US20080212657A1 - Iterative detection and decoding for a mimo-ofdm system - Google Patents
Iterative detection and decoding for a mimo-ofdm system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080212657A1 US20080212657A1 US12/119,253 US11925308A US2008212657A1 US 20080212657 A1 US20080212657 A1 US 20080212657A1 US 11925308 A US11925308 A US 11925308A US 2008212657 A1 US2008212657 A1 US 2008212657A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- transmitter
- modulation
- priori information
- decoding
- information
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 52
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 55
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 53
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 abstract description 26
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 6
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 40
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 20
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 16
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 16
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000005562 fading Methods 0.000 description 12
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 11
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001143 conditioned effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002123 temporal effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002939 deleterious effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 241000404883 Pisa Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006185 dispersion Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003116 impacting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000135 prohibitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- IHVWIQJPVBMYOH-UHFFFAOYSA-N s-random Chemical compound O=C1NC(=O)C(C)=CN1C(OC1COP(O)(O)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C(NC(=O)C(C)=C2)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C(N=C(N)C=C2)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C(NC(=O)C(C)=C2)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C(NC(=O)C(C)=C2)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C(NC(=O)C(C)=C2)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C(N=C(N)C=C2)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C(N=C(N)C=C2)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C3=NC=NC(N)=C3N=C2)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C(NC(=O)C(C)=C2)=O)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC1OC(N2C3=NC=NC(N)=C3N=C2)CC1OP(O)(=S)OCC(C(C1)OP(O)(=S)OCC2C(CC(O2)N2C(NC(=O)C(C)=C2)=O)OP(O)(=S)OCC2C(CC(O2)N2C3=C(C(NC(N)=N3)=O)N=C2)OP(O)(=S)OCC2C(CC(O2)N2C3=NC=NC(N)=C3N=C2)OP(S)(=O)OCC2C(CC(O2)N2C3=NC=NC(N)=C3N=C2)OP(O)(=S)OCC2C(CC(O2)N2C(NC(=O)C(C)=C2)=O)OP(O)(=S)OCC2C(CC(O2)N2C3=NC=NC(N)=C3N=C2)OP(O)(=S)OCC2C(CC(O2)N2C(NC(=O)C(C)=C2)=O)OP(O)(=S)OCC2C(CC(O2)N2C3=NC=NC(N)=C3N=C2)O)OC1N1C=C(C)C(=O)NC1=O IHVWIQJPVBMYOH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000017105 transposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
- H04L1/0045—Arrangements at the receiver end
- H04L1/0047—Decoding adapted to other signal detection operation
- H04L1/005—Iterative decoding, including iteration between signal detection and decoding operation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
- H04L27/26—Systems using multi-frequency codes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
- H04L1/0002—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the transmission rate
- H04L1/0003—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the transmission rate by switching between different modulation schemes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/0001—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff
- H04L1/0009—Systems modifying transmission characteristics according to link quality, e.g. power backoff by adapting the channel coding
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
- H04L1/0056—Systems characterized by the type of code used
- H04L1/0059—Convolutional codes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
- H04L1/0056—Systems characterized by the type of code used
- H04L1/0064—Concatenated codes
- H04L1/0066—Parallel concatenated codes
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/004—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by using forward error control
- H04L1/0056—Systems characterized by the type of code used
- H04L1/0071—Use of interleaving
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L1/00—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received
- H04L1/02—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by diversity reception
- H04L1/06—Arrangements for detecting or preventing errors in the information received by diversity reception using space diversity
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
- H04L25/03006—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
- H04L25/03171—Arrangements involving maximum a posteriori probability [MAP] detection
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
- H04L25/03006—Arrangements for removing intersymbol interference
- H04L25/03178—Arrangements involving sequence estimation techniques
- H04L25/03305—Joint sequence estimation and interference removal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/03—Shaping networks in transmitter or receiver, e.g. adaptive shaping networks
- H04L25/03891—Spatial equalizers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L25/00—Baseband systems
- H04L25/02—Details ; arrangements for supplying electrical power along data transmission lines
- H04L25/06—Dc level restoring means; Bias distortion correction ; Decision circuits providing symbol by symbol detection
- H04L25/067—Dc level restoring means; Bias distortion correction ; Decision circuits providing symbol by symbol detection providing soft decisions, i.e. decisions together with an estimate of reliability
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
- H04L27/02—Amplitude-modulated carrier systems, e.g. using on-off keying; Single sideband or vestigial sideband modulation
- H04L27/06—Demodulator circuits; Receiver circuits
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L27/00—Modulated-carrier systems
- H04L27/26—Systems using multi-frequency codes
- H04L27/2601—Multicarrier modulation systems
- H04L27/2647—Arrangements specific to the receiver only
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
- H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
- H04B7/0413—MIMO systems
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B7/00—Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
- H04B7/02—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas
- H04B7/04—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas
- H04B7/08—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the receiving station
- H04B7/0837—Diversity systems; Multi-antenna system, i.e. transmission or reception using multiple antennas using two or more spaced independent antennas at the receiving station using pre-detection combining
- H04B7/0842—Weighted combining
- H04B7/0848—Joint weighting
- H04B7/0854—Joint weighting using error minimizing algorithms, e.g. minimum mean squared error [MMSE], "cross-correlation" or matrix inversion
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/0001—Arrangements for dividing the transmission path
- H04L5/0014—Three-dimensional division
- H04L5/0023—Time-frequency-space
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to data communication, and more specifically to techniques for performing iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM communication system.
- a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication system employs multiple (N T ) transmit antennas and multiple (N R ) receive antennas for data transmission.
- a MIMO channel formed by the N T transmit and N R receive antennas may be decomposed into N S independent channels, with N S ⁇ min ⁇ N T , N R ⁇ .
- Each of the N S independent channels is also referred to as a spatial subchannel of the MIMO channel and corresponds to a dimension.
- the MIMO system can provide improved performance (e.g., increased transmission capacity) over that of a single-input single-output (SISO) communication system if the additional dimensionalities created by the multiple transmit and receive antennas are utilized.
- SISO single-input single-output
- a wideband MIMO system typically experiences frequency selective fading, i.e., different amounts of attenuation across the system bandwidth.
- This frequency selective fading causes inter-symbol interference (ISI), which is a phenomenon whereby each symbol in a received signal acts as distortion to subsequent symbols in the received signal. This distortion degrades performance by impacting the ability to correctly detect the received symbols.
- ISI is a non-negligible noise component that may have a large impact on the overall signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio (SNR) for systems designed to operate at high SNR levels, such as MIMO systems.
- SNR signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio
- equalization may be used at the receivers to combat ISI.
- the computational complexity required to perform equalization is typically significant or prohibitive for most applications.
- Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing may be used to combat ISI, and achieves this without the use of computationally intensive equalization.
- An OFDM system effectively partitions the system bandwidth into a number of (N F ) frequency subchannels, which may be referred to as sub-bands or frequency bins. Each frequency subchannel is associated with a respective subcarrier upon which data may be modulated.
- the frequency subchannels of the OFDM system may experience frequency selective fading (i.e., different amounts of attenuation for different frequency subchannels), depending on the characteristics (e.g., multipath profile) of the propagation path between the transmit and receive antennas.
- the ISI due to the frequency selective fading may be combated by repeating a portion of each OFDM symbol (i.e., appending a cyclic prefix to each OFDM symbol), as is known in the art.
- a MIMO system may thus advantageously employ OFDM to combat ISI.
- the frequency subchannels of the MIMO-OFDM system may experience different channel conditions (e.g., different fading and multipath effects) and may achieve different SNRs.
- the channel conditions may vary over time. Consequently, the supported data rates may vary from frequency subchannel to frequency subchannel and from spatial subchannel to spatial subchannel, and may further vary with time.
- aspects of the invention provide techniques to iteratively detect and decode data transmitted in a wireless (e.g., MIMO-OFDM) communication system.
- the iterative detection and decoding exploits the error correction capabilities of the channel code to provide improved performance. This is achieved by iteratively passing soft (multi-bit) “a priori” information between a soft-input soft-output detector and a soft-input soft-output decoder.
- the detector receives modulation symbols previously generated at a transmitter system based on one or more coding and modulation schemes, performs a detection function that is complementary to the symbol mapping performed at the transmitter system, and provides soft-decision symbols for transmitted coded bits. Extrinsic information in the soft-decision symbols (which comprises the a priori information for the decoder, as described below) is then decoded by the decoder based on one or more decoding schemes complementary to the one or more coding schemes used at the transmitter system. The decoder further provides its extrinsic information (which comprises the a priori information for the detector) that is then used by the detector in the detection process.
- the detection and decoding may be iterated a number of times. During the iterative detection and decoding process, the reliability of the bit decisions is improved with each iteration.
- the iterative detection and decoding process described herein may be used to combat frequency selective fading as well as flat fading. Moreover, the iterative detection and decoding process may be flexibly used with various types of coding schemes (e.g., serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes) and with various modulation schemes (e.g., M-PSK and M-QAM).
- the a priori information passed between the detector and decoder and the soft-decision symbols may be represented using log-likelihood ratios (LLRs).
- LLRs log-likelihood ratios
- Techniques are provided herein to reduce the computational complexity associated with deriving the LLRs. Such techniques include the use of interference nulling to isolate each transmitted signal by removing the other interferers and the use of a “dual-maxima” or some other approximation to compute the LLRs, which are described below.
- the invention further provides methods, receiver units, transmitter units, receiver systems, transmitter systems, systems, and other apparatuses and elements that implement various aspects, embodiments, and features of the invention, as described in further detail below.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a transmitter system and a receiver system in a MIMO-OFDM system
- FIGS. 2A and 2B are block diagrams of two transmitter units that code and modulate data with (1) a single coding and modulation scheme and (2) separate coding and modulation schemes on a per-antenna basis, respectively;
- FIGS. 3A and 3B are block diagrams of serial and parallel concatenated convolutional encoders, respectively;
- FIG. 3C is a block diagram of a recursive convolutional encoder
- FIGS. 4A and 4B are block diagrams of two receiver units that detect and decode data previously processed with (1) a single coding and modulation scheme and (2) separate coding and modulation schemes on a per-antenna basis, respectively;
- FIG. 4C is a block diagram of a receiver unit that performs successive nulling and interference cancellation to recover one transmitted signal at a time
- FIGS. 5A and 5B are block diagrams of two Turbo decoders capable of performing iterative decoding for serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes, respectively;
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an interference canceller that may be used for the receiver unit in FIG. 4C .
- the iterative detection and decoding techniques described herein may be used for various wireless communication systems.
- various aspects and embodiments of the invention are described specifically for multiple-input multiple output communication system that implements orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (i.e., a MIMO-OFDM system).
- a MIMO system employs N T transmit antennas and N R receive antennas for data transmission, where N R ⁇ N T .
- a MIMO channel formed by the N T transmit antennas and N R receive antennas may be decomposed into N S spatial subchannels, where N S ⁇ min ⁇ N T , N R ⁇ .
- An OFDM system effectively partitions the system bandwidth into N F frequency subchannels. Each frequency subchannel may be defined to be sufficiently narrow so that its frequency response is considered flat or frequency non-selective.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a transmitter system 110 and a receiver system 150 in a MIMO-OFDM system 100 .
- Transmitter system 110 and receiver system 150 are capable of implementing various aspects and embodiments of the invention, as described below.
- traffic data is provided at a particular data rate from a data source 112 to a transmit (TX) data processor 114 , which codes and interleaves the traffic data based on one or more coding schemes to provide coded data.
- the coding may be performed based on a single coding scheme for all transmit antennas, one coding scheme for each transmit antenna or each subset of transmit antennas, or one coding scheme for each transmission channel or each group of transmission channels.
- the data rate and the coding may be determined by a data rate control and a coding control, respectively, provided by a controller 130 .
- the coded data is then provided to a modulator 116 , which may also receive pilot data (e.g., data of a known pattern and processed in a known manner).
- the pilot data may be multiplexed with the coded traffic data (e.g., using time division multiplexing (TDM) or code division multiplexing (CDM)) in all or a subset of the frequency subchannels and in all or a subset of the spatial subchannels used to transmit the traffic data.
- TDM time division multiplexing
- CDM code division multiplexing
- the pilot may be used by the receiver system to perform a number of functions such as acquisition, frequency and timing synchronization, channel estimation, coherent data demodulation, and so on.
- the processing by modulator 116 includes (1) modulating the received data with one or more modulation schemes (e.g., M-PSK, M-QAM, and so on) to provide modulation symbols, (2) transforming the modulation symbols to form OFDM symbols, and (3) appending a cyclic prefix to each OFDM symbol to form a corresponding transmission symbol.
- the modulation may be performed based on a single modulation scheme for all transmit antennas, one modulation scheme for each transmit antenna or each subset of transmit antennas, or one modulation scheme for each transmission channel or each group of transmission channels.
- the modulation is performed based on a modulation control provided by controller 130 .
- the modulated data i.e., the transmission symbols
- TMTR transmitters
- Each transmitter 122 converts the received modulated data into one or more analog signals and further conditions (e.g., amplifies, filters, and quadrature modulates) the analog signals to generate a modulated signal suitable for transmission over the communication channel.
- the modulated signals from transmitters 122 a through 122 t are then transmitted via antennas 124 a through 124 t , respectively, to the receiver system.
- the transmitted modulated signals are received by antennas 152 a through 152 r , and the received signal from each antenna is provided to a respective receiver (RCVR) 154 .
- Each receiver 154 conditions (e.g., filters, amplifies, and downconverts) a respective received signal and digitizes the conditioned signal to provide a respective stream of data samples, which represent the transmission symbols received via the associated antenna.
- a demodulator (Demod) 156 receives and demodulates the N R data sample streams from receivers 154 a through 154 r to provide N R corresponding streams of received modulation symbols. For each data sample stream, demodulator 156 removes the cyclic prefix included in each transmission symbol and then transforms each received OFDM symbol to provide a corresponding stream of received modulation symbols.
- a detector/decoder 158 initially performs the detection function that is complementary to the symbol mapping and provides soft-decision (multi-bit) symbols for the coded bits transmitted from the transmitter system.
- the soft-decision symbols are then decoded based on one or more decoding schemes complementary to the one or more coding schemes used at the transmitter system.
- the detection and decoding may be performed iteratively a number of times, as described in further detail below.
- the decoded data is then provided to a data sink 160 .
- Controllers 130 and 170 direct the operation at the transmitter and receiver systems, respectively.
- Memories 132 and 172 provide storage for program codes and data used by controllers 130 and 170 , respectively.
- FIG. 2A is a block diagram of a transmitter unit 200 a , which is an embodiment of the transmitter portion of transmitter system 110 in FIG. 1 .
- Transmitter unit 200 a includes (1) a TX data processor 114 a that receives and codes traffic data in accordance with a specific coding scheme to provide coded data and (2) a modulator 116 a that modulates the coded data in accordance with a specific modulation scheme to provide modulated data.
- TX data processor 114 a and modulator 116 a are thus one embodiment of TX data processor 114 and modulator 116 , respectively, in FIG. 1 .
- TX data processor 114 a includes an encoder 212 , a channel interleaver 214 , and a demultiplexer (Demux) 216 .
- Encoder 212 receives and codes the traffic data (i.e., the information bits) in accordance with the selected coding scheme to provide coded bits.
- the coding increases the reliability of the data transmission.
- the selected coding scheme may include any combination of cyclic redundancy check (CRC) coding, convolutional coding, Turbo coding, block coding, and so on.
- Channel interleaver 214 then interleaves the coded bits based on a particular interleaving scheme and provides interleaved coded bits.
- the interleaving provides time diversity for the coded bits, permits the data to be transmitted based on an average signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio (SNR) for the frequency and/or spatial subchannels used for the data transmission, combats fading, and further removes correlation between coded bits used to form each modulation symbol.
- SNR signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio
- the interleaving may further provide frequency diversity if the coded bits are transmitted over multiple frequency subchannels. The coding and channel interleaving are described in further detail below.
- Demultiplexer 216 then demultiplexes the interleaved and coded data into N T coded data streams for the N T transmit antennas to be used for the data transmission.
- the N T coded data streams are then provided to modulator 116 a.
- modulator 116 a includes N T OFDM modulators, with each OFDM modulator assigned to process a respective coded data stream for one transmit antenna.
- Each OFDM modulator includes a symbol mapping element 222 , an inverse fast Fourier transformer (IFFT) 224 , and a cyclic prefix generator 226 .
- IFFT inverse fast Fourier transformer
- all N T symbol mapping elements 222 a through 222 t implement the same modulation scheme.
- symbol mapping element 222 maps the received coded bits to modulation symbols for the (up to) N F frequency subchannels to be used for data transmission on the transmit antenna associated with the OFDM modulator.
- the particular modulation scheme to be implemented by symbol mapping element 222 is determined by the modulation control provided by controller 130 .
- Symbol mapping element 222 then provides a vector of (up to) N F modulation symbols for each transmission symbol period, with the number of modulation symbols in each vector corresponding to the number of frequency subchannels to be used for data transmission for that transmission symbol period.
- Gray mapping may be preferably used for the symbol mapping since it may provide better performance in terms of bit error rate (BER).
- BER bit error rate
- the neighboring points in the signal constellation (in both the horizontal and vertical directions) differ by only one out of the q bit positions. Gray mapping reduces the number of bit errors for more likely error events, which correspond to a received modulation symbol being mapped to a location near the correct location, in which case only one coded bit would be received in error.
- each symbol mapping element 222 may be designed to implement a non-Gray mapped constellation.
- improved performance may be achieved if the constellation is defined such that neighboring points differ by as many bit positions as possible (i.e., the opposite goal as for Gray mapping, or “anti-Gray” mapping).
- IFFT 224 then converts each modulation symbol vector into its time-domain representation (which is referred to as an OFDM symbol) using the inverse fast Fourier transform.
- IFFT 224 may be designed to perform the inverse transform on any number of frequency subchannels (e.g., 8, 16, 32, . . . , N F , . . . ).
- cyclic prefix generator 226 repeats a portion of the OFDM symbol to form a corresponding transmission symbol.
- the cyclic prefix ensures that the transmission symbol retains its orthogonal properties in the presence of multipath delay spread, thereby improving performance against deleterious path effects such as channel dispersion caused by frequency selective fading.
- the transmission symbols from cyclic prefix generator 226 are then provided to an associated transmitter 122 and processed to generate a modulated signal, which is then transmitted from the associated antenna 124 .
- FIG. 2B is a block diagram of a transmitter unit 200 b , which is another embodiment of the transmitter portion of transmitter system 110 in FIG. 1 .
- a particular coding scheme is used for each of the N T transmit antennas and a particular modulation scheme is used for all N F frequency subchannels of each transmit antenna (i.e., separate coding and modulation on a per-antenna basis).
- the specific coding and modulation schemes to be used for each transmit antenna may be selected based on the expected channel conditions (e.g., by the receiver system and sent back to the transmitter system).
- Transmitter unit 200 b includes (1) a TX data processor 114 b that receives and codes traffic data in accordance with separate coding schemes to provide coded data and (2) a modulator 116 b that modulates the coded data in accordance with separate modulation schemes to provide modulated data.
- TX data processor 114 b and modulator 116 b are another embodiment of TX data processor 114 and modulator 116 , respectively, in FIG. 1 .
- TX data processor 114 b includes a demultiplexer 210 , N T encoders 212 a through 212 t , and N T channel interleavers 214 a through 214 t (i.e., one set of encoder and channel interleaver for each transmit antenna).
- Demultiplexer 210 demultiplexes the traffic data (i.e., the information bits) into N T data streams for the N T transmit antennas to be used for the data transmission. Each data stream is then provided to a respective encoder 212 .
- Each encoder 212 receives and codes a respective data stream based on the specific coding scheme selected for the corresponding transmit antenna to provide coded bits.
- the coded bits from each encoder 212 are then provided to a respective channel interleaver 214 , which interleaves the coded bits based on a particular interleaving scheme to provide diversity.
- Channel interleavers 214 a through 214 t then provide to modulator 116 b N T interleaved and coded data streams for the N T transmit antennas.
- modulator 116 b includes N T OFDM modulators, with each OFDM modulator including symbol mapping element 222 , IFFT 224 , and cyclic prefix generator 226 .
- the N T symbol mapping elements 222 a through 222 t may implement different modulation schemes.
- the subsequent processing by IFFT 224 and cyclic prefix generator 226 is as described above.
- the transmitter unit may also be implemented and are within the scope of the invention.
- the coding and modulation may be separately performed for each subset of transmit antennas, each transmission channel, or each group of transmission channels.
- the implementation of encoders 212 , channel interleavers 214 , symbol mapping elements 222 , IFFTs 224 , and cyclic prefix generators 226 is known in the art and not described in detail herein.
- the encoder may implement any one of the following (1) a serial concatenated convolutional code (SCCC), (2) a parallel concatenated convolutional code (PCCC), (3) a simple convolutional code, (4) a concatenated code comprised of a block code and a convolutional code, and so on.
- SCCC serial concatenated convolutional code
- PCCC parallel concatenated convolutional code
- simple convolutional code (4) a concatenated code comprised of a block code and a convolutional code, and so on.
- Concatenated convolutional codes are also referred to as Turbo codes.
- FIG. 3A is a block diagram of an embodiment of a serial concatenated convolutional encoder 212 x , which may be used for each of encoders 212 in FIGS. 2A and 2B .
- Encoder 212 x includes an outer convolutional encoder 312 a , a code interleaver 314 , and an inner convolutional encoder 312 b , all coupled in series.
- Outer convolutional encoder 312 a codes the information bits with a particular outer code of code rate R o .
- the coded output from encoder 312 a is provided to code interleaver 314 , which interleaves each packet of N P coded bits in accordance with a particular (e.g., pseudo-random) interleaving scheme.
- Code interleaver 314 may implement any one of a number of interleaving schemes, such as the ones used for cdma2000 and W-CDMA.
- the N P coded bits in a packet are written, by row, into a 2 5 -row by 2 n -column array, where n is the smallest integer such that N P ⁇ 2 5+n .
- the rows are then shuffled in accordance with a bit-reversal rule. For example, row 1 (“00001”) is swapped with row 16 (“10000”), row 3 (“00011”) is swapped with row 24 (“11000”), and so on.
- the bits within each row are then permutated (i.e., rearranged) according to a row-specific linear congruential sequence (LCS).
- LCS linear congruential sequence
- the i-th bit in the row is placed in location x(i).
- the bits in the array are then read out by column.
- LCS code interleaving scheme is described in further detail in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/205,511, entitled “Turbo Code Interleaver Using Linear Congruential Sequences,” filed Dec. 4, 1998, and in a cdma2000 document entitled “C.S0002-A-1 Physical Layer Standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems,” both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
- Other code interleavers may also be used and are within the scope of the invention.
- a random interleaver or a symmetrical-random (S-random) interleaver may also be used instead of the LCS interleaver described above.
- Inner convolutional encoder 312 b receives and further codes the interleaved bits from code interleaver 314 with a particular inner code of code rate R i .
- encoder 312 b implements a recursive code to fully realize the benefit of the significant interleaving gain provided by code interleaver 314 .
- the inner code does not need to be a powerful code since the key desired property is recursiveness. In fact, the inner code may simply be a rate-1 differential code.
- FIG. 3B is a block diagram of an embodiment of a parallel concatenated convolutional encoder 212 y , which may also be used for each of encoders 212 in FIGS. 2A and 2B .
- Encoder 212 y includes two constituent convolutional encoder 312 c and 312 d , a code interleaver 324 , a puncturing element 326 , and a parallel-to-serial (P/S) converter 328 .
- Code interleaver 324 interleaves the information bits in accordance with a particular (i.e., pseudo-random) interleaving scheme, and may be implemented as described above for code interleaver 314 .
- the information bits are provided to convolutional encoder 312 c and the interleaved information bits are provided to convolutional encoder 312 d .
- Each encoder 312 codes the received bits based on a particular constituent code and provides a respective stream of parity bits.
- Encoders 312 c and 312 d may be implemented with two recursive systematic constituent codes with code rates of R 1 and R 2 , respectively. The recursive codes maximize the benefits provided by the interleaving gain.
- the parity bits b y and b z from encoders 312 c and 312 d , respectively, are provided to puncturing element 326 , which punctures (i.e., deletes) zero or more of the parity bits to provide the desired number of output bits.
- the information bits (which are also referred to as the systematic bits), and the punctured parity bits from convolutional encoders 312 c and 312 d are provided to P/S converter 328 and serialized into a coded bit stream that is provided to the next processing element.
- FIG. 3C is a block diagram of an embodiment of a recursive convolutional encoder 312 x , which may be used for each of encoders 312 a through 312 d in FIGS. 3A and 3B .
- Encoder 312 x may also be used for each of encoders 212 in FIGS. 2A and 2B .
- encoder 312 x implements the following transfer function for the recursive convolutional code:
- Encoder 312 x may also be designed to implement other convolutional codes, and this is within the scope of the invention.
- Encoder 312 x includes a number of series-coupled delay elements 332 , a number of modulo-2 adders 334 , and a switch 336 .
- the states of delay elements 332 are set to zeros and switch 336 is in the up position.
- adder 334 a performs modulo-2 addition of the received bit with the output bit from adder 334 c and provides the result to delay element 332 a .
- Adder 334 b performs modulo-2 addition of the bits from adder 334 a and delay elements 332 a and 332 c and provides the parity bit.
- Adder 334 c performs modulo-2 addition of the bits from delay elements 332 b and 332 c.
- switch 336 is moved to the down position and three zero (“0”) bits are provided to encoder 312 x .
- Encoder 312 x then codes the three zero bits and provides three tail systematic bits and three tail parity bits.
- SCCCs provide better performance than PCCCs in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels at medium to high SNR levels, which is typically the desired operating region for MIMO systems. While the BER for PCCCs asymptotically reaches an error floor, this floor is absent or much lower for SCCCs.
- PCCCs outperform SCCCs in the high BER region, and may be more suitably used when the system loads approach the capacity limits of the channel at low SNRs.
- Both PCCCs and SCCCs may be implemented using relatively simple constituent codes (e.g., having constraint lengths of 3 to 16), such as the one shown in FIG. 3C .
- the coded bits from each encoder 212 are interleaved by a respective channel interleaver 214 to provide temporal, frequency, and/or spatial diversity against deleterious path effects (e.g., fading and multipath).
- a respective channel interleaver 214 to provide temporal, frequency, and/or spatial diversity against deleterious path effects (e.g., fading and multipath).
- the interleaving may be used to ensure that the coded bits that form each modulation symbol are not located close to each other temporally (i.e., the channel interleaving distributes the coded bits that are temporally close together in a pseudo-random manner among modulation symbols that may be transmitted over different frequency subchannels, spatial subchannels, and/or transmission symbol periods).
- the combination of encoding, channel interleaving and symbol mapping may be viewed as a serial concatenated code, where the symbol mapper takes on the role of the inner code.
- the channel interleaver provides interleaving gain in much the same way as in an SCCC, as described earlier. This potential for performance gain is unlocked by the iterative receiver structure described below.
- the channel interleaving can provide improved performance for various coding and modulation schemes, such as a single common coding and modulation scheme for all transmit antennas or separate coding and modulation scheme per antenna.
- the coded bits for each packet are written (linearly) to rows of an array.
- the bits in each row may then be permutated (i.e., rearranged) based on (1) a bit-reversal rule, (2) a linear congruential sequence (such as the one described above for the code interleaver), (3) a randomly generated pattern, or (4) a permutation pattern generated in some other manner.
- the rows are also permutated in accordance with a particular row permutation pattern.
- the permutated coded bits are then retrieved from each column of the array and provided to the next processing element.
- Other channel interleaving schemes may also be used and this is within the scope of the invention.
- the channel interleaving is performed separately for each independently coded data stream.
- the information bits and the tail and parity bits for each packet may also be channel interleaved separately.
- the information bits b x , the tail and parity bits b y from the first constituent encoder 312 c , and the tail and parity bits b z from the second constituent encoder 312 d may be interleaved by three separate channel interleavers, which may employ the same or different interleaving schemes. This separate channel interleaving allows for flexible puncturing of the individual parity bits.
- the interleaving interval may be selected to provide the desired temporal, frequency, and/or spatial diversity, or any combination thereof.
- the coded bits for a particular time period e.g., 10 msec, 20 msec, and so on
- the channel interleaving may be performed for each transmit antenna, or across each group of transmit antennas or across all transmit antennas to provide spatial diversity.
- the channel interleaving may also be performed for each frequency subchannel, or across each group of frequency subchannels or across all frequency subchannels to provide frequency diversity.
- the channel interleaving may also be performed across each group of one or more frequency subchannels of each group of one or more transmit antennas such that the coded bits from one data stream may be distributed over one or more frequency subchannels of one or more transmit antennas to provide a combination of temporal, frequency, and spatial diversity.
- the channel interleaving may also be performed across all frequency subchannels of all transmit antennas.
- FIG. 4A is a block diagram of an embodiment of a receiver unit 400 a , which is an embodiment of the receiver portion of receiver system 150 in FIG. 1 .
- a single demodulation scheme is used for all N F frequency subchannels of all N T transmit antennas and a single decoding scheme is used for all transmit antennas.
- Receiver unit 400 a may thus be used to receive a data transmission from transmitter unit 200 a in FIG. 2A .
- the signals transmitted from the N T transmit antennas are initially received by each of N R antennas 152 a through 152 r and routed to a respective receiver 154 (which is also referred to as a front-end unit).
- Each receiver 154 conditions (e.g., filters, amplifies, and downconverts) a respective received signal and further digitizes the conditioned signal to provide data samples.
- Each receiver 154 may further demodulate the data samples with a recovered pilot to provide a stream of received transmission symbols, which is provided to a demodulator 156 a.
- demodulator 156 a includes N R OFDM demodulators, with each OFDM demodulator assigned to process a respective transmission symbol stream from one receive antenna.
- Each OFDM demodulator includes a cyclic prefix remover 412 and a fast Fourier transformer (FFT) 414 .
- Cyclic prefix remover 412 removes the cyclic prefix previously appended to each OFDM symbol by the transmitter system to ensure ISI-free reception of the transmitted modulation symbols.
- FFT 414 then transforms each received OFDM symbol to provide a vector of N F received modulation symbols for the N F frequency subchannels used to transmit the OFDM symbol.
- the N R modulation symbol vectors from all N R OFDM demodulators for each transmission symbol period are provided to a detector/decoder 158 a , which is one embodiment of detector/decoder 158 in FIG. 1 .
- detector/decoder 158 a includes a detector 420 a and a decoder 430 that perform iterative detection and decoding on the modulation symbols received from all N R receive antennas to provide decoded data.
- the iterative detection and decoding exploits the error correction capabilities of the channel code to provide improved performance. This is achieved by iteratively passing soft “a priori” information between the soft-input soft-output (SISO) detector 420 a and the soft-input soft-output decoder 430 , as described in further detail below.
- SISO soft-input soft-output
- Detector 420 a receives the modulation symbols from demodulator 156 a and a priori information from decoder 430 and derives soft-decision (i.e., multi-bit) symbols for all N F frequency subchannels of all N T transmit antennas, with each such soft-decision symbol being an estimate of a coded bit transmitted by the transmitter system.
- the soft-decision symbols may be represented as log-likelihood ratios (LLRs), which are denoted as L(b k ) in FIG. 4A .
- Each summer 422 also receives the a priori information for its coded bit b k from decoder 430 (which is referred to as the detector a priori information and denoted as L a (b k )), and subtracts this detector a priori information from the received soft-decision symbol to derive extrinsic information for the coded bit (denoted as L e (b k )).
- extrinsic information for all (N T ⁇ N F ⁇ q) coded bits is then (1) converted from parallel to serial by a P/S converter 424 , (2) deinterleaved by a channel deinterleaver 426 in a manner complementary to the channel interleaving performed at the transmitter system, and (3) provided as a priori information from the detector to the decoder (which is referred to as the decoder a priori information and denoted as L a D (b k )).
- Decoder 430 uses the decoder a priori information in the decoding process and provides the decoded data. Decoder 430 further provides “a posteriori” information (denoted as L D (b k )) to a summer 432 . Summer 432 then subtracts the decoder a priori information, L a D (b k ), from the decoder a posteriori information, L D (b k ) to derive extrinsic information from the decoder for the detector (denoted as L e D (b k )).
- This detector extrinsic information is then interleaved by a channel interleaver 434 , converted from serial to parallel by a S/P converter 436 , and provided as the detector a priori information, L a (b k ), to detector 420 a and summers 422 .
- the output of the detection process may be expressed as:
- the decoder a priori information, L a D (b k ) is simply the detector extrinsic information, L e (b k ), after the parallel-to-serial conversion and channel deinterleaving.
- the detector a priori information, L a D (b k ) is simply the decoder extrinsic information, L e D (b k ), after the channel interleaving and serial-to-parallel conversion.
- the detection and decoding process may be iterated a number of times. During the iterative detection and decoding process, the reliability of the bit decisions is improved with each iteration.
- the iterative detection and decoding process described herein may be used to combat frequency selective fading (e.g., by using OFDM with cyclic prefix) as well as flat fading (without any modifications).
- the iterative detection and decoding process may be flexibly used with various types of coding and modulation schemes, including the serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes as described above.
- detector 420 a provides soft-decision symbols for the transmitted coded bits based on the modulation symbols received from the N R receive antennas as well as the a priori information fed back from decoder 430 .
- the soft-decision symbols may be conveniently represented in the form of log-likelihood ratios (LLRs) and include channel information, extrinsic information, and a priori information.
- the channel information for each coded bit includes information about the channel response between the transmit and receive antennas.
- the extrinsic information for each coded bit comprises incremental information about that coded bit that is extracted from other coded bits in the detection process.
- the a priori information for each coded bit includes information about the coded bit that is known or derived outside the detection process.
- the decoder a priori information should be provided by an independent source. However, since such a source is not available, an independent source may be mimicked by minimizing the correlation between the decoder a priori information (i.e., the detector output) and previous decisions made by the decoder (i.e., the detector a priori information). This is achieved by subtracting the detector a priori information from the soft-decision symbols derived by the detector, using summers 422 as shown in FIG. 4A .
- the modulation symbol received from the output of the OFDM demodulator coupled to the m-th receive antenna for the l-th frequency subchannel at time index j may be expressed as:
- Equation (3) may be expressed in matrix form, as follows:
- the N F ⁇ N R received modulation symbols in r correspond to the N F ⁇ N T transmitted modulation symbols, which may be expressed as:
- each modulation symbol is formed by a respective group of q coded bits.
- the N F ⁇ N R received modulation symbols in r thus further correspond to the N F ⁇ N T .q transmitted coded bits, which may be expressed as:
- b n [b n,0,1 . . . b n,0,q b n,1,1 . . . b n,1,q . . . b n,N F ⁇ 1,1 . . . b n,N F ⁇ 1,q ] T .
- the detector computes the LLRs for each transmitted coded bit b n,l,i , as follows:
- r ⁇ , over the probability of the coded bit b n,l,i being a ⁇ 1 given the received modulation symbols r , Pr ⁇ b n,l,i ⁇ 1
- the probabilities for each coded bit are derived based on the received modulation symbol containing that bit and the sequence of coded bits received for r , as derived below.
- LLRs may then be expressed as:
- Pr ⁇ c ⁇ In the first iteration of the iterative detection and decoding process, it is assumed that all points in the signal constellation are equally likely. Hence, the term Pr ⁇ c ⁇ can be removed from the numerator and denominator of equation (10). In subsequent iterations, however, the only assumption is that the transmitted modulation symbols are independent. Furthermore, since the coded bits that make up the modulation symbols are interleaved, it is assumed that the bit probabilities are independent. Based on these assumptions, the term Pr ⁇ c ⁇ may expressed as:
- the received modulation symbols r 1,1 , r 2,1 , . . . , r N R ,N F ⁇ 1 are conditionally independent given c .
- c ⁇ may then be expressed as:
- Equation (13) may further be decomposed as follows:
- the LLR for the k-th coded bit, L(b k ), may be decomposed into two parts.
- L a (b k ) represents the a priori information for the k-th coded bit computed by the decoder and fed back to the detector.
- This detector a priori information is expressed in the form of a priori LLRs, which may be expressed as:
- L e (b k ) represents the extrinsic information for the k-th coded bit computed by the detector and fed forward to the decoder.
- the product of the a priori probabilities, ⁇ Pr ⁇ b p ⁇ , in equation (14) may be expressed as:
- L e (b k ) the detector extrinsic information, L e (b k ), may be expressed in terms of the detector a priori LLRs, as follows:
- L a (b k ) Since the detector a priori information, L a (b k ), is known by the decoder, it may be subtracted from L(b k ) by summers 422 in FIG. 4A such that only the detector extrinsic information, L e (b k ), is provided to the decoder.
- the signal from transmit antenna 1 may be treated as the desired signal and the other signals from the remaining (N T ⁇ 1) transmit antennas may be treated as interference to the desired signal.
- the (N T ⁇ 1) interferers may be nulled (or canceled).
- the vector of N R modulation symbols, r l (which are received from the N R receive antennas for the l-th frequency subchannel) may be pre-multiplied by an (N R ⁇ N T +1) ⁇ N R nulling matrix, ⁇ l (1) , and the resulting vector ⁇ tilde over (r) ⁇ i (1) of (N R ⁇ N T +1) elements may be expressed as:
- ⁇ tilde over (r) ⁇ (1) ⁇ 1 (1)
- r l ⁇ l (1) H l c l + ⁇ l (1)
- the nulling matrices, ⁇ l (n) may be determined based on algorithms known in the art.
- the derivation of the nulling matrix, ⁇ l (1) , for transmit antenna 1 is briefly described as follows. First, the N R ⁇ (N T ⁇ 1) channel response matrix, H l (1) , for transmit antennas 2 through N T and the N R receive antennas is determined. A set of (N R ⁇ N T +1) orthonormal vectors ⁇ v 1 (1) v 2 (1) . . . v N R ⁇ N T +1 ⁇ , whose members are the rows of the nulling matrix, ⁇ l (1) , is then computed such that
- ⁇ l (1)* is the Hermitian of ⁇ l (1) and I is the identity matrix (i.e., all ones along the diagonal and zeros elsewhere).
- Fast algorithms are available for computing the orthonormal vectors, as is known in the art.
- the LLRs for the coded bits from the desired transmit antenna may then be calculated in a similar manner as described above, without regard to the components from the other (N T ⁇ 1) transmit antennas.
- the LLRs for the coded bits transmitted on all N F frequency subchannels of this transmit antenna [b 1,0,1 . . . b 1,0,q . . . b 1,1,1 . . . b 1,1,q . . . b 1,N F ⁇ 1,1 . . . b 1,N F ⁇ 1,q ].
- ⁇ tilde over (r) ⁇ (1) [ ⁇ tilde over (r) ⁇ 0 (1)T ⁇ tilde over (r) ⁇ 1 (1)T . . . ⁇ tilde over (r) ⁇ N F ⁇ 1 (1)T ] T .
- Equation (19) may be expressed in a form similar to equation (14), as follows:
- Equation (20) instead of calculating (N F ⁇ N T ⁇ q) LLR values for all N T transmit antennas, only (N F ⁇ q) LLR values are calculated at a time for each of N T transmit antennas.
- the complexity of the calculation in Eq (20) is no longer exponential in the number of transmit antennas N T since (1) each summation is performed over only the modulation symbols c n , transmitted from the desired n-th transmit antenna, and (2) the term ⁇ Pr ⁇ b p ⁇ is evaluated only for the coded bits transmitted from the n-th transmit antenna.
- Equation (20) The product of the a priori probabilities, ⁇ Pr ⁇ b p ⁇ , in equation (20) may be expressed as:
- L e (n) (b k ) L e (n) (b k )
- the detection with interference nulling described above may be repeated N T times, once for each transmit antenna.
- the (N T ⁇ 1) interferers of this desired signal may be nulled out by pre-multiplying the received modulation symbol vectors, r l , with the nulling matrix, ⁇ l (n) , derived for that transmit antenna and that frequency subchannel, as shown in equation (18).
- the LLRs for the coded bits in the desired signal may then be computed, as shown in equations (20) and (22).
- equation (20) or (22) may be evaluated N T times, once for each desired signal, with each evaluation providing a set of (N F ⁇ q) LLRs for the coded bits in the desired signal.
- the dual-maxima approximation may also be used to reduce the computational complexity associated with deriving the LLRs for the coded bits.
- the LLR for each coded bit is computed as the logarithm of the ratio of two summations.
- Each summation is performed over a number of elements, with each such element being composed of products of exponential terms, exp( ⁇ m,l ) and exp( ⁇ n ).
- the exponentiation in the elements of each summation enhances the differences between the individual elements of the summation. Hence, one element typically dominates each summation, and the following approximation may be made:
- Equation (25) The approximation shown in equation (25) is often referred to as the dual-maxima approximation.
- the dual-maxima approximation may be used to simplify the computation for the LLRs for the coded bits.
- the logarithm of the ratio of two summations may first be decomposed as follows:
- the dual-maxima approximation algorithm finds the maximum element in each summation (i.e., one for the numerator and another for the denominator in equation (22)) and uses these two maximum elements in the LLR calculation, as shown in equation (25).
- FIG. 4B is a block diagram of an embodiment of a receiver unit 400 b , which is another embodiment of the receiver portion of receiver system 150 in FIG. 1 .
- different demodulation and decoding schemes may be used for the N T transmit antennas.
- Receiver unit 400 b may thus be used to receive a data transmission from transmitter unit 200 b in FIG. 2B , which employs separate coding and modulation schemes on a per-antenna basis.
- the signals transmitted from the N T transmit antennas are initially received by each of N R antennas 152 a through 152 r and routed to a respective receiver 154 .
- Each receiver 154 conditions, digitizes, and processes a respective received signal to provide a respective stream of transmission symbols.
- the transmission symbol stream from each receiver 154 is provided to a respective OFDM demodulator 410 within a demodulator 156 b .
- Each OFDM demodulator 410 removes the cyclic prefix appended to each OFDM symbol by the transmitter system and then transforms each received OFDM symbol to provide a vector of N F received modulation symbols for the N F frequency subchannels used to transmit the OFDM symbol.
- the N R modulation symbol vectors from all N R OFDM demodulators 410 for each transmission symbol period are provided to a detector/decoder 158 b , which is another embodiment of detector/decoder 158 in FIG. 1 .
- detector/decoder 158 b includes a detector 420 b and N T decoder blocks 440 , which collectively perform iterative detection and decoding on the modulation symbols received from all N R receive antennas to provide the decoded data.
- Each decoder block 440 is assigned to process the modulation symbols transmitted from a respective transmit antenna, which may have been coded and modulated with its own specific coding and modulation schemes.
- Detector 420 b receives the modulation symbols from demodulator 156 b and the a priori information from the N T decoders 430 a through 430 t and provides soft-decision symbols for the N T transmit antennas, with each such soft-decision symbol being an estimate of a transmitted coded bit and may be represented by the LLR, as shown in equation (22). For each transmission symbol period, detector 420 b provides N T vectors of soft-decision symbols for the N T transmit antennas to the N T decoder blocks 440 , with each vector including (N F ⁇ q n ) soft-decision symbols (where q n is dependent on the specific modulation scheme used for the n-th transmit antenna).
- each decoder block 440 the detector a priori information for each coded bit being processed by that decoder block is subtracted from the corresponding soft-decision symbol to derive the extrinsic information for the coded bit.
- the detector extrinsic information for all (N F ⁇ q n ) coded bits is then converted from parallel to serial by P/S converter 424 , deinterleaved by channel deinterleaver 426 , and provided as a priori information to decoder 430 .
- Decoder 430 within each decoder block 440 uses the decoder a priori information in the decoding process and provides the decoded data for the transmit antenna assigned to and processed by the decoder block. Decoder 430 further provides the a posteriori information for the coded bits transmitted by the assigned transmit antenna.
- a summer 432 then subtracts the decoder a priori information from the decoder a posteriori information to derive the decoder extrinsic information, which is then interleaved by channel interleaver 434 , converted from serial to parallel by S/P converter 436 , and provided as a priori information to detector 420 b and summer 422 .
- the detection and decoding process may be iterated a number of times. During the iterative detection and decoding process, the reliability of the bit decisions is improved with each iteration.
- FIG. 4C is a block diagram of an embodiment of a receiver unit 400 c , which is yet another embodiment of the receiver portion of receiver system 150 in FIG. 1 .
- the detector performs successive nulling and interference cancellation to recover one transmitted signal at a time.
- Receiver unit 400 c may be used to recover a data transmission from transmitter unit 200 b in FIG. 2B (which employs separate coding and modulation schemes on a per-antenna basis).
- the N R received signals are initially processed by receivers 154 and further processed by demodulator 156 to provide N R modulation symbol vectors, r , for each transmission symbol period, which are then provided to a detector/decoder 158 c .
- Detector/decoder 158 c performs iterative detection and decoding as well as successive nulling and interference cancellation.
- detector/decoder 158 c implements a multi-stage (or multi-layer) detection scheme that includes both nulling of interferers and post-decoding interference cancellation (i.e., successive nulling and interference cancellation).
- Detector/decoder 158 c includes a detector 420 c , N T decoder blocks 440 , and P/S converter 442 .
- Detector 420 c includes N T detection stages (or layers), with each stage being assigned to process and recover the data for a particular transmit antenna.
- Each stage (except for the last stage) includes an interference nuller 450 , an LLR computer 452 , and an interference canceller 460 .
- the last stage only includes LLR computer 452 since all other transmitted signals have been nulled by this time.
- the received modulation symbol vectors r are provided as the input vectors r (1) for interference nuller 450 a , which pre-multiplies the modulation symbol vector r l (1) for each frequency subchannel with the nulling matrix ⁇ l (1) for that frequency subchannel of the first transmit antenna to provide the vector ⁇ tilde over (r) ⁇ l (1) having the components from the other (N T ⁇ 1) transmit antennas approximately removed.
- the pre-multiplication may be performed as shown in equation (18), which is:
- the vectors ⁇ tilde over (r) ⁇ (1) are then provided to LLR computer 452 a , which computes the LLRs for the coded bits transmitted from the first transmit antenna, as shown in equation (22).
- the LLRs for the (N F ⁇ q 1 ) coded bits from the first transmit antenna are then provided to decoder block 440 a , which operates on the decoder a priori information to provide the detector a priori information and the decoded bits for the first transmit antenna, as described below.
- the detector a priori information from decoder block 440 a is provided back to LLR computer 452 a and used to compute the new decoder a priori information for the next iteration.
- the detection and decoding for the first transmit antenna may be iterated a number of times.
- the decoded bits from decoder block 440 a are also provided to interference canceller 460 a . Assuming that the data for the first stage has been decoded correctly, the contribution of these decoded bits on the received modulation symbols (which is denoted as î (1) is derived and subtracted from that stage's input vectors r (1) to derive the input vectors r (2) for the next stage.
- This interference cancellation may be expressed as:
- Each subsequent stage performs the detection and decoding in a similar manner as described above for the first stage to provide the decoded bits for the assigned transmit antenna.
- the input vectors, r (n) for each subsequent stage contain less interference than that of the previous stage.
- the nulling is performed by interference nuller 450 using the modulation symbols from all N R receive antennas, the diversity order increases by one from one stage to the next.
- the last stage only the signal contribution from the last (N T -th) transmit antenna remains, if the interference cancellation was effectively performed in the preceding stages. Hence, no nulling is necessary and the iterative detection and decoding may be performed directly on that stage's input vectors r (N T ) .
- Pre-decoding interference estimation and cancellation may also be used, and this is within the scope of the invention.
- a hard decision may be made on the LLR outputs from the detector.
- the hard decision may then be re-modulated and multiplied with the estimated channel response to obtain pre-decoding interference estimates (which are typically not as reliable as post-decoding interference estimates).
- the pre-decoding interference estimates may then be canceled from the received modulation symbols.
- Decoders 430 in FIGS. 4A and 4B may be implemented based on various designs and may be dependent on the particular coding scheme(s) used at the transmitter system.
- each decoder 430 may be implemented as an iterative decoder (i.e., a Turbo decoder) if a Turbo code is used.
- a Turbo decoder i.e., a Turbo decoder
- the structures for the Turbo decoders for serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes are described below.
- FIG. 5A is a simplified block diagram of a Turbo decoder 430 x capable of performing iterative decoding for serial concatenated convolutional codes, such as the one shown in FIG. 3A .
- Turbo decoder 430 x includes inner and outer maximum a posteriori (MAP) decoders 512 a and 512 b , a code deinterleaver 514 , and a code interleaver 516 .
- MAP maximum a posteriori
- the coded bits (or more specifically, the a priori LLRs for the decoder, L a D (b k )) are provided to inner MAP decoder 512 a , which derives the a posteriori information for the coded bits based on the inner convolutional code.
- the a posteriori information is then subtracted by the a priori information for MAP decoder 512 a to provide extrinsic information, e k s1 , which is indicative of corrections/adjustments in the confidence of the values for the information bits.
- the extrinsic information is then deinterleaved by code deinterleaver 514 and provided as a priori information to outer MAP decoder 512 b .
- MAP decoder 512 a also provides the LLRs for the coded bits, which comprise the a posteriori information, L D (b k ), that is provided to summer 432 in FIGS. 4A and 4B .
- MAP decoder 512 b receives the a priori information from MAP decoder 512 a (after the code deinterleaving) and derives the a posteriori information for the coded bits based on the outer convolutional code.
- the a posteriori information is subtracted by the a priori information for MAP decoder 512 b to provide extrinsic information, e k s2 , which is indicative of further corrections/adjustments in the confidence of the values for the information bits.
- the extrinsic information, e k s2 is then interleaved by code interleaver 516 and provided to inner MAP decoder 512 a.
- the decoding by inner and outer MAP decoders 512 a and 512 b may be iterated a number of times (e.g., 8, 12, 16, or possibly more). With each iteration, greater confidence is gained for the detected values of the information bits. After all the decoding iterations have been completed, the final LLRs for the information bits are provided to a bit detector within MAP decoder 512 b and sliced to provide the decoded bits, which are hard-decision (i.e., “0” or “1”) values for the information bits.
- MAP decoders 512 a and 512 b may be implemented with the well-known BCJR soft-input soft-output MAP algorithm or its lower complexity derivatives.
- the soft-output Viterbi (SOV) algorithm may be implemented instead of the MAP algorithms.
- MAP decoders and MAP algorithms are described in further detail in the aforementioned papers by Viterbi and Robertson.
- the MAP and SOV algorithms may also be used to decode simple convolutional codes. The complexity of these algorithms is comparable to the standard Viterbi decoding algorithm, multiplied by the number of iterations.
- FIG. 5B is a simplified block diagram of a Turbo decoder 430 y capable of performing iterative decoding for parallel concatenated convolutional codes, such as the one shown in FIG. 3B .
- Turbo decoder 430 y includes a S/P converter 510 , two MAP decoders 512 c and 512 d , two code interleavers 524 a and 524 b , a code deinterleaver 526 , and a P/S converter 528 .
- MAP decoder 512 c receives the a priori LLRs for the information bits, L a D (b k x ), the a priori LLRs for the first constituent encoder's parity bits, L a D (b k y ), and extrinsic information from MAP decoder 512 d , e k p2 (after deinterleaving by code deinterleaver 526 ). MAP decoder 512 c then derives the a posteriori information for the information bits based on the first constituent convolutional code.
- This a posteriori information is then subtracted by the received a priori information to provide extrinsic information, e k p1 , which is indicative of corrections/adjustments in the confidence of the values for the information bits determined from the first constituent encoder's parity bits.
- the extrinsic information is then interleaved by code interleaver 524 a and provided to MAP decoder 52 d.
- MAP decoder 512 d receives the a priori LLRs for the information bits, L a D (b k x ) (after interleaving by code interleaver 524 b ), the a priori LLRs for the second constituent encoder's parity bits, L a D (b k z ), and the extrinsic information from MAP decoder 512 c , e k p1 (after interleaving by code interleaver 524 a ). MAP decoder 512 d then derives the a posteriori information for the information bits based on the second constituent convolutional code.
- This a posteriori information is then subtracted by the received extrinsic information, e k p1 , to provide the extrinsic information, e k 2 , which is indicative of further corrections/adjustments in the confidence of the values for the information bits determined from the second constituent encoder's parity bits.
- the extrinsic information, e k 2 is then deinterleaved by code deinterleaver 526 and provided to MAP decoder 512 c.
- P/S converter 528 receives the first constituent encoder's parity bit LLRs from MAP decoder 512 c , the second constituent encoder's parity bit LLRs from MAP decoder 512 d , and the information bit LLRs from MAP decoder 512 d . P/S converter 528 then performs parallel-to-serial conversion of the received LLRs and provides the a posteriori information, L D (b k ), to summer 432 in FIGS. 4A and 4B .
- MAP decoders 512 c and 512 d may also be iterated a number of times (e.g., 8, 12, 16, or possibly more). After all the decoding iterations have been completed, the final LLRs for the information bits are provided to a bit detector within MAP decoder 512 d and sliced to provide the decoded bits.
- MAP decoders 512 c and 512 d may be implemented with the BCJR SISO MAP algorithm or its lower complexity derivatives or with the SOV algorithm.
- the number of iterations in both the decoder and the iterative detector-decoder can be fixed or variable (i.e., adaptive).
- the stop criterion may be triggered when (1) the BER converges or reaches an acceptable level, (2) the worse or average LLR reaches a particular confidence level, or (3) some other criterion is met.
- FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an embodiment of an interference canceller 460 x , which may be used for each interference canceller 460 in FIG. 4C .
- the decoded bits from the decoder block 440 for the same stage are re-encoded and channel interleaved by a TX data processor 114 x to provide re-encoded bits for the transmit antenna being processed by the stage (i.e., the assigned transmit antenna).
- the re-encoded bits are further symbol mapped by a modulator 116 x to provide remodulated symbols, which are estimates of the modulation symbols at the transmitter prior to the OFDM processing and channel distortion.
- TX data processor 114 x and modulator 116 x each performs the same processing (e.g., encoding, channel interleaving, and modulation) as that performed at the transmitter system for the data stream on the assigned transmit antenna.
- the remodulated symbols are then provided to a channel simulator 612 , which processes the symbols with the estimated channel response to provide estimates of the interference due to the decoded bits.
- channel simulator 612 For each frequency subchannel, channel simulator 612 multiples the remodulated symbols for the assigned n-th transmit antenna with a vector ⁇ n,l that includes an estimate of the channel response between the n-th transmit antenna and each of the N R receive antennas.
- the vector ⁇ n,l is one column of the estimated channel response matrix ⁇ l for the l-th frequency subchannel.
- the matrix ⁇ l may be determined by a channel estimator associated with the same stage and provided to channel simulator 612 .
- the estimated interference component î l (n) due to the symbol from the n-th transmit antenna may be expressed as:
- i ⁇ _ l ( n ) [ h ⁇ n , 1 , l ⁇ c ⁇ n , l h ⁇ n , 2 , l ⁇ c ⁇ n , l ⁇ h ⁇ n , N R , l ⁇ c ⁇ n , l ] .
- the N R elements in the interference vector î l (n) correspond to components in the input vector r l (n) due to the modulation symbol ⁇ tilde over (c) ⁇ n,l transmitted from the n-th transmit antenna.
- the components in the vectors î (n) are interference to the remaining (not yet detected) modulation symbols from the other transmit antennas which are also included in the input vectors î (n) .
- the interference vectors î (n) are then subtracted from the input vectors ⁇ circumflex over (r) ⁇ (n) by a summer 614 to provide modified vectors ⁇ circumflex over (r) ⁇ (n+1) having the interference components from the decoded bits removed. This cancellation can be expressed as shown above in equation (27).
- the modified vectors ⁇ circumflex over (r) ⁇ (n+1) are provided as the input vectors to the next processing stage, as shown in FIG. 4C .
- a channel estimator within demodulator 156 may process the received OFDM symbols and derive estimates of one or more characteristics of the communication channel, such as the channel frequency response, the channel noise variance, the SNR of the received symbols, and so on.
- Detector/decoder 158 may also derive and provide the status of each received packet and may further provide one or more other performance metrics indicative of the decoded results. These various types of information may be provided to controller 170 .
- Controller 170 may determine or select a particular “rate” to be used for all transmit antennas, for each transmit antenna, for each subset of transmit antennas, for each transmission channel, or for each group of transmission channels based on the various types of information received from demodulator 156 and detector/decoder 158 .
- the rate is indicative of a set of specific values for a set of transmission parameters.
- the rate may indicate (or may be associated with) a specific data rate to be used for the data transmission, a specific coding scheme and/or code rate, a specific modulation scheme, and so on.
- Channel state information in the form of the selected rate, the channel response estimates, and/or other information may be provided by controller 170 , processed by an encoder 180 , modulated by a modulator 182 , and conditioned and transmitted by one or more transmitters 154 back to transmitter system 110 .
- CSI Channel state information
- the one or more modulated signals from receiver system 150 are received by antennas 124 , conditioned by receivers 122 , demodulated by a demodulator 140 , and decoded by a decoder 142 to recover the channel state information transmitted by the receiver system.
- the channel state information is then provided to controller 130 and used to control the processing of the data transmission to the receiver system.
- the data rate of the data transmission may be determined based on the selected rate provided by the receiver system, or may be determined based on the channel response estimates provided by the receiver system.
- the specific coding and modulation schemes associated with the selected rate are determined and reflected in the coding and modulation control provided by controller 130 to TX data processor 114 and modulator 116 .
- the iterative detection and decoding techniques have been described specifically for serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes. These techniques may also be used with other codes, such as convolutional codes, block codes, concatenated codes of different types (e.g., a convolutional code with a block code), and so on. Furthermore, the iterative detection and decoding techniques have been described specifically for a MIMO-OFDM system. These techniques may also be used for a MIMO system that does not implement OFDM, an OFDM system that does not utilize MIMO, or some other wireless communication systems (e.g., a wireless LAN system).
- the iterative detection and decoding techniques may be implemented in various units in a wireless communication system, such as in a terminal, a base station, an access point, and so on.
- the iterative detection and decoding techniques described herein may be implemented by various means. For example, these techniques may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination thereof.
- the elements used to perform the iterative detection and decoding e.g., detector 420 and decoder(s) 430
- the elements used to perform the iterative detection and decoding may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof.
- ASICs application specific integrated circuits
- DSPs digital signal processors
- DSPDs digital signal processing devices
- PLDs programmable logic devices
- FPGAs field programmable gate arrays
- processors controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the
- the iterative detection and decoding may be performed with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the computations and functions described herein.
- the software codes may be stored in a memory unit (e.g., memory 172 in FIG. 1 ) and executed by a processor (e.g., controller 170 ).
- the memory unit may be implemented within the processor or external to the processor, in which case it can be communicatively coupled to the processor via various means as is known in the art.
Abstract
Techniques to iteratively detect and decode data transmitted in a wireless (e.g., MIMO-OFDM) communication system. The iterative detection and decoding is performed by iteratively passing soft (multi-bit) “a priori” information between a detector and a decoder. The detector receives modulation symbols, performs a detection function that is complementary to the symbol mapping performed at the transmitter, and provides soft-decision symbols for transmitted coded bits. “Extrinsic information” in the soft-decision symbols is then decoded by the decoder to provide its extrinsic information, which comprises the a priori information used by the detector in the detection process. The detection and decoding may be iterated a number of times. The soft-decision symbols and the a priori information may be represented using log-likelihood ratios (LLRs). Techniques are provided to reduce the computational complexity associated with deriving the LLRs, including interference nulling to isolate each transmitted signal and “dual-maxima” approximation.
Description
- The present application for patent claims priority to Provisional application Ser. No. 10/005,104 entitled “ITERATIVE DETECTION AND DECODING FOR A MIMO-OFDM SYSTEM” filed Dec. 3, 2001, and assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.
- 1. Field
- The present invention relates generally to data communication, and more specifically to techniques for performing iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM communication system.
- 2. Background
- A multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication system employs multiple (NT) transmit antennas and multiple (NR) receive antennas for data transmission. A MIMO channel formed by the NT transmit and NR receive antennas may be decomposed into NS independent channels, with NS≦min {NT, NR}. Each of the NS independent channels is also referred to as a spatial subchannel of the MIMO channel and corresponds to a dimension. The MIMO system can provide improved performance (e.g., increased transmission capacity) over that of a single-input single-output (SISO) communication system if the additional dimensionalities created by the multiple transmit and receive antennas are utilized.
- A wideband MIMO system typically experiences frequency selective fading, i.e., different amounts of attenuation across the system bandwidth. This frequency selective fading causes inter-symbol interference (ISI), which is a phenomenon whereby each symbol in a received signal acts as distortion to subsequent symbols in the received signal. This distortion degrades performance by impacting the ability to correctly detect the received symbols. As such, ISI is a non-negligible noise component that may have a large impact on the overall signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio (SNR) for systems designed to operate at high SNR levels, such as MIMO systems. In such systems, equalization may be used at the receivers to combat ISI. However, the computational complexity required to perform equalization is typically significant or prohibitive for most applications.
- Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (OFDM) may be used to combat ISI, and achieves this without the use of computationally intensive equalization. An OFDM system effectively partitions the system bandwidth into a number of (NF) frequency subchannels, which may be referred to as sub-bands or frequency bins. Each frequency subchannel is associated with a respective subcarrier upon which data may be modulated. The frequency subchannels of the OFDM system may experience frequency selective fading (i.e., different amounts of attenuation for different frequency subchannels), depending on the characteristics (e.g., multipath profile) of the propagation path between the transmit and receive antennas. With OFDM, the ISI due to the frequency selective fading may be combated by repeating a portion of each OFDM symbol (i.e., appending a cyclic prefix to each OFDM symbol), as is known in the art.
- A MIMO system may thus advantageously employ OFDM to combat ISI. The frequency subchannels of the MIMO-OFDM system may experience different channel conditions (e.g., different fading and multipath effects) and may achieve different SNRs. Moreover, the channel conditions may vary over time. Consequently, the supported data rates may vary from frequency subchannel to frequency subchannel and from spatial subchannel to spatial subchannel, and may further vary with time. To achieve high performance, it is necessary to properly code and modulate the data at the transmitter (e.g., based on the determined channel conditions) and to properly detect and decode the received signals at the receiver.
- There is therefore a need in the art for techniques to detect and decode signals that may have been (flexibly) coded and modulated based on one or more coding and modulation schemes, e.g., as determined by the channel conditions.
- Aspects of the invention provide techniques to iteratively detect and decode data transmitted in a wireless (e.g., MIMO-OFDM) communication system. The iterative detection and decoding exploits the error correction capabilities of the channel code to provide improved performance. This is achieved by iteratively passing soft (multi-bit) “a priori” information between a soft-input soft-output detector and a soft-input soft-output decoder.
- The detector receives modulation symbols previously generated at a transmitter system based on one or more coding and modulation schemes, performs a detection function that is complementary to the symbol mapping performed at the transmitter system, and provides soft-decision symbols for transmitted coded bits. Extrinsic information in the soft-decision symbols (which comprises the a priori information for the decoder, as described below) is then decoded by the decoder based on one or more decoding schemes complementary to the one or more coding schemes used at the transmitter system. The decoder further provides its extrinsic information (which comprises the a priori information for the detector) that is then used by the detector in the detection process.
- The detection and decoding may be iterated a number of times. During the iterative detection and decoding process, the reliability of the bit decisions is improved with each iteration. The iterative detection and decoding process described herein may be used to combat frequency selective fading as well as flat fading. Moreover, the iterative detection and decoding process may be flexibly used with various types of coding schemes (e.g., serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes) and with various modulation schemes (e.g., M-PSK and M-QAM).
- The a priori information passed between the detector and decoder and the soft-decision symbols may be represented using log-likelihood ratios (LLRs). Techniques are provided herein to reduce the computational complexity associated with deriving the LLRs. Such techniques include the use of interference nulling to isolate each transmitted signal by removing the other interferers and the use of a “dual-maxima” or some other approximation to compute the LLRs, which are described below.
- Various aspects and embodiments of the invention are described in further detail below. The invention further provides methods, receiver units, transmitter units, receiver systems, transmitter systems, systems, and other apparatuses and elements that implement various aspects, embodiments, and features of the invention, as described in further detail below.
- The features, nature, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference characters identify correspondingly throughout and wherein:
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a transmitter system and a receiver system in a MIMO-OFDM system; -
FIGS. 2A and 2B are block diagrams of two transmitter units that code and modulate data with (1) a single coding and modulation scheme and (2) separate coding and modulation schemes on a per-antenna basis, respectively; -
FIGS. 3A and 3B are block diagrams of serial and parallel concatenated convolutional encoders, respectively; -
FIG. 3C is a block diagram of a recursive convolutional encoder; -
FIGS. 4A and 4B are block diagrams of two receiver units that detect and decode data previously processed with (1) a single coding and modulation scheme and (2) separate coding and modulation schemes on a per-antenna basis, respectively; -
FIG. 4C is a block diagram of a receiver unit that performs successive nulling and interference cancellation to recover one transmitted signal at a time; -
FIGS. 5A and 5B are block diagrams of two Turbo decoders capable of performing iterative decoding for serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes, respectively; and -
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an interference canceller that may be used for the receiver unit inFIG. 4C . - The iterative detection and decoding techniques described herein may be used for various wireless communication systems. For clarity, various aspects and embodiments of the invention are described specifically for multiple-input multiple output communication system that implements orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (i.e., a MIMO-OFDM system).
- As noted above, a MIMO system employs NT transmit antennas and NR receive antennas for data transmission, where NR≧NT. A MIMO channel formed by the NT transmit antennas and NR receive antennas may be decomposed into NS spatial subchannels, where NS≦min {NT, NR}. An OFDM system effectively partitions the system bandwidth into NF frequency subchannels. Each frequency subchannel may be defined to be sufficiently narrow so that its frequency response is considered flat or frequency non-selective. A MIMO-OFDM system may thus transmit data via a number of (NC) “transmission channels” (where NC=NS·NF), with each such transmission channel corresponding to a frequency subchannel of a spatial subchannel.
-
FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of atransmitter system 110 and areceiver system 150 in a MIMO-OFDM system 100.Transmitter system 110 andreceiver system 150 are capable of implementing various aspects and embodiments of the invention, as described below. - At
transmitter system 110, traffic data is provided at a particular data rate from adata source 112 to a transmit (TX)data processor 114, which codes and interleaves the traffic data based on one or more coding schemes to provide coded data. The coding may be performed based on a single coding scheme for all transmit antennas, one coding scheme for each transmit antenna or each subset of transmit antennas, or one coding scheme for each transmission channel or each group of transmission channels. The data rate and the coding may be determined by a data rate control and a coding control, respectively, provided by acontroller 130. - The coded data is then provided to a
modulator 116, which may also receive pilot data (e.g., data of a known pattern and processed in a known manner). The pilot data may be multiplexed with the coded traffic data (e.g., using time division multiplexing (TDM) or code division multiplexing (CDM)) in all or a subset of the frequency subchannels and in all or a subset of the spatial subchannels used to transmit the traffic data. The pilot may be used by the receiver system to perform a number of functions such as acquisition, frequency and timing synchronization, channel estimation, coherent data demodulation, and so on. - In a specific embodiment, the processing by
modulator 116 includes (1) modulating the received data with one or more modulation schemes (e.g., M-PSK, M-QAM, and so on) to provide modulation symbols, (2) transforming the modulation symbols to form OFDM symbols, and (3) appending a cyclic prefix to each OFDM symbol to form a corresponding transmission symbol. Similarly, the modulation may be performed based on a single modulation scheme for all transmit antennas, one modulation scheme for each transmit antenna or each subset of transmit antennas, or one modulation scheme for each transmission channel or each group of transmission channels. The modulation is performed based on a modulation control provided bycontroller 130. The modulated data (i.e., the transmission symbols) is then provided to transmitters (TMTR) 122 a through 122 t associated with the NT transmit antennas to be used for data transmission. - Each transmitter 122 converts the received modulated data into one or more analog signals and further conditions (e.g., amplifies, filters, and quadrature modulates) the analog signals to generate a modulated signal suitable for transmission over the communication channel. The modulated signals from
transmitters 122 a through 122 t are then transmitted viaantennas 124 a through 124 t, respectively, to the receiver system. - At
receiver system 150, the transmitted modulated signals are received byantennas 152 a through 152 r, and the received signal from each antenna is provided to a respective receiver (RCVR) 154. Each receiver 154 conditions (e.g., filters, amplifies, and downconverts) a respective received signal and digitizes the conditioned signal to provide a respective stream of data samples, which represent the transmission symbols received via the associated antenna. A demodulator (Demod) 156 receives and demodulates the NR data sample streams fromreceivers 154 a through 154 r to provide NR corresponding streams of received modulation symbols. For each data sample stream,demodulator 156 removes the cyclic prefix included in each transmission symbol and then transforms each received OFDM symbol to provide a corresponding stream of received modulation symbols. - A detector/
decoder 158 initially performs the detection function that is complementary to the symbol mapping and provides soft-decision (multi-bit) symbols for the coded bits transmitted from the transmitter system. The soft-decision symbols are then decoded based on one or more decoding schemes complementary to the one or more coding schemes used at the transmitter system. In an aspect, the detection and decoding may be performed iteratively a number of times, as described in further detail below. The decoded data is then provided to adata sink 160. -
Controllers Memories controllers -
FIG. 2A is a block diagram of atransmitter unit 200 a, which is an embodiment of the transmitter portion oftransmitter system 110 inFIG. 1 . In this embodiment, a single coding scheme is used for all NT transmit antennas and a single modulation scheme is used for all NF frequency subchannels of all transmit antennas.Transmitter unit 200 a includes (1) aTX data processor 114 a that receives and codes traffic data in accordance with a specific coding scheme to provide coded data and (2) amodulator 116 a that modulates the coded data in accordance with a specific modulation scheme to provide modulated data.TX data processor 114 a andmodulator 116 a are thus one embodiment ofTX data processor 114 andmodulator 116, respectively, inFIG. 1 . - In the specific embodiment shown in
FIG. 2A ,TX data processor 114 a includes anencoder 212, achannel interleaver 214, and a demultiplexer (Demux) 216.Encoder 212 receives and codes the traffic data (i.e., the information bits) in accordance with the selected coding scheme to provide coded bits. The coding increases the reliability of the data transmission. The selected coding scheme may include any combination of cyclic redundancy check (CRC) coding, convolutional coding, Turbo coding, block coding, and so on. Several designs forencoder 212 are described below. -
Channel interleaver 214 then interleaves the coded bits based on a particular interleaving scheme and provides interleaved coded bits. The interleaving provides time diversity for the coded bits, permits the data to be transmitted based on an average signal-to-noise-and-interference ratio (SNR) for the frequency and/or spatial subchannels used for the data transmission, combats fading, and further removes correlation between coded bits used to form each modulation symbol. The interleaving may further provide frequency diversity if the coded bits are transmitted over multiple frequency subchannels. The coding and channel interleaving are described in further detail below. -
Demultiplexer 216 then demultiplexes the interleaved and coded data into NT coded data streams for the NT transmit antennas to be used for the data transmission. The NT coded data streams are then provided to modulator 116 a. - In the specific embodiment shown in
FIG. 2A , modulator 116 a includes NT OFDM modulators, with each OFDM modulator assigned to process a respective coded data stream for one transmit antenna. Each OFDM modulator includes a symbol mapping element 222, an inverse fast Fourier transformer (IFFT) 224, and a cyclic prefix generator 226. In this embodiment, all NTsymbol mapping elements 222 a through 222 t implement the same modulation scheme. - Within each OFDM modulator, symbol mapping element 222 maps the received coded bits to modulation symbols for the (up to) NF frequency subchannels to be used for data transmission on the transmit antenna associated with the OFDM modulator. The particular modulation scheme to be implemented by symbol mapping element 222 is determined by the modulation control provided by
controller 130. For OFDM, the modulation may be achieved by grouping sets of q coded bits to form non-binary symbols and mapping each non-binary symbol to a specific point in a signal constellation corresponding to the selected modulation scheme (e.g., QPSK, M-PSK, M-QAM, or some other scheme). Each mapped signal point corresponds to an M-ary modulation symbol, where M=2q. Symbol mapping element 222 then provides a vector of (up to) NF modulation symbols for each transmission symbol period, with the number of modulation symbols in each vector corresponding to the number of frequency subchannels to be used for data transmission for that transmission symbol period. - If conventional non-iterative symbol de-mapping and decoding are performed at the receiver system, then Gray mapping may be preferably used for the symbol mapping since it may provide better performance in terms of bit error rate (BER). With Gray mapping, the neighboring points in the signal constellation (in both the horizontal and vertical directions) differ by only one out of the q bit positions. Gray mapping reduces the number of bit errors for more likely error events, which correspond to a received modulation symbol being mapped to a location near the correct location, in which case only one coded bit would be received in error.
- However, if iterative detection and decoding are performed as described below, it can be shown that non-Gray mapping outperforms Gray mapping. This is true due to the fact that independence between the coded bits enhances independence between the detection and decoding processes, which then provides improved performance when iterative detection and decoding are performed. Thus, each symbol mapping element 222 may be designed to implement a non-Gray mapped constellation. In certain instances, improved performance may be achieved if the constellation is defined such that neighboring points differ by as many bit positions as possible (i.e., the opposite goal as for Gray mapping, or “anti-Gray” mapping).
- IFFT 224 then converts each modulation symbol vector into its time-domain representation (which is referred to as an OFDM symbol) using the inverse fast Fourier transform. IFFT 224 may be designed to perform the inverse transform on any number of frequency subchannels (e.g., 8, 16, 32, . . . , NF, . . . ). In an embodiment, for each OFDM symbol, cyclic prefix generator 226 repeats a portion of the OFDM symbol to form a corresponding transmission symbol. The cyclic prefix ensures that the transmission symbol retains its orthogonal properties in the presence of multipath delay spread, thereby improving performance against deleterious path effects such as channel dispersion caused by frequency selective fading. The transmission symbols from cyclic prefix generator 226 are then provided to an associated transmitter 122 and processed to generate a modulated signal, which is then transmitted from the associated antenna 124.
-
FIG. 2B is a block diagram of atransmitter unit 200 b, which is another embodiment of the transmitter portion oftransmitter system 110 inFIG. 1 . In this embodiment, a particular coding scheme is used for each of the NT transmit antennas and a particular modulation scheme is used for all NF frequency subchannels of each transmit antenna (i.e., separate coding and modulation on a per-antenna basis). The specific coding and modulation schemes to be used for each transmit antenna may be selected based on the expected channel conditions (e.g., by the receiver system and sent back to the transmitter system). -
Transmitter unit 200 b includes (1) aTX data processor 114 b that receives and codes traffic data in accordance with separate coding schemes to provide coded data and (2) amodulator 116 b that modulates the coded data in accordance with separate modulation schemes to provide modulated data.TX data processor 114 b andmodulator 116 b are another embodiment ofTX data processor 114 andmodulator 116, respectively, inFIG. 1 . - In the specific embodiment shown in
FIG. 2B ,TX data processor 114 b includes ademultiplexer 210, NT encoders 212 a through 212 t, and NT channel interleavers 214 a through 214 t (i.e., one set of encoder and channel interleaver for each transmit antenna).Demultiplexer 210 demultiplexes the traffic data (i.e., the information bits) into NT data streams for the NT transmit antennas to be used for the data transmission. Each data stream is then provided to arespective encoder 212. - Each
encoder 212 receives and codes a respective data stream based on the specific coding scheme selected for the corresponding transmit antenna to provide coded bits. The coded bits from eachencoder 212 are then provided to arespective channel interleaver 214, which interleaves the coded bits based on a particular interleaving scheme to provide diversity.Channel interleavers 214 a through 214 t then provide to modulator 116 b NT interleaved and coded data streams for the NT transmit antennas. - In the specific embodiment shown in
FIG. 2B ,modulator 116 b includes NT OFDM modulators, with each OFDM modulator including symbol mapping element 222, IFFT 224, and cyclic prefix generator 226. In this embodiment, the NTsymbol mapping elements 222 a through 222 t may implement different modulation schemes. Within each OFDM modulator, symbol mapping element 222 maps groups of qn coded bits to form Mn-ary modulation symbols, where Mn corresponds to the specific modulation scheme selected for the n-th transmit antenna (as determined by the modulation control provided by controller 130) and Mn=2qn . The subsequent processing by IFFT 224 and cyclic prefix generator 226 is as described above. - Other designs for the transmitter unit may also be implemented and are within the scope of the invention. For example, the coding and modulation may be separately performed for each subset of transmit antennas, each transmission channel, or each group of transmission channels. The implementation of
encoders 212,channel interleavers 214, symbol mapping elements 222, IFFTs 224, and cyclic prefix generators 226 is known in the art and not described in detail herein. - The coding and modulation for MIMO systems with and without OFDM arc described in further detail in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/826,481 and 09/956,449, both entitled “Method and Apparatus for Utilizing Channel State Information in a Wireless Communication System,” respectively filed Mar. 23, 2001 and Sep. 18, 2001; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/854,235, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Processing Data in a Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) Communication System Utilizing Channel State Information,” filed May 11, 2001; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/776,075, entitled “Coding Scheme for a Wireless Communication System,” filed Feb. 1, 2001; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/993,087, entitled “Multiple-Access Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) Communication System,” filed Nov. 6, 2001. These applications are all assigned to the assignee of the present application and incorporated herein by reference. Still other coding and modulation schemes may also be used, and this is within the scope of the invention.
- An example OFDM system is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/532,492, entitled “High Efficiency, High Performance Communication System Employing Multi-Carrier Modulation,” filed Mar. 30, 2000, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated herein by reference. OFDM is also described by John A. C. Bingham in a paper entitled “Multicarrier Modulation for Data Transmission: An Idea Whose Time Has Come,” IEEE Communications Magazine, May 1990, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- Various types of encoder may be used to code data prior to transmission. For example, the encoder may implement any one of the following (1) a serial concatenated convolutional code (SCCC), (2) a parallel concatenated convolutional code (PCCC), (3) a simple convolutional code, (4) a concatenated code comprised of a block code and a convolutional code, and so on. Concatenated convolutional codes are also referred to as Turbo codes.
-
FIG. 3A is a block diagram of an embodiment of a serial concatenatedconvolutional encoder 212 x, which may be used for each ofencoders 212 inFIGS. 2A and 2B .Encoder 212 x includes an outerconvolutional encoder 312 a, acode interleaver 314, and an innerconvolutional encoder 312 b, all coupled in series. Outerconvolutional encoder 312 a codes the information bits with a particular outer code of code rate Ro. The coded output fromencoder 312 a is provided tocode interleaver 314, which interleaves each packet of NP coded bits in accordance with a particular (e.g., pseudo-random) interleaving scheme. -
Code interleaver 314 may implement any one of a number of interleaving schemes, such as the ones used for cdma2000 and W-CDMA. In one specific interleaving scheme, the NP coded bits in a packet are written, by row, into a 25-row by 2n-column array, where n is the smallest integer such that NP≦25+n. The rows are then shuffled in accordance with a bit-reversal rule. For example, row 1 (“00001”) is swapped with row 16 (“10000”), row 3 (“00011”) is swapped with row 24 (“11000”), and so on. The bits within each row are then permutated (i.e., rearranged) according to a row-specific linear congruential sequence (LCS). The LCS for row k may be defined as xk(i+1)={xk(i)+ck}mod 2n, where i=0, 1, . . . 2n−1, xk(0)=ck, and ck is a specific value selected for each row and is further dependent on the value for n. For the permutation in each row, the i-th bit in the row is placed in location x(i). The bits in the array are then read out by column. - The LCS code interleaving scheme is described in further detail in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/205,511, entitled “Turbo Code Interleaver Using Linear Congruential Sequences,” filed Dec. 4, 1998, and in a cdma2000 document entitled “C.S0002-A-1 Physical Layer Standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems,” both of which are incorporated herein by reference. Other code interleavers may also be used and are within the scope of the invention. For example, a random interleaver or a symmetrical-random (S-random) interleaver may also be used instead of the LCS interleaver described above.
- Inner
convolutional encoder 312 b receives and further codes the interleaved bits fromcode interleaver 314 with a particular inner code of code rate Ri. In an embodiment,encoder 312 b implements a recursive code to fully realize the benefit of the significant interleaving gain provided bycode interleaver 314. The inner code does not need to be a powerful code since the key desired property is recursiveness. In fact, the inner code may simply be a rate-1 differential code. The overall code rate for serial concatenatedconvolutional encoder 212 x is RSCCC=Ro·Ri. -
FIG. 3B is a block diagram of an embodiment of a parallel concatenatedconvolutional encoder 212 y, which may also be used for each ofencoders 212 inFIGS. 2A and 2B .Encoder 212 y includes two constituentconvolutional encoder code interleaver 324, apuncturing element 326, and a parallel-to-serial (P/S)converter 328.Code interleaver 324 interleaves the information bits in accordance with a particular (i.e., pseudo-random) interleaving scheme, and may be implemented as described above forcode interleaver 314. - As shown in
FIG. 3B , the information bits are provided toconvolutional encoder 312 c and the interleaved information bits are provided toconvolutional encoder 312 d. Each encoder 312 codes the received bits based on a particular constituent code and provides a respective stream of parity bits.Encoders - The parity bits by and bz from
encoders element 326, which punctures (i.e., deletes) zero or more of the parity bits to provide the desired number of output bits. Puncturingelement 326 is an optional element that may be used to adjust the overall code rate, RPCCC, of the parallel concatenated convolutional encoder, which is given by 1/RPCCC=1/R1+1/R2−1. - The information bits (which are also referred to as the systematic bits), and the punctured parity bits from
convolutional encoders S converter 328 and serialized into a coded bit stream that is provided to the next processing element. -
FIG. 3C is a block diagram of an embodiment of a recursiveconvolutional encoder 312 x, which may be used for each ofencoders 312 a through 312 d inFIGS. 3A and 3B .Encoder 312 x may also be used for each ofencoders 212 inFIGS. 2A and 2B . - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 3C ,encoder 312 x implements the following transfer function for the recursive convolutional code: -
-
Encoder 312 x may also be designed to implement other convolutional codes, and this is within the scope of the invention. -
Encoder 312 x includes a number of series-coupled delay elements 332, a number of modulo-2 adders 334, and aswitch 336. Initially, the states of delay elements 332 are set to zeros and switch 336 is in the up position. Then, for each received bit in a packet,adder 334 a performs modulo-2 addition of the received bit with the output bit fromadder 334 c and provides the result to delayelement 332 a.Adder 334 b performs modulo-2 addition of the bits fromadder 334 a and delayelements Adder 334 c performs modulo-2 addition of the bits fromdelay elements - After all NI information bits in the packet have been coded,
switch 336 is moved to the down position and three zero (“0”) bits are provided to encoder 312 x.Encoder 312 x then codes the three zero bits and provides three tail systematic bits and three tail parity bits. - It can be shown analytically and via computer simulations that SCCCs provide better performance than PCCCs in additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channels at medium to high SNR levels, which is typically the desired operating region for MIMO systems. While the BER for PCCCs asymptotically reaches an error floor, this floor is absent or much lower for SCCCs. PCCCs outperform SCCCs in the high BER region, and may be more suitably used when the system loads approach the capacity limits of the channel at low SNRs. Both PCCCs and SCCCs may be implemented using relatively simple constituent codes (e.g., having constraint lengths of 3 to 16), such as the one shown in
FIG. 3C . - Referring back to
FIGS. 2A and 2B , the coded bits from eachencoder 212 are interleaved by arespective channel interleaver 214 to provide temporal, frequency, and/or spatial diversity against deleterious path effects (e.g., fading and multipath). Moreover, since the coded bits are subsequently grouped together to form non-binary symbols that are then mapped to M-ary modulation symbols, the interleaving may be used to ensure that the coded bits that form each modulation symbol are not located close to each other temporally (i.e., the channel interleaving distributes the coded bits that are temporally close together in a pseudo-random manner among modulation symbols that may be transmitted over different frequency subchannels, spatial subchannels, and/or transmission symbol periods). The combination of encoding, channel interleaving and symbol mapping (especially anti-Gray mapping) may be viewed as a serial concatenated code, where the symbol mapper takes on the role of the inner code. The channel interleaver provides interleaving gain in much the same way as in an SCCC, as described earlier. This potential for performance gain is unlocked by the iterative receiver structure described below. The channel interleaving can provide improved performance for various coding and modulation schemes, such as a single common coding and modulation scheme for all transmit antennas or separate coding and modulation scheme per antenna. - Various interleaving schemes may be used for the channel interleaver. In one interleaving scheme, the coded bits for each packet are written (linearly) to rows of an array. The bits in each row may then be permutated (i.e., rearranged) based on (1) a bit-reversal rule, (2) a linear congruential sequence (such as the one described above for the code interleaver), (3) a randomly generated pattern, or (4) a permutation pattern generated in some other manner. The rows are also permutated in accordance with a particular row permutation pattern. The permutated coded bits are then retrieved from each column of the array and provided to the next processing element. Other channel interleaving schemes may also be used and this is within the scope of the invention.
- In an embodiment, the channel interleaving is performed separately for each independently coded data stream. For the PCCCs, the information bits and the tail and parity bits for each packet may also be channel interleaved separately. For example, the information bits bx, the tail and parity bits by from the first
constituent encoder 312 c, and the tail and parity bits bz from the secondconstituent encoder 312 d may be interleaved by three separate channel interleavers, which may employ the same or different interleaving schemes. This separate channel interleaving allows for flexible puncturing of the individual parity bits. - The interleaving interval may be selected to provide the desired temporal, frequency, and/or spatial diversity, or any combination thereof. For example, the coded bits for a particular time period (e.g., 10 msec, 20 msec, and so on) and for a particular combination of transmission channels may be interleaved. The channel interleaving may be performed for each transmit antenna, or across each group of transmit antennas or across all transmit antennas to provide spatial diversity. The channel interleaving may also be performed for each frequency subchannel, or across each group of frequency subchannels or across all frequency subchannels to provide frequency diversity. The channel interleaving may also be performed across each group of one or more frequency subchannels of each group of one or more transmit antennas such that the coded bits from one data stream may be distributed over one or more frequency subchannels of one or more transmit antennas to provide a combination of temporal, frequency, and spatial diversity. The channel interleaving may also be performed across all frequency subchannels of all transmit antennas.
-
FIG. 4A is a block diagram of an embodiment of areceiver unit 400 a, which is an embodiment of the receiver portion ofreceiver system 150 inFIG. 1 . In this embodiment, a single demodulation scheme is used for all NF frequency subchannels of all NT transmit antennas and a single decoding scheme is used for all transmit antennas.Receiver unit 400 a may thus be used to receive a data transmission fromtransmitter unit 200 a inFIG. 2A . - The signals transmitted from the NT transmit antennas are initially received by each of NR antennas 152 a through 152 r and routed to a respective receiver 154 (which is also referred to as a front-end unit). Each receiver 154 conditions (e.g., filters, amplifies, and downconverts) a respective received signal and further digitizes the conditioned signal to provide data samples. Each receiver 154 may further demodulate the data samples with a recovered pilot to provide a stream of received transmission symbols, which is provided to a demodulator 156 a.
- In the specific embodiment shown in
FIG. 4A , demodulator 156 a includes NR OFDM demodulators, with each OFDM demodulator assigned to process a respective transmission symbol stream from one receive antenna. Each OFDM demodulator includes a cyclic prefix remover 412 and a fast Fourier transformer (FFT) 414. Cyclic prefix remover 412 removes the cyclic prefix previously appended to each OFDM symbol by the transmitter system to ensure ISI-free reception of the transmitted modulation symbols. FFT 414 then transforms each received OFDM symbol to provide a vector of NF received modulation symbols for the NF frequency subchannels used to transmit the OFDM symbol. The NR modulation symbol vectors from all NR OFDM demodulators for each transmission symbol period are provided to a detector/decoder 158 a, which is one embodiment of detector/decoder 158 inFIG. 1 . - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 4A , detector/decoder 158 a includes adetector 420 a and adecoder 430 that perform iterative detection and decoding on the modulation symbols received from all NR receive antennas to provide decoded data. The iterative detection and decoding exploits the error correction capabilities of the channel code to provide improved performance. This is achieved by iteratively passing soft “a priori” information between the soft-input soft-output (SISO)detector 420 a and the soft-input soft-output decoder 430, as described in further detail below. -
Detector 420 a receives the modulation symbols fromdemodulator 156 a and a priori information fromdecoder 430 and derives soft-decision (i.e., multi-bit) symbols for all NF frequency subchannels of all NT transmit antennas, with each such soft-decision symbol being an estimate of a coded bit transmitted by the transmitter system. As described in further detail below, the soft-decision symbols may be represented as log-likelihood ratios (LLRs), which are denoted as L(bk) inFIG. 4A . - For each transmission symbol period,
detector 420 a provides up to NB soft-decision symbols to NB respective summers 422, where NB=NT·NF·q and q is dependent on the specific modulation scheme used for the data transmission. Each summer 422 also receives the a priori information for its coded bit bk from decoder 430 (which is referred to as the detector a priori information and denoted as La(bk)), and subtracts this detector a priori information from the received soft-decision symbol to derive extrinsic information for the coded bit (denoted as Le(bk)). The extrinsic information for all (NT·NF·q) coded bits is then (1) converted from parallel to serial by a P/S converter 424, (2) deinterleaved by achannel deinterleaver 426 in a manner complementary to the channel interleaving performed at the transmitter system, and (3) provided as a priori information from the detector to the decoder (which is referred to as the decoder a priori information and denoted as La D(bk)). -
Decoder 430 uses the decoder a priori information in the decoding process and provides the decoded data.Decoder 430 further provides “a posteriori” information (denoted as LD(bk)) to asummer 432.Summer 432 then subtracts the decoder a priori information, La D(bk), from the decoder a posteriori information, LD(bk) to derive extrinsic information from the decoder for the detector (denoted as Le D(bk)). This detector extrinsic information is then interleaved by achannel interleaver 434, converted from serial to parallel by a S/P converter 436, and provided as the detector a priori information, La(bk), todetector 420 a and summers 422. - To briefly summarize, the output of the detection process may be expressed as:
-
L e(b k)=L(b k)−L a(b k) Eq(1) - where
-
- L(bk) represents the soft-decision symbol for the k-th coded bit bk;
- La(bk) represents the detector a priori information for the k-th coded bit, which is provided by the decoder; and
- Le(bk) represents the extrinsic information for the k-th coded bit provided by the detector to the decoder.
The output of the decoding process may similarly be expressed as:
-
L e D(b k)=L D(b k)−L a D(b k), Eq(2) - where
-
- LD(bk) represents the a posteriori information for the k-th coded bit provided by the decoder;
- La D(bk) represents the decoder a priori information for the k-th coded bit provided by the detector; and
- Le D(bk) represents the extrinsic information for the k-th coded bit provided by the decoder to the detector.
- As shown in
FIG. 4A , the decoder a priori information, La D(bk), is simply the detector extrinsic information, Le(bk), after the parallel-to-serial conversion and channel deinterleaving. Similarly, the detector a priori information, La D(bk), is simply the decoder extrinsic information, Le D(bk), after the channel interleaving and serial-to-parallel conversion. - The detection and decoding process may be iterated a number of times. During the iterative detection and decoding process, the reliability of the bit decisions is improved with each iteration. The iterative detection and decoding process described herein may be used to combat frequency selective fading (e.g., by using OFDM with cyclic prefix) as well as flat fading (without any modifications). Moreover, the iterative detection and decoding process may be flexibly used with various types of coding and modulation schemes, including the serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes as described above.
- In
FIG. 4A ,detector 420 a provides soft-decision symbols for the transmitted coded bits based on the modulation symbols received from the NR receive antennas as well as the a priori information fed back fromdecoder 430. The soft-decision symbols may be conveniently represented in the form of log-likelihood ratios (LLRs) and include channel information, extrinsic information, and a priori information. The channel information for each coded bit includes information about the channel response between the transmit and receive antennas. The extrinsic information for each coded bit comprises incremental information about that coded bit that is extracted from other coded bits in the detection process. And the a priori information for each coded bit includes information about the coded bit that is known or derived outside the detection process. - In an embodiment, only the channel information and extrinsic information are passed from the detector to the decoder where, after parallel-to-serial conversion and channel deinterleaving, they are used as a priori information in the decoding process. For simplicity, the channel information and extrinsic information are collectively referred to as simply the extrinsic information. Ideally, the decoder a priori information should be provided by an independent source. However, since such a source is not available, an independent source may be mimicked by minimizing the correlation between the decoder a priori information (i.e., the detector output) and previous decisions made by the decoder (i.e., the detector a priori information). This is achieved by subtracting the detector a priori information from the soft-decision symbols derived by the detector, using summers 422 as shown in
FIG. 4A . - The modulation symbol received from the output of the OFDM demodulator coupled to the m-th receive antenna for the l-th frequency subchannel at time index j (i.e., transmission symbol period j) may be expressed as:
-
- where
-
- hn,m,l(j) is the channel response between the n-th transmit antenna and the m-th receive antenna for the l-th frequency subchannel at time index i;
- cn,l(j) is the modulation symbol transmitted on the l-th frequency subchannel of the n-th transmit antenna; and
- nm,l(j) is a sample function of a zero-mean, temporally and spatially white Gaussian noise process.
To simplify notation, the time index j is dropped in the following derivations.
- Equation (3) may be expressed in matrix form, as follows:
-
r l =H l c l +n l, for l=0, 1, 2, . . . , NF−1, Eq (4) - where
-
- rl=[r1,lr2,l . . . rN
R ,l]T is a vector of NR modulation symbols received from the NR receive antennas for the l-th frequency subchannel; - Hl is the NR×NT matrix of channel gains {hn,m,l} for the l-th frequency subchannel, where hn,m,l denotes the complex channel gain between the n-th transmit antenna and the m-th receive antenna for the l-th frequency subchannel;
- cl=[C1,l, c2,l . . . cN
T ,l]T is a vector of NT modulation symbols transmitted from the NT transmit antennas for the l-th frequency subchannel; - nl=[n1,l n2,l . . . nN
R ,l]T is a vector of NR noise samples for the NR receive antennas for the l-th frequency subchannel; and - “T” denotes the transposition.
- rl=[r1,lr2,l . . . rN
- The modulation symbols received from all NF frequency subchannels of all NR receive antennas for each time index may be expressed as:
-
r=[r 0 T r 1 T . . . r NF −1]T Eq (5) - The NF·NR received modulation symbols in r correspond to the NF·NT transmitted modulation symbols, which may be expressed as:
-
c=[c 1 T c 2 T . . . c NT ]T Eq (6) - As noted above, each modulation symbol is formed by a respective group of q coded bits. The NF·NR received modulation symbols in r thus further correspond to the NF·NT.q transmitted coded bits, which may be expressed as:
-
b=[b 1 T,b 2 T, . . . b NT T]T, Eq (7) - where the coded bits transmitted from the n-th transmit antenna may be expressed as
-
b n =[b n,0,1 . . . b n,0,q b n,1,1 . . . b n,1,q . . . b n,NF −1,1 . . . b n,NF −1,q]T. - The detector computes the LLRs for each transmitted coded bit bn,l,i, as follows:
-
- As shown in equation (8), the LLR for a given coded bit, L(bn,l,i), is computed as the (natural) logarithm of the ratio of the probability of the coded bit bn,l,i, being a +1 given the received modulation symbols r, Pr{bn,l,i=+1|r}, over the probability of the coded bit bn,l,i being a −1 given the received modulation symbols r, Pr{bn,l,i=−1|r}. The probabilities for each coded bit are derived based on the received modulation symbol containing that bit and the sequence of coded bits received for r, as derived below.
- The following equalities may be expressed:
-
- where f(·) represents the symbol mapping from the coded bits b to the modulation symbols c. The LLRs may then be expressed as:
-
- In the first iteration of the iterative detection and decoding process, it is assumed that all points in the signal constellation are equally likely. Hence, the term Pr{c} can be removed from the numerator and denominator of equation (10). In subsequent iterations, however, the only assumption is that the transmitted modulation symbols are independent. Furthermore, since the coded bits that make up the modulation symbols are interleaved, it is assumed that the bit probabilities are independent. Based on these assumptions, the term Pr{c} may expressed as:
-
- where a change in notation of variables is made (i.e., p={n,l,i}) in the term to the right of the equality to simplify notation.
- The received modulation symbols r1,1, r2,1, . . . , rN
R ,NF −1 are conditionally independent given c. The term Pr{r|c} may then be expressed as: -
- where σ2 is the noise spectral density given by σ2=N0/2.
- Substituting equations (11) and (12) into equation (10), the LLR for the k-th coded bit may then be expressed as:
-
- where k={n,l,i}. Equation (13) may further be decomposed as follows:
-
- As shown in equation (14), the LLR for the k-th coded bit, L(bk), may be decomposed into two parts. The term La(bk) represents the a priori information for the k-th coded bit computed by the decoder and fed back to the detector. This detector a priori information is expressed in the form of a priori LLRs, which may be expressed as:
-
- The term Le(bk) represents the extrinsic information for the k-th coded bit computed by the detector and fed forward to the decoder. The product of the a priori probabilities, ΠPr{bp}, in equation (14) may be expressed as:
-
- where C is a constant and
-
- Hence, the detector extrinsic information, Le(bk), may be expressed in terms of the detector a priori LLRs, as follows:
-
- Since the detector a priori information, La(bk), is known by the decoder, it may be subtracted from L(bk) by summers 422 in
FIG. 4A such that only the detector extrinsic information, Le(bk), is provided to the decoder. - It can be seen from equations (13) and (17) that the computational complexity to derive the LLRs for the coded bits grows exponentially with the number of frequency subchannels (NF), the number of transmit antennas (NT), and the size of the signal constellation (2q). Several techniques may be used to reduce the computational burden to derive the coded bit LLRs. Such techniques include the use of interference nulling to isolate each transmitted signal by removing the other interferers and the use of a “dual-maxima” or some other approximation to compute the LLRs. These techniques are described in further detail below.
- Without loss of generality, the signal from transmit
antenna 1 may be treated as the desired signal and the other signals from the remaining (NT−1) transmit antennas may be treated as interference to the desired signal. With NR receive antennas, where NR≧NT, the (NT−1) interferers may be nulled (or canceled). For each of the NF frequency subchannels, the vector of NR modulation symbols, r l (which are received from the NR receive antennas for the l-th frequency subchannel) may be pre-multiplied by an (NR−NT+1)×NR nulling matrix, Θ l (1), and the resulting vector {tilde over (r)} i (1) of (NR−NT+1) elements may be expressed as: -
{tilde over (r)} (1)=Θ 1 (1) r l=Θ l (1) H l c l +Θ l (1) n l ={tilde over (H)} l (1) c 1,l +ñ l (1), for l=0, 1, . . . , NF−1. Eq (18) - As shown in equation (18), the components from transmit
antennas 2, 3, . . . , NT are suppressed in the vector {tilde over (r)} (1) and only the component c1,l from desired transmitantenna 1 remains. - The nulling matrices, Θ l (n), may be determined based on algorithms known in the art. The derivation of the nulling matrix, Θ l (1), for transmit
antenna 1 is briefly described as follows. First, the NR×(NT−1) channel response matrix, H l (1), for transmitantennas 2 through NT and the NR receive antennas is determined. A set of (NR−NT+1) orthonormal vectors {v1 (1) v2 (1) . . . vNR −NT +1}, whose members are the rows of the nulling matrix, Θ l (1), is then computed such that -
ΘHl (1) H l (1)=0 - where 0 is the all-zero matrix, and
-
ΘEl (1) Θ l (1)*=I - where Θ l (1)* is the Hermitian of Θ l (1) and I is the identity matrix (i.e., all ones along the diagonal and zeros elsewhere). Fast algorithms are available for computing the orthonormal vectors, as is known in the art. As indicated by the notation, different nulling matrices are derived for different transmit antennas and different frequency subchannels (i.e., Θ l (n) for n=1, 2, . . . , NT, and l=0, 1, . . . , NF−1).
- Derivation of the nulling matrices for a MIMO system is described in further detail by Vahid Tarokh et al in a paper entitled “Combined Array Processing and Space-Time Coding,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 45, No. 4, May 1999, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- After nulling the interference on the desired signal due to the signals from the other (NT−1) transmit antennas, the LLRs for the coded bits from the desired transmit antenna may then be calculated in a similar manner as described above, without regard to the components from the other (NT−1) transmit antennas. For transmit
antenna 1, the LLRs for the coded bits transmitted on all NF frequency subchannels of this transmit antenna, [b1,0,1 . . . b1,0,q . . . b1,1,1 . . . b1,1,q . . . b1,NF −1,1 . . . b1,NF −1,q], may be expressed as: -
- where {tilde over (r)} (1)=[{tilde over (r)} 0 (1)T {tilde over (r)} 1 (1)T . . . {tilde over (r)} N
F −1 (1)T]T. - After the interference nulling, the LLR computation is simplified since only the desired signal from one transmit antenna is considered at a time. Equation (19) may be expressed in a form similar to equation (14), as follows:
-
- where k=1, 2, . . . , NF·q and k={m, l}.
- As shown in equation (20), instead of calculating (NF·NT·q) LLR values for all NT transmit antennas, only (NF·q) LLR values are calculated at a time for each of NT transmit antennas. However, by performing the interference nulling, the complexity of the calculation in Eq (20) is no longer exponential in the number of transmit antennas NT since (1) each summation is performed over only the modulation symbols c n, transmitted from the desired n-th transmit antenna, and (2) the term ΠPr{bp} is evaluated only for the coded bits transmitted from the n-th transmit antenna.
- The product of the a priori probabilities, ΠPr{bp}, in equation (20) may be expressed as:
-
- The detector extrinsic information, Le (n)(bk), may then be expressed in terms of the detector a priori LLRs, as follows:
-
- The detection with interference nulling described above may be repeated NT times, once for each transmit antenna. For each repetition to recover the desired signal from a particular transmit antenna, the (NT−1) interferers of this desired signal may be nulled out by pre-multiplying the received modulation symbol vectors, r l, with the nulling matrix, Θ l (n), derived for that transmit antenna and that frequency subchannel, as shown in equation (18). The LLRs for the coded bits in the desired signal may then be computed, as shown in equations (20) and (22). Thus, equation (20) or (22) may be evaluated NT times, once for each desired signal, with each evaluation providing a set of (NF·q) LLRs for the coded bits in the desired signal.
- The reduced computational complexity for deriving the LLRs for the coded bits is achieved with a corresponding decrease in diversity, since the desired signal is received with a diversity of order (NR−NT+1), instead of a diversity of order NR, using equation (18).
- The dual-maxima approximation may also be used to reduce the computational complexity associated with deriving the LLRs for the coded bits. As shown in equations (20) and (22), the LLR for each coded bit is computed as the logarithm of the ratio of two summations. Each summation is performed over a number of elements, with each such element being composed of products of exponential terms, exp(βm,l) and exp(αn). The exponentiation in the elements of each summation enhances the differences between the individual elements of the summation. Hence, one element typically dominates each summation, and the following approximation may be made:
-
- For simplicity, the following may be defined:
-
- Applying the approximation shown in equation (23) for the sum of exponents to equation (24), the following can be expressed:
-
- The approximation shown in equation (25) is often referred to as the dual-maxima approximation.
- The dual-maxima approximation may be used to simplify the computation for the LLRs for the coded bits. Specifically, for equation (22), the logarithm of the ratio of two summations may first be decomposed as follows:
-
- Next, instead of summing over the individual elements for all possible values of the coded bits for the modulation symbols c n from the n-th transmit antenna, the dual-maxima approximation algorithm finds the maximum element in each summation (i.e., one for the numerator and another for the denominator in equation (22)) and uses these two maximum elements in the LLR calculation, as shown in equation (25).
- By using approximations based on the dual-maxima approximation, the computational complexity can be made to increase linearly in the number of coded bits per modulation symbol, q, instead of exponentially. Simulation results have shown that the performance degradation due to the use of such approximations is negligible over the range of SNRs where the use of high-order modulations is justified.
- Other approximations and simplifications may also be used to reduce the number of complex additions and multiplications needed to compute the LLRs for the coded bits, and this is within the scope of the invention.
- Other simplifications that may be used for computing LLRs are described by Andrew J. Viterbi in a paper entitled “An Intuitive Justification and a Simplified Implementation of the MAP Decoder for Convolutional Codes,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, Vol. 16, No. 2, February 1998, pp. 260-264, and by Patrick Robertson et al. in a paper entitled “A Comparison of Optimal and Sub-Optimal MAP Decoding Algorithms Operating in the Log Domain,” IEEE International Conference on Communication, 1995, pp. 1009-1012, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. These various simplification techniques typically perform computations in the log-domain, where division becomes subtraction and multiplication becomes addition.
-
FIG. 4B is a block diagram of an embodiment of areceiver unit 400 b, which is another embodiment of the receiver portion ofreceiver system 150 inFIG. 1 . In this embodiment, different demodulation and decoding schemes may be used for the NT transmit antennas.Receiver unit 400 b may thus be used to receive a data transmission fromtransmitter unit 200 b inFIG. 2B , which employs separate coding and modulation schemes on a per-antenna basis. - The signals transmitted from the NT transmit antennas are initially received by each of NR antennas 152 a through 152 r and routed to a respective receiver 154. Each receiver 154 conditions, digitizes, and processes a respective received signal to provide a respective stream of transmission symbols. The transmission symbol stream from each receiver 154 is provided to a respective OFDM demodulator 410 within a
demodulator 156 b. Each OFDM demodulator 410 removes the cyclic prefix appended to each OFDM symbol by the transmitter system and then transforms each received OFDM symbol to provide a vector of NF received modulation symbols for the NF frequency subchannels used to transmit the OFDM symbol. The NR modulation symbol vectors from all NR OFDM demodulators 410 for each transmission symbol period are provided to a detector/decoder 158 b, which is another embodiment of detector/decoder 158 inFIG. 1 . - In the embodiment shown in
FIG. 4B , detector/decoder 158 b includes adetector 420 b and NT decoder blocks 440, which collectively perform iterative detection and decoding on the modulation symbols received from all NR receive antennas to provide the decoded data. Each decoder block 440 is assigned to process the modulation symbols transmitted from a respective transmit antenna, which may have been coded and modulated with its own specific coding and modulation schemes. -
Detector 420 b receives the modulation symbols fromdemodulator 156 b and the a priori information from the NT decoders 430 a through 430 t and provides soft-decision symbols for the NT transmit antennas, with each such soft-decision symbol being an estimate of a transmitted coded bit and may be represented by the LLR, as shown in equation (22). For each transmission symbol period,detector 420 b provides NT vectors of soft-decision symbols for the NT transmit antennas to the NT decoder blocks 440, with each vector including (NF·qn) soft-decision symbols (where qn is dependent on the specific modulation scheme used for the n-th transmit antenna). Within each decoder block 440, the detector a priori information for each coded bit being processed by that decoder block is subtracted from the corresponding soft-decision symbol to derive the extrinsic information for the coded bit. The detector extrinsic information for all (NF·qn) coded bits is then converted from parallel to serial by P/S converter 424, deinterleaved bychannel deinterleaver 426, and provided as a priori information todecoder 430. -
Decoder 430 within each decoder block 440 uses the decoder a priori information in the decoding process and provides the decoded data for the transmit antenna assigned to and processed by the decoder block.Decoder 430 further provides the a posteriori information for the coded bits transmitted by the assigned transmit antenna. Asummer 432 then subtracts the decoder a priori information from the decoder a posteriori information to derive the decoder extrinsic information, which is then interleaved bychannel interleaver 434, converted from serial to parallel by S/P converter 436, and provided as a priori information todetector 420 b and summer 422. - Similar to that described for
FIG. 4A , the detection and decoding process may be iterated a number of times. During the iterative detection and decoding process, the reliability of the bit decisions is improved with each iteration. -
FIG. 4C is a block diagram of an embodiment of areceiver unit 400 c, which is yet another embodiment of the receiver portion ofreceiver system 150 inFIG. 1 . In this embodiment, the detector performs successive nulling and interference cancellation to recover one transmitted signal at a time.Receiver unit 400 c may be used to recover a data transmission fromtransmitter unit 200 b inFIG. 2B (which employs separate coding and modulation schemes on a per-antenna basis). - The NR received signals are initially processed by receivers 154 and further processed by
demodulator 156 to provide NR modulation symbol vectors, r, for each transmission symbol period, which are then provided to a detector/decoder 158 c. Detector/decoder 158 c performs iterative detection and decoding as well as successive nulling and interference cancellation. In particular, detector/decoder 158 c implements a multi-stage (or multi-layer) detection scheme that includes both nulling of interferers and post-decoding interference cancellation (i.e., successive nulling and interference cancellation). - Detector/
decoder 158 c includes adetector 420 c, NT decoder blocks 440, and P/S converter 442.Detector 420 c includes NT detection stages (or layers), with each stage being assigned to process and recover the data for a particular transmit antenna. Each stage (except for the last stage) includes an interference nuller 450, an LLR computer 452, and an interference canceller 460. The last stage only includes LLR computer 452 since all other transmitted signals have been nulled by this time. - Within
detector 420 c, the received modulation symbol vectors r are provided as the input vectors r (1) for interference nuller 450 a, which pre-multiplies the modulation symbol vector r l (1) for each frequency subchannel with the nulling matrix Θ l (1) for that frequency subchannel of the first transmit antenna to provide the vector {tilde over (r)} l (1) having the components from the other (NT−1) transmit antennas approximately removed. The pre-multiplication may be performed as shown in equation (18), which is: -
{tilde over (r)} l (1) =Θ l (1) r l=Θ l (1) H l c l+Θ l (1) n l. -
Interference nuller 450 a performs NF pre-multiplications to derive NF vectors, {tilde over (r)} (1)=[{tilde over (r)} 0 (1)T {tilde over (r)} 1 (1)T . . . {tilde over (r)} NF −1 (1)T]T, for the NF frequency subchannels of the first transmit antenna. - The vectors {tilde over (r)} (1) are then provided to
LLR computer 452 a, which computes the LLRs for the coded bits transmitted from the first transmit antenna, as shown in equation (22). The LLRs for the (NF·q1) coded bits from the first transmit antenna are then provided to decoder block 440 a, which operates on the decoder a priori information to provide the detector a priori information and the decoded bits for the first transmit antenna, as described below. The detector a priori information fromdecoder block 440 a is provided back toLLR computer 452 a and used to compute the new decoder a priori information for the next iteration. The detection and decoding for the first transmit antenna may be iterated a number of times. - The decoded bits from
decoder block 440 a are also provided to interference canceller 460 a. Assuming that the data for the first stage has been decoded correctly, the contribution of these decoded bits on the received modulation symbols (which is denoted as î (1) is derived and subtracted from that stage's input vectors r (1) to derive the input vectors r (2) for the next stage. This interference cancellation may be expressed as: -
r (2) =r (1) −î (1). Eq (27) - Each subsequent stage performs the detection and decoding in a similar manner as described above for the first stage to provide the decoded bits for the assigned transmit antenna. However, the input vectors, r (n), for each subsequent stage contain less interference than that of the previous stage. Also, since the nulling is performed by interference nuller 450 using the modulation symbols from all NR receive antennas, the diversity order increases by one from one stage to the next. Finally, in the last stage, only the signal contribution from the last (NT-th) transmit antenna remains, if the interference cancellation was effectively performed in the preceding stages. Hence, no nulling is necessary and the iterative detection and decoding may be performed directly on that stage's input vectors r (N
T ). - Pre-decoding interference estimation and cancellation may also be used, and this is within the scope of the invention. In this case, a hard decision may be made on the LLR outputs from the detector. The hard decision may then be re-modulated and multiplied with the estimated channel response to obtain pre-decoding interference estimates (which are typically not as reliable as post-decoding interference estimates). The pre-decoding interference estimates may then be canceled from the received modulation symbols.
-
Decoders 430 inFIGS. 4A and 4B may be implemented based on various designs and may be dependent on the particular coding scheme(s) used at the transmitter system. For example, eachdecoder 430 may be implemented as an iterative decoder (i.e., a Turbo decoder) if a Turbo code is used. The structures for the Turbo decoders for serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes are described below. -
FIG. 5A is a simplified block diagram of aTurbo decoder 430 x capable of performing iterative decoding for serial concatenated convolutional codes, such as the one shown inFIG. 3A .Turbo decoder 430 x includes inner and outer maximum a posteriori (MAP)decoders code deinterleaver 514, and acode interleaver 516. - The coded bits (or more specifically, the a priori LLRs for the decoder, La D(bk)) are provided to
inner MAP decoder 512 a, which derives the a posteriori information for the coded bits based on the inner convolutional code. The a posteriori information is then subtracted by the a priori information forMAP decoder 512 a to provide extrinsic information, ek s1, which is indicative of corrections/adjustments in the confidence of the values for the information bits. The extrinsic information is then deinterleaved by code deinterleaver 514 and provided as a priori information toouter MAP decoder 512 b.MAP decoder 512 a also provides the LLRs for the coded bits, which comprise the a posteriori information, LD(bk), that is provided tosummer 432 inFIGS. 4A and 4B . -
MAP decoder 512 b receives the a priori information fromMAP decoder 512 a (after the code deinterleaving) and derives the a posteriori information for the coded bits based on the outer convolutional code. The a posteriori information is subtracted by the a priori information forMAP decoder 512 b to provide extrinsic information, ek s2, which is indicative of further corrections/adjustments in the confidence of the values for the information bits. The extrinsic information, ek s2, is then interleaved by code interleaver 516 and provided toinner MAP decoder 512 a. - The decoding by inner and
outer MAP decoders MAP decoder 512 b and sliced to provide the decoded bits, which are hard-decision (i.e., “0” or “1”) values for the information bits. -
MAP decoders -
FIG. 5B is a simplified block diagram of aTurbo decoder 430 y capable of performing iterative decoding for parallel concatenated convolutional codes, such as the one shown inFIG. 3B .Turbo decoder 430 y includes a S/P converter 510, twoMAP decoders code interleavers code deinterleaver 526, and a P/S converter 528. - The coded bits (or more specifically, the a priori LLRs for the decoder, La D(bk)) are provided to S/
P converter 510, which provides the a priori LLRs for the information bits, La D(bk x), toMAP decoder 512 c and code interleaver 524 b, the a priori LLRs for the first constituent encoder's parity bits, La D(bk y), toMAP decoder 512 c, and the a priori LLRs for the second constituent encoder's parity bits, La D(bk z), to codeinterleaver 524 b, where La D(bk)={La D(bk x), La D(bk y), La D(bk z)}. -
MAP decoder 512 c receives the a priori LLRs for the information bits, La D(bk x), the a priori LLRs for the first constituent encoder's parity bits, La D(bk y), and extrinsic information fromMAP decoder 512 d, ek p2 (after deinterleaving by code deinterleaver 526).MAP decoder 512 c then derives the a posteriori information for the information bits based on the first constituent convolutional code. This a posteriori information is then subtracted by the received a priori information to provide extrinsic information, ek p1, which is indicative of corrections/adjustments in the confidence of the values for the information bits determined from the first constituent encoder's parity bits. The extrinsic information is then interleaved by code interleaver 524 a and provided to MAP decoder 52 d. -
MAP decoder 512 d receives the a priori LLRs for the information bits, La D(bk x) (after interleaving bycode interleaver 524 b), the a priori LLRs for the second constituent encoder's parity bits, La D(bk z), and the extrinsic information fromMAP decoder 512 c, ek p1 (after interleaving by code interleaver 524 a).MAP decoder 512 d then derives the a posteriori information for the information bits based on the second constituent convolutional code. This a posteriori information is then subtracted by the received extrinsic information, ek p1, to provide the extrinsic information, ek 2, which is indicative of further corrections/adjustments in the confidence of the values for the information bits determined from the second constituent encoder's parity bits. The extrinsic information, ek 2, is then deinterleaved by code deinterleaver 526 and provided toMAP decoder 512 c. - P/
S converter 528 receives the first constituent encoder's parity bit LLRs fromMAP decoder 512 c, the second constituent encoder's parity bit LLRs fromMAP decoder 512 d, and the information bit LLRs fromMAP decoder 512 d. P/S converter 528 then performs parallel-to-serial conversion of the received LLRs and provides the a posteriori information, LD(bk), tosummer 432 inFIGS. 4A and 4B . - The decoding by
MAP decoders MAP decoder 512 d and sliced to provide the decoded bits.MAP decoders - In general, the number of iterations in both the decoder and the iterative detector-decoder can be fixed or variable (i.e., adaptive). In the latter case, the stop criterion may be triggered when (1) the BER converges or reaches an acceptable level, (2) the worse or average LLR reaches a particular confidence level, or (3) some other criterion is met.
-
FIG. 6 is a block diagram of an embodiment of aninterference canceller 460 x, which may be used for each interference canceller 460 inFIG. 4C . Withininterference canceller 460 x, the decoded bits from the decoder block 440 for the same stage are re-encoded and channel interleaved by aTX data processor 114 x to provide re-encoded bits for the transmit antenna being processed by the stage (i.e., the assigned transmit antenna). The re-encoded bits are further symbol mapped by amodulator 116 x to provide remodulated symbols, which are estimates of the modulation symbols at the transmitter prior to the OFDM processing and channel distortion.TX data processor 114 x andmodulator 116 x each performs the same processing (e.g., encoding, channel interleaving, and modulation) as that performed at the transmitter system for the data stream on the assigned transmit antenna. The remodulated symbols are then provided to achannel simulator 612, which processes the symbols with the estimated channel response to provide estimates of the interference due to the decoded bits. - For each frequency subchannel,
channel simulator 612 multiples the remodulated symbols for the assigned n-th transmit antenna with a vector ĥ n,l that includes an estimate of the channel response between the n-th transmit antenna and each of the NR receive antennas. The vector ĥ n,l is one column of the estimated channel response matrix Ĥ l for the l-th frequency subchannel. The matrix Ĥ l may be determined by a channel estimator associated with the same stage and provided tochannel simulator 612. - If the remodulated symbol corresponding to the n-th transmit antenna is expressed as {tilde over (c)}n,l, then the estimated interference component î l (n) due to the symbol from the n-th transmit antenna may be expressed as:
-
- The NR elements in the interference vector î l (n) correspond to components in the input vector r l (n) due to the modulation symbol {tilde over (c)}n,l transmitted from the n-th transmit antenna. The interference vectors for all NF frequency subchannels may be formed as î (n)=[î 0 (n)T î l (n)T . . . î N
F −1 (n)T]T. The components in the vectors î (n) are interference to the remaining (not yet detected) modulation symbols from the other transmit antennas which are also included in the input vectors î (n). The interference vectors î (n) are then subtracted from the input vectors {circumflex over (r)} (n) by asummer 614 to provide modified vectors {circumflex over (r)} (n+1) having the interference components from the decoded bits removed. This cancellation can be expressed as shown above in equation (27). The modified vectors {circumflex over (r)} (n+1) are provided as the input vectors to the next processing stage, as shown inFIG. 4C . - The successive cancellation receiver processing technique is described in further detail in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/854,235 and [Attorney Docket No. 010254], and by P. W. Wolniansky et al. in a paper entitled “V-BLAST: An Architecture for Achieving Very High Data Rates over the Rich-Scattering Wireless Channel”, Proc. ISSSE-98, Pisa, Italy, which is incorporated herein by reference.
- In
FIG. 1 , a channel estimator withindemodulator 156 may process the received OFDM symbols and derive estimates of one or more characteristics of the communication channel, such as the channel frequency response, the channel noise variance, the SNR of the received symbols, and so on. Detector/decoder 158 may also derive and provide the status of each received packet and may further provide one or more other performance metrics indicative of the decoded results. These various types of information may be provided tocontroller 170. -
Controller 170 may determine or select a particular “rate” to be used for all transmit antennas, for each transmit antenna, for each subset of transmit antennas, for each transmission channel, or for each group of transmission channels based on the various types of information received fromdemodulator 156 and detector/decoder 158. The rate is indicative of a set of specific values for a set of transmission parameters. For example, the rate may indicate (or may be associated with) a specific data rate to be used for the data transmission, a specific coding scheme and/or code rate, a specific modulation scheme, and so on. Channel state information (CSI) in the form of the selected rate, the channel response estimates, and/or other information may be provided bycontroller 170, processed by anencoder 180, modulated by amodulator 182, and conditioned and transmitted by one or more transmitters 154 back totransmitter system 110. Various forms of CSI are described in the aforementioned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/993,087. - At
transmitter system 110, the one or more modulated signals fromreceiver system 150 are received by antennas 124, conditioned by receivers 122, demodulated by ademodulator 140, and decoded by adecoder 142 to recover the channel state information transmitted by the receiver system. The channel state information is then provided tocontroller 130 and used to control the processing of the data transmission to the receiver system. For example, the data rate of the data transmission may be determined based on the selected rate provided by the receiver system, or may be determined based on the channel response estimates provided by the receiver system. The specific coding and modulation schemes associated with the selected rate are determined and reflected in the coding and modulation control provided bycontroller 130 toTX data processor 114 andmodulator 116. - The iterative detection and decoding techniques have been described specifically for serial and parallel concatenated convolutional codes. These techniques may also be used with other codes, such as convolutional codes, block codes, concatenated codes of different types (e.g., a convolutional code with a block code), and so on. Furthermore, the iterative detection and decoding techniques have been described specifically for a MIMO-OFDM system. These techniques may also be used for a MIMO system that does not implement OFDM, an OFDM system that does not utilize MIMO, or some other wireless communication systems (e.g., a wireless LAN system).
- The iterative detection and decoding techniques may be implemented in various units in a wireless communication system, such as in a terminal, a base station, an access point, and so on.
- The iterative detection and decoding techniques described herein may be implemented by various means. For example, these techniques may be implemented in hardware, software, or a combination thereof. For a hardware implementation, the elements used to perform the iterative detection and decoding (e.g., detector 420 and decoder(s) 430) may be implemented within one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), digital signal processors (DSPs), digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, other electronic units designed to perform the functions described herein, or a combination thereof.
- For a software implementation, the iterative detection and decoding may be performed with modules (e.g., procedures, functions, and so on) that perform the computations and functions described herein. The software codes may be stored in a memory unit (e.g.,
memory 172 inFIG. 1 ) and executed by a processor (e.g., controller 170). The memory unit may be implemented within the processor or external to the processor, in which case it can be communicatively coupled to the processor via various means as is known in the art. - The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
Claims (22)
1. A method for transmitting data in a wireless communication system, comprising:
receiving channel state information (CSI) indicative of one or more characteristics of a communication channel used for data transmission, wherein the CSI is derived at one or more receivers based on iterative detection and decoding of a plurality of modulated signals as received at the one or more receivers, iterative detection and decoding comprises:
deriving first a priori information for the coded data based on the received modulation signals and second a priori information for the coded data; and
decoding the first a priori information to derive the second a priori information, the second a priori information comprises decoded information for the coded data subtracted by the first a priori information.
2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:
interleaving the coded data based on one or more interleaving schemes, and wherein the interleaved data is modulated.
3. A transmitter in a wireless communication system, comprising:
a TX data processor that processes data based on one or more coding schemes to provide coded data, wherein the coding scheme is selected based on channel state information (CSI) derived at a receiver via iterative detection and decoding of a plurality of received modulated signals, iterative detection and decoding comprising:
deriving first a priori information for the coded data based on the received modulation signals and second a priori information for the coded data; and
decoding the first a priori information to derive the second a priori information, the second a priori information comprises decoded information for the coded data subtracted by the first a priori information.
4. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein the TX data processor interleaves the coded data based on one or more interleaving schemes, and wherein the interleaved data is modulated by a modulator to provide a plurality of modulation symbol streams.
5. The transmitter of claim 4 , wherein one interleaving scheme is used for each modulation symbol stream.
6. The transmitter of claim 4 , wherein one interleaving scheme is used for each group of one or more modulation symbol streams.
7. The transmitter of claim 4 , wherein the coded data is interleaved over time and space.
8. The transmitter of claim 4 , wherein the coded data is interleaved over time, frequency, and space.
11. The transmitter of claim 3 , further comprising:
a controller that receives the CSI and selects the coding and modulation schemes based on the received CSI.
10. The transmitter of claim 4 , further comprising:
a controller receives the CSI and selects the coding, interleaving, and modulation schemes based on the received CSI.
11. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein the one or more coding schemes comprise a parallel concatenated convolutional code.
12. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein the one or more coding schemes comprise a serial concatenated convolutional code.
13. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein the one or more coding schemes comprise a convolutional code.
14. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein the one or more coding schemes comprise a block code.
15. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein the one or more modulation schemes are non-Gray modulation schemes.
16. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein the one or more modulation schemes are anti-Gray modulation schemes.
17. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein a separate coding scheme and a separate modulation scheme are used for each of the plurality of modulated signals.
18. The transmitter of claim 4 , wherein a separate coding scheme, a separate interleaving scheme, and a separate modulation scheme are used for each of the plurality of modulated signals.
19. The transmitter of claim 3 , wherein a common coding scheme and a common modulation scheme are used for the plurality of modulated signals.
20. The transmitter of claim 4 , wherein a common coding scheme, a common interleaving scheme, and a common modulation scheme are used for the plurality of modulated signals.
21. A transmitter apparatus in a wireless communication system, comprising:
means for processing data based on one or more coding schemes to provide coded data;
means for selecting the coding scheme based on channel state information (CSI) derived at a receiver via iterative detection and decoding of a plurality of received modulated signals, iterative detection and decoding comprising:
means for deriving first a priori information for the coded data based on the received modulation signals and second a priori information for the coded data; and
means for decoding the first a priori information to derive the second a priori information, the second a priori information comprises decoded information for the coded data subtracted by the first a priori information.
22. The transmitter apparatus of claim 21 , further comprising:
means for interleaving the coded data based on one or more interleaving schemes to provide a plurality of coded and interleaved data streams, and wherein the interleaved data is modulated.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/119,253 US20080212657A1 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2008-05-12 | Iterative detection and decoding for a mimo-ofdm system |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/005,104 US7154936B2 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2001-12-03 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
US11/557,662 US7372896B2 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2006-11-08 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
US12/119,253 US20080212657A1 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2008-05-12 | Iterative detection and decoding for a mimo-ofdm system |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/557,662 Continuation US7372896B2 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2006-11-08 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080212657A1 true US20080212657A1 (en) | 2008-09-04 |
Family
ID=21714197
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/005,104 Expired - Lifetime US7154936B2 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2001-12-03 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
US11/081,260 Abandoned US20050157811A1 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2005-03-15 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
US11/557,662 Expired - Lifetime US7372896B2 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2006-11-08 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
US12/119,253 Abandoned US20080212657A1 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2008-05-12 | Iterative detection and decoding for a mimo-ofdm system |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/005,104 Expired - Lifetime US7154936B2 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2001-12-03 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
US11/081,260 Abandoned US20050157811A1 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2005-03-15 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
US11/557,662 Expired - Lifetime US7372896B2 (en) | 2001-12-03 | 2006-11-08 | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US7154936B2 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1451991A2 (en) |
JP (2) | JP2006503446A (en) |
KR (1) | KR100942401B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1618222A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002343608A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BR0214640A (en) |
TW (1) | TWI292271B (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003049397A2 (en) |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060233153A1 (en) * | 2005-04-15 | 2006-10-19 | Spreadtrum Communications Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatic frequency correction |
US20080112502A1 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2008-05-15 | Limberg Allen L | System for digital television broadcasting using modified 2/3 trellis coding |
US20090322961A1 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2009-12-31 | Limberg Allen Leroy | System for digital television broadcasting using modified 2/3 trellis coding |
US20100235710A1 (en) * | 2003-09-09 | 2010-09-16 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Signal transmission method and transmitter in radio multiplex transmission system |
WO2011013926A3 (en) * | 2009-07-31 | 2011-06-16 | Seo Hong Seok | Method for processing a received signal to which channel state information is applied in an orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing system |
US20110261898A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2011-10-27 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Multiple-input multiple-output ofdm systems |
US8437417B1 (en) * | 2002-02-15 | 2013-05-07 | Marvell International Ltd. | Method and apparatus for performing baseband equalization in symbol modulated communications |
US20140247909A1 (en) * | 2011-10-05 | 2014-09-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and Device for Decoding a Transport Block of a Communication Signal |
WO2017100689A1 (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2017-06-15 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Soft-information moderation for mimo detectors |
WO2018038852A1 (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2018-03-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Concatenated decoding methods for range extension |
Families Citing this family (354)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7295509B2 (en) | 2000-09-13 | 2007-11-13 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Signaling method in an OFDM multiple access system |
US9130810B2 (en) | 2000-09-13 | 2015-09-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | OFDM communications methods and apparatus |
US8670390B2 (en) | 2000-11-22 | 2014-03-11 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Cooperative beam-forming in wireless networks |
US10355720B2 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2019-07-16 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Distributed software-defined radio |
US10931338B2 (en) | 2001-04-26 | 2021-02-23 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Coordinated multipoint systems |
US9819449B2 (en) | 2002-05-14 | 2017-11-14 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Cooperative subspace demultiplexing in content delivery networks |
ATE384365T1 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2008-02-15 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | TRANSMISSION METHOD AND DEVICE IN A RADIO COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK |
US7236536B2 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2007-06-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for detection and decoding of signals received from a linear propagation channel |
FR2828359A1 (en) * | 2001-07-31 | 2003-02-07 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | TRANSMITTER, RECEIVER, METHODS, PROGRAM AND SIGNAL SUITABLE FOR MODULATIONS WITH A LARGE NUMBER OF STATES |
DE60206873T2 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2006-06-14 | Lucent Technologies Inc | Receiver and method for multiple input and multiple output iterative detection by feedback of soft decisions |
EP1339197A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2003-08-27 | Motorola, Inc. | I/Q Mismatch compensation in an OFDM receiver in presence of frequency offset |
US6959171B2 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2005-10-25 | Intel Corporation | Data transmission rate control |
JP3963737B2 (en) | 2002-02-28 | 2007-08-22 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Multi-carrier signal generation method, radio transmission apparatus, and radio reception apparatus |
US6801580B2 (en) * | 2002-04-09 | 2004-10-05 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Ordered successive interference cancellation receiver processing for multipath channels |
EP1502439B1 (en) * | 2002-04-30 | 2007-06-20 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Backward compatible dvb-s standard transmission system |
AU2003903826A0 (en) | 2003-07-24 | 2003-08-07 | University Of South Australia | An ofdm receiver structure |
KR100878521B1 (en) * | 2002-05-09 | 2009-01-13 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus of generating the soft output of the signal which passes a channel and method thereof |
US10142082B1 (en) | 2002-05-14 | 2018-11-27 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Pre-coding in OFDM |
US9136931B2 (en) * | 2002-05-14 | 2015-09-15 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Cooperative wireless networks |
US9628231B2 (en) | 2002-05-14 | 2017-04-18 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Spreading and precoding in OFDM |
US10644916B1 (en) | 2002-05-14 | 2020-05-05 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Spreading and precoding in OFDM |
US7359313B2 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2008-04-15 | Agere Systems Inc. | Space-time bit-interleaved coded modulation for wideband transmission |
US7013116B2 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2006-03-14 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | MIMO systems having a channel decoder matched to a MIMO detector |
US7133425B2 (en) * | 2002-07-10 | 2006-11-07 | Solarflare Communications, Inc. | Communication system |
EP1392004B1 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2009-01-21 | Interuniversitair Microelektronica Centrum Vzw | Method for multi-user MIMO transmission and apparatuses suited therefore |
US6757337B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2004-06-29 | Motorola, Inc. | Coding-assisted MIMO joint detection and decoding |
US7715508B2 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2010-05-11 | Tensorcomm, Incorporated | Iterative interference cancellation using mixed feedback weights and stabilizing step sizes |
FR2845227B1 (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2005-01-14 | Telediffusion De France Tdf | METHOD FOR RECEIVING A MODULE SIGNAL ACCORDING TO A MULTI-LEVEL ENCODING TECHNIQUE, DECODING METHOD, RECEIVING DEVICE, ENCODING-DECODING SYSTEM AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF |
US8169944B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-05-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Random access for wireless multiple-access communication systems |
US7986742B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2011-07-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilots for MIMO communication system |
US20040081131A1 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2004-04-29 | Walton Jay Rod | OFDM communication system with multiple OFDM symbol sizes |
US8570988B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2013-10-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel calibration for a time division duplexed communication system |
US7002900B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2006-02-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Transmit diversity processing for a multi-antenna communication system |
US8208364B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-06-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | MIMO system with multiple spatial multiplexing modes |
US8320301B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-11-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | MIMO WLAN system |
US8134976B2 (en) | 2002-10-25 | 2012-03-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel calibration for a time division duplexed communication system |
US7164764B2 (en) * | 2002-11-07 | 2007-01-16 | Solarflare Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for precode crosstalk mitigation |
US7386057B2 (en) * | 2003-02-20 | 2008-06-10 | Nec Corporation | Iterative soft interference cancellation and filtering for spectrally efficient high-speed transmission in MIMO systems |
US7042967B2 (en) * | 2003-03-03 | 2006-05-09 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Reduced complexity sliding window based equalizer |
TWI260143B (en) * | 2003-03-03 | 2006-08-11 | Interdigital Tech Corp | Reduced complexity sliding window based equalizer method and apparatus |
CN1762118A (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2006-04-19 | 松下电器产业株式会社 | OFDM reception device and OFDM reception method |
US7822140B2 (en) * | 2003-03-17 | 2010-10-26 | Broadcom Corporation | Multi-antenna communication systems utilizing RF-based and baseband signal weighting and combining |
GB0307471D0 (en) | 2003-04-01 | 2003-05-07 | Qinetiq Ltd | Signal Processing apparatus and method |
US8196000B2 (en) | 2003-04-02 | 2012-06-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for interleaving in a block-coherent communication system |
US7434145B2 (en) * | 2003-04-02 | 2008-10-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Extracting soft information in a block-coherent communication system |
JP4133531B2 (en) * | 2003-04-15 | 2008-08-13 | シャープ株式会社 | Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication system |
JP4077355B2 (en) * | 2003-04-16 | 2008-04-16 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Communication apparatus and communication method |
US8363535B2 (en) | 2003-04-28 | 2013-01-29 | Marvell International Ltd. | Frequency domain echo and next cancellation |
US7342970B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2008-03-11 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Array processing using an aggregate channel matrix generated using a block code structure |
US8064528B2 (en) | 2003-05-21 | 2011-11-22 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Estimating frequency-offsets and multi-antenna channels in MIMO OFDM systems |
WO2005004367A2 (en) | 2003-07-02 | 2005-01-13 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Communication apparatus and communication method |
DE10334723A1 (en) | 2003-07-30 | 2005-02-24 | Bayer Materialscience Ag | New binder combination for highly resistant plastic coatings |
US7394858B2 (en) | 2003-08-08 | 2008-07-01 | Intel Corporation | Systems and methods for adaptive bit loading in a multiple antenna orthogonal frequency division multiplexed communication system |
US8908496B2 (en) | 2003-09-09 | 2014-12-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Incremental redundancy transmission in a MIMO communication system |
US7769097B2 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2010-08-03 | Intel Corporation | Methods and apparatus to control transmission of a multicarrier wireless communication channel through multiple antennas |
US7724838B2 (en) * | 2003-09-25 | 2010-05-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Hierarchical coding with multiple antennas in a wireless communication system |
GB2407007B (en) * | 2003-10-09 | 2006-06-28 | Toshiba Res Europ Ltd | Estimator for mimo receiver |
KR100955952B1 (en) * | 2003-10-13 | 2010-05-19 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for space-time coding using lifting low density parity check codes in a wireless communication system |
US7508748B2 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2009-03-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rate selection for a multi-carrier MIMO system |
US7623553B2 (en) * | 2003-11-03 | 2009-11-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method, apparatus, and system for data transmission and processing in a wireless communication environment |
US7616698B2 (en) | 2003-11-04 | 2009-11-10 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Multiple-input multiple output system and method |
KR100584439B1 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2006-05-26 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for interference cancellation of ofdm system using multiple antenna |
US8705659B2 (en) * | 2003-11-06 | 2014-04-22 | Apple Inc. | Communication channel optimization systems and methods in multi-user communication systems |
KR100520159B1 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2005-10-10 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for interference cancellation of ofdm system using multiple antenna |
KR100938095B1 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2010-01-21 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for generating a preamble sequence in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing communication system |
JP4490922B2 (en) * | 2003-11-21 | 2010-06-30 | パナソニック株式会社 | Multi-antenna transmission apparatus and multi-antenna transmission method |
US7725084B2 (en) * | 2003-11-24 | 2010-05-25 | Nokia Corporation | Apparatus, and associated method, for communicating communication data in a multiple-input, multiple-output communication system |
US9473269B2 (en) | 2003-12-01 | 2016-10-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for providing an efficient control channel structure in a wireless communication system |
US7570695B2 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2009-08-04 | Intel Corporation | Method and adaptive bit interleaver for wideband systems using adaptive bit loading |
US8027417B2 (en) | 2003-12-19 | 2011-09-27 | Nortel Networks Limited | Interference-weighted communication signal processing systems and methods |
KR100981580B1 (en) * | 2003-12-23 | 2010-09-10 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Differential Space-Time Block Codes Transceiver Apparatus For Up To 8 Transmit Antennas |
US7573946B2 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2009-08-11 | Intel Corporation | Apparatus and associated methods to perform space-frequency interleaving in a multicarrier wireless communication channel |
US7308047B2 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2007-12-11 | Intel Corporation | Symbol de-mapping methods in multiple-input multiple-output systems |
US7813453B2 (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2010-10-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Data detection for a hierarchical coded data transmission |
US7233773B2 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2007-06-19 | Broadcom Corporation | Configuring a MIMO communication |
KR20080042944A (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2008-05-15 | 닛본 덴끼 가부시끼가이샤 | Radio communication system, reception device and demodulation method |
US7466773B2 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2008-12-16 | Broadcom Corporation | WLAN receiver having an iterative decoder |
US7873022B2 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2011-01-18 | Broadcom Corporation | Multiple input multiple output wireless local area network communications |
CN100385824C (en) * | 2004-02-20 | 2008-04-30 | 电子科技大学 | Adaptive channel estimation method of MIMO-OFDM system |
US20050201180A1 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2005-09-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and methods for back-off and clipping control in wireless communication systems |
US8077691B2 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2011-12-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilot transmission and channel estimation for MISO and MIMO receivers in a multi-antenna system |
WO2005088853A1 (en) * | 2004-03-09 | 2005-09-22 | Neocific Inc. | Methods and apparatus for random access in multi-carrier communication systems |
US20050220203A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-06 | Ojard Eric J | System & method for spreading on fading channels |
US8160121B2 (en) * | 2007-08-20 | 2012-04-17 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for distributed input-distributed output wireless communications |
US10886979B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2021-01-05 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for link adaptation in DIDO multicarrier systems |
US10187133B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2019-01-22 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for power control and antenna grouping in a distributed-input-distributed-output (DIDO) network |
US8542763B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2013-09-24 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods to coordinate transmissions in distributed wireless systems via user clustering |
US10985811B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2021-04-20 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for distributed antenna wireless communications |
US11394436B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2022-07-19 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for distributed antenna wireless communications |
US7636381B2 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2009-12-22 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for distributed input-distributed output wireless communications |
US8170081B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2012-05-01 | Rearden, LLC. | System and method for adjusting DIDO interference cancellation based on signal strength measurements |
US7848442B2 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2010-12-07 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Signal processing apparatus and method in multi-input/multi-output communications systems |
US10425134B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2019-09-24 | Rearden, Llc | System and methods for planned evolution and obsolescence of multiuser spectrum |
US10200094B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2019-02-05 | Rearden, Llc | Interference management, handoff, power control and link adaptation in distributed-input distributed-output (DIDO) communication systems |
US7711030B2 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2010-05-04 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for spatial-multiplexed tropospheric scatter communications |
US10277290B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2019-04-30 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods to exploit areas of coherence in wireless systems |
US7885354B2 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2011-02-08 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for enhancing near vertical incidence skywave (“NVIS”) communication using space-time coding |
US9312929B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2016-04-12 | Rearden, Llc | System and methods to compensate for Doppler effects in multi-user (MU) multiple antenna systems (MAS) |
US7599420B2 (en) * | 2004-07-30 | 2009-10-06 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for distributed input distributed output wireless communications |
US7633994B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2009-12-15 | Rearden, LLC. | System and method for distributed input-distributed output wireless communications |
US9819403B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2017-11-14 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for managing handoff of a client between different distributed-input-distributed-output (DIDO) networks based on detected velocity of the client |
US11451275B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2022-09-20 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for distributed antenna wireless communications |
US11309943B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2022-04-19 | Rearden, Llc | System and methods for planned evolution and obsolescence of multiuser spectrum |
US8654815B1 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2014-02-18 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for distributed antenna wireless communications |
US10749582B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2020-08-18 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods to coordinate transmissions in distributed wireless systems via user clustering |
US9826537B2 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2017-11-21 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for managing inter-cluster handoff of clients which traverse multiple DIDO clusters |
US8571086B2 (en) * | 2004-04-02 | 2013-10-29 | Rearden, Llc | System and method for DIDO precoding interpolation in multicarrier systems |
CN100583678C (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2010-01-20 | Lg电子株式会社 | Signal processing device and method of MIMO communication system |
KR100919531B1 (en) * | 2004-05-26 | 2009-10-01 | 닛본 덴끼 가부시끼가이샤 | Spatially-multiplexed signal detecting method and time space iterative decoder using same |
KR20060046335A (en) * | 2004-06-01 | 2006-05-17 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for channel state feedback using arithmetic coding |
GB2415336B (en) * | 2004-06-18 | 2006-11-08 | Toshiba Res Europ Ltd | Bit interleaver for a mimo system |
US9271221B2 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2016-02-23 | Apple Inc. | Closed loop MIMO systems and methods |
US20050289537A1 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2005-12-29 | Lee Sam J | System and method for installing software on a computing device |
KR101148405B1 (en) * | 2004-07-01 | 2012-05-21 | 콸콤 인코포레이티드 | Advanced mimo interleaving |
KR20060006542A (en) * | 2004-07-16 | 2006-01-19 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Mimo transmitter for wlan system at the base of ofdm and methods thereof |
US8457152B2 (en) * | 2004-07-16 | 2013-06-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multiple modulation schemes in single rate layering wireless communication systems |
US9137822B2 (en) | 2004-07-21 | 2015-09-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Efficient signaling over access channel |
US9148256B2 (en) | 2004-07-21 | 2015-09-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Performance based rank prediction for MIMO design |
US8391410B2 (en) | 2004-07-29 | 2013-03-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for configuring a pilot symbol in a wireless communication system |
US20070081484A1 (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2007-04-12 | Wang Michael M | Methods and apparatus for transmitting a frame structure in a wireless communication system |
US9246728B2 (en) | 2004-07-29 | 2016-01-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for frequency diversity |
CN101036336B (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2012-12-26 | 高通股份有限公司 | Interlacing system and method |
GB2416967B (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2007-01-31 | Toshiba Res Europ Ltd | Turbo equalization in a MIMO digital wireless wideband system |
US20080317142A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2008-12-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for frequency diversity |
US9685997B2 (en) | 2007-08-20 | 2017-06-20 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods to enhance spatial diversity in distributed-input distributed-output wireless systems |
US11431386B1 (en) | 2004-08-02 | 2022-08-30 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Transmit pre-coding |
US11184037B1 (en) | 2004-08-02 | 2021-11-23 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Demodulating and decoding carrier interferometry signals |
US11552737B1 (en) | 2004-08-02 | 2023-01-10 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Cooperative MIMO |
ES2339788T3 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2010-05-25 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CODIFICATION OF THE SPACE FREQUENCY BLOCK IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR MULTIPLEXATION DIVISION IN ORTOGONAL FREQUENCIES. |
US8527855B2 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2013-09-03 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Interleaving and parsing for MIMO-OFDM systems |
JP2006067070A (en) * | 2004-08-25 | 2006-03-09 | Fujitsu Ltd | Mimo system receiving method and receiver |
US8130855B2 (en) | 2004-11-12 | 2012-03-06 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for combining space-frequency block coding, spatial multiplexing and beamforming in a MIMO-OFDM system |
US7570698B2 (en) * | 2004-11-16 | 2009-08-04 | Intel Corporation | Multiple output multicarrier transmitter and methods for spatial interleaving a plurality of spatial streams |
EP1659727B1 (en) | 2004-11-19 | 2015-03-25 | ATI International SRL | Iterative decoding of packet data |
GB2420951B (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2007-06-06 | Toshiba Res Europ Ltd | Decoder for a multiplexed transmission system |
KR100677542B1 (en) * | 2004-12-24 | 2007-02-02 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Control method of multi-input multi-output system through single serial interface, and apparatus thereof |
US7558335B2 (en) * | 2005-02-10 | 2009-07-07 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Communication system modulating/demodulating data using antenna patterns and associated methods |
US7333421B2 (en) * | 2005-02-22 | 2008-02-19 | Interdigitial Technology Corporation | OFDM-MIMO communication system using smart spatial symbol mapping and associated methods |
US9246560B2 (en) | 2005-03-10 | 2016-01-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for beamforming and rate control in a multi-input multi-output communication systems |
US9154211B2 (en) | 2005-03-11 | 2015-10-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for beamforming feedback in multi antenna communication systems |
CA2601151A1 (en) * | 2005-03-14 | 2006-09-21 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Iterative stbicm mimo receiver using group-wise demapping |
US8446892B2 (en) | 2005-03-16 | 2013-05-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel structures for a quasi-orthogonal multiple-access communication system |
US9461859B2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2016-10-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilot signal transmission for an orthogonal frequency division wireless communication system |
US9143305B2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2015-09-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilot signal transmission for an orthogonal frequency division wireless communication system |
US9520972B2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2016-12-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilot signal transmission for an orthogonal frequency division wireless communication system |
US7688979B2 (en) * | 2005-03-21 | 2010-03-30 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | MIMO air interface utilizing dirty paper coding |
US7539463B2 (en) * | 2005-03-30 | 2009-05-26 | Intel Corporation | Techniques to enhance diversity for a wireless system |
JP4884722B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2012-02-29 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Wireless communication apparatus and wireless communication method |
RU2408988C2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2011-01-10 | Нтт Досомо, Инк. | Device and method of radio communication |
CN100373840C (en) * | 2005-04-01 | 2008-03-05 | 东南大学 | Method and apparatus for detecting normalized iterative soft interference cancelling signal |
US9184870B2 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2015-11-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Systems and methods for control channel signaling |
US7991088B2 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2011-08-02 | Tommy Guess | Iterative interference cancellation using mixed feedback weights and stabilizing step sizes |
US7826516B2 (en) | 2005-11-15 | 2010-11-02 | Rambus Inc. | Iterative interference canceller for wireless multiple-access systems with multiple receive antennas |
GB2425236B (en) * | 2005-04-12 | 2007-08-01 | Toshiba Res Europ Ltd | Apparatus and method of equalisation |
US7613243B2 (en) | 2005-04-12 | 2009-11-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interleaver and parser for OFDM MIMO systems |
US9036538B2 (en) | 2005-04-19 | 2015-05-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Frequency hopping design for single carrier FDMA systems |
US9408220B2 (en) | 2005-04-19 | 2016-08-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Channel quality reporting for adaptive sectorization |
KR100723876B1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2007-05-31 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Detector for multi-level modulated signal, iterative receiver for multi-level modulated signal and the method using the same |
US7466749B2 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2008-12-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Rate selection with margin sharing |
CN100486235C (en) | 2005-05-16 | 2009-05-06 | 东南大学 | Iterative receiving method for maintaining soft information |
US20090141826A1 (en) * | 2005-05-31 | 2009-06-04 | Toshinori Suzuki | Digital signal transmitting system, receiving apparatus and receiving method |
US8611284B2 (en) | 2005-05-31 | 2013-12-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Use of supplemental assignments to decrement resources |
US8879511B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2014-11-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Assignment acknowledgement for a wireless communication system |
US8565194B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2013-10-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Puncturing signaling channel for a wireless communication system |
US8462859B2 (en) | 2005-06-01 | 2013-06-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Sphere decoding apparatus |
US7630350B2 (en) * | 2005-06-06 | 2009-12-08 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and system for parsing bits in an interleaver for adaptive modulations in a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) wireless local area network (WLAN) system |
US9179319B2 (en) | 2005-06-16 | 2015-11-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Adaptive sectorization in cellular systems |
US8599945B2 (en) | 2005-06-16 | 2013-12-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Robust rank prediction for a MIMO system |
EP1881621A4 (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2011-08-03 | Panasonic Corp | Radio communication base station device, radio communication mobile station device, and radio communication method in multi-carrier communication |
JP4788879B2 (en) * | 2005-07-08 | 2011-10-05 | 日本電気株式会社 | RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, RECEPTION DEVICE USING A plurality of antennas, DEMODULATION METHOD USED FOR THEM, AND PROGRAM THEREOF |
WO2008110854A2 (en) | 2007-03-14 | 2008-09-18 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | A method and apparatus for multiple antenna communications, computer program product therefor |
US9025689B2 (en) * | 2005-07-20 | 2015-05-05 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | Method and apparatus for multiple antenna communications, and related systems and computer program |
US7746939B2 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2010-06-29 | Itt Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for encoding information in a signal by spectral notch modulation |
US9391751B2 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2016-07-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System and method for frequency diversity |
US9042212B2 (en) | 2005-07-29 | 2015-05-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for communicating network identifiers in a communication system |
KR20070015997A (en) * | 2005-08-02 | 2007-02-07 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for transmitting/receiving signal using differentiated multi level modulation and demodulation in wireless communication system |
US8885628B2 (en) | 2005-08-08 | 2014-11-11 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Code division multiplexing in a single-carrier frequency division multiple access system |
US9209956B2 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2015-12-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Segment sensitive scheduling |
US20070041457A1 (en) | 2005-08-22 | 2007-02-22 | Tamer Kadous | Method and apparatus for providing antenna diversity in a wireless communication system |
US8644292B2 (en) | 2005-08-24 | 2014-02-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Varied transmission time intervals for wireless communication system |
US9136974B2 (en) | 2005-08-30 | 2015-09-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Precoding and SDMA support |
CN1941760B (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2010-06-09 | 上海无线通信研究中心 | multi-antenna orthogonal frequency division multiplexing iterative transmit/receiver and method |
US20070081448A1 (en) * | 2005-10-06 | 2007-04-12 | Mansoor Ahmed | Partially coherent transmission for a multi-carrier communication system |
US7590184B2 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2009-09-15 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Blind preamble detection for an orthogonal frequency division multiplexed sample stream |
US8711947B2 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2014-04-29 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Digital broadcasting transmission and reception system, and a signal processing method using turbo processing and turbo decoding |
US8045512B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2011-10-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Scalable frequency band operation in wireless communication systems |
US9225416B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2015-12-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Varied signaling channels for a reverse link in a wireless communication system |
US9088384B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2015-07-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilot symbol transmission in wireless communication systems |
US9172453B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2015-10-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for pre-coding frequency division duplexing system |
US8693405B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2014-04-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | SDMA resource management |
US8582509B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2013-11-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Scalable frequency band operation in wireless communication systems |
US8477684B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2013-07-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Acknowledgement of control messages in a wireless communication system |
JP2009514400A (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2009-04-02 | クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド | Precoding for segment-responsive scheduling in wireless communication systems |
US9210651B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2015-12-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for bootstraping information in a communication system |
US9144060B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2015-09-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Resource allocation for shared signaling channels |
US9225488B2 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2015-12-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Shared signaling channel |
KR101106682B1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2012-01-18 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for generating of multiple antenna log likelihood ratio |
US20070110135A1 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2007-05-17 | Tommy Guess | Iterative interference cancellation for MIMO-OFDM receivers |
US7623602B2 (en) * | 2005-11-15 | 2009-11-24 | Tensorcomm, Inc. | Iterative interference canceller for wireless multiple-access systems employing closed loop transmit diversity |
US8467466B2 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2013-06-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Reduced complexity detection and decoding for a receiver in a communication system |
US8582548B2 (en) | 2005-11-18 | 2013-11-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Frequency division multiple access schemes for wireless communication |
US7957745B2 (en) * | 2005-11-23 | 2011-06-07 | Motorola Mobility, Inc. | Adaptive bearer configuration for broadcast/multicast service |
US7729438B2 (en) * | 2005-12-01 | 2010-06-01 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interleaver design for IEEE 802.11n standard |
KR100739182B1 (en) * | 2005-12-08 | 2007-07-13 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Mobile communications terminal for supporting space-time hybrid automatic repeat request techniques and method thereof |
KR100863702B1 (en) | 2005-12-14 | 2008-10-15 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for iterative detection and decoding in mimo wireless communication system |
KR100889302B1 (en) * | 2005-12-14 | 2009-03-18 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Partial iterative detection and decoding receiver and method in multiple antenna system |
KR100923915B1 (en) | 2005-12-16 | 2009-10-28 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Iterative detection and decoding receiver and method in multiple antenna system |
US7756004B2 (en) * | 2005-12-20 | 2010-07-13 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interleaver design with column swap and bit circulation for multiple convolutional encoder MIMO OFDM system |
US7859987B2 (en) | 2005-12-20 | 2010-12-28 | Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. | Interleaver for IEEE 802.11n standard |
US7660232B2 (en) | 2005-12-20 | 2010-02-09 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interleaver design with column skip for IEEE 802.11n standard |
US7729447B2 (en) * | 2005-12-22 | 2010-06-01 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Interleaver design with multiple encoders for more than two transmit antennas in high throughput WLAN communication systems |
KR100812351B1 (en) * | 2006-01-13 | 2008-03-11 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus for generating down link signal, and method and apparatus for determining the log-likelihood ratio in cellular system |
US7830998B2 (en) * | 2006-01-17 | 2010-11-09 | Edgewater Computer Systems, Inc. | Approximate linear FM synchronization symbols for a bandwidth configurable OFDM modem |
KR20070079448A (en) * | 2006-02-02 | 2007-08-07 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Iterative detection and decoding receiver and method in multiple antenna system |
WO2007091235A2 (en) | 2006-02-09 | 2007-08-16 | Altair Semiconductor Ltd. | Low peak-to-average power ratio transmission in frequency-division multiple access systems |
KR100896443B1 (en) * | 2006-02-21 | 2009-05-14 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for transmitting and receiving in multi-user multi-antenna communication systems |
US7933357B2 (en) | 2006-02-21 | 2011-04-26 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Apparatus and method for transmission and reception in a multi-user MIMO communication system |
US7586991B2 (en) * | 2006-03-16 | 2009-09-08 | Posdata Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for calculating likelihood metric of a received signal in a digital communication system |
US8091009B2 (en) * | 2006-03-23 | 2012-01-03 | Broadcom Corporation | Symbol by symbol map detection for signals corrupted by colored and/or signal dependent noise |
CA2541567C (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2012-07-17 | University Of Waterloo | Parallel soft spherical mimo receiver and decoding method |
US20070250555A1 (en) * | 2006-04-20 | 2007-10-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Apparatus and method of equalisation |
CN101064541B (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2010-06-09 | 上海无线通信研究中心 | Parallel confidence spread detecting method for multi-aerial system |
CN101714885B (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2013-04-10 | 上海无线通信研究中心 | Serial belief propagation detection method of multi-antenna system |
US8116242B2 (en) * | 2006-07-18 | 2012-02-14 | Motorola Mobility, Inc. | Receiver having multi-antenna log likelihood ratio generation with channel estimation error |
US8259823B2 (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2012-09-04 | Altair Semiconductor Ltd. | Energy-efficient uplink slot allocation in time-frequency division multiple access systems |
CN1921366B (en) * | 2006-09-25 | 2010-07-21 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and device for realizing coded identification log-likelihood ratio |
KR100826529B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-30 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Method and Apparatus for Receiving Signal in OFDM Communication System Using Multiple Transmit/receive antenna |
US20100074378A1 (en) * | 2006-10-05 | 2010-03-25 | c/o Agency for Science, Technology and Research | Method and System for Estimating a Signal and Computer Program Product |
JP4304632B2 (en) * | 2006-10-12 | 2009-07-29 | ソニー株式会社 | Receiving device, receiving method, program, and recording medium |
CN101529739A (en) | 2006-10-24 | 2009-09-09 | 三菱电机株式会社 | Transmitter apparatus, receiver apparatus, communication apparatus and communication system |
US8019020B1 (en) * | 2006-11-01 | 2011-09-13 | Marvell International Ltd. | Binary decoding for correlated input information |
KR100949290B1 (en) * | 2006-11-17 | 2010-03-25 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for interference cancellation in broadband wireless access system |
US8001452B2 (en) * | 2006-11-17 | 2011-08-16 | Agere Systems Inc. | Methods and apparatus for soft decision decoding using reliability values based on a log base two function |
WO2008066349A1 (en) * | 2006-12-01 | 2008-06-05 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Method and apparatus for transmitting/receiving multiple codewords in sc-fdma system |
KR100932456B1 (en) * | 2006-12-05 | 2009-12-16 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Device and Method for Interference Interference Mitigation in Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiple Access System |
KR100855019B1 (en) | 2006-12-28 | 2008-09-02 | 포스데이타 주식회사 | Systems and Method for generating soft decision |
US7711062B2 (en) * | 2006-12-29 | 2010-05-04 | Intel Corporation | Decoding methods and apparatus for MIMO communication systems |
EP2122954A2 (en) * | 2007-01-15 | 2009-11-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method of generating low peak-to-average power ratio ( papr) binary preamble sequences for ofdm systems |
WO2008087598A2 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-24 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | System, apparatus and method for interleaving data bits or symbols |
KR100929850B1 (en) * | 2007-04-02 | 2009-12-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and Method for Eliminating Interference in Broadband Wireless Communication Systems |
US8059764B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2011-11-15 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Systems and methods for low-complexity max-log MIMO detection |
KR101369838B1 (en) * | 2007-04-20 | 2014-03-06 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Transport stream generating device, Transmitting device, Receiving device, Digital broadcasting system having them and method thereof |
KR101371179B1 (en) * | 2007-05-09 | 2014-03-07 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for interference cancellation in multilple antenna system |
TWI400902B (en) | 2007-06-28 | 2013-07-01 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Method and apparatus for demapping symbol in multi-input multi-output communication system |
KR100933053B1 (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2009-12-21 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Receiver of Multiple Input / Output Communication System and Signal Detection Method Using the Same |
CN100583649C (en) * | 2007-07-23 | 2010-01-20 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and apparatus for encoding/decoding vector as well as flow medium player |
KR101407172B1 (en) * | 2007-08-06 | 2014-06-12 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Data transmission method using turbo code |
KR101454027B1 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2014-10-24 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Time division multiplexing communication system with parallel structure and method for the same |
US8989155B2 (en) | 2007-08-20 | 2015-03-24 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for wireless backhaul in distributed-input distributed-output wireless systems |
PT2575312E (en) * | 2007-09-06 | 2014-09-22 | Lg Electronics Inc | Method and system for transmitting and receiving signals |
WO2009035244A2 (en) * | 2007-09-10 | 2009-03-19 | Lg Electronics Inc. | System for transmitting and receiving signals |
EP2195985A4 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2011-06-08 | Lg Electronics Inc | Method and system for transmitting and receiving signals |
US7948862B2 (en) * | 2007-09-26 | 2011-05-24 | Solarflare Communications, Inc. | Crosstalk cancellation using sliding filters |
CN101647203B (en) * | 2007-10-01 | 2014-07-09 | 艾格瑞系统有限公司 | Systems and methods for media defect detection |
GB0720559D0 (en) * | 2007-10-19 | 2007-11-28 | Fujitsu Ltd | MIMO wireless communication system |
FI20075864A0 (en) * | 2007-11-30 | 2007-11-30 | Nokia Corp | Device, computer program and method |
US8181081B1 (en) | 2007-11-30 | 2012-05-15 | Marvell International Ltd. | System and method for decoding correlated data |
WO2009072813A2 (en) | 2007-12-04 | 2009-06-11 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and system for transmitting and receiving signals |
KR100888860B1 (en) | 2007-12-07 | 2009-03-17 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Method for dividing received symbol signal modulated bit reflected gray code into bits, and device thereof |
KR100903876B1 (en) * | 2007-12-14 | 2009-06-24 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Method for dividing received signal modulated phase shift keying using Bit Reflected Gray Code into bits, and device thereof |
KR100909570B1 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2009-07-24 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Iterative channel and noise variance estimation apparatus and method for multi-input orthogonal frequency division system |
KR100958792B1 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2010-05-18 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Accelerated turbo transceiver and method for mimo system |
JP5213879B2 (en) * | 2008-01-31 | 2013-06-19 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Transmitting apparatus and modulation method |
US20090220034A1 (en) * | 2008-03-03 | 2009-09-03 | Ramprashad Sean A | Layered receiver structure |
WO2009113792A1 (en) * | 2008-03-10 | 2009-09-17 | Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute | Apparatus and method for mapping symbol |
KR101182852B1 (en) | 2008-03-10 | 2012-09-14 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus and method for mapping symbol |
CN101534167B (en) * | 2008-03-13 | 2013-11-06 | 财团法人工业技术研究院 | Preposed encoder and decoder and method thereof |
US8161357B2 (en) * | 2008-03-17 | 2012-04-17 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for using intrinsic data for regenerating data from a defective medium |
US8095855B2 (en) * | 2008-03-17 | 2012-01-10 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for regenerating data from a defective medium |
US9184874B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2015-11-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Storing log likelihood ratios in interleaved form to reduce hardware memory |
KR101527114B1 (en) * | 2008-04-02 | 2015-06-08 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for detecting signal based on lattice reduction capable to support different encoding scheme by stream in a multiple input multiple output wireless communication system |
US8149527B2 (en) * | 2008-04-29 | 2012-04-03 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing attenuation of information derived from a defective medium |
US8121224B2 (en) * | 2008-04-29 | 2012-02-21 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for filter based media defect detection |
US7849385B2 (en) * | 2008-04-29 | 2010-12-07 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for media defect detection utilizing correlated DFIR and LLR data |
EP2134017B1 (en) * | 2008-05-09 | 2015-04-01 | Vodafone Holding GmbH | Method and system for data communication |
US8185798B2 (en) * | 2008-06-30 | 2012-05-22 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | Techniques for reducing joint detection complexity in a channel-coded multiple-input multiple-output communication system |
WO2010019250A2 (en) | 2008-08-11 | 2010-02-18 | Solarflare Communications, Inc. | Method of synchronization for low power idle |
US8949701B2 (en) | 2008-09-23 | 2015-02-03 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for low latency media defect detection |
US8139457B2 (en) * | 2008-09-23 | 2012-03-20 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for low latency media defect detection |
US8693570B2 (en) * | 2008-10-31 | 2014-04-08 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Communication methods and systems having data permutation |
US8461848B2 (en) * | 2008-12-10 | 2013-06-11 | Marvell International Ltd. | Cable diagnostics for Base-T systems |
US8737502B2 (en) * | 2009-02-09 | 2014-05-27 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Multiplexing and coding schemes for multiple transmit antennas in a wireless communication system |
US8804859B2 (en) * | 2009-02-23 | 2014-08-12 | Mediatek, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for dealing with spectrum inversion |
US8219892B2 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2012-07-10 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for enhanced media defect detection |
US8411537B2 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2013-04-02 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for recovering information from a defective medium |
US7952824B2 (en) * | 2009-03-06 | 2011-05-31 | Agere Systems Inc. | Systems and methods for defective media region identification |
EP2228935A1 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2010-09-15 | Nederlandse Organisatie voor toegepast -natuurwetenschappelijk onderzoek TNO | MIMO communication method and devices |
US8745439B2 (en) * | 2009-04-17 | 2014-06-03 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for multilevel media defect detection |
US8347155B2 (en) * | 2009-04-17 | 2013-01-01 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for predicting failure of a storage medium |
CN101582742B (en) * | 2009-06-16 | 2012-10-03 | 北京邮电大学 | Method for detecting iteration of multiple input multiple output (MIMO) system, system thereof and device thereof |
US8176400B2 (en) * | 2009-09-09 | 2012-05-08 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for enhanced flaw scan in a data processing device |
JP5093261B2 (en) * | 2010-02-22 | 2012-12-12 | 株式会社デンソー | Sync signal detector |
US20110205653A1 (en) * | 2010-02-24 | 2011-08-25 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and Methods for Data Recovery |
US8345369B2 (en) * | 2010-02-24 | 2013-01-01 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for data recovery using enhanced sync mark location |
US8446939B2 (en) * | 2010-04-21 | 2013-05-21 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Channel quality estimation for MLSE MIMO receiver |
US8593933B2 (en) * | 2010-04-27 | 2013-11-26 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Modified spatial diversity schemes for coverage enhancement |
US8634332B2 (en) * | 2010-04-29 | 2014-01-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Using joint decoding engine in a wireless device |
US8612843B2 (en) | 2011-08-19 | 2013-12-17 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for qualitative media defect determination |
US8788921B2 (en) | 2011-10-27 | 2014-07-22 | Lsi Corporation | Detector with soft pruning |
US8522119B2 (en) * | 2011-12-07 | 2013-08-27 | Xilinx, Inc. | Reduction in decoder loop iterations |
US9264266B2 (en) * | 2011-12-29 | 2016-02-16 | Intel Corporation | Successive interference cancellation system and method for MIMO horizontal encoding and decoding |
US8744017B2 (en) * | 2012-03-02 | 2014-06-03 | CMMB Vision USA Inc. | Demapping for hierarchical Quadrature Amplitude Modulation |
US20130262400A1 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2013-10-03 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Data index query method, apparatus and system |
US9129653B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2015-09-08 | Avago Technologies General Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Systems and methods for calibration coasting in a data processing system |
WO2013159207A1 (en) * | 2012-04-27 | 2013-10-31 | The Royal Institution For The Advancement Of Learning/Mcgill University | Methods and devices for communications systems using multiplied rate transmission |
US8819521B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2014-08-26 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for short media defect detection using non-binary coded information |
US8897406B2 (en) | 2012-04-30 | 2014-11-25 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Communication system with iterative detector and decoder and method of operation thereof |
US8831146B2 (en) | 2012-06-14 | 2014-09-09 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Communication system with iterative detector and decoder and method of operation thereof |
US8675297B2 (en) | 2012-06-15 | 2014-03-18 | Lsi Corporation | Media defect classification |
US9076492B2 (en) | 2012-07-12 | 2015-07-07 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for rapid erasure retry decoding |
US8826110B2 (en) | 2012-07-17 | 2014-09-02 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for defect scanning |
ES2439143B1 (en) * | 2012-07-18 | 2015-02-13 | Telefónica, S.A. | METHOD AND SYSTEM THAT IMPLEMENT A TURBO-DIVERSITY SCHEME FOR WIRELESS OFDM SYSTEMS |
US8732562B2 (en) | 2012-07-25 | 2014-05-20 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for improved short media defect detection |
US8972800B2 (en) | 2012-07-30 | 2015-03-03 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for enhanced media defect detection |
CN104662853B (en) * | 2012-08-21 | 2017-07-11 | 扬智欧洲有限公司 | Soft metric values compression method |
US9071983B2 (en) * | 2012-08-28 | 2015-06-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Communication system with repeat-response processing mechanism and method of operation thereof |
US9245586B2 (en) | 2012-10-18 | 2016-01-26 | Avago Technologies General Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Systems and methods for short media defect detection using multi-iteration soft data feedback |
US8996970B2 (en) | 2012-10-24 | 2015-03-31 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for positive feedback short media defect detection |
US11190947B2 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2021-11-30 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for concurrent spectrum usage within actively used spectrum |
US10194346B2 (en) | 2012-11-26 | 2019-01-29 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for exploiting inter-cell multiplexing gain in wireless cellular systems via distributed input distributed output technology |
US11050468B2 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2021-06-29 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for mitigating interference within actively used spectrum |
US11189917B2 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2021-11-30 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for distributing radioheads |
US9973246B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2018-05-15 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for exploiting inter-cell multiplexing gain in wireless cellular systems via distributed input distributed output technology |
US9923657B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2018-03-20 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for exploiting inter-cell multiplexing gain in wireless cellular systems via distributed input distributed output technology |
US10164698B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2018-12-25 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for exploiting inter-cell multiplexing gain in wireless cellular systems via distributed input distributed output technology |
US10488535B2 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2019-11-26 | Rearden, Llc | Apparatus and method for capturing still images and video using diffraction coded imaging techniques |
US10547358B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2020-01-28 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for radio frequency calibration exploiting channel reciprocity in distributed input distributed output wireless communications |
US9225468B1 (en) * | 2013-04-01 | 2015-12-29 | Marvell International Ltd. | Systems and methods for detecting data in a received multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) signal |
US9244752B2 (en) | 2013-05-02 | 2016-01-26 | Avago Technologies General Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Systems and methods for detecting media flaws |
US8917468B1 (en) | 2013-06-06 | 2014-12-23 | Lsi Corporation | Systems and methods for media defect detection with pattern qualification |
US9124477B2 (en) * | 2013-08-28 | 2015-09-01 | Broadcom Corporation | Frequency interleave within communication systems |
EP3090501B1 (en) * | 2013-12-30 | 2019-06-12 | Telecom Italia S.p.A. | Improved receiver for wireless communications networks |
US9432234B2 (en) * | 2014-04-09 | 2016-08-30 | Broadcom Corporation | Frequency interleaving and de-interleaving for OFDM modulation |
US11290162B2 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2022-03-29 | Rearden, Llc | Systems and methods for mitigating interference within actively used spectrum |
US9325450B2 (en) * | 2014-05-21 | 2016-04-26 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | Method and system for processing digital data, corresponding apparatus and computer program product |
CN104852784B (en) * | 2015-04-07 | 2018-02-16 | 浙江理工大学 | A kind of multiple cell mimo system upward signal detection method based on constellation structures |
US9716601B2 (en) * | 2015-04-24 | 2017-07-25 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Method and apparatus for soft detection of high order QAM symbols in MIMO channels |
US9602240B1 (en) * | 2015-09-11 | 2017-03-21 | Signalchip Innovations Private Limited | Method and system for symbol level interference cancellation at a receiver for multiuser detection |
EP3151432B1 (en) * | 2015-10-01 | 2018-08-01 | Mitsubishi Electric R&D Centre Europe B.V. | Method and a device for demodulating received symbols using a turbo-demodulation scheme comprising an iterative mimo decoder and wherein an iterative channel decoder is used in the turbo-demodulation scheme |
WO2017198197A1 (en) * | 2016-05-20 | 2017-11-23 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method for flexible sparse code multiple access codebook design, transmission and detection |
KR101832901B1 (en) * | 2017-01-11 | 2018-02-27 | 서울과학기술대학교 산학협력단 | Soft Decision Decoding Apparatus and method using Iterative Tabu Search for MIMO |
EP3624349B1 (en) * | 2017-05-24 | 2023-06-14 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Decoding method and device |
US10243773B1 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2019-03-26 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Efficient peak-to-average-power reduction for OFDM and MIMO-OFDM |
US10637705B1 (en) | 2017-05-25 | 2020-04-28 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Peak-to-average-power reduction for OFDM multiple access |
KR102416491B1 (en) * | 2017-06-19 | 2022-07-05 | 삼성전자 주식회사 | Data decoding method and device in wireless communication system |
CN108736934B (en) * | 2018-05-18 | 2021-02-09 | 东南大学 | Large-scale MIMO system signal detection method |
US11917604B2 (en) | 2019-01-25 | 2024-02-27 | Tybalt, Llc | Orthogonal multiple access and non-orthogonal multiple access |
CN113454964A (en) | 2019-01-25 | 2021-09-28 | 珍吉斯科姆控股有限责任公司 | Orthogonal and non-orthogonal multiple access |
US11343823B2 (en) | 2020-08-16 | 2022-05-24 | Tybalt, Llc | Orthogonal multiple access and non-orthogonal multiple access |
CN111726198B (en) * | 2019-03-22 | 2023-08-22 | 瑞昱半导体股份有限公司 | Iterative detection and decoding circuit and method thereof, and MIMO receiver |
WO2020242898A1 (en) | 2019-05-26 | 2020-12-03 | Genghiscomm Holdings, LLC | Non-orthogonal multiple access |
EP3758319B1 (en) * | 2019-06-27 | 2023-01-18 | Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG | Receiver module, data transmission system and method for receiving an electromagnetic signal |
CN111614360B (en) * | 2020-04-26 | 2023-10-27 | 四川润泽经伟信息技术有限公司 | Carrier interference device based on satellite communication countermeasure system and corresponding decoding method |
CN112787758B (en) * | 2021-01-15 | 2021-11-02 | 北京理工大学 | Serial interference elimination uplink multiple access system of mass medium modulation equipment |
Citations (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5237586A (en) * | 1992-03-25 | 1993-08-17 | Ericsson-Ge Mobile Communications Holding, Inc. | Rake receiver with selective ray combining |
US5659578A (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 1997-08-19 | At&T Wireless Services, Inc. | High rate Reed-Solomon concatenated trellis coded 16 star QAM system for transmission of data over cellular mobile radio |
US6222835B1 (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 2001-04-24 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and configuration for packet-oriented data transmission in a digital transmission system |
US6307882B1 (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2001-10-23 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Determining channel characteristics in a space-time architecture wireless communication system having multi-element antennas |
US20020034261A1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2002-03-21 | Eidson Donald Brian | Rate n/n systematic, recursive convolutional encoder and corresponding decoder |
US6442214B1 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2002-08-27 | Iospan Wireless, Inc. | Diversity transmitter based on linear transform processing of transmitted information |
US20020165626A1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-11-07 | Hammons A. Roger | Space-time coded OFDM system for MMDS applications |
US6487694B1 (en) * | 1999-12-20 | 2002-11-26 | Hitachi America, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for turbo-code decoding a convolution encoded data frame using symbol-by-symbol traceback and HR-SOVA |
US6499128B1 (en) * | 1999-02-18 | 2002-12-24 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Iterated soft-decision decoding of block codes |
US20030076890A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-04-24 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detection and decoding of signals received from a linear propagation channel |
US20030086504A1 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2003-05-08 | Magee David Patrick | System and method for soft slicing |
US20030112901A1 (en) * | 2001-11-29 | 2003-06-19 | Gupta Alok Kumar | Method and apparatus for determining the log-likelihood ratio with precoding |
US6587452B1 (en) * | 1999-01-04 | 2003-07-01 | Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. | High performance signal structure with multiple modulation formats |
US6591390B1 (en) * | 2000-04-11 | 2003-07-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | CRC-based adaptive halting turbo decoder and method of use |
US6731696B1 (en) * | 1997-12-31 | 2004-05-04 | At&T Corp. | Multi-channel parallel/serial concatenated convolutional codes and trellis coded modulation encoder/decoder |
US20040100897A1 (en) * | 1998-02-12 | 2004-05-27 | Shattil Steve J. | Carrier interferometry coding with aplications to cellular and local area networks |
US20040174939A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-09-09 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Near-optimal multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel detection via sequential Monte Carlo |
US6807146B1 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2004-10-19 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Protocols for scalable communication system using overland signals and multi-carrier frequency communication |
US6816556B2 (en) * | 2000-01-18 | 2004-11-09 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Bandwidth-efficient concatenated trellis-coded modulation decoder and decoding method thereof |
US20040240590A1 (en) * | 2000-09-12 | 2004-12-02 | Cameron Kelly Brian | Decoder design adaptable to decode coded signals using min* or max* processing |
US6856656B2 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2005-02-15 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | Iterative carrier phase tracking decoding system |
US20050047517A1 (en) * | 2003-09-03 | 2005-03-03 | Georgios Giannakis B. | Adaptive modulation for multi-antenna transmissions with partial channel knowledge |
US6901119B2 (en) * | 2001-02-22 | 2005-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for implementing soft-input/soft-output iterative detectors/decoders |
US6977974B1 (en) * | 2000-11-20 | 2005-12-20 | At&T Corp. | De-modulation of MOK(M-ary orthogonal modulation) |
US7133853B2 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2006-11-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for decoding LDPC codes |
US20070140374A1 (en) * | 1996-08-29 | 2007-06-21 | Raleigh Gregory G | Spatio-temporal processing for communication |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB9709285D0 (en) | 1997-05-08 | 1997-06-25 | Philips Electronics Nv | Flexible two-way telecommunications system |
JP2002523969A (en) * | 1998-08-18 | 2002-07-30 | ビームリーチ・ネットワークス・インコーポレイテッド | Stack carrier discrete multitone communication technology |
GB9911777D0 (en) | 1999-05-20 | 1999-07-21 | Univ Southampton | Transceiver |
GB9917977D0 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 1999-09-29 | Smithkline Beecham Biolog | Novel compounds |
WO2001019013A1 (en) | 1999-09-09 | 2001-03-15 | Home Wireless Networks, Inc. | Turbo detection of space-time codes |
US6888809B1 (en) * | 2000-01-13 | 2005-05-03 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Space-time processing for multiple-input, multiple-output, wireless systems |
US6987754B2 (en) | 2000-03-07 | 2006-01-17 | Menashe Shahar | Adaptive downstream modulation scheme for broadband wireless access systems |
US6473467B1 (en) * | 2000-03-22 | 2002-10-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for measuring reporting channel state information in a high efficiency, high performance communications system |
-
2001
- 2001-12-03 US US10/005,104 patent/US7154936B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2002
- 2002-10-31 EP EP02780563A patent/EP1451991A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-10-31 EP EP10011032.9A patent/EP2317717A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2002-10-31 BR BRPI0214640-1A patent/BR0214640A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-10-31 WO PCT/US2002/035175 patent/WO2003049397A2/en active Application Filing
- 2002-10-31 JP JP2003550464A patent/JP2006503446A/en active Pending
- 2002-10-31 CN CNA028277937A patent/CN1618222A/en active Pending
- 2002-10-31 KR KR1020047008529A patent/KR100942401B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-10-31 AU AU2002343608A patent/AU2002343608A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2002-11-07 TW TW091132778A patent/TWI292271B/en active
-
2005
- 2005-03-15 US US11/081,260 patent/US20050157811A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-11-08 US US11/557,662 patent/US7372896B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2008
- 2008-05-12 US US12/119,253 patent/US20080212657A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2010
- 2010-01-04 JP JP2010000271A patent/JP2010136404A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5237586A (en) * | 1992-03-25 | 1993-08-17 | Ericsson-Ge Mobile Communications Holding, Inc. | Rake receiver with selective ray combining |
US5659578A (en) * | 1994-11-23 | 1997-08-19 | At&T Wireless Services, Inc. | High rate Reed-Solomon concatenated trellis coded 16 star QAM system for transmission of data over cellular mobile radio |
US20070140374A1 (en) * | 1996-08-29 | 2007-06-21 | Raleigh Gregory G | Spatio-temporal processing for communication |
US6222835B1 (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 2001-04-24 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and configuration for packet-oriented data transmission in a digital transmission system |
US6731696B1 (en) * | 1997-12-31 | 2004-05-04 | At&T Corp. | Multi-channel parallel/serial concatenated convolutional codes and trellis coded modulation encoder/decoder |
US20040100897A1 (en) * | 1998-02-12 | 2004-05-27 | Shattil Steve J. | Carrier interferometry coding with aplications to cellular and local area networks |
US6307882B1 (en) * | 1998-07-10 | 2001-10-23 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Determining channel characteristics in a space-time architecture wireless communication system having multi-element antennas |
US6587452B1 (en) * | 1999-01-04 | 2003-07-01 | Golden Bridge Technology, Inc. | High performance signal structure with multiple modulation formats |
US6499128B1 (en) * | 1999-02-18 | 2002-12-24 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Iterated soft-decision decoding of block codes |
US6487694B1 (en) * | 1999-12-20 | 2002-11-26 | Hitachi America, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for turbo-code decoding a convolution encoded data frame using symbol-by-symbol traceback and HR-SOVA |
US6816556B2 (en) * | 2000-01-18 | 2004-11-09 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Bandwidth-efficient concatenated trellis-coded modulation decoder and decoding method thereof |
US6591390B1 (en) * | 2000-04-11 | 2003-07-08 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | CRC-based adaptive halting turbo decoder and method of use |
US6807146B1 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2004-10-19 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Protocols for scalable communication system using overland signals and multi-carrier frequency communication |
US6442214B1 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2002-08-27 | Iospan Wireless, Inc. | Diversity transmitter based on linear transform processing of transmitted information |
US20020034261A1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2002-03-21 | Eidson Donald Brian | Rate n/n systematic, recursive convolutional encoder and corresponding decoder |
US20040240590A1 (en) * | 2000-09-12 | 2004-12-02 | Cameron Kelly Brian | Decoder design adaptable to decode coded signals using min* or max* processing |
US20020165626A1 (en) * | 2000-11-06 | 2002-11-07 | Hammons A. Roger | Space-time coded OFDM system for MMDS applications |
US6977974B1 (en) * | 2000-11-20 | 2005-12-20 | At&T Corp. | De-modulation of MOK(M-ary orthogonal modulation) |
US6856656B2 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2005-02-15 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | Iterative carrier phase tracking decoding system |
US6901119B2 (en) * | 2001-02-22 | 2005-05-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for implementing soft-input/soft-output iterative detectors/decoders |
US7133853B2 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2006-11-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for decoding LDPC codes |
US20030076890A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-04-24 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detection and decoding of signals received from a linear propagation channel |
US7236536B2 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2007-06-26 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for detection and decoding of signals received from a linear propagation channel |
US20030086504A1 (en) * | 2001-11-05 | 2003-05-08 | Magee David Patrick | System and method for soft slicing |
US20030112901A1 (en) * | 2001-11-29 | 2003-06-19 | Gupta Alok Kumar | Method and apparatus for determining the log-likelihood ratio with precoding |
US20040174939A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-09-09 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Near-optimal multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel detection via sequential Monte Carlo |
US20050047517A1 (en) * | 2003-09-03 | 2005-03-03 | Georgios Giannakis B. | Adaptive modulation for multi-antenna transmissions with partial channel knowledge |
Cited By (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8437417B1 (en) * | 2002-02-15 | 2013-05-07 | Marvell International Ltd. | Method and apparatus for performing baseband equalization in symbol modulated communications |
US9036743B1 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2015-05-19 | Marvell International Ltd. | System and method for performing maximum ratio combining on a plurality of received symbols |
US8675786B1 (en) | 2002-02-15 | 2014-03-18 | Marvell International Ltd. | Method and apparatus for performing baseband equalization in symbol modulated communications |
US20100235710A1 (en) * | 2003-09-09 | 2010-09-16 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Signal transmission method and transmitter in radio multiplex transmission system |
US8375270B2 (en) | 2003-09-09 | 2013-02-12 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Signal transmission method and transmitter in radio multiplex transmission system |
US7725090B2 (en) * | 2005-04-15 | 2010-05-25 | Spreadtrum Communications Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatic frequency correction |
US20060233153A1 (en) * | 2005-04-15 | 2006-10-19 | Spreadtrum Communications Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatic frequency correction |
US20080112502A1 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2008-05-15 | Limberg Allen L | System for digital television broadcasting using modified 2/3 trellis coding |
US8005166B2 (en) | 2006-11-14 | 2011-08-23 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | System for digital television broadcasting using modified 2/3 trellis coding |
US20090322961A1 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2009-12-31 | Limberg Allen Leroy | System for digital television broadcasting using modified 2/3 trellis coding |
US8687718B2 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2014-04-01 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Multiple-input multiple-output OFDM systems |
US20110261898A1 (en) * | 2008-07-07 | 2011-10-27 | Commonwealth Scientific And Industrial Research Organisation | Multiple-input multiple-output ofdm systems |
JP2013501395A (en) * | 2009-07-31 | 2013-01-10 | ソ、ホン−ソク | Received signal processing method for processing received signal by applying channel state information by orthogonal frequency division multiplexing |
WO2011013926A3 (en) * | 2009-07-31 | 2011-06-16 | Seo Hong Seok | Method for processing a received signal to which channel state information is applied in an orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing system |
US20140247909A1 (en) * | 2011-10-05 | 2014-09-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and Device for Decoding a Transport Block of a Communication Signal |
US9692553B2 (en) * | 2011-10-05 | 2017-06-27 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and device for decoding a transport block of a communication signal |
WO2017100689A1 (en) * | 2015-12-10 | 2017-06-15 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Soft-information moderation for mimo detectors |
WO2018038852A1 (en) * | 2016-08-26 | 2018-03-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Concatenated decoding methods for range extension |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050157811A1 (en) | 2005-07-21 |
BR0214640A (en) | 2007-03-13 |
WO2003049397A3 (en) | 2004-02-26 |
TWI292271B (en) | 2008-01-01 |
JP2006503446A (en) | 2006-01-26 |
US20070064831A1 (en) | 2007-03-22 |
US7154936B2 (en) | 2006-12-26 |
EP2317717A2 (en) | 2011-05-04 |
EP1451991A2 (en) | 2004-09-01 |
US7372896B2 (en) | 2008-05-13 |
WO2003049397A2 (en) | 2003-06-12 |
KR100942401B1 (en) | 2010-02-17 |
TW200303672A (en) | 2003-09-01 |
CN1618222A (en) | 2005-05-18 |
AU2002343608A8 (en) | 2003-06-17 |
KR20050058269A (en) | 2005-06-16 |
US20030103584A1 (en) | 2003-06-05 |
AU2002343608A1 (en) | 2003-06-17 |
EP2317717A3 (en) | 2013-04-10 |
JP2010136404A (en) | 2010-06-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7372896B2 (en) | Iterative detection and decoding for a MIMO-OFDM system | |
US7724838B2 (en) | Hierarchical coding with multiple antennas in a wireless communication system | |
US7359313B2 (en) | Space-time bit-interleaved coded modulation for wideband transmission | |
AU2003216479C1 (en) | Data transmission with non-uniform distribution of data rates for a multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system | |
US20050128966A1 (en) | Communications apparatus and methods | |
US20060087960A1 (en) | Transmitter and receiver in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system using an antenna array and methods thereof | |
Sellathurai et al. | A simplified diagonal BLAST architecture with iterative parallel-interference cancellation receivers | |
EP1746756B1 (en) | A method and system for decoding signals, corresponding receiver and computer program product | |
US7924945B2 (en) | Iterative receiving method for a MIMO system, and corresponding receiver and computer program | |
Chen et al. | Layered turbo space-time coded MIMO-OFDM systems for time varying channels | |
Wang et al. | Space-time turbo detection and decoding for MIMO block transmission systems | |
Sun et al. | A novel iterative receiver for coded MIMO OFDM systems | |
Davies et al. | Polynomial matrix QR decomposition and iterative decoding of frequency selective MIMO channels | |
Chen et al. | Low-complexity turbo equalization for MIMO-OFDM system without cyclic prefix | |
Sun et al. | An iterative receiver for groupwise bit-interleaved coded QAM STBC OFDM | |
Wang et al. | Turbo detection and decoding for space-time block-coded block transmission systems | |
Davies et al. | A polynomial QR decomposition based turbo equalization technique for frequency selective MIMO channels | |
Sand et al. | EXIT chart analysis of iterative receivers for space-time-frequency coded OFDM systems | |
Kafle et al. | Iterative semi-blind space-time multiuser detection for MC-CDMA uplink system | |
Tsiligkaridis | Fast peak-power reduction for MIMO-OFDM systems with diversity | |
Lin et al. | Scaled matched filter based iterative receiver for coded MIMO-OFDM systems | |
Qiao et al. | Iteratative soft interference cancellation for uplink turbo-coded MIMO MC-CDMA system | |
Zhang et al. | Turbo-based Interference Cancellation for SFBC-OFDM Systems | |
Wang et al. | A Novel Low-Complexity MAP SISO Detector for Iterative Detection in Precoded OFDM Systems | |
Huang et al. | A Novel Layered Space-Time-Frequency Architecture with Convolutional Coding |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: QUALCOMM, INCORPORATED, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BJERKE, BJORN A.;KETCHUM, JOHN W.;WALTON, JAY R.;REEL/FRAME:027609/0682 Effective date: 20020206 |