US20090047695A1 - Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules - Google Patents

Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090047695A1
US20090047695A1 US12/173,515 US17351508A US2009047695A1 US 20090047695 A1 US20090047695 A1 US 20090047695A1 US 17351508 A US17351508 A US 17351508A US 2009047695 A1 US2009047695 A1 US 2009047695A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
protein
immobilized
proteins
monolayer
substrate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/173,515
Inventor
Peter Wagner
Dana Ault-Riche
Steffen Nock
Christian Itin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Zyomyx Inc
Original Assignee
Zyomyx Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Zyomyx Inc filed Critical Zyomyx Inc
Priority to US12/173,515 priority Critical patent/US20090047695A1/en
Publication of US20090047695A1 publication Critical patent/US20090047695A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82YSPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y30/00Nanotechnology for materials or surface science, e.g. nanocomposites
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S435/00Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
    • Y10S435/805Test papers
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S435/00Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology
    • Y10S435/81Packaged device or kit
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T436/00Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
    • Y10T436/14Heterocyclic carbon compound [i.e., O, S, N, Se, Te, as only ring hetero atom]
    • Y10T436/142222Hetero-O [e.g., ascorbic acid, etc.]
    • Y10T436/143333Saccharide [e.g., DNA, etc.]

Definitions

  • Genomics provides information on the genetic composition and the activity of an organism's genes.
  • Bioinformatics uses computer algorithms to recognize and predict structural patterns in DNA and proteins, defining families of related genes and proteins. The information gained from the combination of these approaches is expected to boost the number of drug targets, usually proteins, from the current 500 to over 10,000 in the coming decade.
  • Automated multiwell formats are the best developed high-throughput screening systems. Automated 96-well plate-based screening systems are the most widely used. The current trend in plate-based screening systems is to reduce the volume of the reaction wells further, thereby increasing the density of the wells per plate (96-well to 384-, and 1536-well per plate). The reduction in reaction volumes results in increased throughput, dramatically decreased bioreagent costs, and a decrease in the number of plates which need to be managed by automation.
  • miniaturized cell-based assays have the potential to generate screening data of superior quality and accuracy, due to their in vivo nature.
  • the interaction of drug compounds with proteins other than the desired targets is a serious problem related to this approach which leads to a high rate of false positive results.
  • Microfluidics-based screening systems that measure in vitro reactions in solution make use of ten to several-hundred micrometer wide channels.
  • Micropumps, electroosmotic flow, integrated valves and mixing devices control liquid movement through the channel network.
  • Microfluidic networks prevent evaporation but, due to the large surface to volume ratio, result in significant protein inactivation. The successful use of microfluidic networks in biomolecule screening remains to be shown.
  • DNA microarray technology is not immediately transferable to protein screening microdevices.
  • microarrays are exclusively available for nucleic acid hybridization assays (‘DNA-chips’).
  • DNA-chips nucleic acid hybridization assays
  • Their underlying chemistry and materials are not readily transferable to protein assays.
  • Nucleic acids withstand temperatures up to 100° C., can be dried and re-hydrated without loss of activity and bound directly to organic adhesion layers absorbed on surfaces such as glass.
  • proteins must remain hydrated, kept at ambient temperatures, and are very sensitive to the physical and chemical properties of the support materials. Therefore, maintaining protein activity at the liquid-solid interface requires entirely different immobilization strategies than those used for nucleic acids. Additionally, the proper orientation of the protein at the interface is desirable to ensure accessibility of their active sites with interacting molecules.
  • cross-reactivity of a drug with related proteins can be the cause of low efficacy or even side effects in patients.
  • AZT a major treatment for AIDS
  • Block-reactivity with closely related proteins is also a problem with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin.
  • NSAIDs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • cyclooxygenase-2 an enzyme which promotes pain and inflammation.
  • cyclooxygenase-1 that is responsible for keeping the stomach lining and kidneys healthy, leading to common side-effects including stomach irritation.
  • the present invention is directed to a device and methods of use of the device that satisfy the need for parallel, in vitro, high-throughput screening of functionally or structurally related protein targets against potential drug compounds in a manner that minimizes reagent volumes and protein inactivation problems.
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides a device that has a plurality of noncontiguous reactive sites and is useful for processing fluid samples.
  • biological moieties are immobilized on a monolayer via an affinity tag which enhances the site-specific immobilization of the biological moiety onto the monolayer.
  • Each of the reactive sites is separated from neighboring reactive sites by substrate that is free of the monolayer.
  • the monolayer is on a portion of a surface of a substrate and comprises molecules of the formula X—R—Y where R is a spacer, X is a functional group that binds R to the surface, and Y is a functional group for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer via the affinity tag.
  • Each of the reactive sites is displayed on the device in a manner that allows it to react with a component of a fluid sample.
  • the device of the present invention is a micromachined or microfabricated device.
  • the plurality of reactive sites are contained within parallel microchannels. These microchannels may be microfabricated into or onto the substrate.
  • At least one coating may be formed on the substrate or applied to the substrate of a device of the present invention such that the coating is positioned between the substrate and the monolayer of each reactive site.
  • the monolayer of a device of the present invention may optionally be a mixed monolayer of more than one type of organic molecule.
  • an adaptor molecule is also included in the device of the present invention to link the affinity tag to the biological moiety.
  • the affinity tag, biological moiety, and the adaptor molecule are preferably, but not necessarily, a fusion protein.
  • the biological moiety immobilized on one reactive site can either be the same as or different from the biological moiety immobilized on a second reactive site. If the reactive sites are different, the biological moieties of the different reactive sites are preferably members of the same protein family or are otherwise functionally or structurally related.
  • the present invention further provides for methods of using the device to screen a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to interact with a component of a fluid sample.
  • the interaction being assayed may be a binding interaction or a catalytic one. Some embodiments of these methods first involve delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the device. If binding between the biological moiety and the component is to be detected, the reactive sites are then optionally washed to remove any unbound component from the area. If binding interactions are being monitored, the methods also involve detecting, either directly or indirectly, the retention of the component at each reactive site. If the interaction being assayed is catalytic, then the presence, absence, or amount of reaction product is instead detected.
  • similar methods are used diagnostically to screen a fluid sample for the presence, absence, or amount of a plurality of analytes (in parallel).
  • the device may also be used to screen a plurality of drug candidates in parallel for their ability to bind or react with a biological moiety.
  • different fluid samples each containing a different drug candidate (or a different mixture of drug candidates) to be tested, is delivered to the different reactive sites of the invention device.
  • the present invention also provides for methods of determining in parallel whether or not a plurality of proteins belong to a certain protein family based on either binding to a common ligand or reactivity with a common substrate. These methods involve delivering a fluid sample comprising a ligand or substrate of a known protein family to the reactive sites of the invention device that contain the different proteins and then detecting, either directly or indirectly, for binding or reaction with the known ligand that is characteristic of the protein family.
  • An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a device for processing a fluid sample that comprises a substrate, a plurality of parallel microchannels microfabricated into or onto said substrates and a moiety immobilized within at least one of the parallel microchannels, in such a way that the moiety interacts with a component of the fluid sample.
  • the immobilized moiety is a biological moiety such as a protein.
  • FIG. 1 shows the top view of a covered microchannel array device.
  • FIG. 2 shows a cross section of a covered microchannel array fabricated by bulk micromachining.
  • FIG. 3 shows a cross section of a covered microchannel array fabricated by sacrificial micromachining.
  • FIG. 4 shows aminoreactive monolayer molecules on a substrate.
  • FIG. 5 shows aminoreactive monolayer molecules on a coated substrate.
  • FIG. 6 shows a biological moiety immobilized on a monolayer-coated substrate via an affinity tag.
  • FIG. 7 shows a cross section view of a biomolecule-coated microchannel in a microchannel array device.
  • FIG. 8 shows a biological moiety immobilized on a monolayer-coated substrate via an affinity tag and an adaptor molecule.
  • FIG. 9 shows four possible expression vectors for expressing fusion proteins of the desired protein and an affinity tag and, optionally, an adaptor molecule.
  • FIG. 10 shows a schematic diagram of a fluorescence detection unit which may be used to monitor interaction of the immobilized biological moieties of a microchannel array with an analyte.
  • substrate refers to the bulk, underlying, and core material of the devices of the invention.
  • micromachining and “microfabricating” are both used herein to refer to any number of techniques which are useful in the generation of microstructures (structures of sub-millimeter scale). Such technologies include, but are not limited to, laser ablation, sputtering, electrodeposition, low-pressure vapor deposition, photolithography, and etching. Related technologies such as LIGA (Lithographie, Galvanoformung und Abformtechnik, high aspect ratio plating) are also included. Most of these techniques were originally developed for use in semiconductors, microelectronics, and microelectromechanical systems but are applicable to the present invention as well.
  • LIGA Lithographie, Galvanoformung und Abformtechnik, high aspect ratio plating
  • coating is used herein to refer to a layer that is either formed on or applied to the surface of the substrate.
  • a substrate such as silicon
  • a silicon oxide coating is formed on the surface upon exposure to air.
  • the coating is in no way derived from the substrate and may be placed upon the surface via mechanical, electrical, or chemical means.
  • An example of this type of coating would be a metal coating that is applied to a polymer substrate.
  • a coating may be of any thickness, typically the coating has a thickness smaller than that of the substrate.
  • An “interlayer” is a second coating or layer that is positioned between the first coating and the substrate.
  • the primary purpose of a typical interlayer is to aid adhesion between the first coating and the substrate.
  • One such example is the use of a titanium interlayer to help attach a gold coating to a silicon chip.
  • other possible functions of an interlayer are also anticipated. For instance, some interlayers may perform a role in the detection system of the device.
  • affinity tag is used herein to refer to a functional moiety capable of immobilizing a biological moiety onto the exposed functionality of a monolayer.
  • the affinity tag may be a simple chemical functional group. Other possibilities include amino acids, polypeptides, proteins, lipid bilayers, or a hydrogel.
  • the affinity tag may be either covalently or noncovalently attached to the biological moiety (via chemical conjugation or as a fusion protein, for instance).
  • an affinity tag may also be an internal part of the biological-moiety, such as an amino acid.
  • the affinity tag may bind to the monolayer either covalently or noncovalently.
  • an “adaptor molecule”, for purposes of this invention, is any entity that links an affinity tag to a biological moiety.
  • the adaptor molecule need not necessarily be a discrete molecule that is noncovalently attached to both the affinity tag and the biological moiety.
  • the adaptor molecule can be covalently attached to the affinity tag or the biological moiety or both (via chemical conjugation or as a fusion protein, for instance).
  • Examples of adaptor molecules include polypeptides, proteins, membrane anchors, and biotin.
  • a “biological moiety” is any entity that either has, or is suspected of having, a physiological function.
  • a “monolayer” is a single-molecule thick layer of organic molecules on a surface.
  • a monolayer may be disordered or ordered.
  • One face of the monolayer is composed of chemical functionalities on the termini of the organic molecules that are chemisorbed or physisorbed onto the surface material (headgroups).
  • the other face of the monolayer is exposed and may bear any number of chemical functionalities (end groups).
  • the molecules of the monolayer are highly ordered and tightly packed, largely due to hydrophobic and van der Waals interactions between the molecules.
  • polypeptide and “protein” are used interchangeably herein to refer to a polymer of amino acid residues. These terms also apply to amino acid polymers in which one or more amino acid residues is an artificial chemical analogue of a corresponding naturally occurring amino acid, as well as to naturally occurring amino acid polymers. An amino acid polymer in which one or more amino acid residues is an “unnatural” amino acid, not corresponding to any naturally occurring amino acid, is also encompassed by the use of the terms “protein” and “polypeptide” herein.
  • Proteins are considered herein to be members of the same “protein family” or to be “related” if they show significant similarities in structure and/or function, as would be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art.
  • Related proteins can be identified by sequence homology searches of DNA and protein databases using standard bioinformatics resources and software packages (examples of public databases: NCBI, NIH, EMBL, SwissProt, Brookhaven database, Washington University—Merck; private databases: Incyte, Hyseq, Hunan Genome Science; examples of software packages include EMOTIF, Blast, Fasta, Multalign, GCG Wisconsin University).
  • Enzymatically related proteins of non-homologous sequence can be identified by one of ordinary skill in the art by screening the scientific literature (example: Medline database).
  • fusion protein refers to a protein composed of two or more polypeptides that, although typically unjoined in their native state, are joined by their respective amino and carboxyl termini through a peptide linkage to form a single continuous polypeptide. It is understood that the two or more polypeptide components can either be directly joined or indirectly joined through a peptide linker/spacer.
  • nucleic acid refers to a deoxyribonucleotide or ribonucleotide monomer or polymer in either single- or double-stranded form, and unless otherwise limited, encompasses known analogs of natural nucleotides that can function in a manner similar to naturally occurring nucleotides.
  • the nucleic acid may be obtained from a natural source, an in vitro reaction enzymatic or chemical synthesis. No distinction is made herein between a nucleic acid, a polynucleotide, and an oligonucleotide.
  • normal physiological condition is used herein to refer to conditions that are typical inside a living organism or a cell. While it is recognized that some organs or organisms provide extreme conditions, the intra-organismal and intra-cellular environment normally varies around pH 7 (i.e. from pH 6.5 to pH 7.5), contains water as the predominant solvent, and exists at a temperature above 0° C. and below 50° C. It will be recognized that the concentration of various salts depends on the organ, organism, cell, or cellular compartment used as a reference.
  • the present invention provides a device for processing a fluid sample.
  • This device has a plurality of noncontiguous reactive sites, each of the sites comprising the following: a substrate; a monolayer on a portion of a surface of the substrate, comprising molecules of the formula X—R—Y where R is a spacer, X is a functional group that binds R to the surface, and Y is a functional group for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer; an affinity tag that enhances site-specific immobilization of a biological moiety onto the monolayer; and a biological moiety immobilized on the monolayer through Y via the affinity tag.
  • Each of the sites of the device may independently react with a component of the fluid sample and are separated from each other by substrate that is free of monolayer molecules of the formula X—R—Y.
  • the substrate of the invention device may be organic or inorganic, biological or non-biological, or any combination of these materials.
  • the substrate can optionally be transparent or translucent.
  • Substrates suitable for micromachining or microfabrication are preferred.
  • the substrate of the invention can optionally comprise a material selected from a group consisting of silicon, silica, quartz, glass, controlled pore glass, carbon, alumina, titanium dioxide, germanium, silicon nitride, zeolites, and gallium arsenide.
  • Many metals such as gold, platinum, aluminum, copper, titanium, and their alloys are also options for substrates.
  • many ceramics and polymers may be used as substrates, either in planar or bead form.
  • Polymers which may be used as substrates include, but are not limited to, the following: polystyrene; poly(tetra)fluorethylene; (poly)vinylidenedifluoride; polycarbonate; polymethylmethacrylate; polyvinylethylene; polyethyleneimine; poly(etherether)ketone; polyoxymethylene (POM); polyvinylphenol; polylactides; polymethacrylimide (PMI); polyalkenesulfone (PAS); polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate; polydimethylsiloxane; polyacrylamide; polyimide; co-block-polymers; and Eupergit®. Photoresists, polymerized Langmuir-Blodgett films, and LIGA structures may also serve as substrates in the present invention.
  • the preferred substrates of the present invention comprise silicon, silica, glass, or a polymer.
  • the device comprises a micromachined or microfabricated device.
  • the device is optionally a microdevice with dimensions on the millimeter to centimeter scale.
  • each of the reactive sites of the device is in a microchannel oriented parallel to microchannels of other reactive sites on the device.
  • the microchannels of such a device have optionally been microfabricated or micromachined into or onto the substrate of the device.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of the invention showing an array of microchannels 1 that have been fabricated into a bulk substrate material. In the particular device shown, eighty parallel microchannels 1 have been microfabricated into a substrate 3 .
  • the device comprises at least 2 parallel microchannel reactive sites. In another embodiment of the invention, the device comprises at least 10 parallel microchannel reactive sites. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the device comprises at least 100 parallel microchannel reactive sites. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the device comprises from about 100 to about 500 parallel microchannels. The microchannels are typically separated from one another by from about 10 ⁇ m to about 5 mm. The device may optionally comprise from about 2 to about 500 parallel microchannels per cm 2 of substrate.
  • the dimensions of the microchannels may vary. However, in preferred embodiments the scale is small enough so as to only require minute fluid sample volumes.
  • the width and depth of each microchannel of the invention device is typically between about 10 ⁇ m and about 500 ⁇ m. In a preferred embodiment of the device, the width and depth of each microchannel is between about 50 and 200 ⁇ m.
  • the length of each microchannel is from about 1 to about 20 mm in length. In a preferred embodiment, the length of each microchannel is from about 2 to about 8 mm long. Any one of a variety of channel cross-section geometries (trapezoidal, rectangular, v-shaped, semicircular, etc.) may be employed in the device. The geometry is determined by the type of microfabrication or micromachining process used to generate the microchannels, as is known in the art. Trapezoidal or rectangular cross-section geometries are preferred for the microchannels, since they readily accommodate standard fluorescence detection methods.
  • the substrate material In order to generate a plurality of reactive sites, such as a parallel array of microchannels, the substrate material first has to be cleaned to remove contaminants such as solvent stains, dust, or organic residues.
  • a variety of cleaning procedures can be used depending on the substrate material and origin of contaminants. These include wet immersion processes (for example, RCA1+2, “pyranha”, solvents), dry vapor phase cleaning, thermal treatment, plasma or glow discharge techniques, polishing with abrasive compounds, short-wavelength light exposure, ultrasonic agitation and treatment with supercritical fluids.
  • Channels can then be formed on the surface of the substrate by either (1) bulk micromachining, (2) sacrificial micromachining, (3) LIGA (high aspect ratio plating) or (4) other techniques, or any combination thereof.
  • Such techniques are well known in the semiconductor and microelectronics industries and are described in, for example, Ghandi, VLSI Fabrication Principles , Wiley (1983) and Sze, VLSI Technology, 2nd. Ed., McGraw-Hill (1988); Wolf and Taube, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, Vol. 1, Lattice Press (1986), and Madou, Fundamentals of Microfabrication , CRC Press (1997).
  • Typical resist materials include positive and negative organic resists (such as Kodak 747, PR102), inorganic materials (such as polysilicon, silicon nitride) and biological etch resists (for example Langmuir-Blodgett films and two-dimensional protein crystals such as the S-layer of Sulfolobus acidocladarius ).
  • Pattern transfer into the substrate and resist stripping occurs via wet-chemical and dry etching techniques including plasma etching, reactive ion etching, sputtering, ion-beam-assisted chemical etching and reactive ion beam etching.
  • a photoresist may be spincoated onto a cleaned 4 inch Si(110) wafer. Ultraviolet light exposure through a photomask onto the photoresist then results in a pattern of channels in the photoresist, exposing a pattern of strips of the silicon underneath. Wet-chemical etching techniques can then be applied to etch the channel pattern into the silicon. Next, a thin layer of titanium can be coated on the surface. A thin layer of gold is then coated on the surface via thermal or electron beam evaporation. Standard resist stripping follows. (Alternatively, the gold-coating could be carried out after the strip resist.)
  • FIG. 2 shows a cross section view of one example of a microchannel array fabricated by bulk micromachining.
  • a microchannel 1 in substrate 3 is covered by a glass cover 2 .
  • the surface of the substrate 3 is covered with a coating 5 .
  • Typical resist materials for sacrificial micromachining are silicon nitride (Si 3 N 4 ), polysilicon, thermally grown silicon oxide and organic resists such as SU-8 and polyimides allowing the formation of high aspect-ratio features with straight sidewalls.
  • FIG. 3 shows a cross section view of one example of a microchannel array that has been fabricated by sacrificial micromachining.
  • Microchannel 1 has walls that consist of photoresist 4 and a floor that comprises a substrate 3 that is covered with a coating 5 .
  • microchannel arrays include focused ion-beam (FIB) milling, electrostatic discharge machining (EDM), ultrasonic drilling, laser ablation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,410), mechanical milling and thermal molding techniques.
  • FIB focused ion-beam
  • EDM electrostatic discharge machining
  • ultrasonic drilling ultrasonic drilling
  • laser ablation U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,410
  • thermal molding techniques One skilled in the art will recognize that many variations in microfabrication or micromachining techniques may be used to construct the device of the present invention.
  • transparent or translucent covers are attached to the substrate via anodic bonding or adhesive coatings, resulting in microchannel arrays with inlet and outlet ports.
  • the microchannel covers are glass, especially Pyrex or quartz glass.
  • a cover which is neither transparent nor translucent may be bonded or otherwise attached to the substrate to enclose the microchannels.
  • the cover may be part of a detection system to monitor the interaction between biological moieties immobilized within the channel and an analyte.
  • a polymeric cover may be attached to a polymeric substrate channel array by other means, such as by the application of heat with pressure or through solvent-based bonding.
  • FIG. 1 One particular embodiment of a covered microchannel array is illustrated by FIG. 1 .
  • a transparent glass cover 2 covers most of the length, although not all, of each of the parallel microchannels of the array. Since in this particular embodiment the microchannels do not extend fully to the edge of the substrate, the incomplete coverage of the channel length provides an inlet and outlet port for each of the microchannels.
  • Attachment of the covers to the microchannel array can precede monolayer formation. If this is the case, then the monolayer component containing solution (typically an organic solvent) can be applied to the interior of the channels via microfabricated dispensing systems that have integrated microcapillaries and suitable entry/exit ports. Alternatively, the monolayers can be deposited in the microchannels prior to enclosure of the microchannels. For these embodiments, monolayers can optionally be transferred to the inner microchannel surfaces via simple immersion or through microcontact printing (see PCT Publication WO 96/29629).
  • the monolayer component containing solution typically an organic solvent
  • the volume of each enclosed microchannel may optionally be from about 5 nanoliters to about 300 nanoliters. In a preferred embodiment, the volume of an enclosed microchannel of the invention device is between 10 and 50 nanoliters.
  • volumes of fluid may be moved through each microchannel by a number of standard means known to those skilled in the art.
  • the sophisticated means required for moving fluids through microfluidic devices and mixing in microtiter plates are not needed for the microchannel array of the present invention.
  • Simple liquid exchange techniques commonly used with capillary technologies will suffice.
  • fluid may be moved through the channel using standard pumps.
  • more sophisticated methods of fluid movement through the microchannels such as electro-osmosis may be employed (for example, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,908,112).
  • bulk-loading dispensing devices can be used to load all microchannels of the device at once with the same fluid.
  • integrated microcapillary dispensing devices may be microfabricated out of glass or other substrates to load fluids separately to each microchannel of the device.
  • the sides, bottom, or cover of the microchannel or any combination thereof can then be further chemically modified to achieve the desired bioreactive and biocompatible properties.
  • the reactive sites of the device may optionally further comprise a coating between a substrate and its monolayer.
  • This coating may either be formed on the substrate or applied to the substrate.
  • the substrate can be modified with a coating using thin-film technology based on either physical vapor deposition (PVD) or plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Thin layers of metals or the exposure of hydroxylated surfaces on a substrate are often necessary to allow chemisorption or physisorption of bioreactive organic monolayer systems.
  • plasma exposure can be used to directly activate the substrate.
  • plasma etch procedures can be used to oxidize a polymeric surface (i.e. polystyrene or polyethylene) to expose polar functionalities such as hydroxyls, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, or the like on the surface.
  • the coating on the substrate may comprise a metal film.
  • metal films include, but are not limited to aluminum, chromium, titanium, nickel, stainless steel, zinc, lead, iron, magnesium, manganese, cadmium, tungsten, cobalt, and alloys or oxides thereof.
  • the metal film is a noble metal film.
  • Noble metals that may be used for a noble metal film include, but are not limited to gold, platinum, silver, copper, and palladium.
  • the coating comprises gold or a gold alloy.
  • the metal film is from about 50 nm to about 500 nm in thickness.
  • the coating on the substrate comprises a composition such as silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon hydride, indium tin oxide, magnesium oxide, alumina, glass, hydroxylated surfaces, or a polymer.
  • the reactive site comprises a coating between the substrate and the monolayer, then it is understood that the coating must be composed of a material for which a suitable functional group X is available (see below). If no such coating is present, then it is understood that the substrate must be composed of a material for which a suitable functional group X is available.
  • adhesion layer or mediator between said coating and said substrate.
  • a layer of titanium may be desirable between a silicon wafer substrate and a gold coating.
  • an epoxy glue such as Epo-tek 377® and Epo-tek 301-2® (Epoxy Technology Inc., Billerica, Mass.) may be preferred to aid adherence of the coating to the substrate. Determinations as to what material should be used for the adhesion layer would be obvious to one skilled in the art once materials were chosen for the substrate and coating.
  • additional adhesion mediators or interlayers may be necessary to improve the mechanical or optical properties of the device, for example, for detection purposes in waveguides.
  • Deposition or formation of the coating on the substrate must occur prior to the formation of bioreactive monolayers thereon.
  • the monolayer of each reactive site is comprised of molecules of the general formula X—R—Y where R is a spacer, X is a functional group that binds R to the surface of a portion of the substrate, and Y is a functional group for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer.
  • R is a spacer
  • X is a functional group that binds R to the surface of a portion of the substrate
  • Y is a functional group for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer.
  • Three major classes of monolayer formation are preferably used to expose high densities of bioreactive omega-functionalities on the substrate: (i) alkylsiloxane monolayers (“silanes”) on hydroxylated surfaces (as taught in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,405,766, PCT Publication WO 96/38726, U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,087, and U.S. Pat. No.
  • alkyl-thiol/dialkyldisulfide monolayers on noble metals preferably Au(111)
  • noble metals preferably Au(111)
  • alkyl monolayer formation on oxide-free passivated silicon as taught in, for example, Linford et al., J. Am. Chem.
  • R of the monolayer molecule may comprise a hydrocarbon chain from about 1 to about 200 carbons long.
  • the hydrocarbon chain may comprise an alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, alkaryl, aralkyl group, or any combination thereof.
  • R is a chemical moiety that promotes formation of a self-assembled monolayer.
  • R is an alkylchain from about 8 to about 22 carbons long.
  • R is a straight alkane from about 8 to about 22 carbons long.
  • R may readily comprise a hydrocarbon chain from about 2 to about 200 carbons long and interrupted by at least one hetero atom.
  • one or more of the hydrogen moieties of R can optionally be substituted with deuterium.
  • X may be chosen as any group which affords chemisorption or physisorption of the monolayer onto the surface of the substrate (or the coating, if present).
  • the substrate or coating is a metal or metal alloy
  • X at least prior to incorporation into the monolayer, is preferably an asymmetrical or symmetrical disulfide, sulfide, diselenide, selenide, thiol, isonitrile, selenol, a trivalent phosphorus compound, isothiocyanate, isocyanate, xanthanate, thiocarbamate, a phosphine, a amine, thio acid or dithio acid.
  • This embodiment is especially preferred when the substrate, or coating if used, is a noble metal such as gold, silver, or platinum.
  • a preferred embodiment of the invention comprises an X that, prior to incorporation into said monolayer, is a monohalosilane, dihalosilane, trihalosilane, trialkoxysilane, dialkoxysilane, or a monoalkoxysilane.
  • X is a monohalosilane, dihalosilane, trihalosilane, trialkoxysilane, dialkoxysilane, or a monoalkoxysilane.
  • silanes trichlorosilane and trialkoxysilane are particularly preferred.
  • the surface of the substrate (or coating thereon) is composed of a metal oxide such as titanium oxide, tantalum oxide, indium tin oxide, magnesium oxide, or alumina and X is a carboxylic acid.
  • X may optionally be a hydroxamic acid.
  • the substrate used in the invention is a polymer
  • a coating on the substrate such as a copper coating will be included in the device.
  • An appropriate functional group X for the coating would then be chosen for use in the device.
  • the surface of the polymer may be plasma-modified to expose desirable surface functionalities for monolayer formation.
  • EP 780423 describes the use of a monolayer molecule that has an alkene X functionality on a plasma exposed surface.
  • Still another possibility for the invention device comprised of a polymer is that the surface of the polymer on which the monolayer is formed is functionalized due to copolymerization of appropriately functionalized precursor molecules.
  • X prior to incorporation into the monolayer, can be a free-radical-producing moiety.
  • This functional group is especially appropriate when the surface on which the monolayer is formed is a hydrogenated silicon surface.
  • free-radical producing moieties include, but are not limited to, diacylperoxides, peroxides, and azo compounds.
  • unsaturated moieties such as unsubstituted alkenes, alkynes, cyano compounds and isonitrile compounds can be used for X, if the reaction with X is accompanied by ultraviolet, infrared, visible, or microwave radiation.
  • X prior to incorporation into the monolayer, may be a hydroxyl, carboxyl, vinyl, sulfonyl, phosphoryl, silicon hydride, or an amino group.
  • the component, Y, of the monolayer is responsible for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer.
  • the Y group is either highly reactive (activated) towards the biological moiety or is easily converted into such an activated form.
  • the coupling of Y with the biological moiety occurs readily under normal physiological conditions not detrimental to the biological activity of the biological moiety.
  • the functional group Y will be altered upon interacting with the biological moiety.
  • the functional group Y may either form a covalent linkage or a noncovalent linkage with the biological moiety, a covalent linkage is preferred.
  • Y is a functional group that is activated in situ before attachment of the biological moiety's affinity tag.
  • Possibilities for this type of functional group include, but are not limited to, such simple moieties such as a hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino, aldehyde, carbonyl, methyl, methylene, alkene, alkyne, carbonate, aryliodide, or a vinyl group. Appropriate modes of activation for these simple functional groups would be known by one of ordinary skill in the art.
  • Y can comprise a functional group that requires photoactivation prior to becoming activated enough to trap the biological moiety.
  • Y is a highly reactive functional moiety compatible with monolayer formation and needs no in situ activation prior to reaction with the biological moiety or its affinity tag.
  • Y include, but are not limited to, maleimide, N-hydroxysuccimide (Wagner et al., Biophysical Journal, 1996, 70:2052-2066), nitrilotriacetic acid (U.S. Pat. No.
  • FIG. 4 shows one example of a monolayer on a substrate 3 .
  • substrate 3 comprises silicon (having a silicon oxide surface).
  • the monolayer is aminoreactive because it bears a functional group Y that is N-hydroxysuccinimide.
  • FIG. 5 shows another example of a monolayer on a substrate 3 .
  • a thin film coating 5 comprised of gold covers the surface of the substrate 3 .
  • an adhesion interlayer 6 is used to adhere the coating 5 to the substrate 3 and is comprised of titanium.
  • This monolayer is also aminoreactive because it bears a functional group Y that is N-hydroxysuccinimide.
  • Y is selected from the group of simple functional moieties.
  • Possible Y functional groups include, but are not limited to, —OH, —NH 2 , —COOH, —COOR, —RSR, —PO 4 ⁇ 3 , OSO 3 ⁇ 2 , —SO 3 —, —COO—, —SOO—, —CONR 2 , —CN, —NR 2 , and the like.
  • Simple groups such as these are only preferred for X when the affinity tag of the invention composes a layer of affinity tag molecules (such as poly-lysine) that coats the exposed portion of the monolayer prior to immobilization of the biological moiety (see below).
  • the monolayer molecules of the present invention can optionally be assembled on the surface in parts.
  • the monolayer need not necessarily be constructed by chemisorption or physisorption of molecules of the formula X—R—Y to the surface of the substrate (or coating).
  • X may be chemisorbed or physisorbed to the surface of the substrate (or coating) alone first. Then, R or even just individual components of R can be attached to X through a suitable chemical reaction.
  • Y can be attached to the ends of the monolayer molecule through a suitable covalent linkage.
  • the monolayer of an individual reactive site may optionally comprise at least two different X—R—Y molecules. This second X—R—Y molecule may immobilize the same or a different biological moiety.
  • the monolayer molecules, X—R—Y, of a reactive site may have failed to attach any biological moiety.
  • the monolayer of an individual reactive site can comprise a second organic molecule that is of the formula, X—R—V where R is the spacer, X is the functional group that binds R to the surface, and V is a moiety resistant to the non-specific binding of biomolecules.
  • R is the spacer
  • X is the functional group that binds R to the surface
  • V is a moiety resistant to the non-specific binding of biomolecules.
  • the device may further comprise at least one unreactive site devoid of any biological moiety that comprises a monolayer of molecules of the formula X—R—V, where R is the spacer, X is the functional group that binds R to the surface, and V is the moiety resistant to the non-specific binding of biomolecules.
  • the unreactive site does not comprise any monolayers of molecules of the formula X—R—Y.
  • the biological moieties are immobilized on the monolayers via the affinity tags.
  • a solution containing the biological moiety to be immobilized can be exposed to the bioreactive units of the microdevice by either dispensing the solution by means of microfabricated adapter systems with integrated microcapillaries and entry/exit ports or alternatively by transferring the biological moieties via noncontact printing using dispensing microdevices with ball-point pen-type of mechanisms. The use of other printing techniques is also anticipated.
  • unreacted Y-functional groups are preferably quenched prior to use of the device.
  • affinity tag is of critical importance to the present invention.
  • the use of an affinity tag on the biological moiety of interest to be immobilized allows for at least one of two advantages.
  • An affinity tag can confer enhanced binding or reaction with Y. This enhancement effect may be either kinetic or thermodynamic.
  • affinity tag/Y-group combination used in the present invention preferably allows for immobilization of the biological molecule in a manner which does not require harsh conditions. This helps ensure that the biological reactivity of the biological moiety remains intact. Aqueous, biological buffer conditions are ideal.
  • An affinity tag can also offer immobilization that is specific to a designated site or location on the biological moiety. This site-specific immobilization will help ensure that the reactive site of the biological moiety is accessible to ligands in solution.
  • the affinity tag comprises at least one amino acid.
  • the affinity tag may be a polypeptide comprising at least one monolayer-reactive amino acid.
  • the affinity tag may be a lone, monolayer-reactive amino acid. Examples of possible monolayer-reactive amino acids include cysteine, lysine, histidine, arginine, tyrosine, and glutamine.
  • a polypeptide or single amino acid affinity tag is preferably expressed as a fusion protein along with the biological moiety.
  • Amino acid tags provide either a single amino acid or a series of amino acids that can interact with the Y-functionalities of the monolayer. Amino acid affinity tags can also be introduced to a specific site on a recombinant protein to facilitate oriented immobilization by covalent binding to the bioreactive Y-functional group of the monolayer.
  • the affinity tag may comprise a poly(amino acid) tag.
  • a poly(amino acid) tag is a polypeptide that comprises from about 2 to about 100 residues of a single amino acid. Other amino acid residues may also be present in the affinity tag.
  • the affinity tag may comprise a poly-cysteine, poly-lysine, poly-arginine, or poly-histidine.
  • Amino acid tags are preferably composed of two to twenty residues of a single amino acid, such as, for example, histidines, lysines, arginines, cysteines, glutamines, tyrosines, or any combination of these.
  • an amino acid tag of one to twenty amino acids includes at least one to ten cysteines for thioether linkage; or one to ten lysines for amide linkage; or one to ten arginines for coupling to vicinal dicarbonyl groups.
  • cysteines for thioether linkage
  • ten lysines for amide linkage
  • arginines for coupling to vicinal dicarbonyl groups.
  • the position of the amino acid tag can be at the amino-, or carboxy-terminus of the protein or anywhere in-between.
  • affinity tags introduced for protein purification are preferentially located at the C-terminus of the recombinant protein to ensure that only full-length proteins are isolated during protein purification.
  • Affinity tags may also contain one or more unnatural amino acids.
  • Unnatural amino acids can be introduced using suppressor tRNAs that recognize stop codons (i.e. amber), as described in Noren et al., Science, 1989, 244:182-188, Ellman et al., Methods Enzym., 1991, 202:301-336, and Cload et al., Chem. Biol., 1996, 3:1033-1038, herein incorporated by reference.
  • the tRNAs are chemically amino-acylated to contain chemically altered (“unnatural”) amino acids for use with specific coupling chemistries (i.e. ketone modifications, photoreactive groups).
  • the affinity tag can comprise a whole protein, such as, but not limited to, glutathione S-transferase, an antibody, avidin, or streptavidin.
  • the affinity tag may be an organic bioconjugate which is chemically coupled to the biomolecule of interest.
  • Biotin or an antigen may be chemically crosslinked to the biomolecule.
  • a chemical crosslinker may be used that attaches a simple functional moiety such as a thiol or an amine to the biomolecule.
  • FIG. 6 shows a biological moiety 10 immobilized on a monolayer 7 on a substrate 3 .
  • An affinity tag 8 connects the biological moiety 10 to the monolayer 7 .
  • the monolayer 7 is formed on a coating 5 separated from the surface of the substrate 3 by an interlayer 6 .
  • FIG. 7 shows a cross section of a biomolecule-coated microchannel of one embodiment of a microchannel array device.
  • the microchannel 1 is covered by a glass cover 2 .
  • the walls of the microchannel are comprised of substrate 3 , coated first with an interlayer 6 , then with a coating 5 , then with an organic monolayer 7 and finally, with the biological moiety 10 via the affinity tag 8 .
  • the affinity tag is a component of a layer of affinity tag molecules immobilized on the monolayer.
  • a hydrogel can serve as a suitable layer of affinity tag molecules.
  • Dextran is one possible hydrogel material useful for the present invention.
  • other polysaccharides or water-swellable organic polymers may also suffice. Uses of such hydrogels to immobilize biological moieties are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,242,828.
  • Poly-lysine is another option. An example of a use of poly-lysine layer on an 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid monolayer can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,629,213.
  • the layer of affinity tag molecules can optionally instead constitute a phospholipid monolayer or a phospholipid bilayer, as described in PCT Publication WO 96/38726.
  • a phospholipid monolayer or bilayer as an affinity tag would be suitable if the biological moiety to be immobilized is a membrane protein, such as an ion channel protein.
  • Another major embodiment of devices of the present invention comprises an adaptor molecule that links the affinity tag to the immobilized biological moiety.
  • the additional spacing of the biological moiety from the surface of the substrate (or coating) that is afforded by the use of an adaptor molecule is particularly advantageous if the biological moiety is a type of molecule which is known to be prone to surface inactivation, as is the case with proteins.
  • an adaptor molecule which is appropriate for a given affinity tag and/or biological moiety. For instance, if the affinity tag is streptavidin, then the adaptor molecule could be a biotin molecule that is chemically conjugated to the biological moiety. Alternatively, if the affinity tag is a phospholipid bilayer or monolayer then a membrane anchor could be chosen as a suitable adaptor molecule.
  • the adaptor is a polypeptide, such as protein G or protein A.
  • the affinity tag, adaptor molecule, and biological moiety together compose a fusion protein.
  • a fusion protein may be readily expressed using standard recombinant DNA technology.
  • Adaptor proteins are especially useful to increase the solubility of the protein of interest and to increase the distance between the surface of the substrate or coating and the protein of interest. Use of an adaptor protein or polypeptide can also be very useful in facilitating the preparative steps of protein purification by affinity binding.
  • GFP glutathione-S-transferase
  • maltose-binding protein chitin-binding protein
  • thioredoxin green-fluorescent protein
  • GFP can also be used for quantification of surface binding.
  • FIG. 8 shows a biological moiety 10 immobilized on a monolayer 7 via both an affinity tag 8 and an adaptor molecule 9 .
  • the monolayer 7 has been formed on a coating 5 on a substrate 3 .
  • An interlayer 6 is also used between the coating 5 and the substrate 3 .
  • fusion proteins can be expressed from recombinant DNA either in vivo or in vitro.
  • Amino acid affinity tags are introduced by polymerase chain reaction. Expression in vivo is in either bacteria ( Escherichia coli ), lower eukaryotes ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces pombe, Pichia pastoris ) or higher eukaryotes (bacculo-infected insect cells, insect cells mammalian cells), or in vitro ( Escherichia coli lysates, wheat germ extracts, reticulocyte lysates). Proteins are purified by affinity chromatography using commercially available resins.
  • DNA sequences encoding amino acid affinity tags and adaptor proteins are engineered into the expression vectors such that the genes of interest can be cloned in frame either 5′ or 3′ of the DNA sequence encoding the affinity tag and adaptor protein.
  • FIG. 9 shows four possible expression vectors useful for expressing a protein of interest, a polypeptide affinity tag, and a polypeptide adaptor molecule as a fusion protein.
  • the vector contains an origin of replication sequence 35 and a gene 36 capable of conferring antibiotic resistance to a host cell.
  • the insert of the vector contains a promoter sequence 30 and a termination signal sequence 34 . Between the sequences 30 and 34 , the insert also contains a gene 33 encoding the protein of interest and sequence 31 , encoding the polypeptide affinity tag.
  • Sequence 32 which codes for a polypeptide adaptor molecule may also be included in the plasmid construct and is positioned between the protein and affinity-tag coding regions ( 33 and 31 , respectively).
  • cDNAs for the protein of interest will be amplified by PCR using cDNA libraries or EST (expressed sequence tag) clones as templates.
  • cDNAs can be cloned into commercial expression vectors (Qiagen, Novagen, Clontech) and introduced into the appropriate organism for expression (organisms include: Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces pombe, Pichia pastoris , bacculovirus/insect cells, insect cells, mammalian cells).
  • PCR-amplified DNA sequences are directly used in coupled in vitro transcription/translation systems ( Escherichia coli S30 lysates from T7 RNA polymerase expressing, preferably protease-deficient strains, wheat germ lysates, reticulocyte lysates with and without microsomes (Promega, Pharmacia, Panvera)).
  • the choice of organism for optimal expression depends on the extent of post-translational modifications (i.e. glycosylation, lipid-modifications).
  • Escherichia coli based protein expression will be the method of choice for soluble proteins that do not require extensive post-translational modifications for activity. Extracellular or intracellular domains of membrane proteins will be fused to protein adaptors for expression and purification.
  • PCR reactions are carried out under standard conditions. Oligonucleotide primers contain unique restriction sites for facile cloning into the expression vectors. Alternatively, the TA cloning system (Clontech) can be used. Expression vectors contain the sequences for affinity tags and the protein adaptors. PCR products are ligated into the expression vectors (under inducible promoters) and introduced into the appropriate competent Escherichia coli strain by calcium-dependent transformation (strains include: XL-1 blue, BL21, SG13009(lon-)). Transformed Escherichia coli cells are plated and individual colonies transferred into 96-array blocks.
  • Cultures are grown to mid-log phase, induced for expression, and cells collected by centrifugation. Cells are resuspended containing lysozyme and the membranes broken by rapid freeze/thaw cycles, or by sonication. Cell debris is removed by centrifugation and the supernatants transferred to 96-tube arrays.
  • the appropriate affinity matrix is added, protein of interest bound and nonspecifically bound proteins removed by repeated washing steps using 12-96 pin suction devices and centrifugation. Alternatively, magnetic affinity beads and filtration devices can be used (Qiagen). The proteins are eluted and transferred to a new 96-well array.
  • Protein concentrations are determined and an aliquot of each protein is spotted onto a nitrocellulose filter and verified by Western analysis using an antibody directed against the affinity tag. The purity of each sample is assessed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining or mass spectroscopy. Proteins are snap-frozen and stored at ⁇ 80° C.
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae allows for core glycosylation and lipid modifications of proteins.
  • the approach described above for Escherichia coli can be used with slight modifications for transformation and cell lysis. Transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is by lithium-acetate and cell lysis is either by lyticase digestion of the cell walls followed by freeze-thaw, sonication or glass-bead extraction. Variations of post-translational modifications can be obtained by different yeast strains (i.e. Saccharomyces pombe, Pichia pastoris ).
  • the advantage of the bacculovirus system or mammalian cells are the wealth of post-translational modifications that can be obtained.
  • the bacculo-system requires cloning of viruses, obtaining high titer stocks and infection of liquid insect cell suspensions (cells are SF9, SF21).
  • Mammalian cell-based expression requires transfection and cloning of cell lines. Soluble proteins are collected from the medium while intracellular or membrane bound proteins require cell lysis (either detergent solubilization, freeze-thaw). Proteins can then be purified analogous to the procedure described for Escherichia coli.
  • Escherichia coli lysates obtained from protease-deficient and T7 RNA polymerase overexpressing strains.
  • Escherichia coli lysates provide efficient protein expression (30-50 ⁇ g/ml lysate). The entire process is carried out in 96-well arrays.
  • Genes of interest are amplified by PCR using oligonucleotides that contain the gene-specific sequences containing a T7 RNA polymerase promoter and binding site and a sequence encoding the affinity tag.
  • an adaptor protein can be fused to the gene of interest by PCR.
  • Amplified DNAs can be directly transcribed and translated in the Escherichia coli lysates without prior cloning for fast analysis. The proteins are then isolated by binding to an affinity matrix and processed as described above.
  • Alternative systems which may be used include wheat germ extracts and reticulocyte extracts.
  • In vitro synthesis of membrane proteins and or post-translationally modified proteins will require reticulocyte lysates in combination with microsomes.
  • the biological moiety of one reactive site differs from the biological moiety of a second reactive site on the same device.
  • the biological moiety of one reactive site is different from that of another, the two biological moieties are related.
  • the biological moieties are members of the same protein family.
  • the different biological moieties may be functionally related or just suspected of being functionally related.
  • the function of the biological moieties may not be entirely known.
  • the different biological moieties may either share a similarity in structure or sequence or be suspected of sharing a similarity in structure or sequence.
  • the different immobilized biological moieties may simply be fragments of different members of the same protein family.
  • the biological moieties may be known isozymes.
  • protein families preferred in the present invention include, but are not limited to, receptor families (examples: growth factor receptors, catecholamine receptors, amino acid derivative receptors, cytokine receptors, lectins), ligand families (examples: cytokines, serpins), enzyme families (examples: proteases, kinases, phosphatases, ras-like GTPases, hydrolases), and transcription factors (examples: steroid hormone receptors, heat-shock transcription factors, zinc-finger, leucine-zipper, homeodomain).
  • the different biological moieties are all HIV proteases.
  • the different biological moieties are all hepatitis C virus (HCV) proteases.
  • HCV hepatitis C virus
  • Other examples of biological moieties of interest include antibodies and fragments thereof (such as Fab).
  • the biological moieties of different reactive sites are identical to one another.
  • the immobilized biological moiety may optionally instead comprise a nucleic acid, a peptide nucleic acid, a hormone, an antigen, an epitope, or any small organic molecule which either has or is suspected of having a physiological function.
  • the devices of the present invention are particularly well-suited for use in high-throughput drug screening.
  • Other uses include medical diagnostics and biosensors. In each case a plurality of biological moieties or drug candidates or analytes can be screened in parallel.
  • a method for screening a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to interact with a component of a fluid sample comprises delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of one of the invention devices having a different biological moiety immobilized on each reactive site and then detecting the interaction of said component with the immobilized biological moiety at each reactive site.
  • the invention device is suitable for assaying both a catalytic reaction of an enzyme, a binding event, or a translocation by a membrane protein through a lipid bilayer.
  • Possible interactions towards which the present invention may be directed include, but are not limited to, antibody/antigen, antibody/hapten, enzyme/substrate, carrier protein/substrate, lectin/carbohydrate, receptor/hormone, receptor/effector, protein/DNA, protein/RNA, complementary strands of nucleic acid, repressor/inducer, or the like.
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides for a method of screening a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to react with a component of a fluid sample, comprising delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of a device of the present invention, wherein each reactive site of the device comprises a different biological moiety and detecting, either directly or indirectly, formation of product of the reaction of the component with the immobilized biological moiety at each reactive site.
  • Another embodiment of the invention provides a method for screening a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to bind a component of a fluid sample.
  • This method comprises the following steps: delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the invention device; washing the reactive site with fluid which does not contain the component in order to elute unbound component from the reactive sites; and detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence, absence, or amount of the component retained at each reactive site.
  • An alternative method for screening a plurality of biological moieties for their ability to bind a component of a fluid sample comprises adding a known ligand of the biological moieties to the fluid sample, delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the invention device, washing said reactive sites with fluid that does not contain either the known ligand or the component in order to elute unbound molecules of the known ligand and the component, detecting the presence of the known ligand retained at each reactive site, and comparing retention of the known ligand detected with retention of the known ligand in the absence of the component.
  • the invention device can be interfaced with a means for detection of absorption in the visible range, chemiluminescence, or fluorescence (including lifetime, polarization, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), and fluorescence-resonance energy transfer (FRET)).
  • built-in detectors such as optical waveguides (PCT Publication WO 96/26432 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,196), surface plasmons, and surface charge sensors are compatible with many embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 10 shows a schematic diagram of one type of fluorescence detection unit which may be used to monitor the interaction of immobilized biological moieties of a microchannel array with an analyte.
  • the microchannel array device 21 is positioned on a base plate 20 .
  • Light from a 100 W mercury arc lamp 25 is directed through an excitation filter 24 and onto a beam splitter 23 .
  • the light is then directed through a lens 22 , such as a Micro Nikkor 55 mm 1:2:8 lens, and onto the microchannels of the device 21 .
  • Fluorescence emission from the device returns through the lens 22 and the beam splitter 23 .
  • the emission is received by a cooled CCD camera 27 , such as the Slowscan TE/CCD-1024SF&SB (Princeton Instruments).
  • the camera is operably connected to a CPU 28 , which is, in turn, operably connected to a VCR/monitor 29 .
  • the drug candidate and a known ligand of a member of the protein family that is labeled by a chemically-conjugated fluorescent moiety are delivered in a fluid sample into each microchannel. After a short incubation period, the microchannels are flushed with fluid which lacks both the drug candidate and the ligand.
  • the amount of fluorescent ligand remaining in each of the microchannels (and presumably bound to the protein molecules of that microchannel) can be detected by using a fluorescence detector/quantifier with optical access to the reactive site, either through a transparent or translucent cover or substrate.
  • drug candidate and ligand are delivered into the microchannel in a fluid sample and changes in the chromogenic or fluorescent properties can be detected by using an optical detector/quantifier with optical access to the reactive site, either through a transparent or translucent cover or substrate.
  • the present invention provides for a method of screening the ability of a drug candidate to inhibit the reaction of a plurality of members of a protein family with their substrate, comprising the following steps: combining the drug candidate and the substrate in a fluid sample; delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of a device of the present invention, wherein each reactive site of the device comprises a different member of the protein family; and detecting, either directly or indirectly, for the inhibition of product formation at each reactive site.
  • drug candidate and ligand are delivered in a fluid sample to each microchannel. After a short incubation period the microchannels may be flushed with fluid lacking ligand and the ligand accumulated between lipid bilayer and the device is determined by measuring changes in fluorescence, absorption, or electrical charge.
  • An alternative embodiment of the invention provides for a method for screening a plurality of drug candidates in parallel for their ability to inhibit a reaction of an enzyme with its substrate.
  • This method first involves adding the enzyme's substrate to a plurality of fluid samples, each of which contains at least one of the drug candidates of interest.
  • each of the fluid samples is delivered to a reactive site of an invention device, such as the microchannel array.
  • each reactive site bears the immobilized enzyme.
  • any inhibition of product formation at each reactive site is monitored.
  • Another aspect of the invention provides a method for screening a plurality of binding candidates in parallel for their ability to bind a biological moiety.
  • This method comprises delivering different fluid samples, each containing at least one of the binding candidates, to the reactive sites of the invention device, washing the reactive sites with fluid which does not contain the binding candidate in order to elute unbound binding candidates, and detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence of said binding candidate retained at each reactive site.
  • An alternative method for screening a plurality of binding candidates in parallel for their ability to bind a biological moiety comprises the following: adding a known ligand of the biological moiety to a plurality of fluid samples, each of the fluid samples containing at least one of the binding candidates; delivering a different fluid sample to each of the reactive sites of the invention device, wherein multiple reactive sites comprise the same biological moiety; washing said reactive sites with fluid that contains neither the known ligand nor a binding candidate in order to elute unbound molecules of each; detecting the presence of the known ligand retained at each reactive site; and comparing retention of the known ligand detected with retention of the known ligand in the absence of the binding candidate.
  • the present invention also provides for a method of pairing a plurality of proteins with their substrates.
  • a fluid sample comprising a substrate of a known enzyme family is first delivered to the reactive sites of the invention device where each reactive site of the device comprises a different protein.
  • any suitable detection means may be used to detect, either directly or indirectly, for the presence of product formed by the reaction of the substrate with the protein of each reactive site.
  • a method for pairing a plurality of proteins with their ligands comprises delivering a fluid sample comprising a ligand of a known protein family to the reactive sites of the invention device; washing the reactive sites with fluid that does not contain the ligand to remove unbound ligand; and detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence of the ligand retained at each reactive site.
  • the device of the present invention may also be used in a diagnostic manner.
  • the different biological moieties of the reactive sites are not preferably members of the same protein family.
  • One diagnostic use of the invention device is a method for detecting in a fluid sample the presence of a plurality of analytes which react with said biological moieties. The steps of this method comprise delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the invention device; and detecting the interaction of the analyte with the immobilized biological moiety at each reactive site.
  • Another diagnostic method for detecting in a fluid sample the presence of a plurality of analytes which bind said biological moieties comprises the following: delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the invention device; washing said reactive sites with an analyte-free fluid to remove unbound analyte; and detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence of analyte retained at each reactive site.
  • An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a device for processing a fluid sample that comprises a substrate, a plurality of parallel microchannels microfabricated into or onto said substrate; and a moiety immobilized within at least one of the parallel microchannels.
  • the immobilized moiety is free to interact with a component of the fluid sample.
  • the immobilized moiety is an immobilized biological moiety.
  • the immobilized biological moiety is a protein.
  • the device may optionally comprise at least 10 parallel microchannels. In a preferred embodiment, the device comprises from about 100 to about 500 microchannels. In one embodiment, the device comprises from about 2 to about 500 parallel microchannels per cm 2 .
  • each of the microchannels is optionally between about 10 ⁇ m and about 500 ⁇ m.
  • the depth of each of the microchannels is also optionally between about 10 ⁇ m and about 500 ⁇ m.
  • One embodiment of the device further comprises a cover over at least a part of each of the microchannels.
  • the cover is a glass cover.
  • the volume of each of the covered microchannels may range from about 5 nanoliters to about 300 nanoliters. In a preferred embodiment, the volume of each of the covered microchannels is between about 10 nanoliters and about 50 nanoliters.
  • microchannel arrays are fabricated via standard microstereolithography into the device material (bulk micromachining).
  • Alternative techniques include surface-micromachining and LIGA (injection molding).
  • a computer-aided design pattern (reflecting the final channel geometries) is transferred to a photomask using standard techniques, which is then used to transfer the pattern onto a silicon wafer coated with photoresist.
  • the device with lateral dimensions of 50 ⁇ 15 mm, contains a series of 100 parallel channels separated with a spacing of 250 ⁇ m. Each channel is 5 mm long and has a cross-section of 100 ⁇ 100 ⁇ m.
  • the channel volume is 50 nl. 4′′ diameter Si(100) wafers (Virginia Semiconductor) or 4′′ diameter Corning 7740 glass wafers are used as bulk materials.
  • Si(100) wafers are first cleaned in a 5:1:1 DI water:NH 3 :H 2 O 2 bath (RCA1, 90° C., 10 min), followed by a 5:1:1 deionized (DI) water:HCl:H 2 O 2 bath (RCA2, 90° C., 10 min) and finally passivated in 1% aqueous HF and singed at 150° C. for 30 min.
  • DI water:NH 3 :H 2 O 2 bath RCA1, 90° C., 10 min
  • DI deionized
  • HCl H 2 O 2 bath
  • RIE Deep silicon reactive ion etching
  • the wafer is primed with a 20 nm thin titanium layer, followed by a 200 nm thin gold layer both layers deposited using electron-beam evaporation (5 ⁇ /s, Thermionics).
  • the device is covered and sealed with a 50 ⁇ m thin glass cover (pyrex 7740) using low-temperature field assisted glass-silicon bonding resulting in a multichannel array with inlet and outlet ports.
  • the gold-coated channel walls can then be further chemically modified to achieve the desired bioreactive and biocompatible properties (see Example 3, below).
  • Typical resist materials for sacrificial micromachining are silicon nitride (Si 3 N 4 ), polysilicon, thermally grown silicon oxide and organic resists such as epoxy-based SU-8 and polyimides allowing the formation of high aspect-ratio features with straight sidewalls.
  • the device with lateral dimensions of 50 ⁇ 15 mm, contains a series of 100 parallel channels separated with a spacing of 250 ⁇ m. Each channel is 5 mm long and has a cross-section of 100 ⁇ 100 ⁇ m.
  • the channel volume is 50 nl. 4′′ diameter Si(100) wafers (Virginia Semiconductor) or 4′′ diameter Corning 7740 glass wafers are used as bulk materials.
  • Si(100) wafers are first cleaned in a 5:1:1 DI water:NH 3 :H 2 O 2 bath (RCA1, 90° C., 10 min), followed by a 5:1:1 deionized (DI) water:HCl:H 2 O 2 bath (RCA2, 90° C., 10 min) and finally passivated in 1% aqueous HF and singed at 150° C. for 30 min.
  • Spincoating of the wafer with EPON SU-8 results in a 100 ⁇ m thick film that is exposed similar to Example 1, above, and developed in a propyleneglycol-monomethyletheracetate (PGMEA) solution resulting in a multi-channel structure with high-aspect ratio vertical sidewalls.
  • PMEA propyleneglycol-monomethyletheracetate
  • Example 3 Deposition of metal films (20 nm Ti, 200 nm Au) is carried out as described in Example 1, above.
  • the device is covered with a 50 ⁇ m thin adhesive glass cover.
  • the gold-coated channel walls can then be further chemically modified to achieve the desired bioreactive and biocompatible properties (see Example 3, below).
  • Tin-layer chromatography is performed on precoated silica gel 60 F254 plates (MERCK, Darmstadt, FRG), and detection was done using Cl 2 /toluidine, PdCl 2 and UV-detection under NH 3 -vapor.
  • Medium pressure liquid chromatography is performed on a Labomatic MD-80 (LABOMATIC INSTR. AG, Allschwil, Switzerland) using a Buechi column (460 ⁇ 36 mm; BUECHI, Flawil, Switzerland), filled with silica gel 60 (particle size 15-40 ⁇ m) from Merck.
  • Monolayers based on 11,11′-dithiobis(succinimidylundecanoate) (DSU) are deposited on Au(111) surfaces of microdevices described under Examples 1 and 2 by immersing them into a 1 mM solution of DSU in chloroform at room temperature for 1 hour. After rinsing with 10 volumes of solvent, the N-hydroxysuccinimide-terminated monolayer are dried under a stream of nitrogen and immediately used for protein immobilization.
  • DSU 11,11′-dithiobis(succinimidylundecanoate)
  • HIV protease (Genebank HIVHXB2CG) is an essential component of the HIV life cycle, and a major target in anti-viral therapy. HIV protease is required for the proteolytic processing of the gag and gag-pol gene products into functional proteins. Inhibition of HIV protease prevents the production of infectious viral progeny, and hence further rounds of infection. HIV protease belongs to the family of aspartic proteases and is a symmetric homodimer with an active site formed at the interface of the two 99 amino acids long subunits. The core residues in the active site consist of a conserved tripeptide motif (Asp-Thr-Gly) (Roberts et al., Science, 1990, 248:358).
  • Asp-Thr-Gly conserved tripeptide motif
  • Mutant proteases are generated by PCR mutagenesis (Weiner et al., Gene, 1994, 151:119) and expressed in Escherichia coli using two approaches: (i) mutant and wild-type protease cDNAs are cloned into a Escherichia coli expression vector containing a N-terminal histidine tag (H 6 ; Hochuli et al., Biotechnology 1988, 6:1321) followed by a factor Xa cleavage site, while the stop codon of HIV protease is replaced by a sequence encoding a lysine tag (K 6 ) followed by a stop codon.
  • H 6 N-terminal histidine tag
  • K 6 lysine tag
  • the resulting fusion protein is purified from inclusion bodies as described in Wondrak and Louis, Biochemistry, 1996, 35:12957, and the histidine tag removed by factor Xa as described in Wu et al., Biochemistry, 1998, 37:4518; or (ii) mutant and wild-type protease cDNAs are cloned into an Escherichia coli expression vector creating a fusion between HIV protease, a tri-glycine linker, glutathione S-transferase (GST) and a lysine-tag (HIV-GST-K 6 ).
  • the autoprocessing site F*P at the carboxy terminus of the HIV protease is changed to F*I to prevent self-cleavage of the fusion proteins (Louis et al., Eur. J. Biochem., 1991, 199:36.1).
  • the resulting proteins HIV-GST-K 6 are purified from Escherichia coli lysates by standard chromatography on glutathione agarose beads and stored in an amine-free buffer at ⁇ 80° C. (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl).
  • HIV protease variants in the form of HIV-GST-K 6 , and GST-K 6 are immobilized to the aminoreactive monolayer surface of the microchannel device (see Example 4, above). HIV-GST-K 6 and GST-K 6 are diluted to concentrations of 1 ⁇ g/ml in 25 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 150 mM NaCl. First, 50 ⁇ l of protein-free buffer is transferred through the channels to hydrate the monolayer surface. After 5 min of incubation, 10 ⁇ l of the corresponding protein solutions are flushed through the channels to guarantee total replacement with protein-containing solution. Immobilization is finished after 30 min at room temperature. The channels are rinsed with 50 ⁇ l immobilization buffer and subjected to analysis.
  • Each microchannel displays a different HIV-GST-K 6 variant or control (GST-K 6 ).
  • Ultrapure water with a resistance of 18 M ⁇ cm is generally used for all aqueous buffers (purified by passage through a Barnstead Nanopure® system).
  • HIV protease requires at least a heptapeptide substrate (Moore et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1989, 159:420).
  • FRET intra-molecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer
  • a peptide substrate corresponding to the p17-p24 cleavage site of the viral gag protein (Skalka, Cell, 1989, 56:911) is modified by the addition of an energy-transfer pair (Geoghegan et al., FEBS Lett., 1990, 262:119): In Dns-Ser-Gln-Asn-Tyr-Pro-Ile-Val-Trp (Dns-SSQNYPIVW), the Dns (dansyl) and Trp groups are the N- and C-terminal extensions, respectively (Geoghegan et al.). Excitation of Trp is at 290 nm, and emission of Dns is at 575 nm.
  • the modified heptapeptide Dns-SSQNYPIVW is prepared as described (Geoghegan et al.) and analyzed by amino acid analysis, nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry. The purity is checked by HPLC analysis using a Vydac C-4 column and an acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% TFA.
  • each microchannel with an immobilized HIV variant is filled with 20 ⁇ M of Dns-SSQNYPIVW in 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 13% glycerol, 10 mM DTT.
  • Addition of the substrate to the immobilized proteins leads to time-dependent intensity changes in the fluorescence emission spectrum.
  • the 360 nm Trp emission peak progressively will increase to about 2.5 times its initial intensity, while the Dns group's emission band (575 nm) will decline in intensity. This intensity change will be observed in all the channels containing active forms of the HIV variants.
  • GST-K 6 fusion protein is measured in parallel.
  • both Dns-SSQNYPIVW and a small organic molecule that is to be tested for its potential as a drug is delivered in a 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 13% glycerol, 10 mM DTT solution to each channel.
  • An organic molecule which acts as an inhibitor for a wide range of HIV protease variants will diminish the Trp emission peak increase and the Dns emission band decrease associated with reaction of the protease with the peptide substrate in a number of the microchannels.
  • a less desirable drug candidate on the other hand, will inhibit the reaction of the HIV protease with the peptide substrate only in selected microchannels (or none at all).
  • Sequinavir Protease inhibitors Sequinavir (Roche), Ritonavir (Abbot) or Indinavir (Merck) can also be added to the reaction buffer and used as positive controls for the specificity of inhibition. Sequinavir will inhibit all the HIV variants except those containing either the G48V or the L90M mutation. Ritonavir in contrast is unable to block the activity of the M46I, L63P, A71V, V82F and the 184V variants. Indinavir has a similar inhibition pattern like Ritonavir except that the A71V variant is not affected. In addition Indinavir is not able to decrease the activity of the L10R HIV protease variant.

Abstract

Methods and devices for the parallel, in vitro screening of biomolecular activity using miniaturized microfabricated devices are provided. The biomolecules that can be immobilized on the surface of the devices of the present invention include proteins, polypeptides, nucleic acids, polysaccharides, phospholipids, and related unnatural polymers of biological relevance. These devices are useful in high-throughput drug screening and clinical diagnostics and are preferably used for the parallel screening of families of related proteins.

Description

  • This application is a continuation of co-pending application Ser. No. 09/115,397, filed Jul. 14, 1998, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes and the specific purposes disclosed throughout this application.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • A vast number of new drug targets are now being identified using a combination of genomics, bioinformaties, genetics, and high-throughput (HTP) biochemistry. Genomics provides information on the genetic composition and the activity of an organism's genes. Bioinformatics uses computer algorithms to recognize and predict structural patterns in DNA and proteins, defining families of related genes and proteins. The information gained from the combination of these approaches is expected to boost the number of drug targets, usually proteins, from the current 500 to over 10,000 in the coming decade.
  • The number of chemical compounds available for screening as potential drugs is also growing dramatically due to recent advances in combinatorial chemistry, the production of large numbers of organic compounds through rapid parallel and automated synthesis. The compounds produced in the combinatorial libraries being generated will far outnumber those compounds being prepared by traditional, manual means, natural product extracts, or those in the historical compound files of large pharmaceutical companies.
  • Both the rapid increase of new drug targets and the availability of vast libraries of chemical compounds creates an enormous demand for new technologies which improve the screening process. Current technological approaches which attempt to address this need include multiwell-plate-based screening systems, cell-based screening systems, microfluidics-based screening systems, and screening of soluble targets against solid-phase synthesized drug components.
  • Automated multiwell formats are the best developed high-throughput screening systems. Automated 96-well plate-based screening systems are the most widely used. The current trend in plate-based screening systems is to reduce the volume of the reaction wells further, thereby increasing the density of the wells per plate (96-well to 384-, and 1536-well per plate). The reduction in reaction volumes results in increased throughput, dramatically decreased bioreagent costs, and a decrease in the number of plates which need to be managed by automation.
  • However, although increases in well numbers per plate are desirable for high throughput efficiency, the use of volumes smaller than 1 microliter in the well format generates significant problems with evaporation, dispensing times, protein inactivation, and assay adaptation. Proteins are very sensitive to the physical and chemical properties of the reaction chamber surfaces. Proteins are prone to denaturation at the liquid/solid and liquid/air interfaces. Miniaturization of assays to volumes smaller than 1 microliter increases the surface to volume ratio substantially. (Changing volumes from 1 microliter to 10 nanoliter increases the surface ratio by 460%, leading to increased protein inactivation.) Furthermore, solutions of submicroliter volumes evaporate rapidly, within seconds to a few minutes, when in contact with air. Maintaining microscopic volumes in open systems is therefore very difficult.
  • Other types of high-throughput assays, such as miniaturized cell-based assays are also being developed. Miniaturized cell-based assays have the potential to generate screening data of superior quality and accuracy, due to their in vivo nature. However, the interaction of drug compounds with proteins other than the desired targets is a serious problem related to this approach which leads to a high rate of false positive results.
  • Microfluidics-based screening systems that measure in vitro reactions in solution make use of ten to several-hundred micrometer wide channels. Micropumps, electroosmotic flow, integrated valves and mixing devices control liquid movement through the channel network. Microfluidic networks prevent evaporation but, due to the large surface to volume ratio, result in significant protein inactivation. The successful use of microfluidic networks in biomolecule screening remains to be shown.
  • Drug screening of soluble targets against solid-phase synthesized drug components is intrinsically limited. The surfaces required for solid state organic synthesis are chemically diverse and often cause the inactivation or non-specific binding of proteins, leading to a high rate of false-positive results. Furthermore, the chemical diversity of drug compounds is limited by the combinatorial synthesis approach that is used to generate the compounds at the interface. Another major disadvantage of this approach stems from the limited accessibility of the binding site of the soluble target protein to the immobilized drug candidates.
  • DNA microarray technology is not immediately transferable to protein screening microdevices. To date, microarrays are exclusively available for nucleic acid hybridization assays (‘DNA-chips’). Their underlying chemistry and materials are not readily transferable to protein assays. Nucleic acids withstand temperatures up to 100° C., can be dried and re-hydrated without loss of activity and bound directly to organic adhesion layers absorbed on surfaces such as glass. In contrast, proteins must remain hydrated, kept at ambient temperatures, and are very sensitive to the physical and chemical properties of the support materials. Therefore, maintaining protein activity at the liquid-solid interface requires entirely different immobilization strategies than those used for nucleic acids. Additionally, the proper orientation of the protein at the interface is desirable to ensure accessibility of their active sites with interacting molecules.
  • In addition to the goal of achieving high-throughput screening of compounds against targets to identify potential drug leads, researchers also need to be able to identify a highly specific lead compound early in the drug discovery process. Analyzing a multitude of members of a protein family or forms of a polymorphic protein in parallel enables quick identification of highly specific lead compounds. Proteins within a structural family share similar binding sites and catalytic mechanisms. Often, a compound that effectively interferes with the activity of one family member also interferes with other members of the same family. Using standard technology to discover such additional interactions requires a tremendous effort in time and costs and as a consequence is simply not done.
  • However, cross-reactivity of a drug with related proteins can be the cause of low efficacy or even side effects in patients. For instance, AZT, a major treatment for AIDS, blocks not only viral polymerases, but also human polymerases, causing deleterious side effects. Cross-reactivity with closely related proteins is also a problem with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin. These drugs inhibit cyclooxygenase-2, an enzyme which promotes pain and inflammation. However, the same drugs also strongly inhibit a related enzyme, cyclooxygenase-1, that is responsible for keeping the stomach lining and kidneys healthy, leading to common side-effects including stomach irritation.
  • For the foregoing reasons, there is a need for miniaturized devices and for methods for the parallel, in vitro, high-throughput screening of functionally and/or structurally related protein targets against potential drug compounds in a manner that minimizes reagent volumes and protein inactivation problems.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is directed to a device and methods of use of the device that satisfy the need for parallel, in vitro, high-throughput screening of functionally or structurally related protein targets against potential drug compounds in a manner that minimizes reagent volumes and protein inactivation problems.
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides a device that has a plurality of noncontiguous reactive sites and is useful for processing fluid samples. On each of the reactive sites of the device, biological moieties are immobilized on a monolayer via an affinity tag which enhances the site-specific immobilization of the biological moiety onto the monolayer. Each of the reactive sites is separated from neighboring reactive sites by substrate that is free of the monolayer. The monolayer is on a portion of a surface of a substrate and comprises molecules of the formula X—R—Y where R is a spacer, X is a functional group that binds R to the surface, and Y is a functional group for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer via the affinity tag. Each of the reactive sites is displayed on the device in a manner that allows it to react with a component of a fluid sample.
  • In a preferred embodiment the device of the present invention is a micromachined or microfabricated device.
  • In a particularly preferred embodiment of the device, the plurality of reactive sites are contained within parallel microchannels. These microchannels may be microfabricated into or onto the substrate.
  • Optionally, at least one coating may be formed on the substrate or applied to the substrate of a device of the present invention such that the coating is positioned between the substrate and the monolayer of each reactive site.
  • The monolayer of a device of the present invention may optionally be a mixed monolayer of more than one type of organic molecule.
  • In a preferred embodiment, an adaptor molecule is also included in the device of the present invention to link the affinity tag to the biological moiety.
  • The affinity tag, biological moiety, and the adaptor molecule (if present) are preferably, but not necessarily, a fusion protein.
  • The biological moiety immobilized on one reactive site can either be the same as or different from the biological moiety immobilized on a second reactive site. If the reactive sites are different, the biological moieties of the different reactive sites are preferably members of the same protein family or are otherwise functionally or structurally related.
  • The present invention further provides for methods of using the device to screen a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to interact with a component of a fluid sample. The interaction being assayed may be a binding interaction or a catalytic one. Some embodiments of these methods first involve delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the device. If binding between the biological moiety and the component is to be detected, the reactive sites are then optionally washed to remove any unbound component from the area. If binding interactions are being monitored, the methods also involve detecting, either directly or indirectly, the retention of the component at each reactive site. If the interaction being assayed is catalytic, then the presence, absence, or amount of reaction product is instead detected.
  • In other embodiments of the present invention, similar methods are used diagnostically to screen a fluid sample for the presence, absence, or amount of a plurality of analytes (in parallel).
  • In another method, the device may also be used to screen a plurality of drug candidates in parallel for their ability to bind or react with a biological moiety. In this method, different fluid samples, each containing a different drug candidate (or a different mixture of drug candidates) to be tested, is delivered to the different reactive sites of the invention device.
  • The present invention also provides for methods of determining in parallel whether or not a plurality of proteins belong to a certain protein family based on either binding to a common ligand or reactivity with a common substrate. These methods involve delivering a fluid sample comprising a ligand or substrate of a known protein family to the reactive sites of the invention device that contain the different proteins and then detecting, either directly or indirectly, for binding or reaction with the known ligand that is characteristic of the protein family.
  • An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a device for processing a fluid sample that comprises a substrate, a plurality of parallel microchannels microfabricated into or onto said substrates and a moiety immobilized within at least one of the parallel microchannels, in such a way that the moiety interacts with a component of the fluid sample. In a preferred embodiment, the immobilized moiety is a biological moiety such as a protein.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
  • FIG. 1 shows the top view of a covered microchannel array device.
  • FIG. 2 shows a cross section of a covered microchannel array fabricated by bulk micromachining.
  • FIG. 3 shows a cross section of a covered microchannel array fabricated by sacrificial micromachining.
  • FIG. 4 shows aminoreactive monolayer molecules on a substrate.
  • FIG. 5 shows aminoreactive monolayer molecules on a coated substrate.
  • FIG. 6 shows a biological moiety immobilized on a monolayer-coated substrate via an affinity tag.
  • FIG. 7 shows a cross section view of a biomolecule-coated microchannel in a microchannel array device.
  • FIG. 8 shows a biological moiety immobilized on a monolayer-coated substrate via an affinity tag and an adaptor molecule.
  • FIG. 9 shows four possible expression vectors for expressing fusion proteins of the desired protein and an affinity tag and, optionally, an adaptor molecule.
  • FIG. 10 shows a schematic diagram of a fluorescence detection unit which may be used to monitor interaction of the immobilized biological moieties of a microchannel array with an analyte.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • A variety of devices and methods useful for high-throughput drug screening, clinical diagnostics, and related processes are provided by the present invention.
  • (a) Definitions
  • The term “substrate” as used herein refers to the bulk, underlying, and core material of the devices of the invention.
  • The terms “micromachining” and “microfabricating” are both used herein to refer to any number of techniques which are useful in the generation of microstructures (structures of sub-millimeter scale). Such technologies include, but are not limited to, laser ablation, sputtering, electrodeposition, low-pressure vapor deposition, photolithography, and etching. Related technologies such as LIGA (Lithographie, Galvanoformung und Abformtechnik, high aspect ratio plating) are also included. Most of these techniques were originally developed for use in semiconductors, microelectronics, and microelectromechanical systems but are applicable to the present invention as well.
  • The term “coating” is used herein to refer to a layer that is either formed on or applied to the surface of the substrate. For instance, exposure of a substrate, such as silicon, to air can result in oxidation of the exposed surface. In the case of a substrate made of silicon, a silicon oxide coating is formed on the surface upon exposure to air. In other instances, the coating is in no way derived from the substrate and may be placed upon the surface via mechanical, electrical, or chemical means. An example of this type of coating would be a metal coating that is applied to a polymer substrate. Although a coating may be of any thickness, typically the coating has a thickness smaller than that of the substrate.
  • An “interlayer” is a second coating or layer that is positioned between the first coating and the substrate. The primary purpose of a typical interlayer is to aid adhesion between the first coating and the substrate. One such example is the use of a titanium interlayer to help attach a gold coating to a silicon chip. However, other possible functions of an interlayer are also anticipated. For instance, some interlayers may perform a role in the detection system of the device.
  • The term “affinity tag” is used herein to refer to a functional moiety capable of immobilizing a biological moiety onto the exposed functionality of a monolayer. In some cases, the affinity tag may be a simple chemical functional group. Other possibilities include amino acids, polypeptides, proteins, lipid bilayers, or a hydrogel. The affinity tag may be either covalently or noncovalently attached to the biological moiety (via chemical conjugation or as a fusion protein, for instance). In some cases, an affinity tag may also be an internal part of the biological-moiety, such as an amino acid. Likewise, the affinity tag may bind to the monolayer either covalently or noncovalently.
  • An “adaptor molecule”, for purposes of this invention, is any entity that links an affinity tag to a biological moiety. The adaptor molecule need not necessarily be a discrete molecule that is noncovalently attached to both the affinity tag and the biological moiety. The adaptor molecule can be covalently attached to the affinity tag or the biological moiety or both (via chemical conjugation or as a fusion protein, for instance). Examples of adaptor molecules include polypeptides, proteins, membrane anchors, and biotin.
  • A “biological moiety” is any entity that either has, or is suspected of having, a physiological function.
  • A “monolayer” is a single-molecule thick layer of organic molecules on a surface. A monolayer may be disordered or ordered. One face of the monolayer is composed of chemical functionalities on the termini of the organic molecules that are chemisorbed or physisorbed onto the surface material (headgroups). The other face of the monolayer is exposed and may bear any number of chemical functionalities (end groups). Preferably, the molecules of the monolayer are highly ordered and tightly packed, largely due to hydrophobic and van der Waals interactions between the molecules.
  • The terms “polypeptide” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein to refer to a polymer of amino acid residues. These terms also apply to amino acid polymers in which one or more amino acid residues is an artificial chemical analogue of a corresponding naturally occurring amino acid, as well as to naturally occurring amino acid polymers. An amino acid polymer in which one or more amino acid residues is an “unnatural” amino acid, not corresponding to any naturally occurring amino acid, is also encompassed by the use of the terms “protein” and “polypeptide” herein.
  • Proteins are considered herein to be members of the same “protein family” or to be “related” if they show significant similarities in structure and/or function, as would be recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art. Related proteins can be identified by sequence homology searches of DNA and protein databases using standard bioinformatics resources and software packages (examples of public databases: NCBI, NIH, EMBL, SwissProt, Brookhaven database, Washington University—Merck; private databases: Incyte, Hyseq, Hunan Genome Science; examples of software packages include EMOTIF, Blast, Fasta, Multalign, GCG Wisconsin University). Enzymatically related proteins of non-homologous sequence can be identified by one of ordinary skill in the art by screening the scientific literature (example: Medline database).
  • The term “fusion protein” refers to a protein composed of two or more polypeptides that, although typically unjoined in their native state, are joined by their respective amino and carboxyl termini through a peptide linkage to form a single continuous polypeptide. It is understood that the two or more polypeptide components can either be directly joined or indirectly joined through a peptide linker/spacer.
  • The term “nucleic acid” refers to a deoxyribonucleotide or ribonucleotide monomer or polymer in either single- or double-stranded form, and unless otherwise limited, encompasses known analogs of natural nucleotides that can function in a manner similar to naturally occurring nucleotides. The nucleic acid may be obtained from a natural source, an in vitro reaction enzymatic or chemical synthesis. No distinction is made herein between a nucleic acid, a polynucleotide, and an oligonucleotide.
  • The term “normal physiological condition” is used herein to refer to conditions that are typical inside a living organism or a cell. While it is recognized that some organs or organisms provide extreme conditions, the intra-organismal and intra-cellular environment normally varies around pH 7 (i.e. from pH 6.5 to pH 7.5), contains water as the predominant solvent, and exists at a temperature above 0° C. and below 50° C. It will be recognized that the concentration of various salts depends on the organ, organism, cell, or cellular compartment used as a reference.
  • (b) Devices with a Plurality of Bioreactive Sites
  • In one aspect, the present invention provides a device for processing a fluid sample. This device has a plurality of noncontiguous reactive sites, each of the sites comprising the following: a substrate; a monolayer on a portion of a surface of the substrate, comprising molecules of the formula X—R—Y where R is a spacer, X is a functional group that binds R to the surface, and Y is a functional group for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer; an affinity tag that enhances site-specific immobilization of a biological moiety onto the monolayer; and a biological moiety immobilized on the monolayer through Y via the affinity tag.
  • Each of the sites of the device may independently react with a component of the fluid sample and are separated from each other by substrate that is free of monolayer molecules of the formula X—R—Y.
  • Numerous different materials may be used as the substrate of the invention device. The substrate may be organic or inorganic, biological or non-biological, or any combination of these materials. The substrate can optionally be transparent or translucent. Substrates suitable for micromachining or microfabrication are preferred. The substrate of the invention can optionally comprise a material selected from a group consisting of silicon, silica, quartz, glass, controlled pore glass, carbon, alumina, titanium dioxide, germanium, silicon nitride, zeolites, and gallium arsenide. Many metals such as gold, platinum, aluminum, copper, titanium, and their alloys are also options for substrates. In addition, many ceramics and polymers may be used as substrates, either in planar or bead form. Polymers which may be used as substrates include, but are not limited to, the following: polystyrene; poly(tetra)fluorethylene; (poly)vinylidenedifluoride; polycarbonate; polymethylmethacrylate; polyvinylethylene; polyethyleneimine; poly(etherether)ketone; polyoxymethylene (POM); polyvinylphenol; polylactides; polymethacrylimide (PMI); polyalkenesulfone (PAS); polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate; polydimethylsiloxane; polyacrylamide; polyimide; co-block-polymers; and Eupergit®. Photoresists, polymerized Langmuir-Blodgett films, and LIGA structures may also serve as substrates in the present invention. The preferred substrates of the present invention comprise silicon, silica, glass, or a polymer.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the device comprises a micromachined or microfabricated device. The device is optionally a microdevice with dimensions on the millimeter to centimeter scale.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the invention, each of the reactive sites of the device is in a microchannel oriented parallel to microchannels of other reactive sites on the device. The microchannels of such a device have optionally been microfabricated or micromachined into or onto the substrate of the device. FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of the invention showing an array of microchannels 1 that have been fabricated into a bulk substrate material. In the particular device shown, eighty parallel microchannels 1 have been microfabricated into a substrate 3.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the device comprises at least 2 parallel microchannel reactive sites. In another embodiment of the invention, the device comprises at least 10 parallel microchannel reactive sites. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the device comprises at least 100 parallel microchannel reactive sites. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the device comprises from about 100 to about 500 parallel microchannels. The microchannels are typically separated from one another by from about 10 μm to about 5 mm. The device may optionally comprise from about 2 to about 500 parallel microchannels per cm2 of substrate.
  • The dimensions of the microchannels may vary. However, in preferred embodiments the scale is small enough so as to only require minute fluid sample volumes. The width and depth of each microchannel of the invention device is typically between about 10 μm and about 500 μm. In a preferred embodiment of the device, the width and depth of each microchannel is between about 50 and 200 μm. The length of each microchannel is from about 1 to about 20 mm in length. In a preferred embodiment, the length of each microchannel is from about 2 to about 8 mm long. Any one of a variety of channel cross-section geometries (trapezoidal, rectangular, v-shaped, semicircular, etc.) may be employed in the device. The geometry is determined by the type of microfabrication or micromachining process used to generate the microchannels, as is known in the art. Trapezoidal or rectangular cross-section geometries are preferred for the microchannels, since they readily accommodate standard fluorescence detection methods.
  • In order to generate a plurality of reactive sites, such as a parallel array of microchannels, the substrate material first has to be cleaned to remove contaminants such as solvent stains, dust, or organic residues. A variety of cleaning procedures can be used depending on the substrate material and origin of contaminants. These include wet immersion processes (for example, RCA1+2, “pyranha”, solvents), dry vapor phase cleaning, thermal treatment, plasma or glow discharge techniques, polishing with abrasive compounds, short-wavelength light exposure, ultrasonic agitation and treatment with supercritical fluids.
  • Channels can then be formed on the surface of the substrate by either (1) bulk micromachining, (2) sacrificial micromachining, (3) LIGA (high aspect ratio plating) or (4) other techniques, or any combination thereof. Such techniques are well known in the semiconductor and microelectronics industries and are described in, for example, Ghandi, VLSI Fabrication Principles, Wiley (1983) and Sze, VLSI Technology, 2nd. Ed., McGraw-Hill (1988); Wolf and Taube, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, Vol. 1, Lattice Press (1986), and Madou, Fundamentals of Microfabrication, CRC Press (1997).
  • In bulk micromachining, large portions of the substrate are removed to form rectangular or v-shaped grooves comprising the final dimensions of the microchannels. This process is usually carried out with standard photolithographic techniques involving spin-coating of resist materials, illumination through lithography masks followed by wet-chemical development and posttreatment steps such as descumming and post-baking. The resulting resist pattern is then used as an etch resist material for subsequent wet or dry etching of the bulk material to form the desired topographical structures. Typical resist materials include positive and negative organic resists (such as Kodak 747, PR102), inorganic materials (such as polysilicon, silicon nitride) and biological etch resists (for example Langmuir-Blodgett films and two-dimensional protein crystals such as the S-layer of Sulfolobus acidocladarius). Pattern transfer into the substrate and resist stripping occurs via wet-chemical and dry etching techniques including plasma etching, reactive ion etching, sputtering, ion-beam-assisted chemical etching and reactive ion beam etching.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, for instance, a photoresist may be spincoated onto a cleaned 4 inch Si(110) wafer. Ultraviolet light exposure through a photomask onto the photoresist then results in a pattern of channels in the photoresist, exposing a pattern of strips of the silicon underneath. Wet-chemical etching techniques can then be applied to etch the channel pattern into the silicon. Next, a thin layer of titanium can be coated on the surface. A thin layer of gold is then coated on the surface via thermal or electron beam evaporation. Standard resist stripping follows. (Alternatively, the gold-coating could be carried out after the strip resist.)
  • FIG. 2 shows a cross section view of one example of a microchannel array fabricated by bulk micromachining. A microchannel 1 in substrate 3 is covered by a glass cover 2. At the bottom of the microchannel, the surface of the substrate 3 is covered with a coating 5.
  • In sacrificial micromachining, the substrate is left essentially untouched. Various thick layers of other materials are built up by vapor deposition, plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) or spin coating and selectively remain behind or are removed by subsequent processing steps. Thus, the resulting channel walls are chemically different from the bottom of the channels and the resist material remains as part of the microdevice. Typical resist materials for sacrificial micromachining are silicon nitride (Si3N4), polysilicon, thermally grown silicon oxide and organic resists such as SU-8 and polyimides allowing the formation of high aspect-ratio features with straight sidewalls.
  • FIG. 3 shows a cross section view of one example of a microchannel array that has been fabricated by sacrificial micromachining. Microchannel 1 has walls that consist of photoresist 4 and a floor that comprises a substrate 3 that is covered with a coating 5.
  • In high-aspect ratio plating or LIGA, three-dimensional metal structures are made by high-energy X-ray radiation exposures on materials coated with X-ray resists. Subsequent electrodeposition and resist removal result in metal structures that can be used for precision plastic injection molding. These injection-molded plastic parts can be used either as the final microdevice or as lost molds. The LIGA process has been described by Becker et al., Microelectron Engineering (1986) 4:35-56 and Becker et al., Naturwissenschaften (1982) 69:520-523.
  • Alternative techniques for the fabrication of microchannel arrays include focused ion-beam (FIB) milling, electrostatic discharge machining (EDM), ultrasonic drilling, laser ablation (U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,410), mechanical milling and thermal molding techniques. One skilled in the art will recognize that many variations in microfabrication or micromachining techniques may be used to construct the device of the present invention.
  • In one embodiment, transparent or translucent covers are attached to the substrate via anodic bonding or adhesive coatings, resulting in microchannel arrays with inlet and outlet ports. In a preferred embodiment, the microchannel covers are glass, especially Pyrex or quartz glass. In alternative embodiments, a cover which is neither transparent nor translucent may be bonded or otherwise attached to the substrate to enclose the microchannels. In other embodiments the cover may be part of a detection system to monitor the interaction between biological moieties immobilized within the channel and an analyte. Alternatively, a polymeric cover may be attached to a polymeric substrate channel array by other means, such as by the application of heat with pressure or through solvent-based bonding.
  • One particular embodiment of a covered microchannel array is illustrated by FIG. 1. In this device, a transparent glass cover 2 covers most of the length, although not all, of each of the parallel microchannels of the array. Since in this particular embodiment the microchannels do not extend fully to the edge of the substrate, the incomplete coverage of the channel length provides an inlet and outlet port for each of the microchannels.
  • Attachment of the covers to the microchannel array can precede monolayer formation. If this is the case, then the monolayer component containing solution (typically an organic solvent) can be applied to the interior of the channels via microfabricated dispensing systems that have integrated microcapillaries and suitable entry/exit ports. Alternatively, the monolayers can be deposited in the microchannels prior to enclosure of the microchannels. For these embodiments, monolayers can optionally be transferred to the inner microchannel surfaces via simple immersion or through microcontact printing (see PCT Publication WO 96/29629).
  • The volume of each enclosed microchannel may optionally be from about 5 nanoliters to about 300 nanoliters. In a preferred embodiment, the volume of an enclosed microchannel of the invention device is between 10 and 50 nanoliters.
  • Volumes of fluid may be moved through each microchannel by a number of standard means known to those skilled in the art. The sophisticated means required for moving fluids through microfluidic devices and mixing in microtiter plates are not needed for the microchannel array of the present invention. Simple liquid exchange techniques commonly used with capillary technologies will suffice. For instance, fluid may be moved through the channel using standard pumps. Alternatively, more sophisticated methods of fluid movement through the microchannels such as electro-osmosis may be employed (for example, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,908,112).
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, bulk-loading dispensing devices can be used to load all microchannels of the device at once with the same fluid. Alternatively, integrated microcapillary dispensing devices may be microfabricated out of glass or other substrates to load fluids separately to each microchannel of the device.
  • After formation of a microchannel, the sides, bottom, or cover of the microchannel or any combination thereof, can then be further chemically modified to achieve the desired bioreactive and biocompatible properties.
  • The reactive sites of the device may optionally further comprise a coating between a substrate and its monolayer. This coating may either be formed on the substrate or applied to the substrate. The substrate can be modified with a coating using thin-film technology based on either physical vapor deposition (PVD) or plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD). Thin layers of metals or the exposure of hydroxylated surfaces on a substrate are often necessary to allow chemisorption or physisorption of bioreactive organic monolayer systems. Alternatively, plasma exposure can be used to directly activate the substrate. For instance, plasma etch procedures can be used to oxidize a polymeric surface (i.e. polystyrene or polyethylene) to expose polar functionalities such as hydroxyls, carboxylic acids, aldehydes, or the like on the surface.
  • The coating on the substrate may comprise a metal film. Possible metal films include, but are not limited to aluminum, chromium, titanium, nickel, stainless steel, zinc, lead, iron, magnesium, manganese, cadmium, tungsten, cobalt, and alloys or oxides thereof. In a preferred embodiment, the metal film is a noble metal film. Noble metals that may be used for a noble metal film include, but are not limited to gold, platinum, silver, copper, and palladium. In an especially preferred embodiment, the coating comprises gold or a gold alloy. In a preferred embodiment, the metal film is from about 50 nm to about 500 nm in thickness.
  • In alternative embodiments, the coating on the substrate comprises a composition such as silicon, silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon hydride, indium tin oxide, magnesium oxide, alumina, glass, hydroxylated surfaces, or a polymer.
  • If the reactive site comprises a coating between the substrate and the monolayer, then it is understood that the coating must be composed of a material for which a suitable functional group X is available (see below). If no such coating is present, then it is understood that the substrate must be composed of a material for which a suitable functional group X is available.
  • It is contemplated that many coatings will require the addition of at least one adhesion layer or mediator between said coating and said substrate. For instance, a layer of titanium may be desirable between a silicon wafer substrate and a gold coating. In an alternative embodiment an epoxy glue such as Epo-tek 377® and Epo-tek 301-2® (Epoxy Technology Inc., Billerica, Mass.) may be preferred to aid adherence of the coating to the substrate. Determinations as to what material should be used for the adhesion layer would be obvious to one skilled in the art once materials were chosen for the substrate and coating. In other embodiments, additional adhesion mediators or interlayers may be necessary to improve the mechanical or optical properties of the device, for example, for detection purposes in waveguides.
  • Deposition or formation of the coating on the substrate (if such coatings are desired) must occur prior to the formation of bioreactive monolayers thereon.
  • The monolayer of each reactive site is comprised of molecules of the general formula X—R—Y where R is a spacer, X is a functional group that binds R to the surface of a portion of the substrate, and Y is a functional group for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer. Three major classes of monolayer formation are preferably used to expose high densities of bioreactive omega-functionalities on the substrate: (i) alkylsiloxane monolayers (“silanes”) on hydroxylated surfaces (as taught in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,405,766, PCT Publication WO 96/38726, U.S. Pat. No. 5,412,087, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,688,642); (ii) alkyl-thiol/dialkyldisulfide monolayers on noble metals (preferably Au(111)) (as, for example, described in Allara et al., U.S. Pat. No. 4,690,715; Bamdad et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,620,850; Wagner et al., Biophysical Journal, 1996, 70:2052-2066); and (iii) alkyl monolayer formation on oxide-free passivated silicon (as taught in, for example, Linford et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995, 117:3145-3155, Wagner et al., Journal of Structural Biology, 1997, 119:189-201, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,429,708). One of ordinary skill in the art however, will recognize that many possible moieties may be substituted for X, R, and/or Y, dependent largely upon the choice of substrate, coating, and affinity tag. Many examples of monolayers are described in Ulman, An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films From Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-Assembly, Academic Press (1991), herein incorporated by reference.
  • R of the monolayer molecule may comprise a hydrocarbon chain from about 1 to about 200 carbons long. The hydrocarbon chain may comprise an alkyl, aryl, alkenyl, alkynyl, cycloalkyl, alkaryl, aralkyl group, or any combination thereof. In a preferred embodiment, R is a chemical moiety that promotes formation of a self-assembled monolayer. In a preferred embodiment, R is an alkylchain from about 8 to about 22 carbons long. In a further preferred embodiment, R is a straight alkane from about 8 to about 22 carbons long. However, it is also contemplated that in an alternative embodiment, R may readily comprise a hydrocarbon chain from about 2 to about 200 carbons long and interrupted by at least one hetero atom. The interrupting hetero groups can include —O—, —CONH—, —CONHCO—, —NH—, —CSNH—, —CO—, —CS—, —S—, —SO—, —(OCH2CH2)n-(where n=1-20), —(CF2)n-(where n=1-22), and the like. Alternatively, one or more of the hydrogen moieties of R can optionally be substituted with deuterium.
  • X may be chosen as any group which affords chemisorption or physisorption of the monolayer onto the surface of the substrate (or the coating, if present). For instance, if the substrate or coating is a metal or metal alloy, X, at least prior to incorporation into the monolayer, is preferably an asymmetrical or symmetrical disulfide, sulfide, diselenide, selenide, thiol, isonitrile, selenol, a trivalent phosphorus compound, isothiocyanate, isocyanate, xanthanate, thiocarbamate, a phosphine, a amine, thio acid or dithio acid. This embodiment is especially preferred when the substrate, or coating if used, is a noble metal such as gold, silver, or platinum.
  • If the substrate of the device is a material such as silicon, silicon oxide, indium tin oxide, magnesium oxide, alumina, quartz, glass, or silica, then a preferred embodiment of the invention comprises an X that, prior to incorporation into said monolayer, is a monohalosilane, dihalosilane, trihalosilane, trialkoxysilane, dialkoxysilane, or a monoalkoxysilane. Among these silanes, trichlorosilane and trialkoxysilane are particularly preferred.
  • In other embodiments, the surface of the substrate (or coating thereon) is composed of a metal oxide such as titanium oxide, tantalum oxide, indium tin oxide, magnesium oxide, or alumina and X is a carboxylic acid. Alternatively, if the surface of the substrate (or coating thereon) of the device is copper, then X may optionally be a hydroxamic acid.
  • If the substrate used in the invention is a polymer, then in many cases a coating on the substrate such as a copper coating will be included in the device. An appropriate functional group X for the coating would then be chosen for use in the device. In an alternative embodiment comprising a polymer substrate, the surface of the polymer may be plasma-modified to expose desirable surface functionalities for monolayer formation. For instance, EP 780423 describes the use of a monolayer molecule that has an alkene X functionality on a plasma exposed surface. Still another possibility for the invention device comprised of a polymer is that the surface of the polymer on which the monolayer is formed is functionalized due to copolymerization of appropriately functionalized precursor molecules.
  • Another possibility is that prior to incorporation into the monolayer, X can be a free-radical-producing moiety. This functional group is especially appropriate when the surface on which the monolayer is formed is a hydrogenated silicon surface. Possible free-radical producing moieties include, but are not limited to, diacylperoxides, peroxides, and azo compounds. Alternatively, unsaturated moieties such as unsubstituted alkenes, alkynes, cyano compounds and isonitrile compounds can be used for X, if the reaction with X is accompanied by ultraviolet, infrared, visible, or microwave radiation.
  • In alternative embodiments, X, prior to incorporation into the monolayer, may be a hydroxyl, carboxyl, vinyl, sulfonyl, phosphoryl, silicon hydride, or an amino group.
  • The component, Y, of the monolayer is responsible for binding a biological moiety onto the monolayer. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the Y group is either highly reactive (activated) towards the biological moiety or is easily converted into such an activated form. In a preferred embodiment, the coupling of Y with the biological moiety occurs readily under normal physiological conditions not detrimental to the biological activity of the biological moiety. One skilled in the art will also appreciate that in many cases, the functional group Y will be altered upon interacting with the biological moiety. Although the functional group Y may either form a covalent linkage or a noncovalent linkage with the biological moiety, a covalent linkage is preferred.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, Y is a functional group that is activated in situ before attachment of the biological moiety's affinity tag. Possibilities for this type of functional group include, but are not limited to, such simple moieties such as a hydroxyl, carboxyl, amino, aldehyde, carbonyl, methyl, methylene, alkene, alkyne, carbonate, aryliodide, or a vinyl group. Appropriate modes of activation for these simple functional groups would be known by one of ordinary skill in the art. Alternatively, Y can comprise a functional group that requires photoactivation prior to becoming activated enough to trap the biological moiety.
  • In an especially preferred embodiment of the device of the present invention, Y is a highly reactive functional moiety compatible with monolayer formation and needs no in situ activation prior to reaction with the biological moiety or its affinity tag. Such possibilities for Y include, but are not limited to, maleimide, N-hydroxysuccimide (Wagner et al., Biophysical Journal, 1996, 70:2052-2066), nitrilotriacetic acid (U.S. Pat. No. 5,620,850), activated hydroxyl, haloacetyl, bromoacetyl, iodoacetyl, activated carboxyl, hydrazide, epoxy, aziridine, trifluoromethyldiaziridine, pyridyldisulfide, N-acyl-imidazole, imidazolecarbamate, succinimidylcarbonate, arylazide, anhydride, diazoacetate, benzophenone, isothiocyanate, isocyanate, imidoester, fluorobenzene, and biotin.
  • FIG. 4 shows one example of a monolayer on a substrate 3. In this example, substrate 3 comprises silicon (having a silicon oxide surface). The monolayer is aminoreactive because it bears a functional group Y that is N-hydroxysuccinimide.
  • FIG. 5 shows another example of a monolayer on a substrate 3. In this case, however, a thin film coating 5 comprised of gold covers the surface of the substrate 3. Also, in this embodiment, an adhesion interlayer 6 is used to adhere the coating 5 to the substrate 3 and is comprised of titanium. This monolayer is also aminoreactive because it bears a functional group Y that is N-hydroxysuccinimide.
  • In an alternative embodiment, Y is selected from the group of simple functional moieties. Possible Y functional groups include, but are not limited to, —OH, —NH2, —COOH, —COOR, —RSR, —PO4 −3, OSO3 −2, —SO3—, —COO—, —SOO—, —CONR2, —CN, —NR2, and the like. Simple groups such as these are only preferred for X when the affinity tag of the invention composes a layer of affinity tag molecules (such as poly-lysine) that coats the exposed portion of the monolayer prior to immobilization of the biological moiety (see below).
  • The monolayer molecules of the present invention can optionally be assembled on the surface in parts. In other words, the monolayer need not necessarily be constructed by chemisorption or physisorption of molecules of the formula X—R—Y to the surface of the substrate (or coating). Instead, in one embodiment, X may be chemisorbed or physisorbed to the surface of the substrate (or coating) alone first. Then, R or even just individual components of R can be attached to X through a suitable chemical reaction. Upon completion of addition of the spacer R to the X moiety already immobilized on the surface, Y can be attached to the ends of the monolayer molecule through a suitable covalent linkage.
  • Not all monolayer molecules at a given reactive site need to be identical. Some may consist of mixed monolayers. For instance, the monolayer of an individual reactive site may optionally comprise at least two different X—R—Y molecules. This second X—R—Y molecule may immobilize the same or a different biological moiety. In addition, many of the monolayer molecules, X—R—Y, of a reactive site may have failed to attach any biological moiety.
  • As another alternative of the invention, the monolayer of an individual reactive site can comprise a second organic molecule that is of the formula, X—R—V where R is the spacer, X is the functional group that binds R to the surface, and V is a moiety resistant to the non-specific binding of biomolecules. One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the possibilities for V will vary depending upon the nature of the biological moiety chosen for the sites of the device. For instance, functional groups V which are resistant to non-specific protein binding are used if the immobilized biological moiety of the device comprises protein. The nature of V will be somewhat dependent upon the type of proteins and solutions used. However, V will most typically comprise a hydroxyl, saccharide, or polyethylene glycol moiety (EP Publication 780423).
  • As a still further alternative of the invention device, the device may further comprise at least one unreactive site devoid of any biological moiety that comprises a monolayer of molecules of the formula X—R—V, where R is the spacer, X is the functional group that binds R to the surface, and V is the moiety resistant to the non-specific binding of biomolecules. In this embodiment, the unreactive site does not comprise any monolayers of molecules of the formula X—R—Y.
  • Regardless of the nature of the monolayer molecules, in some cases it can be desirable to provide crosslinking between molecules of the monolayer. In general, this confers additional stability to the monolayer. Methods of crosslinking such monolayers are known to those skilled in the art (see Ullman, An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films: From Langmuir-Blodgett to Self-Assembly, Academic Press (1991).
  • In addition to facilitating binding of the biological moiety to the substrate, functionalization of the substrate with monolayers is necessary for other reasons as well. Many biological moieties and protein, in particular, are susceptible to disruption of their bioactivities at surface interfaces. Proteins are prone to both denaturation and undesirable, non-specific binding at the solid/liquid interface. Other biological moieties such as small molecule ligands may have less problematic interactions with the substrate surface interface, but upon approach of the biological binding partner, presumably a protein, to the small molecule in an assay, problems of inactivation become highly relevant. A highly-ordered organic monolayer effectively “carpets” the surface of the substrate or coating, protecting the biological moiety from contact with the surface. These highly-ordered, self-assembled monolayers are preferred in the present invention. Additionally, the spacer R creates distance between the immobilized biological moiety and the surface.
  • Following formation of monolayers on the reactive sites of the invention device, the biological moieties are immobilized on the monolayers via the affinity tags. A solution containing the biological moiety to be immobilized can be exposed to the bioreactive units of the microdevice by either dispensing the solution by means of microfabricated adapter systems with integrated microcapillaries and entry/exit ports or alternatively by transferring the biological moieties via noncontact printing using dispensing microdevices with ball-point pen-type of mechanisms. The use of other printing techniques is also anticipated. Following attachment of the biological moieties to the monolayer, unreacted Y-functional groups are preferably quenched prior to use of the device.
  • The affinity tag is of critical importance to the present invention. The use of an affinity tag on the biological moiety of interest to be immobilized, allows for at least one of two advantages. An affinity tag can confer enhanced binding or reaction with Y. This enhancement effect may be either kinetic or thermodynamic. In general, affinity tag/Y-group combination used in the present invention preferably allows for immobilization of the biological molecule in a manner which does not require harsh conditions. This helps ensure that the biological reactivity of the biological moiety remains intact. Aqueous, biological buffer conditions are ideal. An affinity tag can also offer immobilization that is specific to a designated site or location on the biological moiety. This site-specific immobilization will help ensure that the reactive site of the biological moiety is accessible to ligands in solution.
  • In a preferred embodiment, especially when the biological moiety of the invention device is a protein or a polypeptide, the affinity tag comprises at least one amino acid. The affinity tag may be a polypeptide comprising at least one monolayer-reactive amino acid. Alternatively, the affinity tag may be a lone, monolayer-reactive amino acid. Examples of possible monolayer-reactive amino acids include cysteine, lysine, histidine, arginine, tyrosine, and glutamine. A polypeptide or single amino acid affinity tag is preferably expressed as a fusion protein along with the biological moiety. Amino acid tags provide either a single amino acid or a series of amino acids that can interact with the Y-functionalities of the monolayer. Amino acid affinity tags can also be introduced to a specific site on a recombinant protein to facilitate oriented immobilization by covalent binding to the bioreactive Y-functional group of the monolayer.
  • The affinity tag may comprise a poly(amino acid) tag. A poly(amino acid) tag is a polypeptide that comprises from about 2 to about 100 residues of a single amino acid. Other amino acid residues may also be present in the affinity tag. For instance, the affinity tag may comprise a poly-cysteine, poly-lysine, poly-arginine, or poly-histidine. Amino acid tags are preferably composed of two to twenty residues of a single amino acid, such as, for example, histidines, lysines, arginines, cysteines, glutamines, tyrosines, or any combination of these. According to a preferred embodiment an amino acid tag of one to twenty amino acids includes at least one to ten cysteines for thioether linkage; or one to ten lysines for amide linkage; or one to ten arginines for coupling to vicinal dicarbonyl groups. One of ordinary skill in the art can readily pair suitable affinity tags with a given Y-functionality.
  • The position of the amino acid tag can be at the amino-, or carboxy-terminus of the protein or anywhere in-between. Where compatible with protein function, affinity tags introduced for protein purification are preferentially located at the C-terminus of the recombinant protein to ensure that only full-length proteins are isolated during protein purification.
  • Affinity tags may also contain one or more unnatural amino acids. Unnatural amino acids can be introduced using suppressor tRNAs that recognize stop codons (i.e. amber), as described in Noren et al., Science, 1989, 244:182-188, Ellman et al., Methods Enzym., 1991, 202:301-336, and Cload et al., Chem. Biol., 1996, 3:1033-1038, herein incorporated by reference. The tRNAs are chemically amino-acylated to contain chemically altered (“unnatural”) amino acids for use with specific coupling chemistries (i.e. ketone modifications, photoreactive groups).
  • In an alternative embodiment the affinity tag can comprise a whole protein, such as, but not limited to, glutathione S-transferase, an antibody, avidin, or streptavidin.
  • Other bioconjugation and immobilization techniques known in the art may be adapted for the purpose of immobilizing biomolecules on activated monolayers. For instance, in an alternative embodiment, the affinity tag may be an organic bioconjugate which is chemically coupled to the biomolecule of interest. Biotin or an antigen may be chemically crosslinked to the biomolecule. Alternatively, a chemical crosslinker may be used that attaches a simple functional moiety such as a thiol or an amine to the biomolecule.
  • FIG. 6 shows a biological moiety 10 immobilized on a monolayer 7 on a substrate 3. An affinity tag 8 connects the biological moiety 10 to the monolayer 7. The monolayer 7 is formed on a coating 5 separated from the surface of the substrate 3 by an interlayer 6.
  • FIG. 7 shows a cross section of a biomolecule-coated microchannel of one embodiment of a microchannel array device. The microchannel 1 is covered by a glass cover 2. The walls of the microchannel are comprised of substrate 3, coated first with an interlayer 6, then with a coating 5, then with an organic monolayer 7 and finally, with the biological moiety 10 via the affinity tag 8.
  • In an alternative embodiment, the affinity tag is a component of a layer of affinity tag molecules immobilized on the monolayer. A hydrogel can serve as a suitable layer of affinity tag molecules. Dextran is one possible hydrogel material useful for the present invention. Alternatively, other polysaccharides or water-swellable organic polymers may also suffice. Uses of such hydrogels to immobilize biological moieties are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,242,828. Poly-lysine is another option. An example of a use of poly-lysine layer on an 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid monolayer can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,629,213. The layer of affinity tag molecules can optionally instead constitute a phospholipid monolayer or a phospholipid bilayer, as described in PCT Publication WO 96/38726. Use of a phospholipid monolayer or bilayer as an affinity tag would be suitable if the biological moiety to be immobilized is a membrane protein, such as an ion channel protein.
  • Another major embodiment of devices of the present invention comprises an adaptor molecule that links the affinity tag to the immobilized biological moiety. The additional spacing of the biological moiety from the surface of the substrate (or coating) that is afforded by the use of an adaptor molecule is particularly advantageous if the biological moiety is a type of molecule which is known to be prone to surface inactivation, as is the case with proteins. One of ordinary skill in the art will be able to choose an adaptor molecule which is appropriate for a given affinity tag and/or biological moiety. For instance, if the affinity tag is streptavidin, then the adaptor molecule could be a biotin molecule that is chemically conjugated to the biological moiety. Alternatively, if the affinity tag is a phospholipid bilayer or monolayer then a membrane anchor could be chosen as a suitable adaptor molecule.
  • In one embodiment, the adaptor is a polypeptide, such as protein G or protein A. In a preferred embodiment, the affinity tag, adaptor molecule, and biological moiety together compose a fusion protein. Such a fusion protein may be readily expressed using standard recombinant DNA technology. Adaptor proteins are especially useful to increase the solubility of the protein of interest and to increase the distance between the surface of the substrate or coating and the protein of interest. Use of an adaptor protein or polypeptide can also be very useful in facilitating the preparative steps of protein purification by affinity binding. Examples of possible adaptor proteins include glutathione-S-transferase (GST), maltose-binding protein, chitin-binding protein, thioredoxin, green-fluorescent protein (GFP). GFP can also be used for quantification of surface binding.
  • FIG. 8 shows a biological moiety 10 immobilized on a monolayer 7 via both an affinity tag 8 and an adaptor molecule 9. The monolayer 7 has been formed on a coating 5 on a substrate 3. An interlayer 6 is also used between the coating 5 and the substrate 3.
  • In preparation for immobilization to the devices and arrays of the present invention, fusion proteins can be expressed from recombinant DNA either in vivo or in vitro. Amino acid affinity tags are introduced by polymerase chain reaction. Expression in vivo is in either bacteria (Escherichia coli), lower eukaryotes (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces pombe, Pichia pastoris) or higher eukaryotes (bacculo-infected insect cells, insect cells mammalian cells), or in vitro (Escherichia coli lysates, wheat germ extracts, reticulocyte lysates). Proteins are purified by affinity chromatography using commercially available resins.
  • DNA sequences encoding amino acid affinity tags and adaptor proteins are engineered into the expression vectors such that the genes of interest can be cloned in frame either 5′ or 3′ of the DNA sequence encoding the affinity tag and adaptor protein.
  • FIG. 9 shows four possible expression vectors useful for expressing a protein of interest, a polypeptide affinity tag, and a polypeptide adaptor molecule as a fusion protein. The vector contains an origin of replication sequence 35 and a gene 36 capable of conferring antibiotic resistance to a host cell. The insert of the vector contains a promoter sequence 30 and a termination signal sequence 34. Between the sequences 30 and 34, the insert also contains a gene 33 encoding the protein of interest and sequence 31, encoding the polypeptide affinity tag. Sequence 32 which codes for a polypeptide adaptor molecule may also be included in the plasmid construct and is positioned between the protein and affinity-tag coding regions (33 and 31, respectively).
  • Preferably, production of families of related proteins involves parallel processing from cloning to protein expression and protein purification. cDNAs for the protein of interest will be amplified by PCR using cDNA libraries or EST (expressed sequence tag) clones as templates. For in vivo expression of the proteins, cDNAs can be cloned into commercial expression vectors (Qiagen, Novagen, Clontech) and introduced into the appropriate organism for expression (organisms include: Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces pombe, Pichia pastoris, bacculovirus/insect cells, insect cells, mammalian cells). For in vitro expression PCR-amplified DNA sequences are directly used in coupled in vitro transcription/translation systems (Escherichia coli S30 lysates from T7 RNA polymerase expressing, preferably protease-deficient strains, wheat germ lysates, reticulocyte lysates with and without microsomes (Promega, Pharmacia, Panvera)). The choice of organism for optimal expression depends on the extent of post-translational modifications (i.e. glycosylation, lipid-modifications).
  • Escherichia coli based protein expression will be the method of choice for soluble proteins that do not require extensive post-translational modifications for activity. Extracellular or intracellular domains of membrane proteins will be fused to protein adaptors for expression and purification.
  • The entire approach can be performed using 96-well assay plates. PCR reactions are carried out under standard conditions. Oligonucleotide primers contain unique restriction sites for facile cloning into the expression vectors. Alternatively, the TA cloning system (Clontech) can be used. Expression vectors contain the sequences for affinity tags and the protein adaptors. PCR products are ligated into the expression vectors (under inducible promoters) and introduced into the appropriate competent Escherichia coli strain by calcium-dependent transformation (strains include: XL-1 blue, BL21, SG13009(lon-)). Transformed Escherichia coli cells are plated and individual colonies transferred into 96-array blocks. Cultures are grown to mid-log phase, induced for expression, and cells collected by centrifugation. Cells are resuspended containing lysozyme and the membranes broken by rapid freeze/thaw cycles, or by sonication. Cell debris is removed by centrifugation and the supernatants transferred to 96-tube arrays. The appropriate affinity matrix is added, protein of interest bound and nonspecifically bound proteins removed by repeated washing steps using 12-96 pin suction devices and centrifugation. Alternatively, magnetic affinity beads and filtration devices can be used (Qiagen). The proteins are eluted and transferred to a new 96-well array. Protein concentrations are determined and an aliquot of each protein is spotted onto a nitrocellulose filter and verified by Western analysis using an antibody directed against the affinity tag. The purity of each sample is assessed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining or mass spectroscopy. Proteins are snap-frozen and stored at −80° C.
  • Saccharomyces cerevisiae allows for core glycosylation and lipid modifications of proteins. The approach described above for Escherichia coli can be used with slight modifications for transformation and cell lysis. Transformation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is by lithium-acetate and cell lysis is either by lyticase digestion of the cell walls followed by freeze-thaw, sonication or glass-bead extraction. Variations of post-translational modifications can be obtained by different yeast strains (i.e. Saccharomyces pombe, Pichia pastoris).
  • The advantage of the bacculovirus system or mammalian cells are the wealth of post-translational modifications that can be obtained. The bacculo-system requires cloning of viruses, obtaining high titer stocks and infection of liquid insect cell suspensions (cells are SF9, SF21). Mammalian cell-based expression requires transfection and cloning of cell lines. Soluble proteins are collected from the medium while intracellular or membrane bound proteins require cell lysis (either detergent solubilization, freeze-thaw). Proteins can then be purified analogous to the procedure described for Escherichia coli.
  • For in vitro translation the system of choice is Escherichia coli lysates obtained from protease-deficient and T7 RNA polymerase overexpressing strains. Escherichia coli lysates provide efficient protein expression (30-50 μg/ml lysate). The entire process is carried out in 96-well arrays. Genes of interest are amplified by PCR using oligonucleotides that contain the gene-specific sequences containing a T7 RNA polymerase promoter and binding site and a sequence encoding the affinity tag. Alternatively, an adaptor protein can be fused to the gene of interest by PCR. Amplified DNAs can be directly transcribed and translated in the Escherichia coli lysates without prior cloning for fast analysis. The proteins are then isolated by binding to an affinity matrix and processed as described above.
  • Alternative systems which may be used include wheat germ extracts and reticulocyte extracts. In vitro synthesis of membrane proteins and or post-translationally modified proteins will require reticulocyte lysates in combination with microsomes.
  • In one embodiment of the present invention, the biological moiety of one reactive site differs from the biological moiety of a second reactive site on the same device.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, although the biological moiety of one reactive site is different from that of another, the two biological moieties are related. In a preferred embodiment the biological moieties are members of the same protein family. The different biological moieties may be functionally related or just suspected of being functionally related. In another embodiment, however, the function of the biological moieties may not be entirely known. In these cases, the different biological moieties may either share a similarity in structure or sequence or be suspected of sharing a similarity in structure or sequence. In one embodiment, the different immobilized biological moieties may simply be fragments of different members of the same protein family. In another embodiment, the biological moieties may be known isozymes.
  • Examples of protein families preferred in the present invention include, but are not limited to, receptor families (examples: growth factor receptors, catecholamine receptors, amino acid derivative receptors, cytokine receptors, lectins), ligand families (examples: cytokines, serpins), enzyme families (examples: proteases, kinases, phosphatases, ras-like GTPases, hydrolases), and transcription factors (examples: steroid hormone receptors, heat-shock transcription factors, zinc-finger, leucine-zipper, homeodomain). In one embodiment, the different biological moieties are all HIV proteases. In another embodiment, the different biological moieties are all hepatitis C virus (HCV) proteases. Other examples of biological moieties of interest include antibodies and fragments thereof (such as Fab).
  • In an alternative embodiment of the invention device, the biological moieties of different reactive sites are identical to one another.
  • Although proteins, or fragments thereof, are the preferred biological moieties of the present invention, the immobilized biological moiety may optionally instead comprise a nucleic acid, a peptide nucleic acid, a hormone, an antigen, an epitope, or any small organic molecule which either has or is suspected of having a physiological function.
  • Methods for using the devices of the present invention are provided by other aspects of the invention. The devices of the present invention are particularly well-suited for use in high-throughput drug screening. Other uses include medical diagnostics and biosensors. In each case a plurality of biological moieties or drug candidates or analytes can be screened in parallel.
  • In one aspect of the invention, a method for screening a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to interact with a component of a fluid sample is provided. This method comprises delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of one of the invention devices having a different biological moiety immobilized on each reactive site and then detecting the interaction of said component with the immobilized biological moiety at each reactive site. The invention device is suitable for assaying both a catalytic reaction of an enzyme, a binding event, or a translocation by a membrane protein through a lipid bilayer.
  • Possible interactions towards which the present invention may be directed include, but are not limited to, antibody/antigen, antibody/hapten, enzyme/substrate, carrier protein/substrate, lectin/carbohydrate, receptor/hormone, receptor/effector, protein/DNA, protein/RNA, complementary strands of nucleic acid, repressor/inducer, or the like.
  • One embodiment of the present invention provides for a method of screening a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to react with a component of a fluid sample, comprising delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of a device of the present invention, wherein each reactive site of the device comprises a different biological moiety and detecting, either directly or indirectly, formation of product of the reaction of the component with the immobilized biological moiety at each reactive site.
  • Another embodiment of the invention provides a method for screening a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to bind a component of a fluid sample. This method comprises the following steps: delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the invention device; washing the reactive site with fluid which does not contain the component in order to elute unbound component from the reactive sites; and detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence, absence, or amount of the component retained at each reactive site.
  • An alternative method for screening a plurality of biological moieties for their ability to bind a component of a fluid sample comprises adding a known ligand of the biological moieties to the fluid sample, delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the invention device, washing said reactive sites with fluid that does not contain either the known ligand or the component in order to elute unbound molecules of the known ligand and the component, detecting the presence of the known ligand retained at each reactive site, and comparing retention of the known ligand detected with retention of the known ligand in the absence of the component.
  • A wide range of detection methods are applicable to this and other methods of the invention. The invention device can be interfaced with a means for detection of absorption in the visible range, chemiluminescence, or fluorescence (including lifetime, polarization, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), and fluorescence-resonance energy transfer (FRET)). Furthermore, built-in detectors such as optical waveguides (PCT Publication WO 96/26432 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,196), surface plasmons, and surface charge sensors are compatible with many embodiments of the invention.
  • FIG. 10 shows a schematic diagram of one type of fluorescence detection unit which may be used to monitor the interaction of immobilized biological moieties of a microchannel array with an analyte. In the illustrated detection unit, the microchannel array device 21 is positioned on a base plate 20. Light from a 100 W mercury arc lamp 25 is directed through an excitation filter 24 and onto a beam splitter 23. The light is then directed through a lens 22, such as a Micro Nikkor 55 mm 1:2:8 lens, and onto the microchannels of the device 21. Fluorescence emission from the device returns through the lens 22 and the beam splitter 23. After also passing through an emission filter 26, the emission is received by a cooled CCD camera 27, such as the Slowscan TE/CCD-1024SF&SB (Princeton Instruments). The camera is operably connected to a CPU 28, which is, in turn, operably connected to a VCR/monitor 29.
  • To test the specificity of a drug candidate, its interaction with multiple members of a protein family is determined. Members of the protein family are separately immobilized in microchannels. The drug candidate's ability to interfere with protein activity, such as binding, catalytic conversion, or translocation of a ligand through a lipid bilayer, is then determined.
  • For instance, to test a drug candidate's ability to interfere with a protein binding event, the drug candidate and a known ligand of a member of the protein family that is labeled by a chemically-conjugated fluorescent moiety, are delivered in a fluid sample into each microchannel. After a short incubation period, the microchannels are flushed with fluid which lacks both the drug candidate and the ligand. The amount of fluorescent ligand remaining in each of the microchannels (and presumably bound to the protein molecules of that microchannel) can be detected by using a fluorescence detector/quantifier with optical access to the reactive site, either through a transparent or translucent cover or substrate.
  • To test a drug candidate's ability to interfere with a catalytic conversion of a ligand, drug candidate and ligand are delivered into the microchannel in a fluid sample and changes in the chromogenic or fluorescent properties can be detected by using an optical detector/quantifier with optical access to the reactive site, either through a transparent or translucent cover or substrate.
  • In a more general sense, the present invention provides for a method of screening the ability of a drug candidate to inhibit the reaction of a plurality of members of a protein family with their substrate, comprising the following steps: combining the drug candidate and the substrate in a fluid sample; delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of a device of the present invention, wherein each reactive site of the device comprises a different member of the protein family; and detecting, either directly or indirectly, for the inhibition of product formation at each reactive site.
  • To test a drug candidate's ability to interfere with the translocation of a ligand through a lipid bilayer, drug candidate and ligand are delivered in a fluid sample to each microchannel. After a short incubation period the microchannels may be flushed with fluid lacking ligand and the ligand accumulated between lipid bilayer and the device is determined by measuring changes in fluorescence, absorption, or electrical charge.
  • An alternative embodiment of the invention provides for a method for screening a plurality of drug candidates in parallel for their ability to inhibit a reaction of an enzyme with its substrate. This method first involves adding the enzyme's substrate to a plurality of fluid samples, each of which contains at least one of the drug candidates of interest. Next, each of the fluid samples is delivered to a reactive site of an invention device, such as the microchannel array. In this embodiment, each reactive site bears the immobilized enzyme. Finally, any inhibition of product formation at each reactive site (due to the presence of the drug candidate in the solution) is monitored.
  • Another aspect of the invention provides a method for screening a plurality of binding candidates in parallel for their ability to bind a biological moiety. This method comprises delivering different fluid samples, each containing at least one of the binding candidates, to the reactive sites of the invention device, washing the reactive sites with fluid which does not contain the binding candidate in order to elute unbound binding candidates, and detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence of said binding candidate retained at each reactive site.
  • An alternative method for screening a plurality of binding candidates in parallel for their ability to bind a biological moiety is also provided by the present invention comprises the following: adding a known ligand of the biological moiety to a plurality of fluid samples, each of the fluid samples containing at least one of the binding candidates; delivering a different fluid sample to each of the reactive sites of the invention device, wherein multiple reactive sites comprise the same biological moiety; washing said reactive sites with fluid that contains neither the known ligand nor a binding candidate in order to elute unbound molecules of each; detecting the presence of the known ligand retained at each reactive site; and comparing retention of the known ligand detected with retention of the known ligand in the absence of the binding candidate.
  • The present invention also provides for a method of pairing a plurality of proteins with their substrates. In this method, a fluid sample comprising a substrate of a known enzyme family is first delivered to the reactive sites of the invention device where each reactive site of the device comprises a different protein. Next, any suitable detection means may be used to detect, either directly or indirectly, for the presence of product formed by the reaction of the substrate with the protein of each reactive site.
  • In another aspect of the invention, a method for pairing a plurality of proteins with their ligands is provided. This method comprises delivering a fluid sample comprising a ligand of a known protein family to the reactive sites of the invention device; washing the reactive sites with fluid that does not contain the ligand to remove unbound ligand; and detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence of the ligand retained at each reactive site.
  • The device of the present invention may also be used in a diagnostic manner. In the diagnostic embodiments of the invention, the different biological moieties of the reactive sites are not preferably members of the same protein family. One diagnostic use of the invention device is a method for detecting in a fluid sample the presence of a plurality of analytes which react with said biological moieties. The steps of this method comprise delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the invention device; and detecting the interaction of the analyte with the immobilized biological moiety at each reactive site.
  • Another diagnostic method for detecting in a fluid sample the presence of a plurality of analytes which bind said biological moieties, comprises the following: delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of the invention device; washing said reactive sites with an analyte-free fluid to remove unbound analyte; and detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence of analyte retained at each reactive site.
  • An alternative embodiment of the invention provides a device for processing a fluid sample that comprises a substrate, a plurality of parallel microchannels microfabricated into or onto said substrate; and a moiety immobilized within at least one of the parallel microchannels. In the device, the immobilized moiety is free to interact with a component of the fluid sample. In a preferred embodiment of this invention, the immobilized moiety is an immobilized biological moiety. In an especially preferred embodiment, the immobilized biological moiety is a protein.
  • The device may optionally comprise at least 10 parallel microchannels. In a preferred embodiment, the device comprises from about 100 to about 500 microchannels. In one embodiment, the device comprises from about 2 to about 500 parallel microchannels per cm2.
  • The width of each of the microchannels is optionally between about 10 μm and about 500 μm. The depth of each of the microchannels is also optionally between about 10 μm and about 500 μm.
  • One embodiment of the device further comprises a cover over at least a part of each of the microchannels. In one embodiment, the cover is a glass cover. The volume of each of the covered microchannels may range from about 5 nanoliters to about 300 nanoliters. In a preferred embodiment, the volume of each of the covered microchannels is between about 10 nanoliters and about 50 nanoliters.
  • (c) Examples
  • The following specific examples are intended to illustrate the invention and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the claims:
  • Example 1 Fabrication of a Microchannel Array by Bulk Micromachining
  • In a preferred embodiment microchannel arrays are fabricated via standard microstereolithography into the device material (bulk micromachining). Alternative techniques include surface-micromachining and LIGA (injection molding). Usually, a computer-aided design pattern (reflecting the final channel geometries) is transferred to a photomask using standard techniques, which is then used to transfer the pattern onto a silicon wafer coated with photoresist.
  • In a typical example, the device (“chip”), with lateral dimensions of 50×15 mm, contains a series of 100 parallel channels separated with a spacing of 250 μm. Each channel is 5 mm long and has a cross-section of 100×100 μm. The channel volume is 50 nl. 4″ diameter Si(100) wafers (Virginia Semiconductor) or 4″ diameter Corning 7740 glass wafers are used as bulk materials. Si(100) wafers are first cleaned in a 5:1:1 DI water:NH3:H2O2 bath (RCA1, 90° C., 10 min), followed by a 5:1:1 deionized (DI) water:HCl:H2O2 bath (RCA2, 90° C., 10 min) and finally passivated in 1% aqueous HF and singed at 150° C. for 30 min. After the wafer has been spincoated with polymethyl methacrylate PMMA as positive photoresist and prebaked for 25 minutes at 90° C., it is exposed using a Karl Suss contact printer and developed according to standard protocols. The wafer is then dried and postbaked at 110° C. for 25 min. Deep silicon reactive ion etching (RIE) is used to anisotropically dry-etch the channel features into the bulk material resulting in high aspect ratio, vertical sidewall features in the silicon (etch rate 2.5 μm/min). In the next step, the wafer is primed with a 20 nm thin titanium layer, followed by a 200 nm thin gold layer both layers deposited using electron-beam evaporation (5 Å/s, Thermionics). After resist stripping (acetone) and a short plasma treatment, the device is covered and sealed with a 50 μm thin glass cover (pyrex 7740) using low-temperature field assisted glass-silicon bonding resulting in a multichannel array with inlet and outlet ports. The gold-coated channel walls can then be further chemically modified to achieve the desired bioreactive and biocompatible properties (see Example 3, below).
  • Additional details of these procedures can be found in the following references: Madou, Fundamentals of Microfabrication, CRC Press (1997); Wolf and Tauber, Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, Vol. 1: Process Technology, Lattice Press, (1986); and Thomson et al., Introduction to Microlithography, American Chemical Society, (1994).
  • Example 2 Fabrication of a Microchannel Array by Sacrificial Micromachining
  • In sacrificial micromachining, the bulk material is left essentially untouched. Various thick layers of other materials are built up by either physical vapor deposition (PVD), plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) or spin coating and selectively remain behind or are removed by subsequent processing steps. Thus, the resulting channel walls are chemically different from the bottom of the channels and the resist material remains as part of the microdevice. Typical resist materials for sacrificial micromachining are silicon nitride (Si3N4), polysilicon, thermally grown silicon oxide and organic resists such as epoxy-based SU-8 and polyimides allowing the formation of high aspect-ratio features with straight sidewalls.
  • In a typical example, the device (“chip”), with lateral dimensions of 50×15 mm, contains a series of 100 parallel channels separated with a spacing of 250 μm. Each channel is 5 mm long and has a cross-section of 100×100 μm. The channel volume is 50 nl. 4″ diameter Si(100) wafers (Virginia Semiconductor) or 4″ diameter Corning 7740 glass wafers are used as bulk materials. Si(100) wafers are first cleaned in a 5:1:1 DI water:NH3:H2O2 bath (RCA1, 90° C., 10 min), followed by a 5:1:1 deionized (DI) water:HCl:H2O2 bath (RCA2, 90° C., 10 min) and finally passivated in 1% aqueous HF and singed at 150° C. for 30 min. Spincoating of the wafer with EPON SU-8 results in a 100 μm thick film that is exposed similar to Example 1, above, and developed in a propyleneglycol-monomethyletheracetate (PGMEA) solution resulting in a multi-channel structure with high-aspect ratio vertical sidewalls. Deposition of metal films (20 nm Ti, 200 nm Au) is carried out as described in Example 1, above. The device is covered with a 50 μm thin adhesive glass cover. The gold-coated channel walls can then be further chemically modified to achieve the desired bioreactive and biocompatible properties (see Example 3, below).
  • Additional details on sacrificial micromachining processes can be found in Lorenz, et al., Proceedings of MME'96 (Micro Mechanics Europe), Barcelona, Spain, October 1996, p. 32-35.
  • Example 3 Synthesis of an Aminoreactive Monolayer Molecule (Following the Procedure Outlined in Wagner et al., Biophys. J., 1996, 70:2052-2066)
  • General. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra are recorded on Bruker instruments (100 to 400 MHz). Chemical shifts (δ) are reported in ppm relative to internal standard ((CH3)4Si, δ=0.00 (1H- and 13C-NMR)). FAB-mass spectra are recorded on a VG-SABSEQ instrument (Cs+, 20 keV). Transmission infrared spectra are obtained as dispersions in KBr on an FTIR Perkin-Elmer 1600 Series instrument. Tin-layer chromatography (TLC) is performed on precoated silica gel 60 F254 plates (MERCK, Darmstadt, FRG), and detection was done using Cl2/toluidine, PdCl2 and UV-detection under NH3-vapor. Medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) is performed on a Labomatic MD-80 (LABOMATIC INSTR. AG, Allschwil, Switzerland) using a Buechi column (460×36 mm; BUECHI, Flawil, Switzerland), filled with silica gel 60 (particle size 15-40 μm) from Merck.
  • Synthesis of 11,11′-dithiobis(succinimidylundecanoate) (DSU). Sodium thiosulfate (55.3 g, 350 mmol) is added to a suspension of 11-bromo-undecanoic acid (92.8 g, 350 mmol) in 50% aqueous 1,4-dioxane (1000 ml). The mixture is heated at reflux (90° C.) for 2 h until the reaction to the intermediate Bunte salt was complete (clear solution). The oxidation to the corresponding disulfide is carried out in situ by adding iodine in portions until the solution retained with a yellow to brown colour. The surplus of iodine is retitrated with 15% sodium pyrosulfite in water. After removal of 1,4-dioxane by rotary evaporation the creamy suspension is filtered to yield product 11,11′-dithiobis(undecanoic acid). Recrystallization from ethyl acetate/THF provides a white solid (73.4 g, 96.5%): mp 94° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3/CD3OD 95: 5): δ 2.69 (t, 2H, J=7.3 Hz), 2.29 (t, 2H, J=7.5 Hz), 1.76-1.57 (m, 4H), and 1.40-1.29 (m, 12H); FAB-MS (Cs+, 20 keV): m/z (relative intensity) 434 (100, M+). Anal. Calcd. for C22H42O4S2: C, 60.79; H, 9.74; S, 14.75. Found: C, 60.95; H, 9.82; S, 14.74. To a solution of 11,11′-dithiobis(undecanoic acid). (1.0 g, 2.3 mmol) in THF (50 ml) is added N-hydroxysuccinimide (0.575 g, 5 mmol) followed by DCC (1.03 g, 5 mmol) at 0° C. After the reaction mixture is allowed to warm to 23° C. and is stirred for 36 h at room temperature, the dicyclohexylurea (DCU) is filtered. Removal of the solvent under reduced pressure and recrystallization from acetone/hexane provides 11,11′-dithiobis(succinimidylundecanoate) as a white solid. Final purification is achieved by medium pressure liquid chromatography (9 bar) using silica gel and a 2:1 mixture of ethyl acetate and hexane. The organic phase is concentrated and dried in vacuum to afford 11,11′-dithiobis(succinimidylundecanoate) (1.12 g, 78%): mp 95° C.; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 2.83 (s, 4H), 2.68 (t, 2H, J=7.3 Hz), 2.60 (t, 2H, J=7.5 Hz), 1.78-1.63 (m, 4H), and 1.43-1.29 (m, 12H); FAB-MS (Cs+, 20 keV): m/z (relative intensity) 514 (100), 628 (86, M+). Anal. Calcd. for C30H48N2O8S2: C, 57.30; H, 7.69; N, 4.45; S, 10.20. Found: C, 57.32; H, 7.60; N, 4.39; S, 10.25.
  • Example 4 Formation of an Aminoreactive Monolayer on Gold (Following the Procedure of Wagner et al., Biophys. J., 1996, 70:2052-2066)
  • Monolayers based on 11,11′-dithiobis(succinimidylundecanoate) (DSU) are deposited on Au(111) surfaces of microdevices described under Examples 1 and 2 by immersing them into a 1 mM solution of DSU in chloroform at room temperature for 1 hour. After rinsing with 10 volumes of solvent, the N-hydroxysuccinimide-terminated monolayer are dried under a stream of nitrogen and immediately used for protein immobilization.
  • Example 5 Expression and Purification of HIV Protease Variants
  • The HIV protease (Genebank HIVHXB2CG) is an essential component of the HIV life cycle, and a major target in anti-viral therapy. HIV protease is required for the proteolytic processing of the gag and gag-pol gene products into functional proteins. Inhibition of HIV protease prevents the production of infectious viral progeny, and hence further rounds of infection. HIV protease belongs to the family of aspartic proteases and is a symmetric homodimer with an active site formed at the interface of the two 99 amino acids long subunits. The core residues in the active site consist of a conserved tripeptide motif (Asp-Thr-Gly) (Roberts et al., Science, 1990, 248:358). Resistant variants of HIV protease have emerged against all inhibitors currently used. Most prevalent mutations causing resistance individually or in combination are: L10R, D30N, M46I, L63P, A71V, V82F (Kaplan et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1994, 91:5597; Ho et al., J. Virol. 1994, 68: 2016; Condra et al., Nature, 1995, 374:569; Schock et al., J. Biol. Chem., 1996, 271:31957; Korant and Rizzo, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 1997, 421:279). Additional mutations that preserve protease activity are systematically generated (Loeb et al., Nature, 1989, 340:397).
  • Mutant proteases are generated by PCR mutagenesis (Weiner et al., Gene, 1994, 151:119) and expressed in Escherichia coli using two approaches: (i) mutant and wild-type protease cDNAs are cloned into a Escherichia coli expression vector containing a N-terminal histidine tag (H6; Hochuli et al., Biotechnology 1988, 6:1321) followed by a factor Xa cleavage site, while the stop codon of HIV protease is replaced by a sequence encoding a lysine tag (K6) followed by a stop codon. The resulting fusion protein is purified from inclusion bodies as described in Wondrak and Louis, Biochemistry, 1996, 35:12957, and the histidine tag removed by factor Xa as described in Wu et al., Biochemistry, 1998, 37:4518; or (ii) mutant and wild-type protease cDNAs are cloned into an Escherichia coli expression vector creating a fusion between HIV protease, a tri-glycine linker, glutathione S-transferase (GST) and a lysine-tag (HIV-GST-K6). The autoprocessing site F*P at the carboxy terminus of the HIV protease is changed to F*I to prevent self-cleavage of the fusion proteins (Louis et al., Eur. J. Biochem., 1991, 199:36.1). The resulting proteins HIV-GST-K6 are purified from Escherichia coli lysates by standard chromatography on glutathione agarose beads and stored in an amine-free buffer at −80° C. (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl).
  • Example 6 Immobilization of Fusion Proteins on an Aminoreactive Monolayer
  • HIV protease variants, in the form of HIV-GST-K6, and GST-K6 are immobilized to the aminoreactive monolayer surface of the microchannel device (see Example 4, above). HIV-GST-K6 and GST-K6 are diluted to concentrations of 1 μg/ml in 25 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.5) containing 150 mM NaCl. First, 50 μl of protein-free buffer is transferred through the channels to hydrate the monolayer surface. After 5 min of incubation, 10 μl of the corresponding protein solutions are flushed through the channels to guarantee total replacement with protein-containing solution. Immobilization is finished after 30 min at room temperature. The channels are rinsed with 50 μl immobilization buffer and subjected to analysis. Each microchannel displays a different HIV-GST-K6 variant or control (GST-K6). Ultrapure water with a resistance of 18 MΩcm is generally used for all aqueous buffers (purified by passage through a Barnstead Nanopure® system).
  • Example 7 Assay of Protease Activity in Microchannels
  • HIV protease requires at least a heptapeptide substrate (Moore et al., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1989, 159:420). To analyze the activity of the different HIV variants, a continuous assay based on intra-molecular fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is used. A peptide substrate corresponding to the p17-p24 cleavage site of the viral gag protein (Skalka, Cell, 1989, 56:911) is modified by the addition of an energy-transfer pair (Geoghegan et al., FEBS Lett., 1990, 262:119): In Dns-Ser-Gln-Asn-Tyr-Pro-Ile-Val-Trp (Dns-SSQNYPIVW), the Dns (dansyl) and Trp groups are the N- and C-terminal extensions, respectively (Geoghegan et al.). Excitation of Trp is at 290 nm, and emission of Dns is at 575 nm. Cleavage of the peptide at the Tyr-Pro bond reduces the Dns emission and increases Trp emission at 360 nm. The modified heptapeptide Dns-SSQNYPIVW is prepared as described (Geoghegan et al.) and analyzed by amino acid analysis, nuclear magnetic resonance and mass spectrometry. The purity is checked by HPLC analysis using a Vydac C-4 column and an acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% TFA. In order to test the activity of all the HIV variants described above, each microchannel with an immobilized HIV variant (see Example 6) is filled with 20 μM of Dns-SSQNYPIVW in 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 13% glycerol, 10 mM DTT. Addition of the substrate to the immobilized proteins leads to time-dependent intensity changes in the fluorescence emission spectrum. The 360 nm Trp emission peak progressively will increase to about 2.5 times its initial intensity, while the Dns group's emission band (575 nm) will decline in intensity. This intensity change will be observed in all the channels containing active forms of the HIV variants. To control for changes in background fluorescence, GST-K6 fusion protein is measured in parallel.
  • Competition assays can be carried out to test the specificity of the proteolysis by the HIV variants. In one assay, both Dns-SSQNYPIVW and a small organic molecule that is to be tested for its potential as a drug, is delivered in a 50 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, 13% glycerol, 10 mM DTT solution to each channel. An organic molecule which acts as an inhibitor for a wide range of HIV protease variants will diminish the Trp emission peak increase and the Dns emission band decrease associated with reaction of the protease with the peptide substrate in a number of the microchannels. A less desirable drug candidate, on the other hand, will inhibit the reaction of the HIV protease with the peptide substrate only in selected microchannels (or none at all).
  • Protease inhibitors Sequinavir (Roche), Ritonavir (Abbot) or Indinavir (Merck) can also be added to the reaction buffer and used as positive controls for the specificity of inhibition. Sequinavir will inhibit all the HIV variants except those containing either the G48V or the L90M mutation. Ritonavir in contrast is unable to block the activity of the M46I, L63P, A71V, V82F and the 184V variants. Indinavir has a similar inhibition pattern like Ritonavir except that the A71V variant is not affected. In addition Indinavir is not able to decrease the activity of the L10R HIV protease variant.
  • These experiments demonstrate how an HIV-variant microchannel device may be used to test the inhibitory effect of small organic molecules on the activity of the HIV protease.
  • All documents cited in the above specification are herein incorporated by reference. Various modifications and variations of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. Although the invention has been described in connection with specific preferred embodiments, it should be understood that the invention as claimed should not be unduly limited to such specific embodiments. Indeed, various modifications of the described modes for carrying out the invention which are obvious to those skilled in the art are intended to be within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (38)

1-56. (canceled)
57. A method comprising:
providing a sample detection device, the sample detection device comprising (i) a substrate having an upper surface, (ii) a plurality of parallel channels formed in or on the upper surface of the substrate, each channel extending between a first and a second end and having a bottom wall surface, wherein the channels are linearly aligned and can be loaded with fluids containing one or more analytes, and (iii) a plurality of immobilization molecules for immobilizing proteins, peptides, small molecules or nucleic acids at immobilization regions in each channel;
(b) introducing the fluids into the channels so that the fluids contact the immobilized proteins, peptides, small molecules or nucleic acids; and
(c) monitoring the interaction between the analytes in the fluids and the immobilized proteins, peptides, small molecules or nucleic acids in the channels.
58. The method of claim 57, wherein the plurality of parallel channels includes at least 2 parallel microchannels.
59. The method of claim 57, wherein the plurality of parallel channels Includes at least 10 parallel microchannels.
60. The method of claim 57, wherein the plurality of parallel channels includes at least 100 parallel microchannels.
61. The method of claim 57, wherein each pair of adjacent channels is separated a distance of between about 10 μm and 5 mm.
62. The method of claim 57, wherein each channel has a cross section width that is between about 10 μm and 500 μm.
63. The method of claim 57, wherein each channel has a cross section length that is between about 1 mm and 20 mm.
64. The method of claim 57, wherein each channel has a trapezoidal cross section.
65. The method of claim 57, wherein each channel has a rectangular cross section.
66. The method of claim 57, wherein each channel has a semi-circular cross section.
67. The method of claim 57, wherein the sample detection device further comprises a cover over the channels.
68. The method of claim 57, wherein the sample detection device further comprises a cover that is wholly or partly translucent or transparent.
69. The method of claim 57, wherein the sample detection device further comprises a cover that is wholly or partly non-translucent or non-transparent.
70. The method of claim 57, wherein the sample detection device further comprises a coating disposed between the bottom wall surface and the immobilization molecules
71. The method of claim 57, wherein the immobilized proteins, peptides, small molecules or nucleic acids are chemisorbed or physisorbed to the immobilization regions.
72. A method for screening a plurality of biological moieties in parallel for their ability to interact, react with or bind to a component of a fluid sample, comprising:
(a) delivering the fluid sample to the reactive sites of a device for processing a fluid sample, said device having at least 100 noncontiguous reactive sites, each of said sites comprising:
(i) a substrate;
(ii) a different immobilized protein, peptide, or nucleic acid; and
(iii) a monolayer chemisorbed or physisorbed on the surface of said reactive sites, said monolayer comprising molecules of the formula

X-R-Y
wherein R is a spacer, X is a functional group that binds R to the surface and Y is
a functional group for binding said protein, peptide, or nucleic acid onto the monolayer; and
(b) detecting, either directly or indirectly, the interaction or reaction of said component with the immobilized protein, peptide, or nucleic acid, or the binding of said component with the protein, peptide, or nucleic acid at a reactive site.
73. A method according to claim 72 wherein the device further comprises:
(iv) an affinity tag, wherein said affinity tag enhances site-specific Immobilization of said protein, peptide, or nucleic acid onto the monolayer.
74. A method according to claim 72 wherein each of said reactive sites may independently react with a component of the fluid sample and are separated from each other by a region of said substrate that is free of molecules of the formula X-R-Y.
75. A method according to claim 72 in which a plurality of binding candidates is screened in parallel for their ability to bind a protein, peptide, or nucleic acid, and in which different fluid samples, each containing at least one of the binding candidates, are delivered to the reactive sites of the device, further comprising
(c) washing the reactive sites with fluid which does not contain said binding candidate in order to elute unbound binding candidates; and
(d) detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence of said binding candidate retained at each reactive site.
76. A method according to claim 72 in which a plurality of binding candidates is screened in parallel for their ability to bind a protein, peptide, or nucleic acid, and in which different fluid samples, each containing at least one of the binding candidates, are delivered to the reactive sites of the device, further comprising
(c) washing the reactive sites with fluid which does not contain said binding candidate in order to elute unbound binding candidates; and
(d) detecting, either directly or indirectly, the presence of said binding candidate retained at each reactive site.
77. A method according to claim 72 in which a plurality of analytes which bind said proteins, peptides, or nucleic acids is detected, comprising:
(a) delivering a fluid sample comprising said analytes to the reactive sites of the device;
(b) washing the reactive sites with an analyte-free fluid to remove unbound analyte; and
(c) detecting, either directly or indirectly; the presence of analyte retained at each reactive site.
78. A method according to claim 72 in which a plurality of proteins is paired with their ligands, comprising:
(a) delivering a fluid sample comprising a ligand of a known protein family to the reactive sites of the device, wherein each reactive site of the device comprises a different protein;
(b) washing the reactive sites with fluid that does not contain said ligand to remove unbound ligand; and
(c) detecting, either directly or indirectly; the presence of the ligand retained at each reactive site.
79. A method according to claim 72 wherein each reactive site comprises an immobilized peptide.
80. A method according to claim 72 wherein each reactive site comprises an immobilized nucleic acid.
81. A method according to claim 72 wherein each reactive site comprises an immobilized protein.
82. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized proteins of the same family.
83. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized proteins that are functionally related.
84. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized proteins that are structurally related.
85. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized fusion proteins.
86. A method according to claim 85 wherein the device further comprises an affinity tag, wherein said affinity tag enhances site-specific immobilization of said protein onto the monolayer.
87. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized recombinant proteins.
88. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized kinases.
89. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized antibodies.
90. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized capture agents.
91. A method according to claim 72, wherein said device comprises from about 100 to about 500 microchannels.
92. A method according to claim 72, wherein said device comprises from about 2 to about 500 parallel microchannels per cm2.
93. A method according to claim 81 wherein the device comprises immobilized recombinant fusion proteins
US12/173,515 1998-07-14 2008-07-15 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules Abandoned US20090047695A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/173,515 US20090047695A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2008-07-15 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/115,397 US6576478B1 (en) 1998-07-14 1998-07-14 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US10/112,847 US20020115225A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2002-03-29 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US12/173,515 US20090047695A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2008-07-15 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/112,847 Continuation US20020115225A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2002-03-29 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090047695A1 true US20090047695A1 (en) 2009-02-19

Family

ID=22361123

Family Applications (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/115,397 Expired - Fee Related US6576478B1 (en) 1998-07-14 1998-07-14 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US09/353,554 Expired - Fee Related US6596545B1 (en) 1998-07-14 1999-07-14 Microdevices for screening biomolecules
US09/570,586 Expired - Fee Related US6582969B1 (en) 1998-07-14 2000-05-12 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US10/112,982 Abandoned US20020110932A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2002-03-29 Microdevices for screening biomolecules
US10/112,847 Abandoned US20020115225A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2002-03-29 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US12/173,515 Abandoned US20090047695A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2008-07-15 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules

Family Applications Before (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/115,397 Expired - Fee Related US6576478B1 (en) 1998-07-14 1998-07-14 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US09/353,554 Expired - Fee Related US6596545B1 (en) 1998-07-14 1999-07-14 Microdevices for screening biomolecules
US09/570,586 Expired - Fee Related US6582969B1 (en) 1998-07-14 2000-05-12 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US10/112,982 Abandoned US20020110932A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2002-03-29 Microdevices for screening biomolecules
US10/112,847 Abandoned US20020115225A1 (en) 1998-07-14 2002-03-29 Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (6) US6576478B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1097379B1 (en)
JP (1) JP4489949B2 (en)
AT (1) ATE419527T1 (en)
AU (1) AU764027B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2337197C (en)
DE (1) DE69940198D1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000004390A2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110065597A1 (en) * 2009-01-22 2011-03-17 Li-Cor, Inc. Single molecule proteomics with dynamic probes
CN102207511A (en) * 2010-03-31 2011-10-05 恩普乐股份有限公司 Micro-channel chip and micro-analysis system
US8785143B2 (en) 2010-08-30 2014-07-22 Panasonic Healthcare Co., Ltd. Method for immobilizing streptavidin on a self-assembled monolayer
US8871457B2 (en) 2010-10-19 2014-10-28 Panasonic Healthcare Co., Ltd Method for immobilizing glucose oxidase on a self-assembled monolayer
US8980645B2 (en) 2010-01-25 2015-03-17 Panasonic Healthcare Holdings Co., Ltd. Method for immobilizing protein A on a self-assembled monolayer

Families Citing this family (222)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6503711B1 (en) 1997-06-18 2003-01-07 Ulrich J. Krull Nucleic acid biosensor diagnostics
US6893877B2 (en) 1998-01-12 2005-05-17 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Methods for screening substances in a microwell array
WO1999040434A1 (en) 1998-02-04 1999-08-12 Invitrogen Corporation Microarrays and uses therefor
US20020119579A1 (en) * 1998-07-14 2002-08-29 Peter Wagner Arrays devices and methods of use thereof
US6794197B1 (en) 1998-07-14 2004-09-21 Zyomyx, Inc. Microdevice and method for detecting a characteristic of a fluid
US6576478B1 (en) * 1998-07-14 2003-06-10 Zyomyx, Inc. Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US6897073B2 (en) * 1998-07-14 2005-05-24 Zyomyx, Inc. Non-specific binding resistant protein arrays and methods for making the same
US6780582B1 (en) 1998-07-14 2004-08-24 Zyomyx, Inc. Arrays of protein-capture agents and methods of use thereof
US6406921B1 (en) * 1998-07-14 2002-06-18 Zyomyx, Incorporated Protein arrays for high-throughput screening
DE19853640C2 (en) * 1998-11-20 2002-01-31 Molecular Machines & Ind Gmbh Multi-vessel arrangement with improved sensitivity for optical analysis, processes for its production and its use in optical analysis processes
US6827979B2 (en) 1999-01-07 2004-12-07 Northwestern University Methods utilizing scanning probe microscope tips and products therefor or produced thereby
US6635311B1 (en) 1999-01-07 2003-10-21 Northwestern University Methods utilizing scanning probe microscope tips and products therefor or products thereby
US6573369B2 (en) 1999-05-21 2003-06-03 Bioforce Nanosciences, Inc. Method and apparatus for solid state molecular analysis
US7052545B2 (en) * 2001-04-06 2006-05-30 California Institute Of Technology High throughput screening of crystallization of materials
US8709153B2 (en) 1999-06-28 2014-04-29 California Institute Of Technology Microfludic protein crystallography techniques
US7195670B2 (en) * 2000-06-27 2007-03-27 California Institute Of Technology High throughput screening of crystallization of materials
US7179638B2 (en) * 1999-07-30 2007-02-20 Large Scale Biology Corporation Microarrays and their manufacture by slicing
US6969506B2 (en) * 1999-08-17 2005-11-29 Battelle Memorial Institute Methods of conducting simultaneous exothermic and endothermic reactions
CA2400644C (en) * 2000-02-18 2009-07-14 Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Apparatus and methods for parallel processing of micro-volume liquid reactions
US20020151040A1 (en) 2000-02-18 2002-10-17 Matthew O' Keefe Apparatus and methods for parallel processing of microvolume liquid reactions
US6720157B2 (en) 2000-02-23 2004-04-13 Zyomyx, Inc. Chips having elevated sample surfaces
US6686461B1 (en) 2000-03-22 2004-02-03 Solulink Bioscience, Inc. Triphosphate oligonucleotide modification reagents and uses thereof
US7102024B1 (en) 2000-08-01 2006-09-05 Schwartz David A Functional biopolymer modification reagents and uses thereof
US7867763B2 (en) 2004-01-25 2011-01-11 Fluidigm Corporation Integrated chip carriers with thermocycler interfaces and methods of using the same
IL152634A0 (en) * 2000-05-04 2003-06-24 Univ Yale High density protein arrays for screening of protein activity
SE0001669D0 (en) * 2000-05-04 2000-05-04 Forskarpatent I Syd Ab Monitoring of analytes at submicromolar with extremely high sensitivity
CA2410306C (en) * 2000-05-25 2009-12-15 Westonbridge International Limited Micromachined fluidic device and method for making same
US20020049152A1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-04-25 Zyomyx, Inc. Methods for immobilizing polypeptides
EP1301632A2 (en) * 2000-07-19 2003-04-16 Pointilliste, Inc. Nested sorting and high throughput screening
US7354721B2 (en) 2000-09-22 2008-04-08 Clontech Laboratories, Inc. Highly sensitive proteomic analysis methods, and kits and systems for practicing the same
US20100261159A1 (en) * 2000-10-10 2010-10-14 Robert Hess Apparatus for assay, synthesis and storage, and methods of manufacture, use, and manipulation thereof
WO2002030561A2 (en) * 2000-10-10 2002-04-18 Biotrove, Inc. Apparatus for assay, synthesis and storage, and methods of manufacture, use, and manipulation thereof
US7887885B2 (en) 2000-10-20 2011-02-15 Northwestern University Nanolithography methods and products therefor and produced thereby
US7351575B2 (en) 2000-11-08 2008-04-01 Surface Logix, Inc. Methods for processing biological materials using peelable and resealable devices
US7001740B2 (en) 2000-11-08 2006-02-21 Surface Logix, Inc. Methods of arraying biological materials using peelable and resealable devices
US7439056B2 (en) 2000-11-08 2008-10-21 Surface Logix Inc. Peelable and resealable devices for arraying materials
US6967074B2 (en) 2000-11-08 2005-11-22 Surface Logix, Inc. Methods of detecting immobilized biomolecules
US6803205B2 (en) 2000-11-08 2004-10-12 Surface Logix, Inc. Methods of measuring enzyme activity using peelable and resealable devices
US7371563B2 (en) 2000-11-08 2008-05-13 Surface Logix, Inc. Peelable and resealable devices for biochemical assays
US6653121B2 (en) * 2000-11-10 2003-11-25 Tactical Fabs, Inc. Roughened and oxidized well chips and method of making same
US6905816B2 (en) 2000-11-27 2005-06-14 Intelligent Medical Devices, Inc. Clinically intelligent diagnostic devices and methods
EP2202520A1 (en) 2000-11-27 2010-06-30 Intelligent Medical Devices LLC Clinically intelligent diagnostic devices and methods
US7776571B2 (en) 2000-12-12 2010-08-17 Autogenomics, Inc. Multi-substrate biochip unit
US6582987B2 (en) * 2000-12-30 2003-06-24 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Method of fabricating microchannel array structure embedded in silicon substrate
US7332286B2 (en) 2001-02-02 2008-02-19 University Of Pennsylvania Peptide or protein microassay method and apparatus
US6913697B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2005-07-05 Science & Technology Corporation @ Unm Nanostructured separation and analysis devices for biological membranes
US20020164816A1 (en) * 2001-04-06 2002-11-07 California Institute Of Technology Microfluidic sample separation device
AU2002307152A1 (en) 2001-04-06 2002-10-21 California Institute Of Technology Nucleic acid amplification utilizing microfluidic devices
US6752922B2 (en) * 2001-04-06 2004-06-22 Fluidigm Corporation Microfluidic chromatography
AU2002245988A1 (en) 2001-04-18 2002-10-28 Ulrich J. Krull Gradient resolved hybridisation platform
AU2002338428A1 (en) * 2001-04-20 2002-11-05 Carnegie Mellon University Methods and systems for identifying proteins
US7723123B1 (en) * 2001-06-05 2010-05-25 Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. Western blot by incorporating an affinity purification zone
WO2003006948A2 (en) * 2001-07-10 2003-01-23 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Surface plasmon resonance imaging of micro-arrays
DK1410029T3 (en) 2001-07-16 2008-01-07 Protein Forest Inc Arrays of buffers for analysis of biomolecules at their isoelectric point
US7128876B2 (en) * 2001-07-17 2006-10-31 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Microdevice and method for component separation in a fluid
US6976527B2 (en) * 2001-07-17 2005-12-20 The Regents Of The University Of California MEMS microcapillary pumped loop for chip-level temperature control
US20030143612A1 (en) * 2001-07-18 2003-07-31 Pointilliste, Inc. Collections of binding proteins and tags and uses thereof for nested sorting and high throughput screening
US6977138B2 (en) 2001-07-24 2005-12-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Reactive polymer coatings
US7666661B2 (en) 2001-08-27 2010-02-23 Platypus Technologies, Llc Substrates, devices, and methods for quantitative liquid crystal assays
AT500669B1 (en) * 2001-09-24 2007-02-15 Oesterr Forsch Seibersdorf SOLID CARRIER FOR THE IMMOBILIZATION OF BIOMOLECULES
CA2462833C (en) * 2001-10-02 2012-07-03 Northwestern University Protein and peptide nanoarrays
US8440093B1 (en) 2001-10-26 2013-05-14 Fuidigm Corporation Methods and devices for electronic and magnetic sensing of the contents of microfluidic flow channels
AU2002353997A1 (en) * 2001-11-01 2003-05-12 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute In vitro metabolic engineering on microscale devices
US7361310B1 (en) 2001-11-30 2008-04-22 Northwestern University Direct write nanolithographic deposition of nucleic acids from nanoscopic tips
EP1463796B1 (en) 2001-11-30 2013-01-09 Fluidigm Corporation Microfluidic device and methods of using same
US7691333B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2010-04-06 Fluidigm Corporation Microfluidic device and methods of using same
US20040002078A1 (en) 2001-12-05 2004-01-01 Sense Proteomic Limited Arrays
US20050221283A1 (en) * 2001-12-11 2005-10-06 Mahant Vijay K Biochip
EP1770429A3 (en) * 2001-12-11 2007-04-11 Autogenomics, Inc. Multi-substrate biochip unit
EP1474504A2 (en) * 2002-01-24 2004-11-10 Pointilliste, Inc. Use of collections of binding sites for sample profiling and other applications
JP3740528B2 (en) * 2002-02-05 2006-02-01 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 Fine particle manufacturing method
US6703216B2 (en) 2002-03-14 2004-03-09 The Regents Of The University Of California Methods, compositions and apparatuses for detection of gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB)
EP1499706A4 (en) 2002-04-01 2010-11-03 Fluidigm Corp Microfluidic particle-analysis systems
GB0208766D0 (en) * 2002-04-02 2002-05-29 Univ Surrey Liquid-liquid separation
US7112444B2 (en) * 2002-04-24 2006-09-26 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Method of performing gradient-based assays in a microfluidic device
SE0201257D0 (en) * 2002-04-25 2002-04-25 Medical Invest In Sweden Ab Improved Separation
AU2003224586A1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2003-11-17 Gyros Ab Integrated microfluidic device (ea)
WO2003093802A1 (en) * 2002-04-30 2003-11-13 Gyros Ab Integrated microfluidic device (ea)
JP4030796B2 (en) * 2002-05-13 2008-01-09 富士フイルム株式会社 Measuring chip
AU2003300257A1 (en) 2002-05-21 2004-05-04 Northwestern University Peptide and protein arrays and direct-write lithographic printing of peptides and proteins
CA2486812A1 (en) * 2002-05-22 2004-05-21 Platypus Technologies, Llc Substrates, devices, and methods for cellular assays
AU2003248273A1 (en) * 2002-07-12 2004-02-02 Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation Analytical chip, analytical chip unit, analyzing apparatus, method of analysis using the apparatus, and method of producing the analytical chip
US20050008828A1 (en) * 2002-07-25 2005-01-13 Trustees Of Stevens Institute Of Technology Patterned polymer microgel and method of forming same
US8277753B2 (en) 2002-08-23 2012-10-02 Life Technologies Corporation Microfluidic transfer pin
EP1551753A2 (en) 2002-09-25 2005-07-13 California Institute Of Technology Microfluidic large scale integration
US20040226620A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-11-18 Daniel Therriault Microcapillary networks
ES2375724T3 (en) 2002-09-27 2012-03-05 The General Hospital Corporation MICROFLUDE DEVICE FOR SEPERATION OF CELLS AND ITS USES.
JP5695287B2 (en) * 2002-10-02 2015-04-01 カリフォルニア インスティテュート オブ テクノロジー Nucleic acid analysis of microfluids
EP1585806A2 (en) * 2002-10-30 2005-10-19 Pointilliste, Inc. Methods for producing polypeptide-tagged collections and capture systems containing the tagged polypeptides
WO2004041918A2 (en) * 2002-10-31 2004-05-21 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Microstructures and methods of fabrication thereof
US20060094108A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2006-05-04 Karl Yoder Thermal cycler for microfluidic array assays
CA2521999A1 (en) 2002-12-20 2004-09-02 Biotrove, Inc. Assay apparatus and method using microfluidic arrays
US7172682B2 (en) * 2003-01-24 2007-02-06 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Enzyme immobilization for electroosmotic flow
JP4519124B2 (en) * 2003-01-30 2010-08-04 ユィロス・パテント・アクチボラグ Wall inside the microfluidic device
EP1597577A4 (en) * 2003-02-10 2007-02-21 Pointilliste Inc Self-assembling arrays and uses thereof
DE10312628A1 (en) * 2003-03-21 2004-10-07 Friz Biochem Gmbh Method and device for wetting a substrate with a liquid
AU2003272978A1 (en) * 2003-04-01 2004-11-01 Nihon University Method of measuring protein solubility, process for producing crystal and apparatus therefor
US7666361B2 (en) 2003-04-03 2010-02-23 Fluidigm Corporation Microfluidic devices and methods of using same
US20050145496A1 (en) 2003-04-03 2005-07-07 Federico Goodsaid Thermal reaction device and method for using the same
US8828663B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2014-09-09 Fluidigm Corporation Thermal reaction device and method for using the same
US7476363B2 (en) * 2003-04-03 2009-01-13 Fluidigm Corporation Microfluidic devices and methods of using same
US7604965B2 (en) 2003-04-03 2009-10-20 Fluidigm Corporation Thermal reaction device and method for using the same
US20040209383A1 (en) * 2003-04-17 2004-10-21 Industrial Technology Research Institute Lift-off process for protein chip
US20060205010A1 (en) * 2003-04-22 2006-09-14 Catherine Allioux Methods of host cell protein analysis
US7316543B2 (en) * 2003-05-30 2008-01-08 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Electroosmotic micropump with planar features
JP2007526438A (en) * 2003-06-06 2007-09-13 コンビナトルックス インコーポレイテッド System and method for multidimensional evaluation of composition combinations
US20040248323A1 (en) * 2003-06-09 2004-12-09 Protometrix, Inc. Methods for conducting assays for enzyme activity on protein microarrays
US7141617B2 (en) * 2003-06-17 2006-11-28 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Directed assembly of three-dimensional structures with micron-scale features
US20050064465A1 (en) * 2003-07-02 2005-03-24 Caliper Life Sciences, Inc. Continuous and non-continuous flow bioreactor
US20060014003A1 (en) * 2003-07-24 2006-01-19 Libera Matthew R Functional nano-scale gels
US20050064395A1 (en) 2003-07-25 2005-03-24 Platypus Technologies, Llc Liquid crystal based analyte detection
US7413712B2 (en) 2003-08-11 2008-08-19 California Institute Of Technology Microfluidic rotary flow reactor matrix
US7754497B2 (en) * 2003-08-29 2010-07-13 Reverse Proteomics Research Institute Co., Ltd. Method for immobilizing proteins
US20070092964A1 (en) 2003-09-03 2007-04-26 Zymoyx, Inc. Ion detection using a pillar chip
US20050059139A1 (en) * 2003-09-11 2005-03-17 Norihisa Mino Device substrate, method of manufacturing the same, and microchip
EP1516665A1 (en) * 2003-09-18 2005-03-23 Sony International (Europe) GmbH A method of immobilizing and stretching a nucleic acid on a substrate
US7166212B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2007-01-23 Chromba, Inc. Multicapillary column for chromatography and sample preparation
US20070017870A1 (en) 2003-09-30 2007-01-25 Belov Yuri P Multicapillary device for sample preparation
US20060046305A1 (en) * 2003-10-15 2006-03-02 National University Of Singapore Method and apparatus for detecting analyte with filter
US20050095648A1 (en) * 2003-10-30 2005-05-05 Mario Geysen Method for designing linear epitopes and algorithm therefor and polypeptide epitopes
CA2545482A1 (en) 2003-11-10 2005-05-26 Platypus Technologies, Llc Substrates, devices, and methods for cellular assays
US20060057597A1 (en) * 2003-11-12 2006-03-16 California Institute Of Technology Method and system for processing nanoparticles using a self assembly mechanism to form combined species
JP4372521B2 (en) * 2003-11-27 2009-11-25 日立ソフトウエアエンジニアリング株式会社 Biomolecule recovery method
WO2005059552A1 (en) 2003-12-15 2005-06-30 University Of Pennsylvania Method and devices for running reactions on a target plate for maldi mass spectrometry
WO2005067980A2 (en) * 2004-01-12 2005-07-28 Pointilliste, Inc. Design of therapeutics and therapeutics
US7407799B2 (en) * 2004-01-16 2008-08-05 California Institute Of Technology Microfluidic chemostat
WO2005072353A2 (en) * 2004-01-25 2005-08-11 Fluidigm Corporation Crystal forming devices and systems and methods for making and using the same
US20060065528A1 (en) * 2004-02-03 2006-03-30 Gabriel Lopez Nanostructured devices for separation and analysis
US20050260522A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2005-11-24 William Weber Permanent resist composition, cured product thereof, and use thereof
CA2559171A1 (en) 2004-03-12 2005-09-29 Biotrove, Inc. Nanoliter array loading
US7723126B2 (en) * 2004-03-24 2010-05-25 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Plasma-enhanced functionalization of inorganic oxide surfaces
US8916348B2 (en) * 2004-05-06 2014-12-23 Clondiag Gmbh Method and device for the detection of molecular interactions
US7449280B2 (en) * 2004-05-26 2008-11-11 Microchem Corp. Photoimageable coating composition and composite article thereof
AU2005269227A1 (en) * 2004-08-04 2006-02-09 Axela Inc. Patterned surfaces with chemical crosslinkers for use in diffraction-based sensing
US20060105453A1 (en) 2004-09-09 2006-05-18 Brenan Colin J Coating process for microfluidic sample arrays
US20060068424A1 (en) * 2004-08-13 2006-03-30 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Biosensor
JP4112597B2 (en) * 2004-09-30 2008-07-02 独立行政法人科学技術振興機構 Self-organizing material patterning method, self-organizing material patterning substrate and production method thereof, and photomask using self-organizing material patterning substrate
KR100489853B1 (en) * 2004-11-24 2005-05-17 주식회사 아이엠티 Apparatus for dry surface cleaning of materials using shock wave
SE0403139D0 (en) * 2004-12-23 2004-12-23 Nanoxis Ab Device and use thereof
JP2008538282A (en) * 2005-04-05 2008-10-23 セルポイント ダイアグノスティクス, インコーポレイテッド Device and method for enrichment and modification of circulating tumor cells and other particles
US20070196820A1 (en) 2005-04-05 2007-08-23 Ravi Kapur Devices and methods for enrichment and alteration of cells and other particles
US7300631B2 (en) * 2005-05-02 2007-11-27 Bioscale, Inc. Method and apparatus for detection of analyte using a flexural plate wave device and magnetic particles
US7648844B2 (en) * 2005-05-02 2010-01-19 Bioscale, Inc. Method and apparatus for detection of analyte using an acoustic device
US7749445B2 (en) * 2005-05-02 2010-07-06 Bioscale, Inc. Method and apparatus for analyzing bioprocess fluids
US7611908B2 (en) * 2005-05-02 2009-11-03 Bioscale, Inc. Method and apparatus for therapeutic drug monitoring using an acoustic device
CA2610875A1 (en) * 2005-06-06 2006-12-14 Decision Biomarkers, Inc. Assays based on liquid flow over arrays
JP2007010341A (en) * 2005-06-28 2007-01-18 Sumitomo Bakelite Co Ltd Immunity analysis method
US8921102B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2014-12-30 Gpb Scientific, Llc Devices and methods for enrichment and alteration of circulating tumor cells and other particles
WO2007022026A2 (en) * 2005-08-11 2007-02-22 Biotrove, Inc. Apparatus for assay, synthesis and storage, and methods of manufacture, use, and manipulation thereof
US7662572B2 (en) 2005-08-25 2010-02-16 Platypus Technologies, Llc. Compositions and liquid crystals
JP2007057458A (en) * 2005-08-26 2007-03-08 Fujifilm Corp Biosensor
US20070059716A1 (en) * 2005-09-15 2007-03-15 Ulysses Balis Methods for detecting fetal abnormality
FR2897858B1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2008-06-20 Commissariat Energie Atomique METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A NETWORK OF CAPILLARIES OF A CHIP
US7815868B1 (en) 2006-02-28 2010-10-19 Fluidigm Corporation Microfluidic reaction apparatus for high throughput screening
US7909928B2 (en) 2006-03-24 2011-03-22 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Reactive coatings for regioselective surface modification
EP2007514A2 (en) * 2006-03-28 2008-12-31 Inanovate, Inc. Nano-particle biochip substrates
JP4984648B2 (en) * 2006-05-26 2012-07-25 富士通株式会社 Detection element, manufacturing method thereof, and target detection apparatus
US7947148B2 (en) 2006-06-01 2011-05-24 The Regents Of The University Of Michigan Dry adhesion bonding
US8137912B2 (en) 2006-06-14 2012-03-20 The General Hospital Corporation Methods for the diagnosis of fetal abnormalities
US20080050739A1 (en) 2006-06-14 2008-02-28 Roland Stoughton Diagnosis of fetal abnormalities using polymorphisms including short tandem repeats
EP2029779A4 (en) 2006-06-14 2010-01-20 Living Microsystems Inc Use of highly parallel snp genotyping for fetal diagnosis
US8372584B2 (en) 2006-06-14 2013-02-12 The General Hospital Corporation Rare cell analysis using sample splitting and DNA tags
US20080007838A1 (en) * 2006-07-07 2008-01-10 Omnitech Partners, Inc. Field-of-view indicator, and optical system and associated method employing the same
CA2657576C (en) 2006-07-14 2023-10-31 The Regents Of The University Of California Cancer biomarkers and methods of use thereof
JP4292279B2 (en) * 2006-07-18 2009-07-08 ファルマ・アクセス株式会社 Crystal production tool
US7842499B2 (en) * 2006-08-07 2010-11-30 Platypus Technologies, Llc Substrates, devices, and methods for cellular assays
WO2008024483A2 (en) * 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 U.S. Genomics, Inc. Array-based analyte detection
KR100851980B1 (en) * 2006-09-05 2008-08-12 삼성전자주식회사 Centrifugal force based microfluidic device having heat-activative unit, microfluidic system comprinsing the same and method for driving the system
US20090087925A1 (en) * 2007-10-01 2009-04-02 Zyomyx, Inc. Devices and methods for analysis of samples with depletion of analyte content
GB0622956D0 (en) * 2006-11-17 2006-12-27 Univ Birmingham Molecular detection system
US8029902B2 (en) * 2006-12-11 2011-10-04 Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation Plasma-enhanced functionalization of substrate surfaces with quaternary ammonium and quaternary phosphonium groups
US8399047B2 (en) 2007-03-22 2013-03-19 The Regents Of The Univeristy Of Michigan Multifunctional CVD coatings
US7956102B2 (en) * 2007-04-09 2011-06-07 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Sol-gel inks
US8093039B2 (en) * 2007-04-10 2012-01-10 The Trustees Of The Stevens Institute Of Technology Surfaces differentially adhesive to eukaryotic cells and non-eukaryotic cells
EP1990638A1 (en) * 2007-05-11 2008-11-12 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Flow-through biosensor
WO2009020633A2 (en) * 2007-08-07 2009-02-12 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Metal oxide coating on surfaces
EP2193365A4 (en) 2007-08-20 2015-05-13 Platypus Technologies Llc Improved devices for cell assays
US8354280B2 (en) * 2007-09-06 2013-01-15 Bioscale, Inc. Reusable detection surfaces and methods of using same
JP2009069051A (en) * 2007-09-14 2009-04-02 Canon Inc Manufacturing method of microfluid device
EP2011573B1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2010-07-21 Agilent Technologies, Inc. Freezing a microfluidic chip
US8580344B2 (en) * 2008-03-17 2013-11-12 Intermolecular, Inc. Stamp usage to enhance surface layer functionalization and selectivity
US8802027B2 (en) * 2008-03-28 2014-08-12 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Surfaces, including microfluidic channels, with controlled wetting properties
WO2009121034A2 (en) * 2008-03-28 2009-10-01 Pelican Group Holdings, Inc. Multicapillary sample preparation devices and methods for processing analytes
CN101550441B (en) * 2008-04-01 2011-11-23 博尔诚(北京)科技有限公司 Method for high-flux analysis of specimen containing biological marker and sample bank preparation
US20110124520A1 (en) * 2008-05-30 2011-05-26 Massachuesetts Institute Of Technology Compositions and Methods for Spatial Separation and Screening of Cells
US9182406B2 (en) * 2008-08-04 2015-11-10 Biodesy, Inc. Nonlinear optical detection of molecules comprising an unnatural amino acid possessing a hyperpolarizability
US8178355B2 (en) 2008-09-15 2012-05-15 Platypus Technologies, Llc. Detection of vapor phase compounds by changes in physical properties of a liquid crystal
EP2334812B1 (en) 2008-09-20 2016-12-21 The Board of Trustees of The Leland Stanford Junior University Noninvasive diagnosis of fetal aneuploidy by sequencing
US7922939B2 (en) * 2008-10-03 2011-04-12 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Metal nanoparticle inks
US8187500B2 (en) * 2008-10-17 2012-05-29 The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Illinois Biphasic inks
BRPI0923806A2 (en) 2008-12-30 2015-07-14 Centocor Ortho Biotech Inc Serum markers for predicting clinical response to anti-tnfa antibodies in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
US8331751B2 (en) * 2009-03-02 2012-12-11 mBio Diagnositcs, Inc. Planar optical waveguide with core of low-index-of-refraction interrogation medium
US9212995B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2015-12-15 Mbio Diagnostics, Inc. System and method for detecting multiple molecules in one assay
US9658222B2 (en) 2009-03-02 2017-05-23 Mbio Diagnostics, Inc. Planar waveguide based cartridges and associated methods for detecting target analyte
US8300993B2 (en) * 2009-03-02 2012-10-30 Mbio Diagnostics, Inc. Waveguide with integrated lens
JP4922341B2 (en) * 2009-05-14 2012-04-25 シャープ株式会社 Target recognition molecule and method for immobilizing the target recognition molecule
JP5412207B2 (en) 2009-08-04 2014-02-12 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ Biomolecule-immobilized substrate and method for producing the same
US9700889B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2017-07-11 Cyvek, Inc. Methods and systems for manufacture of microarray assay systems, conducting microfluidic assays, and monitoring and scanning to obtain microfluidic assay results
US10065403B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2018-09-04 Cyvek, Inc. Microfluidic assay assemblies and methods of manufacture
US9855735B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2018-01-02 Cyvek, Inc. Portable microfluidic assay devices and methods of manufacture and use
US9651568B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2017-05-16 Cyvek, Inc. Methods and systems for epi-fluorescent monitoring and scanning for microfluidic assays
US9759718B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2017-09-12 Cyvek, Inc. PDMS membrane-confined nucleic acid and antibody/antigen-functionalized microlength tube capture elements, and systems employing them, and methods of their use
US9500645B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2016-11-22 Cyvek, Inc. Micro-tube particles for microfluidic assays and methods of manufacture
KR101105328B1 (en) * 2009-11-23 2012-01-16 한국표준과학연구원 Apparatus and method for quantifying the binding and dissociation kinetics of molecular interactions
JP5701894B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2015-04-15 サイヴェク・インコーポレイテッド Method and apparatus for performing an assay
US9216412B2 (en) 2009-11-23 2015-12-22 Cyvek, Inc. Microfluidic devices and methods of manufacture and use
JP2011137651A (en) * 2009-12-25 2011-07-14 Sharp Corp Target recognition molecule and method for immobilizing the same
EP3508854A1 (en) 2010-04-27 2019-07-10 The Regents of The University of California Cancer biomarkers and methods of use thereof
KR20120006591A (en) * 2010-07-13 2012-01-19 삼성전자주식회사 Sensor for fluid preventing generation of air bubble
WO2012037369A1 (en) 2010-09-15 2012-03-22 Mbio Diagnostics, Inc. System and method for detecting multiple molecules in one assay
US8729502B1 (en) 2010-10-28 2014-05-20 The Research Foundation For The State University Of New York Simultaneous, single-detector fluorescence detection of multiple analytes with frequency-specific lock-in detection
AU2012230899A1 (en) 2011-03-21 2013-10-10 Biodesy, Llc Classification of kinase inhibitors using nonlinear optical techniques
JP5921083B2 (en) * 2011-05-10 2016-05-24 キヤノン株式会社 Flow path device and inspection system using the same
WO2012168988A1 (en) * 2011-06-10 2012-12-13 パナソニック株式会社 Method for affixing antibodies to self-assembled monolayer
EP2748874A4 (en) 2011-08-26 2015-07-29 Aviana Molecular Technologies Llc Biocoated piezoelectric biosensor platform for point-of-care diagnostic use
JP5615306B2 (en) * 2012-02-03 2014-10-29 シャープ株式会社 Target recognition molecule and method for immobilizing the target recognition molecule
EP2822688B1 (en) 2012-03-08 2019-09-25 Cyvek, Inc. Microfluidic assay assemblies and methods of manufacture
US11543411B2 (en) 2014-12-05 2023-01-03 Prelude Corporation DCIS recurrence and invasive breast cancer
WO2016106286A1 (en) 2014-12-23 2016-06-30 Biodesy, Inc. Attachment of proteins to interfaces for use in nonlinear optical detection
US10228367B2 (en) 2015-12-01 2019-03-12 ProteinSimple Segmented multi-use automated assay cartridge
CN107976411B (en) * 2016-10-25 2020-10-23 中国科学院微生物研究所 Biosensor containing allosteric transcription factor regulation system, kit and application of biosensor in small molecule detection
WO2020056338A1 (en) 2018-09-14 2020-03-19 Prelude Corporation Method of selection for treatment of subjects at risk of invasive breast cancer

Family Cites Families (182)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2348886A (en) * 1942-10-19 1944-05-16 David E Dodgson Black-out port ventilator
US2376252A (en) * 1943-01-09 1945-05-15 American Cyanamid Co Oxide catalysts in dehydrogenation of cymene
US4071409A (en) 1976-05-20 1978-01-31 Corning Glass Works Immobilization of proteins on inorganic support materials
US4281061A (en) * 1979-07-27 1981-07-28 Syva Company Double antibody for enhanced sensitivity in immunoassay
US4722896A (en) 1981-01-26 1988-02-02 The Beth Israel Hospital Association Method for affinity purification of hybridoma antibodies
US4444879A (en) * 1981-01-29 1984-04-24 Science Research Center, Inc. Immunoassay with article having support film and immunological counterpart of analyte
US4690715A (en) 1982-06-18 1987-09-01 American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories Modification of the properties of metals
US4514508A (en) * 1982-07-06 1985-04-30 Biond Inc. Assaying for a multiplicity of antigens or antibodies with a detection compound
US4973493A (en) 1982-09-29 1990-11-27 Bio-Metric Systems, Inc. Method of improving the biocompatibility of solid surfaces
US4994373A (en) * 1983-01-27 1991-02-19 Enzo Biochem, Inc. Method and structures employing chemically-labelled polynucleotide probes
US4591570A (en) * 1983-02-02 1986-05-27 Centocor, Inc. Matrix of antibody-coated spots for determination of antigens
GB8314523D0 (en) 1983-05-25 1983-06-29 Lowe C R Diagnostic device
JPS6041183A (en) 1983-08-16 1985-03-04 三菱電機株式会社 Admission managing apparatus
AU600885B2 (en) * 1984-05-25 1990-08-30 Zymogenetics Inc. Stable DNA constructs
US5096807A (en) 1985-03-06 1992-03-17 Murex Corporation Imaging immunoassay detection system with background compensation and its use
US5523215A (en) * 1985-03-28 1996-06-04 Chiron Corporation Enhanced purification and expression of insoluble recombinant proteins
US5866363A (en) * 1985-08-28 1999-02-02 Pieczenik; George Method and means for sorting and identifying biological information
US4894146A (en) * 1986-01-27 1990-01-16 University Of Utah Thin channel split flow process and apparatus for particle fractionation
US4802951A (en) * 1986-03-07 1989-02-07 Trustees Of Boston University Method for parallel fabrication of nanometer scale multi-device structures
US4728591A (en) * 1986-03-07 1988-03-01 Trustees Of Boston University Self-assembled nanometer lithographic masks and templates and method for parallel fabrication of nanometer scale multi-device structures
US5643948A (en) * 1986-06-11 1997-07-01 Procyon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Protein kinase C modulators. K.
US4859538A (en) 1986-11-20 1989-08-22 Ribi Hans O Novel lipid-protein compositions and articles and methods for their preparation
US5079600A (en) 1987-03-06 1992-01-07 Schnur Joel M High resolution patterning on solid substrates
US4987032A (en) 1987-06-26 1991-01-22 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Functional organic thin film and method of manufacture thereof
US5154808A (en) 1987-06-26 1992-10-13 Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd. Functional organic thin film and process for producing the same
GB8803000D0 (en) * 1988-02-10 1988-03-09 Ekins Roger Philip Determination of ambient concentrations of several analytes
US5300425A (en) * 1987-10-13 1994-04-05 Terrapin Technologies, Inc. Method to produce immunodiagnostic reagents
US6692751B1 (en) * 1988-05-06 2004-02-17 New York Blood Center Methods and systems for producing recombinant viral antigens
US4908112A (en) 1988-06-16 1990-03-13 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. Silicon semiconductor wafer for analyzing micronic biological samples
US5281540A (en) * 1988-08-02 1994-01-25 Abbott Laboratories Test array for performing assays
US5720928A (en) * 1988-09-15 1998-02-24 New York University Image processing and analysis of individual nucleic acid molecules
SE462454B (en) 1988-11-10 1990-06-25 Pharmacia Ab METHOD FOR USE IN BIOSENSORS
JPH02272081A (en) 1989-04-14 1990-11-06 Fuji Photo Film Co Ltd Functional organic thin film
IT1229691B (en) 1989-04-21 1991-09-06 Eniricerche Spa SENSOR WITH ANTIGEN CHEMICALLY LINKED TO A SEMICONDUCTIVE DEVICE.
US5424186A (en) * 1989-06-07 1995-06-13 Affymax Technologies N.V. Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis
US6919211B1 (en) * 1989-06-07 2005-07-19 Affymetrix, Inc. Polypeptide arrays
US5744101A (en) 1989-06-07 1998-04-28 Affymax Technologies N.V. Photolabile nucleoside protecting groups
US5143854A (en) 1989-06-07 1992-09-01 Affymax Technologies N.V. Large scale photolithographic solid phase synthesis of polypeptides and receptor binding screening thereof
US5800992A (en) * 1989-06-07 1998-09-01 Fodor; Stephen P.A. Method of detecting nucleic acids
US6416952B1 (en) * 1989-06-07 2002-07-09 Affymetrix, Inc. Photolithographic and other means for manufacturing arrays
US6346413B1 (en) * 1989-06-07 2002-02-12 Affymetrix, Inc. Polymer arrays
US5252743A (en) * 1989-11-13 1993-10-12 Affymax Technologies N.V. Spatially-addressable immobilization of anti-ligands on surfaces
DE3939973A1 (en) 1989-12-02 1991-06-06 Basf Ag TWO-DIMENSIONAL CRYSTALLIZED MACROMOLECULAR LAYERS
US5283173A (en) * 1990-01-24 1994-02-01 The Research Foundation Of State University Of New York System to detect protein-protein interactions
US5858188A (en) * 1990-02-28 1999-01-12 Aclara Biosciences, Inc. Acrylic microchannels and their use in electrophoretic applications
EP0484472B1 (en) 1990-04-12 1997-07-16 SIGRIST, Hans, Dr. Method for the light-induced immobilization of biomolecules on chemically "inert" surfaces
US5861254A (en) * 1997-01-31 1999-01-19 Nexstar Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Flow cell SELEX
US5665582A (en) * 1990-10-29 1997-09-09 Dekalb Genetics Corp. Isolation of biological materials
US5639620A (en) * 1990-10-31 1997-06-17 Coulter Corporation Polymeric particles having a biodegradable gelatin or aminodextran coating and process for making same
US5294369A (en) 1990-12-05 1994-03-15 Akzo N.V. Ligand gold bonding
EP0834576B1 (en) * 1990-12-06 2002-01-16 Affymetrix, Inc. (a Delaware Corporation) Detection of nucleic acid sequences
US5763170A (en) * 1991-04-16 1998-06-09 Amersham International Plc Method for forming an array of biological particles
WO1993008472A1 (en) * 1991-10-15 1993-04-29 Multilyte Limited Binding assay employing labelled reagent
US5605662A (en) 1993-11-01 1997-02-25 Nanogen, Inc. Active programmable electronic devices for molecular biological analysis and diagnostics
US6051380A (en) * 1993-11-01 2000-04-18 Nanogen, Inc. Methods and procedures for molecular biological analysis and diagnostics
IL103674A0 (en) * 1991-11-19 1993-04-04 Houston Advanced Res Center Method and apparatus for molecule detection
US5412087A (en) 1992-04-24 1995-05-02 Affymax Technologies N.V. Spatially-addressable immobilization of oligonucleotides and other biological polymers on surfaces
US5384261A (en) 1991-11-22 1995-01-24 Affymax Technologies N.V. Very large scale immobilized polymer synthesis using mechanically directed flow paths
AU675054B2 (en) * 1991-11-22 1997-01-23 Affymetrix, Inc. Combinatorial strategies for polymer synthesis
PT1696031E (en) * 1991-12-02 2010-06-25 Medical Res Council Production of anti-self antibodies from antibody segment repertoires and displayed on phage
EP0544969B1 (en) * 1991-12-06 1997-03-05 Ciba-Geigy Ag Apparatus and method for electrophoretic separation
US5296144A (en) * 1992-01-02 1994-03-22 World Trade Corporation Composite membrane of a hydrophilic asymmetric membrane coated with an organosiloxane block copolymer
CA2064683A1 (en) 1992-03-26 1993-09-27 Krishna Mohan Rao Kallury Formation of thermostable enzymes with extra-ordinary heat tolerance by immobilization on phospholipid matrices
ATE143730T1 (en) 1992-04-22 1996-10-15 Ecole Polytech LIPID MEMBRANES FOR BIOSENSOR APPLICATIONS
US5637469A (en) * 1992-05-01 1997-06-10 Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Methods and apparatus for the detection of an analyte utilizing mesoscale flow systems
US5726026A (en) * 1992-05-01 1998-03-10 Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Mesoscale sample preparation device and systems for determination and processing of analytes
US5304487A (en) * 1992-05-01 1994-04-19 Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania Fluid handling in mesoscale analytical devices
DE4237113B4 (en) * 1992-11-03 2006-10-12 "Iba Gmbh" Peptides and their fusion proteins, expression vector and method of producing a fusion protein
CA2108705A1 (en) 1992-11-06 1994-05-07 Richard Barner Biologically recognizing layers on new ti02 waveguide for biosensors
US5472881A (en) 1992-11-12 1995-12-05 University Of Utah Research Foundation Thiol labeling of DNA for attachment to gold surfaces
US5532142A (en) * 1993-02-12 1996-07-02 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Method of isolation and purification of fusion polypeptides
IT1270866B (en) * 1993-03-10 1997-05-13 Eniricerche Spa RECOMBINANT VECTOR AND ITS USE FOR THE EXOCELLULAR PREPARATION OF ANTIBODIES IN THE FORM OF A SINGLE MOLECULE FROM BACILLUS SUBTILIS
US5512492A (en) 1993-05-18 1996-04-30 University Of Utah Research Foundation Waveguide immunosensor with coating chemistry providing enhanced sensitivity
US5677196A (en) 1993-05-18 1997-10-14 University Of Utah Research Foundation Apparatus and methods for multi-analyte homogeneous fluoro-immunoassays
ES2201077T3 (en) 1993-05-28 2004-03-16 Baylor College Of Medicine METHOD AND SPECTROMETER OF MASSES FOR DESORTION AND IONIZATION OF ANALYTS.
US5861242A (en) 1993-06-25 1999-01-19 Affymetrix, Inc. Array of nucleic acid probes on biological chips for diagnosis of HIV and methods of using the same
US5837832A (en) 1993-06-25 1998-11-17 Affymetrix, Inc. Arrays of nucleic acid probes on biological chips
US5441876A (en) * 1993-07-30 1995-08-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Process for the preparation of headgroup-modified phospholipids using phosphatidylhydroxyalkanols as intermediates
RU2041262C1 (en) * 1993-08-11 1995-08-09 Институт молекулярной биологии им.В.А.Энгельгардта РАН Method for immobilization of water soluble bioorganic compounds on capillary-porous carrier
JPH0784372A (en) 1993-09-17 1995-03-31 Res Dev Corp Of Japan Organic silane modified oxide and modified surface light patterning oxide
DE4332003C2 (en) 1993-09-21 1996-02-22 Seeger Stefan Process for coating surfaces with biomolecules and other receptor molecules
US5512131A (en) 1993-10-04 1996-04-30 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Formation of microstamped patterns on surfaces and derivative articles
US5776748A (en) * 1993-10-04 1998-07-07 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Method of formation of microstamped patterns on plates for adhesion of cells and other biological materials, devices and uses therefor
EP1157743B1 (en) 1993-10-28 2009-03-11 Houston Advanced Research Center Microfabricated, flowthrough porous apparatus for discrete detection of binding reactions
US5429807A (en) * 1993-10-28 1995-07-04 Beckman Instruments, Inc. Method and apparatus for creating biopolymer arrays on a solid support surface
US5429708A (en) 1993-12-22 1995-07-04 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Molecular layers covalently bonded to silicon surfaces
DE4435728A1 (en) * 1994-01-19 1995-07-20 Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh Biotin silane compounds and binding matrix containing these compounds
EP0752099A1 (en) 1994-02-09 1997-01-08 Abbott Laboratories Diagnostic flow cell device
US5538897A (en) * 1994-03-14 1996-07-23 University Of Washington Use of mass spectrometry fragmentation patterns of peptides to identify amino acid sequences in databases
US5514501A (en) 1994-06-07 1996-05-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Commerce Process for UV-photopatterning of thiolate monolayers self-assembled on gold, silver and other substrates
US6287850B1 (en) * 1995-06-07 2001-09-11 Affymetrix, Inc. Bioarray chip reaction apparatus and its manufacture
US5807522A (en) 1994-06-17 1998-09-15 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Methods for fabricating microarrays of biological samples
US5653864A (en) * 1994-06-30 1997-08-05 Nok Corporation Protein biosensor and method for protein measurement with the same
AU2897595A (en) 1994-07-14 1996-02-16 Technobiochip Biosensor and method and instrument for deposition of alternating monomolecular layers
US5498545A (en) * 1994-07-21 1996-03-12 Vestal; Marvin L. Mass spectrometer system and method for matrix-assisted laser desorption measurements
DE4427785A1 (en) * 1994-08-08 1996-02-15 Behringwerke Ag Method for the detection of disorders of the Protein C / Protein S system
US5620850A (en) * 1994-09-26 1997-04-15 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Molecular recognition at surfaces derivatized with self-assembled monolayers
SE9403245D0 (en) 1994-09-26 1994-09-26 Pharmacia Biosensor Ab Improvements relating to bilayer lipid membranes
US5571410A (en) 1994-10-19 1996-11-05 Hewlett Packard Company Fully integrated miniaturized planar liquid sample handling and analysis device
US5585069A (en) * 1994-11-10 1996-12-17 David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. Partitioned microelectronic and fluidic device array for clinical diagnostics and chemical synthesis
US5603351A (en) 1995-06-07 1997-02-18 David Sarnoff Research Center, Inc. Method and system for inhibiting cross-contamination in fluids of combinatorial chemistry device
US5688642A (en) 1994-12-01 1997-11-18 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Selective attachment of nucleic acid molecules to patterned self-assembled surfaces
US5622826A (en) 1994-12-22 1997-04-22 Houston Advanced Research Center Method for immobilization of molecules on platinum solid support surfaces
US5814565A (en) 1995-02-23 1998-09-29 University Of Utah Research Foundation Integrated optic waveguide immunosensor
WO1996029629A2 (en) 1995-03-01 1996-09-26 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Microcontact printing on surfaces and derivative articles
US5629213A (en) 1995-03-03 1997-05-13 Kornguth; Steven E. Analytical biosensor
WO1996027614A1 (en) * 1995-03-08 1996-09-12 Elias Klein Surface modified affinity separation membrane
US6066448A (en) * 1995-03-10 2000-05-23 Meso Sclae Technologies, Llc. Multi-array, multi-specific electrochemiluminescence testing
US6140045A (en) * 1995-03-10 2000-10-31 Meso Scale Technologies Multi-array, multi-specific electrochemiluminescence testing
US5624711A (en) * 1995-04-27 1997-04-29 Affymax Technologies, N.V. Derivatization of solid supports and methods for oligomer synthesis
US5625184A (en) * 1995-05-19 1997-04-29 Perseptive Biosystems, Inc. Time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis of biomolecules
US5700642A (en) 1995-05-22 1997-12-23 Sri International Oligonucleotide sizing using immobilized cleavable primers
WO1996038726A1 (en) 1995-05-30 1996-12-05 Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne (Epfl) Covalently immobilized phospholipid bilayers on solid surfaces
US5776674A (en) 1995-06-05 1998-07-07 Seq, Ltd Chemical biochemical and biological processing in thin films
US6720149B1 (en) * 1995-06-07 2004-04-13 Affymetrix, Inc. Methods for concurrently processing multiple biological chip assays
US5545531A (en) * 1995-06-07 1996-08-13 Affymax Technologies N.V. Methods for making a device for concurrently processing multiple biological chip assays
WO1996039937A1 (en) 1995-06-07 1996-12-19 The Regents Of The University Of California Microfabricated devices for diagnostic applications
US5856174A (en) * 1995-06-29 1999-01-05 Affymetrix, Inc. Integrated nucleic acid diagnostic device
US5872010A (en) * 1995-07-21 1999-02-16 Northeastern University Microscale fluid handling system
WO1997007429A1 (en) 1995-08-18 1997-02-27 President And Fellows Of Harvard College Self-assembled monolayer directed patterning of surfaces
US5849208A (en) 1995-09-07 1998-12-15 Microfab Technoologies, Inc. Making apparatus for conducting biochemical analyses
EP0774464B1 (en) * 1995-10-17 2004-07-28 Combichem, Inc. A template for solution phase synthesis of combinatorial libraries
US5716825A (en) * 1995-11-01 1998-02-10 Hewlett Packard Company Integrated nucleic acid analysis system for MALDI-TOF MS
DE19543232A1 (en) 1995-11-07 1997-05-15 Knoell Hans Forschung Ev Production of matrix-bound miniaturised combinatorial polymer and oligomer library
US5763263A (en) * 1995-11-27 1998-06-09 Dehlinger; Peter J. Method and apparatus for producing position addressable combinatorial libraries
EP0876601B1 (en) 1995-12-01 2004-07-14 Innogenetics N.V. Impedimetric detection system and method of production thereof
DE19548152A1 (en) 1995-12-22 1997-06-26 Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh Process for covering a surface with a film of an oligoethylene glycol derivative
EP0904277A4 (en) 1996-02-16 2003-01-22 Millennium Pharm Inc Compositions and methods for the treatment and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease
ATE207798T1 (en) 1996-03-15 2001-11-15 Harvard College METHOD FOR SHAPING OBJECTS AND MICROSTRUCTURING SURFACES USING CAPILLARY EFFECT MOLDS
AU706862B2 (en) 1996-04-03 1999-06-24 Applied Biosystems, Llc Device and method for multiple analyte detection
US5942443A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-08-24 Caliper Technologies Corporation High throughput screening assay systems in microscale fluidic devices
AU711861B2 (en) 1996-04-25 1999-10-21 Mcgill University Biosensor device and method
US6165335A (en) 1996-04-25 2000-12-26 Pence And Mcgill University Biosensor device and method
US5925552A (en) 1996-04-25 1999-07-20 Medtronic, Inc. Method for attachment of biomolecules to medical devices surfaces
US5731152A (en) 1996-05-13 1998-03-24 Motorola, Inc. Methods and systems for biological reagent placement
US6075875A (en) * 1996-09-30 2000-06-13 Microsoft Corporation Segmentation of image features using hierarchical analysis of multi-valued image data and weighted averaging of segmentation results
US20030017149A1 (en) * 1996-10-10 2003-01-23 Hoeffler James P. Single chain monoclonal antibody fusion reagents that regulate transcription in vivo
GB9624927D0 (en) * 1996-11-29 1997-01-15 Oxford Glycosciences Uk Ltd Gels and their use
US6228326B1 (en) 1996-11-29 2001-05-08 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Arrays of independently-addressable supported fluid bilayer membranes
US5905024A (en) * 1996-12-17 1999-05-18 University Of Chicago Method for performing site-specific affinity fractionation for use in DNA sequencing
CA2276462C (en) * 1996-12-31 2007-06-12 Genometrix Incorporated Multiplexed molecular analysis system apparatus and method
US5837860A (en) 1997-03-05 1998-11-17 Molecular Tool, Inc. Covalent attachment of nucleic acid molecules onto solid-phases via disulfide bonds
US6180288B1 (en) * 1997-03-21 2001-01-30 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Gel sensors and method of use thereof
WO1998049548A1 (en) * 1997-04-25 1998-11-05 Caliper Technologies Corporation Microfluidic devices incorporating improved channel geometries
WO1998050773A2 (en) 1997-05-08 1998-11-12 University Of Minnesota Microcantilever biosensor
US5869004A (en) * 1997-06-09 1999-02-09 Caliper Technologies Corp. Methods and apparatus for in situ concentration and/or dilution of materials in microfluidic systems
NZ516848A (en) * 1997-06-20 2004-03-26 Ciphergen Biosystems Inc Retentate chromatography apparatus with applications in biology and medicine
US6368871B1 (en) * 1997-08-13 2002-04-09 Cepheid Non-planar microstructures for manipulation of fluid samples
US5922617A (en) * 1997-11-12 1999-07-13 Functional Genetics, Inc. Rapid screening assay methods and devices
US6061476A (en) * 1997-11-24 2000-05-09 Cognex Corporation Method and apparatus using image subtraction and dynamic thresholding
US6232066B1 (en) * 1997-12-19 2001-05-15 Neogen, Inc. High throughput assay system
AU758407B2 (en) * 1997-12-24 2003-03-20 Cepheid Integrated fluid manipulation cartridge
US6087102A (en) * 1998-01-07 2000-07-11 Clontech Laboratories, Inc. Polymeric arrays and methods for their use in binding assays
WO1999040434A1 (en) 1998-02-04 1999-08-12 Invitrogen Corporation Microarrays and uses therefor
US6087103A (en) * 1998-03-04 2000-07-11 Lifespan Biosciences, Inc. Tagged ligand arrays for identifying target-ligand interactions
JP4163383B2 (en) * 1998-04-14 2008-10-08 カリフォルニア・インスティテュート・オブ・テクノロジー Method and system for determining analyte activity
US6576478B1 (en) * 1998-07-14 2003-06-10 Zyomyx, Inc. Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US6406921B1 (en) * 1998-07-14 2002-06-18 Zyomyx, Incorporated Protein arrays for high-throughput screening
US6682942B1 (en) * 1998-07-14 2004-01-27 Zyomyx, Inc. Microdevices for screening biomolecules
US6897073B2 (en) * 1998-07-14 2005-05-24 Zyomyx, Inc. Non-specific binding resistant protein arrays and methods for making the same
US20030138973A1 (en) * 1998-07-14 2003-07-24 Peter Wagner Microdevices for screening biomolecules
US20020119579A1 (en) * 1998-07-14 2002-08-29 Peter Wagner Arrays devices and methods of use thereof
US6197599B1 (en) * 1998-07-30 2001-03-06 Guorong Chin Method to detect proteins
US6190908B1 (en) * 1998-08-12 2001-02-20 The Scripps Research Institute Modulation of polypeptide display on modified filamentous phage
US6635311B1 (en) * 1999-01-07 2003-10-21 Northwestern University Methods utilizing scanning probe microscope tips and products therefor or products thereby
AU3387700A (en) 1999-03-02 2000-09-21 Chiron Corporation Microarrays for identifying pathway activation or induction
US6171850B1 (en) * 1999-03-08 2001-01-09 Caliper Technologies Corp. Integrated devices and systems for performing temperature controlled reactions and analyses
AU773291B2 (en) 1999-03-10 2004-05-20 Government of The United States of America, as represented by The Secretary Department of Health & Human Services, The National Institutes of Health, The UPA, a universal protein array system
WO2000053625A2 (en) 1999-03-11 2000-09-14 Combimatrix Corporation Microarrays of peptide affinity probes for analyzing gene products and methods for analyzing gene products
US6573369B2 (en) * 1999-05-21 2003-06-03 Bioforce Nanosciences, Inc. Method and apparatus for solid state molecular analysis
KR100379411B1 (en) * 1999-06-28 2003-04-10 엘지전자 주식회사 biochip and method for patterning and measuring biomaterial of the same
US6899137B2 (en) * 1999-06-28 2005-05-31 California Institute Of Technology Microfabricated elastomeric valve and pump systems
US6406840B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2002-06-18 Biomosaic Systems, Inc. Cell arrays and the uses thereof
US6720157B2 (en) * 2000-02-23 2004-04-13 Zyomyx, Inc. Chips having elevated sample surfaces
US7132251B1 (en) * 2000-05-04 2006-11-07 Procognia Ltd Method and composition for analyzing a carbohydrate polymer
US6531283B1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2003-03-11 Molecular Staging, Inc. Protein expression profiling
US7094568B2 (en) * 2000-08-17 2006-08-22 Sense Proteomic Ltd. Method for producing proteins tagged at the N- or C-terminus
US6699665B1 (en) * 2000-11-08 2004-03-02 Surface Logix, Inc. Multiple array system for integrating bioarrays
AU2002348289A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2003-06-10 Protometrix, Inc. Method of using a non-antibody protein to detect and measure an analyte
US20040248323A1 (en) * 2003-06-09 2004-12-09 Protometrix, Inc. Methods for conducting assays for enzyme activity on protein microarrays
US20050026215A1 (en) * 2003-07-17 2005-02-03 Predki Paul F. Method for the prediction of an epitope
US20060099704A1 (en) * 2004-07-14 2006-05-11 Predki Paul F Method for providing protein microarrays

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110065597A1 (en) * 2009-01-22 2011-03-17 Li-Cor, Inc. Single molecule proteomics with dynamic probes
US8980645B2 (en) 2010-01-25 2015-03-17 Panasonic Healthcare Holdings Co., Ltd. Method for immobilizing protein A on a self-assembled monolayer
CN102207511A (en) * 2010-03-31 2011-10-05 恩普乐股份有限公司 Micro-channel chip and micro-analysis system
US20110241134A1 (en) * 2010-03-31 2011-10-06 Koichi Ono Micro-channel chip and micro-analysis system
US8362468B2 (en) * 2010-03-31 2013-01-29 Enplas Corporation Micro-channel chip and micro-analysis system
US8785143B2 (en) 2010-08-30 2014-07-22 Panasonic Healthcare Co., Ltd. Method for immobilizing streptavidin on a self-assembled monolayer
US8871457B2 (en) 2010-10-19 2014-10-28 Panasonic Healthcare Co., Ltd Method for immobilizing glucose oxidase on a self-assembled monolayer

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4489949B2 (en) 2010-06-23
EP1097379A2 (en) 2001-05-09
US20020115225A1 (en) 2002-08-22
CA2337197A1 (en) 2000-01-27
US6596545B1 (en) 2003-07-22
ATE419527T1 (en) 2009-01-15
US6576478B1 (en) 2003-06-10
JP2002520621A (en) 2002-07-09
US6582969B1 (en) 2003-06-24
AU764027B2 (en) 2003-08-07
WO2000004390A3 (en) 2000-05-04
WO2000004390A2 (en) 2000-01-27
EP1097379B1 (en) 2008-12-31
AU5102499A (en) 2000-02-07
US20020110932A1 (en) 2002-08-15
CA2337197C (en) 2007-09-18
DE69940198D1 (en) 2009-02-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6582969B1 (en) Microdevices for high-throughput screening of biomolecules
US6682942B1 (en) Microdevices for screening biomolecules
US6475809B1 (en) Protein arrays for high-throughput screening
US20090042744A1 (en) Microdevices for screening biomolecules
US7247469B2 (en) Non-specific binding resistant protein arrays and methods for making the same
US6780582B1 (en) Arrays of protein-capture agents and methods of use thereof
US20020119579A1 (en) Arrays devices and methods of use thereof
Murakami et al. Application of micromachine techniques to biotechnological research
AU2003257898A1 (en) Microdevices for screening biomolecules
AU2003262452B2 (en) Arrays of proteins and methods of use thereof I

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: EXPRESSLY ABANDONED -- DURING EXAMINATION