|Publication number||US20100054529 A1|
|Application number||US 12/397,073|
|Publication date||Mar 4, 2010|
|Priority date||May 8, 1995|
|Also published as||CA2326565A1, CA2326565C, EP0961239A2, EP0961239A3, US6285776, US6427020, US6449377, US6567534, US6754377, US6771796, US6922480, US7499566, US7991182, US20020021825, US20030026452, US20030035565, US20050254684, US20070047766|
|Publication number||12397073, 397073, US 2010/0054529 A1, US 2010/054529 A1, US 20100054529 A1, US 20100054529A1, US 2010054529 A1, US 2010054529A1, US-A1-20100054529, US-A1-2010054529, US2010/0054529A1, US2010/054529A1, US20100054529 A1, US20100054529A1, US2010054529 A1, US2010054529A1|
|Inventors||Geoffrey B. Rhoads|
|Original Assignee||Rhoads Geoffrey B|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (17), Non-Patent Citations (16), Referenced by (28), Classifications (83), Legal Events (4)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/187,783, filed Jul. 22, 2005 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,499,566), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/208,735, filed Jul. 29, 2002 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,922,480), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/293,601, filed Apr. 15, 1999 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,020) which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/074,034, filed May 6, 1998 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,449,377), which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/438,159, filed May 8, 1995 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,481), and copending provisional application 60/082,228, filed Apr. 16, 1998.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/293,601 is also a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/234,780, filed Jan. 20, 1999, which claims priority to provisional application 60/071,983, filed Jan. 20, 1998.
(The specification of application Ser. No. 08/438,159 is substantially identical to that of applicant's issued patents U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,636,292, 5,710,834, 5,748,763, 5,748,783. The specification of application 60/082,228 is attached hereto as Appendix A.)
Patent application Ser. No. 09/293,602 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,285,776), entitled Methods for Identifying Equipment Used in Counterfeiting, was filed as a sibling application of parent application Ser. No. 09/293,601.
The subject matter of this application is also related to that of the present assignee's other pending applications, namely Ser. Nos. 08/508,083 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,978), 08/534,005 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,832,119), 08/637,531 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,822,436), 08/649,419 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,862,260), 08/746,613 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,122,403), 08/951,858 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,026,193), and 08/969,072 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,160), and the allowed applications referenced below.
The present invention relates to methods and devices for recognizing banknotes and responding accordingly (e.g., by intervening to prevent attempted banknote counterfeiting).
Watermarking is a quickly growing field of endeavor, with several different approaches. The present assignee's work is reflected in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,710,834, 5,636,292, 5,721,788, 5,748,763, 5,748,783, and 5,745,604, in allowed U.S. application Ser. Nos. 08/327,426 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,768,426), 08/508,083 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,978), 08/438,159 (now U.S. Pat. No. 5,850,481), and in laid-open PCT application WO97/43736. Other work is illustrated by U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,734,752, 5,646,997, 5,659,726, 5,664,018, 5,671,277, 5,687,191, 5,687,236, 5,689,587, 5,568,570, 5,572,247, 5,574,962, 5,579,124, 5,581,500, 5,613,004, 5,629,770, 5,461,426, 5,743,631, 5,488,664, 5,530,759, 5,539,735, 4,943,973, 5,337,361, 5,404,160, 5,404,377, 5,315,098, 5,319,735, 5,337,362, 4,972,471, 5,161,210, 5,243,423, 5,091,966, 5,113,437, 4,939,515, 5,374,976, 4,855,827, 4,876,617, 4,939,515, 4,963,998, 4,969,041, and published foreign applications WO 98/02864, EP 822,550, WO 97/39410, WO 96/36163, GB 2,196,167, EP 777,197, EP 736,860, EP 705,025, EP 766,468, EP 782,322, WO 95/20291, WO 96/26494, WO 96/36935, WO 96/42151, WO 97/22206, WO 97/26733. Some of the foregoing patents relate to visible watermarking techniques. Other visible watermarking techniques (e.g. data glyphs) are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,706,364, 5,689,620, 5,684,885, 5,680,223, 5,668,636, 5,640,647, 5,594,809.
Most of the work in watermarking, however, is not in the patent literature but rather in published research. In addition to the patentees of the foregoing patents, some of the other workers in this field (whose watermark-related writings can by found by an author search in the INSPEC database) include I. Pitas, Eckhard Koch, Jian Zhao, Norishige Morimoto, Laurence Boney, Kineo Matsui, A. Z. Tirkel, Fred Mintzer, B. Macq, Ahmed H. Tewfik, Frederic Jordan, Naohisa Komatsu, and Lawrence O' Gorman.
The artisan is assumed to be familiar with the foregoing prior art.
In the following disclosure it should be understood that references to watermarking encompass not only the assignee's watermarking technology, but can likewise be practiced with any other watermarking technology, such as those indicated above.
Watermarking can be applied to myriad forms of information. The present disclosure focuses on its applications to line art imagery, of the sort typically employed in banknotes, travelers checks, passports, stock certificates, and the like (hereafter collectively referred to as “banknotes”). However, it should be recognized that the principles discussed below can also be applied outside this particular field.
Most of the prior art in image watermarking has focused on pixelated imagery (e.g. bit-mapped images, JPEG/MPEG imagery, VGA/SVGA display devices, etc.). In most watermarking techniques, the luminance or color values of component pixels are slightly changed to effect subliminal encoding of binary data through the image. (This encoding can be done directly in the pixel domain, or in another domain, such as the DCT domain.) In some systems, isolated pixels are changed in accordance with one or more bits of the binary data; in others, plural domain-related groupings of pixels (e.g. locally adjoining, or corresponding to a given DCT component) are so changed. In all cases, however, pixels have served as the ultimate carriers of the embedded data.
While pixelated imagery is a relatively recent development, line art goes back centuries. One familiar example is U.S. paper currency. On the one dollar banknote, for example, line art is used in several different ways. One is to form intricate webbing patterns around the margin of the note (generally comprised of light lines on dark background). Another is so form grayscale imagery, such as the portrait of George Washington (generally comprised of dark lines on a light background).
In an illustrative embodiment of the present invention, the line art on a banknote or other security document is slightly changed to effect the encoding of plural-bit digital data (i.e. the banknote is digitally watermarked). When such a banknote is thereafter scanned, the resulting image data can be recognized as corresponding to a banknote by detection of the encoded data. (Alternatively, the image data can be recognized as corresponding to a banknote by machine detection of other forms of watermarking, or by reference to visible structures characteristic of banknotes.)
In response to detection of a banknote, the detecting apparatus (e.g., a scanner, photocopier, or printer) can intervene so as to prevent or deter counterfeiting. For example, the apparatus can interrupt a copying operation, and display a message reminding the operator that it is illegal to reproduce currency. Another option is to dial a remote service and report the attempted reproduction of a banknote. Yet another option is to permit the copying, but to insert forensic tracer data (e.g. steganographically encoded binary data) in the resultant copy. The tracer data can memorialize the serial number of the machine that made the copy and/or the date and time the copy was made. To address privacy concerns, such tracer data is not normally inserted in photocopied output, but is so inserted only when the subject being photocopied is detected as being a banknote.
The foregoing features and advantages of the invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Associated with each grid point is a surrounding region 12, shown in
Region 12 can take various shapes; the illustrated rounded-rectangular shape is representative only. (The illustrated shape has the advantage of encompassing a fairly large area while introducing fewer visual artifacts than, e.g., square regions.) In other embodiments, squares, rectangles, circles, ellipses, etc., can alternatively be employed.
In a first embodiment of the invention, shown in
Whether the luminance in a given region should be increased or decreased depends on the particular watermarking algorithm used. Any algorithm can be used, by changing the luminosity of regions 12 as the algorithm would otherwise change the luminance or colors of pixels in a pixelated image.
In an exemplary algorithm, the binary data is represented as a sequence of −1 s and 1 s, instead of 0 s and 1 s. (The binary data can comprise a single datum, but more typically comprises several. In an illustrative embodiment, the data comprises 100 bits.)
Each element of the binary data sequence is then multiplied by a corresponding element of a pseudo-random number sequence, comprised of −1 s and 1 s, to yield an intermediate data signal. Each element of this intermediate data signal is mapped to a corresponding sub-part of the image, such as a region 12. The image in (and optionally around) this region is analyzed to determine its relative capability to conceal embedded data, and a corresponding scale factor is produced. Exemplary scale factors may range from 0 to 3. The scale factor for the region is then multiplied by the element of the intermediate data signal mapped to the region in order to yield a “tweak” value for the region. In the illustrated case, the resulting tweaks can range from −3 to 3. The luminosity of the region is then adjusted in accordance with the tweak value. A tweak value of −3 may correspond to a −5% change in luminosity; −2 may correspond to −2% change; −1 may correspond to −1% change; 0 may correspond to no change; 1 may correspond to +1% change; 2 may correspond to +2% change, and 3 may correspond to +5% change. (This example follows the basic techniques described in the Real Time Encoder embodiment disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,834.)
In region A, the luminance is reduced by increasing the line width. In region D, the luminance is increased by reducing the line width; similarly in region C (but to a lesser extent).
No line passes through region B, so there is no opportunity to change the region's luminance. This is not fatal to the method, however, since the watermarking algorithm redundantly encodes each bit of data in sub-parts spaced throughout the line art image.
The changes to line widths in regions A and D of
(Many watermarking algorithms routinely operate within a signal margin of about +/−1% changes in luminosity to effect encoding. That is, the “noise” added by the encoding amounts to just 1% or so of the underlying signal. Lines typically don't occupy the full area of a region, so a 10% change to line width may only effect a 1% change to region luminosity, etc. Banknotes are different from photographs in that the art need not convey photorealism. Thus, banknotes can be encoded with higher energy than is used in watermarking photographs, provided the result is still aesthetically satisfactory. To illustrate, localized luminance changes on the order of 10% are possible in banknotes, while such a level of watermark energy in photographs would generally be considered unacceptable. In some contexts, localized luminance changes of 20, 30, 50 or even 100% are acceptable.)
In the illustrated embodiment, the change to line width is a function solely of the tweak to be applied to a single region. Thus, if a line passes through any part of a region to which a tweak of 2% is to be applied, the line width in that region is changed to effect the 2% luminance difference. In variant embodiments, the change in line width is a function of the line's position in the region. In particular, the change in line width is a function of the distance between the region's center grid point and the line's closest approach to that point. If the line passes through the grid point, the full 2% change is effected. At successively greater distances, successively less change is applied. The manner in which the magnitude of the tweak changes as a function of line position within the region can be determined by applying one of various interpolation algorithms, such as the bi-linear, bi-cubic, cubic splines, custom curve, etc.
In other variant embodiments, the change in line width in a given region is a weighted function of the tweaks for adjoining or surrounding regions. Thus, the line width in one region may be increased or decreased in accordance with a tweak value corresponding to one or more adjoining regions.
Combinations of the foregoing embodiments can also be employed.
In the foregoing embodiments, it is sometimes necessary to trade-off the tweak values of adjoining regions. For example, a line may pass along a border between regions, or pass through the point equidistant from four grid points (“equidistant zones”). In such cases, the line may be subject to conflicting tweak values—one region may want to increase the line width, while another may want to decrease the line width. (Or both may want to increase the line width, but differing amounts.) Similarly in cases where the line does not pass through an equidistant zone, but the change in line width is a function of a neighborhood of regions whose tweaks are of different values. Again, known interpolation functions can be employed to determine the weight to be given the tweak from each region in determining what change is to be made to the line width in any given region.
In the exemplary watermarking algorithm, the average change in luminosity across the image is zero, so no generalized lightening or darkening of the image is apparent. The localized changes in luminosity are so minute in magnitude, and localized in position, that they are essentially invisible (e.g. inconspicuous/subliminal) to human viewers.
An alternative embodiment is shown in
It will be noted that the line on the left edge of region A does not return to its nominal (dashed) position as it exits the region. This is because the region to the left of region A also is to have decreased luminosity. Where possible, it is generally preferable not to return a line to its nominal position, but instead permit shifted lines to remain shifted as they enter adjoining regions. So doing permits a greater net line movement within a region, increasing the embedded signal level.
Again, the line shifts in
One way to think of the
The magnetic analogy is useful because the magnetic effect exerted on a line depends on the distance between the line and the grid point. Thus, a line passing near a grid point is shifted more in position than a line near the periphery of the region.
Each of the variants discussed above in connection with
Combinations of the embodiments of
In still a further embodiment, the luminance in each region is changed while leaving the line unchanged. This can be effected by sprinkling tiny dots of ink in the otherwise-vacant parts of the region. In high quality printing, of the type used with banknotes, droplets on the order of 3 μm in diameter can be deposited. (Still larger droplets are still beyond the perception threshold for most viewers.) Speckling a region with such droplets (either in a regular array, or random, or according to a desired profile such as Gaussian), can readily effect a 1% or so change in luminosity. (Usually dark droplets are added to a region, effecting a decrease in luminosity. Increases in luminosity can be effected by speckling with a light colored ink, or by forming light voids in line art otherwise present in a region.)
In a variant of the speckling technique, very thin mesh lines can be inserted in the artwork—again to slightly change the luminance of one or more regions.
Although not previously mentioned, it is contemplated that the banknote will include some manner of calibration information to facilitate registration of the image for decoding. This calibration information can be steganographic or overt. Several techniques for steganographically embedding calibration information are disclosed in my prior patents and applications. Other techniques can be found in others of the cited work.
To decode watermark data, the encoded line art image must be converted into electronic form for analysis. This conversion is typically performed by a scanner.
Scanners are well known, so a detailed description is not provided here. Suffice it to say that scanners conventionally employ a line of closely spaced photodetector cells that produce signals related to the amount of the light reflected from successive swaths of the image. Most inexpensive consumer scanners have a resolution of 300 dots per inch (dpi), or a center to center spacing of component photodetectors of about 84 μm. Higher quality scanners of the sort found in most professional imaging equipment and photocopiers have resolutions of 600 dpi (42 μm), 1200 dpi (21μm), or better.
Taking the example of a 300 dpi scanner (84 μm photodetector spacing), each 250 μm region 12 on the banknote will correspond to about a 3×3 array of photodetector samples. Naturally, only in rare instances will a given region be physically registered with the scanner so that nine photodetector samples capture the luminance in that region, and nothing else. More commonly, the line art is skewed with respect to the scanner photodetectors, or is longitudinally misaligned (i.e. some photodetectors image sub-parts of two adjoining regions). However, since the scanner oversamples the regions, the luminance of each region can unambiguously be determined.
In one embodiment, the scanned data from the line art is collected in a two dimensional array and processed—according to one of the techniques disclosed in my prior patents and applications—to detect the embedded calibration information. The array is then processed to effect a virtual re-registration of the image data. A software program then analyzes the statistics of the re-registered data (using the techniques disclosed in my prior writings) to extract the bits of the embedded data.
(Again, the reference to my earlier watermark decoding techniques is exemplary only. Once scanning begins and the data is available in pixel form, it is straightforward to apply any other watermark decoding technique to extract a correspondingly-encoded watermark.)
In a variant embodiment, the scanned data is not assembled in a complete array prior to the processing. Instead, it is processed in real-time, as it is generated, in order to detect embedded watermark data without delay. (Depending on the parameters of the scanner, it may be necessary to scan a half-inch or so of the line art image before the statistics of the resulting data unambiguously indicate the presence of a watermark.)
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, various hardware devices are provided with the capability to recognize embedded watermark data in any line art images they process, and to respond accordingly.
One example is a color photocopier. Such devices employ a color scanner to generate sampled (pixel) data corresponding to an input media (e.g. a dollar bill). If watermark data associated with a banknote is detected, the photocopier can take one or more steps.
One option is simply to interrupt copying, and display a message reminding the operator that it is illegal to reproduce currency.
Another option is to dial a remote service and report the attempted reproduction of a banknote. Photocopiers with dial-out capabilities are known in the art (e.g. U.S. Pat. No. 5,305,199) and are readily adapted to this purpose. The remote service can be an independent service, or can be a government agency.
Yet another option is to permit the copying, but to insert forensic tracer data in the resultant copy. This tracer data can take various forms. Steganographically encoded binary data is one example. An example is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 5,568,268. The tracer data can memorialize the serial number of the machine that made the copy and/or the date and time the copy was made. To address privacy concerns, such tracer data is not normally inserted in photocopied output, but is so inserted only when the subject being photocopied is detected as being a banknote. (Such an arrangement is shown in
Desirably, the scan data is analyzed on a line-by-line basis in order to identify illicit photocopying with a minimum of delay. If a banknote is scanned, one or more lines of scanner output data may be provided to the photocopier's reprographic unit before the banknote detection decision has been made. In this case the photocopy will have two regions: a first region that is not tracer-marked, and a second, subsequent region in which the tracer data has been inserted.
Photocopiers with other means to detect not-to-be-copied documents are known in the art, and employ various response strategies. Examples are detailed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,583,614, 4,723,149, 5,633,952, 5,640,467, and 5,424,807.
Another hardware device that can employ the foregoing principles is a standalone scanner. A programmed processor (or dedicated hardware) inside the scanner analyzes the data being generated by the device, and responds accordingly.
Yet another hardware device that can employ the foregoing principles is a printer. A processor inside the device analyzes graphical image data to be printed, looking for watermarks associated with banknotes.
For both the scanner and printer devices, response strategies can include disabling operation, or inserting tracer information. (Such devices typically do not have dial-out capabilities.)
Again, it is desirable to process the scanner or printer data as it becomes available, so as to detect any banknote processing with a minimum of delay. Again, there will be some lag time before a detection decision is made. Accordingly, the scanner or printer output will be comprised of two parts, one without the tracer data, and another with the tracer data.
Banknotes presently include various visible structures that can be used as aids in banknote detection (e.g. the seal of the issuing central bank, and various geometrical markings). In accordance with a further aspect of the present invention, a banknote is analyzed by an integrated system that considers both the visible structures and watermark-embedded data.
Visible banknote structures can be sensed using known pattern recognition techniques. Examples of such techniques are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,321,773, 5,390,259, 5,533,144, 5,539,841, 5,583,614, 5,633,952, 4,723,149 and 5,424,807 and laid-open foreign application EP 766,449.
In photocopiers (and the like) equipped to detect both visible and watermarked banknote markings, the detection of either causes one or more of the above-noted banknote responses to be initiated.
Again, scanners and printers can be equipped with a similar capability—analyzing the data for either of these banknote hallmarks. If either is detected, the software (or hardware) responds accordingly.
Identification of banknotes by watermark data provides an important advantage over recognition by visible structures—it cannot so easily be defeated. A banknote can be doctored (e.g. by white-out, scissors, or less crude techniques) to remove/obliterate the visible structures. Such a document can then be freely copied on either a visible structure-sensing photocopier or scanner/printer installation. The removed visible structure can then be added in via a second printing/photocopying operation. If the printer is not equipped with banknote-disabling capabilities, image-editing tools can be used to insert visible structures back into image data sets scanned from such doctored bills, and the complete bill freely printed. By additionally including embedded watermark data in the banknote, and sensing same, such ruses will not succeed.
(A similar ruse is to scan a banknote image on a non-banknote-sensing scanner. The resulting image set can then be edited by conventional image editing tools to remove/obliterate the visible structures. Such a data set can then be printed—even on a printer/photocopier that examines such data for the presence of visible structures. Again, the missing visible structures can be inserted by a subsequent printing/photocopying operation.)
Desirably, the visible structure detector and the watermark detector are integrated together as a single hardware and/or software tool. This arrangement provides various economies, e.g., in interfacing with the scanner, manipulating pixel data sets for pattern recognition and watermark extraction, electronically re-registering the image to facilitate pattern recognition/watermark extraction, issuing control signals (e.g. disabling) signals to the photocopier/scanner, etc.
(To provide a comprehensive disclosure without unduly lengthening the following specification, applicants incorporate by reference the patent documents cited above (except application Ser. No. 09/234,780 and 60/071,983).)
From the foregoing, it will be recognized that embodiments according to the present invention allow banknotes to be recognized based on optical scan data, and responsive actions taken, thereby reducing the risk of counterfeiting. Other devices, responsive to authentic banknotes, are enabled.
Having described and illustrated the principles of my invention with reference to several illustrative embodiments, it will be recognized that these embodiments are exemplary only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of my invention. Guided by the foregoing teachings, it should be apparent that other watermarking, decoding, and anti-counterfeiting technologies can be substituted for, and/or combined with, the elements detailed above to yield similar effects.
While the invention has been described with reference to embodiments employing regular rectangular arrays of grid points, those skilled in the art will recognize that other arrays of points—neither rectangular nor regular—can alternatively be used.
While the invention has been described with reference to embodiments that scale the embedded energy in accordance with local image characteristics, in other embodiments a manually crafted energy profile can be implemented. That is, a mask defining embedded signal magnitudes at different parts of the image can be manually devised, and employed to tailor the change in luminance in each region.
In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of the invention may be put, it should be recognized that the detailed embodiments are illustrative only and should not be taken as limiting the scope of my invention. Rather, I claim as my invention all such embodiments as may come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5530759 *||Feb 1, 1995||Jun 25, 1996||International Business Machines Corporation||Color correct digital watermarking of images|
|US5715403 *||Nov 23, 1994||Feb 3, 1998||Xerox Corporation||System for controlling the distribution and use of digital works having attached usage rights where the usage rights are defined by a usage rights grammar|
|US5729637 *||Apr 10, 1995||Mar 17, 1998||Adobe Systems, Inc.||Method and apparatus for producing a hybrid data structure for displaying a raster image|
|US5808747 *||May 30, 1996||Sep 15, 1998||Eastman Kodak Company||Apparatus and method for production of signatures|
|US5862260 *||May 16, 1996||Jan 19, 1999||Digimarc Corporation||Methods for surveying dissemination of proprietary empirical data|
|US5893127 *||Nov 18, 1996||Apr 6, 1999||Canon Information Systems, Inc.||Generator for document with HTML tagged table having data elements which preserve layout relationships of information in bitmap image of original document|
|US5943422 *||Aug 12, 1996||Aug 24, 1999||Intertrust Technologies Corp.||Steganographic techniques for securely delivering electronic digital rights management control information over insecure communication channels|
|US5973692 *||Mar 10, 1997||Oct 26, 1999||Knowlton; Kenneth Charles||System for the capture and indexing of graphical representations of files, information sources and the like|
|US6004276 *||Mar 3, 1997||Dec 21, 1999||Quinton Instrument Company||Open architecture cardiology information system|
|US6094649 *||Dec 22, 1997||Jul 25, 2000||Partnet, Inc.||Keyword searches of structured databases|
|US6122403 *||Nov 12, 1996||Sep 19, 2000||Digimarc Corporation||Computer system linked by using information in data objects|
|US6185683 *||Dec 28, 1998||Feb 6, 2001||Intertrust Technologies Corp.||Trusted and secure techniques, systems and methods for item delivery and execution|
|US6295530 *||May 15, 1996||Sep 25, 2001||Andrew M. Ritchie||Internet service of differently formatted viewable data signals including commands for browser execution|
|US6628824 *||Mar 17, 1999||Sep 30, 2003||Ken Belanger||Method and apparatus for image identification and comparison|
|US20020051544 *||Jan 2, 2002||May 2, 2002||Fujitsu Limited||User support system for cryptographic communication in network systems|
|US20030206554 *||Jul 20, 2001||Nov 6, 2003||Hughes Electronics Corporation||System and method for multicasting multimedia content|
|WO1996036163A2 *||May 7, 1996||Nov 14, 1996||Digimarc Corp||Steganography systems|
|1||*||Digimarc Unleashes MarcSpider on the World Wide Web to Help Digital Image Creators Track Uses of their Work, Business Wire, 04/08/1997, all pages.|
|2||*||Katz, Marty, Digital Watermarks Often Fail on Web Images, The New York Times, 11/11/1997, all pages.|
|3||*||Perrig et al., Digital Image Watermarking in the "Real World," 03/09/1998, all pages.|
|4||*||Perrig et al., Digital Image Watermarking in the "Real World," Abstract downloaded from http://users.ece.cmu.edu/~adrian/projects/wmark-realworld/wmark-realworld.html|
|5||*||Personal Page of Fabien Petitcolas, downloaded from https://web.archive.org/web/19980112222351/http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/fapp2/, January 1998, one page.|
|6||*||Petitcolas et al., Attacks on Copyright Marking Systems, Information Hiding 1998, LNCS 1525, pp. 218-238, April 1998, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, all pages.|
|7||*||Petitcolas et al., Weaknesses of copyright marking systems, Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Multimedia '98, Sept. 1998, all pages.|
|8||*||Petitcolas, Fabien A.P., Attacks on Watermarking Schemes II, University of Cambridge, Oct 1997, all pages.|
|9||*||Petitcolas, publications, articles & other texts, downloaded from http://www.petitcolas.net/fabien/publications/index.html, Oct 2013, all pages.|
|10||*||Petitcolas, weaknesses of existing watermarking schemes - why web-spiders fail?, downloaded from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~fapp2/watermarking/image_watermarking/2mosaic/, Aug 2000, all pages.|
|11||*||Petitcolas, web pages on "mosaic attack," downloaded from http://web.archive.org/web/20040406010507/http://www.petitcolas.net/fabien/watermarking/2mosaic/, April 2004, all pages.|
|12||*||Petitcolas, web pages on "mosaic attack," downloaded from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/users/fapp2/watermarking/2mosaic/index.html, Sept 2002, all pages.|
|13||*||Thomas, Wes, webreview, Protecting Your Images with Digital Watermarks, Jan 1998, all pages.|
|14||*||UCL Microelectronics Lab.- Crypto Group, Call for Papers - Workshop on Information Hiding, dowloaded from https://web.archive.org/web/19980201122908/http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/crypto/call_papers/WIH98.html, October 1997, all pages.|
|15||*||UCL Microelectronics Lab.- Crypto Group, Call for Papers, dowloaded from https://web.archive.org/web/19980201122908/http://www.dice.ucl.ac.be/crypto/call_for_papers.html, February 1998, all pages.|
|16||*||Zhao, Jin, A WWW Service to Embed and Prove Digital Copyright Watermarks, Proc. of the European Conf. on Multimedia Applications, May 1996, all pages.|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US7965863||Nov 20, 2007||Jun 21, 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Digital watermarks as a gateway and control mechanism|
|US7970166||Mar 18, 2009||Jun 28, 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Steganographic encoding methods and apparatus|
|US7974436||Sep 28, 2006||Jul 5, 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Methods, apparatus and programs for generating and utilizing content signatures|
|US7978874||Mar 17, 2005||Jul 12, 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Digital watermarking for workflow by tracking content or content identifiers with respect to time|
|US7986845||Nov 17, 2009||Jul 26, 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Steganographic systems and methods|
|US7991182||Oct 26, 2006||Aug 2, 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Methods for steganographic encoding media|
|US8000495||Oct 14, 2008||Aug 16, 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Digital watermarking systems and methods|
|US8036419||Oct 7, 2009||Oct 11, 2011||Digimarc Corporation||Digital watermarks|
|US8094869||Apr 29, 2004||Jan 10, 2012||Digimarc Corporation||Fragile and emerging digital watermarks|
|US8103879||Sep 8, 2009||Jan 24, 2012||Digimarc Corporation||Processing audio or video content with multiple watermark layers|
|US8150032||Aug 31, 2010||Apr 3, 2012||Digimarc Corporation||Methods for controlling rendering of images and video|
|US8165342||Apr 6, 2010||Apr 24, 2012||Digimarc Corporation||Color image or video processing|
|US8181884||Aug 29, 2007||May 22, 2012||Digimarc Corporation||Machine-readable features for objects|
|US8243980||Mar 9, 2004||Aug 14, 2012||Digimarc Corporation||Image processing using embedded registration data to determine and compensate for geometric transformation|
|US8290202 *||Jan 11, 2007||Oct 16, 2012||Digimarc Corporation||Methods utilizing steganography|
|US8355526||Mar 23, 2005||Jan 15, 2013||Digimarc Corporation||Digitally watermarking holograms|
|US8447067||Apr 19, 2010||May 21, 2013||Digimarc Corporation||Location-based arrangements employing mobile devices|
|US8543823||Oct 14, 2003||Sep 24, 2013||Digimarc Corporation||Digital watermarking for identification documents|
|US8644548||Sep 21, 2011||Feb 4, 2014||Digimarc Corporation||Digital watermarks|
|US8792675||Apr 17, 2012||Jul 29, 2014||Digimarc Corporation||Color image or video processing|
|US8953908||Jun 13, 2005||Feb 10, 2015||Digimarc Corporation||Metadata management and generation using perceptual features|
|US20040158724 *||Oct 14, 2003||Aug 12, 2004||Carr J. Scott||Digital watermarking for identification documents|
|US20040264733 *||Mar 9, 2004||Dec 30, 2004||Rhoads Geoffrey B.||Image processing using embedded registration data to determine and compensate for geometric transformation|
|US20050041835 *||Apr 29, 2004||Feb 24, 2005||Reed Alastair M.||Fragile and emerging digital watermarks|
|US20050249374 *||Mar 17, 2005||Nov 10, 2005||Levy Kenneth L||Digital watermarking for workflow|
|US20050271246 *||Mar 15, 2005||Dec 8, 2005||Sharma Ravi K||Watermark payload encryption methods and systems|
|US20060039581 *||Mar 23, 2005||Feb 23, 2006||Decker Stephen K||Digitally watermarking holograms|
|US20060115108 *||Jun 13, 2005||Jun 1, 2006||Rodriguez Tony F||Metadata management and generation using digital watermarks|
|U.S. Classification||382/100, 725/118|
|International Classification||G07D7/12, H04N1/00, G06T7/00, H04N1/40, H04K1/00, H04N1/387, G07D7/00, B29C45/14, B42D15/00, G06T1/00, G10L19/00, G06K9/00, H04N1/32, H04N7/173|
|Cooperative Classification||B42D25/29, Y10S283/901, H04N1/32203, H04N1/32304, H04N1/32309, H04N1/32144, G07D7/002, H04N1/32219, H04N2201/3271, H04N1/32261, H04N2201/3249, H04N1/00867, H04N1/00002, G06T2201/0051, G07D7/004, H04N2201/3233, H04N1/0087, H04N1/00875, H04N2201/3205, H04N2201/327, H04N2201/3246, G06T7/0002, H04N1/00859, H04N1/00005, H04N2201/3239, H04N2201/3226, H04N1/00244, H04N1/00092, G06T1/0021, H04N1/00037, G06T1/005, H04N1/00846, G06T1/0028, G06T1/0071, G06T1/0064, B29C45/1418, H04N1/32208, G10L19/018, H04N2201/3207, G06T2201/0065|
|European Classification||B42D15/00C, G07D7/00D, G06T1/00W, G06T7/00B, H04N1/00A, H04N1/00P3P, H04N1/00P2R2, G06T1/00W6, H04N1/32C19B3, G06T1/00W6M, G06T1/00W6G, G06T1/00W2, H04N1/00P3M2, H04N1/32C19B7, G07D7/00B4, H04N1/00C3K, H04N1/00A1, H04N1/00A3E, H04N1/00P3A, H04N1/00P3M2H, H04N1/32C19B3B, H04N1/32C19B3C, H04N1/32C19B3J, H04N1/32C19B6D, H04N1/00A5, G10L19/018, H04N1/32C19|
|May 19, 2009||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION,OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:RHOADS, GEOFFREY B.;REEL/FRAME:022706/0445
Effective date: 20090515
|May 12, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION),OREGO
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582
Effective date: 20100430
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION (AN OREGON CORPORATION), OREG
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:024369/0582
Effective date: 20100430
|Oct 29, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DMRC LLC, OREGON
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIGIMARC CORPORATION (A DELAWARE CORPORATION);REEL/FRAME:025217/0508
Effective date: 20080801
|Nov 2, 2010||AS||Assignment|
Owner name: DIGIMARC CORPORATION, OREGON
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:025227/0832
Effective date: 20080903
Owner name: DMRC CORPORATION, OREGON
Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:DMRC LLC;REEL/FRAME:025227/0808
Effective date: 20080801