Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20100054529 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 12/397,073
Publication dateMar 4, 2010
Filing dateMar 3, 2009
Priority dateMay 8, 1995
Also published asCA2326565A1, CA2326565C, EP0961239A2, EP0961239A3, US6285776, US6427020, US6449377, US6567534, US6754377, US6771796, US6922480, US7499566, US7991182, US20020021825, US20030026452, US20030035565, US20050254684, US20070047766
Publication number12397073, 397073, US 2010/0054529 A1, US 2010/054529 A1, US 20100054529 A1, US 20100054529A1, US 2010054529 A1, US 2010054529A1, US-A1-20100054529, US-A1-2010054529, US2010/0054529A1, US2010/054529A1, US20100054529 A1, US20100054529A1, US2010054529 A1, US2010054529A1
InventorsGeoffrey B. Rhoads
Original AssigneeRhoads Geoffrey B
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Methods for Extracting Identifying Information From Video and Audio Content
US 20100054529 A1
Abstract
The presently claimed invention relates generally to extracting or computing identifying information from media content, e.g., such as video and audio. One claim recites a method including: obtaining data representing video or audio associated with an online network resource; obtaining instructions from the online network resource, the instructions are associated with the data; processing the data in accordance with at least some of the instructions; utilizing one or more processors, computing identifying information from the data, the identifying information facilitating identification of the video or audio. Of course, other claims and combinations are provided as well.
Images(4)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(12)
1. A method comprising:
obtaining data representing video or audio associated with an online network resource;
obtaining instructions from the online network resource, the instructions are associated with the data;
processing the data in accordance with at least some of the instructions;
utilizing one or more processors, computing identifying information of the data, the identifying information facilitating identification of the video or audio.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising managing rendering of the video or audio based at least in part on the identifying information.
3. The method of claim 2 further comprising accessing usage rights associated with the identifying information, said act of managing utilizes the usage rights.
4. The method of claim 1 in which the act of computing identifying information from the data comprises decoding digital watermarking hiding in the data.
5. The method of claim 4 in which the identifying information comprises a plural-bit identifier.
6. A computer readable medium comprising instructions stored thereon to control an apparatus to perform the method of claim 1.
7. An apparatus comprising:
one or more processors to:
obtain data representing video or audio associated with an online network resource;
obtain instructions from the online network resource, the instructions are associated with the data;
process the data in accordance with at least some of the instructions; and
compute identifying information of the data, the identifying information facilitating identification of the video or audio.
8. The apparatus of claim 7 in which the one or more processors further manage rendering of the video or audio based at least in part on the identifying information.
9. The apparatus of claim 8 in which the one or more processors further access usage rights associated with the identifying information, the one or more processors utilize the usage rights when managing rendering of the video or audio.
10. The apparatus of claim 7 in which the one or more processors compute identifying information from the data by decoding digital watermarking hiding in the data.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 in which the identifying information comprises a plural-bit identifier.
12. A method comprising:
obtaining data representing video or audio by querying an online network resource;
obtaining instructions from the online network resource, the instructions are associated with the data;
manipulating the data by reference to least some of the instructions;
utilizing one or more processors, extracting identifying information from the data.
Description
    RELATED APPLICATION DATA
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/187,783, filed Jul. 22, 2005 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,499,566), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/208,735, filed Jul. 29, 2002 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,922,480), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/293,601, filed Apr. 15, 1999 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,020) which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/074,034, filed May 6, 1998 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,377), which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/438,159, filed May 8, 1995 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,481), and copending provisional application 60/082,228, filed Apr. 16, 1998.
  • [0002]
    U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/293,601 is also a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/234,780, filed Jan. 20, 1999, which claims priority to provisional application 60/071,983, filed Jan. 20, 1998.
  • [0003]
    (The specification of application Ser. No. 08/438,159 is substantially identical to that of applicant's issued patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,636,292, 5,710,834, 5,748,763, 5,748,783. The specification of application 60/082,228 is attached hereto as Appendix A.)
  • [0004]
    Patent application Ser. No. 09/293,602 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,285,776), entitled Methods for Identifying Equipment Used in Counterfeiting, was filed as a sibling application of parent application Ser. No. 09/293,601.
  • [0005]
    The subject matter of this application is also related to that of the present assignee's other pending applications, namely Ser. Nos. 08/508,083 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,978), 08/534,005 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,832,119), 08/637,531 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,822,436), 08/649,419 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,260), 08/746,613 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,122,403), 08/951,858 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,193), and 08/969,072 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,160), and the allowed applications referenced below.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0006]
    The present invention relates to methods and devices for recognizing banknotes and responding accordingly (e.g., by intervening to prevent attempted banknote counterfeiting).
  • BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    Watermarking is a quickly growing field of endeavor, with several different approaches. The present assignee's work is reflected in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,710,834, 5,636,292, 5,721,788, 5,748,763, 5,748,783, and 5,745,604, in allowed U.S. application Ser. Nos. 08/327,426 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,768,426), 08/508,083 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,978), 08/438,159 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,481), and in laid-open PCT application WO97/43736. Other work is illustrated by U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,734,752, 5,646,997, 5,659,726, 5,664,018, 5,671,277, 5,687,191, 5,687,236, 5,689,587, 5,568,570, 5,572,247, 5,574,962, 5,579,124, 5,581,500, 5,613,004, 5,629,770, 5,461,426, 5,743,631, 5,488,664, 5,530,759, 5,539,735, 4,943,973, 5,337,361, 5,404,160, 5,404,377, 5,315,098, 5,319,735, 5,337,362, 4,972,471, 5,161,210, 5,243,423, 5,091,966, 5,113,437, 4,939,515, 5,374,976, 4,855,827, 4,876,617, 4,939,515, 4,963,998, 4,969,041, and published foreign applications WO 98/02864, EP 822,550, WO 97/39410, WO 96/36163, GB 2,196,167, EP 777,197, EP 736,860, EP 705,025, EP 766,468, EP 782,322, WO 95/20291, WO 96/26494, WO 96/36935, WO 96/42151, WO 97/22206, WO 97/26733. Some of the foregoing patents relate to visible watermarking techniques. Other visible watermarking techniques (e.g. data glyphs) are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,706,364, 5,689,620, 5,684,885, 5,680,223, 5,668,636, 5,640,647, 5,594,809.
  • [0008]
    Most of the work in watermarking, however, is not in the patent literature but rather in published research. In addition to the patentees of the foregoing patents, some of the other workers in this field (whose watermark-related writings can by found by an author search in the INSPEC database) include I. Pitas, Eckhard Koch, Jian Zhao, Norishige Morimoto, Laurence Boney, Kineo Matsui, A. Z. Tirkel, Fred Mintzer, B. Macq, Ahmed H. Tewfik, Frederic Jordan, Naohisa Komatsu, and Lawrence O' Gorman.
  • [0009]
    The artisan is assumed to be familiar with the foregoing prior art.
  • [0010]
    In the following disclosure it should be understood that references to watermarking encompass not only the assignee's watermarking technology, but can likewise be practiced with any other watermarking technology, such as those indicated above.
  • [0011]
    Watermarking can be applied to myriad forms of information. The present disclosure focuses on its applications to line art imagery, of the sort typically employed in banknotes, travelers checks, passports, stock certificates, and the like (hereafter collectively referred to as “banknotes”). However, it should be recognized that the principles discussed below can also be applied outside this particular field.
  • [0012]
    Most of the prior art in image watermarking has focused on pixelated imagery (e.g. bit-mapped images, JPEG/MPEG imagery, VGA/SVGA display devices, etc.). In most watermarking techniques, the luminance or color values of component pixels are slightly changed to effect subliminal encoding of binary data through the image. (This encoding can be done directly in the pixel domain, or in another domain, such as the DCT domain.) In some systems, isolated pixels are changed in accordance with one or more bits of the binary data; in others, plural domain-related groupings of pixels (e.g. locally adjoining, or corresponding to a given DCT component) are so changed. In all cases, however, pixels have served as the ultimate carriers of the embedded data.
  • [0013]
    While pixelated imagery is a relatively recent development, line art goes back centuries. One familiar example is U.S. paper currency. On the one dollar banknote, for example, line art is used in several different ways. One is to form intricate webbing patterns around the margin of the note (generally comprised of light lines on dark background). Another is so form grayscale imagery, such as the portrait of George Washington (generally comprised of dark lines on a light background).
  • [0014]
    In an illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the line art on a banknote or other security document is slightly changed to effect the encoding of plural-bit digital data (i.e. the banknote is digitally watermarked). When such a banknote is thereafter scanned, the resulting image data can be recognized as corresponding to a banknote by detection of the encoded data. (Alternatively, the image data can be recognized as corresponding to a banknote by machine detection of other forms of watermarking, or by reference to visible structures characteristic of banknotes.)
  • [0015]
    In response to detection of a banknote, the detecting apparatus (e.g., a scanner, photocopier, or printer) can intervene so as to prevent or deter counterfeiting. For example, the apparatus can interrupt a copying operation, and display a message reminding the operator that it is illegal to reproduce currency. Another option is to dial a remote service and report the attempted reproduction of a banknote. Yet another option is to permit the copying, but to insert forensic tracer data (e.g. steganographically encoded binary data) in the resultant copy. The tracer data can memorialize the serial number of the machine that made the copy and/or the date and time the copy was made. To address privacy concerns, such tracer data is not normally inserted in photocopied output, but is so inserted only when the subject being photocopied is detected as being a banknote.
  • [0016]
    The foregoing features and advantages of the invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0017]
    FIGS. 1A and 1B show prior art techniques for achieving grayscale effects using line art.
  • [0018]
    FIG. 2 shows a virtual array of grid points that can be imposed on an image according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • [0019]
    FIG. 3 shows a virtual array of regions that can be imposed on an image according to the FIG. 2 embodiment.
  • [0020]
    FIG. 4 shows an excerpt of FIG. 3 with a line from a line art image passing therethrough.
  • [0021]
    FIG. 5 shows changes to the width of the line of FIG. 3 to effect watermark encoding according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • [0022]
    FIG. 6 shows changes to the position of the line of FIG. 3 to effect watermark encoding according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • [0023]
    FIG. 7 is a block diagram of a photocopier according to another embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0024]
    Referring to FIG. 2, an illustrative form of the invention employs a grid 10 of imaginary reference points arrayed over a line art image. The spacing between points is 250 μm in the illustrated arrangement, but greater or lesser spacings can of course be used.
  • [0025]
    Associated with each grid point is a surrounding region 12, shown in FIG. 3. As described below, the luminosity (or reflectance) of each of these regions 12 is slightly changed to effect the subliminal encoding of binary data.
  • [0026]
    Region 12 can take various shapes; the illustrated rounded-rectangular shape is representative only. (The illustrated shape has the advantage of encompassing a fairly large area while introducing fewer visual artifacts than, e.g., square regions.) In other embodiments, squares, rectangles, circles, ellipses, etc., can alternatively be employed.
  • [0027]
    FIG. 4 is a magnified view of an excerpt of FIG. 3, showing a line 14 passing through the grid of points. The width of the line, of course, depends on the particular image of which it is a part. The illustrated line is about 25 μm in width; greater or lesser widths can naturally be used.
  • [0028]
    In a first embodiment of the invention, shown in FIG. 5, the width of the line is controllably varied so as to change the luminosity of the regions through which it passes. To increase the luminosity (or reflectance), the line is made narrower (i.e. less ink in the region). To decrease the luminosity, the line is made wider (i.e. more ink).
  • [0029]
    Whether the luminance in a given region should be increased or decreased depends on the particular watermarking algorithm used. Any algorithm can be used, by changing the luminosity of regions 12 as the algorithm would otherwise change the luminance or colors of pixels in a pixelated image.
  • [0030]
    In an exemplary algorithm, the binary data is represented as a sequence of −1 s and 1 s, instead of 0 s and 1 s. (The binary data can comprise a single datum, but more typically comprises several. In an illustrative embodiment, the data comprises 100 bits.)
  • [0031]
    Each element of the binary data sequence is then multiplied by a corresponding element of a pseudo-random number sequence, comprised of −1 s and 1 s, to yield an intermediate data signal. Each element of this intermediate data signal is mapped to a corresponding sub-part of the image, such as a region 12. The image in (and optionally around) this region is analyzed to determine its relative capability to conceal embedded data, and a corresponding scale factor is produced. Exemplary scale factors may range from 0 to 3. The scale factor for the region is then multiplied by the element of the intermediate data signal mapped to the region in order to yield a “tweak” value for the region. In the illustrated case, the resulting tweaks can range from −3 to 3. The luminosity of the region is then adjusted in accordance with the tweak value. A tweak value of −3 may correspond to a −5% change in luminosity; −2 may correspond to −2% change; −1 may correspond to −1% change; 0 may correspond to no change; 1 may correspond to +1% change; 2 may correspond to +2% change, and 3 may correspond to +5% change. (This example follows the basic techniques described in the Real Time Encoder embodiment disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,834.)
  • [0032]
    In FIG. 5, the watermarking algorithm determined that the luminance of region A should be reduced by a certain percentage, while the luminance of regions C and D should be increased by certain percentages.
  • [0033]
    In region A, the luminance is reduced by increasing the line width. In region D, the luminance is increased by reducing the line width; similarly in region C (but to a lesser extent).
  • [0034]
    No line passes through region B, so there is no opportunity to change the region's luminance. This is not fatal to the method, however, since the watermarking algorithm redundantly encodes each bit of data in sub-parts spaced throughout the line art image.
  • [0035]
    The changes to line widths in regions A and D of FIG. 5 are exaggerated for purposes of illustration. While the illustrated variance is possible, most implementations will modulate the line width 3-50% (increase or decrease).
  • [0036]
    (Many watermarking algorithms routinely operate within a signal margin of about +/−1% changes in luminosity to effect encoding. That is, the “noise” added by the encoding amounts to just 1% or so of the underlying signal. Lines typically don't occupy the full area of a region, so a 10% change to line width may only effect a 1% change to region luminosity, etc. Banknotes are different from photographs in that the art need not convey photorealism. Thus, banknotes can be encoded with higher energy than is used in watermarking photographs, provided the result is still aesthetically satisfactory. To illustrate, localized luminance changes on the order of 10% are possible in banknotes, while such a level of watermark energy in photographs would generally be considered unacceptable. In some contexts, localized luminance changes of 20, 30, 50 or even 100% are acceptable.)
  • [0037]
    In the illustrated embodiment, the change to line width is a function solely of the tweak to be applied to a single region. Thus, if a line passes through any part of a region to which a tweak of 2% is to be applied, the line width in that region is changed to effect the 2% luminance difference. In variant embodiments, the change in line width is a function of the line's position in the region. In particular, the change in line width is a function of the distance between the region's center grid point and the line's closest approach to that point. If the line passes through the grid point, the full 2% change is effected. At successively greater distances, successively less change is applied. The manner in which the magnitude of the tweak changes as a function of line position within the region can be determined by applying one of various interpolation algorithms, such as the bi-linear, bi-cubic, cubic splines, custom curve, etc.
  • [0038]
    In other variant embodiments, the change in line width in a given region is a weighted function of the tweaks for adjoining or surrounding regions. Thus, the line width in one region may be increased or decreased in accordance with a tweak value corresponding to one or more adjoining regions.
  • [0039]
    Combinations of the foregoing embodiments can also be employed.
  • [0040]
    In the foregoing embodiments, it is sometimes necessary to trade-off the tweak values of adjoining regions. For example, a line may pass along a border between regions, or pass through the point equidistant from four grid points (“equidistant zones”). In such cases, the line may be subject to conflicting tweak values—one region may want to increase the line width, while another may want to decrease the line width. (Or both may want to increase the line width, but differing amounts.) Similarly in cases where the line does not pass through an equidistant zone, but the change in line width is a function of a neighborhood of regions whose tweaks are of different values. Again, known interpolation functions can be employed to determine the weight to be given the tweak from each region in determining what change is to be made to the line width in any given region.
  • [0041]
    In the exemplary watermarking algorithm, the average change in luminosity across the image is zero, so no generalized lightening or darkening of the image is apparent. The localized changes in luminosity are so minute in magnitude, and localized in position, that they are essentially invisible (e.g. inconspicuous/subliminal) to human viewers.
  • [0042]
    An alternative embodiment is shown in FIG. 6, in which line position is changed rather than line width.
  • [0043]
    In FIG. 6 the original position of the line is shown in dashed form, and the changed position of the line is shown in solid form. To decrease a region's luminosity, the line is moved slightly closer to the center of the grid point; to increase a region's luminosity, the line is moved slightly away. Thus, in region A, the line is moved towards the center grid point, while in region D it is moved away.
  • [0044]
    It will be noted that the line on the left edge of region A does not return to its nominal (dashed) position as it exits the region. This is because the region to the left of region A also is to have decreased luminosity. Where possible, it is generally preferable not to return a line to its nominal position, but instead permit shifted lines to remain shifted as they enter adjoining regions. So doing permits a greater net line movement within a region, increasing the embedded signal level.
  • [0045]
    Again, the line shifts in FIG. 6 are somewhat exaggerated. More typical line shifts are on the order of 3-50 μm.
  • [0046]
    One way to think of the FIG. 6 embodiment is to employ a magnetism analogy. The grid point in the center of each region can be thought of as a magnet. It either attracts or repels lines. A tweak value of −3, for example, may correspond to a strong-valued attraction force; a tweak value of +2 may correspond to a middle-valued repulsion force, etc. In FIG. 6, the grid point in region A exhibits an attraction force (i.e. a negative tweak value), and the grid point in region D exhibits a repulsion force (e.g. a positive tweak value).
  • [0047]
    The magnetic analogy is useful because the magnetic effect exerted on a line depends on the distance between the line and the grid point. Thus, a line passing near a grid point is shifted more in position than a line near the periphery of the region.
  • [0048]
    Each of the variants discussed above in connection with FIG. 5 is likewise applicable to FIG. 6.
  • [0049]
    Combinations of the embodiments of FIGS. 5 and 6 can of course be used, resulting in increased watermark energy, better signal-to-noise ratio and, in many cases, less noticeable changes.
  • [0050]
    In still a further embodiment, the luminance in each region is changed while leaving the line unchanged. This can be effected by sprinkling tiny dots of ink in the otherwise-vacant parts of the region. In high quality printing, of the type used with banknotes, droplets on the order of 3 μm in diameter can be deposited. (Still larger droplets are still beyond the perception threshold for most viewers.) Speckling a region with such droplets (either in a regular array, or random, or according to a desired profile such as Gaussian), can readily effect a 1% or so change in luminosity. (Usually dark droplets are added to a region, effecting a decrease in luminosity. Increases in luminosity can be effected by speckling with a light colored ink, or by forming light voids in line art otherwise present in a region.)
  • [0051]
    In a variant of the speckling technique, very thin mesh lines can be inserted in the artwork—again to slightly change the luminance of one or more regions.
  • [0052]
    Although not previously mentioned, it is contemplated that the banknote will include some manner of calibration information to facilitate registration of the image for decoding. This calibration information can be steganographic or overt. Several techniques for steganographically embedding calibration information are disclosed in my prior patents and applications. Other techniques can be found in others of the cited work.
  • [0053]
    To decode watermark data, the encoded line art image must be converted into electronic form for analysis. This conversion is typically performed by a scanner.
  • [0054]
    Scanners are well known, so a detailed description is not provided here. Suffice it to say that scanners conventionally employ a line of closely spaced photodetector cells that produce signals related to the amount of the light reflected from successive swaths of the image. Most inexpensive consumer scanners have a resolution of 300 dots per inch (dpi), or a center to center spacing of component photodetectors of about 84 μm. Higher quality scanners of the sort found in most professional imaging equipment and photocopiers have resolutions of 600 dpi (42 μm), 1200 dpi (21μm), or better.
  • [0055]
    Taking the example of a 300 dpi scanner (84 μm photodetector spacing), each 250 μm region 12 on the banknote will correspond to about a 33 array of photodetector samples. Naturally, only in rare instances will a given region be physically registered with the scanner so that nine photodetector samples capture the luminance in that region, and nothing else. More commonly, the line art is skewed with respect to the scanner photodetectors, or is longitudinally misaligned (i.e. some photodetectors image sub-parts of two adjoining regions). However, since the scanner oversamples the regions, the luminance of each region can unambiguously be determined.
  • [0056]
    In one embodiment, the scanned data from the line art is collected in a two dimensional array and processed—according to one of the techniques disclosed in my prior patents and applications—to detect the embedded calibration information. The array is then processed to effect a virtual re-registration of the image data. A software program then analyzes the statistics of the re-registered data (using the techniques disclosed in my prior writings) to extract the bits of the embedded data.
  • [0057]
    (Again, the reference to my earlier watermark decoding techniques is exemplary only. Once scanning begins and the data is available in pixel form, it is straightforward to apply any other watermark decoding technique to extract a correspondingly-encoded watermark.)
  • [0058]
    In a variant embodiment, the scanned data is not assembled in a complete array prior to the processing. Instead, it is processed in real-time, as it is generated, in order to detect embedded watermark data without delay. (Depending on the parameters of the scanner, it may be necessary to scan a half-inch or so of the line art image before the statistics of the resulting data unambiguously indicate the presence of a watermark.)
  • [0059]
    In accordance with another aspect of the invention, various hardware devices are provided with the capability to recognize embedded watermark data in any line art images they process, and to respond accordingly.
  • [0060]
    One example is a color photocopier. Such devices employ a color scanner to generate sampled (pixel) data corresponding to an input media (e.g. a dollar bill). If watermark data associated with a banknote is detected, the photocopier can take one or more steps.
  • [0061]
    One option is simply to interrupt copying, and display a message reminding the operator that it is illegal to reproduce currency.
  • [0062]
    Another option is to dial a remote service and report the attempted reproduction of a banknote. Photocopiers with dial-out capabilities are known in the art (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,199) and are readily adapted to this purpose. The remote service can be an independent service, or can be a government agency.
  • [0063]
    Yet another option is to permit the copying, but to insert forensic tracer data in the resultant copy. This tracer data can take various forms. Steganographically encoded binary data is one example. An example is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,568,268. The tracer data can memorialize the serial number of the machine that made the copy and/or the date and time the copy was made. To address privacy concerns, such tracer data is not normally inserted in photocopied output, but is so inserted only when the subject being photocopied is detected as being a banknote. (Such an arrangement is shown in FIG. 7.)
  • [0064]
    Desirably, the scan data is analyzed on a line-by-line basis in order to identify illicit photocopying with a minimum of delay. If a banknote is scanned, one or more lines of scanner output data may be provided to the photocopier's reprographic unit before the banknote detection decision has been made. In this case the photocopy will have two regions: a first region that is not tracer-marked, and a second, subsequent region in which the tracer data has been inserted.
  • [0065]
    Photocopiers with other means to detect not-to-be-copied documents are known in the art, and employ various response strategies. Examples are detailed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,583,614, 4,723,149, 5,633,952, 5,640,467, and 5,424,807.
  • [0066]
    Another hardware device that can employ the foregoing principles is a standalone scanner. A programmed processor (or dedicated hardware) inside the scanner analyzes the data being generated by the device, and responds accordingly.
  • [0067]
    Yet another hardware device that can employ the foregoing principles is a printer. A processor inside the device analyzes graphical image data to be printed, looking for watermarks associated with banknotes.
  • [0068]
    For both the scanner and printer devices, response strategies can include disabling operation, or inserting tracer information. (Such devices typically do not have dial-out capabilities.)
  • [0069]
    Again, it is desirable to process the scanner or printer data as it becomes available, so as to detect any banknote processing with a minimum of delay. Again, there will be some lag time before a detection decision is made. Accordingly, the scanner or printer output will be comprised of two parts, one without the tracer data, and another with the tracer data.
  • [0070]
    Banknotes presently include various visible structures that can be used as aids in banknote detection (e.g. the seal of the issuing central bank, and various geometrical markings). In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a banknote is analyzed by an integrated system that considers both the visible structures and watermark-embedded data.
  • [0071]
    Visible banknote structures can be sensed using known pattern recognition techniques. Examples of such techniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,321,773, 5,390,259, 5,533,144, 5,539,841, 5,583,614, 5,633,952, 4,723,149 and 5,424,807 and laid-open foreign application EP 766,449.
  • [0072]
    In photocopiers (and the like) equipped to detect both visible and watermarked banknote markings, the detection of either causes one or more of the above-noted banknote responses to be initiated.
  • [0073]
    Again, scanners and printers can be equipped with a similar capability—analyzing the data for either of these banknote hallmarks. If either is detected, the software (or hardware) responds accordingly.
  • [0074]
    Identification of banknotes by watermark data provides an important advantage over recognition by visible structures—it cannot so easily be defeated. A banknote can be doctored (e.g. by white-out, scissors, or less crude techniques) to remove/obliterate the visible structures. Such a document can then be freely copied on either a visible structure-sensing photocopier or scanner/printer installation. The removed visible structure can then be added in via a second printing/photocopying operation. If the printer is not equipped with banknote-disabling capabilities, image-editing tools can be used to insert visible structures back into image data sets scanned from such doctored bills, and the complete bill freely printed. By additionally including embedded watermark data in the banknote, and sensing same, such ruses will not succeed.
  • [0075]
    (A similar ruse is to scan a banknote image on a non-banknote-sensing scanner. The resulting image set can then be edited by conventional image editing tools to remove/obliterate the visible structures. Such a data set can then be printed—even on a printer/photocopier that examines such data for the presence of visible structures. Again, the missing visible structures can be inserted by a subsequent printing/photocopying operation.)
  • [0076]
    Desirably, the visible structure detector and the watermark detector are integrated together as a single hardware and/or software tool. This arrangement provides various economies, e.g., in interfacing with the scanner, manipulating pixel data sets for pattern recognition and watermark extraction, electronically re-registering the image to facilitate pattern recognition/watermark extraction, issuing control signals (e.g. disabling) signals to the photocopier/scanner, etc.
  • [0077]
    (To provide a comprehensive disclosure without unduly lengthening the following specification, applicants incorporate by reference the patent documents cited above (except application Ser. No. 09/234,780 and 60/071,983).)
  • [0078]
    From the foregoing, it will be recognized that embodiments according to the present invention allow banknotes to be recognized based on optical scan data, and responsive actions taken, thereby reducing the risk of counterfeiting. Other devices, responsive to authentic banknotes, are enabled.
  • [0079]
    Having described and illustrated the principles of my invention with reference to several illustrative embodiments, it will be recognized that these embodiments are exemplary only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of my invention. Guided by the foregoing teachings, it should be apparent that other watermarking, decoding, and anti-counterfeiting technologies can be substituted for, and/or combined with, the elements detailed above to yield similar effects.
  • [0080]
    While the invention has been described with reference to embodiments employing regular rectangular arrays of grid points, those skilled in the art will recognize that other arrays of points—neither rectangular nor regular—can alternatively be used.
  • [0081]
    While the invention has been described with reference to embodiments that scale the embedded energy in accordance with local image characteristics, in other embodiments a manually crafted energy profile can be implemented. That is, a mask defining embedded signal magnitudes at different parts of the image can be manually devised, and employed to tailor the change in luminance in each region.
  • [0082]
    In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the invention may be put, it should be recognized that the detailed embodiments are illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of my invention. Rather, I claim as my invention all such embodiments as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US4258588 *Mar 16, 1979Mar 31, 1981Yum Robert SDifferential transmission with limited torque transmitter
US4639779 *Oct 15, 1985Jan 27, 1987Greenberg Burton LMethod and apparatus for the automatic identification and verification of television broadcast programs
US4805020 *Oct 14, 1985Feb 14, 1989Greenberg Burton LTelevision program transmission verification method and apparatus
US4807031 *Oct 20, 1987Feb 21, 1989Interactive Systems, IncorporatedInteractive video method and apparatus
US5385371 *Apr 26, 1994Jan 31, 1995Izawa; MichioMap in which information which can be coded is arranged in invisible state and a method for coding the content of the map
US5387941 *Sep 18, 1992Feb 7, 1995Wavephore, Inc.Data with video transmitter
US5404377 *Apr 8, 1994Apr 4, 1995Moses; Donald W.Simultaneous transmission of data and audio signals by means of perceptual coding
US5481294 *Oct 27, 1993Jan 2, 1996A. C. Nielsen CompanyAudience measurement system utilizing ancillary codes and passive signatures
US5486686 *May 18, 1992Jan 23, 1996Xerox CorporationHardcopy lossless data storage and communications for electronic document processing systems
US5493677 *Jun 8, 1994Feb 20, 1996Systems Research & Applications CorporationGeneration, archiving, and retrieval of digital images with evoked suggestion-set captions and natural language interface
US5509074 *Jan 27, 1994Apr 16, 1996At&T Corp.Method of protecting electronically published materials using cryptographic protocols
US5530759 *Feb 1, 1995Jun 25, 1996International Business Machines CorporationColor correct digital watermarking of images
US5606609 *Sep 19, 1994Feb 25, 1997Scientific-AtlantaElectronic document verification system and method
US5613004 *Jun 7, 1995Mar 18, 1997The Dice CompanySteganographic method and device
US5710834 *May 8, 1995Jan 20, 1998Digimarc CorporationMethod and apparatus responsive to a code signal conveyed through a graphic image
US5715403 *Nov 23, 1994Feb 3, 1998Xerox CorporationSystem for controlling the distribution and use of digital works having attached usage rights where the usage rights are defined by a usage rights grammar
US5719937 *Sep 12, 1996Feb 17, 1998Solana Technology Develpment CorporationMulti-media copy management system
US5721788 *Jul 31, 1992Feb 24, 1998Corbis CorporationMethod and system for digital image signatures
US5729637 *Apr 10, 1995Mar 17, 1998Adobe Systems, Inc.Method and apparatus for producing a hybrid data structure for displaying a raster image
US5745604 *Mar 15, 1996Apr 28, 1998Digimarc CorporationIdentification/authentication system using robust, distributed coding
US5808747 *May 30, 1996Sep 15, 1998Eastman Kodak CompanyApparatus and method for production of signatures
US5862260 *May 16, 1996Jan 19, 1999Digimarc CorporationMethods for surveying dissemination of proprietary empirical data
US5893127 *Nov 18, 1996Apr 6, 1999Canon Information Systems, Inc.Generator for document with HTML tagged table having data elements which preserve layout relationships of information in bitmap image of original document
US5943422 *Aug 12, 1996Aug 24, 1999Intertrust Technologies Corp.Steganographic techniques for securely delivering electronic digital rights management control information over insecure communication channels
US5973692 *Mar 10, 1997Oct 26, 1999Knowlton; Kenneth CharlesSystem for the capture and indexing of graphical representations of files, information sources and the like
US6004276 *Mar 3, 1997Dec 21, 1999Quinton Instrument CompanyOpen architecture cardiology information system
US6026193 *Oct 16, 1997Feb 15, 2000Digimarc CorporationVideo steganography
US6032195 *Jul 31, 1998Feb 29, 2000Motorola, Inc.Method, system, and article for navigating an electronic network and performing a task using a destination-specific software agent
US6094649 *Dec 22, 1997Jul 25, 2000Partnet, Inc.Keyword searches of structured databases
US6122403 *Nov 12, 1996Sep 19, 2000Digimarc CorporationComputer system linked by using information in data objects
US6185683 *Dec 28, 1998Feb 6, 2001Intertrust Technologies Corp.Trusted and secure techniques, systems and methods for item delivery and execution
US6188010 *Oct 29, 1999Feb 13, 2001Sony CorporationMusic search by melody input
US6199048 *Jan 15, 1999Mar 6, 2001Neomedia Technologies, Inc.System and method for automatic access of a remote computer over a network
US6295530 *May 15, 1996Sep 25, 2001Andrew M. RitchieInternet service of differently formatted viewable data signals including commands for browser execution
US6343138 *Jun 29, 1999Jan 29, 2002Digimarc CorporationSecurity documents with hidden digital data
US6345104 *Jul 31, 1998Feb 5, 2002Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarks and methods for security documents
US6363159 *Nov 17, 1999Mar 26, 2002Digimarc CorporationConsumer audio appliance responsive to watermark data
US6381341 *Nov 17, 1999Apr 30, 2002Digimarc CorporationWatermark encoding method exploiting biases inherent in original signal
US6516079 *Mar 15, 2000Feb 4, 2003Digimarc CorporationDigital watermark screening and detecting strategies
US6519352 *Jan 23, 2002Feb 11, 2003Digimarc CorporationEncoding and decoding in accordance with steganographically-conveyed data
US6522770 *Aug 1, 2000Feb 18, 2003Digimarc CorporationManagement of documents and other objects using optical devices
US6522771 *Jan 16, 2001Feb 18, 2003Digimarc CorporationProcessing scanned security documents notwithstanding corruptions such as rotation
US6535617 *Apr 19, 2000Mar 18, 2003Digimarc CorporationRemoval of fixed pattern noise and other fixed patterns from media signals
US6535618 *Jul 17, 2000Mar 18, 2003Digimarc CorporationImage capture device with steganographic data embedding
US6539095 *Nov 17, 1999Mar 25, 2003Geoffrey B. RhoadsAudio watermarking to convey auxiliary control information, and media embodying same
US6542618 *Nov 17, 1999Apr 1, 2003Digimarc CorporationMethods for watermark decoding
US6542620 *Jul 27, 2000Apr 1, 2003Digimarc CorporationSignal processing to hide plural-bit information in image, video, and audio data
US6542927 *Jun 29, 2001Apr 1, 2003Digimarc CorporationLinking of computers based on steganographically embedded digital data
US6546112 *Nov 23, 1998Apr 8, 2003Digimarc CorporationSecurity document with steganographically-encoded authentication data
US6549922 *Oct 1, 1999Apr 15, 2003Alok SrivastavaSystem for collecting, transforming and managing media metadata
US6549933 *Aug 4, 1998Apr 15, 2003International Business Machines CorporationManaging, accessing, and retrieving networked information using physical objects associated with the networked information
US6553129 *Apr 28, 2000Apr 22, 2003Digimarc CorporationComputer system linked by using information in data objects
US6628824 *Mar 17, 1999Sep 30, 2003Ken BelangerMethod and apparatus for image identification and comparison
US6678392 *Jul 25, 2001Jan 13, 2004Digimarc CorporationMethod for encoding auxiliary data within a source signal
US6704869 *Jul 22, 2002Mar 9, 2004Digimarc CorporationExtracting digital watermarks using logarithmic sampling and symmetrical attributes
US6718046 *Aug 31, 2001Apr 6, 2004Digimarc CorporationLow visibility watermark using time decay fluorescence
US6718047 *Aug 7, 2002Apr 6, 2004Digimarc CorporationWatermark embedder and reader
US6721440 *Jul 2, 2001Apr 13, 2004Digimarc CorporationLow visibility watermarks using an out-of-phase color
US6724912 *May 1, 2000Apr 20, 2004Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking of physical objects
US6728390 *Dec 7, 2001Apr 27, 2004Digimarc CorporationMethods and systems using multiple watermarks
US6870547 *Nov 28, 2000Mar 22, 2005Eastman Kodak CompanyMethod and apparatus for rendering a low-resolution thumbnail image suitable for a low resolution display having a reference back to an original digital negative and an edit list of operations
US6996252 *Apr 5, 2004Feb 7, 2006Digimarc CorporationLow visibility watermark using time decay fluorescence
US7003132 *Apr 1, 2003Feb 21, 2006Digimarc CorporationEmbedding hidden auxiliary code signals in media
US7003731 *Oct 17, 2000Feb 21, 2006Digimare CorporationUser control and activation of watermark enabled objects
US7006661 *Oct 21, 2002Feb 28, 2006Digimarc CorpDigital watermarking systems and methods
US7024016 *Apr 24, 2001Apr 4, 2006Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking apparatus and methods
US7158654 *Jan 2, 2003Jan 2, 2007Digimarc CorporationImage processor and image processing method
US7164780 *Feb 17, 2005Jan 16, 2007Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking apparatus and methods
US7171016 *Nov 5, 1998Jan 30, 2007Digimarc CorporationMethod for monitoring internet dissemination of image, video and/or audio files
US7171020 *Nov 26, 2003Jan 30, 2007Digimarc CorporationMethod for utilizing fragile watermark for enhanced security
US7174031 *May 17, 2005Feb 6, 2007Digimarc CorporationMethods for using wireless phones having optical capabilities
US7177443 *Feb 17, 2005Feb 13, 2007Digimarc CorporationMethod and apparatus for associating identifiers with content
US7181022 *Mar 25, 2003Feb 20, 2007Digimarc CorporationAudio watermarking to convey auxiliary information, and media embodying same
US7184570 *May 27, 2004Feb 27, 2007Digimarc CorporationMethods and systems for steganographic processing
US7319775 *Jul 12, 2001Jan 15, 2008Digimarc CorporationWavelet domain watermarks
US7321667 *May 11, 2005Jan 22, 2008Digimarc CorporationData hiding through arrangement of objects
US7330563 *May 9, 2006Feb 12, 2008Digimarc CorporationDocuments, articles and authentication of documents and articles
US7330564 *Jan 11, 2007Feb 12, 2008Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking apparatus and methods
US7340076 *Apr 16, 2003Mar 4, 2008Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarks for unmanned vehicle navigation
US7349555 *Feb 26, 2007Mar 25, 2008Digimarc CorporationDocuments and apparatus to encode documents
US7499566 *Jul 22, 2005Mar 3, 2009Digimarc CorporationMethods for steganographic encoding media
US7502759 *May 2, 2002Mar 10, 2009Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking methods and related toy and game applications
US7508955 *Oct 26, 2007Mar 24, 2009Digimarc CorporationAuthentication of objects using steganography
US7650009 *May 7, 2008Jan 19, 2010Digimarc CorporationControlling use of audio or image content
US7685426 *Feb 2, 2005Mar 23, 2010Digimarc CorporationManaging and indexing content on a network with image bookmarks and digital watermarks
US20020009208 *Apr 17, 2001Jan 24, 2002Adnan AlattarAuthentication of physical and electronic media objects using digital watermarks
US20020051544 *Jan 2, 2002May 2, 2002Fujitsu LimitedUser support system for cryptographic communication in network systems
US20030021440 *Apr 17, 2002Jan 30, 2003Rhoads Geoffrey B.Digital watermarking employing noise model
US20030040326 *Jun 20, 2002Feb 27, 2003Levy Kenneth L.Wireless methods and devices employing steganography
US20030206554 *Jul 20, 2001Nov 6, 2003Hughes Electronics CorporationSystem and method for multicasting multimedia content
US20040005093 *Feb 25, 2003Jan 8, 2004Digimarc CorporationMedia-independent document security method and apparatus
US20050013462 *Jan 23, 2004Jan 20, 2005Rhoads Geoffrey B.Paper products and physical objects as means to access and control a computer or to navigate over or act as a portal on a network
US20050041835 *Apr 29, 2004Feb 24, 2005Reed Alastair M.Fragile and emerging digital watermarks
US20050058318 *Oct 5, 2001Mar 17, 2005Rhoads Geoffrey B.Embedding information in a digital image digitized from a developed photographic film
US20060013435 *Sep 20, 2005Jan 19, 2006Rhoads Geoffrey BBackground watermark processing
US20060028689 *Aug 11, 2003Feb 9, 2006Perry Burt WDocument management with embedded data
US20060041591 *Aug 4, 2005Feb 23, 2006Rhoads Geoffrey BAssociating data with images in imaging systems
US20060062386 *Sep 13, 2005Mar 23, 2006Rhoads Geoffrey BSteganographic encoding and decoding of auxiliary codes in media signals
US20070016790 *Sep 25, 2006Jan 18, 2007Brundage Trent JIdentification document and related methods
US20070047766 *Oct 26, 2006Mar 1, 2007Rhoads Geoffrey BMethods for Steganographic Encoding Media
US20070055884 *Feb 21, 2006Mar 8, 2007Rhoads Geoffrey BUser control and activation of watermark enabled objects
US20090012944 *Sep 16, 2008Jan 8, 2009Rodriguez Tony FInternet and Database Searching with Handheld Devices
US20100008537 *Sep 15, 2009Jan 14, 2010Rhoads Geoffrey BEmbedding Hidden Auxiliary Information in Media
US20110002677 *Mar 5, 2010Jan 6, 2011Cochran Don WMethod and system for digital narrowband, wavelength specific cooking, curing, food preparation, and processing
US20110007936 *Jul 13, 2010Jan 13, 2011Rhoads Geoffrey BEncoding and Decoding Media Signals
US20110040780 *Apr 6, 2010Feb 17, 2011Rhoads Geoffrey BAudio processing
US20110051998 *Aug 31, 2010Mar 3, 2011Rhoads Geoffrey BMethods for Controlling Rendering of Images and Video
US20110058707 *Sep 14, 2010Mar 10, 2011Rhoads Geoffrey BDigital Watermarks
US20110066734 *Sep 27, 2010Mar 17, 2011Rhoads Geoffrey BNetwork linking methods and apparatus
WO1996036163A2 *May 7, 1996Nov 14, 1996Digimarc CorporationSteganography systems
Non-Patent Citations
Reference
1 *Digimarc Unleashes MarcSpider on the World Wide Web to Help Digital Image Creators Track Uses of their Work, Business Wire, 04/08/1997, all pages.
2 *Katz, Marty, Digital Watermarks Often Fail on Web Images, The New York Times, 11/11/1997, all pages.
3 *Perrig et al., Digital Image Watermarking in the "Real World," 03/09/1998, all pages.
4 *Perrig et al., Digital Image Watermarking in the "Real World," Abstract downloaded from http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~adrian/projects/wmark-realworld/wmark-realworld.html
5 *Personal Page of Fabien Petitcolas, downloaded from https://web.archive.org/web/19980112222351/http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/fapp2/, January 1998, one page.
6 *Petitcolas et al., Attacks on Copyright Marking Systems, Information Hiding 1998, LNCS 1525, pp. 218-238, April 1998, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, all pages.
7 *Petitcolas et al., Weaknesses of copyright marking systems, Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Multimedia '98, Sept. 1998, all pages.
8 *Petitcolas, Fabien A.P., Attacks on Watermarking Schemes II, University of Cambridge, Oct 1997, all pages.
9 *Petitcolas, publications, articles & other texts, downloaded from http://www.petitcolas.net/fabien/publications/index.html, Oct 2013, all pages.
10 *Petitcolas, weaknesses of existing watermarking schemes - why web-spiders fail?, downloaded from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~fapp2/watermarking/image_watermarking/2mosaic/, Aug 2000, all pages.
11 *Petitcolas, web pages on "mosaic attack," downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20040406010507/http://www.petitcolas.net/fabien/watermarking/2mosaic/, April 2004, all pages.
12 *Petitcolas, web pages on "mosaic attack," downloaded from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/fapp2/watermarking/2mosaic/index.html, Sept 2002, all pages.
13 *Thomas, Wes, webreview, Protecting Your Images with Digital Watermarks, Jan 1998, all pages.
14 *UCL Microelectronics Lab.- Crypto Group, Call for Papers - Workshop on Information Hiding, dowloaded from https://web.archive.org/web/19980201122908/http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/crypto/call_papers/WIH98.html, October 1997, all pages.
15 *UCL Microelectronics Lab.- Crypto Group, Call for Papers, dowloaded from https://web.archive.org/web/19980201122908/http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/crypto/call_for_papers.html, February 1998, all pages.
16 *Zhao, Jin, A WWW Service to Embed and Prove Digital Copyright Watermarks, Proc. of the European Conf. on Multimedia Applications, May 1996, all pages.
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US7965863Nov 20, 2007Jun 21, 2011Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarks as a gateway and control mechanism
US7970166Mar 18, 2009Jun 28, 2011Digimarc CorporationSteganographic encoding methods and apparatus
US7974436Sep 28, 2006Jul 5, 2011Digimarc CorporationMethods, apparatus and programs for generating and utilizing content signatures
US7978874Mar 17, 2005Jul 12, 2011Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking for workflow by tracking content or content identifiers with respect to time
US7986845Nov 17, 2009Jul 26, 2011Digimarc CorporationSteganographic systems and methods
US7991182Oct 26, 2006Aug 2, 2011Digimarc CorporationMethods for steganographic encoding media
US8000495Oct 14, 2008Aug 16, 2011Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking systems and methods
US8036419Oct 7, 2009Oct 11, 2011Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarks
US8094869Apr 29, 2004Jan 10, 2012Digimarc CorporationFragile and emerging digital watermarks
US8103879Sep 8, 2009Jan 24, 2012Digimarc CorporationProcessing audio or video content with multiple watermark layers
US8150032Aug 31, 2010Apr 3, 2012Digimarc CorporationMethods for controlling rendering of images and video
US8165342Apr 6, 2010Apr 24, 2012Digimarc CorporationColor image or video processing
US8181884Aug 29, 2007May 22, 2012Digimarc CorporationMachine-readable features for objects
US8243980Mar 9, 2004Aug 14, 2012Digimarc CorporationImage processing using embedded registration data to determine and compensate for geometric transformation
US8290202 *Jan 11, 2007Oct 16, 2012Digimarc CorporationMethods utilizing steganography
US8355526Mar 23, 2005Jan 15, 2013Digimarc CorporationDigitally watermarking holograms
US8447067Apr 19, 2010May 21, 2013Digimarc CorporationLocation-based arrangements employing mobile devices
US8543823Oct 14, 2003Sep 24, 2013Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarking for identification documents
US8644548Sep 21, 2011Feb 4, 2014Digimarc CorporationDigital watermarks
US8792675Apr 17, 2012Jul 29, 2014Digimarc CorporationColor image or video processing
US8953908Jun 13, 2005Feb 10, 2015Digimarc CorporationMetadata management and generation using perceptual features
US20040158724 *Oct 14, 2003Aug 12, 2004Carr J. ScottDigital watermarking for identification documents
US20040264733 *Mar 9, 2004Dec 30, 2004Rhoads Geoffrey B.Image processing using embedded registration data to determine and compensate for geometric transformation
US20050041835 *Apr 29, 2004Feb 24, 2005Reed Alastair M.Fragile and emerging digital watermarks
US20050249374 *Mar 17, 2005Nov 10, 2005Levy Kenneth LDigital watermarking for workflow
US20050271246 *Mar 15, 2005Dec 8, 2005Sharma Ravi KWatermark payload encryption methods and systems
US20060039581 *Mar 23, 2005Feb 23, 2006Decker Stephen KDigitally watermarking holograms
US20060115108 *Jun 13, 2005Jun 1, 2006Rodriguez Tony FMetadata management and generation using digital watermarks
US20070180251 *Jan 11, 2007Aug 2, 2007Carr J SMethods Utilizing Steganography
US20090232352 *Mar 18, 2009Sep 17, 2009Carr J ScottSteganographic Encoding Methods and Apparatus
US20100067737 *Nov 17, 2009Mar 18, 2010Miller Marc DSteganographic Systems and Methods
US20100226525 *Sep 8, 2009Sep 9, 2010Levy Kenneth LProcessing Audio or Video Content with Multiple Watermark Layers
US20100293106 *Apr 19, 2010Nov 18, 2010Rhoads Geoffrey BLocation-Based Arrangements Employing Mobile Devices
US20100310164 *Apr 6, 2010Dec 9, 2010Reed Alastair MColor image or video processing
US20110051998 *Aug 31, 2010Mar 3, 2011Rhoads Geoffrey BMethods for Controlling Rendering of Images and Video
Classifications
U.S. Classification382/100, 725/118
International ClassificationG07D7/12, H04N1/00, G06T7/00, H04N1/40, H04K1/00, H04N1/387, G07D7/00, B29C45/14, B42D15/00, G06T1/00, G10L19/00, G06K9/00, H04N1/32, H04N7/173
Cooperative ClassificationB42D25/29, Y10S283/901, H04N1/32203, H04N1/32304, H04N1/32309, H04N1/32144, G07D7/002, H04N1/32219, H04N2201/3271, H04N1/32261, H04N2201/3249, H04N1/00867, H04N1/00002, G06T2201/0051, G07D7/004, H04N2201/3233, H04N1/0087, H04N1/00875, H04N2201/3205, H04N2201/327, H04N2201/3246, G06T7/0002, H04N1/00859, H04N1/00005, H04N2201/3239, H04N2201/3226, H04N1/00244, H04N1/00092, G06T1/0021, H04N1/00037, G06T1/005, H04N1/00846, G06T1/0028, G06T1/0071, G06T1/0064, B29C45/1418, H04N1/32208, G10L19/018, H04N2201/3207, G06T2201/0065
European ClassificationB42D15/00C, G07D7/00D, G06T1/00W, G06T7/00B, H04N1/00A, H04N1/00P3P, H04N1/00P2R2, G06T1/00W6, H04N1/32C19B3, G06T1/00W6M, G06T1/00W6G, G06T1/00W2, H04N1/00P3M2, H04N1/32C19B7, G07D7/00B4, H04N1/00C3K, H04N1/00A1, H04N1/00A3E, H04N1/00P3A, H04N1/00P3M2H, H04N1/32C19B3B, H04N1/32C19B3C, H04N1/32C19B3J, H04N1/32C19B6D, H04N1/00A5, G10L19/018, H04N1/32C19
Legal Events
DateCodeEventDescription
May 19, 2009ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION,OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RHOADS, GEOFFREY B.;REEL/FRAME:022706/0445
Effective date: 20090515
May 12, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION),OREGO
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582
Effective date: 20100430
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION), OREG
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582
Effective date: 20100430
Oct 29, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: DMRC LLC, OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:025217/0508
Effective date: 20080801
Nov 2, 2010ASAssignment
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGON
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025227/0832
Effective date: 20080903
Owner name: DMRC CORPORATION, OREGON
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC LLC;REEL/FRAME:025227/0808
Effective date: 20080801