|Publication number||US20100217384 A1|
|Application number||US 12/776,136|
|Publication date||Aug 26, 2010|
|Filing date||May 7, 2010|
|Priority date||Jun 30, 2000|
|Also published as||EP1401358A2, EP1401358A4, US6769434, US20020042651, US20050055088, US20110118830, WO2002001999A2, WO2002001999A3|
|Publication number||12776136, 776136, US 2010/0217384 A1, US 2010/217384 A1, US 20100217384 A1, US 20100217384A1, US 2010217384 A1, US 2010217384A1, US-A1-20100217384, US-A1-2010217384, US2010/0217384A1, US2010/217384A1, US20100217384 A1, US20100217384A1, US2010217384 A1, US2010217384A1|
|Inventors||John R. Liddicoat, Gregory H. Lambrecht, Todd F. Davenport, William E. Cohn, Steven B. Woolfson, Daniel C. Taylor|
|Original Assignee||Medtronic Vascular, Inc.|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (22), Referenced by (2), Classifications (5)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/895,272, filed Jul. 20, 2004, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/896,259, filed Jun. 29, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,769,434, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Pat. App. No. 60/215,245, filed Jun. 30, 2000.
Of all valvular heart lesions, aortic stenosis carries the worst prognosis. Within one year of diagnosis, approximately half of all patients with critical aortic stenosis have died, and by three years, this figure rises to approximately 80%. Currently, the most prominent and effective treatment for patients with aortic stenosis is aortic valve replacement via open heart surgery. Unfortunately, this procedure is a substantial and invasive undertaking for the patient.
While there have been significant advances in heart valve technology over the past 30 years, there has been little progress in the development of safer and less invasive valve delivery systems. Aortic valve replacement currently requires a sternotomy or thoracotomy, use of cardiopulmonary bypass to arrest the heart and lungs, and a large incision on the aorta. The native valve is resected through this incision and then a prosthetic valve is sutured to the inner surface of the aorta with a multitude of sutures passing only partly into the wall of the aorta. Given the current invasiveness of this procedure and the requirement to utilize cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic valve replacement surgery is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. This is especially true in elderly patients, and in those patients who require concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting. Even when a good surgical result is achieved, virtually all patients require approximately 6 weeks to several months to fully recover from the procedure. In order to decrease these associated risks of aortic valve surgery, many have pursued novel approaches and technologies.
Less invasive approaches to aortic valve surgery have generally followed two paths.
In the 1980's, there was a flurry of interest in percutaneous balloon valvotomy. In this procedure, a cardiologist introduced a catheter through the femoral artery to dilate the patient's aortic valve, thereby relieving the stenosis. Using the technology available at that time, success was limited: the valve area was increased only minimally, and nearly all patients had restenosis within one year.
More recently, surgeons have approached the aortic valve via smaller chest wall incisions. However, these approaches still require cardiopulmonary bypass and cardiac arrest, which themselves entail significant morbidity and a prolonged post-operative recovery.
The ideal minimally invasive approach to the treatment of aortic valve disease requires aortic valve replacement without cardiopulmonary bypass and without cardiac arrest. Such an approach would greatly reduce patient morbidity and mortality and hasten recovery. Unfortunately, although there has been great progress in the treatment of coronary artery disease without cardiopulmonary bypass (e.g., angioplasty, with or without stenting, and “off-pump” coronary artery bypass grafting), similar advances have not yet been realized in heart valve surgery. With an aging population and improved access to advanced diagnostic testing, the incidence and accurate diagnosis of aortic stenosis will continue to increase. The development of a system for “off-pump” aortic valve replacement would be of significant benefit to this increasing patient population.
There are three important challenges to replacing a diseased aortic valve without cardiopulmonary bypass.
The first challenge is to remove the diseased valve without causing stroke or other ischemic events that might result from the liberation of particulate material while removing the diseased valve.
The second challenge is to prevent cardiac failure during removal of the diseased valve. In this respect it must be appreciated that the aortic valve continues to serve a critical function even when it is diseased. However, as the diseased valve is removed, it becomes acutely and severely incompetent, causing the patient to develop heart failure which results in death unless the function of the valve is taken over by another means.
The third challenge is placing a prosthetic valve into the vascular system and affixing it to the wall of the aorta. More particularly, during cardiac rhythm, the aortic and arterial pressures are substantially greater than atmospheric pressure. Therefore, any sizable incision made to the aorta in order to insert a standard valve prosthesis into the arterial system creates the potential for uncontrollable bleeding from the incision site. Furthermore, even if bleeding is successfully controlled, pressures within the aorta may result in weakening of the aorta caused by aortic wall dissection. In addition, large incisions on the aorta also increase the potential for liberating plaque from the aortic wall that can lead to embolic complications.
For these reasons, prior art valve prostheses potentially suitable for off-pump implantation have relied upon relatively flimsy expandable structures to support and secure the valve within the aorta. More particularly, these prosthetic valves are constructed so that they can be compressed to a relatively small dimension suitable for insertion into the arterial system, advanced to the site of the aortic valve, and then expanded against the aortic wall. Unfortunately, however, none of these relatively flimsy valve prostheses have proven adequate to endure the repetitive stresses undergone by the aortic valve over the ten to twenty years typically required.
In addition to the foregoing, the precise placement of such expandable prosthetic valves in the correct sub-coronary position can be extremely challenging, particularly in view of the high pressure, pulsatile blood flow passing through the aorta. Furthermore, expandable prosthetic valves would typically be positioned from a remote artery, which would reduce the ability to precisely control the placement and positioning of the device and therefore would increases the risk of obstructing the coronary arteries. The expandable prosthetic valves are held on the ends of elongate, flexible catheters that are threaded into the aorta, around the aortic arch and then expanded. The pulsatile flow during cardiac rhythm induces a to-and-fro motion of the valve prosthesis relative to the aorta that makes the timing of valve expansion critical for proper placement of the expandable prosthetic valve and hence the survival of the patient.
Finally, many of the challenges discussed in the foregoing section pertaining to aortic valve replacement are also relevant to other procedures in the aortic root such as aortic valve resection, aortic valve decalcification, stent grafting for aortic dissections, etc.
It is, therefore, one object of the present invention to enable the passage of a device from the left atrium, through the left ventricle, and into the arterial system.
Further, another object of the present invention is to enable the implantation of a device in the arterial system without cardiopulmonary bypass.
Further, another object of the present invention is to enable the implantation of a prosthetic valve in the arterial system without cardiopulmonary bypass.
Another object of the present invention is to allow the insertion of such a valve while minimizing the risks to the patient posed by large arterial incisions.
And another object of the present invention is to simplify the precise placement of such a valve.
Further, another object of the present invention is to enable the implantation of a device other than a valve, such as but not limited to a valve resection tool, a decalcifying tool, an aortic valve repair tool, or a stented aortic graft, in the arterial system without cardiopulmonary bypass.
Another object of the present invention is to allow the insertion of a device other than a valve, such as but not limited to a valve resection tool, a decalcifying tool, an aortic valve repair tool, or a stented aortic graft, while minimizing the risks to the patient posed by large arterial incisions.
And another object of the present invention is to simplify the precise placement of a device other than a valve, such as but not limited to a valve resection tool, a decalcifying tool, an aortic valve repair tool, or a stented aortic graft.
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for positioning a device in the arterial system. More specifically, the present invention relates to a method and apparatus for positioning an aortic valve prosthesis in the aorta or aortic outflow tract, with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.
One aspect of the present invention is a method for deploying an aortic valve prosthesis. This valve prosthesis may include any of the known aortic valves including, but not limited to, stented and unstented bioprosthetic valves, stented mechanical valves, and expandable or self-expanding valves, whether biological or artificial.
In one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of inserting a prosthesis or device from a lower pressure region into a higher pressure region of the cardiovascular system comprising the steps of: making an opening in a wall of a lower pressure region of the cardiovascular system; advancing the prosthesis or device through the opening and into the lower pressure region; and advancing the prosthesis or device through a natural barrier between the lower pressure region and the higher pressure region.
In another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of inserting a prosthesis or device into a vessel within the arterial system comprising the steps of: making an opening in a wall of a low pressure region of the heart; advancing the prosthesis or device through the opening and into the low pressure region; advancing the prosthesis or device through a natural barrier between the low pressure region and the left ventricle; and advancing the prosthesis or device from the left ventricle into the arterial system and the vessel.
And in another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of inserting a prosthesis or device into a vessel within the arterial system comprising the steps of: making an opening in a wall of the left atrium; advancing the prosthesis or device through the opening and into the left atrium; advancing the prosthesis or device through the mitral valve and into the left ventricle; and advancing the prosthesis or device from the left ventricle into the arterial system and the vessel.
And in another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for positioning a device in the arterial system comprising the steps of: making a first opening leading to the left atrium; passing a valve prosthesis through the first opening and into a cardiac chamber of the left side of the heart using a first manipulation instrument; making a second opening in the arterial system and advancing one end of a second manipulation instrument through the second opening and into the aforementioned cardiac chamber; securing the second manipulation instrument to the valve prosthesis; and then using the second manipulation instrument to retract at least some portion of the valve prosthesis out of the aforementioned cardiac chamber.
An alternative method for positioning a device in the arterial system comprises the steps of: making an opening leading to the left atrium; passing a valve prosthesis through the opening and into a cardiac chamber of the left side of the heart using an articulating manipulation instrument; using the articulating manipulation instrument to guide the valve prosthesis into the arterial cardiac chamber; releasing the valve prosthesis into a desired position: and then retracting at least a portion of the articulating manipulation instrument out of the aforementioned cardiac chamber and left atrium.
The pressure of blood flowing through the left atrium is very low, peaking at a few inches of water during the cardiac cycle. This pressure is a small fraction of that found within the arterial system and thus permits insertion of a conventional valve prosthesis through a relatively large opening formed in the wall of the left atrium without the risk of uncontrollable bleeding. In this respect it will be appreciated that various methods are known to those skilled in the art for controlling bleeding from an incision into the left atrium. The left atrium also rarely suffers from atherosclerotic plaque formation or calcification, thus minimizing the risk of embolic debris during such incision.
Another aspect of the present invention is the use of a prosthesis holding apparatus for releasably holding the valve prosthesis during manipulation to its implant site. The prosthesis holding apparatus may be secured to the prosthetic valve at any suitable location(s) through the use of any of a variety of approaches including, but not limited to, suture loops, barbs, hooks, grasping jaws, opposing magnetic poles, friction fits and the like. The prosthesis holding apparatus is configured to provides first and second manipulation mounts for engagement by the aforementioned first and second manipulation instruments, respectively, whereby the prosthetic valve can be delivered to its implant site. This construction is highly advantageous in that it permits the valve prosthesis to be passed easily and reliably from the first manipulation instrument to the second manipulation instrument within the vascular system.
In an alternative preferred embodiment, the prosthetic holding apparatus is attached on the ventricular side of the prosthesis. The aforementioned first manipulation instrument would articulate at or near the prosthetic valve to facilitate manipulation of the prosthesis holding apparatus (and hence the prosthesis itself) through the smallest possible incision site, then through the left atrium, the mitral valve and within the heart to align and position the prosthesis within the aortic annulus or left ventricular outflow track. In this alternative embodiment, there is no need for the aforementioned second manipulation instrument or the second manipulation mount.
In addition, if the prosthesis holding apparatus is attached on the aortic side of the prosthesis, the manipulation instrument may articulate and may be introduced into the arterial system, brought across the mitral valve into the left atrium, out the left atrium to pick up the prosthesis holding apparatus (and hence the prosthesis) and then retracted back to position the prosthesis directly into the aortic annulus without the need for another manipulation instrument.
These and other objects and features of the present invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like elements and further wherein:
The present invention can be used to implant a variety of prostheses into the arterial system or left side of the heart. The prosthesis used in the preferred embodiment is an aortic valve prosthesis. Alternatively, the prosthesis may comprise, but is not limited to, a cylindrical arterial stent, an arterial prosthesis or graft, a ventricular assist device, a device for the treatment of heart failure such as an intraventricular counterpulsation balloon, chordae tendinae prostheses, arterial filters suitable for acute or chronic filtration of emboli from the blood stream, arterial occlusion devices and the like.
For clarity of illustration, the present invention will hereinafter be discussed in the context of implanting an aortic valve prosthesis.
It should also be appreciated that the present invention may be practiced either “on-pump” or “off-pump”. In other words, the present invention may be performed either with or without the support of cardiopulmonary bypass. The present invention also may be performed either with or without cardiac arrest.
Looking now at
Prosthetic valve 200 is preferably a conventional mechanical aortic valve of the sort well known in the art, although other forms of valve prostheses may also be used.
In one preferred form of the invention, first manipulation instrument 400 functions by virtue of the relative motion of an outer cannula 405 relative to an inner grasper 410. More particularly, inner grasper 410 has an elastically deformable distal gripper 415 which is open when the gripper is outside of outer cannula 405. However, when deformable gripper 415 is pulled at least partially into or against outer cannula 405, gripper 415 is elastically deformed into a closed position, whereby it may grip an object, e.g., first manipulation mount 105 formed on prosthesis holding apparatus 100. First manipulation instrument 400 is shown in
The specific embodiment of first manipulation instrument 400 shown in
Still looking now at
First manipulation instrument 400 is also shown as having a relatively small dimension perpendicular to its long axis. This configuration allows atriotomy 10 to be reduced in size after the passage of temporary prosthetic assembly 300 into left atrium 5. This perpendicular dimension may be constant or varied along the long axis of first manipulation instrument 400.
The specific embodiment of the prosthesis holding apparatus 100 shown in
Still looking now at
When the methods and devices of the present invention are employed during an off-pump valve replacement procedure, it may be beneficial to provide temporary valves and/or filters in the arterial system, downstream of the site of the native aortic valve. Thus, for example, in
Bleeding through incision 35 may be readily controlled through a variety of means. These include, but are not limited to, employing a valved or un-valved arterial cannula, a purse-string suture placed around incision 35 and then pulled tight about second manipulation instrument 500, a side-arm graft sewn to aorta 20 that may be constricted about a region of second manipulation instrument 500, the use of a tight fit between a portion of second manipulation instrument 500 and aortic incision 35, etc.
Second manipulation instrument 500 is shown in
It should be appreciated that the orientation of second manipulation mount 110 is preferably such as to enable the long axis of second manipulation instrument 500 to be substantially perpendicular to the flow area of prosthetic valve 200. This arrangement is particularly helpful when guiding prosthetic valve 200 into its final position within aorta 20 as shown hereafter in
The use of two separate manipulation instruments, and the method of passing valve prosthesis 200 from one to the other, avoids the complex manipulations of valve prosthesis 200 that would be required to position valve 200 within aorta 20 using only a single manipulation instrument introduced through the left atrium. In this respect it should be appreciated that such a “single manipulation instrument” technique has been found to be possible, however, and is best facilitated by using a manipulation instrument capable of bending or articulating at or near the site of its attachment to valve holding apparatus 100. In this respect it has been found that it can be particularly advantageous to provide a manipulation instrument capable of bending or articulating within about 4 cm or so of the point of attachment to valve holding apparatus 100. It has also been found that it can be particularly advantageous for such an articulating instrument to be able to deflect its distal tip by an angle of between about 90 to 180 degrees from the long axis of the first manipulation instrument 400 shown in
The angular offset of first manipulation mount 105 and second manipulation mount 110 is preferably set to facilitate passage of temporary prosthetic assembly 300 from left atrium 5 to aorta 20 using two substantially straight manipulation instruments, e.g., first manipulation instrument 400 and second manipulation instrument 500. This angle is preferably approximately 45 degrees. However, this angle may also be varied so as to optimize passage of different valve designs or other prostheses using curved, straight or articulating manipulation instruments from various access sites into the left atrium and arterial system. This angle may be fixed or variable on a given prosthesis holding apparatus 100.
Once second manipulation instrument 500 is safely secured to second manipulation mount 110, first manipulation instrument 400 may be released from first manipulation mount 105 and removed from left ventricle 5, as shown in
Looking next at
In use, prosthesis holding apparatus 100 is fit about valve prosthesis 200 so that wire fingers 140 hold valve cuff 205 to struts 115. Prosthesis holding apparatus 100 is then engaged by first manipulation instrument 400, using first manipulation mount 105, and moved into and through right atrium 5, through mitral valve 30 and into left ventricle 25. Then second manipulation tool 500, comprising outer cannula 505 and inner grasper 510 having the deformable gripper 515, engages second manipulation mount 110. The distal tip 520 of outer cannula 505 is placed against edge 150 of base 120 and gripper 515 is drawn proximally within outer cannula 505 until deformable gripper 515 engages shoulder 525, whereupon prosthesis holding apparatus 100 (and hence prosthetic valve 200) will be mounted to second manipulation tool 500. Second manipulation tool 500 is then used to maneuver temporary prosthetic assembly 300 into position, whereupon the valve's cuff 205 is secured to the side wall of the aorta, e.g., with barbs, staples, suture, etc. Then prosthesis holding apparatus 100 is detached from prosthetic valve 200 by pulling inner grasper 510 proximally relative to outer cannula 505 so that wire fingers 140 are pulled past valve cuff 205 (
In practice, it has been found that it can sometimes be difficult to locate second manipulation mount 110 with second manipulation instrument 500 so as to “hand off' temporary prosthesis assembly 300 from first manipulation instrument 400 to second manipulation instrument 500. This can be particularly true where the procedure is to be conducted “off-pump”, i.e., without stopping the heart. To this end, and looking now at
In accordance with the present invention, it is also possible to enter the left atrium other than through an exterior wall of the left atrium. Thus, for example, it is possible to introduce the prosthetic valve through an opening in an exterior wall of the right atrium, pass the prosthetic valve through an incision in the interatrial septum and across to the left atrium, and then advance the prosthetic valve to its implantation site via the mitral valve and the left ventricle.
As noted above, the manipulation instrument(s) do not need to take the form of the installation instrument 400 or 500. It is also possible to deliver the prosthetic valve to its implant site using a guidewire and a pusher tool riding on the guidewire.
Thus, for example, in an alternative preferred embodiment, a wire, a catheter, a tube or any other filament can be placed from the left atrium, through the ventricle and into the arterial system, over (or through) which a prosthesis or device can be advanced (pushed or pulled). As an example, a catheter with a balloon can be placed through an incision in the left atrial wall. The balloon can be inflated and this catheter can then be “floated” along the flow of blood across the mitral valve, into the left ventricle, and out into the arterial system. At that point the catheter can be grasped by an instrument placed through a small incision in the aorta or passed into the aorta by means of a remote vessel such as the femoral artery. At this point, the prosthesis or device can be mounted onto the catheter and either be pushed (or pulled) over the catheter into position. This procedure can be similarly performed by the use of a wire or other filament structure. Also, a tube could be employed, with the prosthesis or device being advanced within the tube.
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US5011469 *||Aug 29, 1988||Apr 30, 1991||Shiley, Inc.||Peripheral cardiopulmonary bypass and coronary reperfusion system|
|US5702368 *||May 30, 1995||Dec 30, 1997||Heartport, Inc.||System for cardiac procedures|
|US5713950 *||Jun 2, 1995||Feb 3, 1998||Cox; James L.||Method of replacing heart valves using flexible tubes|
|US5792179 *||May 28, 1997||Aug 11, 1998||Sideris; Eleftherios B.||Retrievable cardiac balloon placement|
|US5855601 *||Jun 21, 1996||Jan 5, 1999||The Trustees Of Columbia University In The City Of New York||Artificial heart valve and method and device for implanting the same|
|US5957949 *||May 1, 1997||Sep 28, 1999||World Medical Manufacturing Corp.||Percutaneous placement valve stent|
|US6190397 *||Jun 3, 1999||Feb 20, 2001||Origin Medsystems, Inc.||Means and method for performing an anastomosis|
|US6241699 *||Jul 22, 1998||Jun 5, 2001||Chase Medical, Inc.||Catheter system and method for posterior epicardial revascularization and intracardiac surgery on a beating heart|
|US6398726 *||Nov 9, 1999||Jun 4, 2002||Intuitive Surgical, Inc.||Stabilizer for robotic beating-heart surgery|
|US6425916 *||Feb 10, 1999||Jul 30, 2002||Michi E. Garrison||Methods and devices for implanting cardiac valves|
|US6468265 *||Nov 9, 1999||Oct 22, 2002||Intuitive Surgical, Inc.||Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia|
|US6596003 *||Jun 28, 2000||Jul 22, 2003||Genzyme Corporation||Vascular anastomosis device|
|US6629534 *||Apr 7, 2000||Oct 7, 2003||Evalve, Inc.||Methods and apparatus for cardiac valve repair|
|US6673040 *||Aug 27, 1999||Jan 6, 2004||Cardeon Corporation||System and methods for catheter procedures with circulatory support in high risk patients|
|US6802319 *||Mar 24, 2000||Oct 12, 2004||John H. Stevens||Minimally-invasive devices and methods for treatment of congestive heart failure|
|US6896690 *||Jan 27, 2000||May 24, 2005||Viacor, Inc.||Cardiac valve procedure methods and devices|
|US7470284 *||Feb 25, 2004||Dec 30, 2008||Medtronic, Inc.||Cardiac valve procedure methods and devices|
|US20020144696 *||Sep 10, 1999||Oct 10, 2002||A. Adam Sharkawy||Conduits for use in placing a target vessel in fluid communication with a source of blood|
|US20030036795 *||Oct 10, 2002||Feb 20, 2003||Andersen Henning Rud||Valve prosthesis for implantation in the body and a catheter for implanting such valve prosthesis|
|US20030040736 *||Jun 25, 1999||Feb 27, 2003||John H. Stevens||Endovacular cardiac venting catheter and method|
|US20050015112 *||Nov 13, 2003||Jan 20, 2005||Cohn William E.||Cardiac valve procedure methods and devices|
|US20100249921 *||Jun 9, 2010||Sep 30, 2010||Cohn William E||Cardiac Valve Procedure Methods and Devices|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US8981282 *||Oct 25, 2012||Mar 17, 2015||Mitutoyo Corporation||Displacement detecting device, displacement detecting method, and computer-readable medium|
|US20130105675 *||Oct 25, 2012||May 2, 2013||Mitutoyo Corporation||Displacement detecting device, displacement detecting method, and computer-readable medium|
|Cooperative Classification||Y10S623/902, A61F2/2427|