Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20090248161 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/408,100
Publication dateOct 1, 2009
Filing dateMar 20, 2009
Priority dateMar 20, 2008
Also published asUS8728163, US20120209389
Publication number12408100, 408100, US 2009/0248161 A1, US 2009/248161 A1, US 20090248161 A1, US 20090248161A1, US 2009248161 A1, US 2009248161A1, US-A1-20090248161, US-A1-2009248161, US2009/0248161A1, US2009/248161A1, US20090248161 A1, US20090248161A1, US2009248161 A1, US2009248161A1
InventorsCharles Theofilos, George England
Original AssigneeK2M, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Artificial disc replacement device
US 20090248161 A1
Abstract
An artificial disk replacement device includes opposing plate members with a pivoting assembly disposed therebetween. The pivoting assembly allows the plate members to pivot relative to each other in a first direction, but inhibit movement of the plate members in a second direction. The plate members may be installed prior to installing the pivoting assembly. An installation tool for use with the artificial disk replacement device is also disclosed.
Images(9)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(10)
1. An intervertebral implant comprising:
a first plate member;
a second plate member; and
a coupling disposed between the first plate member and the second plate member, the coupling adapted to allow the first plate member to pivot relative to the second plate member about a first axis extending through the coupling and inhibiting the first end plate from rotating relative to the second plate member about a second axis that is transverse to the first axis.
2. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, wherein the first plate member and the second plate member are adapted for engaging opposing vertebral endplates.
3. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, wherein the coupling includes:
a support member having a substantially hemispherical dome and a pair of opposing arms extending therefrom, and
a cup adapted for operative engagement with the support member, the cup having a complementary substantially hemispherical configuration and a pair of opposed openings configured to slidably engage the pair of opposing arms such that the cup is movable relative to the support member in a first direction and is inhibited from moving relative to the support member in a second direction that is orthogonal to the first direction.
4. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, wherein the coupling includes:
a support member having a substantially asymmetric dome and a pair of opposing arms extending therefrom, and
a cup adapted for operative engagement with the support member, the cup having a complementary substantially asymmetric configuration and a pair of opposed openings configured to slidably engage the pair of opposing arms such that the cup is movable relative to the support member in a first direction and is inhibited from moving relative to the support member in a second direction that is orthogonal to the first direction
5. The intervertebral implant of claim 1, further including at least one engaging member for attaching the coupling to at least one of the first and second plate members.
6. The intervertebral implant of claim 2, wherein the first and second plate members include a plurality of extensions, each extension adapted to frictionally engage the endplate of a vertebral body.
7. A method of installing an intervertebral implant comprising the steps of:
providing a distraction device having a jaw assembly with a pair of movable blades;
attaching a first plate member to one of the movable blades and a second plate member to the other of the movable blades;
inserting the first plate member and the second plate member attached to the distraction device between adjacent vertebral bodies;
operating the distraction device to spread apart the adjacent vertebral bodies with the first plate member in contact with one vertebral body and the second plate member in contact with the other vertebral body;
inserting a coupling into a space between the first plate member and the second plate member;
forming the intervertebral implant by securing the coupling to the first end plate and the second end plate; and
removing the distraction device such that the first plate member and the second plate member engage opposing sides of the coupling and the coupling.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of inserting the coupling includes the coupling having a support member operably coupled to a cup such that the cup is movable relative to the support member in a first direction and inhibited from moving relative to the support member in a second direction.
9. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of inserting the coupling further includes the support member having a substantially hemispherical surface with a pair of opposing arms extending therefrom and the cup including a complementary configuration with a pair of opposed openings that are adapted for rotatably engaging the arms.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of inserting the coupling further includes the support member having a substantially asymmetric surface with a pair of opposing arms extending therefrom and the cup including a complementary configuration with a pair of opposed openings that are adapted for rotatably engaging the arms
Description
    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application claims priority to, and the benefit of, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/070,126, filed Mar. 20, 2008, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0002]
    1. Technical Field
  • [0003]
    This application relates to a device for use in orthopedic spine surgery. In particular, the present invention relates to an artificial disc replacement device that replaces a damaged or diseased intervertebral disc.
  • [0004]
    2. Background of Related Art
  • [0005]
    The human spine is composed of thirty-three vertebrae at birth and twenty-four as a mature adult. Between each pair of vertebrae is an intervertebral disc, which maintains the space between adjacent vertebrae and acts as a cushion under compressive, bending, and rotational loads and motions. A healthy intervertebral disc has a great deal of water in the nucleus pulposus, which is the center portion of the disc. The water content gives the nucleus a spongy quality and allows it to absorb spinal stress. Excessive pressure or injuries to the nucleus can cause injury to the annulus, which is the outer ring that holds the disc together. Generally, the annulus is the first portion of the disc that experiences injury. These injuries are typically in the form of small tears. These tears heal by scar tissue. The scar tissue is not as strong as normal annulus tissue. Over time, as more scar tissue forms, the annulus becomes weaker. Eventually this can lead to damage of the nucleus pulposus. The nucleus begins to lose its water content due to the damage; it begins to dry up. Because of water loss, the discs lose some of their ability to act as a cushion. This can lead to even more stress on the annulus and still more tears as the cycle repeats. As the nucleus loses its water content, it collapses, allowing the vertebrae above and below the disc space to move closer to one another. This results in a narrowing of the disc space between the two vertebrae. As this shift occurs, the facet joints located at the back of the spine are forced to shift. This shift changes the way the facet joints work together and can cause problems in the facet joints as well.
  • [0006]
    When a disc or vertebrae is damaged due to disease or injury, standard practice is to remove all or part of the intervertebral disc, insert a natural or artificial disc spacer, and construct an artificial structure to hold the affected vertebrae in place to achieve a spinal fusion. In doing so, while the diseased or injured anatomy is addressed and the accompanying pain is significantly reduced, the natural biomechanics of the spine are affected in a unique and unpredictable way. More often than not, the patient will develop complicating spinal issues in the future.
  • [0007]
    To that end, there is an overall need to treat the disease or injury while maintaining or preserving the natural spine biomechanics. Normal spine anatomy, specifically intervertebral disc anatomy, allows one vertebra to rotate with respect to its adjacent vertebra about all three axes. Similarly, the intervertebral disc also allows adjacent vertebra to translate along all three axes with respect to one another.
  • [0008]
    For the above stated reasons, a need exits for an implantable device which may be used as an artificial disc replacement thereby maintaining disc height and motion. More specifically, the motion maintained must address at least the principle motions of rotation about all three axes. The device must also have a means to inhibit or minimize expulsion of the device from its installed location. The implantable device has an additional need of having a prolonged life span in the body that can withstand early implantation, as is often indicated for younger patients. In addition, the implantable device will have a limited amount of particulate debris so as to reduce complications over the useful life of the device.
  • SUMMARY
  • [0009]
    The present disclosure relates to an artificial disk replacement device or disk. The disk includes opposing plate members with a pivoting assembly disposed therebetween. The pivoting assembly may include a support member and a cup. Additionally, the pivoting assembly may include an engagement member. The pivoting assembly is configured for slidable insertion into openings in the first and second plate members. Each plate member may include one or more teeth for securely engaging endplates of adjacent vertebral bodies.
  • [0010]
    The pivoting assembly is adapted for allowing relative movement of the first and second plate members with respect to each other in a first direction, while inhibiting relative movement of the first and second plate members in a second direction. The first direction is transverse or orthogonal with respect to the first direction.
  • [0011]
    One embodiment of the disk is adapted for use in lumbar procedures. In this embodiment, the support member includes a hemispherical dome with opposing arms that lie in the first direction. The cup has opposing openings adapted for pivotally engaging the arms of the support member. As such, the cup moves symmetrically about the axis extending through the arms and the openings.
  • [0012]
    In an alternate embodiment, the disk is adapted for use in cervical procedures. In this embodiment, the dome of the support member is eccentric or asymmetric with respect to the axis extending through the opposing arms. Thus, when the cup pivots about the axis extending through the arms, the asymmetric configuration of the dome interacts with the cup causing the plate members of the disk to pivot and lift (i.e. increase the distance between the plate members).
  • [0013]
    An installation tool and a method of installing the disk are also disclosed. The installation tool has a handle, a knob, and a shaft. At the distal end of the installation tool, a pair of opposing jaws or blade portions exists. The blade portions releasably engage the first and second plate members. An attachment portion is located at a distal end of the shaft for releasably engaging the pivoting assembly of the disk. With the first and second plate members attached to the blade portions and the pivoting assembly coupled to the attachment portion, the physician inserts the distal end of the installation tool between the adjacent vertebral bodies. Rotating the handle in one direction causes the shaft to translate distally through the installation tool. As the pivoting assembly moves distally, it engages inner surfaces of the blade portions urging them apart. Once the pivoting assembly is fully translated in the distal direction, the support member and the engagement member slide into openings in the respective first and second plate members, thereby securing the pivoting assembly between the first and second plate members and completing the assembly of the disk. Since the distraction of the adjacent vertebral bodies is performed prior to installing the pivoting assembly, this reduces the installation force necessary to install the disk. Thus, the potential trauma to the patient is reduced and any possibility of deforming the disk is also reduced.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0014]
    The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will become more apparent in light of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
  • [0015]
    FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the presently disclosed artificial disc replacement device;
  • [0016]
    FIG. 2 is an end view of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0017]
    FIG. 3 is an exploded side view, with parts separated, of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0018]
    FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a first plate member of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0019]
    FIG. 5 is a perspective view of an insert of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0020]
    FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a cup of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0021]
    FIG. 7 is a perspective view of an articulating insert of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0022]
    FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a support member of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0023]
    FIG. 9A is a perspective view of a second plate member of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0024]
    FIG. 9B is an end view of the second plate member of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0025]
    FIG. 10A is a perspective view of a distraction instrument coupled with the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1;
  • [0026]
    FIG. 10B is an enlarged perspective view of a distal end of the distraction instrument of FIG. 10A with the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1 coupled to a jaw assembly of the distraction instrument; and
  • [0027]
    FIG. 10C is an enlarged view of the distal end of FIG. 10B with the jaws in a closed position and an exploded perspective view of the artificial disc replacement device of FIG. 1.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • [0028]
    Particular embodiments of the present disclosure will be described herein with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings and in the description that follows, the term “proximal,” will refer to the end of a device or system that is closest to the operator, while the term “distal” will refer to the end of the device or system that is farthest from the operator. In addition, the term “cephalad” is used in this application to indicate a direction toward a patient's head, whereas the term “caudad” indicates a direction toward the patient's feet. Further still, for the purposes of this application, the term “medial” indicates a direction toward the middle of the body of the patient, whilst the term “lateral” indicates a direction toward a side of the body of the patient (i.e., away from the middle of the body of the patient). The term “posterior” indicates a direction toward the patient's back, and the term “anterior” indicates a direction toward the patient's front.
  • [0029]
    Referring now to the drawings, in which like reference numerals identify identical or substantially similar parts throughout the several views, FIGS. 1-3 illustrate an embodiment of the presently disclosed artificial disk replacement device or disk 100. Disk 100 includes a first plate member 10, a support member 20, a cup 30, a coupling member 40, an engaging member 50, and a second plate member 60.
  • [0030]
    Each of the first and second plate members 10, 60 have a superior surface adapted for engaging an endplate of a vertebral body. One or more teeth 12 are disposed on the superior surface 14, 64 of the first and second plate members 10, 60. Each tooth 12 has a generally pyramidal configuration for securely engaging the endplate of the respective vertebral body. It is contemplated that each tooth 12 may have other configurations that are configured and dimensioned for securely engaging the vertebral endplate. The superior surfaces 14, 64 are curvate surfaces, although other configurations are contemplated. In addition, each plate member 10, 60 includes an opening 15, 65 along one side thereof.
  • [0031]
    With reference to FIGS. 3 and 8, the support member 20 includes a dome 22 disposed on a base portion 24. The dome 22 has a generally spherical shape. The support member 20 includes opposing arms 21, 23 that are positioned on wing portions 25, 27 of the base portion 24. The wing portions 25, 27 are adapted for slidable engagement with the opening 15 of the first plate member 10 (FIG. 3). After the support member 20 is inserted into the opening 15, the first plate member 10 and the support member 20 are securely affixed to one another. Alternatively, the dome 22 may have an alternate configuration such that it is somewhat asymmetrical or eccentric.
  • [0032]
    Referring now to FIGS. 3 and 6, the cup 30 is a generally hemispherical structure with a pair of opposed openings. Although only one opening 32 is shown, the opposing opening is substantially similar to the opening 32. Each opening 32 is configured and dimensioned for slidable engagement with the arms 21, 23. The cup 30 has a configuration that is complementary to that of the dome 22. In one embodiment, the dome 22 is generally hemispherical and the cup 30 has a complementary configuration. As such, the cup 30 nests atop the support member 20 such that the openings 32 rest atop the arms 21, 23. The cup 30 and the dome 22 are configured such that a gap is defined between a bottom lip 34 of the cup 30 and the base portion 24 of the support member 20. This permits the cup 30 to pivot about an axis X of the disk 100. An extension 36 is disposed on one end of the cup 30 opposite to the bottom lip 34.
  • [0033]
    The coupling member 40 (FIGS. 3 and 7) has a curvate upper surface 42 and a central opening 44. The opening 44 is configured for receiving the extension 36 of the cup 30. When the coupling member 40 is coupled to the cup 30, the opening 44 receives the extension 36.
  • [0034]
    The engaging member 50 (FIGS. 3 and 5) includes a recess 52 and wings 53, 55. The wings 53, 55 are configured for slidably engaging the recess 65 of the second plate member 60. After sliding the engaging member 50 into the second plate member 60, the engaging member 50 is securely affixed to the second plate member 60.
  • [0035]
    The disk 100 may be considered as the first and second plate members 10, 60 having a pivoting assembly 70 (FIG. 3) disposed therebetween. The pivoting assembly 70 includes the support member 20 and the cup 30. The pivoting assembly 70 may include the coupling member 40 in one of its embodiments. As assembled, the pivoting assembly 70 permits movement of the first and second plate members 10, 60 with respect to the axis X (FIG. 3), while inhibiting movement of the first and second plate members 10, 60 with respect to axis Y (FIG. 3). As such, the first and second plate members 10, 60 are capable of pivoting in a first direction and are inhibited from pivoting in a second direction, wherein the second direction is transverse or orthogonal to the first direction. This arrangement permits a predetermined range of movement of the adjacent vertebral bodies, while simultaneously inhibiting rotational movement of the adjacent vertebral bodies.
  • [0036]
    The presently disclosed disk 100 is suitable for use in cervical applications as well as in lumbar applications. When used in cervical applications, the dome 22 of the support member 20 (FIG. 8) has an eccentric or asymmetrical configuration. Coupling this with the cup 30 having a complementary configuration, allows the disk to pivot about the axis X, and provides a desired amount of lift. As used herein, the term lift refers to displacement of the first and second plate members 10, 60 with respect to each other along the axis Y. As such, pivoting the first and second plate members 10, 60 about the axis X, also causes the first and second plate members 10, 60 to move away from each other along the axis Y, thereby defining the lift of the disk 100. In lumbar applications, the dome 22 of the support member 20 is generally hemispherical and the cup has a complementary configuration. This arrangement allows the first and second plate members 10, 60 to pivot about the axis X without the first and second plate members 10, 60 moving relative to each other along the axis Y.
  • [0037]
    An installation tool 200 is shown in FIGS. 10A and 10B. The installation tool 200 includes a handle 210 and a knob 212. A partially threaded shaft 214 is threadably engaged with a housing 216. The threaded engagement between the shaft 214 and the housing 216 allows the shaft 214 to move longitudinally relative to the housing 216 in response to rotation of the handle 210. At the distal end of the shaft 214 is an attachment portion 218 that releasably couples the pivoting assembly 70 to the installation tool 200. The installation tool 200 also includes opposing arms 222, 224 that have blade or jaw portions 226, 228 extending distally therefrom. Each blade portion 226, 228 is generally U-shaped and is further configured and adapted for releasably engaging respective first and second plate members 10, 60. Each blade portion 226, 228 includes respective stop portions 225, 227 that limit the insertion depth of the blade portions 226, 228 between the adjacent vertebral bodies. Rotating the handle 210 in a first direction causes distal translation of the shaft 214 relative to the housing 216. As the shaft 214 advances distally, the pivoting assembly 70 engages inner surfaces of the blade portions 226, 228 urging them apart. When the pivoting assembly 70 is completely disposed between the first and second plate members 10, 60, the shaft 214 is at its distalmost position.
  • [0038]
    The disk 100 is installed between adjacent vertebral bodies using the installation tool 200. With the first and second plate members 10, 60 attached to respective blade portions 228, 226 and the pivoting assembly 70 releasably coupled to the attachment portion 218, the physician inserts the distal end of the installation tool 200 between the adjacent vertebral bodies until the stop portions 225, 227 engage the exterior of the adjacent vertebral bodies indicating that the maximum insertion depth has been achieved. Subsequently, handle 210 is rotated in a first direction and advances shaft 214 distally, thereby advancing the pivoting assembly 70 distally. During the distal movement of the pivoting assembly 70, the engaging member 50 and the support member 20 slidably engage inner surfaces of the blade portions 226, 228 urging them apart and distracting the adjacent vertebral bodies. Continued distal translation of the pivoting assembly 70 positions the pivoting assembly 70 between the first and second plate members 10, 60 such that the support member 20 and the engaging member 50 are attached to the first and second plate members 10, 60. Once the pivoting assembly 70 is attached to the first and second plate members 10, 60, the knob 212 is rotated so that the pivoting assembly 70 separates from the attachment portion 218 of the shaft 214. Subsequently, the installation tool 200 is removed. Since the first and second plate members 10, 60 are installed prior to any distraction of the adjacent vertebral bodies, inserting the pivoting assembly 70 between the first and second plate members 10, 60 requires a minimal amount of insertion force. As such, this reduces trauma to the patient and reduces deformation of the disk 100.
  • [0039]
    While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise. Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments. Thus the scope of the embodiments should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents, rather than by the examples given.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4997432 *Mar 14, 1989Mar 5, 1991Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Surgical instrument set
US5306308 *Oct 23, 1990Apr 26, 1994Ulrich GrossIntervertebral implant
US5314477 *Mar 4, 1991May 24, 1994J.B.S. Limited CompanyProsthesis for intervertebral discs and instruments for implanting it
US5370697 *Feb 19, 1993Dec 6, 1994Sulzer Medizinaltechnik AgArtificial intervertebral disk member
US5401269 *Mar 10, 1993Mar 28, 1995Waldemar Link Gmbh & Co.Intervertebral disc endoprosthesis
US5458642 *Jan 18, 1994Oct 17, 1995Beer; John C.Synthetic intervertebral disc
US5507816 *Dec 1, 1992Apr 16, 1996Customflex LimitedSpinal vertebrae implants
US5534029 *Dec 1, 1993Jul 9, 1996Yumiko ShimaArticulated vertebral body spacer
US5556431 *Aug 9, 1994Sep 17, 1996B+E,Uml U+Ee Ttner-Janz; KarinIntervertebral disc endoprosthesis
US5676701 *Jun 7, 1995Oct 14, 1997Smith & Nephew, Inc.Low wear artificial spinal disc
US5676702 *Dec 1, 1995Oct 14, 1997Tornier S.A.Elastic disc prosthesis
US5893889 *Jun 20, 1997Apr 13, 1999Harrington; MichaelArtificial disc
US5989291 *Feb 26, 1998Nov 23, 1999Third Millennium Engineering, LlcIntervertebral spacer device
US6228118 *Aug 4, 1998May 8, 2001Gordon, Maya, Roberts And Thomas, Number 1, LlcMultiple axis intervertebral prosthesis
US6231609 *Feb 10, 1999May 15, 2001Hamid M. MehdizadehDisc replacement prosthesis
US6368350 *Mar 11, 1999Apr 9, 2002Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.Intervertebral disc prosthesis and method
US6375682 *Aug 6, 2001Apr 23, 2002Lewis W. FleischmannCollapsible, rotatable and expandable spinal hydraulic prosthetic device
US6395035 *Apr 11, 2001May 28, 2002Synthes (U.S.A.)Strain regulating fusion cage for spinal fusion surgery
US6402785 *Jun 2, 2000Jun 11, 2002Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Artificial disc implant
US6517580 *Mar 9, 2000Feb 11, 2003Scient'x Societe A Responsabilite LimitedDisk prosthesis for cervical vertebrae
US6527804 *Dec 9, 1999Mar 4, 2003Dimso (Distribution Medicale Du Sud-Quest)Intervertebral disk prosthesis
US6582468 *Dec 9, 1999Jun 24, 2003Spryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with compressible body
US6607558 *Jul 3, 2001Aug 19, 2003Axiomed Spine CorporationArtificial disc
US6626943 *Aug 23, 2002Sep 30, 2003Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd.Artificial intervertebral disc
US6682562 *Mar 2, 2001Jan 27, 2004Eurosurgical SaIntervertebral disc prosthesis
US6706068 *Apr 22, 2003Mar 16, 2004Bret A. FerreeArtificial disc replacements with natural kinematics
US6723127 *Jun 21, 2002Apr 20, 2004Spine Core, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc having a wave washer force restoring element
US6726720 *Mar 27, 2002Apr 27, 2004Depuy Spine, Inc.Modular disc prosthesis
US6733532 *Dec 9, 1999May 11, 2004Stryker SpineIntervertebral disc prosthesis with improved mechanical behavior
US6740118 *Jan 9, 2002May 25, 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Intervertebral prosthetic joint
US6793678 *Mar 27, 2003Sep 21, 2004Depuy Acromed, Inc.Prosthetic intervertebral motion disc having dampening
US6875235 *May 9, 2003Apr 5, 2005Bret A. FerreeProsthetic joints with contained compressible resilient members
US6936789 *Oct 31, 2002Aug 30, 2005Illinois Tool Works Inc.Triggerless welding implement and method of operating same
US6994727 *Dec 15, 2003Feb 7, 2006Amedica CorporationTotal disc implant
US7001432 *Jan 13, 2003Feb 21, 2006Cervitech, Inc.Intervertebral prosthesis
US7001433 *Oct 29, 2002Feb 21, 2006Pioneer Laboratories, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc device
US7025787 *Nov 25, 2002Apr 11, 2006Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Implantable joint prosthesis and associated instrumentation
US7048766 *Jun 4, 2004May 23, 2006Ferree Bret AMethods and apparatus for total disc replacements with oblique keels
US7105024 *May 6, 2003Sep 12, 2006Aesculap Ii, Inc.Artificial intervertebral disc
US7128761 *Dec 10, 2003Oct 31, 2006Axiomed Spine CorporationMethod and apparatus for replacing a damaged spinal disc
US7156876 *Oct 8, 2003Jan 2, 2007Depuy Acromed, Inc.Intervertebral motion disc having articulation and shock absorption
US7198644 *Jun 29, 2004Apr 3, 2007Aesculap Ag & Co. KgIntervertebral implant
US7204852 *Dec 13, 2002Apr 17, 2007Spine Solutions, Inc.Intervertebral implant, insertion tool and method of inserting same
US7255714 *Sep 30, 2003Aug 14, 2007Michel H. MalekVertically adjustable intervertebral disc prosthesis
US7270679 *Feb 18, 2004Sep 18, 2007Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.Implants based on engineered metal matrix composite materials having enhanced imaging and wear resistance
US7282063 *Jan 21, 2004Oct 16, 2007Advanced Prosthetic Technologies, Inc.Artificial disc spinal surgical prosthesis
US7331994 *Jul 30, 2004Feb 19, 2008Vanderbilt UniversityIntervertebral disc replacement prosthesis
US7361192 *Apr 22, 2005Apr 22, 2008Doty Keith LSpinal disc prosthesis and methods of use
US7491241 *Sep 16, 2003Feb 17, 2009Spinecore, Inc.Intervertebral spacer device having recessed notch pairs for manipulation using a surgical tool
US7517363 *Jun 19, 2003Apr 14, 2009Depuy Acromed, Inc.Intervertebral disc having translation
US20020128715 *Aug 8, 2001Sep 12, 2002Vincent BryanImplantable joint prosthesis
US20030045939 *Aug 23, 2002Mar 6, 2003Simon CasuttArtificial intervertebral disc
US20030069643 *May 20, 2002Apr 10, 2003Ralph James D.Tension bearing artificial disc providing a centroid of motion centrally located within an intervertebral space
US20040002761 *Jun 19, 2003Jan 1, 2004Christopher RogersIntervertebral disc having translation
US20040138750 *Oct 14, 2003Jul 15, 2004St. Francis Medical Technologies, Inc.Artificial vertebral disk replacement implant with a spacer and method
US20040220668 *Feb 6, 2004Nov 4, 2004Sdgi Holdings, Inc.Method and device for correcting spondylolisthesis from the lateral approach
US20050267581 *Jul 21, 2005Dec 1, 2005Thierry MarnayIntervertebral Implant
US20060020341 *Jun 15, 2005Jan 26, 2006Susanne SchneidIntervertebral implant
US20080109081 *Sep 17, 2007May 8, 2008Qi-Bin BaoJoint Arthroplasty Devices Having Articulating Members
US20090062920 *Feb 22, 2007Mar 5, 2009Faneuil Innovations Investment Ltd.Intervertebral disc replacement
US20090082867 *Sep 8, 2004Mar 26, 2009Cesar Sebastian BuenoIntervertebral disc prosthesis for universal application
US20090132052 *Jul 17, 2006May 21, 2009Abbott SpineIntervertebral disk prosthesis provided with anchor means
USRE40260 *Aug 18, 2004Apr 22, 2008Scient'x Societe AnonymeDisk prosthesis for cervical vertebrae
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7905919Feb 26, 2010Mar 15, 2011Biomedflex LlcProsthetic joint
US7914580Jun 29, 2010Mar 29, 2011Biomedflex LlcProsthetic ball-and-socket joint
US8029574Oct 4, 2011Biomedflex LlcProsthetic knee joint
US8070823Dec 6, 2011Biomedflex LlcProsthetic ball-and-socket joint
US8308812Nov 13, 2012Biomedflex, LlcProsthetic joint assembly and joint member therefor
US8512413Sep 9, 2011Aug 20, 2013Biomedflex, LlcProsthetic knee joint
US9005306Nov 7, 2007Apr 14, 2015Biomedflex, LlcMedical Implants With Compliant Wear-Resistant Surfaces
US9005307Dec 5, 2011Apr 14, 2015Biomedflex, LlcProsthetic ball-and-socket joint
US9107754Nov 9, 2012Aug 18, 2015Biomedflex, LlcProsthetic joint assembly and prosthetic joint member
Classifications
U.S. Classification623/17.15, 623/17.11
International ClassificationA61F2/44
Cooperative ClassificationA61F2002/3065, A61F2002/30367, A61F2002/3082, A61F2002/30934, A61F2/4425, A61F2220/0025, A61F2/4611, A61F2002/4628, A61F2220/0033, A61F2002/443, A61F2002/30604, A61F2002/4627, A61F2002/30841, A61F2002/30387
European ClassificationA61F2/44D2, A61F2/46B7
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
Jun 8, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: SNJ PATENTS, LLC, FLORIDA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:THEOFILOS, CHARLES S.;ENGLAND, GEORGE;REEL/FRAME:022790/0764;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090604 TO 20090605
Sep 1, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: AEGEAN DISC HOLDING, LLC, FLORIDA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SNJ PATENTS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:023178/0649
Effective date: 20090813
Jul 8, 2011ASAssignment
Owner name: SILICON VALLEY BANK, CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ADDENDUM TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:K2M, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026565/0482
Effective date: 20110629
May 22, 2013ASAssignment
Owner name: K2M, INC., VIRGINIA
Free format text: TERMINATION;ASSIGNOR:SILICON VALLEY BANK;REEL/FRAME:030918/0426
Effective date: 20121029
Jul 2, 2013ASAssignment
Owner name: K2M, INC., VIRGINIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:AEGEAN DISC HOLDINGS LLC;REEL/FRAME:030726/0015
Effective date: 20130625