|Publication number||US20090301704 A1|
|Application number||US 12/300,981|
|Publication date||Dec 10, 2009|
|Filing date||May 16, 2007|
|Priority date||May 16, 2006|
|Also published as||CA2652159A1, CN101484662A, CN101484662B, WO2007137061A2, WO2007137061A3|
|Publication number||12300981, 300981, PCT/2007/69027, PCT/US/2007/069027, PCT/US/2007/69027, PCT/US/7/069027, PCT/US/7/69027, PCT/US2007/069027, PCT/US2007/69027, PCT/US2007069027, PCT/US200769027, PCT/US7/069027, PCT/US7/69027, PCT/US7069027, PCT/US769027, US 2009/0301704 A1, US 2009/301704 A1, US 20090301704 A1, US 20090301704A1, US 2009301704 A1, US 2009301704A1, US-A1-20090301704, US-A1-2009301704, US2009/0301704A1, US2009/301704A1, US20090301704 A1, US20090301704A1, US2009301704 A1, US2009301704A1|
|Inventors||Peter M. Dillett, Pat R. Perri|
|Original Assignee||Chevron U.S.A. Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Referenced by (15), Classifications (10), Legal Events (1)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. 119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/801,016 filed on May 16, 2006, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of Art
Provided is a method that relates to the recovery of hydrocarbons in subsurface formations, particularly the recovery of heavy oil from reservoirs in which steam fracturing operations have been conducted.
2. Background of the Related Art
Unconventional, heavy oil reserves, such as, for example, Miocene diatomite (Opal A), can be recovered through “steam fracturing”. Steam fracturing takes place through a cyclic process with characteristics that include injection pressures of approximately 1000 psi and temperatures of +/−500-550° F. Commonly assigned U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,085,276 and 5,305,829 disclose process(es) for cyclic steaming that are applicable to diatomite formations. Such processing generally includes:
In an embodiment, provided is a method of drilling a wellbore useful for the recovery of hydrocarbons from a subsurface reservoir, the method comprising drilling a wellbore having a substantially horizontal productive portion lying within the subsurface reservoir. The subsurface reservoir is penetrated by one or more wellbores previously injected with steam.
In an embodiment, provided is a method of drilling a wellbore useful for the recovery of hydrocarbons from a subsurface reservoir, the method comprising drilling a wellbore having a substantially horizontal productive portion lying within the subsurface reservoir, drilling one or more substantially vertical wellbores; and perforating the one or more substantially vertical wellbores according to a depth of the substantially horizontal productive portion of the wellbore.
The appended drawings illustrate typical embodiments and are not to be considered limiting in scope.
While heavy oil reserves can be recovered through known “steam fracturing” processes, it has been discovered, as indicated by data acquired through the use of surface tiltmeters, that, during some steam cycles, fugitive steam migration can occur in the overburden (i.e., above the reservoir). The fugitive steam migration is believed to be caused by shallow casing damage or out-of-zone fracturing and result in higher than normal pressures in the overburden. The higher than normal pressures are believed to cause surface expressions, drilling issues, workover difficulties and surface uplift. As used herein, “surface expressions” refer to high-pressure volumes of steam and oil that breach the surface and result in recordable spills. Recordable spills are not only costly from an HES (health-environmental-safety) standpoint, but can also lead to significant lost production/revenue if steaming is curtailed as a result. In particular, surface expressions can lead to the abandonment of damaged (or assumed damaged) wellbores.
A surface expression can lead to a moratorium on drilling/steaming new replacement or infill wells in the area of the surface expression, as well as a moratorium on operating remaining wells around the surface expression by conventional cyclic steaming means, for fear of agitating the surface expression. It was surprisingly discovered that such remaining wells, when converted to artificial lift (rod-pump) without active steam injection, in order to help reduce surface dilation and continue to recover reserves in close proximity to the surface expression, produced at rates exceeding expectations.
Thus, high oil production from the post-steam, artificial lift (rod-pump) wells, without direct cyclic steam injection, led to the exploration of whether the performance of rod-pump wells could be duplicated with a horizontal well. It was discovered that a horizontal well could intersect the cyclic-steam induced fractures of abandoned vertical wells and still be productive without steam injection. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the production mechanisms for artificial lift wells in the reservoir are three-fold. First, gravity drainage likely assists in areas of steeply-dipping beds and thus oil can migrate within a single pattern. Second, established, open-fractures (both steam-induced and natural) play a major role in providing migration pathways for the oil in the low-permeability matrix rock. Third, the remaining heat from prior cyclic steaming, along with steaming on the periphery of the area, both play an important role in the heating and viscosity reduction of the oil.
The area near a surface expression can be characterized as one that has both steam-induced fractures as well as existing natural fractures. The high frequency of natural fractures can be documented near surface expressions through a detailed FMI/EMI (electromagnetic interference) study. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the natural fractures, along with steam-induced fractures, likely create a network that can be supplied with steam and can become “pressured”, as well as further heated, which allows for the production of oil through an artificial lift mechanism and does not necessarily require active injection in the producing wellbore. While not clear how far steam and pressure can propagate through existing fractures in the area of a field near a surface expression, rod-pump response to aggressive steaming suggests that the methods disclosed herein are a viable mechanism for continual resurgence in production.
As used herein, the phrase “substantially vertical” refers to an orientation of approximately 30° or less from vertical, while the phrase “substantially horizontal” refers to an orientation of approximately 30° or less from the horizontal.
From a strictly subsurface standpoint, there are a few basic criteria to be followed when planning a wellpath of a horizontal well. The criteria are used to create a “best-fit” line for a lateral section of the well. Exemplary criteria include:
1) The path should be within approximately 50 feet of targeted abandoned wells.
2) The path should pass by the abandoned wells at an elevation no greater than approximately 160 feet above (in TVDSS) top perforations of the abandoned wells.
3) The path should pass by the abandoned wells at a TVDSS elevation that would be no lower than bottom perforations for the abandoned wells.
4) The interpreted fracture networks from abandoned wells was targeted with greater than 150,000 barrels (CWE) of cumulative steam injection.
As disclosed herein, horizontal rod-pump wells are viable options to cyclic steaming in thermally mature areas, by taking advantage of a combination of steam-induced and natural fractures and gravity drainage of hot, mobile oil. Exemplary uses include:
1) Drilling horizontal Wells to supplement existing vertical wells or replace vertical abandoned wells, when the vertical wells have previously been injected with greater than 50,000 cumulative barrels of steam (Cold Water Equivalent or CWE) and the lateral (production) section of the horizontal well is generally between the depths (total vertical depth subsea or TVDSS) of top and bottom perforations of offset vertical wells (when passing by the vertical wells). In one embodiment, the depth range is within approximately 200 feet TVDSS (height) from the top perforation of the vertical wells or approximately 50 feet TVDSS (depth) below bottom perforation of the vertical wells.
2) Drilling horizontal wells in a thermal diatomite field such that a productive portion of the horizontal well lies within approximately 100 feet from all existing or abandoned wells that have previously been injected with greater than 50,000 barrels of steam (OWE), in accordance with the aforementioned parameters for depth relative to perforations of offset vertical wells. In an embodiment, the productive portion of the horizontal well can be defined as any well completion (perforated or slotted liner) that is at an angle of 90°, or higher, and is used for inflow of oil and water.
3) Drilling horizontal wells in thermal diatomite, followed by drilling and completing vertical wells according to the aforementioned parameters for depths of perforations, relative to the productive portion of the horizontal well.
Essentially, the horizontal well disclosed herein employs a “fracture/heat salvage” approach for production in heavy oil fields such as, for example, thermal diatomite settings.
The following illustrative example is intended to be non-limiting.
A surface expression led to a moratorium on drilling/steaming new replacement or infill wells, within a 500 feet radius of the surface expression. The great number (i.e., twenty two) of abandoned wells and the restricted steaming policy led to significant loss of production (on the order of approximately 1000 Barrels Per Day or BPD) in the area of the surface expression.
Despite the abandonment of several active wells around the surface expression, there were several wells that remained. The several remaining wells were not operated by conventional cyclic steaming means, for fear of agitating the surface expression. Thus, one well was converted to artificial lift (rod-pump) in order to increase Antelope withdrawal, help reduce surface dilation, and continue to recover reserves in close proximity to the surface expression. Surprisingly, without active steam injection, the well produced at rates exceeding expectations (on the order of hundreds of BPD), until casing damage necessitated the abandonment of the converted well. Shortly after the conversion to rod-pump, four other producing wells were also equipped with rod-pumps. The four additional converted wells also responded positively.
When planning the first horizontal well, the exemplary well planning criteria as disclosed herein were focused on to ensure that the wellpath would be close enough to the abandoned wells, so as to capitalize on steam-induced fracturing and heating (see
The path of the first horizontal well targeted four previously abandoned wells in the area of the surface expression. The first horizontal well took a little over a week to drill and complete. The well was put on production with an initial production (IP) exceeding 1000 Barrels of Oil Per Day (BOPD). The first horizontal well had sustained production exceeding the average well production in the field by a factor of ten.
Prior to drilling the first horizontal well, the hypothesized mechanism for production was that the horizontal well would take advantage of the years of historic steam injection in the area by intersecting both steam-induced and natural fractures and also benefit from gravity drainage in the reservoir and wellbore (heel-to-toe elevation change rises 12°). The performance of the first horizontal well substantiates the hypotheses and suggests contribution from the majority of lateral section.
In addition to the first horizontal well, two additional horizontal well opportunities in the field were identified and capitalized on. The two additional horizontal wells were planned and drilled parallel to the first horizontal well, with the path of the second and third additional horizontal wells targeting six and five previously abandoned wells in the area of the surface expression, respectively.
Previous near-wellbore volumetric calculations indicated that a considerable portion of the oil in the first horizontal well path was drained within 25 feet of the abandoned wellbores. However, the same study also concluded similar results for the aforementioned vertical rod-pump producers. The actual performance of the first horizontal well (discussed below), along with the rod-pump production response to offset steaming, suggests that oil production can be contributed from further than 25 feet away (from bottomhole location), which suggests that a fracture network exists in the mature area of the surface expression and the fracture network likely allows for the migration of steam and oil.
Many modifications of the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein will readily occur to those of skill in the art. The present disclosure is intended for purposes of illustration only and should not be construed in a limiting sense. Accordingly, the present disclosure is to be construed as including all structure and methods that fall within the scope of the appended claims. The term “comprising” within the claims is intended to mean “including at least” such that the recited listing of elements in a claim are an open set or group. Similarly, the terms “containing,” having,” and “including” are all intended to mean an open set or group of elements. “A,” “an” and other singular terms are intended to include the plural forms thereof unless specifically excluded.
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7775271||Jul 11, 2008||Aug 17, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Device and system for well completion and control and method for completing and controlling a well|
|US7775277||Jun 24, 2008||Aug 17, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Device and system for well completion and control and method for completing and controlling a well|
|US7784543||Jul 11, 2008||Aug 31, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Device and system for well completion and control and method for completing and controlling a well|
|US7789139||Jun 23, 2008||Sep 7, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Device and system for well completion and control and method for completing and controlling a well|
|US7789151||Jun 18, 2008||Sep 7, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Plug protection system and method|
|US7789152||Aug 15, 2008||Sep 7, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Plug protection system and method|
|US7793714||Jun 23, 2008||Sep 14, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Device and system for well completion and control and method for completing and controlling a well|
|US7814974 *||Jun 17, 2008||Oct 19, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Systems, methods and apparatuses for monitoring and recovery of petroleum from earth formations|
|US7819190||Jun 17, 2008||Oct 26, 2010||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Systems, methods and apparatuses for monitoring and recovery of petroleum from earth formations|
|US7913755||Jul 11, 2008||Mar 29, 2011||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Device and system for well completion and control and method for completing and controlling a well|
|US7931081||Jun 17, 2008||Apr 26, 2011||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Systems, methods and apparatuses for monitoring and recovery of petroleum from earth formations|
|US8833474||May 2, 2012||Sep 16, 2014||Ben M. Enis||Method and apparatus for using pressure cycling and cold liquid CO2 for releasing natural gas from coal and shale formations|
|US8839875||Dec 28, 2010||Sep 23, 2014||Ben M. Enis||Method and apparatus for sequestering CO2 gas and releasing natural gas from coal and gas shale formations|
|US9085953||Apr 10, 2012||Jul 21, 2015||Baker Hughes Incorporated||Downhole flow control device and method|
|WO2011081665A1 *||Dec 28, 2010||Jul 7, 2011||Enis Ben M||Sequestering co2 and releasing natural gas from coal and gas shale formations|
|U.S. Classification||166/50, 166/245, 166/272.3|
|International Classification||E21B43/30, E21B43/24, E03B3/11|
|Cooperative Classification||E21B43/24, E21B43/305|
|European Classification||E21B43/30B, E21B43/24|
|Mar 6, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., CALIFORNIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DILLETT, PETER M.;PERRI, PAT R.;REEL/FRAME:022357/0131;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090225 TO 20090303