Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20090217587 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/395,447
Publication dateSep 3, 2009
Filing dateFeb 27, 2009
Priority dateFeb 29, 2008
Also published asUS8652222, US20090217575
Publication number12395447, 395447, US 2009/0217587 A1, US 2009/217587 A1, US 20090217587 A1, US 20090217587A1, US 2009217587 A1, US 2009217587A1, US-A1-20090217587, US-A1-2009217587, US2009/0217587A1, US2009/217587A1, US20090217587 A1, US20090217587A1, US2009217587 A1, US2009217587A1
InventorsPattabhi K. Raman, Edwin J. Hippo, Nelson Yee
Original AssigneeGreatpoint Energy, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Biomass Compositions for Catalytic Gasification
US 20090217587 A1
Abstract
Particulate compositions are described comprising an intimate mixture of a biomass, such as switchgrass or hybrid poplar, a non-biomass carbonaceous material, such as petroleum coke or coal, and a gasification catalyst, where the gasification catalyst is loaded onto at least one of the biomass or non-biomass for gasification in the presence of steam to yield a plurality of gases including methane and at least one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and other higher hydrocarbons are formed. Processes are also provided for the preparation of the particulate compositions and converting the particulate composition into a plurality of gaseous products.
Images(10)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(15)
1. A particulate composition having a particle distribution size suitable for gasification in a fluidized bed zone, the particulate composition comprising an intimate mixture of (a) a first carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass; (b) a second carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass; and (c) a gasification catalyst which, in the presence of steam and under suitable temperature and pressure, exhibits gasification activity whereby a plurality of gases comprising methane and one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons are formed, wherein:
(i) the first carbonaceous feedstock and second carbonaceous feedstock are present in the particulate composition at a weight ratio of from about 5:95 to about 95:5;
(ii) the gasification catalyst is loaded onto at least one of the first carbonaceous feedstock and the second carbonaceous feedstock;
(iii) the gasification catalyst comprises a source of at least one alkali metal and is present in an amount sufficient to provide, in the particulate composition, a ratio of alkali metal atoms to carbon atoms ranging from 0.01 to about 0.10.
2. The particulate composition according to claim 1, wherein the alkali metal comprises potassium, sodium or both.
3. The particulate composition according to claim 2, wherein the alkali metal is potassium.
4. The particulate composition according to claim 1, having a particle size ranging from about 25 microns to about 2500 microns.
5. The particulate composition according to claim 1, wherein the non-biomass comprises the gasification catalyst.
6. A process for converting a particulate composition into a plurality of gaseous products, the process comprising the steps of:
(a) supplying a particulate composition according to claim 1 to a gasifying reactor;
(b) reacting the particulate composition in the gasifying reactor in the presence of steam and under suitable temperature and pressure to form a plurality of gaseous including methane and one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons; and
(c) at least partially separating the plurality of gaseous products to produce a stream comprising a predominant amount of one of the gaseous products.
7. The process according to claim 6, wherein the stream comprises a predominant amount of methane.
8. The process according to claim 6, wherein a char is formed in step (b), and the char is removed from the gasifying reactor and sent to a catalyst recovery and recycle process.
9. The process according to claim 8, wherein the gasification catalyst comprises gasification catalyst recycled from the catalyst recovery and recycle process.
10. A process for preparing a particulate composition, the process comprising the steps of:
(a) providing a first particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass, a second particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass, and an alkali metal gasification catalyst which, in the presence of steam and under suitable temperature and pressure, exhibits gasification activity whereby a plurality of gases including methane and at least one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons are formed from the particulate composition;
(b) mixing the first particulate carbonaceous feedstock, the second particulate carbonaceous feedstock and, the alkali metal gasification catalyst to form a mixture; and
(c) optionally thermally treating the mixture under a flow of inert dry gas to form the particulate composition,
wherein the gasification catalyst comprises a source of at least one alkali metal and is present in an amount sufficient to provide, in the particulate composition, a ratio of alkali metal atoms of the gasification catalyst to carbon atoms ranging from about 0.01 to about 0.10.
11. The process according to claim 10, wherein the first carbonaceous feedstock and second carbonaceous feedstock are contacted with an aqueous solution comprising the gasification catalyst to form a slurry; the slurry is dewatered to form a catalyst-loaded wet cake which is the mixture; and the mixture is thermally treated to form the particulate composition.
12. The process according to claim 10, wherein the first carbonaceous feedstock and second carbonaceous feedstock are contacted separately with an aqueous solution comprising the gasification catalyst to form a first and a second slurry, the first and second slurries are dewatered separately to form a first and a second catalyst-loaded wet cake; the first and second catalyst-loaded wet cakes are combined to form the mixture; and the mixture is thermally treated to form the particulate composition.
13. The process according to claim 10, wherein the first carbonaceous feedstock and second carbonaceous feedstock are contacted separately with an aqueous solution comprising the gasification catalyst to form a first and a second slurry, the first and second slurries are dewatered separately to form a first and a second catalyst-loaded wet cake; the first and second catalyst-loaded wet cakes are thermally treated to form first and second dry particulates; and the first and second dry particulates are combined to form the mixture which is the particulate composition.
14. The process according to claim 10, wherein the first carbonaceous feedstock is contacted with an aqueous solution comprising the gasification catalyst to form a slurry; the slurry is dewatered to form a catalyst-loaded wet cake; and the catalyst-loaded wet cake is mixed with the second carbonaceous feedstock to form the mixture.
15. The process according to claim 10, wherein the second carbonaceous feedstock is contacted with an aqueous solution comprising the gasification catalyst to form a slurry; the slurry is dewatered to form a catalyst-loaded wet cake; and the catalyst-loaded wet cake is mixed with the first carbonaceous feedstock to form the mixture.
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/032,734 (filed Feb. 29, 2008), the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present disclosure relates to particulate compositions comprising biomass and non-biomass components as well as at least one gasification catalyst. Further, the disclosure relates to processes for preparation of the particulate compositions and for gasification of the same in the presence of steam to form gaseous products, and in particular, methane.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    In view of numerous factors such as higher energy prices and environmental concerns, the production of value-added gaseous products from lower-fuel-value carbonaceous feedstocks, such as biomass, coal and petroleum coke, is receiving renewed attention. The catalytic gasification of such materials to produce methane and other value-added gases is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,828,474, U.S. Pat. No. 3,998,607, U.S. Pat. No. 4,057,512, U.S. Pat. No. 4,092,125, U.S. Pat. No. 4,094,650, U.S. Pat. No. 4,204,843, U.S. Pat. No. 4,468,231, U.S. Pat. No. 4,500,323, U.S. Pat. No. 4,541,841, U.S. Pat. No. 4,551,155, U.S. Pat. No. 4,558,027, U.S. Pat. No. 4,606,105, U.S. Pat. No. 4,617,027, U.S. Pat. No. 4,609,456, U.S. Pat. No. 5,017,282, U.S. Pat. No. 5,055,181, U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,465, U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,430, U.S. Pat. No. 6,894,183, U.S. Pat. No. 6,955,695, US2003/0167961A1, US2006/0265953A1, US2007/000177A1, US2007/083072A1, US2007/0277437A1 and GB1599932.
  • [0004]
    Treatment of biomass alone can have high theoretical carbon conversion, but has its own challenges regarding maintaining bed composition, fluidization of the bed in the gasification reactor, control of possible liquid phases and agglomeration of the bed in the gasification reactor and char withdrawal. Additionally, biomass has inherently high moisture content, requiring additional handling and drying measures to provide an appropriate feedstock for gasification. Therefore, methods and compositions are needed which can support and provide a gasification catalyst for the gasification of biomass while addressing the preceding challenges.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0005]
    The present disclosure relates to particulate compositions comprising a biomass, a non-biomass, and at least one gasification catalyst. Further, the disclosure relates to processes for preparation of the particulate compositions and for gasification of the same in the presence of steam to form gaseous products, and in particular, methane. Through blending appropriate levels of non-biomass materials with the biomass in the feedstock, problems such as bed fluidization may be addressed.
  • [0006]
    In a first aspect, the present invention provides a particulate composition having a particle distribution size suitable for gasification in a fluidized bed zone, the particulate composition comprising an intimate mixture of (a) a first carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass; (b) a second carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass; and (c) a gasification catalyst which, in the presence of steam and under suitable temperature and pressure, exhibits gasification activity whereby a plurality of gases comprising methane and one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons are formed, wherein, (i) the first carbonaceous feedstock and second carbonaceous feedstock are present in the particulate composition at a weight ratio of from about 5:95 to about 95:5; (ii) the gasification catalyst loaded onto at least one of the first carbonaceous feedstock and the second carbonaceous feedstock; (iii) the gasification catalyst comprises a source of at least one alkali metal and is present in an amount sufficient to provide, in the particulate composition, a ratio of alkali metal atoms to carbon atoms ranging from 0.01 to about 0.10.
  • [0007]
    In a second aspect, the present invention provides a process for converting a particulate composition into a plurality of gaseous products, the process comprising the steps of: (a) supplying a particulate composition according to the first aspect to a gasifying reactor; (b) reacting the particulate composition in the gasifying reactor in the presence of steam and under suitable temperature and pressure to form a plurality of gaseous including methane and one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons; and (c) at least partially separating the plurality of gaseous products to produce a stream comprising a predominant amount of one of the gaseous products.
  • [0008]
    In a third aspect, the present invention provides a process for preparing a particulate composition, the process comprising the steps of: (a) providing a first particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass, a second particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass, and an alkali metal gasification catalyst which, in the presence of steam and under suitable temperature and pressure, exhibits gasification activity whereby a plurality of gases including methane and at least one or more of hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and other higher hydrocarbons are formed from the particulate composition; (b) mixing the first particulate carbonaceous feedstock, the second particulate carbonaceous feedstock and, the alkali metal gasification catalyst to form a mixture; and (c) optionally thermally treating the mixture under a flow of inert dry gas to form the particulate composition, wherein the gasification catalyst comprises a source of at least one alkali metal and is present in an amount sufficient to provide, in the particulate composition, a ratio of alkali metal atoms of the gasification catalyst to carbon atoms ranging from about 0.01 to about 0.10.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0009]
    The present disclosure relates to a particulate composition, methods for the preparation of the particulate composition, and methods for the catalytic gasification of the particulate composition. Generally, the particulate composition includes one or more biomasses in various blends with one or more non-biomass carbonaceous materials, for example, coals and/or petroleum coke.
  • [0010]
    The present invention can be practiced, for example, using any of the developments to catalytic gasification technology disclosed in commonly owned US2007/0000177A1, US2007/0083072A1 and US2007/0277437A1; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380 (filed 23 Jul. 2008), U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/234,012 (filed 19 Sep. 2008) and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/234,018 (filed 19 Sep. 2008). All of the above are incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth.
  • [0011]
    Moreover, the present invention can be practiced in conjunction with the subject matter of the following U.S. patent applications, each of which was filed on Dec. 28, 2008: Ser. No. 12/342,554, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/342,565, entitled “PETROLEUM COKE COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,578, entitled “COAL COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,596, entitled “PROCESSES FOR MAKING SYNTHESIS GAS AND SYNGAS-DERIVED PRODUCTS”; Ser. No. 12/342,608, entitled “PETROLEUM COKE COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION”; Ser. No. 12/342,628, entitled “PROCESSES FOR MAKING SYNGAS-DERIVED PRODUCTS”; Ser. No. 12/342,663, entitled “CARBONACEOUS FUELS AND PROCESSES FOR MAKING AND USING THEM”; Ser. No. 12/342,715, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/342,736, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/343,143, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PROCESS WITH RECOVERY OF ALKALI METAL FROM CHAR”; Ser. No. 12/343,149, entitled “STEAM GENERATING SLURRY GASIFIER FOR THE CATALYTIC GASIFICATION OF A CARBONACEOUS FEEDSTOCK”; and Ser. No. 12/343,159, entitled “CONTINUOUS PROCESSES FOR CONVERTING CARBONACEOUS FEEDSTOCK INTO GASEOUS PRODUCTS”. All of the above are incorporated by reference herein for all purposes as if fully set forth.
  • [0012]
    Further, the present invention can be practiced in conjunction with the subject matter of the following U.S. patent applications, each of which was filed concurrently herewith: Ser. No. ______, entitled “PROCESSES FOR MAKING ABSORBENTS AND PROCESSES FOR REMOVING CONTAMINANTS FROM FLUIDS USING THEM” (attorney docket no. FN-0019 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “STEAM GENERATION PROCESSES UTILIZING BIOMASS FEEDSTOCKS” (attorney docket no. FN-0020 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “REDUCED CARBON FOOTPRINT STEAM GENERATION PROCESSES” (attorney docket no. FN-0021 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE SEPARATION OF METHANE FROM A GAS STREAM” (attorney docket no. FN-0022 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “SELECTIVE REMOVAL AND RECOVERY OF ACID GASES FROM GASIFICATION PRODUCTS” (attorney docket no. FN-0023 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “COAL COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION” (attorney docket no. FN-0024 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “COAL COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION” (attorney docket no. FN-0025 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “CO-FEED OF BIOMASS AS SOURCE OF MAKEUP CATALYSTS FOR CATALYTIC COAL GASIFICATION” (attorney docket no. FN-0026 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “COMPACTOR-FEEDER” (attorney docket no. FN-0027 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “CARBONACEOUS FINES RECYCLE” (attorney docket no. FN-0028 US NP1); Ser. No. ______, entitled “BIOMASS CHAR COMPOSITIONS FOR CATALYTIC GASIFICATION” (attorney docket no. FN-0029 US NP1); and Ser. No. ______, entitled “CATALYTIC GASIFICATION PARTICULATE COMPOSITIONS” (attorney docket no. FN-0030 US NP1). All of the above are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes as if fully set forth.
  • [0013]
    All publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein, if not otherwise indicated, are explicitly incorporated by reference herein in their entirety for all purposes as if fully set forth.
  • [0014]
    Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this disclosure belongs. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control.
  • [0015]
    Except where expressly noted, trademarks are shown in upper case.
  • [0016]
    Although methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure, suitable methods and materials are described herein.
  • [0017]
    Unless stated otherwise, all percentages, parts, ratios, etc., are by weight.
  • [0018]
    When an amount, concentration, or other value or parameter is given as a range, or a list of upper and lower values, this is to be understood as specifically disclosing all ranges formed from any pair of any upper and lower range limits, regardless of whether ranges are separately disclosed. Where a range of numerical values is recited herein, unless otherwise stated, the range is intended to include the endpoints thereof, and all integers and fractions within the range. It is not intended that the scope of the present disclosure be limited to the specific values recited when defining a range.
  • [0019]
    When the term “about” is used in describing a value or an end-point of a range, the disclosure should be understood to include the specific value or end-point referred to.
  • [0020]
    As used herein, the terms “comprises,” “comprising,” “includes,” “including,” “has,” “having” or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion. For example, a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements is not necessarily limited to only those elements but can include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Further, unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by any one of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
  • [0021]
    The use of “a” or “an” to describe the various elements and components herein is merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the disclosure. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.
  • [0022]
    The materials, methods, and examples herein are illustrative only and, except as specifically stated, are not intended to be limiting.
  • Biomass
  • [0023]
    The term “biomass” as used herein refers to carbonaceous materials derived from recently (for example, within the past 100 years) living organisms, including plant-based biomass and animal-based biomass. For clarification, biomass does not include fossil-based carbonaceous materials, such as coal.
  • [0024]
    The term “plant-based biomass” as used herein means materials derived from green plants, crops, algae, and trees, such as, but not limited to, sweet sorghum, bagasse, sugarcane, bamboo, hybrid poplar, hybrid willow, albizia trees, eucalyptus, alfalfa, clover, oil palm, switchgrass, sudangrass, millet, jatropha, and miscanthus (e.g., Miscanthus×giganteus). Biomass further include wastes from agricultural cultivation, processing, and/or degradation such as corn cobs and husks, corn stover, straw, nut shells, vegetable oils, canola oil, rapeseed oil, biodiesels, tree bark, wood chips, sawdust, and yard wastes.
  • [0025]
    The term “animal-based biomass” as used herein means wastes generated from animal cultivation and/or utilization. For example, biomass includes, but is not limited to, wastes from livestock cultivation and processing such as animal manure, guano, poultry litter, animal fats, and municipal solid wastes (e.g., sewage).
  • Non-Biomass
  • [0026]
    The term “non-biomass”, as used herein, means those carbonaceous materials which are not encompassed by the term “biomass” as defined herein. For example, non-biomass include, but is not limited to, anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, lignite, petroleum coke, or mixtures thereof.
  • [0027]
    (a) Petroleum Coke
  • [0028]
    The terms “petroleum coke” and “petcoke” as used herein includes both (i) the solid thermal decomposition product of high-boiling hydrocarbon fractions obtained in petroleum processing (heavy residues—“resid petcoke”); and (ii) the solid thermal decomposition product of processing tar sands (bituminous sands or oil sands—“tar sands petcoke”). Such carbonization products include, for example, green, calcined, needle and fluidized bed petcoke.
  • [0029]
    Resid petcoke can also be derived from a crude oil, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading heavy-gravity residual crude oil, which petoke contains ash as a minor component, typically about 1.0 wt % or less, and more typically about 0.5 wt % of less, based on the weight of the coke. Typically, the ash in such lower-ash cokes comprises metals such as nickel and vanadium.
  • [0030]
    Tar sands petcoke can be derived from an oil sand, for example, by coking processes used for upgrading oil sand. Tar sands petcoke contains ash as a minor component, typically in the range of about 2 wt % to about 12 wt %, and more typically in the range of about 4 wt % to about 12 wt %, based on the overall weight of the tar sands petcoke. Typically, the ash in such higher-ash cokes comprises materials such as silica and/or alumina.
  • [0031]
    Petroleum coke has an inherently low moisture content, typically, in the range of from about 0.2 to about 2 wt % (based on total petroleum coke weight); it also typically has a very low water soaking capacity to allow for conventional catalyst impregnation methods. The resulting particulate compositions contain, for example, a lower average moisture content which increases the efficiency of downstream drying operation versus conventional drying operations.
  • [0032]
    The petroleum coke can comprise at least about 70 wt % carbon, at least about 80 wt % carbon, or at least about 90 wt % carbon, based on the total weight of the petroleum coke. Typically, the petroleum coke comprises less than about 20 wt % percent inorganic compounds, based on the weight of the petroleum coke.
  • [0033]
    (b) Coal
  • [0034]
    The term “coal” as used herein means peat, lignite, sub-bituminous coal, bituminous coal, anthracite, or mixtures thereof. In certain embodiments, the coal has a carbon content of less than about 85%, or less than about 80%, or less than about 75%, or less than about 70%, or less than about 65%, or less than about 60%, or less than about 55%, or less than about 50% by weight, based on the total coal weight. In other embodiments, the coal has a carbon content ranging up to about 85%, or up to about 80%, or up to about 75% by weight, based on the total coal weight. Examples of useful coal include, but are not limited to, Illinois #6, Pittsburgh #8, Beulah (N. Dak.), Utah Blind Canyon, and Powder River Basin (PRB) coals. Anthracite, bituminous coal, sub-bituminous coal, and lignite coal may contain about 10 wt %, from about 5 to about 7 wt %, from about 4 to about 8 wt %, and from about 9 to about 11 wt %, ash by total weight of the coal on a dry basis, respectively. However, the ash content of any particular coal source will depend on the rank and source of the coal, as is familiar to those skilled in the art [see, for example, Coal Data: A Reference, Energy Information Administration, Office of Coal, Nuclear, Electric and Alternate Fuels, U.S. Department of Energy, DOE/EIA-0064(93), February 1995].
  • [0035]
    The ash produced from a coal typically comprises both a fly ash and a bottom ash, as are familiar to those skilled in the art. The fly ash from a bituminous coal can comprise from about 20 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 5 to about 35 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash. The fly ash from a sub-bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 30 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash. The fly ash from a lignite coal can comprise from about 15 to about 45 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 25 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the fly ash [Meyers, et al. Fly Ash. A Highway Construction Material. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-IP-76-16, Washington, D.C., 1976].
  • [0036]
    The bottom ash from a bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 60 wt % silica and from about 20 to about 30 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. The bottom ash from a sub-bituminous coal can comprise from about 40 to about 50 wt % silica and from about 15 to about 25 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. The bottom ash from a lignite coal can comprise from about 30 to about 80 wt % silica and from about 10 to about 20 wt % alumina, based on the total weight of the bottom ash. [Moulton, Lyle K. “Bottom Ash and Boiler Slag,” Proceedings of the Third International Ash Utilization Symposium. U.S. Bureau of Mines, Information Circular No. 8640, Washington, D.C., 1973.]
  • Catalyst Components
  • [0037]
    Particulate compositions according to the present disclosure are based on the above-described biomass and non-biomass, such as coal and/or petroleum coke, and further comprise an amount of an alkali metal component, as alkali metal and/or an alkali metal compound. Typically, the gasification catalyst is present in an amount sufficient to provide, a ratio of alkali metal atoms to carbon atoms in the particulate composition ranging from about 0.01, or from about 0.02, or from about 0.03, or from about 0.04, to about 0.10, or to about 0.08, or to about 0.07, or to about 0.06.
  • [0038]
    Typically, the alkali metal component may also be provided within the particulate compositions to achieve an alkali metal content of from about 3 to about 10 times more than the combined ash content of the biomass and non-biomass in the particulate composition, on a mass basis.
  • [0039]
    Suitable alkali metals are lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium, and mixtures thereof. Particularly useful are potassium sources. Suitable alkali metal compounds include alkali metal carbonates, bicarbonates, formates, oxalates, amides, hydroxides, acetates, or similar compounds. For example, the catalyst can comprise one or more of sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, rubidium carbonate, lithium carbonate, cesium carbonate, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, rubidium hydroxide or cesium hydroxide, and particularly, potassium carbonate and/or potassium hydroxide.
  • [0040]
    Co-catalysts or other catalyst additives may also be utilized, such as disclosed in the previously incorporated references.
  • Particulate Composition
  • [0041]
    The particulate composition can be supplied as a fine particulate having an average particle size of from about 25 microns, or from about 45 microns, up to about 2500 microns, or up to about 500 microns. One skilled in the art can readily determine the appropriate particle size for the individual particulates and the particulate composition. For example, when a fluid bed gasification reactor is used, the particulate composition can have an average particle size which enables incipient fluidization of the particulate composition at the gas velocity used in the fluid bed gasification reactor.
  • [0042]
    The ratio of the biomass particulate and non-biomass in the particulate composition can be selected based on technical considerations, processing economics, availability, and proximity of the non-biomass and biomass sources. The availability and proximity of the sources for the particulate compositions affect the price of the feeds, and thus, the overall production costs of the catalytic gasification process. For example, the biomass and the non-biomass can be blended in at about 5:95, about 10:90, about 15:85, about 20:80, about 25:75, about 30:70, about 35:65, about 40:60, about 45:55, about 50:50, about 55:45, about 60:40 , about 65:35, about 70:20, about 75:25, about 80:20, about 85:15, about 90:10, or about 95:5 by weight on a wet or dry basis, depending on the processing conditions.
  • [0043]
    As indicated above, the particulate composition further comprises a gasification catalyst that comprises a source of at least one alkali metal. The alkali metal component may be loaded onto the biomass or non-biomass particulate; however, the alkali metal component may be blended into the particulate composition as a separate particulate source as well. In one embodiment, at least the non-biomass particulate of the particulate composition comprises a gasification catalyst and optionally, a co-catalyst/catalyst additive as discussed previously. In another embodiment, both the biomass and non-biomass particulates comprise a gasification catalyst.
  • [0044]
    More significantly, the biomass and non-biomass sources, as well as the ratio of the biomass particulate to the non-biomass particulate, can be used to control other material characteristics of the feedstock blend.
  • [0045]
    Non-biomass materials, such as coals, and certain biomass materials, such as rice hulls, typically include significant quantities of inorganic matter including calcium, alumina and silica which form inorganic oxides (i.e., ash) in the gasification reactor. At temperatures above about 500° C. to about 600° C., potassium and other alkali metals can react with the alumina and silica in ash to form insoluble alkali aluminosilicates. In this form, the alkali metal is substantially water-insoluble and inactive as a catalyst. To prevent buildup of the residue in the gasification reactor, a solid purge of char comprising ash, unreacted carbonaceous material, and various alkali metal compounds (both water soluble and water insoluble) are routinely withdrawn. Preferably, the alkali metal is recovered from the char, and any unrecovered catalyst is generally compensated by a catalyst make-up stream. The more alumina and silica that is in the feedstock, the more costly it is to obtain a higher alkali metal recovery.
  • [0046]
    In preparing the particulate compositions of the present invention, the ash content of the biomass and non-biomass particulates can be selected to be, for example, to be about 20 wt % or less, or about 15 wt % or less, or about 10 wt % or less, or about 5 wt % or less, depending on ratio of the particulates and/or the starting ash in the non-biomass source. In other embodiments, the resulting particulate composition can comprise an ash content ranging from about 5 wt %, or from about 10 wt %, to about 20 wt %, or to about 15 wt %, based on the weight of the particulate composition. In other embodiments, the ash content of the particulate composition can comprise less than about 20 wt %, or less than about 15 wt %, or less than about 10 wt %, or less than about 8 wt %, or less than about 6 wt % alumina, based on the weight of the ash. In certain embodiments, the resulting particulate composition can comprise an ash content of less than about 20 wt %, based on the weight of the particulate composition where the ash content of the particulate composition comprises less than about 20 wt % alumina, or less than about 15 wt % alumina, based on the weight of the ash.
  • [0047]
    Such lower alumina values in the particulate composition allow for decreased losses of alkali catalysts in the gasification process. As indicated above, alumina can react with alkali source to yield an insoluble char comprising, for example, an alkali aluminate or aluminosilicate. Such insoluble char can lead to decreased catalyst recovery (i.e., increased catalyst loss), and thus, require additional costs of make-up catalyst in the overall gasification process, as will be discussed later.
  • [0048]
    Additionally, the resulting particulate compositions can have a significantly higher % carbon, and thus btu/lb value and methane product per unit weight of the particulate composition. In certain embodiments, the resulting particulate composition has a carbon content ranging from about 75 wt %, or from about 80 wt %, or from about 85 wt %, or from about 90 wt %, up to about 95 wt %, based on the combined weight of the non-biomass and biomass.
  • Methods for Making the Particulate Composition
  • [0049]
    The biomass and non-biomass sources typically require initial processing to prepare the particulate composition for gasification. Each component of the particulate composition may be separately processed, for example, to crush the sources to prepare appropriately sized particulates and/or to add one or more gasification catalysts, and subsequently mixed.
  • [0050]
    The particulates of the biomass and non-biomass sources can be prepared via crushing and/or grinding, either separately or together, according to any methods known in the art, such as impact crushing and wet or dry grinding to yield particulates. Depending on the method utilized for crushing and/or grinding of the biomass and non-biomass sources, the resulting particulates may be sized (i. e., separated according to size) to provide an appropriate feedstock.
  • [0051]
    Any method known to those skilled in the art can be used to size the particulates. For example, sizing can be preformed by screening or passing the particulates through a screen or number of screens. Screening equipment can include grizzlies, bar screens, and wire mesh screens. Screens can be static or incorporate mechanisms to shake or vibrate the screen. Alternatively, classification can be used to separate the biomass and non-biomass particulates. Classification equipment can include ore sorters, gas cyclones, hydrocyclones, rake classifiers, rotating trommels, or fluidized classifiers. The biomass and non-biomass can be also sized or classified prior to grinding and/or crushing.
  • [0052]
    Additional feedstock processing steps may be necessary depending on the qualities of biomass and non-biomass sources. Biomass may contain high moisture contents, such as green plants and grasses, can require drying prior to crushing; likewise, non-biomass such as high-moisture coals, can require drying prior to crushing. Some caking coals can require partial oxidation to simplify gasification reactor operation. Non-biomass feedstocks deficient in ion-exchange sites, such as anthracites or low-sulfur petroleum cokes, can be pre-treated to create additional ion-exchange sites to facilitate catalysts loading and/or association. Such pre-treatments can be accomplished by any method known to the art that creates ion-exchange capable sites and/or enhances the porosity of the feedstock (see, for example, previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 4,468,231 and GB1599932). Often, pre-treatment is accomplished in an oxidative manner using any oxidant known to the art.
  • [0053]
    In one example, the non-biomass and/or biomass is wet ground and sized (e.g., to a particle size distribution of 25 to 2500 microns) and then drained of its free water (i.e., dewatered) to a wet cake consistency. Examples of suitable methods for the wet grinding, sizing, and dewatering are known to those skilled in the art; for example, see previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380 (filed 23 Jul. 2008).
  • [0054]
    The filter cakes of the non-biomass and/or biomass particulates formed by the wet grinding in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure can have a moisture content ranging from about 40% to about 60%, about 40% to about 55%, or below 50%. It will be appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art that the moisture content of dewatered wet ground non-biomass and/or biomass particulates depends on the particular type of non-biomass or biomass, the particle size distribution, and the particular dewatering equipment used. Such filter cakes of biomass and/or non-biomass particulates can be thermally treated, as described herein, to produce dry biomass and/or dry non-biomass particulates which can be utilized in preparing the particulate compositions as described below.
  • [0055]
    The non-biomass and/or biomass particulates may subsequently treated to associate at least a first catalyst (e.g., gasification catalyst) therewith. Optionally, a second component (e.g., a second gasification catalyst or a co-catalyst, or other additive) can be provided to one or more of the particulates; in such instances, the particulates can be treated in separate processing steps to provide the first catalyst and second component. For example, the primary gasification catalyst can be supplied to a first non-biomass and/or biomass particulate (e.g., a potassium and/or sodium source), followed by a separate treatment to provide a calcium source to the first non-biomass and/or biomass particulate. Alternatively, the first and second catalysts can be provided as a mixture in a single treatment to a particulate; or a first particulate (e.g., the non-biomass) may be treated with a first catalyst and a second particulate (e.g., biomass) may be treated with a second component and the two treated particulates blended (see, previously incorporated US2007/0000177A1).
  • [0056]
    Any methods known to those skilled in the art can be used to associate one or more gasification catalysts with the non-biomass and/or biomass particulates. Such methods include but are not limited to, admixing with a solid catalyst source and impregnating the catalyst on to particulates. Several impregnation methods known to those skilled in the art can be employed to incorporate the gasification catalysts. These methods include but are not limited to, incipient wetness impregnation, evaporative impregnation, vacuum impregnation, dip impregnation, ion exchanging, and combinations of these methods.
  • [0057]
    In one embodiment, an alkali metal gasification catalyst can be impregnated into one or more of the particulates by slurrying with a solution (e.g., aqueous) of the catalyst. When a particulate is slurried with a solution of the catalyst and/or co-catalyst, the resulting slurry can be dewatered to provide a catalyzed particulate, again typically, as a wet cake. The catalyst solution for slurrying the particulate can be prepared from any catalyst source in the present methods, including fresh or make-up catalyst and recycled catalyst or catalyst solution (infra). Methods for dewatering the slurry to provide a wet cake of the catalyzed particulate include filtration (gravity or vacuum), centrifugation, and a fluid press.
  • [0058]
    One particular method suitable for combining coal with a gasification catalyst to provide a catalyzed particulate is via ion exchange as described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/178,380 (filed 23 Jul. 2008). Catalyst loading by ion exchange mechanism may be maximized based on adsorption isotherms specifically developed for the coal, as discussed in the incorporated reference. Such loading provides a catalyzed particulate as a wet cake. Additional catalyst retained on the ion-exchanged particulate wet cake, including inside the pores, can be controlled so that the total catalyst target value can be obtained in a controlled manner. The catalyst loaded and dewatered wet cake may contain, for example, about 50% moisture. The total amount of catalyst loaded can be controlled by controlling the concentration of catalyst components in the solution, as well as the contact time, temperature and method, as can be readily determined by those of ordinary skill in the relevant art based on the characteristics of the starting coal.
  • [0059]
    Alternatively, the slurried particulates may be dried with a fluid bed slurry drier (i.e., treatment with superheated steam to vaporize the liquid), or the solution evaporated, to provide a dry catalyzed particulate.
  • [0060]
    The catalyzed biomass and/or non-biomass particulates typically comprise greater than about 50%, greater than about 70%, greater than about 85%, or greater than about 90% of the total amount of the loaded catalyst associated with the particulate. The percentage of total loaded catalyst that is associated with the particulates can be determined according to methods known to those skilled in the art.
  • [0061]
    Separate biomass and non-biomass particulates and/or catalyzed biomass and/or non-biomass particulates can be blended appropriately to control, for example, the total catalyst loading or other qualities of the particulate composition, as discussed previously. The appropriate ratios of the separate particulates will depend on the qualities of the feedstocks as well as the desired properties of the particulate composition. For example, a biomass particulate and a catalyzed non-biomass particulate can be combined in such a ratio to yield a particulate composition having a predetermined ash content, as discussed previously.
  • [0062]
    Any of the preceding particulates, as one or more dry particulates and/or one or more wet cakes, can be combined by any methods known to those skilled in the art including, but not limited to, kneading, and vertical or horizontal mixers, for example, single or twin screw, ribbon, or drum mixers. The resulting particulate composition can be stored for future use or transferred to a feed operation for introduction into a gasification reactor. The particulate composition can be conveyed to storage or feed operations according to any methods known to those skilled in the art, for example, a screw conveyer or pneumatic transport.
  • [0063]
    Ultimately, the particulate composition may be dried, under a flow of an inert gas, with a fluid bed slurry drier (i.e., treatment with superheated steam to vaporize the liquid), or the solution evaporated, to provide a catalyzed particulate typically having a residual moisture content, for example, of less than about 8 wt %, or less than about 6 wt %, or less than about 4 wt %.
  • [0064]
    For example, a particulate composition may be prepared according to the preceding methods by providing a first particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass, a second particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass, and a gasification catalyst. The first particulate carbonaceous feedstock and second particulate carbonaceous feedstock can be contacted as a blend with an aqueous solution comprising gasification catalyst to form a slurry. The resulting slurry can be dewatered to form a catalyst-loaded wet cake, and the wet cake can be thermally treated under a flow of inert dry gas to form the particulate composition.
  • [0065]
    In another example, a particulate composition may be prepared according to the preceding methods by providing a first particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass, a second particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass, and a gasification catalyst. The first particulate carbonaceous feedstock can be contacted with an aqueous solution comprising gasification catalyst to form a slurry, and the slurry dewatered to form a catalyst-loaded wet cake. The catalyst-loaded wet cake can be mixed with the second particulate carbonaceous feedstock to form a mixture. Finally, the mixture can be thermally treated, under a flow of inert dry gas, to form the particulate composition.
  • [0066]
    In another yet example, a particulate composition may be prepared according to the preceding methods by providing a first particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass, a second particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass, and a gasification catalyst. The second particulate carbonaceous feedstock can be contacted with an aqueous solution comprising gasification catalyst to form a slurry and the slurry dewatered to form a catalyst-loaded wet cake. The catalyst-loaded wet cake can be mixed with the first particulate carbonaceous feedstock to form a mixture, and the mixture thermally treated under a flow of inert dry gas to form the particulate composition.
  • [0067]
    In another yet example, a particulate composition may be prepared according to the preceding methods by providing a first particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass, a second particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass, and a gasification catalyst. The first and second particulate carbonaceous feedstocks can be separately contacted with an aqueous solution comprising gasification catalyst to form a first and second slurry; the first and second slurry dewatered to form first and second catalyst-loaded wet cakes. The first and second catalyst-loaded wet cakes can be mixed to form a mixture, and the mixture thermally treated under a flow of inert dry gas to form the particulate composition.
  • [0068]
    In another yet example, a particulate composition may be prepared according to the preceding methods by providing a first particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a biomass, a second particulate carbonaceous feedstock that is a non-biomass, and a gasification catalyst. The first and second particulate carbonaceous feedstocks can be separately contacted with an aqueous solution comprising gasification catalyst to form a first and second slurry; the first and second slurry dewatered to form first and second catalyst-loaded wet cakes. The first and second catalyst-loaded wet cakes can be thermally treated for form first and second dry particulates; and the first and second dry particulates mixed to form a mixture which is the particulate composition.
  • Catalytic Gasification Methods
  • [0069]
    The particulate compositions of the present disclosure are particularly useful in integrated gasification processes for converting biomass and non-biomass to combustible gases, such as methane. The gasification reactors for such processes are typically operated at moderately high pressures and temperature, requiring introduction of the particulate composition to the reaction zone of the gasification reactor while maintaining the required temperature, pressure, and flow rate of the feedstock. Those skilled in the art are familiar with feed systems for providing feedstocks to high pressure and/or temperature environments, including, star feeders, screw feeders, rotary pistons, and lock-hoppers. It should be understood that the feed system can include two or more pressure-balanced elements, such as lock hoppers, which would be used alternately.
  • [0070]
    In some instances, the particulate composition can be prepared at pressures conditions above the operating pressure of gasification reactor. Hence, the particulate composition can be directly passed into the gasification reactor without further pressurization.
  • [0071]
    Any of several catalytic gasifiers can be utilized. Suitable gasification reactors include counter-current fixed bed, co-current fixed bed, fluidized bed, entrained flow, and moving bed reactors.
  • [0072]
    The particulate compositions are particularly useful for gasification at moderate temperatures of at least about 450° C., or of at least about 600° C. or above, to about 900° C., or to about 750° C., or to about 700° C.; and at pressures of at least about 50 psig, or at least about 200 psig, or at least about 400 psig, to about 1000 psig, or to about 700 psig, or to about 600 psig.
  • [0073]
    The gas utilized in the gasification reactor for pressurization and reactions of the particulate composition typically comprises steam, and optionally, oxygen or air, and are supplied to the reactor according to methods known to those skilled in the art. For example, any of the steam boilers known to those skilled in the art can supply steam to the reactor. Such boilers can be powered, for example, through the use of any carbonaceous material such as powdered coal, biomass etc., and including but not limited to rejected carbonaceous materials from the particulate composition preparation operation (e.g., fines, supra). Steam can also be supplied from a second gasification reactor coupled to a combustion turbine where the exhaust from the reactor is thermally exchanged to a water source and produce steam. Alternatively, the steam may be provided to the gasification reactor as described previously incorporated U.S. patent applications Ser. No. ______, entitled “STEAM GENERATION PROCESSES UTILIZING BIOMASS FEEDSTOCKS” (attorney docket no. FN-0020 US NP1), and Ser. No. ______, entitled “REDUCED CARBON FOOTPRINT STEAM GENERATION PROCESSES” (attorney docket no. FN-0021 US NP1).
  • [0074]
    Recycled steam from other process operations can also be used for supplying steam to the reactor. For example, when the slurried particulate composition is dried with a fluid bed slurry drier, as discussed previously, the steam generated through vaporization can be fed to the gasification reactor.
  • [0075]
    The small amount of required heat input for the catalytic gasification reaction can be provided by superheating a gas mixture of steam and recycle gas feeding the gasification reactor by any method known to one skilled in the art. In one method, compressed recycle gas of CO and H2 can be mixed with steam and the resulting steam/recycle gas mixture can be further superheated by heat exchange with the gasification reactor effluent followed by superheating in a recycle gas furnace.
  • [0076]
    A methane reformer can be included in the process to supplement the recycle carbon monoxide and hydrogen fed to the reactor to ensure that enough recycle gas is supplied to the reactor so that the net heat of reaction is as close to neutral as possible (only slightly exothermic or endothermic), in other words, that the reaction is run under thermally neutral conditions. In such instances, methane can be supplied for the reformer from the methane product, as described below.
  • [0077]
    Reaction of the particulate composition under the described conditions typically provides a crude product gas and a char. The char produced in the gasification reactor during the present processes typically is removed from the gasification reactor for sampling, purging, and/or catalyst recovery. Methods for removing char are well known to those skilled in the art. One such method taught by EP-A-0102828, for example, can be employed. The char can be periodically withdrawn from the gasification reactor through a lock hopper system, although other methods are known to those skilled in the art. Processes have been developed to recover alkali metal from the solid purge in order to reduce raw material costs and to minimize environmental impact of a catalytic gasification process.
  • [0078]
    The char can be quenched with recycle gas and water and directed to a catalyst recycling operation for extraction and reuse of the alkali metal catalyst. Particularly useful recovery and recycling processes are described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,459,138, as well as previously incorporated U.S. Pat. No. 4,057,512 and US2007/0277437A1, and previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 12/342,554, 12/342,715, 12/342,736 and 12/343,143. Reference can be had to those documents for further process details.
  • [0079]
    Crude product gas effluent leaving the gasification reactor can pass through a portion of the gasification reactor which serves as a disengagement zone where particles too heavy to be entrained by the gas leaving the gasification reactor (i.e., fines) are returned to the fluidized bed. The disengagement zone can include one or more internal cyclone separators or similar devices for removing fines and particulates from the gas. The gas effluent passing through the disengagement zone and leaving the gasification reactor generally contains CH4, CO2, H2 and CO, H2S, NH3, unreacted steam, entrained fines, and other contaminants such as COS.
  • [0080]
    The gas stream from which the fines have been removed can then be passed through a heat exchanger to cool the gas and the recovered heat can be used to preheat recycle gas and generate high pressure steam. Residual entrained fines can also be removed by any suitable means such as external cyclone separators optionally followed by Venturi scrubbers. The recovered fines can be processed to recover alkali metal catalyst, or directly recycled back to feedstock preparation as described in previously U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled “CARBONACEOUS FINES RECYCLE” (attorney docket no. FN-0028 US NP1).
  • [0081]
    The gas stream from which the fines have been removed can be fed to COS hydrolysis reactors for COS removal (sour process) and further cooled in a heat exchanger to recover residual heat prior to entering water scrubbers for ammonia recovery, yielding a scrubbed gas comprising at least H2S, CO2, CO, H2, and CH4. Methods for COS hydrolysis are known to those skilled in the art, for example, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,100,256.
  • [0082]
    The residual heat from the scrubbed gas can be used to generate low pressure steam. Scrubber water and sour process condensate can be processed to strip and recover H2S, CO2 and NH3; such processes are well known to those skilled in the art. NH3 can typically be recovered as an aqueous solution (e.g., 20 wt %).
  • [0083]
    A subsequent acid gas removal process can be used to remove H2S and CO2 from the scrubbed gas stream by a physical absorption method involving solvent treatment of the gas to give a cleaned gas stream. Such processes involve contacting the scrubbed gas with a solvent such as monoethanolamine, diethanolamine, methyldiethanolamine, diisopropylamine, diglycolamine, a solution of sodium salts of amino acids, methanol, hot potassium carbonate or the like. One method can involve the use of SelexolŽ (UOP LLC, Des Plaines, Ill. USA) or RectisolŽ (Lurgi AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany) solvent having two trains; each train consisting of an H2S absorber and a CO2 absorber. The spent solvent containing H2S, CO2 and other contaminants can be regenerated by any method known to those skilled in the art, including contacting the spent solvent with steam or other stripping gas to remove the contaminants or by passing the spent solvent through stripper columns. Recovered acid gases can be sent for sulfur recovery processing. The resulting cleaned gas stream contains mostly CH4, H2, and CO and, typically, small amounts of CO2 and H2O. Any recovered H2S from the acid gas removal and sour water stripping can be converted to elemental sulfur by any method known to those skilled in the art, including the Claus process. Sulfur can be recovered as a molten liquid. One method for removing acid gases from the scrubbed gas stream is described in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled “SELECTIVE REMOVAL AND RECOVERY OF ACID GASES FROM GASIFICATION PRODUCTS” (attorney docket no. FN-0023 US NP1).
  • [0084]
    The cleaned gas stream can be further processed to separate and recover CH4 by any suitable gas separation method known to those skilled in the art including, but not limited to, cryogenic distillation and the use of molecular sieves or ceramic membranes, or via the generation of methane hydrate as disclosed in previously incorporated U.S. patent application Ser. No. ______, entitled “PROCESS AND APPARATUS FOR THE SEPARATION OF METHANE FROM A GAS STREAM” (attorney docket no. FN-0022 US NP1). Typically, two gas streams can be produced by the gas separation process, a methane product stream and a syngas stream (H2 and CO). The syngas stream can be compressed and recycled to the gasification reactor. If necessary, a portion of the methane product can be directed to a reformer, as discussed previously and/or a portion of the methane product can be used as plant fuel.
  • EXAMPLES Example 1
  • [0085]
    Feedstock Preparation
  • [0086]
    As-received coal (Powder River Basin) can be stage-crushed to maximize the amount of material having particle sizes ranging from about 0.85 to about 1.4 mm. Fines (<0.85 mm) can be separated from the crushed materials by vibratory screening and directed to the steam generating combustion reactor.
  • [0087]
    The crushed coal can be slurried with an aqueous solution of potassium carbonate, dewatered, and dried via a fluid bed slurry drier to yield a catalyzed feedstock typically containing 185 lb coal (88 wt %), 14.9 lb catalyst (7 wt %), and 10.5 lb moisture (5 wt %). The coal fines separated at the crushing stage can subsequently be used as the feedstock for combustion reactor for the preparation of steam.
  • [0088]
    Switchgrass can be dried and crushed to produce a particulate having an average size of about 250 microns. The coal fines from the preceding crushing stage can be blended in a twin screw mixer to produce a biomass feedstock having a 9:1 w/w ratio of the switchgrass to coal fines.
  • Example 2
  • [0089]
    Catalytic Gasification
  • [0090]
    The biomass feedstock of Example 1 can be provided to a combustion reactor fed by an enriched oxygen source. The resulting exhaust gas from the combustion reactor will contain hot CO2. The exhaust gas can be passed through a heat exchanger in contact with a water source to produce steam. The generated steam and the exhaust gas from the combustion reactor can be superheated and then introduced to a fluidized bed gasification reactor (catalytic gasifier) supplied with the catalyzed feedstock of Example 1. The catalyzed feedstock should be introduced under a positive pressure of nitrogen. Typical conditions for the catalytic gasifier would be: total pressure, 500 psi and temperature, 1200° F. The effluent of the catalytic gasifier would contain methane, CO2, H2, CO, water, H2S, ammonia, and nitrogen, which can be passed to a scrubber to remove ammonia, and an acid gas removal unit to remove H2S and CO2. The CO2 can be recovered.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US3164330 *Aug 30, 1961Jan 5, 1965Georg NeidlRotary-pump apparatus
US3435590 *Sep 1, 1967Apr 1, 1969Chevron ResCo2 and h2s removal
US3876393 *Nov 26, 1973Apr 8, 1975Showa Denko KkMethod and article for removing mercury from gases contaminated therewith
US4005996 *Sep 4, 1975Feb 1, 1977El Paso Natural Gas CompanyMethanation process for the production of an alternate fuel for natural gas
US4011066 *Jul 7, 1975Mar 8, 1977Metallgesellschaft AktiengesellschaftProcess of purifying gases produced by the gasification of solid or liquid fossil fuels
US4017272 *May 27, 1976Apr 12, 1977Bamag Verfahrenstechnik GmbhProcess for gasifying solid carbonaceous fuel
US4069304 *Dec 31, 1975Jan 17, 1978TrwHydrogen production by catalytic coal gasification
US4077778 *May 13, 1977Mar 7, 1978Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Process for the catalytic gasification of coal
US4189307 *Jun 26, 1978Feb 19, 1980Texaco Development CorporationProduction of clean HCN-free synthesis gas
US4193771 *May 8, 1978Mar 18, 1980Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Alkali metal recovery from carbonaceous material conversion process
US4193772 *Jun 5, 1978Mar 18, 1980Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Process for carbonaceous material conversion and recovery of alkali metal catalyst constituents held by ion exchange sites in conversion residue
US4200349 *Jan 10, 1979Apr 29, 1980Fairchild Camera And Instrument CorporationLow force printed circuit board connector apparatus
US4200439 *Dec 19, 1977Apr 29, 1980Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Gasification process using ion-exchanged coal
US4243639 *May 10, 1979Jan 6, 1981Tosco CorporationMethod for recovering vanadium from petroleum coke
US4249471 *Jan 29, 1979Feb 10, 1981Gunnerman Rudolf WMethod and apparatus for burning pelletized organic fibrous fuel
US4252771 *Apr 4, 1978Feb 24, 1981Asnaprogetti S.P.A.Methanation reactor
US4260421 *May 18, 1979Apr 7, 1981Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Cement production from coal conversion residues
US4315753 *Aug 14, 1980Feb 16, 1982The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The InteriorElectrochemical apparatus for simultaneously monitoring two gases
US4315758 *Oct 15, 1979Feb 16, 1982Institute Of Gas TechnologyProcess for the production of fuel gas from coal
US4318712 *May 19, 1980Mar 9, 1982Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Catalytic coal gasification process
US4322222 *Sep 3, 1980Mar 30, 1982Occidental Petroleum CorporationProcess for the gasification of carbonaceous materials
US4372755 *Oct 30, 1980Feb 8, 1983Enrecon, Inc.Production of a fuel gas with a stabilized metal carbide catalyst
US4375362 *Oct 5, 1981Mar 1, 1983Exxon Research And Engineering Co.Gasification of ash-containing solid fuels
US4428535 *Jul 6, 1981Jan 31, 1984Liquid Carbonic CorporationApparatus to cool particulate matter for grinding
US4432773 *Mar 21, 1983Feb 21, 1984Euker Jr Charles AFluidized bed catalytic coal gasification process
US4433065 *Mar 5, 1982Feb 21, 1984Shell Oil CompanyProcess for the preparation of hydrocarbons from carbon-containing material
US4436028 *May 10, 1982Mar 13, 1984Wilder David MRoll mill for reduction of moisture content in waste material
US4436531 *Aug 27, 1982Mar 13, 1984Texaco Development CorporationSynthesis gas from slurries of solid carbonaceous fuels
US4443415 *Jun 22, 1982Apr 17, 1984Amax Inc.Recovery of V2 O5 and nickel values from petroleum coke
US4444568 *Mar 26, 1982Apr 24, 1984Metallgesellschaft, AktiengesellschaftMethod of producing fuel gas and process heat fron carbonaceous materials
US4491609 *Aug 3, 1983Jan 1, 1985Bergwerksverband GmbhMethod of manufacturing adsorbents
US4497784 *Nov 29, 1983Feb 5, 1985Shell Oil CompanySolution removal of HCN from gaseous streams, with hydrolysis of thiocyanate formed
US4500323 *Jul 29, 1982Feb 19, 1985Kraftwerk Union AktiengesellschaftProcess for the gasification of raw carboniferous materials
US4505881 *Nov 29, 1983Mar 19, 1985Shell Oil CompanyAmmonium polysulfide removal of HCN from gaseous streams, with subsequent production of NH3, H2 S, and CO2
US4508544 *Dec 12, 1983Apr 2, 1985Exxon Research & Engineering Co.Converting a fuel to combustible gas
US4508693 *Nov 29, 1983Apr 2, 1985Shell Oil Co.Solution removal of HCN from gaseous streams, with pH adjustment of reacted solution and hydrolysis of thiocyanate formed
US4572826 *Dec 24, 1984Feb 25, 1986Shell Oil CompanyTwo stage process for HCN removal from gaseous streams
US4661237 *Mar 29, 1983Apr 28, 1987Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki KaishaProcess for thermal cracking of carbonaceous substances which increases gasoline fraction and light oil conversions
US4720289 *Jul 5, 1985Jan 19, 1988Exxon Research And Engineering CompanyProcess for gasifying solid carbonaceous materials
US4803061 *Dec 29, 1986Feb 7, 1989Texaco Inc.Partial oxidation process with magnetic separation of the ground slag
US4808194 *Nov 26, 1984Feb 28, 1989Texaco Inc.Stable aqueous suspensions of slag, fly-ash and char
US4810475 *Aug 18, 1987Mar 7, 1989Shell Oil CompanyRemoval of HCN, and HCN and COS, from a substantially chloride-free gaseous stream
US4822935 *Aug 26, 1987Apr 18, 1989Scott Donald SHydrogasification of biomass to produce high yields of methane
US4892567 *Aug 15, 1988Jan 9, 1990Mobil Oil CorporationSimultaneous removal of mercury and water from fluids
US4995193 *Jul 18, 1990Feb 26, 1991Ube Industries, Ltd.Method of preventing adherence of ash to gasifier wall
US5093094 *Sep 4, 1991Mar 3, 1992Shell Oil CompanySolution removal of H2 S from gas streams
US5094737 *Oct 1, 1990Mar 10, 1992Exxon Research & Engineering CompanyIntegrated coking-gasification process with mitigation of bogging and slagging
US5277884 *Mar 2, 1992Jan 11, 1994Reuel ShinnarSolvents for the selective removal of H2 S from gases containing both H2 S and CO2
US5388645 *Nov 3, 1993Feb 14, 1995Amoco CorporationMethod for producing methane-containing gaseous mixtures
US5388650 *Jun 14, 1993Feb 14, 1995Generon SystemsNon-cryogenic production of nitrogen for on-site injection in downhole drilling
US5616154 *Apr 15, 1994Apr 1, 1997Battelle Memorial InstituteMethod for the catalytic conversion of organic materials into a product gas
US5720785 *Apr 5, 1996Feb 24, 1998Shell Oil CompanyMethod of reducing hydrogen cyanide and ammonia in synthesis gas
US5733515 *Feb 28, 1996Mar 31, 1998Calgon Carbon CorporationPurification of air in enclosed spaces
US5855631 *May 6, 1997Jan 5, 1999Leas; Arnold M.Catalytic gasification process and system
US5865898 *Jul 27, 1993Feb 2, 1999The Texas A&M University SystemMethods of biomass pretreatment
US6013158 *Mar 30, 1999Jan 11, 2000Wootten; William A.Apparatus for converting coal to hydrocarbons
US6015104 *Mar 8, 1999Jan 18, 2000Rich, Jr.; John W.Process and apparatus for preparing feedstock for a coal gasification plant
US6028234 *Dec 17, 1996Feb 22, 2000Mobil Oil CorporationProcess for making gas hydrates
US6032737 *Apr 7, 1998Mar 7, 2000Atlantic Richfield CompanyMethod and system for increasing oil production from an oil well producing a mixture of oil and gas
US6180943 *Oct 23, 1991Jan 30, 2001General Electric CompanyTomograph acquisition apparatus having a pair of rotatable scintillation detectors which form detection fields at an angle of inclination relative to each other
US6187465 *Nov 5, 1998Feb 13, 2001Terry R. GallowayProcess and system for converting carbonaceous feedstocks into energy without greenhouse gas emissions
US6379645 *Oct 14, 1999Apr 30, 2002Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.Production of hydrogen using methanation and pressure swing adsorption
US6506349 *Jul 2, 1997Jan 14, 2003Tofik K. KhanmamedovProcess for removal of contaminants from a gas stream
US6506361 *May 18, 2000Jan 14, 2003Air Products And Chemicals, Inc.Gas-liquid reaction process including ejector and monolith catalyst
US6692711 *Jun 2, 2000Feb 17, 2004Exxonmobil Research And Engineering CompanyProduction of low sulfur syngas from natural gas with C4+/C5+ hydrocarbon recovery
US6855852 *Jun 23, 2000Feb 15, 2005Metasource Pty LtdNatural gas hydrate and method for producing same
US7168488 *Aug 30, 2002Jan 30, 2007Statoil AsaMethod and plant or increasing oil recovery by gas injection
US7481275 *Dec 12, 2003Jan 27, 2009Statoil AsaPlant and a method for increased oil recovery
US7666383 *Feb 23, 2010Cabot CorporationMethod to produce hydrogen or synthesis gas and carbon black
US7677309 *Mar 16, 2010Statoil AsaMethod for increased oil recovery from an oil field
US7897126 *Mar 1, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalytic gasification process with recovery of alkali metal from char
US7901644 *Dec 23, 2008Mar 8, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalytic gasification process with recovery of alkali metal from char
US8114176 *Oct 12, 2005Feb 14, 2012Great Point Energy, Inc.Catalytic steam gasification of petroleum coke to methane
US8114177 *Feb 27, 2009Feb 14, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Co-feed of biomass as source of makeup catalysts for catalytic coal gasification
US8123827 *Dec 23, 2008Feb 28, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for making syngas-derived products
US8349037 *Aug 27, 2009Jan 8, 2013Basf SeAdsorber material and process for desulfurizing hydrocarbonaceous gases
US8349039 *Jan 8, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Carbonaceous fines recycle
US8361428 *Jan 29, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Reduced carbon footprint steam generation processes
US8366795 *Feb 5, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalytic gasification particulate compositions
US20030070808 *May 21, 2002Apr 17, 2003Conoco Inc.Use of syngas for the upgrading of heavy crude at the wellhead
US20040020123 *Aug 29, 2002Feb 5, 2004Takahiro KimuraDewatering device and method for gas hydrate slurrys
US20040023086 *Mar 2, 2001Feb 5, 2004Qingquan SuFuel cell powder generation method and system
US20070000177 *Jun 1, 2006Jan 4, 2007Hippo Edwin JMild catalytic steam gasification process
US20070051043 *Feb 8, 2006Mar 8, 2007Future Energy Gmbh And Manfred SchingnitzMethod and device for producing synthesis by partial oxidation of slurries made from fuels containing ash with partial quenching and waste heat recovery
US20090012188 *Aug 7, 2007Jan 8, 2009Alexandre RojeyProcess for the production of synthesis gas with conversion of CO2 into hydrogen
US20090048476 *Jul 23, 2008Feb 19, 2009Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalyst-Loaded Coal Compositions, Methods of Making and Use
US20100018113 *Jun 25, 2009Jan 28, 2010Casella Waste Systems, Inc.Engineered fuel feed stock
US20100050654 *Mar 4, 2010Alstom Technology Ltd.System for hot solids combustion and gasification
US20100071235 *Mar 25, 2010Tsann Kuen (Zhangzhou) Enterprise Co., Ltd.Insulation cover for iron
US20100076235 *Mar 25, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for Gasification of a Carbonaceous Feedstock
US20110031439 *Feb 10, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US20110062012 *Mar 17, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US20110062721 *Mar 17, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation combined cycle process
US20110062722 *Mar 17, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation combined cycle process
US20110064648 *Sep 15, 2010Mar 17, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Two-mode process for hydrogen production
US20120046510 *Aug 17, 2011Feb 23, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US20120060417 *Sep 9, 2011Mar 15, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US20130042824 *Feb 21, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US20130046124 *Aug 15, 2012Feb 21, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7897126Mar 1, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalytic gasification process with recovery of alkali metal from char
US7901644Dec 23, 2008Mar 8, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalytic gasification process with recovery of alkali metal from char
US7922782Jun 1, 2006Apr 12, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalytic steam gasification process with recovery and recycle of alkali metal compounds
US7926750Feb 27, 2009Apr 19, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Compactor feeder
US8114176Oct 12, 2005Feb 14, 2012Great Point Energy, Inc.Catalytic steam gasification of petroleum coke to methane
US8114177Feb 27, 2009Feb 14, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Co-feed of biomass as source of makeup catalysts for catalytic coal gasification
US8123827Dec 23, 2008Feb 28, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for making syngas-derived products
US8163048Apr 24, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalyst-loaded coal compositions, methods of making and use
US8192716Jun 5, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Sour shift process for the removal of carbon monoxide from a gas stream
US8202913Jun 19, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8268899Sep 18, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8286901Oct 16, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Coal compositions for catalytic gasification
US8297542Oct 30, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Coal compositions for catalytic gasification
US8328890Dec 11, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8349039Jan 8, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Carbonaceous fines recycle
US8361428Jan 29, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Reduced carbon footprint steam generation processes
US8366795Feb 5, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Catalytic gasification particulate compositions
US8479833Oct 18, 2010Jul 9, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US8479834Oct 18, 2010Jul 9, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US8502007Sep 18, 2009Aug 6, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Char methanation catalyst and its use in gasification processes
US8557878Apr 26, 2011Oct 15, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock with vanadium recovery
US8647402Sep 18, 2009Feb 11, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8648121Feb 22, 2012Feb 11, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock with nickel recovery
US8652222Feb 27, 2009Feb 18, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Biomass compositions for catalytic gasification
US8652696Mar 3, 2011Feb 18, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation fuel cell power generation
US8653149May 26, 2011Feb 18, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Conversion of liquid heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks to gaseous products
US8669013Feb 21, 2011Mar 11, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation fuel cell power generation
US8709113Feb 27, 2009Apr 29, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Steam generation processes utilizing biomass feedstocks
US8728182May 12, 2010May 20, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8728183May 12, 2010May 20, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8733459Dec 16, 2010May 27, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
US8734547Dec 29, 2009May 27, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for preparing a catalyzed carbonaceous particulate
US8734548Dec 29, 2009May 27, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for preparing a catalyzed coal particulate
US8748687Aug 17, 2011Jun 10, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US8999020Mar 31, 2009Apr 7, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for the separation of methane from a gas stream
US9012524Oct 3, 2012Apr 21, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US9034058Sep 27, 2013May 19, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
US9034061Sep 27, 2013May 19, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
US9127221May 31, 2012Sep 8, 2015Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
US9234149Mar 4, 2015Jan 12, 2016Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Steam generating slurry gasifier for the catalytic gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock
US9273260Sep 27, 2013Mar 1, 2016Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
US9328920Sep 27, 2013May 3, 2016Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Use of contaminated low-rank coal for combustion
US20130199087 *Aug 16, 2011Aug 8, 2013Nelson Mandela Metropolitan UniversityCarbonaceous fines beneficiation using micro-algae and related processes
WO2010033852A2Sep 18, 2009Mar 25, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for gasification of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2010078297A1Dec 29, 2009Jul 8, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for preparing a catalyzed carbonaceous particulate
WO2010078298A1Dec 29, 2009Jul 8, 2010Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for preparing a catalyzed coal particulate
WO2011017630A1Aug 6, 2010Feb 10, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2011034888A1Sep 15, 2010Mar 24, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Processes for hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2011034889A1Sep 15, 2010Mar 24, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation combined cycle process
WO2011034890A2Sep 15, 2010Mar 24, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation combined cycle process
WO2011034891A1Sep 15, 2010Mar 24, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Two-mode process for hydrogen production
WO2011049858A2Oct 18, 2010Apr 28, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
WO2011049861A2Oct 18, 2010Apr 28, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
WO2011084580A2Dec 16, 2010Jul 14, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process
WO2011084581A1Dec 16, 2010Jul 14, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated enhanced oil recovery process injecting nitrogen
WO2011106285A1Feb 21, 2011Sep 1, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Integrated hydromethanation fuel cell power generation
WO2011139694A1Apr 26, 2011Nov 10, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock with vanadium recovery
WO2011150217A2May 26, 2011Dec 1, 2011Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Conversion of liquid heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks to gaseous products
WO2012024369A1Aug 17, 2011Feb 23, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of carbonaceous feedstock
WO2012033997A1Sep 9, 2011Mar 15, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2012061235A1Oct 28, 2011May 10, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2012061238A1Oct 28, 2011May 10, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2012116003A1Feb 22, 2012Aug 30, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock with nickel recovery
WO2012145497A1Apr 19, 2012Oct 26, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock with char beneficiation
WO2012166879A1May 31, 2012Dec 6, 2012Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2013025808A1Aug 15, 2012Feb 21, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2013025812A1Aug 15, 2012Feb 21, 2013Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Hydromethanation of a carbonaceous feedstock
WO2014055349A1Sep 27, 2013Apr 10, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
WO2014055351A1Sep 27, 2013Apr 10, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
WO2014055353A1Sep 27, 2013Apr 10, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Agglomerated particulate low-rank coal feedstock and uses thereof
WO2014055365A1Sep 27, 2013Apr 10, 2014Greatpoint Energy, Inc.Use of contaminated low-rank coal for combustion
Classifications
U.S. Classification48/127.7, 502/174
International ClassificationC10L3/00, B01J27/20
Cooperative ClassificationC10J2300/0943, C10J3/54, Y02P20/145, C10J2300/0903, Y02E50/10, C10J2300/0986, C10L1/326, C10J3/482, Y02E50/30, C10J2300/0916, C10L5/44, C10L5/04
European ClassificationC10J3/48B, C10L1/32C, C10L5/04, C10L5/44, C10J3/54
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Mar 6, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: GREATPOINT ENERGY, INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RAMAN, PATTABHI K.;HIPPO, EDWIN J.;YEE, NELSON;REEL/FRAME:022359/0440;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090218 TO 20090220
Owner name: GREATPOINT ENERGY, INC., ILLINOIS
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RAMAN, PATTABHI K.;HIPPO, EDWIN J.;YEE, NELSON;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090218 TO 20090220;REEL/FRAME:022359/0440