by software operating in a microcomputer (μC) or digital signal processor (DSP) and/or an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC).
  • [0036]
    In a further embodiment the image capture means 60 of FIG. 1 includes an optional image subsampling means, wherein the image is actively down-sampled. In one embodiment, the subsampling is done using a bi-cubic spline algorithm, such as those that are known to one familiar in the art of signal and image processing. Those familiar with this art are aware of subsampling algorithms that interpolate and preserve pixel relationships as best they can given the limitation that less data is available. In other words, the subsampling stage is performed to maintain significant data while minimizing the image size, thus the amount of pixel-wise calculations involved, which are generally costly operations.
  • [0037]
    A subsample representation may include a multi resolution presentation of the image, as well as a representation in which the sampling rate is not constant for the entire image. For example, areas suspected as indicative of red eye may have different resolution, most likely higher resolution, than areas positively determined not to include red eye.
  • [0038]
    In an alternative embodiment, the subsampling means utilizes hardware based subsampling wherein the processing unit of the digital imaging appliance incorporates a dedicated subsampling engine providing the advantage of a very fast execution of a subsampling operation. Such digital imaging appliance with dedicated subsampling engine may be based on a state-of-art digital imaging appliance incorporating hardware that facilitates the rapid generation of image thumbnails.
  • [0039]
    The decision to subsample the image is, in part, dependent on the size of the original image. If the user has selected a low resolution image format, there may be little gain in performance of redeye detection and false avoidance steps. Thus, the inclusion of a subsampling means, or step or operation, is optional.
  • [0040]
    The red eye detection filter of the preferred embodiment may comprise a selection of sub filters that may be calculated in succession or in parallel. In such cases, the sub-filters may operate on only a selected region, or a suspected region. Such regions are substantially smaller than the entire image. The decision to subsample the image is, in part, dependent on one or a combination of a few factors such as the size of the suspected region, the success or failure of previous or parallel filters, the distance between the regions and the complexity of the computation of the sub filter. Many of the parameters involved in deciding whether or not to subsample a region, and to what degree, may also be determined by an empirical process of optimization between success rate, failure rate and computation time.
  • [0041]
    Where the subsampling means, step or operation is implemented, then both the original and subsampled images are preferably stored in the image store 80 of FIG. 1. The subsampled image is now available to be used by the redeye detector 90 and the false avoidance analyzer 98 of FIG. 1.
  • [0042]
    As discussed before, the system and method of the preferred embodiment involves the detection and removal of red eye artifacts. The actual removal of the red eye will eventually be performed on the full resolution image. However, all or portions of the detection of redeye candidate pixel groupings, the subsequent testing of said pixel groupings for determining false redeye groupings, and the initial step of the removal, where the image is presented to the user for user confirmation of the correction, can be performed on the entire image, the subsampled image, or a subset of regions of the entire image or the subsampled image.
  • [0043]
    There is generally a tradeoff between speed and accuracy. Therefore, according to yet another embodiment involving performing all detection on the subsampled image, the detection, and subsequent false-determining, may be performed selectively, e.g., sometimes on full resolution regions that are suspected as red-eye, and sometimes on a subsampled resolution. We remark that the search step 200 of FIG. 8 comprises, in a practical embodiment, a number of successively applied color filters based on iterative refinements of an initial pixel by pixel search of the captured image. In addition to searching for a red color, it is preferably determined whether the luminance, or brightness of a redeye region, lies within a suitable range of values. Further, the local spatial distribution of color and luminance are relevant factors in the initial search for redeye pixel groupings. As each subsequent filter is preferably only applied locally to pixels in close proximity to a grouping of potential redeye pixels, it can equally well be applied to the corresponding region in the full-sized image.
  • [0044]
    Thus, where it is advantageous to the accuracy of a particular color-based filter, it is possible to apply that filter to the full-sized image rather than to the subsampled image. This applies equally to filters which may be employed in the false-determining analyzer 98.
  • [0045]
    Examples of non-color based false-determining analysis filters include those which consider the localized contrast, saturation or texture distributions in the vicinity of a potential redeye pixel grouping, those that perform localized edge or shape detection and more sophisticated filters which statistically combine the results of a number of simple local filters to enhance the accuracy of the resulting false-determining analysis.
  • [0046]
    It is preferred that more computationally expensive filters that operate on larger portions of the images will utilize a subsampled version, while the more sensitive and delicate filters may be applied to the corresponding region of the full resolution image. It is preferred that in the case of full resolution only small portions of the image will be used for such filters.
  • [0047]
    As a non exhaustive example, filters that look for a distinction between lips and eyes may utilize a full resolution portion, while filters that distinguish between background colors may use a subsample of the image. Furthermore, several different sizes of subsampled images may be generated and employed selectively to suit the sensitivity of the different pixel locating and false determining filters.
  • [0048]
    The decision whether the filter should use a subsampled representation, and the rate of the downsampling, may be determined empirically by a-priori statistically comparing the success rate vs. mis-detection rate of a filter with the subsampling rate and technique of known images. It is further worth noting that the empirical determination will often be specific to a particular camera model. Thus, the decision to use the full sized image or the subsampled image data, for a particular pixel locating or false determining filter, may be empirically determined for each camera.
  • [0049]
    In another aspect, a pre-acquisition or precapture image may be effectively utilized in an embodiment of the invention. Another type of subsampled representation of the image may be one that differs temporally from the captured image, in addition or alternative to the spatial differentiation with other aforementioned algorithms such as spline and bi-cubic. The subsample representation of the image may be an image captured before the final image is captured, and preferably just before. A camera may provide a digital preview of the image, which may be a continuous subsample version of the image. Such pre-capture may be used by the camera and the camera user, for example, to establish correct exposure, focus and/or composition.
  • [0050]
    The precapture image process may involve an additional step of conversion from the sensor domain, also referred to as raw-ccd, to a known color space that the red eye filter is using for calculations. In the case that the preview or precapture image is being used, an additional step of alignment may be used in the case that the final image and the pre-capture differ, such as in camera or object movement.
  • [0051]
    The pre-acquisition image may be normally processed directly from an image sensor without loading it into camera memory. To facilitate this processing, a dedicated hardware subsystem is implemented to perform pre-acquisition image processing. Depending on the settings of this hardware subsystem, the pre-acquisition image processing may satisfy some predetermined criteria which then implements the loading of raw image data from the buffer of the imaging sensor into the main system memory together with report data, possibly stored as metadata, on the predetermined criteria. One example of such a test criterion is the existence of red areas within the pre-acquisition image prior to the activation of the camera flash module. Report data on such red areas can be passed to the redeye filter to eliminate such areas from the redeye detection process. Note that where the test criteria applied by the pre-acquisition image processing module are not met then it can loop to obtain a new pre-acquisition test image from the imaging sensor. This looping may continue until either the test criteria are satisfied or a system time-out occurs. Note further that the pre-acquisition image processing step is significantly faster than the subsequent image processing chain of operations due to the taking of image data directly from the sensor buffers and the dedicated hardware subsystem used to process this data.
  • [0052]
    Once the test criteria are satisfied, the raw image data may be then properly loaded into main system memory to allow image processing operations to convert the raw sensor data into a final pixelated image. Typical steps may include converting Bayer or RGGB image data to YCC or RGB pixelated image data, calculation and adjustment of image white balance, calculation and adjustment of image color range, and calculation and adjustment of image luminance, potentially among others.
  • [0053]
    Following the application of this image processing chain, the final, full-size image may be available in system memory, and may then be copied to the image store for further processing by the redeye filter subsystem. A camera may incorporate dedicated hardware to do global luminance and/or color/grayscale histogram calculations on the raw and/or final image data. One or more windows within the image may be selected for doing “local” calculations, for example. Thus, valuable data may be obtained using a first pass” or pre-acquisition image before committing to a main image processing approach which generates a more final picture.
  • [0054]
    A subsampled image, in addition to the precapture and more finalized images, may be generated in parallel with the final image by a main image processing toolchain. Such processing may be preferably performed within the image capture module 60 of FIG. 1. An exemplary process may include the following operations. First, a raw image may be acquired or pre-captured. This raw image may be processed prior to storage. This processing may generate some report data based on some predetermined test criteria. If the criteria are not met, the pre-acquisition image processing operation may obtain a second, and perhaps one or more additional, pre-acquisition images from the imaging sensor buffer until such test criteria are satisfied.
  • [0055]
    Once the test criteria are satisfied, a full-sized raw image may be loaded into system memory and the full image processing chain may be applied to the image. A final image and a subsample image may then ultimately preferably be generated.
  • [0056]
    FIG. 11 illustrates in block form a further exemplary arrangement in accordance with a precapture image utilization aspect. After the pre-acquisition test phase, the “raw” image is loaded from the sensor into the image capture module. After converting the image from its raw format (e.g., Bayer RGGB) into a more standardized pixel format such as YCC or RGB, it may be then subject to a post-capture image processing chain which eventually generates a full-sized final image and one or more subsampled copies of the original. These may be preferably passed to the image store, and the red-eye filter is preferably then applied. Note that the image capture and image store functional blocks of FIG. 11 correspond to blocks 60 and 80 illustrated at FIG. 1.
  • [0057]
    FIG. 2 shows a pixel grid upon which an image of an eye is focused. Preferably the digital camera records an image comprising a grid of pixels at least 640 by 480. FIG. 2 shows a 24 by 12 pixel portion of the larger grid labeled columns A-X and rows 1-12 respectively.
  • [0058]
    FIG. 3 shows pixel coordinates of the pupil of FIG. 2. The pupil is the darkened circular portion and substantially includes seventeen pixels: K7, K8, L6, L7, L8, L9, M5, M6, M7, M8, M9, N6, N7, N8, N9, O7 and O8, as indicated by shaded squares at the aforementioned coordinates. In a non-flash photograph, these pupil pixels would be substantially black in color. In a red-eye photograph, these pixels would be substantially red in color. It should be noted that the aforementioned pupil pixels have a shape indicative of the pupil of the subject, the shape preferably being a substantially circular, semi-circular or oval grouping of pixels. Locating a group of substantially red pixels forming a substantially circular or oval area is useful by the red-eye filter.
  • [0059]
    FIG. 4 shows pixel coordinates of the iris of FIG. 2. The iris pixels are substantially adjacent to the pupil pixels of FIG. 2. Iris pixels J5, J6, J7, J8, J9, K5, K10, L10, M10, N10, O5, O10, P5, P6, P7, P8 and P9 are indicated by shaded squares at the aforementioned coordinates. The iris pixels substantially surround the pupil pixels and may be used as further indicia of a pupil. In a typical subject, the iris pixels will have a substantially constant color. However, the color will vary as the natural color of the eyes each individual subject varies. The existence of iris pixels depends upon the size of the iris at the time of the photograph, if the pupil is very large then iris pixels may not be present.
  • [0060]
    FIG. 5 shows pixel coordinates which include a combination of iris and pupil colors of FIG. 2. The pupil/iris pixels are located at K6, K9, L5, N5, O6, and O9, as indicated by shaded squares at the aforementioned coordinates. The pupil/iris pixels are adjacent to the pupil pixels, and also adjacent to any iris pixels which may be present. Pupil/iris pixels may also contain colors of other areas of the subject's eyes including skin tones and white areas of the eye.
  • [0061]
    FIG. 6 shows pixel coordinates of the white eye area of FIG. 2. The seventy one pixels are indicated by the shaded squares of FIG. 6 and are substantially white in color and are in the vicinity of and substantially surround the pupil pixels of FIG. 2.
  • [0062]
    FIG. 7 shows pixel coordinates of the eyebrow area of FIG. 2. The pixels are indicated by the shaded squares of FIG. 7 and are substantially white in color. The eyebrow pixels substantially form a continuous line in the vicinity of the pupil pixels. The color of the line will vary as the natural color of the eyebrow of each individual subject varies. Furthermore, some subjects may have no visible eyebrow at all.
  • [0063]
    It should be appreciated that the representations of FIG. 2 through FIG. 7 are particular to the example shown. The coordinates of pixels and actual number of pixels comprising the image of an eye will vary depending upon a number of variables. These variables include the location of the subject within the photograph, the distance between the subject and the camera, and the pixel density of the camera.
  • [0064]
    The red-eye filter 90 of FIG. 1 searches the digitally stored image for pixels having a substantially red color, then determines if the grouping has a round or oval characteristics, similar to the pixels of FIG. 3. If found, the color of the grouping is modified. In the preferred embodiment, the color is modified to black.
  • [0065]
    Searching for a circular or oval grouping helps eliminate falsely modifying red pixels which are not due to the red-eye phenomenon. In the example of FIG. 2, the red-eye phenomenon is found in a 5.times.5 grouping of pixels of FIG. 3. In other examples, the grouping may contain substantially more or less pixels depending upon the actual number of pixels comprising the image of an eye, but the color and shape of the grouping will be similar. Thus for example, a long line of red pixels will not be falsely modified because the shape is not substantially round or oval.
  • [0066]
    Additional tests may be used to avoid falsely modifying a round group of pixels having a color indicative of the red-eye phenomenon by further analysis of the pixels in the vicinity of the grouping. For example, in a red-eye phenomenon photograph, there will typically be no other pixels within the vicinity of a radius originating at the grouping having a similar red color because the pupil is surrounded by components of the subject's face, and the red-eye color is not normally found as a natural color on the face of the subject. Preferably the radius is large enough to analyze enough pixels to avoid falsing, yet small enough to exclude the other eye of the subject, which may also have the red-eye phenomenon. Preferably, the radius includes a range between two and five times the radius of the grouping. Other indicia of the recording may be used to validate the existence of red-eye including identification of iris pixels of FIG. 4 which surround the pupil pixels. The iris pixels will have a substantially common color, but the size and color of the iris will vary from subject to subject. Furthermore, the white area of the eye may be identified as a grouping of substantially white pixels in the vicinity of and substantially surrounding the pupil pixels as shown in FIG. 6. However, the location of the pupil within the opening of the eyelids is variable depending upon the orientation of the head of the subject at the time of the photograph. Consequently, identification of a number of substantially white pixels in the vicinity of the iris without a requirement of surrounding the grouping will further validate the identification of the red-eye phenomenon and prevent false modification of other red pixel groupings. The number of substantially white pixels is preferably between two and twenty times the number of pixels in the pupil grouping. As a further validation, the eyebrow pixels of FIG. 7 can be identified.
  • [0067]
    Further, additional criterion can be used to avoid falsely modifying a grouping of red pixels. The criterion include determining if the photographic conditions were indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. These include conditions known in the art including use of a flash, ambient light levels and distance of the subject. If the conditions indicate the red-eye phenomenon is not present, then red-eye filter 90 is not engaged.
  • [0068]
    FIG. 5 shows combination pupil/iris pixels which have color components of the red-eye phenomenon combined with color components of the iris or even the white area of the eye. The invention modifies these pixels by separating the color components associated with red-eye, modifying color of the separated color components and then adding back modified color to the pixel. Preferably the modified color is black. The result of modifying the red component with a black component makes for a more natural looking result. For example, if the iris is substantially green, a pupil/iris pixel will have components of red and green. The red-eye filter removes the red component and substitutes a black component, effectively resulting in a dark green pixel.
  • [0069]
    FIG. 8 shows a flow chart of a method operating in accordance with the present invention. The red-eye filter process is in addition to other processes known to those skilled in the art which operate within the camera. These other processes include flash control, focus, and image recording, storage and display. The red-eye filter process preferably operates within software within a .mu.C or DSP and processes an image stored in image store 80. The red-eye filter process is entered at step 200. At step 210 conditions are checked for the possibility of the red-eye phenomenon. These conditions are included in signals from exposure control means 30 which are communicated directly to the red-eye filter. Alternatively the exposure control means may store the signals along with the digital image in image store 80. If conditions do not indicate the possibility of red-eye at step 210, then the process exits at step 215. Step 210 is further detailed in FIG. 9, and is an optional step which may be bypassed in an alternate embodiment. Then is step 220 the digital image is searched of pixels having a color indicative of red-eye. The grouping of the red-eye pixels are then analyzed at step 230. Red-eye is determined if the shape of a grouping is indicative of the red-eye phenomenon. This step also accounts for multiple red-eye groupings in response to a subject having two red-eyes, or multiple subjects having red-eyes. If no groupings indicative of red-eye are found, then the process exits at step 215. Otherwise, false red-eye groupings are checked at optional step 240. Step 240 is further detailed in FIG. 10 and prevents the red-eye filter from falsely modifying red pixel groupings which do not have further indicia of the eye of a subject. After eliminating false groupings, if no grouping remain, the process exits at step 215. Otherwise step 250 modifies the color of the groupings which pass step 240, preferably substituting the color red for the color black within the grouping. Then in optional step 260, the pixels surrounding a red-eye grouping are analyzed for a red component. These are equivalent to the pixels of FIG. 5. The red component is substituted for black by the red-eye filter. The process then exits at step 215.
  • [0070]
    It should be appreciated that the pixel color modification can be stored directly in the image store by replacing red-eye pixels with pixels modified by the red-eye filter. Alternately the modified pixels can be stored as an overlay in the image store, thereby preserving the recorded image and only modifying the image when displayed in image display 100. Preferably the filtered image is communicated through image output means 110. Alternately the unfiltered image with the overlay may be communicated through image output means 110 to a external device such as a personal computer capable of processing such information.
  • [0071]
    FIG. 9 shows a flow chart for testing if conditions indicate the possibility of a red-eye phenomenon corresponding to step 210 of FIG. 8. Entered at step 300, step 310 checks if a flash was used in the photograph. If not, step 315 indicates that red-eye is not possible. Otherwise optional step 320 checks if a low level of ambient light was present at the time of the photograph. If not, step 315 indicates that red-eye is not possible. Otherwise optional step 330 checks if the subject is relatively close to the camera at the time of the photograph. If not, step 215 indicates that red-eye is not possible. Otherwise step 340 indicates that red-eye is possible.
  • [0072]
    FIG. 10 shows a flow chart for testing if conditions indicate a false red-eye grouping corresponding to step 240 of FIG. 8. Entered at step 400, step 410 checks if other red-eye pixels are found within a radius of a grouping. Preferably the radius is between two and five times the radius of the grouping. If found step 415 indicates a false red-eye grouping. Otherwise step 420 checks if a substantially white area of pixels is found in the vicinity of the grouping. This area is indicative of the white area of a subject's eye and has preferably between two and twenty times the number of pixels in the grouping. If not found step 415 indicates a false red-eye grouping. Otherwise step 430 searches the vicinity of the grouping for an iris ring or an eyebrow line. If not found, step 415 indicates a false red-eye grouping. Otherwise step 440 indicates the red-eye grouping is not false. It should be appreciated that each of the tests 410, 420 and 430 check for a false red-eye grouping. In alternate embodiments, other tests may be used to prevent false modification of the image, or the tests of FIG. 10 may be used either alone or in combination.
  • [0073]
    It should be further appreciated that either the red-eye condition test 210 or the red-eye falsing test 240 of FIG. 8 may be used to achieve satisfactory results. In an alternate embodiment test 240 may be acceptable enough to eliminate test 210, or visa versa. Alternately the selectivity of either the color and/or grouping analysis of the red-eye phenomenon may be sufficient to eliminate both tests 210 and 240 of FIG. 8. Furthermore, the color red as used herein means the range of colors and hues and brightnesses indicative of the red-eye phenomenon, and the color white as used herein means the range of colors and hues and brightnesses indicative of the white area of the human eye.
  • [0074]
    Thus, what has been provided is an improved method and apparatus for eliminating red-eye phenomenon within a miniature digital camera having a flash without the distraction of a pre-flash.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5016107 *May 9, 1989May 14, 1991Eastman Kodak CompanyElectronic still camera utilizing image compression and digital storage
US5130789 *Dec 13, 1989Jul 14, 1992Eastman Kodak CompanyLocalized image recoloring using ellipsoid boundary function
US5202720 *Jan 31, 1990Apr 13, 1993Minolta Camera Kabushiki KaishaPhotographic camera with flash unit
US5748764 *Apr 3, 1995May 5, 1998Eastman Kodak CompanyAutomated detection and correction of eye color defects due to flash illumination
US5751836 *Sep 27, 1996May 12, 1998David Sarnoff Research Center Inc.Automated, non-invasive iris recognition system and method
US5761550 *Feb 20, 1997Jun 2, 1998Kancigor; BarryTelescoping flash unit for a camera
US5862217 *Mar 28, 1996Jan 19, 1999Fotonation, Inc.Method and apparatus for in-camera encryption
US5862218 *Apr 4, 1996Jan 19, 1999Fotonation, Inc.Method and apparatus for in-camera image marking and authentication
US6016354 *Oct 23, 1997Jan 18, 2000Hewlett-Packard CompanyApparatus and a method for reducing red-eye in a digital image
US6035072 *Dec 8, 1997Mar 7, 2000Read; Robert LeeMapping defects or dirt dynamically affecting an image acquisition device
US6172706 *Apr 5, 1996Jan 9, 2001Canon Kabushiki KaishaVideo camera with automatic zoom adjustment based on distance between user's eyes
US6204858 *May 30, 1997Mar 20, 2001Adobe Systems IncorporatedSystem and method for adjusting color data of pixels in a digital image
US6252976 *May 26, 1998Jun 26, 2001Eastman Kodak CompanyComputer program product for redeye detection
US6407777 *Oct 9, 1997Jun 18, 2002Deluca Michael JosephRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US6505003 *Oct 12, 2001Jan 7, 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyHybrid cameras that revise stored electronic image metadata at film unit removal and methods
US6510520 *Jun 26, 1998Jan 21, 2003Fotonation, Inc.Secure storage device for transfer of digital camera data
US6516154 *Jul 17, 2001Feb 4, 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyImage revising camera and method
US6700614 *Sep 24, 1999Mar 2, 2004Ricoh Company, Ltd.Autofocus apparatus
US6718051 *Oct 16, 2000Apr 6, 2004Xerox CorporationRed-eye detection method
US6724941 *Sep 30, 1999Apr 20, 2004Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processing method, image processing device, and recording medium
US6728401 *Aug 17, 2000Apr 27, 2004Viewahead TechnologyRed-eye removal using color image processing
US6873743 *Mar 29, 2002Mar 29, 2005Fotonation Holdings, LlcMethod and apparatus for the automatic real-time detection and correction of red-eye defects in batches of digital images or in handheld appliances
US6885766 *Jan 30, 2002Apr 26, 2005Imaging Solutions AgAutomatic color defect correction
US6895112 *Feb 13, 2001May 17, 2005Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US6900882 *Dec 4, 2001May 31, 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Print processing method, printing order receiving machine and print processing device
US6912298 *Aug 11, 2003Jun 28, 2005Adobe Systems IncorporationObject detection using dynamic probability scans
US6984039 *Dec 1, 2003Jan 10, 2006Eastman Kodak CompanyLaser projector having silhouette blanking for objects in the output light path
US7030927 *Mar 6, 2002Apr 18, 2006Fujinon CorporationApparatus for detecting focusing status of taking lens
US7035461 *Aug 22, 2002Apr 25, 2006Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod for detecting objects in digital images
US7042501 *Dec 11, 1998May 9, 2006Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processing apparatus
US7042505 *Jun 12, 2002May 9, 2006Fotonation Ireland Ltd.Red-eye filter method and apparatus
US7062086 *Oct 25, 2004Jun 13, 2006Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US7171044 *Oct 8, 2004Jan 30, 2007Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US7352394 *Feb 4, 2004Apr 1, 2008Fotonation Vision LimitedImage modification based on red-eye filter analysis
US20020041329 *May 17, 1999Apr 11, 2002Eran SteinbergIn camera messaging and advertisement system
US20030007687 *Jul 5, 2001Jan 9, 2003Jasc Software, Inc.Correction of "red-eye" effects in images
US20030021478 *Jul 23, 2002Jan 30, 2003Minolta Co., Ltd.Image processing technology for identification of red eyes in image
US20030025811 *Aug 9, 2002Feb 6, 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyCustomizing a digital camera based on demographic factors
US20030044063 *Jul 9, 2002Mar 6, 2003Guenter MeckesMethod for processing digital photographic image data that includes a method for the automatic detection of red-eye defects
US20030044070 *Jul 9, 2002Mar 6, 2003Manfred FuersichMethod for the automatic detection of red-eye defects in photographic image data
US20030044177 *Jul 9, 2002Mar 6, 2003Knut OberhardtMethod for the automatic detection of red-eye defects in photographic image data
US20030044178 *Jul 9, 2002Mar 6, 2003Knut OberhardtMethod for the automatic detection of red-eye defects in photographic image data
US20030058349 *Sep 23, 2002Mar 27, 2003Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Method, apparatus, and program for image processing
US20030095197 *Sep 20, 2001May 22, 2003Eastman Kodak CompanySystem and method for deciding when to correct image-specific defects based on camera, scene, display and demographic data
US20030113035 *Dec 19, 2001Jun 19, 2003Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod and system for compositing images to produce a cropped image
US20030118216 *Feb 6, 2003Jun 26, 2003Goldberg David A.Obtaining person-specific images in a public venue
US20040017481 *Apr 8, 2003Jan 29, 2004Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Digital camera, image pickup method, and image format conversion method
US20040027593 *Oct 12, 2001Feb 12, 2004David WilkinsTechniques for resolution independent rendering of images
US20040032512 *Aug 8, 2003Feb 19, 2004Kia SilverbrookCorrection of distortions in digital images
US20040032526 *Aug 8, 2003Feb 19, 2004Silverbrook Research Pty LtdMethod of processing digital image to correct for flash effects
US20040033071 *Aug 1, 2003Feb 19, 2004Naoki KuboElectronic flash device and camera having the same
US20040037460 *Aug 22, 2002Feb 26, 2004Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod for detecting objects in digital images
US20040046878 *Jul 31, 2002Mar 11, 2004Nick JarmanImage processing to remove red-eyed features
US20040056975 *Sep 22, 2003Mar 25, 2004Daisuke HataAutofocus apparatus
US20040057715 *May 30, 2003Mar 25, 2004Olympus Optical Co., Ltd.Strobe light emitting apparatus and camera
US20040090461 *Oct 31, 2003May 13, 2004Adams Guy De Warrenne BruceInterface devices
US20040093432 *Nov 7, 2002May 13, 2004Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod and system for conducting image processing from a mobile client device
US20040114796 *Dec 10, 2003Jun 17, 2004Toshihiko KakuImage correction apparatus and image pickup apparatus
US20040114797 *Oct 22, 2003Jun 17, 2004Guenter MeckesMethod for automatic determination of color-density correction values for the reproduction of digital image data
US20040114829 *Oct 10, 2003Jun 17, 2004Intelligent System Solutions Corp.Method and system for detecting and correcting defects in a digital image
US20040114904 *Dec 11, 2002Jun 17, 2004Zhaohui SunSystem and method to compose a slide show
US20040119851 *Dec 10, 2003Jun 24, 2004Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Face recognition method, face recognition apparatus, face extraction method, and image pickup apparatus
US20050001024 *Dec 3, 2002Jan 6, 2005Yosuke KusakaElectronic apparatus, electronic camera, electronic device, image display apparatus, and image transmission system
US20050013602 *Jul 16, 2004Jan 20, 2005Pentax CorporationDigital camera having red-eye reduction bracket photographing mode
US20050013603 *Jul 13, 2004Jan 20, 2005Shoji IchimasaImage sensing apparatus, image processing apparatus, and control method therefor
US20050024498 *Jul 27, 2004Feb 3, 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processor and image processing system
US20050031224 *Aug 5, 2003Feb 10, 2005Yury PrilutskyDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US20050041121 *Aug 16, 2004Feb 24, 2005Eran SteinbergRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US20050046730 *Aug 24, 2004Mar 3, 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Digital camera
US20050047655 *Aug 29, 2003Mar 3, 2005Huitao LuoDetecting and correcting redeye in an image
US20050047656 *Aug 29, 2003Mar 3, 2005Huitao LuoSystems and methods of detecting and correcting redeye in an image suitable for embedded applications
US20050053279 *Oct 25, 2004Mar 10, 2005Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US20050058340 *Oct 4, 2004Mar 17, 2005Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US20050058342 *Oct 8, 2004Mar 17, 2005Microsoft CorporationRed-eye detection based on red region detection with eye confirmation
US20050062856 *Sep 17, 2004Mar 24, 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Camera equipped with red-eye correction feature
US20050063083 *Oct 24, 2003Mar 24, 2005Dart Scott E.Systems and methods for the implementation of a digital images schema for organizing units of information manageable by a hardware/software interface system
US20050074164 *Sep 17, 2004Apr 7, 2005Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image processing apparatus and method, red-eye detection method, as well as programs for executing the image processing method and the red-eye detection method
US20050078191 *Oct 14, 2003Apr 14, 2005Hewlett-Packard Development Company LpSystem and method to allow undoing of certain digital image modifications
US20050117132 *Dec 1, 2003Jun 2, 2005Eastman Kodak CompanyLaser projector having silhouette blanking for objects in the output light path
US20050124719 *Dec 5, 2003Jun 9, 2005Yu-Chin LaiSurface modification of contact lenses
US20050129331 *Nov 4, 2004Jun 16, 2005Omron CorporationPupil color estimating device
US20050140801 *Feb 4, 2004Jun 30, 2005Yury PrilutskyOptimized performance and performance for red-eye filter method and apparatus
US20060008171 *Jul 6, 2004Jan 12, 2006Microsoft CorporationDigital photography with flash/no flash extension
US20060039690 *Aug 30, 2005Feb 23, 2006Eran SteinbergForeground/background segmentation in digital images with differential exposure calculations
US20060045352 *Sep 1, 2004Mar 2, 2006Eastman Kodak CompanyDetermining the age of a human subject in a digital image
US20060050300 *Aug 16, 2005Mar 9, 2006Canon Kabushiki KaishaInformation processing apparatus and method for managing order data of on-line orders, program for the same
US20060066628 *Sep 30, 2004Mar 30, 2006Microsoft CorporationSystem and method for controlling dynamically interactive parameters for image processing
US20060082847 *Oct 13, 2005Apr 20, 2006Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image correction apparatus and method of controlling same
US20060093212 *Oct 28, 2004May 4, 2006Eran SteinbergMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection in an acquired digital image
US20060093213 *May 6, 2005May 4, 2006Eran SteinbergMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection in an acquired digital image based on image quality pre and post filtering
US20060093238 *Jul 15, 2005May 4, 2006Eran SteinbergMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection in an acquired digital image using face recognition
US20060098867 *Nov 10, 2004May 11, 2006Eastman Kodak CompanyDetecting irises and pupils in images of humans
US20060098875 *Nov 4, 2005May 11, 2006Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.Image search apparatus for images to be detected, and method of controlling same
US20060119832 *Jan 24, 2006Jun 8, 2006Takayuki IidaPrint processing method, printing order receiving machine and print processing device
US20060120599 *Sep 21, 2005Jun 8, 2006Eran SteinbergMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection in an acquired digital image
US20070116379 *Nov 18, 2005May 24, 2007Peter CorcoranTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US20070133863 *Oct 10, 2006Jun 14, 2007Hitachi, Ltd.Image Alignment Method, Comparative Inspection Method, and Comparative Inspection Device for Comparative Inspections
US20080002060 *Jun 27, 2007Jan 3, 2008Fotonation Vision LimitedOptimized Performance and Performance for Red-Eye Filter Method and Apparatus
US20080043121 *Jul 2, 2007Feb 21, 2008Fotonation Vision LimitedOptimized Performance and Performance for Red-Eye Filter Method and Apparatus
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7684630Mar 23, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image adjustable compression and resolution using face detection information
US7689009Mar 30, 2010Fotonation Vision Ltd.Two stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US7693311Apr 6, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedPerfecting the effect of flash within an image acquisition devices using face detection
US7702136Jul 5, 2007Apr 20, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedPerfecting the effect of flash within an image acquisition devices using face detection
US7738015Aug 16, 2004Jun 15, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US7746385Jun 29, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US7787022May 13, 2008Aug 31, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US7804531Sep 28, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US7809162Oct 30, 2008Oct 5, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US7844076Nov 30, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image processing using face detection and skin tone information
US7844135Nov 30, 2010Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedDetecting orientation of digital images using face detection information
US7847839Aug 7, 2008Dec 7, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US7847840Dec 7, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US7848549Dec 7, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US7852384Dec 14, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US7853043Dec 14, 2009Dec 14, 2010Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US7860274Oct 30, 2008Dec 28, 2010Fotonation Vision LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US7864990Dec 11, 2008Jan 4, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedReal-time face tracking in a digital image acquisition device
US7865036Sep 14, 2009Jan 4, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedMethod and apparatus of correcting hybrid flash artifacts in digital images
US7869628Jan 11, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US7912245Mar 22, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedMethod of improving orientation and color balance of digital images using face detection information
US7916190Mar 29, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US7916897Jun 5, 2009Mar 29, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedFace tracking for controlling imaging parameters
US7920723Aug 2, 2006Apr 5, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US7953251Nov 16, 2010May 31, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedMethod and apparatus for detection and correction of flash-induced eye defects within digital images using preview or other reference images
US7953252Nov 22, 2010May 31, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US7962629Sep 6, 2010Jun 14, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedMethod for establishing a paired connection between media devices
US7965875Jun 12, 2007Jun 21, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedAdvances in extending the AAM techniques from grayscale to color images
US7970182Jun 28, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US7970183Nov 22, 2010Jun 28, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US7970184Nov 22, 2010Jun 28, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US7995804Aug 9, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedRed eye false positive filtering using face location and orientation
US8000526Aug 16, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedDetecting redeye defects in digital images
US8005265Sep 8, 2008Aug 23, 2011Tessera Technologies Ireland LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US8036458Nov 8, 2007Oct 11, 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDetecting redeye defects in digital images
US8036460Oct 11, 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAnalyzing partial face regions for red-eye detection in acquired digital images
US8050465Nov 1, 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedReal-time face tracking in a digital image acquisition device
US8055029Jun 18, 2007Nov 8, 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedReal-time face tracking in a digital image acquisition device
US8055067Jan 18, 2007Nov 8, 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedColor segmentation
US8055090Sep 14, 2010Nov 8, 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US8081254Dec 20, 2011DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedIn-camera based method of detecting defect eye with high accuracy
US8126208Dec 3, 2010Feb 28, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US8126217Apr 3, 2011Feb 28, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US8126218May 30, 2011Feb 28, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US8131016Dec 3, 2010Mar 6, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US8131021Apr 4, 2011Mar 6, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US8135184May 23, 2011Mar 13, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod and apparatus for detection and correction of multiple image defects within digital images using preview or other reference images
US8155397Sep 26, 2007Apr 10, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace tracking in a camera processor
US8160308Apr 17, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US8170294May 1, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod of detecting redeye in a digital image
US8175342Apr 3, 2011May 8, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US8180115May 15, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedTwo stage detection for photographic eye artifacts
US8184900Aug 20, 2007May 22, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAutomatic detection and correction of non-red eye flash defects
US8203621Jun 14, 2010Jun 19, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedRed-eye filter method and apparatus
US8212864Jan 29, 2009Jul 3, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethods and apparatuses for using image acquisition data to detect and correct image defects
US8213737Jun 20, 2008Jul 3, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image enhancement with reference images
US8224108Dec 4, 2010Jul 17, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US8233674May 23, 2011Jul 31, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedRed eye false positive filtering using face location and orientation
US8264575Sep 11, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedRed eye filter method and apparatus
US8265388Sep 11, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAnalyzing partial face regions for red-eye detection in acquired digital images
US8270674Jan 3, 2011Sep 18, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedReal-time face tracking in a digital image acquisition device
US8320641Nov 27, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection using preview or other reference images
US8326066Mar 8, 2010Dec 4, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image adjustable compression and resolution using face detection information
US8330831Dec 11, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod of gathering visual meta data using a reference image
US8335355Apr 21, 2010Dec 18, 2012DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedMethod and component for image recognition
US8345114Jan 1, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAutomatic face and skin beautification using face detection
US8379917Feb 19, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace recognition performance using additional image features
US8384793Jul 30, 2009Feb 26, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedAutomatic face and skin beautification using face detection
US8385610Jun 11, 2010Feb 26, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace tracking for controlling imaging parameters
US8498452Aug 26, 2008Jul 30, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US8503800Feb 27, 2008Aug 6, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedIllumination detection using classifier chains
US8503818Sep 25, 2007Aug 6, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedEye defect detection in international standards organization images
US8509496Nov 16, 2009Aug 13, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedReal-time face tracking with reference images
US8520093Aug 31, 2009Aug 27, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace tracker and partial face tracker for red-eye filter method and apparatus
US8593542Jun 17, 2008Nov 26, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedForeground/background separation using reference images
US8675991Jun 2, 2006Mar 18, 2014DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedModification of post-viewing parameters for digital images using region or feature information
US8682097Jun 16, 2008Mar 25, 2014DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDigital image enhancement with reference images
US8692867Dec 2, 2010Apr 8, 2014DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedObject detection and rendering for wide field of view (WFOV) image acquisition systems
US8723959Apr 2, 2011May 13, 2014DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedFace and other object tracking in off-center peripheral regions for nonlinear lens geometries
US8860816Mar 31, 2011Oct 14, 2014Fotonation LimitedScene enhancements in off-center peripheral regions for nonlinear lens geometries
US8872887Dec 2, 2010Oct 28, 2014Fotonation LimitedObject detection and rendering for wide field of view (WFOV) image acquisition systems
US8896703Apr 11, 2011Nov 25, 2014Fotonation LimitedSuperresolution enhancment of peripheral regions in nonlinear lens geometries
US8896725Jun 17, 2008Nov 25, 2014Fotonation LimitedImage capture device with contemporaneous reference image capture mechanism
US8947501Mar 31, 2011Feb 3, 2015Fotonation LimitedScene enhancements in off-center peripheral regions for nonlinear lens geometries
US8948468Jun 26, 2003Feb 3, 2015Fotonation LimitedModification of viewing parameters for digital images using face detection information
US8957993 *Mar 6, 2013Feb 17, 2015FotoNationDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US8982180Apr 2, 2011Mar 17, 2015Fotonation LimitedFace and other object detection and tracking in off-center peripheral regions for nonlinear lens geometries
US8989453Aug 26, 2008Mar 24, 2015Fotonation LimitedDigital image processing using face detection information
US9007480Jul 30, 2009Apr 14, 2015Fotonation LimitedAutomatic face and skin beautification using face detection
US9025054 *Feb 19, 2013May 5, 2015Fotonation LimitedDetecting red eye filter and apparatus using meta-data
US9053545Mar 19, 2007Jun 9, 2015Fotonation LimitedModification of viewing parameters for digital images using face detection information
US9129381Jun 17, 2008Sep 8, 2015Fotonation LimitedModification of post-viewing parameters for digital images using image region or feature information
US20080043121 *Jul 2, 2007Feb 21, 2008Fotonation Vision LimitedOptimized Performance and Performance for Red-Eye Filter Method and Apparatus
US20080317339 *Jun 19, 2008Dec 25, 2008Fotonation Ireland LimitedMethod and apparatus for red-eye detection using preview or other reference images
US20090232402 *Mar 11, 2009Sep 17, 2009Seiko Epson CorporationImage Processing Apparatus, Image Processing Method, and Computer Program for Image Processing
US20130162869 *Feb 19, 2013Jun 27, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDetecting Red Eye Filter and Apparatus Using Meta-Data
US20130188077 *Mar 6, 2013Jul 25, 2013DigitalOptics Corporation Europe LimitedDetecting Red Eye Filter and Apparatus Using Meta-Data
Classifications
U.S. Classification348/222.1, 348/E05.038, 348/E05.031
International ClassificationH04N5/217, H04N5/235, H04N1/62, G06T5/50, G06T7/00, G06T7/40, H04N5/228, G06K9/00, G06T5/00
Cooperative ClassificationG06K9/0061, H04N1/62, G06T5/005, G06T7/408, G06T2207/30216, H04N1/624, H04N5/2354
European ClassificationH04N1/62C, G06K9/00S2, H04N1/62, H04N5/235L, G06T5/00D, G06T7/40C
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Mar 19, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: FOTONATION IRELAND LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DELUCA, MICHAEL J.;PRILUTSKY, YURY;STEINBERG, ERAN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:020672/0111;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040615 TO 20040624
Mar 25, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: FOTONATION VISION LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FOTONATION IRELAND LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:020700/0122
Effective date: 20041227
Oct 10, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: TESSERA TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FOTONATION VISION LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:025117/0780
Effective date: 20101001
Oct 30, 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGITALOPTICS CORPORATION EUROPE LIMITED, IRELAND
Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:TESSERA TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:027144/0293
Effective date: 20110713