Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS20110208861 A1
Publication typeApplication
Application numberUS 13/099,516
Publication dateAug 25, 2011
Filing dateMay 3, 2011
Priority dateJun 23, 2004
Also published asUS7962591, US20050289181
Publication number099516, 13099516, US 2011/0208861 A1, US 2011/208861 A1, US 20110208861 A1, US 20110208861A1, US 2011208861 A1, US 2011208861A1, US-A1-20110208861, US-A1-2011208861, US2011/0208861A1, US2011/208861A1, US20110208861 A1, US20110208861A1, US2011208861 A1, US2011208861A1
InventorsWilliam Deninger, Erik de la Iglesia
Original AssigneeMcafee, Inc.
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Object classification in a capture system
US 20110208861 A1
Abstract
Objects can be extracted from data flows captured by a capture device. Each captured object can then be classified according to content. In one embodiment, the present invention includes determining whether a captured object is binary or textual in nature, and classifying the captured object as one of a plurality of textual content types based tokens found in the captured object if the captured object is determined to be textual in nature.
Images(8)
Previous page
Next page
Claims(21)
1.-31. (canceled)
32. A method, comprising:
receiving a flow of packets in a network environment;
extracting an object from at least one of the packets;
classifying the object based on at least one signature provided inside the object; and
providing the object to an object statistics module configured to perform a statistical calculation in order to determine whether the object is binary or textual.
33. The method of claim 32, wherein if the object is binary, a determination is made whether the object is encrypted.
34. The method of claim 32, wherein if the object is textual, a determination is made about a type of text in the object.
35. The method of claim 32, wherein at least one statistical analysis is performed in order to evaluate a frequency of bytes contained in the object.
36. The method of claim 32, wherein if the object is determined to be binary, then a distribution analysis is performed to determine whether bytes in the object are uniformly distributed.
37. The method of claim 36, wherein if the bytes are distributed uniformly, then the object is classified as being associated with encrypted data.
38. The method of claim 36, wherein if a byte distribution is found to be non-uniform, the object is classified using a catchall binary unknown type.
39. The method of claim 32, further comprising:
inserting an indicator reflective of the object being classified as binary or textual.
40. The method of claim 32, further comprising:
generating a tag data structure that includes a content field associated with the object.
41. The method of claim 32, wherein if the object is determined to be textual, a token database is accessed in order to statistically analyze a presence of certain tokens in the object.
42. The method of claim 41, wherein at least some of the tokens in the token database are reflective of either a word, a phrase, a syntax, a grammatical notation, or a part of a word.
43. The method of claim 41, wherein the token database is organized by content type.
44. The method of claim 41, wherein particular tokens in the token database have a numerical weight associated thereto.
45. The method of claim 41, wherein a token analyzer is configured to access the token database in order to sum weights for content types associated with particular tokens of the object.
46. The method of claim 41, wherein certain tokens in the token database are weighted differently as a function of their frequency and as a function of their strength in an association with a specific content type.
47. The method of claim 41, wherein the token analyzer is configured to assign a confidence characteristic to its content classification.
48. The method of claim 41, wherein the token analyzer is configured to perform object classification using a Bayesian statistical analysis, which is indicative of a probability of a correctness of a particular classification.
49. The method of claim 41, wherein the signature is a binary signature associated with a bit torrent.
50. An apparatus comprising:
a processor;
a memory element; and
an object statistics module, wherein the processor and the memory element interact with the object statistics module such that the apparatus is configured for;
receiving a flow of packets in a network environment;
extracting an object from at least one of the packets;
classifying the object based on at least one signature provided inside the object; and
providing the object to an object statistics module configured to perform a statistical calculation in order to determine whether the object is binary or textual, wherein at least one statistical analysis is performed in order to evaluate a frequency of bytes contained in the object.
51. Logic encoded in non-transitory media that includes code for execution and when executed by a processor operable to perform operations comprising:
receiving a flow of packets in a network environment;
extracting an object from at least one of the packets;
classifying the object based on at least one signature provided inside the object; and
providing the object to an object statistics module configured to perform a statistical calculation in order to determine whether the object is binary or textual, wherein if the object is determined to be textual, a token database is accessed in order to statistically analyze a presence of certain tokens in the object.
Description
    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0001]
    The present invention relates to computer networks, and in particular, to a object classification.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0002]
    Computer networks and systems have become indispensable tools for modern business. Modern enterprises use such networks for communications and for storage. The information and data stored on the network of a business enterprise is often a highly valuable asset. Modern enterprises use numerous tools to keep outsiders, intruders, and unauthorized personnel from accessing valuable information stored on the network. These tools include firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and packet sniffer devices. However, once an intruder has gained access to sensitive content, there is no network device that can prevent the electronic transmission of the content from the network to outside the network. Similarly, there is no network device that can analyse the data leaving the network to monitor for policy violations, and make it possible to track down information leeks. What is needed is a comprehensive system to capture, store, and analyse all data communicated using the enterprises network.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    Objects can be extracted from data flows captured by a capture device. Each captured object can then be classified according to content. In one embodiment, the present invention includes determining whether a captured object is binary or textual in nature, and classifying the captured object as one of a plurality of textual content types based tokens found in the captured object if the captured object is determined to be textual in nature.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0004]
    The present invention is illustrated by way of example, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals refer to similar elements and in which:
  • [0005]
    FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a computer network connected to the Internet;
  • [0006]
    FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating one configuration of a capture system according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0007]
    FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating the capture system according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0008]
    FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an object assembly module according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0009]
    FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an object store module according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0010]
    FIG. 6 is a block diagram illustrating an example hardware architecture for a capture system according to one embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0011]
    FIG. 7 is a block diagram illustrating an object classification module according to one embodiment of the present invention; and
  • [0012]
    FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating object classification processing according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0013]
    Although the present system will be discussed with reference to various illustrated examples, these examples should not be read to limit the broader spirit and scope of the present invention. Some portions of the detailed description that follows are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the computer science arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared and otherwise manipulated.
  • [0014]
    It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers or the like. It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise, it will be appreciated that throughout the description of the present invention, use of terms such as “processing”, “computing”, “calculating”, “determining”, “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
  • [0015]
    As indicated above, one embodiment of the present invention is instantiated in computer software, that is, computer readable instructions, which, when executed by one or more computer processors/systems, instruct the processors/systems to perform the designated actions. Such computer software may be resident in one or more computer readable media, such as hard drives, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, read-only memory, read-write memory and so on. Such software may be distributed on one or more of these media, or may be made available for download across one or more computer networks (e.g., the Internet). Regardless of the format, the computer programming, rendering and processing techniques discussed herein are simply examples of the types of programming, rendering and processing techniques that may be used to implement aspects of the present invention. These examples should in no way limit the present invention, which is best understood with reference to the claims that follow this description.
  • [0016]
    Networks
  • [0017]
    FIG. 1 illustrates a simple prior art configuration of a local area network (LAN) 10 connected to the Internet 12. Connected to the LAN 102 are various components, such as servers 14, clients 16, and switch 18. There are numerous other known networking components and computing devices that can be connected to the LAN 10. The LAN 10 can be implemented using various wireline or wireless technologies, such as Ethernet and 802.11b. The LAN 10 may be much more complex than the simplified diagram in FIG. 1, and may be connected to other LANs as well.
  • [0018]
    In FIG. 1, the LAN 10 is connected to the Internet 12 via a router 20. This router 20 can be used to implement a firewall, which are widely used to give users of the LAN 10 secure access to the Internet 12 as well as to separate a company's public Web server (can be one of the servers 14) from its internal network, i.e., LAN 10. In one embodiment, any data leaving the LAN 10 towards the Internet 12 must pass through the router 12. However, there the router 20 merely forwards packets to the Internet 12. The router 20 cannot capture, analyse, and searchably store the content contained in the forwarded packets.
  • [0019]
    One embodiment of the present invention is now illustrated with reference to FIG. 2. FIG. 2 shows the same simplified configuration of connecting the LAN 10 to the Internet 12 via the router 20. However, in FIG. 2, the router 20 is also connected to a capture system 22. In one embodiment, the router 12 splits the outgoing data stream, and forwards one copy to the Internet 12 and the other copy to the capture system 22.
  • [0020]
    There are various other possible configurations. For example, the router 12 can also forward a copy of all incoming data to the capture system 22 as well. Furthermore, the capture system 22 can be configured sequentially in front of, or behind the router 20, however this makes the capture system 22 a critical component in connecting to the Internet 12. In systems where a router 12 is not used at all, the capture system can be interposed directly between the LAN 10 and the Internet 12. In one embodiment, the capture system 22 has a user interface accessible from a LAN-attached device, such as a client 16.
  • [0021]
    In one embodiment, the capture system 22 intercepts all data leaving the network. In other embodiments, the capture system can also intercept all data being communicated inside the network 10. In one embodiment, the capture system 22 reconstructs the documents leaving the network 10, and stores them in a searchable fashion. The capture system 22 can then be used to search and sort through all documents that have left the network 10. There are many reasons such documents may be of interest, including network security reasons, intellectual property concerns, corporate governance regulations, and other corporate policy concerns.
  • [0022]
    Capture System
  • [0023]
    One embodiment of the present invention is now described with reference to FIG. 3. FIG. 3 shows one embodiment of the capture system 22 in more detail. The capture system 22 includes a network interface module 24 to receive the data from the network 10 or the router 20. In one embodiment, the network interface module 24 is implemented using one or more network interface cards (NIC), e.g., Ethernet cards. In one embodiment, the router 20 delivers all data leaving the network to the network interface module 24.
  • [0024]
    The captured raw data is then passed to a packet capture module 26. In one embodiment, the packet capture module 26 extracts data packets from the data stream received from the network interface module 24. In one embodiment, the packet capture module 26 reconstructs Ethernet packets from multiple sources to multiple destinations for the raw data stream.
  • [0025]
    In one embodiment, the packets are then provided the object assembly module 28. The object assembly module 28 reconstructs the objects being transmitted by the packets. For example, when a document is transmitted, e.g. as an email attachment, it is broken down into packets according to various data transfer protocols such as Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) and Ethernet. The object assembly module 28 can reconstruct the document from the captured packets.
  • [0026]
    One embodiment of the object assembly module 28 is now described in more detail with reference to FIG. 4. When packets first enter the object assembly module, they are first provided to a reassembler 36. In one embodiment, the reassembler 36 groups—assembles—the packets into unique flows. For example, a flow can be defined as packets with identical Source IP and Destination IP addresses as well as identical TCP Source and Destination Ports. That is, the reassembler 36 can organize a packet stream by sender and recipient.
  • [0027]
    In one embodiment, the reassembler 36 begins a new flow upon the observation of a starting packet defined by the data transfer protocol. For a TCP/IP embodiment, the starting packet is generally referred to as the “SYN” packet. The flow can terminate upon observation of a finishing packet, e.g., a “Reset” or “FIN” packet in TCP/IP. If now finishing packet is observed by the reassembler 36 within some time constraint, it can terminate the flow via a timeout mechanism. In an embodiment using the TPC protocol, a TCP flow contains an ordered sequence of packets that can be assembled into a contiguous data stream by the reassembler 36. Thus, in one embodiment, a flow is an ordered data stream of a single communication between a source and a destination.
  • [0028]
    The flown assembled by the reassember 36 can then be provided to a protocol demultiplexer (demux) 38. In one embodiment, the protocol demux 38 sorts assembled flows using the TCP Ports. This can include performing a speculative classification of the flow contents based on the association of well-known port numbers with specified protocols. For example, Web Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP) packets—i.e., Web traffic—are typically associated with port 80, File Transfer Protocol (FTP) packets with port 20, Kerberos authentication packets with port 88, and so on. Thus in one embodiment, the protocol demux 38 separates all the different protocols in one flow.
  • [0029]
    In one embodiment, a protocol classifier 40 also sorts the flows in addition to the protocol demux 38. In one embodiment, the protocol classifier 40—operating either in parallel or in sequence with the protocol demux 38—applies signature filters to the flows to attempt to identify the protocol based solely on the transported data. Furthermore, the protocol demux 38 can make a classification decision based on port number which is subsequently overridden by protocol classifier 40. For example, if an individual or program attempted to masquerade an illicit communication (such as file sharing) using an apparently benign port such as port 80 (commonly used for HTTP Web browsing), the protocol classifier 40 would use protocol signatures, i.e., the characteristic data sequences of defined protocols, to verify the speculative classification performed by protocol demux 38.
  • [0030]
    In one embodiment, the object assembly module 28 outputs each flow organized by protocol, which represent the underlying objects. Referring again to FIG. 3, these objects can then be handed over to the object classification module 30 (sometimes also referred to as the “content classifier”) for classification based on content. A classified flow may still contain multiple content objects depending on the protocol used. For example, protocols such as HTTP (Internet Web Surfing) may contain over 100 objects of any number of content types in a single flow. To deconstruct the flow, each object contained in the flow is individually extracted, and decoded, if necessary, by the object classification module 30.
  • [0031]
    The object classification module 30 uses the inherent properties and signatures of various documents to determine the content type of each object. For example, a Word document has a signature that is distinct from a PowerPoint document, or an Email document. The object classification module 30 can extract out each individual object and sort them out by such content types. Such classification renders the present invention immune from cases where a malicious user has altered a file extension or other property in an attempt to avoid detection of illicit activity.
  • [0032]
    In one embodiment, the object classification module 30 determines whether each object should be stored or discarded. In one embodiment, this determination is based on a various capture rules. For example, a capture rule can indicate that Web Traffic should be discarded. Another capture rule can indicate that all PowerPoint documents should be stored, except for ones originating from the CEO's IP address. Such capture rules can be implemented as regular expressions, or by other similar means. Several embodiments of the object classification module 30 are described in more detail further below.
  • [0033]
    In one embodiment, the capture rules are authored by users of the capture system 22. The capture system 22 is made accessible to any network-connected machine through the network interface module 24 and user interface 34. In one embodiment, the user interface 34 is a graphical user interface providing the user with friendly access to the various features of the capture system 22. For example, the user interface 34 can provide a capture rule authoring tool that allows users to write and implement any capture rule desired, which are then applied by the object classification module 30 when determining whether each object should be stored. The user interface 34 can also provide pre-configured capture rules that the user can select from along with an explanation of the operation of such standard included capture rules. In one embodiment, the default capture rule implemented by the object classification module 30 captures all objects leaving the network 10.
  • [0034]
    If the capture of an object is mandated by the capture rules, the object classification module 30 can also determine where in the object store module 32 the captured object should be stored. With reference to FIG. 5, in one embodiment, the objects are stored in a content store 44 memory block. Within the content store 44 are files 46 divided up by content type. Thus, for example, if the object classification module determines that an object is a Word document that should be stored, it can store it in the file 46 reserved for Word documents. In one embodiment, the object store module 32 is integrally included in the capture system 22. In other embodiments, the object store module can be external—entirely or in part—using, for example, some network storage technique such as network attached storage (NAS) and storage area network (SAN).
  • [0035]
    Tag Data Structure
  • [0036]
    In one embodiment, the content store is a canonical storage location, simply a place to deposit the captured objects. The indexing of the objects stored in the content store 44 is accomplished using a tag database 42. In one embodiment, the tag database 42 is a database data structure in which each record is a “tag” that indexes an object in the content store 44 and contains relevant information about the stored object. An example of a tag record in the tag database 42 that indexes an object stored in the content store 44 is set forth in Table 1:
  • [0000]
    TABLE 1
    Field Name Definition
    MAC Address Ethernet controller MAC address unique to
    each capture system
    Source IP Source Ethernet IP Address of object
    Destination IP Destination Ethernet IP Address of object
    Source Port Source TCP/IP Port number of object
    Destination Port Destination TCP/IP Port number of the object
    Protocol IP Protocol that carried the object
    Instance Canonical count identifying object within a
    protocol capable of carrying multiple data
    within a single TCP/IP connection
    Content Content type of the object
    Encoding Encoding used by the protocol carrying object
    Size Size of object
    Timestamp Time that the object was captured
    Owner User requesting the capture of object (rule author)
    Configuration Capture rule directing the capture of object
    Signature Hash signature of object
    Tag Signature Hash signature of all preceding tag fields
  • [0037]
    There are various other possible tag fields, and some embodiments can omit numerous tag fields listed in Table 1. In other embodiments, the tag database 42 need not be implemented as a database, and a tag need not be a record. Any data structure capable of indexing an object by storing relational data over the object can be used as a tag data structure. Furthermore, the word “tag” is merely descriptive, other names such as “index” or “relational data store,” would be equally descriptive, as would any other designation performing similar functionality.
  • [0038]
    The mapping of tags to objects can, in one embodiment, be obtained by using unique combinations of tag fields to construct an object's name. For example, one such possible combination is an ordered list of the Source IP, Destination IP, Source Port, Destination Port, Instance and Timestamp. Many other such combinations including both shorter and longer names are possible. In another embodiment, the tag can contain a pointer to the storage location where the indexed object is stored.
  • [0039]
    The tag fields shown in Table 1 can be expressed more generally, to emphasize the underlying information indicated by the tag fields in various embodiments. Some of these possible generic tag fields are set forth in Table 2:
  • [0000]
    TABLE 2
    Field Name Definition
    Device Identity Identifier of capture device
    Source Address Origination Address of object
    Destination Address Destination Address of object
    Source Port Origination Port of object
    Destination Port Destination Port of the object
    Protocol Protocol that carried the object
    Instance Canonical count identifying object within a
    protocol capable of carrying multiple data
    within a single connection
    Content Content type of the object
    Encoding Encoding used by the protocol carrying object
    Size Size of object
    Timestamp Time that the object was captured
    Owner User requesting the capture of object (rule author)
    Configuration Capture rule directing the capture of object
    Signature Signature of object
    Tag Signature Signature of all preceding tag fields
  • [0040]
    For many of the above tag fields in Tables 1 and 2, the definition adequately describes the relational data contained by each field. For the content field, the types of content that the object can be labelled as are numerous. Some example choices for content types (as determined, in one embodiment, by the object classification module 30) are JPEG, GIF, BMP, TIFF, PNG (for objects containing images in these various formats); Skintone (for objects containing images exposing human skin); PDF, MSWord, Excel, PowerPoint, MSOffice (for objects in these popular application formats); HTML, WebMail, SMTP, FTP (for objects captured in these transmission formats); Telnet, Rlogin, Chat (for communication conducted using these methods); GZIP, ZIP, TAR (for archives or collections of other objects); Basic_Source, C++_Source, C_Source, Java_Source, FORTRAN_Source, Verilog_Source, VHDL_Source, Assembly_Source, Pascal_Source, Cobol_Source, Ada_Source, Lisp_Source, Perl_Source, XQuery_Source, Hypertext Markup Language, Cascaded Style Sheets, JavaScript, DXF, Spice, Gerber, Mathematica, Matlab, AllegroPCB, ViewLogic, TangoPCAD, BSDL, C_Shell, K_Shell, Bash_Shell, Bourne_Shell, FTP, Telnet, MSExchange, POP3, RFC822, CVS, CMS, SQL, RTSP, MIME, PDF, PS (for source, markup, query, descriptive, and design code authored in these high-level programming languages); C Shell, K Shell, Bash Shell (for shell program scripts); Plaintext (for otherwise unclassified textual objects); Crypto (for objects that have been encrypted or that contain cryptographic elements); Englishtext, Frenchtext, Germantext, Spanishtext, Japanesetext, Chinesetext, Koreantext, Russiantext (any human language text); Binary Unknown, ASCII Unknown, and Unknown (as catchall categories).
  • [0041]
    The signature contained in the Signature and Tag Signature fields can be any digest or hash over the object, or some portion thereof. In one embodiment, a well-known hash, such as MD5 or SHA1 can be used. In one embodiment, the signature is a digital cryptographic signature. In one embodiment, a digital cryptographic signature is a hash signature that is signed with the private key of the capture system 22. Only the capture system 22 knows its own private key, thus, the integrity of the stored object can be verified by comparing a hash of the stored object to the signature decrypted with the public key of the capture system 22, the private and public keys being a public key cryptosystem key pair. Thus, if a stored object is modified from when it was originally captured, the modification will cause the comparison to fail.
  • [0042]
    Similarly, the signature over the tag stored in the Tag Signature field can also be a digital cryptographic signature. In such an embodiment, the integrity of the tag can also be verified. In one embodiment, verification of the object using the signature, and the tag using the tag signature is performed whenever an object is presented, e.g., displayed to a user. In one embodiment, if the object or the tag is found to have been compromised, an alarm is generated to alert the user that the object displayed may not be identical to the object originally captured.
  • [0043]
    Object Classification
  • [0044]
    One embodiment of the object classification module 30 is now described in more detail with reference to FIG. 7. As described above, in one embodiment, the output of the object assembly module 28 are flows classified by protocol. In one embodiment, the object classification module 30 includes a number of protocol handlers 62 designed to extract the objects from a classified flow.
  • [0045]
    For some protocols, such as HTTP, an off-the-shelf protocol handler can be used. For other protocols, the creator of the protocol may provide a protocol handler. Some protocol handlers 62 are designed specially for the capture system 22. In one embodiment, a protocol handlers 62 is included to extract objects from any known transmission protocol, such as HTTP and SMTP. The protocol handlers 62 and object extraction can also be implemented in the object assembly module 28, or in any other module prior to object classification.
  • [0046]
    Where the object assembly module 28 has been unable to identify the protocol of the flow, the flow is provided to an “unknown protocol handler,” included in the list of protocol handlers 62. In one embodiment, the unknown protocol handler extracts the objects contained in the unidentified flow in the absence of a known protocol. In one embodiment, the unknown protocol handler classifies the entire received flow as a single object. For example, classifying the entire unknown flow as one object can address the difficulty associated with classifying FTP data flows. Other embodiments for the operation of the unknown protocol handler are described further below.
  • [0047]
    In one embodiment, the extracted object (or objects) is input for the binary signature module 64. As explained above, the binary signature module 64 attempts to classify an object based on binary signatures found inside the object. Binary signatures result from the content encapsulating software operating in some unique manner.
  • [0048]
    Binary signatures may be inserted on purpose of by happenstance. For example, the binary signature of a Bit Torrent object is the string “BitTorrent” seen at the very beginning of the object. Similarly, all Microsoft Office documents begin with a 32-bit Microsoft identifier based on which each office document can be classified. As another example, JPEG images contain the string “JFIF” at the ninth byte of the object, and the twelfth byte of the object is 0x30 in hexadecimal notation.
  • [0049]
    Binary signatures may be collected from various sources, such as UNIX “Magic Files,” or additional research and observation. In one embodiment, the signature database containing the signatures of known content types is updated regularly. Signatures can change or become obsolete, while new signatures may be added to known content types or because of new content types.
  • [0050]
    In one embodiment, if the binary signature module 64 is able to classify the object by content, then the content classification is inserted into the “Content” field of the tag data structure set forth above. If, however, the binary signature module 64 is unable to classify the object, i.e., the object did not match any known signatures, then the object is provided to the object statistics module 66.
  • [0051]
    In one embodiment, the object statistics module 66 performs various statistical calculations on the object and reaches one or more conclusions based on the results of these calculations. Specifically, in one embodiment, the object statistics module 66 determines whether the object is binary or textual in nature, if binary, whether it is encrypted, and, if textual, what type of text the object contains.
  • [0052]
    In one embodiment, one statistical analysis performed by the object statistics module 66 calculates the frequency of the bytes contained in the object. In one embodiment, if all 256 possible bytes occur with statistically even frequency, then the object is processed further as a binary object. If, however, certain bytes associated with textual formats—such as ASCII, extended ASCII, or Unicode)—are seen with elevated frequencies, then the object is processed as a text object.
  • [0053]
    In one embodiment, if the object is determined to be binary data, then the object statistics module 66 performs a distribution analysis (e.g., calculating the variance of the byte distibution) to determine whether the bytes are uniformly distributed or not. In one embodiment, if the bytes are distributed uniformly (to a statistically significant degree), then the object statistics module 66 classifies the object as content type “crypto,” i.e., encrypted data, since most encrypted data appears randomized. In one embodiment, if the byte distribution is found to be non-uniform, the object is classified using the catchall “Binary_Unknown” type. The appropriate classification is then inserted into the tag.
  • [0054]
    In one embodiment, if the object is determined to be text (e.g., ASCII), then the object statistics module 66 accesses a token database 68 to statistically analyze whether and/or how many times each token appears in the object. A token may be a word, a phrase, a part of a word, grammatical notations, patterns, syntax, and any other textual data. Tokens may vary in size, but will generally be relatively small, usually between 3 and 12 bytes in length. The tokens need not be stored in a token database 68, any appropriate storage scheme and data structure can be used.
  • [0055]
    The statistical information associated with the tokens is provided, in one embodiment, to the token analyzer 70, which classifies the object as one of a number of various text types using the information. Since various textual documents include different types of syntax, grammar, and words, it is possible to classify text objects using such tokens. For example, certain phrases—such as “is a”, “the”, “and”—appear more regularly in English language text than text in other languages. Similarly, certain tokens—such as “++”, “for (“—appear often in certain programming languages.
  • [0056]
    In one embodiment, the possible textual content types include Englishtext, Frenchtext, Germantext, Spanishtext, Japanesetext, Chinesetext, Koreantext, Russiantext, (i.e., text from any specific language or a catchall Languagetext category) and various programming language, markup language, query language, and other computer language source code, including Basic_Source, C++_Source, C_Source, Java_Source, FORTRAN_Source, Verilog_Source, VHDL_Source, Assembly_Source, Pascal_Source, Cobol_Source, Ada_Source, Lisp_Source, Perl_Source, XQuery_Source, Hypertext Markup Language, Cascaded Style Sheets, JavaScript, DXF, Spice, Gerber, Mathematica, Matlab, AllegroPCB, ViewLogic, TangoPCAD, BSDL, C_Shell, K_Shell, Bash_Shell, Bourne_Shell, FTP, Telnet, MSExchange, POP3, RFC822, CVS, CMS, SQL, RTSP, MIME, PDF, PS, and Stockdata.
  • [0057]
    In one embodiment, the tokens in the token database 68 are organized by content type. In other words, each possible content type has tokens associated with it. Furthermore, each token has a numerical weight associated with it. In one embodiment, the token analyzer 70 accesses the token database 68, and calculates a raw number associated with each content type by summing the weights of the tokens found in the object, counting each instance of tokens found more than once. The token analyzer 70 can then classify the object according to the content type with the highest numerical value.
  • [0058]
    In one embodiment, the tokens in the token database 68 are weighted differently as a function of their frequency and the strength of their association with the specific content type. For example, a common English language word will have a lower weight than a syntax that is highly specific to a certain programming language, such as C++, or other documentation language, such as Verilog.
  • [0059]
    In one embodiment, the token analyzer 70 assigns a confidence to its classification. For example, if the token summation for Verilog tokens present in an object is twice the total of other content type tokens, then the confidence in a Veriolog classification is relatively high. If, however, two or more content types have token sums that are closer together, the confidence that the content type with the highest token sum is the correct classification is lower. The confidence can be expressed numerically, by ranger, or as a percentage.
  • [0060]
    In one embodiment, the token analyzer 70 performs object classification using Bayesian statistics, which naturally indicate the probability of the correctness of the classification. For Bayesian analysis the token analyzer only needs to know which tokens are present in the object, but not how many times each token was observed in the object. Based on this input, Bayesian statistics can provide the probability of the object being each of the content types. The highest probability content type can be the classification received by the object.
  • [0061]
    The probability that the object is the classified content type provided by Bayesian statistics can be converted to, or used as, a confidence in the object classification. In one embodiment, where two (or more) content types are close in probability, both as stored in the content field of the tag, with the appropriate probabilities.
  • [0062]
    The various embodiments of the object classification method described above have been described in terms of functional modules carrying out the various actions required by each embodiment. However, the modular architecture shown in FIG. 7 is just one example architecture for implementing object classification. Thus, one embodiment demonstrating object classification without any specific architecture is now described with reference to FIG. 8.
  • [0063]
    The input for object classification remains the captured, assembled, and classified flow of packets. In block 102, a determination is made as to whether the protocol carrying the flow is known. If yes, then in block 104 the appropriate protocol handler associated with the known protocol (e.g., HTTP) is called to extract one or more objects from the flow.
  • [0064]
    If, on the other hand, the protocol is not determinable or unknown (e.g., an FTP data flow), then in block 106 the unknown protocol handler is called to extract the objects from the flow. In one embodiment, the unknown protocol handler outputs the entire flow as an object. In another embodiment the unknown protocol handler employs methods similar to those discussed with reference to object classification to extract objects from the unclassifiable flow.
  • [0065]
    In one embodiment, the unknown protocol handler traverses the unknown flow looking for statistically strong binary signatures. If a probable binary signature is found the object embedded in the unknown flow can be simultaneously extracted and classified based on the binary signature without a priori knowledge of the underlying protocol of the flow.
  • [0066]
    In one embodiment, the unknown protocol handler is configured to identify textual domains—also referred to as ASCII domains—which are regions of the flow identified by a strong ASCII statistical components. If a textual domain is identified in the unclassified flow, the token classification method described above may be employed to extract and classify the textual object content contained in the flow.
  • [0067]
    After one or more objects are extracted, processing can proceed object by object, or in parallel on a per object basis. In block 108, an attempt is made to classify the object using binary signatures, as set forth above. If in block 110 it is determined that a binary signature has been found, then the object is classified based on the binary signature in block 112 and the processing terminates.
  • [0068]
    On the other hand, if binary signature classification fails, then in block 114 statistical analysis is performed on the object. This can include, but is not limited to, byte analysis (e.g., how many times each possible byte occurred in the object), byte distribution analysis (e.g., how were the bytes distributed across the object), token presence analysis (e.g., what known tokens were found in the object), and token frequency analysis (e.g., how many times each token was found in the object).
  • [0069]
    In block 116 a decision is made as to whether the object is binary or textual in nature. For example, if ASCII character bytes occur more frequently than other bytes, the object may be determined to be textual in nature. However, if all bytes occur with approximately even frequency, then the object is probably binary. If the object is binary, then in block 118 a determination is made as to whether the byte distribution is uniform, based on the analysis performed in block 114.
  • [0070]
    If the distribution of the bytes throughout the object is uniform—defined for example as the variance or standard deviation of the bytes being below three sigma (3 σ) or some other threshold—then the object is classified as a cryptographic object in block 120. In other words, the object is determined to include content that is encrypted by some cryptographic method, and the processing terminates. If, the byte distribution is found to be non-uniform (i.e., non-random), then the object is classified as a binary unknown object in block 122, and the processing terminates.
  • [0071]
    If, in block 116 the object was determined to be textual in nature, then token analysis is performed on the object in block 124. Token analysis can include calculating totals of token weights found in the object, performing Bayesian statistics of content types based on tokens present in the object, or any other token-based method of determining content type. Based on the calculations performed in block 124, the object is classified as some textual content type in block 126.
  • [0072]
    In block 128, the confidence of the classification of block 126 is calculated. The confidence may be based on a Bayesian statistic, an comparison of weight sums of other content types, or some other statistical method. The object classification processing then terminates. The object classification derived as a result of the processing can then be used to populate a tag describing the object, or can be associated with the object in some other way, e.g., in a database.
  • [0073]
    General Matters
  • [0074]
    In several embodiments, the capture system 22 has been described above as a stand-alone device. However, the capture system of the present invention can be implemented on any appliance capable of capturing and analyzing data from a network. For example, the capture system 22 described above could be implemented on one or more of the servers 14 or clients 16 shown in FIG. 1. The capture system 22 can interface with the network 10 in any number of ways, including wirelessly.
  • [0075]
    In one embodiment, the capture system 22 is an appliance constructed using commonly available computing equipment and storage systems capable of supporting the software requirements. In one embodiment, illustrated by FIG. 6, the hardware consists of a capture entity 46, a processing complex 48 made up of one or more processors, a memory complex 50 made up of one or more memory elements such as RAM and ROM, and storage complex 52, such as a set of one or more hard drives or other digital or analog storage means. In another embodiment, the storage complex 52 is external to the capture system 22, as explained above. In one embodiment, the memory complex stored software consisting of an operating system for the capture system device 22, a capture program, and classification program, a database, a filestore, an analysis engine and a graphical user interface.
  • [0076]
    Thus, a capture system and an object classification procedure have been described. In the forgoing description, various specific values were given names, such as “objects,” and various specific modules, such as the “object statistics module” and “token database” have been described. However, these names are merely to describe and illustrate various aspects of the present invention, and in no way limit the scope of the present invention. Furthermore, various modules, such as the binary signature module 64 and the token analyzer 70 in FIG. 7, can be implemented as software or hardware modules, or without dividing their functionalities into modules at all. The present invention is not limited to any modular architecture either in software or in hardware, whether described above or not.
Patent Citations
Cited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US5787232 *Jan 10, 1996Jul 28, 1998Siemens Corporate Research, Inc.Efficient data-driven theory revision system
US5873081 *Jun 27, 1997Feb 16, 1999Microsoft CorporationDocument filtering via directed acyclic graphs
US5924096 *Oct 15, 1997Jul 13, 1999Novell, Inc.Distributed database using indexed into tags to tracks events according to type, update cache, create virtual update log on demand
US6073142 *Jun 23, 1997Jun 6, 2000Park City GroupAutomated post office based rule analysis of e-mail messages and other data objects for controlled distribution in network environments
US6343376 *Oct 22, 1998Jan 29, 2002Computer Computer CorporationSystem and method for program verification and optimization
US6411952 *Jun 24, 1998Jun 25, 2002Compaq Information Technologies Group, LpMethod for learning character patterns to interactively control the scope of a web crawler
US6493761 *Jul 3, 2001Dec 10, 2002Nb NetworksSystems and methods for data processing using a protocol parsing engine
US6556983 *Jan 12, 2000Apr 29, 2003Microsoft CorporationMethods and apparatus for finding semantic information, such as usage logs, similar to a query using a pattern lattice data space
US6584458 *Feb 19, 1999Jun 24, 2003Novell, Inc.Method and apparatuses for creating a full text index accommodating child words
US7007020 *Mar 10, 2000Feb 28, 2006Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.Distributed OLAP-based association rule generation method and system
US7062705 *Jul 18, 2001Jun 13, 2006Cisco Technology, Inc.Techniques for forming electronic documents comprising multiple information types
US7181769 *Jun 6, 2003Feb 20, 2007Ncircle Network Security, Inc.Network security system having a device profiler communicatively coupled to a traffic monitor
US7188173 *Sep 30, 2002Mar 6, 2007Intel CorporationMethod and apparatus to enable efficient processing and transmission of network communications
US7506155 *May 31, 2005Mar 17, 2009Gatekeeper LlcE-mail virus protection system and method
US7539683 *Jul 15, 2008May 26, 2009International Business Machines CorporationSystems, methods, and computer products for information sharing using personalized index caching
US7730011 *Oct 19, 2005Jun 1, 2010Mcafee, Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US7739080 *Apr 19, 2004Jun 15, 2010Versata Development Group, Inc.Consolidation of product data models
US7886359 *Jul 15, 2004Feb 8, 2011Symantec CorporationMethod and apparatus to report policy violations in messages
US7899828 *Mar 30, 2004Mar 1, 2011Mcafee, Inc.Tag data structure for maintaining relational data over captured objects
US7907608 *Aug 12, 2005Mar 15, 2011Mcafee, Inc.High speed packet capture
US7921072 *May 31, 2005Apr 5, 2011Alcatel-Lucent Usa Inc.Methods and apparatus for mapping source schemas to a target schema using schema embedding
US7926099 *Dec 27, 2005Apr 12, 2011Novell, Inc.Computer-implemented method and system for security event transport using a message bus
US7930540 *Nov 22, 2004Apr 19, 2011Mcafee, Inc.Cryptographic policy enforcement
US7949849 *Jun 27, 2005May 24, 2011Mcafee, Inc.File system for a capture system
US7958227 *May 22, 2006Jun 7, 2011Mcafee, Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US7962591 *Jun 23, 2004Jun 14, 2011Mcafee, Inc.Object classification in a capture system
US8166307 *Aug 31, 2010Apr 24, 2012McAffee, Inc.Document registration
US8176049 *Mar 31, 2010May 8, 2012Mcafee Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US8200026 *May 26, 2009Jun 12, 2012Mcafee, Inc.Identifying image type in a capture system
US8205242 *Jul 10, 2008Jun 19, 2012Mcafee, Inc.System and method for data mining and security policy management
US8205244 *Feb 27, 2007Jun 19, 2012Airdefense, Inc.Systems and methods for generating, managing, and displaying alarms for wireless network monitoring
US8463800 *Mar 27, 2012Jun 11, 2013Mcafee, Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US8473442 *Feb 25, 2009Jun 25, 2013Mcafee, Inc.System and method for intelligent state management
US8635706 *Mar 16, 2012Jan 21, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for data mining and security policy management
US8656039 *Jun 8, 2004Feb 18, 2014Mcafee, Inc.Rule parser
US8667121 *Mar 25, 2009Mar 4, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for managing data and policies
US8683035 *Apr 18, 2011Mar 25, 2014Mcafee, Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US8700561 *Dec 27, 2011Apr 15, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for providing data protection workflows in a network environment
US8706709 *Jan 15, 2009Apr 22, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for intelligent term grouping
US8707008 *Mar 16, 2011Apr 22, 2014Mcafee, Inc.File system for a capture system
US8730955 *Feb 10, 2011May 20, 2014Mcafee, Inc.High speed packet capture
US8762386 *Jun 24, 2011Jun 24, 2014Mcafee, Inc.Method and apparatus for data capture and analysis system
US20020032772 *Sep 13, 2001Mar 14, 2002Bjorn OlstadMethod for searching and analysing information in data networks
US20020046221 *Apr 24, 2001Apr 18, 2002Spectrum Controls, Inc.Method, system, and apparatus for providing data regarding the operation and monitoring of a control system
US20020129140 *Dec 6, 2001Sep 12, 2002Ariel PeledSystem and method for monitoring unauthorized transport of digital content
US20030055962 *Aug 30, 2001Mar 20, 2003Freund Gregor P.System providing internet access management with router-based policy enforcement
US20030105854 *Dec 11, 2002Jun 5, 2003Vilhjalmur ThorsteinssonMethod and system for controlling and coordinating devices and appliances, such as from a central portal and via a wide-area communications network
US20040015579 *Jun 2, 2003Jan 22, 2004Geoffrey CooperMethod and apparatus for enterprise management
US20040059920 *Sep 19, 2002Mar 25, 2004International Business Machines CorporationSecurity health checking tool
US20040064537 *Sep 30, 2002Apr 1, 2004Anderson Andrew V.Method and apparatus to enable efficient processing and transmission of network communications
US20040114518 *Dec 17, 2002Jun 17, 2004Macfaden Michael RobertAdaptive classification of network traffic
US20040122936 *Dec 20, 2002Jun 24, 2004Ge Mortgage Holdings, LlcMethods and apparatus for collecting, managing and presenting enterprise performance information
US20040139120 *Nov 10, 2003Jul 15, 2004Matt ClarkFeature-based solutions provisioning of data services
US20040196970 *Apr 1, 2003Oct 7, 2004Cole Eric B.Methodology, system and computer readable medium for detecting file encryption
US20050033726 *May 19, 2004Feb 10, 2005Ju WuApparatus and method for accessing diverse native data sources through a metadata interface
US20050038788 *Aug 14, 2003Feb 17, 2005International Business Machines CorporationAnnotation security to prevent the divulgence of sensitive information
US20050044289 *Dec 5, 2003Feb 24, 2005Hendel Matthew D.Continuous media priority aware storage scheduler
US20050050028 *Jun 12, 2004Mar 3, 2005Anthony RoseMethods and systems for searching content in distributed computing networks
US20050055399 *Sep 10, 2003Mar 10, 2005Gene SavchukHigh-performance network content analysis platform
US20050086252 *Jul 15, 2004Apr 21, 2005Chris JonesMethod and apparatus for creating an information security policy based on a pre-configured template
US20050138110 *Nov 26, 2004Jun 23, 2005Redlich Ron M.Data security system and method with multiple independent levels of security
US20070011309 *May 26, 2006Jan 11, 2007Network Intelligence CorporationNetwork event capture and retention system
US20070039049 *Sep 19, 2005Feb 15, 2007Netmanage, Inc.Real-time activity monitoring and reporting
US20070106660 *Jun 1, 2006May 10, 2007Bbnt Solutions LlcMethod and apparatus for using confidence scores of enhanced metadata in search-driven media applications
US20070106685 *Sep 18, 2006May 10, 2007Podzinger Corp.Method and apparatus for updating speech recognition databases and reindexing audio and video content using the same
US20070106693 *Jun 2, 2006May 10, 2007Bbnt Solutions LlcMethods and apparatus for providing virtual media channels based on media search
US20070112837 *Jun 1, 2006May 17, 2007Bbnt Solutions LlcMethod and apparatus for timed tagging of media content
US20070116366 *Nov 21, 2005May 24, 2007William DeningerIdentifying image type in a capture system
US20070124384 *Nov 18, 2005May 31, 2007Microsoft CorporationVoicemail and fax filtering
US20070139723 *Dec 21, 2005Jun 21, 2007Beadle Bruce ASystem and method for controlling copying of documents
US20070140128 *Oct 27, 2006Jun 21, 2007Eric KlinkerSystem and method to provide routing control of information over networks
US20070143559 *Dec 20, 2005Jun 21, 2007Yuichi YagawaApparatus, system and method incorporating virtualization for data storage
US20080027971 *Jul 28, 2006Jan 31, 2008Craig StatchukMethod and system for populating an index corpus to a search engine
US20080030383 *Aug 6, 2007Feb 7, 2008International Characters, Inc.Method and Apparatus for Lexical Analysis Using Parallel Bit Streams
US20080082497 *Sep 29, 2006Apr 3, 2008Leblang Jonathan AMethod and system for identifying and displaying images in response to search queries
US20080115125 *Nov 13, 2006May 15, 2008Cingular Wireless Ii, LlcOptimizing static dictionary usage for signal compression and for hypertext transfer protocol compression in a wireless network
US20080127346 *Nov 21, 2007May 29, 2008Electronics And Telecommunications Research InstituteSystem and method of detecting anomaly malicious code by using process behavior prediction technique
US20080140657 *Feb 2, 2006Jun 12, 2008Behnam AzvineDocument Searching Tool and Method
US20080141117 *Apr 12, 2005Jun 12, 2008Exbiblio, B.V.Adding Value to a Rendered Document
US20080159627 *Mar 6, 2007Jul 3, 2008Yahoo! Inc.Part-based pornography detection
US20090070327 *Sep 6, 2007Mar 12, 2009Alexander Stephan LoeserMethod for automatically generating regular expressions for relaxed matching of text patterns
US20090070328 *May 22, 2008Mar 12, 2009Alexander Stephan LoeserMethod and system for automatically generating regular expressions for relaxed matching of text patterns
US20090070459 *Apr 18, 2006Mar 12, 2009Cho Young HHigh-Performance Context-Free Parser for Polymorphic Malware Detection
US20090157659 *Jul 15, 2008Jun 18, 2009International Business Machines CorporationSystems, methods, and computer products for information sharing using personalized index caching
US20090158430 *Dec 18, 2008Jun 18, 2009Borders Kevin RMethod, system and computer program product for detecting at least one of security threats and undesirable computer files
US20090193033 *Feb 4, 2009Jul 30, 2009Zulfikar Amin RamzanMethod and apparatus for communication efficient private information retrieval and oblivious transfer
US20100011016 *Jul 11, 2008Jan 14, 2010Adobe Systems IncorporatedDictionary compilations
US20100011410 *Jul 10, 2008Jan 14, 2010Weimin LiuSystem and method for data mining and security policy management
US20100023726 *Jul 28, 2008Jan 28, 2010Aviles Joaquin JDual Hash Indexing System and Methodology
US20100037324 *Aug 7, 2008Feb 11, 2010Grant Calum Anders MckayComputer file control through file tagging
US20100088317 *Oct 1, 2009Apr 8, 2010Stored Iq, Inc.Method and apparatus for harvesting file system metadata
US20100100551 *Dec 18, 2009Apr 22, 2010Knauft Christopher LSystem and method of dynamically generating index information
US20100121853 *Jan 20, 2010May 13, 2010Mcafee, Inc., A Delaware CorporationQuery generation for a capture system
US20100174528 *Jan 4, 2010Jul 8, 2010International Business Machines CorporationCreating a terms dictionary with named entities or terminologies included in text data
US20100185622 *Mar 31, 2010Jul 22, 2010Mcafee, Inc.Attributes of Captured Objects in a Capture System
US20100191732 *Jan 27, 2009Jul 29, 2010Rick LoweDatabase for a capture system
US20110004599 *Sep 1, 2010Jan 6, 2011Mcafee, Inc.A system and method for word indexing in a capture system and querying thereof
US20110040552 *Aug 17, 2009Feb 17, 2011Abraxas CorporationStructured data translation apparatus, system and method
US20110149959 *Feb 10, 2011Jun 23, 2011Mcafee, Inc., A Delaware CorporationHigh speed packet capture
US20120114119 *Nov 4, 2010May 10, 2012Ratinder Paul Singh AhujaSystem and method for protecting specified data combinations
US20140164314 *Jan 16, 2014Jun 12, 2014Ratinder Paul Singh AhujaSystem and method for providing data protection workflows in a network environment
US20140164442 *Feb 14, 2014Jun 12, 2014Erik de la IglesiaRule parser
Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US8166307Aug 31, 2010Apr 24, 2012McAffee, Inc.Document registration
US8176049Mar 31, 2010May 8, 2012Mcafee Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US8200026May 26, 2009Jun 12, 2012Mcafee, Inc.Identifying image type in a capture system
US8205242Jul 10, 2008Jun 19, 2012Mcafee, Inc.System and method for data mining and security policy management
US8271794Jul 1, 2010Sep 18, 2012Mcafee, Inc.Verifying captured objects before presentation
US8301635Dec 13, 2010Oct 30, 2012Mcafee, Inc.Tag data structure for maintaining relational data over captured objects
US8307007Jul 20, 2011Nov 6, 2012Mcafee, Inc.Query generation for a capture system
US8307206Mar 14, 2011Nov 6, 2012Mcafee, Inc.Cryptographic policy enforcement
US8447722Mar 25, 2009May 21, 2013Mcafee, Inc.System and method for data mining and security policy management
US8463800Mar 27, 2012Jun 11, 2013Mcafee, Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US8473442Feb 25, 2009Jun 25, 2013Mcafee, Inc.System and method for intelligent state management
US8504537Mar 24, 2006Aug 6, 2013Mcafee, Inc.Signature distribution in a document registration system
US8548170May 25, 2004Oct 1, 2013Mcafee, Inc.Document de-registration
US8554774Sep 1, 2010Oct 8, 2013Mcafee, Inc.System and method for word indexing in a capture system and querying thereof
US8560534Jan 27, 2009Oct 15, 2013Mcafee, Inc.Database for a capture system
US8601537Mar 19, 2012Dec 3, 2013Mcafee, Inc.System and method for data mining and security policy management
US8635706Mar 16, 2012Jan 21, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for data mining and security policy management
US8656039Jun 8, 2004Feb 18, 2014Mcafee, Inc.Rule parser
US8667121Mar 25, 2009Mar 4, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for managing data and policies
US8683035Apr 18, 2011Mar 25, 2014Mcafee, Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US8700561Dec 27, 2011Apr 15, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for providing data protection workflows in a network environment
US8706709Jan 15, 2009Apr 22, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for intelligent term grouping
US8707008Mar 16, 2011Apr 22, 2014Mcafee, Inc.File system for a capture system
US8730955Feb 10, 2011May 20, 2014Mcafee, Inc.High speed packet capture
US8762386Jun 24, 2011Jun 24, 2014Mcafee, Inc.Method and apparatus for data capture and analysis system
US8806615Nov 4, 2010Aug 12, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for protecting specified data combinations
US8850591Jan 13, 2009Sep 30, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for concept building
US8918359May 16, 2013Dec 23, 2014Mcafee, Inc.System and method for data mining and security policy management
US9092471Feb 14, 2014Jul 28, 2015Mcafee, Inc.Rule parser
US9094338Mar 21, 2014Jul 28, 2015Mcafee, Inc.Attributes of captured objects in a capture system
US9195937Mar 30, 2012Nov 24, 2015Mcafee, Inc.System and method for intelligent state management
US9253154Aug 12, 2008Feb 2, 2016Mcafee, Inc.Configuration management for a capture/registration system
US9313232Dec 19, 2014Apr 12, 2016Mcafee, Inc.System and method for data mining and security policy management
US9374225Sep 30, 2013Jun 21, 2016Mcafee, Inc.Document de-registration
US9430564Jan 16, 2014Aug 30, 2016Mcafee, Inc.System and method for providing data protection workflows in a network environment
US9602548Nov 16, 2015Mar 21, 2017Mcafee, Inc.System and method for intelligent state management
Classifications
U.S. Classification709/224, 707/E17.044, 707/803
International ClassificationH04L29/06, G06F15/16, G06F17/00, G06F17/30, H04L29/08
Cooperative ClassificationH04L67/2842, H04L67/28, H04L67/327, H04L67/2819, H04L63/12
European ClassificationH04L29/08N27, H04L29/08N31Y, H04L29/08N27S, H04L29/08N27E