US20090234878A1 - System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects - Google Patents
System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090234878A1 US20090234878A1 US12/372,435 US37243509A US2009234878A1 US 20090234878 A1 US20090234878 A1 US 20090234878A1 US 37243509 A US37243509 A US 37243509A US 2009234878 A1 US2009234878 A1 US 2009234878A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- user
- target
- profile
- interest
- users
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 227
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 27
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 abstract description 50
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 235000012571 Ficus glomerata Nutrition 0.000 description 56
- 244000153665 Ficus glomerata Species 0.000 description 56
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 54
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 42
- 230000000699 topical effect Effects 0.000 description 41
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 37
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 31
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 29
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 26
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm Methods 0.000 description 25
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 25
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 23
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 21
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 19
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 18
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 17
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 17
- 238000003066 decision tree Methods 0.000 description 16
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 15
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 15
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 14
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 description 13
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000009499 grossing Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 9
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 6
- PXFBZOLANLWPMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 16-Epiaffinine Natural products C1C(C2=CC=CC=C2N2)=C2C(=O)CC2C(=CC)CN(C)C1C2CO PXFBZOLANLWPMH-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dihydrogen sulfide Chemical compound S RWSOTUBLDIXVET-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003064 k means clustering Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000002372 labelling Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 4
- 235000019640 taste Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 241000282412 Homo Species 0.000 description 3
- 230000001427 coherent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005304 joining Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010561 standard procedure Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007727 cost benefit analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 2
- QCAWEPFNJXQPAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N methoxyfenozide Chemical compound COC1=CC=CC(C(=O)NN(C(=O)C=2C=C(C)C=C(C)C=2)C(C)(C)C)=C1C QCAWEPFNJXQPAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000036651 mood Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012015 optical character recognition Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002453 shampoo Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011524 similarity measure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000344 soap Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008093 supporting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- WYWHKKSPHMUBEB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 6-Mercaptoguanine Natural products N1C(N)=NC(=S)C2=C1N=CN2 WYWHKKSPHMUBEB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000007476 Maximum Likelihood Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000282881 Orycteropodidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 125000002015 acyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002457 bidirectional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001010 compromised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010494 dissociation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005593 dissociations Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002996 emotional effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008571 general function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001976 improved effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005764 inhibitory process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009545 invasion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001537 neural effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005192 partition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007639 printing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001747 pupil Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007670 refining Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008521 reorganization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004043 responsiveness Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000011218 segmentation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940095374 tabloid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012549 training Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009424 underpinning Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/43—Processing of content or additional data, e.g. demultiplexing additional data from a digital video stream; Elementary client operations, e.g. monitoring of home network or synchronising decoder's clock; Client middleware
- H04N21/442—Monitoring of processes or resources, e.g. detecting the failure of a recording device, monitoring the downstream bandwidth, the number of times a movie has been viewed, the storage space available from the internal hard disk
- H04N21/44213—Monitoring of end-user related data
- H04N21/44222—Analytics of user selections, e.g. selection of programs or purchase activity
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01H—ELECTRIC SWITCHES; RELAYS; SELECTORS; EMERGENCY PROTECTIVE DEVICES
- H01H1/00—Contacts
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/30—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols characterised by the use of specific devices or networks
- G06Q20/306—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols characterised by the use of specific devices or networks using TV related infrastructures
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q20/00—Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
- G06Q20/38—Payment protocols; Details thereof
- G06Q20/383—Anonymous user system
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04H—BROADCAST COMMUNICATION
- H04H60/00—Arrangements for broadcast applications with a direct linking to broadcast information or broadcast space-time; Broadcast-related systems
- H04H60/02—Arrangements for generating broadcast information; Arrangements for generating broadcast-related information with a direct linking to broadcast information or to broadcast space-time; Arrangements for simultaneous generation of broadcast information and broadcast-related information
- H04H60/06—Arrangements for scheduling broadcast services or broadcast-related services
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04H—BROADCAST COMMUNICATION
- H04H60/00—Arrangements for broadcast applications with a direct linking to broadcast information or broadcast space-time; Broadcast-related systems
- H04H60/35—Arrangements for identifying or recognising characteristics with a direct linkage to broadcast information or to broadcast space-time, e.g. for identifying broadcast stations or for identifying users
- H04H60/46—Arrangements for identifying or recognising characteristics with a direct linkage to broadcast information or to broadcast space-time, e.g. for identifying broadcast stations or for identifying users for recognising users' preferences
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/06—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols the encryption apparatus using shift registers or memories for block-wise or stream coding, e.g. DES systems or RC4; Hash functions; Pseudorandom sequence generators
- H04L9/065—Encryption by serially and continuously modifying data stream elements, e.g. stream cipher systems, RC4, SEAL or A5/3
- H04L9/0656—Pseudorandom key sequence combined element-for-element with data sequence, e.g. one-time-pad [OTP] or Vernam's cipher
- H04L9/0662—Pseudorandom key sequence combined element-for-element with data sequence, e.g. one-time-pad [OTP] or Vernam's cipher with particular pseudorandom sequence generator
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/08—Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
- H04L9/0816—Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
- H04L9/0819—Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s)
- H04L9/0825—Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s) using asymmetric-key encryption or public key infrastructure [PKI], e.g. key signature or public key certificates
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/21—Server components or server architectures
- H04N21/222—Secondary servers, e.g. proxy server, cable television Head-end
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/21—Server components or server architectures
- H04N21/222—Secondary servers, e.g. proxy server, cable television Head-end
- H04N21/2223—Secondary servers, e.g. proxy server, cable television Head-end being a public access point, e.g. for downloading to or uploading from clients
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/23—Processing of content or additional data; Elementary server operations; Server middleware
- H04N21/231—Content storage operation, e.g. caching movies for short term storage, replicating data over plural servers, prioritizing data for deletion
- H04N21/23106—Content storage operation, e.g. caching movies for short term storage, replicating data over plural servers, prioritizing data for deletion involving caching operations
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/25—Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
- H04N21/251—Learning process for intelligent management, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies
- H04N21/252—Processing of multiple end-users' preferences to derive collaborative data
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/25—Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
- H04N21/258—Client or end-user data management, e.g. managing client capabilities, user preferences or demographics, processing of multiple end-users preferences to derive collaborative data
- H04N21/25866—Management of end-user data
- H04N21/25891—Management of end-user data being end-user preferences
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/25—Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
- H04N21/262—Content or additional data distribution scheduling, e.g. sending additional data at off-peak times, updating software modules, calculating the carousel transmission frequency, delaying a video stream transmission, generating play-lists
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/25—Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
- H04N21/262—Content or additional data distribution scheduling, e.g. sending additional data at off-peak times, updating software modules, calculating the carousel transmission frequency, delaying a video stream transmission, generating play-lists
- H04N21/26208—Content or additional data distribution scheduling, e.g. sending additional data at off-peak times, updating software modules, calculating the carousel transmission frequency, delaying a video stream transmission, generating play-lists the scheduling operation being performed under constraints
- H04N21/26241—Content or additional data distribution scheduling, e.g. sending additional data at off-peak times, updating software modules, calculating the carousel transmission frequency, delaying a video stream transmission, generating play-lists the scheduling operation being performed under constraints involving the time of distribution, e.g. the best time of the day for inserting an advertisement or airing a children program
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/25—Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
- H04N21/266—Channel or content management, e.g. generation and management of keys and entitlement messages in a conditional access system, merging a VOD unicast channel into a multicast channel
- H04N21/26603—Channel or content management, e.g. generation and management of keys and entitlement messages in a conditional access system, merging a VOD unicast channel into a multicast channel for automatically generating descriptors from content, e.g. when it is not made available by its provider, using content analysis techniques
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/20—Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
- H04N21/25—Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
- H04N21/266—Channel or content management, e.g. generation and management of keys and entitlement messages in a conditional access system, merging a VOD unicast channel into a multicast channel
- H04N21/2668—Creating a channel for a dedicated end-user group, e.g. insertion of targeted commercials based on end-user profiles
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/43—Processing of content or additional data, e.g. demultiplexing additional data from a digital video stream; Elementary client operations, e.g. monitoring of home network or synchronising decoder's clock; Client middleware
- H04N21/433—Content storage operation, e.g. storage operation in response to a pause request, caching operations
- H04N21/4332—Content storage operation, e.g. storage operation in response to a pause request, caching operations by placing content in organized collections, e.g. local EPG data repository
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/45—Management operations performed by the client for facilitating the reception of or the interaction with the content or administrating data related to the end-user or to the client device itself, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies, resolving scheduling conflicts
- H04N21/4508—Management of client data or end-user data
- H04N21/4532—Management of client data or end-user data involving end-user characteristics, e.g. viewer profile, preferences
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/45—Management operations performed by the client for facilitating the reception of or the interaction with the content or administrating data related to the end-user or to the client device itself, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies, resolving scheduling conflicts
- H04N21/454—Content or additional data filtering, e.g. blocking advertisements
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/45—Management operations performed by the client for facilitating the reception of or the interaction with the content or administrating data related to the end-user or to the client device itself, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies, resolving scheduling conflicts
- H04N21/462—Content or additional data management, e.g. creating a master electronic program guide from data received from the Internet and a Head-end, controlling the complexity of a video stream by scaling the resolution or bit-rate based on the client capabilities
- H04N21/4622—Retrieving content or additional data from different sources, e.g. from a broadcast channel and the Internet
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/45—Management operations performed by the client for facilitating the reception of or the interaction with the content or administrating data related to the end-user or to the client device itself, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies, resolving scheduling conflicts
- H04N21/466—Learning process for intelligent management, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/45—Management operations performed by the client for facilitating the reception of or the interaction with the content or administrating data related to the end-user or to the client device itself, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies, resolving scheduling conflicts
- H04N21/466—Learning process for intelligent management, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies
- H04N21/4662—Learning process for intelligent management, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies characterized by learning algorithms
- H04N21/4665—Learning process for intelligent management, e.g. learning user preferences for recommending movies characterized by learning algorithms involving classification methods, e.g. Decision trees
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/47—End-user applications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/47—End-user applications
- H04N21/475—End-user interface for inputting end-user data, e.g. personal identification number [PIN], preference data
- H04N21/4755—End-user interface for inputting end-user data, e.g. personal identification number [PIN], preference data for defining user preferences, e.g. favourite actors or genre
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/40—Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
- H04N21/47—End-user applications
- H04N21/478—Supplemental services, e.g. displaying phone caller identification, shopping application
- H04N21/4782—Web browsing, e.g. WebTV
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N21/00—Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television or video on demand [VOD]
- H04N21/80—Generation or processing of content or additional data by content creator independently of the distribution process; Content per se
- H04N21/81—Monomedia components thereof
- H04N21/812—Monomedia components thereof involving advertisement data
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/14—Systems for two-way working
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/16—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
- H04N7/162—Authorising the user terminal, e.g. by paying; Registering the use of a subscription channel, e.g. billing
- H04N7/163—Authorising the user terminal, e.g. by paying; Registering the use of a subscription channel, e.g. billing by receiver means only
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/16—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
- H04N7/162—Authorising the user terminal, e.g. by paying; Registering the use of a subscription channel, e.g. billing
- H04N7/165—Centralised control of user terminal ; Registering at central
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/16—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
- H04N7/167—Systems rendering the television signal unintelligible and subsequently intelligible
- H04N7/1675—Providing digital key or authorisation information for generation or regeneration of the scrambling sequence
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/16—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
- H04N7/173—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems with two-way working, e.g. subscriber sending a programme selection signal
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/16—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
- H04N7/173—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems with two-way working, e.g. subscriber sending a programme selection signal
- H04N7/17309—Transmission or handling of upstream communications
- H04N7/17318—Direct or substantially direct transmission and handling of requests
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04N—PICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
- H04N7/00—Television systems
- H04N7/16—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
- H04N7/173—Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems with two-way working, e.g. subscriber sending a programme selection signal
- H04N7/17345—Control of the passage of the selected programme
- H04N7/17354—Control of the passage of the selected programme in an intermediate station common to a plurality of user terminals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
- G06F16/22—Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04H—BROADCAST COMMUNICATION
- H04H60/00—Arrangements for broadcast applications with a direct linking to broadcast information or broadcast space-time; Broadcast-related systems
- H04H60/29—Arrangements for monitoring broadcast services or broadcast-related services
- H04H60/31—Arrangements for monitoring the use made of the broadcast services
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L2209/00—Additional information or applications relating to cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication H04L9/00
- H04L2209/60—Digital content management, e.g. content distribution
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99933—Query processing, i.e. searching
- Y10S707/99936—Pattern matching access
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S707/00—Data processing: database and file management or data structures
- Y10S707/99931—Database or file accessing
- Y10S707/99939—Privileged access
Definitions
- This invention relates to customized electronic identification of desirable objects, such as news articles, in an electronic media environment, and in particular to a system that automatically constructs both a “target profile” for each target object in the electronic media based, for example, on the frequency with which each word appears in an article relative to its overall frequency of use in all articles, as well as a “target profile interest summary” for each user, which target profile interest summary describes the user's interest level in various types of target objects.
- the system evaluates the target profiles against the users' target profile interest summaries to generate a user-customized rank ordered listing of target objects most likely to be of interest to each user so that the user can select from among these potentially relevant target objects, which were automatically selected by this system from the plethora of target objects that are profiled on the electronic media.
- Users' target profile interest summaries can be used to efficiently organize the distribution of information in a large scale system consisting of many users interconnected by means of a communication network. Additionally, a cryptographically based proxy server is provided to ensure the privacy of a user's target profile interest summary, by giving the user control over the ability of third parties to access this summary and to identify or contact the user.
- Electronic media such as on-line information sources, provide a vast amount of information to users, typically in the form of “articles,” each of which comprises a publication item or document that relates to a specific topic.
- the difficulty with electronic media is that the amount of information available to the user is overwhelming and the article repository systems that are connected on-line are not organized in a manner that sufficiently simplifies access to only the articles of interest to the user.
- a user either fails to access relevant articles because they are not easily identified or expends a significant amount of time and energy to conduct an exhaustive search of all articles to identify those most likely to be of interest to the user. Furthermore, even if the user conducts an exhaustive search, present information searching techniques do not necessarily accurately extract only the most relevant articles, but also present articles of marginal relevance due to the functional limitations of the information searching techniques. There is also no existing system which automatically estimates the inherent quality of a n article or other target object to distinguish among a number of articles or target objects identified as of possible interest to a user.
- Users may receive information on a computer network either by actively retrieving the information or by passively receiving information that is sent to them. Just as users of information retrieval systems face the problem of too much information, so do users who are targeted with electronic junk mail by individuals and organizations. An ideal system would protect the user from unsolicited advertising, both by automatically extracting only the most relevant messages received by electronic mail, and by preserving the confidentiality of the user's preferences, which should not be freely available to others on the network.
- the cluster “summaries” are generated by picking those words which appear most frequently in the cluster and the titles of those articles closest to the center of the cluster. However, no feedback from users is collected or stored, so no performance improvement occurs over time.
- Apple's Advanced Technology Group has developed an interface based on the concept of a “pile of articles”. This interface is described in an article titled “A ‘pile’ metaphor for supporting casual organization of information in Human factors in computer systems” published in CHI '92 Conf. Proc. 627-634 by Mander, R. G. Salomon and Y. Wong. 1992. Another article titled “Content awareness in a file system interface: implementing the ‘pile’ metaphor for organizing information” was published in 16 Ann. Int'l SIGIR '93, ACM 260-269 by Rose E. D. et al. The Apple interface uses word frequencies to automatically file articles by picking the pile most similar to the article being filed. This system functions to cluster articles into subpiles, determine key words for indexing by picking the words with the largest TF/IDF (where TF is term (word) frequency and IDF is the inverse document frequency) and label piles by using the determined key words.
- TF/IDF where TF is term (word) frequency and IDF is the
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,331,554 issued to Graham et al. discloses a method for retrieving segments of a manual by comparing a query with nodes in a decision tree.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,331,556 addresses techniques for deriving morphological part-of-speech information and thus to make use of the similarities of different forms of the same word (e.g. “article” and “articles”).
- the above-described problems are solved and a technical advance achieved in the field by the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects in an electronic media environment, which system enables a user to access target objects of relevance and interest to the user without requiring the user to expend an excessive amount of time and energy.
- Profiles of the target objects are stored on electronic media and are accessible via a data communication network.
- the target objects are informational In nature, and so may themselves be stored on electronic media and be accessible via a data communication network.
- target object an object available for access by the user, which may be either physical or electronic in nature, is termed a “target object”,
- target profile a digitally represented profile indicating that target object's attributes
- user the user looking for the target object is termed a “user”
- profile holding that user's attributes including age/zip code/etc.
- a “user profile” a summary of digital profiles of target objects that a user likes and/or dislikes, is termed the “target profile interest summary” of that user
- search profile set a collection of target objects with similar profiles
- a “cluster” i.) an aggregate profile formed by averaging the attributes of all tar get objects in a cluster, termed a “cluster profile”
- a real number determined by calculating the statistical variance of the profiles of all target objects in a cluster is termed a “cluster variance,” (k.) a real number determined by calculating the maximum distance between
- the system for electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention automatically constructs both a target profile for each target object in the electronic media based, for example, on the frequency with which each word appears in an article relative to its overall frequency of use in all articles, as well as a “target profile interest summary” for each user, which target profile interest summary describes the user's interest level in various types of target objects.
- the system evaluates the target profiles against the users' target profile interest summaries to generate a user-customized rank ordered listing of tar get objects most likely to be of interest to each user so that the user can select from among these potentially relevant target objects, which were automatically selected by this system from the plethora of target objects available on the electronic media.
- a target profile interest summary for a single user must represent multiple areas of interest, for example, by consisting of a set of individual search profiles, each of which identifies one of the user's areas of interest.
- Each user is presented with those target objects whose profiles most closely match the user's interests as described by the user's target profile interest summary.
- Users' target profile interest summaries are automatically updated on a continuing basis to reflect each user's changing interests.
- target objects can be grouped into clusters based on their similarity to each other, for example, based on similarity of their topics in the case where the target objects are published articles, and menus automatically generated for each duster of target objects to allow users to navigate throughout the clusters and manually locate target objects of interest.
- a particular user may not wish to make public all of the interests recorded in the user's target profile interest summary, particularly when these interests are determined by the user's purchasing patterns.
- the user may desire that all or part of the target profile interest summary be kept confidential, such as information relating to the user's political, religious, financial or purchasing behavior, indeed, confidentiality with respect to purchasing behavior is the user's legal right in many states. It is therefore necessary that data in a user's target profile interest summary be protected from unwanted disclosure except with the user's agreement.
- the user's target profile interest summaries must be accessible to the relevant servers that perform the matching of target objects to the users, if the benefit of this matching is desired by both providers and consumers of the target objects.
- the disclosed system provides a solution to the privacy problem by using a proxy server which acts as an intermediary between the information provider and the user.
- the proxy server dissociates the user's true identity from the pseudonym by the use of cryptographic techniques.
- the proxy server also permits users to control access to their target profile interest summaries and/or user profiles, including provision of this information to marketers and advertisers if they so desire, possibly in exchange for cash or other considerations. Marketers may purchase these profiles in order to target advertisements to particular users, or they may purchase partial user profiles, which do not include enough information to identify the individual users in question, in order to carry out standard kinds of demographic analysis and market research on the resulting database of partial user profiles.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects uses a fundamental methodology for accurately and efficiently matching users and target objects by automatically calculating, using and updating profile information that describes both the users' interests and the target objects' characteristics.
- the target objects may be published articles, purchasable items, or even other people, and their properties are stored, and/or represented and/or denoted on the electronic media as (digital) data. Examples of target objects can include, but are not limited to: a newspaper story of potential interest, a movie to watch, an item to buy, e-mail to receive, or another person to correspond with.
- the information delivery process in the preferred embodiment is based on determining the similarity between a profile for the target object and the profiles of target objects for which the user (or a similar user) has provided positive feedback in the past.
- the individual data that describe a target object and constitute the target object's profile are herein termed “attributes” of the target object.
- Attributes may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) long pieces of text (a newspaper story, a movie review, a product description or an advertisement), (2) short pieces of text (name of a movie's director, name of town from which an advertisement was placed, name of the language in which an article was written), (3) numeric measurements (price of a product, rating given to a movie, reading level of a book), (4) associations with other types of objects (list of actors in a movie, list of persons who have read a document). Any of these attributes, but especially the numeric ones, may correlate with the quality of the target object, such as measures of its popularity (how often it is accessed) or of user satisfaction (number of complaints received).
- the preferred embodiment of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects operates in an electronic media environment for accessing these target objects, which may be news, electronic mail, other published documents, or product descriptions.
- the system in its broadest construction comprises three conceptual modules, which may b(c) separate entities distributed across many implementing systems, or combined into a lesser subset of physical entities.
- the specific embodiment of this system disclosed herein illustrates the use of a first module which automatically constructs a “target profile” for each target object in the electronic media based on various descriptive attributes of the target object.
- a second module uses interest feedback from users to construct a “target profile interest summary” for each user, for example in the form of a “search profile set” consisting of a plurality of search profiles, each of which corresponds to a single topic of high interest for the user.
- the system further includes a profile processing module which estimates each user's interest in various target objects by reference to the users' target profile interest summaries, for example by comparing the target profiles of these target objects against the search profiles in users' search profile sets, and generates for each user a customized rank-ordered listing of target objects most likely to be of interest to that user.
- Each user's target profile interest summary is automatically updated on a continuing basis to reflect the user's changing interests.
- Target objects may be of various sorts, and it is sometimes advantageous to use a single system that delivers and/or clusters target objects of several distinct sorts at once, in a unified framework. For example, users who exhibit a strong interest in certain novels may also show an interest in certain movies, presumably of a similar nature.
- a system in which some target objects are novels and other target objects are movies can discover such a correlation and exploit it in order to group particular novels with particular movies, e.g., for clustering purposes, or to recommend the movies to a user who has demonstrated interest in the novels.
- the system can match the products with the sites and thereby recommend to the marketers of those products that they place advertisements at those sites, e.g., in the form of hypertext links to their own sites.
- the ability to measure the similarity of profiles describing target objects and a user's interests can be applied in two basic ways: filtering and browsing. Filtering is useful when large numbers of target objects are described in the electronic media space. These target objects can for example be articles that are received or potentially received by a user, who only has time to read a small fraction of them. For example, one might potentially receive all items on the AP news wire service, all items posted to a number of news groups, all advertisements in a set of newspapers, or all unsolicited electronic mail, but few people have the time or inclination to read so many articles.
- a filtering system in the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects automatically selects a set of articles that the user is likely to wish to read.
- This filtering system improves over time by noting which articles the user reads and by generating a measurement of the depth to which the user reads each article. This information is then used to update the user's target profile interest summary. Browsing provides an alternate method of selecting a small subset of a large number of target objects, such as articles. Articles are organized so that users can actively navigate among groups of articles by moving from one group to a larger, more general group, to a smaller, more specific group, or to a closely related group. Each individual article forms a one-member group of its own, so that the user can navigate to and from individual articles as well as larger groups.
- the methods used by the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects allow articles to be grouped into clusters and the clusters to be grouped and merged into larger and larger clusters. These hierarchies of clusters then form the basis for menuing and navigational systems to allow the rapid searching of large numbers of articles. This same clustering technique is applicable to any type of target objects that can be profiled on the electronic media.
- the detailed, comprehensive target profiles and user-specific target profile interest summaries enable the system to provide responsive routing of specific queries for user information access.
- the information maps so produced and the application of users' target profile interest summaries to predict the information consumption patterns of a user allows for pre-caching of data at locations on the data communication network and at times that minimize the traffic flow in the communication network to thereby efficiently provide the desired information to the user and/or conserve valuable storage space by only storing those target objects (or segments thereof) which are relevant to the user's interests.
- FIG. 1 illustrates in block diagram form a typical architecture of an electronic media system in which the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention can be implemented as part of a user server system;
- FIG. 2 illustrates in block diagram form one embodiment of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects
- FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate typical network trees
- FIG. 5 illustrates in flow diagram form a method for automatically generating article profiles and an associated hierarchical menu system
- FIGS. 6-9 illustrate examples of menu generating process
- FIG. 10 illustrates in flow diagram form the operational steps taken by the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects to screen articles for a user
- FIG. 11 illustrates a hierarchical cluster tree example
- FIG. 12 illustrates in flow diagram form the process for determination of likelihood of interest by a specific user in a selected target object
- FIGS. 13A-B illustrate in flow diagram form the automatic clustering process
- FIG. 14 illustrates in flow diagram form the use of the pseudonymous server
- FIG. 15 illustrates in flow diagram form the use of the system for accessing information in response to a user query
- FIG. 16 illustrates in flow diagram form the use of the system for accessing information in response to a user query when the system is a distributed network implementation.
- Target objects being compared can be, as an example but not limited to: textual documents, human beings, movies, or mutual funds.
- the computed similarity measurements serve as input to additional processes, which function to enable human users to locate desired target objects using a large computer system.
- additional processes estimate a human user's interest in various target objects, or else cluster a plurality of target objects in to logically coherent groups.
- the methods used by these additional processes might in principle be implemented on either a single computer or on a computer network. Jointly or separately, they form the underpinning for various sorts of database systems and information retrieval systems.
- IR Information Retrieval
- the user is a literate human and the target objects in question are textual documents stored on data storage devices interconnected to the user via a computer network. That is, the target objects consist entirely of text, and so are digitally stored on the data storage devices within the computer network.
- target objects consist entirely of text, and so are digitally stored on the data storage devices within the computer network.
- target object domains that present related retrieval problems that are not capable of being solved by present information retrieval technology:
- the user wishes to locate some small subset of the target objects—such as the target objects that the user most desires to rent, buy, investigate, meet, read, give mammograms to, insure, and so forth.
- the task is to help the user identify the most interesting target objects, where the user's interest in a target object is defined to be a numerical measurement of the user's relative desire to locate that object rather than others.
- Attributes c-g are numeric attributes, of the sort that might be found in a database record. It is evident that they can be used to help the user identify target objects (movies) of interest. For example, the user might previously have rented many Parental Guidance (PG) films, and many films made in the 1970's. This generalization is useful: new films with values for one or both attributes that are numerically similar to these (such as MPAA rating of 1, release date of 1975) are judged similar to the films the user already likes, and therefore of probable interest Attributes a-b and h are textual attributes. They too are important for helping the user locate desired films.
- PG Parental Guidance
- Attribute i is an associative attribute. It records associations between the target objects in this domain, namely movies, and ancillary target objects of an entirely different sort, namely humans. A good indication that the user wants to rent a particular movie is that the user has previously rented other movies with similar attribute values, and this holds for attribute I just as it does for attributes a-h.
- Attribute j is another example of an associative attribute, recording associations between target objects and actors. Notice that any of these attributes can be made subject to authentication when the profile is constructed, through the use of digital signatures; for example, the target object could be accompanied by a digitally signed note from the MPAA, which note names the target object and specifies its authentic value for attribute c.
- numeric, textual, and associative are common: numeric, textual, and associative.
- the system might only consider a single, textual attribute when measuring similarity: the full text of the target object.
- numeric and associative attributes are common:
- a convention may optionally be adopted that any document also links to itself.
- a target object's popularity can be usefully measured as a numeric attribute specifying the number of users who have retrieved that object.
- Related measurable numeric attributes that also indicate a kind of popularity include the number of replies to a target object, in the domain where target objects are messages posted to an electronic community such as an computer bulletin board or newsgroup, and the number of links leading to a target object, in the domain where target objects are interlinked hypertext documents on the World Wide Web or a similar system.
- a target object may also receive explicit numeric evaluations (another kind of numeric attribute) from various groups, such as the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), as above, which rates movies' appropriateness for children, or the American Medical Association, which might rate the accuracy and novelty of medical research papers, or a random survey sample of users (chosen from all users or a selected set of experts), who could be asked to rate nearly anything.
- MPAA Motion Picture Association of America
- Certain other types of evaluation, which also yield numeric attributes, may be carried out mechanically.
- the difficulty of reading a text can be assessed by standard procedures that count word and sentence lengths, while the vulgarity of a text could be defined as (say) the number of vulgar words it contains, and the expertise of a text could be crudely assessed by counting the number of similar texts its author had previously retrieved and read using the invention, perhaps confining this count to texts that have high approval ratings from critics.
- textual and associative attributes are large and complex pieces of data, for information retrieval purposes they can be decomposed into smaller, simpler numeric attributes.
- any set of attributes can be replaced by a (usually larger) set of numeric attributes, and hence that any profile can be represented as a vector of numbers denoting the values of these numeric attributes.
- a textual attribute such as the full text of a movie review, can be replaced by a collection of numeric attributes that represent scores to denote the presence and significance of the words “aardvark,” “aback,” “abacus,” and so on through “zymurgy” in that text.
- the score of a word in a text may be defined in numerous ways.
- the score is the rate of the word in the text, which is computed by computing the number of times the word occurs in the text, and dividing this number by the total number of words in the text. This sort of score is often called the “term frequency” (TF) of the word.
- TF term frequency
- the definition of term frequency may optionally be modified to weight different portions of the text unequally: for example, any occurrence of a word in the text's title might be counted as a 3-fold or more generally k-fold occurrence (as if the title had been repeated k times within the text), in order to reflect a heuristic assumption that the words in the title are particularly important indicators of the text's content or topic.
- the score of a word is typically defined to be not merely its term frequency, but its term frequency multiplied by the negated logarithm of the word's “global frequency,” as measured with respect to the textual attribute in question.
- the global frequency of a word which effectively measures the word's uninformativeness, is a fraction between 0 and 1, defined to be the fraction of all target objects for which the textual attribute in question contains this word.
- This adjusted score is often known in the art as TF/IDF (“term frequency times inverse document frequency”).
- TF/IDF term frequency times inverse document frequency
- this sentence contains a sequence of overlapping character 5-grams which starts “for e”, “or ex”, “r exa”, “exam”, “examp”, etc.
- the sentence may be characterized, imprecisely but usefully, by the score of each possible character 5-gram (“aaaaa”, “aaaab”, . . . “zzzzz”) in the sentence.
- most of these numeric attributes have values of 0, since most 5-grams do not appear in the target object attributes.
- These zero values need not be stored anywhere.
- the value of a textual attribute could be characterized by storing the set of character 5-grams that actually do appear in the text, together with the nonzero score of each one. Any 5-gram that is no t included in the set can be assumed to have a score of zero.
- the decomposition of textual attributes is not limited to attributes whose values are expected to be long texts.
- a simple, one-term textual attribute can be replaced by a collection of numeric attributes in exactly the same way.
- the “name of director” attribute which is textual, can be replaced by numeric attributes giving the scores for “Federico-Fellini,” “Woody-Allen,” “Terence-Davies,” and so forth, in that attribute.
- the score of a word is usually defined to be its rate in the text, without any consideration of global frequency. Note that under these conditions, one of the scores is 1, while the other scores are 0 and need not be stored.
- an associative attribute may be decomposed into a number of component associations.
- a typical associative attribute used in profiling a movie would be a list of customers who have rented that movie. This list can be replaced by a collection of numeric attributes, which give the “association scores” between the movie and each of the customers known to the system. For example, the 165th such numeric attribute would be the association score between the movie and customer #165, where the association score is defined to be 1 if customer #165 has previously rented the movie, and 0 otherwise.
- this associations core could be defined to be the degree of interest, possibly zero, that customer #165 exhibited in the movie, as determined by relevance feedback (as described below).
- an associative attribute indicating the major shareholders of the company would be decomposed into a collection of association scores, each of which would indicate the percentage of the company (possibly zero) owned by some particular individual or corporate body.
- each association score may optionally be adjusted by a multiplicative factor: for example, the association score between a movie and customer #165 might be multiplied by the negated logarithm of the “global frequency” of customer #165, i.e., the fraction of all movies that have been rented by customer #165.
- scores used in decomposing textual attributes most association scores found when decomposing a particular value of an associative attribute are zero, and a similar economy of storage may be gained in exactly the same manner by storing a list of only those ancillary objects with which the target object has a nonzero association score, together with their respective association scores.
- the distance between two values of a given attribute is a numeric, associative, or textual attribute. If the attribute is numeric, then the distance between two values of the attribute is the absolute value of the difference between the two values. (Other definitions are also possible: for example, the distance between prices p 1 and p 2 might be defined by
- V may therefore be regarded as a vector with components V 1 , V 2 , V 3 , etc., representing the association scores between the object and ancillary objects 1 , 2 , 3 , etc., respectively.
- One technique is to augment the set of words actually found in the article with a set of synonyms or other words which tend to co-occur with the words in the article, so that “Kennedy” could be added to every article that mentions “JFK.”
- words found in the article may be wholly replaced by synonyms, so that “JFK” might be replaced by “Kennedy” or by “John F. Kennedy” wherever it appears.
- the synonym dictionary may be sensitive to the topic of the document as a whole; for example, it may recognize that “crane” is likely to have a different synonym in a document that mentions birds than in a document that mentions construction.
- a related technique is to replace each word by its morphological stem, so that “staple”, “stapler”, and “staples” are all replaced by “staple.”
- Common function words (“a”, “and”, “the” . . . ) can influence the calculated similarity of texts without regard to their topics, and so are typically removed from the text before the scores of terms in the text are computed.
- a more general approach to recognizing synonyms is to use a revised measure of the distance between textual attribute vectors V and U, namely arccos(AV(AU) t /sqrt(AV(AV) t AU(AU) t ), where the matrix A is the dimensionality-reducing linear transformation (or an approximation thereto) determined by collecting the vector values of the textual attribute, for all target objects known to the system, and applying singular value decomposition to the resulting collection.
- the same approach can be applied to the vector values of associative attributes.
- the above definitions allow us to determine how close together two target objects are with respect to a single attribute, whether numeric, associative, or textual.
- the distance between two target objects X and Y with respect to their entire multi-attribute profiles P X and P Y is then denoted d(X,Y) or d(P X , P Y ) and defined as:
- k is a fixed positive real number, typically 2, and the weights are non-negative real numbers indicating the relative importance of the various attributes.
- the target objects are consumer goods, and the weight of the “color” attribute is comparatively very small, then price is not a consideration in determining similarity: a user who likes a brown massage cushion is predicted to show equal interest in the same cushion manufactured in blue, and vice-versa.
- the weight of the “color” attribute is comparatively very high, then users are predicted to show interest primarily in products whose colors they have liked in the past, a brown massage cushion and a blue massage cushion are not at all the same kind of target object, however similar in other attributes, and a good experience with one does not by itself inspire much interest in the other.
- Target objects may be of various sorts, and it is sometimes advantageous to use a single system that is able to compare tar get objects of distinct sorts. For example, in a system where some target objects are novels while other target objects are movies, it is desirable to judge a novel and a movie similar if their profiles show that similar users like them (an associative attribute). However, it is important to note that certain attributes specified in the movie's target profile are undefined in the novel's target profile, and vice versa: a novel has no “cast list” associative attribute and a movie has no “reading level” numeric attribute. In general, a system in which target objects fall into distinct sorts may sometimes have to measure the similarity of two target objects for which somewhat different sets of attributes are defined.
- Max(a) be an upper bound on the distance between two values of attribute a; notice that if attribute a is an associative or textual attribute, this distance is an angle determined by arccos, so that Max(a) may be chosen to be 180 degrees, while if attribute a is a numeric attribute, a sufficiently large number must be selected by the system designers.
- the distance between two values of attribute a is given as before in the case where both values are defined; the distance between two undefined values is taken to be zero; finally, the distance between a defined value and an undefined value is always taken to be Max(a)/2.
- a simple application of the similarity measurement is a system to match buyers with sellers in small-volume markets, such as used cars and other used goods, artwork, or employment.
- Sellers submit profiles of the goods (target objects) they want to sell, and buyers submit profiles of the goods (target objects) they want to buy. Participants may submit or withdraw these profiles at any time.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects computes the similarities between seller-submitted profiles and buyer-submitted profiles, and when two profiles match closely (i.e., the similarity is above a threshold), the corresponding seller and buyer are notified of each other's identities.
- a filtering system is a device that can search through many target objects and estimate a given user's interest in each target object, so as to identify those that are of greatest interest to the user.
- the filtering system uses relevance feed back to refine its knowledge of the user's interests: whenever the filtering system identifies a target object as potentially interesting to a user, the user (if an on-line user) provides feedback as to whether or not that target object really is of interest.
- Such feedback is stored long-term in summarized form, as part of a database of user feedback information, and may be provided either actively or passively.
- active feedback the user explicitly indicates his or her interest, for instance, on a scale of ⁇ 2 (active distaste) through 0 (no special interest) to 10 (great interest).
- the system infers the user's interest from the user's behavior. For example, if target objects are textual documents, the system might monitor which documents the user chooses to read, or not to read, and how much time the user spends reading them.
- a typical formula for assessing interest in a document via passive feedback, in this domain, on a scale of 0 to 10, might be:
- target objects are electronic mail messages
- interest points might also be added in the case of a particularly lengthy or particularly prompt reply.
- target objects are purchasable goods
- interest points might be added for target objects that the user actually purchases, with further points in the case of a large-quantity or high-price purchase.
- further points might be added for target objects that the user accesses early in a session, on the grounds that users access the objects that most interest them first.
- Other potential sources of passive feedback include an electronic measurement of the extent to which the user's pupils dilate while the user views the target object or a description of the target object. It is possible to combine active and passive feedback. One option is to take a weighted average of the two ratings.
- Another option is to use passive feedback by default, but to allow the user to examine and actively modify the passive feedback score.
- an uninteresting article may sometimes remain on the display device for a long period while the user is engaged in unrelated business; the passive feedback score is then inappropriately high, and the user may wish to correct it before continuing.
- a visual indicator such as a sliding bar or indicator needle on the user's screen
- a visual indicator can be used to continuously display the passive feedback score estimated by the system for the target object being viewed, unless the user has manually adjusted the indicator by a mouse operation or other means in order to reflect a different score for this target object, after which the indicator displays the active feedback score selected by the user, and this active feedback score is used by the system instead of the passive feedback score.
- the user cannot see or adjust the indicator until just after the user has finished viewing the target object. Regardless how a user's feedback is computed, it is stored long-term as part of that user's target profile interest summary.
- the filtering system For target objects that the user has not yet seen, the filtering system must estimate the user's interest. This estimation task is the heart of the filtering problem, and the reason that the similarity measurement is important. More concretely, the preferred embodiment of the filtering system is a news clipping service that periodically presents the user with news articles of potential interest. The user provides active and/or passive feedback to the system relating to these presented articles. However, the system does not have feedback information from the user for articles that have never been presented to the user, such as new articles that have just been added to the database, or old articles that the system chose not to present to the user. Similarly, in the dating service domain where target objects are prospective romantic partners, the system has only received feedback on old flames, not on prospective new loves.
- the evaluation of the likelihood of interest in a particular target object for a specific user can automatically be computed.
- the interest that a given target object X holds for a user U is assumed to be a sum of two quantities: q(U, X), the intrinsic “quality” of X, plus f(U, X), the “topical interest” that users like U have in target objects like X.
- the intrinsic quality measure q(U, X) is easily estimated at steps 1201 - 1203 directly from numeric attributes of the target object X.
- the computation process begins at step 1201 , where certain designated numeric attributes of target object X are specifically selected, which attributes by their very nature should be positively or negatively correlated with users' interest.
- Quality attributes have the normative property that the higher (or in some cases lower) their value, the more interesting a user is expected to find them.
- Quality attributes of target object X may include, but are not limited to, target object X's popularity among users in general, the rating a particular reviewer has given target object X, the age (time since authorship—also known as outdatedness) of target object X, the number of vulgar words used in target object X, the price of target object X, and the amount of money that the company selling target object X has donated to the user's favorite charity.
- each of the selected attributes is multiplied by a positive or negative weight indicative of the strength of user U's preference for those target objects that have high values for this attribute, which weight must be retrieved from a data file storing quality attribute weights for the selected user.
- a weighted sum of the identified weighted selected attributes is computed to determine the intrinsic quality measure q(U, X).
- the summarized weighted relevance feedback data is retrieved, wherein some relevance feedback points are weighted more heavily than others and the stored relevance data can be summarized to some degree, for example by the use of search profile sets.
- the more difficult part of determining user U's interest in target object X is to find or compute at step 1205 the value of f(U, X), which denotes the topical interest that users like U generally have in target objects like X.
- the method of determining a user's interest relies on the following heuristic: when X and Y are similar target objects (have similar attributes), and U and V are similar users (have similar attributes), then topical interest f(U, X) is predicted to have a similar value to the value of topical interest f(V, Y).
- the problem of estimating topical interest at all points becomes a problem of interpolating among these estimates of topical interest at selected points, such as the feedback estimate of f(V, Y) as r(V, Y) ⁇ q(V, Y).
- This interpolation can be accomplished with any standard smoothing technique, using as input the known point estimates of the value of the topical interest function f(*, *), and determining as output a function that approximates the entire topical interest function f(*, *).
- point estimates of the topical interest function f(*, *) should be given equal weight as inputs to the smoothing algorithm. Since passive relevance feedback is less reliable than active relevance feedback, point estimates made from passive relevance feedback should be weighted less heavily than point estimates made from active relevance feedback, or even not used at all. In most domains, a user's interests may change over time and, therefore, estimates of topic al interest that derive from more recent feedback should also be weighted more heavily. A user's interests may vary according to mood, so estimates of topical interest that derive from the current session should be weighted more heavily for the duration of the current session, and past estimates of topical interest made at approximately the current time of day or on the current weekday should be weighted more heavily.
- target profile Y was created in 1990 to describe a particular investment that was available in 1990, and that was purchased in 1990 by user V
- the system solicits relevance feedback from user V in the years 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, etc., and treats these as successively stronger indications of user V's true interest in target profile Y, and thus as indications of user V's likely interest in new investments whose current profiles resemble the original 1990 investment profile Y.
- the system tends to recommend additional investments when they have profiles like target profile Y, on the grounds that they too will turn out to be satisfactory in 4 to 5 years.
- This approach requires user U, user V, and all other users to have some attributes of their own stored in the system: for example, age (numeric), social security number (textual), and list of documents previously retrieved (associative). It is these attributes that determine the notion of “similar users.” Thus it is desirable to generate profiles of users (termed “user profiles”) as well as profiles of target objects (termed “target profiles”). Some attributes employed for profiling users may be related to the attributes employed for profiling target objects: for example, using associative attributes, it is possible to characterize target objects such as X by the interest that various users have shown in them, and simultaneously to characterize users such as U by the interest that they have shown m various target objects.
- user profiles may make use of any attributes that are useful in characterizing humans, such as those suggested in the example domain above where target objects are potential consumers. Notice that user U's interest can be estimated even if user U is a new user or an off-line user who has never provided any feedback, because the relevance feedback of users whose attributes are similar to U's attributes is taken into account.
- this example has the characteristic that (U, X) is far away from all the points (V, Y) where feedback is available.
- topical interest f(U, X) is presumed to be close to zero, even if the value of the topical interest function f(*, *) is high at all the faraway surrounding points at which its value is known.
- a smoothing technique such a presumption of no topical interest can be introduced, if appropriate, by manipulating the input to the smoothing technique.
- These fake observations should be given relatively low weight as inputs to the smoothing algorithm. The more strongly they are weighted, the stronger the presumption of no interest.
- the summations are over all pairs (V, Y) such that user V has provided feedback r(V, Y) on target object Y, i.e., all pairs (V, Y) such that relevance feedback r(V, Y) is defined.
- the estimate of the topical interest f(U, X) is not necessarily equal to r(U, X)-q(U, X), even when r(U, X) is defined.
- the method described above requires the filtering system to measure distances between (user, target object) pairs, such as the distance between (U, X) and (V, Y). Given the means described earlier for measuring the distance between two multi-attribute profiles, the method must therefore associate a weight with each attribute used in the profile of (user, target object) pairs, that is, with each attribute used to profile either users or target objects. These weights specify the relative importance of the attributes in establishing similarity or difference, and therefore, in determining how topical interest is generalized from one (user, target object) pair to another. Additional weights determine which attributes of a target object contribute to the quality function q, and by how much. It is possible and often desirable for a filtering system to store a different set of weights for each user.
- a user who thinks of two-star films as having materially different topic and style from four-star films wants to assign a high weight to “number of stars” for purposes of the similarity distance measure d(*, *); this means that interest in a two-star film does not necessarily signal interest in an otherwise similar four-star film, or vice-versa. If the user also agrees with the critics, and actually prefers four-star films, the user also wants to assign “number of stars” a high positive weight in the determination of the quality function q.
- a user who dislikes vulgarity wants to assign the “vulgarity score” attribute a high negative weight in the determination of the quality function q, although the “vulgarity score” attribute does not necessarily have a high weight in determining the topical similarity of two films.
- Attribute weights may be set or adjusted by the system administrator or the individual user, on either a temporary or a permanent basis. However, it is often desirable for the filtering system to learn attribute weights automatically, based on relevance feedback.
- the optimal attribute weights for a user U are those that allow the most accurate prediction of user U's interests. That is, with the distance measure and quality function defined by these attribute weights, user U's interest in target object X, q(U, X)+f(U, X), can be accurately estimated by the techniques above. The effectiveness of a particular set of attribute weights for user U can therefore be gauged by seeing how well it predicts user U's known interests.
- a gradient-descent or other numerical optimization method may be used to adjust user U's attribute weights so that this error measure reaches a (local) minimum.
- This approach tends to work best if the smoothing technique used in estimation is such that the value of f(V, Y) is strongly affected by the point estimate r(V, Y) ⁇ q(V, Y) when the latter value is provided as input. Otherwise, the presence or absence of the single input feedback rating r(U, X i , in steps (i)-(ii) may not make a i and b i very different from each other.
- a slight variation of this learning technique adjusts a single global set of at tribute weights for all users, by adjusting the weights so as to minimize not a particular user's error measure but rather the total error measure of all users.
- These global weights are used as a default initial setting for a new user who has not yet provided any feedback. Gradient descent can then be employed to adjust this user's individual weights over time. Even when the attribute weights are chosen to minimize the error measure for user U, the error measure is generally still positive, meaning that residue feedback from user U has not been reduced to 0 on all target objects.
- a useful quality attribute for a target object X is the average amount of residue feedback r res (V, X) from users on that target object, averaged over all users V who have provided relevance feedback on the target object.
- residue feedback is never averaged indiscriminately over all users to form a new attribute, but instead is smoothed to consider users' similarity to each other.
- the quality measure q(U, X) depends on the user U as well as the target object X, so that a given target object X may be perceived by different users to have different quality.
- q(U, X) is calculated as a weighted sum of various quality attributes that are dependent only on X, but then an additional term is added, namely an estimate of r res (U, X) found by applying a smoothing algorithm to known values of r res (V, X).
- V ranges over all users who have provided relevance feedback on target object X, and the smoothing algorithm is sensitive to the distances d(U, V) from each such user V to user U.
- a method for defining the distance between any pair of target objects was disclosed above. Given this distance measure, it is simple to apply a standard clustering algorithm, such as k-means, to group the target objects into a number of clusters, in such a way that similar target objects tend to be grouped in the same cluster. It is clear that the resulting clusters can be used to improve the efficiency of matching buyers and sellers in the application described in section “Matching Buyers and Sellers” above: it is not necessary to compare every buy profile to every sell profile, but only to compare buy profiles and sell profiles that are similar enough to appear in the same cluster. As explained below, the results of the clustering procedure can also be used to make filtering more efficient, and in the service of querying and browsing tasks.
- k-means such as k-means
- the k-means clustering method is familiar to those skilled in the art. Briefly put, it finds a grouping of points (target profiles, in this case, whose numeric coordinates are given by numeric decomposition of their attributes as described above) to minimize the distance between points in the clusters and the centers of the clusters in which they are located. This is done by alternating between assigning each point to the cluster which has the nearest center and then, once the points have been assigned, computing the (new) center of each cluster by averaging the coordinates of the points (target profiles) located in this cluster.
- Other clustering methods can be used, such as “soft” or “fuzzy” k-means clustering, in which objects are allowed to belong to more than one cluster. This can be cast as a clustering problem similar to the k-means problem, but now the criterion being optimized is a little different:
- C ranges over cluster numbers
- i ranges over target objects
- X i is the numeric vector corresponding to the profile of target object number i
- x c is the mean of all the numeric vectors corresponding to target profiles of target objects in cluster number C, termed the “cluster profile” of cluster C
- d(*, *) is the metric used to measure distance between two target profiles
- i iC is a value between 0 and 1 that indicates how much target object number i is associated with cluster number C
- i iC is either 0 or 1.
- Hierarchical clustering of target objects is often useful.
- Hierarchical clustering produces a tree which divides the target objects first into two large clusters of roughly similar objects; each of these clusters is in turn divided into two or more smaller clusters, which in turn are each divided into yet smaller clusters until the collection of target objects has been entirely divided into “clusters” consisting of a single object each, as diagrammed in FIG. 8
- the node d denotes a particular target object d, or equivalently, a single-member cluster consisting of this target object.
- Target object d is a member of the cluster (a, b, d), which is a subset of the cluster (a, b, c, d, e, f), which in turn is a subset of all target objects.
- the tree shown in FIG. 8 would be produced from a set of target objects such as those shown geometrically in FIG. 7 .
- each letter represents a target object
- axes x 1 and x 2 represent two of the many numeric attributes on which the target objects differ.
- Such a cluster tree may be created by hand, using human judgment to form clusters and subclusters of similar objects, or may be created automatically in either of two standard ways: top-down or bottom-up.
- top-down hierarchical clustering the set of all target objects in FIG. 7 would be divided into the clusters (a, b, c, d, e, f) and (g, h, i, j, k).
- the clustering algorithm would then be reapplied to the target objects in each cluster, so that the cluster (g, h, i, j, k) is subpartitioned into the clusters (g, k) and (h, i, j), and so on to arrive at the tree shown in FIG. 8 .
- bottom-up hierarchical clustering the set of all target objects in FIG.
- the target profile of a single Woody Allen film would assign “Woody-Allen” a score of 1 in the “name-of-director” field, while giving “Tedericc-Fellini” and “Terence-Davies” scores of 0.
- a cluster that consisted of 20 films directed by Allen and 5 directed by Fellini would be profiled with scores of 0.8, 0.2, and 0 respectively, because, for example, 0.8 is the average of 20 ones and 5 zeros.
- a hierarchical cluster tree of target objects makes it possible for the system to search efficiently for target objects with target profiles similar to P. It is only necessarily to navigate through the tree, automatically, in search of such target profiles.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects begins by considering the largest, top-level clusters, and selects the cluster whose profile is most similar to target profile P. In the event of a near-tie, multiple clusters may be selected. Next, the system considers all subclusters of the selected clusters, and this time selects the subcluster or subclusters whose profiles are closest to target profile P.
- This refinement process is iterated until the clusters selected on a given step are sufficiently small, and these are the desired clusters of target objects with profiles most similar to target profile P. Any hierarchical cluster tree therefore serves as a decision tree for identifying target objects.
- this process is as follows (and in flow diagram form in FIGS. 13A and 13B ):
- step 5 of this pseudo-code smaller thresholds are typically used at lower levels of the tree, for example by making the threshold an affine function or other function of the cluster variance or cluster diameter of the cluster p i .
- this process may be executed in distributed fashion as follows: steps 3-7 are executed by the server that stores the root node of hierarchical cluster tree T, and the recursion in step 7 to a subcluster tree T i involves the transmission of a search request to the server that stores the root node of tree T i , which server carries out the recursive step upon receipt of this request.
- Steps 1-2 are carried out by the processor that initiates the search, and the server that executes step 6 must send a message identifying the target object to this initiating processor, which adds it to the list.
- a standard back-propagation neural net is one such method: it should be trained to take the attributes of a target object as input, and produce as output a unique pattern that can be used to identify the appropriate low-level cluster. For maximum accuracy, low-level clusters that are similar to each other (close together in the cluster tree) should be given similar identifying patterns.
- Another approach is a standard decision tree that considers the attributes of target profile P one at a time until it can identify the appropriate cluster. If profiles are large, this may be more rapid than considering all attributes.
- a hybrid approach to searching uses distance measurements as described above to navigate through the top few levels of the hierarchical cluster tree, until it reaches an cluster of intermediate size whose profile is similar to target profile P, and then continues by using a decision tree specialized to search for low-level subclusters of that intermediate cluster.
- One use of these searching techniques is to search for target objects that match a search profile from a user's search profile set. This form of searching is used repeatedly in the news clipping service, active navigation, and Virtual Community Service applications, described below.
- Another use is to add a new target object quickly to the cluster tree. An existing cluster that is similar to the new target object can be located rapidly, and the new target object can be added to this cluster. If the object is beyond a certain threshold distance from the cluster center, then it is advisable to start a new cluster.
- This incremental clustering scheme can be used, and can be built using variants of subroutines available in advanced statistical packages. Note that various methods can be used to locate the new target objects that must be added to the cluster tree, depending on the architecture used.
- a “webcrawler” program running on a central computer periodically scans all servers in search of new target objects, calculates the target profiles of these objects, and adds them to the hierarchical cluster tree by the above method.
- a software “agent” at that server calculates the target profile and adds it to the hierarchical cluster tree by the above method.
- target objects are wallpaper patterns
- an attribute such as “genre” (a single textual term such as “Art-Deco,” “Children's,” “Rustic,” etc.) may be a matter of judgment and opinion, difficult to determine except by consulting a human. More significantly, if each wallpaper pattern has an associative attribute that records the positive or negative relevance feedback to that pattern from various human users (consumers), then all the association scores of any newly introduced pattern are initially zero, so that it is initially unclear what other patterns are similar to the new pattern with respect to the users who like them.
- the system can in principle determine the genre of a wallpaper pattern by consulting one or more randomly chosen individuals from a set of known human experts, while to determine the numeric association score between a new wallpaper pattern and a particular user, it can in principle show the pattern to the that user and obtain relevance feedback. Since such requests inconvenience people, however, it is important not to determine all difficult attributes this way, but only the ones that are most important for purposes of classifying the document. “Rapid profiling” is a method for selecting those numeric attributes that are most important to determine.
- the root of the decision tree considers some attribute of the target object. If the value of this attribute is not yet known, it is determined by a method appropriate to that attribute; for example, if the attribute is the association score of the target object with user #4589, then relevance feedback (to be used as the value of this attribute) is solicited from user #4589, perhaps by the ruse of adding the possibly uninteresting target object to a set of objects that the system recommends to the user's attention, in order to find out what the user thinks of it.
- the rapid profiling method descends the decision tree by one level, choosing one of the decision subtrees of the root in accordance with the determined value of the root attribute.
- the root of this chosen subtree considers another attribute of the target object, whose value is likewise determined by an appropriate method.
- the process can be repeated to determine as many attributes as desired, by whatever methods are available, although it is ordinarily stopped after a small number of attributes, to avoid the burden of determining too many attributes.
- the rapid profiling method can be used to identify important attributes in any sort of profile, and not just profiles of target objects.
- the disclosed method for determining topical interest through similarity requires users as well as target objects to have profiles.
- New users may be profiled or partially profiled through the rapid profiling process.
- the rapid profiling procedure can rapidly form a rough characterization of a new user's interests by soliciting the user's feedback on a small number of significant target objects, and perhaps also by determining a small number of other key attributes of the new user, by on-line queries, telephone surveys, or other means.
- each user's user profile is subdivided into a set of long-term attributes, such as demographic characteristics, and a set of short-term attributes that help to identify the user's temporary, desires and emotional state, such as the user's textual or multiple-choice answers to questions whose answers reflect the user's mood.
- a subset of the user's long-term attributes are determined when the user first registers with the system, through the use of a rapid profiling tree of long-term attributes.
- a subset of the user's short-term attributes are additionally determined, through the use of a separate rapid profiling tree that asks about short-term attributes.
- a technique similar to rapid profiling is of interest in market research (or voter research).
- the target objects are consumers.
- a particular attribute in each target profile indicates whether the consumer described by that target profile h as purchased product X.
- a decision tree can be built that attempts to determine what value a consumer has for this attribute, by consideration of the other attributes in the consumer's profile. This decision tree may be traversed to determine whether additional users are likely to purchase product X. More generally, the top few levels of the decision tree provide information, valuable to advertisers who are planning mass-market or direct-mail campaigns, about the most significant characteristics of consumers of product X.
- Similar information can alternatively be extracted from a collection of consumer profiles without recourse to a decision tree, by considering attributes one at a time, and identifying those attributes on which pro duct X's consumers differ significantly from its non-consumers.
- These techniques serve to characterize consumers of a particular product; they can be equally well applied to voter research or other survey research, where the objective is to characterize those individuals from a given set of surveyed individuals who favor a particular candidate, hold a particular opinion, belong to a particular demographic group, or have some other set of distinguishing attributes.
- researchers may wish to purchase batches of analyzed or unanalyzed user profiles from which personal identifying information has been removed.
- statistical conclusions can be drawn, and relationships between attributes can be elucidated using knowledge discovery techniques which are well known in the art.
- FIG. 1 illustrates in block diagram form the overall architecture of an electronic media system, known in the art, in which the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention can be used to provide user customized access to target objects that are available via the electronic media system.
- the electronic media system comprises a data communication facility that interconnects a plurality of users with a number of information servers.
- the users are typically individuals, whose personal computers (terminals) T 1 -T n are connected via a data communications link, such as a modem and a telephone connection established in well-known fashion, to a telecommunication network N.
- User information access software is resident on the user's personal computer and serves to communicate over the data communications link and the telecommunication network N with one of the plurality of network vendors V 1 -V k (America Online, Prodigy, CompuServe, other private companies or even universities) who provide data interconnection service with selected ones of the information servers I 1 -I m .
- the user can, by use of the user information access software, interact with the information servers I 1 -I m to request and obtain access to data that resides on mass storage systems -SS m that are part of the information server apparatus. New data is input to this system y users via their personal computers T 1 -T n and by commercial information services by populating their mass storage systems SS 1 -SS m with commercial data.
- Each user terminal T 1 -T n and the information servers I 1 -I m have phone numbers or IP addresses on the network N which enable a data communication link to be established between a particular user terminal T 1 -T n and the selected information server I 1 -I m .
- a user's electronic mail address also uniquely identifies the user and the user's network vendor V 1 -V k in an industry-standard format such as: username@aol.com or username@netcom.com.
- the network vendors V 1 -V k provide access passwords for their subscribers (selected users), through which the users can access the information servers I l -I m .
- the subscribers pay the network vendors V 1 -V k for the access services on a fee schedule that typically includes a monthly subscription fee and usage based charges.
- a difficulty with this system is that there are numerous information servers I 1 -I m located around the world, each of which provides access to a set of information of differing format, content and topics and via a cataloging system that is typically unique to the particular information server I 1 -I m
- the information is comprised of individual “files,” which can contain audio data, video data, graphics data, text data, structured database data and combinations thereof.
- each target object is associated with a unique file: for target objects that are informational in nature and can be digitally represented, the file directly stores the informational content of the target object, while for target objects that are not stored electronically, such as purchasable goods, the file contains an identifying description of the target object.
- Target objects stored electronically as text files can include commercially provided news articles, published documents, letters, user-generated documents, descriptions of physical objects, or combinations of these classes of data.
- the organization of the files containing the information and the native format of the data contained in files of the same conceptual type may vary by information server I 1 -I m .
- a user can have difficulty in locating files that contain the desired information, because the information may be contained in files whose information server cataloging may not enable the user to locate them. Furthermore, there is no standard catalog that defines the presence and services provided by all information servers I 1 -I m . A user therefore does not have simple access to information but must expend a significant amount of time and energy to excerpt a segment of the information that may be relevant to the user from the plethora of information that is generated and populated on this system. Even if the user commits the necessary resources to this task, existing information retrieval processes lack the accuracy and efficiency to ensure that the user obtains the desired information.
- the three modules of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects can be implemented in a distributed manner, even with various modules being implemented on and/or by different vendors within the electronic media system.
- the information servers I 1 -I m can include the target profile generation module while the network vendors V 1 -V k may implement the user profile generation module, the target profile interest summary generation module, and/or the profile processing module.
- a module can itself be implemented in a distributed manner, with numerous nodes being present in the network N, each node serving a population of users in a particular geographic area. The totality of these nodes comprises the functionality of the particular module.
- the vendors V 1 -V k may be augmented with some number of proxy servers, which provide a mechanism for ongoing pseudonymous access and profile building through the method described herein. At least one trusted validation server must be in place to administer the creation of pseudonyms in the system.
- An important characteristic of this system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects is its responsiveness, since the intended use of the system is in an interactive mode.
- the system utility grows with the number of the users and this increases the number of possible consumer/product relationships between users and target objects.
- a system that serves a large group of users must maintain interactive performance and the disclosed method for profiling and clustering target objects and users can in turn be used for optimizing the distribution of data among the members of a virtual community and through a data communications network, based on users' target profile interest summaries.
- the various processors interconnected by the data communication network N as shown in FIG. 1 can be divided into two classes and grouped as illustrated in FIG. 2 : clients and servers.
- the clients C 1 -Cn are individual user's computer systems which are connected to servers S 1 -S 5 at various times via data communications links. Each of the clients Ci is typically associated with a single server Sj, but these associations can change over time.
- the clients C 1 -Cn both interface with users and produce and retrieve files to and from servers.
- the clients C 1 -Cn are not necessarily continuously on-line, since they typically serve a single user and can be movable systems, such as laptop computers, which can be connected to the data communications network N at any of a number of locations.
- a server Si is a computer system that is presumed to be continuously on-line and functions to both collect files from various sources on the data communication network N for access by local clients C 1 -Cn and collect files from local clients C 1 -Cn for access by remote clients.
- the server Si is equipped with persistent storage, such as a magnetic disk data storage medium, and are interconnected with other servers via data communications links.
- the data communications links can be of arbitrary topology and architecture, and are described herein for the purpose of simplicity as point-to-point links or, more precisely, as virtual point-to-point links.
- the servers S 1 -S 5 comprise the network vendors V 1 -Vk as well as the information servers I 1 -I m of FIG. 1 and the functions performed by these two classes of modules can be merged to a greater or lesser extent in a single server Si or distributed over a number of servers in the data communication network N.
- FIG. 3 illustrates in block diagram form a representation of an arbitrarily selected network topology for a plurality of servers A-D, each of which is interconnected to at least one other server and typically also to a plurality of clients p-s.
- Servers A-D are interconnected by a collection of point to point data communications links, and server A is connected to client r, server B is connected to clients p-q, while server D is connected to clients.
- Servers transmit encrypted or unencrypted messages amongst themselves: a message typically contains the textual and/or graphic information stored in a particular file, and also contains data which describe the type and origin of this file, the name of the server that is supposed to receive the message, and the purpose for which the file contents are being transmitted. Some messages are not associated with any file, but are sent by one server to other servers for control reasons, for example to request transmission of a file or to announce the availability of a new file.
- Messages can be forwarded by a server to another server, as in the case where server A transmits a message to server D via a relay node of either server C or servers B, C. It is generally preferable to have multiple paths through the network, with each path being characterized by its performance capability and cost to enable the network N to optimize traffic routing.
- a compromise between total user anonymity and total public disclosure of the user's search profiles or target profile interest summary is a pseudonym.
- a pseudonym is an artifact that allows a service provider to communicate with users and build and accumulate records of their preferences over time, while at the same time remaining unaware of the users' true identities, so that users can keep their purchases or preferences private.
- a second and equally important requirement of a pseudonym system is that it provide for digital credentials, which are used to guarantee that the user represented by a particular pseudonym has certain properties. These credentials may be granted on the basis of result of activities and transactions conducted by means of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects, or on the basis of other activities and transactions conducted on the network N of the present system, on the basis of users' activities outside of network N.
- a service provider may require proof that the purchaser has sufficient funds on deposit at his/her bank, which might possibly not be on a network, before agreeing to transact business with that user.
- the user therefore, must provide the service provider with proof of funds (a credential) from the bank, while still not disclosing the user's true identity to the service provider.
- Each proxy server for example S 2 in FIG. 2 , is a server which communicates with clients and other servers S 5 in the network either directly or through anonymizing mix paths as detailed in the paper by D. Chaum titled “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms,” published in Communications of the ACM, Volume 24, Number 2, February 1981. Any server in the network N may be configured to act as a proxy server in addition to its other functions.
- Each proxy server provides service to a set of users, which set is termed the “user base” of that proxy server.
- a given proxy server provides three sorts of service to each user U in its user base, as follows:
- our combined method allows a given user to use either a single pseudonym in all transactions where he or she wishes to remain pseudonymous, or else different pseudonyms for different types of transactions.
- each service provider might transact with the user under a different pseudonym for the user.
- a coalition of service providers all of whom match users with the same genre of target objects, might agree to transact with the user using a common pseudonym, so that the target profile interest summary associated with that pseudonym would be complete with respect to said genre of target objects.
- the user may freely choose a proxy server to service each pseudonym; these proxy servers may be the same or different.
- our system provides security, in that it can guarantee that users of a service are legitimately entitled to the services used and that no user is using multiple pseudonyms to communicate with the same provider.
- This uniqueness of pseudonyms is important for the purposes of this application, since the transaction information gathered for a given individual must represent a complete and consistent picture of a single user's activities with respect to a given service provider or coalition of service providers; otherwise, a user's target profile interest summary and user profile would not be able to represent the user's interests to other parties as completely and accurately as possible.
- the service provider must have a means of protection from users who violate previously agreed upon terms of service. For example, if a user that uses a given pseudonym engages in activities that violate the terms of service, then the service provider should be able to take action against the user, such as denying the user service and blacklisting the user from transactions with other parties that the user might be tempted to defraud. This type of situation might occur when a user employs a service provider for illegal activities or defaults in payments to the service provider.
- resolution credentials are credentials that are periodically provided to individuals contingent upon their behaving consistent with the agreed upon terms of service between the user and information provider and network vendor entities (such as regular payment for services rendered, civil conduct, etc.).
- resolution credentials are credentials that are periodically provided to individuals contingent upon their behaving consistent with the agreed upon terms of service between the user and information provider and network vendor entities (such as regular payment for services rendered, civil conduct, etc.).
- the issuer of a resolution credential refuses to grant this resolution credential to the user, then the refusal may be appealed to an adjudicating third party.
- the integrity of the user profiles and target profile interest summaries stored on proxy servers is important: if a seller relies on such user-specific information to deliver promotional offers or other material to a particular class of users, but not to other users, then the user-specific information must be accurate and untampered with in any way.
- the user may likewise wish to ensure that other parties not tamper with the user's user profile and target profile interest summary, since such modification could degrade the system's ability to match the user with the most appropriate target objects. This is done by providing for the user to apply digital signatures to the control messages sent by the user to the proxy server.
- Each pseudonym is paired with a public cryptographic key and a private cryptographic key, where the private key is known only to the user who holds that pseudonym; when the user sends a control message to a proxy server under a given pseudonym, the proxy server uses the pseudonym's public key to verify that the message has been digitally signed by someone who knows the pseudonym's private key. This prevents other parties from masquerading as the user.
- 5,245,656 also omits a method for the convenient updating of pseudonymous user profile information, such as is provided in this application, and does not provide for assurance of unique and credentialed registration of pseudonyms from a credentialing agent as is also provided in this application, and does not provide a means of access control to the user based on profile information and conditional access as will be subsequently described.
- the method described by Loeb et al. also does not describe any provision for credentials, such as might be used for authenticating a user's right to access particular target objects, such as target objects that are intended to be available only upon payment of a subscription fee, or target objects that are intended to be unavailable to younger users.
- the user employs as an intermediary any one of a number of proxy servers available on the data communication network N of FIG. 2 (for example, server S 2 ).
- the proxy servers function to disguise the true identity of the user from other parties on the data communication network N.
- the proxy server represents a given user to either single network vendors and information servers or coalitions thereof.
- a proxy server e.g.
- S 2 is a server computer with CPU, main memory, secondary disk storage and network communication function and with a database function which retrieves the target profile interest summary and access control instructions associated with a particular pseudonym P, which represents a particular user U, and performs bi-directional routing of commands, target objects and billing information between the user at a given client (e.g. C 3 ) and other network entities such as network vendors V 1 -Vk and information servers I 1 -Im.
- Each proxy server maintains an encrypted target profile interest summary associated with each allocated pseudonym in its pseudonym database D.
- the actual user-specific information and the associated pseudonyms need not be stored locally on the proxy server, but may alternatively be stored in a distributed fashion and be remotely addressable from the proxy server via point-to-point connections.
- the proxy server supports two types of bi-directional connections: point-to-point connections and pseudonymous connections through mix paths, as taught by D. Chaum in the paper titled “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms”, Communications of the ACM, Volume 24, Number 2, February 1981.
- the normal connections between the proxy server and information servers for example a connection between proxy server S 2 and information server S 4 in FIG. 2 , are accomplished through the point-to-point connection protocols provided by network N as described in the “Electronic Media System Architecture” section of this application.
- the normal type of point-to-point connections may be used between S 2 -S 4 , for example, since the dissociation of the user and the pseudonym need only occur between the client C 3 and the proxy server S 2 , where the pseudonym used by the user is available. Knowing that an information provider such as S 4 communicates with a given pseudonym P on proxy server S 2 does not compromise the true identity of user U.
- the bidirectional connection between the user and the proxy server S 2 can also be a normal point-to-point connection, but it may instead be made anonymous and secure, if the user desires, though the consistent use of an anonymizing mix protocol as taught by D.
- This mix path protocol is distributed and resistant to traffic analysis attacks and other known forms of analysis which may be used by malicious parties to try and ascertain the true identity of a pseudonym bearer. Breaking the protocol requires a large number of parties to maliciously collude or be cryptographically compromised.
- an extension to the method is taught where the user can include a return path definition in the message so the information server S 4 can return the requested information to the user's client processor C 3 . We utilize this feature in a novel fashion to provide for access and reachability control under user and proxy server control.
- the user can use different pseudonyms with different organizations (or disjoint sets of organizations), yet still present credentials that were granted by one organization, under one pseudonym, in order to transact with another organization under another pseudonym, without revealing that the two pseudonyms correspond to the same user.
- Credentials may be granted to provide assurances regarding the pseudonym bearer's age, financial status, legal status, and the like. For example, credentials signifying “legal adult” may be issued to a pseudonym based on information known about the corresponding user by the given is suing organization.
- Credential-issuing organizations may also certify particular facts about a user's demographic profile or target profile interest summary, for example by granting a credential that asserts “the bearer of this pseudonym is either well-read or is middle-aged and works for a large company”; by presenting this credential to another entity, the user can prove eligibility for (say) a discount without revealing the user's personal data to that entity.
- the method taught by Chaum provides for assurances that no individual may correspond with a given organization or coalition of organizations using more than one pseudonym; that credentials may not be feasibly forged by the user; and that credentials may not be transferred from one user's pseudonym to a different user's pseudonym.
- the method provides for expiration of credentials and for the issuance of “black marks” against Individuals who do not act according to the terms of service that they are extended. This is done through the resolution credential mechanism as described in Chaum's work, in which resolutions are issued periodically by organizations to pseudonyms that are in good standing.
- a user If a user is not issued this resolution credential by a particular organization or coalition of organization, then this user cannot have it available to be transferred to other pseudonyms which he uses with other organizations. Therefore, the user cannot convince these other organizations that he has acted accordance with terms of service in other dealings. If this is the case, then the organization can use this lack of resolution credential to infer that the user is not in good standing in his other dealings.
- organizations may issue a list of quality related credentials based upon the experience of transaction (or interaction) with the user which may act similarly to a letter of recommendation as in a resume. If such a credential is issued from multiple organizations, their values become averaged.
- organizations may be issued credentials from users such as customers which may be used to indicate to other future users quality of service which can be expected by subsequent users on the basis of various criteria.
- a pseudonym is a data record consisting of two fields.
- the first field specifies the address of the proxy server at which the pseudonym is registered.
- the second field contains a unique string of bits (e.g., a random binary number) that is associated with a particular user, credentials take the form of public-key digital signatures computed on this number, and the number itself is issued by a pseudonym administering server Z, as depicted in FIG. 2 , and detailed In a generic form in the paper by D. Chaum and J. H. Evertse, titled “A secure and privacy-protecting protocol for transmitting personal information between organizations.”.
- All of the user's transactions with a given coalition can be linked by virtue of the fact that they are conducted under the same pseudonym, and therefore can be combined to define a unified picture, in the form of a user profile and a target profile interest summary, of the user's interests vis-a-vis the service or services provided by said coalition.
- a pseudonym may be useful and the present description is in no way intended to limit the scope of the claimed invention for example, the previously described rapid profiling tree could be used to pseudonymously acquire information about the user which is considered by the user to be sensitive such as that information which is of interest to such entities as insurance companies, medical specialists, family counselors or dating services.
- the organizations that the user U interacts with are the servers S 1 -Sn on the network N.
- the user employs a proxy server, e.g. S 2 , as an intermediary between the local server of the user's own client and the information provider or network vendor.
- a proxy server e.g. S 2
- S(M,K) represent the digital signing of message M by modular exponentiation with key K as detailed in a paper by Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., and Adleman, L. Titled “A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems”, published in the Comm. ACM 21, 2 February 120-126.
- server Z for a pseudonym P and is granted a signed pseudonym signed with the private key SK z of server Z
- the following protocol takes place to establish an entry for the user U in the proxy server S 2 's database D. 1.
- the user now sends proxy server S 2 the pseudonym, which has been signed by Z to indicate the authenticity and uniqueness of the pseudonym.
- the user also generates a PK P , SK P key pair for use with the granted pseudonym, where is the private key associated with the pseudonym and PK P is the public key associated with the pseudonym.
- the user forms a request to establish pseudonym P on proxy server S 2 , by sending the signed pseudonym S(P, SK Z ) to the proxy server S 2 along with a request to create a new database entry, indexed by P, and the public key PK P . It envelopes the message and transmits it to a proxy server S 2 through an anonymizing mix path, along with an anonymous return envelope header. 2.
- the proxy server S 2 receives the database creation entry request and associated certified pseudonym message.
- the proxy server S 2 checks to ensure that the requested pseudonym P is signed by server Z and if so grants the request and creates a database entry for the pseudonym, as well as storing the user's public key PK P to ensure that only the user U can make requests in the future using pseudonym P. 3.
- the structure of the user's database entry consists of a user profile as detailed herein, a target profile interest summary as detailed herein, and a Boolean combination of access control criteria as detailed below, along with the associated public key for the pseudonym P. 4.
- the user U may provide proxy server S 2 with credentials on that pseudonym, provided by third parties, which credentials make certain assertions about that pseudonym.
- the proxy server may verify those credentials and make appropriate modifications to the user's profile as required by these credentials, such as recording the user's new demographic status as an adult. It may also store those credentials, so that it can present them to service providers on the user's behalf.
- the above steps may be repeated, with either the same or a different proxy server, each time user U requires a new pseudonym for use with a new and disjoint coalition of providers.
- the proxy server S 2 may reply to the user with a signed message indicating that the generated pseudonym has already been allocated, and asking for a new pseudonym to be generated.
- a proxy server S 2 Once a proxy server S 2 has authenticated and registered a user's pseudonym, the user may begin to use the services of the proxy server S 2 , in interacting with other network entities such as service providers, as exemplified by server S 4 in FIG. 2 , an information service provider node connected to the network.
- the user controls the proxy server S 2 by forming digitally encoded requests that the user subsequently transmits to the proxy server S 2 over the network N.
- the nature and format of these requests will vary, since the proxy server may be used for any of the services described in this application, such as the browsing, querying, and other navigational functions described below.
- the user wishes to communicate under pseudonym P with a particular information provider or user at address A, where P is a pseudonym allocated to the user and A is either a public network address at a server such as S 4 , or another pseudonym that is registered on a proxy server such as S 4 .
- address A is the address of an information provider, and the user is requesting that the in formation provider send target objects of interest.
- the user must form a request R to proxy server S 2 , that requests proxy server S 2 to send a message to address A and to forward the response back to the user.
- the user may thereby communicate with other parties, either non-pseudonymous parties, in the case where address A is a public network address, or pseudonymous parties, in the case where address A is a pseudonym held by, for example, a business or another user who prefers to operate pseudonymously.
- the request R to proxy server S 2 formed by the user may have different content.
- request R may instruct proxy server S 2 to use the methods described later in this description to retrieve from the most convenient server a particular piece of information that has been multicast to many servers, and to send this information to the user.
- request R may instruct proxy server S 2 to multicast to many servers a file associated with a new target object provided by the user, as described below. If the user is a subscriber to the news clipping service described below, request R may instruct proxy server S 2 to forward to the user all target objects that the news clipping service has sent to proxy server S 2 for the user's attention.
- request R may instruct proxy server S 2 to select a particular cluster from the hierarchical cluster tree and provide a menu of its subclusters to the user, or to activate a query that temporarily affects proxy server S 2 's record of the user's target profile interest summary. If the user is a member of a virtual community as described below, request R may instruct proxy server S 2 to forward to the user all messages that have been sent to the virtual community.
- the user Regardless of the content of request R, the user, at client C 3 , initiates a connection to the user's local server S 1 , and instructs server S 1 to send the request R along a secure mix path to the proxy server S 2 , initiating the following sequence of actions:
- a particular pseudonym may be extended for the consumer with respect to the given provider as detailed in the previous section.
- the consumer and the service provider agree to certain terms.
- the service provider may decline to provide service to the pseudonym under which it transacts with the user.
- the service provider has the recourse of refusing to provide resolution credentials to the pseudonym, and may choose to do so until the pseudonym bearer returns to good standing.
- a user may request access in sequence to many files, which are stored on one or more information servers. This behavior is common when navigating a hypertext system such as the World Wide Web, or when using the target object browsing system described below.
- the user requests access to a particular target object or menu of target objects; once the corresponding file has been transmitted to the users client processor, the user views its contents and makes another such request, and so on.
- Each request may take many seconds to satisfy, due to retrieval and transmission delays.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects can respond more quickly to each request, by retrieving or starting to retrieve the appropriate files even before the user requests them. This early retrieval is termed “pre-fetching of files.”
- Successful pre-fetching depends on the ability of the system to predict the next action or actions of the user.
- the system may further collect and utilize a similar set of statistics that describes the aggregate behavior of all users; in cases where the system cannot confidently make a prediction as to what a particular user will do, because the relevant statistics concerning that user's user cluster are derived from only a small amount of data, the system may instead make its predictions based on the aggregate statistics for all users, which are derived from a larger amount of data.
- a pre-fetching system that both employs these insights and that makes its pre-fetching decisions through accurate measurement of the expected cost and benefit of each potential pre-fetch.
- Pre-fetching exhibits a cost-benefit tradeoff. Let t denote the approximate number of minutes that pre-fetched files are retained in local storage (before they are deleted to make room for other pre-fetched files). If the system elects to pre-fetch a file corresponding to a target object X, then the user benefits from a fast response at no extra cost, provided that the user explicitly requests target object X soon thereafter. However, if the user does not request target object X within t minutes of the pre-fetch, then the pre-fetch was worthless, and its cost is an added cost that must be borne (directly or indirectly) by the user. The first scenario therefore provides benefit at no cost, while the second scenario incurs a cost at no benefit.
- the system tries to favor the first scenario by pre-fetching only those files that the user will access anyway.
- the system may pre-fetch either conservatively, where it controls costs by pre-fetching only files that the user is extremely likely to request explicitly (and that are relatively cheap to retrieve), or more aggressively, where it also pre-fetches files that the user is only moderately likely to request explicitly, thereby increasing both the total cost and (to a lesser degree) the total benefit to the user.
- pre-fetching for a user U is accomplished by the user's proxy server S.
- proxy server S retrieves a user-requested file F from an information server, it uses the identity of this file F and the characteristics of the user, as described below, to identify a group of other files G 1 . . . Gk that the user is likely to access soon.
- the user's request for file F is said to “trigger” files G 1 . . . Gk.
- Proxy server S pre-fetches each of these triggered files Gi as follows:
- Proxy server S each time it retrieves a file F in response to a request, to identify the files G 1 . . . Gk that should be triggered by the request for file F and pre-fetched immediately.
- Proxy server S employs a cost-benefit analysis, performing each pre-fetch whose benefit exceeds a user-determined multiple of its cost; the user may set the multiplier low for aggressive prefetching or high for conservative prefetching. These pre-fetches may be performed in parallel.
- pre-fetching file Gi immediately is defined to be the expected number of seconds saved by such a pre-fetch, as compared to a situation where Gi is left to be retrieved later (either by a later pre-fetch, or by the user's request) if at all.
- the cost of pre-fetching file Gi immediately is defined to be the expected cost for proxy server S to retrieve file Gi, as determined for example by the network locations of server S and file Gi and by information provider charges, times 1 minus the probability that proxy server S will have to retrieve file Gi within t minutes (to satisfy either a later pre-fetch or the user's explicit request) if it is not pre-fetched now.
- the proxy server S may estimate the necessary costs and benefits by adhering to the following discipline:
- Proxy server S can therefore decide rapidly which files G should be triggered by a request for a given file F from a given user U, as follows.
- server S must execute steps 3c-3g above for any ordered pair of requests R 0 and R 2 made within t minutes of each other by a user who employs server S as a proxy server.
- server S must execute steps 3c-3g above for any ordered pair of requests R 0 and R 2 made within t minutes of each other, by any user on the network, such that R 0 requests a file stored on server S.
- the user's proxy server when a user makes a request R 2 , the user's proxy server must send a notification of request R 2 to all servers S such that, during the preceding t minutes (where the variable t may now depend on server S), the user has made a request R 0 for a file stored on server S.
- This notification need not be sent immediately, and it is generally more efficient for each proxy server to buffer up such notifications and send them periodically in groups to the appropriate servers.
- proxy server S 2 can act as a representative on behalf of each user in its user base, permitting access to the user and the user's private data only in accordance with criteria that have been set by the user. Proxy server S 2 can restrict access in two ways:
- the user may instruct the proxy server S 2 to impose more complex requirements on the granting of requests by third parties, not simply boolean combinations of required credentials.
- the user may impose any Boolean combination of simple requirements that may include, but are not limited to, the following:
- the proxy server S 2 enforces access control as follows:
- the parents of a child user may instruct the proxy server that only target objects that have been digitally signed by a recognized child protection organization may be transmitted to the user, thus, the proxy server will not let the user retrieve pornography, even from a rogue information server that is willing to provide pornography to users who have not supplied an adulthood credential.
- the graphical representation of the network N presented in FIG. 3 shows that at least one of the data communications links can be eliminated, as shown in FIG. 4 , while still enabling the network N to transmit messages among all the servers A-D.
- elimination we mean that the link is unused in the logical design of the network, rather than a physical disconnection of the link.
- the graphs that result when all redundant data communications links are eliminated are termed “trees” or “connected acyclic graphs.”
- a graph where a message could be transmitted by a server through other servers and then return to the transmitting server over a different originating data communications link is termed a “cycle.”
- a tree is thus an acyclic graph whose edges (links) connect a set of graph “nodes” (servers). The tree can be used to efficiently broadcast any data file to selected servers in a set of interconnected servers.
- the tree structure is attractive in a communications network because much information distribution is multicast in nature—that is, a piece of information available at a single source must be distributed to a multiplicity of points where the information can be accessed.
- This technique is widely known: for example, “FAX trees” are in common use in political organizations, and multicast trees are widely used in distribution of multimedia data in the Internet; for example, see “Scalable Feedback Control for Multicast Video Distribution in the Internet,” (Jean—Chrysostome Bolot, Thierry Turletti, & Ian Wakeman, Computer Communication Review, Vol. 24, #4, October '94, Proceedings of SIGCOMM '94, pp.
- Algorithms for constructing multicast trees have either been ad-hoc, as is the case of the Deering, et al. Internet multicast tree, which adds clients as they request service by grafting them into the existing tree, or by construction of a minimum cost spanning tree.
- a distributed algorithm for creating a spanning tree (defined as a tree that connects, or “spans,” all nodes of the graph) on a set of Ethernet bridges was developed by Radia Perlman (“Interconnections. Bridges and Routers,” Radia Perlman, Addison-Wesley, 1992). Creating a minimal-cost spanning tree for a graph depends on having a cost model for the arcs of the graph (corresponding to communications links in the communications network).
- the default cost (more complicated costing models for path costs are discussed on pp. 72-73 of Perlman) is calculated as a simple distance measure to the root; thus the spanning tree minimizes the cost to the root by first electing a unique root and then constructing a spanning tree based on the distances from the root.
- the root is elected by recourse to a numeric ID contained in “configuration messages”: the server w hose ID has minimum numeric value is chosen as the root.
- core servers For that group.
- core servers We first show how to use the similarity-based methods described above to select the servers most interested in a group of target objects, herein termed “core servers” for that group. Next we show how to construct an unrooted multicast tree that can be used to broadcast files to these core servers. Finally, we show how files corresponding to target objects are actually broadcast through the multicast tree at the initiative of a client, and how these files are later retrieved from the core servers when clients request them.
- a separate set of core servers and hence a separate multicast tree may be used for each topical group of target objects.
- servers may communicate among themselves through any path over which messages can travel; the goal of each multicast tree is to optimize the multicast distribution of files corresponding to target objects of the corresponding topic. Note that this problem is completely distinct from selecting a multiplicity of spanning trees for the complete set of interconnected nodes as disclosed by Sincoskie in U.S. Pat. No. 4,706,080 and the publication titled “Extended Bridge Algorithms for Large Networks” by W. D. Sincoskie and C. J. Cotton, published January 1988 in IEEE Network on pages 16-24.
- the trees in this disclosure are intentionally designed to interconnect a selected subset of nodes in the system, and are successful to the degree that this subset is relatively small.
- Proxy server Si randomly selects a target object T from cluster C.
- proxy server Si applies the techniques disclosed above to user U's stored user profile and target profile interest summary in order to estimate the interest w(U, T) that user U has in the selected target object T.
- the aggregate interest w(Si, T) that the user base of proxy server Si has in the target object T is defined to be the sum of these interest values w(U, T).
- w(Si, T) may be defined to be the sum of values s(w(U, T)) over all U in the user base.
- s(*) is a sigmoidal function that is close to 0 for small arguments and close to a constant p max for large arguments; thus s(w(U, T)) estimates the probability that user U will access target object T, which probability is assumed to be independent of the probability that any other user will access target object T.
- w(Si, T) is made to estimate the probability that at least one user from the user base of Si will access target object T: then w(Si, T) may be defined as the maximum of values w(U, T), or of 1 minus the product over the users U of the quantity (1 ⁇ s(w(U, T))).
- Proxy server Si repeats steps (a)-(b) for several target objects T selected randomly from cluster C, and averages the several values of w(Si, T) thereby computed in step (b) to determine the desired quantity w(Si, C), which quantity represents the expected aggregate interest by the user base of proxy server Si in the target objects of cluster C.
- w(Si, C) For each search profile P s in the locally stored search profile set of any user in the user base of proxy server Si, proxy server Si computes the distance d(P s , P c ) between the search profile and the cluster profile P c of cluster C. (b). w(Si,C) is chosen to be the maximum value of ( ⁇ d(P s ,P c )/r) across all such search profiles P s , where r is computed as an affine function of the cluster diameter of cluster C.
- This affine function are chosen to be smaller (thereby increasing w(Si, C)) for servers Si for which the target object provider wishes to improve performance, as may be the case if the users in the user base of proxy server Si pay a premium for improved performance, or if performance at Si will otherwise be unacceptably low due to slow network connections.
- the proxy server Si is modified so that it maintains not only target profile interest summaries for each user in its user base, but also a single aggregate target profile interest summary for the entire user base.
- This aggregate target profile interest summary is determined in the usual way from relevance feedback, but the relevance feedback on a target object, in this case, is considered to be the frequency with which users in the user base retrieved the target object when it was new.
- the aggregate target profile interest summary for proxy server Si is updated.
- w(Si, C) Is estimated by the following steps:
- client r provides on-line information for the network, such as an electronic newspaper.
- This information can be structured by client r into a prearranged form, comprising a number of files, each of which is associated with a different target object.
- the files can contain textual representations of stock prices, weather forecasts, editorials, etc.
- the system determines likely demand for the target objects associated with these files in order to optimize the distribution of the files through the network N of interconnected clients p-s and proxy servers A-D.
- cluster C consists of text articles relating to the aerospace industry; further assume that the target profile interest summaries stored at proxy servers A and B for the users at clients p and r indicate that these users are strongly interested in such articles. Then the proxy servers A and B are selected as core servers for the multicast tree MT(C). The multicast tree MT(C) is then computed to consist of the core servers, A and B, connected by an edge that represents the least costly virtual point-to-point link between A and B (either the direct path A-B or the indirect path A-C-B, depending on the cost).
- a global request message M triggers the broadcast of an embedded request R to ail core servers in a multicast tree MT(C).
- the content of request R and the identity of cluster C are included in the message M, as is a field indicating that message M is a global request message.
- the message M contains a field S last which is unspecified except under certain circumstances described below, when it names a specific core server.
- a global request message M may be transmitted to proxy server S by a user registered with proxy server S, which transmission may take place along a pseudonymous mix path, or it may be transmitted to proxy server S from another proxy server, along a virtual point-to-point connection.
- proxy server S When a proxy server S receives a message M that is marked as a global request message, it acts as follows: 1. If proxy server S is not a core server for topic C, it retrieves its locally stored list of nearby core servers for topic C, selects from this list a nearby core server S′, and transmits a copy of message M over a virtual point-to-point connection to core server S′. If this transmission fails, proxy server S repeats the procedure with other core servers on its list. 2. If proxy server S is a core server for topic C, it executes the following steps: (a) Act on the request R that is embedded in message M.
- Si cannot be reached in a reasonable amount of time by any virtual point-to-point connection (for example, server Si is broken), recurse to step (c) above with S orig bound to S curr and S curr bound to S ⁇ sub I ⁇ for the duration of the recursion.
- step (e) When server S′ in step 1 or a server Si in step 2(e) receives a copy of the global request message M, it acts according to exactly the same steps. As a result, all core servers eventually receive a copy of global request message M and act on the embedded request R, unless some core servers cannot be reached. Even if a core server is unreachable, step (e) ensures that the broadcast can continue to other core servers in most circumstances, provided that d>1; higher values of d provide additional insurance against unreachable core servers.
- the system for customized electronic information of desirable objects executes the following steps in order to introduce a new target object into the system. These steps are initiated by an entity E, which may be either a user entering commands via a keyboard at a client processor q, as illustrated in FIG. 3 , or an automatic software process resident on a client or server processor q. 1.
- entity E which may be either a user entering commands via a keyboard at a client processor q, as illustrated in FIG. 3 , or an automatic software process resident on a client or server processor q. 1.
- Processor q forms a signed request R, which asks the receiver to store a copy of a file F on its local storage device.
- File F which is maintained by client q on storage at client q or on storage accessible by client q over the network, contains the informational content of or an identifying description of a target object, as described above.
- the request R also includes an address at which entity E may be contacted (possibly a pseudonymous address at some proxy server D), and asks the receiver to store the fact that file F is maintained by an entity at said address.
- Processor q embeds request R in a message M 1 , which it pseudonymously transmits to the entity E's proxy server D as described above. Message M 1 instructs proxy server D to broadcast request R along an appropriate multicast tree.
- proxy server D Upon receipt of message M 1 , proxy server D examines the doubly embedded file F and computes a target profile P for the corresponding target object. It compares the target profile P to each of the cluster profiles for topical clusters C 1 . . .
- Proxy server D sends itself a global request message M instructing itself to broadcast request R along the topical multicast tree MT(Ck). 5. Proxy server D notifies entity E through a pseudonymous communication that file F has been multicast along the topical multicast tree for cluster Ck.
- step 4 eventually causes all core servers for topic Ck to act on request R and therefore store a local copy of file F.
- a core server Si may have to delete a less useful file.
- Si may choose to delete the least recently accessed file.
- Si deletes a file that it believes few users will access.
- w(Si, C F ) the weight w(Si, C F ), where C F is a cluster consisting of the single target object associated with file F.
- server Si when server Si needs to delete a file, it chooses to delete the file F with the lowest weight w(Si, C F ). To reflect the fact that files are accessed less as they age, server Si periodically multiplies its stored value of w(Si, C F ) by a decay factor, such as 0.95, for each file F that it then stores. Alter natively, instead of using a decay factor, server Si may periodically recompute aggregate interest w(Si, C F ) for each file F that it stores; the aggregate interest changes over time because target objects typically have an age attribute that the system considers in estimating user interest, as described above.
- a decay factor such as 0.95
- entity E later wishes to remove file F from the network, for example because it has just multicast an updated version, it pseudonymously transmits a digitally signed global request message to proxy server D, requesting all proxy servers in the multicast tree MT(Ck) to delete any local copy of file F that they may be storing.
- a query message In addition to global request messages, another type of message that may be transmitted to any proxy server S is termed a “query message.”
- a query message When transmitted to a proxy server, a query message causes a reply to be sent to the originator of the message; this reply will contain an answer to a given query Q if any of the servers in a given multicast tree MT(C) are able to answer it, and will otherwise indicate that no answer is available.
- the query and the cluster C are named in the query message.
- the query message contains a field S last which is unspecified except under certain circumstances described below, when it names a specific core server.
- Proxy server S sets A r , to be the return address for the client or server that transmitted message M to server S.
- a r may be either a network address or a pseudonymous address 2 . If proxy server S is not a core server for cluster C, it retrieves its locally stored list of nearby core servers for topic C, selects from this list a nearby core server S′, and transmits a copy of the locate message M over a virtual point-to-point connection to core server S′. If this transmission fails, proxy server S repeats the procedure with other core servers on its list. Upon receiving a reply, it forwards this reply to address A r . 3.
- proxy server S is a core server for cluster C, and it is able to answer query Q using locally stored information, then it transmits a “positive” reply to A, containing the answer. 4. If proxy server S is a core server for topic C, but it is unable to answer query Q using locally stored information, then it carries out a parallel depth-first search by executing the following steps: (a) Set L to be the empty list, (b) retrieve the locally stored subtree of MT(C). For each server Si directly linked to S curr in this subtree, other than S last , (if specified), add the ordered pair (Si, S) to the list L.
- step (c) If L is empty, transmit a “negative” reply to address A r saying that server S cannot locate an answer to query Q, and terminate the execution of step 4; otherwise proceed to step (d). (d) Select a list L 1 of one or more server pairs (Ai, Bi) from the list L.
- a locate message M(Ai, Bi) For each server pair (Ai, Bi) on the list L 1 , form a locate message M(Ai, Bi), which is a copy of message M whose S last field has been modified to specify Bi, and transmit this message M(Ai, Bi) to server Ai over a virtual point-to-point connection, (e) For each reply received (by S) to a message sent in step (d), act as follows: (I) If a “positive” reply arrives to a locate message M(Ai, Bi), then forward this reply to A r and terminate step 4, immediately, (ii) If a “negative” reply arrives to a locate message M(Ai, Bi), then remove the pair (Ai, Bi) from the list L 1 .
- a processor q in the network When a processor q in the network wishes to retrieve the file associated with a given target object, it executes the following steps. These steps are initiated by an entity E, which may be either a user entering commands via a keyboard at a client q, as illustrated in FIG. 3 , or an automatic software process resident on a client or server processor q. 1.
- entity E which may be either a user entering commands via a keyboard at a client q, as illustrated in FIG. 3 , or an automatic software process resident on a client or server processor q. 1.
- Processor q forms a query Q that asks whether the recipient (a core server for cluster C) still stores a file F that was previously multicast to the multicast tree MT(C); if so, the recipient server should reply with its own server name.
- processor q must already know the name of file F and the identity of cluster C; typically, this information is provided to entity E by a service such as the news clipping service or browsing system described below, which must identify files to the user by (name, multicast topic) pair.
- Processor q forms a query message M that poses query Q to the multicast tree MT(C).
- Processor q pseudonymously transmits message M to the user's proxy server D, as described above.
- Processor q receives a response M 2 to message M. 5. If the response M 2 is “positive,” that is, it names a server S that still stores file F, then processor q pseudonymously instructs the user's proxy server D to retrieve file F from server S.
- processor q If the retrieval fails because server S has deleted file F since it answered the query, then client q returns to step 1. 6. If the response M 2 is “negative,” that is, it indicates that no server in MT(C) still stores file F, then processor q forms a query Q that asks the recipient for the address A of the entity that maintains file F; this entity will ordinarily maintain a copy of file F definitely. All core servers in MT(C) ordinarily retain this information (unless instructed to delete it by the maintaining entity), even if they delete file F for space reasons. Therefore, processor q should receive a response providing address A, whereupon processor q pseudonymously instructs the user's proxy server D to retrieve file F from address A.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention can be used in the electronic media system of FIG. 1 to implement an automatic news clipping service which learns to select (filter) news articles to match a user's interests, based solely on which articles the user chooses to read.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects generates a target profile for each article that enters the electronic media system, based on the relative frequency of occurrence of the words contained in the article.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects also generates a search profile set for each user, as a function of the target profiles of the articles the user has accessed and the relevance feedback the user has provided on these articles.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects As new articles are received for storage on the mass storage systems SS 1 -SS m of the information servers I 1 -I m , the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects generates their target profiles.
- the generated target profiles are later compared to the search profiles in the users' search profile sets, and those new articles whose tar get profiles are closest (most similar) to the closest search profile in a user's search profile set are identified to that user for possible reading.
- the computer program providing the articles to the user monitors how much the user reads (the number of screens of data and the number of minutes spent reading), and adjusts the search profiles in the users search profile set to more closely match what the user apparently prefers to read.
- the details of the method used by this system are disclosed in flow diagram form in FIG. 5 .
- This method requires selecting a specific method of calculating user-specific search profile sets, of measuring similarity between two profiles, and of updating a user's search profile set (or more generally target profile interest summary) based on what the user read, and the examples disclosed herein are examples of the many possible implementations that can be used and should not be construed to limit the scope of the system.
- the news clipping service instantiates target profile interest summaries as search profile sets, so that a set of high-interest search profiles is stored for each user.
- the search profiles associate d with a given user change over time.
- they can be initially determined for a new user (or explicitly altered by an existing user) by any of a number of procedures, including the following preferred methods: (1) asking the user to specify search profiles directly by giving keywords and/or numeric attributes, (2) using copies of the profiles of target objects or target clusters that the user indicates are representative of his or her interest, (3) using a standard set of search profiles copied or otherwise determined from the search profile sets of people who are demographically similar to the user.
- Articles are available on-line from a wide variety of sources. In the preferred embodiment, one would use the current days news as supplied by a news source, such as the AP or Reuters news wire. These news articles are input to the electronic media system by being loaded into the mass storage system SS 4 of an information server S 4 .
- the article profile module 201 of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects can reside on the information server S 4 and operates pursuant to the steps illustrated in the flow diagram of FIG.
- the article profile module 201 at step 502 generates a target profile for the article and stores the target profile in an article indexing memory (typically part of mass storage system SS 4 for later use in selectively delivering articles to users, This method is equally useful for selecting which articles to read from electronic news groups and electronic bulletin boards, and can be used as part of a system for screening and organizing electronic mail (“e-mail”).
- e-mail electronic mail
- a target profile is computed for each new article, as described earlier.
- the most important attribute of the target profile is a textual attribute that stands for the entire text of the article.
- This textual attribute is represented as described earlier, as a vector of numbers, which numbers in the preferred embodiment include the relative frequencies (TF/IDF scores) of word occurrences in this article relative to other comparable articles.
- the server must count the frequency of occurrence of each word in the article in order to compute the TF/IDF scores.
- a hierarchical cluster tree which serves as a decision tree for determining which news articles are closest to the user's interest.
- the resulting clusters can be viewed as a tree in which the top of the tree includes all target objects and branches further down the tree represent divisions of the set of target objects into successively smaller subclusters of target objects.
- Each cluster has a cluster profile, so that at each node of the tree, the average target profile (centroid) of all target objects stored in the subtree rooted at that node is stored. This average of target profiles is computed over the representation of target profiles as vectors of numeric attributes, as described above.
- FIG. 11 The process by which a user employs this apparatus to retrieve news articles of interest is illustrated in flow diagram form in FIG. 11 .
- the user logs into the data communication network N via their client processor C 1 and activates the news reading program. This is accomplished by the user establishing a pseudonymous data communications connection as described above to a proxy server S 2 , which provides front-end access to the data communication network N.
- the proxy server S 2 maintains a list of authorized pseudonyms and their corresponding public keys and provides access and billing control.
- the user has a search profile set stored in the local data storage medium on the proxy server S 2 .
- the profile matching module 203 resident on proxy server S 2 sequentially considers each search profile p k from the user's search profile set to determine which news articles are most likely of interest to the user.
- the news articles were automatically clustered into a hierarchical cluster tree at an earlier step so that the determination can be made rapidly for each user.
- the hierarchical cluster tree serves as a decision tree for determining which articles' target profiles are most similar to search profile p k : the search for relevant articles begins at the top of the tree, and at each level of the tree the branch or branches are selected which have cluster profiles closest to p k . This process is recursively executed until the leaves of the tree are reached, identifying individual articles of interest to the user, as described in the section “Searching for Target Objects” above.
- the system begins by non-hierarchically clustering all the search profiles in the search profile sets of a large number of users. For each cluster k of search profiles, with cluster profile p k , it uses the method described in the section “Searching for Target Objects” to locate articles with target profiles similar to p k . Each located article is then identified as of interest to each user who has a search profile represented in cluster k of search profiles.
- the threshold used in step 6 is typically an affine function or other function of the greater of the cluster variances (or cluster diameters) of S and T.
- the profile processing module 203 stores a list of the identified articles for presentation to each user.
- the profile processing system 203 retrieves the generated list of relevant articles and presents this list of titles of the selected articles to the user, who can then select at step 1105 any article for viewing. (If no titles are available, then the first sentence(s) of each article can be used.)
- the list of article titles is sorted according to the degree of similarity of the article's target profile to the most similar search profile in the user's search profile set.
- the resulting sorted list is either transmitted in real time to the user client processor C 1 , if the user is present at their client processor C 1 , or can be transmitted to a user's mailbox, resident on the user's client processor C 1 or stored within the server S 2 for later retrieval by the user; other methods of transmission include facsimile transmission of the printed list or telephone transmission by means of a text-to-speech system.
- the user can then transmit a request by computer, facsimile, or telephone to indicate which of the identified articles the user wishes to review, if any.
- the user can still access all articles in any information server S 4 to which the user has authorized access, however, those lower on the generated list are simply further from the user's interests, as determined by the user's search profile set.
- the server S 2 retrieves the article from the local data storage medium or from an information server S 4 and presents the article one screen at a time to the user's client processor C 1 .
- the user can at any time select another article for reading or exit the process.
- the user's search profile set generator 202 at step 1107 monitors which articles the user reads, keeping track of how many pages of text are viewed by the user, how much time is spent viewing the article, and whether all pages of the article were viewed. This information can be combined to measure the depth of the user's interest in the article, yielding a passive relevance feedback score, as described earlier. Although the exact details depend on the length and nature of the articles being searched, a typical formula might be:
- measure of article attractiveness 0.2 if the second page is accessed+0.2 if all pages are accessed+0.2 if more than 30 seconds was spent on the article+0.2 if more than one minute was spent on the article+0.2 if the minutes spent in the article are greater than half the number of pages.
- the computed measure of article attractiveness can then be used as a weighting function to adjust the user's search profile set to thereby more accurately reflect the user's dynamically changing interests.
- Updating of a user's generated search profile set can be done at step 1108 using the method described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/346,425.
- the server S 2 shifts each search profile in the set slightly in the direction of the target profiles of those nearby articles for which the computed measure of article attractiveness was high.
- the user's desired attributes u ik and an article's attributes d jk would be some form of word frequencies such as TF/IDF and potentially other attributes such as the source, reading level, and length of the article, while d(u i , d j ) is the distance between these two attribute vectors (profiles) using the similarity measure described above. If the user picks a different set of P articles than was predicted, the user search profile set generation module should try to adjust u and/or to more accurately predict the articles the user selected.
- u I and/or d j should be shifted to increase their similarity if user I was predicted not to select article j but did select it, and perhaps also to decrease their similarity if user I was predicted to select article j but did not.
- u I is chosen to be the search profile from user I's search profile set that is closest to target profile. If e is positive, this adjustment increases the match between user I's search profile set and the target profiles of the articles user I actually selects, by making u I closer to d j for the case where the algorithm failed to predict an article that the viewer selected.
- the size of e determines how many example articles one must see to change the search profile substantially. If e is too large, the algorithm becomes unstable, but for sufficiently small e, it drives u to its correct value. In general, e should be proportional to the measure of article attractiveness; for example, it should be relatively high if user I spends a long time reading article j.
- the news clipping service may deliver news articles (or advertisements and coupons for purchasables) to off-line users as well as to users who are on-line.
- the off-line users may have no way of providing relevance feedback
- the user profile of an off-line user U may be similar to the profiles of on-line users, for example because user U is demographically similar to these other users, and the level of user U's interest in particular target objects can therefore be estimated via the general interest-estimation methods described earlier.
- the news clipping service chooses a set of news articles (respectively, advertisements and coupons) that are predicted to be of interest to user U, thereby determining the content of a customized newspaper (respectively, advertising/coupon circular) that may be printed and physically sent to user U via other methods.
- the target objects included in the printed document delivered to user U are those with the highest median predicted interest among a group G of users, where group G consists of either the single off-line user U, a set of off-line users who are demographically similar to user U, or a set of off-line users who are in the same geographic area and thus on the same newspaper delivery route.
- group G consists of either the single off-line user U, a set of off-line users who are demographically similar to user U, or a set of off-line users who are in the same geographic area and thus on the same newspaper delivery route.
- user group G is clustered into several subgroups G 1 . . .
- the filtering technology of the news clipping service is not limited to news articles provided by a single source, but may be extended to articles or target objects collected from any number of sources. For example, rather than identifying new news articles of interest, the technology may identify new or updated World Wide Web pages of interest.
- broadcast clipping where individual users desire to broadcast messages to all interested users, the pool of news articles is replaced by a pool of messages to be broadcast, and these messages are sent to the broadcast-clipping-service subscribers most interested in them.
- the system scans the transcripts of all real-time spoken or written discussions on the network that are currently in progress and designated as public, and employs the news-clipping technology to rapidly identify discussions that the user may be interested in joining, or to rapidly identify and notify users who may be interested in joining an ongoing discussion.
- the method is used as a post-process that filters and ranks in order of interest the many target objects found by a conventional database search, such as a search for all homes selling for under $200,000 in a given area, for all 1994 news articles about Marcia Clark, or for all Italian-language films.
- the method is used to filter and rank the links in a hypertext document by estimating the user's interest in the document or other object associated with each link.
- paying advertisers who may be companies or individuals, are the source of advertisements or other messages, which take the place of the news articles in the news clipping service.
- a consumer who buys a product is deemed to have provided positive relevance feedback on advertisements for that product, and a consumer who buys a product apparently because of a particular advertisement (for example, by using a coupon clipped from that advertisement) is deemed to have provided particularly high relevance feedback on that advertisement.
- Such feedback may be communicated to a proxy server by the consumer's client processor (if the consumer is making the purchase electronically), by the retail vendor, or by the credit-card reader (at the vendor's establishment) that the consumer uses to pay for the purchase.
- the disclosed technology is then used to match advertisements with those users who are most interested in them; advertisements selected for a user are presented to that user by any one of several means, including electronic mail, automatic display on the users screen, or printing them on a printer at a retail establishment where the consumer is paying for a purchase.
- the threshold distance used to identify interest may be increased for a particular advertisement, causing the system to present that advertisement to more users, in accordance with the amount that the advertiser is willing to pay.
- a further use of the capabilities of this system is to manage a users investment portfolio. Instead of recommending articles to the user, the system recommends target objects that are investments. As illustrated above by the example of stock market investments, many different attributes can be used together to profile each investment. The user's past investment behavior is characterized in the user's search profile set or target profile interest summary, and this information is used to match the user with stock opportunities (target objects) similar in nature to past investments. The rapid profiling method described above may be used to determine a rough set of preferences for new users. Quality attributes used in this system can include negatively weighted attributes, such as a measurement of fluctuations in dividends historically paid by the investment, a quality attribute that would have a strongly negative weight for a conservative investor dependent on a regular flow of investment income.
- the user can set filter parameters so that the system can monitor stock prices and automatically take certain actions, such as placing buy or sell orders, or e-mailing or paging the user with a notification, when certain stock performance characteristics are met.
- the system can immediately notify the user when a selected stock reaches a predetermined price, without the user having to monitor the stock market activity.
- the user's investments can be profiled in part by a “type of investment” attribute (to be used in conjunction with other attributes), which distinguishes among bonds, mutual funds, growth stocks, income stocks, etc., to thereby segment the user's portfolio according to investment type.
- Each investment type can then be managed to identify investment opportunities and the user can identify the desired ratio of investment capital for each type.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects functions in an e ⁇ _mail environment in a similar but slightly different manner.
- the news clipping service selects and retrieves news information that would not otherwise reach its subscribers. But at the same time, large numbers of e-mail messages do reach users, having been generated and sent by humans or automatic programs. These users need an e-mail filter, which automatically processes the messages received.
- the necessary processing includes a determination of the action to be taken with each message, including, but not limited to: filing the message, notifying the user of receipt of a high priority message, automatically responding to a message.
- the e-mail filter system must not require too great an investment on the part of the user to learn and use, and the user must have confidence in the appropriateness of the actions automatically taken by the system.
- the same filter may be applied to voice mail messages or facsimile messages that have been converted into electronically stored text, whether automatically or at the user's request, via the use of well-known techniques for speech recognition or optical character recognition.
- a message processing function MPF(*) maps from a received message (document) to one or more of a set of actions.
- the actions which may be quite specific, may be either predefined or customized by the use r.
- Each action A has an appropriateness function F A (*,*) such that F A (U,D) returns a real number, representing the appropriateness of selecting action A on behalf of user U when user U is in receipt of message D.
- F A (*,*) such that F A (U,D) returns a real number, representing the appropriateness of selecting action A on behalf of user U when user U is in receipt of message D.
- F discard (U,D) is small
- alerting the user of receipt of the message is highly appropriate, so that F alert (U,D) is large.
- the function MPF(D) is used to automatically select the appropriate action or actions.
- the following set of actions might be useful:
- actions 8 and 9 in the sample list above are designed to filter out messages that are undesirable to the user or that are received from undesirable sources, such as pesky salespersons, by deleting the unwanted message and/or sending a reply that indicates that messages of this type will not be read.
- the appropriateness functions must be tailored to describe the appropriateness of carrying out each action given the target profile for a particular document, and then a message processing function MPF can be found which is in some sense optimal with respect to the appropriateness function.
- MPF One reasonable choice of MPF always picks the action with highest appropriateness, and in cases where multiple actions are highly appropriate and are also compatible with each other, selects more than one action: for example, it may automatically reply to a message and also file the same message in directory X, so that the value of MPF(D) is the set ⁇ reply, file in directory X ⁇ .
- the system asks the user for confirmation of the action(s) selected by MPF.
- the system also asks the user for confirmation: for example, mail should not be deleted if it is nearly as appropriate to let the user see it.
- Each received document is viewed as a target object whose profile includes such attributes as the entire text of the document (represented as TF/IDF scores), document sender, date sent, document length, date of last document received from this sender, key words, list of other addressees, etc. It was disclosed above how to estimate an interest function on profiled target objects, using relevance feedback together with measured similarities among target objects and among users. In the con text of the e-mail filter, the task is to estimate several appropriateness functions F A (*,*), one per action.
- the e-mail filter learns to take particular actions on e-mail messages that have certain attributes or combinations of attributes. For example, messages from John Doe that originate in the (212) area code may prompt the system to forward a copy by fax transmission to a given fax number, or to file the message in directory X on the user's client processor.
- a variation allows active requests of this form from the user, such as a request that any message from John Doe be forwarded to a desired fax number until further notice.
- This active user input requires the use of a natural language or form-based interface for which specific commands are associated with particular attributes and combinations of attributes.
- a very important and novel characteristic of the architecture is the ability to identify new or updated target objects that are relevant to the user, as determined by the user's search profile set or target profile interest summary.
- Updated target objects include revised versions of documents and new models of purchasable goods.
- the system may notify the user of these relevant target objects by an electronic notification such as an e-mail message or facsimile transmission.
- the user's e-mail filter can then respond appropriately to the notification, for instance, by bringing the notification immediately to the user's personal attention, or by automatically submitting an electronic request to purchase the target object named in the notification.
- a simple example of the latter response is for the e-mail filter to retrieve an on-line document at a nominal or zero charge, or request to buy a purchasable of limited quantity such as a used product or an auctionable.
- a hierarchical cluster tree imposes a useful organization on a collection of target objects.
- the tree is of direct use to a user who wishes to browse through all the target objects in the tree. Such a user may be exploring the collection with or without a well-specified goal.
- the tree's division of target objects into coherent clusters provides an efficient method whereby the user can locate a target object of interest.
- the user first chooses one of the highest level (largest) clusters from a menu, and is presented with a menu listing the subclusters of said cluster, whereupon the user may select one of these subclusters.
- the system locates the subcluster, via the appropriate pointer that was stored with the larger cluster, and allows the user to select one of its subclusters from another menu.
- the user views the menus on a computer screen or terminal screen and selects from them with a keyboard or mouse. However, the user may also make selections over the telephone, with a voice synthesizer reading the menus and the user selecting subclusters via the telephone's touch-tone keypad.
- the user simultaneously maintains two connections to the server, a telephone voice connection and a fax connection; the server sends successive menus to the user by fax, while the user selects choices via the telephone's touch-tone keypad.
- This degree of interest may be estimated numerically as the number of subclusters or target objects the user has selected from menus associated with the given cluster or its subclusters, expressed as a proportion of the total number of subclusters or target objects the user has selected.
- This associative attribute is particularly valuable if the hierarchical tree was built using “soft” or “fuzzy” clustering, which allows a subcluster or target object to appear in multiple clusters: if a target document appears in both the “sports” and the “humor” clusters, and the user selects it from a menu associated with the “humor” cluster, then the system increases its association between the user and the “humor” cluster but not its association between the user and the “sports” cluster.
- each subcluster must be usefully labeled (at step 503 ), in such a way as to suggest their content to the human user. It is straightforward to include some basic information about each subcluster in its label, such as the number of target objects the subcluster contains (possibly just 1) and the number of these that have been added or updated recently. However, it is also necessary to display additional information that indicates the cluster's content. This content-descriptive information may be provided by a human, particularly for large or frequently accessed clusters, but it may also be generated automatically. The basic automatic technique is simply to display the cluster's “characteristic value” for each of a few highly weighted attributes.
- this may be taken to mean the cluster's average value for that attribute: thus, if the “year of release” attribute is highly weighted in predicting which movies a user will like, then it is useful to display average year of release as part of each cluster's label. Thus the user sees that one cluster consists of movies that were released around 1962, while another consists of movies from around 1982.
- the system can display the attribute's value for the cluster member (target object) whose profile is most similar to the cluster's profile (the mean profile for all members of the cluster), for example, the title of the most typical movie in the cluster.
- a useful technique is to select those terms for which the amount by which the term's average TF/IDF score across members of the cluster exceeds the term's average TF/IDF score across all tar get objects is greatest, either in absolute terms or else as a fraction of the standard deviation of the term's TF/IDF score across all target objects.
- the selected terms are replaced with their morphological stems, eliminating duplicates (so that if bot h “slept” and “sleeping” were selected, they would be replaced by the single term “sleep”) and optionally eliminating close synonyms or collocates (so that if both “nurse” and “medical” were selected, they might both be replaced by a single term such as “nurse,” “medical,” “medicine,” or “hospital”).
- the resulting set of terms is displayed as part of the label.
- the system can display as part of the label the image or images whose associated target objects have target profiles most similar to the cluster profile.
- Users' navigational patterns may provide some useful feedback as to the quality of the labels.
- this may signal that the first cluster's label is misleading.
- other terms and attributes can pro vide “next-best” alternative labels for the first cluster, such “next-best” labels can be automatically substituted for the misleading label.
- any user can locally relabel a cluster for his or her own convenience.
- cluster label provided by a user is in general visible only to that user, it is possible to make global use of these labels via a “user labels” textual attribute for target objects, which attribute is defined for a given target object to be the concatenation of all labels provided by any user for any cluster containing that target object.
- This attribute influences similarity judgments: for example, it may induce the system to regard target articles in a cluster often labeled “Sports News” by users as being mildly similar to articles in an otherwise dissimilar cluster often labeled “International News” by users, precisely because the “user labels” attribute in each cluster profile is strongly associated with the term “News.”
- the “user label” attribute is also used in the automatic generation of labels, just as other textual attributes are, so that if the user-generated labels for a cluster often include “Sports,” the term “Sports” may be included in the automatically generated label as well.
- menus it is not necessary for menus to be displayed as simple lists of labeled options; it is possible to display or print a menu in a form that shows in more detail the relation of the different menu options to each other.
- the menu options are visually laid out in two dimensions or in a perspective drawing of three dimensions. Each option is displayed or printed as a textual or graphical label.
- the physical coordinates at which the options are displayed or printed are generated by the following sequence of steps: (1) construct for each option the cluster profile of the cluster it represents, (2) construct from each cluster profile its decomposition into a numeric vector, as described above, (3) apply singular value decomposition (SVD) to determine the set of two or three orthogonal linear axes along which these numeric vectors are most greatly differentiated, and (4) take the coordinates of each option to be the projected coordinates of that option's numeric vector along said axes.
- SSD singular value decomposition
- Step (3) may be varied to determine a set of, say, 6 axes, so that step (4) lays out the options in a 6-dimensional space; in this case the user may view the geometric projection of the 6-dimensional layout onto any plane passing through the origin, and may rotate this viewing plane in order to see differing configurations of the options, which emphasize similarity with respect to differing attributes in the profiles of the associated clusters.
- the sizes of the cluster labels can be varied according to the number of objects contained in the corresponding clusters.
- all options from the parent menu are displayed in some number of dimensions, as just described, but with the option corresponding to the current menu replaced by a more prominent subdisplay of the options on the current menu; optionally, the scale of this composite display may be gradually increased over time, thereby increasing the area of the screen devoted to showing the options on the current menu, and giving the visual impression that the user is regarding the parent cluster and “zooming in” on the current cluster and its subclusters.
- a hierarchical cluster-tree may be configured with multiple cluster selections branching from each node or the same labeled clusters presented in the form of single branches for multiple nodes ordered in a hierarchy.
- the user is able to perform lateral navigation between neighboring clusters as well, by requesting that the system search for a cluster whose cluster profile resembles the cluster profile of the currently selected cluster. If this type of navigation is performed at the level of individual objects (leaf ends), then automatic hyperlinks may be then created as navigation occurs. This is one way that nearest neighbor clustering navigation may be performed. For example, in a domain where target objects are home pages on the World Wide Web, a collection of such pages could be laterally linked to create a “virtual mall.”
- the simplest way to use the automatic menuing system described above is for the user to begin browsing at the top of the tree and moving to more specific subclusters.
- the user optionally provides a query consisting of textual and/or other attributes, from which query the system constructs a profile in the manner described herein, optionally altering textual attributes as described herein before decomposing them into numeric attributes.
- Query profiles are similar to the search profiles in a user's search profile set, except that their attributes are explicitly specified by a user, most often for one-time usage, and unlike search profiles, they are not automatically updated to reflect changing interests.
- a typical query in the domain of text articles might have “Tell me about the relation between Galileo and the Medici family” as the value of its “text of article” attribute, and 8 as the value of its “reading difficulty” attribute (that is, 8th-grade level).
- the system uses the method of section “Searching for Target Objects” above to automatically locate a small set of one or more clusters with profiles similar to the query profile, for example, the articles they contain are written at roughly an 8th-grade level and tend to mention Galileo and the Medicis. The user may start browsing at any of these clusters, and can move from it to subclusters, superclusters, and other nearby clusters.
- a query is matched to an already answered question.
- the relevant domain is a customer service center, electronic newsgroup, or Better Business Bureau where questions are frequently answered.
- Each new question-answer pair is recorded for future reference as a target object, with a textual attribute that specifies the question together with the answer provided.
- the question should be weighted more heavily than the answer when this textual attribute is decomposed into TF/IDF scores.
- a query specifying “Tell me about the relation between Galileo and the Medici family” as the value of this attribute therefore locates a cluster of similar questions together with their answers.
- each question-answer pair may be profiled with two separate textual attributes, one for the question and one for the answer.
- a query might then locate a cluster by specifying only the question attribute, or for completeness, both the question attribute and the (lower-weighted) answer attribute, to be the text “Tell me about the relation between Galileo and the Medici family.”
- the filtering technology described earlier can also aid the user in navigating among the target objects.
- the system presents the user with a menu of subclusters of a cluster C of target objects, it can simultaneously present an additional menu of the most interesting target objects in cluster C, so that the user has the choice of accessing a subcluster or directly accessing one of the target objects. If this additional menu lists n target objects, then for each I between 1 and n inclusive, in increasing order, the I th most prominent choice on this additional menu, which choice is denoted Top(C,i), is found by considering all target objects in cluster C that are further than a threshold distance t from all of Top(C,1), Top(C,2), . . .
- the threshold distance t is 0, then the menu resulting from this procedure simply displays the n most interesting objects in cluster C, but the threshold distance may be increased to achieve more variety in the target objects displayed.
- the threshold distance t is chosen to be an affine function or other function of the cluster variance or cluster diameter of the cluster C.
- the user U can “masquerade” as another user V, such as a prominent intellectual or a celebrity supermodel; as long as user U is masquerading as user V, the filtering technology will recommend articles not according to user U's preferences, but rather according to user V's preferences.
- user U has access to the user-specific data of user V, for example because user V has leased these data to user U for a financial consideration, then user U can masquerade as user V by instructing user U's proxy server S to temporarily substitute user V's user profile and target profile interest summary for user U's.
- user U has access to an average user profile and an composite target profile interest summary for a group G of users; by instructing proxy server S to substitute these for user U's user-specific data, user U can masquerade as a typical member of group G, as is useful in exploring group preferences for sociological, political, or market research. More generally, user U may “partially masquerade” as another user V or group G, by instructing proxy server S to temporarily replace user U's user-specific data with a weighted average of user U's user-specific data and the user-specific data for user V and group G.
- the hierarchical menu presented to the user for the user's navigation need not be exactly isomorphic to the cluster tree.
- the menu is typically a somewhat modified version of the cluster tree, reorganized manually or automatically so that the clusters most interesting to a user are easily accessible by the user.
- the system first attempts automatically to identify existing clusters that are of interest to the user.
- the system may identify a cluster as interesting because the user often accesses target objects in that cluster—or, in a more sophisticated variation, because the user is predicted to have high interest in the cluster's profile, using the methods disclosed herein for estimating interest from relevance feedback.
- the system can at the user's request or at all times display a special list of the most interesting clusters, or the most interesting subclusters of the current cluster, so that the user can select one of these clusters based on its label and jump directly to it.
- the I th most prominent choice on the list which choice is denoted Top(I)
- Top(I) is found by considering all appropriate clusters C that are further than a threshold distance t from all of Top(1), Top(2), . . . Top(I ⁇ 1), and selecting the one in which the user's interest is estimated to be highest.
- the threshold distance t is optionally dependent on the computed cluster variance or cluster diameter of the profiles in the latter cluster.
- menus can be reorganized so that the most interesting subcluster choices appear earliest on the menu, or are visually marked as interesting; for example, their labels are displayed in a special color or type face, or are displayed together with a number or graphical image indicating the likely level of interest.
- interesting clusters can be moved to menus higher in the tree, i.e., closer to the root of the tree, so that they are easier to access if the user starts browsing at the root of the tree.
- uninteresting clusters can be moved to menus lower in the tree, to make room for interesting clusters that are being moved higher.
- clusters with an especially low interest score can simply be suppressed from the menus; thus, a user with children may assign an extremely negative weight to the “vulgarity” attribute in the determination of q, so that vulgar clusters and documents will not be available at all.
- a customized tree develops that can be more efficiently navigated by the particular user. If menus are chosen so that each menu item is chosen with approximately equal probability, then the expected number of choices the user has to make is minimized. If, for example, a user frequently accessed target objects whose profiles resembled the cluster profile of cluster (a, b, d) in FIG. 8 then the menu in FIG. 9 could be modified to show the structure illustrated in FIG. 10 .
- a user U In the variation where the general techniques disclosed herein for estimating a user's interest from relevance feedback are used to identify interesting clusters, it is possible for a user U to supply “temporary relevance feedback” to indicate a temporary interest that is added to his or her usual interests. This is done by entering a query as described above, i.e., a set of textual and other attributes that closely match the user's interests of the moment. This query becomes “active,” and affects the system's determination of interest in either of two ways. In one approach, an active query is treated as if it were any other target object, and by virtue of being a query, it is taken to have received relevance feedback that indicates especially high interest.
- target objects X whose target profiles are similar to an active query's profile are simply considered to have higher quality q(U, X), in that q(U, X) is incremented by a term that increases with target object X's similarity to the query profile.
- Either strategy affects the usual interest estimates: clusters that match user U's usual interests (and have high quality q(*)) are still considered to be of interest, and clusters w hose profiles are similar to an active query are adjudged to have especially high interest. Clusters that are similar to both the query and the user's usual interests are most interesting of all. The user may modify or deactivate an active query at any time while browsing.
- the user may replace or augment the original (perhaps vague) query profile with the target profile of target object or cluster X, t hereby amplifying or refining the original query to indicate an particular interest in objects similar to X.
- the user is browsing through documents, and specifies an initial query containing the word “Lloyd's,” so that the system predicts documents containing the word “Lloyd's” to be more interesting and makes them more easily accessible, even to the point of listing such documents or clusters of such documents, as described above.
- an associative attribute that records the associations between a target object and whatever terms are employed in queries used to find that target object.
- the association score of target object X with a particular query term T is defined to be the mean relevance feedback on target object X, averaged over just those accesses of target object X that were made while a query containing term T was active, multiplied by the negated logarithm of term T's global frequency in all queries.
- the effect of this associative attribute is to increase the measured similarity of two documents if they are good responses to queries that contain the same terms.
- a further maneuver can be used to improve the accuracy of responses to a query: in the summation used to determine the quality q(U, X) of a target object X, a term is included that is proportional to the sum of association scores between target object X and each term in the active query, if any, so that target objects that are closely associated with terms in an active query are determined to have higher quality and therefore higher interest for the user.
- the user can be given the ability to reorganize the tree manually, as he or she sees fit. Any changes are optionally saved on the user's local storage device so that they will affect the presentation of the tree in future sessions.
- the user can choose to move or copy menu options to other menus, so that useful clusters can thereafter be chosen directly from the root menu of the tree or from other easily accessed or topically appropriate menus.
- the user can select clusters C 1 , C 2 , . . . C k listed on a particular menu M and choose to remove these clusters from the menu, replacing them on the menu with a single aggregate cluster M′ containing all the target objects from clusters C 1 , C 2 , . . . C k .
- the immediate subclusters of new cluster M′ are either taken to be clusters C 1 , C 2 , . . .
- C k themselves, or else, in a variation similar to the “scatter-gather” method, are automatically computed by clustering the set of all the subclusters of clusters C 1 , C 2 , . . . C k according to the similarity of the cluster profiles of these subclusters.
- the browsing techniques described above may be applied to a domain where the target objects are purchasable goods.
- the target objects are purchasable goods.
- shoppers look for goods to purchase over the Internet or other electronic media, it is typically necessary to display thousands or tens of thousands of products in a fashion that helps consumers find the items they are looking for.
- the current practice is to use hand-crafted menus and sub-menus in which similar items are grouped together. It is possible to use the automated clustering and browsing methods described above to more effectively group and present the items.
- Purchasable items can be hierarchically clustered using a plurality of different criteria.
- Useful attributes for a purchasable item include but are not limited to a textual description and predefined category labels (if available), the unit price of the item, and an associative attribute listing the users who have bought this item in the past. Also useful is an associative attribute indicating which other items are often bought on the same shopping “trip” as this item; items that are often bought on the same trip will be judged similar with respect to this attribute, so tend to be grouped together. Retailers may be interested in utilizing a similar technique for purposes of predicting both the nature and relative quantity of items which are likely to be popular to their particular clientele. This prediction may be made by using aggregate purchasing records as the search profile set from which a collection of target objects is recommended. Estimated customer demand which is indicative of (relative) inventory quantity for each target object item is determined by measuring the cluster variance of that item compared to another target object item (which is in stock).
- hierarchically clustering the purchasable target objects results in a hierarchical menu system, in which the target objects or clusters of target objects that appear on each menu can be labeled by names or icons and displayed in a two-dimensional or three-dimensional menu in which similar items are displayed physically near each other or on the same graphically represented “shelf.”
- this grouping occurs both at the level of specific items (such as standard size Ivory soap or large Breck shampoo) and at the level of classes of items (such as soaps and shampoos).
- Non-purchasable objects such as artwork, advertisements, and free samples may also be added to a display of purchasable objects, if they are associated with (liked by) substantially the same users as are the purchasable objects in the display.
- the files associated with target objects are typically distributed across a large number of different servers S 1 -So and clients C 1 -Cn. Each file has been entered into the data storage medium at some server or client in any one of a number of ways, including, but not limited to: scanning, keyboard input, e-mail, FTP transmission, automatic synthesis from another file under the control of another computer program. While a system to enable users to efficiently locate target objects may store its hierarchical cluster tree on a single centralized machine, greater efficiency can be achieved if the storage of the hierarchical cluster tree is distributed across many machines in the network.
- Each cluster C including single-member clusters (target objects), is digitally represented by a file F, which is multicast to a topical multicast tree MT(C 1 ); here cluster C 1 is either cluster C itself or some supercluster of cluster C. In this way, file F is stored at multiple servers, for redundancy.
- the file F that represents cluster C contains at least the following data:
- the cluster profile for cluster C or data sufficient to reconstruct this cluster profile.
- the number of target objects contained in cluster C 3.
- a human-readable label for cluster C as described in section “Labeling Clusters” above.
- a client machine can retrieve the file F from the multicast tree MT(C 1 ) from the multicast tree MT(C 1 ) is described above in section “Retrieving Files from a Multicast Tree.” Once it has retrieved file F, the client can perform further tasks pertaining to this cluster, such as displaying a labeled menu of subclusters, from which the user may select subclusters for the client to retrieve next.
- the advantage of this distributed implementation is threefold.
- the system can be scaled to larger cluster sizes and numbers of target objects, since much more searching and data retrieval can be carried out concurrently.
- the system is fault-tolerant in that partial matching can be achieved even if portions of the system are temporarily unavailable. It is important to note here the robustness due to redundancy inherent in our design—data is replicated at tree sites so that even if a server is down, the data can be located elsewhere.
- the distributed hierarchical cluster tree can be created in a distributed fashion, that is, with the participation of many processors. Indeed, in most applications it should be recreated from time to time, because as users interact with target objects, the associative attributes in the target profiles of the target objects change to reflect these interactions; the system's similarity measurements can therefore take these interactions into account when judging similarity, which allows a more perspicuous cluster tree to be built
- the key technique is the following procedure for merging n disjoint cluster trees, represented respectively by files F 1 . . . Fn in distributed fashion as described above, into a combined cluster tree that contains all the target objects from all these trees.
- the files F 1 . . . Fn are described above, except that the cluster labels are not included in the representation.
- the following steps are executed by a server S 1 , in response to a request message from another server S 0 , which request message includes pointers to the files F 1 . . . Fn. 1. Retrieve files F 1 . . . Fn. 2. Let L and M be empty lists. 3. For each file Fi from among F 1 . . . Fn: 4. If file Fi contains pointers to subcluster files, add these pointers to list L. S. If file Fi represents a single target object, add a pointer to file Fi to list L. 6. For each pointer X on list L, retrieve the file that pointer P points to and extract the cluster profile P(X) that this file stores. 7.
- the distributed hierarchical cluster tree for a particular domain of target objects is constructed by merging many local hierarchical cluster trees, as follows. 1. One server S (preferably one with good connectivity) is elected from the tree. 2. Server S sends itself a global request message that causes each proxy server in MT full (that is, each proxy server in the network) to ask its clients for files for the cluster tree. 3. The clients of each proxy server transmit to the proxy server any files that they maintain, which files represent target objects from the appropriate domain that should be added to the cluster tree. 4.
- Server S forms a request R 1 that, upon receipt, will cause the recipient server S 1 to take the following actions: (a) Build a hierarchical cluster tree of all the files stored on server S 1 that are maintained by users in the user base of S 1 . These files correspond to target objects from the appropriate domain.
- This cluster tree is typically stored entirely on S 1 , but may in principle be stored in a distributed fashion,
- step 5(b) Wait until all servers to which the server S 1 has propagated request R have sent the recipient reply messages containing pointers to cluster trees, (c) Merge together the cluster tree created in step 5(a) and the cluster trees supplied in step 5(b), by sending any server (such as S 1 itself) a message requesting such a merge, as described above, (d) Upon receiving a reply to the message sent in (c), which reply includes a pointer to a file representing the merged cluster tree, forward this reply to the sender of request R 1 , unless this is S 1 itself. 5.
- Server S sends itself a global request message that causes all servers in MT full to act on embedded request R 1 . 6.
- Server S receives a reply to the message it sent in 5(c).
- This reply includes a pointer to a file F that represents the completed hierarchical cluster tree.
- Server S multicasts file F to all proxy servers in MT full .
- server S can send additional messages through the cluster tree, to arrange that multicast trees MT(C) are created for sufficiently large clusters C, and that each file F is multicast to the tree MT(C), where C is the smallest cluster containing file F.
- the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects described herein can of course function as a browser for bulletin boards, where target objects are taken to be bulletin boards, or subtopics of bulletin boards, and each target profile is the cluster profile for a cluster of documents posted on some bulletin board.
- a user can locate bulletin boards of interest by all the navigational techniques described above, including browsing and querying.
- this method only serves to locate existing virtual communities. Because people have varied and varying complex interests, it is desirable to automatically locate groups of people with common interests in order to form virtual communities.
- VCS Virtual Community Service
- the Virtual Community Service described below is a network-based agent that seeks out users of a network with common interests, dynamically creates bulletin boards or electronic mailing lists for those users, and introduces them to each other electronically via e-mail. It is useful to note that once virtual communities have been created by VCS, the other browsing and filtering technologies described above can subsequently be used to help a user locate particular virtual communities (whether pre-existing or automatically generated by VCS); similarly, since the messages sent to a given virtual community may vary in interest and urgency for a user who has joined that community, these browsing and filtering technologies (such as the e-mail filter) can also be used to alert the user to urgent messages and to screen out uninteresting ones.
- the functions of the Virtual Community Service are general functions that could be implemented on any network ranging from an office network in a small company to the World Wide Web or the Internet.
- the four main steps in the procedure are: 1. Scan postings to existing virtual communities. 2. Identify groups of users with common interests. 3. Match users with virtual communities, creating new virtual communities when necessary. 4. Continue to enroll additional users in the existing virtual communities.
- users may post messages to virtual communities pseudonymously, even employing different pseudonyms for different virtual communities.
- Posts not employing a pseudonymous mix path may, as usual, be considered to be posts employing a non-secure pseudonym, namely the user's true network address.
- the above steps may be expressed more generally as follows 1. Scan pseudonymous postings to existing virtual communities. 2. Identify groups of pseudonyms whose associated users have common interests. 3. Match pseudonymous users with virtual communities, creating new virtual communities when necessary. 4. Continue to enroll additional pseudonymous users in the existing virtual communities.
- Virtual Community Service constantly scans all the messages posted to all the newsgroups and electronic mailing lists on a given network, and constructs a target profile for each message found.
- the network can be the Internet, or a set of bulletin boards maintained by America Online, Prodigy, or CompuServe, or a smaller set of bulletin boards that might be local to a single organization, for example a large company, a law firm, or a university.
- the scanning activity need not be confined to bulletin boards and mailing lists that were created by Virtual Community Service, but may also be used to scan the activity of communities that predate Virtual Community Service or are otherwise created by means outside the Virtual Community Service system, provided that these communities are public or otherwise grant their permission.
- the target profile of each message includes textual attributes specifying the title and body text of the message. In the case of a spoken rather than written message, the latter attribute may be computed from the acoustic speech data by using a speech recognition system.
- the target profile also includes an associative attribute listing the authors) and designated recipients) of the message, where the recipients may be individuals and/or entire virtual communities; if this attribute is highly weighted, then the system tends to regard messages among the same set of people as being similar or related, even if the topical similarity of the messages is not clear from their content, as may happen when some of the messages are very short.
- Other important attributes include the fraction of the message that consists of quoted material from previous messages, as well as attributes that are generally useful in characterizing documents, such as the message's date, length, and reading level.
- Virtual Community Service attempts to identify groups of pseudonymous users with common interests. These groups, herein termed “pre-communities,” are represented as sets of pseudonyms. Whenever Virtual Community Service identifies a pre-community, it will subsequently attempt to put the users in said pre-community in contact with each other, as described below. Each pre-community is said to be “determined” by a cluster of messages, pseudonymous users, search profiles, or target objects.
- Virtual Community Service clusters the messages that were scanned and profiled in the above step, based on the similarity of those messages' computed target profiles, thus automatically finding threads of discussion that show common interests among the users.
- discussions in a single virtual community tend to show common interests; however, this method uses all the texts from every available virtual community, including bulletin boards and electronic mailing lists.
- a user who wishes to initiate or join a discussion on some topic may send a “feeler message” on that topic to a special mailing list designated for feeler mess ages; as a consequence of the scanning procedure described above, the feeler message is automatically grouped with any similarly profiled messages that have been sent to this special mailing list, to topical mailing lists, or to topical bulletin boards.
- the clustering step employs “soft clustering,” in which a message may belong to multiple clusters and hence to multiple virtual communities.
- Each cluster of messages that is found by Virtual Community Service and that is of sufficient size (for example, 10-20 different messages) determines a pre-community whose members are the pseudonymous authors and recipients of the messages in the cluster. More precisely, the pre-community consists of the various pseudonyms under which the messages in the cluster were sent and received.
- Pre-communities can be generated by grouping together users who have similar interests of any sort, not merely Individuals who have already written or received messages about similar topics. If the user profile associated with each pseudonym indicates the user's interests, for example through an associative attribute that indicates the documents or Web sites a user likes, then pseudonyms can be clustered based on the similarity of their associated user profiles, and each of the resulting clusters of pseudonyms determines a pre-community comprising the pseudonyms in the cluster. 2.
- each pseudonym has an associated search profile set formed through participation in the news clipping service described above, then all search profiles of all pseudonymous users can be clustered based on their similarity, and each cluster of search profiles determines a pre-community whose members are the pseudonyms from whose search profile sets the search profiles in the cluster are drawn. Such groups of people have been reading about the same topic (or, more generally, accessing similar target objects) and so presumably share an interest. 3. If users participate in a news clipping service or any other filtering or browsing system for target objects, then an individual user can pseudonymously request the formation of a virtual community to discuss a particular cluster of one or more target objects known to that system.
- This cluster of target objects determines a pre-community consisting of the pseudonyms of users determined to be most interested in that cluster (for example, users who have search profiles similar to the cluster pro file), together with the pseudonym of the user who requested formation of the virtual community.
- Virtual Community Service identifies a cluster C of messages, users, search profiles, or target objects that determines a pre-community M, it attempts to arrange for the members of this pre-community to have the chance to participate in a common virtual community V.
- an existing virtual community V may suit the needs of the pre-community M. Virtual Community Service first attempts to find such an existing community V.
- V may be chosen to be any existing virtual community such that the cluster profile of cluster C is within a threshold distance of the mean profile of the set of messages recently posted to virtual community V; in the case where cluster C is a cluster of users, V may be chosen to be any existing virtual community such that the cluster profile of cluster C is within a threshold distance of the mean user profile of the active members of virtual community V; in the case where the cluster C is a cluster of search profiles, V may be chosen to be any existing virtual community such that the cluster profile of cluster C is within a threshold distance of the cluster profile of the largest cluster resulting from clustering all the search profiles of active members of virtual community V; and in the case where the cluster C is a cluster of one or more target objects chosen from a separate browsing or filtering system, V may be chosen to be any existing virtual community initiated in the same way from a cluster whose cluster profile in that other system is within a threshold distance of the cluster profile of cluster C.
- the threshold distance used in each case is optionally dependent on the cluster variance or cluster
- Virtual Community Service attempts to create a new virtual community V. Regardless of whether virtual community V is an existing community or a newly created community, Virtual Community Service sends an e-mail message to each pseudonym P in pre-community M whose associated user U does not already belong to virtual community V (under pseudonym P) and has not previously turned down a request to join virtual community V.
- the e-mail message informs user U of the existence of virtual community V, and provides instructions which user U may follow in order to join virtual community V if desired; these instructions vary depending on whether virtual community V is an existing community or a new community.
- the message includes a credential, granted to pseudonym P, which credential must be presented by user U upon joining the virtual community V, as proof that user U was actually invited to join. If user U wishes to join virtual community V under a different pseudonym Q, user U may first transfer the credential from pseudonym P to pseudonym Q, as described above.
- the e-mail message further provides an indication of the common interests of the community, for example by including a list of titles of messages recently sent to the community, or a charter or introductory message provided by the community (if available), or a label generated by the methods described above that identifies the content of the cluster of messages, user profiles, search profiles, or target objects that was used to identify the pre-community M.
- Virtual Community Service must create a new community V, several methods are available for enabling the members of the new community to communicate with each other. If the pre-community M is large, for example containing more than 50 users, then Virtual Community Service typically establishes either a multicast tree, as described below, or a widely-distributed bulletin board, assigning a name to the new bulletin board. If the pre-community M has fewer members, for example 2-50, Virtual Community Service typically establishes either a multicast tree, as described below, or an e-mail mailing list. If the new virtual community V was determined by a cluster of messages, then Virtual Community Service kicks off the discussion by distributing these messages to all members of virtual community V.
- virtual communities can gather include real-time typed or spoken conversations (or engagement or distributed multi-user applications including video games) over the computer network and physical meetings, any of which can be scheduled by a partly automated process wherein Virtual Community Service requests meeting time preferences from all members of the pre-community M and then notifies these individuals of an appropriate meeting time.
- Virtual Community Service continues to scan other virtual communities for new messages whose target profiles are similar to the community's cluster profile (average message profile). Copies of any such messages are sent to the new virtual community, and the pseudonymous authors of these messages, as well as users who show high interest in reading such messages, are informed by Virtual Community Service (as for pre-community members, above) that they may want to join the community. Each such user can then decide whether or not to join the community.
- VCS may also send an urgent e-mail message to such user whereby the user may be automatically notified as soon as the dialog appears, if desired.
- IRC Internet Relay Chat
- Virtual Community Service provides automatic creation of new virtual communities in any local or wide-area network, as well as maintenance of all virtual communities on the network, including those not created by Virtual Community Service.
- the core technology underlying Virtual Community Service is creating a search and clustering mechanism that can find articles that are “similar” in that the users share interests. This is precisely what was described above.
- On a very small network a human could be “in the loop”, scanning proposed virtual communities and perhaps even giving them names. But on larger networks Virtual Community Service has to run in fully automatic mode, since it is likely to find a large number of virtual communities.
- Virtual Community Service Once a virtual community has been identified, it is straightforward for Virtual Community Service to establish a mailing list so that any member of the virtual community may distribute e-mail to all other members. Another method of distribution is to use a conventional network bulletin board or newsgroup to distribute the messages to all servers in the network, where they can be accessed by any member of the virtual community.
- these simple methods do not take into account cost and performance advantages which accrue from optimizing the construction of a multicast tree to carry messages to the virtual community.
- a multicast tree distributes messages to only a selected set of servers, and unlike an e-mail mailing list, it does so efficiently.
- a separate multicast tree MT(V) is maintained for each virtual community V, by use of the following four procedures. 1. To construct or reconstruct this multicast tree, the core servers for virtual community V are taken to be those proxy servers that serve at least one pseudonymous member of virtual community V. Then the multicast tree MT(V) is established via steps 4-6 in the section “Multicast Tree Construction Procedure” above. 2. When a new user joins virtual community V, which is an existing virtual community, the user sends a message to the user's proxy server S. If user's proxy server S is not already a core server for V, then it is designated as a core server and is added to the multicast tree MT(V), as follows.
- server S retrieves its locally stored list of nearby core servers for V, and chooses a server S 1 .
- Server S sends a control message to Si, indicating that it would like to be added to the multicast tree MT(V).
- server Si retrieves its locally stored subtree G 1 of MT(V), and forms a new graph G from G 1 by removing all degree-1 vertices other than Si itself.
- Server Si transmits graph G to server S, which stores it as its locally stored subtree of MT(V). Finally, server S sends a message to itself and to all servers that are vertices of graph G, instructing these servers to modify their locally stored subtrees of MT(V) by adding S as a vertex and adding an edge between S 1 and S. 3.
- client q embeds message F in a request R instructing the recipient to store message F locally, for a limited time, for access by members of virtual community V.
- Request R includes a credential proving that the user is a member of virtual community V or is otherwise entitled to post messages to virtual community V (for example is not “black marked” by that or other virtual community members).
- Client q then broadcasts request R to all core servers in the multicast tree MT(V), by means of a global request message transmitted to the user's proxy server as described above.
- the core servers satisfy request R, provided that they can verify the included credential. 4.
- a user U at client q initiates the steps described in section “Retrieving Files from a Multicast Tree,” above.
- user U If user U does not want to retrieve a particular message, but rather wants to retrieve all new messages sent to virtual community V, then user U pseudonymously instructs its proxy server (which is a core server for V) to send it all messages that were multicast to MT(V) after a certain date. In either case, user U must provide a credential proving user U to be a member of virtual community V, or otherwise entitled to access messages on virtual community V.
- proxy server which is a core server for V
- a method has been presented for automatically selecting articles of interest to a user.
- the method generates sets of search profiles for the users based on such attributes as the relative frequency of occurrence of words in the articles read by the users, and uses these search profiles to efficiently identify future articles of interest.
- the methods is characterized by passive monitoring (users do not need to explicitly rate the articles), multiple search profiles per user (reflecting interest in multiple topics) and use of elements of the search profiles which are automatically determined from the data (notably, the TF/IDF measure based on word frequencies and descriptions of purchasable items).
- a method has also been presented for automatically generating menus to allow users to locate and retrieve articles on topics of interest. This method clusters articles based on their similarity, as measured by the relative frequency of word occurrences. Clusters are labeled either with article titles or with key words extracted from the article. The method can be applied to large sets of articles distributed over many machines.
Abstract
This invention relates to customized electronic identification of desirable objects, such as news articles, in an electronic media environment, and in particular to a system that automatically constructs both a “target profile” for each target object in the electronic media based, for example, on the frequency with which each word appears in an article relative to its overall frequency of use in all articles, as well as a “target profile interest summary” for each user, which target profile interest summary describes the user's interest level in various types of target objects. The system then evaluates the target profiles against the users' target profile interest summaries to generate a user-customized rank ordered listing of target objects most likely to be of interest to each user so that the user can select from among these potentially relevant target objects, which were automatically selected by this system from the plethora of target objects that are profiled on the electronic media. Users' target profile interest summaries can be used to efficiently organize the distribution of information in a large scale system consisting of many users interconnected by means of a communication network. Additionally, a crypto graphically-based pseudonym proxy server is provided to ensure the privacy of a user's target profile interest summary, by giving the user control over the ability of third parties to access this summary and to identify or contact the user.
Description
- This application is a continuation (CON) of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/551,198, entitled “SYSTEM FOR CUSTOMIZED ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICATION OF DESIRABLE OBJECTS,” filed on Oct. 31, 1995, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 08/346,425, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SCHEDULING BROADCAST OF AND ACCESS TO VIDEO PROGRAMS AND OTHER DATA USING CUSTOMER PROFILES,” filed on Nov. 28, 1994, each of which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
- This invention relates to customized electronic identification of desirable objects, such as news articles, in an electronic media environment, and in particular to a system that automatically constructs both a “target profile” for each target object in the electronic media based, for example, on the frequency with which each word appears in an article relative to its overall frequency of use in all articles, as well as a “target profile interest summary” for each user, which target profile interest summary describes the user's interest level in various types of target objects. The system then evaluates the target profiles against the users' target profile interest summaries to generate a user-customized rank ordered listing of target objects most likely to be of interest to each user so that the user can select from among these potentially relevant target objects, which were automatically selected by this system from the plethora of target objects that are profiled on the electronic media. Users' target profile interest summaries can be used to efficiently organize the distribution of information in a large scale system consisting of many users interconnected by means of a communication network. Additionally, a cryptographically based proxy server is provided to ensure the privacy of a user's target profile interest summary, by giving the user control over the ability of third parties to access this summary and to identify or contact the user.
- It is a problem in the filed of electronic media to enable a user to access information of relevance and interest to the user without requiring the user to expend an excessive amount of time and energy searching for the information. Electronic media, such as on-line information sources, provide a vast amount of information to users, typically in the form of “articles,” each of which comprises a publication item or document that relates to a specific topic. The difficulty with electronic media is that the amount of information available to the user is overwhelming and the article repository systems that are connected on-line are not organized in a manner that sufficiently simplifies access to only the articles of interest to the user. Presently, a user either fails to access relevant articles because they are not easily identified or expends a significant amount of time and energy to conduct an exhaustive search of all articles to identify those most likely to be of interest to the user. Furthermore, even if the user conducts an exhaustive search, present information searching techniques do not necessarily accurately extract only the most relevant articles, but also present articles of marginal relevance due to the functional limitations of the information searching techniques. There is also no existing system which automatically estimates the inherent quality of a n article or other target object to distinguish among a number of articles or target objects identified as of possible interest to a user.
- Therefore, in the field of information retrieval, there is a long-standing need for a system which enables users to navigate through the plethora of information. With commercialization of communication networks, such as the Internet, the growth of available information has increased. Customization of the information delivery process to the user's unique tastes and interests is the ultimate solution to this problem. However, the techniques which have been proposed to date either only address the user's interests on a superficial level or provide greater depth and intelligence at the cost of unwanted demands on the user's time and energy. While many researchers have agreed that traditional methods have been lacking in this regard, no one to date has successfully addressed these problems in a holistic manner and provided a system that can fully learn and reflect the user's tastes and interests. This is particularly true in a practical commercial context, such as on-line services available on the Internet. There is a need for an information retrieval system that is largely or entirely passive, unobtrusive, undemanding of the user, and yet both precise and comprehensive in its ability to learn and truly represent the user's tastes and interests. Present information retrieval systems require the user to specify the desired information retrieval behavior through cumbersome interfaces.
- Users may receive information on a computer network either by actively retrieving the information or by passively receiving information that is sent to them. Just as users of information retrieval systems face the problem of too much information, so do users who are targeted with electronic junk mail by individuals and organizations. An ideal system would protect the user from unsolicited advertising, both by automatically extracting only the most relevant messages received by electronic mail, and by preserving the confidentiality of the user's preferences, which should not be freely available to others on the network.
- Researchers in the field of published article information retrieval have devoted considerable effort to finding efficient and accurate methods of allowing users to select articles of interest from a large set of articles. The most widely used methods of information retrieval are based on keyword matching: the user specifies a set of keywords which the user thinks are exclusively found in the desired articles and the information retrieval computer retrieves all articles which contain those keywords. Such methods are fast, but are notoriously unreliable, as users may not think of the right keywords, or the keywords may be used in unwanted articles in an irrelevant or unexpected context. As a result, the information retrieval computers retrieve many articles which are unwanted by the user. The logical combination of keywords and the use of wild-card search parameters help improve the accuracy of keyword searching but do not completely solve the problem of inaccurate search results. Starting in the 1960's, an alternate approach to information retrieval was developed: users were presented with an article and asked if it contained the information they wanted, or to quantify how close the information contained in the article was to what they wanted. Each article was described by a profile which comprised either a list of the words in the article or, in more advanced systems, a table of word frequencies in the article. Since a measure of similarity between articles is the distance between their profiles, the measured similarity of article profiles can be used in article retrieval. For example, a user searching for information on a subject can write a short description of the desired information. The information retrieval computer generates an article profile for the request and then retrieves articles with profiles similar to the profile generated for the request. These requests can then be refined using “relevance feedback”, where the user actively or passively rates the articles retrieved as to how close the information contained therein is to what is desired. The information retrieval computer then uses this relevance feedback information to refine the request profile and the process is repeated until the user either finds enough articles or tires of the search.
- A number of researchers have looked at methods for selecting articles of most interest to users. An article titled “Social Information filtering: algorithms for automating ‘word of mouth’” was published at the CHi-95 Proceedings by Patti Maes et al and describes the Ringo information retrieval system which recommends musical selections. The Ringo system requires active feedback from the users—users must manually specify how much they like or dislike each musical selection. The Ringo system maintains a complete list of users ratings of music selections and makes recommendations by finding which selections were liked by multiple people. However, the Ringo system does not take advantage of any available descriptions of the music, such as structured descriptions in a data base, or free text, such as that contained in music reviews. An article titled “Evolving agents for personalized information filtering”, published at the Proc. 9th IEEE Conf. on AI for Applications by Sheth and Maes, described the use of agents for information filtering which use genetic algorithms to learn to categorize Usenet news articles. In this system, users must define news categories and the users actively indicate their opinion of the selected articles. Their system uses a list of keywords to represent sets of articles and the records of users' interests are updated using genetic algorithms.
- A number of other research groups have looked at the automatic generation and labeling of clusters of articles for the purpose of browsing through the articles. A group at Xerox Pare published a paper titled “Scatter/gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large article collections” at the 15 Ann. Int'l SIGIR '92, ACM 318-329 (Cutting et al. 1992). This group developed a method they call “scatter/gather” for performing information retrieval searches. In this method, a collection of articles is “scattered” into a small number of clusters, the user then chooses one or more of these clusters based on short summaries of the cluster. The selected clusters are then “gathered” into a subcollection, and then the process is repeated. Each iteration of this process is expected to produce a small, more focused collection. The cluster “summaries” are generated by picking those words which appear most frequently in the cluster and the titles of those articles closest to the center of the cluster. However, no feedback from users is collected or stored, so no performance improvement occurs over time.
- Apple's Advanced Technology Group has developed an interface based on the concept of a “pile of articles”. This interface is described in an article titled “A ‘pile’ metaphor for supporting casual organization of information in Human factors in computer systems” published in CHI '92 Conf. Proc. 627-634 by Mander, R. G. Salomon and Y. Wong. 1992. Another article titled “Content awareness in a file system interface: implementing the ‘pile’ metaphor for organizing information” was published in 16 Ann. Int'l SIGIR '93, ACM 260-269 by Rose E. D. et al. The Apple interface uses word frequencies to automatically file articles by picking the pile most similar to the article being filed. This system functions to cluster articles into subpiles, determine key words for indexing by picking the words with the largest TF/IDF (where TF is term (word) frequency and IDF is the inverse document frequency) and label piles by using the determined key words.
- Numerous patents address information retrieval methods, but none develop records of a user's interest based on passive monitoring of which articles the user accesses. None of the systems described in these patents pre sent computer architectures to allow fast retrieval of articles distributed across many computers. None of the systems described in these patents address issues of using such article retrieval and matching methods for purposes of commerce or of matching users with common interests or developing records of users' interests. U.S. Pat. No. 5,321,833 issued to Chang et al. teaches a method in which users choose terms to use in an information retrieval query, and specify the relative weightings of the different terms. The Chang system then calculates multiple levels of weighting criteria. U.S. Pat. No. 5,301,109 issued to Landauer et al. teaches a method for retrieving articles in a multiplicity of languages by constructing “latent vectors” (SVD or PCA vectors) which represent correlations between the different words. U.S. Pat. No. 5,331,554 issued to Graham et al. discloses a method for retrieving segments of a manual by comparing a query with nodes in a decision tree. U.S. Pat. No. 5,331,556 addresses techniques for deriving morphological part-of-speech information and thus to make use of the similarities of different forms of the same word (e.g. “article” and “articles”).
- Therefore, there presently is no information retrieval and delivery system operable in an electronic media environment that enables a user to access information of relevance and interest to the user without requiring the user to expend an excessive amount of time and energy.
- The above-described problems are solved and a technical advance achieved in the field by the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects in an electronic media environment, which system enables a user to access target objects of relevance and interest to the user without requiring the user to expend an excessive amount of time and energy. Profiles of the target objects are stored on electronic media and are accessible via a data communication network. In many applications, the target objects are informational In nature, and so may themselves be stored on electronic media and be accessible via a data communication network.
- Relevant definitions of terms for the purpose of this description include: (a.) an object available for access by the user, which may be either physical or electronic in nature, is termed a “target object”, (b.) a digitally represented profile indicating that target object's attributes is termed a “target profile”, (c.) the user looking for the target object is termed a “user”, (d.) a profile holding that user's attributes, including age/zip code/etc. is termed a “user profile”, (e.) a summary of digital profiles of target objects that a user likes and/or dislikes, is termed the “target profile interest summary” of that user, (f.) a profile consisting of a collection of attributes, such that a user likes target objects whose profiles are similar to this collection of attributes, is termed a “search profile” or in some contexts a “query” or “query profile,” (g.) a specific embodiment of the target profile interest summary which comprises a set of search profiles is termed the “search profile set” of a user, (h.) a collection of target objects with similar profiles, is termed a “cluster,” (i.) an aggregate profile formed by averaging the attributes of all tar get objects in a cluster, termed a “cluster profile,” (j) a real number determined by calculating the statistical variance of the profiles of all target objects in a cluster, is termed a “cluster variance,” (k.) a real number determined by calculating the maximum distance between the profiles of any two target objects in a cluster, is termed a “cluster diameter.”
- The system for electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention automatically constructs both a target profile for each target object in the electronic media based, for example, on the frequency with which each word appears in an article relative to its overall frequency of use in all articles, as well as a “target profile interest summary” for each user, which target profile interest summary describes the user's interest level in various types of target objects. The system then evaluates the target profiles against the users' target profile interest summaries to generate a user-customized rank ordered listing of tar get objects most likely to be of interest to each user so that the user can select from among these potentially relevant target objects, which were automatically selected by this system from the plethora of target objects available on the electronic media.
- Because people have multiple interests, a target profile interest summary for a single user must represent multiple areas of interest, for example, by consisting of a set of individual search profiles, each of which identifies one of the user's areas of interest. Each user is presented with those target objects whose profiles most closely match the user's interests as described by the user's target profile interest summary. Users' target profile interest summaries are automatically updated on a continuing basis to reflect each user's changing interests. In addition, target objects can be grouped into clusters based on their similarity to each other, for example, based on similarity of their topics in the case where the target objects are published articles, and menus automatically generated for each duster of target objects to allow users to navigate throughout the clusters and manually locate target objects of interest. For reasons of confidentiality and privacy, a particular user may not wish to make public all of the interests recorded in the user's target profile interest summary, particularly when these interests are determined by the user's purchasing patterns. The user may desire that all or part of the target profile interest summary be kept confidential, such as information relating to the user's political, religious, financial or purchasing behavior, indeed, confidentiality with respect to purchasing behavior is the user's legal right in many states. It is therefore necessary that data in a user's target profile interest summary be protected from unwanted disclosure except with the user's agreement. At the same time, the user's target profile interest summaries must be accessible to the relevant servers that perform the matching of target objects to the users, if the benefit of this matching is desired by both providers and consumers of the target objects. The disclosed system provides a solution to the privacy problem by using a proxy server which acts as an intermediary between the information provider and the user. The proxy server dissociates the user's true identity from the pseudonym by the use of cryptographic techniques. The proxy server also permits users to control access to their target profile interest summaries and/or user profiles, including provision of this information to marketers and advertisers if they so desire, possibly in exchange for cash or other considerations. Marketers may purchase these profiles in order to target advertisements to particular users, or they may purchase partial user profiles, which do not include enough information to identify the individual users in question, in order to carry out standard kinds of demographic analysis and market research on the resulting database of partial user profiles.
- In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects uses a fundamental methodology for accurately and efficiently matching users and target objects by automatically calculating, using and updating profile information that describes both the users' interests and the target objects' characteristics. The target objects may be published articles, purchasable items, or even other people, and their properties are stored, and/or represented and/or denoted on the electronic media as (digital) data. Examples of target objects can include, but are not limited to: a newspaper story of potential interest, a movie to watch, an item to buy, e-mail to receive, or another person to correspond with. In all these cases, the information delivery process in the preferred embodiment is based on determining the similarity between a profile for the target object and the profiles of target objects for which the user (or a similar user) has provided positive feedback in the past. The individual data that describe a target object and constitute the target object's profile are herein termed “attributes” of the target object. Attributes may include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) long pieces of text (a newspaper story, a movie review, a product description or an advertisement), (2) short pieces of text (name of a movie's director, name of town from which an advertisement was placed, name of the language in which an article was written), (3) numeric measurements (price of a product, rating given to a movie, reading level of a book), (4) associations with other types of objects (list of actors in a movie, list of persons who have read a document). Any of these attributes, but especially the numeric ones, may correlate with the quality of the target object, such as measures of its popularity (how often it is accessed) or of user satisfaction (number of complaints received).
- The preferred embodiment of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects operates in an electronic media environment for accessing these target objects, which may be news, electronic mail, other published documents, or product descriptions. The system in its broadest construction comprises three conceptual modules, which may b(c) separate entities distributed across many implementing systems, or combined into a lesser subset of physical entities. The specific embodiment of this system disclosed herein illustrates the use of a first module which automatically constructs a “target profile” for each target object in the electronic media based on various descriptive attributes of the target object. A second module uses interest feedback from users to construct a “target profile interest summary” for each user, for example in the form of a “search profile set” consisting of a plurality of search profiles, each of which corresponds to a single topic of high interest for the user. The system further includes a profile processing module which estimates each user's interest in various target objects by reference to the users' target profile interest summaries, for example by comparing the target profiles of these target objects against the search profiles in users' search profile sets, and generates for each user a customized rank-ordered listing of target objects most likely to be of interest to that user. Each user's target profile interest summary is automatically updated on a continuing basis to reflect the user's changing interests.
- Target objects may be of various sorts, and it is sometimes advantageous to use a single system that delivers and/or clusters target objects of several distinct sorts at once, in a unified framework. For example, users who exhibit a strong interest in certain novels may also show an interest in certain movies, presumably of a similar nature. A system in which some target objects are novels and other target objects are movies can discover such a correlation and exploit it in order to group particular novels with particular movies, e.g., for clustering purposes, or to recommend the movies to a user who has demonstrated interest in the novels. Similarly, if users who exhibit an interest in certain World Wide Web sites also exhibit an interest in certain products, the system can match the products with the sites and thereby recommend to the marketers of those products that they place advertisements at those sites, e.g., in the form of hypertext links to their own sites.
- The ability to measure the similarity of profiles describing target objects and a user's interests can be applied in two basic ways: filtering and browsing. Filtering is useful when large numbers of target objects are described in the electronic media space. These target objects can for example be articles that are received or potentially received by a user, who only has time to read a small fraction of them. For example, one might potentially receive all items on the AP news wire service, all items posted to a number of news groups, all advertisements in a set of newspapers, or all unsolicited electronic mail, but few people have the time or inclination to read so many articles. A filtering system in the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects automatically selects a set of articles that the user is likely to wish to read. The accuracy of this filtering system improves over time by noting which articles the user reads and by generating a measurement of the depth to which the user reads each article. This information is then used to update the user's target profile interest summary. Browsing provides an alternate method of selecting a small subset of a large number of target objects, such as articles. Articles are organized so that users can actively navigate among groups of articles by moving from one group to a larger, more general group, to a smaller, more specific group, or to a closely related group. Each individual article forms a one-member group of its own, so that the user can navigate to and from individual articles as well as larger groups. The methods used by the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects allow articles to be grouped into clusters and the clusters to be grouped and merged into larger and larger clusters. These hierarchies of clusters then form the basis for menuing and navigational systems to allow the rapid searching of large numbers of articles. This same clustering technique is applicable to any type of target objects that can be profiled on the electronic media.
- There are a number of variations on the theme of developing and using profiles for article retrieval, with the basic implementation of an on-line news clipping service representing the preferred embodiment of the invention. Variations of this basic system are disclosed and comprise a system to filter electronic mail, an extension for retrieval of target objects such as purchasable items which may have more complex descriptions, a system to automatically build and alter menuing systems for browsing and searching through large numbers of target objects, and a system to construct virtual communities of people with common interests. These intelligent filters and browsers are necessary to provide a truly passive, intelligent system interface. A user interface that permits intuitive browsing and filtering represents for the first time an intelligent system for determining the affinities between users and target objects. The detailed, comprehensive target profiles and user-specific target profile interest summaries enable the system to provide responsive routing of specific queries for user information access. The information maps so produced and the application of users' target profile interest summaries to predict the information consumption patterns of a user allows for pre-caching of data at locations on the data communication network and at times that minimize the traffic flow in the communication network to thereby efficiently provide the desired information to the user and/or conserve valuable storage space by only storing those target objects (or segments thereof) which are relevant to the user's interests.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates in block diagram form a typical architecture of an electronic media system in which the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention can be implemented as part of a user server system; -
FIG. 2 illustrates in block diagram form one embodiment of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects; -
FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate typical network trees; -
FIG. 5 illustrates in flow diagram form a method for automatically generating article profiles and an associated hierarchical menu system; -
FIGS. 6-9 illustrate examples of menu generating process; -
FIG. 10 illustrates in flow diagram form the operational steps taken by the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects to screen articles for a user; -
FIG. 11 illustrates a hierarchical cluster tree example; -
FIG. 12 illustrates in flow diagram form the process for determination of likelihood of interest by a specific user in a selected target object; -
FIGS. 13A-B illustrate in flow diagram form the automatic clustering process; -
FIG. 14 illustrates in flow diagram form the use of the pseudonymous server; -
FIG. 15 illustrates in flow diagram form the use of the system for accessing information in response to a user query; and -
FIG. 16 illustrates in flow diagram form the use of the system for accessing information in response to a user query when the system is a distributed network implementation. - This section describes a general procedure for automatically measuring the similarity between two target objects, or, more precisely, between target profiles that are automatically generated for each of the two target objects. This similarity determination process is applicable to target objects in a wide variety of contexts. Target objects being compared can be, as an example but not limited to: textual documents, human beings, movies, or mutual funds. It is assumed that the target profiles which describe the target objects are stored at one or more locations in a data communication network on data storage media associated with a computer system. The computed similarity measurements serve as input to additional processes, which function to enable human users to locate desired target objects using a large computer system. These additional processes estimate a human user's interest in various target objects, or else cluster a plurality of target objects in to logically coherent groups. The methods used by these additional processes might in principle be implemented on either a single computer or on a computer network. Jointly or separately, they form the underpinning for various sorts of database systems and information retrieval systems.
- In classical Information Retrieval (IR) technology, the user is a literate human and the target objects in question are textual documents stored on data storage devices interconnected to the user via a computer network. That is, the target objects consist entirely of text, and so are digitally stored on the data storage devices within the computer network. However, there are other target object domains that present related retrieval problems that are not capable of being solved by present information retrieval technology:
-
- (a.) the user is a film buff and the target objects are movies available on videotape.
- (b.) the user is a consumer and the target objects are used cars being sold.
- (c.) the user is a consumer and the target objects are products being sold through promotional deals.
- (d.) the user is an investor and the target objects are publicly traded stocks, mutual funds and/or real estate properties.
- (e.) the user is a student and the target objects are classes being offered.
- (f.) the user is an activist and the target objects are Congressional bills of potential concern. (g.) the user is a direct-mail marketer and the target objects are potential customers.
- (h.) the user is a net-surfer and the target objects are pages, servers, or newsgroups available on the World Wide Web.
- (i.) the user is a philanthropist and the target objects are charities.
- (j.) the user is ill and the target objects are medical specialists.
- (k.) the user is an employee and the target objects are potential employers.
- (l.) the user is an employer and the target objects are potential employees.
- (m.) the user is an beleaguered executive and the target objects are electronic mail messages addressed to the user.
- (n.) the user is a lonely heart and the target objects are potential conversation partners,
- (o.) the user is in search of an expert and the target objects are users, with known retrieval habits, of an document retrieval system.
- (p.) the user is a social worker and the target objects are families that may need extra visits,
- (q.) the user is an oncologist and the target objects are women for whom mammograms may be advisable.
- (r.) the user is an auto insurance company and the target objects are potential customers
- In all these cases, the user wishes to locate some small subset of the target objects—such as the target objects that the user most desires to rent, buy, investigate, meet, read, give mammograms to, insure, and so forth. The task is to help the user identify the most interesting target objects, where the user's interest in a target object is defined to be a numerical measurement of the user's relative desire to locate that object rather than others.
- The generality of this problem motivates a general approach to solving the information retrieval problems noted above. It is assumed that many target objects are known to the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects, and that specifically, the system stores (or has the ability to reconstruct) several pieces of information about each target object. These pieces of information are termed “attributes”: collectively, they are said to form a profile of the target object, or a “target profile,” For example, where the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects is activated to identify movies of interest, the system is likely be concerned with the values of attributes such as these:
-
- (a.) title of movie,
- (b.) name of director,
- (c.) Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) child-appropriateness rating (0=G, 1=PG, . . . ),
- (d.) date of release,
- (e.) number of stars granted by a particular critic,
- (f.) number of stars granted by a second critic,
- (g.) number of stars granted by a third critic,
- (h.) full text of review by the third critic,
- (i.) list of customers who have previously rented this movie,
- (j.) list of actors.
- Each movie has a different set of values for these attributes. This example conveniently illustrates three kinds of attributes. Attributes c-g are numeric attributes, of the sort that might be found in a database record. It is evident that they can be used to help the user identify target objects (movies) of interest. For example, the user might previously have rented many Parental Guidance (PG) films, and many films made in the 1970's. This generalization is useful: new films with values for one or both attributes that are numerically similar to these (such as MPAA rating of 1, release date of 1975) are judged similar to the films the user already likes, and therefore of probable interest Attributes a-b and h are textual attributes. They too are important for helping the user locate desired films. For example, perhaps the user has shown a past interest in films whose review text (attribute h) contains words like “chase,” “explosion,” “explosions,” “hero,” “gripping,” and “superb.” This generalization is again useful in identifying new films of interest. Attribute i is an associative attribute. It records associations between the target objects in this domain, namely movies, and ancillary target objects of an entirely different sort, namely humans. A good indication that the user wants to rent a particular movie is that the user has previously rented other movies with similar attribute values, and this holds for attribute I just as it does for attributes a-h. For example, if the user has often liked movies that customer C17 and customer C190 have rented, then the user may like other such movies, which have similar values for attribute i. Attribute j is another example of an associative attribute, recording associations between target objects and actors. Notice that any of these attributes can be made subject to authentication when the profile is constructed, through the use of digital signatures; for example, the target object could be accompanied by a digitally signed note from the MPAA, which note names the target object and specifies its authentic value for attribute c.
- These three kinds of attributes are common: numeric, textual, and associative. In the classical information retrieval problem, where the target objects are documents (or more generally, coherent document sections extracted by a text segmentation method), the system might only consider a single, textual attribute when measuring similarity: the full text of the target object. However, a more sophisticated system would consider a longer target profile, including numeric and associative attributes:
- (a.) full text of document (textual),
- (b.) title (textual),
- (c.) author (textual),
- (d.) language in which document is written (textual),
- (e.) date of creation (numeric),
- (f.) date of last update (numeric),
- (g.) length in words (numeric),
- (h.) reading level (numeric),
- (i.) quality of document as rated by a third\_party editorial agency (numeric),
- (j.) list of other readers who have retrieved this document (associative).
- As another domain example, consider a domain where the user is an advertiser and the target objects are potential customers. The system might store the following attributes for each target object (potential customer):
- (a.) first two digits of zip code (textual),
- (b.) first three digits of zip code (textual),
- (c.) entire five-digit zip code (textual),
- (d.) distance of residence from advertiser's nearest physical storefront (numeric),
- (e.) annual family income (numeric),
- (f.) number of children (numeric),
- (g.) list of previous items purchased by this potential customer (associative),
- list of filenames stored on this potential customer's client computer (associative),
list of movies rented by this potential customer (associative),
list of investments in this potential customer's investment portfolio (associative),
list of documents retrieved by this potential customer (associative),
written response to Rorschach inkblot test (textual),
multiple-choice responses by this customer to 20 self-image questions (20 textual attributes). - As always, the notion is that similar consumers buy similar products. It should be noted that diverse sorts of information are being used here to characterize consumers, from their consumption patterns to their literary tastes and psychological peculiarities, and that this fact illustrates both the flexibility and power of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention. Diverse sorts of information can be used as attributes in other domains as well (as when physical, economic, psychological and interest-related questions are used to profile the applicants to a dating service, which is indeed a possible domain for the present system), and the advertiser domain is simply an example.
- As a final domain example, consider a domain where the user is an stock market investor and the target objects are publicly traded corporations. A great many attributes might be used to characterize each corporation, including but not limited to the following:
-
- (a.) type of business (textual),
- (b.) corporate mission statement (textual),
- (c.) number of employees during each of the last 10 years (ten separate numeric attributes),
- (d.) percentage growth in number of employees during each of the last 10 years,
- (e.) dividend payment issued in each of the last 40 quarters, as a percentage of current share price,
- (f.) percentage appreciation of stock value during each of the last 40 quarters, list of shareholders (associative),
- (g.) composite text of recent articles about the corporation in the financial press (textual).
- It is worth noting some additional attributes that are of interest in some domains. In the case of documents and certain other domains, it is useful to know the source of each target object (for example, refereed journal article vs. UPI newswire article vs. Usenet newsgroup posting vs. question-answer pair from a question-and-answer list vs. tabloid newspaper article vs. . . . ); the source may be represented as a single-term textual attribute. Important associative attributes for a hypertext document are the list of documents that it links to, and the list of documents that link to it. Documents with similar citations are similar with respect to the former attribute, and documents that are cited in the same places are similar with respect to the latter. A convention may optionally be adopted that any document also links to itself. Especially in systems where users can choose whether or not to retrieve a target object, a target object's popularity (or circulation) can be usefully measured as a numeric attribute specifying the number of users who have retrieved that object. Related measurable numeric attributes that also indicate a kind of popularity include the number of replies to a target object, in the domain where target objects are messages posted to an electronic community such as an computer bulletin board or newsgroup, and the number of links leading to a target object, in the domain where target objects are interlinked hypertext documents on the World Wide Web or a similar system. A target object may also receive explicit numeric evaluations (another kind of numeric attribute) from various groups, such as the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA), as above, which rates movies' appropriateness for children, or the American Medical Association, which might rate the accuracy and novelty of medical research papers, or a random survey sample of users (chosen from all users or a selected set of experts), who could be asked to rate nearly anything. Certain other types of evaluation, which also yield numeric attributes, may be carried out mechanically. For example, the difficulty of reading a text can be assessed by standard procedures that count word and sentence lengths, while the vulgarity of a text could be defined as (say) the number of vulgar words it contains, and the expertise of a text could be crudely assessed by counting the number of similar texts its author had previously retrieved and read using the invention, perhaps confining this count to texts that have high approval ratings from critics. Finally, it is possible to synthesize certain textual attributes mechanically, for example to reconstruct the script of a movie by applying speech recognition techniques to its soundtrack or by applying optical character recognition techniques to its closed-caption subtitles.
- Although textual and associative attributes are large and complex pieces of data, for information retrieval purposes they can be decomposed into smaller, simpler numeric attributes. This means that any set of attributes can be replaced by a (usually larger) set of numeric attributes, and hence that any profile can be represented as a vector of numbers denoting the values of these numeric attributes. In particular, a textual attribute, such as the full text of a movie review, can be replaced by a collection of numeric attributes that represent scores to denote the presence and significance of the words “aardvark,” “aback,” “abacus,” and so on through “zymurgy” in that text. The score of a word in a text may be defined in numerous ways. The simplest definition is that the score is the rate of the word in the text, which is computed by computing the number of times the word occurs in the text, and dividing this number by the total number of words in the text. This sort of score is often called the “term frequency” (TF) of the word. The definition of term frequency may optionally be modified to weight different portions of the text unequally: for example, any occurrence of a word in the text's title might be counted as a 3-fold or more generally k-fold occurrence (as if the title had been repeated k times within the text), in order to reflect a heuristic assumption that the words in the title are particularly important indicators of the text's content or topic.
- However, for lengthy textual attributes, such as the text of an entire document, the score of a word is typically defined to be not merely its term frequency, but its term frequency multiplied by the negated logarithm of the word's “global frequency,” as measured with respect to the textual attribute in question. The global frequency of a word, which effectively measures the word's uninformativeness, is a fraction between 0 and 1, defined to be the fraction of all target objects for which the textual attribute in question contains this word. This adjusted score is often known in the art as TF/IDF (“term frequency times inverse document frequency”). When global frequency of a word is taken into account in this way, the common, uninformative words have scores comparatively close to zero, no matter how often or rarely they appear in the text. Thus, their rate has little influence on the object's target profile. Alternative methods of calculating word scores include latent semantic indexing or probabilistic models.
- Instead of breaking the text into its component words, one could alternatively break the text into overlapping word bigrams (sequences of 2 adjacent words), or more generally, word n-grams. These word n-grams may be scored in the same way as individual words. Another possibility is to use character n-grams. For example, this sentence contains a sequence of overlapping character 5-grams which starts “for e”, “or ex”, “r exa”, “exam”, “examp”, etc. The sentence may be characterized, imprecisely but usefully, by the score of each possible character 5-gram (“aaaaa”, “aaaab”, . . . “zzzzz”) in the sentence. Conceptually speaking, in the character 5-gram case, the textual attribute would be decomposed into at least 265=11,881,376 numeric attributes. Of course, for a given target object, most of these numeric attributes have values of 0, since most 5-grams do not appear in the target object attributes. These zero values need not be stored anywhere. For purposes of digital storage, the value of a textual attribute could be characterized by storing the set of character 5-grams that actually do appear in the text, together with the nonzero score of each one. Any 5-gram that is no t included in the set can be assumed to have a score of zero. The decomposition of textual attributes is not limited to attributes whose values are expected to be long texts. A simple, one-term textual attribute can be replaced by a collection of numeric attributes in exactly the same way. Consider again the case where the target objects are movies. The “name of director” attribute, which is textual, can be replaced by numeric attributes giving the scores for “Federico-Fellini,” “Woody-Allen,” “Terence-Davies,” and so forth, in that attribute. For these one-term textual attributes, the score of a word is usually defined to be its rate in the text, without any consideration of global frequency. Note that under these conditions, one of the scores is 1, while the other scores are 0 and need not be stored. For example, if Davies did direct the film, then it is “Terence-Davies” whose score is 1, since “Terence-Davies” constitutes 100% of the words in the textual value of the “name of director” attribute. It might seem that nothing has been gained over simply regarding the textual attribute as having the string value “Terence-Davies.” However, the trick of decomposing every non-numeric attribute into a collection of numeric attributes proves useful for the clustering and decision tree methods described later, which require the attribute values of different objects to be averaged and/or ordinally ranked. Only numeric attributes can be averaged or ranked in this way.
- Just as a textual attribute may be decomposed into a number of component terms (letter or word n-grams), an associative attribute may be decomposed into a number of component associations. For instance, in a domain where the target objects are movies, a typical associative attribute used in profiling a movie would be a list of customers who have rented that movie. This list can be replaced by a collection of numeric attributes, which give the “association scores” between the movie and each of the customers known to the system. For example, the 165th such numeric attribute would be the association score between the movie and customer #165, where the association score is defined to be 1 if customer #165 has previously rented the movie, and 0 otherwise. In a subtler refinement, this associations core could be defined to be the degree of interest, possibly zero, that customer #165 exhibited in the movie, as determined by relevance feedback (as described below). As another example, in a domain where target objects are companies, an associative attribute indicating the major shareholders of the company would be decomposed into a collection of association scores, each of which would indicate the percentage of the company (possibly zero) owned by some particular individual or corporate body. Just as with the term scores used in decomposing lengthy textual attributes, each association score may optionally be adjusted by a multiplicative factor: for example, the association score between a movie and customer #165 might be multiplied by the negated logarithm of the “global frequency” of customer #165, i.e., the fraction of all movies that have been rented by customer #165. Just as with the term scores used in decomposing textual attributes, most association scores found when decomposing a particular value of an associative attribute are zero, and a similar economy of storage may be gained in exactly the same manner by storing a list of only those ancillary objects with which the target object has a nonzero association score, together with their respective association scores.
- What does it mean for two target objects to be similar? More precisely, how should one measure the degree of similarity? Many approaches are possible and any reasonable metric that can be computed over the set of target object profiles can be used, where target objects are considered to be similar if the distance between their profiles is small according to this metric. Thus, the following preferred embodiment of a target object similarity measurement system has many variations.
- First, define the distance between two values of a given attribute according to whether the attribute is a numeric, associative, or textual attribute. If the attribute is numeric, then the distance between two values of the attribute is the absolute value of the difference between the two values. (Other definitions are also possible: for example, the distance between prices p1 and p2 might be defined by |(p1−p2)|/(max(p1,p2)+1), to recognize that when it comes to customer interest, $50 00 and $5020 are very similar, whereas $3 and $23 are not.) If the attribute is associative, then its value V may be decomposed as described above into a collection of real numbers, representing the association scores between the target object in question and various ancillary objects. V may therefore be regarded as a vector with components V1, V2, V3, etc., representing the association scores between the object and
ancillary objects 1, 2, 3, etc., respectively. The distance between two vector values V and U of an associative attribute is then computed using the angle distance measure, arccos (VUt/sqrt((Vvt)(UUt)). (Note that the three inner products in this expression have the form XYt=X1Y1+X2Y2+X3Y3+ . . . , and that for efficient computation, terms of the form XiYi may be omitted from this sum if either of the scores Xi and Yi is zero.) Finally, if the attribute is textual, then its value V may be decomposed as described above into a collection of real numbers, representing the scores of various word n-grams or character n-grams in the text. Then the value V may again be regarded as a vector, and the distance between two values is again defined via the angle distance measure. Other similarity metrics between two vectors, such as the dice measure, may be used instead. It happens that the obvious alternative metric, Euclidean distance, does not work well: even similar texts tend not to overlap substantially in the content words they use, so that texts encountered in practice are all substantially orthogonal to each other, assuming that TF/IDF scores are used to reduce the influence of non-content words. The scores of two words in a textual attribute vector may be correlated; for example, “Kennedy” and “JFK” tend to appear in the same documents. Thus it may be advisable to alter the text somewhat before computing the scores of terms in the text, by using a synonym dictionary that groups together similar words. The effect of this optional pre-alteration is that two texts using related words are measured to be as similar as if they had actually used the same words. One technique is to augment the set of words actually found in the article with a set of synonyms or other words which tend to co-occur with the words in the article, so that “Kennedy” could be added to every article that mentions “JFK.” Alternatively, words found in the article may be wholly replaced by synonyms, so that “JFK” might be replaced by “Kennedy” or by “John F. Kennedy” wherever it appears. In either case, the result is that documents about Kennedy and documents about JFK are adjudged similar. The synonym dictionary may be sensitive to the topic of the document as a whole; for example, it may recognize that “crane” is likely to have a different synonym in a document that mentions birds than in a document that mentions construction. A related technique is to replace each word by its morphological stem, so that “staple”, “stapler”, and “staples” are all replaced by “staple.” Common function words (“a”, “and”, “the” . . . ) can influence the calculated similarity of texts without regard to their topics, and so are typically removed from the text before the scores of terms in the text are computed. A more general approach to recognizing synonyms is to use a revised measure of the distance between textual attribute vectors V and U, namely arccos(AV(AU)t/sqrt(AV(AV)tAU(AU)t), where the matrix A is the dimensionality-reducing linear transformation (or an approximation thereto) determined by collecting the vector values of the textual attribute, for all target objects known to the system, and applying singular value decomposition to the resulting collection. The same approach can be applied to the vector values of associative attributes. The above definitions allow us to determine how close together two target objects are with respect to a single attribute, whether numeric, associative, or textual. The distance between two target objects X and Y with respect to their entire multi-attribute profiles PX and PY is then denoted d(X,Y) or d(PX, PY) and defined as: -
(((distance with respect to attribute a)(weight of attribute a))k+((distance with respect to attribute b)(weight of attribute b))k+((distance with respect to attribute c)(weight of attribute c)k+ . . . )k - where k is a fixed positive real number, typically 2, and the weights are non-negative real numbers indicating the relative importance of the various attributes. For example, if the target objects are consumer goods, and the weight of the “color” attribute is comparatively very small, then price is not a consideration in determining similarity: a user who likes a brown massage cushion is predicted to show equal interest in the same cushion manufactured in blue, and vice-versa. On the other hand, if the weight of the “color” attribute is comparatively very high, then users are predicted to show interest primarily in products whose colors they have liked in the past, a brown massage cushion and a blue massage cushion are not at all the same kind of target object, however similar in other attributes, and a good experience with one does not by itself inspire much interest in the other. Target objects may be of various sorts, and it is sometimes advantageous to use a single system that is able to compare tar get objects of distinct sorts. For example, in a system where some target objects are novels while other target objects are movies, it is desirable to judge a novel and a movie similar if their profiles show that similar users like them (an associative attribute). However, it is important to note that certain attributes specified in the movie's target profile are undefined in the novel's target profile, and vice versa: a novel has no “cast list” associative attribute and a movie has no “reading level” numeric attribute. In general, a system in which target objects fall into distinct sorts may sometimes have to measure the similarity of two target objects for which somewhat different sets of attributes are defined. This requires an extension to the distance metric d(*,*) defined above. In certain applications, it is sufficient when carrying out such a comparison simply to disregard attributes that are not defined for both target objects: this allows a cluster of novels to be matched with the most similar cluster of movies, for example, by considering only those attributes that novels and movies have in common. However, while this method allows comparisons between (say) novels and movies, it does not define a proper metric over the combined space of novels and movies and therefore does not allow clustering to be applied to the set of all target objects. When necessary for clustering or other purposes, a metric that allows comparison of any two target objects (whether of the same or different sorts) can be defined as follows. If a is an attribute, then let Max(a) be an upper bound on the distance between two values of attribute a; notice that if attribute a is an associative or textual attribute, this distance is an angle determined by arccos, so that Max(a) may be chosen to be 180 degrees, while if attribute a is a numeric attribute, a sufficiently large number must be selected by the system designers. The distance between two values of attribute a is given as before in the case where both values are defined; the distance between two undefined values is taken to be zero; finally, the distance between a defined value and an undefined value is always taken to be Max(a)/2. This allows us to determine how close together two target objects are with respect to an attribute a, even if attribute a does not have a defined value for both target objects. The distance d(*,*) between two target objects with respect to their entire multi-attribute profiles is then given in terms of these individual attribute distances exactly as before. It is assumed that one attribute in such a system specifies the sort of target object (“movie”, “novel”, etc.), and that this attribute may be highly weighted if target objects of different sorts are considered to be very different despite any attributes they may have in common.
- A simple application of the similarity measurement is a system to match buyers with sellers in small-volume markets, such as used cars and other used goods, artwork, or employment. Sellers submit profiles of the goods (target objects) they want to sell, and buyers submit profiles of the goods (target objects) they want to buy. Participants may submit or withdraw these profiles at any time. The system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects computes the similarities between seller-submitted profiles and buyer-submitted profiles, and when two profiles match closely (i.e., the similarity is above a threshold), the corresponding seller and buyer are notified of each other's identities. To prevent users from being flooded with responses, it may be desirable to limit the number of notifications each user receives to a fixed number, such as ten per day.
- A filtering system is a device that can search through many target objects and estimate a given user's interest in each target object, so as to identify those that are of greatest interest to the user. The filtering system uses relevance feed back to refine its knowledge of the user's interests: whenever the filtering system identifies a target object as potentially interesting to a user, the user (if an on-line user) provides feedback as to whether or not that target object really is of interest. Such feedback is stored long-term in summarized form, as part of a database of user feedback information, and may be provided either actively or passively. In active feedback, the user explicitly indicates his or her interest, for instance, on a scale of −2 (active distaste) through 0 (no special interest) to 10 (great interest). In passive feedback, the system infers the user's interest from the user's behavior. For example, if target objects are textual documents, the system might monitor which documents the user chooses to read, or not to read, and how much time the user spends reading them. A typical formula for assessing interest in a document via passive feedback, in this domain, on a scale of 0 to 10, might be:
- +2 if the second page is viewed,
- +2 if all pages are viewed,
- +2 if more than 30 seconds was spent viewing the document,
- +2 if more than one minute was spent viewing the document,
- +2 if the minutes spent viewing the document are greater than half the number of pages.
- If the target objects are electronic mail messages, interest points might also be added in the case of a particularly lengthy or particularly prompt reply. If the target objects are purchasable goods, interest points might be added for target objects that the user actually purchases, with further points in the case of a large-quantity or high-price purchase. In any domain, further points might be added for target objects that the user accesses early in a session, on the grounds that users access the objects that most interest them first. Other potential sources of passive feedback include an electronic measurement of the extent to which the user's pupils dilate while the user views the target object or a description of the target object. It is possible to combine active and passive feedback. One option is to take a weighted average of the two ratings. Another option is to use passive feedback by default, but to allow the user to examine and actively modify the passive feedback score. In the scenario above, for instance, an uninteresting article may sometimes remain on the display device for a long period while the user is engaged in unrelated business; the passive feedback score is then inappropriately high, and the user may wish to correct it before continuing. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, a visual indicator, such as a sliding bar or indicator needle on the user's screen, can be used to continuously display the passive feedback score estimated by the system for the target object being viewed, unless the user has manually adjusted the indicator by a mouse operation or other means in order to reflect a different score for this target object, after which the indicator displays the active feedback score selected by the user, and this active feedback score is used by the system instead of the passive feedback score. In a variation, the user cannot see or adjust the indicator until just after the user has finished viewing the target object. Regardless how a user's feedback is computed, it is stored long-term as part of that user's target profile interest summary.
- Relevance feedback only determines the user's interest in certain target objects: namely, the target objects that the user has actually had the opportunity to evaluate (whether actively or passively). For target objects that the user has not yet seen, the filtering system must estimate the user's interest. This estimation task is the heart of the filtering problem, and the reason that the similarity measurement is important. More concretely, the preferred embodiment of the filtering system is a news clipping service that periodically presents the user with news articles of potential interest. The user provides active and/or passive feedback to the system relating to these presented articles. However, the system does not have feedback information from the user for articles that have never been presented to the user, such as new articles that have just been added to the database, or old articles that the system chose not to present to the user. Similarly, in the dating service domain where target objects are prospective romantic partners, the system has only received feedback on old flames, not on prospective new loves.
- As shown in flow diagram form in
FIG. 12 , the evaluation of the likelihood of interest in a particular target object for a specific user can automatically be computed. The interest that a given target object X holds for a user U is assumed to be a sum of two quantities: q(U, X), the intrinsic “quality” of X, plus f(U, X), the “topical interest” that users like U have in target objects like X. For any target object X, the intrinsic quality measure q(U, X) is easily estimated at steps 1201-1203 directly from numeric attributes of the target object X. The computation process begins atstep 1201, where certain designated numeric attributes of target object X are specifically selected, which attributes by their very nature should be positively or negatively correlated with users' interest. Such attributes, termed “quality attributes,” have the normative property that the higher (or in some cases lower) their value, the more interesting a user is expected to find them. Quality attributes of target object X may include, but are not limited to, target object X's popularity among users in general, the rating a particular reviewer has given target object X, the age (time since authorship—also known as outdatedness) of target object X, the number of vulgar words used in target object X, the price of target object X, and the amount of money that the company selling target object X has donated to the user's favorite charity. Atstep 1202, each of the selected attributes is multiplied by a positive or negative weight indicative of the strength of user U's preference for those target objects that have high values for this attribute, which weight must be retrieved from a data file storing quality attribute weights for the selected user. Atstep 1203, a weighted sum of the identified weighted selected attributes is computed to determine the intrinsic quality measure q(U, X). Atstep 1204, the summarized weighted relevance feedback data is retrieved, wherein some relevance feedback points are weighted more heavily than others and the stored relevance data can be summarized to some degree, for example by the use of search profile sets. The more difficult part of determining user U's interest in target object X is to find or compute atstep 1205 the value of f(U, X), which denotes the topical interest that users like U generally have in target objects like X. The method of determining a user's interest relies on the following heuristic: when X and Y are similar target objects (have similar attributes), and U and V are similar users (have similar attributes), then topical interest f(U, X) is predicted to have a similar value to the value of topical interest f(V, Y). This heuristic leads to an effective method because estimated values of the topical interest function f(*, *) are actually know n for certain arguments to that function: specifically, if user V has provided a relevance-feedback rating of r(V, Y) for target object Y, then insofar as that rating represents user V's true interest in target object Y, we have r(V, Y)=q(V, Y)+f(V, Y) and can estimate f(V, Y) as r(V, Y)−q(V, Y). Thus, the problem of estimating topical interest at all points becomes a problem of interpolating among these estimates of topical interest at selected points, such as the feedback estimate of f(V, Y) as r(V, Y)−q(V, Y). This interpolation can be accomplished with any standard smoothing technique, using as input the known point estimates of the value of the topical interest function f(*, *), and determining as output a function that approximates the entire topical interest function f(*, *). - Not all point estimates of the topical interest function f(*, *) should be given equal weight as inputs to the smoothing algorithm. Since passive relevance feedback is less reliable than active relevance feedback, point estimates made from passive relevance feedback should be weighted less heavily than point estimates made from active relevance feedback, or even not used at all. In most domains, a user's interests may change over time and, therefore, estimates of topic al interest that derive from more recent feedback should also be weighted more heavily. A user's interests may vary according to mood, so estimates of topical interest that derive from the current session should be weighted more heavily for the duration of the current session, and past estimates of topical interest made at approximately the current time of day or on the current weekday should be weighted more heavily. Finally, in domains where users are trying to locate target objects of long-term interest (investments, romantic partners, pen pals, employers, employees, suppliers, service providers) from the possibly meager information provided by the target profiles, the users are usually not in a position to provide reliable immediate feedback on a target object, but can provide reliable feedback at a later date. An estimate of topical interest f(V, Y) should be weighted more heavily if user V has had more experience with target object Y. Indeed, a useful strategy is for the system to track long-term feedback for such target objects. For example, if target profile Y was created in 1990 to describe a particular investment that was available in 1990, and that was purchased in 1990 by user V, then the system solicits relevance feedback from user V in the years 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, etc., and treats these as successively stronger indications of user V's true interest in target profile Y, and thus as indications of user V's likely interest in new investments whose current profiles resemble the original 1990 investment profile Y. In particular, if in 1994 and 1995 user V is well-disposed toward his or her 1990 purchase of the investment described by target profile Y, then in those years and later, the system tends to recommend additional investments when they have profiles like target profile Y, on the grounds that they too will turn out to be satisfactory in 4 to 5 years. It makes these recommendations both to user V and to users whose investment portfolios and other attributes are similar to user V's. The relevance feedback provided by user V in this case may be either active (feedback=satisfaction ratings provided by the investor V) or passive (feedback=difference between average annual return of the investment and average annual return of the Dow Jones index portfolio since purchase of the investment, for example).
- To effectively apply the smoothing technique, it is necessary to have a definition of the similarity distance between (U, X) and (V, Y), for any users U and V and any target objects X and Y. We have already seen how to define the distance d(X, Y) between two target objects X and Y, given their attributes. We may regard a pair such as (U, X) as an extended object that bears all the attributes of target X and all the attributes of user U; then the distance between (U, X) and (V, Y) may be computed in exactly the same way. This approach requires user U, user V, and all other users to have some attributes of their own stored in the system: for example, age (numeric), social security number (textual), and list of documents previously retrieved (associative). It is these attributes that determine the notion of “similar users.” Thus it is desirable to generate profiles of users (termed “user profiles”) as well as profiles of target objects (termed “target profiles”). Some attributes employed for profiling users may be related to the attributes employed for profiling target objects: for example, using associative attributes, it is possible to characterize target objects such as X by the interest that various users have shown in them, and simultaneously to characterize users such as U by the interest that they have shown m various target objects. In addition, user profiles may make use of any attributes that are useful in characterizing humans, such as those suggested in the example domain above where target objects are potential consumers. Notice that user U's interest can be estimated even if user U is a new user or an off-line user who has never provided any feedback, because the relevance feedback of users whose attributes are similar to U's attributes is taken into account.
- For some uses of filtering systems, when estimating topical interest, it is appropriate to make an additional “presumption of no topical interest” (or “bias toward zero”). To understand the usefulness of such a presumption, suppose the system needs to determine whether target object X is topically interesting to the user U, but that users like user U have never provided feedback on target objects even remotely like target object X. The presumption of no topical interest says that if this is so, it is because users like user U are simply not interested in such target objects and therefore do not seek them out and interact with them. On this presumption, the system should estimate topical interest f(U, X) to be low. Formally, this example has the characteristic that (U, X) is far away from all the points (V, Y) where feedback is available. In such a case, topical interest f(U, X) is presumed to be close to zero, even if the value of the topical interest function f(*, *) is high at all the faraway surrounding points at which its value is known. When a smoothing technique is used, such a presumption of no topical interest can be introduced, if appropriate, by manipulating the input to the smoothing technique. In addition to using observed values of the topical interest function f(*, *) as input, the trick is to also introduce fake observations of the form topical interest f(V, Y)=0 for a lattice of points (V, Y) distributed throughout the multidimensional space. These fake observations should be given relatively low weight as inputs to the smoothing algorithm. The more strongly they are weighted, the stronger the presumption of no interest.
- The following provides another simple example of an estimation technique that has a presumption of no interest. Let g be a decreasing function from non-negative real numbers to non-negative real numbers, such as g(x)=ex or g(x)*= min(1, x−k) where k>1. Estimate topical interest f(U, X) with the following g-weighted average:
-
- Here the summations are over all pairs (V, Y) such that user V has provided feedback r(V, Y) on target object Y, i.e., all pairs (V, Y) such that relevance feedback r(V, Y) is defined. Note that both with this technique and with conventional smoothing techniques, the estimate of the topical interest f(U, X) is not necessarily equal to r(U, X)-q(U, X), even when r(U, X) is defined.
- The method described above requires the filtering system to measure distances between (user, target object) pairs, such as the distance between (U, X) and (V, Y). Given the means described earlier for measuring the distance between two multi-attribute profiles, the method must therefore associate a weight with each attribute used in the profile of (user, target object) pairs, that is, with each attribute used to profile either users or target objects. These weights specify the relative importance of the attributes in establishing similarity or difference, and therefore, in determining how topical interest is generalized from one (user, target object) pair to another. Additional weights determine which attributes of a target object contribute to the quality function q, and by how much. It is possible and often desirable for a filtering system to store a different set of weights for each user. For example, a user who thinks of two-star films as having materially different topic and style from four-star films wants to assign a high weight to “number of stars” for purposes of the similarity distance measure d(*, *); this means that interest in a two-star film does not necessarily signal interest in an otherwise similar four-star film, or vice-versa. If the user also agrees with the critics, and actually prefers four-star films, the user also wants to assign “number of stars” a high positive weight in the determination of the quality function q. In the same way, a user who dislikes vulgarity wants to assign the “vulgarity score” attribute a high negative weight in the determination of the quality function q, although the “vulgarity score” attribute does not necessarily have a high weight in determining the topical similarity of two films.
- Attribute weights (of both sorts) may be set or adjusted by the system administrator or the individual user, on either a temporary or a permanent basis. However, it is often desirable for the filtering system to learn attribute weights automatically, based on relevance feedback. The optimal attribute weights for a user U are those that allow the most accurate prediction of user U's interests. That is, with the distance measure and quality function defined by these attribute weights, user U's interest in target object X, q(U, X)+f(U, X), can be accurately estimated by the techniques above. The effectiveness of a particular set of attribute weights for user U can therefore be gauged by seeing how well it predicts user U's known interests.
- Formally, suppose that user U has previously provided feedback on target objects X1, X2, X3, . . . Xn, and that the feedback ratings are r(U, X1), r(U, X2), r(U, X3), . . . r(U, Xn). Values of feedback ratings r(*,*) for other users and other target objects may also be known. The system may use the following procedure to gauge the effectiveness of the set of attribute weights it currently stores for user U: (T) For each 1<=I<=n, use the estimation techniques to estimate q(U, X1)+f(U, Xi) from all known values of feedback ratings r. Call this estimate ai. (ii) Repeat step (i), but this time make the estimate for each 1<=i<= n without using the feedback ratings r(U, Xj) as input, for any j such that the distance d(Xi, Xj) is smaller than a fixed threshold. That is, estimate each q(U, Xi)+(U, Xi) from other values of feedback rating r only; in particular, do not use r(U, Xi) itself. Call this estimate bi. The difference ai-bi is herein termed the “residue feedback rres(U, Xi) of user U on target object Xi.” (iii) Compute user U's error measure, (a1−b1)2+(a2−b2)2+(a3−b3)2+ . . . +(an−bn)2.
- A gradient-descent or other numerical optimization method may be used to adjust user U's attribute weights so that this error measure reaches a (local) minimum. This approach tends to work best if the smoothing technique used in estimation is such that the value of f(V, Y) is strongly affected by the point estimate r(V, Y)−q(V, Y) when the latter value is provided as input. Otherwise, the presence or absence of the single input feedback rating r(U, Xi, in steps (i)-(ii) may not make ai and bi very different from each other. A slight variation of this learning technique adjusts a single global set of at tribute weights for all users, by adjusting the weights so as to minimize not a particular user's error measure but rather the total error measure of all users. These global weights are used as a default initial setting for a new user who has not yet provided any feedback. Gradient descent can then be employed to adjust this user's individual weights over time. Even when the attribute weights are chosen to minimize the error measure for user U, the error measure is generally still positive, meaning that residue feedback from user U has not been reduced to 0 on all target objects. It is useful to note that high residue feedback from a user U on a target object X indicates that user U liked target object X unexpectedly well given its profile, that is, better than the smoothing model could predict from user U's opinions on target objects with similar profiles. Similarly, low residue feedback indicates that user U liked target object X less than was expected. By definition, this unexplained preference or dispreference cannot be the result of topical similarity, and therefore must be regarded as an indication of the intrinsic quality of target object X. It follows that a useful quality attribute for a target object X is the average amount of residue feedback rres(V, X) from users on that target object, averaged over all users V who have provided relevance feedback on the target object. In a variation of this idea, residue feedback is never averaged indiscriminately over all users to form a new attribute, but instead is smoothed to consider users' similarity to each other. Recall that the quality measure q(U, X) depends on the user U as well as the target object X, so that a given target object X may be perceived by different users to have different quality. In this variation, as before, q(U, X) is calculated as a weighted sum of various quality attributes that are dependent only on X, but then an additional term is added, namely an estimate of rres(U, X) found by applying a smoothing algorithm to known values of rres(V, X). Here V ranges over all users who have provided relevance feedback on target object X, and the smoothing algorithm is sensitive to the distances d(U, V) from each such user V to user U.
- A method for defining the distance between any pair of target objects was disclosed above. Given this distance measure, it is simple to apply a standard clustering algorithm, such as k-means, to group the target objects into a number of clusters, in such a way that similar target objects tend to be grouped in the same cluster. It is clear that the resulting clusters can be used to improve the efficiency of matching buyers and sellers in the application described in section “Matching Buyers and Sellers” above: it is not necessary to compare every buy profile to every sell profile, but only to compare buy profiles and sell profiles that are similar enough to appear in the same cluster. As explained below, the results of the clustering procedure can also be used to make filtering more efficient, and in the service of querying and browsing tasks.
- The k-means clustering method is familiar to those skilled in the art. Briefly put, it finds a grouping of points (target profiles, in this case, whose numeric coordinates are given by numeric decomposition of their attributes as described above) to minimize the distance between points in the clusters and the centers of the clusters in which they are located. This is done by alternating between assigning each point to the cluster which has the nearest center and then, once the points have been assigned, computing the (new) center of each cluster by averaging the coordinates of the points (target profiles) located in this cluster. Other clustering methods can be used, such as “soft” or “fuzzy” k-means clustering, in which objects are allowed to belong to more than one cluster. This can be cast as a clustering problem similar to the k-means problem, but now the criterion being optimized is a little different:
-
ΣiΣciicd(xi,x c) - where C ranges over cluster numbers, i ranges over target objects, Xi is the numeric vector corresponding to the profile of target object number i,
x c is the mean of all the numeric vectors corresponding to target profiles of target objects in cluster number C, termed the “cluster profile” of cluster C, d(*, *) is the metric used to measure distance between two target profiles, and iiC is a value between 0 and 1 that indicates how much target object number i is associated with cluster number C, where i is an indicator matrix with the property that for each i, SUM SUB C I SUB iC=1. For k-means clustering, iiC is either 0 or 1. - Any of these basic types of clustering might be used by the system:
-
- 1) Association-based clustering, in which profiles contain only associative attributes, and thus distance is defined entirely by associations. This kind of clustering generally (a) clusters target objects based on the similarity of the users who like them or (b) clusters users based on the similarity of the target objects they like. In this approach, the system does not need any information about target objects or users, except for their history of interaction with each other.
- 2) Content-based clustering, in which profiles contain only non-associative attributes. This kind of clustering (a) clusters target objects based on the similarity of their non-associative attributes (such as word frequencies) or (b) clusters users base d on the similarity of their non-associative attributes (such as demographics and psychographics). In this approach, the system does not need to record any information about users' historical patterns of information access, but it does need information about the intrinsic properties of users and/or target objects.
- 3) Uniform hybrid method, in which profiles may contain both associative and non-associative attributes. This method combines 1a and 2a, or 1b and 2b. The distance d(PX, PY) between two profiles PX and PY may be computed by the general similarity-measurement methods described earlier.
- 4) Sequential hybrid method. First apply the k-means procedure to do 1a, so that articles are labeled by cluster based on which user read them, then use supervised clustering (maximum likelihood discriminant methods) using the word frequencies to do the process of method 2a described above. This tries to use knowledge of who read what to do a better job of clustering based on word frequencies. One could similarly combine the methods 1b and 2b described above.
- Hierarchical clustering of target objects is often useful. Hierarchical clustering produces a tree which divides the target objects first into two large clusters of roughly similar objects; each of these clusters is in turn divided into two or more smaller clusters, which in turn are each divided into yet smaller clusters until the collection of target objects has been entirely divided into “clusters” consisting of a single object each, as diagrammed in
FIG. 8 In this diagram, the node d denotes a particular target object d, or equivalently, a single-member cluster consisting of this target object. Target object d is a member of the cluster (a, b, d), which is a subset of the cluster (a, b, c, d, e, f), which in turn is a subset of all target objects. The tree shown inFIG. 8 would be produced from a set of target objects such as those shown geometrically inFIG. 7 . InFIG. 7 , each letter represents a target object, and axes x1 and x2 represent two of the many numeric attributes on which the target objects differ. Such a cluster tree may be created by hand, using human judgment to form clusters and subclusters of similar objects, or may be created automatically in either of two standard ways: top-down or bottom-up. In top-down hierarchical clustering, the set of all target objects inFIG. 7 would be divided into the clusters (a, b, c, d, e, f) and (g, h, i, j, k). The clustering algorithm would then be reapplied to the target objects in each cluster, so that the cluster (g, h, i, j, k) is subpartitioned into the clusters (g, k) and (h, i, j), and so on to arrive at the tree shown inFIG. 8 . In bottom-up hierarchical clustering, the set of all target objects inFIG. 7 would be grouped into numerous small clusters, namely (a, b), d, (c, f), e, (g,k), (h, i), and j. These clusters would then themselves be grouped into the larger clusters (a, b, d), (c, e, f), (g, k), and (h, i, j), according to their cluster profiles. These larger clusters would themselves be grouped into (a, b, c, d, e, f) and (g, k, h, i, j), and so on until all target objects had been grouped together, resulting in the tree ofFIG. 8 . Note that for bottom-up clustering to work, it must be possible to apply the clustering algorithm to a set of existing clusters. This requires a notion of the distance between two clusters. The method disclosed above for measuring the distance between target objects can be applied directly, provided that clusters are profiled in the same way as target objects. It is only necessary to adopt the convention that a cluster's profile is the average of the target profiles of all the target objects in the cluster; that is, to determine the cluster's value for a given attribute, take the mean value of that attribute across all the target objects in the cluster. For the mean value to be well-defined, all attributes must be numeric, so it is necessary as usual to replace each textual or associative attribute with its decomposition into numeric attributes (scores), as described earlier. For example, the target profile of a single Woody Allen film would assign “Woody-Allen” a score of 1 in the “name-of-director” field, while giving “Tedericc-Fellini” and “Terence-Davies” scores of 0. A cluster that consisted of 20 films directed by Allen and 5 directed by Fellini would be profiled with scores of 0.8, 0.2, and 0 respectively, because, for example, 0.8 is the average of 20 ones and 5 zeros. - Given a target object with target profile P, or alternatively given a search profile P, a hierarchical cluster tree of target objects makes it possible for the system to search efficiently for target objects with target profiles similar to P. It is only necessarily to navigate through the tree, automatically, in search of such target profiles. The system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects begins by considering the largest, top-level clusters, and selects the cluster whose profile is most similar to target profile P. In the event of a near-tie, multiple clusters may be selected. Next, the system considers all subclusters of the selected clusters, and this time selects the subcluster or subclusters whose profiles are closest to target profile P. This refinement process is iterated until the clusters selected on a given step are sufficiently small, and these are the desired clusters of target objects with profiles most similar to target profile P. Any hierarchical cluster tree therefore serves as a decision tree for identifying target objects. In pseudo-code form, this process is as follows (and in flow diagram form in
FIGS. 13A and 13B ): -
- 1. Initialize list of identified target objects to the empty list at step 13A00
- 2. Initialize the current tree T to be the hierarchical cluster tree of all objects at step 13A01 and at step 13A02 scan the current cluster tree for target objects similar to P, using the process detailed in
FIG. 13B . At step 13A03, the list of target objects is returned. - 3. At step 13B00, the variable I is set to 1 and for each child subtree Ti of the root of tree T, is retrieved.
- 4. At step 13B02, calculate d(P, pi), the similarity distance between P and pi,
- 5. At step 13B03, if d(P, pi)<t, a threshold, brach to one of two options
- 6. If tree Ti contains only one target object at step 13B04, add that target object to list of identified target objects at step 13B05 and advance to step 13B07.
- 7. If tree Ti contains multiple target objects at step 13B04, scan the ith child subtree for target objects similar to P by invoking the steps of the process of
FIG. 13B recursively and then recurse to step 3 (step 13A01 inFIG. 13A ) with T bound for the duration of the recursion to tree Ti, in order to search in tree Ti for target objects with profiles similar to P.
- In
step 5 of this pseudo-code, smaller thresholds are typically used at lower levels of the tree, for example by making the threshold an affine function or other function of the cluster variance or cluster diameter of the cluster pi. If the cluster tree is distributed across a plurality of servers, as described in the section of this description titled “Network Context of the Browsing System”, this process may be executed in distributed fashion as follows: steps 3-7 are executed by the server that stores the root node of hierarchical cluster tree T, and the recursion in step 7 to a subcluster tree Ti involves the transmission of a search request to the server that stores the root node of tree Ti, which server carries out the recursive step upon receipt of this request. Steps 1-2 are carried out by the processor that initiates the search, and the server that executes step 6 must send a message identifying the target object to this initiating processor, which adds it to the list. - Assuming that low-level clusters have been already been formed through clustering, there are alternative search methods for identifying the low-level cluster whose profile is most similar to a given target profile P. A standard back-propagation neural net is one such method: it should be trained to take the attributes of a target object as input, and produce as output a unique pattern that can be used to identify the appropriate low-level cluster. For maximum accuracy, low-level clusters that are similar to each other (close together in the cluster tree) should be given similar identifying patterns. Another approach is a standard decision tree that considers the attributes of target profile P one at a time until it can identify the appropriate cluster. If profiles are large, this may be more rapid than considering all attributes. A hybrid approach to searching uses distance measurements as described above to navigate through the top few levels of the hierarchical cluster tree, until it reaches an cluster of intermediate size whose profile is similar to target profile P, and then continues by using a decision tree specialized to search for low-level subclusters of that intermediate cluster.
- One use of these searching techniques is to search for target objects that match a search profile from a user's search profile set. This form of searching is used repeatedly in the news clipping service, active navigation, and Virtual Community Service applications, described below. Another use is to add a new target object quickly to the cluster tree. An existing cluster that is similar to the new target object can be located rapidly, and the new target object can be added to this cluster. If the object is beyond a certain threshold distance from the cluster center, then it is advisable to start a new cluster. Several variants of this incremental clustering scheme can be used, and can be built using variants of subroutines available in advanced statistical packages. Note that various methods can be used to locate the new target objects that must be added to the cluster tree, depending on the architecture used. In one method, a “webcrawler” program running on a central computer periodically scans all servers in search of new target objects, calculates the target profiles of these objects, and adds them to the hierarchical cluster tree by the above method. In another, whenever a new target object is added to any of the servers, a software “agent” at that server calculates the target profile and adds it to the hierarchical cluster tree by the above method.
- In some domains, complete profiles of target objects are not always easy to construct automatically. When target objects are wallpaper patterns, for example, an attribute such as “genre” (a single textual term such as “Art-Deco,” “Children's,” “Rustic,” etc.) may be a matter of judgment and opinion, difficult to determine except by consulting a human. More significantly, if each wallpaper pattern has an associative attribute that records the positive or negative relevance feedback to that pattern from various human users (consumers), then all the association scores of any newly introduced pattern are initially zero, so that it is initially unclear what other patterns are similar to the new pattern with respect to the users who like them. Indeed, if this associative attribute is highly weighted, the initial lack of relevance feedback information may be difficult to remedy, due to a vicious circle in which users of moderate-to-high interest are needed to provide relevance feedback but relevance feedback is needed to identify users of moderate-to-high interest.
- Fortunately, however, it is often possible in principle to determine certain attributes of a new target object by extraordinary methods, including but not limited to methods that consult a human. For example, the system can in principle determine the genre of a wallpaper pattern by consulting one or more randomly chosen individuals from a set of known human experts, while to determine the numeric association score between a new wallpaper pattern and a particular user, it can in principle show the pattern to the that user and obtain relevance feedback. Since such requests inconvenience people, however, it is important not to determine all difficult attributes this way, but only the ones that are most important for purposes of classifying the document. “Rapid profiling” is a method for selecting those numeric attributes that are most important to determine. (Recall that all attributes can be decomposed into numeric attributes, such as association scores or term scores.) First, a set of existing target objects that already have complete or largely complete profiles are clustered using a k-means algorithm. Next, each of the resulting clusters is assigned a unique identifying number, and each clustered target object is labeled with the identifying number of its cluster. Standard methods then allow construction of a single decision tree that can determine any target object's cluster number, with substantial accuracy, by considering the attributes of the target object, one at a time. Only attributes that can if necessary be determined for any new target object are used in the construction of this decision tree. To profile a new target object, the decision tree is traversed downward from its root as far as is desired. The root of the decision tree considers some attribute of the target object. If the value of this attribute is not yet known, it is determined by a method appropriate to that attribute; for example, if the attribute is the association score of the target object with user #4589, then relevance feedback (to be used as the value of this attribute) is solicited from user #4589, perhaps by the ruse of adding the possibly uninteresting target object to a set of objects that the system recommends to the user's attention, in order to find out what the user thinks of it. Once the root attribute is determined, the rapid profiling method descends the decision tree by one level, choosing one of the decision subtrees of the root in accordance with the determined value of the root attribute. The root of this chosen subtree considers another attribute of the target object, whose value is likewise determined by an appropriate method. The process can be repeated to determine as many attributes as desired, by whatever methods are available, although it is ordinarily stopped after a small number of attributes, to avoid the burden of determining too many attributes.
- It should be noted that the rapid profiling method can be used to identify important attributes in any sort of profile, and not just profiles of target objects. In particular, recall that the disclosed method for determining topical interest through similarity requires users as well as target objects to have profiles. New users, like new target objects, may be profiled or partially profiled through the rapid profiling process. For example, when user profiles include an associative attribute that records the user's relevance feedback on all target objects in the system, the rapid profiling procedure can rapidly form a rough characterization of a new user's interests by soliciting the user's feedback on a small number of significant target objects, and perhaps also by determining a small number of other key attributes of the new user, by on-line queries, telephone surveys, or other means. Once the new user has been partially profiled in this way, the methods disclosed above predict that the new user's interests resemble the known interests of other users with similar profiles. In a variation, each user's user profile is subdivided into a set of long-term attributes, such as demographic characteristics, and a set of short-term attributes that help to identify the user's temporary, desires and emotional state, such as the user's textual or multiple-choice answers to questions whose answers reflect the user's mood. A subset of the user's long-term attributes are determined when the user first registers with the system, through the use of a rapid profiling tree of long-term attributes. In addition, each time the user logs on to the system, a subset of the user's short-term attributes are additionally determined, through the use of a separate rapid profiling tree that asks about short-term attributes.
- A technique similar to rapid profiling is of interest in market research (or voter research). Suppose that the target objects are consumers. A particular attribute in each target profile indicates whether the consumer described by that target profile h as purchased product X. A decision tree can be built that attempts to determine what value a consumer has for this attribute, by consideration of the other attributes in the consumer's profile. This decision tree may be traversed to determine whether additional users are likely to purchase product X. More generally, the top few levels of the decision tree provide information, valuable to advertisers who are planning mass-market or direct-mail campaigns, about the most significant characteristics of consumers of product X.
- Similar information can alternatively be extracted from a collection of consumer profiles without recourse to a decision tree, by considering attributes one at a time, and identifying those attributes on which pro duct X's consumers differ significantly from its non-consumers. These techniques serve to characterize consumers of a particular product; they can be equally well applied to voter research or other survey research, where the objective is to characterize those individuals from a given set of surveyed individuals who favor a particular candidate, hold a particular opinion, belong to a particular demographic group, or have some other set of distinguishing attributes. Researchers may wish to purchase batches of analyzed or unanalyzed user profiles from which personal identifying information has been removed. As with any statistical database, statistical conclusions can be drawn, and relationships between attributes can be elucidated using knowledge discovery techniques which are well known in the art.
- The following section describes the preferred computer and network architecture for implementing the methods described in this patent.
-
FIG. 1 illustrates in block diagram form the overall architecture of an electronic media system, known in the art, in which the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention can be used to provide user customized access to target objects that are available via the electronic media system. In particular, the electronic media system comprises a data communication facility that interconnects a plurality of users with a number of information servers. The users are typically individuals, whose personal computers (terminals) T1-Tn are connected via a data communications link, such as a modem and a telephone connection established in well-known fashion, to a telecommunication network N. User information access software is resident on the user's personal computer and serves to communicate over the data communications link and the telecommunication network N with one of the plurality of network vendors V1-Vk (America Online, Prodigy, CompuServe, other private companies or even universities) who provide data interconnection service with selected ones of the information servers I1-Im. The user can, by use of the user information access software, interact with the information servers I1-Im to request and obtain access to data that resides on mass storage systems -SSm that are part of the information server apparatus. New data is input to this system y users via their personal computers T1-Tn and by commercial information services by populating their mass storage systems SS1-SSm with commercial data. Each user terminal T1-Tn and the information servers I1-Im have phone numbers or IP addresses on the network N which enable a data communication link to be established between a particular user terminal T1-Tn and the selected information server I1-Im. A user's electronic mail address also uniquely identifies the user and the user's network vendor V1-Vk in an industry-standard format such as: username@aol.com or username@netcom.com. The network vendors V1-Vk provide access passwords for their subscribers (selected users), through which the users can access the information servers Il-Im. The subscribers pay the network vendors V1-Vk for the access services on a fee schedule that typically includes a monthly subscription fee and usage based charges. A difficulty with this system is that there are numerous information servers I1-Im located around the world, each of which provides access to a set of information of differing format, content and topics and via a cataloging system that is typically unique to the particular information server I1-Im The information is comprised of individual “files,” which can contain audio data, video data, graphics data, text data, structured database data and combinations thereof. In the terminology of this patent, each target object is associated with a unique file: for target objects that are informational in nature and can be digitally represented, the file directly stores the informational content of the target object, while for target objects that are not stored electronically, such as purchasable goods, the file contains an identifying description of the target object. Target objects stored electronically as text files can include commercially provided news articles, published documents, letters, user-generated documents, descriptions of physical objects, or combinations of these classes of data. The organization of the files containing the information and the native format of the data contained in files of the same conceptual type may vary by information server I1-Im. - Thus, a user can have difficulty in locating files that contain the desired information, because the information may be contained in files whose information server cataloging may not enable the user to locate them. Furthermore, there is no standard catalog that defines the presence and services provided by all information servers I1-Im. A user therefore does not have simple access to information but must expend a significant amount of time and energy to excerpt a segment of the information that may be relevant to the user from the plethora of information that is generated and populated on this system. Even if the user commits the necessary resources to this task, existing information retrieval processes lack the accuracy and efficiency to ensure that the user obtains the desired information. It is obvious that within the constructs of this electronic media system, the three modules of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects can be implemented in a distributed manner, even with various modules being implemented on and/or by different vendors within the electronic media system. For example, the information servers I1-Im can include the target profile generation module while the network vendors V1-Vk may implement the user profile generation module, the target profile interest summary generation module, and/or the profile processing module. A module can itself be implemented in a distributed manner, with numerous nodes being present in the network N, each node serving a population of users in a particular geographic area. The totality of these nodes comprises the functionality of the particular module. Various other partitions of the modules and their functions are possible and the examples provided herein represent illustrative examples and are not intended to limit the scope of the claimed invention. For the purposes of pseudonymous creation and update of users' target profile interest summaries (as described below), the vendors V1-Vk may be augmented with some number of proxy servers, which provide a mechanism for ongoing pseudonymous access and profile building through the method described herein. At least one trusted validation server must be in place to administer the creation of pseudonyms in the system.
- An important characteristic of this system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects is its responsiveness, since the intended use of the system is in an interactive mode. The system utility grows with the number of the users and this increases the number of possible consumer/product relationships between users and target objects. A system that serves a large group of users must maintain interactive performance and the disclosed method for profiling and clustering target objects and users can in turn be used for optimizing the distribution of data among the members of a virtual community and through a data communications network, based on users' target profile interest summaries.
- The various processors interconnected by the data communication network N as shown in
FIG. 1 can be divided into two classes and grouped as illustrated inFIG. 2 : clients and servers. The clients C1-Cn are individual user's computer systems which are connected to servers S1-S5 at various times via data communications links. Each of the clients Ci is typically associated with a single server Sj, but these associations can change over time. The clients C1-Cn both interface with users and produce and retrieve files to and from servers. The clients C1-Cn are not necessarily continuously on-line, since they typically serve a single user and can be movable systems, such as laptop computers, which can be connected to the data communications network N at any of a number of locations. Clients could also be a variety of other computers, such as computers and kiosks providing access to customized information as well as targeted advertising to many users, where the users identify themselves with passwords or with smart cards. A server Si is a computer system that is presumed to be continuously on-line and functions to both collect files from various sources on the data communication network N for access by local clients C1-Cn and collect files from local clients C1-Cn for access by remote clients. The server Si is equipped with persistent storage, such as a magnetic disk data storage medium, and are interconnected with other servers via data communications links. The data communications links can be of arbitrary topology and architecture, and are described herein for the purpose of simplicity as point-to-point links or, more precisely, as virtual point-to-point links. The servers S1-S5 comprise the network vendors V1-Vk as well as the information servers I1-Im ofFIG. 1 and the functions performed by these two classes of modules can be merged to a greater or lesser extent in a single server Si or distributed over a number of servers in the data communication network N. Prior to proceeding with the description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, a number of terms are defined.FIG. 3 illustrates in block diagram form a representation of an arbitrarily selected network topology for a plurality of servers A-D, each of which is interconnected to at least one other server and typically also to a plurality of clients p-s. Servers A-D are interconnected by a collection of point to point data communications links, and server A is connected to client r, server B is connected to clients p-q, while server D is connected to clients. Servers transmit encrypted or unencrypted messages amongst themselves: a message typically contains the textual and/or graphic information stored in a particular file, and also contains data which describe the type and origin of this file, the name of the server that is supposed to receive the message, and the purpose for which the file contents are being transmitted. Some messages are not associated with any file, but are sent by one server to other servers for control reasons, for example to request transmission of a file or to announce the availability of a new file. Messages can be forwarded by a server to another server, as in the case where server A transmits a message to server D via a relay node of either server C or servers B, C. It is generally preferable to have multiple paths through the network, with each path being characterized by its performance capability and cost to enable the network N to optimize traffic routing. - While the method of using target profile interest summaries presents many advantages t both target object providers and users, there are important privacy issues for both users and providers that must be resolved if the system is to be used freely and without inhibition by users without fear of invasion of privacy. It is likely that users desire that some, if not all, of the user-specific information in their user profiles and target profile interest summaries remain confidential, to be disclosed only under certain circumstances related to certain types of transactions and according to their personal wishes for differing levels of confidentiality regarding their purchases and expressed interests.
- However, complete privacy and inaccessibility of user transactions and profile summary information would hinder implementation of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects and would deprive the user of many of the ad vantages derived through the system's use of user-specific information. In many cases, complete and total privacy is not desired by all parties to a transaction. For example, a buyer may desire to be targeted for certain mailings that describe products that are related to his or her interests, and a seller may desire to target users who are predicted to be interested in the goods and services that the seller provides. Indeed, the usefulness of the technology described herein is contingent upon the ability of the system to collect and compare data about many users and many target objects. A compromise between total user anonymity and total public disclosure of the user's search profiles or target profile interest summary is a pseudonym. A pseudonym is an artifact that allows a service provider to communicate with users and build and accumulate records of their preferences over time, while at the same time remaining ignorant of the users' true identities, so that users can keep their purchases or preferences private. A second and equally important requirement of a pseudonym system is that it provide for digital credentials, which are used to guarantee that the user represented by a particular pseudonym has certain properties. These credentials may be granted on the basis of result of activities and transactions conducted by means of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects, or on the basis of other activities and transactions conducted on the network N of the present system, on the basis of users' activities outside of network N. For example, a service provider may require proof that the purchaser has sufficient funds on deposit at his/her bank, which might possibly not be on a network, before agreeing to transact business with that user. The user, therefore, must provide the service provider with proof of funds (a credential) from the bank, while still not disclosing the user's true identity to the service provider.
- Our method solves the above problems by combining the pseudonym granting and credential transfer methods taught by D. Chaum and J. H. Evertse, in the paper titled “A secure and privacy-protecting protocol for transmitting personal information between organizations,” with the implementation of a set of one or more proxy servers distributed throughout the network N. Each proxy server, for example S2 in
FIG. 2 , is a server which communicates with clients and other servers S5 in the network either directly or through anonymizing mix paths as detailed in the paper by D. Chaum titled “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms,” published in Communications of the ACM, Volume 24, Number 2, February 1981. Any server in the network N may be configured to act as a proxy server in addition to its other functions. Each proxy server provides service to a set of users, which set is termed the “user base” of that proxy server. A given proxy server provides three sorts of service to each user U in its user base, as follows: -
- 1. The first function of the proxy server is to bidirectionally transfer communications between user U and other entities such as information servers (possibly including the proxy server itself) and/or other users. Specifically, letting S denote the server that is directly associated with user U's client processor, the proxy server communicates with server S (and thence with user U), either through anonymizing mix paths that obscure the identity of server S and user U, in which case the proxy server knows user U only through a secure pseudonym, or else through a conventional virtual point-to-point connection, in which case the proxy server knows user U by user U's address at server S, which address may be regarded as a non-secure pseudonym for user U.
- 2. A second function of the proxy server is to record user-specific information associated with user U. This user-specific information includes a user profile and target profile interest summary for user U, as well as a list of access control instructions specified by user U, as described below, and a set of one-time return addresses provided by user U that can be used to send messages to user U without knowing user U's true identity. All of this user-specific information is stored in a database that is keyed by user U's pseudonym (whether secure or non-secure) on the proxy server.
- 3. A third function of the proxy server is to act as a selective forwarding agent for unsolicited communications that are addressed to user U: the proxy server forwards some such communications to user U and rejects others, in accordance with the access control instructions specified by user U.
- Our combined method allows a given user to use either a single pseudonym in all transactions where he or she wishes to remain pseudonymous, or else different pseudonyms for different types of transactions. In the latter case, each service provider might transact with the user under a different pseudonym for the user. More generally, a coalition of service providers, all of whom match users with the same genre of target objects, might agree to transact with the user using a common pseudonym, so that the target profile interest summary associated with that pseudonym would be complete with respect to said genre of target objects. When a user employs several pseudonyms in order to transact with different coalitions of service providers, the user may freely choose a proxy server to service each pseudonym; these proxy servers may be the same or different.
- From the service provider's perspective, our system provides security, in that it can guarantee that users of a service are legitimately entitled to the services used and that no user is using multiple pseudonyms to communicate with the same provider. This uniqueness of pseudonyms is important for the purposes of this application, since the transaction information gathered for a given individual must represent a complete and consistent picture of a single user's activities with respect to a given service provider or coalition of service providers; otherwise, a user's target profile interest summary and user profile would not be able to represent the user's interests to other parties as completely and accurately as possible.
- The service provider must have a means of protection from users who violate previously agreed upon terms of service. For example, if a user that uses a given pseudonym engages in activities that violate the terms of service, then the service provider should be able to take action against the user, such as denying the user service and blacklisting the user from transactions with other parties that the user might be tempted to defraud. This type of situation might occur when a user employs a service provider for illegal activities or defaults in payments to the service provider. The method of the paper titled “Security without identification: Transaction systems to make Big-Brother obsolete”, published in the Communications of the ACM, 28(10), October 1985; pp. 1030-1044, incorporated herein, provides for a mechanism to enforce protection against this type of behavior through the use of resolution credentials, which are credentials that are periodically provided to individuals contingent upon their behaving consistent with the agreed upon terms of service between the user and information provider and network vendor entities (such as regular payment for services rendered, civil conduct, etc.). For the user's safety, if the issuer of a resolution credential refuses to grant this resolution credential to the user, then the refusal may be appealed to an adjudicating third party. The integrity of the user profiles and target profile interest summaries stored on proxy servers is important: if a seller relies on such user-specific information to deliver promotional offers or other material to a particular class of users, but not to other users, then the user-specific information must be accurate and untampered with in any way. The user may likewise wish to ensure that other parties not tamper with the user's user profile and target profile interest summary, since such modification could degrade the system's ability to match the user with the most appropriate target objects. This is done by providing for the user to apply digital signatures to the control messages sent by the user to the proxy server. Each pseudonym is paired with a public cryptographic key and a private cryptographic key, where the private key is known only to the user who holds that pseudonym; when the user sends a control message to a proxy server under a given pseudonym, the proxy server uses the pseudonym's public key to verify that the message has been digitally signed by someone who knows the pseudonym's private key. This prevents other parties from masquerading as the user.
- Our approach, as disclosed in this application, provides an improvement over the prior art in privacy-protected pseudonymy for network subscribers such as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,656, which provides for a name translator station to act as an intermediary between a service provider and the user. However, while U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,656 provides that the information transmitted between the end user U and the service provider be doubly encrypted, the fact that a relationship exists between user U and the service provider is known to the name translator, and this fact could be used to compromise user U, for example if the service provider specializes in the provision of content that is not deemed acceptable by user U's peers. The method of U.S. Pat. No. 5,245,656 also omits a method for the convenient updating of pseudonymous user profile information, such as is provided in this application, and does not provide for assurance of unique and credentialed registration of pseudonyms from a credentialing agent as is also provided in this application, and does not provide a means of access control to the user based on profile information and conditional access as will be subsequently described. The method described by Loeb et al. also does not describe any provision for credentials, such as might be used for authenticating a user's right to access particular target objects, such as target objects that are intended to be available only upon payment of a subscription fee, or target objects that are intended to be unavailable to younger users.
- In order that a user may ensure that some or all of the information in the user's user profile and target profile interest summary remain dissociated from the user's true identity, the user employs as an intermediary any one of a number of proxy servers available on the data communication network N of
FIG. 2 (for example, server S2). The proxy servers function to disguise the true identity of the user from other parties on the data communication network N. The proxy server represents a given user to either single network vendors and information servers or coalitions thereof. A proxy server, e.g. S2, is a server computer with CPU, main memory, secondary disk storage and network communication function and with a database function which retrieves the target profile interest summary and access control instructions associated with a particular pseudonym P, which represents a particular user U, and performs bi-directional routing of commands, target objects and billing information between the user at a given client (e.g. C3) and other network entities such as network vendors V1-Vk and information servers I1-Im. Each proxy server maintains an encrypted target profile interest summary associated with each allocated pseudonym in its pseudonym database D. The actual user-specific information and the associated pseudonyms need not be stored locally on the proxy server, but may alternatively be stored in a distributed fashion and be remotely addressable from the proxy server via point-to-point connections. - The proxy server supports two types of bi-directional connections: point-to-point connections and pseudonymous connections through mix paths, as taught by D. Chaum in the paper titled “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms”, Communications of the ACM, Volume 24, Number 2, February 1981. The normal connections between the proxy server and information servers, for example a connection between proxy server S2 and information server S4 in
FIG. 2 , are accomplished through the point-to-point connection protocols provided by network N as described in the “Electronic Media System Architecture” section of this application. The normal type of point-to-point connections may be used between S2-S4, for example, since the dissociation of the user and the pseudonym need only occur between the client C3 and the proxy server S2, where the pseudonym used by the user is available. Knowing that an information provider such as S4 communicates with a given pseudonym P on proxy server S2 does not compromise the true identity of user U. The bidirectional connection between the user and the proxy server S2 can also be a normal point-to-point connection, but it may instead be made anonymous and secure, if the user desires, though the consistent use of an anonymizing mix protocol as taught by D. Chaum in the paper titled “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms”, Communications of the ACM, Volume 24, Number 2, February 1981. This mix procedure provides untraceable secure anonymous mail between to parties with blind return addresses through a set of forwarding and return routing servers termed “mixes”. The mix routing protocol, as taught in the Chaum paper, is used with the proxy server S2 to provide a registry of persistent secure pseudonyms that can be employed by users other than user U, by information providers I1-Im, by vendors V1-Vk and by other proxy servers to communicate with the users in the proxy server's user base on a continuing basis. The security provided by this mix path protocol is distributed and resistant to traffic analysis attacks and other known forms of analysis which may be used by malicious parties to try and ascertain the true identity of a pseudonym bearer. Breaking the protocol requires a large number of parties to maliciously collude or be cryptographically compromised. In addition an extension to the method is taught where the user can include a return path definition in the message so the information server S4 can return the requested information to the user's client processor C3. We utilize this feature in a novel fashion to provide for access and reachability control under user and proxy server control. - Chaum's pseudonym and credential issuance system, as described in a publication by D. Chaum and J. H. Evertse, titled “A secure and privacy-protecting protocol for transmitting personal information between organizations,” has several desirable properties for use as a component in our system. The system allows for individuals to use different pseudonyms with different organizations (such as banks and coalitions of service providers). The organizations which are presented with a pseudonym have no more information about the individual than the pseudonym itself and a record of previous transactions carried out under that pseudonym. Additionally, credentials, which represent facts about a pseudonym that an organization is willing to certify, can be granted to a particular pseudonym, and transferred to other pseudonyms that the same user employs. For, example, the user can use different pseudonyms with different organizations (or disjoint sets of organizations), yet still present credentials that were granted by one organization, under one pseudonym, in order to transact with another organization under another pseudonym, without revealing that the two pseudonyms correspond to the same user. Credentials may be granted to provide assurances regarding the pseudonym bearer's age, financial status, legal status, and the like. For example, credentials signifying “legal adult” may be issued to a pseudonym based on information known about the corresponding user by the given is suing organization. Then, when the credential is transferred to another pseudonym that represents the user to another disjoint organization, presentation of this credential on the other pseudonym can be taken as proof of legal adulthood, which might satisfy a condition of terms of service. Credential-issuing organizations may also certify particular facts about a user's demographic profile or target profile interest summary, for example by granting a credential that asserts “the bearer of this pseudonym is either well-read or is middle-aged and works for a large company”; by presenting this credential to another entity, the user can prove eligibility for (say) a discount without revealing the user's personal data to that entity.
- Additionally, the method taught by Chaum provides for assurances that no individual may correspond with a given organization or coalition of organizations using more than one pseudonym; that credentials may not be feasibly forged by the user; and that credentials may not be transferred from one user's pseudonym to a different user's pseudonym. Finally, the method provides for expiration of credentials and for the issuance of “black marks” against Individuals who do not act according to the terms of service that they are extended. This is done through the resolution credential mechanism as described in Chaum's work, in which resolutions are issued periodically by organizations to pseudonyms that are in good standing. If a user is not issued this resolution credential by a particular organization or coalition of organization, then this user cannot have it available to be transferred to other pseudonyms which he uses with other organizations. Therefore, the user cannot convince these other organizations that he has acted accordance with terms of service in other dealings. If this is the case, then the organization can use this lack of resolution credential to infer that the user is not in good standing in his other dealings. In one approach organizations (or other users) may issue a list of quality related credentials based upon the experience of transaction (or interaction) with the user which may act similarly to a letter of recommendation as in a resume. If such a credential is issued from multiple organizations, their values become averaged. In an alternative variation organizations may be issued credentials from users such as customers which may be used to indicate to other future users quality of service which can be expected by subsequent users on the basis of various criteria.
- In our implementation, a pseudonym is a data record consisting of two fields. The first field specifies the address of the proxy server at which the pseudonym is registered. The second field contains a unique string of bits (e.g., a random binary number) that is associated with a particular user, credentials take the form of public-key digital signatures computed on this number, and the number itself is issued by a pseudonym administering server Z, as depicted in
FIG. 2 , and detailed In a generic form in the paper by D. Chaum and J. H. Evertse, titled “A secure and privacy-protecting protocol for transmitting personal information between organizations.”. It is possible to send information to the user holding a given pseudonym, by enveloping the information in a control message that specifies the pseudonym and is addressed to the proxy server that is named in the first field of the pseudonym; the proxy server may forward the information to the user upon receipt of the control message. - While the user may use a single pseudonym for all transactions, in the more general case a user has a set of several pseudonyms, each of which represents the user in his or her interactions with a single provider or coalition of service providers. Each pseudonym in the pseudonym set is designated for transactions with a different coalition of related service providers, and the pseudonyms used with one provider or coalition of providers cannot be linked to the pseudonyms used with other disjoint coalitions of providers. All of the user's transactions with a given coalition can be linked by virtue of the fact that they are conducted under the same pseudonym, and therefore can be combined to define a unified picture, in the form of a user profile and a target profile interest summary, of the user's interests vis-a-vis the service or services provided by said coalition. There are other circumstances for which the use of a pseudonym may be useful and the present description is in no way intended to limit the scope of the claimed invention for example, the previously described rapid profiling tree could be used to pseudonymously acquire information about the user which is considered by the user to be sensitive such as that information which is of interest to such entities as insurance companies, medical specialists, family counselors or dating services.
- In our system, the organizations that the user U interacts with are the servers S1-Sn on the network N. However, rather than directly corresponding with each server, the user employs a proxy server, e.g. S2, as an intermediary between the local server of the user's own client and the information provider or network vendor. Mix paths as described by D. Chaum in the paper titled “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms”, Communications of the ACM, Volume 24, Number 2, February 1981 allow for untraceability and security between the client, such as C3, and the proxy server, e.g. S2. Let S(M,K) represent the digital signing of message M by modular exponentiation with key K as detailed in a paper by Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., and Adleman, L. Titled “A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems”, published in the Comm. ACM 21, 2 February 120-126. Once a user applies to server Z for a pseudonym P and is granted a signed pseudonym signed with the private key SKz of server Z, the following protocol takes place to establish an entry for the user U in the proxy server S2's database D. 1. The user now sends proxy server S2 the pseudonym, which has been signed by Z to indicate the authenticity and uniqueness of the pseudonym. The user also generates a PKP, SKP key pair for use with the granted pseudonym, where is the private key associated with the pseudonym and PKP is the public key associated with the pseudonym. The user forms a request to establish pseudonym P on proxy server S2, by sending the signed pseudonym S(P, SKZ) to the proxy server S2 along with a request to create a new database entry, indexed by P, and the public key PKP. It envelopes the message and transmits it to a proxy server S2 through an anonymizing mix path, along with an anonymous return envelope header. 2. The proxy server S2 receives the database creation entry request and associated certified pseudonym message. The proxy server S2 checks to ensure that the requested pseudonym P is signed by server Z and if so grants the request and creates a database entry for the pseudonym, as well as storing the user's public key PKP to ensure that only the user U can make requests in the future using pseudonym P. 3. The structure of the user's database entry consists of a user profile as detailed herein, a target profile interest summary as detailed herein, and a Boolean combination of access control criteria as detailed below, along with the associated public key for the pseudonym P. 4. At any time after database entry for Pseudonym P is established, the user U may provide proxy server S2 with credentials on that pseudonym, provided by third parties, which credentials make certain assertions about that pseudonym. The proxy server may verify those credentials and make appropriate modifications to the user's profile as required by these credentials, such as recording the user's new demographic status as an adult. It may also store those credentials, so that it can present them to service providers on the user's behalf.
- The above steps may be repeated, with either the same or a different proxy server, each time user U requires a new pseudonym for use with a new and disjoint coalition of providers. In practice there is an extremely small probability that a given pseudonym may have already been allocated by due to the random nature of the pseudonym generation process carried out by Z. If this highly unlikely event occurs, then the proxy server S2 may reply to the user with a signed message indicating that the generated pseudonym has already been allocated, and asking for a new pseudonym to be generated.
- Once a proxy server S2 has authenticated and registered a user's pseudonym, the user may begin to use the services of the proxy server S2, in interacting with other network entities such as service providers, as exemplified by server S4 in
FIG. 2 , an information service provider node connected to the network. The user controls the proxy server S2 by forming digitally encoded requests that the user subsequently transmits to the proxy server S2 over the network N. The nature and format of these requests will vary, since the proxy server may be used for any of the services described in this application, such as the browsing, querying, and other navigational functions described below. - In a generic scenario, the user wishes to communicate under pseudonym P with a particular information provider or user at address A, where P is a pseudonym allocated to the user and A is either a public network address at a server such as S4, or another pseudonym that is registered on a proxy server such as S4. (In the most common version of this scenario, address A is the address of an information provider, and the user is requesting that the in formation provider send target objects of interest.) The user must form a request R to proxy server S2, that requests proxy server S2 to send a message to address A and to forward the response back to the user. The user may thereby communicate with other parties, either non-pseudonymous parties, in the case where address A is a public network address, or pseudonymous parties, in the case where address A is a pseudonym held by, for example, a business or another user who prefers to operate pseudonymously.
- In other scenarios, the request R to proxy server S2 formed by the user may have different content. For example, request R may instruct proxy server S2 to use the methods described later in this description to retrieve from the most convenient server a particular piece of information that has been multicast to many servers, and to send this information to the user. Conversely, request R may instruct proxy server S2 to multicast to many servers a file associated with a new target object provided by the user, as described below. If the user is a subscriber to the news clipping service described below, request R may instruct proxy server S2 to forward to the user all target objects that the news clipping service has sent to proxy server S2 for the user's attention. If the user is employing the active navigation service described below, request R may instruct proxy server S2 to select a particular cluster from the hierarchical cluster tree and provide a menu of its subclusters to the user, or to activate a query that temporarily affects proxy server S2's record of the user's target profile interest summary. If the user is a member of a virtual community as described below, request R may instruct proxy server S2 to forward to the user all messages that have been sent to the virtual community.
- Regardless of the content of request R, the user, at client C3, initiates a connection to the user's local server S1, and instructs server S1 to send the request R along a secure mix path to the proxy server S2, initiating the following sequence of actions:
-
- 1. The user's client processor C3 forms a signed message S(R, SKP), which is paired with the user's pseudonym P and (if the request R requires a response) a secure one-time set of return envelopes, to form a message M. It protects the message M with an multiply enveloped route for the outgoing path. The enveloped routes provide for secure communication between S1 and the proxy server S2. The message M is enveloped in the most deeply nested message and is therefore difficult to recover should the message be intercepted by an eavesdropper.
- 2. The message M is sent by client C3 to its local server S1, and is then routed by the data communication network N from server S1 through a set of mixes as dictated by the outgoing envelope set and arrives at the selected proxy server S2.
- 3. The proxy server S2 separates the received message M into the request message R, the pseudonym P, and (if included) the set of envelopes for the return path. The proxy server S2 uses pseudonym P to index and retrieve the corresponding record in proxy server S2's database, which record is stored in local storage at the proxy server S2 or on other distributed storage media accessible to proxy server S2 via the network N. This record contains a public key PKP, user-specific information, and credentials associated with pseudonym P. The proxy server S2 uses the public key PKP to check that the signed version S(R, SKP) of request message R is valid.
- 4. Provided that the signature on request message R is valid, the proxy server S2 acts on the request R. For example, in the generic scenario described above, request message R includes an embedded message M1 and an address A to whom message M1 should be sent; in this case, proxy server S2 sends message M1 to the server named in address A, such as server S4. The communication is done using signed and optionally encrypted messages over the normal point to point connections provided by the data communication network N. When necessary in order to act on embedded message M1, server S4 may exchange or be caused to exchange further signed and optionally encrypted messages with proxy server S2, still over normal point to point connections, in order to negotiate the release of user-specific information and credentials from proxy server S2. In particular, server S4 may require server S2 to supply credentials proving that the user is entitled to the information requested—for example, proving that the user is a subscriber in good standing to a particular information service, that the user is old enough to legally receive adult material, and that the user has been offered a particular discount (by means of a special discount credential issued to the user's pseudonym).
- 5. If proxy server S2 has sent a message to a server S4 and server S4 has created a response M2 to message M1 to be sent to the user, then server S4 transmits the response M2 to the proxy server S2 using normal network point-to-point connections.
- 6. The proxy server S2, upon receipt of the response M2, creates a return message Mr comprising the response M2 embedded in the return envelope set that was earlier transmitted to proxy server S2 by the user in the original message M. It transmits the return message Mr along the pseudonymous mix path specified by this return envelope set, so that the response M2 reaches the user at the user's client processor C3.
- 7. The response M2 may contain a request for electronic payment to the information server S4. The user may then respond by means of a message M3 transmitted by the same means as described for message M1 above, which message M3 encloses some form of anonymous payment. Alternatively, the proxy server may respond automatically with such a payment, which is debited from an account maintained by the proxy server for this user.
- 8. Either the response message M2 from the information server S4 to the user, or a subsequent message sent by the proxy server S2 to the user, may contain advertising material that is related to the user's request and/or is targeted to the user. Typically, if the user has just retrieved a target object X, then (a) either proxy server S2 or information server S4 determines a weighted set of advertisements that are “associated with” target object X, (b) a subset of this set is chosen randomly, where the weight of an advertisement is proportional to the probability that it is included in the subset, and (c) proxy server S2 selects from this subset just those advertisements that the user is most likely to be interested in. In the variation where proxy server S2 determines the set of advertisements associated with target object X, then this set typically consists of all advertisements that the proxy server's owner has been paid to disseminate and whose target profiles are within a threshold similarity distance of the target profile of target object X. In the variation where proxy server S4 determines the set of advertisements associated with target object X, advertisers typically purchase the right to include advertisements in this set. In either case, the weight of an advertisement is determined by the amount that an advertiser is willing to pay. Following step (c), proxy server S2 retrieves the selected advertising material and transmits it to the user's client processor C3, where it will be displayed to the user, within a specified length of time after it is received, by a trusted process running on the user's client processor C3. When proxy server S2 transmits an advertisement, it sends a message to the advertiser, indicating that the advertisement has been transmitted to a user with a particular predicted level of interest. The message may also indicate the identity of target object X. In return, the advertiser may transmit an electronic payment to proxy server S2; proxy server S2 retains a service fee for itself, optionally forwards a service fee to information server S4, and the balance is forwarded to the user or used to credit the user's account on the proxy server.
- 9. If the response M2 contains or identifies a target object, the passive and/or active relevance feedback that the user provides on this object is tabulated by a process on the user's client processor C3. A summary of such relevance feedback information, digitally signed by client processor C3 with a proprietary private key SKC3, is periodically transmitted through an a secure mix path to the proxy server S2, whereupon the search
profile generation module 202 resident on server S2 updates the appropriate target profile interest summary associated with pseudonym P, provided that the signature on the summary message can be authenticated with the corresponding public key PKC3 which is available to all tabulating process that are ensured to have integrity.
- When a consumer enters into a financial relationship with a particular information server based on both parties agreeing to terms for the relationship, a particular pseudonym may be extended for the consumer with respect to the given provider as detailed in the previous section. When entering into such a relationship, the consumer and the service provider agree to certain terms. However, if the user violates the terms of this relationship, the service provider may decline to provide service to the pseudonym under which it transacts with the user. In addition, the service provider has the recourse of refusing to provide resolution credentials to the pseudonym, and may choose to do so until the pseudonym bearer returns to good standing.
- In some circumstances, a user may request access in sequence to many files, which are stored on one or more information servers. This behavior is common when navigating a hypertext system such as the World Wide Web, or when using the target object browsing system described below.
- In general, the user requests access to a particular target object or menu of target objects; once the corresponding file has been transmitted to the users client processor, the user views its contents and makes another such request, and so on. Each request may take many seconds to satisfy, due to retrieval and transmission delays. However, to the extent that the sequence of requests is predictable, the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects can respond more quickly to each request, by retrieving or starting to retrieve the appropriate files even before the user requests them. This early retrieval is termed “pre-fetching of files.”
- Pre-fetching of locally stored data has been heavily studied in memory hierarchies, including CPU caches and secondary storage (disks), for several decades. A leader in this area has been A. J. Smith of Berkeley, who identified a variety of schemes and analyzed opportunities using extensive traces in both databases and CPU caches. His conclusion was that general schemes only really paid off where there was some reasonable chance that sequential access was occurring, e.g., in a sequential read of data. As the balances between various latencies in the memory hierarchy shifted during the late 1980's and early 1990's, J. M. Smith and others identified further opportunities for pre-fetching of both locally stored data and network data. In particular, deeper analysis of patterns in work by Blaha showed the possibility of using expert systems for deep pattern analysis that could be used for pre-fetching. Work by J. M. Smith proposed the use of reference history trees to anticipate references in storage hierarchies where there was some historical data. Recent work by Touch and the Berkeley work addressed the case of data on the World-Wide Web, where the large size of images and the long latencies provide extra incentive to pre-fetch; Touch's technique is to pre-send when large bandwidths permit some speculation using HTML storage references embedded in WEB pages, and the Berkeley work uses techniques similar to J. M. Smith's reference histories specialized to the semantics of HTML data.
- Successful pre-fetching depends on the ability of the system to predict the next action or actions of the user. In the context of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects, it is possible to cluster users into groups according to the similarity of their user profiles. Any of the well-known pre-fetching methods that collect and utilize aggregate statistics on past user behavior, in order to predict future user behavior, may then be implemented in so as to collect and utilize a separate set of statistics for each cluster of users. In this way, the system generalizes its access pattern statistics from each user to similar users, without generalizing among users who have substantially different interests. The system may further collect and utilize a similar set of statistics that describes the aggregate behavior of all users; in cases where the system cannot confidently make a prediction as to what a particular user will do, because the relevant statistics concerning that user's user cluster are derived from only a small amount of data, the system may instead make its predictions based on the aggregate statistics for all users, which are derived from a larger amount of data. For the sake of concreteness, we now describe a particular instantiation of a pre-fetching system, that both employs these insights and that makes its pre-fetching decisions through accurate measurement of the expected cost and benefit of each potential pre-fetch.
- Pre-fetching exhibits a cost-benefit tradeoff. Let t denote the approximate number of minutes that pre-fetched files are retained in local storage (before they are deleted to make room for other pre-fetched files). If the system elects to pre-fetch a file corresponding to a target object X, then the user benefits from a fast response at no extra cost, provided that the user explicitly requests target object X soon thereafter. However, if the user does not request target object X within t minutes of the pre-fetch, then the pre-fetch was worthless, and its cost is an added cost that must be borne (directly or indirectly) by the user. The first scenario therefore provides benefit at no cost, while the second scenario incurs a cost at no benefit. The system tries to favor the first scenario by pre-fetching only those files that the user will access anyway. Depending on the users wishes, the system may pre-fetch either conservatively, where it controls costs by pre-fetching only files that the user is extremely likely to request explicitly (and that are relatively cheap to retrieve), or more aggressively, where it also pre-fetches files that the user is only moderately likely to request explicitly, thereby increasing both the total cost and (to a lesser degree) the total benefit to the user.
- In the system described herein, pre-fetching for a user U is accomplished by the user's proxy server S. Whenever proxy server S retrieves a user-requested file F from an information server, it uses the identity of this file F and the characteristics of the user, as described below, to identify a group of other files G1 . . . Gk that the user is likely to access soon. The user's request for file F is said to “trigger” files G1 . . . Gk. Proxy server S pre-fetches each of these triggered files Gi as follows:
-
- 1. Unless file Gi is already stored locally (e.g., due to previous pre-fetch), proxy server S retrieves file Gi from an appropriate information server and stores it locally.
- 2. Proxy server S timestamps its local copy of file Gi as having just been pre-fetched, so that file Gi will be retained in local storage for a minimum of approximately t minutes before being deleted.
Whenever user U (or, in principle, any other user registered with proxy server S) requests proxy server S to retrieve a file that has been pre-fetched and not yet deleted, proxy server S can then retrieve the file from local storage rather than from another server. In a variation on steps 1-2 above, proxy server S pre-fetches a file Gi somewhat differently, so that pre-fetched files are stored on the user's client processor q rather than on server S: - 1. If proxy server S has not pre-fetched file Gi in the past t minutes, it retrieves file Gi and transmits it to user U's client processor q.
- 2. Upon receipt of the message sent in
step 1, client q stores a local copy of file Gi if one is not currently stored. - 3. Proxy server S notifies client q that client q should timestamp its local copy of file Gi; this notification may be combined with the message transmitted in
step 1, if any. - 4. Upon receipt of the message sent in step 3, client q timestamps its local copy of file Gi as having just been pre-fetched, so that file Gi will be retained in local storage for a minimum of approximately t minutes before being deleted.
During the period that client q retains file Gi in local storage, client q can respond to any request for file Gi (by user U or, in principle, any other user of client q) immediately and without the assistance of proxy server S.
- The difficult task is for proxy server S, each time it retrieves a file F in response to a request, to identify the files G1 . . . Gk that should be triggered by the request for file F and pre-fetched immediately. Proxy server S employs a cost-benefit analysis, performing each pre-fetch whose benefit exceeds a user-determined multiple of its cost; the user may set the multiplier low for aggressive prefetching or high for conservative prefetching. These pre-fetches may be performed in parallel. The benefit of pre-fetching file Gi immediately is defined to be the expected number of seconds saved by such a pre-fetch, as compared to a situation where Gi is left to be retrieved later (either by a later pre-fetch, or by the user's request) if at all. The cost of pre-fetching file Gi immediately is defined to be the expected cost for proxy server S to retrieve file Gi, as determined for example by the network locations of server S and file Gi and by information provider charges,
times 1 minus the probability that proxy server S will have to retrieve file Gi within t minutes (to satisfy either a later pre-fetch or the user's explicit request) if it is not pre-fetched now. - The above definitions of cost and benefit have some attractive properties. For example, if users tend to retrieve either file F1 or file F2 (say) after file F, and tend only in the former case to subsequently retrieve file G1, then the system will generally not pre-fetch G1 immediately after retrieving file F: for, to the extent that the user is likely to retrieve file F2, the cost of the pre-fetch is high, and to the extent that the user is likely to retrieve file F1 instead, the benefit of the pre-fetch is low, since the system can save as much or nearly as much time by waiting until the user chooses F1 and pre-fetching G1 only then.
- The proxy server S may estimate the necessary costs and benefits by adhering to the following discipline:
-
- 1. Proxy server S maintains a set of disjoint clusters of the users in its user base, clustered according to their user profiles.
- 2. Proxy server S maintains an initially empty set PFT of “pre-fetch triples” <C,F,G>, where F and G are files, and where C identifies either a cluster of users or the set of all users in the user base of proxy server S. Each pre-fetch triple in the set PFT is associated with several stored values specific to that triple. Pre-fetch triples and their associated values are maintained according to the rules in 3 and 4.
- 3. Whenever a user U in the user base of proxy server S makes a request R2 for a file G, or a request R2 that triggers file G, then proxy server S takes the following actions:
- a. For C being the user cluster containing user U, and then again for C being the set of all users:
- b. For any request R0 for a file, say file F, made by user U during the t minutes strictly prior to the request R2:
- c. If the triple <C,F,G> is not currently a member of the set PFT, it is added to the set PFT with a count of 0, a trigger-count of 0, a target-count of 0, a total benefit of 0, and a timestamp whose value is the current date and time.
- d. The count of the triple <C,F,G> is increased by one.
- e. If file G was not triggered or explicitly retrieved by any request that user U made strictly in between requests R0 and R2, then the target-count of the triple <C,F,G> is increased by one.
- f. If request R2 was a request for file G, then the total benefit of triple <C,F,G> is increased either by the time elapsed between request R0 and request R2, or by the expected time to retrieve file G, whichever is less.
- g. If request R2 was a request for file G, and G was triggered or explicitly retrieved by one or more requests that user U made strictly in between requests R0 and R2, with R1 denoting the earliest such request, then the total benefit of triple <C,F,G> is decreased either by the time elapsed between request R1 and request R2, or by the expected time to retrieve file G, whichever is less.
- 4. If a user U requests a file F, then the trigger-count is incremented by one for each triple currently in the set PFT such that the triple has form <C,F,G>, where user U is in the set or cluster identified by C.
- 5. The “age” of a triple <C,F,G> is defined to be the number of days elapsed between its timestamp and the current date and time. If the age of any triple <C,F,G> exceeds a fixed constant number of days, and also exceeds a fixed constant multiple of the triple's count, then the triple may be deleted from the set PFT.
- Proxy server S can therefore decide rapidly which files G should be triggered by a request for a given file F from a given user U, as follows.
-
- 1. Let C0 be the user cluster containing user U, and C1 be the set of all users.
- 2. Server S constructs a list L of all triples <C0,F,G> such that <C0,F,G> appears in set PFT with a count exceeding a fixed threshold.
- 3. Server S adds to list L all triples <C1,F,G> such that <C0,F,G> does not appear on list L and <C1,F,G> appears in set PFT with a count exceeding another fixed threshold.
- 4. For each triple <C,F,G> on list L.
- 5. Server S computes the cost of triggering file G to be expected cost of retrieving file Gi,
times 1 minus the quotient of the target-count of <C,F,G> by the trigger-count of <C,F,G>. - 6. Server S computes the benefit of triggering file G to be the total benefit of <C,F,G> divided by the count of <C,F,G>.
- 7. Finally, proxy server S uses the computed cost and benefit, as described earlier, to decide whether file G should be triggered. The approach to pre-fetching just described has the advantage that all data storage and manipulation concerning pre-fetching decisions by proxy server S is handled locally at proxy server S. However, this “user-based” approach does lead to duplicated storage and effort across proxy servers, as well as incomplete data at each individual proxy server. That is, the information indicating what files are frequently retrieved after file F is scattered in an uncoordinated way across numerous proxy servers. An alternative, “file-based” approach is to store all such information with file F itself. The difference is as follows. In the user-based approach, a pre-fetch triple <C,F,G> in server S's set PFT may mention any file F and any file G on the network, but is restricted to clusters C that are subsets of the user base of server S. By contrast, in the file-based approach, a pre-fetch triple <C,F,G> in server S's set PFT may mention any user cluster C and any file G on the network, but is restricted to files F that are stored on server S. (Note that in the file-based approach, user clustering is network wide, and user clusters may include users from different proxy servers.) When a proxy server S2 sends a request to server S to retrieve file F for a user U, server S2 indicates in this message the user Us user cluster C0, as well as the user U's value for the user-determined multiplier that is used in cost-benefit analysis. Server S can use this information, together with all its triples in its set PFT of the form <C0,F,G> and <C1,F,G>, where C1 is the set of all users everywhere on the network, to determine (exactly as in the user-based approach) which files G1 . . . Gk are triggered by the request for file F. When server S sends file F back to proxy server S2, it also sends this list of files G1 . . . Gk, so that proxy server S2 can proceed to pre-fetch files G1 . . . Gk.
- The file-based approach requires some additional data transmission. Recall that under the user-based approach, server S must execute steps 3c-3g above for any ordered pair of requests R0 and R2 made within t minutes of each other by a user who employs server S as a proxy server. Under the file-based approach, server S must execute steps 3c-3g above for any ordered pair of requests R0 and R2 made within t minutes of each other, by any user on the network, such that R0 requests a file stored on server S. Therefore, when a user makes a request R2, the user's proxy server must send a notification of request R2 to all servers S such that, during the preceding t minutes (where the variable t may now depend on server S), the user has made a request R0 for a file stored on server S. This notification need not be sent immediately, and it is generally more efficient for each proxy server to buffer up such notifications and send them periodically in groups to the appropriate servers.
- Although users' true identities are protected by the use of secure mix paths, pseudonymity does not guarantee complete privacy. In particular, advertisers can in principle employ user-specific data to barrage users with unwanted solicitations. The general solution to this problem is for proxy server S2 to act as a representative on behalf of each user in its user base, permitting access to the user and the user's private data only in accordance with criteria that have been set by the user. Proxy server S2 can restrict access in two ways:
-
- 1. The proxy server S2 may restrict access by third parties to server S2's pseudonymous database of user-specific information. When a third party such as an advertiser sends a message to server S2 requesting the release of user-specific information for a pseudonym P, server S2 re fuses to honor the request unless the message includes credentials for the accessor adequate to prove that the accessor is entitled to this information. The user associated with pseudonym P may at any time send signed control messages to proxy server S2, specifying the credentials or Boolean combinations of credentials that proxy server S2 should thenceforth consider to be adequate grounds for releasing a specified subset of the information associated with pseudonym P. Proxy server S2 stores these access criteria with its database record for pseudonym P. For example, a user might wish to proxy server S2 to release purchasing information only to selected information providers, to charitable organizations (that is, organizations that can provide a government-issued credential that is issued only to registered charities), and to market researchers who have paid user U for the right to study user U's purchasing habits.
- 2. The proxy server S2 may restrict the ability of third parties to send electronic messages to the user. When a third party such as an advertiser attempts to send information (such as a textual message or a request to enter into spoken or written real-time communication) to pseudonym P, by sending a message to proxy server S2 requesting proxy server S2 to forward the information to the user at pseudonym P, proxy server S2 will refuse to honor the request, unless the message includes credentials for the accessor adequate to meet the requirements the user has chosen to impose, as above, on third parties who wish to send information to the user. If the message does include adequate credentials, then proxy server S2 removes a single-use pseudonymous return address envelope from its database record for pseudonym P, and uses the envelope to send a message containing the specified information along a secure mix path to the user of pseudonym P. If the envelope being used is the only envelope stored for pseudonym P, or more generally if the supply of such envelopes is low, proxy server S2 adds a notation to this message before sending it, which notation indicates to the user's local server that it should send additional envelopes to proxy server S2 for future use.
- In a more general variation, the user may instruct the proxy server S2 to impose more complex requirements on the granting of requests by third parties, not simply boolean combinations of required credentials. The user may impose any Boolean combination of simple requirements that may include, but are not limited to, the following:
-
- (a.) the accessor (third party) is a particular party
- (b.) the accessor has provided a particular credential
- (c.) satisfying the request would involve disclosure to the accessor of a certain fact about the user's user profile
- (d.) satisfying the request would involve disclosure to the accessor of the user's target profile interest summary
- (e.) satisfying the request would involve disclosure to the accessor of statistical summary data, which data are computed from the user's user profile or target profile interest summary together with the user profiles and target profile interest summaries of at least n other users in the user base of the proxy server
- (f.) the content of the request is to send the user a target object, and this target object has a particular attribute (such as high reading level, or low vulgarity, or an authenticated Parental Guidance rating from the MPAA)
- (g.) the content of the request is to send the user a target object, and this target object has been digitally signed with a particular private key (such as the private key used by the National Pharmaceutical Association to certify approved documents)
- (h.) the content of the request is to send the user a target object, and the target profile has been digitally signed by a profile authentication agency, guaranteeing that the target profile is a true and accurate profile of the target object it claims to describe, with all attributes authenticated.
- (i.) the content of the request is to send the user a target object, and the target profile of this target object is within a specified distance of a particular search profile specified by the user
- (j.) the content of the request is to send the user a target object, and the proxy server S2, by using the user's stored target profile interest summary, estimates the user's likely interest in the target object to be above a specified threshold
- (k.) the accessor indicates its willingness to make a particular payment to the user in exchange for the fulfillment of the request
- The steps required to create and maintain the user's access-control requirements are as follows:
-
- 1. The user composes a boolean combination of predicates that apply to requests; the resulting complex predicate should be true when applied to a request that the user wants proxy server S2 to honor, and false otherwise. The complex predicate may be encoded in another form, for efficiency.
- 2. The complex predicate is signed with SKP, and transmitted from the user's client processor C3 to the proxy server S2 through the mix path enclosed in a packet that also contains the user's pseudonym P.
- 3. The proxy server S2 receives the packet, verifies its authenticity using PKP and stores the access control instructions specified in the packet as part of its database record for pseudonym P.
- The proxy server S2 enforces access control as follows:
-
- 1. The third party (accessor) transmits a request to proxy server S2 using the normal point-to-point connections provided by the network N. The request may be to access the target profile interest summaries associated with a set of pseudonyms P1 . . . Pn, or to access the user profiles associated with a set of pseudonyms P1 . . . Pn, or to forward a message to the users associated with pseudonyms P1 . . . Pn. The accessor may explicitly specify the pseudonyms P1 . . . Pn, or may ask that P1 . . . Pn be chosen to be the set of all pseudonyms registered with proxy server S2 that meet specified conditions.
- 2. The proxy server S2 indexes the database record for each pseudonym Pi (1<=I<=n), retrieves the access requirements provided by the user associated with Pi, and determines whether and how the transmitted request should be satisfied for Pi. If the requirements are satisfied, S2 proceeds with steps 3a-3c.
- 3a. If the request can be satisfied but only upon payment of a fee, the proxy server S2 transmits a payment request to the accessor, and waits for the accessor to send the payment to the proxy server S2. Proxy server S2 retains a service fee and forwards the balance of the payment to the user associated with pseudonym Pi, via an anonymous return packet that this user has provided.
- 3b. If the request can be satisfied but only upon provision of a credential, the proxy server S2 transmits a credential request to the accessor, and waits for the accessor to send the credential to the proxy server S2,
- 3c. The proxy server S2 satisfies the request by disclosing user-specific information to the accessor, by providing the accessor with a set of single-use envelopes to communicate directly with the user, or by forwarding a message to the user, as requested.
- 4. Proxy server S2 optionally sends a message to the accessor, indicating why each of the denied requests for P1 . . . Pn was denied, and/or indicating how many requests were satisfied.
- 5. The active and/or passive relevance feedback provided by any user U with respect to any target object sent by any path from the accessor is tabulated by the above-described tabulating process resident on user U's client processor C3. As described above, a summary of such information is periodically transmitted to the proxy server S2 to enable the proxy server S2 to update that user's target profile interest summary and user profile.
- The access control criteria can be applied to solicited as well as unsolicited transmissions. That is, the proxy server can be used to protect the user from inappropriate or misrepresented target objects that the user may request. If the user requests a target object from an information server, but the target object turns out not to meet the access control criteria, then the proxy server will not permit the information server to transmit the target object to the user, or to charge the user for such transmission. For example, to guard against target objects whose profiles have been tampered with, the user may specify an access control criterion that requires the provider to prove the target profile's accuracy by means of a digital signature from a profile authentication agency. As another example, the parents of a child user may instruct the proxy server that only target objects that have been digitally signed by a recognized child protection organization may be transmitted to the user, thus, the proxy server will not let the user retrieve pornography, even from a rogue information server that is willing to provide pornography to users who have not supplied an adulthood credential.
- Distribution of Information with Multicast Trees
- The graphical representation of the network N presented in
FIG. 3 shows that at least one of the data communications links can be eliminated, as shown inFIG. 4 , while still enabling the network N to transmit messages among all the servers A-D. By elimination, we mean that the link is unused in the logical design of the network, rather than a physical disconnection of the link. The graphs that result when all redundant data communications links are eliminated are termed “trees” or “connected acyclic graphs.” A graph where a message could be transmitted by a server through other servers and then return to the transmitting server over a different originating data communications link is termed a “cycle.” A tree is thus an acyclic graph whose edges (links) connect a set of graph “nodes” (servers). The tree can be used to efficiently broadcast any data file to selected servers in a set of interconnected servers. - The tree structure is attractive in a communications network because much information distribution is multicast in nature—that is, a piece of information available at a single source must be distributed to a multiplicity of points where the information can be accessed. This technique is widely known: for example, “FAX trees” are in common use in political organizations, and multicast trees are widely used in distribution of multimedia data in the Internet; for example, see “Scalable Feedback Control for Multicast Video Distribution in the Internet,” (Jean—Chrysostome Bolot, Thierry Turletti, & Ian Wakeman, Computer Communication Review, Vol. 24, #4, October '94, Proceedings of SIGCOMM '94, pp. 58-67) or “An Architecture For Wide-Area Multicast Routing,” (Stephen Deering, Deborah Estrin, Dino Farinacci, Van Jacobson, Ching-Gung Liu, & Liming Wei, Computer Communication Review, Vol. 24, #4, October '94, Proceedings of SIGCOMM '94, pp. 126-135). While there are many possible trees that can be overlaid on a graph representation of a network, both the nature of the networks (e.g., the cost of transmitting data over a link) and their use (for example, certain nodes may exhibit more frequent intercommunication) can make one choice of tree better than another for use as a multicast tree. One of the most difficult problems in practical network design is the construction of “good” multicast trees, that is, tree choices which exhibit low cost (due to data not traversing links unnecessarily) and good performance (due to data frequently being close to where it is needed)
- Algorithms for constructing multicast trees have either been ad-hoc, as is the case of the Deering, et al. Internet multicast tree, which adds clients as they request service by grafting them into the existing tree, or by construction of a minimum cost spanning tree. A distributed algorithm for creating a spanning tree (defined as a tree that connects, or “spans,” all nodes of the graph) on a set of Ethernet bridges was developed by Radia Perlman (“Interconnections. Bridges and Routers,” Radia Perlman, Addison-Wesley, 1992). Creating a minimal-cost spanning tree for a graph depends on having a cost model for the arcs of the graph (corresponding to communications links in the communications network). In the case of Ethernet bridges, the default cost (more complicated costing models for path costs are discussed on pp. 72-73 of Perlman) is calculated as a simple distance measure to the root; thus the spanning tree minimizes the cost to the root by first electing a unique root and then constructing a spanning tree based on the distances from the root. In this algorithm, the root is elected by recourse to a numeric ID contained in “configuration messages”: the server w hose ID has minimum numeric value is chosen as the root. Several problems exist with this algorithm in general. First, the method of using an ID does not necessarily select the best root for the nodes interconnected in the tree. Second, the cost model is simplistic.
- We first show how to use the similarity-based methods described above to select the servers most interested in a group of target objects, herein termed “core servers” for that group. Next we show how to construct an unrooted multicast tree that can be used to broadcast files to these core servers. Finally, we show how files corresponding to target objects are actually broadcast through the multicast tree at the initiative of a client, and how these files are later retrieved from the core servers when clients request them.
- Since the choice of core servers to distribute a file to depends on the set of users who are likely to retrieve the file (that is, the set of users who are likely to be interested in the corresponding target object), a separate set of core servers and hence a separate multicast tree may be used for each topical group of target objects. Throughout the description below, servers may communicate among themselves through any path over which messages can travel; the goal of each multicast tree is to optimize the multicast distribution of files corresponding to target objects of the corresponding topic. Note that this problem is completely distinct from selecting a multiplicity of spanning trees for the complete set of interconnected nodes as disclosed by Sincoskie in U.S. Pat. No. 4,706,080 and the publication titled “Extended Bridge Algorithms for Large Networks” by W. D. Sincoskie and C. J. Cotton, published January 1988 in IEEE Network on pages 16-24. The trees in this disclosure are intentionally designed to interconnect a selected subset of nodes in the system, and are successful to the degree that this subset is relatively small.
- A set of topical multicast trees for a set of homogenous target objects may be constructed or reconstructed at any time, as follows. The set of target objects is grouped into a fixed number of topical clusters C1 . . . Cp with the methods described above, for example, by choosing C1 . . . Cp to be the result of a k-means clustering of the set of target objects, or alternatively a covering set of low-level clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree of these target objects. A multicast tree MT(c) is then constructed from each cluster C in C1 . . . Cp, by the following procedure:
-
- 1. Given a set of proxy servers, S1 . . . Sn, and a topical cluster C. It is assumed that a general multicast tree MTfull that contains all the proxy servers S1 . . . Sn has previously been constructed by well-known methods.
- 2. Each pair <Si, C> is associated with a weight, w(Si, C), which is intended to covary with the expected number of users in the user base of proxy server Si who will subsequently access a target object from cluster C. This weight is computed by proxy server Si in any of several ways, all of which make use of the similarity measurement computation described herein.
- One variation makes use of the following steps: (a) Proxy server Si randomly selects a target object T from cluster C. (b) For each pseudonym in its local database, with associated user U, proxy server Si applies the techniques disclosed above to user U's stored user profile and target profile interest summary in order to estimate the interest w(U, T) that user U has in the selected target object T. The aggregate interest w(Si, T) that the user base of proxy server Si has in the target object T is defined to be the sum of these interest values w(U, T). Alternatively, w(Si, T) may be defined to be the sum of values s(w(U, T)) over all U in the user base. Here s(*) is a sigmoidal function that is close to 0 for small arguments and close to a constant pmax for large arguments; thus s(w(U, T)) estimates the probability that user U will access target object T, which probability is assumed to be independent of the probability that any other user will access target object T. In a variation, w(Si, T) is made to estimate the probability that at least one user from the user base of Si will access target object T: then w(Si, T) may be defined as the maximum of values w(U, T), or of 1 minus the product over the users U of the quantity (1−s(w(U, T))). (c) Proxy server Si repeats steps (a)-(b) for several target objects T selected randomly from cluster C, and averages the several values of w(Si, T) thereby computed in step (b) to determine the desired quantity w(Si, C), which quantity represents the expected aggregate interest by the user base of proxy server Si in the target objects of cluster C.
- In another variation, where target profile interest summaries are embodied as search profile sets, the following procedure is followed to compute w(Si, C): (a). For each search profile Ps in the locally stored search profile set of any user in the user base of proxy server Si, proxy server Si computes the distance d(Ps, Pc) between the search profile and the cluster profile Pc of cluster C. (b). w(Si,C) is chosen to be the maximum value of (−d(Ps,Pc)/r) across all such search profiles Ps, where r is computed as an affine function of the cluster diameter of cluster C. The slope and/or intercept of this affine function are chosen to be smaller (thereby increasing w(Si, C)) for servers Si for which the target object provider wishes to improve performance, as may be the case if the users in the user base of proxy server Si pay a premium for improved performance, or if performance at Si will otherwise be unacceptably low due to slow network connections.
- In another variation, the proxy server Si is modified so that it maintains not only target profile interest summaries for each user in its user base, but also a single aggregate target profile interest summary for the entire user base. This aggregate target profile interest summary is determined in the usual way from relevance feedback, but the relevance feedback on a target object, in this case, is considered to be the frequency with which users in the user base retrieved the target object when it was new. Whenever a user retrieves a target object by means of a request to proxy server Si, the aggregate target profile interest summary for proxy server Si is updated. In this variation, w(Si, C) Is estimated by the following steps:
-
- (a) Proxy server Si randomly selects a target object T from cluster C.
- (b) Proxy server Si applies the techniques disclosed above to its stored aggregate target profile interest summary in order to estimate the aggregate interest w(Si, T) that its aggregated user base had in the selected target object T, when new; this may be interpreted as an estimate of the likelihood that at least one member of the user base will retrieve a new target object similar to T.
- (c) Proxy server Si repeats steps (a)-(b) for several target objects T selected randomly from cluster C, and averages the several values of w(Si, T) thereby computed in step (b) to determine the desired quantity w(Si, C), which quantity represents the expected aggregate interest by the user base of proxy server Si in the target objects of cluster C.
- 3. Those servers Si from among S1 . . . Sn with the greatest weights w(Si, C) are designated “core servers” for cluster C. In one variation, where it is desired to select a fixed number of core servers, those servers Si with the greatest values of w(Si, C) are selected. In another variation, the value of w(Si, C) for each server Si is compared against a fixed threshold wmin, and those servers Si such that w(Si, C) equals or exceeds wmin are selected as core servers. If cluster C represents a narrow and specialized set of target objects, as often happens when the clusters C1 . . . Cp are numerous, it is usually adequate to select only a small number of core server cluster C, thereby obtaining substantial advantages in computational efficiency in steps 4-5 below
- 4. A complete graph G(C) is constructed whose vertices are the designated core servers for cluster C. For each pair of core servers, the cost of transmitting a message between those core servers along the cheapest path is estimated, and the weight of the edge connecting those core servers is taken to be this cost. The cost is determined as a suitable function of average transmission charges, average transmission delay, and worst-case or near-worst-case transmission delay.
- 5. The multicast tree MT(C) is computed by standard methods to be the minimum spanning tree (or a near-minimum spanning tree) for G(C), where the weight of an edge between two core servers is taken to b e the cost of transmitting a message between those two core servers. Note that MT(C) does not contain as vertices all proxy servers S1 . . . Sn, but only the core servers for cluster C.
- 6, A message M is formed describing the cluster profile for cluster C, the core servers for cluster C and the topology of the multicast tree MT(C) constructed on those core servers. Message M is broadcast to all proxy servers S1 . . . Sn by means of the general multicast tree MTfull. Each proxy server Si, upon receipt of message M, extracts the cluster profile of cluster C, and stores it on a local storage device, together with certain other information that it determines from message M, as follows. If proxy server Si is named in message M as a core server for cluster C, then proxy server Si extracts and stores the subtree of MT(C) induced by all core servers whose path distance from Si in the graph MT(C) is less than or equal to d, where d is a constant positive integer (usually from 1 to 3). If message M does not name proxy server Si as a core server for MT(C), then proxy server Si extracts and stores a list of one or more nearby core servers that can be inexpensively contacted by proxy server Si over virtual point-to-point links.
- In the network of
FIG. 3 , to illustrate the use of trees, as applied to the system of the present invention, consider the following simple example where it is assumed that client r provides on-line information for the network, such as an electronic newspaper. This information can be structured by client r into a prearranged form, comprising a number of files, each of which is associated with a different target object. In the case of an electronic newspaper, the files can contain textual representations of stock prices, weather forecasts, editorials, etc. The system determines likely demand for the target objects associated with these files in order to optimize the distribution of the files through the network N of interconnected clients p-s and proxy servers A-D. Assume that cluster C consists of text articles relating to the aerospace industry; further assume that the target profile interest summaries stored at proxy servers A and B for the users at clients p and r indicate that these users are strongly interested in such articles. Then the proxy servers A and B are selected as core servers for the multicast tree MT(C). The multicast tree MT(C) is then computed to consist of the core servers, A and B, connected by an edge that represents the least costly virtual point-to-point link between A and B (either the direct path A-B or the indirect path A-C-B, depending on the cost). - One type of message that may be transmitted to any proxy server S is termed a “global request message.” Such a message M triggers the broadcast of an embedded request R to ail core servers in a multicast tree MT(C). The content of request R and the identity of cluster C are included in the message M, as is a field indicating that message M is a global request message. In addition, the message M contains a field Slast which is unspecified except under certain circumstances described below, when it names a specific core server. A global request message M may be transmitted to proxy server S by a user registered with proxy server S, which transmission may take place along a pseudonymous mix path, or it may be transmitted to proxy server S from another proxy server, along a virtual point-to-point connection.
- When a proxy server S receives a message M that is marked as a global request message, it acts as follows: 1. If proxy server S is not a core server for topic C, it retrieves its locally stored list of nearby core servers for topic C, selects from this list a nearby core server S′, and transmits a copy of message M over a virtual point-to-point connection to core server S′. If this transmission fails, proxy server S repeats the procedure with other core servers on its list. 2. If proxy server S is a core server for topic C, it executes the following steps: (a) Act on the request R that is embedded in message M. (b) Set Scurr to be S(C) Retrieve the locally stored subtree of MT(C), and extract from it a list L of all core servers that are directly linked to Scurr in this subtree. (d) If the message M specifies a value for Slast and Slast appears on the list L, remove Slast from the list L. Note that list L may be empty before this step, or may become empty as a result of this step. (e) For each server Si in list L, transmit a copy of message M from server S to server Si over a virtual point-to-point connection, where the Slast field of the copy of message M has been altered to Scurr. If Si cannot be reached in a reasonable amount of time by any virtual point-to-point connection (for example, server Si is broken), recurse to step (c) above with Sorig bound to Scurr and Scurr bound to S{\sub I} for the duration of the recursion.
- When server S′ in
step 1 or a server Si in step 2(e) receives a copy of the global request message M, it acts according to exactly the same steps. As a result, all core servers eventually receive a copy of global request message M and act on the embedded request R, unless some core servers cannot be reached. Even if a core server is unreachable, step (e) ensures that the broadcast can continue to other core servers in most circumstances, provided that d>1; higher values of d provide additional insurance against unreachable core servers. - The system for customized electronic information of desirable objects executes the following steps in order to introduce a new target object into the system. These steps are initiated by an entity E, which may be either a user entering commands via a keyboard at a client processor q, as illustrated in
FIG. 3 , or an automatic software process resident on a client or server processor q. 1. Processor q forms a signed request R, which asks the receiver to store a copy of a file F on its local storage device. File F, which is maintained by client q on storage at client q or on storage accessible by client q over the network, contains the informational content of or an identifying description of a target object, as described above. The request R also includes an address at which entity E may be contacted (possibly a pseudonymous address at some proxy server D), and asks the receiver to store the fact that file F is maintained by an entity at said address. 2. Processor q embeds request R in a message M1, which it pseudonymously transmits to the entity E's proxy server D as described above. Message M1 instructs proxy server D to broadcast request R along an appropriate multicast tree. 3. Upon receipt of message M1, proxy server D examines the doubly embedded file F and computes a target profile P for the corresponding target object. It compares the target profile P to each of the cluster profiles for topical clusters C1 . . . Cp described above, and chooses Ck to be the cluster with the smallest similarity distance to profile P. 4. Proxy server D sends itself a global request message M instructing itself to broadcast request R along the topical multicast tree MT(Ck). 5. Proxy server D notifies entity E through a pseudonymous communication that file F has been multicast along the topical multicast tree for cluster Ck. - As a result of the procedure that server D and other servers follow for acting on global request messages,
step 4 eventually causes all core servers for topic Ck to act on request R and therefore store a local copy of file F. In order to make room for file F on its local storage device, a core server Si may have to delete a less useful file. There are several ways to choose a file to delete. One option, well known in the art, is for Si to choose to delete the least recently accessed file. In another variation, Si deletes a file that it believes few users will access. In this variation, whenever a server Si stores a copy of a file F, it also computes and stores the weight w(Si, CF), where CF is a cluster consisting of the single target object associated with file F. Then, when server Si needs to delete a file, it chooses to delete the file F with the lowest weight w(Si, CF). To reflect the fact that files are accessed less as they age, server Si periodically multiplies its stored value of w(Si, CF) by a decay factor, such as 0.95, for each file F that it then stores. Alter natively, instead of using a decay factor, server Si may periodically recompute aggregate interest w(Si, CF) for each file F that it stores; the aggregate interest changes over time because target objects typically have an age attribute that the system considers in estimating user interest, as described above. - If entity E later wishes to remove file F from the network, for example because it has just multicast an updated version, it pseudonymously transmits a digitally signed global request message to proxy server D, requesting all proxy servers in the multicast tree MT(Ck) to delete any local copy of file F that they may be storing.
- In addition to global request messages, another type of message that may be transmitted to any proxy server S is termed a “query message.” When transmitted to a proxy server, a query message causes a reply to be sent to the originator of the message; this reply will contain an answer to a given query Q if any of the servers in a given multicast tree MT(C) are able to answer it, and will otherwise indicate that no answer is available. The query and the cluster C are named in the query message. In addition, the query message contains a field Slast which is unspecified except under certain circumstances described below, when it names a specific core server. When a proxy server S receives a message M that is marked as a query message, it acts as follows: 1. Proxy server S sets Ar, to be the return address for the client or server that transmitted message M to server S. Ar may be either a network address or a pseudonymous address 2. If proxy server S is not a core server for cluster C, it retrieves its locally stored list of nearby core servers for topic C, selects from this list a nearby core server S′, and transmits a copy of the locate message M over a virtual point-to-point connection to core server S′. If this transmission fails, proxy server S repeats the procedure with other core servers on its list. Upon receiving a reply, it forwards this reply to address Ar. 3. If proxy server S is a core server for cluster C, and it is able to answer query Q using locally stored information, then it transmits a “positive” reply to A, containing the answer. 4. If proxy server S is a core server for topic C, but it is unable to answer query Q using locally stored information, then it carries out a parallel depth-first search by executing the following steps: (a) Set L to be the empty list, (b) Retrieve the locally stored subtree of MT(C). For each server Si directly linked to Scurr in this subtree, other than Slast, (if specified), add the ordered pair (Si, S) to the list L. (c) If L is empty, transmit a “negative” reply to address Ar saying that server S cannot locate an answer to query Q, and terminate the execution of
step 4; otherwise proceed to step (d). (d) Select a list L1 of one or more server pairs (Ai, Bi) from the list L. For each server pair (Ai, Bi) on the list L1, form a locate message M(Ai, Bi), which is a copy of message M whose Slast field has been modified to specify Bi, and transmit this message M(Ai, Bi) to server Ai over a virtual point-to-point connection, (e) For each reply received (by S) to a message sent in step (d), act as follows: (I) If a “positive” reply arrives to a locate message M(Ai, Bi), then forward this reply to Ar and terminatestep 4, immediately, (ii) If a “negative” reply arrives to a locate message M(Ai, Bi), then remove the pair (Ai, Bi) from the list L1. (iii) If the message M(Ai, Bi) could not be successfully delivered to Ai, then remove the pair (Ai, Bi) from the list L1, and add the pair (Ci, Ai) to the list L1 for each Ci other than Bi that is directly linked to Ai in the locally stored subtree of MT(C). (f) Once L1 no longer contains any pair (Ai, Bi) for which a message M(Ai, Bi) has been sent, or after a fixed period of time has elapsed, return to step (c). - Retrieving Files from a Multicast Tree
- When a processor q in the network wishes to retrieve the file associated with a given target object, it executes the following steps. These steps are initiated by an entity E, which may be either a user entering commands via a keyboard at a client q, as illustrated in
FIG. 3 , or an automatic software process resident on a client or server processor q. 1. Processor q forms a query Q that asks whether the recipient (a core server for cluster C) still stores a file F that was previously multicast to the multicast tree MT(C); if so, the recipient server should reply with its own server name. Note that processor q must already know the name of file F and the identity of cluster C; typically, this information is provided to entity E by a service such as the news clipping service or browsing system described below, which must identify files to the user by (name, multicast topic) pair. 2. Processor q forms a query message M that poses query Q to the multicast tree MT(C). 3. Processor q pseudonymously transmits message M to the user's proxy server D, as described above. 4. Processor q receives a response M2 to message M. 5. If the response M2 is “positive,” that is, it names a server S that still stores file F, then processor q pseudonymously instructs the user's proxy server D to retrieve file F from server S. If the retrieval fails because server S has deleted file F since it answered the query, then client q returns to step 1. 6. If the response M2 is “negative,” that is, it indicates that no server in MT(C) still stores file F, then processor q forms a query Q that asks the recipient for the address A of the entity that maintains file F; this entity will ordinarily maintain a copy of file F definitely. All core servers in MT(C) ordinarily retain this information (unless instructed to delete it by the maintaining entity), even if they delete file F for space reasons. Therefore, processor q should receive a response providing address A, whereupon processor q pseudonymously instructs the user's proxy server D to retrieve file F from address A. - When multiple versions of a file F exist on local servers throughout the data communication network N, but are not marked as alternate versions of the same file, the system's ability to rapidly locate files similar to F (by treating them as target objects and applying the methods disclosed in “Searching for Target Objects” above) makes it possible to find all the alternate versions, even if they are stored remotely. These related data files may then be reconciled by any method. In a simple instantiation, all versions of the data file would be replaced with the version that had the latest date or version number. In another instantiation, each version would be automatically annotated with references or pointers to the other versions.
- The system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects of the present invention can be used in the electronic media system of
FIG. 1 to implement an automatic news clipping service which learns to select (filter) news articles to match a user's interests, based solely on which articles the user chooses to read. The system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects generates a target profile for each article that enters the electronic media system, based on the relative frequency of occurrence of the words contained in the article. The system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects also generates a search profile set for each user, as a function of the target profiles of the articles the user has accessed and the relevance feedback the user has provided on these articles. As new articles are received for storage on the mass storage systems SS1-SSm of the information servers I1-Im, the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects generates their target profiles. The generated target profiles are later compared to the search profiles in the users' search profile sets, and those new articles whose tar get profiles are closest (most similar) to the closest search profile in a user's search profile set are identified to that user for possible reading. The computer program providing the articles to the user monitors how much the user reads (the number of screens of data and the number of minutes spent reading), and adjusts the search profiles in the users search profile set to more closely match what the user apparently prefers to read. The details of the method used by this system are disclosed in flow diagram form inFIG. 5 . This method requires selecting a specific method of calculating user-specific search profile sets, of measuring similarity between two profiles, and of updating a user's search profile set (or more generally target profile interest summary) based on what the user read, and the examples disclosed herein are examples of the many possible implementations that can be used and should not be construed to limit the scope of the system. - The news clipping service instantiates target profile interest summaries as search profile sets, so that a set of high-interest search profiles is stored for each user. The search profiles associate d with a given user change over time. As in any application involving search profiles, they can be initially determined for a new user (or explicitly altered by an existing user) by any of a number of procedures, including the following preferred methods: (1) asking the user to specify search profiles directly by giving keywords and/or numeric attributes, (2) using copies of the profiles of target objects or target clusters that the user indicates are representative of his or her interest, (3) using a standard set of search profiles copied or otherwise determined from the search profile sets of people who are demographically similar to the user.
- Retrieve New Articles from Article Source
- Articles are available on-line from a wide variety of sources. In the preferred embodiment, one would use the current days news as supplied by a news source, such as the AP or Reuters news wire. These news articles are input to the electronic media system by being loaded into the mass storage system SS4 of an information server S4. The
article profile module 201 of the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects can reside on the information server S4 and operates pursuant to the steps illustrated in the flow diagram ofFIG. 5 , where, as each article is received atstep 501 by the information server S4, thearticle profile module 201 atstep 502 generates a target profile for the article and stores the target profile in an article indexing memory (typically part of mass storage system SS4 for later use in selectively delivering articles to users, This method is equally useful for selecting which articles to read from electronic news groups and electronic bulletin boards, and can be used as part of a system for screening and organizing electronic mail (“e-mail”). - A target profile is computed for each new article, as described earlier. The most important attribute of the target profile is a textual attribute that stands for the entire text of the article. This textual attribute is represented as described earlier, as a vector of numbers, which numbers in the preferred embodiment include the relative frequencies (TF/IDF scores) of word occurrences in this article relative to other comparable articles. The server must count the frequency of occurrence of each word in the article in order to compute the TF/IDF scores.
- These news articles are then hierarchically clustered in a hierarchical cluster tree at
step 503, which serves as a decision tree for determining which news articles are closest to the user's interest. The resulting clusters can be viewed as a tree in which the top of the tree includes all target objects and branches further down the tree represent divisions of the set of target objects into successively smaller subclusters of target objects. Each cluster has a cluster profile, so that at each node of the tree, the average target profile (centroid) of all target objects stored in the subtree rooted at that node is stored. This average of target profiles is computed over the representation of target profiles as vectors of numeric attributes, as described above. - The process by which a user employs this apparatus to retrieve news articles of interest is illustrated in flow diagram form in
FIG. 11 . Atstep 1101, the user logs into the data communication network N via their client processor C1 and activates the news reading program. This is accomplished by the user establishing a pseudonymous data communications connection as described above to a proxy server S2, which provides front-end access to the data communication network N. The proxy server S2 maintains a list of authorized pseudonyms and their corresponding public keys and provides access and billing control. The user has a search profile set stored in the local data storage medium on the proxy server S2. When the user requests access to “news” atstep 1102, theprofile matching module 203 resident on proxy server S2 sequentially considers each search profile pk from the user's search profile set to determine which news articles are most likely of interest to the user. The news articles were automatically clustered into a hierarchical cluster tree at an earlier step so that the determination can be made rapidly for each user. The hierarchical cluster tree serves as a decision tree for determining which articles' target profiles are most similar to search profile pk: the search for relevant articles begins at the top of the tree, and at each level of the tree the branch or branches are selected which have cluster profiles closest to pk. This process is recursively executed until the leaves of the tree are reached, identifying individual articles of interest to the user, as described in the section “Searching for Target Objects” above. - A variation on this process exploits the fact that many users have similar interests. Rather than carry out steps 5-9 of the above process separately for each search profile of each user, it is possible to achieve added efficiency by carrying out these steps only once for each group of similar search profiles, thereby satisfying many users' needs at once. In this variation, the system begins by non-hierarchically clustering all the search profiles in the search profile sets of a large number of users. For each cluster k of search profiles, with cluster profile pk, it uses the method described in the section “Searching for Target Objects” to locate articles with target profiles similar to pk. Each located article is then identified as of interest to each user who has a search profile represented in cluster k of search profiles.
- Notice that the above variation attempts to match clusters of search profiles with similar clusters of articles. Since this is a symmetrical problem, it may instead be given a symmetrical solution, as the following more general variation shows. At some point before the matching process commences, all the news articles to be considered are clustered into a hierarchical tree, termed the “target profile cluster tree,” and the search profiles of all users to be considered are clustered into a second hierarchical tree, termed the “search profile cluster tree.” The following steps serve to find all matches between individual target profiles from any target profile cluster tree and individual search profiles from any search profile cluster tree: 1. For each child subtree S of the root of the search profile cluster tree (or, let S be the entire search profile cluster tree if it contains only one search profile): 2. Compute the cluster profile Ps to be the average of all search profiles in subtree S 3. For each subcluster (child subtree) T of the root of the target profile cluster tree (or, let T be the entire target profile cluster tree if it contains only one target profile): 4. Compute the cluster profile PT to be the average of all target profiles in
subtree T 5. Calculate d(PS, PT, the distance between PS and PT 6. If d(PS, PT)<t, a threshold, 7. If S contains only one search profile and T contains only one target profile, decl are a match between that search profile and that target profile, 8. otherwise recurse to step 1 to find all matches between search profiles in tree S and target profiles in tree T. - The threshold used in step 6 is typically an affine function or other function of the greater of the cluster variances (or cluster diameters) of S and T. Whenever a match is declared between a search profile and a target profile, the target object that contributed the target profile is identified as being of interest to the user who contributed the search profile. Notice that the process can be applied even when the set of users to be considered or the set of target objects to be considered is very small. In the case of a single user, the process reduces to the method given for identifying articles of interest to a single user. In the case of a single target object, the process constitutes a method for identifying users to whom that target object is of interest.
- Once the profile correlation step is completed for a selected user or group of users, at
step 1104 theprofile processing module 203 stores a list of the identified articles for presentation to each user. At a user's request, theprofile processing system 203 retrieves the generated list of relevant articles and presents this list of titles of the selected articles to the user, who can then select atstep 1105 any article for viewing. (If no titles are available, then the first sentence(s) of each article can be used.) The list of article titles is sorted according to the degree of similarity of the article's target profile to the most similar search profile in the user's search profile set. The resulting sorted list is either transmitted in real time to the user client processor C1, if the user is present at their client processor C1, or can be transmitted to a user's mailbox, resident on the user's client processor C1 or stored within the server S2 for later retrieval by the user; other methods of transmission include facsimile transmission of the printed list or telephone transmission by means of a text-to-speech system. The user can then transmit a request by computer, facsimile, or telephone to indicate which of the identified articles the user wishes to review, if any. The user can still access all articles in any information server S4 to which the user has authorized access, however, those lower on the generated list are simply further from the user's interests, as determined by the user's search profile set. The server S2 retrieves the article from the local data storage medium or from an information server S4 and presents the article one screen at a time to the user's client processor C1. The user can at any time select another article for reading or exit the process. - Monitor which Articles are Read
- The user's search profile set
generator 202 atstep 1107 monitors which articles the user reads, keeping track of how many pages of text are viewed by the user, how much time is spent viewing the article, and whether all pages of the article were viewed. This information can be combined to measure the depth of the user's interest in the article, yielding a passive relevance feedback score, as described earlier. Although the exact details depend on the length and nature of the articles being searched, a typical formula might be: -
measure of article attractiveness=0.2 if the second page is accessed+0.2 if all pages are accessed+0.2 if more than 30 seconds was spent on the article+0.2 if more than one minute was spent on the article+0.2 if the minutes spent in the article are greater than half the number of pages. - The computed measure of article attractiveness can then be used as a weighting function to adjust the user's search profile set to thereby more accurately reflect the user's dynamically changing interests.
- Updating of a user's generated search profile set can be done at
step 1108 using the method described in copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/346,425. When an article is read, the server S2 shifts each search profile in the set slightly in the direction of the target profiles of those nearby articles for which the computed measure of article attractiveness was high. Given a search profile with attributes uik from a user's search profile set, and a set of J articles available with attributes djk (assumed correct for now), where I indexes users, j indexes articles, and k indexes attributes, user I would be predicted to pick a set of P distinct articles to minimize the sum of d(uI, bj) over the chosen articles j. The user's desired attributes uik and an article's attributes djk would be some form of word frequencies such as TF/IDF and potentially other attributes such as the source, reading level, and length of the article, while d(ui, dj) is the distance between these two attribute vectors (profiles) using the similarity measure described above. If the user picks a different set of P articles than was predicted, the user search profile set generation module should try to adjust u and/or to more accurately predict the articles the user selected. In particular, uI and/or dj should be shifted to increase their similarity if user I was predicted not to select article j but did select it, and perhaps also to decrease their similarity if user I was predicted to select article j but did not. A preferred method is to shift u for each wrong prediction that user I will not select article j, using the formula: uik′=uik−e(uik djk) - Here uI is chosen to be the search profile from user I's search profile set that is closest to target profile. If e is positive, this adjustment increases the match between user I's search profile set and the target profiles of the articles user I actually selects, by making uI closer to dj for the case where the algorithm failed to predict an article that the viewer selected. The size of e determines how many example articles one must see to change the search profile substantially. If e is too large, the algorithm becomes unstable, but for sufficiently small e, it drives u to its correct value. In general, e should be proportional to the measure of article attractiveness; for example, it should be relatively high if user I spends a long time reading article j. One could in theory also use the above formula to decrease the match in the case where the algorithm predicted an article that the user did not read, by making e negative in that case. However, there is no guarantee that u will move in the correct direction in that case. One can also shift the attribute weights WI of user I by using a similar algorithm: wik′=(wik−e|uik−djk|)/Σk(wik−e|uik−djk|)
- This is particularly important if one is combining word frequencies with other attributes. As before, this increases the match if e is positive—for the case where the algorithm failed to predict an article that the user read, this time by decreasing the weights on those characteristics for which the user's target profile uI differs from the article's profile dj. Again, the size of e determines how many example articles one must see to replace what was originally believed. Unlike the procedure for adjusting u, one also make use of the fact that the above algorithm decreases the match if e is negative—for the case where the algorithm predicted an article that the user did not read. The denominator of the expression prevents weights from shrinking to zero over time by renormalizing the modified weights wI′ so that they sum to one. Both u and w can be adjusted for each article accessed. When e is small, as it should be, there is no conflict between the two parts of the algorithm. The selected user's search profile set is updated at
step 1108. - The news clipping service may deliver news articles (or advertisements and coupons for purchasables) to off-line users as well as to users who are on-line. Although the off-line users may have no way of providing relevance feedback, the user profile of an off-line user U may be similar to the profiles of on-line users, for example because user U is demographically similar to these other users, and the level of user U's interest in particular target objects can therefore be estimated via the general interest-estimation methods described earlier. In one application, the news clipping service chooses a set of news articles (respectively, advertisements and coupons) that are predicted to be of interest to user U, thereby determining the content of a customized newspaper (respectively, advertising/coupon circular) that may be printed and physically sent to user U via other methods. In general, the target objects included in the printed document delivered to user U are those with the highest median predicted interest among a group G of users, where group G consists of either the single off-line user U, a set of off-line users who are demographically similar to user U, or a set of off-line users who are in the same geographic area and thus on the same newspaper delivery route. In a variation, user group G is clustered into several subgroups G1 . . . Gk; an average user profile Pi is created from each subgroup Gi; for each article T and each user profile Pi, the interest in T by a hypothetical user with user profile Pi is predicted, and the interest of article T to group G is taken to be the maximum interest in article T by any of these k hypothetical users; finally, the customized newspaper for user group G is constructed from those articles of greatest interest to group G.
- The filtering technology of the news clipping service is not limited to news articles provided by a single source, but may be extended to articles or target objects collected from any number of sources. For example, rather than identifying new news articles of interest, the technology may identify new or updated World Wide Web pages of interest. In a second application, termed “broadcast clipping,” where individual users desire to broadcast messages to all interested users, the pool of news articles is replaced by a pool of messages to be broadcast, and these messages are sent to the broadcast-clipping-service subscribers most interested in them. In a third application, the system scans the transcripts of all real-time spoken or written discussions on the network that are currently in progress and designated as public, and employs the news-clipping technology to rapidly identify discussions that the user may be interested in joining, or to rapidly identify and notify users who may be interested in joining an ongoing discussion. In a fourth application, the method is used as a post-process that filters and ranks in order of interest the many target objects found by a conventional database search, such as a search for all homes selling for under $200,000 in a given area, for all 1994 news articles about Marcia Clark, or for all Italian-language films. In a fifth application, the method is used to filter and rank the links in a hypertext document by estimating the user's interest in the document or other object associated with each link. In a sixth application, paying advertisers, who may be companies or individuals, are the source of advertisements or other messages, which take the place of the news articles in the news clipping service. A consumer who buys a product is deemed to have provided positive relevance feedback on advertisements for that product, and a consumer who buys a product apparently because of a particular advertisement (for example, by using a coupon clipped from that advertisement) is deemed to have provided particularly high relevance feedback on that advertisement. Such feedback may be communicated to a proxy server by the consumer's client processor (if the consumer is making the purchase electronically), by the retail vendor, or by the credit-card reader (at the vendor's establishment) that the consumer uses to pay for the purchase. Given a database of such relevance feedback, the disclosed technology is then used to match advertisements with those users who are most interested in them; advertisements selected for a user are presented to that user by any one of several means, including electronic mail, automatic display on the users screen, or printing them on a printer at a retail establishment where the consumer is paying for a purchase. The threshold distance used to identify interest may be increased for a particular advertisement, causing the system to present that advertisement to more users, in accordance with the amount that the advertiser is willing to pay.
- A further use of the capabilities of this system is to manage a users investment portfolio. Instead of recommending articles to the user, the system recommends target objects that are investments. As illustrated above by the example of stock market investments, many different attributes can be used together to profile each investment. The user's past investment behavior is characterized in the user's search profile set or target profile interest summary, and this information is used to match the user with stock opportunities (target objects) similar in nature to past investments. The rapid profiling method described above may be used to determine a rough set of preferences for new users. Quality attributes used in this system can include negatively weighted attributes, such as a measurement of fluctuations in dividends historically paid by the investment, a quality attribute that would have a strongly negative weight for a conservative investor dependent on a regular flow of investment income. Furthermore, the user can set filter parameters so that the system can monitor stock prices and automatically take certain actions, such as placing buy or sell orders, or e-mailing or paging the user with a notification, when certain stock performance characteristics are met. Thus, the system can immediately notify the user when a selected stock reaches a predetermined price, without the user having to monitor the stock market activity. The user's investments can be profiled in part by a “type of investment” attribute (to be used in conjunction with other attributes), which distinguishes among bonds, mutual funds, growth stocks, income stocks, etc., to thereby segment the user's portfolio according to investment type. Each investment type can then be managed to identify investment opportunities and the user can identify the desired ratio of investment capital for each type.
- In addition to the news clipping service described above, the system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects functions in an e\_mail environment in a similar but slightly different manner. The news clipping service selects and retrieves news information that would not otherwise reach its subscribers. But at the same time, large numbers of e-mail messages do reach users, having been generated and sent by humans or automatic programs. These users need an e-mail filter, which automatically processes the messages received. The necessary processing includes a determination of the action to be taken with each message, including, but not limited to: filing the message, notifying the user of receipt of a high priority message, automatically responding to a message. The e-mail filter system must not require too great an investment on the part of the user to learn and use, and the user must have confidence in the appropriateness of the actions automatically taken by the system. The same filter may be applied to voice mail messages or facsimile messages that have been converted into electronically stored text, whether automatically or at the user's request, via the use of well-known techniques for speech recognition or optical character recognition.
- The filtering problem can be defined as follows: a message processing function MPF(*) maps from a received message (document) to one or more of a set of actions. The actions, which may be quite specific, may be either predefined or customized by the use r. Each action A has an appropriateness function FA (*,*) such that FA (U,D) returns a real number, representing the appropriateness of selecting action A on behalf of user U when user U is in receipt of message D. For example, if D comes from a credible source and is marked urgent, then discarding the message has a high cost to the user and has low appropriateness, so that Fdiscard (U,D) is small, whereas alerting the user of receipt of the message is highly appropriate, so that Falert (U,D) is large. Given the determined appropriateness function, the function MPF(D) is used to automatically select the appropriate action or actions. As an example, the following set of actions might be useful:
- 1. Urgently notify user of receipt of message
- 2. Insert message into queue for user to read later
- 3. Insert message into queue for user to read later, and suggest that user reply
- 4. Insert message into queue for user to read later, and suggest that user forward it to individual R
- 5. Summarize message and insert summary into queue
- 6. Forward message to user's secretary
- 7. File message in directory X
- 8. File message in directory Y
- 9. Delete message (i.e., ignore message and do not save)
- 10. Notify sender that further messages on this subject are unwanted
- Notice that
actions 8 and 9 in the sample list above are designed to filter out messages that are undesirable to the user or that are received from undesirable sources, such as pesky salespersons, by deleting the unwanted message and/or sending a reply that indicates that messages of this type will not be read. The appropriateness functions must be tailored to describe the appropriateness of carrying out each action given the target profile for a particular document, and then a message processing function MPF can be found which is in some sense optimal with respect to the appropriateness function. One reasonable choice of MPF always picks the action with highest appropriateness, and in cases where multiple actions are highly appropriate and are also compatible with each other, selects more than one action: for example, it may automatically reply to a message and also file the same message in directory X, so that the value of MPF(D) is the set \{reply, file in directory X\}. In cases where the appropriateness of even the most appropriate action falls below a user-specified threshold, as should happen for messages of an unfamiliar type, the system asks the user for confirmation of the action(s) selected by MPF. In addition, in cases where MPF selects one action over another action that is nearly as appropriate, the system also asks the user for confirmation: for example, mail should not be deleted if it is nearly as appropriate to let the user see it. - It is possible to write appropriateness functions manually, but the time necessary and lack of user expertise render this solution impractical. The automatic training of this system is preferable, using the automatic user profiling system described above. Each received document is viewed as a target object whose profile includes such attributes as the entire text of the document (represented as TF/IDF scores), document sender, date sent, document length, date of last document received from this sender, key words, list of other addressees, etc. It was disclosed above how to estimate an interest function on profiled target objects, using relevance feedback together with measured similarities among target objects and among users. In the con text of the e-mail filter, the task is to estimate several appropriateness functions FA (*,*), one per action. This is handled with exactly the same method as was used earlier to estimate the topical interest function f(*,*). Relevance feedback in this case is provided by the user's observed actions over time: whenever user U chooses action A on document D, either freely or by choosing or confirming an action recommended by the system, this is taken to mean that the appropriateness of action A on document D is high, particularly if the user takes this action A immediately after seeing document D. A presumption of no appropriateness (corresponding to the earlier presumption of no interest) is used so that action A is considered inappropriate on a document unless the user or similar users have taken action A on this document or similar documents. In particular, if no similar document has been seen, no action is considered especially appropriate, and the e-mail filter asks the user to specify the appropriate action or confirm that the action chosen by the e-mail filter is the appropriate one.
- Thus, the e-mail filter learns to take particular actions on e-mail messages that have certain attributes or combinations of attributes. For example, messages from John Doe that originate in the (212) area code may prompt the system to forward a copy by fax transmission to a given fax number, or to file the message in directory X on the user's client processor. A variation allows active requests of this form from the user, such as a request that any message from John Doe be forwarded to a desired fax number until further notice. This active user input requires the use of a natural language or form-based interface for which specific commands are associated with particular attributes and combinations of attributes.
- A very important and novel characteristic of the architecture is the ability to identify new or updated target objects that are relevant to the user, as determined by the user's search profile set or target profile interest summary. (“Updated target objects” include revised versions of documents and new models of purchasable goods.) The system may notify the user of these relevant target objects by an electronic notification such as an e-mail message or facsimile transmission. In the variation where the system sends an e-mail message, the user's e-mail filter can then respond appropriately to the notification, for instance, by bringing the notification immediately to the user's personal attention, or by automatically submitting an electronic request to purchase the target object named in the notification. A simple example of the latter response is for the e-mail filter to retrieve an on-line document at a nominal or zero charge, or request to buy a purchasable of limited quantity such as a used product or an auctionable.
- A hierarchical cluster tree imposes a useful organization on a collection of target objects. The tree is of direct use to a user who wishes to browse through all the target objects in the tree. Such a user may be exploring the collection with or without a well-specified goal. The tree's division of target objects into coherent clusters provides an efficient method whereby the user can locate a target object of interest. The user first chooses one of the highest level (largest) clusters from a menu, and is presented with a menu listing the subclusters of said cluster, whereupon the user may select one of these subclusters. The system locates the subcluster, via the appropriate pointer that was stored with the larger cluster, and allows the user to select one of its subclusters from another menu. This process is repeated until the user comes to a leaf of the tree, which yields the details of an actual target object. Hierarchical trees allow rapid selection of one target object from a large set. In ten menu selections from menus of ten items (subclusters) each, one can reach 1010=10,000,000,000 (ten billion) items. In the preferred embodiment, the user views the menus on a computer screen or terminal screen and selects from them with a keyboard or mouse. However, the user may also make selections over the telephone, with a voice synthesizer reading the menus and the user selecting subclusters via the telephone's touch-tone keypad. In another variation, the user simultaneously maintains two connections to the server, a telephone voice connection and a fax connection; the server sends successive menus to the user by fax, while the user selects choices via the telephone's touch-tone keypad.
- Just as user profiles commonly include an associative attribute indicating the user's degree of interest in each target object, it is useful to augment user profiles with an additional associative attribute indicating the user's degree of interest in each cluster in the hierarchical cluster tree. This degree of interest may be estimated numerically as the number of subclusters or target objects the user has selected from menus associated with the given cluster or its subclusters, expressed as a proportion of the total number of subclusters or target objects the user has selected. This associative attribute is particularly valuable if the hierarchical tree was built using “soft” or “fuzzy” clustering, which allows a subcluster or target object to appear in multiple clusters: if a target document appears in both the “sports” and the “humor” clusters, and the user selects it from a menu associated with the “humor” cluster, then the system increases its association between the user and the “humor” cluster but not its association between the user and the “sports” cluster.
- Since a user who is navigating the cluster tree is repeatedly expected to select one of several subclusters from a menu, these subclusters must be usefully labeled (at step 503), in such a way as to suggest their content to the human user. It is straightforward to include some basic information about each subcluster in its label, such as the number of target objects the subcluster contains (possibly just 1) and the number of these that have been added or updated recently. However, it is also necessary to display additional information that indicates the cluster's content. This content-descriptive information may be provided by a human, particularly for large or frequently accessed clusters, but it may also be generated automatically. The basic automatic technique is simply to display the cluster's “characteristic value” for each of a few highly weighted attributes. With numeric attributes, this may be taken to mean the cluster's average value for that attribute: thus, if the “year of release” attribute is highly weighted in predicting which movies a user will like, then it is useful to display average year of release as part of each cluster's label. Thus the user sees that one cluster consists of movies that were released around 1962, while another consists of movies from around 1982. For short textual attributes, such as “title of movie” or “title of document,” the system can display the attribute's value for the cluster member (target object) whose profile is most similar to the cluster's profile (the mean profile for all members of the cluster), for example, the title of the most typical movie in the cluster. For longer textual attributes, a useful technique is to select those terms for which the amount by which the term's average TF/IDF score across members of the cluster exceeds the term's average TF/IDF score across all tar get objects is greatest, either in absolute terms or else as a fraction of the standard deviation of the term's TF/IDF score across all target objects. The selected terms are replaced with their morphological stems, eliminating duplicates (so that if bot h “slept” and “sleeping” were selected, they would be replaced by the single term “sleep”) and optionally eliminating close synonyms or collocates (so that if both “nurse” and “medical” were selected, they might both be replaced by a single term such as “nurse,” “medical,” “medicine,” or “hospital”). The resulting set of terms is displayed as part of the label. Finally, if freely redistributable thumbnail photographs or other graphical images are associated with some of the target objects in the cluster for labeling purposes, then the system can display as part of the label the image or images whose associated target objects have target profiles most similar to the cluster profile.
- Users' navigational patterns may provide some useful feedback as to the quality of the labels. In particular, if users often select a particular cluster to explore, but then quickly backtrack and try a different cluster, this may signal that the first cluster's label is misleading. Insofar as other terms and attributes can pro vide “next-best” alternative labels for the first cluster, such “next-best” labels can be automatically substituted for the misleading label. In addition, any user can locally relabel a cluster for his or her own convenience. Although a cluster label provided by a user is in general visible only to that user, it is possible to make global use of these labels via a “user labels” textual attribute for target objects, which attribute is defined for a given target object to be the concatenation of all labels provided by any user for any cluster containing that target object. This attribute influences similarity judgments: for example, it may induce the system to regard target articles in a cluster often labeled “Sports News” by users as being mildly similar to articles in an otherwise dissimilar cluster often labeled “International News” by users, precisely because the “user labels” attribute in each cluster profile is strongly associated with the term “News.” The “user label” attribute is also used in the automatic generation of labels, just as other textual attributes are, so that if the user-generated labels for a cluster often include “Sports,” the term “Sports” may be included in the automatically generated label as well.
- It is not necessary for menus to be displayed as simple lists of labeled options; it is possible to display or print a menu in a form that shows in more detail the relation of the different menu options to each other. Thus, in a variation, the menu options are visually laid out in two dimensions or in a perspective drawing of three dimensions. Each option is displayed or printed as a textual or graphical label. The physical coordinates at which the options are displayed or printed are generated by the following sequence of steps: (1) construct for each option the cluster profile of the cluster it represents, (2) construct from each cluster profile its decomposition into a numeric vector, as described above, (3) apply singular value decomposition (SVD) to determine the set of two or three orthogonal linear axes along which these numeric vectors are most greatly differentiated, and (4) take the coordinates of each option to be the projected coordinates of that option's numeric vector along said axes. Step (3) may be varied to determine a set of, say, 6 axes, so that step (4) lays out the options in a 6-dimensional space; in this case the user may view the geometric projection of the 6-dimensional layout onto any plane passing through the origin, and may rotate this viewing plane in order to see differing configurations of the options, which emphasize similarity with respect to differing attributes in the profiles of the associated clusters. In the visual representation, the sizes of the cluster labels can be varied according to the number of objects contained in the corresponding clusters. In a further variation, all options from the parent menu are displayed in some number of dimensions, as just described, but with the option corresponding to the current menu replaced by a more prominent subdisplay of the options on the current menu; optionally, the scale of this composite display may be gradually increased over time, thereby increasing the area of the screen devoted to showing the options on the current menu, and giving the visual impression that the user is regarding the parent cluster and “zooming in” on the current cluster and its subclusters.
- It should be appreciated that a hierarchical cluster-tree may be configured with multiple cluster selections branching from each node or the same labeled clusters presented in the form of single branches for multiple nodes ordered in a hierarchy. In one variation, the user is able to perform lateral navigation between neighboring clusters as well, by requesting that the system search for a cluster whose cluster profile resembles the cluster profile of the currently selected cluster. If this type of navigation is performed at the level of individual objects (leaf ends), then automatic hyperlinks may be then created as navigation occurs. This is one way that nearest neighbor clustering navigation may be performed. For example, in a domain where target objects are home pages on the World Wide Web, a collection of such pages could be laterally linked to create a “virtual mall.”
- The simplest way to use the automatic menuing system described above is for the user to begin browsing at the top of the tree and moving to more specific subclusters. However, in a variation, the user optionally provides a query consisting of textual and/or other attributes, from which query the system constructs a profile in the manner described herein, optionally altering textual attributes as described herein before decomposing them into numeric attributes. Query profiles are similar to the search profiles in a user's search profile set, except that their attributes are explicitly specified by a user, most often for one-time usage, and unlike search profiles, they are not automatically updated to reflect changing interests. A typical query in the domain of text articles might have “Tell me about the relation between Galileo and the Medici family” as the value of its “text of article” attribute, and 8 as the value of its “reading difficulty” attribute (that is, 8th-grade level). The system uses the method of section “Searching for Target Objects” above to automatically locate a small set of one or more clusters with profiles similar to the query profile, for example, the articles they contain are written at roughly an 8th-grade level and tend to mention Galileo and the Medicis. The user may start browsing at any of these clusters, and can move from it to subclusters, superclusters, and other nearby clusters. For a user who is looking for something in particular, it is generally less efficient to start at the largest cluster and repeatedly select smaller subclusters than it is to write a brief description of what one is looking for and then to move to nearby clusters if the objects initially recommended are not precisely those desired.
- Although it is customary in information retrieval systems to match a query to a document, an interesting variation is possible where a query is matched to an already answered question. The relevant domain is a customer service center, electronic newsgroup, or Better Business Bureau where questions are frequently answered. Each new question-answer pair is recorded for future reference as a target object, with a textual attribute that specifies the question together with the answer provided. As explained earlier with reference to document titles, the question should be weighted more heavily than the answer when this textual attribute is decomposed into TF/IDF scores. A query specifying “Tell me about the relation between Galileo and the Medici family” as the value of this attribute therefore locates a cluster of similar questions together with their answers. In a variation, each question-answer pair may be profiled with two separate textual attributes, one for the question and one for the answer. A query might then locate a cluster by specifying only the question attribute, or for completeness, both the question attribute and the (lower-weighted) answer attribute, to be the text “Tell me about the relation between Galileo and the Medici family.”
- The filtering technology described earlier can also aid the user in navigating among the target objects. When the system presents the user with a menu of subclusters of a cluster C of target objects, it can simultaneously present an additional menu of the most interesting target objects in cluster C, so that the user has the choice of accessing a subcluster or directly accessing one of the target objects. If this additional menu lists n target objects, then for each I between 1 and n inclusive, in increasing order, the Ith most prominent choice on this additional menu, which choice is denoted Top(C,i), is found by considering all target objects in cluster C that are further than a threshold distance t from all of Top(C,1), Top(C,2), . . . Top(C, I−1), and selecting the one in which the user's interest is estimated to be highest. If the threshold distance t is 0, then the menu resulting from this procedure simply displays the n most interesting objects in cluster C, but the threshold distance may be increased to achieve more variety in the target objects displayed. Generally the threshold distance t is chosen to be an affine function or other function of the cluster variance or cluster diameter of the cluster C.
- As a novelty feature, the user U can “masquerade” as another user V, such as a prominent intellectual or a celebrity supermodel; as long as user U is masquerading as user V, the filtering technology will recommend articles not according to user U's preferences, but rather according to user V's preferences. Provided that user U has access to the user-specific data of user V, for example because user V has leased these data to user U for a financial consideration, then user U can masquerade as user V by instructing user U's proxy server S to temporarily substitute user V's user profile and target profile interest summary for user U's. In a variation, user U has access to an average user profile and an composite target profile interest summary for a group G of users; by instructing proxy server S to substitute these for user U's user-specific data, user U can masquerade as a typical member of group G, as is useful in exploring group preferences for sociological, political, or market research. More generally, user U may “partially masquerade” as another user V or group G, by instructing proxy server S to temporarily replace user U's user-specific data with a weighted average of user U's user-specific data and the user-specific data for user V and group G.
- Although the topology of a hierarchical cluster tree is fixed by the techniques that build the tree, the hierarchical menu presented to the user for the user's navigation need not be exactly isomorphic to the cluster tree. The menu is typically a somewhat modified version of the cluster tree, reorganized manually or automatically so that the clusters most interesting to a user are easily accessible by the user. In order to automatically reorganize the menu in a user-specific way, the system first attempts automatically to identify existing clusters that are of interest to the user. The system may identify a cluster as interesting because the user often accesses target objects in that cluster—or, in a more sophisticated variation, because the user is predicted to have high interest in the cluster's profile, using the methods disclosed herein for estimating interest from relevance feedback.
- Several techniques can then be used to make interesting clusters more easily accessible. The system can at the user's request or at all times display a special list of the most interesting clusters, or the most interesting subclusters of the current cluster, so that the user can select one of these clusters based on its label and jump directly to it. In general, when the system constructs a list of interesting clusters in this way, the Ith most prominent choice on the list, which choice is denoted Top(I), is found by considering all appropriate clusters C that are further than a threshold distance t from all of Top(1), Top(2), . . . Top(I−1), and selecting the one in which the user's interest is estimated to be highest. Here the threshold distance t is optionally dependent on the computed cluster variance or cluster diameter of the profiles in the latter cluster. Several techniques that reorganize the hierarchical menu tree are also useful. First, menus can be reorganized so that the most interesting subcluster choices appear earliest on the menu, or are visually marked as interesting; for example, their labels are displayed in a special color or type face, or are displayed together with a number or graphical image indicating the likely level of interest. Second, interesting clusters can be moved to menus higher in the tree, i.e., closer to the root of the tree, so that they are easier to access if the user starts browsing at the root of the tree. Third, uninteresting clusters can be moved to menus lower in the tree, to make room for interesting clusters that are being moved higher. Fourth, clusters with an especially low interest score (representing active dislike) can simply be suppressed from the menus; thus, a user with children may assign an extremely negative weight to the “vulgarity” attribute in the determination of q, so that vulgar clusters and documents will not be available at all. As the interesting clusters and the documents in them migrate toward the top of the tree, a customized tree develops that can be more efficiently navigated by the particular user. If menus are chosen so that each menu item is chosen with approximately equal probability, then the expected number of choices the user has to make is minimized. If, for example, a user frequently accessed target objects whose profiles resembled the cluster profile of cluster (a, b, d) in
FIG. 8 then the menu inFIG. 9 could be modified to show the structure illustrated inFIG. 10 . - In the variation where the general techniques disclosed herein for estimating a user's interest from relevance feedback are used to identify interesting clusters, it is possible for a user U to supply “temporary relevance feedback” to indicate a temporary interest that is added to his or her usual interests. This is done by entering a query as described above, i.e., a set of textual and other attributes that closely match the user's interests of the moment. This query becomes “active,” and affects the system's determination of interest in either of two ways. In one approach, an active query is treated as if it were any other target object, and by virtue of being a query, it is taken to have received relevance feedback that indicates especially high interest. In an alternative approach, target objects X whose target profiles are similar to an active query's profile are simply considered to have higher quality q(U, X), in that q(U, X) is incremented by a term that increases with target object X's similarity to the query profile. Either strategy affects the usual interest estimates: clusters that match user U's usual interests (and have high quality q(*)) are still considered to be of interest, and clusters w hose profiles are similar to an active query are adjudged to have especially high interest. Clusters that are similar to both the query and the user's usual interests are most interesting of all. The user may modify or deactivate an active query at any time while browsing. In addition, if the user discovers a target object or cluster X of particular interest while browsing, he or she may replace or augment the original (perhaps vague) query profile with the target profile of target object or cluster X, t hereby amplifying or refining the original query to indicate an particular interest in objects similar to X. For example, suppose the user is browsing through documents, and specifies an initial query containing the word “Lloyd's,” so that the system predicts documents containing the word “Lloyd's” to be more interesting and makes them more easily accessible, even to the point of listing such documents or clusters of such documents, as described above. In particular, certain articles about insurance containing the phrase “Lloyd's of London” are made more easily accessible, as are certain pieces of Welsh fiction containing phrases like “Lloyd's father.” The user browses while this query is active, and hits upon a useful article describing the relation of Lloyd's of London to other British insurance houses; by replacing or augmenting the query with the full text of this article, the user can turn the attention of the system to other documents that resemble this article, such as documents about British insurance houses, rather than Welsh folk tales.
- In a system where queries are used, it is useful to include in the target profiles an associative attribute that records the associations between a target object and whatever terms are employed in queries used to find that target object. The association score of target object X with a particular query term T is defined to be the mean relevance feedback on target object X, averaged over just those accesses of target object X that were made while a query containing term T was active, multiplied by the negated logarithm of term T's global frequency in all queries. The effect of this associative attribute is to increase the measured similarity of two documents if they are good responses to queries that contain the same terms. A further maneuver can be used to improve the accuracy of responses to a query: in the summation used to determine the quality q(U, X) of a target object X, a term is included that is proportional to the sum of association scores between target object X and each term in the active query, if any, so that target objects that are closely associated with terms in an active query are determined to have higher quality and therefore higher interest for the user. To complement the system's automatic reorganization of the hierarchical cluster tree, the user can be given the ability to reorganize the tree manually, as he or she sees fit. Any changes are optionally saved on the user's local storage device so that they will affect the presentation of the tree in future sessions. For example, the user can choose to move or copy menu options to other menus, so that useful clusters can thereafter be chosen directly from the root menu of the tree or from other easily accessed or topically appropriate menus. In an other example, the user can select clusters C1, C2, . . . Ck listed on a particular menu M and choose to remove these clusters from the menu, replacing them on the menu with a single aggregate cluster M′ containing all the target objects from clusters C1, C2, . . . Ck. In this case, the immediate subclusters of new cluster M′ are either taken to be clusters C1, C2, . . . Ck themselves, or else, in a variation similar to the “scatter-gather” method, are automatically computed by clustering the set of all the subclusters of clusters C1, C2, . . . Ck according to the similarity of the cluster profiles of these subclusters.
- In one application, the browsing techniques described above may be applied to a domain where the target objects are purchasable goods. When shoppers look for goods to purchase over the Internet or other electronic media, it is typically necessary to display thousands or tens of thousands of products in a fashion that helps consumers find the items they are looking for. The current practice is to use hand-crafted menus and sub-menus in which similar items are grouped together. It is possible to use the automated clustering and browsing methods described above to more effectively group and present the items. Purchasable items can be hierarchically clustered using a plurality of different criteria. Useful attributes for a purchasable item include but are not limited to a textual description and predefined category labels (if available), the unit price of the item, and an associative attribute listing the users who have bought this item in the past. Also useful is an associative attribute indicating which other items are often bought on the same shopping “trip” as this item; items that are often bought on the same trip will be judged similar with respect to this attribute, so tend to be grouped together. Retailers may be interested in utilizing a similar technique for purposes of predicting both the nature and relative quantity of items which are likely to be popular to their particular clientele. This prediction may be made by using aggregate purchasing records as the search profile set from which a collection of target objects is recommended. Estimated customer demand which is indicative of (relative) inventory quantity for each target object item is determined by measuring the cluster variance of that item compared to another target object item (which is in stock).
- As described above, hierarchically clustering the purchasable target objects results in a hierarchical menu system, in which the target objects or clusters of target objects that appear on each menu can be labeled by names or icons and displayed in a two-dimensional or three-dimensional menu in which similar items are displayed physically near each other or on the same graphically represented “shelf.” As described above, this grouping occurs both at the level of specific items (such as standard size Ivory soap or large Breck shampoo) and at the level of classes of items (such as soaps and shampoos). When the user selects a class of items (for instance, by clicking on it), then the more specific level of detail is displayed. It is neither necessary nor desirable to limit each item to appearing in one group; customers are more likely to find an object if it is in multiple categories. Non-purchasable objects such as artwork, advertisements, and free samples may also be added to a display of purchasable objects, if they are associated with (liked by) substantially the same users as are the purchasable objects in the display.
- The files associated with target objects are typically distributed across a large number of different servers S1-So and clients C1-Cn. Each file has been entered into the data storage medium at some server or client in any one of a number of ways, including, but not limited to: scanning, keyboard input, e-mail, FTP transmission, automatic synthesis from another file under the control of another computer program. While a system to enable users to efficiently locate target objects may store its hierarchical cluster tree on a single centralized machine, greater efficiency can be achieved if the storage of the hierarchical cluster tree is distributed across many machines in the network. Each cluster C, including single-member clusters (target objects), is digitally represented by a file F, which is multicast to a topical multicast tree MT(C1); here cluster C1 is either cluster C itself or some supercluster of cluster C. In this way, file F is stored at multiple servers, for redundancy. The file F that represents cluster C contains at least the following data:
- 1. The cluster profile for cluster C, or data sufficient to reconstruct this cluster profile. 2. The number of target objects contained in cluster C. 3. A human-readable label for cluster C, as described in section “Labeling Clusters” above. 4. If the cluster is divided into subclusters, a list of pointers to files representing the subclusters. Each pointer is an ordered pair containing naming, first, a file, and second, a multicast tree or a specific server where that file is stored. 5. If the cluster consists of a single target object, a pointer to the file corresponding to that target object.
- The process by which a client machine can retrieve the file F from the multicast tree MT(C1) is described above in section “Retrieving Files from a Multicast Tree.” Once it has retrieved file F, the client can perform further tasks pertaining to this cluster, such as displaying a labeled menu of subclusters, from which the user may select subclusters for the client to retrieve next.
- The advantage of this distributed implementation is threefold. First, the system can be scaled to larger cluster sizes and numbers of target objects, since much more searching and data retrieval can be carried out concurrently. Second, the system is fault-tolerant in that partial matching can be achieved even if portions of the system are temporarily unavailable. It is important to note here the robustness due to redundancy inherent in our design—data is replicated at tree sites so that even if a server is down, the data can be located elsewhere.
- The distributed hierarchical cluster tree can be created in a distributed fashion, that is, with the participation of many processors. Indeed, in most applications it should be recreated from time to time, because as users interact with target objects, the associative attributes in the target profiles of the target objects change to reflect these interactions; the system's similarity measurements can therefore take these interactions into account when judging similarity, which allows a more perspicuous cluster tree to be built The key technique is the following procedure for merging n disjoint cluster trees, represented respectively by files F1 . . . Fn in distributed fashion as described above, into a combined cluster tree that contains all the target objects from all these trees. The files F1 . . . Fn are described above, except that the cluster labels are not included in the representation. The following steps are executed by a server S1, in response to a request message from another server S0, which request message includes pointers to the files F1 . . . Fn. 1. Retrieve files F1 . . . Fn. 2. Let L and M be empty lists. 3. For each file Fi from among F1 . . . Fn: 4. If file Fi contains pointers to subcluster files, add these pointers to list L. S. If file Fi represents a single target object, add a pointer to file Fi to list L. 6. For each pointer X on list L, retrieve the file that pointer P points to and extract the cluster profile P(X) that this file stores. 7. Apply a clustering algorithm to group the pointers X on list L according to the distances between their respective cluster profiles P(X). 8. For each (nonempty) resulting group C of pointers: 9. If C contains only one pointer, add this pointer to list M; 10. otherwise, if C contains exactly the same subcluster pointers as does one of the files Fi from among F1 . . . Fn, then add a pointer to file Fi to list M; 11. otherwise: 12. Select an arbitrary server S2 on the network, for example by randomly selecting one of the pointers in group C and choosing the server it points to. 13. Send a request message to server S2 that includes the subcluster pointers in group C and requests server S2 to merge the corresponding subcluster trees. 14. Receive a response from server S2, containing a pointer to a file G that represents the merged tree. Add this pointer to list M. 15. For each file Fi from among F1 . . . Fn: 16. If list M does not include a pointer to file Fi, send a message to the server or servers storing Fi instructing them to delete file Fi. 17. Create and store a file F that represents a new cluster, whose subcluster pointers are exactly the subcluster pointers on list M. 18. Send a reply message to server S0, which reply message contains a pointer to file F and indicates that file F represents the merged cluster tree.
- With the help of the above procedure, and the multicast tree MT full that includes all proxy servers in the network, the distributed hierarchical cluster tree for a particular domain of target objects is constructed by merging many local hierarchical cluster trees, as follows. 1. One server S (preferably one with good connectivity) is elected from the tree. 2. Server S sends itself a global request message that causes each proxy server in MTfull (that is, each proxy server in the network) to ask its clients for files for the cluster tree. 3. The clients of each proxy server transmit to the proxy server any files that they maintain, which files represent target objects from the appropriate domain that should be added to the cluster tree. 4. Server S forms a request R1 that, upon receipt, will cause the recipient server S1 to take the following actions: (a) Build a hierarchical cluster tree of all the files stored on server S1 that are maintained by users in the user base of S1. These files correspond to target objects from the appropriate domain. This cluster tree is typically stored entirely on S1, but may in principle be stored in a distributed fashion,
- (b) Wait until all servers to which the server S1 has propagated request R have sent the recipient reply messages containing pointers to cluster trees, (c) Merge together the cluster tree created in step 5(a) and the cluster trees supplied in step 5(b), by sending any server (such as S1 itself) a message requesting such a merge, as described above, (d) Upon receiving a reply to the message sent in (c), which reply includes a pointer to a file representing the merged cluster tree, forward this reply to the sender of request R1, unless this is S1 itself. 5. Server S sends itself a global request message that causes all servers in MTfull to act on embedded request R1. 6. Server S receives a reply to the message it sent in 5(c). This reply includes a pointer to a file F that represents the completed hierarchical cluster tree. Server S multicasts file F to all proxy servers in MTfull. Once the hierarchical cluster tree has been created as above, server S can send additional messages through the cluster tree, to arrange that multicast trees MT(C) are created for sufficiently large clusters C, and that each file F is multicast to the tree MT(C), where C is the smallest cluster containing file F.
- Computer users frequently join other users for discussions on computer bulletin boards, newsgroups, mailing lists, and real-time chat sessions over the computer network, which may be typed (as with Internet Relay Chat (IRC)), spoken (as with Internet phone), or videoconferenced. These forums are herein termed “virtual communities.” In current practice, each virtual community has a specified topic, and users discover communities of interest by word of mouth or by examining a long list of communities (typically hundreds or thousands). The users then must decide for themselves which of thousands of messages they find interesting from among those posted to the selected virtual communities, that is, made publicly available to members of those communities. If they desire, they may also write additional messages and post them to the virtual communities of their choice. The existence of thousands of Internet bulletin boards (also termed newsgroups) and countless more Internet mailing lists and private bulletin board services (BBS's) demonstrates the very strong interest among members of the electronic community in forums for the discussion of ideas about almost any subject imaginable. Presently, virtual community creation proceeds in a haphazard form, usually instigated by a single individual who decides that a topic is worthy of discussion. There are protocols on the Internet for voting to determine whether a newsgroup should be created, but there is a large hierarchy of newsgroups (which begin with the prefix “alt.”) that do not follow this protocol.
- The system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects described herein can of course function as a browser for bulletin boards, where target objects are taken to be bulletin boards, or subtopics of bulletin boards, and each target profile is the cluster profile for a cluster of documents posted on some bulletin board. Thus, a user can locate bulletin boards of interest by all the navigational techniques described above, including browsing and querying. However, this method only serves to locate existing virtual communities. Because people have varied and varying complex interests, it is desirable to automatically locate groups of people with common interests in order to form virtual communities. The Virtual Community Service (VCS) described below is a network-based agent that seeks out users of a network with common interests, dynamically creates bulletin boards or electronic mailing lists for those users, and introduces them to each other electronically via e-mail. It is useful to note that once virtual communities have been created by VCS, the other browsing and filtering technologies described above can subsequently be used to help a user locate particular virtual communities (whether pre-existing or automatically generated by VCS); similarly, since the messages sent to a given virtual community may vary in interest and urgency for a user who has joined that community, these browsing and filtering technologies (such as the e-mail filter) can also be used to alert the user to urgent messages and to screen out uninteresting ones.
- The functions of the Virtual Community Service are general functions that could be implemented on any network ranging from an office network in a small company to the World Wide Web or the Internet. The four main steps in the procedure are: 1. Scan postings to existing virtual communities. 2. Identify groups of users with common interests. 3. Match users with virtual communities, creating new virtual communities when necessary. 4. Continue to enroll additional users in the existing virtual communities.
- More generally, users may post messages to virtual communities pseudonymously, even employing different pseudonyms for different virtual communities. (Posts not employing a pseudonymous mix path may, as usual, be considered to be posts employing a non-secure pseudonym, namely the user's true network address.) Therefore, the above steps may be expressed more generally as follows 1. Scan pseudonymous postings to existing virtual communities. 2. Identify groups of pseudonyms whose associated users have common interests. 3. Match pseudonymous users with virtual communities, creating new virtual communities when necessary. 4. Continue to enroll additional pseudonymous users in the existing virtual communities.
- Each of these steps can be carried out as described below.
- Using the technology described above, Virtual Community Service constantly scans all the messages posted to all the newsgroups and electronic mailing lists on a given network, and constructs a target profile for each message found. The network can be the Internet, or a set of bulletin boards maintained by America Online, Prodigy, or CompuServe, or a smaller set of bulletin boards that might be local to a single organization, for example a large company, a law firm, or a university. The scanning activity need not be confined to bulletin boards and mailing lists that were created by Virtual Community Service, but may also be used to scan the activity of communities that predate Virtual Community Service or are otherwise created by means outside the Virtual Community Service system, provided that these communities are public or otherwise grant their permission.
- The target profile of each message includes textual attributes specifying the title and body text of the message. In the case of a spoken rather than written message, the latter attribute may be computed from the acoustic speech data by using a speech recognition system. The target profile also includes an associative attribute listing the authors) and designated recipients) of the message, where the recipients may be individuals and/or entire virtual communities; if this attribute is highly weighted, then the system tends to regard messages among the same set of people as being similar or related, even if the topical similarity of the messages is not clear from their content, as may happen when some of the messages are very short. Other important attributes include the fraction of the message that consists of quoted material from previous messages, as well as attributes that are generally useful in characterizing documents, such as the message's date, length, and reading level.
- Next, Virtual Community Service attempts to identify groups of pseudonymous users with common interests. These groups, herein termed “pre-communities,” are represented as sets of pseudonyms. Whenever Virtual Community Service identifies a pre-community, it will subsequently attempt to put the users in said pre-community in contact with each other, as described below. Each pre-community is said to be “determined” by a cluster of messages, pseudonymous users, search profiles, or target objects.
- In the usual method for determining pre-communities, Virtual Community Service clusters the messages that were scanned and profiled in the above step, based on the similarity of those messages' computed target profiles, thus automatically finding threads of discussion that show common interests among the users. Naturally, discussions in a single virtual community tend to show common interests; however, this method uses all the texts from every available virtual community, including bulletin boards and electronic mailing lists. Indeed, a user who wishes to initiate or join a discussion on some topic may send a “feeler message” on that topic to a special mailing list designated for feeler mess ages; as a consequence of the scanning procedure described above, the feeler message is automatically grouped with any similarly profiled messages that have been sent to this special mailing list, to topical mailing lists, or to topical bulletin boards. The clustering step employs “soft clustering,” in which a message may belong to multiple clusters and hence to multiple virtual communities. Each cluster of messages that is found by Virtual Community Service and that is of sufficient size (for example, 10-20 different messages) determines a pre-community whose members are the pseudonymous authors and recipients of the messages in the cluster. More precisely, the pre-community consists of the various pseudonyms under which the messages in the cluster were sent and received.
- Alternative methods for determining a pre-community, which do not require the scanning step above, include the following: 1. Pre-communities can be generated by grouping together users who have similar interests of any sort, not merely Individuals who have already written or received messages about similar topics. If the user profile associated with each pseudonym indicates the user's interests, for example through an associative attribute that indicates the documents or Web sites a user likes, then pseudonyms can be clustered based on the similarity of their associated user profiles, and each of the resulting clusters of pseudonyms determines a pre-community comprising the pseudonyms in the cluster. 2. If each pseudonym has an associated search profile set formed through participation in the news clipping service described above, then all search profiles of all pseudonymous users can be clustered based on their similarity, and each cluster of search profiles determines a pre-community whose members are the pseudonyms from whose search profile sets the search profiles in the cluster are drawn. Such groups of people have been reading about the same topic (or, more generally, accessing similar target objects) and so presumably share an interest. 3. If users participate in a news clipping service or any other filtering or browsing system for target objects, then an individual user can pseudonymously request the formation of a virtual community to discuss a particular cluster of one or more target objects known to that system. This cluster of target objects determines a pre-community consisting of the pseudonyms of users determined to be most interested in that cluster (for example, users who have search profiles similar to the cluster pro file), together with the pseudonym of the user who requested formation of the virtual community.
- Matching Users with Communities
- Once Virtual Community Service identifies a cluster C of messages, users, search profiles, or target objects that determines a pre-community M, it attempts to arrange for the members of this pre-community to have the chance to participate in a common virtual community V. In many cases, an existing virtual community V may suit the needs of the pre-community M. Virtual Community Service first attempts to find such an existing community V. In the case where cluster C is a cluster of messages, V may be chosen to be any existing virtual community such that the cluster profile of cluster C is within a threshold distance of the mean profile of the set of messages recently posted to virtual community V; in the case where cluster C is a cluster of users, V may be chosen to be any existing virtual community such that the cluster profile of cluster C is within a threshold distance of the mean user profile of the active members of virtual community V; in the case where the cluster C is a cluster of search profiles, V may be chosen to be any existing virtual community such that the cluster profile of cluster C is within a threshold distance of the cluster profile of the largest cluster resulting from clustering all the search profiles of active members of virtual community V; and in the case where the cluster C is a cluster of one or more target objects chosen from a separate browsing or filtering system, V may be chosen to be any existing virtual community initiated in the same way from a cluster whose cluster profile in that other system is within a threshold distance of the cluster profile of cluster C. The threshold distance used in each case is optionally dependent on the cluster variance or cluster diameter of the profile sets whose means are being compared.
- If no existing virtual community V meets these conditions and is also willing to accept all the users in pre-community M as hew members, then Virtual Community Service attempts to create a new virtual community V. Regardless of whether virtual community V is an existing community or a newly created community, Virtual Community Service sends an e-mail message to each pseudonym P in pre-community M whose associated user U does not already belong to virtual community V (under pseudonym P) and has not previously turned down a request to join virtual community V. The e-mail message informs user U of the existence of virtual community V, and provides instructions which user U may follow in order to join virtual community V if desired; these instructions vary depending on whether virtual community V is an existing community or a new community. The message includes a credential, granted to pseudonym P, which credential must be presented by user U upon joining the virtual community V, as proof that user U was actually invited to join. If user U wishes to join virtual community V under a different pseudonym Q, user U may first transfer the credential from pseudonym P to pseudonym Q, as described above. The e-mail message further provides an indication of the common interests of the community, for example by including a list of titles of messages recently sent to the community, or a charter or introductory message provided by the community (if available), or a label generated by the methods described above that identifies the content of the cluster of messages, user profiles, search profiles, or target objects that was used to identify the pre-community M.
- If Virtual Community Service must create a new community V, several methods are available for enabling the members of the new community to communicate with each other. If the pre-community M is large, for example containing more than 50 users, then Virtual Community Service typically establishes either a multicast tree, as described below, or a widely-distributed bulletin board, assigning a name to the new bulletin board. If the pre-community M has fewer members, for example 2-50, Virtual Community Service typically establishes either a multicast tree, as described below, or an e-mail mailing list. If the new virtual community V was determined by a cluster of messages, then Virtual Community Service kicks off the discussion by distributing these messages to all members of virtual community V. In addition to bulletin boards and mailing lists, alternative fora that can be created and in which virtual communities can gather include real-time typed or spoken conversations (or engagement or distributed multi-user applications including video games) over the computer network and physical meetings, any of which can be scheduled by a partly automated process wherein Virtual Community Service requests meeting time preferences from all members of the pre-community M and then notifies these individuals of an appropriate meeting time.
- Even after creation of a new virtual community, Virtual Community Service continues to scan other virtual communities for new messages whose target profiles are similar to the community's cluster profile (average message profile). Copies of any such messages are sent to the new virtual community, and the pseudonymous authors of these messages, as well as users who show high interest in reading such messages, are informed by Virtual Community Service (as for pre-community members, above) that they may want to join the community. Each such user can then decide whether or not to join the community. In the case of Internet Relay Chat (IRC), if the target profile of messages in a real time dialog are (or become) similar to that of a user, VCS may also send an urgent e-mail message to such user whereby the user may be automatically notified as soon as the dialog appears, if desired.
- With these facilities, Virtual Community Service provides automatic creation of new virtual communities in any local or wide-area network, as well as maintenance of all virtual communities on the network, including those not created by Virtual Community Service. The core technology underlying Virtual Community Service is creating a search and clustering mechanism that can find articles that are “similar” in that the users share interests. This is precisely what was described above. One must be sure that Virtual Community Service does not bombard users with notices about communities in which they have no real interest. On a very small network a human could be “in the loop”, scanning proposed virtual communities and perhaps even giving them names. But on larger networks Virtual Community Service has to run in fully automatic mode, since it is likely to find a large number of virtual communities.
- Once a virtual community has been identified, it is straightforward for Virtual Community Service to establish a mailing list so that any member of the virtual community may distribute e-mail to all other members. Another method of distribution is to use a conventional network bulletin board or newsgroup to distribute the messages to all servers in the network, where they can be accessed by any member of the virtual community. However, these simple methods do not take into account cost and performance advantages which accrue from optimizing the construction of a multicast tree to carry messages to the virtual community. Unlike a newsgroup, a multicast tree distributes messages to only a selected set of servers, and unlike an e-mail mailing list, it does so efficiently.
- A separate multicast tree MT(V) is maintained for each virtual community V, by use of the following four procedures. 1. To construct or reconstruct this multicast tree, the core servers for virtual community V are taken to be those proxy servers that serve at least one pseudonymous member of virtual community V. Then the multicast tree MT(V) is established via steps 4-6 in the section “Multicast Tree Construction Procedure” above. 2. When a new user joins virtual community V, which is an existing virtual community, the user sends a message to the user's proxy server S. If user's proxy server S is not already a core server for V, then it is designated as a core server and is added to the multicast tree MT(V), as follows. If more than k servers have been added since the last time the multicast tree MT(V) was rebuilt, where k is a function of the number of core servers already in the tree, then the entire tree is simply rebuilt via steps 4-6 in the section “Multicast Tree Construction Procedure” above. Otherwise, server S retrieves its locally stored list of nearby core servers for V, and chooses a server S1. Server S sends a control message to Si, indicating that it would like to be added to the multicast tree MT(V). Upon receipt of this message, server Si retrieves its locally stored subtree G1 of MT(V), and forms a new graph G from G1 by removing all degree-1 vertices other than Si itself. Server Si transmits graph G to server S, which stores it as its locally stored subtree of MT(V). Finally, server S sends a message to itself and to all servers that are vertices of graph G, instructing these servers to modify their locally stored subtrees of MT(V) by adding S as a vertex and adding an edge between S1 and S. 3. When a user at a client q wishes to send a message F to virtual community V, client q embeds message F in a request R instructing the recipient to store message F locally, for a limited time, for access by members of virtual community V. Request R includes a credential proving that the user is a member of virtual community V or is otherwise entitled to post messages to virtual community V (for example is not “black marked” by that or other virtual community members). Client q then broadcasts request R to all core servers in the multicast tree MT(V), by means of a global request message transmitted to the user's proxy server as described above. The core servers satisfy request R, provided that they can verify the included credential. 4. In order to retrieve a particular message sent to virtual community V, a user U at client q initiates the steps described in section “Retrieving Files from a Multicast Tree,” above. If user U does not want to retrieve a particular message, but rather wants to retrieve all new messages sent to virtual community V, then user U pseudonymously instructs its proxy server (which is a core server for V) to send it all messages that were multicast to MT(V) after a certain date. In either case, user U must provide a credential proving user U to be a member of virtual community V, or otherwise entitled to access messages on virtual community V.
- A method has been presented for automatically selecting articles of interest to a user. The method generates sets of search profiles for the users based on such attributes as the relative frequency of occurrence of words in the articles read by the users, and uses these search profiles to efficiently identify future articles of interest. The methods is characterized by passive monitoring (users do not need to explicitly rate the articles), multiple search profiles per user (reflecting interest in multiple topics) and use of elements of the search profiles which are automatically determined from the data (notably, the TF/IDF measure based on word frequencies and descriptions of purchasable items). A method has also been presented for automatically generating menus to allow users to locate and retrieve articles on topics of interest. This method clusters articles based on their similarity, as measured by the relative frequency of word occurrences. Clusters are labeled either with article titles or with key words extracted from the article. The method can be applied to large sets of articles distributed over many machines.
- It has been further shown how to extend the above methods from articles to any class of target objects for which profiles can be generated, including news articles, reference or work articles, electronic mail, product or service descriptions, people (based on the articles they read, demographic data, or the products they buy), and electronic bulletin boards (based on the articles posted to them). A particular consequence of being able to group people by their interests is that one can form virtual communities of people of common interest, who can then correspond with one another via electronic mail.
Claims (10)
1-34. (canceled)
35. A method for providing a user with a list of selected target objects of a plurality of target objects, the method comprising:
(a) generating profiles of the plurality of target objects using a processor, the profiles comprising a first profile of a first target object of the plurality of target objects, wherein the first profile is generated by processing text included in the first target object and based on links between the first target object and at least one other target object;
(b) generating the list of selected target objects based on the profiles of the plurality of target objects; and
(c) providing the list to the user.
36. The method of claim 35 , wherein the first profile is generated by determining a number of occurrences of at least a portion of a word in the text included in the first target object.
37. The method of claim 36 , wherein the first profile is generated based on a frequency of occurrences of the at least a portion of the word in documents other than the first target object.
38. The method of claim 35 , wherein the first profile is generated based on a location of at least a portion of a word within the first target object.
39. The method of claim 35 , wherein the target objects comprise hypertext documents.
40. The method of claim 35 , wherein (b) is performed in response to receiving a query from the user, wherein the query comprises at least one term.
41. The method of claim 35 , wherein the first profile is generated based on a number of links leading to the first target object from the at least one other target object.
42. The method of claim 35 , further comprising:
(d) generating a user target profile interest summary for the user, the user target profile interest summary being generated from target profiles associated with a plurality of the target objects accessed by the user.
43. The method of claim 42 , wherein (b) comprises correlating the user target profile interest summary with the generated target profiles to identify one or more of said plurality of target objects that are likely to be of interest to the user.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/372,435 US20090234878A1 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2009-02-17 | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/346,425 US5758257A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1994-11-29 | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US55119895A | 1995-10-31 | 1995-10-31 | |
US12/372,435 US20090234878A1 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2009-02-17 | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US55119895A Continuation | 1994-11-29 | 1995-10-31 |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090234878A1 true US20090234878A1 (en) | 2009-09-17 |
Family
ID=23359325
Family Applications (11)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/346,425 Expired - Fee Related US5758257A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1994-11-29 | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US08/477,798 Expired - Lifetime US5734720A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-06-07 | System and method for providing digital communications between a head end and a set top terminal |
US08/550,886 Expired - Lifetime US5754938A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-10-31 | Pseudonymous server for system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US08/551,197 Expired - Lifetime US5754939A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-10-31 | System for generation of user profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US08/551,201 Expired - Lifetime US5835087A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-10-31 | System for generation of object profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US08/849,589 Expired - Lifetime US6088722A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-11-29 | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US09/028,024 Expired - Lifetime US6020883A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1998-02-23 | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US11/133,766 Expired - Fee Related US8056100B2 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2005-05-20 | System and method for providing access to data using customer profiles |
US11/133,759 Expired - Fee Related US7853600B2 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2005-05-20 | System and method for providing access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US12/372,435 Abandoned US20090234878A1 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2009-02-17 | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US13/116,656 Abandoned US20120102523A1 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2011-05-26 | System and method for providing access to data using customer profiles |
Family Applications Before (9)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US08/346,425 Expired - Fee Related US5758257A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1994-11-29 | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US08/477,798 Expired - Lifetime US5734720A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-06-07 | System and method for providing digital communications between a head end and a set top terminal |
US08/550,886 Expired - Lifetime US5754938A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-10-31 | Pseudonymous server for system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US08/551,197 Expired - Lifetime US5754939A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-10-31 | System for generation of user profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US08/551,201 Expired - Lifetime US5835087A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-10-31 | System for generation of object profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US08/849,589 Expired - Lifetime US6088722A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1995-11-29 | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US09/028,024 Expired - Lifetime US6020883A (en) | 1994-11-29 | 1998-02-23 | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US11/133,766 Expired - Fee Related US8056100B2 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2005-05-20 | System and method for providing access to data using customer profiles |
US11/133,759 Expired - Fee Related US7853600B2 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2005-05-20 | System and method for providing access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/116,656 Abandoned US20120102523A1 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2011-05-26 | System and method for providing access to data using customer profiles |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (11) | US5758257A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0796538B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE242581T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU703247B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2207868C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69530995T2 (en) |
MX (1) | MX9703967A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1996017467A2 (en) |
Cited By (119)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050086243A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2005-04-21 | Tangis Corporation | Logging and analyzing computer user's context data |
US20060036575A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2006-02-16 | Clement Lau | System and method for common interest analysis among multiple users |
US20070094258A1 (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2007-04-26 | Sony Corporation | Information transmitting apparatus,terminal apparatus and method thereof |
US20070233701A1 (en) * | 2006-03-29 | 2007-10-04 | Greg Sherwood | System and method for securing content ratings |
US20070263670A1 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2007-11-15 | Beng Corporation | State synchronization apparatuses and methods |
US20070271246A1 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2007-11-22 | Rolf Repasi | Providing a rating for a web site based on weighted user feedback |
US20080027918A1 (en) * | 2003-07-07 | 2008-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of generating a distributed text index for parallel query processing |
US20080097994A1 (en) * | 2006-10-23 | 2008-04-24 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of extracting community and system for the same |
US20080249838A1 (en) * | 2007-04-03 | 2008-10-09 | Robert Lee Angell | Method and apparatus for preferred customer marketing delivery based on biometric data for a customer |
US20080250064A1 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2008-10-09 | Aptima, Inc. | Method and system to compare data entities |
US20090013052A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2009-01-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated selection of appropriate information based on a computer user's context |
US20090089293A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Bccg Ventures, Llc | Selfish data browsing |
US20090172525A1 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2009-07-02 | Business Objects S.A. | Apparatus and method for reformatting a report for access by a user in a network appliance |
US20100049768A1 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2010-02-25 | Robert James C | Automatic management of digital archives, in particular of audio and/or video files |
US20100082332A1 (en) * | 2008-09-26 | 2010-04-01 | Rite-Solutions, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for protecting users from objectionable text |
US20100169342A1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-01 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic Web Satisfaction Prediction System |
US20100169343A1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-01 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic Web User Behavior Prediction System |
US20100169340A1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-01 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic Web Item Recommendation System |
US20100257235A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2010-10-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated response to computer users context |
US20110002334A1 (en) * | 2009-01-09 | 2011-01-06 | Thilmee Baduge | Communication terminal and communication state change method |
US7877686B2 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2011-01-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamically displaying current status of tasks |
US7933981B1 (en) * | 2006-06-21 | 2011-04-26 | Vmware, Inc. | Method and apparatus for graphical representation of elements in a network |
US20110099177A1 (en) * | 2009-01-23 | 2011-04-28 | Nec Corporation | Data retrieval device |
US7945859B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2011-05-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Interface for exchanging context data |
US20110125775A1 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2011-05-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating an aggregate report of a presence of a user on a network |
US7962573B2 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2011-06-14 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US20110172988A1 (en) * | 2010-01-08 | 2011-07-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Adaptive construction of a statistical language model |
US8020104B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2011-09-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Contextual responses based on automated learning techniques |
US20110225035A1 (en) * | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Determining Supply and Demand Using Online Advertisements |
US20110231394A1 (en) * | 2010-03-18 | 2011-09-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Bootstrap and adapt a document search engine |
US20110252044A1 (en) * | 2010-04-13 | 2011-10-13 | Konkuk University Industrial Cooperation Corp. | Apparatus and method for measuring contents similarity based on feedback information of ranked user and computer readable recording medium storing program thereof |
US8103665B2 (en) | 2000-04-02 | 2012-01-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Soliciting information based on a computer user's context |
US8181113B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2012-05-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Mediating conflicts in computer users context data |
US8185461B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2012-05-22 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Longevity analysis and modifiable attribute identification |
US20120143911A1 (en) * | 2010-12-01 | 2012-06-07 | Google Inc. | Recommendations based on topic clusters |
US8200509B2 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2012-06-12 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Masked data record access |
US8249996B1 (en) * | 2010-02-18 | 2012-08-21 | Bank Of America Corporation | Artificial intelligence for social media |
US20120239586A1 (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2012-09-20 | Andrew Vincent Peloso | System and method for funding nonprofit endeavors using targeting |
US8285825B1 (en) * | 2002-11-13 | 2012-10-09 | Novell, Inc. | Method and system for managing network resources based on a dynamic quorum |
US8311960B1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2012-11-13 | Emc Corporation | Interactive semi-supervised machine learning for classification |
CN102782750A (en) * | 2011-01-05 | 2012-11-14 | 松下电器产业株式会社 | Region of interest extraction device, region of interest extraction method |
WO2012159057A1 (en) * | 2011-05-19 | 2012-11-22 | Charite-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin | System and method for conducting processor-assisted indexing and searching |
US8326648B2 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2012-12-04 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | System for secure mobile healthcare selection |
US8346724B2 (en) * | 2000-04-02 | 2013-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Generating and supplying user context data |
CN102868695A (en) * | 2012-09-18 | 2013-01-09 | 天格科技(杭州)有限公司 | Conversation tree-based intelligent online customer service method and system |
WO2013013093A1 (en) * | 2011-07-20 | 2013-01-24 | Ness Computing, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quickly evaluating entities |
US20130041952A1 (en) * | 2011-08-10 | 2013-02-14 | Gregory Robert Silas | System and method for relevant business networking based in controlled relevancy groups, responsilibites and measured performance |
US20130086079A1 (en) * | 2011-10-04 | 2013-04-04 | Abhimanyu Chaudhuri | Graphical user interface for interacting with automatically generated user profiles |
US20130110839A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Evan R. Kirshenbaum | Constructing an analysis of a document |
US20130133066A1 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2013-05-23 | Computer Associates Think, Inc | Transaction-based intrusion detection |
US20130159243A1 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2013-06-20 | Google Inc. | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US20130166494A1 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | General Instrument Corporation | Hierarchical behavioral profile |
US20130173034A1 (en) * | 2011-12-28 | 2013-07-04 | Robert Reimann | Methods and Systems to Select an Audio Track |
US8489997B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2013-07-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Supplying notifications related to supply and consumption of user context data |
US20130246408A1 (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2013-09-19 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content |
US20130290340A1 (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2013-10-31 | Henri Jacques Suermondt | Providing Control Over a Personalized Category of Information |
US8612306B1 (en) * | 2009-07-29 | 2013-12-17 | Google Inc. | Method, system, and storage device for recommending products utilizing category attributes |
US20140006950A1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-01-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Incremental preparation of videos for delivery |
US8639563B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2014-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized marketing messages at a customer level using current events data |
US20140074828A1 (en) * | 2012-09-12 | 2014-03-13 | Myemptyslate, Inc. | Systems and methods for cataloging consumer preferences in creative content |
US8677248B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2014-03-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Requesting computer user's context data |
US20140095516A1 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2014-04-03 | Waldeck Technology, Llc | Profile Construction Using Location-Based Aggregate Profile Information |
US8745056B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2014-06-03 | Google Inc. | Spam detection for user-generated multimedia items based on concept clustering |
US20140172579A1 (en) * | 2012-12-17 | 2014-06-19 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring users viewing media assets |
US8775238B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2014-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized disincentive marketing content for a customer based on customer risk assessment |
US8788286B2 (en) | 2007-08-08 | 2014-07-22 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Side effects prediction using co-associating bioattributes |
US8798777B2 (en) | 2011-03-08 | 2014-08-05 | Packetvideo Corporation | System and method for using a list of audio media to create a list of audiovisual media |
WO2014122661A1 (en) * | 2013-02-05 | 2014-08-14 | Yassin Said | Method for customizing and presentation of data units according to user's field of interest and detailed depth |
US8812355B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2014-08-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized marketing messages for a customer using dynamic customer behavior data |
US8831972B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2014-09-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating a customer risk assessment using dynamic customer data |
US20150089376A1 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2015-03-26 | E&C Holding Company, Llc | Virtual classroom management delivery system and method |
US9031857B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2015-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized marketing messages at the customer level based on biometric data |
US20150142826A1 (en) * | 2013-11-21 | 2015-05-21 | Moxbi, LLC | Systems and Methods for Management and Improvement of Romantically Linked Relationships |
US9058612B2 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2015-06-16 | AVG Netherlands B.V. | Systems and methods for recommending software applications |
US9110998B2 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2015-08-18 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Hierarchical behavioral profile |
US9189551B2 (en) | 2011-07-20 | 2015-11-17 | Opentable. Inc. | Method and apparatus for category based navigation |
US9278255B2 (en) | 2012-12-09 | 2016-03-08 | Arris Enterprises, Inc. | System and method for activity recognition |
US20160070692A1 (en) * | 2014-09-10 | 2016-03-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Determining segments for documents |
US20160112392A1 (en) * | 2014-10-17 | 2016-04-21 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for sharing of content |
US9326070B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2016-04-26 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on playback zone awareness |
US9372555B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2016-06-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Managing interactions between computer users' context models |
US9372914B1 (en) | 2014-01-14 | 2016-06-21 | Google Inc. | Determining computing device characteristics from computer network activity |
AU2015200201B2 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2016-06-23 | Google Llc | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US9396492B2 (en) | 2010-10-15 | 2016-07-19 | Opentable, Inc. | Computer system and method for analyzing data sets and providing personalized recommendations |
US9405733B1 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2016-08-02 | Apple Inc. | System and method for analyzing and categorizing text |
US9443037B2 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2016-09-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Storing and recalling information to augment human memories |
US9449106B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2016-09-20 | Opentable, Inc. | Context-based queryless presentation of recommendations |
US9626684B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2017-04-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing customized digital media marketing content directly to a customer |
US20170154288A1 (en) * | 2015-11-30 | 2017-06-01 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Data entry selection based on data processing |
US9672213B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2017-06-06 | Sonos, Inc. | Providing media items from playback history |
US9685048B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2017-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatically generating an optimal marketing strategy for improving cross sales and upsales of items |
US20170310819A1 (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2017-10-26 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Voice play method and voice play device |
US9846883B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2017-12-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized marketing messages using automatically generated customer identification data |
US20180309874A1 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-10-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for a cognitive system plug-in answering subject matter expert questions |
US10140611B1 (en) * | 2012-11-19 | 2018-11-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Electronic device with light-generating sources to illuminate an indicium |
US20180357489A1 (en) * | 2017-06-07 | 2018-12-13 | Silveredge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. | Method and system for adaptively reducing detection time in real-time supervised detection of televised advertisements |
US10162575B2 (en) * | 2016-07-26 | 2018-12-25 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | System, server device, and information processing apparatus |
TWI646528B (en) * | 2017-05-10 | 2019-01-01 | 華南商業銀行股份有限公司 | System for conducting dialogues |
US10212986B2 (en) | 2012-12-09 | 2019-02-26 | Arris Enterprises Llc | System, apparel, and method for identifying performance of workout routines |
US10334607B2 (en) | 2014-05-29 | 2019-06-25 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Electronic device and wireless network access method in electronic device |
US20190197181A1 (en) * | 2017-12-21 | 2019-06-27 | Shanghai Xiaoi Robot Technology Co., Ltd. | Questioning and answering method, method for generating questioning and answering system, and method for modifying questioning and answering system |
US10509531B2 (en) * | 2017-02-20 | 2019-12-17 | Google Llc | Grouping and summarization of messages based on topics |
US10558735B2 (en) | 2009-06-26 | 2020-02-11 | Seagate Technology Llc | System and method for using an application on a mobile device to transfer internet media content |
US10833970B1 (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2020-11-10 | Pinterest, Inc. | Reducing collections of sets |
US20210234665A1 (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2021-07-29 | nChain Holdings Limited | Partitioning a blockchain network |
US11244358B2 (en) * | 2016-12-27 | 2022-02-08 | Rovi Guide, Inc. | Systems and methods for submitting user selected profile information to an advertiser |
US11250440B2 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2022-02-15 | Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd. | Payment collection device and method and apparatus |
US20220164406A1 (en) * | 2020-11-20 | 2022-05-26 | Amplified Media Logic LLC | Influencer Scoring Model |
US20220207097A1 (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2022-06-30 | Shenzhen Sekorm Component Network Co., Ltd | Multi-node word segmentation system and method for keyword search |
CN114780606A (en) * | 2022-03-30 | 2022-07-22 | 欧阳安安 | Big data mining method and system |
US11423462B2 (en) | 2010-10-15 | 2022-08-23 | Opentable, Inc. | Computer system and method for analyzing data sets and generating personalized recommendations |
US20220327561A1 (en) * | 2013-12-13 | 2022-10-13 | Groupon, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for providing a search feedback system |
US11477302B2 (en) | 2016-07-06 | 2022-10-18 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | Computer-implemented system and method for distributed activity detection |
US20220414126A1 (en) * | 2021-06-29 | 2022-12-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual assistant feedback adjustment |
US11636855B2 (en) | 2019-11-11 | 2023-04-25 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on operational data |
US11647243B2 (en) | 2009-06-26 | 2023-05-09 | Seagate Technology Llc | System and method for using an application on a mobile device to transfer internet media content |
US20230205823A1 (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2023-06-29 | Proofpoint, Inc. | Intelligent clustering systems and methods useful for domain protection |
US11934255B2 (en) | 2022-01-04 | 2024-03-19 | Bank Of America Corporation | System and method for improving memory resource allocations in database blocks for executing tasks |
US11973869B2 (en) | 2018-04-27 | 2024-04-30 | Nchain Licensing Ag | Maintaining blocks of a blockchain in a partitioned blockchain network |
Families Citing this family (4311)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7131070B1 (en) * | 1999-05-13 | 2006-10-31 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Application unit monitoring and reporting system and method |
US7210159B2 (en) * | 1994-02-18 | 2007-04-24 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | System and method for transmitting and utilizing electronic programs guide information |
US5963916A (en) * | 1990-09-13 | 1999-10-05 | Intouch Group, Inc. | Network apparatus and method for preview of music products and compilation of market data |
US7448063B2 (en) * | 1991-11-25 | 2008-11-04 | Actv, Inc. | Digital interactive system for providing full interactivity with live programming events |
US20010013123A1 (en) * | 1991-11-25 | 2001-08-09 | Freeman Michael J. | Customized program creation by splicing server based video, audio, or graphical segments |
US20040261127A1 (en) * | 1991-11-25 | 2004-12-23 | Actv, Inc. | Digital interactive system for providing full interactivity with programming events |
US8352400B2 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2013-01-08 | Hoffberg Steven M | Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore |
US10361802B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2019-07-23 | Blanding Hovenweep, Llc | Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method |
US6400996B1 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2002-06-04 | Steven M. Hoffberg | Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method |
US5903454A (en) | 1991-12-23 | 1999-05-11 | Hoffberg; Linda Irene | Human-factored interface corporating adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus |
USRE48056E1 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2020-06-16 | Blanding Hovenweep, Llc | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
USRE46310E1 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2017-02-14 | Blanding Hovenweep, Llc | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
USRE47908E1 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2020-03-17 | Blanding Hovenweep, Llc | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
US6850252B1 (en) | 1999-10-05 | 2005-02-01 | Steven M. Hoffberg | Intelligent electronic appliance system and method |
US6418424B1 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2002-07-09 | Steven M. Hoffberg | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
US20070299321A1 (en) * | 1992-11-17 | 2007-12-27 | Brown Stephen J | Method and apparatus for remote health monitoring and providing health related information |
WO2001037174A1 (en) * | 1992-11-17 | 2001-05-25 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Method and system for improving adherence with a diet program or other medical regimen |
US7624028B1 (en) * | 1992-11-17 | 2009-11-24 | Health Hero Network, Inc. | Remote health monitoring and maintenance system |
US5307263A (en) | 1992-11-17 | 1994-04-26 | Raya Systems, Inc. | Modular microprocessor-based health monitoring system |
US20010011224A1 (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 2001-08-02 | Stephen James Brown | Modular microprocessor-based health monitoring system |
US8073695B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2011-12-06 | Adrea, LLC | Electronic book with voice emulation features |
US7509270B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2009-03-24 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Electronic Book having electronic commerce features |
US7168084B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2007-01-23 | Sedna Patent Services, Llc | Method and apparatus for targeting virtual objects |
ATE183352T1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 1999-08-15 | Discovery Communicat Inc | IMPROVED TOP-UP TERMINAL FOR CABLE TELEVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS |
US7849393B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2010-12-07 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Electronic book connection to world watch live |
US7835989B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2010-11-16 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Electronic book alternative delivery systems |
US9286294B2 (en) * | 1992-12-09 | 2016-03-15 | Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc | Video and digital multimedia aggregator content suggestion engine |
US7721307B2 (en) * | 1992-12-09 | 2010-05-18 | Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc | Method and apparatus for targeting of interactive virtual objects |
US5798785A (en) * | 1992-12-09 | 1998-08-25 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Terminal for suggesting programs offered on a television program delivery system |
AU6352894A (en) | 1993-03-05 | 1994-09-26 | Roy J. Mankovitz | Apparatus and method using compressed codes for television program record scheduling |
US6239794B1 (en) | 1994-08-31 | 2001-05-29 | E Guide, Inc. | Method and system for simultaneously displaying a television program and information about the program |
AU1333895A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1995-06-19 | Raymond R. Burke | Computer system for allowing a consumer to purchase packaged goods at home |
US7861166B1 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 2010-12-28 | Discovery Patent Holding, Llc | Resizing document pages to fit available hardware screens |
US8095949B1 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 2012-01-10 | Adrea, LLC | Electronic book with restricted access features |
US9053640B1 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 2015-06-09 | Adrea, LLC | Interactive electronic book |
US7865567B1 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 2011-01-04 | Discovery Patent Holdings, Llc | Virtual on-demand electronic book |
US6202058B1 (en) | 1994-04-25 | 2001-03-13 | Apple Computer, Inc. | System for ranking the relevance of information objects accessed by computer users |
US8793738B2 (en) | 1994-05-04 | 2014-07-29 | Starsight Telecast Incorporated | Television system with downloadable features |
US6564321B2 (en) * | 1995-04-28 | 2003-05-13 | Bobo Ii Charles R | Systems and methods for storing, delivering, and managing messages |
US20050204384A1 (en) * | 1994-08-31 | 2005-09-15 | Gemstar Development Corporation | Method and apparatus for displaying television programs and related text |
US6604103B1 (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 2003-08-05 | Mark A. Wolfe | System and method for information retrieval employing a preloading procedure |
US7467137B1 (en) | 1994-09-02 | 2008-12-16 | Wolfe Mark A | System and method for information retrieval employing a preloading procedure |
US6415307B2 (en) * | 1994-10-24 | 2002-07-02 | P2I Limited | Publication file conversion and display |
DE4440598C1 (en) | 1994-11-14 | 1996-05-23 | Siemens Ag | World Wide Web hypertext information highway navigator controlled by spoken word |
US6269392B1 (en) * | 1994-11-15 | 2001-07-31 | Christian Cotichini | Method and apparatus to monitor and locate an electronic device using a secured intelligent agent |
US5715174A (en) | 1994-11-15 | 1998-02-03 | Absolute Software Corporation | Security apparatus and method |
JP2809341B2 (en) | 1994-11-18 | 1998-10-08 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Information summarizing method, information summarizing device, weighting method, and teletext receiving device. |
US6571279B1 (en) * | 1997-12-05 | 2003-05-27 | Pinpoint Incorporated | Location enhanced information delivery system |
US8799461B2 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2014-08-05 | Apple Inc. | System for collecting, analyzing, and transmitting information relevant to transportation networks |
US5758257A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1998-05-26 | Herz; Frederick | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US9832610B2 (en) | 1994-11-29 | 2017-11-28 | Apple Inc. | System for collecting, analyzing, and transmitting information relevant to transportation networks |
US6460036B1 (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 2002-10-01 | Pinpoint Incorporated | System and method for providing customized electronic newspapers and target advertisements |
US6029195A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 2000-02-22 | Herz; Frederick S. M. | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
FI946209A0 (en) * | 1994-12-30 | 1994-12-30 | Nokia Telecommunications Oy | Foerfarande Foer jaemfoerande av attributvaerden hos kontrollerbara objektuttryck i ett naetelement |
EP0953920A3 (en) | 1995-01-23 | 2005-06-29 | BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company | Method and/or systems for accessing information |
US6157721A (en) | 1996-08-12 | 2000-12-05 | Intertrust Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods using cryptography to protect secure computing environments |
US5892900A (en) | 1996-08-30 | 1999-04-06 | Intertrust Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
US6948070B1 (en) * | 1995-02-13 | 2005-09-20 | Intertrust Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
WO1996027155A2 (en) * | 1995-02-13 | 1996-09-06 | Electronic Publishing Resources, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
US7095854B1 (en) * | 1995-02-13 | 2006-08-22 | Intertrust Technologies Corp. | Systems and methods for secure transaction management and electronic rights protection |
WO1996027983A1 (en) * | 1995-03-07 | 1996-09-12 | Interval Research Corporation | System and method for selective recording of information |
US5880768A (en) * | 1995-04-06 | 1999-03-09 | Prevue Networks, Inc. | Interactive program guide systems and processes |
EP0826181A4 (en) | 1995-04-11 | 2005-02-09 | Kinetech Inc | Identifying data in a data processing system |
US6321208B1 (en) * | 1995-04-19 | 2001-11-20 | Brightstreet.Com, Inc. | Method and system for electronic distribution of product redemption coupons |
US6535732B1 (en) * | 1995-05-04 | 2003-03-18 | Interwave Communications International, Ltd. | Cellular network having a concentrated base transceiver station and a plurality of remote transceivers |
GB2300991B (en) * | 1995-05-15 | 1997-11-05 | Andrew Macgregor Ritchie | Serving signals to browsing clients |
GB9526304D0 (en) * | 1995-05-22 | 1996-02-21 | British Sky Broadcasting Ltd | Interactive services interface |
US7302638B1 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2007-11-27 | Wolfe Mark A | Efficiently displaying and researching information about the interrelationships between documents |
US6769128B1 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2004-07-27 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Electronic television program guide schedule system and method with data feed access |
US7246310B1 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2007-07-17 | Wolfe Mark A | Efficiently displaying and researching information about the interrelationships between documents |
KR100394515B1 (en) * | 1995-06-09 | 2004-07-27 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | Information processing systems and methods by which a user withdraws specific information items from a set of information items |
US7917386B2 (en) * | 1995-06-16 | 2011-03-29 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | Virtual couponing method and apparatus for use with consumer kiosk |
US5742845A (en) | 1995-06-22 | 1998-04-21 | Datascape, Inc. | System for extending present open network communication protocols to communicate with non-standard I/O devices directly coupled to an open network |
JP2002083219A (en) * | 2000-07-04 | 2002-03-22 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc | In-content advertisement method, server for in-content advertisement, and transfer medium of program for realizing in-content advertisement |
US8574074B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2013-11-05 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Advertising impression determination |
US7895076B2 (en) | 1995-06-30 | 2011-02-22 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Advertisement insertion, profiling, impression, and feedback |
US6026368A (en) * | 1995-07-17 | 2000-02-15 | 24/7 Media, Inc. | On-line interactive system and method for providing content and advertising information to a targeted set of viewers |
US20020178051A1 (en) | 1995-07-25 | 2002-11-28 | Thomas G. Scavone | Interactive marketing network and process using electronic certificates |
US5907836A (en) * | 1995-07-31 | 1999-05-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Information filtering apparatus for selecting predetermined article from plural articles to present selected article to user, and method therefore |
US8850477B2 (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 2014-09-30 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | Systems and methods for linking television viewers with advertisers and broadcasters |
US6732369B1 (en) | 1995-10-02 | 2004-05-04 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | Systems and methods for contextually linking television program information |
US6388714B1 (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 2002-05-14 | Starsight Telecast Inc | Interactive computer system for providing television schedule information |
US6323911B1 (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 2001-11-27 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | System and method for using television schedule information |
US5673430A (en) * | 1995-10-13 | 1997-09-30 | At&T | System and method for optimizing subscriber programming preferences |
US8037158B2 (en) * | 1995-11-13 | 2011-10-11 | Lakshmi Arunachalam | Multimedia transactional services |
US8271339B2 (en) * | 1995-11-13 | 2012-09-18 | Lakshmi Arunachalam | Method and apparatus for enabling real-time bi-directional transactions on a network |
US7930340B2 (en) * | 1995-11-13 | 2011-04-19 | Lakshmi Arunachalam | Network transaction portal to control multi-service provider transactions |
AU708570B2 (en) * | 1995-11-24 | 1999-08-05 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Two-way data communication method and two-way data communication apparatus using the same |
JP3040945B2 (en) * | 1995-11-29 | 2000-05-15 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Document search device |
US5790785A (en) | 1995-12-11 | 1998-08-04 | Customer Communications Group, Inc. | World Wide Web registration information processing system |
US6591245B1 (en) * | 1996-02-02 | 2003-07-08 | John R. Klug | Media content notification via communications network |
US6615251B1 (en) * | 1995-12-11 | 2003-09-02 | John R. Klug | Method for providing node targeted content in an addressable network |
US5956027A (en) * | 1995-12-12 | 1999-09-21 | At&T Corp | Method and apparatus for sharing a web page |
JP3612125B2 (en) * | 1995-12-14 | 2005-01-19 | 株式会社東芝 | Information filtering method and information filtering apparatus |
US5778367A (en) | 1995-12-14 | 1998-07-07 | Network Engineering Software, Inc. | Automated on-line information service and directory, particularly for the world wide web |
US5978766A (en) * | 1995-12-20 | 1999-11-02 | Starwave Corporation | Machine, method and medium for assisted selection of information from a choice space |
US6675384B1 (en) * | 1995-12-21 | 2004-01-06 | Robert S. Block | Method and apparatus for information labeling and control |
US5970469A (en) * | 1995-12-26 | 1999-10-19 | Supermarkets Online, Inc. | System and method for providing shopping aids and incentives to customers through a computer network |
US9519915B1 (en) * | 1996-12-23 | 2016-12-13 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | System and method for providing shopping aids and incentives to customer through a computer network |
JP2869373B2 (en) * | 1995-12-27 | 1999-03-10 | パイオニア株式会社 | Two-way distribution system |
AU1566597A (en) * | 1995-12-27 | 1997-08-11 | Gary B. Robinson | Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising |
US20050114218A1 (en) * | 1996-01-17 | 2005-05-26 | Privacy Infrastructure, Inc. | Third party privacy system |
US6119101A (en) | 1996-01-17 | 2000-09-12 | Personal Agents, Inc. | Intelligent agents for electronic commerce |
US6205249B1 (en) | 1998-04-02 | 2001-03-20 | Scott A. Moskowitz | Multiple transform utilization and applications for secure digital watermarking |
US7664263B2 (en) | 1998-03-24 | 2010-02-16 | Moskowitz Scott A | Method for combining transfer functions with predetermined key creation |
US9530150B2 (en) | 1996-01-19 | 2016-12-27 | Adcension, Llc | Compensation model for network services |
US6264560B1 (en) | 1996-01-19 | 2001-07-24 | Sheldon F. Goldberg | Method and system for playing games on a network |
US5823879A (en) * | 1996-01-19 | 1998-10-20 | Sheldon F. Goldberg | Network gaming system |
US5931907A (en) * | 1996-01-23 | 1999-08-03 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Software agent for comparing locally accessible keywords with meta-information and having pointers associated with distributed information |
US6065047A (en) * | 1996-01-24 | 2000-05-16 | America Online, Inc. | System for providing subscriber with access to a content area customized for the combination of subscriber's responses to topic prompt, subtopic prompt, and action prompt |
US7035914B1 (en) | 1996-01-26 | 2006-04-25 | Simpleair Holdings, Inc. | System and method for transmission of data |
US6343115B1 (en) * | 1996-02-13 | 2002-01-29 | At&T Corp | Method of announcing an internet call |
US6047327A (en) * | 1996-02-16 | 2000-04-04 | Intel Corporation | System for distributing electronic information to a targeted group of users |
GB9603263D0 (en) * | 1996-02-16 | 1996-04-17 | British Telecomm | Receiver control |
US6076109A (en) * | 1996-04-10 | 2000-06-13 | Lextron, Systems, Inc. | Simplified-file hyper text protocol |
US6014137A (en) | 1996-02-27 | 2000-01-11 | Multimedia Adventures | Electronic kiosk authoring system |
US6553410B2 (en) | 1996-02-27 | 2003-04-22 | Inpro Licensing Sarl | Tailoring data and transmission protocol for efficient interactive data transactions over wide-area networks |
US20040019610A1 (en) * | 1996-02-27 | 2004-01-29 | Burns Kevin S. | Portal information delivery system for personal computers and SOHO computer systems |
JPH11506250A (en) * | 1996-03-04 | 1999-06-02 | フィリップス エレクトロニクス ネムローゼ フェンノートシャップ | User-oriented multimedia presentation system |
CA2251687C (en) * | 1996-03-15 | 2006-05-09 | E Guide, Inc. | Combination of vcr index and epg |
US5863208A (en) | 1996-07-02 | 1999-01-26 | Ho; Chi Fai | Learning system and method based on review |
US6139330A (en) * | 1996-03-19 | 2000-10-31 | Ho; Chi Fai | Computer-aided learning system and method |
US6688888B1 (en) | 1996-03-19 | 2004-02-10 | Chi Fai Ho | Computer-aided learning system and method |
US6035330A (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 2000-03-07 | British Telecommunications | World wide web navigational mapping system and method |
JP2800769B2 (en) * | 1996-03-29 | 1998-09-21 | 日本電気株式会社 | Information filtering method |
US5901287A (en) * | 1996-04-01 | 1999-05-04 | The Sabre Group Inc. | Information aggregation and synthesization system |
US5995943A (en) * | 1996-04-01 | 1999-11-30 | Sabre Inc. | Information aggregation and synthesization system |
US8006260B2 (en) | 1996-04-01 | 2011-08-23 | Gemstar Development Corporation | Apparatus and method for parental control using V-chip plus+ and master password |
US7028088B1 (en) * | 1996-04-03 | 2006-04-11 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | System and method for providing statistics for flexible billing in a cable environment |
US5940073A (en) | 1996-05-03 | 1999-08-17 | Starsight Telecast Inc. | Method and system for displaying other information in a TV program guide |
US6945457B1 (en) | 1996-05-10 | 2005-09-20 | Transaction Holdings Ltd. L.L.C. | Automated transaction machine |
JP3108015B2 (en) * | 1996-05-22 | 2000-11-13 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Hypertext search device |
US7110956B1 (en) * | 1996-05-28 | 2006-09-19 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Capability predictor |
US6014638A (en) * | 1996-05-29 | 2000-01-11 | America Online, Inc. | System for customizing computer displays in accordance with user preferences |
US6034689A (en) * | 1996-06-03 | 2000-03-07 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | Web browser allowing navigation between hypertext objects using remote control |
WO1997046962A1 (en) * | 1996-06-07 | 1997-12-11 | At & T Corp. | Finding an e-mail message to which another e-mail message is a response |
US6151643A (en) | 1996-06-07 | 2000-11-21 | Networks Associates, Inc. | Automatic updating of diverse software products on multiple client computer systems by downloading scanning application to client computer and generating software list on client computer |
US7774230B2 (en) | 1996-06-10 | 2010-08-10 | Phoenix Licensing, Llc | System, method, and computer program product for selecting and presenting financial products and services |
US6999938B1 (en) | 1996-06-10 | 2006-02-14 | Libman Richard M | Automated reply generation direct marketing system |
CA2257537C (en) * | 1996-06-11 | 2005-01-25 | Yeong Kuang Oon | Iterative problem solving technique |
WO1997048230A1 (en) * | 1996-06-13 | 1997-12-18 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | Method and apparatus for searching a guide using program characteristics |
JP3937475B2 (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 2007-06-27 | キヤノン株式会社 | Access control system and method |
US5801787A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 1998-09-01 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | Television schedule system and method of operation for multiple program occurrences |
US5926812A (en) * | 1996-06-20 | 1999-07-20 | Mantra Technologies, Inc. | Document extraction and comparison method with applications to automatic personalized database searching |
CA2185053C (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 2002-04-16 | Frank B. Norman | Interactive reverse channel for direct broadcast satellite system |
US7770230B2 (en) * | 2002-04-22 | 2010-08-03 | Arvato Digital Services Canada, Inc. | System for dynamically encrypting content for secure internet commerce and providing embedded fulfillment software |
US5918236A (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 1999-06-29 | Oracle Corporation | Point of view gists and generic gists in a document browsing system |
US6298120B1 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2001-10-02 | At&T Corp. | Intelligent processing for establishing communication over the internet |
US7010697B2 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2006-03-07 | Protexis, Inc. | System for dynamically encrypting information for secure internet commerce and providing embedded fulfillment software |
DK0932398T3 (en) * | 1996-06-28 | 2006-09-25 | Ortho Mcneil Pharm Inc | Use of topiramate or derivatives thereof for the manufacture of a medicament for the treatment of manic depressive bipolar disorders |
US7146327B1 (en) * | 1996-07-01 | 2006-12-05 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Electronic publication distribution method and system |
US7177429B2 (en) | 2000-12-07 | 2007-02-13 | Blue Spike, Inc. | System and methods for permitting open access to data objects and for securing data within the data objects |
US7159116B2 (en) | 1999-12-07 | 2007-01-02 | Blue Spike, Inc. | Systems, methods and devices for trusted transactions |
US7346472B1 (en) | 2000-09-07 | 2008-03-18 | Blue Spike, Inc. | Method and device for monitoring and analyzing signals |
JP3131564B2 (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 2001-02-05 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Broadcasting system, service providing device, and receiving terminal device |
US6457004B1 (en) * | 1997-07-03 | 2002-09-24 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Document retrieval assisting method, system and service using closely displayed areas for titles and topics |
US6115712A (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 2000-09-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Mechanism for combining data analysis algorithms with databases on the internet |
US6092105A (en) * | 1996-07-12 | 2000-07-18 | Intraware, Inc. | System and method for vending retail software and other sets of information to end users |
US6463416B1 (en) * | 1996-07-15 | 2002-10-08 | Intelli-Check, Inc. | Authentication system for identification documents |
US6026387A (en) * | 1996-07-15 | 2000-02-15 | Kesel; Brad | Consumer comment reporting apparatus and method |
US5862223A (en) * | 1996-07-24 | 1999-01-19 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce |
US7225142B1 (en) * | 1996-08-01 | 2007-05-29 | At&T Corp. | Interactive multimedia advertising and electronic commerce on a hypertext network |
US6732112B1 (en) * | 1996-08-02 | 2004-05-04 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Network system |
JPH1056632A (en) * | 1996-08-07 | 1998-02-24 | Toshiba Corp | Broadcast system and broadcast receiver |
CA2183280C (en) * | 1996-08-14 | 2009-04-14 | Rob Menard | Centralized broadcast channel real-time search system |
US6118492A (en) * | 1996-08-14 | 2000-09-12 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | Guide system and method of operation |
US5933811A (en) | 1996-08-20 | 1999-08-03 | Paul D. Angles | System and method for delivering customized advertisements within interactive communication systems |
US6601103B1 (en) * | 1996-08-22 | 2003-07-29 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing personalized supplemental programming |
WO1998010589A1 (en) * | 1996-09-03 | 1998-03-12 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | Schedule system with enhanced recording capability |
US5905862A (en) * | 1996-09-04 | 1999-05-18 | Intel Corporation | Automatic web site registration with multiple search engines |
US6144973A (en) * | 1996-09-06 | 2000-11-07 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Document requesting system and method of receiving related document in advance |
US20040199402A1 (en) * | 1996-09-06 | 2004-10-07 | Walker Jay S. | Method and system for anonymous communication of information about a home |
US6119114A (en) * | 1996-09-17 | 2000-09-12 | Smadja; Frank | Method and apparatus for dynamic relevance ranking |
US6173298B1 (en) * | 1996-09-17 | 2001-01-09 | Asap, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for implementing a dynamic collocation dictionary |
JP4025379B2 (en) * | 1996-09-17 | 2007-12-19 | 株式会社ニューズウオッチ | Search system |
US6314392B1 (en) * | 1996-09-20 | 2001-11-06 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for clustering-based signal segmentation |
US5933827A (en) * | 1996-09-25 | 1999-08-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for identifying new web pages of interest to a user |
US6195657B1 (en) * | 1996-09-26 | 2001-02-27 | Imana, Inc. | Software, method and apparatus for efficient categorization and recommendation of subjects according to multidimensional semantics |
US20060280437A1 (en) * | 1999-01-27 | 2006-12-14 | Gotuit Media Corp | Methods and apparatus for vending and delivering the content of disk recordings |
US7055166B1 (en) * | 1996-10-03 | 2006-05-30 | Gotuit Media Corp. | Apparatus and methods for broadcast monitoring |
US20020120925A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2002-08-29 | Logan James D. | Audio and video program recording, editing and playback systems using metadata |
US6199076B1 (en) * | 1996-10-02 | 2001-03-06 | James Logan | Audio program player including a dynamic program selection controller |
US20030093790A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2003-05-15 | Logan James D. | Audio and video program recording, editing and playback systems using metadata |
US6029182A (en) * | 1996-10-04 | 2000-02-22 | Canon Information Systems, Inc. | System for generating a custom formatted hypertext document by using a personal profile to retrieve hierarchical documents |
US6049332A (en) * | 1996-10-07 | 2000-04-11 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for the scheduling and ordering of elements in a multimedia environment |
US6198906B1 (en) * | 1996-10-07 | 2001-03-06 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for performing broadcast operations |
US5960407A (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 1999-09-28 | Vivona; Robert G. | Automated market price analysis system |
US6016475A (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 2000-01-18 | The Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | System, method, and article of manufacture for generating implicit ratings based on receiver operating curves |
US6006252A (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 1999-12-21 | Wolfe; Mark A. | System and method for communicating information relating to a network resource |
US6108493A (en) * | 1996-10-08 | 2000-08-22 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | System, method, and article of manufacture for utilizing implicit ratings in collaborative filters |
US6078667A (en) * | 1996-10-10 | 2000-06-20 | Certicom Corp. | Generating unique and unpredictable values |
US6144755A (en) * | 1996-10-11 | 2000-11-07 | Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. (Ita) | Method and apparatus for determining poses |
US6707580B1 (en) | 1996-10-15 | 2004-03-16 | E-Mate Enterprises, Llc | Facsimile to E-mail communication system with local interface |
US20030005463A1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2003-01-02 | Douglas B Macrae | Access to internet data through a television system |
US5842199A (en) * | 1996-10-18 | 1998-11-24 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | System, method and article of manufacture for using receiver operating curves to evaluate predictive utility |
JPH10187525A (en) * | 1996-10-28 | 1998-07-21 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Proxy information acquisition device and information transfer management device |
US5948061A (en) | 1996-10-29 | 1999-09-07 | Double Click, Inc. | Method of delivery, targeting, and measuring advertising over networks |
US6243375B1 (en) * | 1996-11-08 | 2001-06-05 | Gregory J. Speicher | Internet-audiotext electronic communications system with multimedia based matching |
US6282515B1 (en) * | 1996-11-08 | 2001-08-28 | Gregory J. Speicher | Integrated audiotext-internet personal ad services |
JPH10198706A (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 1998-07-31 | Digital Vision Lab:Kk | Information retrieval device, and method therefor |
JP3655714B2 (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 2005-06-02 | 株式会社ニューズウオッチ | Information filtering apparatus and recording medium |
US5801747A (en) * | 1996-11-15 | 1998-09-01 | Hyundai Electronics America | Method and apparatus for creating a television viewer profile |
US6453302B1 (en) * | 1996-11-25 | 2002-09-17 | Clear With Computers, Inc. | Computer generated presentation system |
JP4223578B2 (en) * | 1996-11-29 | 2009-02-12 | ソニー株式会社 | Keyword generation method and apparatus |
US6498921B1 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2002-12-24 | Chi Fai Ho | Method and system to answer a natural-language question |
US5836771A (en) | 1996-12-02 | 1998-11-17 | Ho; Chi Fai | Learning method and system based on questioning |
US6263507B1 (en) * | 1996-12-05 | 2001-07-17 | Interval Research Corporation | Browser for use in navigating a body of information, with particular application to browsing information represented by audiovisual data |
US5893062A (en) | 1996-12-05 | 1999-04-06 | Interval Research Corporation | Variable rate video playback with synchronized audio |
US5966444A (en) * | 1996-12-06 | 1999-10-12 | Yuan; Chuan K. | Method and system for establishing a cryptographic key agreement using linear protocols |
US5931901A (en) * | 1996-12-09 | 1999-08-03 | Robert L. Wolfe | Programmed music on demand from the internet |
US20030066085A1 (en) * | 1996-12-10 | 2003-04-03 | United Video Properties, Inc., A Corporation Of Delaware | Internet television program guide system |
US7607147B1 (en) * | 1996-12-11 | 2009-10-20 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Interactive service device metering systems |
AU766568B2 (en) * | 1996-12-11 | 2003-10-16 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | A metering system |
US6184877B1 (en) * | 1996-12-11 | 2001-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for interactively accessing program information on a television |
US20060195595A1 (en) | 2003-12-19 | 2006-08-31 | Mendez Daniel J | System and method for globally and securely accessing unified information in a computer network |
US7287271B1 (en) | 1997-04-08 | 2007-10-23 | Visto Corporation | System and method for enabling secure access to services in a computer network |
JP3677907B2 (en) | 1996-12-13 | 2005-08-03 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Information transmission / reception method and system using the same |
US6708221B1 (en) | 1996-12-13 | 2004-03-16 | Visto Corporation | System and method for globally and securely accessing unified information in a computer network |
US7039928B2 (en) * | 1996-12-13 | 2006-05-02 | Access Co., Ltd. | Method and device for obtaining audience data on TV program |
JP3841233B2 (en) * | 1996-12-18 | 2006-11-01 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and information processing method |
US6687906B1 (en) | 1996-12-19 | 2004-02-03 | Index Systems, Inc. | EPG with advertising inserts |
US6761657B2 (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 2004-07-13 | Cloyes Gear And Products, Inc. | Roller chain sprocket with added chordal pitch reduction |
US6177931B1 (en) | 1996-12-19 | 2001-01-23 | Index Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for displaying and recording control interface with television programs, video, advertising information and program scheduling information |
US8635649B2 (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 2014-01-21 | Gemstar Development Corporation | System and method for modifying advertisement responsive to EPG information |
US6381741B1 (en) | 1998-05-18 | 2002-04-30 | Liberate Technologies | Secure data downloading, recovery and upgrading |
DE69715040T2 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2003-05-08 | Princeton Video Image Inc | ADAPTER FOR TARGETED ELECTRONIC INSERTION OF CHARACTERS IN VIDEO SIGNALS |
EP2202972A3 (en) * | 1996-12-20 | 2012-05-02 | Irdeto B.V. | System and method for delivering data over a data broadcasting system to specially targeted audiences |
US5991799A (en) | 1996-12-20 | 1999-11-23 | Liberate Technologies | Information retrieval system using an internet multiplexer to focus user selection |
US6604242B1 (en) * | 1998-05-18 | 2003-08-05 | Liberate Technologies | Combining television broadcast and personalized/interactive information |
US6138142A (en) | 1996-12-20 | 2000-10-24 | Intel Corporation | Method for providing customized Web information based on attributes of the requester |
US6256785B1 (en) * | 1996-12-23 | 2001-07-03 | Corporate Media Patners | Method and system for providing interactive look-and-feel in a digital broadcast via an X-Y protocol |
US5931908A (en) * | 1996-12-23 | 1999-08-03 | The Walt Disney Corporation | Visual object present within live programming as an actionable event for user selection of alternate programming wherein the actionable event is selected by human operator at a head end for distributed data and programming |
WO1998029974A1 (en) * | 1996-12-25 | 1998-07-09 | Sony Corporation | Game machine system, broadcasting system, data distribution system and its method, and program executing device and its method |
US6678683B1 (en) * | 1996-12-27 | 2004-01-13 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Document management system using an access-limited character train and password, and a method and computer-readable medium therefor |
US7031441B1 (en) * | 1996-12-30 | 2006-04-18 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for supporting on-demand connectivity for network applications |
US6411696B1 (en) * | 1996-12-31 | 2002-06-25 | Intel Corporation | System for finding a user with a preferred communication mechanism |
WO1998029818A1 (en) | 1996-12-31 | 1998-07-09 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for analyzing online user typing to determine or verify facts |
US6163316A (en) * | 1997-01-03 | 2000-12-19 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Electronic programming system and method |
WO1998031114A1 (en) * | 1997-01-06 | 1998-07-16 | Bellsouth Corporation | Method and system for tracking network use |
US20060031882A1 (en) * | 1997-01-06 | 2006-02-09 | Swix Scott R | Systems, methods, and devices for customizing content-access lists |
US7587323B2 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2009-09-08 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method for developing tailored content |
US20060253884A1 (en) * | 1997-01-06 | 2006-11-09 | Gray James H | Methods and systems for network based capture of television viewer generated clickstreams |
US7617508B2 (en) * | 2003-12-12 | 2009-11-10 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods and systems for collaborative capture of television viewer generated clickstreams |
US8640160B2 (en) * | 1997-01-06 | 2014-01-28 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method and system for providing targeted advertisements |
US20100257037A1 (en) * | 2001-12-14 | 2010-10-07 | Matz William R | Method and system for targeted incentives |
US6983478B1 (en) | 2000-02-01 | 2006-01-03 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Method and system for tracking network use |
US20060075456A1 (en) * | 1997-01-06 | 2006-04-06 | Gray James Harold | Methods and systems for collaborative capture of television viewer generated clickstreams |
US8677384B2 (en) | 2003-12-12 | 2014-03-18 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods and systems for network based capture of television viewer generated clickstreams |
US7802276B2 (en) * | 1997-01-06 | 2010-09-21 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Systems, methods and products for assessing subscriber content access |
US7020652B2 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2006-03-28 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corp. | System and method for customizing content-access lists |
EP0852351A3 (en) * | 1997-01-07 | 2001-09-26 | Fujitsu Limited | Entrance, cross-referencing and branching systems for computer networks |
US7269587B1 (en) | 1997-01-10 | 2007-09-11 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Scoring documents in a linked database |
US6285999B1 (en) | 1997-01-10 | 2001-09-04 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Method for node ranking in a linked database |
US6076166A (en) * | 1997-01-17 | 2000-06-13 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | Personalizing hospital intranet web sites |
US6175831B1 (en) * | 1997-01-17 | 2001-01-16 | Six Degrees, Inc. | Method and apparatus for constructing a networking database and system |
US8364541B2 (en) * | 1997-01-22 | 2013-01-29 | Beh Investments Llc | System and method for real-time bidding for internet advertising space |
US6049821A (en) * | 1997-01-24 | 2000-04-11 | Motorola, Inc. | Proxy host computer and method for accessing and retrieving information between a browser and a proxy |
US5950200A (en) * | 1997-01-24 | 1999-09-07 | Gil S. Sudai | Method and apparatus for detection of reciprocal interests or feelings and subsequent notification |
US6366956B1 (en) | 1997-01-29 | 2002-04-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Relevance access of Internet information services |
US5978799A (en) * | 1997-01-30 | 1999-11-02 | Hirsch; G. Scott | Search engine including query database, user profile database, information templates and email facility |
AUPO489297A0 (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 1997-02-27 | Aunty Abha's Electronic Publishing Pty Ltd | A system for electronic publishing |
US7293228B1 (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 2007-11-06 | Timebase Pty Limited | Maltweb multi-axis viewing interface and higher level scoping |
US6128663A (en) | 1997-02-11 | 2000-10-03 | Invention Depot, Inc. | Method and apparatus for customization of information content provided to a requestor over a network using demographic information yet the user remains anonymous to the server |
EP1486891A3 (en) * | 1997-02-12 | 2005-03-09 | Kokusai Denshin Denwa Co., Ltd | Document retrieval apparatus |
US7236969B1 (en) | 1999-07-08 | 2007-06-26 | Nortel Networks Limited | Associative search engine |
US7212632B2 (en) | 1998-02-13 | 2007-05-01 | Tecsec, Inc. | Cryptographic key split combiner |
US6252597B1 (en) * | 1997-02-14 | 2001-06-26 | Netscape Communications Corporation | Scalable user interface for graphically representing hierarchical data |
US6750881B1 (en) | 1997-02-24 | 2004-06-15 | America Online, Inc. | User definable on-line co-user lists |
US5999919A (en) * | 1997-02-26 | 1999-12-07 | At&T | Efficient micropayment system |
US7529856B2 (en) | 1997-03-05 | 2009-05-05 | At Home Corporation | Delivering multimedia services |
US6370571B1 (en) | 1997-03-05 | 2002-04-09 | At Home Corporation | System and method for delivering high-performance online multimedia services |
US5819258A (en) * | 1997-03-07 | 1998-10-06 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatically generating hierarchical categories from large document collections |
US6128653A (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2000-10-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for communication media commands and media data using the HTTP protocol |
JP3173411B2 (en) * | 1997-03-17 | 2001-06-04 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Related document search device and recording medium storing related document search program |
US5913030A (en) * | 1997-03-18 | 1999-06-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for client/server communications with user information revealed as a function of willingness to reveal and whether the information is required |
IL131949A (en) * | 1997-03-21 | 2004-06-20 | Canal Plus Sa | Broadcast and reception system, and conditional access system therefor |
US6421733B1 (en) * | 1997-03-25 | 2002-07-16 | Intel Corporation | System for dynamically transcoding data transmitted between computers |
US6449653B2 (en) | 1997-03-25 | 2002-09-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Interleaved multiple multimedia stream for synchronized transmission over a computer network |
US6742047B1 (en) * | 1997-03-27 | 2004-05-25 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamically filtering network content |
US6356948B1 (en) * | 1997-03-28 | 2002-03-12 | Aspect Communications Corp | Method and apparatus for managing data |
US7490169B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2009-02-10 | West Corporation | Providing a presentation on a network having a plurality of synchronized media types |
US6714975B1 (en) * | 1997-03-31 | 2004-03-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for targeted advertising on the web based on accumulated self-learning data, clustering users and semantic node graph techniques |
US7143177B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2006-11-28 | West Corporation | Providing a presentation on a network having a plurality of synchronized media types |
US7412533B1 (en) | 1997-03-31 | 2008-08-12 | West Corporation | Providing a presentation on a network having a plurality of synchronized media types |
WO1998044733A1 (en) * | 1997-03-31 | 1998-10-08 | Broadband Associates | Method and system for providing a presentation on a network |
US6138128A (en) * | 1997-04-02 | 2000-10-24 | Microsoft Corp. | Sharing and organizing world wide web references using distinctive characters |
US6141007A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 2000-10-31 | Avid Technology, Inc. | Newsroom user interface including multiple panel workspaces |
US5907831A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 1999-05-25 | Lotvin; Mikhail | Computer apparatus and methods supporting different categories of users |
US6038573A (en) * | 1997-04-04 | 2000-03-14 | Avid Technology, Inc. | News story markup language and system and process for editing and processing documents |
US6014696A (en) * | 1997-04-07 | 2000-01-11 | Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation | Method of restricting data access to WWW server so as to permit specific user to refer to successive pages while entrance page is freely acquired by any user |
US6115718A (en) * | 1998-04-01 | 2000-09-05 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for predicting document access in a collection of linked documents featuring link proprabilities and spreading activation |
US6272507B1 (en) * | 1997-04-09 | 2001-08-07 | Xerox Corporation | System for ranking search results from a collection of documents using spreading activation techniques |
US5835905A (en) * | 1997-04-09 | 1998-11-10 | Xerox Corporation | System for predicting documents relevant to focus documents by spreading activation through network representations of a linked collection of documents |
US5895470A (en) * | 1997-04-09 | 1999-04-20 | Xerox Corporation | System for categorizing documents in a linked collection of documents |
US5893091A (en) * | 1997-04-11 | 1999-04-06 | Immediata Corporation | Multicasting with key words |
US6119164A (en) * | 1997-04-15 | 2000-09-12 | Full Circle Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for distributing over a network unsolicited information to a targeted audience |
EP0976069B1 (en) * | 1997-04-16 | 2003-01-29 | BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS public limited company | Data summariser |
US9113122B2 (en) | 1997-04-21 | 2015-08-18 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Method and apparatus for time-shifting video and text in a text-enhanced television program |
US6044376A (en) * | 1997-04-24 | 2000-03-28 | Imgis, Inc. | Content stream analysis |
US7251784B2 (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 2007-07-31 | Winslowhouse International, Inc. | Supplying supplementary information for printed books |
US6034680A (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 2000-03-07 | Foundation For Concepts In Education, Inc. | Supplying supplementary information for printed books |
US6006222A (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 1999-12-21 | Culliss; Gary | Method for organizing information |
US7155677B2 (en) * | 1997-04-25 | 2006-12-26 | Diane Kessenich | Portal for supplying supplementary information for printed books |
US5990883A (en) * | 1997-04-28 | 1999-11-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Unified presentation of programming from different physical sources |
US8065701B2 (en) * | 1997-04-30 | 2011-11-22 | Sony Corporation | Information broadcasting method, information broadcasting system, and receiving apparatus for transmitting data other than program through digital broadcasting |
US5924090A (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 1999-07-13 | Northern Light Technology Llc | Method and apparatus for searching a database of records |
US5937160A (en) * | 1997-05-01 | 1999-08-10 | Reedy Creek Technologies, Inc. | Systems, methods and computer program products for updating hypertext documents via electronic mail |
US5878223A (en) * | 1997-05-07 | 1999-03-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for predictive caching of information pages |
US6694433B1 (en) * | 1997-05-08 | 2004-02-17 | Tecsec, Inc. | XML encryption scheme |
US7631188B2 (en) * | 1997-05-16 | 2009-12-08 | Tvworks, Llc | Hierarchical open security information delegation and acquisition |
US6400371B1 (en) | 1997-05-16 | 2002-06-04 | Liberate Technologies | Television signal chrominance adjustment |
US6513116B1 (en) | 1997-05-16 | 2003-01-28 | Liberate Technologies | Security information acquisition |
US6480486B2 (en) * | 1997-05-21 | 2002-11-12 | Lextron Systems, Inc. | Micro-localized internet service center |
US8626763B1 (en) | 1997-05-22 | 2014-01-07 | Google Inc. | Server-side suggestion of preload operations |
US7484172B2 (en) | 1997-05-23 | 2009-01-27 | Walker Digital, Llc | System and method for providing a customized index with hyper-footnotes |
US6377963B1 (en) * | 1997-05-23 | 2002-04-23 | Walker Digital, Llc | Method and system for attaching customized indexes to periodicals |
US6026148A (en) * | 1997-05-28 | 2000-02-15 | Blue Grotto Technologies, Inc. | System and method for delivering expert information by computer |
SE9702088D0 (en) * | 1997-06-02 | 1997-06-02 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Method and device for telecommunication |
US6604090B1 (en) * | 1997-06-04 | 2003-08-05 | Nativeminds, Inc. | System and method for selecting responses to user input in an automated interface program |
US6314410B1 (en) | 1997-06-04 | 2001-11-06 | Nativeminds, Inc. | System and method for identifying the context of a statement made to a virtual robot |
US6189043B1 (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 2001-02-13 | At&T Corp | Dynamic cache replication in a internet environment through routers and servers utilizing a reverse tree generation |
US5983227A (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 1999-11-09 | Yahoo, Inc. | Dynamic page generator |
US20030040962A1 (en) * | 1997-06-12 | 2003-02-27 | Lewis William H. | System and data management and on-demand rental and purchase of digital data products |
US6052122A (en) | 1997-06-13 | 2000-04-18 | Tele-Publishing, Inc. | Method and apparatus for matching registered profiles |
US5956701A (en) * | 1997-06-13 | 1999-09-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for using an artificial neural net for image map processing |
US7039599B2 (en) * | 1997-06-16 | 2006-05-02 | Doubleclick Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatic placement of advertising |
US6047277A (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2000-04-04 | Parry; Michael H. | Self-organizing neural network for plain text categorization |
US6353929B1 (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 2002-03-05 | One River Worldtrek, Inc. | Cooperative system for measuring electronic media |
US6012053A (en) * | 1997-06-23 | 2000-01-04 | Lycos, Inc. | Computer system with user-controlled relevance ranking of search results |
US7194424B2 (en) * | 1997-06-25 | 2007-03-20 | Intel Corporation | User demographic profile driven advertising targeting |
US5899995A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-05-04 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatically organizing information |
US5966705A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-10-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Tracking a user across both secure and non-secure areas on the Internet, wherein the users is initially tracked using a globally unique identifier |
US5870744A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-02-09 | Intel Corporation | Virtual people networking |
US8386363B2 (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2013-02-26 | Vehicular Networks Solutions, Inc. | Vehicular data exchange system and method therefor |
US5978776A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 1999-11-02 | Seretti; Harry | Vehicular data exchange system and method therefor |
US6816966B1 (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2004-11-09 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Techniques for securing data flow in internet multicasting |
US6061681A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2000-05-09 | Movo Media, Inc. | On-line dating service for locating and matching people based on user-selected search criteria |
IL121230A (en) * | 1997-07-03 | 2004-05-12 | Nds Ltd | Intelligent electronic program guide |
US20030088872A1 (en) * | 1997-07-03 | 2003-05-08 | Nds Limited | Advanced television system |
IL125141A0 (en) * | 1998-06-29 | 1999-01-26 | Nds Ltd | Advanced television system |
US6122658A (en) * | 1997-07-03 | 2000-09-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Custom localized information in a networked server for display to an end user |
US6345293B1 (en) | 1997-07-03 | 2002-02-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Personalized information for an end user transmitted over a computer network |
US6131110A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 2000-10-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for predicting user interest in unaccessed site by counting the number of links to the unaccessed sites in previously accessed sites |
US5895471A (en) | 1997-07-11 | 1999-04-20 | Unwired Planet, Inc. | Providing a directory of frequently used hyperlinks on a remote server |
US20050039177A1 (en) * | 1997-07-12 | 2005-02-17 | Trevor Burke Technology Limited | Method and apparatus for programme generation and presentation |
GB9714624D0 (en) * | 1997-07-12 | 1997-09-17 | Trevor Burke Technology Limite | Visual programme distribution system |
AU2003203839B2 (en) * | 1997-07-12 | 2005-10-27 | Trevor Burke Technology Limited | Programme generation |
GB0225339D0 (en) * | 2002-10-31 | 2002-12-11 | Trevor Burke Technology Ltd | Method and apparatus for programme generation and classification |
US20040070594A1 (en) * | 1997-07-12 | 2004-04-15 | Burke Trevor John | Method and apparatus for programme generation and classification |
EP1372339B1 (en) * | 1997-07-21 | 2014-06-18 | Gemstar Development Corporation | Systems and methods for displaying and recording control interfaces |
EP2330815A3 (en) * | 1997-07-21 | 2011-07-20 | Gemstar Development Corporation | Systems and methods for displaying and recording control interfaces |
CN1941863B (en) * | 1997-07-21 | 2011-06-29 | 骏升发展(美国)有限公司 | Method for displaying target advertisement to user in electronic program guide system |
US6760746B1 (en) * | 1999-09-01 | 2004-07-06 | Eric Schneider | Method, product, and apparatus for processing a data request |
US5950196A (en) * | 1997-07-25 | 1999-09-07 | Sovereign Hill Software, Inc. | Systems and methods for retrieving tabular data from textual sources |
JPH1155201A (en) | 1997-07-29 | 1999-02-26 | Sony Corp | Device, method and system for information processing and transmitting medium |
WO1999007142A1 (en) * | 1997-07-30 | 1999-02-11 | Index Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for audience monitoring |
US6078916A (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2000-06-20 | Culliss; Gary | Method for organizing information |
US6672775B1 (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2004-01-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cross-machine web page download and storage |
US6014665A (en) * | 1997-08-01 | 2000-01-11 | Culliss; Gary | Method for organizing information |
US6182068B1 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 2001-01-30 | Ask Jeeves, Inc. | Personalized search methods |
US6049783A (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2000-04-11 | Power Financial Group, Inc. | Interactive internet analysis method |
US20060020614A1 (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2006-01-26 | Kolawa Adam K | Method and apparatus for automated selection, organization, and recommendation of items based on user preference topography |
US6553404B2 (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2003-04-22 | Prn Corporation | Digital system |
US6236974B1 (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2001-05-22 | Parasoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for automated selection and organization of products including menus |
WO1999008194A1 (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 1999-02-18 | Pics Previews, Inc. | Digital department system |
US6370513B1 (en) * | 1997-08-08 | 2002-04-09 | Parasoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for automated selection, organization, and recommendation of items |
US7574649B1 (en) * | 1997-08-14 | 2009-08-11 | Keeboo Sarl | Book metaphor for modifying and enforcing sequential navigation of documents |
EP1027665A1 (en) * | 1997-09-02 | 2000-08-16 | Damon C. Torres | Automated content scheduler and displayer |
US6782370B1 (en) * | 1997-09-04 | 2004-08-24 | Cendant Publishing, Inc. | System and method for providing recommendation of goods or services based on recorded purchasing history |
JP4274689B2 (en) * | 1997-09-04 | 2009-06-10 | ブリティッシュ・テレコミュニケーションズ・パブリック・リミテッド・カンパニー | Method and system for selecting data sets |
US6148091A (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 2000-11-14 | The Identiscan Company, Llc | Apparatus for controlling the rental and sale of age-controlled merchandise and for controlling access to age-controlled services |
US6523741B1 (en) | 1997-09-05 | 2003-02-25 | Dimaria Peter C. | Apparatus for controlling the rental and sale of age-controlled merchandise and for controlling access to age-controlled services |
US5960411A (en) | 1997-09-12 | 1999-09-28 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network |
US7222087B1 (en) * | 1997-09-12 | 2007-05-22 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network |
US5983273A (en) * | 1997-09-16 | 1999-11-09 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing physical security for a user account and providing access to the user's environment and preferences |
EP1008260B1 (en) | 1997-09-18 | 2002-05-15 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Electronic-mail reminder for an internet television program guide |
US6119113A (en) * | 1997-09-18 | 2000-09-12 | U S West, Inc. | Method and system for efficiently searching a master database for a desired target without accessing the master database |
US6167397A (en) * | 1997-09-23 | 2000-12-26 | At&T Corporation | Method of clustering electronic documents in response to a search query |
US6564381B1 (en) * | 1997-09-26 | 2003-05-13 | Vxl Capitol Partners Corporation, Ltd. | Automatic digital information and content scheduling and barkering system |
US6085193A (en) * | 1997-09-29 | 2000-07-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for dynamically prefetching information via a server hierarchy |
US6161129A (en) * | 1997-09-30 | 2000-12-12 | At&T Corp. | Unlisted address messaging system |
JP3922482B2 (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 2007-05-30 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method |
US6594355B1 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2003-07-15 | Worldcom, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing real time execution of specific communications services in an intelligent network |
US6779030B1 (en) * | 1997-10-06 | 2004-08-17 | Worldcom, Inc. | Intelligent network |
US6604240B2 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2003-08-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive television program guide system with operator showcase |
US6393481B1 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2002-05-21 | Worldcom, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing real-time call processing services in an intelligent network |
US6363411B1 (en) | 1998-08-05 | 2002-03-26 | Mci Worldcom, Inc. | Intelligent network |
US7024450B1 (en) * | 1997-10-06 | 2006-04-04 | Mci, Inc. | Method and apparatus for deploying service modules among service nodes distributed in an intelligent network |
EP1021770A4 (en) * | 1997-10-06 | 2000-12-20 | Icontact Com Inc | System enabling a salesperson to chat with a customer browsing the salesperson's web site |
US6804711B1 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2004-10-12 | Mci, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing call processing services in an intelligent telecommunication network |
US6425005B1 (en) | 1997-10-06 | 2002-07-23 | Mci Worldcom, Inc. | Method and apparatus for managing local resources at service nodes in an intelligent network |
US6009442A (en) * | 1997-10-08 | 1999-12-28 | Caere Corporation | Computer-based document management system |
US7027568B1 (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2006-04-11 | Verizon Services Corp. | Personal message service with enhanced text to speech synthesis |
US6081840A (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 2000-06-27 | Zhao; Yan | Two-level content distribution system |
US6009410A (en) * | 1997-10-16 | 1999-12-28 | At&T Corporation | Method and system for presenting customized advertising to a user on the world wide web |
US6047234A (en) * | 1997-10-16 | 2000-04-04 | Navigation Technologies Corporation | System and method for updating, enhancing or refining a geographic database using feedback |
JP3198321B2 (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 2001-08-13 | 富士通株式会社 | Electronic communication system and recording medium |
US6708203B1 (en) * | 1997-10-20 | 2004-03-16 | The Delfin Project, Inc. | Method and system for filtering messages based on a user profile and an informational processing system event |
US6005597A (en) * | 1997-10-27 | 1999-12-21 | Disney Enterprises, Inc. | Method and apparatus for program selection |
US6594682B2 (en) * | 1997-10-28 | 2003-07-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Client-side system for scheduling delivery of web content and locally managing the web content |
US6055542A (en) * | 1997-10-29 | 2000-04-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for displaying the contents of a web page based on a user's interests |
US6560588B1 (en) * | 1997-10-30 | 2003-05-06 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and apparatus for identifying items of information from a multi-user information system |
US6708199B2 (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 2004-03-16 | Fujitsu Limited | Distributed searching system and searching apparatus for use in the distributed searching system |
US6212545B1 (en) * | 1997-10-31 | 2001-04-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Distributed searching system and searching apparatus for use in the distributed searching system |
US6269369B1 (en) * | 1997-11-02 | 2001-07-31 | Amazon.Com Holdings, Inc. | Networked personal contact manager |
US8380796B2 (en) | 1997-11-02 | 2013-02-19 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Social networking system |
WO1999023571A1 (en) * | 1997-11-03 | 1999-05-14 | Inca Technology, Inc. | Automatically configuring network-name-services |
US6131087A (en) * | 1997-11-05 | 2000-10-10 | The Planning Solutions Group, Inc. | Method for automatically identifying, matching, and near-matching buyers and sellers in electronic market transactions |
US6014639A (en) * | 1997-11-05 | 2000-01-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Electronic catalog system for exploring a multitude of hierarchies, using attribute relevance and forwarding-checking |
US6112181A (en) | 1997-11-06 | 2000-08-29 | Intertrust Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information |
US7092914B1 (en) * | 1997-11-06 | 2006-08-15 | Intertrust Technologies Corporation | Methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information |
US5940823A (en) * | 1997-11-10 | 1999-08-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for the distribution and storage of electronic mail information |
IL122194A0 (en) * | 1997-11-13 | 1998-06-15 | Scidel Technologies Ltd | Method and apparatus for personalized images inserted into a video stream |
US6236978B1 (en) * | 1997-11-14 | 2001-05-22 | New York University | System and method for dynamic profiling of users in one-to-one applications |
US7257604B1 (en) | 1997-11-17 | 2007-08-14 | Wolfe Mark A | System and method for communicating information relating to a network resource |
US20040031045A1 (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 2004-02-12 | Ivanyi Thomas P. | System and method for measuring and storing information pertaining to television viewer or user behavior |
US6286140B1 (en) * | 1997-11-20 | 2001-09-04 | Thomas P. Ivanyi | System and method for measuring and storing information pertaining to television viewer or user behavior |
US5973683A (en) * | 1997-11-24 | 1999-10-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic regulation of television viewing content based on viewer profile and viewing history |
US6172685B1 (en) * | 1997-11-24 | 2001-01-09 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for increasing the amount and utility of displayed information |
US6385627B1 (en) * | 1997-11-24 | 2002-05-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, apparatus and computer program product for providing document user role indication |
US6029176A (en) * | 1997-11-25 | 2000-02-22 | Cannon Holdings, L.L.C. | Manipulating and analyzing data using a computer system having a database mining engine resides in memory |
US6236991B1 (en) * | 1997-11-26 | 2001-05-22 | International Business Machines Corp. | Method and system for providing access for categorized information from online internet and intranet sources |
US6400808B1 (en) | 1997-11-26 | 2002-06-04 | At&T Corp | System and method for providing call subject information to a called party |
US6065120A (en) * | 1997-12-09 | 2000-05-16 | Phone.Com, Inc. | Method and system for self-provisioning a rendezvous to ensure secure access to information in a database from multiple devices |
US20040107208A1 (en) * | 1997-12-09 | 2004-06-03 | Seet Siew Shon | Method and apparatus for bookmarking telephone numbers for efficient access by wireless phone devices |
WO1999030499A1 (en) | 1997-12-10 | 1999-06-17 | Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. | Method for protecting the audio/visual data across the nrss inte rface |
US6233317B1 (en) * | 1997-12-11 | 2001-05-15 | Unisys Corporation | Multiple language electronic mail notification of received voice and/or fax messages |
US6347315B1 (en) * | 1997-12-12 | 2002-02-12 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Method and apparatus for selecting and utilizing one of computers or databases |
US6230204B1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2001-05-08 | Micron Electronics, Inc. | Method and system for estimating usage of computer resources |
US7296004B1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2007-11-13 | Checkfree Corporation | Electronic bill payment system with merchant identification |
US6269362B1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2001-07-31 | Alta Vista Company | System and method for monitoring web pages by comparing generated abstracts |
US20040049457A1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2004-03-11 | Garrison David Lee | Payment remittance processing when account scheming fails |
US20080028292A1 (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2008-01-31 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Techniques to facilitate reading of a document |
US7257589B1 (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2007-08-14 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Techniques for targeting information to users |
US6052709A (en) * | 1997-12-23 | 2000-04-18 | Bright Light Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method for controlling delivery of unsolicited electronic mail |
US6243088B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2001-06-05 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | User defined extensible visual integration |
US6289342B1 (en) | 1998-01-05 | 2001-09-11 | Nec Research Institute, Inc. | Autonomous citation indexing and literature browsing using citation context |
CA2223597A1 (en) * | 1998-01-06 | 1999-07-06 | Ses Canada Research Inc. | Automated survey kiosk |
WO1999035830A1 (en) * | 1998-01-08 | 1999-07-15 | Thomson Licensing S.A. | Video program guide apparatus and method |
US6938268B1 (en) * | 1998-01-08 | 2005-08-30 | Winston W. Hodge | Video stream sharing |
US6055566A (en) | 1998-01-12 | 2000-04-25 | Lextron Systems, Inc. | Customizable media player with online/offline capabilities |
US20050028194A1 (en) * | 1998-01-13 | 2005-02-03 | Elenbaas Jan Hermanus | Personalized news retrieval system |
US6055572A (en) * | 1998-01-20 | 2000-04-25 | Netscape Communications Corporation | System and method for creating pathfiles for use to predict patterns of web surfaces |
US7711690B1 (en) * | 1998-01-21 | 2010-05-04 | Checkfree Corporation | Dual source remittance processing |
US20020002039A1 (en) | 1998-06-12 | 2002-01-03 | Safi Qureshey | Network-enabled audio device |
US6018738A (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 2000-01-25 | Microsft Corporation | Methods and apparatus for matching entities and for predicting an attribute of an entity based on an attribute frequency value |
US6148342A (en) * | 1998-01-27 | 2000-11-14 | Ho; Andrew P. | Secure database management system for confidential records using separately encrypted identifier and access request |
US6782510B1 (en) * | 1998-01-27 | 2004-08-24 | John N. Gross | Word checking tool for controlling the language content in documents using dictionaries with modifyable status fields |
IL125432A (en) * | 1998-01-30 | 2010-11-30 | Easynet Access Inc | Personalized internet interaction |
US7003790B1 (en) * | 1998-01-31 | 2006-02-21 | Sony Corporation | Broadcast-program selection history information acquisition apparatus and its method |
US6601107B1 (en) * | 1998-02-02 | 2003-07-29 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Adaptive fuzzy control of data acquisition and broadcasting |
CA2319519C (en) * | 1998-02-04 | 2013-04-30 | Corporate Media Partners Doing Business As Americast | Method and system for navigating through content in an organized and categorized fashion |
US6452611B1 (en) * | 1998-02-04 | 2002-09-17 | Corporate Media Partners | Method and system for providing dynamically changing programming categories |
US6205205B1 (en) * | 1998-02-09 | 2001-03-20 | At&T Corp | Method and system for affinity group telephone service |
US6233565B1 (en) * | 1998-02-13 | 2001-05-15 | Saranac Software, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for internet based financial transactions with evidence of payment |
US8077870B2 (en) * | 1998-02-13 | 2011-12-13 | Tecsec, Inc. | Cryptographic key split binder for use with tagged data elements |
US7003528B2 (en) * | 1998-02-13 | 2006-02-21 | 3565 Acquisition, Llc | Method and system for web management |
CA2322026A1 (en) * | 1998-02-27 | 1999-09-02 | Daniel Jaye | System and method for building user profiles |
KR100253252B1 (en) * | 1998-02-27 | 2000-04-15 | 구자홍 | Analysis and search method for user looking and listening habit of aerial frequency broadcasting |
ATE243869T1 (en) | 1998-03-03 | 2003-07-15 | Amazon Com Inc | IDENTIFICATION OF THE MOST RELEVANT ANSWERS TO A CURRENT SEARCH QUERY BASED ON ANSWERS ALREADY SELECTED FOR SIMILAR QUERIES |
US7050992B1 (en) * | 1998-03-03 | 2006-05-23 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Identifying items relevant to a current query based on items accessed in connection with similar queries |
US7124129B2 (en) * | 1998-03-03 | 2006-10-17 | A9.Com, Inc. | Identifying the items most relevant to a current query based on items selected in connection with similar queries |
CA2322217C (en) * | 1998-03-04 | 2007-04-10 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Program guide system with targeted advertising |
US7185355B1 (en) | 1998-03-04 | 2007-02-27 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Program guide system with preference profiles |
CN1183746C (en) * | 1998-03-04 | 2005-01-05 | 联合视频制品公司 | Program guide system with monitoring of advertisement usage and user activities |
EP0940980A2 (en) * | 1998-03-05 | 1999-09-08 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | User interface apparatus and broadcast receiving apparatus |
US20020055906A1 (en) * | 1998-03-11 | 2002-05-09 | Katz Ronald A. | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce |
US7386485B1 (en) | 2004-06-25 | 2008-06-10 | West Corporation | Method and system for providing offers in real time to prospective customers |
US8315909B1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2012-11-20 | West Corporation | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in point-of-sale commerce |
US7729945B1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2010-06-01 | West Corporation | Systems and methods that use geographic data to intelligently select goods and services to offer in telephonic and electronic commerce |
US7437313B1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2008-10-14 | West Direct, Llc | Methods, computer-readable media, and apparatus for offering users a plurality of scenarios under which to conduct at least one primary transaction |
US7364068B1 (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2008-04-29 | West Corporation | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services offered to conferees |
US6055513A (en) | 1998-03-11 | 2000-04-25 | Telebuyer, Llc | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce |
US6286018B1 (en) | 1998-03-18 | 2001-09-04 | Xerox Corporation | Method and apparatus for finding a set of documents relevant to a focus set using citation analysis and spreading activation techniques |
US6477707B1 (en) * | 1998-03-24 | 2002-11-05 | Fantastic Corporation | Method and system for broadcast transmission of media objects |
US6335962B1 (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2002-01-01 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Apparatus and method for grouping and prioritizing voice messages for convenient playback |
JP3664874B2 (en) * | 1998-03-28 | 2005-06-29 | 松下電器産業株式会社 | Document search device |
JP3584727B2 (en) * | 1998-03-30 | 2004-11-04 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Information transmitting device and information receiving device |
JPH11288421A (en) * | 1998-04-03 | 1999-10-19 | Fujitsu Ltd | Service providing device, service receiving device, service providing host, computer readable recording medium for recording selective service reception program, computer readable recording medium for recording selective service transmission program, service selecting method for service receiving device and transmission method for selective service for service providing host |
US6189008B1 (en) | 1998-04-03 | 2001-02-13 | Intertainer, Inc. | Dynamic digital asset management |
US6236987B1 (en) * | 1998-04-03 | 2001-05-22 | Damon Horowitz | Dynamic content organization in information retrieval systems |
US6285985B1 (en) * | 1998-04-03 | 2001-09-04 | Preview Systems, Inc. | Advertising-subsidized and advertising-enabled software |
US6078892A (en) * | 1998-04-09 | 2000-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for customer lead selection and optimization |
US6199113B1 (en) * | 1998-04-15 | 2001-03-06 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Apparatus and method for providing trusted network security |
US6160570A (en) * | 1998-04-20 | 2000-12-12 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Digital television system which selects images for display in a video sequence |
US6185698B1 (en) * | 1998-04-20 | 2001-02-06 | Sun Microsystems, Incorporated | Method and apparatus using ranking to select repair nodes in formation of a dynamic tree for multicast repair |
US6101486A (en) * | 1998-04-20 | 2000-08-08 | Nortel Networks Corporation | System and method for retrieving customer information at a transaction center |
IL127792A (en) * | 1998-04-21 | 2003-04-10 | Ibm | System and method for identifying and selecting portions of information streams for a television system |
IL127790A (en) * | 1998-04-21 | 2003-02-12 | Ibm | System and method for selecting, accessing and viewing portions of an information stream(s) using a television companion device |
IL127791A (en) * | 1998-04-21 | 2003-06-24 | Ibm | System and method for selecting and accessing portions of information stream(s) from a television |
US6003082A (en) * | 1998-04-22 | 1999-12-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Selective internet request caching and execution system |
JPH11313105A (en) * | 1998-04-24 | 1999-11-09 | Canon Inc | Server, client, server control method, client control method, client-server system and storage medium |
US6118873A (en) * | 1998-04-24 | 2000-09-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for encrypting broadcast programs in the presence of compromised receiver devices |
US6564379B1 (en) | 1998-04-30 | 2003-05-13 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Program guide system with flip and browse advertisements |
US6530082B1 (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2003-03-04 | Wink Communications, Inc. | Configurable monitoring of program viewership and usage of interactive applications |
US6163773A (en) * | 1998-05-05 | 2000-12-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data storage system with trained predictive cache management engine |
US6226359B1 (en) * | 1998-05-07 | 2001-05-01 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Voice mail source address indentification blocking |
US6314421B1 (en) * | 1998-05-12 | 2001-11-06 | David M. Sharnoff | Method and apparatus for indexing documents for message filtering |
US6263326B1 (en) * | 1998-05-13 | 2001-07-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method product ‘apparatus for modulations’ |
US7343616B1 (en) * | 1998-05-14 | 2008-03-11 | Sony Corporation | Information retrieval method and apparatus |
US7117518B1 (en) * | 1998-05-14 | 2006-10-03 | Sony Corporation | Information retrieval method and apparatus |
US20020095676A1 (en) * | 1998-05-15 | 2002-07-18 | Robert A. Knee | Interactive television program guide system for determining user values for demographic categories |
US6742183B1 (en) | 1998-05-15 | 2004-05-25 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for advertising television networks, channels, and programs |
US6577351B1 (en) | 1998-05-18 | 2003-06-10 | Liberate Technologies | Anti-aliasing television signals for display |
US7240022B1 (en) | 1998-05-19 | 2007-07-03 | Mypoints.Com Inc. | Demographic information gathering and incentive award system and method |
KR100554193B1 (en) * | 1998-05-20 | 2006-02-22 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | Apparatus for receiving signals |
US6438593B1 (en) * | 1998-05-21 | 2002-08-20 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for information retrieval in broadcast disk systems |
US6169989B1 (en) * | 1998-05-21 | 2001-01-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for parallel profile matching in a large scale webcasting system |
EP1080439A1 (en) * | 1998-05-22 | 2001-03-07 | Cambridge Consultants Limited | Electronic communications system |
US6182084B1 (en) * | 1998-05-26 | 2001-01-30 | Williams Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus of data comparison for statistical information content creation |
US7899710B1 (en) * | 1998-05-27 | 2011-03-01 | Walker Digital, Llc | Determination and presentation of package pricing offers in response to customer interest in a product |
US6182050B1 (en) * | 1998-05-28 | 2001-01-30 | Acceleration Software International Corporation | Advertisements distributed on-line using target criteria screening with method for maintaining end user privacy |
US6314573B1 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2001-11-06 | Diva Systems Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing subscription-on-demand services for an interactive information distribution system |
US7581006B1 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2009-08-25 | Yahoo! Inc. | Web service |
US6976093B2 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2005-12-13 | Yahoo! Inc. | Web server content replication |
US7143193B1 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 2006-11-28 | Yahoo! Inc. | Content collection |
AU4321399A (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 1999-12-13 | William H. Lewis | Method for handling consumer data requests to a content provider |
US7035943B2 (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2006-04-25 | Yahoo! Inc. | Web server content replication |
US6131811A (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2000-10-17 | E-Micro Corporation | Wallet consolidator |
WO1999063458A1 (en) * | 1998-05-29 | 1999-12-09 | Sony Corporation | Experience favorite information providing system |
US6263360B1 (en) * | 1998-06-01 | 2001-07-17 | Sri International | System uses filter tree and feed handler for updating objects in a client from a server object list |
US20070078978A1 (en) * | 1998-06-01 | 2007-04-05 | Sri International | Method and apparatus for updating information in a low-bandwidth client/server object-oriented system |
US6405159B2 (en) | 1998-06-03 | 2002-06-11 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Method for categorizing, describing and modeling types of system users |
US8352984B2 (en) * | 1998-06-12 | 2013-01-08 | Thomson Licensing | System and method for generating and managing user preference information for scheduled and stored television programs |
US6614987B1 (en) * | 1998-06-12 | 2003-09-02 | Metabyte, Inc. | Television program recording with user preference determination |
US7146627B1 (en) | 1998-06-12 | 2006-12-05 | Metabyte Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for delivery of targeted video programming |
US6240411B1 (en) * | 1998-06-15 | 2001-05-29 | Exchange Applications, Inc. | Integrating campaign management and data mining |
US20110093898A1 (en) * | 1998-06-18 | 2011-04-21 | Rosenthol Joshua A | Program guide system with user designated favorite themes |
US6256623B1 (en) * | 1998-06-22 | 2001-07-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Network search access construct for accessing web-based search services |
CA2247706C (en) | 1998-06-23 | 2010-11-23 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Use of browser history file to determine web site reach |
US6161130A (en) * | 1998-06-23 | 2000-12-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Technique which utilizes a probabilistic classifier to detect "junk" e-mail by automatically updating a training and re-training the classifier based on the updated training set |
US6735701B1 (en) * | 1998-06-25 | 2004-05-11 | Macarthur Investments, Llc | Network policy management and effectiveness system |
JP2000013708A (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2000-01-14 | Hitachi Ltd | Program selection aiding device |
US6330561B1 (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2001-12-11 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for improving end to end performance of a data network |
US6075535A (en) * | 1998-06-26 | 2000-06-13 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Method and apparatus for visualizing the tile access frequencies for tiled, multi-resolution images |
US9009773B1 (en) | 1998-06-30 | 2015-04-14 | Cox Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing broadcast data services |
JP4198786B2 (en) * | 1998-06-30 | 2008-12-17 | 株式会社東芝 | Information filtering system, information filtering apparatus, video equipment, and information filtering method |
US6148301A (en) * | 1998-07-02 | 2000-11-14 | First Data Corporation | Information distribution system |
JP2000020443A (en) * | 1998-07-02 | 2000-01-21 | Victor Co Of Japan Ltd | Software agent system |
US9792659B2 (en) * | 1999-04-13 | 2017-10-17 | Iplearn, Llc | Computer-aided methods and apparatus to access materials in a network environment |
US6442755B1 (en) | 1998-07-07 | 2002-08-27 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Electronic program guide using markup language |
US6327619B1 (en) | 1998-07-08 | 2001-12-04 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Metering of internet content using a control |
US8286207B1 (en) | 1998-07-13 | 2012-10-09 | Thomson Licensing | System for processing programs and system timing information derived from multiple broadcast sources |
US6529526B1 (en) | 1998-07-13 | 2003-03-04 | Thomson Licensing S.A. | System for processing programs and program content rating information derived from multiple broadcast sources |
CN1867068A (en) | 1998-07-14 | 2006-11-22 | 联合视频制品公司 | Client-server based interactive television program guide system with remote server recording |
AR020608A1 (en) | 1998-07-17 | 2002-05-22 | United Video Properties Inc | A METHOD AND A PROVISION TO SUPPLY A USER REMOTE ACCESS TO AN INTERACTIVE PROGRAMMING GUIDE BY A REMOTE ACCESS LINK |
CN1180615C (en) | 1998-07-17 | 2004-12-15 | 联合视频制品公司 | Interactive television program guide system having multiple devices within household |
CA2673308C (en) * | 1998-07-17 | 2016-01-19 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Television system with aided user program searching |
US9924234B2 (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2018-03-20 | Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc | Data structure and methods for providing an interactive program |
US6754905B2 (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2004-06-22 | Diva Systems Corporation | Data structure and methods for providing an interactive program guide |
BR9912385A (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2002-01-15 | Diva Systems Corp | User interface generated on a head end, interactive program guide, and processes for generating and distributing a user interface, and interacting with an interactive program guide |
IES990640A2 (en) * | 1998-07-28 | 2000-03-22 | Blackcoat Ltd | Network communication |
US6505348B1 (en) * | 1998-07-29 | 2003-01-07 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | Multiple interactive electronic program guide system and methods |
US6104989A (en) * | 1998-07-29 | 2000-08-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real time detection of topical changes and topic identification via likelihood based methods |
US6295092B1 (en) * | 1998-07-30 | 2001-09-25 | Cbs Corporation | System for analyzing television programs |
US6363377B1 (en) * | 1998-07-30 | 2002-03-26 | Sarnoff Corporation | Search data processor |
AU760816B2 (en) * | 1998-07-30 | 2003-05-22 | Insight Development Corporation | System for capturing, annotating and transmitting images of internet web pages |
AU5251099A (en) * | 1998-08-03 | 2000-02-28 | Robert D. Fish | Self-evolving database and method of using same |
US6788649B1 (en) | 1998-08-03 | 2004-09-07 | Mci, Inc. | Method and apparatus for supporting ATM services in an intelligent network |
AU5234999A (en) * | 1998-08-03 | 2000-02-28 | Doubleclick Inc. | Network for distribution of re-targeted advertising |
US6539375B2 (en) * | 1998-08-04 | 2003-03-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for generating and using a computer user's personal interest profile |
US6505202B1 (en) * | 1998-08-04 | 2003-01-07 | Linda Allan Mosquera | Apparatus and methods for finding information that satisfies a profile and producing output therefrom |
US6665837B1 (en) * | 1998-08-10 | 2003-12-16 | Overture Services, Inc. | Method for identifying related pages in a hyperlinked database |
US6192114B1 (en) * | 1998-09-02 | 2001-02-20 | Cbt Flint Partners | Method and apparatus for billing a fee to a party initiating an electronic mail communication when the party is not on an authorization list associated with the party to whom the communication is directed |
US6226635B1 (en) * | 1998-08-14 | 2001-05-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Layered query management |
US6588013B1 (en) | 1998-08-18 | 2003-07-01 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Promotional material distribution system with automatic updating of promotional material selection algorithms |
AU2005202893B2 (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2007-12-13 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Client-Server Electronic Program Guide |
US6898762B2 (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2005-05-24 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Client-server electronic program guide |
AU2012207036B2 (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2015-06-04 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Client-Server Electronic Program Guide |
US7254823B2 (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2007-08-07 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Apparatus and method for constrained selection of favorite channels |
AU2013204458B2 (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2014-10-09 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Client-Server Electronic Program Guide |
EP1675396A3 (en) * | 1998-08-21 | 2011-06-22 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Client-server electronic program guide |
EP1107097A4 (en) * | 1998-08-24 | 2007-10-17 | Hitachi Ltd | Method for displaying multimedia information processing method, processing device, and processing system |
TW447221B (en) * | 1998-08-26 | 2001-07-21 | United Video Properties Inc | Television message system |
TW463503B (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2001-11-11 | United Video Properties Inc | Television chat system |
US6628661B1 (en) * | 1998-08-27 | 2003-09-30 | Intel Corporation | Spanning tree recovery in computer networks |
US7197534B2 (en) * | 1998-09-01 | 2007-03-27 | Big Fix, Inc. | Method and apparatus for inspecting the properties of a computer |
US6256664B1 (en) * | 1998-09-01 | 2001-07-03 | Bigfix, Inc. | Method and apparatus for computed relevance messaging |
US6263362B1 (en) | 1998-09-01 | 2001-07-17 | Bigfix, Inc. | Inspector for computed relevance messaging |
US8914507B2 (en) * | 1998-09-01 | 2014-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Advice provided for offering highly targeted advice without compromising individual privacy |
US7246150B1 (en) | 1998-09-01 | 2007-07-17 | Bigfix, Inc. | Advice provided for offering highly targeted advice without compromising individual privacy |
US6587550B2 (en) * | 1998-09-02 | 2003-07-01 | Michael O. Council | Method and apparatus for enabling a fee to be charged to a party initiating an electronic mail communication when the party is not on an authorization list associated with the party to whom the communication is directed |
US6925444B1 (en) | 1998-09-08 | 2005-08-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | System and method for creating and sharing purchasing lists on a network |
US6582475B2 (en) * | 1998-09-09 | 2003-06-24 | Ricoh Company Limited | Automatic adaptive document printing help system |
US7386600B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2008-06-10 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Launching a web site using a personal device |
US6823388B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2004-11-23 | L.V. Parners, L.P. | Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location with an optical reader having a programmable memory system |
US7392945B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2008-07-01 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Portable scanner for enabling automatic commerce transactions |
US8028036B1 (en) * | 1998-09-11 | 2011-09-27 | Rpx-Lv Acquisition Llc | Launching a web site using a passive transponder |
US6745234B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2004-06-01 | Digital:Convergence Corporation | Method and apparatus for accessing a remote location by scanning an optical code |
US6694482B1 (en) * | 1998-09-11 | 2004-02-17 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | System and methods for an architectural framework for design of an adaptive, personalized, interactive content delivery system |
US7191247B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2007-03-13 | Lv Partners, Lp | Method for connecting a wireless device to a remote location on a network |
US6636896B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2003-10-21 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Method and apparatus for utilizing an audibly coded signal to conduct commerce over the internet |
US7440993B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2008-10-21 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Method and apparatus for launching a web browser in response to scanning of product information |
US6697949B1 (en) * | 1998-09-11 | 2004-02-24 | L.V. Partner, L.P. | Method and apparatus for controlling a user's pc through an audio-visual broadcast to archive information in the users pc |
US6868433B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2005-03-15 | L.V. Partners, L.P. | Input device having positional and scanning capabilities |
US7379901B1 (en) | 1998-09-11 | 2008-05-27 | Lv Partners, L.P. | Accessing a vendor web site using personal account information retrieved from a credit card company web site |
US6704864B1 (en) | 1999-08-19 | 2004-03-09 | L.V. Partners, L.P. | Automatic configuration of equipment software |
US6487583B1 (en) | 1998-09-15 | 2002-11-26 | Ikimbo, Inc. | System and method for information and application distribution |
EP1210668A1 (en) * | 1998-09-15 | 2002-06-05 | Ikimbo, Inc. | System and method for information and application distribution |
CA2343989A1 (en) * | 1998-09-15 | 2000-03-23 | Millennium Networks, Inc | Audience monitoring and reporting system |
US6889195B2 (en) * | 1998-09-15 | 2005-05-03 | Cim Ltd. | System and method for utilizing a computer network in conjunction with traditional telemarketing |
US6701523B1 (en) * | 1998-09-16 | 2004-03-02 | Index Systems, Inc. | V-Chip plus+in-guide user interface apparatus and method for programmable blocking of television and other viewable programming, such as for parental control of a television receiver |
TW465235B (en) | 1998-09-17 | 2001-11-21 | United Video Properties Inc | Electronic program guide with digital storage |
US8380875B1 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2013-02-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Method and system for addressing a communication document for transmission over a network based on the content thereof |
US6253202B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2001-06-26 | Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc. | Method, system and apparatus for authorizing access by a first user to a knowledge profile of a second user responsive to an access request from the first user |
US8214250B2 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2012-07-03 | Jda Software Group, Inc. | System and method for multi-enterprise supply chain optimization |
WO2000017727A2 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-03-30 | Tacit Knowledge Systems | Method and apparatus for querying a user knowledge profile |
US6377949B1 (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2002-04-23 | Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for assigning a confidence level to a term within a user knowledge profile |
US6115709A (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2000-09-05 | Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc. | Method and system for constructing a knowledge profile of a user having unrestricted and restricted access portions according to respective levels of confidence of content of the portions |
US7260550B1 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2007-08-21 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | System and method for multi-enterprise supply chain optimization |
US6317722B1 (en) | 1998-09-18 | 2001-11-13 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Use of electronic shopping carts to generate personal recommendations |
US6154783A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-11-28 | Tacit Knowledge Systems | Method and apparatus for addressing an electronic document for transmission over a network |
AU5910699A (en) * | 1998-09-18 | 2000-04-10 | Tacit Knowledge Systems | Method of constructing and displaying an entity profile constructed utilizing input from entities other than the owner |
IL126373A (en) | 1998-09-27 | 2003-06-24 | Haim Zvi Melman | Apparatus and method for search and retrieval of documents |
JP2000099441A (en) * | 1998-09-25 | 2000-04-07 | Fujitsu Ltd | Device and method for controlling and presenting information |
US6076069A (en) | 1998-09-25 | 2000-06-13 | Oneclip.Com, Incorporated | Method of and system for distributing and redeeming electronic coupons |
US6266702B1 (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2001-07-24 | Raytheon Company | Method and apparatus to insert and extract data from a plurality of slots of data frames by using access table to identify network nodes and their slots for insertion and extraction data |
US6381647B1 (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2002-04-30 | Raytheon Company | Method and system for scheduling network communication |
US6317415B1 (en) | 1998-09-28 | 2001-11-13 | Raytheon Company | Method and system for communicating information in a network |
US6374314B1 (en) * | 1998-09-28 | 2002-04-16 | Raytheon Company | Method for managing storage of data by storing buffer pointers of data comprising a sequence of frames in a memory location different from a memory location for pointers of data not comprising a sequence of frames |
JP3579263B2 (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2004-10-20 | 株式会社東芝 | Program data selection method and program viewing system |
FI982122A (en) * | 1998-09-30 | 2000-03-31 | Helsingin Puhelin Oyj | A method for controlling the selection of a subscription to a service via a telecommunications network, for example a video-on-demand service |
US6195696B1 (en) * | 1998-10-01 | 2001-02-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Systems, methods and computer program products for assigning, generating and delivering content to intranet users |
US6631361B1 (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2003-10-07 | Ncr Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing explanations of automated decisions applied to user data |
US6938033B1 (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2005-08-30 | Citibank, N.A. | System and method of using e-mail centered internet interaction |
US6438544B1 (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2002-08-20 | Ncr Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamic discovery of data model allowing customization of consumer applications accessing privacy data |
US6715130B1 (en) * | 1998-10-05 | 2004-03-30 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Software requirements metrics and evaluation process |
US7284202B1 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2007-10-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Interactive multi media user interface using affinity based categorization |
US6356879B2 (en) * | 1998-10-09 | 2002-03-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Content based method for product-peer filtering |
WO2000022551A1 (en) * | 1998-10-13 | 2000-04-20 | Chris Cheah | Method and system for controlled distribution of information over a network |
ATE260012T1 (en) * | 1998-10-20 | 2004-03-15 | Worldcom Inc | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DISTRIBUTING SERVICE MODULES TO DISTRIBUTED SERVICE NODES IN AN INTELLIGENT NETWORK |
US6285983B1 (en) * | 1998-10-21 | 2001-09-04 | Lend Lease Corporation Ltd. | Marketing systems and methods that preserve consumer privacy |
AU3096800A (en) * | 1998-10-26 | 2000-05-15 | Intervu, Inc. | Audience management for interactive network events |
ATE268484T1 (en) | 1998-10-28 | 2004-06-15 | Verticalone Corp | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC ACCESS TO PERSONAL DATA |
US6360275B1 (en) * | 1998-10-29 | 2002-03-19 | Shanghai Wonders Information Co., Ltd. | System and method for transmitting and receiving data in a network |
JP3014375B1 (en) * | 1998-10-29 | 2000-02-28 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | Data receiving apparatus and method |
US7313806B1 (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2007-12-25 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for channel surfing through multiple sources based on user-definable preferences |
US6671880B2 (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2003-12-30 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for customized rendering of commercials |
US6223180B1 (en) * | 1998-10-30 | 2001-04-24 | Unisys Corp. | System and computer-implemented method for transforming existing host-based screen applications into components useful in developing integrated business-centric applications |
US7603685B2 (en) * | 1998-11-03 | 2009-10-13 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Program guide system with combination category search |
US6317881B1 (en) * | 1998-11-04 | 2001-11-13 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for collecting and providing viewer feedback to a broadcast |
US6317790B1 (en) * | 1998-11-05 | 2001-11-13 | Oracle Corporation | Method and system for interrupting page delivery operations in a web environment |
US7165098B1 (en) | 1998-11-10 | 2007-01-16 | United Video Properties, Inc. | On-line schedule system with personalization features |
US8121891B2 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2012-02-21 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Personalized product report |
WO2000030345A1 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2000-05-25 | General Instrument Corporation | Digital television receiver with application programming interface for user management |
AU6419399A (en) | 1998-11-12 | 2000-06-05 | General Instrument Corporation | Application programming interface (api) for accessing and managing resources in a digital television receiver |
EP1133875B1 (en) * | 1998-11-13 | 2011-07-20 | Comcast IP Holdings I, LLC | Digital broadcast program ordering |
US6487538B1 (en) | 1998-11-16 | 2002-11-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for local advertising |
JP4490588B2 (en) * | 1998-11-16 | 2010-06-30 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | Program receiving device |
JP2002535689A (en) * | 1998-11-16 | 2002-10-22 | サン・マイクロシステムズ・インコーポレーテッド | Method and apparatus for negotiating local advertising terms |
US20010020242A1 (en) * | 1998-11-16 | 2001-09-06 | Amit Gupta | Method and apparatus for processing client information |
WO2000031664A2 (en) * | 1998-11-19 | 2000-06-02 | Accenture Llp | A system, method and article of manufacture for a grouped profile network interface |
US7076504B1 (en) | 1998-11-19 | 2006-07-11 | Accenture Llp | Sharing a centralized profile |
US6678891B1 (en) | 1998-11-19 | 2004-01-13 | Prasara Technologies, Inc. | Navigational user interface for interactive television |
US6195651B1 (en) | 1998-11-19 | 2001-02-27 | Andersen Consulting Properties Bv | System, method and article of manufacture for a tuned user application experience |
WO2000031956A2 (en) * | 1998-11-25 | 2000-06-02 | Sony Electronics, Inc. | A method and apparatus for accessing stored digital programs |
US6314569B1 (en) * | 1998-11-25 | 2001-11-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for video, audio, and graphic presentation in tandem with video/audio play |
US6363149B1 (en) | 1999-10-01 | 2002-03-26 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for accessing stored digital programs |
EP1005186A3 (en) * | 1998-11-27 | 2003-05-28 | Sony Corporation | Method and system for distributing audiovisual information from a broadcast server and apparatus for reproducing the audiovisual information received from the broadcast server |
US6628302B2 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2003-09-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Interactive video programming methods |
US7610599B1 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2009-10-27 | Sony Corporation | Information providing device and method for index information for scene changes |
US6804825B1 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2004-10-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Video on demand methods and systems |
US7168086B1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2007-01-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Proxy for video on demand server control |
US6859799B1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2005-02-22 | Gemstar Development Corporation | Search engine for video and graphics |
US6392664B1 (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2002-05-21 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | Method and system for presenting television programming and interactive entertainment |
CN1352776A (en) * | 1998-11-30 | 2002-06-05 | 英戴克系统公司 | Smart agent based on habit, statistical inference and psycho-demographic profiling |
US7185353B2 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2007-02-27 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | System and method for delivering statistically scheduled advertisements |
US7150030B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2006-12-12 | Prime Research Alliance, Inc. | Subscriber characterization system |
US20020083441A1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2002-06-27 | Flickinger Gregory C. | Advertisement filtering and storage for targeted advertisement systems |
US7228555B2 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2007-06-05 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | System and method for delivering targeted advertisements using multiple presentation streams |
US6457010B1 (en) | 1998-12-03 | 2002-09-24 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Client-server based subscriber characterization system |
US7240355B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2007-07-03 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | Subscriber characterization system with filters |
US8151295B1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2012-04-03 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | Queue based advertisement scheduling and sales |
US20020083439A1 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2002-06-27 | Eldering Charles A. | System for rescheduling and inserting advertisements |
US6865746B1 (en) | 1998-12-03 | 2005-03-08 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Electronic program guide with related-program search feature |
US6298348B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2001-10-02 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Consumer profiling system |
US6820277B1 (en) | 1999-04-20 | 2004-11-16 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Advertising management system for digital video streams |
US8290351B2 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2012-10-16 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | Alternative advertising in prerecorded media |
AU2004201401B2 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2005-06-30 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd | Generating a subscriber profile vector |
US20020144263A1 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2002-10-03 | Eldering Charles A. | Grouping of advertisements on an advertising channel in a targeted advertisement system |
US6704930B1 (en) | 1999-04-20 | 2004-03-09 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Advertisement insertion techniques for digital video streams |
US20020083445A1 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2002-06-27 | Flickinger Gregory C. | Delivering targeted advertisements to the set-top-box |
US6324519B1 (en) | 1999-03-12 | 2001-11-27 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Advertisement auction system |
EP1208418A4 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2004-09-15 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Subscriber characterization and advertisement monitoring system |
US7949565B1 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2011-05-24 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | Privacy-protected advertising system |
US7328448B2 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2008-02-05 | Prime Research Alliance E, Inc. | Advertisement distribution system for distributing targeted advertisements in television systems |
US6560578B2 (en) * | 1999-03-12 | 2003-05-06 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Advertisement selection system supporting discretionary target market characteristics |
US20020123928A1 (en) * | 2001-01-11 | 2002-09-05 | Eldering Charles A. | Targeting ads to subscribers based on privacy-protected subscriber profiles |
US7039932B2 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2006-05-02 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | Queue-based head-end advertisement scheduling method and apparatus |
US8180675B2 (en) * | 2000-08-31 | 2012-05-15 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | System and method for automatically managing avail inventory data and avail pricing |
US7653923B2 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2010-01-26 | Prime Research Alliance E, Inc. | Scheduling and presenting IPG ads in conjunction with programming ads in a television environment |
AU761730B2 (en) * | 1998-12-03 | 2003-06-05 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Subscriber identification system |
CA2361495C (en) * | 1998-12-04 | 2004-05-04 | Index Systems, Inc. | System and method for providing news, sports, and local guide services through an electronic program guide |
US6792197B1 (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2004-09-14 | Index Systems, Inc. | System and method for generating video taping reminders |
US6802042B2 (en) * | 1999-06-01 | 2004-10-05 | Yodlee.Com, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing calculated and solution-oriented personalized summary-reports to a user through a single user-interface |
US8069407B1 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2011-11-29 | Yodlee.Com, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting changes in websites and reporting results to web developers for navigation template repair purposes |
US7085997B1 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2006-08-01 | Yodlee.Com | Network-based bookmark management and web-summary system |
US7672879B1 (en) | 1998-12-08 | 2010-03-02 | Yodlee.Com, Inc. | Interactive activity interface for managing personal data and performing transactions over a data packet network |
US7134130B1 (en) * | 1998-12-15 | 2006-11-07 | Gateway Inc. | Apparatus and method for user-based control of television content |
IT1303603B1 (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2000-11-14 | Giovanni Sacco | DYNAMIC TAXONOMY PROCEDURE FOR FINDING INFORMATION ON LARGE HETEROGENEOUS DATABASES. |
US6173269B1 (en) | 1998-12-16 | 2001-01-09 | Zowi.Com, Inc | Method and apparatus for executing electronic commercial transactions with minors |
US6405222B1 (en) | 1998-12-17 | 2002-06-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Requesting concurrent entries via bookmark set |
GB9827831D0 (en) * | 1998-12-17 | 1999-02-10 | Tribeka Ltd | Method and apparatus for the distribution of digitised information on demand |
US7073129B1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2006-07-04 | Tangis Corporation | Automated selection of appropriate information based on a computer user's context |
US7231439B1 (en) | 2000-04-02 | 2007-06-12 | Tangis Corporation | Dynamically swapping modules for determining a computer user's context |
US9123380B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2015-09-01 | Gvbb Holdings S.A.R.L. | Systems, methods, and computer program products for automated real-time execution of live inserts of repurposed stored content distribution, and multiple aspect ratio automated simulcast production |
US7107539B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2006-09-12 | Tangis Corporation | Thematic response to a computer user's context, such as by a wearable personal computer |
US20030001880A1 (en) * | 2001-04-18 | 2003-01-02 | Parkervision, Inc. | Method, system, and computer program product for producing and distributing enhanced media |
US8225214B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2012-07-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Supplying enhanced computer user's context data |
ES2284283T3 (en) * | 1998-12-23 | 2007-11-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | PROGRAM PLAYBACK DEVICE. |
US6246803B1 (en) | 1998-12-27 | 2001-06-12 | The University Of Kansas | Real-time feature-based video stream validation and distortion analysis system using color moments |
US7353234B2 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2008-04-01 | Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company | Customized user interface based on user record information |
US6055573A (en) * | 1998-12-30 | 2000-04-25 | Supermarkets Online, Inc. | Communicating with a computer based on an updated purchase behavior classification of a particular consumer |
US7555721B2 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2009-06-30 | Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company | Customized user interface |
US6349295B1 (en) | 1998-12-31 | 2002-02-19 | Walker Digital, Llc | Method and apparatus for performing supplemental searches over a network |
US6473892B1 (en) * | 1998-12-31 | 2002-10-29 | Harland Financial Solutions, Inc. | Data driven, dynamic language document assembly system |
US6654787B1 (en) | 1998-12-31 | 2003-11-25 | Brightmail, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for filtering e-mail |
IL127889A0 (en) * | 1998-12-31 | 1999-10-28 | Almondnet Ltd | A method for transacting an advertisement transfer |
US6654735B1 (en) * | 1999-01-08 | 2003-11-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Outbound information analysis for generating user interest profiles and improving user productivity |
US6243757B1 (en) * | 1999-01-11 | 2001-06-05 | Enuntio, Inc. | Automated information filtering and distribution system |
GB2363650A (en) * | 1999-01-15 | 2002-01-02 | Cybuy Llc | System and method for transaction enabled advertising |
US6868389B1 (en) | 1999-01-19 | 2005-03-15 | Jeffrey K. Wilkins | Internet-enabled lead generation |
EP2178008A3 (en) * | 1999-01-26 | 2010-09-01 | Xerox Corporation | Multi-modal information access |
US6925442B1 (en) * | 1999-01-29 | 2005-08-02 | Elijahu Shapira | Method and apparatus for evaluating vistors to a web server |
US6236395B1 (en) * | 1999-02-01 | 2001-05-22 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Audiovisual information management system |
US7904187B2 (en) | 1999-02-01 | 2011-03-08 | Hoffberg Steven M | Internet appliance system and method |
US6792412B1 (en) * | 1999-02-02 | 2004-09-14 | Alan Sullivan | Neural network system and method for controlling information output based on user feedback |
US6654724B1 (en) * | 1999-02-12 | 2003-11-25 | Adheris, Inc. | System for processing pharmaceutical data while maintaining patient confidentially |
US7958224B2 (en) | 1999-02-17 | 2011-06-07 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | Incentive network for distributing incentives on a network-wide basis and for permitting user access to individual incentives from a plurality of network servers |
US6606611B1 (en) * | 1999-02-27 | 2003-08-12 | Emdadur Khan | System and method for audio-only internet browsing using a standard telephone |
WO2000052934A1 (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2000-09-08 | Comunic. T.V. Ltd. | System and method for serving local and global media content |
US6301619B1 (en) * | 1999-03-02 | 2001-10-09 | Oplus Technologies Ltd | System and method for providing service of sending real time electronic information to selected individual viewers of transmitted video or computerized signals |
US6460079B1 (en) | 1999-03-04 | 2002-10-01 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Method and system for the discovery of cookies and other client information |
US7468934B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2008-12-23 | Ez4Media, Inc. | Clock with link to the internet |
US20020013852A1 (en) | 2000-03-03 | 2002-01-31 | Craig Janik | System for providing content, management, and interactivity for thin client devices |
US20030195796A1 (en) * | 1999-03-04 | 2003-10-16 | Vijay Konda | Internet activity rating system |
US6199099B1 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 2001-03-06 | Ac Properties B.V. | System, method and article of manufacture for a mobile communication network utilizing a distributed communication network |
US7051351B2 (en) * | 1999-03-08 | 2006-05-23 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method of inserting advertisements into an information retrieval system display |
US6229895B1 (en) | 1999-03-12 | 2001-05-08 | Diva Systems Corp. | Secure distribution of video on-demand |
US6629087B1 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2003-09-30 | Nativeminds, Inc. | Methods for creating and editing topics for virtual robots conversing in natural language |
US7277919B1 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2007-10-02 | Bigfix, Inc. | Relevance clause for computed relevance messaging |
US9141717B2 (en) * | 1999-03-22 | 2015-09-22 | Esdr Network Solutions Llc | Methods, systems, products, and devices for processing DNS friendly identifiers |
US7188138B1 (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2007-03-06 | Eric Schneider | Method, product, and apparatus for resource identifier registration and aftermarket services |
USRE43690E1 (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2012-09-25 | Esdr Network Solutions Llc | Search engine request method, product, and apparatus |
US8667051B2 (en) * | 1999-03-22 | 2014-03-04 | Esdr Network Solutions Llc | Real-time communication processing method, product, and apparatus |
US8037168B2 (en) * | 1999-07-15 | 2011-10-11 | Esdr Network Solutions Llc | Method, product, and apparatus for enhancing resolution services, registration services, and search services |
US6338082B1 (en) | 1999-03-22 | 2002-01-08 | Eric Schneider | Method, product, and apparatus for requesting a network resource |
US7082422B1 (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2006-07-25 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for automatic transmission of audible on-line analytical processing system report output |
JP2000276470A (en) * | 1999-03-23 | 2000-10-06 | Seiko Epson Corp | Method and device for information retrieval performance evaluation and recording medium for recording information retrieval performance evaluation processing program |
US8321411B2 (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2012-11-27 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for management of an automatic OLAP report broadcast system |
US6567796B1 (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2003-05-20 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for management of an automatic OLAP report broadcast system |
US7664264B2 (en) | 1999-03-24 | 2010-02-16 | Blue Spike, Inc. | Utilizing data reduction in steganographic and cryptographic systems |
US6278976B1 (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2001-08-21 | Michael Charles Kochian | System for the delivery of audio recordings |
JP2000339345A (en) * | 1999-03-25 | 2000-12-08 | Sony Corp | Retrieval system, retrieval device, retrieval method, input device and input method |
US6289514B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2001-09-11 | Qcom Tv, Inc. | System and method for the near-real time capture and reporting of large population consumer behaviors concerning television use |
US6813775B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2004-11-02 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for sharing viewing preferences |
US6973663B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2005-12-06 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for detecting and viewing similar programs within a video system |
US7146626B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2006-12-05 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and apparatus for storing and displaying digital objects associated with an electronic television program guide using fuzzy logic |
US6754906B1 (en) * | 1999-03-29 | 2004-06-22 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Categorical electronic program guide |
US6742184B1 (en) | 1999-03-29 | 2004-05-25 | Hughes Electronics Corp. | Electronic television program guide with calendar tool |
US7665111B1 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2010-02-16 | Tivo Inc. | Data storage management and scheduling system |
US6507764B1 (en) * | 1999-03-30 | 2003-01-14 | Nct Group, Inc. | Network of digital broadcast stations |
US8689265B2 (en) | 1999-03-30 | 2014-04-01 | Tivo Inc. | Multimedia mobile personalization system |
US20020118954A1 (en) | 2001-12-07 | 2002-08-29 | Barton James M. | Data storage management and scheduling system |
US7543325B2 (en) | 1999-03-30 | 2009-06-02 | Tivo Inc. | System for remotely controlling client recording and storage behavior |
CN1592403A (en) * | 1999-03-30 | 2005-03-09 | 提维股份有限公司 | Data storage management and program system and method |
US6757906B1 (en) | 1999-03-30 | 2004-06-29 | Tivo, Inc. | Television viewer interface system |
US20040255336A1 (en) * | 1999-03-30 | 2004-12-16 | Gotuit Video, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for simultaneous program viewing |
WO2000059202A2 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2000-10-05 | Diva Systems Corporation | Method for distributing and managing content for on demand applications utilizing local storage |
US8275661B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2012-09-25 | Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. | Targeted banner advertisements |
GB9907283D0 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 1999-05-26 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Memory reclamation method |
US7024416B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2006-04-04 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Semi-automatic index term augmentation in document retrieval |
US8572069B2 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2013-10-29 | Apple Inc. | Semi-automatic index term augmentation in document retrieval |
AU4328000A (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2000-10-16 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Techniques for performing a data query in a computer system |
US6434621B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2002-08-13 | Hannaway & Associates | Apparatus and method of using the same for internet and intranet broadcast channel creation and management |
US6826559B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2004-11-30 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Hybrid category mapping for on-line query tool |
US7047242B1 (en) | 1999-03-31 | 2006-05-16 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Weighted term ranking for on-line query tool |
GB2351891B (en) * | 1999-04-01 | 2003-08-06 | Nds Ltd | Item selection for broadcasting system |
US6449632B1 (en) | 1999-04-01 | 2002-09-10 | Bar Ilan University Nds Limited | Apparatus and method for agent-based feedback collection in a data broadcasting network |
US6374290B1 (en) * | 1999-04-01 | 2002-04-16 | Cacheflow, Inc. | Self moderated virtual communities |
US6486892B1 (en) | 1999-04-07 | 2002-11-26 | Joseph L. Stern | System and method for accessing, manipulating and viewing internet and non-internet related information and for controlling networked devices |
US7584120B1 (en) * | 1999-04-07 | 2009-09-01 | Cbs Interactive Inc. | Method and apparatus for defining data of interest |
JP3327877B2 (en) | 1999-04-14 | 2002-09-24 | キヤノン株式会社 | Information providing method, information providing system, terminal device, and storage medium storing information providing program |
JP3368237B2 (en) | 1999-04-14 | 2003-01-20 | キヤノン株式会社 | Code processing method, terminal device, and storage medium |
JP3327864B2 (en) | 1999-04-14 | 2002-09-24 | キヤノン株式会社 | Information registration method, information management method, information registration device, information management device, and storage medium |
JP3376311B2 (en) | 1999-04-14 | 2003-02-10 | キヤノン株式会社 | Information providing method and information providing system |
US6904610B1 (en) | 1999-04-15 | 2005-06-07 | Sedna Patent Services, Llc | Server-centric customized interactive program guide in an interactive television environment |
US6754271B1 (en) | 1999-04-15 | 2004-06-22 | Diva Systems Corporation | Temporal slice persistence method and apparatus for delivery of interactive program guide |
US7546530B1 (en) * | 1999-04-15 | 2009-06-09 | Hoshiko Llc | Method and apparatus for mapping a site on a wide area network |
US7096487B1 (en) | 1999-10-27 | 2006-08-22 | Sedna Patent Services, Llc | Apparatus and method for combining realtime and non-realtime encoded content |
US8775396B2 (en) | 1999-04-15 | 2014-07-08 | Intellectual Ventures I Llc | Method and system for searching a wide area network |
US6847373B1 (en) | 1999-04-16 | 2005-01-25 | Avid Technology, Inc. | Natural color matching in a video editing system |
DE60039861D1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2008-09-25 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | ADVERTISING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR DIGITAL VIDEO TONES |
US20020091575A1 (en) * | 2000-07-24 | 2002-07-11 | Collart Todd R. | System, method and article of manufacture for identifying and tracking usage of a lazer-centric medium |
US7038637B1 (en) * | 1999-04-22 | 2006-05-02 | Si Diamond Technology, Inc. | System and method for selling advertising space on electronic billboards over the internet |
US6430603B2 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2002-08-06 | World Theatre, Inc. | System for direct placement of commercial advertising, public service announcements and other content on electronic billboard displays |
US20020174329A1 (en) * | 1999-04-28 | 2002-11-21 | Bowler Richard A. | Method and system for automatically transitioning files among computer systems |
US6424998B2 (en) | 1999-04-28 | 2002-07-23 | World Theatre, Inc. | System permitting the display of video or still image content on selected displays of an electronic display network according to customer dictates |
CA2301238A1 (en) * | 1999-04-29 | 2000-10-29 | At&T Corp. | Interactive program guide technique |
US6847969B1 (en) * | 1999-05-03 | 2005-01-25 | Streetspace, Inc. | Method and system for providing personalized online services and advertisements in public spaces |
US6985583B1 (en) * | 1999-05-04 | 2006-01-10 | Rsa Security Inc. | System and method for authentication seed distribution |
US6728760B1 (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2004-04-27 | Kent Ridge Digital Labs | Optimizing delivery of computer media |
US6430539B1 (en) | 1999-05-06 | 2002-08-06 | Hnc Software | Predictive modeling of consumer financial behavior |
EP1177674A4 (en) * | 1999-05-10 | 2004-12-08 | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | Advertisement subgroups for digital streams |
US7162471B1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2007-01-09 | Maquis Techtrix Llc | Content query system and method |
US6804675B1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2004-10-12 | Maquis Techtrix, Llc | Online content provider system and method |
US6515681B1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2003-02-04 | Prophet Financial Systems, Inc. | User interface for interacting with online message board |
US6493703B1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2002-12-10 | Prophet Financial Systems | System and method for implementing intelligent online community message board |
US6571234B1 (en) | 1999-05-11 | 2003-05-27 | Prophet Financial Systems, Inc. | System and method for managing online message board |
AU4839800A (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2000-11-21 | Richard A. Holway | Secure system for trading fungible commodities |
US20030004859A1 (en) * | 1999-05-11 | 2003-01-02 | Shaw John C. | Method and system for facilitating secure transactions |
AU764877B2 (en) * | 1999-05-12 | 2003-09-04 | Two Way Media Limited | Interactive television broadcast system |
CA2388385A1 (en) * | 1999-05-15 | 2000-11-23 | John W.L. Ogilvie | Automatic broker tools and techniques |
WO2000070869A1 (en) * | 1999-05-18 | 2000-11-23 | Contentwise Ltd. | Monitoring system |
JP4378576B2 (en) * | 1999-05-18 | 2009-12-09 | ソニー株式会社 | Reception device and method, supply device and method, bidirectional communication system and method, and recording medium |
US6792615B1 (en) * | 1999-05-19 | 2004-09-14 | New Horizons Telecasting, Inc. | Encapsulated, streaming media automation and distribution system |
US6906733B1 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2005-06-14 | Gateway, Inc. | Method, signal, system, and interface for display week-at-a-glance per-network electronic program guide grid |
US9262383B2 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2016-02-16 | E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for processing a markup document |
US9268748B2 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2016-02-23 | E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. | System, method, and computer program product for outputting markup language documents |
US7334260B1 (en) * | 1999-05-21 | 2008-02-19 | Sony Corporation | Information processing apparatus and method, and recording medium on which a program for executing the information processing is recorded |
AU4842200A (en) * | 1999-05-21 | 2000-12-12 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for entering ideographic characters in portable devices |
US7650355B1 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2010-01-19 | E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. | Reusable macro markup language |
US6717590B1 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2004-04-06 | Gateway, Inc. | Verified scheduling of recurrent program recording operations |
US6920608B1 (en) * | 1999-05-21 | 2005-07-19 | E Numerate Solutions, Inc. | Chart view for reusable data markup language |
US9262384B2 (en) | 1999-05-21 | 2016-02-16 | E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. | Markup language system, method, and computer program product |
US7249328B1 (en) * | 1999-05-21 | 2007-07-24 | E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. | Tree view for reusable data markup language |
US7539937B2 (en) * | 1999-05-25 | 2009-05-26 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Periodical distribution via a computer network |
US6549935B1 (en) * | 1999-05-25 | 2003-04-15 | Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd | Method of distributing documents having common components to a plurality of destinations |
JP4465737B2 (en) * | 1999-05-26 | 2010-05-19 | ソニー株式会社 | Receiver and program selection method |
US7086007B1 (en) | 1999-05-27 | 2006-08-01 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Method for integrating user models to interface design |
US6411992B1 (en) * | 1999-05-28 | 2002-06-25 | Qwest Communications Int'l, Inc. | Method and apparatus for broadcasting information over a network |
US7065500B2 (en) * | 1999-05-28 | 2006-06-20 | Overture Services, Inc. | Automatic advertiser notification for a system for providing place and price protection in a search result list generated by a computer network search engine |
US8607138B2 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2013-12-10 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for OLAP report generation with spreadsheet report within the network user interface |
US9208213B2 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2015-12-08 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for network user interface OLAP report formatting |
US6718367B1 (en) * | 1999-06-01 | 2004-04-06 | General Interactive, Inc. | Filter for modeling system and method for handling and routing of text-based asynchronous communications |
US6904409B1 (en) * | 1999-06-01 | 2005-06-07 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for constructing an updateable database of subject behavior patterns |
US7752535B2 (en) | 1999-06-01 | 2010-07-06 | Yodlec.com, Inc. | Categorization of summarized information |
US7146505B1 (en) | 1999-06-01 | 2006-12-05 | America Online, Inc. | Secure data exchange between date processing systems |
EP1192577A4 (en) * | 1999-06-01 | 2002-04-17 | Geoffrey M Jacquez | A method for ordering an item |
US7219072B1 (en) * | 1999-06-01 | 2007-05-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for co-browsing in electronic commerce |
US6549929B1 (en) | 1999-06-02 | 2003-04-15 | Gateway, Inc. | Intelligent scheduled recording and program reminders for recurring events |
KR100624865B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2006-09-18 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Video system based on user profile |
US7065497B1 (en) * | 1999-06-07 | 2006-06-20 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Document delivery system for automatically printing a document on a printing device |
BR0006693B1 (en) * | 1999-06-07 | 2015-01-06 | Hewlett Packard Co | DOCUMENT SUPPLY SYSTEM AND DOCUMENT SUPPLY METHOD |
EP1061742A3 (en) * | 1999-06-08 | 2002-04-24 | AT&T Corp. | Apparatus and method for providing computer network information on a video channel |
US7540012B1 (en) * | 1999-06-08 | 2009-05-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Video on demand configuring, controlling and maintaining |
AU3712300A (en) | 1999-06-11 | 2001-01-02 | Liberate Technologies | Hierarchical open security information delegation and acquisition |
US6711585B1 (en) * | 1999-06-15 | 2004-03-23 | Kanisa Inc. | System and method for implementing a knowledge management system |
US6957445B1 (en) | 1999-06-16 | 2005-10-18 | Gateway Inc. | Method, system, software, and signal for performing events for related programs |
US6591261B1 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2003-07-08 | Zerx, Llc | Network search engine and navigation tool and method of determining search results in accordance with search criteria and/or associated sites |
US6477704B1 (en) | 1999-06-21 | 2002-11-05 | Lawrence Cremia | Method of gathering and utilizing demographic information from request-based media delivery system |
MXPA01013334A (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2002-07-09 | Thomson Multimedia Sa | Method and receiver for managing the consistency of service lists in digital television system. |
US6438752B1 (en) * | 1999-06-22 | 2002-08-20 | Mediaone Group, Inc. | Method and system for selecting television programs based on the past selection history of an identified user |
FR2795588B1 (en) * | 1999-06-22 | 2002-03-22 | Sagem | INFORMATION PRESENTATION SYSTEM |
US6721954B1 (en) | 1999-06-23 | 2004-04-13 | Gateway, Inc. | Personal preferred viewing using electronic program guide |
US6513039B1 (en) * | 1999-06-24 | 2003-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Profile inferencing through automated access control list analysis heuristics |
CN1359591A (en) * | 1999-06-28 | 2002-07-17 | 英戴克系统公司 | System and method for utilizing EPG database for modifying advertisements |
US7013301B2 (en) * | 2003-09-23 | 2006-03-14 | Predixis Corporation | Audio fingerprinting system and method |
US6510431B1 (en) * | 1999-06-28 | 2003-01-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for the routing of requests using an automated classification and profile matching in a networked environment |
US8429026B1 (en) | 1999-06-28 | 2013-04-23 | Dietfood Corp. | System and method for creating and submitting electronic shopping lists |
EP1197075A1 (en) * | 1999-06-28 | 2002-04-17 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive television program guide system and method with niche hubs |
JP3669870B2 (en) * | 1999-06-28 | 2005-07-13 | 株式会社サン・フレア | Optimal template pattern search method, search device, and recording medium |
US20050038819A1 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2005-02-17 | Hicken Wendell T. | Music Recommendation system and method |
AU5775900A (en) * | 1999-06-29 | 2001-01-31 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Method and system for a video-on-demand-related interactive display within an interactive television application |
US6779119B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2004-08-17 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Actual and perceived response time, user interface, and security via usage patterns |
US6622167B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2003-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Document shadowing intranet server, memory medium and method |
US20020026351A1 (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2002-02-28 | Thomas E. Coleman | Method and system for delivery of targeted commercial messages |
US6615247B1 (en) | 1999-07-01 | 2003-09-02 | Micron Technology, Inc. | System and method for customizing requested web page based on information such as previous location visited by customer and search term used by customer |
US7024376B1 (en) * | 1999-07-02 | 2006-04-04 | Yuen Henry C | Internet-based auction method |
US7058817B1 (en) | 1999-07-02 | 2006-06-06 | The Chase Manhattan Bank | System and method for single sign on process for websites with multiple applications and services |
US7228492B1 (en) | 1999-07-06 | 2007-06-05 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | 2D graph displaying document locations of user-specified concept of interest |
US7054831B2 (en) | 1999-07-07 | 2006-05-30 | Eric Koenig | System and method for combining interactive game with interactive advertising |
US6553113B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2003-04-22 | First Usa Bank, Na | System and methods for call decisioning in a virtual call center integrating telephony with computers |
US7343319B1 (en) * | 1999-07-09 | 2008-03-11 | Walker Digital, Llc | Multi-tier pricing of individual products based on volume discounts |
US7536002B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2009-05-19 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Association | System and method of intelligent call routing for cross sell offer selection based on optimization parameters or account-level data |
EP1195051B1 (en) | 1999-07-12 | 2004-12-08 | Thomson Licensing S.A. | Method and device for establishing a communication |
US6873982B1 (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2005-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Ordering of database search results based on user feedback |
US6853950B1 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2005-02-08 | Newsedge Corporation | System for determining changes in the relative interest of subjects |
US7380137B2 (en) * | 1999-07-20 | 2008-05-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Content guard system for copy protection of recordable media |
AU6363500A (en) * | 1999-07-22 | 2001-02-13 | Silicon Valley Bank | Method and system for providing information responsive to a user |
US6493698B1 (en) * | 1999-07-26 | 2002-12-10 | Intel Corporation | String search scheme in a distributed architecture |
US20020023123A1 (en) * | 1999-07-26 | 2002-02-21 | Justin P. Madison | Geographic data locator |
US7158986B1 (en) | 1999-07-27 | 2007-01-02 | Mailfrontier, Inc. A Wholly Owned Subsidiary Of Sonicwall, Inc. | Method and system providing user with personalized recommendations by electronic-mail based upon the determined interests of the user pertain to the theme and concepts of the categorized document |
AU5390899A (en) * | 1999-07-27 | 2001-02-13 | Prevail Corporation | Knowledge management system |
US7379880B1 (en) | 1999-07-28 | 2008-05-27 | Fair Isaac Corporation | Cascaded profiles for multiple interacting entities |
EP1226513A1 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2002-07-31 | Hnc Software Inc. | Cascaded profiles for multiple interacting entities |
US6718363B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2004-04-06 | Verizon Laboratories, Inc. | Page aggregation for web sites |
US7100195B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2006-08-29 | Accenture Llp | Managing user information on an e-commerce system |
US6704873B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2004-03-09 | Accenture Llp | Secure gateway interconnection in an e-commerce based environment |
JP4280949B2 (en) * | 1999-07-30 | 2009-06-17 | ソニー株式会社 | Information receiving apparatus, remote operation system, program guide information providing method for information receiving apparatus, and remote operation method for remote operation system |
US6718535B1 (en) | 1999-07-30 | 2004-04-06 | Accenture Llp | System, method and article of manufacture for an activity framework design in an e-commerce based environment |
US20020124247A1 (en) * | 1999-08-03 | 2002-09-05 | Houghton William C. | Polling interactive television viewers |
US7219073B1 (en) * | 1999-08-03 | 2007-05-15 | Brandnamestores.Com | Method for extracting information utilizing a user-context-based search engine |
AU6617700A (en) * | 1999-08-03 | 2001-02-19 | General Dynamics Government Systems Corporation | Targeted advertising system |
US7475246B1 (en) * | 1999-08-04 | 2009-01-06 | Blue Spike, Inc. | Secure personal content server |
US6487539B1 (en) * | 1999-08-06 | 2002-11-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Semantic based collaborative filtering |
US6763388B1 (en) * | 1999-08-10 | 2004-07-13 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting and viewing portions of web pages |
US6834306B1 (en) * | 1999-08-10 | 2004-12-21 | Akamai Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for notifying a user of changes to certain parts of web pages |
GB9918927D0 (en) * | 1999-08-12 | 1999-10-13 | Pace Micro Tech Plc | Video and/or audio digital data processing |
US7324953B1 (en) * | 1999-08-13 | 2008-01-29 | Danny Murphy | Demographic information database processor |
WO2001013632A1 (en) * | 1999-08-14 | 2001-02-22 | Rotor Communications Corporation | Internet-based program broadcast system |
US6505168B1 (en) | 1999-08-16 | 2003-01-07 | First Usa Bank, Na | System and method for gathering and standardizing customer purchase information for target marketing |
WO2001015449A1 (en) * | 1999-08-20 | 2001-03-01 | Singularis S.A. | Method and apparatus for creating recommendations from users profile built interactively |
US6466975B1 (en) * | 1999-08-23 | 2002-10-15 | Digital Connexxions Corp. | Systems and methods for virtual population mutual relationship management using electronic computer driven networks |
US6591421B1 (en) | 1999-08-25 | 2003-07-08 | Spotware Technologies, Inc. | System and method for automatically detecting and generating electronic program guide entries of future programming |
WO2001015012A2 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2001-03-01 | Symtec Limited | Web connection data |
AU6983500A (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2001-03-26 | Marcus Oliver Schaeffler | Assignment method |
WO2001014952A2 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 2001-03-01 | Memetrics Inc. | On-line experimentation |
AUPQ246899A0 (en) * | 1999-08-26 | 1999-09-16 | Memetrics | An automated communications management agent |
US7647618B1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2010-01-12 | Charles Eric Hunter | Video distribution system |
US7209900B2 (en) | 1999-08-27 | 2007-04-24 | Charles Eric Hunter | Music distribution systems |
US6711552B1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2004-03-23 | Matthew W. Kay | Apparatus and method for saving commerce related information in a broadcast programming network |
US20060212908A1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2006-09-21 | Ochoa Optics Llc | Video distribution system |
US8090619B1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2012-01-03 | Ochoa Optics Llc | Method and system for music distribution |
US6952685B1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2005-10-04 | Ochoa Optics Llc | Music distribution system and associated antipiracy protection |
WO2001017256A1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2001-03-08 | Commerce Tv Corporation | Video distribution system and method |
US20020056118A1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2002-05-09 | Hunter Charles Eric | Video and music distribution system |
US6647417B1 (en) | 2000-02-10 | 2003-11-11 | World Theatre, Inc. | Music distribution systems |
US8041805B2 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2011-10-18 | Opinionlab, Inc. | System and method for reporting to a website owner user reactions to particular web pages of a website |
US6421724B1 (en) * | 1999-08-30 | 2002-07-16 | Opinionlab, Inc. | Web site response measurement tool |
US7085820B1 (en) | 1999-08-30 | 2006-08-01 | Opinionlab, Inc. | System and method for reporting to a website owner user reactions to particular web pages of a website |
US6606581B1 (en) | 2000-06-14 | 2003-08-12 | Opinionlab, Inc. | System and method for measuring and reporting user reactions to particular web pages of a website |
EP1775949A3 (en) | 1999-08-31 | 2007-12-12 | Metabyte Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for delivery of targeted video programming |
EP1230798A1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2002-08-14 | Labeeb K. Ismail | Method and apparatus for delivery of targeted video programming |
US7302430B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2007-11-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Workflow management system for generating output material based on customer input |
USRE44207E1 (en) | 1999-09-01 | 2013-05-07 | Esdr Network Solutions Llc | Network resource access method, product, and apparatus |
WO2001018714A2 (en) * | 1999-09-08 | 2001-03-15 | Wizard Technologies, Inc. | Transaction and account management system |
US7072863B1 (en) | 1999-09-08 | 2006-07-04 | C4Cast.Com, Inc. | Forecasting using interpolation modeling |
KR20010092727A (en) * | 1999-09-10 | 2001-10-26 | 요트.게.아. 롤페즈 | Method of and apparatus for advising about receivable programs |
US6798867B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2004-09-28 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services, with real-time database queries |
US8130918B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2012-03-06 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services, with closed loop transaction processing |
US6940953B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2005-09-06 | Microstrategy, Inc. | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services including module for generating and formatting voice services |
US6850603B1 (en) * | 1999-09-13 | 2005-02-01 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized dynamic and interactive voice services |
US7340040B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2008-03-04 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for real-time, personalized, dynamic, interactive voice services for corporate-analysis related information |
US6836537B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2004-12-28 | Microstrategy Incorporated | System and method for real-time, personalized, dynamic, interactive voice services for information related to existing travel schedule |
US7266181B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2007-09-04 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized dynamic and interactive voice services with integrated inbound and outbound voice services |
US7197461B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2007-03-27 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for voice-enabled input for use in the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic, and interactive voice services |
US6964012B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2005-11-08 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services, including deployment through personalized broadcasts |
US6885734B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2005-04-26 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive inbound and outbound voice services, with real-time interactive voice database queries |
US6829334B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2004-12-07 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services, with telephone-based service utilization and control |
US7124111B1 (en) | 1999-09-14 | 2006-10-17 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Service charge adjustment platform |
US20050060641A1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2005-03-17 | Sezan Muhammed Ibrahim | Audiovisual information management system with selective updating |
US6567786B1 (en) * | 1999-09-16 | 2003-05-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for increasing the effectiveness of customer contact strategies |
US8108245B1 (en) | 1999-09-17 | 2012-01-31 | Cox Communications, Inc. | Method and system for web user profiling and selective content delivery |
US6684399B1 (en) | 1999-09-17 | 2004-01-27 | Spotware Technologies, Inc. | Electronic program guide including live network multimedia broadcast channels |
US6732113B1 (en) * | 1999-09-20 | 2004-05-04 | Verispan, L.L.C. | System and method for generating de-identified health care data |
US8473452B1 (en) | 1999-09-20 | 2013-06-25 | Ims Health Incorporated | System and method for analyzing de-identified health care data |
US6360221B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2002-03-19 | Neostar, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the production, delivery, and receipt of enhanced e-mail |
US7831512B2 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2010-11-09 | Quantumstream Systems, Inc. | Content distribution system and method |
US9092535B1 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2015-07-28 | Google Inc. | E-mail embedded textual hyperlink object |
US9451310B2 (en) | 1999-09-21 | 2016-09-20 | Quantum Stream Inc. | Content distribution system and method |
KR100304482B1 (en) * | 1999-09-22 | 2001-11-02 | 구자홍 | Method and apparatus for user adaptive information presentation using multiple hierarchical preference information structure and the data structure of multiple hierarchical preference information |
KR100350792B1 (en) * | 1999-09-22 | 2002-09-09 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Multimedia data browsing system based on user profile |
US9894251B2 (en) | 1999-09-22 | 2018-02-13 | Production Resource Group, L.L.C | Multilayer control of gobo shape |
AU7564200A (en) * | 1999-09-22 | 2001-04-24 | Oleg Kharisovich Zommers | Interactive personal information system and method |
KR100319157B1 (en) * | 1999-09-22 | 2002-01-05 | 구자홍 | User profile data structure for specifying multiple user preference items, And method for multimedia contents filtering and searching using user profile data |
US7161562B1 (en) * | 1999-09-22 | 2007-01-09 | Production Resource Group, L.L.C. | Multilayer control of gobo shape |
US7461058B1 (en) | 1999-09-24 | 2008-12-02 | Thalveg Data Flow Llc | Optimized rule based constraints for collaborative filtering systems |
US7577243B1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2009-08-18 | At&T Intellectual Property 1, L.P. | Method, system, and article for determining an availability of a telecommunication device |
US6600814B1 (en) | 1999-09-27 | 2003-07-29 | Unisys Corporation | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for reducing the load on a text-to-speech converter in a messaging system capable of text-to-speech conversion of e-mail documents |
GB9922765D0 (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 1999-11-24 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Television |
AU7718500A (en) * | 1999-09-28 | 2001-04-30 | Imetrikus, Inc. | Internet brokering service based upon individual health profiles |
US7734680B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2010-06-08 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for realizing personalized information from multiple information sources |
US7797543B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2010-09-14 | United States Postal Service | Systems and methods for authenticating an electronic message |
US7444661B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2008-10-28 | Gateway Inc. | Electronic program guide utilizing multiple tuning sources |
US7188355B1 (en) * | 1999-09-30 | 2007-03-06 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Television program recommendation system |
US7010492B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2006-03-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamic distribution of controlled and additional selective overlays in a streaming media |
CN1451213B (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2012-10-10 | 美国邮政服务 | Systems and methods for authenticating an electronic message |
US8341662B1 (en) | 1999-09-30 | 2012-12-25 | International Business Machine Corporation | User-controlled selective overlay in a streaming media |
WO2001025948A1 (en) * | 1999-10-05 | 2001-04-12 | Zapmedia, Inc. | System and method for distributing media assets to user devices and managing user rights of the media assets |
US6442696B1 (en) | 1999-10-05 | 2002-08-27 | Authoriszor, Inc. | System and method for extensible positive client identification |
US8434113B1 (en) | 1999-10-06 | 2013-04-30 | Tvworks, Llc | Electronic commerce using streaming media |
US7743070B1 (en) | 1999-10-07 | 2010-06-22 | Blumberg J Seth | Entertainment management interactive system using a computer network |
WO2001026270A2 (en) * | 1999-10-07 | 2001-04-12 | World Multicast.Com, Inc. | Automated subscriber ip multicast programming |
US6240415B1 (en) | 1999-10-07 | 2001-05-29 | J. Seth Blumberg | Corporate and entertainment management interactive system using a computer network |
US7155735B1 (en) * | 1999-10-08 | 2006-12-26 | Vulcan Patents Llc | System and method for the broadcast dissemination of time-ordered data |
GB9923804D0 (en) | 1999-10-08 | 1999-12-08 | Hewlett Packard Co | Electronic commerce system |
AU1091901A (en) * | 1999-10-12 | 2001-04-23 | BBA Systems, Incorporated | Shopping advisor component |
US6847963B1 (en) | 1999-10-12 | 2005-01-25 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Method and system for appending search strings with user profile qualities |
WO2001027765A1 (en) * | 1999-10-12 | 2001-04-19 | Ecommercial.Com, Inc. | Custodial database for on-line marketing and purchasing |
US7072846B1 (en) * | 1999-11-16 | 2006-07-04 | Emergent Music Llc | Clusters for rapid artist-audience matching |
US7022905B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2006-04-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Classification of information and use of classifications in searching and retrieval of information |
US6681247B1 (en) * | 1999-10-18 | 2004-01-20 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Collaborator discovery method and system |
EP1849020A4 (en) | 1999-10-19 | 2010-03-17 | American Calcar Inc | Technique for effective navigation based on user preferences |
US20030182567A1 (en) | 1999-10-20 | 2003-09-25 | Tivo Inc. | Client-side multimedia content targeting system |
US7548874B2 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2009-06-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for group advertisement optimization |
SG94350A1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2003-02-18 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Control content transmission method and storage-based broadcasting system |
US6807574B1 (en) * | 1999-10-22 | 2004-10-19 | Tellme Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for content personalization over a telephone interface |
US7401115B1 (en) | 2000-10-23 | 2008-07-15 | Aol Llc | Processing selected browser requests |
WO2001030069A1 (en) * | 1999-10-22 | 2001-04-26 | Fujitsu Limited | Television set and method |
AU8030600A (en) * | 1999-10-22 | 2001-05-08 | Customatics, Inc. | System for tracking and analyzing data changes in computer databases |
US7941481B1 (en) | 1999-10-22 | 2011-05-10 | Tellme Networks, Inc. | Updating an electronic phonebook over electronic communication networks |
US6684255B1 (en) * | 1999-10-26 | 2004-01-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods and apparatus for transmission and rendering of complex 3D models over networks using mixed representations |
JP2001125908A (en) | 1999-10-26 | 2001-05-11 | Sony Corp | Input device and method |
JP2003517164A (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2003-05-20 | アメリカン カルカー インコーポレイテッド | User navigation system and method |
US7630986B1 (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2009-12-08 | Pinpoint, Incorporated | Secure data interchange |
CA2388606C (en) | 1999-10-27 | 2009-12-29 | Diva Systems Corporation | Picture-in-picture and multiple video streams using slice-based encoding |
FR2800486A1 (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2001-05-04 | Datatrader | Method of management of personalized commercial information in e-commerce, uses scoring via profile descriptors matched against characteristics of offer to determine whether offer will be made |
US6704783B1 (en) * | 1999-10-28 | 2004-03-09 | Fujitsu Limited | Reference state output system, reference state output method, and computer readable medium on which reference state output program is recorded |
US6569206B1 (en) | 1999-10-29 | 2003-05-27 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Facilitation of hypervideo by automatic IR techniques in response to user requests |
US6996775B1 (en) * | 1999-10-29 | 2006-02-07 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Hypervideo: information retrieval using time-related multimedia: |
EP1226524A2 (en) * | 1999-10-29 | 2002-07-31 | Privacomp, Inc. | System for providing dynamic data informed consent to provide data privacy and security in database systems and in networked communications |
US6757866B1 (en) * | 1999-10-29 | 2004-06-29 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Hyper video: information retrieval using text from multimedia |
US20030074301A1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2003-04-17 | Neal Solomon | System, method, and apparatus for an intelligent search agent to access data in a distributed network |
US20020046157A1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2002-04-18 | Neal Solomon | System, method and apparatus for demand-initiated intelligent negotiation agents in a distributed network |
US20020055903A1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2002-05-09 | Neal Solomon | System, method, and apparatus for a cooperative communications network |
US20020069134A1 (en) * | 1999-11-01 | 2002-06-06 | Neal Solomon | System, method and apparatus for aggregation of cooperative intelligent agents for procurement in a distributed network |
MXPA02004473A (en) * | 1999-11-02 | 2004-09-10 | Clarity Inc E | Verbal classification system for the efficient sending and receiving of information. |
AU1357701A (en) * | 1999-11-03 | 2001-05-14 | Measurecast, Inc. | Direct tracking of viewers of selected content in audio and video programming provided over a computer network |
WO2001033477A2 (en) | 1999-11-04 | 2001-05-10 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank | System and method for automated financial project management |
WO2001039064A1 (en) * | 1999-11-07 | 2001-05-31 | Saleshound.Com, Inc. | Computer network based permissive communication system for creating, storing, evaluating, selecting, and transmitting communications |
US6876991B1 (en) | 1999-11-08 | 2005-04-05 | Collaborative Decision Platforms, Llc. | System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform |
US6449719B1 (en) * | 1999-11-09 | 2002-09-10 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Process and streaming server for encrypting a data stream |
US8055894B2 (en) * | 1999-11-09 | 2011-11-08 | Google Inc. | Process and streaming server for encrypting a data stream with bandwidth based variation |
US6757691B1 (en) | 1999-11-09 | 2004-06-29 | America Online, Inc. | Predicting content choices by searching a profile database |
EP1100268B1 (en) * | 1999-11-09 | 2012-07-18 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Audiovisual information management system |
US6618373B1 (en) | 1999-11-10 | 2003-09-09 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and system for reliable in-order distribution of events |
US7454509B2 (en) | 1999-11-10 | 2008-11-18 | Yahoo! Inc. | Online playback system with community bias |
JP4065381B2 (en) | 1999-11-10 | 2008-03-26 | ヤフー! インコーポレイテッド | Internet radio and broadcast method |
WO2001035569A1 (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2001-05-17 | Network Privacy.Com, Inc. | Method and system for data encryption and filtering |
US6392668B1 (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2002-05-21 | Kendara, Inc. | Client-side system and method for network link differentiation |
AU1764801A (en) * | 1999-11-15 | 2001-05-30 | Invisiblehandshake.Com.Inc. | Method and apparatus for conducting e-commerce transactions |
US8150724B1 (en) | 1999-11-16 | 2012-04-03 | Emergent Discovery Llc | System for eliciting accurate judgement of entertainment items |
US7813958B1 (en) | 1999-11-17 | 2010-10-12 | Heavy Hammer, Inc. | Method, system, and software for geographically focused network advertising |
US6976032B1 (en) * | 1999-11-17 | 2005-12-13 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Networked peripheral for visitor greeting, identification, biographical lookup and tracking |
US7299405B1 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2007-11-20 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Method and system for information management to facilitate the exchange of ideas during a collaborative effort |
US7653925B2 (en) * | 1999-11-17 | 2010-01-26 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Techniques for receiving information during multimedia presentations and communicating the information |
JP4320491B2 (en) * | 1999-11-18 | 2009-08-26 | ソニー株式会社 | Document processing system, terminal device, document providing device, document processing method, recording medium |
US6993245B1 (en) | 1999-11-18 | 2006-01-31 | Vulcan Patents Llc | Iterative, maximally probable, batch-mode commercial detection for audiovisual content |
US8571975B1 (en) | 1999-11-24 | 2013-10-29 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for sending money via E-mail over the internet |
US6738758B1 (en) * | 1999-11-24 | 2004-05-18 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Adaptive bucket indexing mechanism to effectively manage service activation requests |
US10275780B1 (en) | 1999-11-24 | 2019-04-30 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Method and apparatus for sending a rebate via electronic mail over the internet |
US20020120619A1 (en) * | 1999-11-26 | 2002-08-29 | High Regard, Inc. | Automated categorization, placement, search and retrieval of user-contributed items |
US9520069B2 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2016-12-13 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Method and system for providing content for learning appliances over an electronic communication medium |
US6816703B1 (en) * | 1999-11-30 | 2004-11-09 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Interactive communications appliance |
US9640083B1 (en) | 2002-02-26 | 2017-05-02 | Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. | Method and system for providing content for learning appliances over an electronic communication medium |
JP4828679B2 (en) * | 1999-12-01 | 2011-11-30 | ソニー株式会社 | Reception device, content selection method, and broadcasting system |
US6564064B1 (en) * | 1999-12-01 | 2003-05-13 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Cellular telephone using pseudolites for determining location |
JP2001160940A (en) * | 1999-12-01 | 2001-06-12 | Sony Corp | Broadcast system and receiver |
US6674994B1 (en) | 1999-12-01 | 2004-01-06 | Panamsat Corporation | Pickup and delivery of data files |
US7062510B1 (en) * | 1999-12-02 | 2006-06-13 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | Consumer profiling and advertisement selection system |
JP4603660B2 (en) * | 1999-12-03 | 2010-12-22 | キヤノン株式会社 | Broadcast receiving apparatus and method for controlling broadcast receiving apparatus |
US6864904B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2005-03-08 | Girafa.Com Inc. | Framework for providing visual context to www hyperlinks |
US6959281B1 (en) | 1999-12-06 | 2005-10-25 | Freeling Kenneth A | Digital computer system and methods for conducting a poll to produce a demographic profile corresponding to an accumulation of response data from encrypted identities |
US6963867B2 (en) * | 1999-12-08 | 2005-11-08 | A9.Com, Inc. | Search query processing to provide category-ranked presentation of search results |
US6771657B1 (en) | 1999-12-09 | 2004-08-03 | General Instrument Corporation | Non real-time delivery of MPEG-2 programs via an MPEG-2 transport stream |
JP2003516675A (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2003-05-13 | ユナイテッド ビデオ プロパティーズ, インコーポレイテッド | Ability to use advanced set-top applications on interactive television systems |
AU4711601A (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2001-07-03 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for coordinating interactive and passive advertisement and merchandising opportunities |
US6742023B1 (en) | 2000-04-28 | 2004-05-25 | Roxio, Inc. | Use-sensitive distribution of data files between users |
US6366907B1 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2002-04-02 | Napster, Inc. | Real-time search engine |
US7305380B1 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2007-12-04 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for performing in-context searching |
US7310629B1 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2007-12-18 | Napster, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling file sharing of multimedia files over a fluid, de-centralized network |
AU2265601A (en) * | 1999-12-16 | 2001-06-25 | Planesia, Inc. | A method and system for conducting electronic commerce by using an intelligent direct marketing engine |
US7340457B1 (en) * | 1999-12-16 | 2008-03-04 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Apparatus and method to facilitate the customization of television content with supplemental data |
US20050086687A1 (en) * | 1999-12-16 | 2005-04-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for managing viewing of multiple live electronic presentations |
EP1109400A1 (en) * | 1999-12-16 | 2001-06-20 | CANAL+ Société Anonyme | Transmission of a command to a receiver or to a decoder |
JP2003522356A (en) * | 1999-12-17 | 2003-07-22 | ワールド シアター,インコーポレイティド | Systems and methods for enabling customers to order selected products from a wide range of products offered by multiple participating merchants |
US6727914B1 (en) * | 1999-12-17 | 2004-04-27 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for recommending television programming using decision trees |
US8079046B2 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2011-12-13 | Tivo Inc. | Intelligent system and methods of recommending media content items based on user preferences |
US8132219B2 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2012-03-06 | Tivo Inc. | Intelligent peer-to-peer system and method for collaborative suggestions and propagation of media |
US6734886B1 (en) * | 1999-12-21 | 2004-05-11 | Personalpath Systems, Inc. | Method of customizing a browsing experience on a world-wide-web site |
US6862741B1 (en) | 1999-12-22 | 2005-03-01 | Gateway, Inc. | System and method for displaying event related electronic program guide data on intelligent remote devices |
US7051118B2 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2006-05-23 | Tibo Software, Inc. | Method and apparatus for anonymous subject-based addressing |
US6981040B1 (en) * | 1999-12-28 | 2005-12-27 | Utopy, Inc. | Automatic, personalized online information and product services |
WO2001050299A2 (en) * | 1999-12-29 | 2001-07-12 | Pango Systems B.V. | System and method for incremental disclosure of personal information to content providers |
US6901406B2 (en) | 1999-12-29 | 2005-05-31 | General Electric Capital Corporation | Methods and systems for accessing multi-dimensional customer data |
US6678684B1 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2004-01-13 | Makio Koga | Worldwide early warning network and method of use |
FR2809839A1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2001-12-07 | Thomson Multimedia Sa | METHOD FOR DOWNLOADING DATA PROCESSED BY ADVERTISEMENT SIGNALS |
US7139728B2 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2006-11-21 | Rod Rigole | Systems and methods for online selection of service providers and management of service accounts |
US6965865B2 (en) | 1999-12-30 | 2005-11-15 | Bank One Delaware N.A. | System and method for integrated customer management |
WO2001050302A2 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2001-07-12 | General Electric Company | Collaboration tool via computer network |
WO2001050793A1 (en) * | 2000-01-04 | 2001-07-12 | Advertising.Com | System and method for transmission of advertising to wireless devices |
WO2001050331A2 (en) * | 2000-01-06 | 2001-07-12 | L90, Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting and delivering internet based advertising |
US6496802B1 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2002-12-17 | Mp3.Com, Inc. | System and method for providing access to electronic works |
US8214254B1 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2012-07-03 | Home Producers Network, Llc | Method and system for compiling a consumer-based electronic database, searchable according to individual internet user-defined micro-demographics (II) |
US7720707B1 (en) | 2000-01-07 | 2010-05-18 | Home Producers Network, Llc | Method and system for compiling a consumer-based electronic database, searchable according to individual internet user-defined micro-demographics |
US7610597B1 (en) | 2000-01-08 | 2009-10-27 | Lightningcast, Inc. | Process for providing targeted user content blended with a media stream |
US6578008B1 (en) * | 2000-01-12 | 2003-06-10 | Aaron R. Chacker | Method and system for an online talent business |
EP1252595A2 (en) * | 2000-01-12 | 2002-10-30 | Metavante Corporation | Integrated systems for electronic bill presentment and payment |
US7139723B2 (en) * | 2000-01-13 | 2006-11-21 | Erinmedia, Llc | Privacy compliant multiple dataset correlation system |
GB2358263A (en) * | 2000-01-13 | 2001-07-18 | Applied Psychology Res Ltd | Generating user profile data |
US7146329B2 (en) | 2000-01-13 | 2006-12-05 | Erinmedia, Llc | Privacy compliant multiple dataset correlation and content delivery system and methods |
US7324948B2 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2008-01-29 | Carl Teo Balbach | Context-specific contact information |
US20060206412A1 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2006-09-14 | Van Luchene Andrew S | Systems and methods for facilitating a transaction by matching seller information and buyer information |
US20010028662A1 (en) * | 2000-01-18 | 2001-10-11 | Hunt Paul M. | Method and system of real-time optimization and implementation of content and advertising programming decisions for broadcasts and narrowcasts |
US6912528B2 (en) | 2000-01-18 | 2005-06-28 | Gregg S. Homer | Rechargeable media distribution and play system |
US20020100042A1 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2002-07-25 | Denis Khoo | Method and system for providing intelligent advertisement placement in a motion picture |
US6748539B1 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2004-06-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for securely checking in and checking out digitized content |
US7124091B1 (en) | 2000-01-19 | 2006-10-17 | Individual Network, Llc | Method and system for ordering an advertising spot over a data network |
US20040193488A1 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2004-09-30 | Denis Khoo | Method and system for advertising over a data network |
US20040107434A1 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2004-06-03 | Denis Khoo | Customized media method and system |
US8813123B2 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2014-08-19 | Interad Technologies, Llc | Content with customized advertisement |
US20020019769A1 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2002-02-14 | Steven Barritz | System and method for establishing incentives for promoting the exchange of personal information and targeted advertising |
US6434747B1 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2002-08-13 | Individual Network, Inc. | Method and system for providing a customized media list |
US6735778B2 (en) * | 2000-01-19 | 2004-05-11 | Denis Khoo | Method and system for providing home shopping programs |
JP3512386B2 (en) * | 2000-01-20 | 2004-03-29 | 株式会社スクウェア・エニックス | Online composite service provision processing method and online composite service provision processing system |
US7933968B1 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2011-04-26 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Token-based personalization of smart appliances |
US6389467B1 (en) | 2000-01-24 | 2002-05-14 | Friskit, Inc. | Streaming media search and continuous playback system of media resources located by multiple network addresses |
JP3994368B2 (en) * | 2000-01-25 | 2007-10-17 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and recording medium |
KR20010000076A (en) * | 2000-01-26 | 2001-01-05 | 오기호 | Internet service system for providing designed information |
US20030208588A1 (en) * | 2000-01-26 | 2003-11-06 | Segal Michael M. | Systems and methods for directing content without compromising privacy |
US6606659B1 (en) | 2000-01-28 | 2003-08-12 | Websense, Inc. | System and method for controlling access to internet sites |
US6757682B1 (en) * | 2000-01-28 | 2004-06-29 | Interval Research Corporation | Alerting users to items of current interest |
US9252898B2 (en) | 2000-01-28 | 2016-02-02 | Zarbaña Digital Fund Llc | Music distribution systems |
US20010037295A1 (en) * | 2000-01-31 | 2001-11-01 | Olsen Karl R. | Push model internet bill presentment and payment system and method |
EP2257061A1 (en) | 2000-02-01 | 2010-12-01 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Methods and system for forced advertising |
EP1252769B2 (en) | 2000-02-01 | 2006-12-20 | Swisscom Mobile AG | System and method for diffusing image objects |
US6571240B1 (en) | 2000-02-02 | 2003-05-27 | Chi Fai Ho | Information processing for searching categorizing information in a document based on a categorization hierarchy and extracted phrases |
DE60044423D1 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2010-07-01 | Hitachi Ltd | Method and device for retrieving and outputting documents and storage medium with corresponding program |
US7333983B2 (en) | 2000-02-03 | 2008-02-19 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of and an apparatus for retrieving and delivering documents and a recording media on which a program for retrieving and delivering documents are stored |
US7051352B1 (en) * | 2000-02-04 | 2006-05-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Adaptive TV program recommender |
US6892191B1 (en) | 2000-02-07 | 2005-05-10 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Multi-feature combination generation and classification effectiveness evaluation using genetic algorithms |
CA2298194A1 (en) * | 2000-02-07 | 2001-08-07 | Profilium Inc. | Method and system for delivering and targeting advertisements over wireless networks |
US7240067B2 (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2007-07-03 | Sybase, Inc. | System and methodology for extraction and aggregation of data from dynamic content |
US7644018B1 (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2010-01-05 | Sony Corporation | System and method for providing publicly vended content via a wireless network |
US7441014B1 (en) | 2000-02-09 | 2008-10-21 | Tvworks, Llc | Broadcast distribution using low-level objects and locator tables |
US7143089B2 (en) * | 2000-02-10 | 2006-11-28 | Involve Technology, Inc. | System for creating and maintaining a database of information utilizing user opinions |
US6993719B1 (en) * | 2000-02-11 | 2006-01-31 | Sony Corporation | System and method for animated character photo-editing interface and cross-platform education icon |
US7136528B2 (en) | 2000-02-11 | 2006-11-14 | Sony Corporation | System and method for editing digital images |
US6721953B1 (en) * | 2000-02-11 | 2004-04-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Display of television program information using dynamically-adjusted scroll rate |
US7262778B1 (en) | 2000-02-11 | 2007-08-28 | Sony Corporation | Automatic color adjustment of a template design |
US8290809B1 (en) | 2000-02-14 | 2012-10-16 | Ebay Inc. | Determining a community rating for a user using feedback ratings of related users in an electronic environment |
US7136860B2 (en) * | 2000-02-14 | 2006-11-14 | Overture Services, Inc. | System and method to determine the validity of an interaction on a network |
US6867789B1 (en) | 2000-02-15 | 2005-03-15 | Bank One, Delaware, National Association | System and method for generating graphical user interfaces |
US6370646B1 (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2002-04-09 | Miramar Systems | Method and apparatus for multiplatform migration |
US6834308B1 (en) * | 2000-02-17 | 2004-12-21 | Audible Magic Corporation | Method and apparatus for identifying media content presented on a media playing device |
US6886005B2 (en) * | 2000-02-17 | 2005-04-26 | E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. | RDL search engine |
US20050283796A1 (en) | 2000-02-18 | 2005-12-22 | Prime Research Alliance E., Inc. | Method and system for addressable and program independent advertising during recorded programs |
GB2360106B (en) * | 2000-02-21 | 2004-09-22 | Ac Properties Bv | Ordering playable works |
US20080059329A1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2008-03-06 | Luchene Andrew S V | Systems and methods wherein a transfer code facilitates a transaction between a seller and a buyer |
US6912571B1 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2005-06-28 | Frank David Serena | Method of replacing content |
EP1259897A2 (en) * | 2000-02-23 | 2002-11-27 | Flavio Sgambaro | Information system and method |
US6701362B1 (en) | 2000-02-23 | 2004-03-02 | Purpleyogi.Com Inc. | Method for creating user profiles |
JP2003524340A (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2003-08-12 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | Transmission system |
WO2001063391A2 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2001-08-30 | Tvgrid, Inc. | Web-driven calendar updating system |
US6937994B1 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2005-08-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for efficiently generating models for targeting products and promotions using classification method by choosing points to be labeled |
US20030023678A1 (en) * | 2000-02-24 | 2003-01-30 | Mitja Rugelj | Device and process for enabling voluntary exchange of data for electronic points |
US6968565B1 (en) | 2000-02-25 | 2005-11-22 | Vulcan Patents Llc | Detection of content display observers with prevention of unauthorized access to identification signal |
US8910199B2 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2014-12-09 | Interval Licensing Llc | Targeted television content display |
US7661116B2 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2010-02-09 | Vulcan Patents Llc | Auction for targeted content |
US7392281B1 (en) * | 2000-02-25 | 2008-06-24 | Navic Systems, Inc. | System and method for providing guaranteed delivery of messages to embedded devices over a data network |
WO2001063916A1 (en) | 2000-02-25 | 2001-08-30 | Interval Research Corporation | Method and system for selecting advertisements |
WO2001065453A1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2001-09-07 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Privacy-protected targeting system |
US9614934B2 (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2017-04-04 | Paypal, Inc. | Methods and systems for harvesting comments regarding users on a network-based facility |
JP3348067B2 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2002-11-20 | 株式会社電通 | Method and apparatus for controlling advertisement playback |
US7428505B1 (en) | 2000-02-29 | 2008-09-23 | Ebay, Inc. | Method and system for harvesting feedback and comments regarding multiple items from users of a network-based transaction facility |
US7827581B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2010-11-02 | BE Labs, Inc. | Wireless multimedia system |
WO2001065747A1 (en) * | 2000-03-01 | 2001-09-07 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Advertisment monitoring and feedback system |
US7505921B1 (en) | 2000-03-03 | 2009-03-17 | Finali Corporation | System and method for optimizing a product configuration |
US7539656B2 (en) * | 2000-03-06 | 2009-05-26 | Consona Crm Inc. | System and method for providing an intelligent multi-step dialog with a user |
US6704931B1 (en) | 2000-03-06 | 2004-03-09 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for displaying television program recommendations |
US6922810B1 (en) | 2000-03-07 | 2005-07-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Grammar-based automatic data completion and suggestion for user input |
US7321870B1 (en) * | 2000-03-08 | 2008-01-22 | Stephen W. Comiskey | System and method for providing financial services to high net worth individuals |
US8463780B1 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2013-06-11 | Music Choice | System and method for providing a personalized media service |
US7783722B1 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2010-08-24 | Music Choice | Personalized audio system and method |
US7133924B1 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2006-11-07 | Music Choice | Personalized audio system and method |
US7275256B1 (en) | 2001-08-28 | 2007-09-25 | Music Choice | System and method for providing an interactive, visual complement to an audio program |
US7856485B2 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2010-12-21 | Music Choice | Systems and methods for providing customized media channels |
US7320025B1 (en) | 2002-03-18 | 2008-01-15 | Music Choice | Systems and methods for providing a broadcast entertainment service and an on-demand entertainment service |
US7028082B1 (en) | 2001-03-08 | 2006-04-11 | Music Choice | Personalized audio system and method |
US7325043B1 (en) | 2000-03-08 | 2008-01-29 | Music Choice | System and method for providing a personalized media service |
US7472093B2 (en) * | 2000-03-08 | 2008-12-30 | Rsa Security Inc. | Targeted delivery of informational content with privacy protection |
US7293279B1 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2007-11-06 | Sedna Patent Services, Llc | Advanced set top terminal having a program pause feature with voice-to-text conversion |
JP2001258012A (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2001-09-21 | Nec Corp | Article and service advertisement method utilizing digital broadcast and internet, and article and service sales method |
GB0005727D0 (en) * | 2000-03-10 | 2000-05-03 | Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv | Television |
AU2001243637A1 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2001-09-24 | Blue Dolphin Group, Inc. | Method of selecting content for a user |
GB0006159D0 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2000-05-03 | Ncr Int Inc | Predicting future behaviour of an individual |
US8539002B2 (en) * | 2000-03-14 | 2013-09-17 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Subjective information record for linking subjective information about a multimedia content with the content |
US6763382B1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2004-07-13 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for demand based paging algorithm |
AU2001245810A1 (en) | 2000-03-17 | 2001-10-03 | United States Postal Service | Methods and systems for proofing identities using a certificate authority |
US20010047337A1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2001-11-29 | Isogon Corporation | Individualization wallet |
US6778643B1 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2004-08-17 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Interface and method of designing an interface |
US20040006473A1 (en) * | 2002-07-02 | 2004-01-08 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Method and system for automated categorization of statements |
US6978373B1 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2005-12-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Methods systems and computer program products for providing secure client profile completion by network intermediaries |
KR20010092616A (en) * | 2000-03-22 | 2001-10-26 | 오지수 | Data processing method and device for VDD system supporting a renting system based on a given period of time |
US7761554B1 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2010-07-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for designating required device attributes for embedding in a world-wide web document request |
US7167895B1 (en) | 2000-03-22 | 2007-01-23 | Intel Corporation | Signaling method and apparatus to provide content on demand in a broadcast system |
US8572639B2 (en) * | 2000-03-23 | 2013-10-29 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Broadcast advertisement adapting method and apparatus |
US20040255334A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2004-12-16 | Gotuit Audio, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for seamlessly changing volumes during playback using a compact disk changer |
US20010044743A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2001-11-22 | Mckinley James M. | System and method for profile driven commerce |
US20060015925A1 (en) * | 2000-03-28 | 2006-01-19 | Gotuit Media Corp | Sales presentation video on demand system |
US6484164B1 (en) * | 2000-03-29 | 2002-11-19 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Data search user interface with ergonomic mechanism for user profile definition and manipulation |
JP4992175B2 (en) * | 2000-03-29 | 2012-08-08 | ソニー株式会社 | Content guide generation apparatus and content guide generation method |
US6662177B1 (en) * | 2000-03-29 | 2003-12-09 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Search user interface providing mechanism for manipulation of explicit and implicit criteria |
US6499029B1 (en) | 2000-03-29 | 2002-12-24 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | User interface providing automatic organization and filtering of search criteria |
US7428500B1 (en) | 2000-03-30 | 2008-09-23 | Amazon. Com, Inc. | Automatically identifying similar purchasing opportunities |
EP2797288A1 (en) | 2000-03-30 | 2014-10-29 | Sony Corporation | Apparatus and method for implementing a content providing schedule |
US7308575B2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2007-12-11 | Arris Group, Inc. | Data scrambling system for a shared transmission media |
US20020054068A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2002-05-09 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing cut-offs in program recording |
AR027760A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2003-04-09 | United Video Properties Inc | PROVISION AND METHOD FOR ADVERTISING NOTICE LINKED WITH METADATA |
US7017110B1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2006-03-21 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for inferring user information need in hypermedia linked document collection |
KR20030036149A (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2003-05-09 | 유나이티드 비디오 프로퍼티즈, 인크. | Systems and methods for improved audience measuring |
US20010053944A1 (en) * | 2000-03-31 | 2001-12-20 | Marks Michael B. | Audio internet navigation system |
US7120683B2 (en) * | 2000-04-03 | 2006-10-10 | Zarlink Semiconductor V.N. Inc. | Single switch image for a stack of switches |
US7975277B1 (en) | 2000-04-03 | 2011-07-05 | Jerding Dean F | System for providing alternative services |
US6970931B1 (en) * | 2000-04-03 | 2005-11-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for translucent online interaction |
GB2361153A (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2001-10-10 | Global Knowledge Network Ltd | User security, privacy and anonymity on the Internet |
AUPQ668300A0 (en) * | 2000-04-04 | 2000-05-04 | Gotrek Pty Ltd | Apparatus and method for distributing and displaying information over computer network |
US8473342B1 (en) | 2000-04-05 | 2013-06-25 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | Method and system for generating certificates having unique Id data |
US7228283B1 (en) * | 2000-04-05 | 2007-06-05 | David Hornstein | Aesthetic profile collection |
US7870577B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2011-01-11 | Visible World, Inc. | Systems and methods for semantic editorial control and video/audio editing |
WO2001078396A1 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2001-10-18 | Stockhouse Media Corporation | Customized multimedia content method, apparatus, media and signals |
US7890971B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2011-02-15 | Visible World, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing and distributing media content |
US7917924B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2011-03-29 | Visible World, Inc. | Systems and methods for semantic editorial control and video/audio editing |
US6801936B1 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2004-10-05 | Arif Diwan | Systems and methods for generating customized bundles of information |
US7900227B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2011-03-01 | Visible World, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing and distributing media content |
US8006261B1 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2011-08-23 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for personalized message creation and delivery |
US7895620B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2011-02-22 | Visible World, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing and distributing media content |
US7870579B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2011-01-11 | Visible Worl, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing and distributing media content |
US8572646B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2013-10-29 | Visible World Inc. | System and method for simultaneous broadcast for personalized messages |
AU2001253239A1 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2001-10-23 | America Online, Inc. | Contextual programming |
JP3810268B2 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2006-08-16 | シャープ株式会社 | Audio visual system |
US7861261B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2010-12-28 | Visible World, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing and distributing media content |
US7904922B1 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2011-03-08 | Visible World, Inc. | Template creation and editing for a message campaign |
WO2001078273A1 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2001-10-18 | Adspace Networks | System for electronically distributing, displaying and controlling advertising and other communicative media |
US7870578B2 (en) | 2000-04-07 | 2011-01-11 | Visible World, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing and distributing media content |
US6772223B1 (en) * | 2000-04-10 | 2004-08-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Configurable classification interface for networking devices supporting multiple action packet handling rules |
CA2405788A1 (en) | 2000-04-10 | 2001-10-18 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive television program guide systems with integrated program listings |
US7725523B2 (en) | 2000-04-11 | 2010-05-25 | Bolnick David A | System, method and computer program product for gathering and delivering personalized user information |
US6879963B1 (en) | 2000-04-12 | 2005-04-12 | Music Choice | Cross channel delivery system and method |
US8271341B2 (en) * | 2000-04-12 | 2012-09-18 | Music Choice | Media content delivery systems and methods |
US7373323B1 (en) * | 2000-04-13 | 2008-05-13 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Method and system for multi-enterprise optimization using flexible trade contracts |
US6678663B1 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2004-01-13 | Michael J. Chiaramonte | Transaction system and methodology with inter-party communications capability |
GB2361335B (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2003-05-07 | Friendspace Inc | Communications arrangement |
US20050144121A1 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2005-06-30 | Mayo Anthony P. | Transaction system and methodology with inter-party communications capability |
AU2001255183A1 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2001-10-30 | Wu Wen | Delayed commitment scheme to prevent attacks based on compromised certificates |
WO2001080149A2 (en) * | 2000-04-18 | 2001-10-25 | Wayport, Inc. | System and method for managing user demographic information using digital certificates |
US8818855B2 (en) * | 2000-04-18 | 2014-08-26 | Intellectual Ventures I Llc | System and method for aggregating information over a wide area network |
US20040148625A1 (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2004-07-29 | Eldering Charles A | Advertisement management system for digital video streams |
US20060217828A1 (en) * | 2002-10-23 | 2006-09-28 | Hicken Wendell T | Music searching system and method |
US7979880B2 (en) * | 2000-04-21 | 2011-07-12 | Cox Communications, Inc. | Method and system for profiling iTV users and for providing selective content delivery |
US7334249B1 (en) * | 2000-04-26 | 2008-02-19 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically altering digital video images |
JP4479051B2 (en) * | 2000-04-28 | 2010-06-09 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method, and recording medium |
US7047551B2 (en) * | 2000-04-28 | 2006-05-16 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Information distributing method and information distributing system |
US8311927B2 (en) | 2000-05-01 | 2012-11-13 | Ndex Systems Inc. | System and method for anonymously matching products or services with a consumer |
US7055168B1 (en) | 2000-05-03 | 2006-05-30 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Method for interpreting and executing user preferences of audiovisual information |
EP1152614A2 (en) * | 2000-05-03 | 2001-11-07 | Hughes Electronics Corporation | Digital over-the-air entertainment and information |
US8352331B2 (en) | 2000-05-03 | 2013-01-08 | Yahoo! Inc. | Relationship discovery engine |
US7162482B1 (en) * | 2000-05-03 | 2007-01-09 | Musicmatch, Inc. | Information retrieval engine |
US7024485B2 (en) * | 2000-05-03 | 2006-04-04 | Yahoo! Inc. | System for controlling and enforcing playback restrictions for a media file by splitting the media file into usable and unusable portions for playback |
US7251665B1 (en) | 2000-05-03 | 2007-07-31 | Yahoo! Inc. | Determining a known character string equivalent to a query string |
US7877766B1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2011-01-25 | Enreach Technology, Inc. | Method and system of providing a non-skippable sub-advertisement stream |
US7934232B1 (en) | 2000-05-04 | 2011-04-26 | Jerding Dean F | Navigation paradigm for access to television services |
US8903950B2 (en) * | 2000-05-05 | 2014-12-02 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Personalized content delivery using peer-to-peer precaching |
US6912525B1 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2005-06-28 | Verizon Laboratories, Inc. | Techniques for web site integration |
US7395544B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2008-07-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Regulating the quality of a broadcast based on monitored viewing behavior information |
AU2001261232A1 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2001-11-20 | Walker Digital, Llc | Method and system for providing a link in an electronic file being presented to a user |
US7552460B2 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2009-06-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Modifying an electronic program guide based on viewer statistics |
US7478414B1 (en) | 2000-05-08 | 2009-01-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for alerting a television viewers to the programs other viewers are watching |
JP2002032406A (en) * | 2000-05-09 | 2002-01-31 | Toshiba Corp | Method and device for providing service information and system thereof |
AU2001263013B2 (en) * | 2000-05-09 | 2006-06-29 | Metavante Corporation | Electronic bill presentment and payment system |
NL1015151C2 (en) * | 2000-05-10 | 2001-12-10 | Collexis B V | Device and method for cataloging textual information. |
US6769010B1 (en) * | 2000-05-11 | 2004-07-27 | Howzone.Com Inc. | Apparatus for distributing information over a network-based environment, method of distributing information to users, and method for associating content objects with a database wherein the content objects are accessible over a network communication medium by a user |
US7103903B1 (en) | 2000-05-11 | 2006-09-05 | Two Way Media Limited | Interactive television broadcast system |
US6625335B1 (en) * | 2000-05-11 | 2003-09-23 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for assigning keywords to documents |
JP2001325274A (en) * | 2000-05-15 | 2001-11-22 | Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> | Information providing method and information providing device for network |
JP4953496B2 (en) * | 2000-05-15 | 2012-06-13 | ソニー株式会社 | Content search / presentation system and method, and software storage medium |
US6922700B1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2005-07-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for similarity indexing and searching in high dimensional space |
US8473341B1 (en) | 2000-05-16 | 2013-06-25 | Walker Digital, Llc | System to provide price adjustments based on indicated product interest |
US7899703B2 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2011-03-01 | Brian Mark Shuster | Method and apparatus for providing internet advertising service |
CA2311857A1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2001-11-16 | Wilson Grad Conn | System and method to facilitate sharing of information |
WO2001089212A1 (en) * | 2000-05-16 | 2001-11-22 | Why.Com, Inc. | Looking up a network resource location |
US8086697B2 (en) | 2005-06-28 | 2011-12-27 | Claria Innovations, Llc | Techniques for displaying impressions in documents delivered over a computer network |
US7177904B1 (en) | 2000-05-18 | 2007-02-13 | Stratify, Inc. | Techniques for sharing content information with members of a virtual user group in a network environment without compromising user privacy |
US7475404B2 (en) | 2000-05-18 | 2009-01-06 | Maquis Techtrix Llc | System and method for implementing click-through for browser executed software including ad proxy and proxy cookie caching |
GB0012211D0 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2000-07-12 | Gemstar Dev Limited | A targeted advertising system |
AU2001253549B2 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2004-01-15 | Intel Corporation | Dynamically controlling video and data transmissions |
JPWO2001090980A1 (en) * | 2000-05-22 | 2004-01-08 | 日本オプロ株式会社 | Advertising printing system |
CN1430851A (en) * | 2000-05-23 | 2003-07-16 | 联合视频制品公司 | Interactive TV. application with watch lists |
US7107535B2 (en) | 2000-05-24 | 2006-09-12 | Clickfox, Llc | System and method for providing customized web pages |
FR2809557B1 (en) * | 2000-05-25 | 2004-12-10 | Cit Alcatel | METHOD FOR BROADCASTING MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION ELEMENTS, RECEIVING MULTIMEDIA INFORMATION ELEMENTS BROADCASTED BY THIS METHOD, AND USER INTERFACE FOR CONSULTING THESE INFORMATION ELEMENTS |
WO2001093485A2 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2001-12-06 | Ideaspace, Inc. | Method and apparatus for organizing information and conducting thematic inquiry |
US7900130B1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2011-03-01 | Libredigital, Inc. | Method, system and computer program product for embedding a hyperlink within a version of a paper |
US7181679B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2007-02-20 | Newsstand, Inc. | Method and system for translating a digital version of a paper |
US6845273B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2005-01-18 | Newsstand, Inc. | Method and system for replacing content in a digital version of a mass-produced printed paper |
US8028314B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2011-09-27 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Audiovisual information management system |
DE10196230T1 (en) * | 2000-05-26 | 2003-11-06 | Newsstand Inc | Method, system and computer program product for providing a digital version of a mass-produced printed matter |
US6850260B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2005-02-01 | Newsstand, Inc. | Method and system for identifying a selectable portion of a digital version of a mass-produced printed paper |
KR100387965B1 (en) * | 2000-05-27 | 2003-06-18 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | User adaptive multimedia service system |
FR2809569B1 (en) * | 2000-05-29 | 2005-04-08 | At Sky | SYSTEM FOR FILTERING DIGITAL DATA TRANSMISSIONS ACCORDING TO USER PROFILES |
JP3622144B2 (en) * | 2000-05-30 | 2005-02-23 | コナミ株式会社 | Personal identification information communication method and wireless system |
US20020026501A1 (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2002-02-28 | Khoi Hoang | Decreased idle time and constant bandwidth data-on-demand broadcast delivery matrices |
US6782393B1 (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2004-08-24 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Method and system for electronic message composition with relevant documents |
IL136481A0 (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2001-06-14 | Im Ur Ltd | A method and a system to create a dynamic newspaper |
US20020053084A1 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2002-05-02 | Escobar George D. | Customized electronic program guide |
CA2410869A1 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2001-12-06 | Iselect Pty Ltd. | Customer decision support at point-of-sale |
US7793213B2 (en) * | 2000-06-01 | 2010-09-07 | About, Inc. | Method and apparatus for delivering customized information according to a user's profile |
US6640218B1 (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2003-10-28 | Lycos, Inc. | Estimating the usefulness of an item in a collection of information |
US7251687B1 (en) | 2000-06-02 | 2007-07-31 | Vignette Corporation | Method for click-stream analysis using web directory reverse categorization |
GB2364850B (en) * | 2000-06-02 | 2004-12-29 | Ibm | System and method for automatic voice message processing |
US7058586B1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2006-06-06 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Information delivery system for providing senders with a recipient's messaging preferences |
US6647355B2 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2003-11-11 | Proleamers, Llc | Techniques for objectively measuring discrepancies in human value systems and applications therefor |
US7072845B1 (en) * | 2000-06-06 | 2006-07-04 | Pitney Bowes Inc. | Messaging system having recipient profiling |
SG93868A1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2003-01-21 | Kent Ridge Digital Labs | Method and system for user-configurable clustering of information |
US8073711B1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2011-12-06 | Healthport Technologies, LLC | Method and system for obtaining health-related records and documents using an online location |
US20010050088A1 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2001-12-13 | Gary Leeds | Method for prevention/rehabilitation customization |
US9697650B2 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2017-07-04 | Flash Seats, Llc | Method and system for access verification within a venue |
US6560608B1 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2003-05-06 | Contivo, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatically selecting a rule |
US8346580B2 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2013-01-01 | Flash Seats, Llc | System and method for managing transfer of ownership rights to access to a venue and allowing access to the venue to patron with the ownership right |
US6496809B1 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2002-12-17 | Brett Nakfoor | Electronic ticketing system and method |
CA2349914C (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2013-07-30 | Invidi Technologies Corp. | Advertising delivery method |
US20060095344A1 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2006-05-04 | Nakfoor Brett A | System and method for fan lifecycle management |
KR100656150B1 (en) * | 2000-06-09 | 2006-12-12 | 안종선 | Automatic community generation system and method |
AU2001268320A1 (en) * | 2000-06-12 | 2001-12-24 | Cachestream Corporation | Personalized content management |
US7426530B1 (en) | 2000-06-12 | 2008-09-16 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for providing customers with seamless entry to a remote server |
JP4529240B2 (en) * | 2000-06-13 | 2010-08-25 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method, information processing system, and recording medium |
WO2001097439A1 (en) * | 2000-06-14 | 2001-12-20 | Commercial Electronics Llc | A method and system for viewer identification and data collection verification |
US7117163B1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2006-10-03 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Product substitution search method |
JP4334112B2 (en) * | 2000-06-16 | 2009-09-30 | シャープ株式会社 | Server operation support apparatus, server operation support method, and machine-readable recording medium storing program for realizing the method |
US20040073617A1 (en) | 2000-06-19 | 2004-04-15 | Milliken Walter Clark | Hash-based systems and methods for detecting and preventing transmission of unwanted e-mail |
US7599850B1 (en) | 2000-06-19 | 2009-10-06 | Catalina Marketing Corporation | Method of and system for managing promotions for purchase transactions over a network |
US8037152B2 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2011-10-11 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Active requesting of information for psuedo-live performance |
EP1295476B1 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2004-01-21 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Addressing of subscribers in a system for providing services |
US20020013851A1 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2002-01-31 | Crandall Evan Stephen | Simultaneous recording of multiple information streams |
CA2451572A1 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2001-12-27 | Steven James Joseph Koskin | System and method for distributing data |
WO2001099009A2 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2001-12-27 | United States Postal Service | Systems and methods for electronic message content identification |
US8090791B1 (en) | 2000-06-20 | 2012-01-03 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Active requesting of information for pseudo-live performance |
US7739335B2 (en) * | 2000-06-22 | 2010-06-15 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing a customized selection of audio content over the internet |
AU2001266981A1 (en) * | 2000-06-22 | 2002-01-02 | Encabler, Inc. | Automatic content viewing recommendation from among multiple programming sources |
US10185936B2 (en) | 2000-06-22 | 2019-01-22 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Method and system for processing internet payments |
US7788123B1 (en) * | 2000-06-23 | 2010-08-31 | Ekhaus Michael A | Method and system for high performance model-based personalization |
US20020156669A1 (en) * | 2000-06-27 | 2002-10-24 | Verhaegh Wilhelmus Franciscus Johannes | Method of determining a schedule, scheduler and system |
AU2001271259A1 (en) * | 2000-06-28 | 2002-01-08 | Intertainer, Inc. | Intelligent media targeting system and method |
US7647340B2 (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2010-01-12 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Metadata in JPEG 2000 file format |
AR029290A1 (en) | 2000-06-28 | 2003-06-18 | American Express Travel Relate | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INTEGRATING PUBLIC AND PRIVATE DATA |
US8041817B2 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2011-10-18 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | Anonymous location service for wireless networks |
US7263709B1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2007-08-28 | Keen Personal Media, Inc. | System for displaying video data having a promotion module responsive to a viewer profile to entice a viewer to watch a premium content |
US7162432B2 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2007-01-09 | Protigen, Inc. | System and method for using psychological significance pattern information for matching with target information |
US6691111B2 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2004-02-10 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for implementing a natural language user interface |
US6983379B1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2006-01-03 | Hitwise Pty. Ltd. | Method and system for monitoring online behavior at a remote site and creating online behavior profiles |
JP2002016866A (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2002-01-18 | Toshiba Corp | File management system and status information transmitting system |
US8087051B2 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2011-12-27 | Thomson Licensing | Database management system and method for electronic program guide and television channel lineup organization |
US8495679B2 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2013-07-23 | Thomson Licensing | Method and apparatus for delivery of television programs and targeted de-coupled advertising |
WO2002003219A1 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2002-01-10 | Plurimus Corporation | Method and system for monitoring online computer network behavior and creating online behavior profiles |
US6981000B2 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2005-12-27 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Customer relationship management system and operation method thereof |
US6425128B1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2002-07-23 | Keen Personal Media, Inc. | Video system with a control device for displaying a menu listing viewing preferences having a high probability of acceptance by a viewer that include weighted premium content |
US7165038B1 (en) * | 2000-07-03 | 2007-01-16 | Ravneet Singh | System using electronic campaign yard sign for gathering supports from email recipients |
US8010400B2 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2011-08-30 | Protigen, Inc. | System and method for using psychological significance pattern information for matching with target information |
US20130101970A1 (en) * | 2000-07-06 | 2013-04-25 | Protigen, Inc. | System and method for using psychological significance pattern information for matching with target information |
US6721779B1 (en) * | 2000-07-07 | 2004-04-13 | Softwired Ag | Messaging proxy system |
US6662215B1 (en) | 2000-07-10 | 2003-12-09 | I Novation Inc. | System and method for content optimization |
KR100374041B1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2003-03-03 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Generating method for sequel description of multimedia data, generating method for user history information using sequel description data and administrating method for user history based on sequel description data |
US7062528B2 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2006-06-13 | Sony Corporation | Method and system for identifying a time specific event |
US20020010652A1 (en) * | 2000-07-14 | 2002-01-24 | Sony Corporation | Vendor ID tracking for e-marker |
JP2002032655A (en) * | 2000-07-17 | 2002-01-31 | Fujitsu Ltd | Computer system |
US7660737B1 (en) * | 2000-07-18 | 2010-02-09 | Smartpenny.Com, Inc. | Economic filtering system for delivery of permission based, targeted, incentivized advertising |
US7031951B2 (en) * | 2000-07-19 | 2006-04-18 | Convergys Information Management Group, Inc. | Expert system adapted dedicated internet access guidance engine |
US7885820B1 (en) * | 2000-07-19 | 2011-02-08 | Convergys Cmg Utah, Inc. | Expert system supported interactive product selection and recommendation |
JP2002032596A (en) * | 2000-07-19 | 2002-01-31 | Fujitsu Ltd | Method for electronic commerce and profile converter to be used in electronic commerce |
US20060259926A1 (en) | 2000-07-20 | 2006-11-16 | Digital Deck, Inc. | Adaptable programming guide for networked devices |
US20020049681A1 (en) * | 2000-07-20 | 2002-04-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Secure anonymous verification, generation and/or proof of ownership of electronic receipts |
US20020029384A1 (en) * | 2000-07-20 | 2002-03-07 | Griggs Theodore L. | Mechanism for distributing content data |
WO2002009427A1 (en) * | 2000-07-21 | 2002-01-31 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and system for determining a user profile |
US7143039B1 (en) | 2000-08-11 | 2006-11-28 | Tellme Networks, Inc. | Providing menu and other services for an information processing system using a telephone or other audio interface |
JP2003085081A (en) * | 2000-07-25 | 2003-03-20 | Nosu:Kk | Information delivery service system |
US6687696B2 (en) * | 2000-07-26 | 2004-02-03 | Recommind Inc. | System and method for personalized search, information filtering, and for generating recommendations utilizing statistical latent class models |
US7212988B1 (en) * | 2000-07-26 | 2007-05-01 | Feldten Guy W | Test screening of videos |
US7039594B1 (en) * | 2000-07-26 | 2006-05-02 | Accenture, Llp | Method and system for content management assessment, planning and delivery |
US7937725B1 (en) | 2000-07-27 | 2011-05-03 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Three-way media recommendation method and system |
US6807568B1 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2004-10-19 | Union Beach, L.P. | Recipient selection of information to be subsequently delivered |
US7454775B1 (en) * | 2000-07-27 | 2008-11-18 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for generating television program recommendations based on similarity metric |
US6671682B1 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2003-12-30 | Lucent Technologies | Method and system for performing tasks on a computer network using user personas |
JP4433249B2 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2010-03-17 | ソニー株式会社 | Content presentation control apparatus and method |
US6779021B1 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2004-08-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for predicting and managing undesirable electronic mail |
US6990633B1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2006-01-24 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Providing a network-based personalized newspaper with personalized content and layout |
US6766362B1 (en) | 2000-07-28 | 2004-07-20 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Providing a network-based personalized newspaper with personalized content and layout |
KR20030022876A (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2003-03-17 | 아메리칸 캘카어 인코포레이티드 | Technique for effective organization and communication of information |
JP2002117206A (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2002-04-19 | Toshiba Corp | Web viewer analysis method, web viewer analysis program, recording medium and web viewer analysis system |
AU2001284365A1 (en) * | 2000-07-31 | 2002-02-13 | The Consumer Media Company Inc. | Improved user-driven data network communication system and method |
US7092928B1 (en) | 2000-07-31 | 2006-08-15 | Quantum Leap Research, Inc. | Intelligent portal engine |
US7702541B2 (en) * | 2000-08-01 | 2010-04-20 | Yahoo! Inc. | Targeted e-commerce system |
WO2002010886A2 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2002-02-07 | Captivads, Inc. | Interactive advertising and multi-media system with a plurality of mobile platforms |
US20020035619A1 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2002-03-21 | Dougherty Carter D. | Apparatus and method for producing contextually marked-up electronic content |
AU2001277249A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2002-02-18 | Steven G. Apel | Audience survey system and method |
US20020049738A1 (en) * | 2000-08-03 | 2002-04-25 | Epstein Bruce A. | Information collaboration and reliability assessment |
US7080071B2 (en) * | 2000-08-04 | 2006-07-18 | Ask Jeeves, Inc. | Automated decision advisor |
US7054614B1 (en) * | 2000-08-07 | 2006-05-30 | Denso Corporation | Context privacy for delivery of context-aware content for wireless terminals |
US7089301B1 (en) | 2000-08-11 | 2006-08-08 | Napster, Inc. | System and method for searching peer-to-peer computer networks by selecting a computer based on at least a number of files shared by the computer |
US20020083178A1 (en) * | 2000-08-11 | 2002-06-27 | Brothers John David West | Resource distribution in network environment |
WO2002017553A2 (en) * | 2000-08-18 | 2002-02-28 | United States Postal Service | Apparatus and methods for the secure transfer of electronic data |
US6757662B1 (en) | 2000-08-21 | 2004-06-29 | Richard L. Greenwald | Method and system for display advertisement qualification and notification |
SG97922A1 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2003-08-20 | Kent Ridge Digital Labs | Knowledge discovery system |
US20020059629A1 (en) * | 2000-08-21 | 2002-05-16 | Markel Steven O. | Detection and recognition of data receiver to facilitate proper transmission of enhanced data |
US7051074B1 (en) * | 2000-08-22 | 2006-05-23 | At&T Corp. | Graph algorithm for common neighborhood analysis |
US6985963B1 (en) | 2000-08-23 | 2006-01-10 | At Home Corporation | Sharing IP network resources |
WO2002017627A2 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2002-02-28 | Intellocity Usa, Inc. | Personalized remote control |
US7421729B2 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2008-09-02 | Intellocity Usa Inc. | Generation and insertion of indicators using an address signal applied to a database |
US7200633B2 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2007-04-03 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Information delivery system and information delivery method |
US20020057286A1 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2002-05-16 | Markel Steven O. | Device independent video enhancement scripting language |
US20020065678A1 (en) * | 2000-08-25 | 2002-05-30 | Steven Peliotis | iSelect video |
US7225456B2 (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2007-05-29 | Sony Corporation | Gateway screen for interactive television |
US6336028B1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2002-01-01 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Software function adding method |
US7096489B2 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2006-08-22 | Sony Corporation | System and method for interactive television |
AU2001288469A1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2002-03-13 | Emotion, Inc. | Method and apparatus for digital media management, retrieval, and collaboration |
WO2002019296A1 (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2002-03-07 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | User terminal program and apparatus |
US7343323B1 (en) | 2000-08-29 | 2008-03-11 | Gcg, Llc | Business transaction system and method |
US6980982B1 (en) * | 2000-08-29 | 2005-12-27 | Gcg, Llc | Search system and method involving user and provider associated beneficiary groups |
US6857007B1 (en) | 2000-08-30 | 2005-02-15 | Bloomfield Enterprises, Llc | Personal digital assistant facilitated communication system |
US20020165781A1 (en) * | 2000-10-31 | 2002-11-07 | Mckay Brent | Interactive media management system and method for network applications |
US20050195173A1 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2005-09-08 | Mckay Brent | User Interface for Large-Format Interactive Display Systems |
US8191103B2 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2012-05-29 | Sony Corporation | Real-time bookmarking of streaming media assets |
US20050166220A1 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2005-07-28 | Mckay Brent | Visual Network Appliance System |
US20060122886A1 (en) * | 2003-12-15 | 2006-06-08 | Mckay Brent | Media targeting system and method |
NL1016056C2 (en) * | 2000-08-30 | 2002-03-15 | Koninkl Kpn Nv | Method and system for personalization of digital information. |
US8543456B2 (en) * | 2003-12-15 | 2013-09-24 | Ip Mining Corporation | Media targeting system and method |
US7142934B2 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2006-11-28 | Universal Electronics Inc. | Audio converter device and method for using the same |
US7155508B2 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2006-12-26 | Yodlee.Com, Inc. | Target information generation and ad server |
US6615208B1 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2003-09-02 | Telcordia Technologies, Inc. | Automatic recommendation of products using latent semantic indexing of content |
AU2001283372A1 (en) * | 2000-09-01 | 2002-03-22 | Search123.Com, Inc. | Auction-based search engine |
AU2001287044A1 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2002-03-22 | Big Think Llc | System and method for personalization implemented on multiple networks and multiple interfaces |
US7003509B2 (en) * | 2003-07-21 | 2006-02-21 | Leonid Andreev | High-dimensional data clustering with the use of hybrid similarity matrices |
US20020065902A1 (en) * | 2000-09-05 | 2002-05-30 | Janik Craig M. | Webpad and method for using the same |
US20020065927A1 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2002-05-30 | Janik Craig M. | Webpad and method for using the same |
US7099304B2 (en) | 2000-09-05 | 2006-08-29 | Flexiworld Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus, methods and systems for anonymous communication |
US20060031550A1 (en) * | 2000-09-05 | 2006-02-09 | Universal Electronics Inc. | Webpad adapted to communicate using wide area and local area communication channels |
US7165175B1 (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2007-01-16 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus, system and method for selectively encrypting different portions of data sent over a network |
GB0021891D0 (en) * | 2000-09-06 | 2000-10-25 | Wave Ltd M | Adaptive video delivery |
US7058694B1 (en) | 2000-09-07 | 2006-06-06 | Clix Network, Inc. | Method for comparing two trinary logic representations in the process of customizing radio broadcasting |
US7840691B1 (en) | 2000-09-07 | 2010-11-23 | Zamora Radio, Llc | Personal broadcast server system for providing a customized broadcast |
US6618593B1 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2003-09-09 | Rovingradar, Inc. | Location dependent user matching system |
US7406704B2 (en) * | 2000-09-08 | 2008-07-29 | Sony Corporation | Virtual channel system for web appliance, including interactive television |
US7650304B1 (en) | 2000-09-08 | 2010-01-19 | Capital One Financial Corporation | Solicitation to web marketing loop process |
US6959319B1 (en) | 2000-09-11 | 2005-10-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for automatically personalizing web portals and web services based upon usage history |
US7567916B1 (en) * | 2000-09-12 | 2009-07-28 | Capital One Financial Corporation | System and method for performing Web based in-view monitoring |
US8020183B2 (en) | 2000-09-14 | 2011-09-13 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Audiovisual management system |
US20030097657A1 (en) * | 2000-09-14 | 2003-05-22 | Yiming Zhou | Method and system for delivery of targeted programming |
US7962398B1 (en) * | 2000-09-15 | 2011-06-14 | Charles Schwab & Co. | Method and system for executing trades in a user preferred security |
FI113413B (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2004-04-15 | Interquest Oy | Method for collecting and processing data |
US8843965B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2014-09-23 | Kaushal Kurapati | Method and apparatus for generating recommendation scores using implicit and explicit viewing preferences |
US7225231B2 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2007-05-29 | Visto Corporation | System and method for transmitting workspace elements across a network |
US7441260B1 (en) | 2000-09-20 | 2008-10-21 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. | Television program recommender with automatic identification of changing viewer preferences |
US8335855B2 (en) | 2001-09-19 | 2012-12-18 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for portal infrastructure tracking |
KR20020056924A (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2002-07-10 | 요트.게.아. 롤페즈 | Presenting a visual distribution of television program recommonendation scores |
US20020142815A1 (en) * | 2000-12-08 | 2002-10-03 | Brant Candelore | Method for creating a user profile through game play |
US8302127B2 (en) * | 2000-09-25 | 2012-10-30 | Thomson Licensing | System and method for personalized TV |
GB2367216B (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2004-01-21 | Hewlett Packard Co | Selection of content for downloading |
EP1199826A3 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2005-11-09 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for making information available to subscribers of a communication network and communication network for the implementation of the method |
US20020059387A1 (en) * | 2000-09-26 | 2002-05-16 | Wolfe Robert L. | Method and apparatus for identifying user characteristics and device characteristics using a communication network |
US6571249B1 (en) * | 2000-09-27 | 2003-05-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Management of query result complexity in hierarchical query result data structure using balanced space cubes |
AU2434002A (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2002-04-08 | Scientific Learning Corporation | Method and apparatus for automated training of language learning skills |
US7490344B2 (en) | 2000-09-29 | 2009-02-10 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for seamless switching |
US6584468B1 (en) | 2000-09-29 | 2003-06-24 | Ninesigma, Inc. | Method and apparatus to retrieve information from a network |
US8301535B1 (en) | 2000-09-29 | 2012-10-30 | Power Financial Group, Inc. | System and method for analyzing and searching financial instrument data |
US7382796B2 (en) | 2000-12-13 | 2008-06-03 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for seamless switching through buffering |
WO2002030111A2 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2002-04-11 | Gist Communications, Inc. | Method and system for creating and presenting a recommendation-based guide to television viewing choices |
US7103906B1 (en) | 2000-09-29 | 2006-09-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | User controlled multi-device media-on-demand system |
US7036146B1 (en) * | 2000-10-03 | 2006-04-25 | Sandia Corporation | System and method for secure group transactions |
JPWO2002029634A1 (en) * | 2000-10-03 | 2004-02-12 | 株式会社ビューポイントコミュニケーションズ | Information retrieval / collection / delivery method on distributed computers |
US7370009B1 (en) | 2000-10-05 | 2008-05-06 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Extreme capacity management in an electronic marketplace environment |
US20020042754A1 (en) * | 2000-10-10 | 2002-04-11 | Del Beccaro David J. | System and method for receiving broadcast audio/video works and for enabling a consumer to purchase the received audio/video works |
JP2004511937A (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2004-04-15 | ユナイテッド ビデオ プロパティーズ, インコーポレイテッド | System and method for providing storage of data in a server of an on-demand media delivery system |
US7043760B2 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2006-05-09 | David H. Holtzman | System and method for establishing and managing relationships between pseudonymous identifications and memberships in organizations |
US7197470B1 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2007-03-27 | Buzzmetrics, Ltd. | System and method for collection analysis of electronic discussion methods |
US7185065B1 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2007-02-27 | Buzzmetrics Ltd | System and method for scoring electronic messages |
AU2002211570A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2002-04-22 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for caching data in media-on-demand systems |
AU2002213071A1 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2002-04-22 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for supplementing on-demand media |
CA2425450A1 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2002-04-18 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing targeted advertisements based on current activity |
US20020062368A1 (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2002-05-23 | David Holtzman | System and method for establishing and evaluating cross community identities in electronic forums |
JP2002191039A (en) * | 2000-10-11 | 2002-07-05 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | State management method for terminal and its system |
US7580890B2 (en) | 2000-10-12 | 2009-08-25 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for supervising account management operations |
US7028329B1 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2006-04-11 | Seiko Epson Corporation | Remote accessible programming |
US6947966B1 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2005-09-20 | Road Runner Holdco Llc | System and method for influencing dynamic community shared elements of audio, video, and text programming via a polling system |
DE60035348T2 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2008-03-20 | Sun Microsystems, Inc., Santa Clara | Extendable provisioning mechanism for a service gateway |
EP1198101A1 (en) * | 2000-10-13 | 2002-04-17 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Provisioning mechanism for a service gateway |
DE60143848D1 (en) | 2000-10-15 | 2011-02-24 | Directv Group Inc | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ADVERTISING DURING A PAUSE |
US20020046120A1 (en) * | 2000-10-16 | 2002-04-18 | Collins Matthew G. | Method of obtaining personal and survey information through games of chance |
US20040010417A1 (en) * | 2000-10-16 | 2004-01-15 | Ariel Peled | Method and apparatus for supporting electronic content distribution |
US20030046401A1 (en) * | 2000-10-16 | 2003-03-06 | Abbott Kenneth H. | Dynamically determing appropriate computer user interfaces |
US20020046402A1 (en) * | 2000-10-16 | 2002-04-18 | Olalekan Akinyanmi | Application server delivery of information to customers from multiple sources |
US7831467B1 (en) * | 2000-10-17 | 2010-11-09 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Method and system for retaining customer loyalty |
US7136834B1 (en) | 2000-10-19 | 2006-11-14 | Liquidnet, Inc. | Electronic securities marketplace having integration with order management systems |
US7200357B2 (en) * | 2000-10-20 | 2007-04-03 | Universal Electronics Inc. | Automotive storage and playback device and method for using the same |
US7054256B2 (en) * | 2000-10-20 | 2006-05-30 | Ochoa Optics Llc | High capacity digital data storage by transmission of radiant energy through arrays of small diameter holes |
JP2002203180A (en) * | 2000-10-23 | 2002-07-19 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Device and method for outputting control information |
US20030088482A1 (en) * | 2000-10-24 | 2003-05-08 | Blumberg J. Seth | Grouping and pooling of economic and design resources relating to products and services |
AU2002226879A1 (en) * | 2000-10-24 | 2002-05-06 | Doubleclick Inc. | Method and system for sharing anonymous user information |
US7890989B1 (en) | 2000-10-24 | 2011-02-15 | Sony Corporation | Automated context-sensitive updating on content in an audiovisual storage system |
US20060015390A1 (en) * | 2000-10-26 | 2006-01-19 | Vikas Rijsinghani | System and method for identifying and approaching browsers most likely to transact business based upon real-time data mining |
US9819561B2 (en) | 2000-10-26 | 2017-11-14 | Liveperson, Inc. | System and methods for facilitating object assignments |
JP2002132818A (en) * | 2000-10-26 | 2002-05-10 | Seiko Epson Corp | System and terminal for providing service, client terminal, and storage medium |
US8868448B2 (en) | 2000-10-26 | 2014-10-21 | Liveperson, Inc. | Systems and methods to facilitate selling of products and services |
US7027974B1 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2006-04-11 | Science Applications International Corporation | Ontology-based parser for natural language processing |
US6856983B2 (en) * | 2000-10-27 | 2005-02-15 | Panacya, Inc. | Adaptive feedback control in e-service management |
US7987280B1 (en) * | 2000-10-27 | 2011-07-26 | Realnetworks, Inc. | System and method for locating and capturing desired media content from media broadcasts |
KR20020067925A (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2002-08-24 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | Adaptive method and apparatus for automatically customizing enhanced program content to user preferences |
US7844489B2 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2010-11-30 | Buyerleverage | Buyer-driven targeting of purchasing entities |
US7188081B1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2007-03-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Electronic shopping basket |
US7581237B1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2009-08-25 | Pace Plc | Method and apparatus for generating television program recommendations based on prior queries |
US20030158776A1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2003-08-21 | Mark Landesmann | Buyer-driven targeting of purchasing entities |
US20020112035A1 (en) * | 2000-10-30 | 2002-08-15 | Carey Brian M. | System and method for performing content experience management |
US7277961B1 (en) | 2000-10-31 | 2007-10-02 | Iprivacy, Llc | Method and system for obscuring user access patterns using a buffer memory |
US7945476B2 (en) * | 2000-10-31 | 2011-05-17 | Context Web, Inc. | Internet contextual advertisement delivery system |
US6668251B1 (en) | 2000-11-01 | 2003-12-23 | Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc. | Rendering discriminator members from an initial set of result data |
US8271333B1 (en) | 2000-11-02 | 2012-09-18 | Yahoo! Inc. | Content-related wallpaper |
US7360080B2 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2008-04-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Non-transferable anonymous credential system with optional anonymity revocation |
US7725405B2 (en) * | 2000-11-03 | 2010-05-25 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for agency based posting and searching for job openings via a computer system and network |
US8515959B2 (en) | 2000-11-06 | 2013-08-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for maintaining and navigating a non-hierarchical personal spatial file system |
US20020055871A1 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2002-05-09 | Thilo Gabler | Method and apparatus for interactive advertising |
US7200606B2 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2007-04-03 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Method and system for selecting documents by measuring document quality |
US20020055876A1 (en) * | 2000-11-07 | 2002-05-09 | Thilo Gabler | Method and apparatus for interactive advertising using user responses |
US6933433B1 (en) | 2000-11-08 | 2005-08-23 | Viacom, Inc. | Method for producing playlists for personalized music stations and for transmitting songs on such playlists |
US7228287B1 (en) * | 2000-11-13 | 2007-06-05 | Ben Simon Samson | Method of providing online incentives |
WO2002049311A2 (en) * | 2000-11-14 | 2002-06-20 | Tritrust.Com, Inc. | Pseudonym credentialing system |
US8127326B2 (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2012-02-28 | Claussen Paul J | Proximity detection using wireless connectivity in a communications system |
CA2428946C (en) | 2000-11-14 | 2010-06-22 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Networked subscriber television distribution |
AU2002243223A1 (en) * | 2000-11-15 | 2002-06-24 | Robert P Arbuckle | System and method for guiding a computer user to promotional material |
US7996288B1 (en) | 2000-11-15 | 2011-08-09 | Iprivacy, Llc | Method and system for processing recurrent consumer transactions |
US20020152463A1 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2002-10-17 | Dudkiewicz Gil Gavriel | System and method for personalized presentation of video programming events |
AU2002239297A1 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2002-06-03 | Mydtv, Inc. | System and methods for determining the desirability of video programming events |
US7444660B2 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2008-10-28 | Meevee, Inc. | System and method for generating metadata for video programming events |
US20020100046A1 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2002-07-25 | Dudkiewicz Gil Gavriel | System and method for determining the desirability of video programming events |
US20020083468A1 (en) * | 2000-11-16 | 2002-06-27 | Dudkiewicz Gil Gavriel | System and method for generating metadata for segments of a video program |
CA2326368A1 (en) * | 2000-11-20 | 2002-05-20 | Adexact Corporation | Method and system for targeted content delivery, presentation, management, and reporting |
US6886006B1 (en) * | 2000-11-21 | 2005-04-26 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and apparatus for disclosing profile information to a reader |
US7275254B1 (en) | 2000-11-21 | 2007-09-25 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining and displaying the service level of a digital television broadcast signal |
US7043473B1 (en) | 2000-11-22 | 2006-05-09 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Media tracking system and method |
US8751957B1 (en) | 2000-11-22 | 2014-06-10 | Pace Micro Technology Plc | Method and apparatus for obtaining auditory and gestural feedback in a recommendation system |
JP2002164857A (en) * | 2000-11-24 | 2002-06-07 | Nec Corp | Information distribution system |
US6845374B1 (en) | 2000-11-27 | 2005-01-18 | Mailfrontier, Inc | System and method for adaptive text recommendation |
US20020077880A1 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2002-06-20 | Gordon Donald F. | Method and apparatus for collecting and reporting consumer trend data in an information distribution system |
AU2002235142A1 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2002-06-03 | Nextworth, Inc. | Anonymous transaction system |
US7607148B2 (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2009-10-20 | Cox Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring an information distribution system |
JP2002163546A (en) * | 2000-11-27 | 2002-06-07 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Information delivery system and information delivery method |
US7653743B2 (en) * | 2000-11-28 | 2010-01-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Protocol for throttling high volume messages |
US7016866B1 (en) * | 2000-11-28 | 2006-03-21 | Accenture Sdn. Bhd. | System and method for assisting the buying and selling of property |
US7047273B2 (en) * | 2000-11-28 | 2006-05-16 | Navic Systems, Inc. | Load balancing in set top cable box environment |
US20020065778A1 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2002-05-30 | Stephane Bouet | Mehtod of and a system for distributing electronic content |
US7209893B2 (en) | 2000-11-30 | 2007-04-24 | Nokia Corporation | Method of and a system for distributing electronic content |
JP2002171456A (en) * | 2000-12-01 | 2002-06-14 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Receiver and transmitter |
AU2002219879A1 (en) * | 2000-12-01 | 2002-06-11 | Peter I. Ohtaki | Cross technology monitoring, profiling and predictive caching method and system |
FR2817639B3 (en) * | 2000-12-01 | 2003-03-28 | Voyez Vous | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DYNAMIC REPRESENTATION OF A SPACE OF CHARACTERIZED OBJECTS FOR RECOMMENDING SUCH OBJECTS OR THEIR CHARACTERISTICS |
US7284256B2 (en) * | 2000-12-04 | 2007-10-16 | Sony Corporation | Method and system to maintain relative statistics for creating automatically a list of favorites |
US7721310B2 (en) * | 2000-12-05 | 2010-05-18 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for selective updating of a user profile |
WO2002046969A2 (en) * | 2000-12-05 | 2002-06-13 | Clickfox, Llc | Graphical user interface and evaluation tool for customizing web sites |
US7599987B2 (en) * | 2000-12-06 | 2009-10-06 | Sony Corporation | Information processing device for obtaining high-quality content |
US7017172B2 (en) | 2000-12-06 | 2006-03-21 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Recommender system using “fuzzy-now” for real-time events |
EP1576438A2 (en) * | 2000-12-06 | 2005-09-21 | Keylink Networks | Electronic information delivery system and process including supplying of information about locations visited by users of portable identification cards |
US7870592B2 (en) | 2000-12-14 | 2011-01-11 | Intertainer, Inc. | Method for interactive video content programming |
US20020083006A1 (en) * | 2000-12-14 | 2002-06-27 | Intertainer, Inc. | Systems and methods for delivering media content |
US7150045B2 (en) * | 2000-12-14 | 2006-12-12 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for protection of electronic media |
US20020075320A1 (en) * | 2000-12-14 | 2002-06-20 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Method and apparatus for generating recommendations based on consistency of selection |
US20020078444A1 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2002-06-20 | William Krewin | System and method for the scaleable delivery of targeted commercials |
IL140365A0 (en) * | 2000-12-17 | 2002-02-10 | Gammasite Inc | A system and method for multi-class multi-label hierarchical categorization |
US7051070B2 (en) | 2000-12-18 | 2006-05-23 | Timothy Tuttle | Asynchronous messaging using a node specialization architecture in the dynamic routing network |
US8505024B2 (en) * | 2000-12-18 | 2013-08-06 | Shaw Parsing Llc | Storing state in a dynamic content routing network |
US7116977B1 (en) | 2000-12-19 | 2006-10-03 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | System and method for using location information to execute an action |
US20020078171A1 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2002-06-20 | Robert Schneider | Document delivery system with integrated feedback generation facilities |
US20020078152A1 (en) * | 2000-12-19 | 2002-06-20 | Barry Boone | Method and apparatus for providing predefined feedback |
US7181225B1 (en) | 2000-12-19 | 2007-02-20 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | System and method for surveying wireless device users by location |
US7085555B2 (en) | 2000-12-19 | 2006-08-01 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Location blocking service from a web advertiser |
US7428411B2 (en) | 2000-12-19 | 2008-09-23 | At&T Delaware Intellectual Property, Inc. | Location-based security rules |
US7224978B2 (en) | 2000-12-19 | 2007-05-29 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Location blocking service from a wireless service provider |
US7523060B1 (en) | 2000-12-20 | 2009-04-21 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | System and method for negotiating according to improved matching criteria |
US6708174B1 (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2004-03-16 | I2 Technologies, Inc. | System and method for retrieving information according to improved matching criteria |
US7463738B2 (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2008-12-09 | Nokia Corporation | Method for providing multimedia files and terminal therefor |
US7295999B1 (en) | 2000-12-20 | 2007-11-13 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for determining eligibility and enrolling members in various programs |
US20020091879A1 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2002-07-11 | James Beriker | System, method and apparatus for dynamic traffic management on a network |
US7440943B2 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2008-10-21 | Xerox Corporation | Recommender system and method |
US20020082913A1 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2002-06-27 | Weijun Li | Advertising enabled digital content |
US7203768B2 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2007-04-10 | Intel Corporation | Managing network traffic using hashing functions |
US6964022B2 (en) * | 2000-12-22 | 2005-11-08 | Xerox Corporation | Electronic board system |
JP4216460B2 (en) * | 2000-12-26 | 2009-01-28 | パイオニア株式会社 | Information processing system, terminal device, and information processing method |
EP1346570A4 (en) * | 2000-12-27 | 2007-12-05 | Digital Networks North America | Advertisements in a television recordation system |
US20020087400A1 (en) * | 2000-12-28 | 2002-07-04 | Denis Khoo | Method and system for providing a reward for playing content received over a data network |
US7331057B2 (en) | 2000-12-28 | 2008-02-12 | Prime Research Alliance E, Inc. | Grouping advertisement subavails |
US20020087662A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Stephane Bouet | System and method for selective updating of media files |
US20020087483A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Shlomi Harif | System, method and program for creating and distributing processes in a heterogeneous network |
US20020087481A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Shlomi Harif | System, method and program for enabling an electronic commerce heterogeneous network |
US20020087962A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Hudson Charles A. | System and process for migrating enhancements to a system |
US20020087432A1 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2002-07-04 | Ivette Muniz | Product configurator method and system |
US20020124249A1 (en) * | 2001-01-02 | 2002-09-05 | Shintani Peter Rae | Targeted advertising during playback of stored content |
US20020087402A1 (en) * | 2001-01-02 | 2002-07-04 | Zustak Fred J. | User selective advertising |
US20040111386A1 (en) * | 2001-01-08 | 2004-06-10 | Goldberg Jonathan M. | Knowledge neighborhoods |
ATE321422T1 (en) | 2001-01-09 | 2006-04-15 | Metabyte Networks Inc | SYSTEM, METHOD AND SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING TARGETED ADVERTISING THROUGH USER PROFILE DATA STRUCTURE BASED ON USER PREFERENCES |
US6944645B2 (en) * | 2001-01-12 | 2005-09-13 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for customizing electronic communications |
US7099671B2 (en) * | 2001-01-16 | 2006-08-29 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Collaborative mechanism of enhanced coexistence of collocated wireless networks |
US6766316B2 (en) | 2001-01-18 | 2004-07-20 | Science Applications International Corporation | Method and system of ranking and clustering for document indexing and retrieval |
US20040025186A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2004-02-05 | Jennings Charles A. | System and method for managing media |
US20070198739A1 (en) * | 2001-01-19 | 2007-08-23 | Streamworks Technologies, Inc. | System and method for routing media |
CN1262955C (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2006-07-05 | 索尼公司 | Communication apparatus communication method, electronic device, control method of electronic device and recording medium |
EP1241588A3 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2006-01-04 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Audio information provision system |
US7174305B2 (en) * | 2001-01-23 | 2007-02-06 | Opentv, Inc. | Method and system for scheduling online targeted content delivery |
US9600842B2 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2017-03-21 | E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. | RDX enhancement of system and method for implementing reusable data markup language (RDL) |
US6990635B2 (en) * | 2001-01-24 | 2006-01-24 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | User interface for collecting viewer ratings of media content and facilitating adaption of content recommenders |
US8121871B2 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2012-02-21 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System, method and software application for accessing and processing information |
US20020102965A1 (en) * | 2001-01-26 | 2002-08-01 | Michael Mandahl | Wireless information exchange and management system and method |
JP2002223418A (en) * | 2001-01-29 | 2002-08-09 | Sony Corp | Contents providing device, contents providing method and program for the contents providing method |
US7921033B2 (en) * | 2001-01-29 | 2011-04-05 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for high-density interactive voting using a computer network |
US20070300258A1 (en) * | 2001-01-29 | 2007-12-27 | O'connor Daniel | Methods and systems for providing media assets over a network |
US20020120626A1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2002-08-29 | Zulaware, Inc. | Indexing network-resident objects |
US6986154B1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2006-01-10 | Keen Personal Media, Inc. | System and method for selecting content to be presented to a user |
US20020133398A1 (en) * | 2001-01-31 | 2002-09-19 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for delivering media |
US7305697B2 (en) | 2001-02-02 | 2007-12-04 | Opentv, Inc. | Service gateway for interactive television |
US6853998B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2005-02-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customer self service subsystem for classifying user contexts |
US6701311B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2004-03-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customer self service system for resource search and selection |
US6778193B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2004-08-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customer self service iconic interface for portal entry and search specification |
US6873990B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2005-03-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customer self service subsystem for context cluster discovery and validation |
US6643639B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2003-11-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customer self service subsystem for adaptive indexing of resource solutions and resource lookup |
US6785676B2 (en) | 2001-02-07 | 2004-08-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customer self service subsystem for response set ordering and annotation |
US8751310B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2014-06-10 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Monitoring advertisement impressions |
US7406529B2 (en) * | 2001-02-09 | 2008-07-29 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for detecting and verifying digitized content over a computer network |
US8112311B2 (en) | 2001-02-12 | 2012-02-07 | Ochoa Optics Llc | Systems and methods for distribution of entertainment and advertising content |
US20020112243A1 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2002-08-15 | World Theatre | Video distribution system |
US20030061607A1 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2003-03-27 | Hunter Charles Eric | Systems and methods for providing consumers with entertainment content and associated periodically updated advertising |
US20020112235A1 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2002-08-15 | Ballou Bernard L. | Video distribution system |
US7356816B2 (en) | 2001-02-13 | 2008-04-08 | Computer Associates Think, Inc. | Method and apparatus for multiplatform migration |
IL148080A0 (en) * | 2001-02-13 | 2002-09-12 | Hosen Eliav | System for distributing video and content on demand |
US7065550B2 (en) * | 2001-02-14 | 2006-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Information provision over a network based on a user's profile |
US20030038796A1 (en) * | 2001-02-15 | 2003-02-27 | Van Beek Petrus J.L. | Segmentation metadata for audio-visual content |
GB2372360B (en) * | 2001-02-15 | 2005-01-19 | Hewlett Packard Co | Improvements in and relating to credential transfer methods |
CA2438620A1 (en) * | 2001-02-20 | 2002-08-29 | Intellocity Usa, Inc. | Content based video selection |
EP2034726A3 (en) * | 2001-02-21 | 2010-12-22 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for interactive program guides with personal video recording features |
US7953636B2 (en) | 2001-02-21 | 2011-05-31 | Genworth Financial, Inc. | System and method for providing customized sales-related data over a network |
JP2002251529A (en) * | 2001-02-22 | 2002-09-06 | Sony Corp | System for providing and acquiring contents, device for providing contents, device for acquiring contents, method of providing and acquiring contents, method of providing contents, method of acquiring contents, storage medium for program for providing contents, storage medium for program for acquiring contents, program for providing contents, and program for acquiring contents |
US20020116710A1 (en) * | 2001-02-22 | 2002-08-22 | Schaffer James David | Television viewer profile initializer and related methods |
US20020169731A1 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2002-11-14 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Television programming recommendations through generalization and specialization of program content |
WO2002069627A2 (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2002-09-06 | Thomson Licensing S.A. | System and method for creating user profiles |
JP3598979B2 (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2004-12-08 | 日産自動車株式会社 | Broadcast receiver |
JP4581269B2 (en) * | 2001-02-28 | 2010-11-17 | ソニー株式会社 | Portable information terminal device, information processing method, recording / playback device, program storage medium, and program |
US7207031B2 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2007-04-17 | Wind River Systems, Inc. | System and method for utilization of a command structure representation |
US7039598B2 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2006-05-02 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Method of estimating expected revenues from business directory books |
JP2002259720A (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-09-13 | Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> | Contents summarizing system, image summarizing system, user terminal unit, summary image producing method, summary image receiving method, and program |
US8214501B1 (en) | 2001-03-02 | 2012-07-03 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods and systems for electronic data exchange utilizing centralized management technology |
US20020124253A1 (en) * | 2001-03-02 | 2002-09-05 | Eyer Mark Kenneth | Personal information database with privacy for targeted advertising |
US20060265397A1 (en) * | 2001-03-06 | 2006-11-23 | Knowledge Vector, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for extensible, profile-and context-based information correlation, routing and distribution |
US6658414B2 (en) | 2001-03-06 | 2003-12-02 | Topic Radio, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for generating and providing access to end-user-definable voice portals |
US7133869B2 (en) * | 2001-03-06 | 2006-11-07 | Knowledge Vector, Inc. | Methods and systems for and defining and distributing information alerts |
US7076485B2 (en) * | 2001-03-07 | 2006-07-11 | The Mitre Corporation | Method and system for finding similar records in mixed free-text and structured data |
US8095948B2 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2012-01-10 | Sony Corporation | System and method for billing for interactive television |
US20020144288A1 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2002-10-03 | Tadamasa Kitsukawa | System and method for allowing access to web sites using interactive television |
FR2822261A1 (en) * | 2001-03-16 | 2002-09-20 | Thomson Multimedia Sa | Navigation procedure for multimedia documents includes software selecting documents similar to current view, using data associated with each document file |
US20020133404A1 (en) * | 2001-03-19 | 2002-09-19 | Pedersen Brad D. | Internet advertisements having personalized context |
US20020170068A1 (en) * | 2001-03-19 | 2002-11-14 | Rafey Richter A. | Virtual and condensed television programs |
US20020138315A1 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2002-09-26 | Mineo Nozaki | Technical support system |
US20020138588A1 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2002-09-26 | Richard Leeds | System and method for adaptive forums communication |
WO2002076113A2 (en) * | 2001-03-20 | 2002-09-26 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Beacon infrastructure |
US20020138333A1 (en) * | 2001-03-22 | 2002-09-26 | Decotiis Allen R. | System, method and article of manufacture for a weighted model to conduct propensity studies |
US20020138284A1 (en) * | 2001-03-22 | 2002-09-26 | Decotiis Allen R. | System, method and article of manufacture for generating a model to analyze a propensity of an individual to have a particular attitude, behavior, or demographic |
AR033067A1 (en) * | 2001-03-22 | 2003-12-03 | United Video Properties Inc | PROVISIONS AND METHODS TO PROVIDE FUNCTIONS OF PERSONAL VIDEO RECORDER |
US7181017B1 (en) | 2001-03-23 | 2007-02-20 | David Felsher | System and method for secure three-party communications |
US20020138836A1 (en) * | 2001-03-23 | 2002-09-26 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for recommending television programming through a celebrity or using a celebrity profile |
US20030061610A1 (en) * | 2001-03-27 | 2003-03-27 | Errico James H. | Audiovisual management system |
US7231652B2 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2007-06-12 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Adaptive sampling technique for selecting negative examples for artificial intelligence applications |
US20020173971A1 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-11-21 | Stirpe Paul Alan | System, method and application of ontology driven inferencing-based personalization systems |
US20020178440A1 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-11-28 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Method and apparatus for automatically selecting an alternate item based on user behavior |
US20020174428A1 (en) * | 2001-03-28 | 2002-11-21 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Method and apparatus for generating recommendations for a plurality of users |
JP2002297185A (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2002-10-11 | Pioneer Electronic Corp | Device and method for information processing |
WO2002078419A2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2002-10-10 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Data protection system that protects data by encrypting the data |
US7272842B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2007-09-18 | Marger Johnson & Mccollom, P.C. | Digital content delivery system transaction engine |
US20020144265A1 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2002-10-03 | Connelly Jay H. | System and method for merging streaming and stored content information in an electronic program guide |
JP3835191B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2006-10-18 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Digital content creation system and digital content creation program |
US7451470B2 (en) * | 2001-03-29 | 2008-11-11 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | TV program profiling technique and interface |
US20020144279A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Guojun Zhou | Method and apparatus for providing custom television channels to viewers |
US20020144269A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Connelly Jay H. | Apparatus and method for a dynamic electronic program guide enabling billing broadcast services per EPG line item |
US20020144283A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Intertainer, Inc. | Content distribution system |
US20020143591A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Connelly Jay H. | Method and apparatus for a hybrid content on demand broadcast system |
US20020143647A1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-03 | Intertainer, Inc. | Subscriber management system |
US6925469B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2005-08-02 | Intertainer, Inc. | Digital entertainment service platform |
JP3835194B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2006-10-18 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Digital content creation system and digital content creation program |
US20020178447A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-11-28 | Plotnick Michael A. | Behavioral targeted advertising |
US20020184047A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-12-05 | Plotnick Michael A. | Universal ad queue |
US20020178445A1 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2002-11-28 | Charles Eldering | Subscriber selected advertisement display and scheduling |
US7412202B2 (en) * | 2001-04-03 | 2008-08-12 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for generating recommendations based on user preferences and environmental characteristics |
US20020147766A1 (en) * | 2001-04-04 | 2002-10-10 | Marko Vanska | Operating user profiles with distributed profile model using a hybrid terminal |
US7757250B1 (en) * | 2001-04-04 | 2010-07-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Time-centric training, inference and user interface for personalized media program guides |
EP1490767B1 (en) * | 2001-04-05 | 2014-06-11 | Audible Magic Corporation | Copyright detection and protection system and method |
US7092926B2 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2006-08-15 | Sedna Patent Services, Llc | Method and apparatus for identifying unique client users from user behavioral data |
US7395547B2 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2008-07-01 | Scientific Atlanta, Inc. | System and method for providing user-defined media presentations |
US20030088687A1 (en) | 2001-12-28 | 2003-05-08 | Lee Begeja | Method and apparatus for automatically converting source video into electronic mail messages |
US20030163815A1 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2003-08-28 | Lee Begeja | Method and system for personalized multimedia delivery service |
US7197506B2 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2007-03-27 | Renar Company, Llc | Collection management system |
US8060906B2 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2011-11-15 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and apparatus for interactively retrieving content related to previous query results |
US20020145589A1 (en) * | 2001-04-06 | 2002-10-10 | Sony Corporation Of Japan | User interface for an e-marker |
US20030145331A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2003-07-31 | Escobar George D. | Modifying content retrieved from a set-top box |
US20040205489A1 (en) * | 2001-04-09 | 2004-10-14 | Ncr Corporation | Operation of web sites on internet |
US7040987B2 (en) * | 2001-04-11 | 2006-05-09 | Walker Digital, Llc | Method and apparatus for remotely customizing a gaming device |
US6788946B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2004-09-07 | Qualcomm Inc | Systems and methods for delivering information within a group communications system |
US7779481B2 (en) | 2001-04-12 | 2010-08-17 | United States Postal Service | Systems and methods for electronic postmarking of data including location data |
AU2002248783B2 (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2007-02-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coupon systems and methods of use of coupons within a group communications system |
CN100409675C (en) * | 2001-04-12 | 2008-08-06 | 皇家菲利浦电子有限公司 | Method and system for registering user preference |
US7200565B2 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2007-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for promoting the use of a selected software product having an adaptation module |
US6966028B1 (en) * | 2001-04-18 | 2005-11-15 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | System and method for a uniform website platform that can be targeted to individual users and environments |
US6804665B2 (en) * | 2001-04-18 | 2004-10-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for discovering knowledge gaps between problems and solutions in text databases |
US7571446B2 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2009-08-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Server, computer system, object management method, server control method, computer program |
US7904814B2 (en) | 2001-04-19 | 2011-03-08 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | System for presenting audio-video content |
US8849716B1 (en) | 2001-04-20 | 2014-09-30 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for preventing identity theft or misuse by restricting access |
US20020157109A1 (en) * | 2001-04-21 | 2002-10-24 | Sony Corporation | System and method for interactive television |
JP2002318132A (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2002-10-31 | Hitachi Ltd | Voice dialogue type navigation system, mobile terminal device and voice dialogue server |
US20020157107A1 (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2002-10-24 | Sony Corporation | Interactive television system |
US20020157092A1 (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2002-10-24 | Sony Corporation | System and method for pulling internet content onto interactive television |
US20020157100A1 (en) * | 2001-04-23 | 2002-10-24 | Sony Corporation | Electronic program guide including virtual channels for interactive television |
US20030065670A1 (en) * | 2001-04-25 | 2003-04-03 | Michel Bisson | Personalization server unified user profile |
US7574513B2 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2009-08-11 | Yahoo! Inc. | Controllable track-skipping |
US7149804B2 (en) * | 2001-04-30 | 2006-12-12 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. | Method and system for providing evaluation of text-based products |
US7739162B1 (en) | 2001-05-04 | 2010-06-15 | West Corporation | System, method, and business method for setting micropayment transaction to a pre-paid instrument |
US20020165770A1 (en) * | 2001-05-04 | 2002-11-07 | Individual Network, Inc. | Method and system for providing content with an option |
US7131134B2 (en) * | 2001-05-08 | 2006-10-31 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Evening planner |
WO2002093436A1 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2002-11-21 | Swisscom Mobile Ag | Method for transmitting an anonymous request from a consumer to a content or service provider through a telecommunication network |
US7185352B2 (en) * | 2001-05-11 | 2007-02-27 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for combining broadcast schedules and content on a digital broadcast-enabled client platform |
US9633182B2 (en) | 2001-05-15 | 2017-04-25 | Altair Engineering, Inc. | Token based digital content licensing method |
US7003515B1 (en) | 2001-05-16 | 2006-02-21 | Pandora Media, Inc. | Consumer item matching method and system |
US7962482B2 (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2011-06-14 | Pandora Media, Inc. | Methods and systems for utilizing contextual feedback to generate and modify playlists |
US20060212442A1 (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2006-09-21 | Pandora Media, Inc. | Methods of Presenting and Providing Content to a User |
US20060206478A1 (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2006-09-14 | Pandora Media, Inc. | Playlist generating methods |
DE10123773A1 (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2002-11-21 | Alcatel Sa | Searching for content in the world wide web, where to improve search efficiency, a user is assigned a search profile that is based on his search history so that searches employ both search criteria and the search profile |
US20020174445A1 (en) * | 2001-05-17 | 2002-11-21 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Video playback device with real-time on-line viewer feedback capability and method of operation |
US7620683B2 (en) * | 2001-05-18 | 2009-11-17 | Kabushiki Kaisha Square Enix | Terminal device, information viewing method, information viewing method of information server system, and recording medium |
US7194760B2 (en) * | 2001-05-21 | 2007-03-20 | Nokia Corporation | Method for protecting privacy when using a Bluetooth device |
US6678516B2 (en) | 2001-05-21 | 2004-01-13 | Nokia Corporation | Method, system, and apparatus for providing services in a privacy enabled mobile and Ubicom environment |
US7441031B2 (en) | 2001-05-21 | 2008-10-21 | Sridhar Shrinivasan | System using registration information set by a user to allow other users to access updated portion of contact information of the user |
US7340438B2 (en) * | 2001-05-21 | 2008-03-04 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for managing and enforcing user privacy |
US7865915B1 (en) * | 2001-05-23 | 2011-01-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Content discovery and differential advertising in video distribution networks |
US20020178060A1 (en) * | 2001-05-25 | 2002-11-28 | Sheehan Patrick M. | System and method for providing and redeeming electronic paperless coupons |
US7389201B2 (en) * | 2001-05-30 | 2008-06-17 | Microsoft Corporation | System and process for automatically providing fast recommendations using local probability distributions |
JP2002366819A (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2002-12-20 | Hewlett Packard Co <Hp> | Distribution system for electronic coupon based upon identifier |
US20020184634A1 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2002-12-05 | Cooper Robert M. | Television rides |
US7228383B2 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2007-06-05 | Visto Corporation | System and method for progressive and hierarchical caching |
US20020184183A1 (en) * | 2001-06-01 | 2002-12-05 | Cherry Darrel D. | Personalized media service |
KR20030020443A (en) * | 2001-06-06 | 2003-03-08 | 소니 가부시끼 가이샤 | Advertisement insert apparatus and advertisement insert method, and storage medium |
KR100911270B1 (en) * | 2001-06-06 | 2009-08-11 | 소니 가부시끼 가이샤 | Advertisement selection apparatus, advertisement selection method, and storage medium |
WO2002099598A2 (en) | 2001-06-07 | 2002-12-12 | First Usa Bank, N.A. | System and method for rapid updating of credit information |
WO2002102079A1 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2002-12-19 | Grotuit Media, Inc. | Audio and video program recording, editing and playback systems using metadata |
US7730509B2 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2010-06-01 | Invidi Technologies Corporation | Asset delivery reporting in a broadcast network |
US20050005308A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2005-01-06 | Gotuit Video, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for recording and replaying sports broadcasts |
US20020186867A1 (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2002-12-12 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Filtering of recommendations employing personal characteristics of users |
US20040268387A1 (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2004-12-30 | Bertrand Wendling | Field of programme delivery |
EP1405517B1 (en) * | 2001-06-11 | 2013-01-02 | NDS Limited | Anonymous ordering system |
US7660459B2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2010-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for predicting customer behavior based on data network geography |
US20040237106A1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2004-11-25 | Sebastien Brule | System for filtering digital data transmissions in accordance with user profiles |
US7716704B2 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2010-05-11 | Thomson Licensing | Television program selection apparatus and method |
US7380262B2 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2008-05-27 | Thomson Licensing | Method and apparatus for generating a list of suggested scheduled television programs |
US20020188497A1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2002-12-12 | Cerwin Francis Anthony | System and method for customer knowledge respository |
US20020198979A1 (en) * | 2001-06-13 | 2002-12-26 | Allen Yu | Weighted decay system and method |
US7020893B2 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2006-03-28 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for continuously and opportunistically driving an optimal broadcast schedule based on most recent client demand feedback from a distributed set of broadcast clients |
US7055165B2 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2006-05-30 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for periodically delivering an optimal batch broadcast schedule based on distributed client feedback |
US6839072B2 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2005-01-04 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and system and article of manufacture for display of option recommendations through time-by-score |
US20020194585A1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2002-12-19 | Connelly Jay H. | Methods and apparatus for providing ranking feedback for content in a broadcast system |
US20020194603A1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2002-12-19 | Jay H. Connelly | Method and apparatus to distribute content using a multi-stage broadcast system |
US20020194586A1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2002-12-19 | Srinivas Gutta | Method and system and article of manufacture for multi-user profile generation |
US20030005451A1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2003-01-02 | Connelly Jay H. | Method and apparatus to distribute content descriptors in a content distribution broadcast system |
US20020193066A1 (en) * | 2001-06-15 | 2002-12-19 | Connelly Jay H. | Methods and apparatus for providing rating feedback for content in a broadcast system |
US8091100B2 (en) * | 2001-06-18 | 2012-01-03 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Prompting of audience member identification |
US7716332B1 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2010-05-11 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method for server-based predictive caching of back-end system data |
US6725217B2 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2004-04-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for knowledge repository exploration and visualization |
JP3825281B2 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2006-09-27 | 日立ソフトウエアエンジニアリング株式会社 | Search scheduling apparatus, program, and recording medium recording program |
JP3820925B2 (en) * | 2001-06-20 | 2006-09-13 | ソニー株式会社 | Receiving apparatus and method, information distribution method, filter storage program, and recording medium |
US8818871B2 (en) * | 2001-06-21 | 2014-08-26 | Thomson Licensing | Method and system for electronic purchases using an intelligent data carrier medium, electronic coupon system, and interactive TV infrastructure |
US7110525B1 (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2006-09-19 | Toby Heller | Agent training sensitive call routing system |
US20030158827A1 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2003-08-21 | Intuition Intelligence, Inc. | Processing device with intuitive learning capability |
JP2003016094A (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2003-01-17 | Hitachi Ltd | Method for profile management used for information filtering and program therefor |
US7328455B2 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2008-02-05 | Intel Corporation | Apparatus and method for enabling secure content decryption within a set-top box |
US7089226B1 (en) * | 2001-06-28 | 2006-08-08 | Microsoft Corporation | System, representation, and method providing multilevel information retrieval with clarification dialog |
US7098869B2 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2006-08-29 | Novus Partners Llc | Business method for billboard advertising |
US7363569B2 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2008-04-22 | Intel Corporation | Correcting for data losses with feedback and response |
US7098870B2 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2006-08-29 | Novus Partners Llc | Advertising method for dynamic billboards |
US7088352B2 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2006-08-08 | Novus Partners Llc | Dynamic device and method for dispensing machines |
US7015875B2 (en) * | 2001-06-29 | 2006-03-21 | Novus Partners Llc | Dynamic device for billboard advertising |
US20030121040A1 (en) * | 2001-07-02 | 2003-06-26 | Ferman A. Mufit | Audiovisual management system |
US20030009371A1 (en) * | 2001-07-03 | 2003-01-09 | Ravi Gauba | Interactive decision-making scenarios in an audio/video broadcast |
JP3994692B2 (en) * | 2001-07-04 | 2007-10-24 | ヤマハ株式会社 | Music information providing system and method |
US7657428B2 (en) | 2001-07-09 | 2010-02-02 | Visible World, Inc | System and method for seamless switching of compressed audio streams |
EP1276061A1 (en) * | 2001-07-09 | 2003-01-15 | Accenture | Computer based system and method of determining a satisfaction index of a text |
US20030014501A1 (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2003-01-16 | Golding Andrew R. | Predicting the popularity of a text-based object |
US20050190934A1 (en) * | 2001-07-11 | 2005-09-01 | Speicher Gregory J. | Internet-audiotext electronic advertising system with respondent mailboxes |
US20100175084A1 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2010-07-08 | Ellis Michael D | Interactive television system with messaging and related promotions |
US7266839B2 (en) | 2001-07-12 | 2007-09-04 | J P Morgan Chase Bank | System and method for providing discriminated content to network users |
US8677416B2 (en) * | 2001-07-17 | 2014-03-18 | Ati Technologies, Inc. | Method, system and software for display of multiple media channels |
US20030041305A1 (en) * | 2001-07-18 | 2003-02-27 | Christoph Schnelle | Resilient data links |
US20030028871A1 (en) * | 2001-07-20 | 2003-02-06 | Annie Wang | Behavior profile system and method |
US8972481B2 (en) | 2001-07-20 | 2015-03-03 | Audible Magic, Inc. | Playlist generation method and apparatus |
US9124384B2 (en) * | 2001-07-23 | 2015-09-01 | Fred Herz Patents, LLC | Method for automatic wavelength allocation in a wavelength division multiplexed fiber optic communications network |
US7376620B2 (en) * | 2001-07-23 | 2008-05-20 | Consona Crm Inc. | System and method for measuring the quality of information retrieval |
US8160586B2 (en) * | 2001-07-24 | 2012-04-17 | Perdiso Co. Limited Liability Company | Mobile link selection method for establishing highly efficient communications between mobile devices |
US20030153338A1 (en) | 2001-07-24 | 2003-08-14 | Herz Frederick S. M. | Autoband |
DE10135922B4 (en) | 2001-07-24 | 2004-04-01 | Grundig Ag I.Ins. | Method and device for operating an electronic navigation system on a screen |
US20030020739A1 (en) * | 2001-07-26 | 2003-01-30 | Cohen Jeremy Stein | System and method for comparing populations of entities |
EP1412874A4 (en) * | 2001-07-27 | 2007-10-17 | Quigo Technologies Inc | System and method for automated tracking and analysis of document usage |
EP1282024A1 (en) * | 2001-07-30 | 2003-02-05 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Trusted identities on a trusted computing platform |
US7065201B2 (en) | 2001-07-31 | 2006-06-20 | Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. | Telephone call processing in an interactive voice response call management system |
US20030028432A1 (en) * | 2001-08-01 | 2003-02-06 | Vidius Inc. | Method for the customization of commercial product placement advertisements in digital media |
US8515773B2 (en) | 2001-08-01 | 2013-08-20 | Sony Corporation | System and method for enabling distribution and brokering of content information |
US7908628B2 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2011-03-15 | Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc | Video and digital multimedia aggregator content coding and formatting |
US20030028884A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2003-02-06 | Swart William D. | Video and digital multimedia aggregator content availability notification system and method |
US20030028890A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2003-02-06 | Swart William D. | Video and digital multimedia acquisition and delivery system and method |
US20030028872A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2003-02-06 | Rajko Milovanovic | System and method for real-time non-participatory user recognition and content provisioning |
US7793326B2 (en) | 2001-08-03 | 2010-09-07 | Comcast Ip Holdings I, Llc | Video and digital multimedia aggregator |
WO2003015393A2 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2003-02-20 | Digeo Inc. | Providing content and applicatons via carousel transmission to thin-client interactive television terminals |
US7631327B2 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2009-12-08 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Enhanced custom content television |
JP4303921B2 (en) * | 2001-08-08 | 2009-07-29 | 株式会社東芝 | Text mining system, method and program |
US7874841B1 (en) | 2001-08-08 | 2011-01-25 | Lycas Geoffrey S | Method and apparatus for personal awareness and growth |
US7809710B2 (en) * | 2001-08-14 | 2010-10-05 | Quigo Technologies Llc | System and method for extracting content for submission to a search engine |
US7107234B2 (en) * | 2001-08-17 | 2006-09-12 | Sony Corporation | Electronic music marker device delayed notification |
US7127454B2 (en) * | 2001-08-17 | 2006-10-24 | Sony Corporation | E-marker find music |
US20030036352A1 (en) * | 2001-08-17 | 2003-02-20 | Sony Corporation | Embedded e-marker and communication system |
US20030034956A1 (en) * | 2001-08-17 | 2003-02-20 | Yuichiro Deguchi | Virtual e-marker |
FI115419B (en) | 2001-08-20 | 2005-04-29 | Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu | User-specific personalization of information services |
FI115420B (en) * | 2001-08-20 | 2005-04-29 | Helsingin Kauppakorkeakoulu | User-specific personalization of information services |
JP2005501489A (en) * | 2001-08-24 | 2005-01-13 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | System with improved user interface |
US20030046090A1 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2003-03-06 | Eric Brown | Personalized health video system |
US20030046683A1 (en) * | 2001-08-28 | 2003-03-06 | Jutzi Curtis E. | Server-side preference prediction based on customer billing information to generate a broadcast schedule |
US7047456B2 (en) * | 2001-08-28 | 2006-05-16 | Intel Corporation | Error correction for regional and dynamic factors in communications |
DE10142498A1 (en) * | 2001-08-30 | 2003-03-27 | Siemens Ag | Encoding/decoding communications data involves transmitting key information as number of selected with each data packet, decoding data by associating key number with key stored in table |
US6778995B1 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2004-08-17 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for efficiently generating cluster groupings in a multi-dimensional concept space |
US6718339B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2004-04-06 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | System and method for controlling a profile's lifetime in a limited memory store device |
US6888548B1 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2005-05-03 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for generating a visualized data representation preserving independent variable geometric relationships |
US6978274B1 (en) | 2001-08-31 | 2005-12-20 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for dynamically evaluating latent concepts in unstructured documents |
US6978275B2 (en) * | 2001-08-31 | 2005-12-20 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for mining a document containing dirty text |
US7257546B2 (en) * | 2001-09-04 | 2007-08-14 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for correlating user data from a content provider and user data from an advertising provider that is stored on autonomous systems |
US7363310B2 (en) | 2001-09-04 | 2008-04-22 | Timebase Pty Limited | Mapping of data from XML to SQL |
US20060161947A1 (en) * | 2001-09-05 | 2006-07-20 | Indra Laksono | Method and apparatus for customizing messaging within a cable system |
US7594176B1 (en) * | 2001-09-05 | 2009-09-22 | Intuit Inc. | Automated retrieval, evaluation, and presentation of context-sensitive user support |
US7089233B2 (en) * | 2001-09-06 | 2006-08-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for searching for web content |
US8255235B2 (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2012-08-28 | United States Postal Service | Item tracking and anticipated delivery confirmation system method |
US20030051240A1 (en) * | 2001-09-10 | 2003-03-13 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Four-way recommendation method and system including collaborative filtering |
US20030049021A1 (en) * | 2001-09-12 | 2003-03-13 | General Instrument Corporation | Apparatus for monitoring of DVD/CD usage and targeted DVD/CD sales utilizing a set top with DVD/CD capability |
US7703118B2 (en) * | 2001-09-13 | 2010-04-20 | Intel Corporation | Delivery of feedback information to scheduling service to determine optimum broadcast times based upon client platform tuner contention |
GB2379753A (en) * | 2001-09-13 | 2003-03-19 | Hewlett Packard Co | Method and apparatus for user self-profiling |
US7960005B2 (en) | 2001-09-14 | 2011-06-14 | Ochoa Optics Llc | Broadcast distribution of content for storage on hardware protected optical storage media |
US20030206710A1 (en) * | 2001-09-14 | 2003-11-06 | Ferman Ahmet Mufit | Audiovisual management system |
US20030055762A1 (en) * | 2001-09-18 | 2003-03-20 | Holt Laurence E. | Incremental active user profile construction for content customization interspersed with content display |
US8413205B2 (en) | 2001-09-19 | 2013-04-02 | Tvworks, Llc | System and method for construction, delivery and display of iTV content |
AU2002327677A1 (en) | 2001-09-19 | 2003-04-01 | Meta Tv, Inc. | Interactive user interface for television applications |
US11388451B2 (en) * | 2001-11-27 | 2022-07-12 | Comcast Cable Communications Management, Llc | Method and system for enabling data-rich interactive television using broadcast database |
US8042132B2 (en) | 2002-03-15 | 2011-10-18 | Tvworks, Llc | System and method for construction, delivery and display of iTV content |
US8713623B2 (en) * | 2001-09-20 | 2014-04-29 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises, LLC | Technique for effectively providing program material in a cable television system |
US7103576B2 (en) | 2001-09-21 | 2006-09-05 | First Usa Bank, Na | System for providing cardless payment |
US7907149B1 (en) * | 2001-09-24 | 2011-03-15 | Wolfgang Daum | System and method for connecting people |
US7231653B2 (en) * | 2001-09-24 | 2007-06-12 | Intel Corporation | Method for delivering transport stream data |
US7100208B2 (en) * | 2001-09-25 | 2006-08-29 | Siemens Communications, Inc. | Method and apparatus for source-based message authorization and rejection |
US7085747B2 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2006-08-01 | J Koninklijke Philips Electronics, Nv. | Real-time event recommender for media programming using “Fuzzy-Now” and “Personal Scheduler” |
US7101185B2 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2006-09-05 | Scientific Learning Corporation | Method and apparatus for automated training of language learning skills |
US20030061611A1 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2003-03-27 | Ramesh Pendakur | Notifying users of available content and content reception based on user profiles |
KR100438857B1 (en) * | 2001-09-26 | 2004-07-05 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Multimedia Searching And Browsing System Based On User Profile |
US6732092B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2004-05-04 | Client Dynamics, Inc. | Method and system for database queries and information delivery |
JP2003108846A (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-11 | Fujitsu Ltd | Sales promotion method, and sales promotion device |
US20030066090A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Brendan Traw | Method and apparatus to provide a personalized channel |
US8943540B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2015-01-27 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to provide a personalized channel |
US20030065520A1 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Jutzi Curtis E. | System and method for selecting relevant products to be transparently acquired for a consumer |
JP4334793B2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2009-09-30 | 太田 美津枝 | Selection support arithmetic unit |
DE10148280A1 (en) * | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-24 | Abb Research Ltd | Process and system for providing information |
US7251625B2 (en) * | 2001-10-02 | 2007-07-31 | Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. | Customer identification system and method |
US20030063222A1 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2003-04-03 | Sony Corporation | System and method for establishing TV setting based on viewer mood |
US20030066091A1 (en) * | 2001-10-03 | 2003-04-03 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Business models, methods, and apparatus for unlocking value-added services on the broadcast receivers |
US20030069964A1 (en) * | 2001-10-04 | 2003-04-10 | Shteyn Yevgeniy Eugene | Digital content catering system |
US7171624B2 (en) * | 2001-10-05 | 2007-01-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | User interface architecture for storage area network |
US7594172B2 (en) * | 2001-10-10 | 2009-09-22 | Fish Robert D | Data storage using spreadsheet and metatags |
US7233781B2 (en) | 2001-10-10 | 2007-06-19 | Ochoa Optics Llc | System and method for emergency notification content delivery |
ITTO20010959A1 (en) * | 2001-10-10 | 2003-04-10 | Telecom Italia Lab Spa | EVENT PROGRAMMING SYSTEM AND RELATED METHOD. |
US20030074447A1 (en) * | 2001-10-16 | 2003-04-17 | Rafey Richter A. | Intuitive mapping between explicit and implicit personalization |
US8079045B2 (en) * | 2001-10-17 | 2011-12-13 | Keen Personal Media, Inc. | Personal video recorder and method for inserting a stored advertisement into a displayed broadcast stream |
US8521827B2 (en) * | 2001-10-18 | 2013-08-27 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | Presentation of information to end-users |
JP4037081B2 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2008-01-23 | パイオニア株式会社 | Information selection apparatus and method, information selection reproduction apparatus, and computer program for information selection |
US7474698B2 (en) | 2001-10-19 | 2009-01-06 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Identification of replay segments |
US20030163363A1 (en) * | 2001-10-19 | 2003-08-28 | Campagne Associates | Computerized prospect rating system and method |
WO2003036948A1 (en) * | 2001-10-22 | 2003-05-01 | Predictive Media Corporation | Method and system for selective initial television channel display |
US7302465B2 (en) * | 2001-10-22 | 2007-11-27 | Comverse, Inc. | Distributed multimedia transfer |
EP1440398A1 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2004-07-28 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Anonymous network-access method and client |
WO2003036970A1 (en) * | 2001-10-25 | 2003-05-01 | Predictive Media Corporation | Method and system for presenting personalized television program recommendation to viewers |
US20030084448A1 (en) * | 2001-10-26 | 2003-05-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Automatic viewing-history based television control system |
US7140032B2 (en) * | 2001-10-29 | 2006-11-21 | Sony Corporation | System and method for establishing TV channel |
US7818206B2 (en) * | 2001-10-29 | 2010-10-19 | Teradata Us, Inc. | System and method for profiling different users having a common computer identifier |
US7295995B1 (en) * | 2001-10-30 | 2007-11-13 | A9.Com, Inc. | Computer processes and systems for adaptively controlling the display of items |
US20030084066A1 (en) * | 2001-10-31 | 2003-05-01 | Waterman Scott A. | Device and method for assisting knowledge engineer in associating intelligence with content |
US20030083951A1 (en) * | 2001-10-31 | 2003-05-01 | Connelly Jay H. | System and method for providing an ordered listing of available, currently broadcasting, and/or acquired products based on predicted relevance |
US8261095B1 (en) * | 2001-11-01 | 2012-09-04 | Google Inc. | Methods and systems for using derived user accounts |
US7958049B2 (en) * | 2001-11-01 | 2011-06-07 | Metavante Corporation | System and method for obtaining customer bill information and facilitating bill payment at biller websites |
US7370014B1 (en) | 2001-11-01 | 2008-05-06 | Metavante Corporation | Electronic bill presentment and payment system that obtains user bill information from biller web sites |
CA2466071C (en) | 2001-11-01 | 2016-04-12 | Bank One, Delaware, N.A. | System and method for establishing or modifying an account with user selectable terms |
US20030088451A1 (en) * | 2001-11-02 | 2003-05-08 | Toshiba Tec Kabushiki Kaisha | Technical support system |
US20030115087A1 (en) * | 2001-11-02 | 2003-06-19 | Toshiba Tec Kabushiki Kaisha | Technical support system |
US20030088454A1 (en) * | 2001-11-02 | 2003-05-08 | Toshiba Tec Kabushiki Kaisha | System, method and computer program product for complaint report issue |
US8702504B1 (en) | 2001-11-05 | 2014-04-22 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Fantasy sports contest highlight segments systems and methods |
US8250025B2 (en) * | 2001-11-06 | 2012-08-21 | Business Controls, Inc. | Anonymous reporting system |
US20030088443A1 (en) * | 2001-11-08 | 2003-05-08 | Majikes Matthew George | System and method for personalizing and delivering insurance or financial services-related content to a user |
US20030097186A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-22 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V | Method and apparatus for generating a stereotypical profile for recommending items of interest using feature-based clustering |
US20030097196A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-22 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for generating a stereotypical profile for recommending items of interest using item-based clustering |
US6801917B2 (en) | 2001-11-13 | 2004-10-05 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for partitioning a plurality of items into groups of similar items in a recommender of such items |
GB0127234D0 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2002-01-02 | British Sky Broadcasting Ltd | Improvements in receivers for television signals |
US20030097300A1 (en) | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-22 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for recommending items of interest based on stereotype preferences of third parties |
US7035863B2 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2006-04-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method, system and program product for populating a user profile based on existing user profiles |
US20030093329A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-15 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for recommending items of interest based on preferences of a selected third party |
US7571452B2 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2009-08-04 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for recommending items of interest to a user based on recommendations for one or more third parties |
JP2003150627A (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-05-23 | Ntt Docomo Inc | Service information providing system and service information providing method |
US20030093806A1 (en) * | 2001-11-14 | 2003-05-15 | Vincent Dureau | Remote re-creation of data in a television system |
AU2002366072A1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2003-06-10 | Mydtv, Inc. | Systems and methods relating to determining the desirability of and recording programming events |
KR100908822B1 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2009-07-21 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | How to create agents to be used for recommending media content |
US7281206B2 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2007-10-09 | Timebase Pty Limited | Maintenance of a markup language document in a database |
US7861169B2 (en) * | 2001-11-19 | 2010-12-28 | Ricoh Co. Ltd. | Multimedia print driver dialog interfaces |
US7747655B2 (en) | 2001-11-19 | 2010-06-29 | Ricoh Co. Ltd. | Printable representations for time-based media |
FI20012255A (en) * | 2001-11-20 | 2003-05-21 | Nokia Corp | Method and system for communicating bandwidth information |
JP2003157376A (en) * | 2001-11-21 | 2003-05-30 | Ricoh Co Ltd | Network system, identification information management method, server device, program and recording medium |
AR037425A1 (en) * | 2001-11-26 | 2004-11-10 | United Video Properties Inc | INTERACTIVE TV PROGRAM GUIDE TO RECORD IMPROVED VIDEO CONTENT |
US7814043B2 (en) * | 2001-11-26 | 2010-10-12 | Fujitsu Limited | Content information analyzing method and apparatus |
US7610358B2 (en) * | 2001-11-26 | 2009-10-27 | Time Warner Cable | System and method for effectively presenting multimedia information materials |
US6976073B2 (en) * | 2001-11-29 | 2005-12-13 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Transparent remote data storage device and method |
US20100125521A1 (en) * | 2001-12-03 | 2010-05-20 | Hanan Christopher C | Biller focused business to business electronic invoice presentment and accounts receivables reconciliation system |
US7987501B2 (en) | 2001-12-04 | 2011-07-26 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for single session sign-on |
US7194536B2 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2007-03-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for monitoring and analyzing instant messaging account transcripts |
US7032007B2 (en) * | 2001-12-05 | 2006-04-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for monitoring instant messaging accounts |
US20030110500A1 (en) * | 2001-12-06 | 2003-06-12 | Rodriguez Arturo A. | Prediction-based adaptative control of television viewing functionality |
US7962011B2 (en) | 2001-12-06 | 2011-06-14 | Plourde Jr Harold J | Controlling substantially constant buffer capacity for personal video recording with consistent user interface of available disk space |
US20030110133A1 (en) * | 2001-12-07 | 2003-06-12 | Maritzen L. Michael | Automated digital rights management and payment system with embedded content |
US7194464B2 (en) | 2001-12-07 | 2007-03-20 | Websense, Inc. | System and method for adapting an internet filter |
US7120922B2 (en) * | 2001-12-11 | 2006-10-10 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Time-adaptive control of television viewing functionality |
US20030115278A1 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2003-06-19 | Goker Mehmet H. | Method and system for personalizing content to be delivered to a group factoring into account individual interests of each group member |
JP4011906B2 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2007-11-21 | 富士通株式会社 | Profile information search method, program, recording medium, and apparatus |
US7212979B1 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2007-05-01 | Bellsouth Intellectuall Property Corporation | System and method for identifying desirable subscribers |
US7444658B1 (en) * | 2001-12-14 | 2008-10-28 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method and system to perform content targeting |
US6995872B2 (en) * | 2001-12-14 | 2006-02-07 | Xerox Corporation | Reduced-buffer error diffusion |
US9967633B1 (en) * | 2001-12-14 | 2018-05-08 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method for utilizing television viewing patterns |
US20110178877A1 (en) | 2001-12-14 | 2011-07-21 | Swix Scott R | Advertising and content management systems and methods |
US20030115191A1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-06-19 | Max Copperman | Efficient and cost-effective content provider for customer relationship management (CRM) or other applications |
US20030112269A1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-06-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Configurable graphical element for monitoring dynamic properties of a resource coupled to a computing environment |
US20030112276A1 (en) * | 2001-12-19 | 2003-06-19 | Clement Lau | User augmentation of content |
NL1019618C2 (en) * | 2001-12-20 | 2003-06-24 | Koninkl Kpn Nv | Method, system and agent for sending information over a communication network. |
JP2003189206A (en) * | 2001-12-20 | 2003-07-04 | Pioneer Electronic Corp | Method and device for generating viewing schedule |
US20050071863A1 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2005-03-31 | Matz William R. | System and method for storing and distributing television viewing patterns form a clearinghouse |
US7086075B2 (en) | 2001-12-21 | 2006-08-01 | Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation | Method and system for managing timed responses to A/V events in television programming |
US20030126108A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-07-03 | Knoinklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for access and display of content allowing users to apply multiple profiles |
US8086491B1 (en) | 2001-12-31 | 2011-12-27 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L. P. | Method and system for targeted content distribution using tagged data streams |
US20030126601A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-07-03 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Visualization of entertainment content |
US20030126227A1 (en) * | 2001-12-31 | 2003-07-03 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V | Method of populating an explicit profile |
US20030131087A1 (en) * | 2002-01-04 | 2003-07-10 | Shippy Keith L. | Method of using billing log activity to determine software update frequency |
US7565402B2 (en) * | 2002-01-05 | 2009-07-21 | Eric Schneider | Sitemap access method, product, and apparatus |
EP1466261B1 (en) | 2002-01-08 | 2018-03-07 | Seven Networks, LLC | Connection architecture for a mobile network |
EP1456796A4 (en) | 2002-01-08 | 2007-11-07 | Tivo Inc | Electronic content distribution and exchange system |
AU2003202288A1 (en) * | 2002-01-10 | 2003-07-30 | Closingguard, Inc. | Method of personalizing electronic site display |
US6654770B2 (en) * | 2002-01-10 | 2003-11-25 | Mycarstats.Com, Llc | Automobile safety and maintenance information systems and methods and related services |
US20030135553A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-07-17 | Ramesh Pendakur | Content-based caching and routing of content using subscription information from downstream nodes |
US20030135857A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-07-17 | Ramesh Pendakur | Content discovery in a digital broadcast data service |
US7412463B2 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2008-08-12 | Bloomberg Finance L.P. | Dynamic legal database providing historical and current versions of bodies of law |
US20030135605A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2003-07-17 | Ramesh Pendakur | User rating feedback loop to modify virtual channel content and/or schedules |
US7565367B2 (en) | 2002-01-15 | 2009-07-21 | Iac Search & Media, Inc. | Enhanced popularity ranking |
DE10201859B4 (en) * | 2002-01-18 | 2004-01-29 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung e.V. | Method for supplying a program-based information system with targeted location information |
US20030139901A1 (en) * | 2002-01-22 | 2003-07-24 | Forman George Henry | Navigating organizational structures |
JP2003215494A (en) * | 2002-01-22 | 2003-07-30 | Canon Inc | Composite reality feeling presenting device and image processing method |
US7328345B2 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2008-02-05 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for end to end securing of content for video on demand |
US20070113250A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2007-05-17 | Logan James D | On demand fantasy sports systems and methods |
US7305070B2 (en) * | 2002-01-30 | 2007-12-04 | At&T Labs, Inc. | Sequential presentation of long instructions in an interactive voice response system |
US20030145325A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2003-07-31 | Paul Finster | Method and system for presentation of pre-generated programming information |
US20030145326A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2003-07-31 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Subscription to TV channels/shows based on recommendation generated by a TV recommender |
US20030154489A1 (en) * | 2002-01-31 | 2003-08-14 | Paul Finster | Method and system for separating static and dynamic data |
US7386439B1 (en) | 2002-02-04 | 2008-06-10 | Cataphora, Inc. | Data mining by retrieving causally-related documents not individually satisfying search criteria used |
DE60230382D1 (en) * | 2002-02-04 | 2009-01-29 | Koninkl Kpn Nv | Method and system for transmitting information via a communications network |
CA2475319A1 (en) * | 2002-02-04 | 2003-08-14 | Cataphora, Inc. | A method and apparatus to visually present discussions for data mining purposes |
US7421660B2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2008-09-02 | Cataphora, Inc. | Method and apparatus to visually present discussions for data mining purposes |
US7428531B2 (en) | 2002-02-06 | 2008-09-23 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Customer information management system and method |
US6716032B2 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2004-04-06 | Edwin C. Reisz | System and method of correlating leveling criteria to label leveled reading books |
US20030154128A1 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2003-08-14 | Liga Kevin M. | Communicating and displaying an advertisement using a personal video recorder |
US20030154254A1 (en) * | 2002-02-14 | 2003-08-14 | Nikhil Awasthi | Assisted messaging for corporate email systems |
FR2836321B1 (en) * | 2002-02-18 | 2006-02-24 | Cit Alcatel | SELECTIVE RECEIVER OF INFORMATION ELEMENTS |
US7941533B2 (en) | 2002-02-19 | 2011-05-10 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for single sign-on session management without central server |
US20030229508A1 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2003-12-11 | Monte Zweben | Methods and systems for providing targeted marketing over the internet |
US6914975B2 (en) * | 2002-02-21 | 2005-07-05 | Sbc Properties, L.P. | Interactive dialog-based training method |
US20030221163A1 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2003-11-27 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Using web structure for classifying and describing web pages |
US7271804B2 (en) * | 2002-02-25 | 2007-09-18 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for arranging concept clusters in thematic relationships in a two-dimensional visual display area |
US7027882B2 (en) * | 2002-02-25 | 2006-04-11 | Sedna Patent Services, Llc | Compact implementations for limited-resource platforms |
WO2003073255A1 (en) * | 2002-02-25 | 2003-09-04 | Predictive Media Corporation | Recommendation-based electronic program guides with user-imperceptible preferences |
EP1343316A1 (en) * | 2002-03-04 | 2003-09-10 | Beta Research GmbH | Method and apparatus for addressing of communication of a provider of digital services |
US20030172378A1 (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2003-09-11 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for creating a personal commercials channel |
US20030172004A1 (en) * | 2002-03-07 | 2003-09-11 | Gateway, Inc. | Sales voting and shopping by recipient attributes |
US7372952B1 (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2008-05-13 | Wai Wu | Telephony control system with intelligent call routing |
US20030172067A1 (en) * | 2002-03-07 | 2003-09-11 | Eytan Adar | System and method for harvesting community knowledge |
US8561167B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2013-10-15 | Mcafee, Inc. | Web reputation scoring |
US7870203B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2011-01-11 | Mcafee, Inc. | Methods and systems for exposing messaging reputation to an end user |
US7903549B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2011-03-08 | Secure Computing Corporation | Content-based policy compliance systems and methods |
US7693947B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2010-04-06 | Mcafee, Inc. | Systems and methods for graphically displaying messaging traffic |
US8132250B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2012-03-06 | Mcafee, Inc. | Message profiling systems and methods |
US20060015942A1 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2006-01-19 | Ciphertrust, Inc. | Systems and methods for classification of messaging entities |
US8578480B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2013-11-05 | Mcafee, Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying potentially malicious messages |
US7124438B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2006-10-17 | Ciphertrust, Inc. | Systems and methods for anomaly detection in patterns of monitored communications |
US7694128B2 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2010-04-06 | Mcafee, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure communication delivery |
US20030172291A1 (en) | 2002-03-08 | 2003-09-11 | Paul Judge | Systems and methods for automated whitelisting in monitored communications |
US7296016B1 (en) | 2002-03-13 | 2007-11-13 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for performing point-of-view searching |
US20070220580A1 (en) * | 2002-03-14 | 2007-09-20 | Daniel Putterman | User interface for a media convergence platform |
US7703116B1 (en) | 2003-07-11 | 2010-04-20 | Tvworks, Llc | System and method for construction, delivery and display of iTV applications that blend programming information of on-demand and broadcast service offerings |
US8707354B1 (en) | 2002-06-12 | 2014-04-22 | Tvworks, Llc | Graphically rich, modular, promotional tile interface for interactive television |
US7617295B1 (en) | 2002-03-18 | 2009-11-10 | Music Choice | Systems and methods for providing a broadcast entertainment service and an on-demand entertainment service |
US6922680B2 (en) * | 2002-03-19 | 2005-07-26 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for recommending an item of interest using a radial basis function to fuse a plurality of recommendation scores |
US8214741B2 (en) | 2002-03-19 | 2012-07-03 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Synchronization of video and data |
US20040153360A1 (en) * | 2002-03-28 | 2004-08-05 | Schumann Douglas F. | System and method of message selection and target audience optimization |
US7716161B2 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2010-05-11 | Google, Inc, | Methods and apparatus for serving relevant advertisements |
US7299292B2 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2007-11-20 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Process and streaming server for encrypting a data stream to a virtual smart card client system |
US7841514B2 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2010-11-30 | Walker Digital, Llc | Digital advertisement board in communication with point-of-sale terminals |
US7136875B2 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2006-11-14 | Google, Inc. | Serving advertisements based on content |
US20040177004A1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2004-09-09 | Mueller Raymond J. | Digital advertisement board in communication with point-of-sale terminals |
US20070038603A1 (en) * | 2005-08-10 | 2007-02-15 | Guha Ramanathan V | Sharing context data across programmable search engines |
US20050114198A1 (en) * | 2003-11-24 | 2005-05-26 | Ross Koningstein | Using concepts for ad targeting |
KR100988153B1 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2010-10-18 | 소니 주식회사 | Information search system, information processing apparatus and method, and information search apparatus and method |
JP4255239B2 (en) * | 2002-03-29 | 2009-04-15 | 富士通株式会社 | Document search method |
US7743045B2 (en) * | 2005-08-10 | 2010-06-22 | Google Inc. | Detecting spam related and biased contexts for programmable search engines |
US9235849B2 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2016-01-12 | Google Inc. | Generating user information for use in targeted advertising |
US7680796B2 (en) * | 2003-09-03 | 2010-03-16 | Google, Inc. | Determining and/or using location information in an ad system |
US7716199B2 (en) * | 2005-08-10 | 2010-05-11 | Google Inc. | Aggregating context data for programmable search engines |
US7693830B2 (en) * | 2005-08-10 | 2010-04-06 | Google Inc. | Programmable search engine |
US20070038614A1 (en) * | 2005-08-10 | 2007-02-15 | Guha Ramanathan V | Generating and presenting advertisements based on context data for programmable search engines |
US6642636B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2003-11-04 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Stepper motor driving assembly with positive brake |
KR20040097262A (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2004-11-17 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | Method and system for providing personalized news |
US7707221B1 (en) | 2002-04-03 | 2010-04-27 | Yahoo! Inc. | Associating and linking compact disc metadata |
US7203909B1 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2007-04-10 | Microsoft Corporation | System and methods for constructing personalized context-sensitive portal pages or views by analyzing patterns of users' information access activities |
US20040137416A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2004-07-15 | Yue Ma | System and method using adaptive learning components to enhance target advertising and customize system behavior |
AU2003220617A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2003-10-27 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Internet portal system and method employing handheld device that connects to broadcast source |
AU2003220618A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2003-10-27 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Asynchronous integration of portable handheld device |
US20050246758A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2005-11-03 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Authoring system and method for supplying tagged media content to portable devices receiving from plural disparate sources |
WO2003088027A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2003-10-23 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | User configurable electronic program guide drawing upon disparate content sources |
AU2003220616A1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2003-10-27 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Handheld device that integrates personal information management with audio/video control |
US7599852B2 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2009-10-06 | Sponster Llc | Method and apparatus for adding advertising tag lines to electronic messages |
US20030196198A1 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2003-10-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for scheduling news stories based upon voting by viewers/listeners |
GB2387676A (en) * | 2002-04-15 | 2003-10-22 | Agena Ltd | A method of recommending television programmes |
US7006677B2 (en) * | 2002-04-15 | 2006-02-28 | General Electric Company | Semi-automatic segmentation algorithm for pet oncology images |
CN1452079A (en) * | 2002-04-16 | 2003-10-29 | 霍树亚 | Electronic information term selected transaction and transaction term transmission controlling system |
US7287275B2 (en) | 2002-04-17 | 2007-10-23 | Moskowitz Scott A | Methods, systems and devices for packet watermarking and efficient provisioning of bandwidth |
GB2387680A (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2003-10-22 | Qinetiq Ltd | A decision aiding tool |
US20040186783A1 (en) * | 2002-04-22 | 2004-09-23 | Paul Knight | Time sensitive inventory sales system |
US7774816B2 (en) * | 2002-04-23 | 2010-08-10 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Conflict manager for a video recorder |
JP4034110B2 (en) * | 2002-04-24 | 2008-01-16 | 富士通株式会社 | Automatic product order processing system |
US8843990B1 (en) | 2002-04-25 | 2014-09-23 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for optimized channel switching in digital television broadcasting |
US7305483B2 (en) | 2002-04-25 | 2007-12-04 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method for the real-time distribution of streaming data on a network |
US20030212568A1 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2003-11-13 | Ian Oliver | Method for measuring mutual understanding |
US20030212619A1 (en) * | 2002-05-10 | 2003-11-13 | Vivek Jain | Targeting customers |
US20040128198A1 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2004-07-01 | Linwood Register | System and method for computer network-based enterprise media distribution |
US7945636B2 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2011-05-17 | In-Store Broadcasting Network, Llc | Providing a multi-tier enterprise level application |
US20030216958A1 (en) * | 2002-05-15 | 2003-11-20 | Linwood Register | System for and method of doing business to provide network-based in-store media broadcasting |
KR100421766B1 (en) * | 2002-05-16 | 2004-03-11 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus and Method for Program proposal service in EPG application using rough fuzzy multi layer perceptrons |
US20030216930A1 (en) * | 2002-05-16 | 2003-11-20 | Dunham Carl A. | Cost-per-action search engine system, method and apparatus |
US7708189B1 (en) | 2002-05-17 | 2010-05-04 | Cipriano Joseph J | Identification verification system and method |
AU2003219435A1 (en) * | 2002-05-21 | 2003-12-02 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Recommendation of media content on a media system |
US8006268B2 (en) * | 2002-05-21 | 2011-08-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Interest messaging entertainment system |
US7305626B2 (en) * | 2002-05-28 | 2007-12-04 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for DOM filtering in UAProf or CC/PP profiles |
WO2003102728A2 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-12-11 | Predictive Media Corporation | Method and system for the storage, viewing management, and delivery of targeted advertising |
US7937471B2 (en) * | 2002-06-03 | 2011-05-03 | Inpro Network Facility, Llc | Creating a public identity for an entity on a network |
AU2003240558A1 (en) * | 2002-06-06 | 2003-12-22 | Vizx Labs, Llc | Biological results evaluation method |
CN101425811A (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2009-05-06 | 美商内数位科技公司 | System and method for a direct conversion multi-carrier processor |
US20030229896A1 (en) * | 2002-06-10 | 2003-12-11 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Decision fusion of recommender scores through fuzzy aggregation connectives |
US7444655B2 (en) * | 2002-06-11 | 2008-10-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Anonymous aggregated data collection |
US20030233447A1 (en) * | 2002-06-13 | 2003-12-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and methods for monitoring content requested by a client device |
US20030233655A1 (en) * | 2002-06-18 | 2003-12-18 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for an adaptive stereotypical profile for recommending items representing a user's interests |
US20030237091A1 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2003-12-25 | Kentaro Toyama | Computer user interface for viewing video compositions generated from a video composition authoring system using video cliplets |
US20030236708A1 (en) * | 2002-06-19 | 2003-12-25 | Marsh David J. | Electronic program guides utilizing demographic stereotypes |
US20030237094A1 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2003-12-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method to compare various initial cluster sets to determine the best initial set for clustering a set of TV shows |
US8006266B2 (en) * | 2002-06-24 | 2011-08-23 | Pace LLC | Method for using only feedback from shows that improve the performance of the recommender system |
US20030237095A1 (en) * | 2002-06-25 | 2003-12-25 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Trend analysis of chunked view history/profiles view voting |
AU2002305963B2 (en) * | 2002-06-25 | 2010-05-13 | Chien Liang Chua | Networking system |
US20040003392A1 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2004-01-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for finding and updating user group preferences in an entertainment system |
JP4406815B2 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2010-02-03 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method, recording medium, and program |
US8046832B2 (en) | 2002-06-26 | 2011-10-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Spam detector with challenges |
US7444413B2 (en) * | 2002-06-26 | 2008-10-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Authorization access controlled content exchange |
US7797215B1 (en) | 2002-06-26 | 2010-09-14 | Power Financial Group, Inc. | System and method for analyzing and searching financial instrument data |
US20040003401A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for using cluster compactness as a measure for generation of additional clusters for stereotyping programs |
US7996862B2 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2011-08-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Metadata mapping to support targeted advertising |
US20040003404A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for personal video recording system advertisements |
US20040003391A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method, system and program product for locally analyzing viewing behavior |
US20040003405A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for personal video recording system menu control |
US7212730B2 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2007-05-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for enhanced edit list for recording options |
US20040001087A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | Warmus James L. | Methods and apparatus for electronic distribution of customized content via a broadcast signal |
US20040003402A1 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | Digeo, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatic ticker generation based on implicit or explicit profiling |
US20040098229A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-05-20 | Brett Error | Efficient click-stream data collection |
US20040002995A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Context and time sensitive profile builder |
US7792844B2 (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2010-09-07 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Capturing and presenting site visitation path data |
US6972698B2 (en) | 2002-06-28 | 2005-12-06 | Sony Corporation | GPS e-marker |
US20040002938A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Sony Corporation And Sony Electronics Inc. | Device and method for exchanging information |
US20040002963A1 (en) * | 2002-06-28 | 2004-01-01 | Cynkin Laurence H. | Resolving query terms based on time of submission |
US7467142B2 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2008-12-16 | Oracle International Corporation | Rule based data management |
US8352983B1 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2013-01-08 | Tvworks, Llc | Programming contextual interactive user interface for television |
US7206851B2 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2007-04-17 | Oracle International Corporation | Identifying dynamic groups |
US8370420B1 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2013-02-05 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Web-integrated display of locally stored content objects |
US7512585B2 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2009-03-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Support for multiple mechanisms for accessing data stores |
US8375113B2 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2013-02-12 | Oracle International Corporation | Employing wrapper profiles |
US7478407B2 (en) * | 2002-07-11 | 2009-01-13 | Oracle International Corporation | Supporting multiple application program interfaces |
US20040015408A1 (en) * | 2002-07-18 | 2004-01-22 | Rauen Philip Joseph | Corporate content management and delivery system |
JP2004056372A (en) * | 2002-07-18 | 2004-02-19 | Pioneer Electronic Corp | Program organizing apparatus, program providing system, method therefor, program therefor, and recording medium having programs recorded therein |
US7844717B2 (en) * | 2003-07-18 | 2010-11-30 | Herz Frederick S M | Use of proxy servers and pseudonymous transactions to maintain individual's privacy in the competitive business of maintaining personal history databases |
AU2003245016A1 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2004-02-09 | Quigo Technologies Inc. | System and method for automated mapping of keywords and key phrases to documents |
JP3864867B2 (en) * | 2002-07-23 | 2007-01-10 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and computer program |
AU2003252126A1 (en) * | 2002-07-24 | 2004-02-09 | On Command Corporation | Techniques for conducting a survey using an item selection system |
US6983481B2 (en) * | 2002-07-25 | 2006-01-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for blocking television commercials with a content interrogation program |
US7454772B2 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2008-11-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Apparatus and method for blocking television commercials and providing an archive interrogation program |
US7239981B2 (en) | 2002-07-26 | 2007-07-03 | Arbitron Inc. | Systems and methods for gathering audience measurement data |
CA2492879A1 (en) * | 2002-07-29 | 2004-02-05 | Opinionlab, Inc. | System and method for providing substantially real-time access to collected information concerning user interaction with a web page of a website |
US7478121B1 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2009-01-13 | Opinionlab, Inc. | Receiving and reporting page-specific user feedback concerning one or more particular web pages of a website |
US7370285B1 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2008-05-06 | Opinionlab, Inc. | Receiving and reporting page-specific user feedback concerning one or more particular web pages of a website |
US7248563B2 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2007-07-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and computer program product for restricting access to a network using a network communications device |
US7516470B2 (en) * | 2002-08-02 | 2009-04-07 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Locally-updated interactive program guide |
US11070890B2 (en) | 2002-08-06 | 2021-07-20 | Comcast Cable Communications Management, Llc | User customization of user interfaces for interactive television |
US7797418B2 (en) | 2002-08-06 | 2010-09-14 | Tvworks, Llc | Method of maintaining broadcast data stream |
US8108894B2 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2012-01-31 | Bies Richard J | Internet-based submission of cable network content |
US7640167B2 (en) * | 2002-08-16 | 2009-12-29 | Nec Infrontia Corporation | Self-service sales management system and method, and its program |
AU2003263928A1 (en) * | 2002-08-19 | 2004-03-03 | Choicestream | Statistical personalized recommendation system |
US7071895B2 (en) * | 2002-08-22 | 2006-07-04 | Novus Communication Technologies, Inc. | Pseudo bit-depth system for dynamic billboards |
EP2109048A1 (en) * | 2002-08-30 | 2009-10-14 | Sony Deutschland Gmbh | Methods to create a user profile and to specify a suggestion for a next selection of a user |
US8234358B2 (en) * | 2002-08-30 | 2012-07-31 | Inpro Network Facility, Llc | Communicating with an entity inside a private network using an existing connection to initiate communication |
US7548242B1 (en) | 2002-08-30 | 2009-06-16 | Interactive Sports Holdings, Inc. | Systems and methods for integrating graphic animation technologies in fantasy sports contest applications |
CN1231907C (en) * | 2002-09-02 | 2005-12-14 | Lg电子株式会社 | Method for controlling reproducing operation in disk device |
US8180732B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2012-05-15 | Sap Ag | Distributing data in master data management systems |
US7424510B2 (en) * | 2002-09-03 | 2008-09-09 | X1 Technologies, Inc. | Methods and systems for Web-based incremental searches |
AU2003270459A1 (en) | 2002-09-06 | 2004-03-29 | Visible World, Inc. | System for authoring and editing personalized message campaigns |
US20040049448A1 (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2004-03-11 | Bob Glickman | Method of defining an exchange-traded fund and computer product for generating real-time fund information |
US9280603B2 (en) * | 2002-09-17 | 2016-03-08 | Yahoo! Inc. | Generating descriptions of matching resources based on the kind, quality, and relevance of available sources of information about the matching resources |
US8220018B2 (en) | 2002-09-19 | 2012-07-10 | Tvworks, Llc | System and method for preferred placement programming of iTV content |
US7594271B2 (en) * | 2002-09-20 | 2009-09-22 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for real-time tamper evidence gathering for software |
US7158983B2 (en) * | 2002-09-23 | 2007-01-02 | Battelle Memorial Institute | Text analysis technique |
US20040059712A1 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2004-03-25 | Dean Jeffrey A. | Serving advertisements using information associated with e-mail |
US20100100437A1 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2010-04-22 | Google, Inc. | Suggesting and/or providing ad serving constraint information |
US8181205B2 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2012-05-15 | Russ Samuel H | PVR channel and PVR IPG information |
US7181442B2 (en) * | 2002-09-24 | 2007-02-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for discovery of dynamic network services |
US8086559B2 (en) | 2002-09-24 | 2011-12-27 | Google, Inc. | Serving content-relevant advertisements with client-side device support |
JP2004118479A (en) | 2002-09-26 | 2004-04-15 | Sony Corp | Information processor and method, storage medium, and program |
US20040073924A1 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2004-04-15 | Ramesh Pendakur | Broadcast scheduling and content selection based upon aggregated user profile information |
US8087054B2 (en) * | 2002-09-30 | 2011-12-27 | Eastman Kodak Company | Automated event content processing method and system |
US7657907B2 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2010-02-02 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Automatic user profiling |
US7908625B2 (en) | 2002-10-02 | 2011-03-15 | Robertson Neil C | Networked multimedia system |
US7058660B2 (en) | 2002-10-02 | 2006-06-06 | Bank One Corporation | System and method for network-based project management |
US7246121B2 (en) * | 2002-10-02 | 2007-07-17 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | System and method for modifying new message retransmission within a system for harvesting community knowledge |
US20040158480A1 (en) * | 2002-10-03 | 2004-08-12 | Lubars Mitchell D. | System and method for bundling resources |
US20040068739A1 (en) * | 2002-10-04 | 2004-04-08 | Russ Samuel H. | Networked multimedia system having a multi-room interactive network guide |
US8046806B2 (en) | 2002-10-04 | 2011-10-25 | Wall William E | Multiroom point of deployment module |
US7360235B2 (en) | 2002-10-04 | 2008-04-15 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Systems and methods for operating a peripheral record/playback device in a networked multimedia system |
US7545935B2 (en) * | 2002-10-04 | 2009-06-09 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Networked multimedia overlay system |
JP2004133502A (en) * | 2002-10-08 | 2004-04-30 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Data distribution system, device or method for the system and recording medium or program for the system |
US7881658B2 (en) * | 2002-10-10 | 2011-02-01 | Znl Enterprises, Llc | Method and apparatus for entertainment and information services delivered via mobile telecommunication devices |
US7900229B2 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2011-03-01 | Opentv, Inc. | Convergence of interactive television and wireless technologies |
WO2004036384A2 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2004-04-29 | Intellocity Usa, Inc. | Ichoose video advertising |
US20040210942A1 (en) * | 2002-10-18 | 2004-10-21 | Thomas Lemmons | Demographic/preference sniffer |
US8046835B2 (en) | 2002-10-23 | 2011-10-25 | Frederick S. M. Herz | Distributed computer network security activity model SDI-SCAM |
US8046259B1 (en) * | 2002-10-23 | 2011-10-25 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for conducting a chat |
US7155427B1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2006-12-26 | Oracle International Corporation | Configurable search tool for finding and scoring non-exact matches in a relational database |
US7246231B2 (en) * | 2002-10-31 | 2007-07-17 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Location privacy through IP address space scrambling |
US8311890B2 (en) * | 2002-11-01 | 2012-11-13 | Google Inc. | Method and system for dynamic textual ad distribution via email |
US7603341B2 (en) | 2002-11-05 | 2009-10-13 | Claria Corporation | Updating the content of a presentation vehicle in a computer network |
US8301493B2 (en) | 2002-11-05 | 2012-10-30 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for providing incentives to consumers to share information |
US7411974B2 (en) * | 2002-11-14 | 2008-08-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Wireless communication rate shaping |
US7411923B2 (en) * | 2002-11-14 | 2008-08-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Wireless communication rate shaping |
WO2004046854A2 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2004-06-03 | Erick Von Schweber | A method and apparatus for information surveying |
US20040098743A1 (en) * | 2002-11-15 | 2004-05-20 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Prediction of ratings for shows not yet shown |
US7720761B2 (en) * | 2002-11-18 | 2010-05-18 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N. A. | Method and system for enhancing credit line management, price management and other discretionary levels setting for financial accounts |
US20040098744A1 (en) * | 2002-11-18 | 2004-05-20 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Creation of a stereotypical profile via image based clustering |
US9805373B1 (en) | 2002-11-19 | 2017-10-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Expertise services platform |
US20040103434A1 (en) | 2002-11-25 | 2004-05-27 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive television systems with conflict management capabilities |
US8204353B2 (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2012-06-19 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Apparatus and methods for tracking and analyzing digital recording device event sequences |
GB2395805A (en) * | 2002-11-27 | 2004-06-02 | Sony Uk Ltd | Information retrieval |
US7298930B1 (en) * | 2002-11-29 | 2007-11-20 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Multimodal access of meeting recordings |
US7392231B2 (en) * | 2002-12-03 | 2008-06-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining utility functions from ordenal rankings |
EP1570668A1 (en) * | 2002-12-04 | 2005-09-07 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Recommendation of video content based on the user profile of users with similar viewing habits |
US20060053449A1 (en) * | 2002-12-10 | 2006-03-09 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Graded access to profile spaces |
US20060156337A1 (en) * | 2002-12-10 | 2006-07-13 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method for operating a personalized radio system |
US20050171948A1 (en) * | 2002-12-11 | 2005-08-04 | Knight William C. | System and method for identifying critical features in an ordered scale space within a multi-dimensional feature space |
US7958525B2 (en) * | 2002-12-11 | 2011-06-07 | Broadcom Corporation | Demand broadcast channels and channel programming based on user viewing history, profiling, and requests |
US8745531B2 (en) * | 2002-12-11 | 2014-06-03 | Broadcom Corporation | Media processing system supporting automated personal channel construction based on user profile and pre-selection |
KR101084503B1 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2011-11-18 | 소니 주식회사 | Information processing device and information processing method, and recording medium |
DE60223060D1 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2007-11-29 | Hewlett Packard Co | System and method for privacy protection |
AU2003293501A1 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2004-07-09 | Wholesecurity, Inc. | Method, system, and computer program product for security within a global computer network |
US6732157B1 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2004-05-04 | Networks Associates Technology, Inc. | Comprehensive anti-spam system, method, and computer program product for filtering unwanted e-mail messages |
US7493289B2 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2009-02-17 | Aol Llc | Digital content store system |
US20040177115A1 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2004-09-09 | Hollander Marc S. | System and method for music search and discovery |
US7797064B2 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2010-09-14 | Stephen Loomis | Apparatus and method for skipping songs without delay |
US7412532B2 (en) * | 2002-12-13 | 2008-08-12 | Aol Llc, A Deleware Limited Liability Company | Multimedia scheduler |
US7912920B2 (en) | 2002-12-13 | 2011-03-22 | Stephen Loomis | Stream sourcing content delivery system |
US20040123326A1 (en) * | 2002-12-18 | 2004-06-24 | General Instrument Corporation | Method and apparatus for allocating tuning devices to broadband head-end services |
GB2396228A (en) * | 2002-12-19 | 2004-06-16 | Nokia Corp | A method of gathering information relating to consumption of broadcast content by receiving stations |
US7327741B1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2008-02-05 | Symantec Operating Corporation | Detecting and breaking cycles in a computer network |
US8160914B1 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2012-04-17 | Versata Development Group, Inc. | Identifying quality user sessions and determining product demand with high resolution capabilities |
JP3953950B2 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2007-08-08 | 富士通株式会社 | Server system using local address |
US20040122693A1 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2004-06-24 | Michael Hatscher | Community builder |
US7219107B2 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2007-05-15 | Sap Ag | Collaborative information spaces |
US7711694B2 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2010-05-04 | Sap Ag | System and methods for user-customizable enterprise workflow management |
US7849175B2 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2010-12-07 | Sap Ag | Control center pages |
US8195631B2 (en) * | 2002-12-23 | 2012-06-05 | Sap Ag | Resource finder tool |
US9503470B2 (en) | 2002-12-24 | 2016-11-22 | Fred Herz Patents, LLC | Distributed agent based model for security monitoring and response |
US8327442B2 (en) | 2002-12-24 | 2012-12-04 | Herz Frederick S M | System and method for a distributed application and network security system (SDI-SCAM) |
US20060111959A1 (en) * | 2002-12-27 | 2006-05-25 | Douglas Tarr | Surveying apparatus and method for compensation reports |
US8819039B2 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2014-08-26 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system to generate a listing in a network-based commerce system |
US20040128171A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2004-07-01 | Rees Timothy E. | Systems and methods for processing insurance information |
GB0230329D0 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2003-02-05 | British Telecomm | Device profile generation |
US20040128698A1 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2004-07-01 | Helena Goldfarb | Apparatus and methods for scheduling events |
US7243105B2 (en) * | 2002-12-31 | 2007-07-10 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Method and apparatus for automatic updating of user profiles |
US8306908B1 (en) | 2002-12-31 | 2012-11-06 | West Corporation | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce |
FR2849736A1 (en) * | 2003-01-02 | 2004-07-09 | Thomson Licensing Sa | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR ACQUIRING FILES BY ACCUMULATING POINTS AND RELATED PRODUCTS |
US7853563B2 (en) | 2005-08-01 | 2010-12-14 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Universal data aggregation |
US8468126B2 (en) * | 2005-08-01 | 2013-06-18 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Publishing data in an information community |
US7917468B2 (en) | 2005-08-01 | 2011-03-29 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Linking of personal information management data |
US7779247B2 (en) | 2003-01-09 | 2010-08-17 | Jericho Systems Corporation | Method and system for dynamically implementing an enterprise resource policy |
US7006945B2 (en) | 2003-01-10 | 2006-02-28 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Processing of video content |
US7487532B2 (en) * | 2003-01-15 | 2009-02-03 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Optimization of a full duplex wideband communications system |
US8094640B2 (en) | 2003-01-15 | 2012-01-10 | Robertson Neil C | Full duplex wideband communications system for a local coaxial network |
US20040143644A1 (en) * | 2003-01-21 | 2004-07-22 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Meta-search engine architecture |
US20040141003A1 (en) * | 2003-01-21 | 2004-07-22 | Dell Products, L.P. | Maintaining a user interest profile reflecting changing interests of a customer |
US7725544B2 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2010-05-25 | Aol Inc. | Group based spam classification |
US7089241B1 (en) * | 2003-01-24 | 2006-08-08 | America Online, Inc. | Classifier tuning based on data similarities |
JP2004252947A (en) * | 2003-01-27 | 2004-09-09 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Evaluation device and method |
US7424115B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2008-09-09 | Nokia Corporation | Generating asymmetric keys in a telecommunications system |
US7493646B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2009-02-17 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive television systems with digital video recording and adjustable reminders |
NO318845B1 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2005-05-09 | Ip Vision Ab | Method and apparatus for distributing video information |
US9818136B1 (en) | 2003-02-05 | 2017-11-14 | Steven M. Hoffberg | System and method for determining contingent relevance |
EP2456104A1 (en) * | 2003-02-10 | 2012-05-23 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Methods and apparatus to adaptively gather audience measurement data |
US8116611B2 (en) * | 2003-02-10 | 2012-02-14 | Aptiv Digital, Inc. | Tuner sharing video recorder system architecture |
US7472170B2 (en) | 2003-02-13 | 2008-12-30 | Bruce Zak | System and method for managing content on a network interface |
US7822757B2 (en) * | 2003-02-18 | 2010-10-26 | Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. | System and method for providing enhanced information |
US20040167882A1 (en) * | 2003-02-21 | 2004-08-26 | Thomson William B. | System and method for determining a user preference for a candidate |
WO2004077784A1 (en) * | 2003-02-27 | 2004-09-10 | Telecom Italia S.P.A. | Method and system for providing information services to a client using a user profile |
US20040172650A1 (en) * | 2003-02-28 | 2004-09-02 | Hawkins William J. | Targeted content delivery system in an interactive television network |
US7543053B2 (en) * | 2003-03-03 | 2009-06-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Intelligent quarantining for spam prevention |
US7219148B2 (en) * | 2003-03-03 | 2007-05-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Feedback loop for spam prevention |
US7441195B2 (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2008-10-21 | Omniture, Inc. | Associating website clicks with links on a web page |
CN100437740C (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2008-11-26 | 奥姆尼图雷有限公司 | Associating website clicks with links on a web page |
US20050216844A1 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2005-09-29 | Error Brett M | Delayed transmission of website usage data |
WO2004079544A2 (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2004-09-16 | Omniture, Inc. | Delayed transmission of website usage data |
US7603373B2 (en) * | 2003-03-04 | 2009-10-13 | Omniture, Inc. | Assigning value to elements contributing to business success |
US7930711B2 (en) * | 2003-03-06 | 2011-04-19 | Wegener Communications, Inc. | Apparatus and method for addressing control in a network for distributed data |
DE10310151A1 (en) * | 2003-03-07 | 2004-09-16 | Linde Ag | Method for operating a fuel system for an LPG engine |
US7676034B1 (en) | 2003-03-07 | 2010-03-09 | Wai Wu | Method and system for matching entities in an auction |
US7158169B1 (en) | 2003-03-07 | 2007-01-02 | Music Choice | Method and system for displaying content while reducing burn-in of a display |
US7626609B1 (en) | 2003-03-07 | 2009-12-01 | Music Choice | Method and system for displaying content while reducing burn-in of a display |
US7020689B2 (en) | 2003-03-07 | 2006-03-28 | Wegener Communications, Inc. | System and method for command transmission utilizing an email return path |
US7742944B2 (en) * | 2003-03-10 | 2010-06-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Method for selecting relevant campaign messages for transmission to recipients |
US8544036B2 (en) * | 2003-03-14 | 2013-09-24 | Nbcuniversal Media, Llc | Methods and apparatus for scheduling broadcast commercials |
US11381875B2 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2022-07-05 | Comcast Cable Communications Management, Llc | Causing display of user-selectable content types |
US10664138B2 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2020-05-26 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Providing supplemental content for a second screen experience |
US8578411B1 (en) | 2003-03-14 | 2013-11-05 | Tvworks, Llc | System and method for controlling iTV application behaviors through the use of application profile filters |
US7768234B2 (en) * | 2004-02-28 | 2010-08-03 | Janik Craig M | System and method for automatically synchronizing and acquiring content for battery powered devices |
US9274576B2 (en) * | 2003-03-17 | 2016-03-01 | Callahan Cellular L.L.C. | System and method for activation of portable and mobile media player devices for wireless LAN services |
US7356143B2 (en) * | 2003-03-18 | 2008-04-08 | Widevine Technologies, Inc | System, method, and apparatus for securely providing content viewable on a secure device |
US7007170B2 (en) * | 2003-03-18 | 2006-02-28 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | System, method, and apparatus for securely providing content viewable on a secure device |
US20040186767A1 (en) * | 2003-03-20 | 2004-09-23 | Yue Ma | System and method employing portable device for capturing and using broadcast source content to operate other digital devices |
US7451113B1 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2008-11-11 | Mighty Net, Inc. | Card management system and method |
US8069076B2 (en) * | 2003-03-25 | 2011-11-29 | Cox Communications, Inc. | Generating audience analytics |
US20040194123A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for adapting digital cinema content to audience metrics |
US20040194128A1 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2004-09-30 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for providing digital cinema content based upon audience metrics |
US20040249973A1 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2004-12-09 | Alkhatib Hasan S. | Group agent |
US20040197088A1 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2004-10-07 | Ferman Ahmet Mufit | System for presenting audio-video content |
US7536638B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2009-05-19 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Action stickers for identifying and processing stored documents |
US20070050696A1 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2007-03-01 | Piersol Kurt W | Physical key for accessing a securely stored digital document |
US7739583B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2010-06-15 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Multimedia document sharing method and apparatus |
US20050246747A1 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2005-11-03 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Utilization of data broadcasting technology with handheld control apparatus |
US7949785B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2011-05-24 | Inpro Network Facility, Llc | Secure virtual community network system |
US7703002B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2010-04-20 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Method and apparatus for composing multimedia documents |
US8712857B1 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2014-04-29 | Tuxis Technologies Llc | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in mobile commerce |
US20040249974A1 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2004-12-09 | Alkhatib Hasan S. | Secure virtual address realm |
US7509569B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2009-03-24 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Action stickers for nested collections |
US7757162B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2010-07-13 | Ricoh Co. Ltd. | Document collection manipulation |
US7552381B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2009-06-23 | Ricoh Co., Ltd. | Check boxes for identifying and processing stored documents |
US20040210520A1 (en) * | 2003-04-02 | 2004-10-21 | Fitzgerald Daleen R. | Bill payment payee information management system and method |
US20040199771A1 (en) * | 2003-04-04 | 2004-10-07 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Method for tracing a security breach in highly distributed content |
US7107447B2 (en) * | 2003-04-17 | 2006-09-12 | America Online, Inc. | Use of pseudonyms vs. real names |
US20040210929A1 (en) * | 2003-04-18 | 2004-10-21 | Srinivas Bollapragada | Methods and apparatus forscheduling broadcast commercial videotapes |
US20060051059A1 (en) | 2004-09-08 | 2006-03-09 | Krakirian Haig H | Video recorder having user extended and automatically extended time slots |
US6760538B1 (en) * | 2003-04-21 | 2004-07-06 | Pioneer Digital Technologies, Inc. | Video recorder having user extended and automatically extended time slots |
US7120619B2 (en) * | 2003-04-22 | 2006-10-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Relationship view |
GB0309174D0 (en) * | 2003-04-23 | 2003-05-28 | Stevenson David W | System and method for navigating a web site |
US20040213557A1 (en) * | 2003-04-23 | 2004-10-28 | Pioneer Digital Technologies, Inc. | Non-hierarchical interface screens for use in a video recorder |
US20040215560A1 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2004-10-28 | Peter Amalraj | Integrated payment system and method |
WO2004097643A2 (en) * | 2003-04-29 | 2004-11-11 | University Of Strathclyde | Monitoring software |
US7483947B2 (en) * | 2003-05-02 | 2009-01-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Message rendering for identification of content features |
DE602004010098T3 (en) | 2003-05-06 | 2014-09-04 | Apple Inc. | METHOD FOR MODIFYING A MESSAGE STORAGE AND TRANSMISSION NETWORK SYSTEM AND DATA ANSWERING SYSTEM |
US20040225555A1 (en) * | 2003-05-09 | 2004-11-11 | Andreas Persidis | System and method for generating targeted marketing resources and market performance data |
US7590695B2 (en) | 2003-05-09 | 2009-09-15 | Aol Llc | Managing electronic messages |
CN1788280A (en) * | 2003-05-12 | 2006-06-14 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | Apparatus and method for performing profile based collaborative filtering |
US20050132197A1 (en) | 2003-05-15 | 2005-06-16 | Art Medlar | Method and apparatus for a character-based comparison of documents |
US20050010563A1 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2005-01-13 | William Gross | Internet search application |
EP1639814B1 (en) * | 2003-05-29 | 2015-03-18 | eat.tv, inc. | System for presentation of multimedia content |
JP4661047B2 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2011-03-30 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and computer program |
US20080015870A1 (en) * | 2003-05-30 | 2008-01-17 | Lawrence Benjamin Elowitz | Apparatus and method for facilitating a search for gems |
KR20060017838A (en) * | 2003-06-02 | 2006-02-27 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | Program recommendation via dynamic category creation |
KR100745995B1 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2007-08-06 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Device for managing meta data and method thereof |
US7272853B2 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2007-09-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Origination/destination features and lists for spam prevention |
US20040254827A1 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2004-12-16 | Hind John R. | Methods, systems and computer program products for indirect profiling of web users |
US20040254957A1 (en) * | 2003-06-13 | 2004-12-16 | Nokia Corporation | Method and a system for modeling user preferences |
US7827487B1 (en) | 2003-06-16 | 2010-11-02 | Opinionlab, Inc. | Soliciting user feedback regarding one or more web pages of a website without obscuring visual content |
US20040260605A1 (en) * | 2003-06-17 | 2004-12-23 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method for promoting entertainment event attendance to networked users using demographic profile data |
US8145710B2 (en) * | 2003-06-18 | 2012-03-27 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for filtering spam messages utilizing URL filtering module |
US7711779B2 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2010-05-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Prevention of outgoing spam |
US7519668B2 (en) * | 2003-06-20 | 2009-04-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Obfuscation of spam filter |
FR2856493A1 (en) * | 2003-06-23 | 2004-12-24 | France Telecom | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION RECEIVED IN THE TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORK SUCH AS THE INTERNET NETWORK |
US8533270B2 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2013-09-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Advanced spam detection techniques |
US7739602B2 (en) | 2003-06-24 | 2010-06-15 | Aol Inc. | System and method for community centric resource sharing based on a publishing subscription model |
US7792828B2 (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2010-09-07 | Jericho Systems Corporation | Method and system for selecting content items to be presented to a viewer |
US7206411B2 (en) | 2003-06-25 | 2007-04-17 | Wegener Communications, Inc. | Rapid decryption of data by key synchronization and indexing |
US9081863B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2015-07-14 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | One-click segmentation definition |
US7991732B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2011-08-02 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Incrementally adding segmentation criteria to a data set |
US7363302B2 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2008-04-22 | Googole, Inc. | Promoting and/or demoting an advertisement from an advertising spot of one type to an advertising spot of another type |
US7603022B2 (en) * | 2003-07-02 | 2009-10-13 | Macrovision Corporation | Networked personal video recording system |
US7454120B2 (en) | 2003-07-02 | 2008-11-18 | Macrovision Corporation | Methods and apparatus for client aggregation of television programming in a networked personal video recording system |
US8438601B2 (en) | 2003-07-02 | 2013-05-07 | Rovi Solutions Corporation | Resource management for a networked personal video recording system |
US9615061B2 (en) * | 2003-07-11 | 2017-04-04 | Tvworks, Llc | System and method for creating and presenting composite video-on-demand content |
US8416952B1 (en) | 2003-07-11 | 2013-04-09 | Tvworks, Llc | Channel family surf control |
US7590693B1 (en) | 2003-07-17 | 2009-09-15 | Avaya Inc. | Method and apparatus for restriction of message distribution for security |
US20070043570A1 (en) * | 2003-07-18 | 2007-02-22 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method of controlling a dialoging process |
US7610313B2 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2009-10-27 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for performing efficient document scoring and clustering |
US20050075934A1 (en) * | 2003-08-04 | 2005-04-07 | Paul Knight | Nutritional assistant for kiosk |
US7370098B2 (en) * | 2003-08-06 | 2008-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic management of autonomic systems |
JP2005056361A (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2005-03-03 | Sony Corp | Information processor and method, program, and storage medium |
US7275159B2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2007-09-25 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Multimedia output device having embedded encryption functionality |
US20050038699A1 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2005-02-17 | Lillibridge Mark David | System and method for targeted advertising via commitment |
US7831573B2 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2010-11-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | System and method for committing to a set |
US20050038698A1 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2005-02-17 | Lukose Rajan M. | Targeted advertisement with local consumer profile |
US9247288B2 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2016-01-26 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Technique for effectively delivering targeted advertisements through a communications network having limited bandwidth |
US20070198327A1 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2007-08-23 | Amir Yazdani | Systems and methods for measuring, targeting, verifying, and reporting advertising impressions |
US9767634B2 (en) | 2003-08-15 | 2017-09-19 | Rentrak Corporation | Systems and methods for measuring consumption of entertainment commodities |
US20050038706A1 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2005-02-17 | Amir Yazdani | Business transaction reporting system |
WO2005017769A1 (en) * | 2003-08-19 | 2005-02-24 | Rapid Intelligence Pty Ltd | Content system |
US8301482B2 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2012-10-30 | Tom Reynolds | Determining strategies for increasing loyalty of a population to an entity |
US7769626B2 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2010-08-03 | Tom Reynolds | Determining strategies for increasing loyalty of a population to an entity |
US20070005338A1 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2007-01-04 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V | Real-time media dictionary |
US8380572B2 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2013-02-19 | Yahoo! Inc. | Selecting among advertisements competing for a slot associated with electronic content delivered over a network |
US20050050021A1 (en) * | 2003-08-25 | 2005-03-03 | Sybase, Inc. | Information Messaging and Collaboration System |
US20050050576A1 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2005-03-03 | Manish Upendran | System and method for integrating broadcast content and non-broadcast content |
US20050076383A1 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2005-04-07 | Manish Upendran | System and method for providing a user interface |
US7346556B2 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2008-03-18 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for performing purchase transactions utilizing a broadcast-based device |
US20050076384A1 (en) * | 2003-08-29 | 2005-04-07 | Manish Upendran | System and method for presenting non-broadcast content on a broadcast-based device |
US20050051620A1 (en) * | 2003-09-04 | 2005-03-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Personal data card processing system |
US8175908B1 (en) | 2003-09-04 | 2012-05-08 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Systems and methods for constructing and utilizing a merchant database derived from customer purchase transactions data |
JP2005084770A (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-03-31 | Sony Corp | Content providing system and method, providing device and method, reproducing device and method, and program |
US20120150888A1 (en) * | 2003-09-10 | 2012-06-14 | Geoffrey Hyatt | Method and system for relationship management and intelligent agent |
JP4624354B2 (en) * | 2003-09-10 | 2011-02-02 | ミュージックマッチ インコーポレイテッド | Music purchasing and playback system and method |
JP4423262B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2010-03-03 | パナソニック株式会社 | Content selection method and content selection device |
WO2005036877A1 (en) | 2003-09-12 | 2005-04-21 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Digital video signature apparatus and methods for use with video program identification systems |
US8819734B2 (en) | 2003-09-16 | 2014-08-26 | Tvworks, Llc | Contextual navigational control for digital television |
US8200761B1 (en) * | 2003-09-18 | 2012-06-12 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for improving security in a data processing system |
US8075402B2 (en) * | 2003-09-22 | 2011-12-13 | Robert Linley Muir | Multigame selection |
US9380269B2 (en) | 2003-09-23 | 2016-06-28 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Scheduling trigger apparatus and method |
US7974878B1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2011-07-05 | SuperMedia LLC | Information distribution system and method that provides for enhanced display formats |
US7822661B1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2010-10-26 | SuperMedia LLC | Information distribution system and method utilizing a position adjustment factor |
US8239273B1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2012-08-07 | SuperMedia LLC | Integrated pay per click and pay per call listings |
US7689466B1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2010-03-30 | SuperMedia LLC | Dynamic pay per call listings |
US7050990B1 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2006-05-23 | Verizon Directories Corp. | Information distribution system |
US8271588B1 (en) | 2003-09-24 | 2012-09-18 | Symantec Corporation | System and method for filtering fraudulent email messages |
US7516086B2 (en) * | 2003-09-24 | 2009-04-07 | Idearc Media Corp. | Business rating placement heuristic |
US7949553B1 (en) * | 2003-09-25 | 2011-05-24 | Pros Revenue Management, L.P. | Method and system for a selection optimization process |
US7693827B2 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2010-04-06 | Google Inc. | Personalization of placed content ordering in search results |
US7346839B2 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2008-03-18 | Google Inc. | Information retrieval based on historical data |
US20050071328A1 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2005-03-31 | Lawrence Stephen R. | Personalization of web search |
US20050222989A1 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2005-10-06 | Taher Haveliwala | Results based personalization of advertisements in a search engine |
CN1331078C (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2007-08-08 | 联想(北京)有限公司 | Method and system for obtaining clustering distance |
US8321278B2 (en) * | 2003-09-30 | 2012-11-27 | Google Inc. | Targeted advertisements based on user profiles and page profile |
US7290278B2 (en) * | 2003-10-02 | 2007-10-30 | Aol Llc, A Delaware Limited Liability Company | Identity based service system |
JP4433754B2 (en) * | 2003-10-08 | 2010-03-17 | ソニー株式会社 | Information providing system, information providing method, recording apparatus, recording method, and computer program |
CA2541824A1 (en) * | 2003-10-08 | 2005-04-14 | Stephan J. Engberg | Method and system for establishing a communication using privacy enhancing techniques |
US7346629B2 (en) * | 2003-10-09 | 2008-03-18 | Yahoo! Inc. | Systems and methods for search processing using superunits |
US7406174B2 (en) * | 2003-10-21 | 2008-07-29 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | System and method for n-dimensional encryption |
US7904924B1 (en) * | 2003-10-31 | 2011-03-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Video-on-demand recommendations based on previously viewed television programs |
US7884274B1 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2011-02-08 | Wieder James W | Adaptive personalized music and entertainment |
US8396800B1 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2013-03-12 | James W. Wieder | Adaptive personalized music and entertainment |
US9053181B2 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2015-06-09 | James W. Wieder | Adaptive personalized playback or presentation using count |
US9098681B2 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2015-08-04 | James W. Wieder | Adaptive personalized playback or presentation using cumulative time |
US20150128039A1 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2015-05-07 | James W. Wieder | Newness Control of a Personalized Music and/or Entertainment Sequence |
US11165999B1 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2021-11-02 | Synergyze Technologies Llc | Identifying and providing compositions and digital-works |
US9053299B2 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2015-06-09 | James W. Wieder | Adaptive personalized playback or presentation using rating |
US8001612B1 (en) | 2003-11-03 | 2011-08-16 | Wieder James W | Distributing digital-works and usage-rights to user-devices |
US20050097593A1 (en) * | 2003-11-05 | 2005-05-05 | Michael Raley | System, method and device for selected content distribution |
US7984468B2 (en) | 2003-11-06 | 2011-07-19 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing program suggestions in an interactive television program guide |
US7080104B2 (en) * | 2003-11-07 | 2006-07-18 | Plaxo, Inc. | Synchronization and merge engines |
US7389324B2 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2008-06-17 | Plaxo, Inc. | Viral engine for network deployment |
EP1531458B1 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2008-04-16 | Sony Deutschland GmbH | Apparatus and method for automatic extraction of important events in audio signals |
DE60319710T2 (en) * | 2003-11-12 | 2009-03-12 | Sony Deutschland Gmbh | Method and apparatus for automatic dissection segmented audio signals |
KR101102638B1 (en) * | 2003-11-13 | 2012-01-04 | 파나소닉 주식회사 | Program recommendation device, program recommendation method of program recommendation device, and computer readerble medium |
US20050147247A1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2005-07-07 | Westberg Thomas E. | Interactive television systems having POD modules and methods for use in the same |
US8170096B1 (en) | 2003-11-18 | 2012-05-01 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for optimized encoding and transmission of a plurality of substantially similar video fragments |
US7716079B2 (en) * | 2003-11-20 | 2010-05-11 | Ebay Inc. | Feedback cancellation in a network-based transaction facility |
US7885850B2 (en) * | 2003-11-20 | 2011-02-08 | Ebay Inc. | Automated feedback cancellation in a network-based transaction facility |
US20050114207A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2005-05-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and storage medium for filtering content presented on a computer system |
US8170912B2 (en) | 2003-11-25 | 2012-05-01 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | Database structure and front end |
US20060155850A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2006-07-13 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Networked mobile EPG service architecture |
US7689712B2 (en) | 2003-11-26 | 2010-03-30 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Techniques for integrating note-taking and multimedia information |
US8566263B2 (en) * | 2003-11-28 | 2013-10-22 | World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc | Adaptive computer-based personalities |
US7526458B2 (en) | 2003-11-28 | 2009-04-28 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Adaptive recommendations systems |
USRE45770E1 (en) | 2003-11-28 | 2015-10-20 | World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc | Adaptive recommendation explanations |
US7539652B2 (en) | 2003-11-28 | 2009-05-26 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Adaptive self-modifying and recombinant systems |
US8600920B2 (en) * | 2003-11-28 | 2013-12-03 | World Assets Consulting Ag, Llc | Affinity propagation in adaptive network-based systems |
US7526464B2 (en) * | 2003-11-28 | 2009-04-28 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Adaptive fuzzy network system and method |
US20090018918A1 (en) * | 2004-11-04 | 2009-01-15 | Manyworlds Inc. | Influence-based Social Network Advertising |
US7606772B2 (en) | 2003-11-28 | 2009-10-20 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Adaptive social computing methods |
US7526459B2 (en) | 2003-11-28 | 2009-04-28 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Adaptive social and process network systems |
JP4124115B2 (en) * | 2003-12-02 | 2008-07-23 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and computer program |
EP1692646A2 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2006-08-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Collaborative sampling for implicit recommenders |
US20050125544A1 (en) * | 2003-12-04 | 2005-06-09 | Yongjun Zhao | Methods and apparatuses for facilitating online communications between parties |
US7877694B2 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2011-01-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Hosted notifications templates |
US20050138653A1 (en) * | 2003-12-17 | 2005-06-23 | Kim Littrell | Methods, systems and storage medium for providing offerings to consumers |
US7027586B2 (en) * | 2003-12-18 | 2006-04-11 | Sbc Knowledge Ventures, L.P. | Intelligently routing customer communications |
US8036931B2 (en) * | 2003-12-19 | 2011-10-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Process and heuristic statistic for prospect selection through data mining |
US20050138049A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-06-23 | Greg Linden | Method for personalized news |
US7652844B2 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2010-01-26 | Bruce Edwards | System and method for protecting removeable media playback devices |
US20050216823A1 (en) * | 2003-12-30 | 2005-09-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Assigning textual ads based on article history |
US7523087B1 (en) * | 2003-12-31 | 2009-04-21 | Google, Inc. | Determining and/or designating better ad information such as ad landing pages |
US8156444B1 (en) | 2003-12-31 | 2012-04-10 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for determining a user interface attribute |
US8375048B1 (en) * | 2004-01-20 | 2013-02-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Query augmentation |
US20080243805A1 (en) * | 2004-01-20 | 2008-10-02 | Srinivas Gutta | Automatic Creation of E-Books |
US8010459B2 (en) | 2004-01-21 | 2011-08-30 | Google Inc. | Methods and systems for rating associated members in a social network |
US8161388B2 (en) | 2004-01-21 | 2012-04-17 | Rodriguez Arturo A | Interactive discovery of display device characteristics |
US20100153997A1 (en) * | 2004-01-21 | 2010-06-17 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive television system with templates for managing vendor-specific video-on-demand content |
US7707039B2 (en) | 2004-02-15 | 2010-04-27 | Exbiblio B.V. | Automatic modification of web pages |
US8442331B2 (en) | 2004-02-15 | 2013-05-14 | Google Inc. | Capturing text from rendered documents using supplemental information |
US7885901B2 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2011-02-08 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and system for seeding online social network contacts |
US7707122B2 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2010-04-27 | Yahoo ! Inc. | System and method of information filtering using measures of affinity of a relationship |
US20050171954A1 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2005-08-04 | Yahoo! Inc. | Selective electronic messaging within an online social network for SPAM detection |
US8612359B2 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2013-12-17 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and system for sharing portal subscriber information in an online social network |
US7269590B2 (en) * | 2004-01-29 | 2007-09-11 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and system for customizing views of information associated with a social network user |
US7310676B2 (en) * | 2004-02-09 | 2007-12-18 | Proxpro, Inc. | Method and computer system for matching mobile device users for business and social networking |
US7895632B2 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2011-02-22 | Sony Corporation | Cable diagnostic and monitoring system |
US7827603B1 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2010-11-02 | Citicorp Development Center, Inc. | System and method for secure message reply |
US7191175B2 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2007-03-13 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for arranging concept clusters in thematic neighborhood relationships in a two-dimensional visual display space |
US10635723B2 (en) | 2004-02-15 | 2020-04-28 | Google Llc | Search engines and systems with handheld document data capture devices |
US7812860B2 (en) | 2004-04-01 | 2010-10-12 | Exbiblio B.V. | Handheld device for capturing text from both a document printed on paper and a document displayed on a dynamic display device |
WO2005079501A2 (en) * | 2004-02-18 | 2005-09-01 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc., Et Al. | Methods and apparatus to determine audience viewing of video-on-demand programs |
US20050193015A1 (en) * | 2004-02-19 | 2005-09-01 | Sandraic Logic, Llc A California Limited Liability Company | Method and apparatus for organizing, sorting and navigating multimedia content |
US7873529B2 (en) * | 2004-02-20 | 2011-01-18 | Symphonyiri Group, Inc. | System and method for analyzing and correcting retail data |
RU2006133549A (en) * | 2004-02-20 | 2008-05-20 | ДАУ ДЖОУНС РЕЙТЕРЗ БИЗНЕС ИНТЕРЭКТИВ, Эл Эл Си (US) | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF INTELLECTUAL SEARCH AND SAMPLE |
US7949639B2 (en) * | 2004-02-20 | 2011-05-24 | Symphonyiri Group, Inc. | Attribute segments and data table bias reduction |
US7548620B2 (en) * | 2004-02-23 | 2009-06-16 | Verisign, Inc. | Token provisioning |
US7873572B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2011-01-18 | Reardon David C | Financial transaction system with integrated electronic messaging, control of marketing data, and user defined charges for receiving messages |
US20090119159A1 (en) * | 2007-10-31 | 2009-05-07 | David C. Reardon | System and Method for Transferring Funds to Recipients of Electronic Messages |
US8799164B2 (en) | 2004-02-26 | 2014-08-05 | David C Reardon | Financial transaction system with integrated electronic messaging, control of marketing data, and user defined charges for receiving messages |
US7774350B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2010-08-10 | Ebay Inc. | System and method to provide and display enhanced feedback in an online transaction processing environment |
US8346660B2 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2013-01-01 | David C. Reardon | System and method for two-way transfer of funds and electronic content between summa account users with gathering of behavioral metrics and management of multiple currencies and escrow accounts |
US20050191603A1 (en) * | 2004-02-26 | 2005-09-01 | Scientific Learning Corporation | Method and apparatus for automated training of language learning skills |
US8214438B2 (en) | 2004-03-01 | 2012-07-03 | Microsoft Corporation | (More) advanced spam detection features |
US7584435B2 (en) * | 2004-03-03 | 2009-09-01 | Omniture, Inc. | Web usage overlays for third-party web plug-in content |
US8356317B2 (en) * | 2004-03-04 | 2013-01-15 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Presence based technology |
US8949899B2 (en) | 2005-03-04 | 2015-02-03 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Collaborative recommendation system |
US7594245B2 (en) | 2004-03-04 | 2009-09-22 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Networked video devices |
JP2007532988A (en) * | 2004-03-04 | 2007-11-15 | シャープ株式会社 | Method and system for instant shared personal preference simultaneous information based on presence technology for television connected to the Internet |
US7882436B2 (en) | 2004-03-10 | 2011-02-01 | Trevor Burke Technology Limited | Distribution of video data |
WO2005088894A1 (en) * | 2004-03-11 | 2005-09-22 | Universal Electronics Inc. | Syncronizing device-specific encrypted data to and from mobile devices using detachable storage media |
US20050204006A1 (en) * | 2004-03-12 | 2005-09-15 | Purcell Sean E. | Message junk rating interface |
US8055553B1 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2011-11-08 | Verizon Laboratories Inc. | Dynamic comparison text functionality |
US20050203948A1 (en) * | 2004-03-15 | 2005-09-15 | De La Rosa Josep Lluis | Method for influencing market decisions of people |
JP4730684B2 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2011-07-20 | イマジニアリング株式会社 | Database system with advanced user interface and web browser using the database system |
US7254774B2 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2007-08-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for improved spell checking |
US8842175B2 (en) * | 2004-03-26 | 2014-09-23 | Broadcom Corporation | Anticipatory video signal reception and processing |
US7716223B2 (en) | 2004-03-29 | 2010-05-11 | Google Inc. | Variable personalization of search results in a search engine |
JP2005294903A (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-20 | Pioneer Electronic Corp | Device, method and program for acquiring program information |
US7664734B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2010-02-16 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for generating multiple implicit search queries |
US7707142B1 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2010-04-27 | Google Inc. | Methods and systems for performing an offline search |
US8041713B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2011-10-18 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing boilerplate |
US8631001B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2014-01-14 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for weighting a search query result |
US20080040315A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2008-02-14 | Auerbach David B | Systems and methods for generating a user interface |
US9009153B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2015-04-14 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying a named entity |
US7272601B1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-09-18 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for associating a keyword with a user interface area |
US7693825B2 (en) | 2004-03-31 | 2010-04-06 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for ranking implicit search results |
US8081849B2 (en) | 2004-12-03 | 2011-12-20 | Google Inc. | Portable scanning and memory device |
US20060081714A1 (en) | 2004-08-23 | 2006-04-20 | King Martin T | Portable scanning device |
US20050222897A1 (en) * | 2004-04-01 | 2005-10-06 | Johann Walter | Method and system for improving at least one of a business process, product and service |
WO2008028674A2 (en) * | 2006-09-08 | 2008-03-13 | Exbiblio B.V. | Optical scanners, such as hand-held optical scanners |
US9116890B2 (en) | 2004-04-01 | 2015-08-25 | Google Inc. | Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document |
US20060098900A1 (en) | 2004-09-27 | 2006-05-11 | King Martin T | Secure data gathering from rendered documents |
US9143638B2 (en) | 2004-04-01 | 2015-09-22 | Google Inc. | Data capture from rendered documents using handheld device |
US7894670B2 (en) | 2004-04-01 | 2011-02-22 | Exbiblio B.V. | Triggering actions in response to optically or acoustically capturing keywords from a rendered document |
US7990556B2 (en) | 2004-12-03 | 2011-08-02 | Google Inc. | Association of a portable scanner with input/output and storage devices |
US8146156B2 (en) | 2004-04-01 | 2012-03-27 | Google Inc. | Archive of text captures from rendered documents |
US9008447B2 (en) | 2004-04-01 | 2015-04-14 | Google Inc. | Method and system for character recognition |
WO2005101266A2 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2005-10-27 | Blue Nile, Inc. | Apparatus and method for facilitating a search for gem settings |
US9087126B2 (en) | 2004-04-07 | 2015-07-21 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for enhanced video selection using an on-screen remote |
US8132204B2 (en) | 2004-04-07 | 2012-03-06 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for enhanced video selection and categorization using metadata |
JP4092697B2 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2008-05-28 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method, program, and recording medium |
US9396212B2 (en) | 2004-04-07 | 2016-07-19 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for enhanced video selection |
US8713418B2 (en) | 2004-04-12 | 2014-04-29 | Google Inc. | Adding value to a rendered document |
US8489624B2 (en) | 2004-05-17 | 2013-07-16 | Google, Inc. | Processing techniques for text capture from a rendered document |
US8620083B2 (en) | 2004-12-03 | 2013-12-31 | Google Inc. | Method and system for character recognition |
US8874504B2 (en) | 2004-12-03 | 2014-10-28 | Google Inc. | Processing techniques for visual capture data from a rendered document |
CA2563834C (en) | 2004-04-23 | 2016-08-16 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Methods and apparatus to maintain audience privacy while determining viewing of video-on-demand programs |
US8490136B2 (en) * | 2009-05-07 | 2013-07-16 | Sirius Xm Radio Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing enhanced electronic program guide with personalized selection of broadcast content using affinities data and user preferences |
US8868670B2 (en) * | 2004-04-27 | 2014-10-21 | Avaya Inc. | Method and apparatus for summarizing one or more text messages using indicative summaries |
US20050246358A1 (en) * | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Gross John N | System & method of identifying and predicting innovation dissemination |
US20060010029A1 (en) * | 2004-04-29 | 2006-01-12 | Gross John N | System & method for online advertising |
US20050246391A1 (en) * | 2004-04-29 | 2005-11-03 | Gross John N | System & method for monitoring web pages |
US20090100523A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2009-04-16 | Harris Scott C | Spam detection within images of a communication |
US20060031879A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2006-02-09 | Vulcan Inc. | Management and non-linear presentation of news-related broadcasted or streamed multimedia content |
US20060031916A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2006-02-09 | Vulcan Inc. | Management and non-linear presentation of broadcasted or streamed multimedia content |
US20050262205A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-24 | Nikolov Radoslav I | Delivering messages in an enterprise messaging system using message selector hierarchy |
US20060031885A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2006-02-09 | Vulcan Inc. | Management and non-linear presentation of music-related broadcasted or streamed multimedia content |
EP1747681A1 (en) * | 2004-05-04 | 2007-01-31 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for programming blackout and retune |
US8028323B2 (en) | 2004-05-05 | 2011-09-27 | Dryden Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for employing a first device to direct a networked audio device to obtain a media item |
US8028038B2 (en) | 2004-05-05 | 2011-09-27 | Dryden Enterprises, Llc | Obtaining a playlist based on user profile matching |
US9826046B2 (en) | 2004-05-05 | 2017-11-21 | Black Hills Media, Llc | Device discovery for digital entertainment network |
US8578420B2 (en) * | 2004-05-05 | 2013-11-05 | Ati Technologies Ulc | Method and apparatus for automated display of video programming guide information |
US20050251750A1 (en) * | 2004-05-10 | 2005-11-10 | Robert Vallone | Television viewer interface system |
US7941490B1 (en) | 2004-05-11 | 2011-05-10 | Symantec Corporation | Method and apparatus for detecting spam in email messages and email attachments |
US20050273833A1 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2005-12-08 | Nokia Corporation | Customized virtual broadcast services |
US20060029000A1 (en) * | 2004-05-14 | 2006-02-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Connection establishment in a proxy server environment |
US20060031256A1 (en) * | 2004-05-20 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Template language for mobile client |
US20070203589A1 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2007-08-30 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Adaptive Recombinant Process Methods |
WO2005116852A2 (en) | 2004-05-20 | 2005-12-08 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Adaptive recombinant processes |
US7650432B2 (en) * | 2004-05-20 | 2010-01-19 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Occasionally-connected application server |
US20060069791A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-03-30 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Service oriented architecture with interchangeable transport protocols |
US20050267947A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-01 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Service oriented architecture with message processing pipelines |
US20060080419A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-04-13 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Reliable updating for a service oriented architecture |
US20060031930A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Dynamically configurable service oriented architecture |
US20050273847A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Programmable message processing stage for a service oriented architecture |
US20060031433A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Batch updating for a service oriented architecture |
US20050273521A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Dynamically configurable service oriented architecture |
US20050273502A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Patrick Paul B | Service oriented architecture with message processing stages |
US20060031353A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Dynamic publishing in a service oriented architecture |
US8615601B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2013-12-24 | Oracle International Corporation | Liquid computing |
US7653008B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2010-01-26 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Dynamically configurable service oriented architecture |
US20060031355A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Programmable service oriented architecture |
US20050273516A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Dynamic routing in a service oriented architecture |
US20050273520A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Service oriented architecture with file transport protocol |
US20050270970A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Failsafe service oriented architecture |
US20060007918A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-01-12 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Scaleable service oriented architecture |
US20050273497A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Service oriented architecture with electronic mail transport protocol |
US20060005063A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-01-05 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Error handling for a service oriented architecture |
US20060031354A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Service oriented architecture |
US20050278335A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-15 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Service oriented architecture with alerts |
US20060031431A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Reliable updating for a service oriented architecture |
US20050264581A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-01 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Dynamic program modification |
US20060136555A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-06-22 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Secure service oriented architecture |
US20050273517A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-08 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Service oriented architecture with credential management |
US7774485B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2010-08-10 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Dynamic service composition and orchestration |
US20060031432A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systens, Inc. | Service oriented architecture with message processing pipelines |
US20050267892A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-01 | Patrick Paul B | Service proxy definition |
US20060031481A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2006-02-09 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Service oriented architecture with monitoring |
US7310684B2 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2007-12-18 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Message processing in a service oriented architecture |
US20050278374A1 (en) * | 2004-05-21 | 2005-12-15 | Bea Systems, Inc. | Dynamic program modification |
US8010458B2 (en) | 2004-05-26 | 2011-08-30 | Facebook, Inc. | System and method for managing information flow between members of an online social network |
US20150051967A1 (en) | 2004-05-27 | 2015-02-19 | Anonymous Media Research, Llc | Media usage monitoring and measurment system and method |
US20050267750A1 (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2005-12-01 | Anonymous Media, Llc | Media usage monitoring and measurement system and method |
US8117143B2 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2012-02-14 | Intel Corporation | Using affinity measures with supervised classifiers |
US20050267810A1 (en) * | 2004-06-01 | 2005-12-01 | Zhiliang Zheng | System, method and computer program product for organizing items for presentment to a user |
US20050267809A1 (en) * | 2004-06-01 | 2005-12-01 | Zhiliang Zheng | System, method and computer program product for presenting advertising alerts to a user |
US20050267872A1 (en) * | 2004-06-01 | 2005-12-01 | Yaron Galai | System and method for automated mapping of items to documents |
US20060041478A1 (en) * | 2004-06-01 | 2006-02-23 | Zhiliang Zheng | Universal network market system |
US20050278742A1 (en) * | 2004-06-09 | 2005-12-15 | Ati Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for the display of a viewing events list |
WO2005125070A2 (en) * | 2004-06-14 | 2005-12-29 | Semandex Networks, Inc. | System and method for providing content-based instant messaging |
US7565630B1 (en) | 2004-06-15 | 2009-07-21 | Google Inc. | Customization of search results for search queries received from third party sites |
US8346157B1 (en) | 2004-06-16 | 2013-01-01 | Colby Steven M | Content customization in asymmertic communication systems |
WO2005125201A1 (en) * | 2004-06-17 | 2005-12-29 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V. | Personalized summaries using personality attributes |
US7813917B2 (en) | 2004-06-22 | 2010-10-12 | Gary Stephen Shuster | Candidate matching using algorithmic analysis of candidate-authored narrative information |
WO2006007194A1 (en) * | 2004-06-25 | 2006-01-19 | Personasearch, Inc. | Dynamic search processor |
US8843978B2 (en) | 2004-06-29 | 2014-09-23 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Method and apparatus for network bandwidth allocation |
US7664819B2 (en) * | 2004-06-29 | 2010-02-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Incremental anti-spam lookup and update service |
WO2006002662A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-12 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and apparatus scheduling processing of data portions from multiple data sources |
US8131754B1 (en) | 2004-06-30 | 2012-03-06 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for determining an article association measure |
US7788274B1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2010-08-31 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for category-based search |
US7673253B1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2010-03-02 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for inferring concepts for association with content |
AU2005269957B2 (en) * | 2004-07-02 | 2011-09-22 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus for identifying viewing information associated with a digital media device |
JP2006023900A (en) * | 2004-07-07 | 2006-01-26 | Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands Bv | Examination and adjustment method and examination control device for rotating disk type memory device |
US7617501B2 (en) | 2004-07-09 | 2009-11-10 | Quest Software, Inc. | Apparatus, system, and method for managing policies on a computer having a foreign operating system |
US8620915B1 (en) | 2007-03-13 | 2013-12-31 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for promoting personalized search results based on personal information |
US8078607B2 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2011-12-13 | Google Inc. | Generating website profiles based on queries from webistes and user activities on the search results |
US8346620B2 (en) | 2004-07-19 | 2013-01-01 | Google Inc. | Automatic modification of web pages |
US8943537B2 (en) * | 2004-07-21 | 2015-01-27 | Cox Communications, Inc. | Method and system for presenting personalized television program recommendation to viewers |
US7698333B2 (en) | 2004-07-22 | 2010-04-13 | Factiva, Inc. | Intelligent query system and method using phrase-code frequency-inverse phrase-code document frequency module |
US7702618B1 (en) | 2004-07-26 | 2010-04-20 | Google Inc. | Information retrieval system for archiving multiple document versions |
US7599914B2 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2009-10-06 | Google Inc. | Phrase-based searching in an information retrieval system |
US7580921B2 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2009-08-25 | Google Inc. | Phrase identification in an information retrieval system |
US7426507B1 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2008-09-16 | Google, Inc. | Automatic taxonomy generation in search results using phrases |
US7580929B2 (en) * | 2004-07-26 | 2009-08-25 | Google Inc. | Phrase-based personalization of searches in an information retrieval system |
US7536408B2 (en) | 2004-07-26 | 2009-05-19 | Google Inc. | Phrase-based indexing in an information retrieval system |
US7711679B2 (en) | 2004-07-26 | 2010-05-04 | Google Inc. | Phrase-based detection of duplicate documents in an information retrieval system |
US7584175B2 (en) | 2004-07-26 | 2009-09-01 | Google Inc. | Phrase-based generation of document descriptions |
US7567959B2 (en) | 2004-07-26 | 2009-07-28 | Google Inc. | Multiple index based information retrieval system |
US20060026587A1 (en) * | 2004-07-28 | 2006-02-02 | Lemarroy Luis A | Systems and methods for operating system migration |
US7856441B1 (en) | 2005-01-10 | 2010-12-21 | Yahoo! Inc. | Search systems and methods using enhanced contextual queries |
US7603349B1 (en) | 2004-07-29 | 2009-10-13 | Yahoo! Inc. | User interfaces for search systems using in-line contextual queries |
US7421441B1 (en) * | 2005-09-20 | 2008-09-02 | Yahoo! Inc. | Systems and methods for presenting information based on publisher-selected labels |
US8972856B2 (en) | 2004-07-29 | 2015-03-03 | Yahoo! Inc. | Document modification by a client-side application |
US7958115B2 (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2011-06-07 | Yahoo! Inc. | Search systems and methods using in-line contextual queries |
US7409402B1 (en) * | 2005-09-20 | 2008-08-05 | Yahoo! Inc. | Systems and methods for presenting advertising content based on publisher-selected labels |
US7631336B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2009-12-08 | Broadband Itv, Inc. | Method for converting, navigating and displaying video content uploaded from the internet to a digital TV video-on-demand platform |
US11259059B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2022-02-22 | Broadband Itv, Inc. | System for addressing on-demand TV program content on TV services platform of a digital TV services provider |
US9584868B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2017-02-28 | Broadband Itv, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
US9635429B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2017-04-25 | Broadband Itv, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
US7590997B2 (en) | 2004-07-30 | 2009-09-15 | Broadband Itv, Inc. | System and method for managing, converting and displaying video content on a video-on-demand platform, including ads used for drill-down navigation and consumer-generated classified ads |
US7904517B2 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2011-03-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Challenge response systems |
US20060031873A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-09 | Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc | System and method for reduced hierarchy key management |
US9060200B1 (en) | 2004-08-11 | 2015-06-16 | Visible World, Inc. | System and method for digital program insertion in cable systems |
US7660865B2 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2010-02-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Spam filtering with probabilistic secure hashes |
US20060212149A1 (en) * | 2004-08-13 | 2006-09-21 | Hicken Wendell T | Distributed system and method for intelligent data analysis |
US20060041476A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Zhiliang Zheng | System and method for providing an expert platform |
US20060041477A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Zhiliang Zheng | System and method for providing targeted information to users |
WO2006023656A2 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-03-02 | Lyhoo Inc. | Universal network market system |
WO2006023508A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-03-02 | Shaw Parsing Llc | Techniques for upstream failure detection and failure recovery |
JP5162240B2 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2013-03-13 | ショー パーシング リミティド ライアビリティ カンパニー | A technique for distributing individual contents via a real-time distribution network |
US8078602B2 (en) | 2004-12-17 | 2011-12-13 | Claria Innovations, Llc | Search engine for a computer network |
US8255413B2 (en) | 2004-08-19 | 2012-08-28 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | Method and apparatus for responding to request for information-personalization |
US8763157B2 (en) | 2004-08-23 | 2014-06-24 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Statutory license restricted digital media playback on portable devices |
US20060041472A1 (en) * | 2004-08-23 | 2006-02-23 | Lukose Rajan M | Systems and methods of interfacing an advertisement with a message presentation client |
US20060064322A1 (en) * | 2004-08-27 | 2006-03-23 | Desmond Mascarenhas | Online education resource for patients with metabolic syndrome |
US20060048042A1 (en) * | 2004-08-30 | 2006-03-02 | Xerox Corporation | Individually personalized customized report document system with user feedback |
US20060048053A1 (en) | 2004-08-30 | 2006-03-02 | Xerox Corporation | Individually personalized customized report document system |
US20060080286A1 (en) * | 2004-08-31 | 2006-04-13 | Flashpoint Technology, Inc. | System and method for storing and accessing images based on position data associated therewith |
US20060053100A1 (en) * | 2004-09-03 | 2006-03-09 | Ich Servers, S.L. | Rapid search system |
DE102004043125B4 (en) * | 2004-09-07 | 2017-10-05 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | throttling device |
GB2418999A (en) * | 2004-09-09 | 2006-04-12 | Surfcontrol Plc | Categorizing uniform resource locators |
GB2418037B (en) * | 2004-09-09 | 2007-02-28 | Surfcontrol Plc | System, method and apparatus for use in monitoring or controlling internet access |
US7529845B2 (en) * | 2004-09-15 | 2009-05-05 | Nokia Corporation | Compressing, filtering, and transmitting of protocol messages via a protocol-aware intermediary node |
US7340672B2 (en) * | 2004-09-20 | 2008-03-04 | Intel Corporation | Providing data integrity for data streams |
US8086575B2 (en) | 2004-09-23 | 2011-12-27 | Rovi Solutions Corporation | Methods and apparatus for integrating disparate media formats in a networked media system |
US9609279B2 (en) | 2004-09-24 | 2017-03-28 | Google Inc. | Method and system for providing secure CODECS |
US7441273B2 (en) * | 2004-09-27 | 2008-10-21 | Mcafee, Inc. | Virus scanner system and method with integrated spyware detection capabilities |
US7630974B2 (en) | 2004-09-28 | 2009-12-08 | Oracle International Corporation | Multi-language support for enterprise identity and access management |
US20080154601A1 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2008-06-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for providing menu and other services for an information processing system using a telephone or other audio interface |
US7178720B1 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2007-02-20 | West Corporation | Methods, computer-readable media, and computer program product for intelligent selection of items encoded onto portable machine-playable entertainment media |
US20060074883A1 (en) * | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems, methods, and interfaces for providing personalized search and information access |
US8768844B2 (en) | 2004-10-06 | 2014-07-01 | Sony Corporation | Method and system for content sharing and authentication between multiple devices |
US8806533B1 (en) | 2004-10-08 | 2014-08-12 | United Video Properties, Inc. | System and method for using television information codes |
US7574433B2 (en) * | 2004-10-08 | 2009-08-11 | Paterra, Inc. | Classification-expanded indexing and retrieval of classified documents |
US7693815B2 (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2010-04-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatic subscriptions to documents based on user navigation behavior |
US20060085253A1 (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2006-04-20 | Matthew Mengerink | Method and system to utilize a user network within a network-based commerce platform |
TWI254880B (en) * | 2004-10-18 | 2006-05-11 | Avectec Com Inc | Method for classifying electronic document analysis |
JP4922175B2 (en) * | 2004-10-19 | 2012-04-25 | ヤフー! インコーポレイテッド | Location-based social networking system and method |
US20060116930A1 (en) * | 2004-10-19 | 2006-06-01 | Goldstein Steven W | Computer system and method for development and marketing of consumer products |
US11283885B2 (en) * | 2004-10-19 | 2022-03-22 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | System and method for location based matching and promotion |
WO2006045102A2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2006-04-27 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for intercepting events in a communication system |
US8010082B2 (en) | 2004-10-20 | 2011-08-30 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Flexible billing architecture |
WO2006046167A2 (en) * | 2004-10-25 | 2006-05-04 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Associative content exchange/copy mechanism |
US20060090184A1 (en) * | 2004-10-26 | 2006-04-27 | David Zito | System and method for presenting information |
WO2006047790A2 (en) * | 2004-10-27 | 2006-05-04 | Client Dynamics, Inc. | Enhanced client relationship management systems and methods with a recommendation engine |
WO2006047712A2 (en) * | 2004-10-27 | 2006-05-04 | Itg Software Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating liquidity |
WO2006050135A1 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2006-05-11 | Eat.Tv, Inc. | System for enabling video-based interactive applications |
US8620717B1 (en) * | 2004-11-04 | 2013-12-31 | Auguri Corporation | Analytical tool |
US8635690B2 (en) | 2004-11-05 | 2014-01-21 | Mcafee, Inc. | Reputation based message processing |
WO2006053095A2 (en) * | 2004-11-08 | 2006-05-18 | Harcourt Assessment, Inc. | Automated assessment development and associated methods |
US7895218B2 (en) | 2004-11-09 | 2011-02-22 | Veveo, Inc. | Method and system for performing searches for television content using reduced text input |
US7860318B2 (en) | 2004-11-09 | 2010-12-28 | Intelli-Check, Inc | System and method for comparing documents |
JP2008521315A (en) * | 2004-11-18 | 2008-06-19 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | Apparatus and method for updating a user profile |
JP4013943B2 (en) * | 2004-11-22 | 2007-11-28 | 船井電機株式会社 | Broadcast signal reception system |
US7706781B2 (en) | 2004-11-22 | 2010-04-27 | Seven Networks International Oy | Data security in a mobile e-mail service |
US7984467B2 (en) * | 2004-11-23 | 2011-07-19 | Stmicroelectronics, Inc. | Method and system for providing an electronic program guide |
CN101438281A (en) * | 2004-11-23 | 2009-05-20 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | Method and apparatus for managing file |
US20060108880A1 (en) * | 2004-11-24 | 2006-05-25 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Linear compressor |
US8874570B1 (en) | 2004-11-30 | 2014-10-28 | Google Inc. | Search boost vector based on co-visitation information |
FI117152B (en) | 2004-12-03 | 2006-06-30 | Seven Networks Internat Oy | E-mail service provisioning method for mobile terminal, involves using domain part and further parameters to generate new parameter set in list of setting parameter sets, if provisioning of e-mail service is successful |
US8099369B2 (en) * | 2004-12-08 | 2012-01-17 | Ngna, Llc | Method and system for securing content in media systems |
US7432916B2 (en) * | 2004-12-09 | 2008-10-07 | Universal Electronics, Inc. | Controlling device with dual-mode, touch-sensitive display |
US7797338B2 (en) * | 2004-12-09 | 2010-09-14 | Aol Inc. | System and method for facilitating personalization of applications based on anticipation of users' interests |
US9723267B2 (en) | 2004-12-15 | 2017-08-01 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Method and apparatus for wideband distribution of content |
US7383438B2 (en) * | 2004-12-18 | 2008-06-03 | Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc | System and method for secure conditional access download and reconfiguration |
US7693863B2 (en) | 2004-12-20 | 2010-04-06 | Claria Corporation | Method and device for publishing cross-network user behavioral data |
EP1672807B1 (en) * | 2004-12-20 | 2011-12-07 | TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (publ) | Scaling in a receiver for coded digital data symbols |
US7797328B2 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2010-09-14 | Thomas Lane Styles | System and method of searching for story-based media |
JP4218758B2 (en) * | 2004-12-21 | 2009-02-04 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Subtitle generating apparatus, subtitle generating method, and program |
CN101088288A (en) * | 2004-12-23 | 2007-12-12 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | Method and device for commending contents |
EP1831804A1 (en) * | 2004-12-24 | 2007-09-12 | Panoratio Database Images GmbH | Relational compressed data bank images (for accelerated interrogation of data banks) |
US7844691B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2010-11-30 | Xstor Systems, Inc. | Scalable distributed storage and delivery |
US8880677B2 (en) * | 2005-01-03 | 2014-11-04 | Qualcomm Connected Experiences, Inc. | System and method for delivering content to users on a network |
WO2006075032A1 (en) * | 2005-01-05 | 2006-07-20 | Musicstrands, S.A.U. | System and method for recommending multimedia elements |
PL1842369T3 (en) * | 2005-01-12 | 2020-11-16 | Invidi Technologies Corporation | Targeted impression model for broadcast network asset delivery |
US8032533B1 (en) | 2005-01-14 | 2011-10-04 | Thomson Reuters Global Resources | Systems, methods, and software for researching statutory information |
US7653920B2 (en) * | 2005-01-24 | 2010-01-26 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Method and system for protecting cable television subscriber-specific information allowing limited subset access |
US7356777B2 (en) | 2005-01-26 | 2008-04-08 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for providing a dynamic user interface for a dense three-dimensional scene |
US7404151B2 (en) * | 2005-01-26 | 2008-07-22 | Attenex Corporation | System and method for providing a dynamic user interface for a dense three-dimensional scene |
TW200704183A (en) * | 2005-01-27 | 2007-01-16 | Matrix Tv | Dynamic mosaic extended electronic programming guide for television program selection and display |
GB2422754B (en) * | 2005-01-27 | 2007-04-04 | Pccw Hkt Datacom Services Ltd | Digital multicast system |
US7567565B2 (en) | 2005-02-01 | 2009-07-28 | Time Warner Cable Inc. | Method and apparatus for network bandwidth conservation |
US7693887B2 (en) * | 2005-02-01 | 2010-04-06 | Strands, Inc. | Dynamic identification of a new set of media items responsive to an input mediaset |
JP4655200B2 (en) * | 2005-02-01 | 2011-03-23 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method, and program |
US20060174270A1 (en) * | 2005-02-02 | 2006-08-03 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing approximated information in an interactive television program guide |
EP1849099B1 (en) | 2005-02-03 | 2014-05-07 | Apple Inc. | Recommender system for identifying a new set of media items responsive to an input set of media items and knowledge base metrics |
US20060179078A1 (en) * | 2005-02-04 | 2006-08-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Multi-party playlist control including wireless enablement |
EP1844386A4 (en) | 2005-02-04 | 2009-11-25 | Strands Inc | System for browsing through a music catalog using correlation metrics of a knowledge base of mediasets |
US20080015999A1 (en) * | 2005-02-04 | 2008-01-17 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Securely ingesting encrypted content into content servers |
CA2596930A1 (en) * | 2005-02-07 | 2006-08-10 | Adzilla, Inc. | Method and system of targeting content |
JP3789463B1 (en) * | 2005-02-07 | 2006-06-21 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Recommended program extracting apparatus and recommended program extracting method |
US7933410B2 (en) * | 2005-02-16 | 2011-04-26 | Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc | System and method for a variable key ladder |
US20060190225A1 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2006-08-24 | Brand Matthew E | Collaborative filtering using random walks of Markov chains |
CN101120351B (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2010-10-06 | Rsa安全公司 | Derivative seeds distribution method |
US20060200412A1 (en) * | 2005-02-23 | 2006-09-07 | Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc | System and method for DRM regional and timezone key management |
US7873912B1 (en) * | 2005-02-25 | 2011-01-18 | Apple Inc. | Process and system for providing a reduced set of fields associated with a report layout |
US20070143776A1 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2007-06-21 | Russ Samuel H | Viewer data collection in a multi-room network |
US20060218581A1 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2006-09-28 | Barbara Ostrowska | Interactive network guide with parental monitoring |
US20060200461A1 (en) * | 2005-03-01 | 2006-09-07 | Lucas Marshall D | Process for identifying weighted contextural relationships between unrelated documents |
WO2006098648A1 (en) * | 2005-03-03 | 2006-09-21 | Armen Zhorzhovich Margarjan | Device and method for forming and displaying a personal channel in a multichannel digital tv |
AU2006220720A1 (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2006-09-14 | Resonance Media Services, Inc. | Scan shuffle for building playlists |
US8645941B2 (en) | 2005-03-07 | 2014-02-04 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | Method for attributing and allocating revenue related to embedded software |
US8306975B1 (en) | 2005-03-08 | 2012-11-06 | Worldwide Creative Techniques, Inc. | Expanded interest recommendation engine and variable personalization |
US9424563B2 (en) * | 2005-03-11 | 2016-08-23 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Accessing medial context information using contextual links |
US7752633B1 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2010-07-06 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Cross-platform event engine |
US8073866B2 (en) | 2005-03-17 | 2011-12-06 | Claria Innovations, Llc | Method for providing content to an internet user based on the user's demonstrated content preferences |
US7620631B2 (en) * | 2005-03-21 | 2009-11-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Pyramid view |
US9547780B2 (en) | 2005-03-28 | 2017-01-17 | Absolute Software Corporation | Method for determining identification of an electronic device |
US7640312B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2009-12-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and program product for managing communications pursuant to an information technology (IT) migration |
US7694212B2 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2010-04-06 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for providing a graphical display of search activity |
US20100311399A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2010-12-09 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for generating audible reminders on mobile user equipment |
US9256685B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2016-02-09 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for modifying search results based on a user's history |
US7783631B2 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2010-08-24 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for managing multiple user accounts |
US7747632B2 (en) | 2005-03-31 | 2010-06-29 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for providing subscription-based personalization |
CN1841393B (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2012-08-08 | 国际商业机器公司 | A method and system for managing web profile information |
US8037140B2 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2011-10-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method and program product for managing communications pursuant to an information technology (IT) migration |
US20060224583A1 (en) * | 2005-03-31 | 2006-10-05 | Google, Inc. | Systems and methods for analyzing a user's web history |
US8234679B2 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2012-07-31 | Time Warner Cable, Inc. | Technique for selecting multiple entertainment programs to be provided over a communication network |
US8229283B2 (en) * | 2005-04-01 | 2012-07-24 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | System and method for quality marking of a recording |
US9069436B1 (en) * | 2005-04-01 | 2015-06-30 | Intralinks, Inc. | System and method for information delivery based on at least one self-declared user attribute |
US7353034B2 (en) | 2005-04-04 | 2008-04-01 | X One, Inc. | Location sharing and tracking using mobile phones or other wireless devices |
US7802293B2 (en) * | 2005-04-06 | 2010-09-21 | Actividentity, Inc. | Secure digital credential sharing arrangement |
US8175889B1 (en) | 2005-04-06 | 2012-05-08 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for tracking changes of address based on service disconnect/connect data |
DE602006016519D1 (en) * | 2005-04-07 | 2010-10-14 | Mold Masters 2007 Ltd | Configurable injection molding distributor and method for its production |
US7603413B1 (en) | 2005-04-07 | 2009-10-13 | Aol Llc | Using automated agents to facilitate chat communications |
US9973817B1 (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2018-05-15 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | System and method for providing a list of video-on-demand programs |
US20090327013A1 (en) * | 2005-04-11 | 2009-12-31 | Jobfox, Inc. | Method and Apparatus for Facilitation Introductions in an Employment System |
EP1872318A4 (en) * | 2005-04-20 | 2010-01-20 | Massive Impact Internat Ltd | Customer discovery and identification system and method |
US7849165B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2010-12-07 | Fiducci Thomas E | Data backup, storage, transfer, and retrieval system, method and computer program product |
US8126990B2 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2012-02-28 | Fiducci Thomas E | Data backup and transfer system, method and computer program product |
US7796742B1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2010-09-14 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for simplified provisioning |
US8438633B1 (en) | 2005-04-21 | 2013-05-07 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Flexible real-time inbox access |
CA2605550A1 (en) | 2005-04-22 | 2006-11-02 | Eric Hoersten | System and method for selling a rental media product |
US7840570B2 (en) * | 2005-04-22 | 2010-11-23 | Strands, Inc. | System and method for acquiring and adding data on the playing of elements or multimedia files |
US7451161B2 (en) | 2005-04-28 | 2008-11-11 | Friendster, Inc. | Compatibility scoring of users in a social network |
US20100082480A1 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-01 | Jason Alexander Korosec | Payments with virtual value |
US7818667B2 (en) | 2005-05-03 | 2010-10-19 | Tv Works Llc | Verification of semantic constraints in multimedia data and in its announcement, signaling and interchange |
US20060259469A1 (en) * | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-16 | Fu-Sheng Chiu | Intelligent adaptive programming based on collected dynamic market data and user feedback |
US20060265368A1 (en) * | 2005-05-23 | 2006-11-23 | Opinionlab, Inc. | Measuring subjective user reaction concerning a particular document |
US9648281B2 (en) * | 2005-05-23 | 2017-05-09 | Open Text Sa Ulc | System and method for movie segment bookmarking and sharing |
US8141111B2 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2012-03-20 | Open Text S.A. | Movie advertising playback techniques |
US7613736B2 (en) * | 2005-05-23 | 2009-11-03 | Resonance Media Services, Inc. | Sharing music essence in a recommendation system |
KR101127971B1 (en) * | 2005-05-23 | 2012-03-29 | 톰슨 라이센싱 | Method for providing an electronic program guide based on user preference data |
US7877689B2 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2011-01-25 | Vignette Software Llc | Distributed scalable media environment for movie advertising placement in user-created movies |
US8145528B2 (en) | 2005-05-23 | 2012-03-27 | Open Text S.A. | Movie advertising placement optimization based on behavior and content analysis |
GB2427043A (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2006-12-13 | Moneyexpert Ltd | Online system offering aggregate product and services data with corresponding propensity analysis |
US8457203B2 (en) * | 2005-05-26 | 2013-06-04 | Ntt Docomo, Inc. | Method and apparatus for coding motion and prediction weighting parameters |
US20090129593A1 (en) * | 2005-05-30 | 2009-05-21 | Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. | Semiconductor device and method for operating the same |
US7937480B2 (en) | 2005-06-02 | 2011-05-03 | Mcafee, Inc. | Aggregation of reputation data |
US7941394B2 (en) | 2005-06-03 | 2011-05-10 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | User interface providing summary information or a status pane in a web analytics tool |
US8538969B2 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2013-09-17 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Data format for website traffic statistics |
US8578041B2 (en) * | 2005-06-03 | 2013-11-05 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Variable sampling rates for website visitation analysis |
US8103659B1 (en) * | 2005-06-06 | 2012-01-24 | A9.Com, Inc. | Perspective-based item navigation |
US7761457B2 (en) * | 2005-06-06 | 2010-07-20 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Creation of segmentation definitions |
US20060282426A1 (en) * | 2005-06-13 | 2006-12-14 | Mine Spears | Method and system for matching users for relationships using a discussion based approach |
US7668538B2 (en) * | 2005-06-15 | 2010-02-23 | Music Choice | Systems and methods for facilitating the acquisition of content |
KR20060131471A (en) * | 2005-06-16 | 2006-12-20 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method for controlling opc data in lead-in zone optical of blu-ray rewritable disc |
US9158855B2 (en) * | 2005-06-16 | 2015-10-13 | Buzzmetrics, Ltd | Extracting structured data from weblogs |
US7617134B2 (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2009-11-10 | Match.Com, L.L.C. | System and method for providing a certified photograph in a network environment |
US8805929B2 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2014-08-12 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Event-driven annotation techniques |
US7739337B1 (en) | 2005-06-20 | 2010-06-15 | Symantec Corporation | Method and apparatus for grouping spam email messages |
US8010609B2 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2011-08-30 | Symantec Corporation | Method and apparatus for maintaining reputation lists of IP addresses to detect email spam |
US7554576B2 (en) * | 2005-06-20 | 2009-06-30 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Information capture and recording system for controlling capture devices |
WO2006136660A1 (en) | 2005-06-21 | 2006-12-28 | Seven Networks International Oy | Maintaining an ip connection in a mobile network |
US8185877B1 (en) | 2005-06-22 | 2012-05-22 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for testing applications |
JP2008545200A (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2008-12-11 | チョイスストリーム インコーポレイテッド | Method and apparatus for a statistical system for targeting advertisements |
WO2007002728A2 (en) * | 2005-06-28 | 2007-01-04 | Claria Corporation | Method and system for controlling and adapting a media stream |
KR20080028982A (en) * | 2005-06-30 | 2008-04-02 | 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. | Electronic device and method of creating a sequence of content items |
US20070198494A1 (en) * | 2005-07-08 | 2007-08-23 | Vadon Mark C | Apparatus and method for facilitating a search for sets of gems |
US7627605B1 (en) * | 2005-07-15 | 2009-12-01 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating media playlists by defining paths through media similarity space |
US20070022459A1 (en) * | 2005-07-20 | 2007-01-25 | Gaebel Thomas M Jr | Method and apparatus for boundary-based network operation |
US20070022113A1 (en) * | 2005-07-22 | 2007-01-25 | Heino Jay J | Systems and methods for automation of employment matching services |
US7930353B2 (en) | 2005-07-29 | 2011-04-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Trees of classifiers for detecting email spam |
US20190268430A1 (en) | 2005-08-01 | 2019-08-29 | Seven Networks, Llc | Targeted notification of content availability to a mobile device |
US8069166B2 (en) * | 2005-08-01 | 2011-11-29 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Managing user-to-user contact with inferred presence information |
US20070033614A1 (en) * | 2005-08-04 | 2007-02-08 | Huffman Roy W Jr | Method for creating unique customized television schedules |
US20070100779A1 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2007-05-03 | Ori Levy | Method and system for extracting web data |
US8429167B2 (en) * | 2005-08-08 | 2013-04-23 | Google Inc. | User-context-based search engine |
US8027876B2 (en) * | 2005-08-08 | 2011-09-27 | Yoogli, Inc. | Online advertising valuation apparatus and method |
JP2009505246A (en) * | 2005-08-11 | 2009-02-05 | コンテクストウェブ・インコーポレーテッド | Method and system for placement and pricing of advertisements or services based on the Internet |
US8875196B2 (en) | 2005-08-13 | 2014-10-28 | Webtuner Corp. | System for network and local content access |
US20070043770A1 (en) * | 2005-08-22 | 2007-02-22 | Redfin | Discovery method for buyers, sellers of real estate |
US7788266B2 (en) | 2005-08-26 | 2010-08-31 | Veveo, Inc. | Method and system for processing ambiguous, multi-term search queries |
US7779011B2 (en) | 2005-08-26 | 2010-08-17 | Veveo, Inc. | Method and system for dynamically processing ambiguous, reduced text search queries and highlighting results thereof |
US20070061386A1 (en) * | 2005-08-30 | 2007-03-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system and program product for performing an integrated information technology (IT) migration and inventory information collection |
US20070055928A1 (en) * | 2005-09-02 | 2007-03-08 | Microsoft Corporation | User workflow lists to organize multimedia files |
US20070055629A1 (en) * | 2005-09-08 | 2007-03-08 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for distributing content to support multiple customer service entities and content packagers |
US7565506B2 (en) * | 2005-09-08 | 2009-07-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for delivering content based on receivers characteristics |
US8528029B2 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2013-09-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and methods of open and closed package subscription |
US8893179B2 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2014-11-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and methods for providing and presenting customized channel information |
US20070061195A1 (en) * | 2005-09-13 | 2007-03-15 | Yahoo! Inc. | Framework for selecting and delivering advertisements over a network based on combined short-term and long-term user behavioral interests |
US9432468B2 (en) * | 2005-09-14 | 2016-08-30 | Liveperson, Inc. | System and method for design and dynamic generation of a web page |
US8738732B2 (en) | 2005-09-14 | 2014-05-27 | Liveperson, Inc. | System and method for performing follow up based on user interactions |
US7567983B2 (en) * | 2005-09-19 | 2009-07-28 | Cox Communications, Inc. | Customer feedback reporting |
US20070067643A1 (en) * | 2005-09-21 | 2007-03-22 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | System and method for software tamper detection |
WO2007038245A2 (en) | 2005-09-23 | 2007-04-05 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Method for evolving detectors to detect malign behavior in an artificial immune system |
US8065733B2 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2011-11-22 | Google, Inc. | Method for evolving detectors to detect malign behavior in an artificial immune system |
US7698061B2 (en) | 2005-09-23 | 2010-04-13 | Scenera Technologies, Llc | System and method for selecting and presenting a route to a user |
US7817608B2 (en) * | 2005-09-23 | 2010-10-19 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Transitioning to secure IP communications for encoding, encapsulating, and encrypting data |
EP3709539A1 (en) * | 2005-09-26 | 2020-09-16 | Nielsen Media Research, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for metering computer-based media presentation |
US20070073549A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Match.Com, L.P. | System and method for providing testing and matching in a network environment |
US7613706B2 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2009-11-03 | Match.Com L.L.C. | System and method for providing a search feature in a network environment |
US8473490B2 (en) | 2005-09-27 | 2013-06-25 | Match.Com, L.L.C. | System and method for providing a near matches feature in a network environment |
US20070073711A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Match.Com, L.P. | System and method for providing a pre-date component in a network environment |
US7676466B2 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2010-03-09 | Match.Com, L.L.C. | System and method for providing enhanced questions for matching in a network environment |
US20070072468A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Match.Com, L.P. | System and method for providing an enhanced selection process in a network environment |
US8051013B2 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2011-11-01 | Match.Com, L.L.C. | System and method for providing a system that includes on-line and off-line features in a network environment |
US20070073802A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Match.Com, L.P. | System and method for providing on-line dating features in a network environment |
US20070073803A1 (en) * | 2005-09-27 | 2007-03-29 | Match.Com, L.P. | System and method for providing a post-date component in a network environment |
US20070079342A1 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2007-04-05 | Guideworks, Llc | Systems and methods for managing local storage of on-demand content |
US8843481B1 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2014-09-23 | Yongyong Xu | System and method of forming action based virtual communities and related search mechanisms |
US8626584B2 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2014-01-07 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Population of an advertisement reference list |
US7877387B2 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2011-01-25 | Strands, Inc. | Systems and methods for promotional media item selection and promotional program unit generation |
US20090070267A9 (en) * | 2005-09-30 | 2009-03-12 | Musicstrands, Inc. | User programmed media delivery service |
US7646962B1 (en) | 2005-09-30 | 2010-01-12 | Guideworks, Llc | System and methods for recording and playing back programs having desirable recording attributes |
US20070094324A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-04-26 | Vata Korkut C | Web-based, secure supervisory system for social guidance and professional consultation and method of use |
US20080147557A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2008-06-19 | Sheehy Dennis G | Display based purchase opportunity originating from in-store identification of sound recordings |
JP2007104312A (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2007-04-19 | Toshiba Corp | Information processing method using electronic guide information and apparatus thereof |
US8874477B2 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2014-10-28 | Steven Mark Hoffberg | Multifactorial optimization system and method |
US8582584B2 (en) * | 2005-10-04 | 2013-11-12 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Self-monitoring and optimizing network apparatus and methods |
US7876998B2 (en) | 2005-10-05 | 2011-01-25 | Wall William E | DVD playback over multi-room by copying to HDD |
US20070106627A1 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2007-05-10 | Mohit Srivastava | Social discovery systems and methods |
US20070078803A1 (en) * | 2005-10-05 | 2007-04-05 | Gilmour David L | Method, system and apparatus for searchcasting with privacy control |
US20070124493A1 (en) * | 2005-10-07 | 2007-05-31 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Jr. University | System and Method for Ordering Content for User Review |
WO2007044787A2 (en) * | 2005-10-11 | 2007-04-19 | William Shattuck Stearns | Remote advertising system |
US8220019B2 (en) | 2005-10-11 | 2012-07-10 | Internet Sports International, Ltd. | Remote advertising system |
US7945585B1 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2011-05-17 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for improving targeted data delivery |
US20070088603A1 (en) * | 2005-10-13 | 2007-04-19 | Jouppi Norman P | Method and system for targeted data delivery using weight-based scoring |
US7945545B1 (en) | 2005-10-13 | 2011-05-17 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for utilizing user information to provide a network address |
ES2433134T3 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2013-12-09 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods to record multiple programs simultaneously with a single tuner |
US7911339B2 (en) | 2005-10-18 | 2011-03-22 | Apple Inc. | Shoe wear-out sensor, body-bar sensing system, unitless activity assessment and associated methods |
US8676900B2 (en) | 2005-10-25 | 2014-03-18 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Asynchronous advertising placement based on metadata |
US11004089B2 (en) | 2005-10-25 | 2021-05-11 | Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC | Associating media content files with advertisements |
US20070118425A1 (en) | 2005-10-25 | 2007-05-24 | Podbridge, Inc. | User device agent for asynchronous advertising in time and space shifted media network |
US10657538B2 (en) | 2005-10-25 | 2020-05-19 | Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC | Resolution of advertising rules |
US8326775B2 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2012-12-04 | Cortica Ltd. | Signature generation for multimedia deep-content-classification by a large-scale matching system and method thereof |
US11003706B2 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2021-05-11 | Cortica Ltd | System and methods for determining access permissions on personalized clusters of multimedia content elements |
US8280906B1 (en) | 2005-10-27 | 2012-10-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for retaining offers for delivering targeted data in a system for targeted data delivery |
US7383334B2 (en) * | 2005-10-28 | 2008-06-03 | Omniture, Inc. | Comparison of website visitation data sets generated from using different navigation tools |
US7584159B1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2009-09-01 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Strategies for providing novel recommendations |
US8571930B1 (en) | 2005-10-31 | 2013-10-29 | A9.Com, Inc. | Strategies for determining the value of advertisements using randomized performance estimates |
US7542951B1 (en) | 2005-10-31 | 2009-06-02 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Strategies for providing diverse recommendations |
US7831535B2 (en) * | 2005-11-02 | 2010-11-09 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Adaptive knowledge lifecycle management aligned with assessed financial value based on organizing structure of knowledge assets |
US20070112719A1 (en) * | 2005-11-03 | 2007-05-17 | Robert Reich | System and method for dynamically generating and managing an online context-driven interactive social network |
US8065370B2 (en) | 2005-11-03 | 2011-11-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Proofs to filter spam |
US8731379B1 (en) | 2005-11-04 | 2014-05-20 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording programs with a network recording device upon failure of a user's equipment |
US8582946B2 (en) | 2005-11-04 | 2013-11-12 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording programs using a network recording device as supplemental storage |
US20070115929A1 (en) * | 2005-11-08 | 2007-05-24 | Bruce Collins | Flexible system for distributing content to a device |
US8571570B2 (en) * | 2005-11-08 | 2013-10-29 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for delivering regional parameters |
US8533358B2 (en) | 2005-11-08 | 2013-09-10 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for fragmenting system information messages in wireless networks |
US9113107B2 (en) | 2005-11-08 | 2015-08-18 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Interactive advertising and program promotion in an interactive television system |
US8600836B2 (en) * | 2005-11-08 | 2013-12-03 | Qualcomm Incorporated | System for distributing packages and channels to a device |
US20080016533A1 (en) * | 2005-11-09 | 2008-01-17 | Rothschild Leigh M | Device, system and method for delivering digital media content to a user |
US20070124385A1 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2007-05-31 | Denny Michael S | Preference-based content distribution service |
US20070129999A1 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2007-06-07 | Jie Zhou | Fraud detection in web-based advertising |
US20070118509A1 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2007-05-24 | Flashpoint Technology, Inc. | Collaborative service for suggesting media keywords based on location data |
US9392069B2 (en) | 2005-11-18 | 2016-07-12 | Aol Inc. | Promoting interoperability of presence-based systems through the use of ubiquitous online identities |
US7644054B2 (en) | 2005-11-23 | 2010-01-05 | Veveo, Inc. | System and method for finding desired results by incremental search using an ambiguous keypad with the input containing orthographic and typographic errors |
US8751502B2 (en) * | 2005-11-29 | 2014-06-10 | Aol Inc. | Visually-represented results to search queries in rich media content |
US8132103B1 (en) | 2006-07-19 | 2012-03-06 | Aol Inc. | Audio and/or video scene detection and retrieval |
CN101326823A (en) * | 2005-11-30 | 2008-12-17 | 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 | Method and system for generating a recommendation for at least one further content item |
US8005817B1 (en) * | 2005-11-30 | 2011-08-23 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | System and method for providing structure and content scoring for XML |
US8689016B2 (en) | 2005-12-02 | 2014-04-01 | Google Inc. | Tamper prevention and detection for video provided over a network to a client |
US8903810B2 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2014-12-02 | Collarity, Inc. | Techniques for ranking search results |
US8429184B2 (en) | 2005-12-05 | 2013-04-23 | Collarity Inc. | Generation of refinement terms for search queries |
US20070134641A1 (en) * | 2005-12-08 | 2007-06-14 | Mobicom Corporation | Personalized content delivery |
US20080086356A1 (en) * | 2005-12-09 | 2008-04-10 | Steve Glassman | Determining advertisements using user interest information and map-based location information |
US9015740B2 (en) | 2005-12-12 | 2015-04-21 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Systems and methods to wirelessly meter audio/visual devices |
US8613024B2 (en) * | 2005-12-13 | 2013-12-17 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Cross-platform predictive popularity ratings for use in interactive television applications |
JP4940410B2 (en) | 2005-12-19 | 2012-05-30 | アップル インコーポレイテッド | User-to-user recommender |
US7904949B2 (en) * | 2005-12-19 | 2011-03-08 | Quest Software, Inc. | Apparatus, systems and methods to provide authentication services to a legacy application |
US7502765B2 (en) * | 2005-12-21 | 2009-03-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for organizing semi-structured data into a taxonomy, based on tag-separated clustering |
US20070162546A1 (en) * | 2005-12-22 | 2007-07-12 | Musicstrands, Inc. | Sharing tags among individual user media libraries |
US20070157246A1 (en) * | 2005-12-23 | 2007-07-05 | Sports Tv Insider, Llc | Sports Broadcast Scheduler |
US7620964B2 (en) * | 2005-12-26 | 2009-11-17 | Mitsubishi Electric Corporation | Recommended program search device and recommended program search method |
US20070192161A1 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2007-08-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | On-demand customer satisfaction measurement |
US20070157247A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing content |
US20100153885A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2010-06-17 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for interacting with advanced displays provided by an interactive media guidance application |
US20070156521A1 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for commerce in media program related merchandise |
US9681105B2 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2017-06-13 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Interactive media guidance system having multiple devices |
US20070157223A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing content |
US8607287B2 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2013-12-10 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive media guidance system having multiple devices |
US9015736B2 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2015-04-21 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for episode tracking in an interactive media environment |
US20070154169A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for accessing media program options based on program segment interest |
US8214869B2 (en) | 2005-12-29 | 2012-07-03 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing a status change of a multimedia asset in multimedia delivery systems |
US20070157220A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing content |
US20070157222A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing content |
US8782706B2 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2014-07-15 | United Video Properties | Systems and methods for providing channel groups in an interactive media guidance application |
US7765235B2 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2010-07-27 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for resolving conflicts and managing system resources in multimedia delivery systems |
US20070154168A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for accessing media program options based on program segment interest |
US20070157237A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | Charles Cordray | Systems and methods for episode tracking in an interactive media environment |
US20070157242A1 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2007-07-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing content |
US20070156589A1 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2007-07-05 | Randy Zimler | Integrating personalized listings of media content into an electronic program guide |
US7792886B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2010-09-07 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling warehouse activities |
US7925649B2 (en) | 2005-12-30 | 2011-04-12 | Google Inc. | Method, system, and graphical user interface for alerting a computer user to new results for a prior search |
US8526612B2 (en) * | 2006-01-06 | 2013-09-03 | Google Inc. | Selective and persistent application level encryption for video provided to a client |
US7792522B1 (en) * | 2006-01-13 | 2010-09-07 | Positive Access Corporation | Software key control for mobile devices |
US20070168405A1 (en) * | 2006-01-17 | 2007-07-19 | Ori Pomerantz | Self-optimizing network attached storage for multiple geographic locations |
US20090012903A1 (en) * | 2006-01-26 | 2009-01-08 | Contextweb, Inc. | Online exchange for internet ad media |
US20070180231A1 (en) * | 2006-01-31 | 2007-08-02 | Widevine Technologies, Inc. | Preventing entitlement management message (EMM) filter attacks |
US20070244880A1 (en) * | 2006-02-03 | 2007-10-18 | Francisco Martin | Mediaset generation system |
US20070186231A1 (en) * | 2006-02-03 | 2007-08-09 | Sbc Knowledge Ventures L.P. | System and method for controlling settings for television services |
US20070203865A1 (en) * | 2006-02-09 | 2007-08-30 | Hirsch Martin C | Apparatus and methods for an item retrieval system |
US8132208B2 (en) * | 2006-02-10 | 2012-03-06 | Cox Communications, Inc. | Presenting a television services program guide information as a video mosaic |
KR20080100342A (en) | 2006-02-10 | 2008-11-17 | 스트랜즈, 아이엔씨. | Dynamic interactive entertainment |
EP2024811A4 (en) | 2006-02-10 | 2010-11-10 | Strands Inc | Systems and methods for prioritizing mobile media player files |
US8087075B2 (en) | 2006-02-13 | 2011-12-27 | Quest Software, Inc. | Disconnected credential validation using pre-fetched service tickets |
CN100505867C (en) * | 2006-02-14 | 2009-06-24 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Service requested system and method |
US8868547B2 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2014-10-21 | Dell Products L.P. | Programming content on a device |
US7653342B2 (en) * | 2006-02-16 | 2010-01-26 | Dell Products L.P. | Providing content to a device when lost a connection to the broadcasting station |
US9123071B1 (en) | 2006-02-17 | 2015-09-01 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Services for using group preferences to improve item selection decisions |
WO2007098069A2 (en) * | 2006-02-17 | 2007-08-30 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Mirroring of live data to guide data in a broadcast system |
WO2007098068A2 (en) * | 2006-02-17 | 2007-08-30 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Amalgamation of user data for geographical trending |
US7764701B1 (en) | 2006-02-22 | 2010-07-27 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Methods, systems, and products for classifying peer systems |
US7779004B1 (en) * | 2006-02-22 | 2010-08-17 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Methods, systems, and products for characterizing target systems |
US20080228479A1 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2008-09-18 | Viva Transcription Coporation | Data transcription and management system and method |
US20070277196A1 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2007-11-29 | Steengaard Bodil H | Methods of user behavior learning and acting in a pervasive system |
US7769395B2 (en) | 2006-06-20 | 2010-08-03 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Location-based operations and messaging |
US8458753B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2013-06-04 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for device capabilities discovery and utilization within a content-based network |
US8170065B2 (en) | 2006-02-27 | 2012-05-01 | Time Warner Cable Inc. | Methods and apparatus for selecting digital access technology for programming and data delivery |
CA2538438A1 (en) | 2006-03-01 | 2007-09-01 | Legalview Assets, Limited | Systems and methods for media programming |
US8689253B2 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2014-04-01 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Method and system for configuring media-playing sets |
US8037506B2 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2011-10-11 | Verimatrix, Inc. | Movie studio-based network distribution system and method |
US7904524B2 (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2011-03-08 | Aggregate Knowledge | Client recommendation mechanism |
US7788358B2 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2010-08-31 | Aggregate Knowledge | Using cross-site relationships to generate recommendations |
WO2007103923A2 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2007-09-13 | La La Media, Inc | Article trading process |
US7853630B2 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2010-12-14 | Aggregate Knowledge | System and method for the dynamic generation of correlation scores between arbitrary objects |
US8185576B2 (en) | 2006-03-14 | 2012-05-22 | Altnet, Inc. | Filter for a distributed network |
US8271521B2 (en) * | 2006-03-20 | 2012-09-18 | Blue Nile, Inc. | Computerized search technique, such as an internet-based gemstone search technique |
US20070239562A1 (en) * | 2006-03-22 | 2007-10-11 | Lawson Jeffrey G | Method for notifying a user of a live event |
US8316394B2 (en) | 2006-03-24 | 2012-11-20 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive media guidance application with intelligent navigation and display features |
US20070239645A1 (en) * | 2006-03-28 | 2007-10-11 | Ping Du | Predictive preprocessing of request |
US7735101B2 (en) | 2006-03-28 | 2010-06-08 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | System allowing users to embed comments at specific points in time into media presentation |
US8909740B1 (en) * | 2006-03-28 | 2014-12-09 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Video session content selected by multiple users |
US8285595B2 (en) * | 2006-03-29 | 2012-10-09 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for refining media recommendations |
US8073860B2 (en) | 2006-03-30 | 2011-12-06 | Veveo, Inc. | Method and system for incrementally selecting and providing relevant search engines in response to a user query |
US8706560B2 (en) | 2011-07-27 | 2014-04-22 | Ebay Inc. | Community based network shopping |
MX2007015979A (en) | 2006-03-31 | 2009-04-07 | Nielsen Media Res Inc | Methods, systems, and apparatus for multi-purpose metering. |
EP2008199A4 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2011-06-29 | Imagini Holdings Ltd | System and method of segmenting and tagging entities based on profile matching using a multi-media survey |
US7610255B2 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2009-10-27 | Imagini Holdings Limited | Method and system for computerized searching and matching multimedia objects using emotional preference |
US20080040390A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2008-02-14 | 3E Company Enviornmental, Ecological And Engineering | Vendor msds management and regulatory compliance systems and methods |
US8300798B1 (en) | 2006-04-03 | 2012-10-30 | Wai Wu | Intelligent communication routing system and method |
US20080021767A1 (en) * | 2006-04-05 | 2008-01-24 | Amanda Benson | System and method for collecting and managing product information in a database |
US7975073B2 (en) * | 2006-04-06 | 2011-07-05 | Polycom, Inc. | Middleware server for interfacing communications, multimedia, and management systems |
US20080036917A1 (en) * | 2006-04-07 | 2008-02-14 | Mark Pascarella | Methods and systems for generating and delivering navigatable composite videos |
US20070245019A1 (en) * | 2006-04-12 | 2007-10-18 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Interactive media content delivery using a backchannel communications network |
US20070245376A1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2007-10-18 | Concert Technology Corporation | Portable media player enabled to obtain previews of media content |
US20070245377A1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2007-10-18 | Concert Technology Corporation | Central system providing previews to a portable media player |
US20070245378A1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2007-10-18 | Concert Technology Corporation | User system providing previews to an associated portable media player |
US20070244985A1 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2007-10-18 | Concert Technology Corporation | User system providing previews of a user's media collection to an associated portable media player |
US8316081B2 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2012-11-20 | Domingo Enterprises, Llc | Portable media player enabled to obtain previews of a user's media collection |
US7603434B2 (en) * | 2006-04-13 | 2009-10-13 | Domingo Enterprises, Llc | Central system providing previews of a user's media collection to a portable media player |
US7702456B2 (en) * | 2006-04-14 | 2010-04-20 | Scenera Technologies, Llc | System and method for presenting a computed route |
US8611285B2 (en) * | 2006-04-18 | 2013-12-17 | Sony Corporation | Method and system for managing video data based on a predicted next channel selection |
WO2007124436A2 (en) | 2006-04-20 | 2007-11-01 | Veveo, Inc. | User interface methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on relationships between the user and other members of an organization |
US20070250499A1 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2007-10-25 | Simon Widdowson | Method and system for finding data objects within large data-object libraries |
US20070269787A1 (en) * | 2006-04-24 | 2007-11-22 | Cronstrom David S | Method and system for recommending media content to a user of a mobile radio terminal |
JP5458321B2 (en) | 2006-04-24 | 2014-04-02 | ヴィジブル ワールド インコーポレイテッド | System and method for generating media content using microtrends |
US8775919B2 (en) | 2006-04-25 | 2014-07-08 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Independent actionscript analytics tools and techniques |
US8682654B2 (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2014-03-25 | Cyberlink Corp. | Systems and methods for classifying sports video |
US8429724B2 (en) * | 2006-04-25 | 2013-04-23 | Seagate Technology Llc | Versatile access control system |
WO2007127881A2 (en) | 2006-04-26 | 2007-11-08 | Business Controls, Inc. | Anonymous reporting system |
US9529903B2 (en) * | 2006-04-26 | 2016-12-27 | The Bureau Of National Affairs, Inc. | System and method for topical document searching |
US8015117B1 (en) | 2006-04-27 | 2011-09-06 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for anonymous reporting |
US8296181B1 (en) | 2006-04-27 | 2012-10-23 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for offsetting printing costs in a system for targeted data delivery |
US8843560B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2014-09-23 | Yahoo! Inc. | Social networking for mobile devices |
US7636779B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2009-12-22 | Yahoo! Inc. | Contextual mobile local search based on social network vitality information |
US8438646B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2013-05-07 | Disney Enterprises, Inc. | System and/or method for distributing media content |
US8005841B1 (en) | 2006-04-28 | 2011-08-23 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Methods, systems, and products for classifying content segments |
US8245267B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2012-08-14 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Methods, systems, and products for recording media on a user device |
WO2007131069A2 (en) * | 2006-05-02 | 2007-11-15 | Inividi Technologies Corporation | Fuzzy logic based viewer identification |
US20130254787A1 (en) | 2006-05-02 | 2013-09-26 | Invidi Technologies Corporation | Method and apparatus to perform real-time audience estimation and commercial selection suitable for targeted advertising |
WO2007131058A2 (en) * | 2006-05-03 | 2007-11-15 | Veveo Inc. | Method and system for performing actions using a non-intrusive television interface with reduced text input |
US20070260626A1 (en) * | 2006-05-04 | 2007-11-08 | Claudia Reisz | Method for customer-choice-based bundling of product options |
JP5313882B2 (en) | 2006-05-05 | 2013-10-09 | ソニー コンピュータ エンタテインメント アメリカ リミテッド ライアビリテイ カンパニー | Device for displaying main content and auxiliary content |
US20090077137A1 (en) * | 2006-05-05 | 2009-03-19 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method of updating a video summary by user relevance feedback |
US20070271202A1 (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2007-11-22 | Corbis Corporation | Determining content pricing for categories of use based on extrinsic and intrinsic factors |
US20090048860A1 (en) * | 2006-05-08 | 2009-02-19 | Corbis Corporation | Providing a rating for digital media based on reviews and customer behavior |
US8607262B2 (en) * | 2006-05-10 | 2013-12-10 | Sharp Laboratories Of America | Method and apparatus for communicating popularity ratings to users |
JP2007304933A (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2007-11-22 | Sony Corp | Information processing system, terminal device, information processing method, program |
JP4812508B2 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2011-11-09 | 富士通株式会社 | System that handles presence information |
US9507778B2 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2016-11-29 | Yahoo! Inc. | Summarization of media object collections |
US11363347B1 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2022-06-14 | Universal Innovation Council, LLC | Creating customized programming content |
US9602884B1 (en) | 2006-05-19 | 2017-03-21 | Universal Innovation Counsel, Inc. | Creating customized programming content |
US8280982B2 (en) | 2006-05-24 | 2012-10-02 | Time Warner Cable Inc. | Personal content server apparatus and methods |
US7894448B1 (en) | 2006-05-24 | 2011-02-22 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Proving that a user profile satisfies selection criteria for targeted data delivery |
US9386327B2 (en) | 2006-05-24 | 2016-07-05 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Secondary content insertion apparatus and methods |
US7559072B2 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2009-07-07 | Sony Corporation | System and method for neighborhood optimization for content recommendation |
US8989778B2 (en) * | 2006-06-01 | 2015-03-24 | Green Dot Corporation | Secure and private location sharing for location-aware mobile communication devices |
US8571580B2 (en) * | 2006-06-01 | 2013-10-29 | Loopt Llc. | Displaying the location of individuals on an interactive map display on a mobile communication device |
US9443022B2 (en) | 2006-06-05 | 2016-09-13 | Google Inc. | Method, system, and graphical user interface for providing personalized recommendations of popular search queries |
US8429712B2 (en) | 2006-06-08 | 2013-04-23 | Quest Software, Inc. | Centralized user authentication system apparatus and method |
CN1889558B (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2010-05-12 | 华为技术有限公司 | Program channel difference processing method in IPIV bearing network |
EP2036340A4 (en) * | 2006-06-12 | 2011-07-06 | Invidi Tech Corp | System and method for auctioning avails |
EP2039154A4 (en) * | 2006-06-12 | 2011-05-04 | Invidi Tech Corp | System and method for inserting media based on keyword search |
US8024762B2 (en) | 2006-06-13 | 2011-09-20 | Time Warner Cable Inc. | Methods and apparatus for providing virtual content over a network |
US20070288384A1 (en) * | 2006-06-13 | 2007-12-13 | Pappas Harry J | System and Method for Distributing a Multimedia Presentation |
US20080015977A1 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2008-01-17 | Curry Edith L | Methods of deterring fraud and other improper behaviors within an organization |
US8285636B2 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2012-10-09 | Curry Edith L | Methods of monitoring behavior/activity of an individual associated with an organization |
WO2007149888A2 (en) | 2006-06-19 | 2007-12-27 | Almondnet, Inc. | Providing collected profiles to media properties having specified interests |
US8200569B1 (en) | 2006-06-22 | 2012-06-12 | Power Financial Group, Inc. | Option search criteria testing |
US8102863B1 (en) | 2006-06-27 | 2012-01-24 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | High-speed WAN to wireless LAN gateway |
US7975150B1 (en) | 2006-06-28 | 2011-07-05 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for protecting queryable data |
US7584223B1 (en) | 2006-06-28 | 2009-09-01 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Verifying information in a database |
US7818203B1 (en) * | 2006-06-29 | 2010-10-19 | Emc Corporation | Method for scoring customer loyalty and satisfaction |
US8615573B1 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2013-12-24 | Quiro Holdings, Inc. | System and method for networked PVR storage and content capture |
US7890490B1 (en) | 2006-06-30 | 2011-02-15 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing advanced information searching in an interactive media guidance application |
JP2008011403A (en) * | 2006-06-30 | 2008-01-17 | Toshiba Corp | Receiving apparatus and method |
US7715552B2 (en) * | 2006-07-05 | 2010-05-11 | Scientific-Atlanta, Llc | Data authentication with a secure environment |
US8020206B2 (en) | 2006-07-10 | 2011-09-13 | Websense, Inc. | System and method of analyzing web content |
US8615800B2 (en) | 2006-07-10 | 2013-12-24 | Websense, Inc. | System and method for analyzing web content |
US9003056B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2015-04-07 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Maintaining a minimum level of real time media recommendations in the absence of online friends |
US8327266B2 (en) | 2006-07-11 | 2012-12-04 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Graphical user interface system for allowing management of a media item playlist based on a preference scoring system |
US8793490B1 (en) | 2006-07-14 | 2014-07-29 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Systems and methods for multifactor authentication |
US7779003B2 (en) * | 2006-07-17 | 2010-08-17 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Computerized search system for medication and other items |
US7624103B2 (en) * | 2006-07-21 | 2009-11-24 | Aol Llc | Culturally relevant search results |
US8364669B1 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2013-01-29 | Aol Inc. | Popularity of content items |
US7783622B1 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2010-08-24 | Aol Inc. | Identification of electronic content significant to a user |
US7624416B1 (en) * | 2006-07-21 | 2009-11-24 | Aol Llc | Identifying events of interest within video content |
US9256675B1 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2016-02-09 | Aol Inc. | Electronic processing and presentation of search results |
US8874586B1 (en) | 2006-07-21 | 2014-10-28 | Aol Inc. | Authority management for electronic searches |
US7890857B1 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2011-02-15 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Method and system for utilizing sizing directives for media |
US8775237B2 (en) | 2006-08-02 | 2014-07-08 | Opinionlab, Inc. | System and method for measuring and reporting user reactions to advertisements on a web page |
US9547648B2 (en) * | 2006-08-03 | 2017-01-17 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Electronic document information extraction |
EP2074572A4 (en) | 2006-08-17 | 2011-02-23 | Experian Inf Solutions Inc | System and method for providing a score for a used vehicle |
US20080046935A1 (en) * | 2006-08-18 | 2008-02-21 | Krakirian Haig H | System and method for displaying program guide information |
US20080046923A1 (en) * | 2006-08-21 | 2008-02-21 | Thomas Jeffrey Enderwick | System for automatic advertisement targeting by means of traffic analysis |
US7739231B2 (en) | 2006-08-28 | 2010-06-15 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Mutual commit people matching process |
EP1895459A1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2008-03-05 | Opinionlab, Inc. | Computer-implemented system and method for measuring and reporting business intelligence based on comments collected from web page users using software associated with accessed web pages |
US7873988B1 (en) | 2006-09-06 | 2011-01-18 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | System and method for rights propagation and license management in conjunction with distribution of digital content in a social network |
US7606752B2 (en) | 2006-09-07 | 2009-10-20 | Yodlee Inc. | Host exchange in bill paying services |
US7647351B2 (en) * | 2006-09-14 | 2010-01-12 | Stragent, Llc | Web scrape template generation |
EP2062171A4 (en) | 2006-09-14 | 2010-10-06 | Veveo Inc | Methods and systems for dynamically rearranging search results into hierarchically organized concept clusters |
US7978617B2 (en) * | 2006-09-15 | 2011-07-12 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Methods for providing performance improvement recommendations |
US8078972B2 (en) * | 2006-09-15 | 2011-12-13 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Methods and interfaces for displaying performance data related to a current remote access session |
US7644375B1 (en) | 2006-09-18 | 2010-01-05 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Dynamic path flow reports |
EP2068323A3 (en) * | 2006-09-20 | 2009-07-01 | John W Hannay & Company Limited | Methods and apparatus for creation, distribution and presentation of polymorphic media |
US20090297120A1 (en) * | 2006-09-20 | 2009-12-03 | Claudio Ingrosso | Methods an apparatus for creation and presentation of polymorphic media |
US20090297121A1 (en) * | 2006-09-20 | 2009-12-03 | Claudio Ingrosso | Methods and apparatus for creation, distribution and presentation of polymorphic media |
US8645973B2 (en) | 2006-09-22 | 2014-02-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Mobile applications |
US7801971B1 (en) | 2006-09-26 | 2010-09-21 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Systems and methods for discovering, creating, using, and managing social network circuits |
US7925592B1 (en) | 2006-09-27 | 2011-04-12 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | System and method of using a proxy server to manage lazy content distribution in a social network |
US7895275B1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2011-02-22 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | System and method providing quality based peer review and distribution of digital content |
US10204316B2 (en) | 2006-09-28 | 2019-02-12 | Leaf Group Ltd. | User generated content publishing system |
US8615778B1 (en) * | 2006-09-28 | 2013-12-24 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Personalized broadcast system |
US7782866B1 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2010-08-24 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Virtual peer in a peer-to-peer network |
US20080092155A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-17 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatically identifying a user profile |
US8554827B2 (en) | 2006-09-29 | 2013-10-08 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Virtual peer for a content sharing system |
US8850481B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2014-09-30 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for modifying an interactive media guidance application interface based on time of day |
US20080092169A1 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2008-04-17 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for modifying an interactive media guidance application interface based on time of day |
US20080086490A1 (en) * | 2006-10-04 | 2008-04-10 | Sap Ag | Discovery of services matching a service request |
US20080086368A1 (en) * | 2006-10-05 | 2008-04-10 | Google Inc. | Location Based, Content Targeted Online Advertising |
US8036979B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2011-10-11 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US8832742B2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2014-09-09 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for acquiring, categorizing and delivering media in interactive media guidance applications |
US9008634B2 (en) * | 2006-10-06 | 2015-04-14 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for providing media content selections |
WO2008045690A2 (en) | 2006-10-06 | 2008-04-17 | Veveo, Inc. | Linear character selection display interface for ambiguous text input |
US8520850B2 (en) | 2006-10-20 | 2013-08-27 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Downloadable security and protection methods and apparatus |
US20080098305A1 (en) * | 2006-10-24 | 2008-04-24 | Young Electric Sign Company | System and method for content management in electronic displays |
WO2008055172A2 (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2008-05-08 | Maxlinear, Inc. | Targeted advertisement in the digital television environment |
US7895332B2 (en) | 2006-10-30 | 2011-02-22 | Quest Software, Inc. | Identity migration system apparatus and method |
US9154844B2 (en) * | 2006-10-30 | 2015-10-06 | Alcatel Lucent | Method and apparatus for reducing delays due to channel changes |
US8086710B2 (en) | 2006-10-30 | 2011-12-27 | Quest Software, Inc. | Identity migration apparatus and method |
US20080103849A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Forman George H | Calculating an aggregate of attribute values associated with plural cases |
US7917154B2 (en) | 2006-11-01 | 2011-03-29 | Yahoo! Inc. | Determining mobile content for a social network based on location and time |
US8108501B2 (en) | 2006-11-01 | 2012-01-31 | Yahoo! Inc. | Searching and route mapping based on a social network, location, and time |
US7738676B1 (en) | 2006-11-02 | 2010-06-15 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Client-side watermarking using hybrid I-frames |
US20080109454A1 (en) * | 2006-11-03 | 2008-05-08 | Willse Alan R | Text analysis techniques |
US8594702B2 (en) | 2006-11-06 | 2013-11-26 | Yahoo! Inc. | Context server for associating information based on context |
WO2008063987A2 (en) | 2006-11-13 | 2008-05-29 | Veveo, Inc. | Method of and system for selecting and presenting content based on user identification |
US7958117B2 (en) | 2006-11-17 | 2011-06-07 | Yahoo! Inc. | Initial impression analysis tool for an online dating service |
US9208174B1 (en) * | 2006-11-20 | 2015-12-08 | Disney Enterprises, Inc. | Non-language-based object search |
US9110903B2 (en) * | 2006-11-22 | 2015-08-18 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method, system and apparatus for using user profile electronic device data in media delivery |
US8402356B2 (en) | 2006-11-22 | 2013-03-19 | Yahoo! Inc. | Methods, systems and apparatus for delivery of media |
US9654495B2 (en) | 2006-12-01 | 2017-05-16 | Websense, Llc | System and method of analyzing web addresses |
US20080155627A1 (en) * | 2006-12-04 | 2008-06-26 | O'connor Daniel | Systems and methods of searching for and presenting video and audio |
US8224905B2 (en) | 2006-12-06 | 2012-07-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Spam filtration utilizing sender activity data |
US8555318B2 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2013-10-08 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Customized media on demand |
US7886334B1 (en) | 2006-12-11 | 2011-02-08 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | System and method for social network trust assessment |
US8359310B1 (en) * | 2006-12-12 | 2013-01-22 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Group swarm metrics and content |
US20080147497A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-19 | Tischer Steven N | Advertising and content management systems and methods |
US20080148311A1 (en) * | 2006-12-13 | 2008-06-19 | Tischer Steven N | Advertising and content management systems and methods |
US7730216B1 (en) | 2006-12-14 | 2010-06-01 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | System and method of sharing content among multiple social network nodes using an aggregation node |
US8000474B1 (en) * | 2006-12-15 | 2011-08-16 | Quiro Holdings, Inc. | Client-side protection of broadcast or multicast content for non-real-time playback |
US20080167891A1 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2008-07-10 | University Of Virginia Patent Foundation | Systems, Devices and Methods for Consumer Segmentation |
US9355273B2 (en) * | 2006-12-18 | 2016-05-31 | Bank Of America, N.A., As Collateral Agent | System and method for the protection and de-identification of health care data |
US8209424B2 (en) * | 2006-12-20 | 2012-06-26 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing remote access to interactive media guidance applications |
US20080155600A1 (en) * | 2006-12-20 | 2008-06-26 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing remote access to interactive media guidance applications |
US8135800B1 (en) | 2006-12-27 | 2012-03-13 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | System and method for user classification based on social network aware content analysis |
US7711684B2 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2010-05-04 | Ebay Inc. | Collaborative content evaluation |
US8769099B2 (en) | 2006-12-28 | 2014-07-01 | Yahoo! Inc. | Methods and systems for pre-caching information on a mobile computing device |
US8620952B2 (en) | 2007-01-03 | 2013-12-31 | Carhamm Ltd., Llc | System for database reporting |
US9167305B2 (en) * | 2007-01-03 | 2015-10-20 | Tivo Inc. | Authorable content rating system |
US8175989B1 (en) | 2007-01-04 | 2012-05-08 | Choicestream, Inc. | Music recommendation system using a personalized choice set |
US8554868B2 (en) | 2007-01-05 | 2013-10-08 | Yahoo! Inc. | Simultaneous sharing communication interface |
US8121896B1 (en) | 2007-01-05 | 2012-02-21 | Coolsoft, LLC | System and method for presenting advertisements |
US8004713B2 (en) | 2007-01-12 | 2011-08-23 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Creating and manufacturing documents that initially exceed equipment finishing capacity |
KR101436661B1 (en) * | 2007-01-22 | 2014-09-01 | 소니 주식회사 | Information processing device and method, and recording medium |
US20080177773A1 (en) * | 2007-01-22 | 2008-07-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customized media selection using degrees of separation techniques |
GB2445764A (en) * | 2007-01-22 | 2008-07-23 | Surfcontrol Plc | Resource access filtering system and database structure for use therewith |
US20080177588A1 (en) * | 2007-01-23 | 2008-07-24 | Quigo Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for selecting aesthetic settings for use in displaying advertisements over a network |
US8179798B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2012-05-15 | Mcafee, Inc. | Reputation based connection throttling |
US8214497B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2012-07-03 | Mcafee, Inc. | Multi-dimensional reputation scoring |
US8763114B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2014-06-24 | Mcafee, Inc. | Detecting image spam |
US8621540B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2013-12-31 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for provisioning in a download-enabled system |
US7949716B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2011-05-24 | Mcafee, Inc. | Correlation and analysis of entity attributes |
US7779156B2 (en) | 2007-01-24 | 2010-08-17 | Mcafee, Inc. | Reputation based load balancing |
US7933765B2 (en) * | 2007-01-25 | 2011-04-26 | Corbis Corporation | Cross-lingual information retrieval |
US8504598B2 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2013-08-06 | Information Resources, Inc. | Data perturbation of non-unique values |
US20080263000A1 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2008-10-23 | John Randall West | Utilizing aggregated data |
US8160984B2 (en) | 2007-01-26 | 2012-04-17 | Symphonyiri Group, Inc. | Similarity matching of a competitor's products |
EP2111593A2 (en) * | 2007-01-26 | 2009-10-28 | Information Resources, Inc. | Analytic platform |
US8819215B2 (en) * | 2007-01-29 | 2014-08-26 | Nokia Corporation | System, methods, apparatuses and computer program products for providing step-ahead computing |
WO2008094960A2 (en) * | 2007-01-30 | 2008-08-07 | Invidi Technologies Corporation | Asset targeting system for limited resource environments |
US20080215416A1 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2008-09-04 | Collarity, Inc. | Searchable interactive internet advertisements |
US7913178B2 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2011-03-22 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for collaborative and private sessions |
US8146126B2 (en) | 2007-02-01 | 2012-03-27 | Invidi Technologies Corporation | Request for information related to broadcast network content |
US20090055369A1 (en) * | 2007-02-01 | 2009-02-26 | Jonathan Phillips | System, method and apparatus for implementing dynamic community formation processes within an online context-driven interactive social network |
DE102007008168A1 (en) * | 2007-02-19 | 2008-08-28 | Siemens Ag | Circuit device and corresponding method for driving a load |
US8566247B1 (en) | 2007-02-19 | 2013-10-22 | Robert H. Nagel | System and method for secure communications involving an intermediary |
US20080201000A1 (en) * | 2007-02-20 | 2008-08-21 | Nokia Corporation | Contextual grouping of media items |
US8490138B2 (en) * | 2007-02-23 | 2013-07-16 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Channel searching by content type |
US20080208668A1 (en) * | 2007-02-26 | 2008-08-28 | Jonathan Heller | Method and apparatus for dynamically allocating monetization rights and access and optimizing the value of digital content |
US8521650B2 (en) | 2007-02-26 | 2013-08-27 | Zepfrog Corp. | Method and service for providing access to premium content and dispersing payment therefore |
US7840903B1 (en) | 2007-02-26 | 2010-11-23 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | Group content representations |
US8015174B2 (en) * | 2007-02-28 | 2011-09-06 | Websense, Inc. | System and method of controlling access to the internet |
US8949215B2 (en) * | 2007-02-28 | 2015-02-03 | Microsoft Corporation | GUI based web search |
US20080215974A1 (en) * | 2007-03-01 | 2008-09-04 | Phil Harrison | Interactive user controlled avatar animations |
US20080215418A1 (en) * | 2007-03-02 | 2008-09-04 | Adready, Inc. | Modification of advertisement campaign elements based on heuristics and real time feedback |
US8195676B2 (en) * | 2007-03-05 | 2012-06-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method of creating and rating items for social interactions |
US7801888B2 (en) | 2007-03-09 | 2010-09-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Media content search results ranked by popularity |
US8701010B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2014-04-15 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of using the refresh button to determine freshness policy |
US7584294B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2009-09-01 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for prefetching objects for caching using QOS |
US8037126B2 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2011-10-11 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of dynamically checking freshness of cached objects based on link status |
US8103783B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2012-01-24 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of providing security and reliability to proxy caches |
US7783757B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2010-08-24 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of revalidating cached objects in parallel with request for object |
US7720936B2 (en) | 2007-03-12 | 2010-05-18 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods of freshening and prefreshening a DNS cache |
US8504775B2 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2013-08-06 | Citrix Systems, Inc | Systems and methods of prefreshening cached objects based on user's current web page |
US20080235746A1 (en) | 2007-03-20 | 2008-09-25 | Michael James Peters | Methods and apparatus for content delivery and replacement in a network |
US8418206B2 (en) | 2007-03-22 | 2013-04-09 | United Video Properties, Inc. | User defined rules for assigning destinations of content |
US8527528B2 (en) * | 2007-03-23 | 2013-09-03 | Neil Binder | Evaluating real estate properties |
US20080243482A1 (en) * | 2007-03-28 | 2008-10-02 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for performing effective drill-down operations in text corpus visualization and exploration using language model approaches for key phrase weighting |
US8374959B2 (en) * | 2007-03-29 | 2013-02-12 | Ebay Inc. | Managing lead-based feedback in a network commerce system |
US8086594B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2011-12-27 | Google Inc. | Bifurcated document relevance scoring |
US8583592B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2013-11-12 | Innography, Inc. | System and methods of searching data sources |
US7693813B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2010-04-06 | Google Inc. | Index server architecture using tiered and sharded phrase posting lists |
DE102007015788B3 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2008-10-23 | Fm Marketing Gmbh | Multimedia device and method for data transmission in a multimedia device |
US8166021B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-04-24 | Google Inc. | Query phrasification |
US7925655B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2011-04-12 | Google Inc. | Query scheduling using hierarchical tiers of index servers |
US7702614B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2010-04-20 | Google Inc. | Index updating using segment swapping |
US8285656B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-10-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
US8166045B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-04-24 | Google Inc. | Phrase extraction using subphrase scoring |
US9977827B2 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2018-05-22 | Innography, Inc. | System and methods of automatic query generation |
EP1975866A1 (en) * | 2007-03-31 | 2008-10-01 | Sony Deutschland Gmbh | Method and system for recommending content items |
US20080250323A1 (en) * | 2007-04-04 | 2008-10-09 | Huff Gerald B | Method and apparatus for recommending an application-feature to a user |
US7941764B2 (en) | 2007-04-04 | 2011-05-10 | Abo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for assigning user preference settings for a category, and in particular a media category |
US20080250067A1 (en) * | 2007-04-06 | 2008-10-09 | Concert Technology Corporation | System and method for selectively identifying media items for play based on a recommender playlist |
US8078514B2 (en) * | 2007-04-09 | 2011-12-13 | Advent Software, Inc. | Double-blind financial services information marketplace |
WO2008127288A1 (en) | 2007-04-12 | 2008-10-23 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining thin-file records and determining thin-file risk levels |
US7813351B2 (en) * | 2007-04-13 | 2010-10-12 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Available bandwidth estimation |
US8041743B2 (en) * | 2007-04-17 | 2011-10-18 | Semandex Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing semantically enhanced identity management |
US20090164387A1 (en) * | 2007-04-17 | 2009-06-25 | Semandex Networks Inc. | Systems and methods for providing semantically enhanced financial information |
US7958155B2 (en) | 2007-04-17 | 2011-06-07 | Semandex Networks, Inc. | Systems and methods for the management of information to enable the rapid dissemination of actionable information |
US8521627B2 (en) * | 2007-04-18 | 2013-08-27 | Blockross Holdings, LLC | Systems and methods for facilitating electronic securities transactions |
US8117105B2 (en) | 2007-04-18 | 2012-02-14 | Pulse Trading, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating electronic securities transactions |
US8087047B2 (en) | 2007-04-20 | 2011-12-27 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing remote access to interactive media guidance applications |
US8671000B2 (en) | 2007-04-24 | 2014-03-11 | Apple Inc. | Method and arrangement for providing content to multimedia devices |
US20080271078A1 (en) * | 2007-04-30 | 2008-10-30 | Google Inc. | Momentary Electronic Program Guide |
US20080307220A1 (en) * | 2007-05-03 | 2008-12-11 | Tom Campbell | Virtual closed-circuit communications |
US9398346B2 (en) * | 2007-05-04 | 2016-07-19 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for predictive capacity allocation |
US20080281854A1 (en) * | 2007-05-07 | 2008-11-13 | Fatdoor, Inc. | Opt-out community network based on preseeded data |
US7636677B1 (en) * | 2007-05-14 | 2009-12-22 | Coremetrics, Inc. | Method, medium, and system for determining whether a target item is related to a candidate affinity item |
US9021352B2 (en) * | 2007-05-17 | 2015-04-28 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for predictive document rendering |
US8996394B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2015-03-31 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for enabling decision activities in a process management and design environment |
US8621093B2 (en) * | 2007-05-21 | 2013-12-31 | Google Inc. | Non-blocking of head end initiated revocation and delivery of entitlements non-addressable digital media network |
US8301623B2 (en) * | 2007-05-22 | 2012-10-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Probabilistic recommendation system |
US8533847B2 (en) * | 2007-05-24 | 2013-09-10 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Apparatus and method for screening new data without impacting download speed |
WO2008147918A2 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2008-12-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets |
US7984068B2 (en) * | 2007-05-25 | 2011-07-19 | Google Inc. | Providing profile information to partner content providers |
WO2008148012A1 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2008-12-04 | Veveo, Inc. | System and method for text disambiguation and context designation in incremental search |
US20080300958A1 (en) * | 2007-05-29 | 2008-12-04 | Tasteindex.Com Llc | Taste network content targeting |
US8832220B2 (en) | 2007-05-29 | 2014-09-09 | Domingo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for increasing data availability on a mobile device based on operating mode |
WO2008150893A1 (en) * | 2007-05-31 | 2008-12-11 | Friendlyfavor, Inc. | Method for enabling the exchange of online favors |
US8693494B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2014-04-08 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Polling |
US8805425B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2014-08-12 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Integrated messaging |
US8839141B2 (en) | 2007-06-01 | 2014-09-16 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Method and system for visually indicating a replay status of media items on a media device |
EP2001223B1 (en) | 2007-06-04 | 2016-09-21 | fm marketing gmbh | Multi-media configuration |
US8099315B2 (en) * | 2007-06-05 | 2012-01-17 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Interest profiles for audio and/or video streams |
US20080307103A1 (en) * | 2007-06-06 | 2008-12-11 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Mediation for auxiliary content in an interactive environment |
US20080306956A1 (en) * | 2007-06-07 | 2008-12-11 | Quantia Communications | Method and system for developing user profile on a network |
US20080307316A1 (en) * | 2007-06-07 | 2008-12-11 | Concert Technology Corporation | System and method for assigning user preference settings to fields in a category, particularly a media category |
KR20080110489A (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2008-12-18 | 소니 가부시끼 가이샤 | Information processing apparatus and method and program |
US8073828B2 (en) | 2007-06-14 | 2011-12-06 | Curbis Corporation | Licensed rights clearance and tracking for digital assets |
US20080319870A1 (en) * | 2007-06-22 | 2008-12-25 | Corbis Corporation | Distributed media reviewing for conformance to criteria |
US20080320516A1 (en) * | 2007-06-25 | 2008-12-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Tailored channel for content consumption |
US11570521B2 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2023-01-31 | Broadband Itv, Inc. | Dynamic adjustment of electronic program guide displays based on viewer preferences for minimizing navigation in VOD program selection |
US8185916B2 (en) * | 2007-06-28 | 2012-05-22 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for integrating a business process management system with an enterprise service bus |
US20090006368A1 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2009-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatic Video Recommendation |
US8243924B2 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2012-08-14 | Google Inc. | Progressive download or streaming of digital media securely through a localized container and communication protocol proxy |
US8548996B2 (en) * | 2007-06-29 | 2013-10-01 | Pulsepoint, Inc. | Ranking content items related to an event |
US20090048977A1 (en) * | 2007-07-07 | 2009-02-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | User profile generation architecture for targeted content distribution using external processes |
US9596317B2 (en) * | 2007-07-07 | 2017-03-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for delivery of targeted information based on a user profile in a mobile communication device |
US9392074B2 (en) * | 2007-07-07 | 2016-07-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | User profile generation architecture for mobile content-message targeting |
US8099316B2 (en) * | 2007-07-09 | 2012-01-17 | Velti Plc | Mobile device marketing and advertising platforms, methods, and systems |
US7958228B2 (en) * | 2007-07-11 | 2011-06-07 | Yahoo! Inc. | Behavioral predictions based on network activity locations |
US20090019492A1 (en) | 2007-07-11 | 2009-01-15 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for mirroring and transcoding media content |
US8660794B2 (en) * | 2007-07-13 | 2014-02-25 | Dash Navigation, Inc. | System and method for providing shared information about traveled road segments |
US8341674B2 (en) | 2007-07-13 | 2012-12-25 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | System for presenting media programming guides |
US8006314B2 (en) | 2007-07-27 | 2011-08-23 | Audible Magic Corporation | System for identifying content of digital data |
US20090037431A1 (en) | 2007-07-30 | 2009-02-05 | Paul Martino | System and method for maintaining metadata correctness |
WO2009020605A2 (en) * | 2007-08-06 | 2009-02-12 | Thomson Licensing | Method and system for product services analysis and optimization |
KR100954624B1 (en) * | 2007-08-10 | 2010-04-28 | 야후! 인크. | Method and system for providing content according to personal preference |
US20090048903A1 (en) * | 2007-08-13 | 2009-02-19 | Universal Passage, Inc. | Method and system for universal life path decision support |
US20090055249A1 (en) * | 2007-08-13 | 2009-02-26 | Universal Passage, Inc. | Method and system for providing a structured virtual world for advertising and data mining as a part of a marketing and sales program for universal life stage decision support |
US20090138335A1 (en) * | 2007-08-13 | 2009-05-28 | Universal Passage, Inc. | Method and system for providing identity template management as a part of a marketing and sales program for universal life stage decision support |
US20090048907A1 (en) * | 2007-08-13 | 2009-02-19 | Universal Passage, Inc. | Method and system for advertising and data mining as a part of a marketing and sales program for universal critical life stage decision support |
US8219494B1 (en) | 2007-08-16 | 2012-07-10 | Corbis Corporation | End-to-end licensing of digital media assets |
US20090055267A1 (en) * | 2007-08-23 | 2009-02-26 | Robert Roker | Internet advertising brokerage apparatus, systems, and methods |
US9118811B2 (en) * | 2007-08-24 | 2015-08-25 | The Invention Science Fund I, Llc | Predicted concurrent streaming program selection |
US9049344B2 (en) | 2007-08-24 | 2015-06-02 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method and system for providing content |
US9111285B2 (en) * | 2007-08-27 | 2015-08-18 | Qurio Holdings, Inc. | System and method for representing content, user presence and interaction within virtual world advertising environments |
US8340812B1 (en) | 2007-08-30 | 2012-12-25 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Optimization of packaging sizes |
US20090064008A1 (en) * | 2007-08-31 | 2009-03-05 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | User interaction for content based storage and retrieval |
US8949877B2 (en) * | 2007-08-31 | 2015-02-03 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method and system for determining subscriber demand for multimedia content |
US20090060469A1 (en) * | 2007-08-31 | 2009-03-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording popular media in an interactive media delivery system |
US20090060468A1 (en) * | 2007-08-31 | 2009-03-05 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for recording popular media in an interactive media delivery system |
US8327403B1 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2012-12-04 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing remote program ordering on a user device via a web server |
US8117223B2 (en) | 2007-09-07 | 2012-02-14 | Google Inc. | Integrating external related phrase information into a phrase-based indexing information retrieval system |
US8107977B2 (en) * | 2007-09-07 | 2012-01-31 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Cross-platform messaging |
US7698422B2 (en) | 2007-09-10 | 2010-04-13 | Specific Media, Inc. | System and method of determining user demographic profiles of anonymous users |
US7934083B2 (en) * | 2007-09-14 | 2011-04-26 | Kevin Norman Taylor | Configurable access kernel |
US20110035662A1 (en) | 2009-02-18 | 2011-02-10 | King Martin T | Interacting with rendered documents using a multi-function mobile device, such as a mobile phone |
US8301574B2 (en) * | 2007-09-17 | 2012-10-30 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Multimedia engagement study |
US7827202B2 (en) * | 2007-09-21 | 2010-11-02 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Content scheduling for fantasy gaming |
US20090083820A1 (en) * | 2007-09-25 | 2009-03-26 | Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc | Re-transmission of television channels over network |
US9071859B2 (en) | 2007-09-26 | 2015-06-30 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for user-based targeted content delivery |
US8561116B2 (en) | 2007-09-26 | 2013-10-15 | Charles A. Hasek | Methods and apparatus for content caching in a video network |
US9690820B1 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2017-06-27 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Database system for triggering event notifications based on updates to database records |
US20090089190A1 (en) * | 2007-09-27 | 2009-04-02 | Girulat Jr Rollin M | Systems and methods for monitoring financial activities of consumers |
US8712872B2 (en) | 2012-03-07 | 2014-04-29 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for optimizing utilization of inventory space for dispensable articles |
US8032714B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2011-10-04 | Aggregate Knowledge Inc. | Methods and systems for caching data using behavioral event correlations |
US8768789B2 (en) | 2012-03-07 | 2014-07-01 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for optimizing utilization of inventory space for dispensable articles |
US9886809B2 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2018-02-06 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | Article dispensing machine and method for auditing inventory while article dispensing machine remains operational |
CN101399958B (en) * | 2007-09-30 | 2010-11-03 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method, system and device for obtaining customer management information |
US20090089250A1 (en) * | 2007-10-02 | 2009-04-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Contract text search summarized by contract |
US20090094313A1 (en) * | 2007-10-03 | 2009-04-09 | Jay Feng | System, method, and computer program product for sending interactive requests for information |
US8341195B1 (en) | 2007-10-04 | 2012-12-25 | Corbis Corporation | Platform for managing media assets for multi-model licensing over multi-level pricing and asset grouping |
US8416247B2 (en) | 2007-10-09 | 2013-04-09 | Sony Computer Entertaiment America Inc. | Increasing the number of advertising impressions in an interactive environment |
US8099757B2 (en) | 2007-10-15 | 2012-01-17 | Time Warner Cable Inc. | Methods and apparatus for revenue-optimized delivery of content in a network |
US8751292B2 (en) * | 2007-10-19 | 2014-06-10 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for providing sellers access to selected consumers |
US20090106331A1 (en) * | 2007-10-22 | 2009-04-23 | General Electric Company | Dynamic two-stage clinical data archiving and retrieval solution |
US8140535B2 (en) * | 2007-10-23 | 2012-03-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Ontology-based network search engine |
WO2009055649A2 (en) * | 2007-10-24 | 2009-04-30 | Technical Financial Services Llc | System and method for proxy voting by individual investors |
US8190986B2 (en) * | 2008-05-19 | 2012-05-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Non-destructive media presentation derivatives |
US20090132326A1 (en) * | 2007-11-16 | 2009-05-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Integrating ads with media |
US20090113480A1 (en) * | 2007-10-24 | 2009-04-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Non-media-centric packaging of content |
US8041702B2 (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2011-10-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Ontology-based network search engine |
JP5082763B2 (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2012-11-28 | ソニー株式会社 | Program guide providing system, program guide providing apparatus, program guide providing method, and program guide providing program |
US20090112707A1 (en) * | 2007-10-26 | 2009-04-30 | Benjamin Weiss | Method and system for using a point-of sale system to correlate transactions to a coupon database |
US20090119710A1 (en) * | 2007-11-01 | 2009-05-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for enhancing support for user-generated content delivery |
US8185930B2 (en) | 2007-11-06 | 2012-05-22 | Mcafee, Inc. | Adjusting filter or classification control settings |
US8045458B2 (en) | 2007-11-08 | 2011-10-25 | Mcafee, Inc. | Prioritizing network traffic |
US8561081B1 (en) | 2007-11-13 | 2013-10-15 | Accenture Global Services Limited | System and method for dynamic brokering of digital content requests |
US9203912B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2015-12-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for message value calculation in a mobile environment |
US20090125321A1 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2009-05-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and systems for determining a geographic user profile to determine suitability of targeted content messages based on the profile |
US8447778B2 (en) | 2007-11-15 | 2013-05-21 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Adaptively optimizing order entry system |
US20090133078A1 (en) | 2007-11-16 | 2009-05-21 | United Video Properties, Inc | Systems and methods for automatically purchasing and recording popular pay programs in an interactive media delivery system |
JP4952531B2 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2012-06-13 | 富士通株式会社 | Recording apparatus, recording program, and recording method |
US8789108B2 (en) * | 2007-11-20 | 2014-07-22 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Personalized video system |
US8856833B2 (en) * | 2007-11-21 | 2014-10-07 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Maintaining a user profile based on dynamic data |
US8943539B2 (en) | 2007-11-21 | 2015-01-27 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Enabling a friend to remotely modify user data |
JP5170103B2 (en) * | 2007-11-26 | 2013-03-27 | 富士通株式会社 | Recording / playback device |
US20090138457A1 (en) * | 2007-11-26 | 2009-05-28 | Concert Technology Corporation | Grouping and weighting media categories with time periods |
US8224856B2 (en) | 2007-11-26 | 2012-07-17 | Abo Enterprises, Llc | Intelligent default weighting process for criteria utilized to score media content items |
US8566884B2 (en) * | 2007-11-29 | 2013-10-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Socially collaborative filtering |
US10152721B2 (en) * | 2007-11-29 | 2018-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Aggregate scoring of tagged content across social bookmarking systems |
US8914367B2 (en) * | 2007-11-29 | 2014-12-16 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Socially collaborative filtering for providing recommended content to a website for presentation to an identified user |
US20090150939A1 (en) * | 2007-12-05 | 2009-06-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Spanning multiple mediums |
US8069142B2 (en) | 2007-12-06 | 2011-11-29 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for synchronizing data on a network |
US8364181B2 (en) | 2007-12-10 | 2013-01-29 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Electronic-mail filtering for mobile devices |
US8307029B2 (en) | 2007-12-10 | 2012-11-06 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for conditional delivery of messages |
US8671154B2 (en) | 2007-12-10 | 2014-03-11 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for contextual addressing of communications on a network |
US20090158146A1 (en) * | 2007-12-13 | 2009-06-18 | Concert Technology Corporation | Resizing tag representations or tag group representations to control relative importance |
US8413181B2 (en) | 2007-12-13 | 2013-04-02 | Time Warner Cable, Inc. | System and method for selecting and delivering ADS based on cross-platform activity |
US9002828B2 (en) | 2007-12-13 | 2015-04-07 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Predictive content delivery |
US8793305B2 (en) | 2007-12-13 | 2014-07-29 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Content delivery to a mobile device from a content service |
US20090158350A1 (en) * | 2007-12-14 | 2009-06-18 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing enhanced recording options of media content |
US9391789B2 (en) * | 2007-12-14 | 2016-07-12 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for multi-level distribution information cache management in a mobile environment |
US8127986B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2012-03-06 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US9990674B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2018-06-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US8700539B2 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2014-04-15 | Nokia Corporation | Creating a travel community |
US8166168B2 (en) | 2007-12-17 | 2012-04-24 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for disambiguating non-unique identifiers using information obtained from disparate communication channels |
US8270937B2 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2012-09-18 | Kota Enterprises, Llc | Low-threat response service for mobile device users |
US20090165049A1 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2009-06-25 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Methods and devices for presenting and interactive media guidance application |
US20090165051A1 (en) * | 2007-12-19 | 2009-06-25 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Methods and devices for presenting an interactive media guidance application |
US9015147B2 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2015-04-21 | Porto Technology, Llc | System and method for generating dynamically filtered content results, including for audio and/or video channels |
US8010601B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2011-08-30 | Waldeck Technology, Llc | Contiguous location-based user networks |
US8117193B2 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2012-02-14 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Tunersphere |
US8024431B2 (en) * | 2007-12-21 | 2011-09-20 | Domingo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for identifying transient friends |
US8316015B2 (en) | 2007-12-21 | 2012-11-20 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Tunersphere |
US20100257131A1 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2010-10-07 | Kun-Oh Kim | Apparatus and method for controlling hybrid motor |
US8131714B2 (en) * | 2008-01-02 | 2012-03-06 | Think Village-OIP, LLC | Linguistic assistance systems and methods |
EP3349439A1 (en) * | 2008-01-04 | 2018-07-18 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for selecting media assets for display in a screen of an interactive media guidance application |
US9626685B2 (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2017-04-18 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Systems and methods of mapping attention |
US9706345B2 (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2017-07-11 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Interest mapping system |
US8762285B2 (en) | 2008-01-06 | 2014-06-24 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for message clustering |
US8793718B2 (en) * | 2008-01-10 | 2014-07-29 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | System and method for collecting opinion data |
US8107921B2 (en) | 2008-01-11 | 2012-01-31 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Mobile virtual network operator |
US20090182618A1 (en) | 2008-01-16 | 2009-07-16 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and Method for Word-of-Mouth Advertising |
US20090187462A1 (en) * | 2008-01-18 | 2009-07-23 | Lisa Cohen Gevelber | Method and system for providing relevant coupons to consumers based on financial transaction history and network search activity |
US8752093B2 (en) | 2008-01-21 | 2014-06-10 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and method of providing recommendations related to a service system |
US8160975B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2012-04-17 | Mcafee, Inc. | Granular support vector machine with random granularity |
US8862657B2 (en) | 2008-01-25 | 2014-10-14 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Policy based content service |
US8554629B2 (en) * | 2008-01-25 | 2013-10-08 | Google Inc. | Targeted ads based on user purchases |
US20090193338A1 (en) | 2008-01-28 | 2009-07-30 | Trevor Fiatal | Reducing network and battery consumption during content delivery and playback |
US8364522B1 (en) | 2008-01-30 | 2013-01-29 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for providing a small business coupon distribution system |
US9060208B2 (en) | 2008-01-30 | 2015-06-16 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for predictive delivery of content over a network |
JP4850859B2 (en) * | 2008-02-05 | 2012-01-11 | 株式会社コナミデジタルエンタテインメント | Information processing apparatus, information processing apparatus control method, and program |
US8868464B2 (en) | 2008-02-07 | 2014-10-21 | Google Inc. | Preventing unauthorized modification or skipping of viewing of advertisements within content |
WO2009100420A2 (en) * | 2008-02-07 | 2009-08-13 | Realnetworks, Inc. | Selective advertising in media content |
US8412571B2 (en) * | 2008-02-11 | 2013-04-02 | Advertising.Com Llc | Systems and methods for selling and displaying advertisements over a network |
AU2009215193A1 (en) * | 2008-02-12 | 2009-08-20 | Pacific Biosciences Of California, Inc. | Compositions and methods for use in analytical reactions |
US8627371B2 (en) * | 2008-02-12 | 2014-01-07 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | System and method of applying user profiles at a set-top box device |
US8769558B2 (en) | 2008-02-12 | 2014-07-01 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Discovery and analytics for episodic downloaded media |
US20090204490A1 (en) * | 2008-02-13 | 2009-08-13 | Music Innovations International, Llc | Online professional development system and virtual manager for performance artists |
US9503691B2 (en) | 2008-02-19 | 2016-11-22 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for enhanced advertising and promotional delivery in a network |
US8813143B2 (en) | 2008-02-26 | 2014-08-19 | Time Warner Enterprises LLC | Methods and apparatus for business-based network resource allocation |
US7996357B2 (en) | 2008-02-29 | 2011-08-09 | Plaxo, Inc. | Enabling synchronization with a difference unaware data source |
US8560390B2 (en) | 2008-03-03 | 2013-10-15 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and apparatus for social network marketing with brand referral |
US8554623B2 (en) | 2008-03-03 | 2013-10-08 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and apparatus for social network marketing with consumer referral |
US8538811B2 (en) | 2008-03-03 | 2013-09-17 | Yahoo! Inc. | Method and apparatus for social network marketing with advocate referral |
US20090228296A1 (en) * | 2008-03-04 | 2009-09-10 | Collarity, Inc. | Optimization of social distribution networks |
US7707089B1 (en) | 2008-03-12 | 2010-04-27 | Jpmorgan Chase, N.A. | Method and system for automating fraud authorization strategies |
US7865455B2 (en) * | 2008-03-13 | 2011-01-04 | Opinionlab, Inc. | System and method for providing intelligent support |
US20090235309A1 (en) * | 2008-03-14 | 2009-09-17 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Methods and devices for presenting an interactive media guidance application |
US8725740B2 (en) | 2008-03-24 | 2014-05-13 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | Active playlist having dynamic media item groups |
US8561108B2 (en) * | 2008-03-25 | 2013-10-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Video episode order adherence |
US8689266B2 (en) * | 2008-03-25 | 2014-04-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic rebroadcast scheduling of videos |
US8589486B2 (en) | 2008-03-28 | 2013-11-19 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for addressing communications |
US8745133B2 (en) | 2008-03-28 | 2014-06-03 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for optimizing the storage of data |
US8073759B1 (en) | 2008-03-28 | 2011-12-06 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for predictive event budgeting based on financial data from similarly situated consumers |
US8271506B2 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2012-09-18 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for modeling relationships between entities |
US8060423B1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2011-11-15 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for automatic categorization of financial transaction data based on financial data from similarly situated users |
US8688553B1 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2014-04-01 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for using consumer financial data in product market analysis |
US8832552B2 (en) * | 2008-04-03 | 2014-09-09 | Nokia Corporation | Automated selection of avatar characteristics for groups |
US8589503B2 (en) | 2008-04-04 | 2013-11-19 | Mcafee, Inc. | Prioritizing network traffic |
US9854286B1 (en) * | 2008-04-08 | 2017-12-26 | Control4 Corporation | Systems and methods for optimizing the broadcast of multimedia |
US8726146B2 (en) | 2008-04-11 | 2014-05-13 | Advertising.Com Llc | Systems and methods for video content association |
US8051080B2 (en) * | 2008-04-16 | 2011-11-01 | Yahoo! Inc. | Contextual ranking of keywords using click data |
US9183281B2 (en) * | 2008-04-18 | 2015-11-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Context-based document unit recommendation for sensemaking tasks |
US8239769B2 (en) * | 2008-04-22 | 2012-08-07 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | System and method for selling preference-based virtual objects |
US8261334B2 (en) | 2008-04-25 | 2012-09-04 | Yodlee Inc. | System for performing web authentication of a user by proxy |
US8380562B2 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2013-02-19 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Advertisement campaign system using socially collaborative filtering |
US20090271417A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-10-29 | John Toebes | Identifying User Relationships from Situational Analysis of User Comments Made on Media Content |
US20090276368A1 (en) * | 2008-04-28 | 2009-11-05 | Strands, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing personalized recommendations of products and services based on explicit and implicit user data and feedback |
US8744976B2 (en) * | 2008-04-28 | 2014-06-03 | Yahoo! Inc. | Discovery of friends using social network graph properties |
EP2283131B1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2016-08-10 | Strike Bio, Inc. | Highly pure plasmid dna preparations and processes for preparing the same |
US20090276351A1 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2009-11-05 | Strands, Inc. | Scaleable system and method for distributed prediction markets |
US8293714B2 (en) * | 2008-05-05 | 2012-10-23 | Covx Technology Ireland, Ltd. | Anti-angiogenic compounds |
FR2931278B1 (en) * | 2008-05-14 | 2017-11-03 | Airtag | METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING AT LEAST ONE TARGET MESSAGE FROM A SERVICE PROVIDER TO A USER OF A PORTABLE TERMINAL |
US20090307003A1 (en) * | 2008-05-16 | 2009-12-10 | Daniel Benyamin | Social advertisement network |
JP5136208B2 (en) * | 2008-05-23 | 2013-02-06 | ブラザー工業株式会社 | Content distributed storage system, content storage method, node device, and node processing program |
US8989561B1 (en) | 2008-05-29 | 2015-03-24 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for alerting users of the postponed recording of programs |
EP2304597A4 (en) * | 2008-05-31 | 2012-10-31 | Apple Inc | Adaptive recommender technology |
US20090300144A1 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2009-12-03 | Sony Computer Entertainment Inc. | Hint-based streaming of auxiliary content assets for an interactive environment |
US20090299945A1 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2009-12-03 | Strands, Inc. | Profile modeling for sharing individual user preferences |
US8601526B2 (en) | 2008-06-13 | 2013-12-03 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for displaying media content and media guidance information |
WO2009151640A1 (en) * | 2008-06-13 | 2009-12-17 | Ebay Inc. | Method and system for clustering |
US20080276270A1 (en) * | 2008-06-16 | 2008-11-06 | Chandra Shekar Kotaru | System, method, and apparatus for implementing targeted advertising in communication networks |
JP2010000632A (en) * | 2008-06-18 | 2010-01-07 | Canon Inc | Substrate for inkjet head, and inkjet head equipped with substrate |
US8787947B2 (en) | 2008-06-18 | 2014-07-22 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Application discovery on mobile devices |
US8122501B2 (en) | 2008-06-20 | 2012-02-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Traitor detection for multilevel assignment |
US8108928B2 (en) | 2008-06-20 | 2012-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Adaptive traitor tracing |
US20090328104A1 (en) * | 2008-06-26 | 2009-12-31 | At&T Delaware Intellectual Property, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer products for personalized channel services |
US8312033B1 (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2012-11-13 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing an integrated identifier |
US8438178B2 (en) * | 2008-06-26 | 2013-05-07 | Collarity Inc. | Interactions among online digital identities |
US8078158B2 (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2011-12-13 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Provisioning applications for a mobile device |
US8624908B1 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2014-01-07 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods of transitioning from buffering video to recording video |
US8706406B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2014-04-22 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for determination and display of personalized distance |
US8452855B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2013-05-28 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for presentation of media related to a context |
US8813107B2 (en) | 2008-06-27 | 2014-08-19 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for location based media delivery |
AU2009267107A1 (en) * | 2008-06-30 | 2010-01-07 | Websense, Inc. | System and method for dynamic and real-time categorization of webpages |
KR101474735B1 (en) * | 2008-06-30 | 2014-12-30 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Broadcasting receiving apparatus and operating method thereof |
EP2300937B1 (en) * | 2008-07-11 | 2019-08-21 | Thomson Reuters Global Resources Unlimited Company | System and method for web-based control of desktop |
US20100015991A1 (en) * | 2008-07-15 | 2010-01-21 | Kota Enterprises, Llc | System and method for calling a geosoc |
US9338407B2 (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2016-05-10 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | Apparatus and method for presenting an electronic programming guide |
US20100017455A1 (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2010-01-21 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Customized media broadcast for a broadcast group |
US20100017261A1 (en) * | 2008-07-17 | 2010-01-21 | Kota Enterprises, Llc | Expert system and service for location-based content influence for narrowcast |
US20100017725A1 (en) * | 2008-07-21 | 2010-01-21 | Strands, Inc. | Ambient collage display of digital media content |
JP4656202B2 (en) * | 2008-07-22 | 2011-03-23 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and method, program, and recording medium |
CN102160074A (en) * | 2008-07-22 | 2011-08-17 | 康塔网络公司 | New open insertion order system to interface with exchange for internet ad media |
US11245708B2 (en) * | 2008-07-23 | 2022-02-08 | Mcafee, Llc | Model-based system, method, and computer program product for detecting at least potentially unwanted activity associated with confidential data |
US7991689B1 (en) | 2008-07-23 | 2011-08-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for detecting bust out fraud using credit data |
US8260846B2 (en) | 2008-07-25 | 2012-09-04 | Liveperson, Inc. | Method and system for providing targeted content to a surfer |
US8762313B2 (en) | 2008-07-25 | 2014-06-24 | Liveperson, Inc. | Method and system for creating a predictive model for targeting web-page to a surfer |
US20100023984A1 (en) * | 2008-07-28 | 2010-01-28 | John Christopher Davi | Identifying Events in Addressable Video Stream for Generation of Summary Video Stream |
US8086700B2 (en) | 2008-07-29 | 2011-12-27 | Yahoo! Inc. | Region and duration uniform resource identifiers (URI) for media objects |
US8583668B2 (en) | 2008-07-30 | 2013-11-12 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for context enhanced mapping |
US10230803B2 (en) | 2008-07-30 | 2019-03-12 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | System and method for improved mapping and routing |
US8504558B2 (en) * | 2008-07-31 | 2013-08-06 | Yahoo! Inc. | Framework to evaluate content display policies |
US8805844B2 (en) | 2008-08-04 | 2014-08-12 | Liveperson, Inc. | Expert search |
US8776115B2 (en) * | 2008-08-05 | 2014-07-08 | Invidi Technologies Corporation | National insertion of targeted advertisement |
CA2733199C (en) | 2008-08-06 | 2018-01-09 | Invidi Technologies Corporation | Third party data matching for targeted advertising |
US7979506B2 (en) * | 2008-08-12 | 2011-07-12 | Robert James Cole | System and method for restrictively exchange product data between communication devices of a limited-user network |
US8504073B2 (en) | 2008-08-12 | 2013-08-06 | Teaneck Enterprises, Llc | Customized content delivery through the use of arbitrary geographic shapes |
US9256904B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2016-02-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
KR101090100B1 (en) * | 2008-08-16 | 2011-12-07 | 한국지질자원연구원 | Method of preparing silica-titania nanoporous composite particles |
US8589402B1 (en) | 2008-08-21 | 2013-11-19 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Generation of smart tags to locate elements of content |
US8386506B2 (en) | 2008-08-21 | 2013-02-26 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for context enhanced messaging |
US8200669B1 (en) * | 2008-08-21 | 2012-06-12 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Management of smart tags via hierarchy |
US8990106B2 (en) * | 2008-08-22 | 2015-03-24 | Realwire Limited | Information categorisation systems, modules, and methods |
US8458153B2 (en) * | 2008-08-26 | 2013-06-04 | Michael Pierce | Web-based services for querying and matching likes and dislikes of individuals |
EP2159720A1 (en) * | 2008-08-28 | 2010-03-03 | Bach Technology AS | Apparatus and method for generating a collection profile and for communicating based on the collection profile |
US10142594B2 (en) | 2008-08-28 | 2018-11-27 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | System and method for tailored video-on-demand catalogs |
US20100058378A1 (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2010-03-04 | Marc Feldman | Computer-cost subsidizing method |
US8949718B2 (en) | 2008-09-05 | 2015-02-03 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Visual audio links for digital audio content |
US8195668B2 (en) * | 2008-09-05 | 2012-06-05 | Match.Com, L.L.C. | System and method for providing enhanced matching based on question responses |
US8601003B2 (en) | 2008-09-08 | 2013-12-03 | Apple Inc. | System and method for playlist generation based on similarity data |
US8578426B2 (en) * | 2008-09-10 | 2013-11-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for selecting media content for broadcast based on viewer preference indications |
US8613026B2 (en) * | 2008-09-10 | 2013-12-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and systems for viewer interactivity and social networking in a mobile TV broadcast network |
US8259082B2 (en) | 2008-09-12 | 2012-09-04 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Multimodal portable communication interface for accessing video content |
US9992525B1 (en) | 2008-09-15 | 2018-06-05 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and system for inserting local channel insertion in a multi-terminal system |
EP2329394A4 (en) * | 2008-09-16 | 2012-02-29 | Freewheel Media Inc | Delivery forecast computing apparatus for display and streaming video advertising |
US8281027B2 (en) | 2008-09-19 | 2012-10-02 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for distributing media related to a location |
US8108778B2 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2012-01-31 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for context enhanced mapping within a user interface |
US9600484B2 (en) | 2008-09-30 | 2017-03-21 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | System and method for reporting and analysis of media consumption data |
US8429691B2 (en) * | 2008-10-02 | 2013-04-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Computational recommendation engine |
EP2374066A4 (en) | 2008-10-02 | 2013-12-04 | Apple Inc | Real-time visualization of user consumption of media items |
US20100088312A1 (en) * | 2008-10-08 | 2010-04-08 | Radiostations, Inc. | Real-Time Radio Station Audio Content Search and Delivery |
JP5170682B2 (en) * | 2008-10-09 | 2013-03-27 | シャープ株式会社 | Communication terminal |
US8909759B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2014-12-09 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Bandwidth measurement |
US9002729B2 (en) * | 2008-10-21 | 2015-04-07 | Accenture Global Services Limited | System and method for determining sets of online advertisement treatments using confidences |
US9892417B2 (en) | 2008-10-29 | 2018-02-13 | Liveperson, Inc. | System and method for applying tracing tools for network locations |
US9124769B2 (en) | 2008-10-31 | 2015-09-01 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to verify presentation of media content |
US20100114607A1 (en) * | 2008-11-04 | 2010-05-06 | Sdi Health Llc | Method and system for providing reports and segmentation of physician activities |
US8346664B1 (en) | 2008-11-05 | 2013-01-01 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for modifying financial transaction categorization lists based on input from multiple users |
US8244517B2 (en) | 2008-11-07 | 2012-08-14 | Yahoo! Inc. | Enhanced matching through explore/exploit schemes |
US20100205628A1 (en) * | 2009-02-12 | 2010-08-12 | Davis Bruce L | Media processing methods and arrangements |
US20100125872A1 (en) * | 2008-11-17 | 2010-05-20 | Crow James J | System and Method for Actively Programming Aggregated Media On-Demand Networks |
US9031866B1 (en) | 2008-11-17 | 2015-05-12 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Systems and methods for use of transaction data for customers |
US8032508B2 (en) | 2008-11-18 | 2011-10-04 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for URL based query for retrieving data related to a context |
US8024317B2 (en) | 2008-11-18 | 2011-09-20 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for deriving income from URL based context queries |
US9805123B2 (en) * | 2008-11-18 | 2017-10-31 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | System and method for data privacy in URL based context queries |
US8060492B2 (en) | 2008-11-18 | 2011-11-15 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for generation of URL based context queries |
US11832024B2 (en) * | 2008-11-20 | 2023-11-28 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Method and apparatus for delivering video and video-related content at sub-asset level |
US9357247B2 (en) | 2008-11-24 | 2016-05-31 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for content delivery and message exchange across multiple content delivery networks |
US10063934B2 (en) | 2008-11-25 | 2018-08-28 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Reducing unicast session duration with restart TV |
US8566855B2 (en) * | 2008-12-02 | 2013-10-22 | Sony Corporation | Audiovisual user interface based on learned user preferences |
US8494899B2 (en) | 2008-12-02 | 2013-07-23 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Dynamic talk radio program scheduling |
US9224172B2 (en) | 2008-12-02 | 2015-12-29 | Yahoo! Inc. | Customizable content for distribution in social networks |
US8443390B2 (en) * | 2008-12-05 | 2013-05-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced method and apparatus for enhancing support for service delivery |
US8055675B2 (en) | 2008-12-05 | 2011-11-08 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for context based query augmentation |
US7921223B2 (en) | 2008-12-08 | 2011-04-05 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Protected distribution and location based aggregation service |
US20100146559A1 (en) * | 2008-12-10 | 2010-06-10 | Qualcom Incorporated | Feedback based broadcast scheduling |
US7994910B2 (en) * | 2008-12-10 | 2011-08-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Directing a movement of visitors in an event venue for maximizing revenue |
US20100153181A1 (en) * | 2008-12-11 | 2010-06-17 | Georgia Tech Research Corporation | Systems and methods for providing information services |
US8205060B2 (en) * | 2008-12-16 | 2012-06-19 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Discardable files |
US9015209B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2015-04-21 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Download management of discardable files |
US8375192B2 (en) * | 2008-12-16 | 2013-02-12 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Discardable files |
US9020993B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2015-04-28 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Download management of discardable files |
US9104686B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2015-08-11 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | System and method for host management of discardable objects |
US20100153474A1 (en) * | 2008-12-16 | 2010-06-17 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Discardable files |
US8849856B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2014-09-30 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Discardable files |
US8732139B2 (en) | 2008-12-18 | 2014-05-20 | Sap Ag | Method and system for dynamically partitioning very large database indices on write-once tables |
US8166016B2 (en) | 2008-12-19 | 2012-04-24 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for automated service recommendations |
KR20100072750A (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2010-07-01 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Method for targeted advertisements |
US8700072B2 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2014-04-15 | At&T Mobility Ii Llc | Scalable message fidelity |
US8583563B1 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2013-11-12 | Match.Com, L.L.C. | System and method for providing enhanced matching based on personality analysis |
US20100169328A1 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-01 | Strands, Inc. | Systems and methods for making recommendations using model-based collaborative filtering with user communities and items collections |
US20100169326A1 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-01 | Nokia Corporation | Method, apparatus and computer program product for providing analysis and visualization of content items association |
US20100169317A1 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Product or Service Review Summarization Using Attributes |
US8298087B1 (en) | 2009-01-02 | 2012-10-30 | Nintendo Of America Inc. | Recommendation engine for electronic game shopping channel |
US8185829B2 (en) * | 2009-01-07 | 2012-05-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for rating exchangeable gestures via communications in virtual world applications |
US8103959B2 (en) * | 2009-01-07 | 2012-01-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Gesture exchange via communications in virtual world applications |
JP5626537B2 (en) | 2009-01-15 | 2014-11-19 | アーモンドネット インコーポレーテッドAlmondnet,Inc. | Request offline profile data for online use in confidentiality |
US8869290B2 (en) * | 2010-06-04 | 2014-10-21 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and system for secure content distribution by a broadband gateway |
US8571209B2 (en) | 2009-01-19 | 2013-10-29 | International Business Machines | Recording keys in a broadcast-encryption-based system |
US20100185518A1 (en) * | 2009-01-21 | 2010-07-22 | Yahoo! Inc. | Interest-based activity marketing |
US20100192069A1 (en) * | 2009-01-23 | 2010-07-29 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Differentiating a User from Multiple Users Based on a Determined Pattern of Accessing a Prescribed Network Destination |
US8972859B2 (en) * | 2009-01-28 | 2015-03-03 | Avaya Inc. | Embedded learning management system |
CA2750700C (en) * | 2009-01-30 | 2018-11-27 | Invidi Technologies Corporation | System and method for auctioning avails |
US9183881B2 (en) | 2009-02-02 | 2015-11-10 | Porto Technology, Llc | System and method for semantic trick play |
US8200602B2 (en) * | 2009-02-02 | 2012-06-12 | Napo Enterprises, Llc | System and method for creating thematic listening experiences in a networked peer media recommendation environment |
US8234582B1 (en) * | 2009-02-03 | 2012-07-31 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Visualizing object behavior |
US8250473B1 (en) | 2009-02-03 | 2012-08-21 | Amazon Technoloies, Inc. | Visualizing object behavior |
US8341540B1 (en) | 2009-02-03 | 2012-12-25 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Visualizing object behavior |
US9935793B2 (en) * | 2009-02-10 | 2018-04-03 | Yahoo Holdings, Inc. | Generating a live chat session in response to selection of a contextual shortcut |
US8539359B2 (en) | 2009-02-11 | 2013-09-17 | Jeffrey A. Rapaport | Social network driven indexing system for instantly clustering people with concurrent focus on same topic into on-topic chat rooms and/or for generating on-topic search results tailored to user preferences regarding topic |
US20100205041A1 (en) * | 2009-02-12 | 2010-08-12 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Determining the interest of individual entities based on a general interest |
US9141758B2 (en) * | 2009-02-20 | 2015-09-22 | Ims Health Incorporated | System and method for encrypting provider identifiers on medical service claim transactions |
US8555359B2 (en) | 2009-02-26 | 2013-10-08 | Yodlee, Inc. | System and methods for automatically accessing a web site on behalf of a client |
US20100235266A1 (en) * | 2009-03-10 | 2010-09-16 | Google Inc. | Determining Charge for Content Distribution |
US20100235329A1 (en) * | 2009-03-10 | 2010-09-16 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | System and method of embedding second content in first content |
US8190473B2 (en) * | 2009-03-10 | 2012-05-29 | Google Inc. | Category similarities |
US8447066B2 (en) | 2009-03-12 | 2013-05-21 | Google Inc. | Performing actions based on capturing information from rendered documents, such as documents under copyright |
CN102349087B (en) | 2009-03-12 | 2015-05-06 | 谷歌公司 | Automatically providing content associated with captured information, such as information captured in real-time |
WO2010104690A1 (en) * | 2009-03-13 | 2010-09-16 | Simulmedia, Inc. | Method and apparatus for television program promotion |
US9230259B1 (en) | 2009-03-20 | 2016-01-05 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Systems and methods for mobile ordering and payment |
US8380866B2 (en) * | 2009-03-20 | 2013-02-19 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Techniques for facilitating annotations |
US8150967B2 (en) * | 2009-03-24 | 2012-04-03 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for verified presence tracking |
US9083932B2 (en) | 2009-03-25 | 2015-07-14 | Eloy Technology, Llc | Method and system for providing information from a program guide |
US20120047087A1 (en) | 2009-03-25 | 2012-02-23 | Waldeck Technology Llc | Smart encounters |
US11076189B2 (en) | 2009-03-30 | 2021-07-27 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Personal media channel apparatus and methods |
US9215423B2 (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2015-12-15 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Recommendation engine apparatus and methods |
US8301624B2 (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2012-10-30 | Yahoo! Inc. | Determining user preference of items based on user ratings and user features |
US8250600B2 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2012-08-21 | Alcatel Lucent | Advertisement scheduling in a packet-based media-delivery system |
US8683521B1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2014-03-25 | Google Inc. | Feature-based video suggestions |
EP2414954A4 (en) * | 2009-04-02 | 2013-05-22 | Altair Eng Inc | Hardware unit-based license management method |
US8117564B2 (en) * | 2009-04-10 | 2012-02-14 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for generating a media guidance application with multiple perspective views |
JP5332847B2 (en) * | 2009-04-10 | 2013-11-06 | ソニー株式会社 | Content processing apparatus and method, program, and recording medium |
CN101515360A (en) * | 2009-04-13 | 2009-08-26 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Method and server for recommending network object information to user |
CA2700030C (en) * | 2009-04-16 | 2019-11-05 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Touchpoint customization system |
WO2010124007A1 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2010-10-28 | Ami Entertainment Network, Inc. | Jukebox menu navigation system |
WO2010124171A2 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2010-10-28 | Telegent Systems, Inc. | System and method for information delivery including delivery via video-based keyed or tagged content |
WO2010125586A2 (en) * | 2009-04-28 | 2010-11-04 | Valuable Innovations Private Limited | A system to select a single channel out of a multitude, along with a dynamically updated download schedule creator for download of "on-demand" as well as "pushed" content from a central site to subsc selection of such content and the availability of the content for playback |
US7657337B1 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2010-02-02 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Skip feature for a broadcast or multicast media station |
US8806047B2 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2014-08-12 | Lemi Technology, Llc | Skip feature for a broadcast or multicast media station |
US8725791B2 (en) | 2009-05-02 | 2014-05-13 | Citrix Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for providing a consistent profile to overlapping user sessions |
US9240015B2 (en) | 2009-05-08 | 2016-01-19 | A2Zlogix, Inc. | Method and system for synchronizing delivery of promotional material to computing devices |
US8639920B2 (en) | 2009-05-11 | 2014-01-28 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing anonymized user profile data |
US9190110B2 (en) | 2009-05-12 | 2015-11-17 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | System and method for assembling a recorded composition |
US8504550B2 (en) * | 2009-05-15 | 2013-08-06 | Citizennet Inc. | Social network message categorization systems and methods |
US20100306708A1 (en) * | 2009-05-29 | 2010-12-02 | Rovi Techonologies Corporation | Systems and methods for handling profiles in a community |
US8214390B2 (en) * | 2009-06-03 | 2012-07-03 | Yahoo! Inc. | Binary interest vector for better audience targeting |
US9602864B2 (en) | 2009-06-08 | 2017-03-21 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Media bridge apparatus and methods |
US9866609B2 (en) | 2009-06-08 | 2018-01-09 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for premises content distribution |
US20120317217A1 (en) * | 2009-06-22 | 2012-12-13 | United Parents Online Ltd. | Methods and systems for managing virtual identities |
US8886760B2 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2014-11-11 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | System and method of predictive data acquisition |
US20100333155A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | Philip David Royall | Selectively using local non-volatile storage in conjunction with transmission of content |
US20100332292A1 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for evaluating vehicle purchase loyalty |
US8255984B1 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2012-08-28 | Quest Software, Inc. | Single sign-on system for shared resource environments |
US8364518B1 (en) | 2009-07-08 | 2013-01-29 | Experian Ltd. | Systems and methods for forecasting household economics |
US8813124B2 (en) | 2009-07-15 | 2014-08-19 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for targeted secondary content insertion |
US9178634B2 (en) | 2009-07-15 | 2015-11-03 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for evaluating an audience in a content-based network |
US8935721B2 (en) * | 2009-07-15 | 2015-01-13 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for classifying an audience in a content distribution network |
US8612435B2 (en) * | 2009-07-16 | 2013-12-17 | Yahoo! Inc. | Activity based users' interests modeling for determining content relevance |
US20110016492A1 (en) * | 2009-07-16 | 2011-01-20 | Gemstar Development Corporation | Systems and methods for forwarding media asset events |
US20110022620A1 (en) * | 2009-07-27 | 2011-01-27 | Gemstar Development Corporation | Methods and systems for associating and providing media content of different types which share atrributes |
US8713018B2 (en) * | 2009-07-28 | 2014-04-29 | Fti Consulting, Inc. | System and method for displaying relationships between electronically stored information to provide classification suggestions via inclusion |
GB2472224A (en) * | 2009-07-29 | 2011-02-02 | Amino Holdings Ltd | Analysing consumption of transmitted audio visual content via weighted tags |
US10223701B2 (en) | 2009-08-06 | 2019-03-05 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | System and method for verified monetization of commercial campaigns |
US9237381B2 (en) | 2009-08-06 | 2016-01-12 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for local channel insertion in an all-digital content distribution network |
US8763090B2 (en) | 2009-08-11 | 2014-06-24 | Sony Computer Entertainment America Llc | Management of ancillary content delivery and presentation |
US8914342B2 (en) | 2009-08-12 | 2014-12-16 | Yahoo! Inc. | Personal data platform |
US8364611B2 (en) | 2009-08-13 | 2013-01-29 | Yahoo! Inc. | System and method for precaching information on a mobile device |
EP2629211A1 (en) * | 2009-08-21 | 2013-08-21 | Mikko Kalervo Väänänen | Method and means for data searching and language translation |
CA3026879A1 (en) | 2009-08-24 | 2011-03-10 | Nuix North America, Inc. | Generating a reference set for use during document review |
GB2470617A (en) * | 2009-09-02 | 2010-12-01 | Qmorphic Corp | Content presentation formed using weighted selection of media channels |
US9104990B2 (en) | 2009-09-05 | 2015-08-11 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | Article vending machine and method for exchanging an inoperable article for an operable article |
US8996162B2 (en) | 2009-09-05 | 2015-03-31 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | Article vending machine and method for exchanging an inoperable article for an operable article |
US20110060738A1 (en) | 2009-09-08 | 2011-03-10 | Apple Inc. | Media item clustering based on similarity data |
US9166714B2 (en) | 2009-09-11 | 2015-10-20 | Veveo, Inc. | Method of and system for presenting enriched video viewing analytics |
US20110066497A1 (en) * | 2009-09-14 | 2011-03-17 | Choicestream, Inc. | Personalized advertising and recommendation |
US20110066488A1 (en) * | 2009-09-17 | 2011-03-17 | Ad Infuse, Inc. | Mobile ad routing |
US20110070819A1 (en) * | 2009-09-23 | 2011-03-24 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for providing reminders associated with detected users |
US9014546B2 (en) | 2009-09-23 | 2015-04-21 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatically detecting users within detection regions of media devices |
US20110078572A1 (en) * | 2009-09-30 | 2011-03-31 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for analyzing clickstream data |
US8359616B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2013-01-22 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for automatically generating advertisements using a media guidance application |
US8161071B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2012-04-17 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for audio asset storage and management |
US8972869B1 (en) * | 2009-09-30 | 2015-03-03 | Saba Software, Inc. | Method and system for managing a virtual meeting |
US8677400B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2014-03-18 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying audio content using an interactive media guidance application |
CA2776973A1 (en) * | 2009-10-05 | 2011-04-14 | Callspace, Inc. | Contextualized telephony message management |
US20110081129A1 (en) * | 2009-10-07 | 2011-04-07 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Broadband recording method and apparatus for video and/or audio programs |
US20110087519A1 (en) * | 2009-10-09 | 2011-04-14 | Visa U.S.A. Inc. | Systems and Methods for Panel Enhancement with Transaction Data |
US8694514B2 (en) * | 2009-10-12 | 2014-04-08 | Oracle International Corporation | Collaborative filtering engine |
US9251157B2 (en) * | 2009-10-12 | 2016-02-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Enterprise node rank engine |
US9659265B2 (en) * | 2009-10-12 | 2017-05-23 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods and systems for collecting and analyzing enterprise activities |
US20110093902A1 (en) * | 2009-10-16 | 2011-04-21 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | System and Method to Process a Data Stream Having Different Content Types |
US8396055B2 (en) | 2009-10-20 | 2013-03-12 | Time Warner Cable Inc. | Methods and apparatus for enabling media functionality in a content-based network |
US8380697B2 (en) * | 2009-10-21 | 2013-02-19 | Citizennet Inc. | Search and retrieval methods and systems of short messages utilizing messaging context and keyword frequency |
US8301512B2 (en) | 2009-10-23 | 2012-10-30 | Ebay Inc. | Product identification using multiple services |
US20110099164A1 (en) * | 2009-10-23 | 2011-04-28 | Haim Zvi Melman | Apparatus and method for search and retrieval of documents and advertising targeting |
US20110099488A1 (en) * | 2009-10-26 | 2011-04-28 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Method and apparatus for presenting video assets |
US8250612B2 (en) * | 2009-10-26 | 2012-08-21 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Digital broadcasting system and method of processing data in digital broadcasting system |
US20110099191A1 (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2011-04-28 | Debashis Ghosh | Systems and Methods for Generating Results Based Upon User Input and Preferences |
JP5208903B2 (en) * | 2009-10-28 | 2013-06-12 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Content control apparatus and content control method |
US10264029B2 (en) | 2009-10-30 | 2019-04-16 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for packetized content delivery over a content delivery network |
US11023675B1 (en) | 2009-11-03 | 2021-06-01 | Alphasense OY | User interface for use with a search engine for searching financial related documents |
US8332232B2 (en) * | 2009-11-05 | 2012-12-11 | Opinionlab, Inc. | System and method for mobile interaction |
US9445158B2 (en) | 2009-11-06 | 2016-09-13 | Eloy Technology, Llc | Distributed aggregated content guide for collaborative playback session |
US20110113438A1 (en) * | 2009-11-06 | 2011-05-12 | Sony Corporation | Method and system of displaying information of specific interest to a user on a television |
US20110113458A1 (en) * | 2009-11-09 | 2011-05-12 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Apparatus and method for product tutorials |
US9635421B2 (en) | 2009-11-11 | 2017-04-25 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for audience data collection and analysis in a content delivery network |
US9256608B2 (en) * | 2009-11-12 | 2016-02-09 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Mapping user content to folders in a file system |
US9251524B2 (en) * | 2009-11-25 | 2016-02-02 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | System and methods for updating user profiles and providing selected documents to users |
US9519728B2 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2016-12-13 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for monitoring and optimizing delivery of content in a network |
US9081799B2 (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2015-07-14 | Google Inc. | Using gestalt information to identify locations in printed information |
JP2011123598A (en) * | 2009-12-09 | 2011-06-23 | Canon Inc | Image discriminating apparatus and method, and program |
US9323784B2 (en) | 2009-12-09 | 2016-04-26 | Google Inc. | Image search using text-based elements within the contents of images |
US8554854B2 (en) * | 2009-12-11 | 2013-10-08 | Citizennet Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying terms relevant to web pages using social network messages |
US8612472B2 (en) * | 2009-12-16 | 2013-12-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Determining preferences from user queries |
US8386381B1 (en) | 2009-12-16 | 2013-02-26 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Method and system for detecting, monitoring and addressing data compromises |
TWI414758B (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2013-11-11 | Ind Tech Res Inst | Mobile adaptive recommendation systems and methods |
US20110154229A1 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | Microsoft Corporation | Mosaic identity |
US20110154224A1 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-06-23 | ChatMe TV, Inc. | Methods, Systems and Platform Devices for Aggregating Together Users of a TVand/or an Interconnected Network |
TR200909517A2 (en) * | 2009-12-17 | 2011-07-21 | Vestel Elektron�K San. Ve T�C. A.�. | PRODUCTION METHOD OF PERSONAL TV CONTENT RECOMMENDED LIST |
US20110153423A1 (en) * | 2010-06-21 | 2011-06-23 | Jon Elvekrog | Method and system for creating user based summaries for content distribution |
KR20110074039A (en) * | 2009-12-24 | 2011-06-30 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Display apparatus and control method of contents thereof |
US8554619B2 (en) * | 2009-12-31 | 2013-10-08 | Google Inc. | Multi-campaign content allocation |
US9201627B2 (en) * | 2010-01-05 | 2015-12-01 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for transferring content between user equipment and a wireless communications device |
JP2011142468A (en) * | 2010-01-06 | 2011-07-21 | Sony Corp | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program |
US8615520B2 (en) * | 2010-01-07 | 2013-12-24 | Idelan, Inc. | Computer based methods and systems for establishing trust between two or more parties |
US8875038B2 (en) | 2010-01-19 | 2014-10-28 | Collarity, Inc. | Anchoring for content synchronization |
US20110185384A1 (en) * | 2010-01-28 | 2011-07-28 | Futurewei Technologies, Inc. | System and Method for Targeted Advertisements for Video Content Delivery |
US20110191330A1 (en) | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-04 | Veveo, Inc. | Method of and System for Enhanced Content Discovery Based on Network and Device Access Behavior |
US20110191801A1 (en) * | 2010-02-04 | 2011-08-04 | Jawanth Vytheeswaran | System and methods for switching between two or more media streams |
US8983989B2 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2015-03-17 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Contextual queries |
US8260664B2 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2012-09-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Semantic advertising selection from lateral concepts and topics |
US20110196862A1 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2011-08-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Outline-based composition and search of presentation material |
US8150859B2 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2012-04-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Semantic table of contents for search results |
US8903794B2 (en) * | 2010-02-05 | 2014-12-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Generating and presenting lateral concepts |
US8775245B2 (en) | 2010-02-11 | 2014-07-08 | News America Marketing Properties, Llc | Secure coupon distribution |
US11232458B2 (en) | 2010-02-17 | 2022-01-25 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | System and method for data mining within interactive multimedia |
US20110214147A1 (en) * | 2010-02-22 | 2011-09-01 | Kashyap Ashwin S | Method for determining content for a personal channel |
US9342661B2 (en) | 2010-03-02 | 2016-05-17 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for rights-managed content and data delivery |
US8888497B2 (en) * | 2010-03-12 | 2014-11-18 | Yahoo! Inc. | Emotional web |
NO331357B1 (en) * | 2010-03-18 | 2011-12-12 | Companybook As | Method and arrangement using modern Database, Search & Matching technology integrated with Social Media |
US20110231395A1 (en) * | 2010-03-19 | 2011-09-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Presenting answers |
US8887202B2 (en) | 2010-03-22 | 2014-11-11 | Mobitv, Inc. | Tile based media content selection |
US8452658B2 (en) | 2010-03-23 | 2013-05-28 | Qazzoo, Llc | Method and apparatus for connecting consumers with one or more product or service providers |
US9652802B1 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2017-05-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Indirect monitoring and reporting of a user's credit data |
US20110238482A1 (en) * | 2010-03-29 | 2011-09-29 | Carney John S | Digital Profile System of Personal Attributes, Tendencies, Recommended Actions, and Historical Events with Privacy Preserving Controls |
TW201209697A (en) | 2010-03-30 | 2012-03-01 | Michael Luna | 3D mobile user interface with configurable workspace management |
US8793729B2 (en) * | 2010-03-31 | 2014-07-29 | Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc. | Preferential program guide |
US9152969B2 (en) | 2010-04-07 | 2015-10-06 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Recommendation ranking system with distrust |
US9767212B2 (en) | 2010-04-07 | 2017-09-19 | Liveperson, Inc. | System and method for dynamically enabling customized web content and applications |
US20110258128A1 (en) * | 2010-04-16 | 2011-10-20 | Hambleton Frederick H | Recycle program |
US8701138B2 (en) | 2010-04-23 | 2014-04-15 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Zone control methods and apparatus |
US20110264530A1 (en) | 2010-04-23 | 2011-10-27 | Bryan Santangelo | Apparatus and methods for dynamic secondary content and data insertion and delivery |
JP5527408B2 (en) * | 2010-04-28 | 2014-06-18 | 株式会社Jvcケンウッド | Item selection device, item selection method, and item selection program |
US20120066084A1 (en) * | 2010-05-10 | 2012-03-15 | Dave Sneyders | System and method for consumer-controlled rich privacy |
US9122701B2 (en) | 2010-05-13 | 2015-09-01 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing media content listings according to points of interest |
US20110282964A1 (en) * | 2010-05-13 | 2011-11-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Delivery of targeted content related to a learned and predicted future behavior based on spatial, temporal, and user attributes and behavioral constraints |
US20110283322A1 (en) * | 2010-05-13 | 2011-11-17 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for providing media content listings according to a destination location |
US9204193B2 (en) | 2010-05-14 | 2015-12-01 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for media detection and filtering using a parental control logging application |
US8621638B2 (en) | 2010-05-14 | 2013-12-31 | Mcafee, Inc. | Systems and methods for classification of messaging entities |
US9167196B2 (en) | 2010-05-19 | 2015-10-20 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for trimming recorded content using a media guidance application |
US8751305B2 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2014-06-10 | 140 Proof, Inc. | Targeting users based on persona data |
US20110288935A1 (en) * | 2010-05-24 | 2011-11-24 | Jon Elvekrog | Optimizing targeted advertisement distribution |
US9300445B2 (en) | 2010-05-27 | 2016-03-29 | Time Warner Cable Enterprise LLC | Digital domain content processing and distribution apparatus and methods |
WO2011151817A1 (en) * | 2010-05-30 | 2011-12-08 | Honeybee Tv Israel Ltd. | Methods and system for providing time based media content suggestions |
US9094819B2 (en) | 2010-06-06 | 2015-07-28 | Tekelec, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for obscuring diameter node information in a communication network |
US8738377B2 (en) | 2010-06-07 | 2014-05-27 | Google Inc. | Predicting and learning carrier phrases for speech input |
US20110307460A1 (en) * | 2010-06-09 | 2011-12-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Navigating relationships among entities |
US9986277B2 (en) | 2010-06-17 | 2018-05-29 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Systems and methods to select targeted advertising |
US8600979B2 (en) | 2010-06-28 | 2013-12-03 | Yahoo! Inc. | Infinite browse |
US20110321075A1 (en) * | 2010-06-29 | 2011-12-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamically modifying media content for presentation to a group audience |
US8307006B2 (en) | 2010-06-30 | 2012-11-06 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to obtain anonymous audience measurement data from network server data for particular demographic and usage profiles |
US8744956B1 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2014-06-03 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for permission arbitrated transaction services |
US8931058B2 (en) | 2010-07-01 | 2015-01-06 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for permission arbitrated transaction services |
US8554631B1 (en) | 2010-07-02 | 2013-10-08 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Method and system for determining point of sale authorization |
US9906838B2 (en) | 2010-07-12 | 2018-02-27 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for content delivery and message exchange across multiple content delivery networks |
US20120023085A1 (en) * | 2010-07-22 | 2012-01-26 | Bellerive Luc | Social graph search system |
US8997136B2 (en) | 2010-07-22 | 2015-03-31 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for packetized content delivery over a bandwidth-efficient network |
US9786159B2 (en) | 2010-07-23 | 2017-10-10 | Tivo Solutions Inc. | Multi-function remote control device |
GB2495066B (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2013-12-18 | Seven Networks Inc | Mobile application traffic optimization |
GB2495877B (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2013-10-02 | Seven Networks Inc | Distributed implementation of dynamic wireless traffic policy |
US8838783B2 (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2014-09-16 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Distributed caching for resource and mobile network traffic management |
PL3407673T3 (en) | 2010-07-26 | 2020-05-18 | Seven Networks, Llc | Mobile network traffic coordination across multiple applications |
EP2599336A4 (en) | 2010-07-30 | 2017-06-07 | Hewlett-Packard Enterprise Development LP | Location-indexed audio content |
US9020922B2 (en) * | 2010-08-10 | 2015-04-28 | Brightedge Technologies, Inc. | Search engine optimization at scale |
US20120042263A1 (en) | 2010-08-10 | 2012-02-16 | Seymour Rapaport | Social-topical adaptive networking (stan) system allowing for cooperative inter-coupling with external social networking systems and other content sources |
US8463802B2 (en) | 2010-08-19 | 2013-06-11 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Card-based management of discardable files |
US8549229B2 (en) | 2010-08-19 | 2013-10-01 | Sandisk Il Ltd. | Systems and methods for managing an upload of files in a shared cache storage system |
US9152727B1 (en) | 2010-08-23 | 2015-10-06 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for processing consumer information for targeted marketing applications |
US8538581B2 (en) | 2010-09-03 | 2013-09-17 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | Article vending machine and method for authenticating received articles |
US9569911B2 (en) | 2010-08-23 | 2017-02-14 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | Secondary media return system and method |
US20120047010A1 (en) * | 2010-08-23 | 2012-02-23 | Michelle Dowling | Targeted advertising for streaming media |
US8499245B1 (en) | 2010-08-24 | 2013-07-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Multi-source profiling for adaptive device operation |
US8745154B1 (en) * | 2010-08-24 | 2014-06-03 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Item download customization |
US8396889B2 (en) * | 2010-08-26 | 2013-03-12 | Lexisnexis, A Division Of Reed Elsevier Inc. | Methods for semantics-based citation-pairing information |
US8396882B2 (en) | 2010-08-26 | 2013-03-12 | Lexisnexis, A Division Of Reed Elsevier Inc. | Systems and methods for generating issue libraries within a document corpus |
US8898713B1 (en) * | 2010-08-31 | 2014-11-25 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Content aggregation and presentation |
US9185341B2 (en) | 2010-09-03 | 2015-11-10 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Digital domain content processing and distribution apparatus and methods |
US10210160B2 (en) | 2010-09-07 | 2019-02-19 | Opentv, Inc. | Collecting data from different sources |
US9699503B2 (en) * | 2010-09-07 | 2017-07-04 | Opentv, Inc. | Smart playlist |
US8949871B2 (en) | 2010-09-08 | 2015-02-03 | Opentv, Inc. | Smart media selection based on viewer user presence |
CA2810541C (en) | 2010-09-22 | 2019-02-12 | Mainak Mazumdar | Methods and apparatus to determine impressions using distributed demographic information |
US9185469B2 (en) * | 2010-09-30 | 2015-11-10 | Kodak Alaris Inc. | Summarizing image collection using a social network |
US9779168B2 (en) | 2010-10-04 | 2017-10-03 | Excalibur Ip, Llc | Contextual quick-picks |
US9767221B2 (en) | 2010-10-08 | 2017-09-19 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | User profile and its location in a clustered profile landscape |
US20120095997A1 (en) * | 2010-10-18 | 2012-04-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Providing contextual hints associated with a user session |
US8612293B2 (en) | 2010-10-19 | 2013-12-17 | Citizennet Inc. | Generation of advertising targeting information based upon affinity information obtained from an online social network |
US8615434B2 (en) | 2010-10-19 | 2013-12-24 | Citizennet Inc. | Systems and methods for automatically generating campaigns using advertising targeting information based upon affinity information obtained from an online social network |
SG189481A1 (en) * | 2010-10-21 | 2013-05-31 | Holybrain Bvba | Method and apparatus for neuropsychological modeling of human experience and purchasing behavior |
US8793120B1 (en) * | 2010-10-28 | 2014-07-29 | A9.Com, Inc. | Behavior-driven multilingual stemming |
CN103620576B (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2016-11-09 | 七网络公司 | It is applicable to the caching of mobile applications behavior and network condition |
US8484314B2 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2013-07-09 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Distributed caching in a wireless network of content delivered for a mobile application over a long-held request |
US8190701B2 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2012-05-29 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Cache defeat detection and caching of content addressed by identifiers intended to defeat cache |
WO2012060995A2 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2012-05-10 | Michael Luna | Distributed caching in a wireless network of content delivered for a mobile application over a long-held request |
US9060032B2 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2015-06-16 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Selective data compression by a distributed traffic management system to reduce mobile data traffic and signaling traffic |
US8326985B2 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2012-12-04 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Distributed management of keep-alive message signaling for mobile network resource conservation and optimization |
US8166164B1 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2012-04-24 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Application and network-based long poll request detection and cacheability assessment therefor |
US9330196B2 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2016-05-03 | Seven Networks, Llc | Wireless traffic management system cache optimization using http headers |
US8843153B2 (en) | 2010-11-01 | 2014-09-23 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Mobile traffic categorization and policy for network use optimization while preserving user experience |
US8930262B1 (en) | 2010-11-02 | 2015-01-06 | Experian Technology Ltd. | Systems and methods of assisted strategy design |
US8930979B2 (en) | 2010-11-11 | 2015-01-06 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for identifying and characterizing latency in a content delivery network |
US9886727B2 (en) | 2010-11-11 | 2018-02-06 | Ikorongo Technology, LLC | Automatic check-ins and status updates |
US8554627B2 (en) | 2010-11-11 | 2013-10-08 | Teaneck Enterprises, Llc | User generated photo ads used as status updates |
US8484186B1 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2013-07-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Personalized people finder |
US10148623B2 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2018-12-04 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods ensuring data privacy in a content distribution network |
US8775794B2 (en) | 2010-11-15 | 2014-07-08 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | System and method for end to end encryption |
US9147042B1 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2015-09-29 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
CN103404193B (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2018-06-05 | 七网络有限责任公司 | The connection that adjustment data transmission is established with the transmission being optimized for through wireless network |
EP3422775A1 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2019-01-02 | Seven Networks, LLC | Optimization of resource polling intervals to satisfy mobile device requests |
US20120137317A1 (en) * | 2010-11-30 | 2012-05-31 | Kirill Elizarov | Media information system and method |
CN102542474B (en) | 2010-12-07 | 2015-10-21 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Result ranking method and device |
KR101763304B1 (en) * | 2010-12-09 | 2017-07-31 | 삼성전자주식회사 | System and method for providing advertisement |
US9021537B2 (en) | 2010-12-09 | 2015-04-28 | Netflix, Inc. | Pre-buffering audio streams |
US8918465B2 (en) | 2010-12-14 | 2014-12-23 | Liveperson, Inc. | Authentication of service requests initiated from a social networking site |
US9350598B2 (en) | 2010-12-14 | 2016-05-24 | Liveperson, Inc. | Authentication of service requests using a communications initiation feature |
WO2012087954A2 (en) | 2010-12-20 | 2012-06-28 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to determine media impressions using distributed demographic information |
US9204200B2 (en) * | 2010-12-23 | 2015-12-01 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Electronic programming guide (EPG) affinity clusters |
US9230019B2 (en) | 2010-12-23 | 2016-01-05 | Virtuanet Llc | Semantic information processing |
US9736524B2 (en) | 2011-01-06 | 2017-08-15 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods of and systems for content search based on environment sampling |
WO2012094675A2 (en) | 2011-01-07 | 2012-07-12 | Seven Networks, Inc. | System and method for reduction of mobile network traffic used for domain name system (dns) queries |
US20120197891A1 (en) * | 2011-01-27 | 2012-08-02 | Electronic Entertainment Design And Research | Genre discovery engines |
US20120215793A1 (en) * | 2011-02-08 | 2012-08-23 | Neuralitic Systems | Method and system for matching segment profiles to a device identified by a privacy-compliant identifier |
US9602414B2 (en) | 2011-02-09 | 2017-03-21 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for controlled bandwidth reclamation |
US9037637B2 (en) | 2011-02-15 | 2015-05-19 | J.D. Power And Associates | Dual blind method and system for attributing activity to a user |
US8543515B2 (en) | 2011-02-25 | 2013-09-24 | Career Management Solutions, Llc | System and method for social recruiting |
US8788849B2 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2014-07-22 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for protecting cached streams |
EP2686779A4 (en) | 2011-03-18 | 2014-09-17 | Nielsen Co Us Llc | Methods and apparatus to determine media impressions |
US8719213B2 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2014-05-06 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Contextually transformed learning layer |
US8600926B2 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2013-12-03 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Integrated interest and expertise-based discovery system and method |
US8843433B2 (en) | 2011-03-29 | 2014-09-23 | Manyworlds, Inc. | Integrated search and adaptive discovery system and method |
US9131343B2 (en) | 2011-03-31 | 2015-09-08 | Teaneck Enterprises, Llc | System and method for automated proximity-based social check-ins |
US9420320B2 (en) | 2011-04-01 | 2016-08-16 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture to estimate local market audiences of media content |
US9063927B2 (en) | 2011-04-06 | 2015-06-23 | Citizennet Inc. | Short message age classification |
US20120259676A1 (en) | 2011-04-07 | 2012-10-11 | Wagner John G | Methods and apparatus to model consumer choice sourcing |
US8972267B2 (en) * | 2011-04-07 | 2015-03-03 | Sony Corporation | Controlling audio video display device (AVDD) tuning using channel name |
EP2700019B1 (en) | 2011-04-19 | 2019-03-27 | Seven Networks, LLC | Social caching for device resource sharing and management |
US8635220B2 (en) | 2011-04-22 | 2014-01-21 | Iris.Tv, Inc. | Digital content curation and distribution system and method |
US8621075B2 (en) | 2011-04-27 | 2013-12-31 | Seven Metworks, Inc. | Detecting and preserving state for satisfying application requests in a distributed proxy and cache system |
GB2496537B (en) | 2011-04-27 | 2014-10-15 | Seven Networks Inc | System and method for making requests on behalf of a mobile device based on atmoic processes for mobile network traffic relief |
EP2518992A1 (en) * | 2011-04-28 | 2012-10-31 | Axel Springer Digital TV Guide GmbH | Apparatus and method for managing a personal channel |
US9558519B1 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2017-01-31 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Exposing reporting cycle information |
US8806545B2 (en) * | 2011-05-05 | 2014-08-12 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Method and system for facilitating demand-driven distribution of content |
US8527351B2 (en) * | 2011-05-11 | 2013-09-03 | Brian C. Wiles | Integrated digital broadcasting system, network, and methods |
US8676937B2 (en) | 2011-05-12 | 2014-03-18 | Jeffrey Alan Rapaport | Social-topical adaptive networking (STAN) system allowing for group based contextual transaction offers and acceptances and hot topic watchdogging |
TWI560634B (en) * | 2011-05-13 | 2016-12-01 | Univ Nat Taiwan Science Tech | Generating method for transaction modes with indicators for option |
KR20140033412A (en) | 2011-05-17 | 2014-03-18 | 웹튜너 코포레이션 | System and method for scalable, high accuracy, sensor and id based audience measurement system |
JP2014519276A (en) | 2011-05-24 | 2014-08-07 | ウエブチユーナー・コーポレイシヨン | System and method for increasing the efficiency and speed of analysis report generation in an audience measurement system |
JP2014518051A (en) | 2011-05-26 | 2014-07-24 | ウエブチユーナー・コーポレイシヨン | A highly scalable audience measurement system with client event pre-processing |
US9014963B1 (en) | 2012-02-03 | 2015-04-21 | Ubetterknowme.com Inc. | System and method for providing a virtual presence while securely managing and applying user profile data |
US9213675B1 (en) | 2011-05-31 | 2015-12-15 | Ubetterknowme.Com | Consumer incentives using mobile devices with point of sale processing systems and methods |
US8838688B2 (en) * | 2011-05-31 | 2014-09-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Inferring user interests using social network correlation and attribute correlation |
US8892488B2 (en) * | 2011-06-01 | 2014-11-18 | Nec Laboratories America, Inc. | Document classification with weighted supervised n-gram embedding |
US8615776B2 (en) * | 2011-06-03 | 2013-12-24 | Sony Corporation | Video searching using TV and user interface therefor |
US8589982B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2013-11-19 | Sony Corporation | Video searching using TV and user interfaces therefor |
US9112623B2 (en) | 2011-06-06 | 2015-08-18 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Asynchronous interaction at specific points in content |
US9154813B2 (en) | 2011-06-09 | 2015-10-06 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Multiple video content in a composite video stream |
US8825620B1 (en) | 2011-06-13 | 2014-09-02 | A9.Com, Inc. | Behavioral word segmentation for use in processing search queries |
WO2012174171A2 (en) | 2011-06-14 | 2012-12-20 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for substituting a media article with alternative media |
US9015746B2 (en) * | 2011-06-17 | 2015-04-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Interest-based video streams |
WO2012174640A1 (en) * | 2011-06-22 | 2012-12-27 | Rogers Communications Inc. | Systems and methods for creating an interest profile for a user |
US8677464B2 (en) | 2011-06-22 | 2014-03-18 | Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Inc. | Systems and methods for managing secure communication sessions with remote devices |
US9262527B2 (en) * | 2011-06-22 | 2016-02-16 | New Jersey Institute Of Technology | Optimized ontology based internet search systems and methods |
EP2727335A4 (en) * | 2011-06-28 | 2015-01-14 | Tata Consultancy Services Ltd | A method and system for context-aware recommendation |
US9049073B2 (en) | 2011-06-28 | 2015-06-02 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for initializing allocations of transport streams based on historical data |
US8949901B2 (en) | 2011-06-29 | 2015-02-03 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Methods and systems for customizing viewing environment preferences in a viewing environment control application |
US8473981B1 (en) | 2011-06-30 | 2013-06-25 | Google Inc. | Augmenting metadata of digital media objects using per object classifiers |
US9785968B1 (en) * | 2011-07-01 | 2017-10-10 | Google Inc. | Selecting content based on user actions and preferences associates with a same time period in a previous year |
US9483606B1 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2016-11-01 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Lifescore |
WO2013008238A1 (en) | 2011-07-12 | 2013-01-17 | Mobli Technologies 2010 Ltd. | Methods and systems of providing visual content editing functions |
US9495465B2 (en) | 2011-07-20 | 2016-11-15 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for providing the identification of geographically closest article dispensing machines |
EP2737742A4 (en) | 2011-07-27 | 2015-01-28 | Seven Networks Inc | Automatic generation and distribution of policy information regarding malicious mobile traffic in a wireless network |
US9240010B2 (en) | 2011-07-28 | 2016-01-19 | Iii Holdings 1, Llc | Systems and methods for generating and using a digital pass |
US9348822B2 (en) | 2011-08-02 | 2016-05-24 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for generating notifications related to new media |
US9002892B2 (en) | 2011-08-07 | 2015-04-07 | CitizenNet, Inc. | Systems and methods for trend detection using frequency analysis |
US20130041750A1 (en) * | 2011-08-12 | 2013-02-14 | Founton Technologies, Ltd. | Method of attention-targeting for online advertisement |
CA2844328A1 (en) | 2011-08-12 | 2013-02-21 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for applying parental control limits from content providers to media content |
CN102956009B (en) | 2011-08-16 | 2017-03-01 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of electronic commerce information based on user behavior recommends method and apparatus |
US8838581B2 (en) * | 2011-08-19 | 2014-09-16 | Facebook, Inc. | Sending notifications about other users with whom a user is likely to interact |
US9959543B2 (en) | 2011-08-19 | 2018-05-01 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for aggregating ratings for media content |
CA2845573C (en) | 2011-08-19 | 2020-11-03 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for importing ratings for media content |
US8621499B2 (en) * | 2011-08-19 | 2013-12-31 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Content recommendation using subsequence profiling |
US10068257B1 (en) | 2011-08-23 | 2018-09-04 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Personalized group recommendations |
US9043846B2 (en) * | 2011-08-30 | 2015-05-26 | Lvmexis Corporation | Inflight entertainment system with selectively preloaded seat end video caches |
US10599620B2 (en) * | 2011-09-01 | 2020-03-24 | Full Circle Insights, Inc. | Method and system for object synchronization in CRM systems |
US10621206B2 (en) | 2012-04-19 | 2020-04-14 | Full Circle Insights, Inc. | Method and system for recording responses in a CRM system |
EP2568396A1 (en) * | 2011-09-08 | 2013-03-13 | Axel Springer Digital TV Guide GmbH | Method and apparatus for generating a sorted list of items |
CN103077179B (en) * | 2011-09-12 | 2016-08-31 | 克利特股份有限公司 | For showing the computer implemented method of the personal time line of the user of social networks, computer system and computer-readable medium thereof |
US20130067349A1 (en) * | 2011-09-12 | 2013-03-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Efficiently providing data from a virtualized data source |
US20130073356A1 (en) * | 2011-09-18 | 2013-03-21 | Thomas E. Cooper | Method and system of sponsored publishing |
US8983905B2 (en) | 2011-10-03 | 2015-03-17 | Apple Inc. | Merging playlists from multiple sources |
US20130085858A1 (en) * | 2011-10-04 | 2013-04-04 | Richard Bill Sim | Targeting advertisements based on user interactions |
US20130097124A1 (en) * | 2011-10-12 | 2013-04-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Automatically aggregating contact information |
US9253282B2 (en) | 2011-10-18 | 2016-02-02 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for generating, using, or updating an enriched user profile |
US20130097416A1 (en) * | 2011-10-18 | 2013-04-18 | Google Inc. | Dynamic profile switching |
US20140282636A1 (en) * | 2011-10-24 | 2014-09-18 | National Ict Australia Limited | Mobile Content Delivery System with Recommendation-Based Pre-Fetching |
US8869208B2 (en) * | 2011-10-30 | 2014-10-21 | Google Inc. | Computing similarity between media programs |
US11030562B1 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2021-06-08 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Pre-data breach monitoring |
US8856843B1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2014-10-07 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Method and system for adding local channels and program guide data at a user receiving device in an aggregated content distribution system |
US8811177B1 (en) | 2011-11-03 | 2014-08-19 | Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. | Method and system for implementing a network analysis tool for endpoints deployments |
US9179171B2 (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2015-11-03 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Content recommendation for a unified catalog |
JP5863423B2 (en) * | 2011-11-30 | 2016-02-16 | キヤノン株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and program |
US9386332B2 (en) * | 2011-12-05 | 2016-07-05 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Multi-screen video |
WO2013086214A1 (en) | 2011-12-06 | 2013-06-13 | Seven Networks, Inc. | A system of redundantly clustered machines to provide failover mechanisms for mobile traffic management and network resource conservation |
US8934414B2 (en) | 2011-12-06 | 2015-01-13 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Cellular or WiFi mobile traffic optimization based on public or private network destination |
WO2013086447A1 (en) | 2011-12-07 | 2013-06-13 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Radio-awareness of mobile device for sending server-side control signals using a wireless network optimized transport protocol |
US9208123B2 (en) | 2011-12-07 | 2015-12-08 | Seven Networks, Llc | Mobile device having content caching mechanisms integrated with a network operator for traffic alleviation in a wireless network and methods therefor |
US8751800B1 (en) | 2011-12-12 | 2014-06-10 | Google Inc. | DRM provider interoperability |
US9253163B2 (en) * | 2011-12-12 | 2016-02-02 | Tekelec, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for encrypting diameter identification information in a communication network |
WO2013090834A1 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2013-06-20 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Operation modes for mobile traffic optimization and concurrent management of optimized and non-optimized traffic |
WO2013090821A1 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2013-06-20 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Hierarchies and categories for management and deployment of policies for distributed wireless traffic optimization |
EP2792188B1 (en) | 2011-12-14 | 2019-03-20 | Seven Networks, LLC | Mobile network reporting and usage analytics system and method using aggregation of data in a distributed traffic optimization system |
US9967621B2 (en) | 2011-12-15 | 2018-05-08 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Dynamic personalized program content |
US8538333B2 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2013-09-17 | Arbitron Inc. | Media exposure linking utilizing bluetooth signal characteristics |
CN103164804B (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2016-11-23 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | The information-pushing method of a kind of personalization and device |
EP2608137A3 (en) | 2011-12-19 | 2013-07-24 | Gface GmbH | Computer-implemented method for selectively displaying content to a user of a social network, computer system and computer readable medium thereof |
US9342612B2 (en) * | 2011-12-19 | 2016-05-17 | Facebook, Inc. | Personalized bookmarks for social networking system actions based on user activity |
US20130166282A1 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2013-06-27 | Federated Media Publishing, Llc | Method and apparatus for rating documents and authors |
WO2013095248A1 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) | Method and processor for 3d scene representation |
US8805418B2 (en) | 2011-12-23 | 2014-08-12 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Methods and systems for performing actions based on location-based rules |
US20140006053A1 (en) * | 2011-12-29 | 2014-01-02 | Netclinic, Inc. | Individualized health product identification and management system |
US9218122B2 (en) | 2011-12-29 | 2015-12-22 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for transferring settings across devices based on user gestures |
US9055311B1 (en) * | 2012-01-03 | 2015-06-09 | Google Inc. | Providing a program listing |
WO2013103988A1 (en) | 2012-01-05 | 2013-07-11 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Detection and management of user interactions with foreground applications on a mobile device in distributed caching |
US9098510B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2015-08-04 | Arrabon Management Services, LLC | Methods and systems for identifying and accessing multimedia content |
US9026544B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2015-05-05 | Arrabon Management Services, LLC | Method and system for identifying and accessing multimedia content |
US8996543B2 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2015-03-31 | Arrabon Management Services, LLC | Method and system for identifying and accessing multimedia content |
US8965908B1 (en) | 2012-01-24 | 2015-02-24 | Arrabon Management Services Llc | Methods and systems for identifying and accessing multimedia content |
US9203864B2 (en) | 2012-02-02 | 2015-12-01 | Seven Networks, Llc | Dynamic categorization of applications for network access in a mobile network |
US9326189B2 (en) | 2012-02-03 | 2016-04-26 | Seven Networks, Llc | User as an end point for profiling and optimizing the delivery of content and data in a wireless network |
US8341101B1 (en) | 2012-02-08 | 2012-12-25 | Adam Treiser | Determining relationships between data items and individuals, and dynamically calculating a metric score based on groups of characteristics |
US11100523B2 (en) | 2012-02-08 | 2021-08-24 | Gatsby Technologies, LLC | Determining relationship values |
US8478702B1 (en) | 2012-02-08 | 2013-07-02 | Adam Treiser | Tools and methods for determining semantic relationship indexes |
US8943004B2 (en) | 2012-02-08 | 2015-01-27 | Adam Treiser | Tools and methods for determining relationship values |
US8943002B2 (en) | 2012-02-10 | 2015-01-27 | Liveperson, Inc. | Analytics driven engagement |
US9015255B2 (en) | 2012-02-14 | 2015-04-21 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to identify session users with cookie information |
US9141924B2 (en) * | 2012-02-17 | 2015-09-22 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating recommendations for staffing a project team |
US9426123B2 (en) | 2012-02-23 | 2016-08-23 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for content distribution to packet-enabled devices via a network bridge |
US8972357B2 (en) | 2012-02-24 | 2015-03-03 | Placed, Inc. | System and method for data collection to validate location data |
US11734712B2 (en) | 2012-02-24 | 2023-08-22 | Foursquare Labs, Inc. | Attributing in-store visits to media consumption based on data collected from user devices |
US9836770B2 (en) | 2012-02-24 | 2017-12-05 | Ad Persistence, Llc | Data capture for user interaction with promotional materials |
US8805941B2 (en) | 2012-03-06 | 2014-08-12 | Liveperson, Inc. | Occasionally-connected computing interface |
US9253176B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2016-02-02 | Intralinks, Inc. | Computerized method and system for managing secure content sharing in a networked secure collaborative exchange environment |
US9148417B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2015-09-29 | Intralinks, Inc. | Computerized method and system for managing amendment voting in a networked secure collaborative exchange environment |
US9251360B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2016-02-02 | Intralinks, Inc. | Computerized method and system for managing secure mobile device content viewing in a networked secure collaborative exchange environment |
US8978079B2 (en) | 2012-03-23 | 2015-03-10 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for managing delivery of content in a network with limited bandwidth using pre-caching |
US8875009B1 (en) * | 2012-03-23 | 2014-10-28 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Analyzing links for NCX navigation |
US8839299B2 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2014-09-16 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for updating content channels |
US9571869B2 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2017-02-14 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for content channels based on selection criteria |
US20130263173A1 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2013-10-03 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for content channels providing selected access |
US10616782B2 (en) | 2012-03-29 | 2020-04-07 | Mgage, Llc | Cross-channel user tracking systems, methods and devices |
US8584156B2 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2013-11-12 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for manipulating content channels |
US9215484B2 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2015-12-15 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for content channels |
US8566165B1 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2013-10-22 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | Performance-efficient system and method for sampling users for population-centric activity modeling |
US9659093B1 (en) * | 2012-04-02 | 2017-05-23 | Google Inc. | Adaptive recommendations of user-generated mediasets |
US9467723B2 (en) | 2012-04-04 | 2016-10-11 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for automated highlight reel creation in a content delivery network |
US8812695B2 (en) | 2012-04-09 | 2014-08-19 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Method and system for management of a virtual network connection without heartbeat messages |
WO2013155208A1 (en) | 2012-04-10 | 2013-10-17 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Intelligent customer service/call center services enhanced using real-time and historical mobile application and traffic-related statistics collected by a distributed caching system in a mobile network |
US8997143B2 (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2015-03-31 | This Technology, Inc. | Data boundary manager for addressable advertising |
US9078040B2 (en) | 2012-04-12 | 2015-07-07 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for enabling media options in a content delivery network |
US9563336B2 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2017-02-07 | Liveperson, Inc. | Dynamic user interface customization |
US9197937B1 (en) | 2012-04-26 | 2015-11-24 | Music Choice | Automatic on-demand navigation based on meta-data broadcast with media content |
US9053497B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2015-06-09 | CitizenNet, Inc. | Systems and methods for targeting advertising to groups with strong ties within an online social network |
US9553860B2 (en) | 2012-04-27 | 2017-01-24 | Intralinks, Inc. | Email effectivity facility in a networked secure collaborative exchange environment |
US9449089B2 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2016-09-20 | Pixability, Inc. | Methods and systems for identifying distribution opportunities |
US9853959B1 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2017-12-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Storage and maintenance of personal data |
WO2013166588A1 (en) | 2012-05-08 | 2013-11-14 | Bitstrips Inc. | System and method for adaptable avatars |
WO2013170187A2 (en) * | 2012-05-11 | 2013-11-14 | Ripple Commerce, Inc. | Consumer-initiated demand-driven interactive marketplace |
US9672196B2 (en) | 2012-05-15 | 2017-06-06 | Liveperson, Inc. | Methods and systems for presenting specialized content using campaign metrics |
US20130311234A1 (en) * | 2012-05-18 | 2013-11-21 | Jeff Lloyd | Demand-based offerings for sale |
US9747253B2 (en) | 2012-06-05 | 2017-08-29 | Redbox Automated Retail, Llc | System and method for simultaneous article retrieval and transaction validation |
AU2013204865B2 (en) | 2012-06-11 | 2015-07-09 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to share online media impressions data |
US20130339334A1 (en) * | 2012-06-15 | 2013-12-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Personalized search engine results |
US9947004B2 (en) | 2012-06-28 | 2018-04-17 | Green Dot Corporation | Wireless client transaction systems and related methods |
KR101392936B1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-05-09 | 한국과학기술연구원 | User Customizable Interface System and Implementing Method thereof |
US9361392B1 (en) * | 2012-07-05 | 2016-06-07 | Microstrategy Incorporated | Comparing subsets of user identities of a social networking platform |
US9854280B2 (en) | 2012-07-10 | 2017-12-26 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for selective enforcement of secondary content viewing |
US20150208109A1 (en) * | 2012-07-12 | 2015-07-23 | Alexandre CHTCHENTININE | Systems, methods and apparatus for providing multimedia content to hair and beauty clients |
US20140019322A1 (en) | 2012-07-13 | 2014-01-16 | Green Dot Corporation | Mobile banking systems and related methods |
US8775631B2 (en) | 2012-07-13 | 2014-07-08 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Dynamic bandwidth adjustment for browsing or streaming activity in a wireless network based on prediction of user behavior when interacting with mobile applications |
US8849804B1 (en) | 2012-08-10 | 2014-09-30 | Google Inc. | Distributing interest categories within a hierarchical classification |
US9282366B2 (en) | 2012-08-13 | 2016-03-08 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to communicate audience measurement information |
US20140067472A1 (en) * | 2012-08-29 | 2014-03-06 | State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | System and Method For Segmenting A Customer Base |
AU2013204953B2 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2016-09-08 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to collect distributed user information for media impressions |
US9087044B2 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2015-07-21 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | Establishing “is a” relationships for a taxonomy |
US8862155B2 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2014-10-14 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for enabling location-based services within a premises |
US10140372B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2018-11-27 | Gracenote, Inc. | User profile based on clustering tiered descriptors |
US20140082645A1 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2014-03-20 | Peter Stern | Apparatus and methods for providing enhanced or interactive features |
US9081778B2 (en) | 2012-09-25 | 2015-07-14 | Audible Magic Corporation | Using digital fingerprints to associate data with a work |
US8554873B1 (en) * | 2012-10-05 | 2013-10-08 | Google Inc. | Custom event and attraction suggestions |
US9130945B2 (en) | 2012-10-12 | 2015-09-08 | Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. | Detection and response to unauthorized access to a communication device |
US9300742B2 (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2016-03-29 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Inc. | Buffer ordering based on content access tracking |
US9258353B2 (en) | 2012-10-23 | 2016-02-09 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Multiple buffering orders for digital content item |
US9161258B2 (en) | 2012-10-24 | 2015-10-13 | Seven Networks, Llc | Optimized and selective management of policy deployment to mobile clients in a congested network to prevent further aggravation of network congestion |
US9721263B2 (en) * | 2012-10-26 | 2017-08-01 | Nbcuniversal Media, Llc | Continuously evolving symmetrical object profiles for online advertisement targeting |
US8793236B2 (en) | 2012-11-01 | 2014-07-29 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Method and apparatus using historical influence for success attribution in network site activity |
US11115722B2 (en) | 2012-11-08 | 2021-09-07 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Crowdsourcing supplemental content |
US20140136185A1 (en) * | 2012-11-13 | 2014-05-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sentiment analysis based on demographic analysis |
US10255598B1 (en) | 2012-12-06 | 2019-04-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit card account data extraction |
US9565472B2 (en) | 2012-12-10 | 2017-02-07 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for content transfer protection |
US9131283B2 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2015-09-08 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for multimedia coordination |
US20140177497A1 (en) | 2012-12-20 | 2014-06-26 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Management of mobile device radio state promotion and demotion |
US9147198B2 (en) | 2013-01-10 | 2015-09-29 | Rovi Technologies Corporation | Systems and methods for providing an interface for data driven media placement |
US20140201037A1 (en) * | 2013-01-14 | 2014-07-17 | Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | System and method for purchasing goods for donation to charities |
US9271238B2 (en) | 2013-01-23 | 2016-02-23 | Seven Networks, Llc | Application or context aware fast dormancy |
US9253262B2 (en) | 2013-01-24 | 2016-02-02 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for connecting media devices through web sockets |
US8874761B2 (en) | 2013-01-25 | 2014-10-28 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Signaling optimization in a wireless network for traffic utilizing proprietary and non-proprietary protocols |
US9071677B2 (en) * | 2013-02-12 | 2015-06-30 | Unify Square, Inc. | Enhanced data capture, analysis, and reporting for unified communications |
US9697263B1 (en) | 2013-03-04 | 2017-07-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Consumer data request fulfillment system |
EP3518168A1 (en) * | 2013-03-06 | 2019-07-31 | Arthur J. Zito, Jr. | Multi-media presentation system |
US9848276B2 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2017-12-19 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for auto-configuring a user equipment device with content consumption material |
US8750123B1 (en) | 2013-03-11 | 2014-06-10 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Mobile device equipped with mobile network congestion recognition to make intelligent decisions regarding connecting to an operator network |
US20140282786A1 (en) | 2013-03-12 | 2014-09-18 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for providing and uploading content to personalized network storage |
US9553927B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2017-01-24 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Synchronizing multiple transmissions of content |
US10880609B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-12-29 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Content event messaging |
US9501506B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-11-22 | Google Inc. | Indexing system |
US9795997B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2017-10-24 | United States Postal Service | Systems, methods and devices for item processing |
US9785995B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-10-10 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Method and apparatus for interactive evolutionary algorithms with respondent directed breeding |
US20140279176A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Redfin Corporation | Provision of real-estate market information |
WO2014143729A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Affinnova, Inc. | Method and apparatus for interactive evolutionary optimization of concepts |
US9558508B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-01-31 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Energy-efficient mobile advertising |
US9659058B2 (en) | 2013-03-22 | 2017-05-23 | X1 Discovery, Inc. | Methods and systems for federation of results from search indexing |
US9100772B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2015-08-04 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Method and apparatus for creating a multi-device media presentation |
US9697533B2 (en) | 2013-04-17 | 2017-07-04 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to monitor media presentations |
US9462346B2 (en) * | 2013-04-26 | 2016-10-04 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Customizable channel guide |
US9519914B2 (en) | 2013-04-30 | 2016-12-13 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to determine ratings information for online media presentations |
US9615136B1 (en) * | 2013-05-03 | 2017-04-04 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Video classification |
US9336305B2 (en) | 2013-05-09 | 2016-05-10 | Lexis Nexis, A Division Of Reed Elsevier Inc. | Systems and methods for generating issue networks |
FR2996979A1 (en) * | 2013-05-17 | 2014-04-18 | Continental Automotive France | Method for selecting e.g. multimedia content source, involves comparing source profiles with user profile to determine scores indicating proximity between content sources and user's taste, and proposing selection of source having best score |
US20140359648A1 (en) * | 2013-05-29 | 2014-12-04 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | History record and proxy rating for media recommendations |
US9705831B2 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2017-07-11 | Snap Inc. | Apparatus and method for maintaining a message thread with opt-in permanence for entries |
US10439972B1 (en) | 2013-05-30 | 2019-10-08 | Snap Inc. | Apparatus and method for maintaining a message thread with opt-in permanence for entries |
US9880983B2 (en) | 2013-06-04 | 2018-01-30 | X1 Discovery, Inc. | Methods and systems for uniquely identifying digital content for eDiscovery |
US9483568B1 (en) | 2013-06-05 | 2016-11-01 | Google Inc. | Indexing system |
US9454726B1 (en) * | 2013-06-06 | 2016-09-27 | Google Inc. | Systems and methods for cohort identification and reporting |
US9477973B2 (en) | 2013-06-25 | 2016-10-25 | International Business Machines | Visually generated consumer product presentation |
US10068246B2 (en) | 2013-07-12 | 2018-09-04 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to collect distributed user information for media impressions |
AU2014290148A1 (en) * | 2013-07-16 | 2016-02-11 | Pinterest, Inc. | Object based contextual menu controls |
US9282066B2 (en) | 2013-07-18 | 2016-03-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Targeted message response |
US9065765B2 (en) | 2013-07-22 | 2015-06-23 | Seven Networks, Inc. | Proxy server associated with a mobile carrier for enhancing mobile traffic management in a mobile network |
US9705617B2 (en) * | 2013-08-08 | 2017-07-11 | Massoud Alibakhsh | System and method for wirelessly transmitting and receiving customized data broadcasts |
US20150046419A1 (en) * | 2013-08-12 | 2015-02-12 | Vidmind Ltd. | Method of sorting search results by recommendation engine |
US9313294B2 (en) | 2013-08-12 | 2016-04-12 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to de-duplicate impression information |
US8886671B1 (en) | 2013-08-14 | 2014-11-11 | Advent Software, Inc. | Multi-tenant in-memory database (MUTED) system and method |
US10333882B2 (en) | 2013-08-28 | 2019-06-25 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to estimate demographics of users employing social media |
US20150062660A1 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | Toshiba Tec Kabushiki Kaisha | File management apparatus and file management method |
US10080060B2 (en) | 2013-09-10 | 2018-09-18 | Opentv, Inc. | Systems and methods of displaying content |
US9659306B1 (en) | 2013-09-20 | 2017-05-23 | Intuit Inc. | Method and system for linking social media systems and financial management systems to provide social group-based marketing programs |
US9332035B2 (en) | 2013-10-10 | 2016-05-03 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to measure exposure to streaming media |
US20150112818A1 (en) | 2013-10-22 | 2015-04-23 | Google Inc. | Content item selection criteria generation |
US9674563B2 (en) | 2013-11-04 | 2017-06-06 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for recommending content |
US11341572B2 (en) * | 2013-11-08 | 2022-05-24 | Refinitiv Us Organization Llc | Fair credit screened market data distribution |
US9485543B2 (en) * | 2013-11-12 | 2016-11-01 | Google Inc. | Methods, systems, and media for presenting suggestions of media content |
US9552395B2 (en) | 2013-11-13 | 2017-01-24 | Google Inc. | Methods, systems, and media for presenting recommended media content items |
WO2015073708A1 (en) | 2013-11-14 | 2015-05-21 | Intralinks, Inc. | Litigation support in cloud-hosted file sharing and collaboration |
US10102536B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2018-10-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Micro-geographic aggregation system |
US9788061B2 (en) | 2013-11-19 | 2017-10-10 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Methods and systems for recommending media content related to a recently completed activity |
US9426538B2 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2016-08-23 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | Method and apparatus for presenting advertising in content having an emotional context |
US9407676B2 (en) | 2013-11-25 | 2016-08-02 | At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp | Method and apparatus for distributing media content |
US9529851B1 (en) | 2013-12-02 | 2016-12-27 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Server architecture for electronic data quality processing |
KR20150069355A (en) * | 2013-12-13 | 2015-06-23 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Display device and method for controlling the same |
US10956947B2 (en) | 2013-12-23 | 2021-03-23 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to measure media using media object characteristics |
WO2015099745A1 (en) * | 2013-12-26 | 2015-07-02 | Thomson Licensing | Multiple profile user interface |
US9852163B2 (en) | 2013-12-30 | 2017-12-26 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to de-duplicate impression information |
US9237138B2 (en) | 2013-12-31 | 2016-01-12 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to collect distributed user information for media impressions and search terms |
US20150193816A1 (en) | 2014-01-06 | 2015-07-09 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to correct misattributions of media impressions |
US10147114B2 (en) | 2014-01-06 | 2018-12-04 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to correct audience measurement data |
JP6399382B2 (en) * | 2014-01-08 | 2018-10-03 | パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 | Authentication system |
US9628950B1 (en) | 2014-01-12 | 2017-04-18 | Investment Asset Holdings Llc | Location-based messaging |
IN2014MU00140A (en) | 2014-01-15 | 2015-08-28 | Whats On India Media Private Ltd | |
EP3105931A4 (en) * | 2014-02-10 | 2017-08-23 | LG Electronics Inc. | Apparatus for transmitting broadcast signals, apparatus for receiving broadcast signals, method for transmitting broadcast signals and method for receiving broadcast signals |
US10262362B1 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2019-04-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automatic generation of code for attributes |
US9264656B2 (en) | 2014-02-26 | 2016-02-16 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing storage space |
US20210182749A1 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2021-06-17 | Dt360 Inc. | Method of predicting component failure in drive train assembly of wind turbines |
US20150262095A1 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Bahwan CyberTek Private Limited | Intelligent Decision Synchronization in Real Time for both Discrete and Continuous Process Industries |
US10902368B2 (en) * | 2014-03-12 | 2021-01-26 | Dt360 Inc. | Intelligent decision synchronization in real time for both discrete and continuous process industries |
GB2539588A (en) | 2014-03-13 | 2016-12-21 | Nielsen Co Us Llc | Methods and apparatus to compensate impression data for misattribution and/or non-coverage by a database proprietor |
US9953330B2 (en) | 2014-03-13 | 2018-04-24 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods, apparatus and computer readable media to generate electronic mobile measurement census data |
US10929858B1 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2021-02-23 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Systems and methods for managing customer data |
US9432477B2 (en) * | 2014-03-31 | 2016-08-30 | Zefr, Inc. | Identifying matching video content |
US11386442B2 (en) | 2014-03-31 | 2022-07-12 | Liveperson, Inc. | Online behavioral predictor |
WO2015159303A2 (en) | 2014-04-02 | 2015-10-22 | Whats On India Media Private Limited | A method and system for customer management |
US9653115B2 (en) | 2014-04-10 | 2017-05-16 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Systems and methods for creating linear video from branched video |
WO2015160332A1 (en) * | 2014-04-15 | 2015-10-22 | Empire Technology Development Llc | Preview determination |
US9613190B2 (en) | 2014-04-23 | 2017-04-04 | Intralinks, Inc. | Systems and methods of secure data exchange |
US10679151B2 (en) | 2014-04-28 | 2020-06-09 | Altair Engineering, Inc. | Unit-based licensing for third party access of digital content |
US9898685B2 (en) | 2014-04-29 | 2018-02-20 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method and apparatus for analyzing media content |
US9699499B2 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2017-07-04 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to measure exposure to streaming media |
CN103957435B (en) * | 2014-05-05 | 2017-05-31 | 中国科学院声学研究所 | The processing method of media resource information, device and system |
US9576030B1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2017-02-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Keeping up with the joneses |
US9276886B1 (en) | 2014-05-09 | 2016-03-01 | Snapchat, Inc. | Apparatus and method for dynamically configuring application component tiles |
JP2015215853A (en) * | 2014-05-13 | 2015-12-03 | 株式会社リコー | System, image processor, image processing method and program |
US9537811B2 (en) | 2014-10-02 | 2017-01-03 | Snap Inc. | Ephemeral gallery of ephemeral messages |
US9396354B1 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2016-07-19 | Snapchat, Inc. | Apparatus and method for automated privacy protection in distributed images |
US9288521B2 (en) | 2014-05-28 | 2016-03-15 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for updating media asset data based on pause point in the media asset |
US9621940B2 (en) | 2014-05-29 | 2017-04-11 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for recording, accessing, and delivering packetized content |
KR101832781B1 (en) * | 2014-06-03 | 2018-02-27 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Broadcast signal transmission device, broadcast signal reception device, broadcast signal transmission method and broadcast signal reception method |
EP2953085A1 (en) | 2014-06-05 | 2015-12-09 | Mobli Technologies 2010 Ltd. | Web document enhancement |
CN105302807B (en) * | 2014-06-06 | 2020-01-10 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Method and device for acquiring information category |
US9113301B1 (en) | 2014-06-13 | 2015-08-18 | Snapchat, Inc. | Geo-location based event gallery |
US9225897B1 (en) | 2014-07-07 | 2015-12-29 | Snapchat, Inc. | Apparatus and method for supplying content aware photo filters |
US20160019667A1 (en) * | 2014-07-15 | 2016-01-21 | Meshal Sager Mohammed ALOTAIBI | Apparatus and method for performing social work |
US10311464B2 (en) | 2014-07-17 | 2019-06-04 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to determine impressions corresponding to market segments |
US20170011421A1 (en) * | 2014-07-29 | 2017-01-12 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Preference analyzing system |
US10346550B1 (en) | 2014-08-28 | 2019-07-09 | X1 Discovery, Inc. | Methods and systems for searching and indexing virtual environments |
US20160063539A1 (en) | 2014-08-29 | 2016-03-03 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to associate transactions with media impressions |
US9736503B1 (en) * | 2014-09-12 | 2017-08-15 | Google Inc. | Optimizing timing of display of a mid-roll video advertisement based on viewer retention data |
US10423983B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2019-09-24 | Snap Inc. | Determining targeting information based on a predictive targeting model |
US10824654B2 (en) | 2014-09-18 | 2020-11-03 | Snap Inc. | Geolocation-based pictographs |
US11216869B2 (en) | 2014-09-23 | 2022-01-04 | Snap Inc. | User interface to augment an image using geolocation |
US10028025B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2018-07-17 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for enabling presence-based and use-based services |
US20160098577A1 (en) * | 2014-10-02 | 2016-04-07 | Stuart H. Lacey | Systems and Methods for Context-Based Permissioning of Personally Identifiable Information |
US10284508B1 (en) | 2014-10-02 | 2019-05-07 | Snap Inc. | Ephemeral gallery of ephemeral messages with opt-in permanence |
US9792957B2 (en) | 2014-10-08 | 2017-10-17 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Systems and methods for dynamic video bookmarking |
US11412276B2 (en) | 2014-10-10 | 2022-08-09 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Systems and methods for parallel track transitions |
US11783382B2 (en) | 2014-10-22 | 2023-10-10 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Systems and methods for curating content metadata |
US10219027B1 (en) | 2014-10-24 | 2019-02-26 | Music Choice | System for providing music content to a user |
US9877057B2 (en) | 2014-10-28 | 2018-01-23 | Echostar Technologies L.L.C. | Addressable content distribution systems and methods |
US9743127B2 (en) * | 2014-10-30 | 2017-08-22 | Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. | Media service user interface systems and methods |
US10373409B2 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2019-08-06 | Intellicheck, Inc. | Identification scan in compliance with jurisdictional or other rules |
AU2015343339A1 (en) | 2014-11-03 | 2017-06-15 | Genentech, Inc. | Methods and biomarkers for predicting efficacy and evaluation of an OX40 agonist treatment |
US9015285B1 (en) | 2014-11-12 | 2015-04-21 | Snapchat, Inc. | User interface for accessing media at a geographic location |
US11392629B2 (en) * | 2014-11-18 | 2022-07-19 | Oracle International Corporation | Term selection from a document to find similar content |
US10311916B2 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-06-04 | Snap Inc. | Gallery of videos set to an audio time line |
US9385983B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2016-07-05 | Snapchat, Inc. | Gallery of messages from individuals with a shared interest |
US10242019B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | User behavior segmentation using latent topic detection |
US20160189182A1 (en) | 2014-12-31 | 2016-06-30 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to correct age misattribution in media impressions |
US9754355B2 (en) | 2015-01-09 | 2017-09-05 | Snap Inc. | Object recognition based photo filters |
US10333696B2 (en) | 2015-01-12 | 2019-06-25 | X-Prime, Inc. | Systems and methods for implementing an efficient, scalable homomorphic transformation of encrypted data with minimal data expansion and improved processing efficiency |
US11388226B1 (en) | 2015-01-13 | 2022-07-12 | Snap Inc. | Guided personal identity based actions |
US10133705B1 (en) | 2015-01-19 | 2018-11-20 | Snap Inc. | Multichannel system |
US9521515B2 (en) | 2015-01-26 | 2016-12-13 | Mobli Technologies 2010 Ltd. | Content request by location |
WO2016123205A1 (en) * | 2015-01-28 | 2016-08-04 | Hahn Bruce C | Deep reading machine and method |
US9294425B1 (en) | 2015-02-06 | 2016-03-22 | Snapchat, Inc. | Storage and processing of ephemeral messages |
US10116676B2 (en) | 2015-02-13 | 2018-10-30 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for data collection, analysis and service modification based on online activity |
US9591027B2 (en) * | 2015-02-17 | 2017-03-07 | Qualys, Inc. | Advanced asset tracking and correlation |
US10380656B2 (en) | 2015-02-27 | 2019-08-13 | Ebay Inc. | Dynamic predefined product reviews |
US10223397B1 (en) | 2015-03-13 | 2019-03-05 | Snap Inc. | Social graph based co-location of network users |
KR102035405B1 (en) | 2015-03-18 | 2019-10-22 | 스냅 인코포레이티드 | Geo-Fence Authorized Provisioning |
US9692967B1 (en) | 2015-03-23 | 2017-06-27 | Snap Inc. | Systems and methods for reducing boot time and power consumption in camera systems |
US9392324B1 (en) | 2015-03-30 | 2016-07-12 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for identifying and storing a portion of a media asset |
RU2015111633A (en) | 2015-03-31 | 2016-10-20 | Общество С Ограниченной Ответственностью "Яндекс" | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING INDICATORS OF ACTIVITY RELATED TO USER, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR COMMUNICATION OF THE FIRST ELEMENT AND SECOND ELEMENT |
US10147108B2 (en) | 2015-04-02 | 2018-12-04 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to identify affinity between segment attributes and product characteristics |
US10147079B2 (en) | 2015-04-14 | 2018-12-04 | Square, Inc. | Open ticket payment handling with offline mode |
US9881094B2 (en) | 2015-05-05 | 2018-01-30 | Snap Inc. | Systems and methods for automated local story generation and curation |
US10135949B1 (en) | 2015-05-05 | 2018-11-20 | Snap Inc. | Systems and methods for story and sub-story navigation |
KR20180004218A (en) | 2015-05-06 | 2018-01-10 | 스냅 인코포레이티드 | Systems and methods for short-term group chat |
CA2988120A1 (en) | 2015-06-02 | 2016-12-08 | Liveperson, Inc. | Dynamic communication routing based on consistency weighting and routing rules |
US10503264B1 (en) | 2015-06-16 | 2019-12-10 | Snap Inc. | Radial gesture navigation |
US9906479B1 (en) | 2015-06-16 | 2018-02-27 | Snap Inc. | Storage management for ephemeral messages |
US10380633B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2019-08-13 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to generate corrected online audience measurement data |
US10045082B2 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2018-08-07 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to correct errors in audience measurements for media accessed using over-the-top devices |
US9967148B2 (en) | 2015-07-09 | 2018-05-08 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for selective diameter topology hiding |
US10993069B2 (en) | 2015-07-16 | 2021-04-27 | Snap Inc. | Dynamically adaptive media content delivery |
US10158983B2 (en) | 2015-07-22 | 2018-12-18 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Providing a summary of media content to a communication device |
US10003841B2 (en) * | 2015-07-27 | 2018-06-19 | Tribune Broadcasting Company, Llc | News production system with dynamic character generator output |
US10033702B2 (en) | 2015-08-05 | 2018-07-24 | Intralinks, Inc. | Systems and methods of secure data exchange |
US10430788B2 (en) | 2015-08-06 | 2019-10-01 | Green Dot Corporation | Systems and methods for fund transfers |
US10817898B2 (en) | 2015-08-13 | 2020-10-27 | Placed, Llc | Determining exposures to content presented by physical objects |
US11121997B1 (en) | 2015-08-24 | 2021-09-14 | Snap Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for determining a non-ephemeral message status in a communication system |
US10616162B1 (en) | 2015-08-24 | 2020-04-07 | Snap Inc. | Systems devices and methods for automatically selecting an ephemeral message availability |
US10460765B2 (en) | 2015-08-26 | 2019-10-29 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Systems and methods for adaptive and responsive video |
US9654841B2 (en) | 2015-08-28 | 2017-05-16 | Echostar Technologies L.L.C. | Apparatus, systems and methods for distribution of addressable content |
US9838754B2 (en) | 2015-09-01 | 2017-12-05 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | On-site measurement of over the top media |
CN106503022B (en) * | 2015-09-08 | 2020-12-01 | 北京邮电大学 | Method and device for pushing recommendation information |
US10157333B1 (en) | 2015-09-15 | 2018-12-18 | Snap Inc. | Systems and methods for content tagging |
US10685055B2 (en) | 2015-09-23 | 2020-06-16 | Altair Engineering, Inc. | Hashtag-playlist content sequence management |
US10013539B1 (en) * | 2015-09-25 | 2018-07-03 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Rapid device identification among multiple users |
US10762484B1 (en) | 2015-09-30 | 2020-09-01 | Square, Inc. | Data structure analytics for real-time recommendations |
US9652896B1 (en) | 2015-10-30 | 2017-05-16 | Snap Inc. | Image based tracking in augmented reality systems |
US10545969B2 (en) * | 2015-11-16 | 2020-01-28 | Facebook, Inc. | Ranking and filtering comments based on audience |
CN105472413B (en) * | 2015-11-19 | 2018-09-04 | 广州创维平面显示科技有限公司 | Method for ordering television channels, system and server |
US10757154B1 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2020-08-25 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Real-time event-based notification system |
US10540176B2 (en) | 2015-11-25 | 2020-01-21 | Sonatype, Inc. | Method and system for controlling software risks for software development |
US11119628B1 (en) | 2015-11-25 | 2021-09-14 | Snap Inc. | Dynamic graphical user interface modification and monitoring |
US10178436B2 (en) * | 2015-11-25 | 2019-01-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method to auto-select media channel programs |
US9984499B1 (en) | 2015-11-30 | 2018-05-29 | Snap Inc. | Image and point cloud based tracking and in augmented reality systems |
US10474321B2 (en) | 2015-11-30 | 2019-11-12 | Snap Inc. | Network resource location linking and visual content sharing |
US10205994B2 (en) | 2015-12-17 | 2019-02-12 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus to collect distributed user information for media impressions |
US10354425B2 (en) | 2015-12-18 | 2019-07-16 | Snap Inc. | Method and system for providing context relevant media augmentation |
US11128853B2 (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2021-09-21 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Seamless transitions in large-scale video |
US11164548B2 (en) | 2015-12-22 | 2021-11-02 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Intelligent buffering of large-scale video |
US10691830B2 (en) | 2015-12-30 | 2020-06-23 | Verimatrix, Inc. | Systems and methods for preserving privacy in distribution of digital content using private tokens |
US11151528B2 (en) | 2015-12-31 | 2021-10-19 | Square, Inc. | Customer-based suggesting for ticket splitting |
US10033736B2 (en) | 2016-01-21 | 2018-07-24 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for remote authentication dial-in user service (radius) topology hiding |
US10270673B1 (en) | 2016-01-27 | 2019-04-23 | The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc | Methods and apparatus for estimating total unique audiences |
US9928230B1 (en) | 2016-09-29 | 2018-03-27 | Vignet Incorporated | Variable and dynamic adjustments to electronic forms |
US9858063B2 (en) | 2016-02-10 | 2018-01-02 | Vignet Incorporated | Publishing customized application modules |
US11023514B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2021-06-01 | Snap Inc. | Methods and systems for generation, curation, and presentation of media collections |
US10404758B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2019-09-03 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for centralized message exchange in a user premises device |
US10285001B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2019-05-07 | Snap Inc. | Generation, curation, and presentation of media collections |
US10679389B2 (en) | 2016-02-26 | 2020-06-09 | Snap Inc. | Methods and systems for generation, curation, and presentation of media collections |
US10212167B2 (en) * | 2016-02-27 | 2019-02-19 | Gryphon Online Safety, Inc. | Method and system to enable controlled safe internet browsing |
US10440025B2 (en) | 2016-06-07 | 2019-10-08 | Gryphon Online Safety, Inc | Remotely controlling access to online content |
US11405399B2 (en) * | 2016-02-27 | 2022-08-02 | Gryphon Online Safety Inc. | Method of protecting mobile devices from vulnerabilities like malware, enabling content filtering, screen time restrictions and other parental control rules while on public network by forwarding the internet traffic to a smart, secured home router |
US11743264B2 (en) | 2016-02-27 | 2023-08-29 | Gryphon Online Safety Inc. | Method of protecting mobile devices from vulnerabilities like malware, enabling content filtering, screen time restrictions and other parental control rules while on public network by forwarding the internet traffic to a smart, secured home router |
US11301572B2 (en) | 2016-02-27 | 2022-04-12 | Gryphon Online Safety, Inc. | Remotely controlling access to online content |
GB2548336B (en) * | 2016-03-08 | 2020-09-02 | Sky Cp Ltd | Media content recommendation |
US10530731B1 (en) | 2016-03-28 | 2020-01-07 | Snap Inc. | Systems and methods for chat with audio and video elements |
US10270839B2 (en) | 2016-03-29 | 2019-04-23 | Snap Inc. | Content collection navigation and autoforwarding |
US10339365B2 (en) | 2016-03-31 | 2019-07-02 | Snap Inc. | Automated avatar generation |
US10686899B2 (en) | 2016-04-06 | 2020-06-16 | Snap Inc. | Messaging achievement pictograph display system |
US11856271B2 (en) | 2016-04-12 | 2023-12-26 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Symbiotic interactive video |
US20170300673A1 (en) * | 2016-04-19 | 2017-10-19 | Brillio LLC | Information apparatus and method for authorizing user of augment reality apparatus |
US10586023B2 (en) | 2016-04-21 | 2020-03-10 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Methods and apparatus for secondary content management and fraud prevention |
US10346871B2 (en) * | 2016-04-22 | 2019-07-09 | Facebook, Inc. | Automatic targeting of content by clustering based on user feedback data |
US9813642B1 (en) | 2016-05-06 | 2017-11-07 | Snap Inc. | Dynamic activity-based image generation |
US10474353B2 (en) | 2016-05-31 | 2019-11-12 | Snap Inc. | Application control using a gesture based trigger |
US10687115B2 (en) | 2016-06-01 | 2020-06-16 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Cloud-based digital content recorder apparatus and methods |
WO2017210618A1 (en) | 2016-06-02 | 2017-12-07 | Fti Consulting, Inc. | Analyzing clusters of coded documents |
CA3027866A1 (en) | 2016-06-15 | 2017-12-21 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Vector-based characterizations of products and individuals with respect to customer service agent assistance |
US10394912B2 (en) * | 2016-06-20 | 2019-08-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | System, method, and recording medium for data mining between private and public domains |
US10805696B1 (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2020-10-13 | Pipbin, Inc. | System for recording and targeting tagged content of user interest |
US10638256B1 (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2020-04-28 | Pipbin, Inc. | System for distribution and display of mobile targeted augmented reality content |
US11785161B1 (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2023-10-10 | Pipbin, Inc. | System for user accessibility of tagged curated augmented reality content |
US11201981B1 (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2021-12-14 | Pipbin, Inc. | System for notification of user accessibility of curated location-dependent content in an augmented estate |
US11876941B1 (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2024-01-16 | Pipbin, Inc. | Clickable augmented reality content manager, system, and network |
US10334134B1 (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2019-06-25 | Maximillian John Suiter | Augmented real estate with location and chattel tagging system and apparatus for virtual diary, scrapbooking, game play, messaging, canvasing, advertising and social interaction |
US11044393B1 (en) | 2016-06-20 | 2021-06-22 | Pipbin, Inc. | System for curation and display of location-dependent augmented reality content in an augmented estate system |
US9681265B1 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2017-06-13 | Snap Inc. | System to track engagement of media items |
US11507977B2 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2022-11-22 | Snap Inc. | Methods and systems for presentation of media collections with automated advertising |
US10430838B1 (en) | 2016-06-28 | 2019-10-01 | Snap Inc. | Methods and systems for generation, curation, and presentation of media collections with automated advertising |
US10733255B1 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2020-08-04 | Snap Inc. | Systems and methods for content navigation with automated curation |
US10182047B1 (en) | 2016-06-30 | 2019-01-15 | Snap Inc. | Pictograph password security system |
US11334768B1 (en) | 2016-07-05 | 2022-05-17 | Snap Inc. | Ephemeral content management |
US10348662B2 (en) | 2016-07-19 | 2019-07-09 | Snap Inc. | Generating customized electronic messaging graphics |
CN109844717B (en) | 2016-08-14 | 2023-05-23 | 利维帕尔森有限公司 | System and method for real-time remote control of mobile applications |
US9971594B2 (en) * | 2016-08-16 | 2018-05-15 | Sonatype, Inc. | Method and system for authoritative name analysis of true origin of a file |
WO2018039377A1 (en) | 2016-08-24 | 2018-03-01 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Disambiguation and authentication of device users |
KR102267482B1 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2021-06-22 | 스냅 인코포레이티드 | Systems and Methods for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping |
US10552968B1 (en) | 2016-09-23 | 2020-02-04 | Snap Inc. | Dense feature scale detection for image matching |
US11212593B2 (en) | 2016-09-27 | 2021-12-28 | Time Warner Cable Enterprises Llc | Apparatus and methods for automated secondary content management in a digital network |
US10223359B2 (en) * | 2016-10-10 | 2019-03-05 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Determining recommended media programming from sparse consumption data |
US10609036B1 (en) | 2016-10-10 | 2020-03-31 | Snap Inc. | Social media post subscribe requests for buffer user accounts |
US9980078B2 (en) | 2016-10-14 | 2018-05-22 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Audio object modification in free-viewpoint rendering |
US10432559B2 (en) | 2016-10-24 | 2019-10-01 | Snap Inc. | Generating and displaying customized avatars in electronic messages |
KR102327511B1 (en) | 2016-11-01 | 2021-11-17 | 스냅 인코포레이티드 | Fast video capture and sensor adjustment |
KR102219304B1 (en) | 2016-11-07 | 2021-02-23 | 스냅 인코포레이티드 | Selective identification and order of image modifiers |
US10911794B2 (en) | 2016-11-09 | 2021-02-02 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for selective secondary content insertion in a digital network |
US10846779B2 (en) | 2016-11-23 | 2020-11-24 | Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC | Custom product categorization of digital media content |
US10798453B2 (en) | 2016-12-06 | 2020-10-06 | The Directv Group, Inc. | Content scheduling |
US10203855B2 (en) | 2016-12-09 | 2019-02-12 | Snap Inc. | Customized user-controlled media overlays |
US10740939B1 (en) | 2016-12-09 | 2020-08-11 | Snap Inc. | Fast image style transfers |
US10860987B2 (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2020-12-08 | Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC | Personalized calendar for digital media content-related events |
CA3047395A1 (en) * | 2016-12-20 | 2018-06-28 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Vector-based optimization of media presentations |
US11050809B2 (en) | 2016-12-30 | 2021-06-29 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Systems and methods for dynamic weighting of branched video paths |
US10846745B1 (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2020-11-24 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Contextual presence |
US10455362B1 (en) | 2016-12-30 | 2019-10-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Contextual presence |
US11616745B2 (en) | 2017-01-09 | 2023-03-28 | Snap Inc. | Contextual generation and selection of customized media content |
US11223668B2 (en) * | 2017-01-12 | 2022-01-11 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Anomaly detection of media event sequences |
US10454857B1 (en) | 2017-01-23 | 2019-10-22 | Snap Inc. | Customized digital avatar accessories |
US11096004B2 (en) | 2017-01-23 | 2021-08-17 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Spatial audio rendering point extension |
CN110383319B (en) | 2017-01-31 | 2023-05-26 | 益百利信息解决方案公司 | Large scale heterogeneous data ingestion and user resolution |
US10915911B2 (en) | 2017-02-03 | 2021-02-09 | Snap Inc. | System to determine a price-schedule to distribute media content |
US11250075B1 (en) | 2017-02-17 | 2022-02-15 | Snap Inc. | Searching social media content |
US10319149B1 (en) | 2017-02-17 | 2019-06-11 | Snap Inc. | Augmented reality anamorphosis system |
US11019001B1 (en) | 2017-02-20 | 2021-05-25 | Snap Inc. | Selective presentation of group messages |
US10374993B2 (en) * | 2017-02-20 | 2019-08-06 | Snap Inc. | Media item attachment system |
US10074381B1 (en) | 2017-02-20 | 2018-09-11 | Snap Inc. | Augmented reality speech balloon system |
US10878837B1 (en) | 2017-03-01 | 2020-12-29 | Snap Inc. | Acoustic neural network scene detection |
US10565795B2 (en) | 2017-03-06 | 2020-02-18 | Snap Inc. | Virtual vision system |
US10523625B1 (en) | 2017-03-09 | 2019-12-31 | Snap Inc. | Restricted group content collection |
US10531219B2 (en) | 2017-03-20 | 2020-01-07 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Smooth rendering of overlapping audio-object interactions |
US10582277B2 (en) | 2017-03-27 | 2020-03-03 | Snap Inc. | Generating a stitched data stream |
US10581782B2 (en) | 2017-03-27 | 2020-03-03 | Snap Inc. | Generating a stitched data stream |
US10091549B1 (en) | 2017-03-30 | 2018-10-02 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Methods and systems for recommending media assets based on the geographic location at which the media assets are frequently consumed |
EP3603086B1 (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2022-04-06 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for creating a virtual channel for binge watching |
US10038929B1 (en) | 2017-03-31 | 2018-07-31 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for creating a virtual channel for binge watching |
US11170393B1 (en) | 2017-04-11 | 2021-11-09 | Snap Inc. | System to calculate an engagement score of location based media content |
CN107103057B (en) * | 2017-04-13 | 2018-09-18 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | A kind of resource supplying method and device |
US10387730B1 (en) | 2017-04-20 | 2019-08-20 | Snap Inc. | Augmented reality typography personalization system |
US10212541B1 (en) | 2017-04-27 | 2019-02-19 | Snap Inc. | Selective location-based identity communication |
US11893647B2 (en) | 2017-04-27 | 2024-02-06 | Snap Inc. | Location-based virtual avatars |
US10382372B1 (en) | 2017-04-27 | 2019-08-13 | Snap Inc. | Processing media content based on original context |
CN110800018A (en) | 2017-04-27 | 2020-02-14 | 斯纳普公司 | Friend location sharing mechanism for social media platform |
US10943255B1 (en) | 2017-04-28 | 2021-03-09 | Snap Inc. | Methods and systems for interactive advertising with media collections |
US10467147B1 (en) | 2017-04-28 | 2019-11-05 | Snap Inc. | Precaching unlockable data elements |
US11074036B2 (en) * | 2017-05-05 | 2021-07-27 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Metadata-free audio-object interactions |
CA3062865A1 (en) * | 2017-05-19 | 2018-11-22 | Liveramp, Inc. | Distributed node cluster for establishing a digital touchpoint across multiple devices on a digital communications network |
US10679428B1 (en) | 2017-05-26 | 2020-06-09 | Snap Inc. | Neural network-based image stream modification |
US10803120B1 (en) | 2017-05-31 | 2020-10-13 | Snap Inc. | Geolocation based playlists |
US10936653B2 (en) | 2017-06-02 | 2021-03-02 | Apple Inc. | Automatically predicting relevant contexts for media items |
KR102027471B1 (en) | 2017-06-20 | 2019-10-01 | 라인 가부시키가이샤 | Method and system for expansion to daily life language by using word vectorization technique based on social network content |
US10788900B1 (en) | 2017-06-29 | 2020-09-29 | Snap Inc. | Pictorial symbol prediction |
EP3422727B1 (en) * | 2017-06-29 | 2020-02-12 | Vestel Elektronik Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. | Method for automated parental control |
US10735183B1 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2020-08-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Symmetric encryption for private smart contracts among multiple parties in a private peer-to-peer network |
WO2019008581A1 (en) | 2017-07-05 | 2019-01-10 | Cortica Ltd. | Driving policies determination |
US11899707B2 (en) | 2017-07-09 | 2024-02-13 | Cortica Ltd. | Driving policies determination |
US10592831B2 (en) * | 2017-07-20 | 2020-03-17 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Methods and systems for recommending actors |
US11216517B1 (en) | 2017-07-31 | 2022-01-04 | Snap Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting user generated content |
US11323398B1 (en) | 2017-07-31 | 2022-05-03 | Snap Inc. | Systems, devices, and methods for progressive attachments |
US11109290B2 (en) | 2017-08-04 | 2021-08-31 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Switching connections over frequency bands of a wireless network |
US11164376B1 (en) | 2017-08-30 | 2021-11-02 | Snap Inc. | Object modeling using light projection |
US9980100B1 (en) | 2017-08-31 | 2018-05-22 | Snap Inc. | Device location based on machine learning classifications |
US11475254B1 (en) | 2017-09-08 | 2022-10-18 | Snap Inc. | Multimodal entity identification |
EP3622716B1 (en) * | 2017-09-14 | 2021-10-27 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing user subscriptions to content sources |
US10474900B2 (en) | 2017-09-15 | 2019-11-12 | Snap Inc. | Real-time tracking-compensated image effects |
US10740974B1 (en) | 2017-09-15 | 2020-08-11 | Snap Inc. | Augmented reality system |
US11715154B2 (en) | 2017-09-22 | 2023-08-01 | Green Dot Corporation | Systems and methods for managing accounts in a financial services system |
US11395087B2 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2022-07-19 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Level-based audio-object interactions |
US10891723B1 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2021-01-12 | Snap Inc. | Realistic neural network based image style transfer |
US10872292B1 (en) | 2017-10-09 | 2020-12-22 | Snap Inc. | Compact neural networks using condensed filters |
US10499191B1 (en) | 2017-10-09 | 2019-12-03 | Snap Inc. | Context sensitive presentation of content |
US20190130082A1 (en) * | 2017-10-26 | 2019-05-02 | Motorola Mobility Llc | Authentication Methods and Devices for Allowing Access to Private Data |
US10573043B2 (en) | 2017-10-30 | 2020-02-25 | Snap Inc. | Mobile-based cartographic control of display content |
US10599289B1 (en) | 2017-11-13 | 2020-03-24 | Snap Inc. | Interface to display animated icon |
US11551059B1 (en) | 2017-11-15 | 2023-01-10 | Snap Inc. | Modulated image segmentation |
US10885564B1 (en) | 2017-11-28 | 2021-01-05 | Snap Inc. | Methods, system, and non-transitory computer readable storage medium for dynamically configurable social media platform |
US11265273B1 (en) | 2017-12-01 | 2022-03-01 | Snap, Inc. | Dynamic media overlay with smart widget |
US11341323B1 (en) * | 2017-12-06 | 2022-05-24 | Dennis J M Donahue, III | Patent application preparation system and template creator |
US10217488B1 (en) | 2017-12-15 | 2019-02-26 | Snap Inc. | Spherical video editing |
US11017173B1 (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2021-05-25 | Snap Inc. | Named entity recognition visual context and caption data |
CN108108451A (en) * | 2017-12-27 | 2018-06-01 | 合肥美的智能科技有限公司 | The group of subscribers portrait acquisition methods and device of group |
US10728619B2 (en) * | 2017-12-31 | 2020-07-28 | PUCs, LLC | Systems and methods for playback responsive advertisements and purchase transactions |
US10523606B2 (en) | 2018-01-02 | 2019-12-31 | Snap Inc. | Generating interactive messages with asynchronous media content |
US10678818B2 (en) | 2018-01-03 | 2020-06-09 | Snap Inc. | Tag distribution visualization system |
US10931991B2 (en) | 2018-01-04 | 2021-02-23 | Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC | Methods and systems for selectively skipping through media content |
US10257578B1 (en) | 2018-01-05 | 2019-04-09 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Dynamic library display for interactive videos |
US10482565B1 (en) | 2018-02-12 | 2019-11-19 | Snap Inc. | Multistage neural network processing using a graphics processor |
US11507614B1 (en) | 2018-02-13 | 2022-11-22 | Snap Inc. | Icon based tagging |
US10939142B2 (en) | 2018-02-27 | 2021-03-02 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Apparatus and methods for content storage, distribution and security within a content distribution network |
US10726603B1 (en) | 2018-02-28 | 2020-07-28 | Snap Inc. | Animated expressive icon |
US10885136B1 (en) | 2018-02-28 | 2021-01-05 | Snap Inc. | Audience filtering system |
US10979752B1 (en) | 2018-02-28 | 2021-04-13 | Snap Inc. | Generating media content items based on location information |
US10327096B1 (en) | 2018-03-06 | 2019-06-18 | Snap Inc. | Geo-fence selection system |
WO2019178361A1 (en) | 2018-03-14 | 2019-09-19 | Snap Inc. | Generating collectible media content items based on location information |
US10212467B1 (en) | 2018-03-19 | 2019-02-19 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method and apparatus for streaming video |
US10542368B2 (en) | 2018-03-27 | 2020-01-21 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Audio content modification for playback audio |
US11163941B1 (en) | 2018-03-30 | 2021-11-02 | Snap Inc. | Annotating a collection of media content items |
US10856028B2 (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2020-12-01 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Method and apparatus for content curation |
US11310176B2 (en) | 2018-04-13 | 2022-04-19 | Snap Inc. | Content suggestion system |
US11295257B2 (en) * | 2018-04-17 | 2022-04-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Cognitive prioritization for report generation |
US10719968B2 (en) | 2018-04-18 | 2020-07-21 | Snap Inc. | Augmented expression system |
US10219111B1 (en) | 2018-04-18 | 2019-02-26 | Snap Inc. | Visitation tracking system |
US11640501B2 (en) * | 2018-04-20 | 2023-05-02 | Orphanalytics Sa | Method and device for verifying the author of a short message |
US11487501B2 (en) | 2018-05-16 | 2022-11-01 | Snap Inc. | Device control using audio data |
US10896197B1 (en) | 2018-05-22 | 2021-01-19 | Snap Inc. | Event detection system |
US10904599B2 (en) * | 2018-05-31 | 2021-01-26 | Adobe Inc. | Predicting digital personas for digital-content recommendations using a machine-learning-based persona classifier |
US11601721B2 (en) * | 2018-06-04 | 2023-03-07 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Interactive video dynamic adaptation and user profiling |
US10860642B2 (en) | 2018-06-21 | 2020-12-08 | Google Llc | Predicting topics of potential relevance based on retrieved/created digital media files |
US10679393B2 (en) | 2018-07-24 | 2020-06-09 | Snap Inc. | Conditional modification of augmented reality object |
US10775974B2 (en) | 2018-08-10 | 2020-09-15 | Vignet Incorporated | User responsive dynamic architecture |
US10997760B2 (en) | 2018-08-31 | 2021-05-04 | Snap Inc. | Augmented reality anthropomorphization system |
US10963434B1 (en) | 2018-09-07 | 2021-03-30 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Data architecture for supporting multiple search models |
US10942909B2 (en) * | 2018-09-25 | 2021-03-09 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Efficient production and consumption for data changes in a database under high concurrency |
US10698583B2 (en) | 2018-09-28 | 2020-06-30 | Snap Inc. | Collaborative achievement interface |
US11126870B2 (en) | 2018-10-18 | 2021-09-21 | Cartica Ai Ltd. | Method and system for obstacle detection |
US11181911B2 (en) | 2018-10-18 | 2021-11-23 | Cartica Ai Ltd | Control transfer of a vehicle |
US20200133308A1 (en) | 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-30 | Cartica Ai Ltd | Vehicle to vehicle (v2v) communication less truck platooning |
US10839694B2 (en) | 2018-10-18 | 2020-11-17 | Cartica Ai Ltd | Blind spot alert |
CN109413510B (en) * | 2018-10-19 | 2021-05-18 | 深圳市商汤科技有限公司 | Video abstract generation method and device, electronic equipment and computer storage medium |
US11126869B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2021-09-21 | Cartica Ai Ltd. | Tracking after objects |
US10778623B1 (en) | 2018-10-31 | 2020-09-15 | Snap Inc. | Messaging and gaming applications communication platform |
US10789535B2 (en) | 2018-11-26 | 2020-09-29 | Cartica Ai Ltd | Detection of road elements |
US10939236B1 (en) | 2018-11-30 | 2021-03-02 | Snap Inc. | Position service to determine relative position to map features |
US11199957B1 (en) | 2018-11-30 | 2021-12-14 | Snap Inc. | Generating customized avatars based on location information |
WO2020117274A1 (en) * | 2018-12-07 | 2020-06-11 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Anonymous service access |
WO2020146667A1 (en) | 2019-01-11 | 2020-07-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure data aggregation and computation |
US11032670B1 (en) | 2019-01-14 | 2021-06-08 | Snap Inc. | Destination sharing in location sharing system |
US10939246B1 (en) | 2019-01-16 | 2021-03-02 | Snap Inc. | Location-based context information sharing in a messaging system |
US20200242213A1 (en) * | 2019-01-28 | 2020-07-30 | Blackberry Limited | Method and system for digital rights management |
US11294936B1 (en) | 2019-01-30 | 2022-04-05 | Snap Inc. | Adaptive spatial density based clustering |
US11297027B1 (en) | 2019-01-31 | 2022-04-05 | Snap Inc. | Automated image processing and insight presentation |
US11799864B2 (en) | 2019-02-07 | 2023-10-24 | Altair Engineering, Inc. | Computer systems for regulating access to electronic content using usage telemetry data |
US10936066B1 (en) | 2019-02-13 | 2021-03-02 | Snap Inc. | Sleep detection in a location sharing system |
US10838599B2 (en) | 2019-02-25 | 2020-11-17 | Snap Inc. | Custom media overlay system |
US10964082B2 (en) | 2019-02-26 | 2021-03-30 | Snap Inc. | Avatar based on weather |
US11643005B2 (en) | 2019-02-27 | 2023-05-09 | Autobrains Technologies Ltd | Adjusting adjustable headlights of a vehicle |
US10852918B1 (en) | 2019-03-08 | 2020-12-01 | Snap Inc. | Contextual information in chat |
US11928875B2 (en) * | 2019-03-08 | 2024-03-12 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Layout-aware, scalable recognition system |
US11285963B2 (en) | 2019-03-10 | 2022-03-29 | Cartica Ai Ltd. | Driver-based prediction of dangerous events |
US11694088B2 (en) | 2019-03-13 | 2023-07-04 | Cortica Ltd. | Method for object detection using knowledge distillation |
US11868414B1 (en) | 2019-03-14 | 2024-01-09 | Snap Inc. | Graph-based prediction for contact suggestion in a location sharing system |
US11132548B2 (en) | 2019-03-20 | 2021-09-28 | Cortica Ltd. | Determining object information that does not explicitly appear in a media unit signature |
US11852554B1 (en) | 2019-03-21 | 2023-12-26 | Snap Inc. | Barometer calibration in a location sharing system |
US11249614B2 (en) | 2019-03-28 | 2022-02-15 | Snap Inc. | Generating personalized map interface with enhanced icons |
US10789527B1 (en) | 2019-03-31 | 2020-09-29 | Cortica Ltd. | Method for object detection using shallow neural networks |
US11488290B2 (en) | 2019-03-31 | 2022-11-01 | Cortica Ltd. | Hybrid representation of a media unit |
US10776669B1 (en) | 2019-03-31 | 2020-09-15 | Cortica Ltd. | Signature generation and object detection that refer to rare scenes |
US11222069B2 (en) | 2019-03-31 | 2022-01-11 | Cortica Ltd. | Low-power calculation of a signature of a media unit |
US10796444B1 (en) | 2019-03-31 | 2020-10-06 | Cortica Ltd | Configuring spanning elements of a signature generator |
US10810782B1 (en) | 2019-04-01 | 2020-10-20 | Snap Inc. | Semantic texture mapping system |
US10560898B1 (en) | 2019-05-30 | 2020-02-11 | Snap Inc. | Wearable device location systems |
US10582453B1 (en) | 2019-05-30 | 2020-03-03 | Snap Inc. | Wearable device location systems architecture |
US11546647B2 (en) * | 2019-06-07 | 2023-01-03 | Roku, Inc. | Content-modification system with probability-based selection feature |
US10893385B1 (en) | 2019-06-07 | 2021-01-12 | Snap Inc. | Detection of a physical collision between two client devices in a location sharing system |
US11134036B2 (en) | 2019-07-05 | 2021-09-28 | Snap Inc. | Event planning in a content sharing platform |
US11307747B2 (en) | 2019-07-11 | 2022-04-19 | Snap Inc. | Edge gesture interface with smart interactions |
US11190840B2 (en) | 2019-07-23 | 2021-11-30 | Rovi Guides, Inc. | Systems and methods for applying behavioral-based parental controls for media assets |
US11812347B2 (en) | 2019-09-06 | 2023-11-07 | Snap Inc. | Non-textual communication and user states management |
US11941065B1 (en) | 2019-09-13 | 2024-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Single identifier platform for storing entity data |
US11403849B2 (en) | 2019-09-25 | 2022-08-02 | Charter Communications Operating, Llc | Methods and apparatus for characterization of digital content |
US11821742B2 (en) | 2019-09-26 | 2023-11-21 | Snap Inc. | Travel based notifications |
US11490047B2 (en) | 2019-10-02 | 2022-11-01 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Systems and methods for dynamically adjusting video aspect ratios |
US11218838B2 (en) | 2019-10-31 | 2022-01-04 | Snap Inc. | Focused map-based context information surfacing |
US11689507B2 (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2023-06-27 | Adobe Inc. | Privacy preserving document analysis |
US10748022B1 (en) | 2019-12-12 | 2020-08-18 | Cartica Ai Ltd | Crowd separation |
US11593662B2 (en) | 2019-12-12 | 2023-02-28 | Autobrains Technologies Ltd | Unsupervised cluster generation |
US11128715B1 (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2021-09-21 | Snap Inc. | Physical friend proximity in chat |
US11429618B2 (en) | 2019-12-30 | 2022-08-30 | Snap Inc. | Surfacing augmented reality objects |
US11169658B2 (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2021-11-09 | Snap Inc. | Combined map icon with action indicator |
US11343323B2 (en) | 2019-12-31 | 2022-05-24 | Snap Inc. | Augmented reality objects registry |
US11316806B1 (en) | 2020-01-28 | 2022-04-26 | Snap Inc. | Bulk message deletion |
US11265281B1 (en) | 2020-01-28 | 2022-03-01 | Snap Inc. | Message deletion policy selection |
US11228551B1 (en) | 2020-02-12 | 2022-01-18 | Snap Inc. | Multiple gateway message exchange |
US11245961B2 (en) | 2020-02-18 | 2022-02-08 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | System and methods for detecting anomalous activities for interactive videos |
US20230144844A1 (en) * | 2020-02-28 | 2023-05-11 | Automat Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for managing a personalized online experience |
US11516167B2 (en) | 2020-03-05 | 2022-11-29 | Snap Inc. | Storing data based on device location |
US11619501B2 (en) | 2020-03-11 | 2023-04-04 | Snap Inc. | Avatar based on trip |
US11590988B2 (en) | 2020-03-19 | 2023-02-28 | Autobrains Technologies Ltd | Predictive turning assistant |
US11430091B2 (en) | 2020-03-27 | 2022-08-30 | Snap Inc. | Location mapping for large scale augmented-reality |
US10956743B1 (en) | 2020-03-27 | 2021-03-23 | Snap Inc. | Shared augmented reality system |
US11625873B2 (en) | 2020-03-30 | 2023-04-11 | Snap Inc. | Personalized media overlay recommendation |
KR20220157502A (en) * | 2020-03-31 | 2022-11-29 | 스냅 인코포레이티드 | Augmented Reality Beauty Product Tutorials |
US11827215B2 (en) | 2020-03-31 | 2023-11-28 | AutoBrains Technologies Ltd. | Method for training a driving related object detector |
US11700225B2 (en) | 2020-04-23 | 2023-07-11 | Snap Inc. | Event overlay invite messaging system |
US11843574B2 (en) | 2020-05-21 | 2023-12-12 | Snap Inc. | Featured content collection interface |
WO2021252662A1 (en) | 2020-06-10 | 2021-12-16 | Snap Inc. | Visual search to launch application |
US11423652B2 (en) | 2020-06-10 | 2022-08-23 | Snap Inc. | Adding beauty products to augmented reality tutorials |
US11290851B2 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2022-03-29 | Snap Inc. | Location sharing using offline and online objects |
US11483267B2 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2022-10-25 | Snap Inc. | Location sharing using different rate-limited links |
US11314776B2 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2022-04-26 | Snap Inc. | Location sharing using friend list versions |
US11503432B2 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2022-11-15 | Snap Inc. | Scalable real-time location sharing framework |
US11308327B2 (en) | 2020-06-29 | 2022-04-19 | Snap Inc. | Providing travel-based augmented reality content with a captured image |
US11899905B2 (en) | 2020-06-30 | 2024-02-13 | Snap Inc. | Selectable items providing post-viewing context actions |
US11756424B2 (en) | 2020-07-24 | 2023-09-12 | AutoBrains Technologies Ltd. | Parking assist |
US11832015B2 (en) | 2020-08-13 | 2023-11-28 | Snap Inc. | User interface for pose driven virtual effects |
US11349797B2 (en) | 2020-08-31 | 2022-05-31 | Snap Inc. | Co-location connection service |
US11475668B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2022-10-18 | Bank Of America Corporation | System and method for automatic video categorization |
US11763919B1 (en) | 2020-10-13 | 2023-09-19 | Vignet Incorporated | Platform to increase patient engagement in clinical trials through surveys presented on mobile devices |
AU2021372452A1 (en) * | 2020-10-29 | 2023-06-08 | Pacific Investment Management Company LLC | Surrogate data generation of private data |
WO2022097469A1 (en) * | 2020-11-09 | 2022-05-12 | 日本電気株式会社 | Migration device, migration method, and storage medium |
US11451841B2 (en) * | 2020-12-03 | 2022-09-20 | AVAST Software s.r.o. | Content feed delivery system and method |
US11558737B2 (en) | 2021-01-08 | 2023-01-17 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for preventing subscriber identifier leakage |
US11417418B1 (en) | 2021-01-11 | 2022-08-16 | Vignet Incorporated | Recruiting for clinical trial cohorts to achieve high participant compliance and retention |
US11240329B1 (en) | 2021-01-29 | 2022-02-01 | Vignet Incorporated | Personalizing selection of digital programs for patients in decentralized clinical trials and other health research |
US11880377B1 (en) | 2021-03-26 | 2024-01-23 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for entity resolution |
US11606756B2 (en) | 2021-03-29 | 2023-03-14 | Snap Inc. | Scheduling requests for location data |
US11645324B2 (en) | 2021-03-31 | 2023-05-09 | Snap Inc. | Location-based timeline media content system |
US11636500B1 (en) | 2021-04-07 | 2023-04-25 | Vignet Incorporated | Adaptive server architecture for controlling allocation of programs among networked devices |
US11888894B2 (en) | 2021-04-21 | 2024-01-30 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for mitigating network function (NF) update and deregister attacks |
US20220342909A1 (en) * | 2021-04-22 | 2022-10-27 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Evaluating clustering in case of data stewardship actions |
US11627467B2 (en) | 2021-05-05 | 2023-04-11 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for generating and using single-use OAuth 2.0 access tokens for securing specific service-based architecture (SBA) interfaces |
US11695563B2 (en) | 2021-05-07 | 2023-07-04 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for single-use authentication messages |
US11570689B2 (en) | 2021-05-07 | 2023-01-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for hiding network function instance identifiers |
US11638155B2 (en) | 2021-05-07 | 2023-04-25 | Oracle International Corporation | Methods, systems, and computer readable media for protecting against mass network function (NF) deregistration attacks |
US11673059B2 (en) | 2021-05-18 | 2023-06-13 | Roblox Corporation | Automatic presentation of suitable content |
US11386367B1 (en) * | 2021-05-27 | 2022-07-12 | Recentive Analytics, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining event schedules |
US11882337B2 (en) | 2021-05-28 | 2024-01-23 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Automated platform for generating interactive videos |
CN114286169B (en) * | 2021-08-31 | 2023-06-20 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Video generation method, device, terminal, server and storage medium |
US11934477B2 (en) | 2021-09-24 | 2024-03-19 | JBF Interlude 2009 LTD | Video player integration within websites |
US11829834B2 (en) | 2021-10-29 | 2023-11-28 | Snap Inc. | Extended QR code |
US11901083B1 (en) | 2021-11-30 | 2024-02-13 | Vignet Incorporated | Using genetic and phenotypic data sets for drug discovery clinical trials |
US11705230B1 (en) | 2021-11-30 | 2023-07-18 | Vignet Incorporated | Assessing health risks using genetic, epigenetic, and phenotypic data sources |
US11656926B1 (en) | 2022-01-26 | 2023-05-23 | Bank Of America Corporation | Systems and methods for automatically applying configuration changes to computing clusters |
US20230342540A1 (en) * | 2022-04-21 | 2023-10-26 | Black Hills Ip Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for generating a document and data processing |
Citations (93)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4264924A (en) * | 1978-03-03 | 1981-04-28 | Freeman Michael J | Dedicated channel interactive cable television system |
US4381522A (en) * | 1980-12-01 | 1983-04-26 | Adams-Russell Co., Inc. | Selective viewing |
US4386416A (en) * | 1980-06-02 | 1983-05-31 | Mostek Corporation | Data compression, encryption, and in-line transmission system |
US4506387A (en) * | 1983-05-25 | 1985-03-19 | Walter Howard F | Programming-on-demand cable system and method |
US4521806A (en) * | 1982-08-19 | 1985-06-04 | World Video Library, Inc. | Recorded program communication system |
US4567512A (en) * | 1982-08-19 | 1986-01-28 | World Video Library, Inc. | Recorded program communication system |
US4590516A (en) * | 1982-06-01 | 1986-05-20 | World Video Library, Inc. | Recorded program communication system |
US4654815A (en) * | 1985-02-07 | 1987-03-31 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Analog signal conditioning and digitizing integrated circuit |
US4672679A (en) * | 1983-08-16 | 1987-06-09 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Context redundancy text compression |
US4745549A (en) * | 1985-06-11 | 1988-05-17 | Hashimoto Corporation | Method of and apparatus for optimal scheduling of television programming to maximize customer satisfaction |
US4751578A (en) * | 1985-05-28 | 1988-06-14 | David P. Gordon | System for electronically controllably viewing on a television updateable television programming information |
US4814746A (en) * | 1983-06-01 | 1989-03-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data compression method |
US4831526A (en) * | 1986-04-22 | 1989-05-16 | The Chubb Corporation | Computerized insurance premium quote request and policy issuance system |
US4906991A (en) * | 1988-04-29 | 1990-03-06 | Xerox Corporation | Textual substitution data compression with finite length search windows |
US4914698A (en) * | 1988-03-16 | 1990-04-03 | David Chaum | One-show blind signature systems |
US4926480A (en) * | 1983-08-22 | 1990-05-15 | David Chaum | Card-computer moderated systems |
US4987593A (en) * | 1988-03-16 | 1991-01-22 | David Chaum | One-show blind signature systems |
US4988998A (en) * | 1989-09-05 | 1991-01-29 | Storage Technology Corporation | Data compression system for successively applying at least two data compression methods to an input data stream |
US4996642A (en) * | 1987-10-01 | 1991-02-26 | Neonics, Inc. | System and method for recommending items |
US5001478A (en) * | 1989-12-28 | 1991-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of encoding compressed data |
US5003307A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1991-03-26 | Stac, Inc. | Data compression apparatus with shift register search means |
US5003591A (en) * | 1989-05-25 | 1991-03-26 | General Instrument Corporation | Functionally modifiable cable television converter system |
US5016009A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1991-05-14 | Stac, Inc. | Data compression apparatus and method |
US5023610A (en) * | 1990-06-13 | 1991-06-11 | Cordell Manufacturing, Inc. | Data compression method using textual substitution |
US5087913A (en) * | 1990-08-27 | 1992-02-11 | Unisys Corporation | Short-record data compression and decompression system |
US5109414A (en) * | 1981-11-03 | 1992-04-28 | Personalized Mass Media Corporation | Signal processing apparatus and methods |
US5126739A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1992-06-30 | Stac Electronics | Data compression apparatus and method |
US5179378A (en) * | 1991-07-30 | 1993-01-12 | University Of South Florida | Method and apparatus for the compression and decompression of data using Lempel-Ziv based techniques |
US5201010A (en) * | 1989-05-01 | 1993-04-06 | Credit Verification Corporation | Method and system for building a database and performing marketing based upon prior shopping history |
US5208877A (en) * | 1991-08-29 | 1993-05-04 | Center For Innovative Technology | Fiber optic grating-based weighted, two-mode fiber sensors |
US5223924A (en) * | 1992-05-27 | 1993-06-29 | North American Philips Corporation | System and method for automatically correlating user preferences with a T.V. program information database |
US5276736A (en) * | 1990-01-29 | 1994-01-04 | David Chaum | Optionally moderated transaction systems |
US5301109A (en) * | 1990-06-11 | 1994-04-05 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Computerized cross-language document retrieval using latent semantic indexing |
US5309437A (en) * | 1990-06-29 | 1994-05-03 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Bridge-like internet protocol router |
US5321833A (en) * | 1990-08-29 | 1994-06-14 | Gte Laboratories Incorporated | Adaptive ranking system for information retrieval |
US5323240A (en) * | 1992-02-07 | 1994-06-21 | Sony Corporation | Television receiver that automatically keeps track of favorite channels to facilitate tuning |
US5408655A (en) * | 1989-02-27 | 1995-04-18 | Apple Computer, Inc. | User interface system and method for traversing a database |
US5410344A (en) * | 1993-09-22 | 1995-04-25 | Arrowsmith Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method of selecting video programs based on viewers' preferences |
US5420807A (en) * | 1993-10-19 | 1995-05-30 | Yozan Inc. | Multiplication circuit for multiplying analog inputs by digital inputs |
US5420806A (en) * | 1993-01-13 | 1995-05-30 | Yozan Inc. | Multiplication circuit for multiplying analog signals by digital signals |
US5483278A (en) * | 1992-05-27 | 1996-01-09 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | System and method for finding a movie of interest in a large movie database |
US5485526A (en) * | 1992-06-02 | 1996-01-16 | Hewlett-Packard Corporation | Memory circuit for lossless data compression/decompression dictionary storage |
US5490140A (en) * | 1994-09-30 | 1996-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing ATM support for frame relay DTEs with a terminal adapter |
US5519858A (en) * | 1992-01-10 | 1996-05-21 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Address recognition engine with look-up database for storing network information |
US5600798A (en) * | 1993-10-26 | 1997-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for controlling LAN data flow control through a frame relay network by end point station transmitting notification to LAN stations based on congestion notification from the frame relay network |
US5600364A (en) * | 1992-12-09 | 1997-02-04 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Network controller for cable television delivery systems |
US5613209A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1997-03-18 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatically selecting a radio talkgroup |
US5614940A (en) * | 1994-10-21 | 1997-03-25 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing broadcast information with indexing |
US5617565A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1997-04-01 | Hitachi America, Ltd. | Broadcast interactive multimedia system |
US5708825A (en) * | 1995-05-26 | 1998-01-13 | Iconovex Corporation | Automatic summary page creation and hyperlink generation |
US5710887A (en) * | 1995-08-29 | 1998-01-20 | Broadvision | Computer system and method for electronic commerce |
US5710884A (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 1998-01-20 | Intel Corporation | System for automatically updating personal profile server with updates to additional user information gathered from monitoring user's electronic consuming habits generated on computer during use |
US5715445A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1998-02-03 | Wolfe; Mark A. | Document retrieval system employing a preloading procedure |
US5717923A (en) * | 1994-11-03 | 1998-02-10 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamically customizing electronic information to individual end users |
US5724521A (en) * | 1994-11-03 | 1998-03-03 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing electronic advertisements to end users in a consumer best-fit pricing manner |
US5724567A (en) * | 1994-04-25 | 1998-03-03 | Apple Computer, Inc. | System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users |
US5734719A (en) * | 1993-10-15 | 1998-03-31 | International Business Systems, Incorporated | Digital information accessing, delivery and production system |
US5734720A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1998-03-31 | Salganicoff; Marcos | System and method for providing digital communications between a head end and a set top terminal |
US5740549A (en) * | 1995-06-12 | 1998-04-14 | Pointcast, Inc. | Information and advertising distribution system and method |
US5856981A (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 1999-01-05 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Reliable connection oriented networks |
US5870770A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1999-02-09 | Wolfe; Mark A. | Document research system and method for displaying citing documents |
US5873066A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 1999-02-16 | Insurance Company Of North America | System for electronically managing and documenting the underwriting of an excess casualty insurance policy |
US5875108A (en) * | 1991-12-23 | 1999-02-23 | Hoffberg; Steven M. | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
US5884270A (en) * | 1996-09-06 | 1999-03-16 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and system for facilitating an employment search incorporating user-controlled anonymous communications |
US5892924A (en) * | 1996-01-31 | 1999-04-06 | Ipsilon Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically shifting between routing and switching packets in a transmission network |
US5903867A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1999-05-11 | Sony Corporation | Information access system and recording system |
US5903359A (en) * | 1990-03-02 | 1999-05-11 | Minolta Co., Ltd. | Image processing apparatus |
US5907841A (en) * | 1993-01-28 | 1999-05-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Document detection system with improved document detection efficiency |
US5907837A (en) * | 1995-07-17 | 1999-05-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Information retrieval system in an on-line network including separate content and layout of published titles |
US6014090A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-01-11 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for delivering local information to travelers |
US6023683A (en) * | 1994-08-10 | 2000-02-08 | Fisher Scientific Company | Electronic sourcing system and method |
US6029195A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 2000-02-22 | Herz; Frederick S. M. | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US6029141A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 2000-02-22 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Internet-based customer referral system |
US6047327A (en) * | 1996-02-16 | 2000-04-04 | Intel Corporation | System for distributing electronic information to a targeted group of users |
US6052064A (en) * | 1997-10-30 | 2000-04-18 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus in a wireless messaging system for dynamic creation of directed simulcast zones |
US6052718A (en) * | 1997-01-07 | 2000-04-18 | Sightpath, Inc | Replica routing |
US6055513A (en) * | 1998-03-11 | 2000-04-25 | Telebuyer, Llc | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce |
US6058379A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 2000-05-02 | Auction Source, L.L.C. | Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation |
US6064970A (en) * | 1996-01-29 | 2000-05-16 | Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance |
US6064980A (en) * | 1998-03-17 | 2000-05-16 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | System and methods for collaborative recommendations |
US6199045B1 (en) * | 1996-08-15 | 2001-03-06 | Spatial Adventures, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing position-related information to mobile recipients |
US6377972B1 (en) * | 1999-01-19 | 2002-04-23 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | High quality streaming multimedia |
US6381465B1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2002-04-30 | Leap Wireless International, Inc. | System and method for attaching an advertisement to an SMS message for wireless transmission |
US6397040B1 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2002-05-28 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Telecommunications apparatus and method |
US20030005074A1 (en) * | 2000-04-25 | 2003-01-02 | Herz Frederick S.M. | Method of combining shared buffers of continuous digital media data with media delivery scheduling |
US6507872B1 (en) * | 1992-09-25 | 2003-01-14 | David Michael Geshwind | Class of methods for improving perceived efficiency of end-user interactive access of a large database such as the world-wide web via a communication network such as “The Internet” |
US6553376B1 (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2003-04-22 | Infolibria, Inc. | Efficient content server using request redirection |
US6563910B2 (en) * | 2001-02-26 | 2003-05-13 | Royal Thoughts, Llc | Emergency response information distribution |
US6571279B1 (en) * | 1997-12-05 | 2003-05-27 | Pinpoint Incorporated | Location enhanced information delivery system |
US20030101124A1 (en) * | 2000-05-12 | 2003-05-29 | Nemo Semret | Method and system for market based resource allocation |
US6697824B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-02-24 | Accenture Llp | Relationship management in an E-commerce application framework |
US6708213B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2004-03-16 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for streaming multimedia information over public networks |
US7483871B2 (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 2009-01-27 | Pinpoint Incorporated | Customized electronic newspapers and advertisements |
Family Cites Families (200)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3786195A (en) * | 1971-08-13 | 1974-01-15 | Dc Dt Liquidating Partnership | Variable delay line signal processor for sound reproduction |
US4008369A (en) | 1975-02-28 | 1977-02-15 | The Magnavox Company | Telephone interfaced subscription cable television system especially useful in hotels and motels |
US4170782A (en) * | 1976-12-13 | 1979-10-09 | Miller Arthur O | Programming and selection monitoring system for television receivers |
US4528589A (en) | 1977-02-14 | 1985-07-09 | Telease, Inc. | Method and system for subscription television billing and access |
US4115846A (en) | 1977-02-22 | 1978-09-19 | Buddy Laine | Reminder system |
US4230990C1 (en) | 1979-03-16 | 2002-04-09 | John G Lert Jr | Broadcast program identification method and system |
CA1142244A (en) | 1979-08-22 | 1983-03-01 | Eric J. Gargini | Wired broadcasting system with subscriber controlled switched programme selection |
JPS5650398A (en) * | 1979-10-01 | 1981-05-07 | Hitachi Ltd | Sound synthesizer |
US4320486A (en) * | 1980-01-11 | 1982-03-16 | Advanced Integrated Design, Incorporated | Transferring information signals from a first to a second recording medium |
US4529870A (en) * | 1980-03-10 | 1985-07-16 | David Chaum | Cryptographic identification, financial transaction, and credential device |
US4464650A (en) | 1981-08-10 | 1984-08-07 | Sperry Corporation | Apparatus and method for compressing data signals and restoring the compressed data signals |
US4586191A (en) * | 1981-08-19 | 1986-04-29 | Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. | Sound signal processing apparatus |
US4694490A (en) * | 1981-11-03 | 1987-09-15 | Harvey John C | Signal processing apparatus and methods |
US4450477A (en) | 1982-03-31 | 1984-05-22 | Lovett Bruce E | Television information system |
US4496171A (en) | 1982-09-29 | 1985-01-29 | Martin Cherry | Media guide |
GB8314468D0 (en) | 1983-05-25 | 1983-06-29 | Agb Research Plc | Television monitoring |
US4816904A (en) | 1983-06-09 | 1989-03-28 | Control Data Corporation | Television and market research data collection system and method |
US4558302A (en) | 1983-06-20 | 1985-12-10 | Sperry Corporation | High speed data compression and decompression apparatus and method |
US4527194A (en) | 1983-07-27 | 1985-07-02 | Zenith Electronics Corporation | Channel assignment for CATV system |
US4947430A (en) * | 1987-11-23 | 1990-08-07 | David Chaum | Undeniable signature systems |
US4759063A (en) * | 1983-08-22 | 1988-07-19 | Chaum David L | Blind signature systems |
US4602279A (en) | 1984-03-21 | 1986-07-22 | Actv, Inc. | Method for providing targeted profile interactive CATV displays |
US4723212A (en) | 1984-07-18 | 1988-02-02 | Catalina Marketing Corp. | Method and apparatus for dispensing discount coupons |
US5173851A (en) | 1984-07-18 | 1992-12-22 | Catalina Marketing International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dispensing discount coupons in response to the purchase of one or more products |
US5036537A (en) | 1984-11-19 | 1991-07-30 | General Instrument Corp. | Geographic black-out method for direct broadcast satellite system |
US4908866A (en) * | 1985-02-04 | 1990-03-13 | Eric Goldwasser | Speech transcribing system |
GB2172127B (en) | 1985-03-06 | 1988-10-12 | Ferranti Plc | Data compression system |
WO1986006050A1 (en) | 1985-04-08 | 1986-10-23 | Odetics, Inc. | Robotic materials handling system |
US4706121B1 (en) * | 1985-07-12 | 1993-12-14 | Insight Telecast, Inc. | Tv schedule system and process |
US4706080A (en) * | 1985-08-26 | 1987-11-10 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Interconnection of broadcast networks |
US5227874A (en) | 1986-03-10 | 1993-07-13 | Kohorn H Von | Method for measuring the effectiveness of stimuli on decisions of shoppers |
US5128752A (en) | 1986-03-10 | 1992-07-07 | Kohorn H Von | System and method for generating and redeeming tokens |
US4763191A (en) | 1986-03-17 | 1988-08-09 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Dial-up telephone network equipment for requesting an identified selection |
EP0243312B1 (en) * | 1986-04-18 | 1995-07-19 | Nagra Plus S.A. | Decoder for a pay television system |
US4761684A (en) | 1986-11-14 | 1988-08-02 | Video Jukebox Network | Telephone access display system |
US4843389A (en) | 1986-12-04 | 1989-06-27 | International Business Machines Corp. | Text compression and expansion method and apparatus |
NZ219198A (en) | 1987-02-05 | 1990-11-27 | Sensasel Worldwide Ltd | Illuminated sign with proximity sensor |
US4816905A (en) * | 1987-04-30 | 1989-03-28 | Gte Laboratories Incorporated & Gte Service Corporation | Telecommunication system with video and audio frames |
US4885757A (en) | 1987-06-01 | 1989-12-05 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Digital adaptive receiver employing maximum-likelihood sequence estimation with neural networks |
JPS6450688A (en) * | 1987-08-21 | 1989-02-27 | Hashimoto Corp | Method and device for generating individual television program |
US4870579A (en) * | 1987-10-01 | 1989-09-26 | Neonics, Inc. | System and method of predicting subjective reactions |
US4876541A (en) | 1987-10-15 | 1989-10-24 | Data Compression Corporation | Stem for dynamically compressing and decompressing electronic data |
US4881075A (en) | 1987-10-15 | 1989-11-14 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Method and apparatus for adaptive data compression |
US4847619A (en) | 1987-10-19 | 1989-07-11 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Performance-based reset of data compression dictionary |
US4941172A (en) | 1987-11-24 | 1990-07-10 | U.S. News | Preprogrammed autodialer and related process |
US4954699A (en) | 1988-04-13 | 1990-09-04 | Npd Research, Inc. | Self-administered survey questionnaire and method |
GB2218287B (en) | 1988-05-02 | 1992-10-07 | Hashimoto Corp | Display system for use with a tv program reservation system |
US5191573A (en) | 1988-06-13 | 1993-03-02 | Hair Arthur R | Method for transmitting a desired digital video or audio signal |
GB8815978D0 (en) | 1988-07-05 | 1988-08-10 | British Telecomm | Method & apparatus for encoding decoding & transmitting data in compressed form |
US4977455B1 (en) * | 1988-07-15 | 1993-04-13 | System and process for vcr scheduling | |
US4979118A (en) | 1989-03-10 | 1990-12-18 | Gte Laboratories Incorporated | Predictive access-control and routing system for integrated services telecommunication networks |
US5649114A (en) | 1989-05-01 | 1997-07-15 | Credit Verification Corporation | Method and system for selective incentive point-of-sale marketing in response to customer shopping histories |
US5305196A (en) | 1989-05-01 | 1994-04-19 | Credit Verification Corporation | Check transaction processing, database building and marketing method and system utilizing automatic check reading |
US5621812A (en) | 1989-05-01 | 1997-04-15 | Credit Verification Corporation | Method and system for building a database for use with selective incentive marketing in response to customer shopping histories |
US5644723A (en) | 1989-05-01 | 1997-07-01 | Credit Verification Corporation | Method and system for selective incentive point-of-sale marketing in response to customer shopping histories |
US5136501A (en) * | 1989-05-26 | 1992-08-04 | Reuters Limited | Anonymous matching system |
US5124791A (en) | 1989-05-31 | 1992-06-23 | Utah State University Foundation | Frame-to-frame compression of vector quantized signals and other post-processing |
US5253066C1 (en) | 1989-06-01 | 2001-05-22 | United Video Properties Inc | Tv recording and viewing control system |
US5047867A (en) | 1989-06-08 | 1991-09-10 | North American Philips Corporation | Interface for a TV-VCR system |
DE3921646A1 (en) | 1989-06-30 | 1991-01-03 | Siemens Ag | METHOD FOR CODING AN ELEMENT SEQUENCE AND DEVICE FOR CARRYING OUT THE METHOD |
US5038211A (en) | 1989-07-05 | 1991-08-06 | The Superguide Corporation | Method and apparatus for transmitting and receiving television program information |
US5058137A (en) | 1989-07-31 | 1991-10-15 | North American Philips Corporation | Lempel-Ziv decoder |
US5477541A (en) | 1989-09-29 | 1995-12-19 | White; Richard E. | Addressing technique for storing and referencing packet data |
US5051822A (en) | 1989-10-19 | 1991-09-24 | Interactive Television Systems, Inc. | Telephone access video game distribution center |
US5099319A (en) * | 1989-10-23 | 1992-03-24 | Esch Arthur G | Video information delivery method and apparatus |
US5155591A (en) * | 1989-10-23 | 1992-10-13 | General Instrument Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing demographically targeted television commercials |
DE69033905T2 (en) * | 1989-10-30 | 2003-02-06 | Starsight Telecast Inc | INTERFACE BETWEEN CABLE TELEVISION CODES AND TV ACCESSORIES |
US5353121A (en) * | 1989-10-30 | 1994-10-04 | Starsight Telecast, Inc. | Television schedule system |
US4995077A (en) | 1989-10-30 | 1991-02-19 | Malinowski Igor P | Card-like device having a microprocessor and speaker for communicating with a telephone line |
US5153763A (en) | 1989-12-01 | 1992-10-06 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | CATV distribution networks using light wave transmission lines |
US5066016A (en) | 1990-01-08 | 1991-11-19 | Neill Mark D O | Method of playing a box-office movie game |
US5446919A (en) | 1990-02-20 | 1995-08-29 | Wilkins; Jeff K. | Communication system and method with demographically or psychographically defined audiences |
US5351075A (en) * | 1990-03-20 | 1994-09-27 | Frederick Herz | Home video club television broadcasting system |
US5251324A (en) * | 1990-03-20 | 1993-10-05 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating and collecting viewing statistics for remote terminals in a cable television system |
US5129036A (en) * | 1990-03-30 | 1992-07-07 | Computer Concepts Corporation | Broadcast digital sound processing system |
US5011191A (en) | 1990-05-23 | 1991-04-30 | Gannon James M | View-through information converter |
CA2036205C (en) | 1990-06-01 | 1996-11-19 | Russell J. Welsh | Program monitoring unit |
US5049881A (en) | 1990-06-18 | 1991-09-17 | Intersecting Concepts, Inc. | Apparatus and method for very high data rate-compression incorporating lossless data compression and expansion utilizing a hashing technique |
US5189630A (en) | 1991-01-15 | 1993-02-23 | Barstow David R | Method for encoding and broadcasting information about live events using computer pattern matching techniques |
US5237157A (en) * | 1990-09-13 | 1993-08-17 | Intouch Group, Inc. | Kiosk apparatus and method for point of preview and for compilation of market data |
US5337426A (en) * | 1990-11-21 | 1994-08-16 | Beckman Instruments, Inc. | Disposable sample collection device |
US5245420A (en) * | 1990-11-27 | 1993-09-14 | Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. | CATV pay per view interdiction system |
US5172413A (en) | 1990-12-20 | 1992-12-15 | Sasktel | Secure hierarchial video delivery system and method |
US5168353A (en) | 1990-12-21 | 1992-12-01 | Gte Laboratories Incorporated | Video distribution system allowing viewer access to time staggered indentical prerecorded programs |
US5832457A (en) | 1991-05-06 | 1998-11-03 | Catalina Marketing International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for selective distribution of discount coupons based on prior customer behavior |
FR2678091A1 (en) * | 1991-06-21 | 1992-12-24 | Martin Juan | Process for automatic censoring of audiovisual programmes |
US5293456A (en) | 1991-06-28 | 1994-03-08 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Object recognition system employing a sparse comparison neural network |
US5140321A (en) | 1991-09-04 | 1992-08-18 | Prime Computer, Inc. | Data compression/decompression method and apparatus |
JP2002504271A (en) | 1991-09-10 | 2002-02-05 | ハイブリッド・ネットワークス・インコーポレイテッド | Remote link adapter for TV broadcast data transmission system |
US5155484A (en) | 1991-09-13 | 1992-10-13 | Salient Software, Inc. | Fast data compressor with direct lookup table indexing into history buffer |
US5373290A (en) | 1991-09-25 | 1994-12-13 | Hewlett-Packard Corporation | Apparatus and method for managing multiple dictionaries in content addressable memory based data compression |
US5243341A (en) | 1992-06-01 | 1993-09-07 | Hewlett Packard Company | Lempel-Ziv compression scheme with enhanced adapation |
US5230020A (en) * | 1991-10-16 | 1993-07-20 | Motorola, Inc. | Algorithm independent cryptographic key management |
US5179591A (en) * | 1991-10-16 | 1993-01-12 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for algorithm independent cryptographic key management |
US7242988B1 (en) | 1991-12-23 | 2007-07-10 | Linda Irene Hoffberg | Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore |
US5903454A (en) * | 1991-12-23 | 1999-05-11 | Hoffberg; Linda Irene | Human-factored interface corporating adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus |
JP3374977B2 (en) | 1992-01-24 | 2003-02-10 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Time series information search method and search system |
US5689648A (en) | 1992-01-31 | 1997-11-18 | Raychem Corporation | Method and apparatus for publication of information |
US5428778A (en) | 1992-02-13 | 1995-06-27 | Office Express Pty. Ltd. | Selective dissemination of information |
US5446891A (en) | 1992-02-26 | 1995-08-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | System for adjusting hypertext links with weighed user goals and activities |
US5353331A (en) | 1992-03-05 | 1994-10-04 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Personal communications service using wireline/wireless integration |
US5217259A (en) | 1992-03-20 | 1993-06-08 | Richard Wilen | Television programming apparatus |
US5287420A (en) * | 1992-04-08 | 1994-02-15 | Supermac Technology | Method for image compression on a personal computer |
JP2659896B2 (en) * | 1992-04-29 | 1997-09-30 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレイション | Structured document copy management method and structured document copy management device |
US5537586A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1996-07-16 | Individual, Inc. | Enhanced apparatus and methods for retrieving and selecting profiled textural information records from a database of defined category structures |
JPH05342191A (en) | 1992-06-08 | 1993-12-24 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | System for predicting and analyzing economic time sequential data |
US5245656A (en) * | 1992-09-09 | 1993-09-14 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Security method for private information delivery and filtering in public networks |
US5386493A (en) * | 1992-09-25 | 1995-01-31 | Apple Computer, Inc. | Apparatus and method for playing back audio at faster or slower rates without pitch distortion |
JP3298674B2 (en) * | 1992-10-12 | 2002-07-02 | クラリオン株式会社 | Audio equipment |
US5400401A (en) | 1992-10-30 | 1995-03-21 | Scientific Atlanta, Inc. | System and method for transmitting a plurality of digital services |
WO1994011967A1 (en) | 1992-11-16 | 1994-05-26 | Stephen Weeks | Information distribution systems, particularly tour guide systems |
ATE183352T1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 1999-08-15 | Discovery Communicat Inc | IMPROVED TOP-UP TERMINAL FOR CABLE TELEVISION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS |
US5986690A (en) | 1992-12-09 | 1999-11-16 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Electronic book selection and delivery system |
US6201536B1 (en) | 1992-12-09 | 2001-03-13 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Network manager for cable television system headends |
US5798785A (en) * | 1992-12-09 | 1998-08-25 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Terminal for suggesting programs offered on a television program delivery system |
US5331554A (en) * | 1992-12-10 | 1994-07-19 | Ricoh Corporation | Method and apparatus for semantic pattern matching for text retrieval |
US5455576A (en) | 1992-12-23 | 1995-10-03 | Hewlett Packard Corporation | Apparatus and methods for Lempel Ziv data compression with improved management of multiple dictionaries in content addressable memory |
US5544320A (en) | 1993-01-08 | 1996-08-06 | Konrad; Allan M. | Remote information service access system based on a client-server-service model |
JP3297914B2 (en) | 1993-01-08 | 2002-07-02 | ソニー株式会社 | Television receiver |
US5406626A (en) * | 1993-03-15 | 1995-04-11 | Macrovision Corporation | Radio receiver for information dissemenation using subcarrier |
US5373558A (en) * | 1993-05-25 | 1994-12-13 | Chaum; David | Desinated-confirmer signature systems |
AU4647693A (en) | 1993-06-23 | 1995-01-17 | Ec Corporation | Computer-based classified ad system and method |
US5331556A (en) * | 1993-06-28 | 1994-07-19 | General Electric Company | Method for natural language data processing using morphological and part-of-speech information |
US5794207A (en) | 1996-09-04 | 1998-08-11 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers |
JPH0744967A (en) | 1993-07-30 | 1995-02-14 | Olympus Optical Co Ltd | Loading/ejecting mechanism for recording medium |
US5343519A (en) | 1993-09-07 | 1994-08-30 | Peter Feldman | Autodialer with pin feature |
US5583763A (en) | 1993-09-09 | 1996-12-10 | Mni Interactive | Method and apparatus for recommending selections based on preferences in a multi-user system |
US5565809A (en) | 1993-09-20 | 1996-10-15 | Yozan Inc. | Computational circuit |
US5371794A (en) * | 1993-11-02 | 1994-12-06 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for privacy and authentication in wireless networks |
AU693148B2 (en) | 1993-12-02 | 1998-06-25 | Sedna Patent Services, Llc | Network manager for cable television system headends |
US5455862A (en) * | 1993-12-02 | 1995-10-03 | Crest Industries, Inc. | Apparatus and method for encrypting communications without exchanging an encryption key |
JP2693907B2 (en) | 1993-12-27 | 1997-12-24 | 日本電気株式会社 | Static routing method |
US5412928A (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1995-05-09 | Reithel; Frederick | Dehydration device |
DE4406091A1 (en) | 1994-02-25 | 1995-08-31 | Grundig Emv | Receiver with a device for generating an individual program preview |
US5537315A (en) | 1994-03-23 | 1996-07-16 | Mitcham; Martin K. | Method and apparatus for issuing insurance from kiosk |
US5430729A (en) | 1994-04-04 | 1995-07-04 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for adaptive directed route randomization and distribution in a richly connected communication network |
KR100348915B1 (en) | 1994-05-12 | 2002-12-26 | 마이크로소프트 코포레이션 | TV program selection method and system |
US5642484A (en) | 1994-05-13 | 1997-06-24 | Captive Communications, Inc. | Pump top advertisement distribution and display system with performance and sales information feedback |
US5768521A (en) | 1994-05-16 | 1998-06-16 | Intel Corporation | General purpose metering mechanism for distribution of electronic information |
US5523796A (en) * | 1994-05-20 | 1996-06-04 | Prevue Networks, Inc. | Video clip program guide |
US5459306A (en) | 1994-06-15 | 1995-10-17 | Blockbuster Entertainment Corporation | Method and system for delivering on demand, individually targeted promotions |
US5541638A (en) * | 1994-06-28 | 1996-07-30 | At&T Corp. | User programmable entertainment method and apparatus |
US5539734A (en) | 1994-07-21 | 1996-07-23 | Newbridge Networks Corporation | Method of maintaining PVC status packetized communication system |
US5561421A (en) | 1994-07-28 | 1996-10-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Access method data compression with system-built generic dictionaries |
JP3224963B2 (en) | 1994-08-31 | 2001-11-05 | 株式会社東芝 | Network connection device and packet transfer method |
US5682325A (en) | 1994-09-12 | 1997-10-28 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Level 1 gateway for video tone networks |
US5805156A (en) | 1994-09-19 | 1998-09-08 | Intel Corporation | Automated media capturing system |
US5541911A (en) | 1994-10-12 | 1996-07-30 | 3Com Corporation | Remote smart filtering communication management system |
US5534911A (en) * | 1994-11-02 | 1996-07-09 | Levitan; Gutman | Virtual personal channel in a television system |
US5696965A (en) | 1994-11-03 | 1997-12-09 | Intel Corporation | Electronic information appraisal agent |
DE69531599T2 (en) | 1994-12-20 | 2004-06-24 | Sun Microsystems, Inc., Mountain View | Method and device for finding and obtaining personalized information |
US5749081A (en) | 1995-04-06 | 1998-05-05 | Firefly Network, Inc. | System and method for recommending items to a user |
US5586121A (en) | 1995-04-21 | 1996-12-17 | Hybrid Networks, Inc. | Asymmetric hybrid access system and method |
WO1996037848A1 (en) | 1995-05-24 | 1996-11-28 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | 900 number billing and collection system and method for on-line computer services |
US5671271A (en) | 1995-05-25 | 1997-09-23 | Henderson; Daniel A. | Dialer programming system and device with integrated printing process |
US5812776A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1998-09-22 | Open Market, Inc. | Method of providing internet pages by mapping telephone number provided by client to URL and returning the same in a redirect command by server |
US6041311A (en) | 1995-06-30 | 2000-03-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and apparatus for item recommendation using automated collaborative filtering |
US5649186A (en) | 1995-08-07 | 1997-07-15 | Silicon Graphics Incorporated | System and method for a computer-based dynamic information clipping service |
US5715633A (en) | 1995-11-06 | 1998-02-10 | Finish Group Ltd. | Versatile modular office partitions |
US5809478A (en) | 1995-12-08 | 1998-09-15 | Allstate Insurance Company | Method for accessing and evaluating information for processing an application for insurance |
US5794210A (en) | 1995-12-11 | 1998-08-11 | Cybergold, Inc. | Attention brokerage |
US5774870A (en) | 1995-12-14 | 1998-06-30 | Netcentives, Inc. | Fully integrated, on-line interactive frequency and award redemption program |
AU1566597A (en) | 1995-12-27 | 1997-08-11 | Gary B. Robinson | Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising |
US6119101A (en) | 1996-01-17 | 2000-09-12 | Personal Agents, Inc. | Intelligent agents for electronic commerce |
US5823879A (en) | 1996-01-19 | 1998-10-20 | Sheldon F. Goldberg | Network gaming system |
US5848396A (en) | 1996-04-26 | 1998-12-08 | Freedom Of Information, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user |
AUPN955096A0 (en) | 1996-04-29 | 1996-05-23 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Telecommunications information dissemination system |
US5947747A (en) | 1996-05-09 | 1999-09-07 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for computer-based educational testing |
US5727129A (en) | 1996-06-04 | 1998-03-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Network system for profiling and actively facilitating user activities |
US5945988A (en) | 1996-06-06 | 1999-08-31 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for automatically determining and dynamically updating user preferences in an entertainment system |
US5862223A (en) | 1996-07-24 | 1999-01-19 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce |
US5951623A (en) | 1996-08-06 | 1999-09-14 | Reynar; Jeffrey C. | Lempel- Ziv data compression technique utilizing a dictionary pre-filled with frequent letter combinations, words and/or phrases |
US5802054A (en) | 1996-08-15 | 1998-09-01 | 3Com Corporation | Atomic network switch with integrated circuit switch nodes |
US5933811A (en) | 1996-08-20 | 1999-08-03 | Paul D. Angles | System and method for delivering customized advertisements within interactive communication systems |
US5884272A (en) | 1996-09-06 | 1999-03-16 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and system for establishing and maintaining user-controlled anonymous communications |
US5948061A (en) | 1996-10-29 | 1999-09-07 | Double Click, Inc. | Method of delivery, targeting, and measuring advertising over networks |
US5903559A (en) | 1996-12-20 | 1999-05-11 | Nec Usa, Inc. | Method for internet protocol switching over fast ATM cell transport |
US5850516A (en) | 1996-12-23 | 1998-12-15 | Schneier; Bruce | Method and apparatus for analyzing information systems using stored tree database structures |
FI106990B (en) | 1996-12-31 | 2001-05-15 | Nokia Mobile Phones Ltd | A method of transmitting information to a user |
US6456852B2 (en) | 1997-01-08 | 2002-09-24 | Trafficmaster Usa, Inc. | Internet distributed real-time wireless location database |
US5961593A (en) | 1997-01-22 | 1999-10-05 | Lucent Technologies, Inc. | System and method for providing anonymous personalized browsing by a proxy system in a network |
US5796952A (en) | 1997-03-21 | 1998-08-18 | Dot Com Development, Inc. | Method and apparatus for tracking client interaction with a network resource and creating client profiles and resource database |
US6256675B1 (en) | 1997-05-06 | 2001-07-03 | At&T Corp. | System and method for allocating requests for objects and managing replicas of objects on a network |
US6134658A (en) | 1997-06-09 | 2000-10-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Multi-server location-independent authentication certificate management system |
US5991740A (en) | 1997-06-10 | 1999-11-23 | Messer; Stephen Dale | Data processing system for integrated tracking and management of commerce related activities on a public access network |
US6256503B1 (en) | 1997-07-09 | 2001-07-03 | Nortel Networks Limited | Method and system in a wireless communications network for providing restricted user termination areas based on originator location |
US5978475A (en) | 1997-07-18 | 1999-11-02 | Counterpane Internet Security, Inc. | Event auditing system |
US6182068B1 (en) | 1997-08-01 | 2001-01-30 | Ask Jeeves, Inc. | Personalized search methods |
US5960411A (en) | 1997-09-12 | 1999-09-28 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Method and system for placing a purchase order via a communications network |
US6269369B1 (en) | 1997-11-02 | 2001-07-31 | Amazon.Com Holdings, Inc. | Networked personal contact manager |
US6134532A (en) | 1997-11-14 | 2000-10-17 | Aptex Software, Inc. | System and method for optimal adaptive matching of users to most relevant entity and information in real-time |
CA2312982A1 (en) | 1997-12-05 | 1999-06-17 | Michael Walden | Wireless sales promotion system |
EP1099354B8 (en) | 1998-07-20 | 2013-06-26 | Unwired Planet, LLC | Subscriber dependent location-based services |
US6243467B1 (en) | 1998-07-23 | 2001-06-05 | The United States Of America As Represented By The National Security Agency | Method of elliptic curve cryptographic digital signature generation and verification using reduced base tau expansion in non-adjacent form |
US6285989B1 (en) | 1998-08-07 | 2001-09-04 | Ariba, Inc. | Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system |
US6275824B1 (en) | 1998-10-02 | 2001-08-14 | Ncr Corporation | System and method for managing data privacy in a database management system |
US6463533B1 (en) | 1999-04-15 | 2002-10-08 | Webtv Networks, Inc. | System for generating site-specific user aliases in a computer network |
US6591103B1 (en) | 1999-06-30 | 2003-07-08 | International Business Machine Corp. | Wireless telecommunications system and method of operation providing users′ carrier selection in overlapping hetergenous networks |
US6549768B1 (en) | 1999-08-24 | 2003-04-15 | Nokia Corp | Mobile communications matching system |
US7630986B1 (en) | 1999-10-27 | 2009-12-08 | Pinpoint, Incorporated | Secure data interchange |
-
1994
- 1994-11-29 US US08/346,425 patent/US5758257A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1995
- 1995-06-07 US US08/477,798 patent/US5734720A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-10-31 US US08/550,886 patent/US5754938A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-10-31 US US08/551,197 patent/US5754939A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-10-31 US US08/551,201 patent/US5835087A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-11-29 EP EP95942920A patent/EP0796538B1/en not_active Revoked
- 1995-11-29 US US08/849,589 patent/US6088722A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-11-29 MX MX9703967A patent/MX9703967A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1995-11-29 AT AT95942920T patent/ATE242581T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1995-11-29 AU AU44103/96A patent/AU703247B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1995-11-29 CA CA002207868A patent/CA2207868C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1995-11-29 DE DE69530995T patent/DE69530995T2/en not_active Revoked
- 1995-11-29 WO PCT/US1995/015429 patent/WO1996017467A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
1998
- 1998-02-23 US US09/028,024 patent/US6020883A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2005
- 2005-05-20 US US11/133,766 patent/US8056100B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2005-05-20 US US11/133,759 patent/US7853600B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-02-17 US US12/372,435 patent/US20090234878A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2011
- 2011-05-26 US US13/116,656 patent/US20120102523A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (99)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4264924A (en) * | 1978-03-03 | 1981-04-28 | Freeman Michael J | Dedicated channel interactive cable television system |
US4386416A (en) * | 1980-06-02 | 1983-05-31 | Mostek Corporation | Data compression, encryption, and in-line transmission system |
US4381522A (en) * | 1980-12-01 | 1983-04-26 | Adams-Russell Co., Inc. | Selective viewing |
US5109414A (en) * | 1981-11-03 | 1992-04-28 | Personalized Mass Media Corporation | Signal processing apparatus and methods |
US4590516A (en) * | 1982-06-01 | 1986-05-20 | World Video Library, Inc. | Recorded program communication system |
US4521806A (en) * | 1982-08-19 | 1985-06-04 | World Video Library, Inc. | Recorded program communication system |
US4567512A (en) * | 1982-08-19 | 1986-01-28 | World Video Library, Inc. | Recorded program communication system |
US4506387A (en) * | 1983-05-25 | 1985-03-19 | Walter Howard F | Programming-on-demand cable system and method |
US4814746A (en) * | 1983-06-01 | 1989-03-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data compression method |
US4672679A (en) * | 1983-08-16 | 1987-06-09 | Wang Laboratories, Inc. | Context redundancy text compression |
US4926480A (en) * | 1983-08-22 | 1990-05-15 | David Chaum | Card-computer moderated systems |
US4654815A (en) * | 1985-02-07 | 1987-03-31 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Analog signal conditioning and digitizing integrated circuit |
US4751578A (en) * | 1985-05-28 | 1988-06-14 | David P. Gordon | System for electronically controllably viewing on a television updateable television programming information |
US4745549A (en) * | 1985-06-11 | 1988-05-17 | Hashimoto Corporation | Method of and apparatus for optimal scheduling of television programming to maximize customer satisfaction |
US4831526A (en) * | 1986-04-22 | 1989-05-16 | The Chubb Corporation | Computerized insurance premium quote request and policy issuance system |
US4996642A (en) * | 1987-10-01 | 1991-02-26 | Neonics, Inc. | System and method for recommending items |
US4987593A (en) * | 1988-03-16 | 1991-01-22 | David Chaum | One-show blind signature systems |
US4914698A (en) * | 1988-03-16 | 1990-04-03 | David Chaum | One-show blind signature systems |
US4906991A (en) * | 1988-04-29 | 1990-03-06 | Xerox Corporation | Textual substitution data compression with finite length search windows |
US5016009A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1991-05-14 | Stac, Inc. | Data compression apparatus and method |
US5126739A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1992-06-30 | Stac Electronics | Data compression apparatus and method |
US5003307A (en) * | 1989-01-13 | 1991-03-26 | Stac, Inc. | Data compression apparatus with shift register search means |
US5630117A (en) * | 1989-02-27 | 1997-05-13 | Apple Computer, Inc. | User interface system and method for traversing a database |
US5408655A (en) * | 1989-02-27 | 1995-04-18 | Apple Computer, Inc. | User interface system and method for traversing a database |
US5201010A (en) * | 1989-05-01 | 1993-04-06 | Credit Verification Corporation | Method and system for building a database and performing marketing based upon prior shopping history |
US5003591A (en) * | 1989-05-25 | 1991-03-26 | General Instrument Corporation | Functionally modifiable cable television converter system |
US4988998A (en) * | 1989-09-05 | 1991-01-29 | Storage Technology Corporation | Data compression system for successively applying at least two data compression methods to an input data stream |
US5001478A (en) * | 1989-12-28 | 1991-03-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of encoding compressed data |
US5276736A (en) * | 1990-01-29 | 1994-01-04 | David Chaum | Optionally moderated transaction systems |
US5903359A (en) * | 1990-03-02 | 1999-05-11 | Minolta Co., Ltd. | Image processing apparatus |
US5301109A (en) * | 1990-06-11 | 1994-04-05 | Bell Communications Research, Inc. | Computerized cross-language document retrieval using latent semantic indexing |
US5023610A (en) * | 1990-06-13 | 1991-06-11 | Cordell Manufacturing, Inc. | Data compression method using textual substitution |
US5309437A (en) * | 1990-06-29 | 1994-05-03 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Bridge-like internet protocol router |
US5087913A (en) * | 1990-08-27 | 1992-02-11 | Unisys Corporation | Short-record data compression and decompression system |
US5321833A (en) * | 1990-08-29 | 1994-06-14 | Gte Laboratories Incorporated | Adaptive ranking system for information retrieval |
US5179378A (en) * | 1991-07-30 | 1993-01-12 | University Of South Florida | Method and apparatus for the compression and decompression of data using Lempel-Ziv based techniques |
US5208877A (en) * | 1991-08-29 | 1993-05-04 | Center For Innovative Technology | Fiber optic grating-based weighted, two-mode fiber sensors |
US5875108A (en) * | 1991-12-23 | 1999-02-23 | Hoffberg; Steven M. | Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system |
US5519858A (en) * | 1992-01-10 | 1996-05-21 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Address recognition engine with look-up database for storing network information |
US5323240A (en) * | 1992-02-07 | 1994-06-21 | Sony Corporation | Television receiver that automatically keeps track of favorite channels to facilitate tuning |
US5223924A (en) * | 1992-05-27 | 1993-06-29 | North American Philips Corporation | System and method for automatically correlating user preferences with a T.V. program information database |
US5483278A (en) * | 1992-05-27 | 1996-01-09 | Philips Electronics North America Corporation | System and method for finding a movie of interest in a large movie database |
US5485526A (en) * | 1992-06-02 | 1996-01-16 | Hewlett-Packard Corporation | Memory circuit for lossless data compression/decompression dictionary storage |
US6507872B1 (en) * | 1992-09-25 | 2003-01-14 | David Michael Geshwind | Class of methods for improving perceived efficiency of end-user interactive access of a large database such as the world-wide web via a communication network such as “The Internet” |
US5600364A (en) * | 1992-12-09 | 1997-02-04 | Discovery Communications, Inc. | Network controller for cable television delivery systems |
US5420806A (en) * | 1993-01-13 | 1995-05-30 | Yozan Inc. | Multiplication circuit for multiplying analog signals by digital signals |
US5907841A (en) * | 1993-01-28 | 1999-05-25 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Document detection system with improved document detection efficiency |
US5410344A (en) * | 1993-09-22 | 1995-04-25 | Arrowsmith Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus and method of selecting video programs based on viewers' preferences |
US5734719A (en) * | 1993-10-15 | 1998-03-31 | International Business Systems, Incorporated | Digital information accessing, delivery and production system |
US5420807A (en) * | 1993-10-19 | 1995-05-30 | Yozan Inc. | Multiplication circuit for multiplying analog inputs by digital inputs |
US5600798A (en) * | 1993-10-26 | 1997-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for controlling LAN data flow control through a frame relay network by end point station transmitting notification to LAN stations based on congestion notification from the frame relay network |
US5903867A (en) * | 1993-11-30 | 1999-05-11 | Sony Corporation | Information access system and recording system |
US5724567A (en) * | 1994-04-25 | 1998-03-03 | Apple Computer, Inc. | System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users |
US6023683A (en) * | 1994-08-10 | 2000-02-08 | Fisher Scientific Company | Electronic sourcing system and method |
US5613209A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1997-03-18 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automatically selecting a radio talkgroup |
US5715445A (en) * | 1994-09-02 | 1998-02-03 | Wolfe; Mark A. | Document retrieval system employing a preloading procedure |
US5490140A (en) * | 1994-09-30 | 1996-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for providing ATM support for frame relay DTEs with a terminal adapter |
US5614940A (en) * | 1994-10-21 | 1997-03-25 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing broadcast information with indexing |
US5724521A (en) * | 1994-11-03 | 1998-03-03 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for providing electronic advertisements to end users in a consumer best-fit pricing manner |
US5717923A (en) * | 1994-11-03 | 1998-02-10 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for dynamically customizing electronic information to individual end users |
US5758257A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1998-05-26 | Herz; Frederick | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US6029195A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 2000-02-22 | Herz; Frederick S. M. | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US7483871B2 (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 2009-01-27 | Pinpoint Incorporated | Customized electronic newspapers and advertisements |
US5754939A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1998-05-19 | Herz; Frederick S. M. | System for generation of user profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US5617565A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1997-04-01 | Hitachi America, Ltd. | Broadcast interactive multimedia system |
US5754938A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1998-05-19 | Herz; Frederick S. M. | Pseudonymous server for system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects |
US6020883A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 2000-02-01 | Fred Herz | System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles |
US5734720A (en) * | 1994-11-29 | 1998-03-31 | Salganicoff; Marcos | System and method for providing digital communications between a head end and a set top terminal |
US5710884A (en) * | 1995-03-29 | 1998-01-20 | Intel Corporation | System for automatically updating personal profile server with updates to additional user information gathered from monitoring user's electronic consuming habits generated on computer during use |
US5708825A (en) * | 1995-05-26 | 1998-01-13 | Iconovex Corporation | Automatic summary page creation and hyperlink generation |
US5870770A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1999-02-09 | Wolfe; Mark A. | Document research system and method for displaying citing documents |
US5740549A (en) * | 1995-06-12 | 1998-04-14 | Pointcast, Inc. | Information and advertising distribution system and method |
US5907837A (en) * | 1995-07-17 | 1999-05-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Information retrieval system in an on-line network including separate content and layout of published titles |
US5710887A (en) * | 1995-08-29 | 1998-01-20 | Broadvision | Computer system and method for electronic commerce |
US6064970A (en) * | 1996-01-29 | 2000-05-16 | Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance |
US5892924A (en) * | 1996-01-31 | 1999-04-06 | Ipsilon Networks, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically shifting between routing and switching packets in a transmission network |
US6047327A (en) * | 1996-02-16 | 2000-04-04 | Intel Corporation | System for distributing electronic information to a targeted group of users |
US6199045B1 (en) * | 1996-08-15 | 2001-03-06 | Spatial Adventures, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing position-related information to mobile recipients |
US5884270A (en) * | 1996-09-06 | 1999-03-16 | Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership | Method and system for facilitating an employment search incorporating user-controlled anonymous communications |
US6052718A (en) * | 1997-01-07 | 2000-04-18 | Sightpath, Inc | Replica routing |
US5873066A (en) * | 1997-02-10 | 1999-02-16 | Insurance Company Of North America | System for electronically managing and documenting the underwriting of an excess casualty insurance policy |
US6397040B1 (en) * | 1997-04-14 | 2002-05-28 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Telecommunications apparatus and method |
US5856981A (en) * | 1997-05-15 | 1999-01-05 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Reliable connection oriented networks |
US6029141A (en) * | 1997-06-27 | 2000-02-22 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | Internet-based customer referral system |
US6058379A (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 2000-05-02 | Auction Source, L.L.C. | Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation |
US6052064A (en) * | 1997-10-30 | 2000-04-18 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus in a wireless messaging system for dynamic creation of directed simulcast zones |
US6571279B1 (en) * | 1997-12-05 | 2003-05-27 | Pinpoint Incorporated | Location enhanced information delivery system |
US20060069749A1 (en) * | 1997-12-05 | 2006-03-30 | Pinpoint Incorporated | Location enhanced information delivery system |
US6014090A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 2000-01-11 | At&T Corp. | Method and apparatus for delivering local information to travelers |
US6055513A (en) * | 1998-03-11 | 2000-04-25 | Telebuyer, Llc | Methods and apparatus for intelligent selection of goods and services in telephonic and electronic commerce |
US6064980A (en) * | 1998-03-17 | 2000-05-16 | Amazon.Com, Inc. | System and methods for collaborative recommendations |
US6553376B1 (en) * | 1998-11-18 | 2003-04-22 | Infolibria, Inc. | Efficient content server using request redirection |
US6377972B1 (en) * | 1999-01-19 | 2002-04-23 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | High quality streaming multimedia |
US6381465B1 (en) * | 1999-08-27 | 2002-04-30 | Leap Wireless International, Inc. | System and method for attaching an advertisement to an SMS message for wireless transmission |
US6697824B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2004-02-24 | Accenture Llp | Relationship management in an E-commerce application framework |
US6708213B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2004-03-16 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method for streaming multimedia information over public networks |
US20030005074A1 (en) * | 2000-04-25 | 2003-01-02 | Herz Frederick S.M. | Method of combining shared buffers of continuous digital media data with media delivery scheduling |
US20030101124A1 (en) * | 2000-05-12 | 2003-05-29 | Nemo Semret | Method and system for market based resource allocation |
US6563910B2 (en) * | 2001-02-26 | 2003-05-13 | Royal Thoughts, Llc | Emergency response information distribution |
Cited By (232)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8489997B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2013-07-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Supplying notifications related to supply and consumption of user context data |
US9559917B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2017-01-31 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Supplying notifications related to supply and consumption of user context data |
US7945859B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2011-05-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Interface for exchanging context data |
US8677248B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2014-03-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Requesting computer user's context data |
US20050086243A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2005-04-21 | Tangis Corporation | Logging and analyzing computer user's context data |
US9372555B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2016-06-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Managing interactions between computer users' context models |
US8181113B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2012-05-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Mediating conflicts in computer users context data |
US8126979B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2012-02-28 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated response to computer users context |
US20100257235A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2010-10-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated response to computer users context |
US7779015B2 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2010-08-17 | Microsoft Corporation | Logging and analyzing context attributes |
US20090013052A1 (en) * | 1998-12-18 | 2009-01-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Automated selection of appropriate information based on a computer user's context |
US8020104B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2011-09-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Contextual responses based on automated learning techniques |
US9183306B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2015-11-10 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Automated selection of appropriate information based on a computer user's context |
US9906474B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2018-02-27 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Automated selection of appropriate information based on a computer user's context |
US8626712B2 (en) | 1998-12-18 | 2014-01-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Logging and analyzing computer user's context data |
US9443037B2 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2016-09-13 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Storing and recalling information to augment human memories |
US7962573B2 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2011-06-14 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US8839298B2 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2014-09-16 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US8108542B2 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2012-01-31 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus to determine broadcast content and scheduling in a broadcast system |
US8103665B2 (en) | 2000-04-02 | 2012-01-24 | Microsoft Corporation | Soliciting information based on a computer user's context |
US8346724B2 (en) * | 2000-04-02 | 2013-01-01 | Microsoft Corporation | Generating and supplying user context data |
US7877686B2 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2011-01-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Dynamically displaying current status of tasks |
US8051078B2 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2011-11-01 | Sony Corporation | System and method for common interest analysis among multiple users |
US20060036575A1 (en) * | 2001-08-03 | 2006-02-16 | Clement Lau | System and method for common interest analysis among multiple users |
US8285825B1 (en) * | 2002-11-13 | 2012-10-09 | Novell, Inc. | Method and system for managing network resources based on a dynamic quorum |
US20080027918A1 (en) * | 2003-07-07 | 2008-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of generating a distributed text index for parallel query processing |
US7966332B2 (en) * | 2003-07-07 | 2011-06-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method of generating a distributed text index for parallel query processing |
US20070094258A1 (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2007-04-26 | Sony Corporation | Information transmitting apparatus,terminal apparatus and method thereof |
US8190617B2 (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2012-05-29 | Sony Corporation | Information transmitting apparatus, terminal apparatus and method thereof |
US9092503B2 (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2015-07-28 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content |
US10896216B2 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2021-01-19 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content on a first system based on user preferences learned on a second system |
US20130246408A1 (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2013-09-19 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content |
US10984037B2 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2021-04-20 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content on a first system based on user preferences learned on a second system |
US10599704B2 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2020-03-24 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content on a first system based on user preferences learned on a second system |
US11321379B1 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2022-05-03 | Veveo Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content |
US11010418B2 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2021-05-18 | Veveo, Inc. | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content |
US11657081B2 (en) | 2006-03-06 | 2023-05-23 | Veveo, Inc | Methods and systems for selecting and presenting content based on dynamically identifying microgenres associated with the content |
US20070233701A1 (en) * | 2006-03-29 | 2007-10-04 | Greg Sherwood | System and method for securing content ratings |
US20070263670A1 (en) * | 2006-05-12 | 2007-11-15 | Beng Corporation | State synchronization apparatuses and methods |
US8112403B2 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2012-02-07 | Symantec Corporation | Providing a rating for a web site based on weighted user feedback |
US20070271246A1 (en) * | 2006-05-19 | 2007-11-22 | Rolf Repasi | Providing a rating for a web site based on weighted user feedback |
US7933981B1 (en) * | 2006-06-21 | 2011-04-26 | Vmware, Inc. | Method and apparatus for graphical representation of elements in a network |
US20100049768A1 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2010-02-25 | Robert James C | Automatic management of digital archives, in particular of audio and/or video files |
US9031965B2 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2015-05-12 | S.I. SV. EL. S.p.A. | Automatic management of digital archives, in particular of audio and/or video files |
US20080097994A1 (en) * | 2006-10-23 | 2008-04-24 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method of extracting community and system for the same |
US20080250064A1 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2008-10-09 | Aptima, Inc. | Method and system to compare data entities |
US7822750B2 (en) * | 2007-01-17 | 2010-10-26 | Aptima, Inc | Method and system to compare data entities |
US8458121B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2013-06-04 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Predisposition prediction using attribute combinations |
US11581096B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2023-02-14 | 23Andme, Inc. | Attribute identification based on seeded learning |
US8788283B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2014-07-22 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Modifiable attribute identification |
US10991467B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2021-04-27 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Treatment determination and impact analysis |
US8185461B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2012-05-22 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Longevity analysis and modifiable attribute identification |
US9170992B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2015-10-27 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Treatment determination and impact analysis |
US10379812B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2019-08-13 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Treatment determination and impact analysis |
US9582647B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2017-02-28 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Attribute combination discovery for predisposition determination |
US8655908B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2014-02-18 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Predisposition modification |
US8655899B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2014-02-18 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Attribute method and system |
US8224835B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2012-07-17 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Expanding attribute profiles |
US8606761B2 (en) | 2007-03-16 | 2013-12-10 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Lifestyle optimization and behavior modification |
US9685048B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2017-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automatically generating an optimal marketing strategy for improving cross sales and upsales of items |
US9031857B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2015-05-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized marketing messages at the customer level based on biometric data |
US8812355B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2014-08-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized marketing messages for a customer using dynamic customer behavior data |
US9361623B2 (en) * | 2007-04-03 | 2016-06-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | Preferred customer marketing delivery based on biometric data for a customer |
US9626684B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2017-04-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Providing customized digital media marketing content directly to a customer |
US8639563B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2014-01-28 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized marketing messages at a customer level using current events data |
US8775238B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2014-07-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized disincentive marketing content for a customer based on customer risk assessment |
US8831972B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2014-09-09 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating a customer risk assessment using dynamic customer data |
US20080249838A1 (en) * | 2007-04-03 | 2008-10-09 | Robert Lee Angell | Method and apparatus for preferred customer marketing delivery based on biometric data for a customer |
US9846883B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2017-12-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Generating customized marketing messages using automatically generated customer identification data |
US8788286B2 (en) | 2007-08-08 | 2014-07-22 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Side effects prediction using co-associating bioattributes |
US20090089293A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Bccg Ventures, Llc | Selfish data browsing |
US9405733B1 (en) * | 2007-12-18 | 2016-08-02 | Apple Inc. | System and method for analyzing and categorizing text |
US10552536B2 (en) | 2007-12-18 | 2020-02-04 | Apple Inc. | System and method for analyzing and categorizing text |
US20090172525A1 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2009-07-02 | Business Objects S.A. | Apparatus and method for reformatting a report for access by a user in a network appliance |
US8578260B2 (en) * | 2007-12-28 | 2013-11-05 | Business Objects Software Limited | Apparatus and method for reformatting a report for access by a user in a network appliance |
US9208157B1 (en) | 2008-01-17 | 2015-12-08 | Google Inc. | Spam detection for user-generated multimedia items based on concept clustering |
US8745056B1 (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2014-06-03 | Google Inc. | Spam detection for user-generated multimedia items based on concept clustering |
US8458097B2 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2013-06-04 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | System, method and software for healthcare selection based on pangenetic data |
US8452619B2 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2013-05-28 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Masked data record access |
US8200509B2 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2012-06-12 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Masked data record access |
US8326648B2 (en) | 2008-09-10 | 2012-12-04 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | System for secure mobile healthcare selection |
US20100082332A1 (en) * | 2008-09-26 | 2010-04-01 | Rite-Solutions, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for protecting users from objectionable text |
US8108406B2 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2012-01-31 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic web user behavior prediction system |
US20100169340A1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-01 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic Web Item Recommendation System |
US11003694B2 (en) | 2008-12-30 | 2021-05-11 | Expanse Bioinformatics | Learning systems for pangenetic-based recommendations |
US8655915B2 (en) | 2008-12-30 | 2014-02-18 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Pangenetic web item recommendation system |
US20100169343A1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-01 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic Web User Behavior Prediction System |
US9031870B2 (en) | 2008-12-30 | 2015-05-12 | Expanse Bioinformatics, Inc. | Pangenetic web user behavior prediction system |
US20100169342A1 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2010-07-01 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic Web Satisfaction Prediction System |
US11514085B2 (en) | 2008-12-30 | 2022-11-29 | 23Andme, Inc. | Learning system for pangenetic-based recommendations |
US8386519B2 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2013-02-26 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic web item recommendation system |
US8255403B2 (en) * | 2008-12-30 | 2012-08-28 | Expanse Networks, Inc. | Pangenetic web satisfaction prediction system |
US20110002334A1 (en) * | 2009-01-09 | 2011-01-06 | Thilmee Baduge | Communication terminal and communication state change method |
US20110099177A1 (en) * | 2009-01-23 | 2011-04-28 | Nec Corporation | Data retrieval device |
US8244739B2 (en) * | 2009-01-23 | 2012-08-14 | Nec Corporation | Data retrieval device using a skip table |
US8311960B1 (en) * | 2009-03-31 | 2012-11-13 | Emc Corporation | Interactive semi-supervised machine learning for classification |
US20140095516A1 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2014-04-03 | Waldeck Technology, Llc | Profile Construction Using Location-Based Aggregate Profile Information |
US9053169B2 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2015-06-09 | Waldeck Technology, Llc | Profile construction using location-based aggregate profile information |
US10558735B2 (en) | 2009-06-26 | 2020-02-11 | Seagate Technology Llc | System and method for using an application on a mobile device to transfer internet media content |
US11647243B2 (en) | 2009-06-26 | 2023-05-09 | Seagate Technology Llc | System and method for using an application on a mobile device to transfer internet media content |
US9767504B1 (en) | 2009-07-29 | 2017-09-19 | Google Inc. | Method, system, and computer readable medium for rendering a graphical user interface visually indicating search results including related suggested products |
US10402889B1 (en) | 2009-07-29 | 2019-09-03 | Google Llc | Method, system, and computer readable medium for rendering a graphical user interface visually indicating search results including related suggested products |
US8612306B1 (en) * | 2009-07-29 | 2013-12-17 | Google Inc. | Method, system, and storage device for recommending products utilizing category attributes |
US20120173573A1 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2012-07-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating an aggregate report of a presence of a user on a network |
US20110125775A1 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2011-05-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating an aggregate report of a presence of a user on a network |
US11049071B2 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2021-06-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating an aggregate report of a presence of a user on a network |
US9886681B2 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2018-02-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating an aggregate report of a presence of a user on a network |
US20180096303A1 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2018-04-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating an aggregate report of a presence of a user on a network |
US9953292B2 (en) * | 2009-11-24 | 2018-04-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Creating an aggregate report of a presence of a user on a network |
US9448990B2 (en) | 2010-01-08 | 2016-09-20 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Adaptive construction of a statistical language model |
US8577670B2 (en) | 2010-01-08 | 2013-11-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Adaptive construction of a statistical language model |
US20110172988A1 (en) * | 2010-01-08 | 2011-07-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Adaptive construction of a statistical language model |
US8249996B1 (en) * | 2010-02-18 | 2012-08-21 | Bank Of America Corporation | Artificial intelligence for social media |
US20110225035A1 (en) * | 2010-03-09 | 2011-09-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Determining Supply and Demand Using Online Advertisements |
US20110231394A1 (en) * | 2010-03-18 | 2011-09-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Bootstrap and adapt a document search engine |
US8527534B2 (en) | 2010-03-18 | 2013-09-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Bootstrap and adapt a document search engine |
US20110252044A1 (en) * | 2010-04-13 | 2011-10-13 | Konkuk University Industrial Cooperation Corp. | Apparatus and method for measuring contents similarity based on feedback information of ranked user and computer readable recording medium storing program thereof |
US8903822B2 (en) * | 2010-04-13 | 2014-12-02 | Konkuk University Industrial Cooperation Corp. | Apparatus and method for measuring contents similarity based on feedback information of ranked user and computer readable recording medium storing program thereof |
US9396492B2 (en) | 2010-10-15 | 2016-07-19 | Opentable, Inc. | Computer system and method for analyzing data sets and providing personalized recommendations |
US11423462B2 (en) | 2010-10-15 | 2022-08-23 | Opentable, Inc. | Computer system and method for analyzing data sets and generating personalized recommendations |
US20130290340A1 (en) * | 2010-10-27 | 2013-10-31 | Henri Jacques Suermondt | Providing Control Over a Personalized Category of Information |
US8688706B2 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2014-04-01 | Google Inc. | Topic based user profiles |
US20120143911A1 (en) * | 2010-12-01 | 2012-06-07 | Google Inc. | Recommendations based on topic clusters |
US9355168B1 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2016-05-31 | Google Inc. | Topic based user profiles |
US8849958B2 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2014-09-30 | Google Inc. | Personal content streams based on user-topic profiles |
US8589434B2 (en) * | 2010-12-01 | 2013-11-19 | Google Inc. | Recommendations based on topic clusters |
US9275001B1 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2016-03-01 | Google Inc. | Updating personal content streams based on feedback |
US9317468B2 (en) | 2010-12-01 | 2016-04-19 | Google Inc. | Personal content streams based on user-topic profiles |
CN102782750A (en) * | 2011-01-05 | 2012-11-14 | 松下电器产业株式会社 | Region of interest extraction device, region of interest extraction method |
US8942540B2 (en) * | 2011-01-05 | 2015-01-27 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation Of America | Interesting section extracting device, interesting section extracting method |
US20120321282A1 (en) * | 2011-01-05 | 2012-12-20 | Tomohiro Konuma | Interesting section extracting device, interesting section extracting method |
US8798777B2 (en) | 2011-03-08 | 2014-08-05 | Packetvideo Corporation | System and method for using a list of audio media to create a list of audiovisual media |
US20120239586A1 (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2012-09-20 | Andrew Vincent Peloso | System and method for funding nonprofit endeavors using targeting |
WO2012159057A1 (en) * | 2011-05-19 | 2012-11-22 | Charite-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin | System and method for conducting processor-assisted indexing and searching |
US8812506B2 (en) | 2011-05-19 | 2014-08-19 | Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Wissenschaften E.V | System and method for conducting processor-assisted indexing and searching |
US9058612B2 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2015-06-16 | AVG Netherlands B.V. | Systems and methods for recommending software applications |
WO2013013093A1 (en) * | 2011-07-20 | 2013-01-24 | Ness Computing, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quickly evaluating entities |
US10853379B2 (en) | 2011-07-20 | 2020-12-01 | Opentable, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quickly evaluating entities |
US11709851B2 (en) | 2011-07-20 | 2023-07-25 | Opentable, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quickly evaluating entities |
US9189551B2 (en) | 2011-07-20 | 2015-11-17 | Opentable. Inc. | Method and apparatus for category based navigation |
US9195769B2 (en) | 2011-07-20 | 2015-11-24 | Opentable, Inc. | Method and apparatus for quickly evaluating entities |
US9117196B2 (en) * | 2011-08-10 | 2015-08-25 | Boardseat Inc. | System and method for relevant business networking based in controlled relevancy groups, responsibilites and measured performance |
US20130041952A1 (en) * | 2011-08-10 | 2013-02-14 | Gregory Robert Silas | System and method for relevant business networking based in controlled relevancy groups, responsilibites and measured performance |
US20130086079A1 (en) * | 2011-10-04 | 2013-04-04 | Abhimanyu Chaudhuri | Graphical user interface for interacting with automatically generated user profiles |
US20130110839A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Evan R. Kirshenbaum | Constructing an analysis of a document |
US8776228B2 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2014-07-08 | Ca, Inc. | Transaction-based intrusion detection |
US20130133066A1 (en) * | 2011-11-22 | 2013-05-23 | Computer Associates Think, Inc | Transaction-based intrusion detection |
CN104081429A (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2014-10-01 | 谷歌公司 | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US8868481B2 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2014-10-21 | Google Inc. | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US20170013297A1 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2017-01-12 | Google Inc. | Video Recommendation Based on Video Co-Occurrence Statistics |
AU2012352903B2 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2015-01-15 | Google Llc | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US11601703B2 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2023-03-07 | Google Llc | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US20150012926A1 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2015-01-08 | Google Inc. | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US9479811B2 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2016-10-25 | Google, Inc. | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US20130159243A1 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2013-06-20 | Google Inc. | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
AU2015200201B2 (en) * | 2011-12-14 | 2016-06-23 | Google Llc | Video recommendation based on video co-occurrence statistics |
US8943015B2 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2015-01-27 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Hierarchical behavioral profile |
US20130166494A1 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | General Instrument Corporation | Hierarchical behavioral profile |
US9110998B2 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2015-08-18 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Hierarchical behavioral profile |
US11474777B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2022-10-18 | Sonos, Inc. | Audio track selection and playback |
US10678500B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2020-06-09 | Sonos, Inc. | Audio track selection and playback |
US10359990B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2019-07-23 | Sonos, Inc. | Audio track selection and playback |
US11886770B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2024-01-30 | Sonos, Inc. | Audio content selection and playback |
US11886769B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2024-01-30 | Sonos, Inc. | Audio track selection and playback |
US11036467B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2021-06-15 | Sonos, Inc. | Audio track selection and playback |
US11016727B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2021-05-25 | Sonos, Inc. | Audio track selection and playback |
US10095469B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2018-10-09 | Sonos, Inc. | Playback based on identification |
US20130173034A1 (en) * | 2011-12-28 | 2013-07-04 | Robert Reimann | Methods and Systems to Select an Audio Track |
US9665339B2 (en) * | 2011-12-28 | 2017-05-30 | Sonos, Inc. | Methods and systems to select an audio track |
US11474778B2 (en) | 2011-12-28 | 2022-10-18 | Sonos, Inc. | Audio track selection and playback |
US10749658B2 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2020-08-18 | E&C Holding Company, Llc | Virtual classroom management delivery system and method |
US10187192B2 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2019-01-22 | E&C Holding Company, Llc | Virtual classroom management delivery system and method |
US9716580B2 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2017-07-25 | E&C Holding Company, Llc | Virtual classroom management delivery system and method |
US20150089376A1 (en) * | 2012-05-31 | 2015-03-26 | E&C Holding Company, Llc | Virtual classroom management delivery system and method |
US20140006950A1 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2014-01-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Incremental preparation of videos for delivery |
US9152220B2 (en) * | 2012-06-29 | 2015-10-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Incremental preparation of videos for delivery |
US20140074828A1 (en) * | 2012-09-12 | 2014-03-13 | Myemptyslate, Inc. | Systems and methods for cataloging consumer preferences in creative content |
CN102868695A (en) * | 2012-09-18 | 2013-01-09 | 天格科技(杭州)有限公司 | Conversation tree-based intelligent online customer service method and system |
US10140611B1 (en) * | 2012-11-19 | 2018-11-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Electronic device with light-generating sources to illuminate an indicium |
US10212986B2 (en) | 2012-12-09 | 2019-02-26 | Arris Enterprises Llc | System, apparel, and method for identifying performance of workout routines |
US9278255B2 (en) | 2012-12-09 | 2016-03-08 | Arris Enterprises, Inc. | System and method for activity recognition |
US20140172579A1 (en) * | 2012-12-17 | 2014-06-19 | United Video Properties, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring users viewing media assets |
WO2014122661A1 (en) * | 2013-02-05 | 2014-08-14 | Yassin Said | Method for customizing and presentation of data units according to user's field of interest and detailed depth |
US9910923B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2018-03-06 | Opentable, Inc. | Context-based queryless presentation of recommendations |
US10394919B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2019-08-27 | Opentable, Inc. | Context-based queryless presentation of recommendations |
US9449106B2 (en) | 2013-03-08 | 2016-09-20 | Opentable, Inc. | Context-based queryless presentation of recommendations |
US20150142826A1 (en) * | 2013-11-21 | 2015-05-21 | Moxbi, LLC | Systems and Methods for Management and Improvement of Romantically Linked Relationships |
US20220327561A1 (en) * | 2013-12-13 | 2022-10-13 | Groupon, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and computer program product for providing a search feedback system |
US9372914B1 (en) | 2014-01-14 | 2016-06-21 | Google Inc. | Determining computing device characteristics from computer network activity |
US11170447B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2021-11-09 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on playback zone awareness |
US9326071B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2016-04-26 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content suggestion based on playback zone awareness |
US9326070B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2016-04-26 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on playback zone awareness |
US9332348B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2016-05-03 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content request including zone name |
US9516445B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2016-12-06 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on playback zone awareness |
US11556998B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2023-01-17 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on playback zone awareness |
US9723418B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2017-08-01 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on playback zone awareness |
US11948205B2 (en) | 2014-02-21 | 2024-04-02 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on playback zone awareness |
US10827510B2 (en) | 2014-05-29 | 2020-11-03 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Electronic device and wireless network access method in electronic device |
US10334607B2 (en) | 2014-05-29 | 2019-06-25 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Electronic device and wireless network access method in electronic device |
US10055412B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2018-08-21 | Sonos, Inc. | Providing media items from playback history |
US9672213B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2017-06-06 | Sonos, Inc. | Providing media items from playback history |
US11068528B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2021-07-20 | Sonos, Inc. | Providing media items from playback history |
US20160070692A1 (en) * | 2014-09-10 | 2016-03-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Determining segments for documents |
US20160112392A1 (en) * | 2014-10-17 | 2016-04-21 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for sharing of content |
US9998442B2 (en) * | 2014-10-17 | 2018-06-12 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for sharing of content |
US20170310819A1 (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2017-10-26 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Voice play method and voice play device |
US20170154288A1 (en) * | 2015-11-30 | 2017-06-01 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Data entry selection based on data processing |
US11477302B2 (en) | 2016-07-06 | 2022-10-18 | Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated | Computer-implemented system and method for distributed activity detection |
US20180309874A1 (en) * | 2016-07-12 | 2018-10-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for a cognitive system plug-in answering subject matter expert questions |
US10162575B2 (en) * | 2016-07-26 | 2018-12-25 | Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. | System, server device, and information processing apparatus |
US10833970B1 (en) * | 2016-08-12 | 2020-11-10 | Pinterest, Inc. | Reducing collections of sets |
US11228633B1 (en) | 2016-08-12 | 2022-01-18 | Pinterest, Inc. | Determining profile signatures associated with sets |
US11652866B2 (en) | 2016-08-12 | 2023-05-16 | Pinterest, Inc. | Generating collections of sets based on user provided annotations |
US11830038B2 (en) * | 2016-12-27 | 2023-11-28 | Rovi Product Corporation | Systems and methods for submitting user selected profile information to an advertiser |
US11244358B2 (en) * | 2016-12-27 | 2022-02-08 | Rovi Guide, Inc. | Systems and methods for submitting user selected profile information to an advertiser |
US10509531B2 (en) * | 2017-02-20 | 2019-12-17 | Google Llc | Grouping and summarization of messages based on topics |
TWI646528B (en) * | 2017-05-10 | 2019-01-01 | 華南商業銀行股份有限公司 | System for conducting dialogues |
US20180357489A1 (en) * | 2017-06-07 | 2018-12-13 | Silveredge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. | Method and system for adaptively reducing detection time in real-time supervised detection of televised advertisements |
US10719714B2 (en) * | 2017-06-07 | 2020-07-21 | Silveredge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. | Method and system for adaptively reducing detection time in real-time supervised detection of televised advertisements |
US10942955B2 (en) * | 2017-12-21 | 2021-03-09 | Shanghai Xiaoi Robot Technology Co., Ltd. | Questioning and answering method, method for generating questioning and answering system, and method for modifying questioning and answering system |
US20190197181A1 (en) * | 2017-12-21 | 2019-06-27 | Shanghai Xiaoi Robot Technology Co., Ltd. | Questioning and answering method, method for generating questioning and answering system, and method for modifying questioning and answering system |
US20210234665A1 (en) * | 2018-04-27 | 2021-07-29 | nChain Holdings Limited | Partitioning a blockchain network |
US11973869B2 (en) | 2018-04-27 | 2024-04-30 | Nchain Licensing Ag | Maintaining blocks of a blockchain in a partitioned blockchain network |
US11250440B2 (en) | 2018-06-04 | 2022-02-15 | Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd. | Payment collection device and method and apparatus |
US20230205823A1 (en) * | 2019-07-16 | 2023-06-29 | Proofpoint, Inc. | Intelligent clustering systems and methods useful for domain protection |
US11636855B2 (en) | 2019-11-11 | 2023-04-25 | Sonos, Inc. | Media content based on operational data |
US20220207097A1 (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2022-06-30 | Shenzhen Sekorm Component Network Co., Ltd | Multi-node word segmentation system and method for keyword search |
US11914658B2 (en) * | 2020-05-15 | 2024-02-27 | Shenzhen Sekorm Component Network Co., Ltd | Multi-node word segmentation system and method for keyword search |
US20220164406A1 (en) * | 2020-11-20 | 2022-05-26 | Amplified Media Logic LLC | Influencer Scoring Model |
US20220414126A1 (en) * | 2021-06-29 | 2022-12-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Virtual assistant feedback adjustment |
US11934255B2 (en) | 2022-01-04 | 2024-03-19 | Bank Of America Corporation | System and method for improving memory resource allocations in database blocks for executing tasks |
CN114780606A (en) * | 2022-03-30 | 2022-07-22 | 欧阳安安 | Big data mining method and system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US5754938A (en) | 1998-05-19 |
EP0796538B1 (en) | 2003-06-04 |
DE69530995D1 (en) | 2003-07-10 |
CA2207868A1 (en) | 1996-06-06 |
US20060150216A1 (en) | 2006-07-06 |
EP0796538A2 (en) | 1997-09-24 |
US5758257A (en) | 1998-05-26 |
AU4410396A (en) | 1996-06-19 |
US7853600B2 (en) | 2010-12-14 |
US20120102523A1 (en) | 2012-04-26 |
US20060161952A1 (en) | 2006-07-20 |
WO1996017467A2 (en) | 1996-06-06 |
MX9703967A (en) | 1998-02-28 |
US5835087A (en) | 1998-11-10 |
US6020883A (en) | 2000-02-01 |
ATE242581T1 (en) | 2003-06-15 |
AU703247B2 (en) | 1999-03-25 |
EP0796538A4 (en) | 1999-08-18 |
WO1996017467A3 (en) | 1996-09-26 |
US8056100B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 |
CA2207868C (en) | 2006-05-09 |
US5754939A (en) | 1998-05-19 |
US5734720A (en) | 1998-03-31 |
US6088722A (en) | 2000-07-11 |
DE69530995T2 (en) | 2004-04-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5835087A (en) | System for generation of object profiles for a system for customized electronic identification of desirable objects | |
US8171032B2 (en) | Providing customized electronic information | |
US6029195A (en) | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects | |
WO1997016796A1 (en) | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects | |
Terveen et al. | Beyond recommender systems: Helping people help each other | |
Perugini et al. | Recommender systems research: A connection-centric survey | |
Aïmeur et al. | Alambic: a privacy-preserving recommender system for electronic commerce | |
US7092914B1 (en) | Methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information | |
Wittig et al. | Intelligent media agents in interactive television systems | |
KR20070088780A (en) | Audience targeting with universal profile synchronization | |
WO1999024928A2 (en) | Systems and methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information | |
KR20070092733A (en) | Audience matching network with performance factoring and revenue allocation | |
EP2486532A1 (en) | Contextualized telephony message management | |
WO2001037193A1 (en) | System, method, and article of manufacture for recommending items to users based on user preferences | |
Perugini et al. | A connection-centric survey of recommender systems research | |
AU2008261113A1 (en) | System for Customized Electronic Identification of Desirable Objects | |
AU1562402A (en) | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects | |
Schafer et al. | View through MetaLens: usage patterns for a meta-recommendation system | |
AU2012216241A1 (en) | System for Customized Electronic Identification of Desirable Objects | |
Miller | Toward a personal recommender system | |
CA2236015A1 (en) | System for customized electronic identification of desirable objects | |
Militaru et al. | A survey of collaborative filtering-based systems for online recommendation | |
Schafer | MetaLens: A framework for multi-source recommendations | |
Albers | Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems And New Approaches For Recommender Systems | |
Ncir | Categorization of recommender system methods |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |