|Publication number||US20090070664 A1|
|Application number||US 12/198,203|
|Publication date||Mar 12, 2009|
|Filing date||Aug 26, 2008|
|Priority date||Dec 18, 1998|
|Also published as||US7428701|
|Publication number||12198203, 198203, US 2009/0070664 A1, US 2009/070664 A1, US 20090070664 A1, US 20090070664A1, US 2009070664 A1, US 2009070664A1, US-A1-20090070664, US-A1-2009070664, US2009/0070664A1, US2009/070664A1, US20090070664 A1, US20090070664A1, US2009070664 A1, US2009070664A1|
|Inventors||Mark Gavin, Roger Dunn, Virginia M. Gavin|
|Original Assignee||Appligent Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Referenced by (5), Classifications (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/215,804 filed Dec. 18, 1998, now U.S. Pat. No. ______ the entirety of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
This invention relates to computer programs for redaction of material from documents stored as electronic files.
For a variety of reasons, documents must be presented in their original format, with certain material, such as text or illustrations, redacted. For example, in response to Freedom of Information Act requests, U.S. Government agencies must release certain documents. Often, these documents contain information which is exempt from disclosure under FOIA. The documents themselves are released in their original format, but the material that is exempt from disclosure must be removed. In other situations, such as in litigation, counsel may wish to provide a document in response to a discovery request, but remove privileged portions of the document.
Traditionally, the primary method of redacting information from documents was to take a physical copy of the document, and cover over the text and images to be redacted. Covering would be done manually with tools such as a black marker, a grease pencil, or strips of opaque tape. This process is slow and labor intensive. Also, on review of the redacted document, if the reviewer determines that information which is required to be disclosed has been redacted, it is difficult to correct such errors. Once the process is completed, the document can be photocopied and a photocopy furnished to the requester. Many U.S. Government agencies have been placing such documents on World Wide Web servers to make the documents available over the Internet. The documents must be scanned before being placed on the Web server.
Methods have been developed to perform redaction of electronic documents. Typically, these methods operate on tag image file format (TIFF) files. Conventionally, these products employ overlays of opaque blocks of color to cover information in the TIFF document.
A variety of disadvantages are associated with TIFF files, particularly when compared with the portable document format (PDF) files in the format developed by Adobe Systems, Inc. For example, in the TIFF format, designers have great flexibility in creating tags, which results in certain applications not being able to read all TIFF files. More recent versions of TIFF are not interchangeable with older versions. Also TIFF files for the same document are much larger than comparable PDF files. The overlays of opaque blocks of color, ordinarily saved separately from the document pages, causes a delay when a document is opened while the overlays are placed by software on the page. Generally, custom programming and system integration is required for the TIFF programs to be operational, because not all applications are compatible with TIFF files. If the overlays of blocks of color are not properly embedded in the document, it is possible for the overlays to be removed. The software packages that are commercially available for redaction of TIFF files are only available for certain operating systems, and do not operate on a variety of platform. For example, such systems are not compatible with both systems that operate on Windows PC's and Macintosh PC's. Finally, if large portions of the text are removed, the opaque blocks of color tend to be very large. This can render printing of the documents to be problematic.
It is an object of the invention to provide a method, a system, and a computer program for convenient identification of portions of a document to be redacted, and for rapid redaction of electronic documents.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a method, system, and computer program for redaction of electronic documents that eliminates the risk of unauthorized recovery from the redacted document of the material that was excised.
Among the advantages of the invention are that the foregoing objects are achieved.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention will become evident from the detailed description of a preferred embodiment, which follows.
A method according to the invention includes the steps of selecting a geometric area on the document for redaction and representing the geometric area as one or more objects. The information in the document representing material to be reviewed, such as text and images, is then represented as a series of geometric locations and codes and stored as one or more objects. The objects representing the geometric area and the objects representing the document information are then compared. An output is created in which the document information is replaced where the geometric location of the geometric areas corresponds to the geometric location of the document information. The resulting output does not contain any of the removed information.
The user may select a particular size and location for rectangle 45 at any time. When the user does this, the redaction program stores an object in memory having geographic information representing the location of the borders of rectangle 45 on document 40. Referring to
After any further changes have been made, the next step is the performance of the redaction. A preliminary step is the translation from the geometric space occupied by the rectangles, as reflected in the stored annotations, to the layout of the textual content of the PDF format document. The first step in the translation is the creation of a model of the content, as shown by the box labeled 305. The model is created by parsing the PDF stream. In the parsing process, the instructions, or information that relate to the text and images and the geographic location of the text and images are identified and stored. For text, these instructions include those that relate to font selection, font size, the transformation matrix through which individual characters are drawn, character and word spacing, escaped characters, and the tokens that cause text to be emitted. The resulting model represents the text as a list of objects describing each occurrence of text using font characteristics and geometric parameters. The model is stored in a convenient memory location. The objects will be referred to as text occurrence objects. Similarly, image information is modeled as a list of objects describing each image. The objects with image information may be referred to as image occurrence objects. Text occurrence objects and image occurrence objects may also be referred to more generally as content objects. Information regarding text and images in a particular geographic location on the displayed document may be dispersed in a PDF stream. The creation of the model places the information in proximity in a document.
The content objects are then compared to the annotation objects. For text occurrence objects, in the comparison process, geometric intersections identified, as indicated by the box labeled 310. It will be understood that text associated with geometric intersections is to be redacted. The program can create an output file. For text that is not identified as corresponding to an annotation object, the text object is reproduced in the output file. As text to be redacted is identified, the text is replaced in an output file with appropriate material, as indicated by the block labeled 315. The replacing material may be exemption codes, hyphens, or other material selected by the user. The output file is also in the form of objects. The output file comprises a geometric representation as a series of objects of the textual content, with those portions to be redacted removed. The redacted text is never contained in the output file that constitutes the newly-created document.
If an image is to be redacted, the program carries out the redaction on a pixel-by-pixel basis. All pixels that have been identified as to be redacted are replaced. For example, all pixels to be redacted may be changed to solid black. The redacted image information is therefore never contained in the output file where the newly-created document is found.
As an option, the program will insert additional characters in the output file for text to assure that the original width is maintained.
The resulting document no longer contains any of the redacted information, as the redacted information was removed in the creation of the document.
Batch annotation and redaction of documents is useful for certain users. For example, Federal government agencies may have lists of keywords that are ordinarily redacted. The method of the invention may include batch annotation and redaction. The user is provided with the option of identifying words that are to be redacted. The method then reviews a selected document in portable document format and creates annotations corresponding to each identified occurrence of the identified word. In a preferred embodiment, the PDF file is parsed and converted into text occurrence objects as described above. The program checks the text occurrence objects against the list of identified words. An annotation object is created coinciding with the geometric position of the word as shown in the text occurrence object. The annotation object can be stored in association with the PDF file. Each occurrence of each of the selected words is thereby designated for redaction. The annotation object can then be considered a candidate annotation for review by a human reviewer.
Through substantially standard techniques, a variety of information can be associated with each annotation. For example, the name of the reviewer, the time and date of creation, codes representing a reason for the exemption, and comments may be included. Displays may include different colors for different reviewers.
The program, method and system of the invention have been described above with respect to the redaction of text from a document. However, the program, method and system may be applied to content of other types, such as image information.
The computer programs in accordance with the invention may be stored and distributed in any suitable storage medium, such as fixed disk, portable diskettes, and CD-ROM or other read-only memories. Also, methods described as being carried out in software running on general-purpose computer hardware may be implemented in hardware.
It will be understood that various changes in the details, materials and arrangements of the programs, methods and systems which have been described and illustrated above in order to explain the nature of this invention may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the principle and scope of the invention as recited in the following claims.
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7805673 *||Jul 31, 2006||Sep 28, 2010||Der Quaeler Loki||Method and apparatus to provide a unified redaction system|
|US8990683 *||Jul 18, 2011||Mar 24, 2015||Adobe Systems Incorporated||Computer generation of documents using layout elements and content elements|
|US20110209053 *||Aug 25, 2011||Beyondcore, Inc.||Shuffling Documents Containing Restricted Information|
|US20110283186 *||Nov 17, 2011||Adobe Systems Incorporated||Computer generation of documents using layout elements and content elements|
|DE102013207040A1 *||Apr 18, 2013||Oct 23, 2014||Universität Rostock||Übertragung und Verarbeitung von computerlesbaren Daten in einem Computernetz|