Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20080270801 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/050,820
Publication dateOct 30, 2008
Filing dateMar 18, 2008
Priority dateSep 11, 2000
Also published asUS6961444, US7197164, US7346776, US20020031240, US20020076083, US20060120559, WO2002023905A1
Publication number050820, 12050820, US 2008/0270801 A1, US 2008/270801 A1, US 20080270801 A1, US 20080270801A1, US 2008270801 A1, US 2008270801A1, US-A1-20080270801, US-A1-2008270801, US2008/0270801A1, US2008/270801A1, US20080270801 A1, US20080270801A1, US2008270801 A1, US2008270801A1
InventorsKenneth L. Levy, Jun Tian
Original AssigneeLevy Kenneth L, Jun Tian
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Watermarking a Media Signal by Adjusting Frequency Domain Values and Adapting to the Media Signal
US 20080270801 A1
Abstract
A method of imperceptibly embedding a code signal in a media signal encodes auxiliary information in frequency components of the media signal. This method forms a code signal comprising a plurality of frequency components. The method embeds the code signal into the media signal by adjusting the frequency component relative to a neighboring component. The method changes selection of the plurality of frequency components corresponding to the codes signal for different instances of embedding the code signal in the media signal. The code signal may be used to encode a combination of fixed and variable message information in audio and image signals, including video. In one application, the attributes of the code signal are measured to determine broadcast signal quality. In another, the code signal robustly carries auxiliary information in distribution channels where distortion is common, such as compression, broadcast distortion, packet loss, digital to analog conversion, and ambient air transmission.
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(8)
1. A method of imperceptibly embedding a code signal in a media signal, the method comprising:
forming a code signal comprising a plurality of frequency components;
embedding the code signal into the media signal, including for each of a plurality of frequency components, adjusting the frequency component relative to a neighboring component; and
changing selection of the plurality of frequency components corresponding to the codes signal for different instances of embedding the code signal in the media signal.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the changing is computed as a function of the media signal.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the function of the media signal comprises a hash of the media signal.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein the changing comprises including a first set of frequency components in the code signal that are repeated in the media signal, and a second set of frequency components that change as a function of the media signal.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the code signal includes frequency components that are measured to determine broadcast signal quality.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein adjusting includes setting a frequency component to satisfy a predetermined relationship with a neighboring component.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein adjusting includes adjusting average energy of frequency components relative to a reference value.
8. A computer readable medium on which is stored, which, when executed by a computer, performs a method of imperceptibly embedding a code signal in a media signal, the method comprising:
forming a code signal comprising a plurality of frequency components;
embedding the code signal into the media signal, including for each of a plurality of frequency components, adjusting the frequency component relative to a neighboring component; and
changing selection of the plurality of frequency components corresponding to the codes signal for different instances of embedding the code signal in the media signal.
Description
    RELATED APPLICATION DATA
  • [0001]
    This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/731,456, filed Dec. 6, 2000 (Now U.S. Pat. No. 7,346,776), which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/232,163 filed Sep. 11, 2000. These applications and patents are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • [0002]
    The invention relates to steganography, data hiding, and watermarking of media signals, such as images and audio signals.
  • BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY
  • [0003]
    Digital watermarking is a process for modifying physical or electronic media to embed a machine-readable code into the media. The media may be modified such that the embedded code is imperceptible or nearly imperceptible to the user, yet may be detected through an automated detection process. Most commonly, digital watermarking is applied to media signals such as images, audio signals, and video signals. However, it may also be applied to other types of media objects, including documents (e.g., through line, word or character shifting), software, multi-dimensional graphics models, and surface textures of objects.
  • [0004]
    Digital watermarking systems typically have two primary components: an encoder that embeds the watermark in a host media signal, and a decoder that detects and reads the embedded watermark from a signal suspected of containing a watermark (a suspect signal). The encoder embeds a watermark by altering the host media signal. The reading component analyzes a suspect signal to detect whether a watermark is present. In applications where the watermark encodes information, the reader extracts this information from the detected watermark.
  • [0005]
    Several particular watermarking techniques have been developed. The reader is presumed to be familiar with the literature in this field. Particular techniques for embedding and detecting imperceptible watermarks in media signals are detailed in the assignee's U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,862,260 and 6,614,914, which are hereby incorporated by reference. Examples of other watermarking techniques are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,197,156, which is hereby incorporated by reference. Additional features of watermarks relating to authentication of media signals and fragile watermarks are described in U.S. patent applications 60/198,138, and 60/232,163, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,574,350 and 6,636,615, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
  • [0006]
    One aspect of the invention is a method of imperceptibly embedding a code signal in a media signal. This forms a code signal comprising a plurality of frequency components. The method embeds the code signal into the media signal by adjusting the frequency component relative to a neighboring component. The method changes selection of the plurality of frequency components corresponding to the codes signal for different instances of embedding the code signal in the media signal.
  • [0007]
    The code signal may be used to encode a combination of fixed and variable message information in audio and image signals, including video. In one application, the attributes of the code signal are measured to determine broadcast signal quality. In another, the code signal robustly carries auxiliary information in distribution channels where distortion is common, such as compression, broadcast distortion, packet loss, digital to analog conversion, and ambient air transmission.
  • [0008]
    Further features will become apparent with reference to the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. The following description details a method for detecting whether an image has been scanned, printed or photocopied after being processed by the method. It also describes alternative implementations and applications.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0009]
    FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of embedding an authentication watermark in a media signal.
  • [0010]
    FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of detecting the authentication watermark from a potentially corrupted version of the watermarked signal.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0011]
    FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of embedding a watermark in an input media signal (100), and in particular, in an image. The embedder begins by dividing a grayscale image into NN blocks of samples at a specified resolution (102), where N is a pre-defined integer. For each block, the embedder computes a frequency transform of the image samples in that block (104), namely, a fast Fourier transform. From the mid-frequency and mid-high frequency coefficients, the embedder selects M Fourier transform coefficients (106), where M is a pre-defined integer. The coefficient locations are fixed by a pre-defined pattern. For example, the locations are scattered among roughly 25 to 100 coefficient locations in the mid to mid-high frequency range of a Fourier transform domain of a block of image samples where N ranges from 64 to 512 at spatial resolutions ranging from 75 to 600 dots per inch (DPI). The locations are symmetric about vertical and horizontal axes (and potentially diagonal axes) to facilitate detection as explained further below.
  • [0012]
    For each of the M selected coefficients, x, the embedder computes a ratio of the magnitude of a selected coefficient relative to the magnitude of its neighbors (108). In particular, it is a ratio of the magnitude of the selected coefficient to the average magnitude of the surrounding neighbors:
  • [0000]

    r(x)=Magnitude_of x/Average_of_Magnitude_of_Eight_Neighbors_of x
  • [0013]
    If r(x)<r, where r is a pre-defined reference value, the embedder increases the magnitude of x such that:
  • [0000]

    r(x)=r.
  • [0014]
    In this implementation, the value of r is a pre-defined constant. The reference may be derived dynamically from the input media signal. Also, the reference may be selected from a table of values so as to select the value of r in the table at the minimum distance from r(x). The adjustment to the host image is selected so as to be imperceptible or substantially imperceptible to a user in an output form of the watermarked signal.
  • [0015]
    Next, the embedder computes the inverse fast Fourier transform on each block to obtain the watermarked grayscale image (112). The watermarked image (114) may then undergo one or more transformations, such as digital to analog conversion, printing, scanning, analog to digital conversion, photocopying, etc. These transformations tend to corrupt the watermarked image in a predictable way.
  • [0016]
    The watermarking process of FIG. 1 may be combined with another watermarking process to embed other watermarks, either robust or fragile to transformations such as sampling distortions, geometric distortions, scaling, rotation, cropping, etc. In particular, the process may be combined with an embedding process described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,862,260 and 6,614,914 to encode a calibration signal that enables a detector to compensate for distortions such as scaling, rotation, translation, differential scale, shear, etc. In one implementation, for example, the calibration signal comprises an array of impulse or delta functions scattered in a pattern in the Fourier domain of each block of image samples. To embed the pattern, the embedder perceptually adapts the calibration signal to the host image block and adds it to that block. The impulse functions of the calibration signal have a pre-defined magnitude and pseudo-random phase. To make the calibration signal less perceptible yet detectable, the embedder modulates the energy of the calibration signal according to the data hiding attributes (e.g., local contrast) of the image samples to which it is added. Preferably, the locations of the impulse functions are scattered across a range of frequencies to make them robust to transformations like spatial scaling, rotation, scanning, printing, and lossy compression. Further, they are preferably arranged to be symmetric about vertical and horizontal axes in the Fourier domain to facilitate detection after flipping or rotating the watermarked image.
  • [0017]
    The frequency coefficient locations selected for the method illustrated in FIG. 1 may be mutually exclusive or overlap the coefficient locations of the calibration signal. The calibration signal preferably has impulse functions at lower frequencies to survive compression, scanning, printing, etc. while the pattern of coefficients employed in FIG. 1 includes coefficients at locations that are likely to be impacted by alterations to be detected, such as printing, scanning and photocopying. In the case where they overlap, the modification of the coefficients according to FIG. 1 is implemented so as not to interfere with the calibrations signal. In particular, the embedder adjusts the selected coefficients as shown in FIG. 1 after the impulse functions of the calibration signal have been introduced, or the embedder calculates the watermarked signal taking into account the changes of the coefficient values due to the calibration signal and the process of FIG. 1.
  • [0018]
    Another approach is to adjust the selected frequency coefficients in the method of FIG. 1 so that those coefficients act as both a calibration signal and an authentication signal. The locations of the coefficients for the method of FIG. 1 and the delta functions of the calibration signal are the same. The embedder increases the magnitudes of selected mid to mid-high frequency coefficients relative to their neighbors to achieve the desired relationship with neighboring coefficients for authentication purposes. Since this modulation includes the addition of a delta function to the selected coefficients, it also inherently embeds a calibration signal comprised of delta functions at the selected locations. To compensate for rotation and scale, the detector performs a Fourier Mellin transform of the suspect signal and the calibration signal into a log-polar space and then correlates the two signals. The location of the correlation peak in log polar space provides the spatial scale and rotation parameters. These parameters may then be used to compensate for rotation and scale changes before performing additional watermark decoding operations, such as the authentication operations of FIG. 2.
  • [0019]
    To compute translation, the delta functions added to the selected coefficients may be given a known pseudorandom phase. In this case, the detector correlates the phase information of the calibration signal with the suspect signal after compensating for rotation and scale. The location of the correlation peak gives the translation offset in the horizontal and vertical directions.
  • [0020]
    In addition to being integrated with other watermark signal components, the process of FIG. 1 may be combined with a robust watermark embedding process to carry a multi-bit message payload carrying metadata or a link to metadata stored in an external database. Example implementations for embedding this type of robust watermark are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,862,260 and 6,614,914.
  • [0021]
    FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating a process of detecting the authentication watermark from a potentially corrupted version of the watermarked media signal (120) from the process of FIG. 1. The first four steps (122) are the same as shown in the embedder. For each block, the detector computes the average of r(x), where x is over all M selected coefficients (124),
  • [0000]

    R=Average_of r(x)
  • [0022]
    The detector computes the average of R over all blocks (126),
  • [0000]

    AR=Average_of_R
  • [0023]
    To detect whether the watermarked signal has undergone alterations, the detector compares the average of R with a pre-defined threshold (128). If AR>=T, where T is a pre-defined threshold, then the detector classifies it as original. If AR<T, then the detector classifies it as a copy. Depending on the application, the detector may indicate the result (130) to a user through some user interface (e.g., visual display, audio output such as text to speech synthesis, etc.). The detector may also indicate the result (130) to another software process or device to take further action, such as communicating the event to a another device or database for logging, recording tracer data about the user or device in which the alteration is detected, linking the detecting device to a network resource such as a web site at a specified URL that informs the user about usage rules, licensing opportunities, etc.
  • [0024]
    To make the process robust to geometric distortion, the detector includes a pre-processing phase in which it correlates a calibration signal with the potentially corrupted watermarked signal as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,862,260 and 6,614,914. Using a Fourier Mellin transform, the detector maps both the calibration signal and the received signal into a log polar coordinate space and correlates the signals (e.g., using generalized matched filters) to calculate estimates of rotation and scale. After compensating for rotation and scale, the detector uses the phase information of the calibration signal to compute translation, e.g., the origin or reference point for each block. Further correlation operations may be used to compute differential scale (e.g., the change in scale in the horizontal and vertical directions after watermarking). After compensating for geometric distortion, the detector executes the process of FIG. 2 to detect alteration in the selected frequency coefficients modified according to the method shown in FIG. 1.
  • [0025]
    While the invention is illustrated with respect to a specific implementation, it may be implemented in a variety of alternative ways. For example, the above example specifically refers to a grayscale image. This example may be adapted to other types of images including video and still imagery, color and monochrome images, etc. For color images, the embedding and detecting operations may be performed on two or more color channels, including luminance, chrominance or some other color channels. The embedding and detecting operations may be applied to frequency coefficients of alternative frequency transforms, such as DCT and wavelet, to name a few.
  • [0026]
    The embedding process shown in FIG. 1 may be performed on a portion of the host signal to create a watermark signal that is combined with the host signal. For example, in one possible implementation, the embedder pre-filters the host signal to yield a high pass filtered signal including content at the mid and high frequency ranges impacted by the watermark. The embedder makes the modification to this filtered signal, and then combines the resulting modified signal with the original signal.
  • [0027]
    The embedding and detecting processes may also be integrated into compression and decompression operations. For example, the frequency domain transform may be executed as part of a compression process, such as JPEG, JPEG 2000 or MPEG, where blocks of the signal are transformed into a frequency domain. Once converted to the frequency domain, frequency coefficients may be adjusted as described above.
  • [0028]
    The embedding and detecting operations apply to other media types, including audio media signals. In addition, the frequency domain coefficients may be selected and adjusted to reference values to detect other types of signal alteration, such as lossy compression, digital to analog and analog to digital conversion, downsampling and upsampling, etc.
  • Semi-Fragile Watermarks
  • [0029]
    A related watermarking approach is to use an array of Fourier magnitude impulse functions with random phase (a calibration signal, also referred to as a watermark synchronization or orientation signal) for semi-fragile, and copy and copy-attack resistant watermarks. Semi-fragile refers to a watermark that degrades in response to some types of degradation of the watermarked signal but not others. In particular for document authentication applications using such a watermark, the watermark decoder can determine if the watermark has been scanned and printed or battered by normal usage, potentially while being read with a web camera. The copy-attack relates to the assertion that one can use noise-reduction, i.e. Wiener filters, to lift a watermark and, then using threshold and masking techniques, one can re-embed it in a new image. Interestingly, these concepts are related because they both include an additional scanning and printing cycle, assuming the copy attack works on printed, not only digital, content. This type of semi-fragile watermark can be used to determine if a watermarked document has been copied, possibly using a high quality copier and low quality reader, and as such, can stop copying and can be used to measure quality of service.
  • [0030]
    One approach to implementing a semi-fragile watermark is to embed extra signal peaks in the Fourier magnitude domain that are of varying intensity, and have the watermark decoder determine if the watermark has been scanned and printed by the relative power of the extra and original calibration signal peaks. The extra peaks refer to a set of peaks used to implement the semifragile watermark. The original calibration signal peaks refer to the ones already included in the watermark to determine its orientation in a geometrically distorted version of the watermarked signal. For an example of such a calibration signal, see U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,862,260 and 6,614,914, which are incorporated by reference. Some peaks are referred to as “extra” because they are included in addition to other peaks that form the original set of peaks in a calibration signal.
  • [0031]
    One advantage of including the semi-fragile watermark in the calibration signal is that the robust part of the watermark, which includes the desired detailed information such as a unique ID, is the multi-bit message, whereas the fragile part, which is only used to determine copying, is a few bit message. The fragile watermark can be considered as a single bit (copied or not) but actually allows more information by being frequency specific, as described below. Interestingly and potentially advantageously, the semi-fragile watermark is separate but inherently related to the robust watermark—thus they cannot be separated for successful copy attacks.
  • [0032]
    Specifically, the extra calibration signal peaks should be located at frequencies that best discriminates between the printing and scanning process, normal scuffing and a web camera reader. These locations can be determined by analyzing the frequency response of printing, scanning, scuffing and web cameras for frequency differences.
  • [0033]
    For example, a printing-scanning process may represent high-frequencies better than a camera, but not low frequencies. In addition, scuffing may show low-and-high frequency losses. Thus, the reader will be able to determine if the watermark has been copied, involving an additional scanning-printing process, by the relative intensities of the extra and original calibration signal peaks at low and high frequencies. In this example, high-and-low frequency loss is acceptable, whereas only low frequency loss represents a copied watermark.
  • [0034]
    In addition, the extra calibration signal peaks could also be dependent upon the content of the host signal, thus providing additional defense against the copy attack. For example, the host image samples could be broken in 16 equal sub-blocks, and the location of the extra peaks depends upon the average intensity of each quadrant to the total average intensity. Or, if only a section of the image is visible to the reader, each 32 by 32 sample block could be used in the above calculation instead of the complete image. Any “hash” of the host image that survives a web camera reader (referred to as a perceptual hash) could be used. To this end, if the watermark is moved to another picture, after it is read, it is less likely that the extra calibration signal peak locations are correct, not to mention that the less intense calibration signal points have been removed by the additional scanning-printing process.
  • [0035]
    Alternatively, in regards to the copy attack, the content dependent information could be used to slightly move the location of a few original calibration signal peaks, as opposed to adding extra calibration signal peaks. This means that the image content is implicitly in the calibration signal's jitter, and the copy attack is less likely to succeed unless the read and embedded images have the same perceptual hash. On the one hand, this approach may reduce robustness of the robust message to scaling, rotation and translation. On the other hand, no extra bits containing the output of the perceptual hash need to be embedded in the robust message.
  • CONCLUDING REMARKS
  • [0036]
    Having described and illustrated the principles of the technology with reference to specific implementations, it will be recognized that the technology can be implemented in many other, different, forms. To provide a comprehensive disclosure without unduly lengthening the specification, applicants incorporate by reference the patents and patent applications referenced above.
  • [0037]
    The methods, processes, and systems described above may be implemented in hardware, software or a combination of hardware and software. For example, the embedding processes may be implemented in a programmable computer or a special purpose digital circuit. Similarly, detecting processes may be implemented in software, firmware, hardware, or combinations of software, firmware and hardware. The methods and processes described above may be implemented in programs executed from a system's memory (a computer readable medium, such as an electronic, optical or magnetic storage device).
  • [0038]
    The particular combinations of elements and features in the above-detailed embodiments are exemplary only; the interchanging and substitution of these teachings with other teachings in this and the incorporated-by-reference patents/applications are also contemplated.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US591527 *Feb 21, 1896Oct 12, 1897 Gold from ores
US4081132 *Oct 22, 1974Mar 28, 1978E M I LimitedCredit cards and other security documents
US4550395 *Oct 11, 1983Oct 29, 1985Carlson John EHolographic system for the storage of audio, video and computer data
US5617119 *Jun 7, 1995Apr 1, 1997Systems Research & Applications CorporationProtection of an electronically stored image in a first color space by the alteration of a digital component in a second color space
US5636292 *May 8, 1995Jun 3, 1997Digimarc CorporationSteganography methods employing embedded calibration data
US5646997 *Dec 14, 1994Jul 8, 1997Barton; James M.Method and apparatus for embedding authentication information within digital data
US5721788 *Jul 31, 1992Feb 24, 1998Corbis CorporationMethod and system for digital image signatures
US5745604 *Mar 15, 1996Apr 28, 1998Digimarc CorporationIdentification/authentication system using robust, distributed coding
US5761686 *Jun 27, 1996Jun 2, 1998Xerox CorporationEmbedding encoded information in an iconic version of a text image
US5809139 *Sep 13, 1996Sep 15, 1998Vivo Software, Inc.Watermarking method and apparatus for compressed digital video
US5809160 *Nov 12, 1997Sep 15, 1998Digimarc CorporationMethod for encoding auxiliary data within a source signal
US5825892 *Oct 28, 1996Oct 20, 1998International Business Machines CorporationProtecting images with an image watermark
US5832119 *Sep 25, 1995Nov 3, 1998Digimarc CorporationMethods for controlling systems using control signals embedded in empirical data
US5835639 *Dec 18, 1996Nov 10, 1998Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod for detecting rotation and magnification in images
US5841886 *Dec 4, 1996Nov 24, 1998Digimarc CorporationSecurity system for photographic identification
US5859920 *Nov 30, 1995Jan 12, 1999Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod for embedding digital information in an image
US5862260 *May 16, 1996Jan 19, 1999Digimarc CorporationMethods for surveying dissemination of proprietary empirical data
US5875249 *Jan 8, 1997Feb 23, 1999International Business Machines CorporationInvisible image watermark for image verification
US5915044 *Apr 13, 1998Jun 22, 1999Intel CorporationEncoding video images using foreground/background segmentation
US5930377 *May 7, 1998Jul 27, 1999Digimarc CorporationMethod for image encoding
US5933798 *Jul 16, 1997Aug 3, 1999U.S. Philips CorporationDetecting a watermark embedded in an information signal
US5974548 *Jul 12, 1996Oct 26, 1999Novell, Inc.Media-independent document security method and apparatus
US6026193 *Oct 16, 1997Feb 15, 2000Digimarc CorporationVideo steganography
US6064764 *Mar 30, 1998May 16, 2000Seiko Epson CorporationFragile watermarks for detecting tampering in images
US6065119 *May 30, 1997May 16, 2000The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaData validation
US6122403 *Nov 12, 1996Sep 19, 2000Digimarc CorporationComputer system linked by using information in data objects
US6219634 *Oct 14, 1998Apr 17, 2001Liquid Audio, Inc.Efficient watermark method and apparatus for digital signals
US6240121 *Jul 9, 1998May 29, 2001Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Apparatus and method for watermark data insertion and apparatus and method for watermark data detection
US6246777 *Mar 19, 1999Jun 12, 2001International Business Machines CorporationCompression-tolerant watermarking scheme for image authentication
US6272176 *Jul 16, 1998Aug 7, 2001Nielsen Media Research, Inc.Broadcast encoding system and method
US6275599 *Aug 28, 1998Aug 14, 2001International Business Machines CorporationCompressed image authentication and verification
US6285775 *Oct 1, 1998Sep 4, 2001The Trustees Of The University Of PrincetonWatermarking scheme for image authentication
US6332030 *Jan 14, 1999Dec 18, 2001The Regents Of The University Of CaliforniaMethod for embedding and extracting digital data in images and video
US6332031 *Jul 14, 2000Dec 18, 2001Digimarc CorporationMultiple watermarking techniques for documents and other data
US6532541 *Jan 22, 1999Mar 11, 2003The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New YorkMethod and apparatus for image authentication
US6535251 *Oct 26, 1999Mar 18, 2003Sharplabs Of America, Inc.Video encoder and method for adjusting quantization step in real time
US6563935 *Sep 2, 1999May 13, 2003Hitachi, Ltd.Method of extracting digital watermark information and method of judging bit value of digital watermark information
US6625295 *Sep 12, 1997Sep 23, 2003Purdue Research FoundationAuthentication of signals using watermarks
US6757407 *Nov 9, 2001Jun 29, 2004Lucent Technologies Inc.Transform domain image watermarking method and system
US6785815 *Jun 7, 2000Aug 31, 2004Intertrust Technologies Corp.Methods and systems for encoding and protecting data using digital signature and watermarking techniques
US6834344 *Sep 17, 1999Dec 21, 2004International Business Machines CorporationSemi-fragile watermarks
US6871180 *May 25, 1999Mar 22, 2005Arbitron Inc.Decoding of information in audio signals
US20010024510 *Feb 27, 2001Sep 27, 2001Keiichi IwamuraDigital content processing method
US20010031064 *Jan 9, 2001Oct 18, 2001Ioana DonescuMethod and device for inserting a watermarking signal in an image
US20020009208 *Apr 17, 2001Jan 24, 2002Adnan AlattarAuthentication of physical and electronic media objects using digital watermarks
US20020076082 *Aug 29, 2001Jun 20, 2002Koji ArimuraReproduction equipment, reproduction equipment specifying equipment, reproduction equipment specifying system and methods and recording media for said equipment and system
US20020095577 *Sep 5, 2001Jul 18, 2002International Business Machines CorporationEmbedding, processing and detection of digital content, information and data
US20020114456 *May 31, 2001Aug 22, 2002Yoichiro SakoRecording medium, recording method of recording medium, recording and/or reproducing method of recording medium, and data copy control method
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7711144Feb 12, 2008May 4, 2010Digimarc CorporationWatermarking employing the time-frequency domain
US7756290May 6, 2008Jul 13, 2010Digimarc CorporationDetecting embedded signals in media content using coincidence metrics
US7974439Sep 15, 2009Jul 5, 2011Digimarc CorporationEmbedding hidden auxiliary information in media
US7974495Aug 3, 2009Jul 5, 2011Digimarc CorporationIdentification and protection of video
US7987094Feb 20, 2007Jul 26, 2011Digimarc CorporationAudio encoding to convey auxiliary information, and decoding of same
US8006092Jul 17, 2007Aug 23, 2011Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarks for checking authenticity of printed objects
US8027510Jul 13, 2010Sep 27, 2011Digimarc CorporationEncoding and decoding media signals
US8051294May 19, 2009Nov 1, 2011Digimarc CorporationMethods for audio watermarking and decoding
US8051295Oct 20, 2009Nov 1, 2011Digimarc CorporationBenchmarks for digital watermarking
US8055012Jul 28, 2009Nov 8, 2011Digimarc CorporationHiding and detecting messages in media signals
US8073193Sep 15, 2009Dec 6, 2011Digimarc CorporationMethods and systems for steganographic processing
US8077912May 4, 2010Dec 13, 2011Digimarc CorporationSignal hiding employing feature modification
US8090141 *Jan 31, 2006Jan 3, 2012Xerox CorporationSystem and method to automatically establish preferred area for image-wise watermark
US8126272Mar 17, 2008Feb 28, 2012Digimarc CorporationMethods combining multiple frames of image data
US8131760Oct 26, 2007Mar 6, 2012Digimarc CorporationUsing object identifiers with content distribution
US8144924Jul 19, 2010Mar 27, 2012Digimarc CorporationContent objects with computer instructions steganographically encoded therein, and associated methods
US8175329Oct 26, 2010May 8, 2012Digimarc CorporationAuthentication of physical and electronic media objects using digital watermarks
US8204222Sep 13, 2005Jun 19, 2012Digimarc CorporationSteganographic encoding and decoding of auxiliary codes in media signals
US8280101Dec 22, 2009Oct 2, 2012Digimarc CorporationIdentification documents and authentication of such documents
US8355514Oct 26, 2007Jan 15, 2013Digimarc CorporationAudio encoding to convey auxiliary information, and media embodying same
US8411898May 25, 2010Apr 2, 2013Digimarc CorporationDigital authentication with analog documents
US8515121Nov 9, 2010Aug 20, 2013Digimarc CorporationArrangement of objects in images or graphics to convey a machine-readable signal
US9224398 *Jul 1, 2010Dec 29, 2015Nokia Technologies OyCompressed sampling audio apparatus
US20070177759 *Jan 31, 2006Aug 2, 2007Xerox CorporationSystem and method to automatically establish preferred area for image-wise watermark
US20080181449 *Feb 12, 2008Jul 31, 2008Hannigan Brett TWatermarking Employing the Time-Frequency Domain
US20130204631 *Jul 1, 2010Aug 8, 2013Nokia CorporationCompressed sampling audio apparatus
Classifications
U.S. Classification713/179, 348/E17.003
International ClassificationG06T1/00, H04L29/08, H04L29/06, H04N1/32, H04N17/00, H04L9/32
Cooperative ClassificationH04L69/329, H04L67/06, H04N17/004, H04L29/06, H04N1/32144, G06T1/0028, G06T1/0071, H04N21/8358, H04N1/32154, G06T2201/0052, H04N21/4425, G06T1/0085, H04N1/3216, G06T1/0042
European ClassificationH04N21/8358, H04N21/4425, H04N1/32C19, G06T1/00W2, G06T1/00W8, H04N1/32C19B2B, H04L29/06, H04L29/08N5, H04N17/00N, G06T1/00W4, G06T1/00W6M, H04N1/32C19B2
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jul 21, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LEVY, KENNETH L.;TIAN, JUN;REEL/FRAME:021268/0422;SIGNING DATES FROM 20080427 TO 20080718
Nov 5, 2008ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION),
Free format text: CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF UNITED STATES PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIGIMARC CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:021785/0796
Effective date: 20081024
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (FORMERLY DMRC CORPORATION),O
Free format text: CONFIRMATION OF TRANSFER OF UNITED STATES PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:L-1 SECURE CREDENTIALING, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DIGIMARC CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:021785/0796
Effective date: 20081024
May 12, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION),OREGO
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582
Effective date: 20100430
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION), OREG
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582
Effective date: 20100430
Oct 29, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: DMRC LLC, OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:025217/0508
Effective date: 20080801
Nov 2, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGON
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025227/0832
Effective date: 20080903
Owner name: DMRC CORPORATION, OREGON
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC LLC;REEL/FRAME:025227/0808
Effective date: 20080801