US20110282972A1 - Social network for location sensing - Google Patents

Social network for location sensing Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110282972A1
US20110282972A1 US13/186,711 US201113186711A US2011282972A1 US 20110282972 A1 US20110282972 A1 US 20110282972A1 US 201113186711 A US201113186711 A US 201113186711A US 2011282972 A1 US2011282972 A1 US 2011282972A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
user
information
location
profile
detected
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/186,711
Inventor
James S. Rosen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yahoo Inc
Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/253,848 external-priority patent/US8019692B2/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US13/186,711 priority Critical patent/US20110282972A1/en
Publication of US20110282972A1 publication Critical patent/US20110282972A1/en
Assigned to YAHOO HOLDINGS, INC. reassignment YAHOO HOLDINGS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: YAHOO! INC.
Assigned to OATH INC. reassignment OATH INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: YAHOO HOLDINGS, INC.
Assigned to YAHOO! INC. reassignment YAHOO! INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ROSEN, JAMES S.
Assigned to VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC. reassignment VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: VERIZON MEDIA INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/01Social networking
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/90Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
    • G06F16/95Retrieval from the web
    • G06F16/953Querying, e.g. by the use of web search engines
    • G06F16/9537Spatial or temporal dependent retrieval, e.g. spatiotemporal queries
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisements
    • G06Q30/0267Wireless devices
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisements
    • G06Q30/0269Targeted advertisements based on user profile or attribute
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisements
    • G06Q30/0272Period of advertisement exposure
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/08Auctions
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/2866Architectures; Arrangements
    • H04L67/30Profiles
    • H04L67/306User profiles
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
    • H04L67/50Network services
    • H04L67/535Tracking the activity of the user
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M15/00Arrangements for metering, time-control or time indication ; Metering, charging or billing arrangements for voice wireline or wireless communications, e.g. VoIP
    • H04M15/04Recording calls, or communications in printed, perforated or other permanent form
    • H04M15/06Recording class or number of calling, i.e. A-party or called party, i.e. B-party
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/02Services making use of location information
    • H04W4/021Services related to particular areas, e.g. point of interest [POI] services, venue services or geofences
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/02Services making use of location information
    • H04W4/029Location-based management or tracking services
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W4/00Services specially adapted for wireless communication networks; Facilities therefor
    • H04W4/20Services signaling; Auxiliary data signalling, i.e. transmitting data via a non-traffic channel
    • H04W4/21Services signaling; Auxiliary data signalling, i.e. transmitting data via a non-traffic channel for social networking applications

Definitions

  • the field of the present invention relates generally to a system and method for generating and collecting profile information regarding people and entities and matching or filtering said people and entities based on that profile information.
  • Social networking systems may use profiles to connect people who might like to meet each other. The idea of connecting strangers or friends who might not otherwise meet is powerful. However, the value of these systems may be limited by the rudimentary methods used to make matches: basic preference characteristics such as a common business relationship, social relationship, family relationship, compatible physical characteristics, or self-declared preferences for food, clothing, leisure activities, sports, entertainment, music, art, etc.
  • a key problem with such basic social networking systems is a lack of verifiability and authenticity of match criteria, leading to a surfeit of low quality matches. Too many low quality matches can lead to a loss of faith in the entire system, poor usability overall, and questions of trust when you meet people (or connect to entities) through such matching criteria.
  • Another problem is that such systems force users to do the tedious work of creating self-generated profiles by inputting personal information, akin to filling out a questionnaire.
  • the information I supply in creating my profile may not be useful for distinguishing me from other users in the system. For instance, I may mention that I am a Red Sox fan in my self-generated profile.
  • What is desired therefore is an improved system and method that adds accountability and standards to user profiles, ideally one which does not burden the user with the cumbersome task of building and maintaining a profile.
  • What is also desired is an improved system and method for location- and context-based matching and filtering of users.
  • What is also desired is an improved system that allows not only people to be matched with other people but also people to be matched with “entities”, such as restaurants, bars, organizations, parties, stores, and even cities.
  • Location-related data and other behavioral and exogenously generated characteristics are used to replace or supplement self-generated profiles in order to enhance the quality and trustworthiness of the matches made using the system and facilitate the inputting of profile information.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a mobile device that may be used in connection with embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the direct exchange of information between mobile devices according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a network system according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a logical diagram of a user profile according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a logical diagram of a target profile according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method for matching users according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • An example embodiment of the present invention provides a system and method for collecting and generating profile information for users of mobile devices and for matching users based on those profiles.
  • the mobile device may generate or receive location based information to augment both the generation of profile information and the use of that information to match users in different contexts.
  • both the profiles and the way that they are used may change based on a user's location and programmable filters and settings established by the user. For instance, a user at a night club on a Saturday night may be notified of friends who are nearby or of other users who have common friends or other characteristics that would indicate a match or facilitate a social meeting.
  • different profile information and filters may be used when the user is at a trade show on a work day.
  • Context may be set easily by the user (by manually selecting “work mode”, “socializing mode”, etc.) and/or set by the device automatically based on time, place, or other parameters.
  • devices may use certain programmable logic to determine context automatically, including use of statistics to guess, for example, that given a combination of place, time, and other factors, the user is most likely in “socializing mode,” thus saving the user the trouble of periodically having to adjust the settings of his device.
  • Profile information may be generated from behavioral characteristics of the user, exogenously generated characteristics, and user-specified information.
  • the profile may include a unique identifier as well as one or more pseudonyms or temporary identifiers for privacy purposes. Profiles may then be used to propose matches between users or provide users with icebreakers (topics of conversation suitable for initiating a conversation).
  • the data fields in the user profile may be tagged to indicate the type of data (behavioral, exogenous, user-specified, or other type) as well as the quality of the data for matching purposes.
  • Quality factors may include an indication of relevance of the particular data to the user and confidence in the accuracy of the information. For example, data may be collected based on the locations visited by the user. However, if location tracking has been disabled on most days, the data regarding a small set of locations visited by the user may not provide meaningful information regarding the user's behavior.
  • confidence in the data may depend upon the source of the data (e.g., whether it is user-specified or obtained from an exogenous source) or whether the data has been verified by a reliable source.
  • my user profile may indicate that I am friends with Joe Smith.
  • This information may provide a useful way to match people who have common friends.
  • Joe may not consider me to be a friend at all.
  • a bona fide friend of his may be misled into meeting me, believing me to be a friend of Joe's, only to find out later that Joe hardly knows me.
  • This kind of confidence problem may arise frequently without some means of qualifying the reliability of data used for matching. Without other indicia of confidence in the data, the usefulness of the information may be undermined, calling into question the entire matching system. Given that the matching system is intended to instill trust in connections, this could lead to abuses where people end up feeling tricked, having trusted the system, only to find that they have made associations based on false pretenses.
  • the confidence in this information may be enhanced if Joe has acknowledged, verified, or even rated our relationship, or (another way of accomplishing the same thing) if my behavioral profile indicates (through GPS tracking or other means) that I spend a lot of time physically with Joe, or if I regularly communicate with him by phone or email. Supplementing user-submitted information with behavioral information obtained from observed behavior can thus significantly increase the credibility of data used to make matches, and thus improve the overall user experience.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example mobile device 100 that may be used in connection with embodiments of the present invention.
  • the mobile device may be, for example, a personal digital assistant (PDA), cellular telephone, laptop computer, pager or other communications device.
  • the example device 100 includes a central processing unit 102 , memory 106 , network interface card (NIC) 110 , global positioning system (GPS) 112 and a bus 104 for communications among these components.
  • the memory 106 may store profile information 108 , including profile information regarding the user of the mobile device 100 , target profiles for matching other users and settings and filters for the use of those profiles.
  • the memory 106 may store the profiles in a relational database, flat file system or other database or file format.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates two mobile devices 202 and 204 using direct communication to exchange selected profile information (which may include, for example, target profiles indicating potential matches). Either device may determine whether there is a match and send a notification to the other user.
  • selected profile information which may include, for example, target profiles indicating potential matches.
  • the profile information 108 may be used by application software stored in memory 106 and processed on CPU 102 . All or part of this information may also be stored on a separate network server that may generate, maintain and process user profiles.
  • NIC 110 or other network interface provides access to an external network to allow communications with the network server and/or other mobile devices.
  • the user may participate through use of a passive identifier, such as a card in his wallet. And if the system can track the user by his physical properties alone, such as with casino-style cameras connected to computers running face recognition software or through other biometric identifiers, the user may in fact participate without having to do or carry anything; his profile gets updated and retrieved as necessary by the system as it “watches” him.
  • the devices and equipment contemplated to use this system may be replaced by chips and devices embedded into people's bodies, biometric identifiers, and other tracking technologies. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to smart phones and other mobile devices and may be adapted to encompass other enabling technologies.
  • GPS 112 generates location data that can be used for generating profile information as well as matching users.
  • Other location based information may be generated or received instead of, or in addition to, position information generated from a global positioning system.
  • location information may be generated based on a cellular telephone network (e.g., based on the cell where the phone is located or through more sophisticated triangulation techniques), or by determining proximity to a device or network access point for which location data is available.
  • a device without location data can know its location, at least approximately, if it can communicate, either directly or indirectly, with a device that does know its location (for example, devices that rely on GPS but are indoors and unable to see the sky can be daisy-chained to pass along location information from a nearby device that can see the sky).
  • a particular venue may broadcast or otherwise provide information about a particular location, event or activity (e.g., through bluetooth, Wi-Fi or other mechanism).
  • a message may be sent to the mobile communication device indicating the location or other information about the event or activity.
  • Different messages may be sent for different parts of the venue, so that, for example, a device of a user at a multi-screen movie theatre can know which movie the user sees.
  • a local triangulation system or mechanism to determine relative locations of users may also be used to identify specific “micro-locations” or help users find each other within a venue, which can be useful especially when the users don't know each other, for instance, if a match occurs between strangers in a crowded bar (micro-location methods might include the strength and direction of the signal received between two users and thus work like a compass, with an arrow pointing towards the target user and a “hot-cold” meter to indicate distance).
  • the identification of other users and devices within a specified range may be collected and time stamped for use in the user's profile, incorporating safeguards for privacy (such as the recording and time-stamping of certain meta-information, instead of names, about people in your vicinity).
  • safeguards for privacy such as the recording and time-stamping of certain meta-information, instead of names, about people in your vicinity.
  • location information such as a GPS position, user entered location, etc.
  • this information can also be associated with the profile even if the user's device is not able to generate this information.
  • Data relating to people at the same venue can be used to enhance the user's profile. For example, if a user goes to a bar populated by people in their 20 s and 30 s who work in financial sector jobs, this can be used to “teach” the system about that user, which can inform matching choices. Similarly, information that is known about people who visit a given location can be used to build the profile of the place itself; thus, a bar may develop an “entity profile” as a hangout for motorcycle enthusiasts, Red Sox fans, or both, depending on the time of day or whether there is a game being played that day at Fenway Park. When an entity has profile information associated with it, this information can then be accessed in advance by anyone who is thinking of going to that bar.
  • Profile matching algorithms could be used to predict whether you would be compatible with the regular customers of that bar.
  • a feedback system could be employed, using behavioral information (such as whether a user repeatedly frequents a particular bar or “type” of bar and/or user-declared information (such as when a user explicitly evaluates his experience at a given place)).
  • An entity's profile and its patrons' profiles can interact dynamically, building on each other and evolving over time as warranted.
  • Embodiments of the present invention serve to remove some of the time and effort, and simultaneously introduce an element of statistical analysis, into a human process that is inefficient and characterized by trial-and-error. This is not intended to eliminate the serendipitous nature of human discovery or trump subjective recommendations; rather, it is intended to be helpful as a supplemental guiding system.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a network 300 according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • the network 300 includes a network server 302 and a database storage system 304 .
  • the database storage system 304 stores profile information regarding users of the system.
  • the database storage system 304 may store the profiles in a relational database, flat file system or other database or file format.
  • Network server 302 collects information from the mobile devices and other sources to generate profile information. For instance, network server 302 may collect information regarding the use of email accounts to communicate with other users of the system.
  • Network server 302 also collects information about the locations of users and processes profiles to match users based on this information.
  • a network server allows information about venues to be collected whether or not a particular user is at that location. For instance, the server may determine the number of users at a particular night club and the number of users who are potential matches or whether specified friends are at that location. A user may request this information in advance to decide whether to go to a particular location. Aggregated (or individual) profile information may also be provided for purposes of evaluating advertising opportunities at a particular venue (e.g., determining which ads should be displayed on a monitor at a sporting event depending upon the profiles of the users at that event) or for other purposes.
  • the network server 302 can also be used to collect historical information about venues and the people who go there.
  • Such information can be useful to people interested in knowing patterns, such as who frequents the venue and when.
  • a user might want to know, for example, whether a given club tends to be frequented by people who have friends in common with him.
  • he may want to verify that nobody he knows is at the venue now, or a regular patron, or even likely to appear there (likeliness being determined by statistical analysis and cross-matching of his acquaintances' profiles with the entity's profile).
  • the server 302 is connected to the Internet 306 for communications with other devices.
  • the server may be connected directly to a wireless network, cellular telephone system or other network.
  • mobile devices 310 , 314 , 316 , 324 , 326 and 328 may be connected to the Internet (or other networks) through a variety of methods to allow communication with server 302 and other mobile devices.
  • device 310 may be synchronized with a personal computer 308 that provides a connection to the Internet. Data may be exchanged with the server through the personal computer 308 .
  • data for a user profile may be entered through the personal computer 308 whether or not it is connected to particular mobile device.
  • data for a user profile may come from a (networked) appliance ( 330 , 332 ), such as a DVR, smart card, digital book reader, etc.
  • Mobile devices 314 and 316 may also be connected to the network through a wireless server 312 that provides a connection to the Internet. For instance, wireless “hot spots” are increasingly being provided at coffee shops, libraries and other locations and may be provided at night clubs, sporting events or other venues visited by users of the system.
  • Mobile devices 324 , 326 and 328 may also be connected to the server 302 through a cellular telephone network.
  • Mobile telecommunication switching offices 320 and 322 may use cellular telecommunications protocols (such as CDMA, GSM, TDMA or other protocol) to communicate with mobile devices 324 , 326 and 328 .
  • the mobile telecommunication switching offices 320 and 322 may, in turn, be connected to the Internet 306 through local offices 318 .
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a user profile 400 according to an example embodiment of the present invention. While FIG. 4 illustrates a data structure for an example user profile, it is understood that other databases, data structures and formats may be used to store and associate the desired data in the user profile: A mobile device 100 and/or network server 302 may be used to generate and update a user profile 400 . User profiles may also be imported from other systems.
  • the example user profile 400 may be stored in a relational database and may have associated tables for storing profile data 402 and settings 416 .
  • the data table 402 may also include entries for various characteristics to be stored as part of the profile. Each characteristic may be stored as a row in the data table 402 .
  • the data table 402 may contain an entry, user type 450 , to indicate whether the profile is for a person or entity (such as a restaurant, entertainment venue or the like). For instance, an entry may include a field identifier 404 to identify the entry, a data value 406 , the type 408 of the data, quality indicators such as relevance 410 and confidence 412 and a pointer or other link to applicable settings 414 in the settings table 416 .
  • the settings table 416 includes settings and parameters that control how entries in the data table 402 are used for matching and other purposes.
  • the settings table 416 includes both user settings 418 and default and automated settings 426 that are established by the system (e.g., application software on a mobile device 100 or network server 302 ).
  • the user may provide settings that control availability 420 of a data entry for various uses, whether a data entry may be used alone or must be aggregated 422 with other specified information before it can be used and other privacy settings 424 .
  • Default settings for each of these options may be established and stored in table 426 .
  • automated settings may be stored by the system in table 426 for options that cannot be changed by the user.
  • the data entries include a type 408 indicating how the data was collected or generated.
  • Data types may include behavioral characteristics collected by the system based on the actions of the user, exogenous information collected from sources other than the user, and user-provided information.
  • the data entry also includes indications of the quality and usefulness of the information.
  • both relevance 410 and confidence 412 can be associated with the data stored in the table. Relevance 410 and confidence 412 may be indicated by a numerical rating based on how the information was collected, generated and/or verified. For instance, relevance 410 may indicate whether behavioral characteristics or composite data was generated from a large sample size.
  • the data entry may only be generated when the user's location can be tracked (which can be controlled by the settings 416 for the device or may be limited by the range and availability of the positioning system). If a user's location is tracked extensively, this data entry may have more relevance as an indicator of the user's behavior. A match might be made, for example, between two people who get coffee at the same cafe every morning. This information could at least be used to serve as an icebreaker.
  • Confidence 412 may also be indicated.
  • a high level of confidence may be associated with data entries generated from behavior that was tracked by the system, data provided in the form of a secure token, or information verified or rated by additional sources, as opposed to user-declared data.
  • behavioral and exogenously generated information in the user profile can greatly enhance the quality of the matches and types of matches that can be made by the system.
  • the following are example behavioral and exogenously generated characteristics that can be used to enhance a location-dependant matching engine included as part of application software on server 302 and/or mobile devices in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • the network server 302 or mobile device 100 may monitor actual phone, SMS, and/or email usage (and/or any other communications device or account or connected appliance, including PC) to infer who the user really knows as well as some information about the nature of the relationship (business vs. social); a system that collects all of this in an automated fashion will be richer than any system that requires constant manual inputs. If I talk to John Burns every day for an hour, it can be inferred that I know him very well.
  • This data may be entered in a user profile 400 by either network server 302 or mobile device 100 (or a mobile device that connects to a PC).
  • mobile device 100 may be a cell phone with a contact list in memory 106 .
  • the cell phone can track the frequency of calls, and amount of time spent on calls, to each person in the contact list.
  • frequently dialed numbers or the numbers of people who call you frequently
  • a laptop computer or mobile email device (which may be the same or different device than the cell phone) can track the number of messages sent and received from various email addresses. This information can be tracked separately or associated with a contact list.
  • the network server 302 and database storage system 304 may allow multiple mobile (or non-mobile) devices to be registered to the same user profile. In this way, both email usage and phone usage may be associated with a particular individual in the user's contact list.
  • the contacts or particular email addresses or phone numbers) with whom there are communications may be added as entries in the data table 402 of the user profile. For example, a field 404 may be added for a contact such as “John Burns” (which may be linked to other contact information for the person through the relational database).
  • the value 406 may be a number representing the frequency and duration of communications.
  • the type 408 would be classified as behavioral.
  • the relevance 410 may be a number based on whether the sample size is large (has tracking been turned on and for how long) and whether both email and phone accounts have been registered with the system for tracking.
  • Confidence 412 may be a number indicating whether the communications is tied to a full contact record (or just an email address or phone number), whether John Burns is also a registered user, whether he identifies the user as a friend and/or his contact information or communications usage information matches the information in the particular user profile, whether there is a history of physical proximity, or other factors indicating reliability of the data.
  • Physical Proximity Just as with regular phone interaction between people, physical proximity can indicate a relationship as well as some degree of its closeness. Bluetooth-enabled mobile devices, for example, may automatically log time which two (or more) people spent together; this can be used to “authenticate” a relationship. This might include “time-shifted” proximity, that is, showing that two people may be in the same place but not at the same time; this can also be supplemental information that is helpful in establishing a relationship (for example, they live in the same dormitory or go to the same library on a regular basis, even if not always at the same time). Physical proximity can be used as a separate data entry or aggregated with telephone and email usage to generate an overall data value to use as a proxy for the level of relationship with others (whether or not registered users of the system).
  • a field 404 may be added for frequently visited locations.
  • the value 406 may be the coordinates for locations where significant time is spent by the user. This data may be separated by the days and times when those locations are visited to distinguish locations visited during working hours from those visited on the weekend or at night.
  • Venues may also have wireless capabilities and provide tags or tokens with additional information about the places visited (such as a concert hall when a particular artist is performing, amusement park, sporting event, etc.).
  • “Where you go” information can also be used by advertisers and other businesses who might want to know more about you for marketing purposes. For example, a token that shows that you saw the same movie multiple times may be useful not just for matching purposes (to signal your interest to other similarly hardcore fans) but also to an advertiser.
  • the Spider-Man marketers might want to hype the sequel by sending out a special message or promotion only to those people who verifiably watched the first movie (in a movie theater) at least three times. This is elaborated upon below.
  • the data may also be used to enhance the relevance 410 and confidence 412 of other data entries. For instance, if I go to 81 Red Sox games a year, it lends more weight to my interest in the Red Sox than a self-generated profile could. Also, this information does not need to be manually entered by the user. It can be recorded automatically by simply going to Fenway Park on game days (using a location-tracking device or by having my matching device “know” where I am by interacting with a transmitter or mating device at Fenway Park, or with other networked devices at the event). Unlike self-generated characteristics, which are subjective, facts about my location objective and verifiable and can be assigned a high value for confidence 412 in the data table 402 .
  • an authenticating mechanism like a digitally-signed token, can “prove” to people or other interested parties (such as an advertiser offering a special deal to the most avid fans) that you really were where you (or your profile) indicated you were.
  • Feedback systems can also be used to provide information for generating data entries in the user profile 400 . What happens when people have the ability to “tag” you with feedback? Do your ex-girlfriends despise you? If you have in your profile exogenously generated ratings about you, which you can not edit, it can help strangers size you up. As a result, it may lead to “better” behavior since you do not want people ruining your “personality credit rating”. In this way, it is similar to an EBay feedback rating, which can be useful to signal to a stranger whether someone can be trusted. In addition, it can also be a fun way to “collect” and show off “friendly behavior points”. There is a powerful karmic component to building and maintaining a positive interpersonal rating.
  • These data entries have a different type 408 than the behavioral data entries described above which are tracked by the system. These entries may be tagged generally as exogenous data or more specifically as feedback from another user.
  • the value 406 may be a rating in various categories and may include specific comments as well (which may be viewable to others or not, depending on the nature of the comments, who is seeking access, and other rules that can be applied to this powerful information).
  • the relevance 410 may be based on the amount of feedback received and the confidence 412 may depend upon the person who is giving the feedback (does that person have a positive feedback rating herself?) and whether (through location or communications tracking) a relationship with that person can be verified.
  • Contact lists can be a powerful way to match uses—using common acquaintances as intermediaries can be a powerful way to match users. Often the problem is that contact lists are a subset of your actual set of acquaintances.
  • entries (of people you know) may be generated based on ordinary contact lists as well as observed behavior as described above. These entries may also be manually entered by the user, with the confidence 412 augmented (or reduced) by behavioral characteristics (as described above) or exogenous information such as manual feedback from the acquaintance acknowledging the relationship (and its closeness level) or the existence of a corresponding entry in the acquaintance's user profile.
  • matches or alerts may be generated when a friend is nearby (based on location data and user profiles) or where a person with one or more common friends is nearby (or actually nearby and with a common friend). For example, the system may want to alert you that a good friend of your best friend happens to be walking past the cafe where you are eating.
  • your credit ratings, police records, medical records, driving records, grades and work performance ratings, and other “scores” from various real-life activities can be integrated into your profile to help with matching, or for other purposes.
  • digital tokens can be used for verifiability.
  • Uses for this information in your profile might include whether someone wants to date you, hire you, give you credit, offer you a special promotion or show you an advertisement (either online or offline, in the case of a dynamically targeted advertising method such as a changeable billboard).
  • a system that collects and processes behavioral data, including location data, has the ability to send alerts that are marketing in nature which appeal to users and which help businesses.
  • An example is for a store to send an alert to you when you enter their competitor's store, luring you to their store instead perhaps by offering you a discount.
  • Another is to have a billboard change dynamically depending on who is looking at it (and what is known about that user based on his profile).
  • Another is to determine patterns that are useful to marketers, such as the fact that people who watch Red Sox games tend to eat at Dunkin' Donuts twice as frequently as people who don't.
  • incentives to share otherwise personal information with marketers may include (but are not limited to) cash payments, better targeted advertising messages that pertain to one's interests, special offers from companies eager to get their business, and free or subsidized devices or service fees for interacting with the matching system,. etc.
  • users may decide how, or whether, they want their information shared.
  • a user might want to share their otherwise private medical records in order to show that they were recently examined and did not have any sexually transmitted diseases (a signed and date-stamped token may be issued by the doctor or clinic to authenticate this information).
  • they might stipulate that only a fraction of their medical records may be shared, and only in very specific circumstances.
  • a settings table 416 is provided. Each entry in the table may specify a number of settings and parameters to apply to data entries or to the collection of data. An entry in the table 416 may be associated with one or more data entries in data table 402 .
  • user settings 418 may be entered by a user through a mobile device or personal computer. The user may specify an availability 420 setting to indicate whether types or classes of data should be collected or made available for matching purposes.
  • a user may specify that location data may be collected and used based on specific types of events (nightclubs, sporting events, concerts, etc.), but that other locations should not be tracked or used, such as adult nightclubs.
  • location data may be made available for matching with another user only if certain conditions are met (for example, using location-based data to alert you when you are within 100 feet of another member of your local Rotary Club, and 10 feet from a member of a different Rotary Club chapter).
  • rules may be established for providing a photo, email address, or phone number to another user, for example requiring that there be a mutual exchange of photos.
  • the user may also specify certain times or days or other conditions that limit matching and notifications (e.g., permit matching only on Friday and Saturday nights).
  • a user may also specify that a level of aggregation 422 must be used for matching based on a particular data entry. For instance, the user may not want to allow others to match solely based on an income level entered in the user profile. However, if the match is based on a large amount of aggregated data, or specific types of data with a high confidence, the user may allow income to be included in an abstracted or aggregated form for use by the matching engine (but not to be provided to the other user).
  • Other privacy settings 424 may also be used to restrict the collection or use of data, to have it deleted after a certain period of time, or to restrict its use for matching or disclosure to other users. Just as it is easy for a user to have his behaviors monitored, it should be easy to de-activate recording of behavior when desired.
  • the user profile 400 may also include default and automated settings.
  • table 426 may specify that behavioral data types cannot be edited by the user, but can be deleted.
  • a user might be able to reset all feedback from other users, but can't simply edit out the feedback comments which he doesn't like.
  • it may be desirable to have the system use environmental filters. For example, if you are in a place where you are getting a large number of matches, the device you are using (or the server that it connects to) can apply a filter to send you alerts only for high-quality matches. Similarly, if you are traveling and getting no “hits”, the service might lower its thresholds either automatically by using location detection to recognize that you are in a foreign country, or simply by recognizing that you have been getting few (or no) matches during a given period of time.
  • the user may also specify one or more target profiles, (e.g., single women in their 20s with certain other characteristics), for determining whether there are matching users with a particular profile.
  • a target profile may be used to identify other users who have matching characteristics and are within a certain distance of the user or another specified location.
  • FIG. 5 is a logical diagram of a target profile 500 according to an example embodiment of the present invention. While FIG. 5 illustrates a data structure and the types of fields for an example target profile, it is understood that other databases, data structure and formats may be used to store and associate the desired data in the target profile.
  • a mobile device 100 and/or network server 302 may store one or more target profiles 500 for purposes of matching. Target user profiles may also be imported from other systems, such as online dating services.
  • the system may be able to develop global “matchmaking intelligence” through observing and learning from successes and failures among people who are looking for a mate. For example, the system may “see” a pattern that people who get up early and walk their dogs tend to get along well with other people who do the same and thus use this behavioral information to come up with a “computer-generated target profile for you”, different from what you might have chosen for yourself. While a computer would not necessarily be able to assess how people “get along” with each other per se, it can glean this information through direct user feedback, such as when people get married and convey this fact as feedback to the system.
  • the example target profile 500 may be stored in a relational database and may have associated tables for storing target data ranges 502 and programmable filters 518 .
  • the data range table 502 may include a plurality of entries for characteristics for the system to use in determining whether another user matches the target profile. If there is a match an action may be taken based on the settings 416 (e.g., beep or send a notice, or display information about the user or group of users who match).
  • Each target characteristic may be stored as a row in the data range table 502 .
  • the entries may correspond to those used for the data table 402 (field 504 , value range 506 , type 508 , relevance 510 , and confidence 512 ), except that threshold values, ranges or wildcard values may be used to specify the requirements for a user profile to match the target profile.
  • a weight 514 may be assigned to the entry to indicate the importance of that entry in determining whether there is a match. (It should be noted that the same may occur on an ad hoc basis between two devices in a way that requires no centralized database.)
  • filters 516 may also be applied to the entry for matching purposes.
  • a pointer may link or otherwise associate one or more entries in the data range table 502 with programmable filters 518 .
  • the programmable filters 518 may specify other conditions for matching in general or for matching a particular entry. For instance, the filter may specify whether a particular entry must match and/or whether only a certain percentage of entries must match. Filters may be based on location 520 , time 522 , context 524 , associations 526 or other conditions 528 .
  • Location 520 may be used to filter users who are within a certain distance of the user (e.g., within Bluetooth range or based on specific location data) or at particular locations or at particular events or venues.
  • Location 520 may also be used to automatically adjust matching rules (e.g., when a user is far from home). For instance, if a user is traveling in a foreign country, the rules may only require matching with another user who speaks the same language (or who is from the same country).
  • the user may also have a setting 416 indicating context 524 (e.g., whether the user is at work, at home, at a social event or traveling). Depending upon this context 524 , a different target profile or profiles may be selected and used for matching.
  • the criteria for matching may change automatically depending upon the context 524 (e.g., a user may be notified of any friend that is nearby when traveling, but not while at work).
  • Time 522 may also be used to automatically adjust matching criteria (e.g., using different criteria on a Friday or Saturday night than on a Monday morning).
  • the system may develop “intelligence” by looking at rules and settings of other users at a given time and/or place and “figure out” certain environmental factors that saves the user from having to manually adjust his settings. For example, the system may be able to differentiate between a bar and a doctor's office through “location memory”. If a few users have “mapped” out a location by identifying the characteristics of a particular location (or location coupled with time, in the case of a multi-use facility), this information can be applied to other users who visit that location. In this case, the user might simply set his device to “turn off matching in doctor's offices” or “turn off matching in all places except bars” and the system could respond accordingly to his wishes.
  • the system may learn through feedback: a certain kind of alert may be snoozed repeatedly, thus indicating that this “kind” of alert is unwelcome (whether based on time, place, or other factor).
  • the user upon getting a match alert, the user might give feedback through the user interface of his device to the system to send “more like this, please”. More generally, the system should be trainable to know where's home, work, girlfriend's apartment, etc. so it can learn about you and “make sense” of your behavioral patterns.
  • Associations 526 may be used to change the matching rules depending who you are with (e.g., your wife or your mistress) and/or who is nearby (e.g., more liberal matching for people who are with or near common friends) and/or who you have relationships with (e.g., whether you have common friends with a high level of relevance and confidence).
  • the use of second degree contacts for matching can be both a criterion in the data range table 502 as well as a filter for determining how other criteria are applied. These entries and filters can be used to notify a user when a close second degree contact is within a certain range or distance (e.g., based on the location 570 filter).
  • a venue or event may also be scanned (by making a request to network server 302 ) to determine how many friends and/or second degree contacts are at that location.
  • users' calendar information is incorporated into their profiles, this information could be used to predict who might be at a particular location in the future. For example, if you are planning to go to Miami for the weekend, you might want to scan the city not just to see who is there currently, but who (among your acquaintances or potential matches) is planning to be there when you will be. In this way, you could be “matched” with a suitable blind date who is flying to Miami from a different city.
  • a user can also make a specific request to “scan” a person with a mobile device at a particular location (e.g., the woman at the end of the bar) to see if the other person has any friends in common, or just to see her public profile.
  • the network server may retrieve a user profile for the mobile device at the specified location or it may be obtained through a direct Bluetooth or infrared connection with the mobile device. This is especially powerful when combined with quality indicia for the matching information (such as relevance 410 and confidence 412 ) as it promotes quality second degree matches and filters out spoofers.
  • This scanning process can also result in “icebreaker” conversation topics being identified, to help initiate an interaction between strangers, as described further below.
  • Mobile devices may also be used by businesses and specific filters may be established for these purposes. Businesses have myriad uses for authentic profile data. When you enter a Prada retail store, if the store knows you make a million dollars a year, or that you spend $ 1000 a month at a competitive store (because information is communicated and collected from use of your smart card, for example), it may treat you better than someone with no known buying history. Similarly, if you are walking the floor of a tradeshow and have in your profile jobs and even past performance reviews or other desirable characteristics like an electrical engineering degree from a certain school, you may get approached by companies seeking to hire you (especially if you have indicated in your profile that you are open to such overtures).
  • transfers of authenticated behavioral information can be beneficial to both businesses and consumers.
  • the consumer at Prada benefits by getting VIP treatment and perhaps special offers based on proven her past purchasing history.
  • a restaurant may passively accumulate profile information about its “behavior”.
  • the restaurant is the “entity” analog to a human user of the system. Every time someone eats at the restaurant, the mobile device may make it easy to rate that restaurant—for example, as you are paying the bill (perhaps with digital cash or a credit card) you are entitled to enter in a rating from 1 - 10 . Your rating will be digitally associated with this restaurant in a user profile 400 for the restaurant (akin to how an ex-girlfriend might rate you). The next person entering (or walking nearby) the restaurant can see these ratings.
  • This information could be stored in database storage system 304 or could be stored in a locally located, tamper resistant device at or near the restaurant (tamper-resistant so the restaurant can't delete or edit negative ratings).
  • Zagat-style restaurant reviews Two key elements distinguish this from Zagat-style restaurant reviews. First, it is designed to be easy to rate a restaurant, right when you are there and the experience is fresh in your mind. Second, users can get high-quality ratings when they need it, i.e., when they are hungry and walking down the street looking for a place to eat, right from a device they're carrying (of course, they could access the same information at other times and places, too).
  • a target profile can be established between a user and restaurants so that the mobile device can notify the user of good restaurant matches and provide ratings to help guide the user's decisions.
  • Fenway Park can compile aggregated and anonymous information about who goes to games. In this case, someone thinking of going to a Red Sox game can find out what “kind” of people attend games.
  • This composite information may be useful when choosing a bar: what are the composite statistics of its patrons... age, gender ratio, income, ratio of locals to tourists, etc. (all of which would be based on data entries 402 in user profiles 400 of those at the bar).
  • someone may be interested in knowing what the composite of the crowd is like right now, on Friday nights versus Sunday nights, or just in general.
  • Group information need not only be aggregated and anonymous. It may be used to “scan” a bar, for example, to see if anyone you know—or any second degree contacts, women looking for a one-night stand, friends from work, etc.—are inside.
  • One key benefit is the ability to do this remotely (e.g., by sending a query request to server 302 ), before you go to the bar, indeed, while you are still at home or work considering where to go.
  • People may also find it useful to get remote composite data about the people who live in cities they may be thinking of moving to (or similarly about neighborhoods), companies they are considering working for, golf clubs they are thinking of joining, resorts they may want to visit, etc.
  • Embodiments of the present invention also enable a variety of additional applications.
  • Karma Points When two people meet using you as an intermediary, you can earn digital karma points (a score or token in the user profile 400 ). Karma points may be fun to collect and may also provide a basis for matching (e.g., filtering those users who are good match makers or who have lots of second degree contacts). Inanimate entities can earn karma points as well, such as a neighborhood cafe, which has been “responsible” for a certain number of matches (that is, people being matched who are regulars at the cafe). When two people meet using you as an intermediary, you can be alerted that this has happened, and that you have just earned 10 “karma points”.
  • the settings 416 on a mobile device 100 may cause the device to make a call or send a text message or email to the intermediary when a match is made among common friends.
  • settings 416 may be used to cause server 302 to send a message to the intermediary.
  • a target profile and filter may be established to match users who have been at a nearby location recently (based on a match for a time stamped location entry in data table 402 ). For instance, the user may be alerted when someone the user knows (as indicated in an data entry in the user profile 400 ) has passed by the user's location within the last 5 minutes. In this case, he might call his friend to say hello and possibly arrange to circle back and meet nearby.
  • a location 520 filter can also be used to relax this criteria for matching depending upon where the user is located. For instance, if the user is traveling in a foreign country, the user may want to be notified of any friend who has been nearby any time within the last several hours. A user may also want to be notified if a friend is at a prior location visited by the user (e.g., the restaurant where the user had lunch an hour ago).
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method for matching users according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • a software application on device 100 or on server 302 may process the user profiles and target profiles to determine whether there is a match and the actions to take if there is a match. Any of the profile information and filters described above may be used and any of the actions described above may be taken based on the information in the user profiles and target profiles.
  • location information may be generated or received by the mobile device 100 and processed locally by the device or may be sent to the server 302 for processing. The location information may request users at a specific location or event or within a certain range of the user or a specified location.
  • other users meeting this criteria are detected (either through direct communications as shown in FIG.
  • the device or server determines whether user profiles (or at least those entries required for matching based on desired target profiles and filters) are available for the detected users. If the user profiles are available, they are retrieved and filters are applied to the user profiles and target profiles as shown at 608 . As shown at 610 , the user profiles are then compared to the filtered target profiles to determine if there is a match. If there is a match, the settings 614 are checked to determine appropriate notices, alerts and other actions to take. The appropriate notices, alerts and actions are then taken by the mobile device 100 and server 302 as shown at 616 . As described above, these actions may include notifying the user of a match, notifying the target of a match and/or notifying an intermediary that two second degree contacts have been matched.
  • programmable filters 518 may specify whether individual criteria/entries must be satisfied or whether only a percentage of the criteria/entries must be satisfied for an overall match between the criteria and a user's profile.
  • regular expressions or other logic may be used as part of the programmable filters and/or criteria.
  • a score may be calculated to determine whether a threshold is met for an overall match and for determining whether to notify the user of the other users and user profiles that meet the threshold. There may be more than one threshold or a scale that is used to determine how to notify the user. If another user with a very high score is nearby, the mobile device may be caused to emit an audible alert or vibrate as well as provide an SMS text message with information from the other user's profile. If the other user has a lower score that is still high enough for some threshold, a text message might be sent without an audible alert.
  • some criteria may be necessary for a match, such as whether the target is a male or female.
  • Other criteria may contribute to a matching score that exceeds some threshold, such as income level. These criteria may contribute either zero or a fixed number (for example, based on the Weight 514 ) toward the score in some cases. For example, a single Weight 514 could be added to the score if the target shares a common second level contact, such as a user or other person listed in contact lists associated with the profiles for both the user and the target.
  • the criteria may allow the Weight 514 , or a portion of the Weight 514 , to be added to the score a number of times based on the other user's profile.
  • additional points could be added to the score for each second level contact in common between the user and the target.
  • the programmable filter 518 may specify a rule whereby the points decrease (eventually to zero) for each additional second level contact that is in common.
  • the same approach may be used for other criteria, such as adding more points for higher income levels up to some maximum.
  • Another example uses third order contacts (the user and the target each know someone who in turn knows a common person, which can be determined based on contact lists, or other factors as described above). Third order contacts may contribute some points to the score, but they may contribute fewer points (and have a lower weight) than second order contacts.
  • any of the other types of criteria and characteristics described above may also be factored into the score based on whether a logical criteria or rule is met and based on weights (whether fixed or scaled) that can be added to the score when the criteria or rule is met.
  • a user interface with a dial, sliding bar or other adjustable setting may be used to adjust the weights for different criteria, which may include a setting making the criteria essential for matching, a setting (or scale of settings) for assigning weights/points that are contributed to the score, a setting indicating that a criteria will not used for matching and/or a setting indicating that a criteria disqualifies a target from matching.
  • the threshold used for matching may also be adjusted by using a dial, sliding bar or other adjustable setting.
  • the threshold may also be automatically adjusted based on context, time of day, location or other factors determined by the system.
  • scores and threshold may be used for entities, such as businesses, or venues or other objects to determine matching and whether to notify a user.
  • similar scores and thresholds may be combined with location based information to determine whether to send a promotional item, advertisement or coupon to a user. For example, a user may have a credit score or score based on purchases made or other criteria that meets a threshold. When a user with a score above the threshold is determined to be at a location near a store or business, a particular ad or electronic coupon may be sent to the user's mobile device. Scalable thresholds may also be used, where different ads or coupons are sent to users based on how much they exceed the threshold score.
  • directions to the location of a business or ads or coupons for a business may be sent to a user's mobile device, when the mobile device is determined to be near (or at) a competitor's business. Whether a user is near a location may be based on a pre-set radius or distance or may be weighted by different amounts as part of the score, depending upon how close the user is to the location.

Abstract

Systems and methods for social networking. Location-related data and other behavioral and exogenously generated characteristics are used to replace or supplement self-generated profiles in order to enhance the quality and trustworthiness of the matches made using the system and facilitate the inputting of profile information.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE
  • This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/620,456, filed Oct. 19, 2004, and of U.S. Provisional Application filed Oct. 17, 2005, for System and Method for Location Based Social Networking, invented by James S. Rosen [Attorney Docket No. 30456.701.102], which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • This application is related to copending U.S. Patent Application No. , filed Oct. 18, 2005, for System And Method For Location Based Matching and Promotion, invented by James S. Rosen [Attorney Docket No. 30456.701.202].
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The field of the present invention relates generally to a system and method for generating and collecting profile information regarding people and entities and matching or filtering said people and entities based on that profile information.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Social networking systems may use profiles to connect people who might like to meet each other. The idea of connecting strangers or friends who might not otherwise meet is powerful. However, the value of these systems may be limited by the rudimentary methods used to make matches: basic preference characteristics such as a common business relationship, social relationship, family relationship, compatible physical characteristics, or self-declared preferences for food, clothing, leisure activities, sports, entertainment, music, art, etc.
  • A key problem with such basic social networking systems is a lack of verifiability and authenticity of match criteria, leading to a surfeit of low quality matches. Too many low quality matches can lead to a loss of faith in the entire system, poor usability overall, and questions of trust when you meet people (or connect to entities) through such matching criteria.
  • Another problem is that such systems force users to do the tedious work of creating self-generated profiles by inputting personal information, akin to filling out a questionnaire. This creates two problems: inconvenience for participants and a lack of standards that everyone can trust. First, many people are busy, or lazy. Any system that relies on its users creating and updating multivariable profiles is inherently flawed. Too many people will let their profiles become stale. Second, people have different standards when it comes to self-declared information. I may think I am a connoisseur of wine, whereas by someone else's definition I am a novice. In addition, the information I supply in creating my profile may not be useful for distinguishing me from other users in the system. For instance, I may mention that I am a Red Sox fan in my self-generated profile. However, this information may not useful for distinguishing among the thousands of other Red Sox fans in the Boston area. Subtleties are lost. For example, I may be a diehard fan and want to meet others who, like me, have season tickets. In other words, gradation information can be important and is sometimes either lost or mischaracterized with self-generated profiling.
  • What is desired therefore is an improved system and method that adds accountability and standards to user profiles, ideally one which does not burden the user with the cumbersome task of building and maintaining a profile. What is also desired is an improved system and method for location- and context-based matching and filtering of users. What is also desired is an improved system that allows not only people to be matched with other people but also people to be matched with “entities”, such as restaurants, bars, organizations, parties, stores, and even cities.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Aspects of the present invention relate to systems and methods for social networking. Location-related data and other behavioral and exogenously generated characteristics are used to replace or supplement self-generated profiles in order to enhance the quality and trustworthiness of the matches made using the system and facilitate the inputting of profile information.
  • INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
  • All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
  • 2745949_1. DOC 7 30456.701.201
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a mobile device that may be used in connection with embodiments of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating the direct exchange of information between mobile devices according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a network system according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a logical diagram of a user profile according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a logical diagram of a target profile according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method for matching users according to an example embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • An example embodiment of the present invention provides a system and method for collecting and generating profile information for users of mobile devices and for matching users based on those profiles. In particular, the mobile device may generate or receive location based information to augment both the generation of profile information and the use of that information to match users in different contexts. In particular, both the profiles and the way that they are used may change based on a user's location and programmable filters and settings established by the user. For instance, a user at a night club on a Saturday night may be notified of friends who are nearby or of other users who have common friends or other characteristics that would indicate a match or facilitate a social meeting. On the other hand, different profile information and filters may be used when the user is at a trade show on a work day. Context may be set easily by the user (by manually selecting “work mode”, “socializing mode”, etc.) and/or set by the device automatically based on time, place, or other parameters. To this end, devices may use certain programmable logic to determine context automatically, including use of statistics to guess, for example, that given a combination of place, time, and other factors, the user is most likely in “socializing mode,” thus saving the user the trouble of periodically having to adjust the settings of his device.
  • Profile information may be generated from behavioral characteristics of the user, exogenously generated characteristics, and user-specified information. In addition, the profile may include a unique identifier as well as one or more pseudonyms or temporary identifiers for privacy purposes. Profiles may then be used to propose matches between users or provide users with icebreakers (topics of conversation suitable for initiating a conversation).
  • The data fields in the user profile may be tagged to indicate the type of data (behavioral, exogenous, user-specified, or other type) as well as the quality of the data for matching purposes. Quality factors may include an indication of relevance of the particular data to the user and confidence in the accuracy of the information. For example, data may be collected based on the locations visited by the user. However, if location tracking has been disabled on most days, the data regarding a small set of locations visited by the user may not provide meaningful information regarding the user's behavior. In addition, confidence in the data may depend upon the source of the data (e.g., whether it is user-specified or obtained from an exogenous source) or whether the data has been verified by a reliable source. For instance, my user profile may indicate that I am friends with Joe Smith. This information may provide a useful way to match people who have common friends. However, Joe may not consider me to be a friend at all. Thus, a bona fide friend of his may be misled into meeting me, believing me to be a friend of Joe's, only to find out later that Joe hardly knows me. This kind of confidence problem may arise frequently without some means of qualifying the reliability of data used for matching. Without other indicia of confidence in the data, the usefulness of the information may be undermined, calling into question the entire matching system. Given that the matching system is intended to instill trust in connections, this could lead to abuses where people end up feeling tricked, having trusted the system, only to find that they have made associations based on false pretenses. On the other hand, the confidence in this information (and in the system generally) may be enhanced if Joe has acknowledged, verified, or even rated our relationship, or (another way of accomplishing the same thing) if my behavioral profile indicates (through GPS tracking or other means) that I spend a lot of time physically with Joe, or if I regularly communicate with him by phone or email. Supplementing user-submitted information with behavioral information obtained from observed behavior can thus significantly increase the credibility of data used to make matches, and thus improve the overall user experience.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an example mobile device 100 that may be used in connection with embodiments of the present invention. The mobile device may be, for example, a personal digital assistant (PDA), cellular telephone, laptop computer, pager or other communications device. The example device 100 includes a central processing unit 102, memory 106, network interface card (NIC) 110, global positioning system (GPS) 112 and a bus 104 for communications among these components. The memory 106 may store profile information 108, including profile information regarding the user of the mobile device 100, target profiles for matching other users and settings and filters for the use of those profiles. The memory 106 may store the profiles in a relational database, flat file system or other database or file format. The storage of this information on device 100 allows matching to occur on an ad hoc basis when other devices are encountered (e.g., through Bluetooth or other communications interfaces), whether or not there is a connection to a particular network or server. For instance, FIG. 2 illustrates two mobile devices 202 and 204 using direct communication to exchange selected profile information (which may include, for example, target profiles indicating potential matches). Either device may determine whether there is a match and send a notification to the other user.
  • The profile information 108 may be used by application software stored in memory 106 and processed on CPU 102. All or part of this information may also be stored on a separate network server that may generate, maintain and process user profiles. NIC 110 or other network interface provides access to an external network to allow communications with the network server and/or other mobile devices.
  • In some embodiments, the user may participate through use of a passive identifier, such as a card in his wallet. And if the system can track the user by his physical properties alone, such as with casino-style cameras connected to computers running face recognition software or through other biometric identifiers, the user may in fact participate without having to do or carry anything; his profile gets updated and retrieved as necessary by the system as it “watches” him. In some embodiments, the devices and equipment contemplated to use this system may be replaced by chips and devices embedded into people's bodies, biometric identifiers, and other tracking technologies. Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention are not limited to smart phones and other mobile devices and may be adapted to encompass other enabling technologies.
  • GPS 112 generates location data that can be used for generating profile information as well as matching users. Other location based information may be generated or received instead of, or in addition to, position information generated from a global positioning system. In some embodiments, location information may be generated based on a cellular telephone network (e.g., based on the cell where the phone is located or through more sophisticated triangulation techniques), or by determining proximity to a device or network access point for which location data is available. In other words, a device without location data can know its location, at least approximately, if it can communicate, either directly or indirectly, with a device that does know its location (for example, devices that rely on GPS but are indoors and unable to see the sky can be daisy-chained to pass along location information from a nearby device that can see the sky). In addition, a particular venue may broadcast or otherwise provide information about a particular location, event or activity (e.g., through bluetooth, Wi-Fi or other mechanism). When a user enters or leaves a nightclub, amusement park, sports arena, concert hall or other venue a message may be sent to the mobile communication device indicating the location or other information about the event or activity. Different messages may be sent for different parts of the venue, so that, for example, a device of a user at a multi-screen movie theatre can know which movie the user sees. A local triangulation system or mechanism to determine relative locations of users may also be used to identify specific “micro-locations” or help users find each other within a venue, which can be useful especially when the users don't know each other, for instance, if a match occurs between strangers in a crowded bar (micro-location methods might include the strength and direction of the signal received between two users and thus work like a compass, with an arrow pointing towards the target user and a “hot-cold” meter to indicate distance). The identification of other users and devices within a specified range may be collected and time stamped for use in the user's profile, incorporating safeguards for privacy (such as the recording and time-stamping of certain meta-information, instead of names, about people in your vicinity). In addition, if other users and devices contain location information (such as a GPS position, user entered location, etc.) this information can also be associated with the profile even if the user's device is not able to generate this information.
  • Data relating to people at the same venue can be used to enhance the user's profile. For example, if a user goes to a bar populated by people in their 20s and 30s who work in financial sector jobs, this can be used to “teach” the system about that user, which can inform matching choices. Similarly, information that is known about people who visit a given location can be used to build the profile of the place itself; thus, a bar may develop an “entity profile” as a hangout for motorcycle enthusiasts, Red Sox fans, or both, depending on the time of day or whether there is a game being played that day at Fenway Park. When an entity has profile information associated with it, this information can then be accessed in advance by anyone who is thinking of going to that bar. Profile matching algorithms could be used to predict whether you would be compatible with the regular customers of that bar. A feedback system could be employed, using behavioral information (such as whether a user repeatedly frequents a particular bar or “type” of bar and/or user-declared information (such as when a user explicitly evaluates his experience at a given place)). An entity's profile and its patrons' profiles can interact dynamically, building on each other and evolving over time as warranted.
  • This process of choosing places to spend time, such as bars, nightclubs, schools, restaurants, country clubs, vacation resorts, companies (where you might be employed), etc. is something that happens today without any help from technology: people go to places and return if they like them. Or they go to places based on recommendations from friends. Embodiments of the present invention serve to remove some of the time and effort, and simultaneously introduce an element of statistical analysis, into a human process that is inefficient and characterized by trial-and-error. This is not intended to eliminate the serendipitous nature of human discovery or trump subjective recommendations; rather, it is intended to be helpful as a supplemental guiding system.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a network 300 according to an example embodiment of the present invention. The network 300 includes a network server 302 and a database storage system 304. The database storage system 304 stores profile information regarding users of the system. The database storage system 304 may store the profiles in a relational database, flat file system or other database or file format. Network server 302 collects information from the mobile devices and other sources to generate profile information. For instance, network server 302 may collect information regarding the use of email accounts to communicate with other users of the system. Network server 302 also collects information about the locations of users and processes profiles to match users based on this information. While some or all of this information may be stored on individual devices and allow for ad hoc matching, the use of a network server allows information about venues to be collected whether or not a particular user is at that location. For instance, the server may determine the number of users at a particular night club and the number of users who are potential matches or whether specified friends are at that location. A user may request this information in advance to decide whether to go to a particular location. Aggregated (or individual) profile information may also be provided for purposes of evaluating advertising opportunities at a particular venue (e.g., determining which ads should be displayed on a monitor at a sporting event depending upon the profiles of the users at that event) or for other purposes. The network server 302 can also be used to collect historical information about venues and the people who go there. Such information can be useful to people interested in knowing patterns, such as who frequents the venue and when. A user might want to know, for example, whether a given club tends to be frequented by people who have friends in common with him. Similarly, if he is planning an illicit rendezvous, he may want to verify that nobody he knows is at the venue now, or a regular patron, or even likely to appear there (likeliness being determined by statistical analysis and cross-matching of his acquaintances' profiles with the entity's profile).
  • In an example embodiment, the server 302 is connected to the Internet 306 for communications with other devices. In other embodiments, the server may be connected directly to a wireless network, cellular telephone system or other network. In the example embodiment, mobile devices 310, 314, 316, 324, 326 and 328 may be connected to the Internet (or other networks) through a variety of methods to allow communication with server 302 and other mobile devices. For instance, device 310 may be synchronized with a personal computer 308 that provides a connection to the Internet. Data may be exchanged with the server through the personal computer 308. In addition, data for a user profile may be entered through the personal computer 308 whether or not it is connected to particular mobile device. Similarly, data for a user profile may come from a (networked) appliance (330, 332), such as a DVR, smart card, digital book reader, etc. Mobile devices 314 and 316 may also be connected to the network through a wireless server 312 that provides a connection to the Internet. For instance, wireless “hot spots” are increasingly being provided at coffee shops, libraries and other locations and may be provided at night clubs, sporting events or other venues visited by users of the system. Mobile devices 324, 326 and 328 may also be connected to the server 302 through a cellular telephone network. Mobile telecommunication switching offices 320 and 322 may use cellular telecommunications protocols (such as CDMA, GSM, TDMA or other protocol) to communicate with mobile devices 324, 326 and 328. The mobile telecommunication switching offices 320 and 322 may, in turn, be connected to the Internet 306 through local offices 318.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a user profile 400 according to an example embodiment of the present invention. While FIG. 4 illustrates a data structure for an example user profile, it is understood that other databases, data structures and formats may be used to store and associate the desired data in the user profile: A mobile device 100 and/or network server 302 may be used to generate and update a user profile 400. User profiles may also be imported from other systems.
  • The example user profile 400 may be stored in a relational database and may have associated tables for storing profile data 402 and settings 416. The data table 402 may also include entries for various characteristics to be stored as part of the profile. Each characteristic may be stored as a row in the data table 402. The data table 402 may contain an entry, user type 450, to indicate whether the profile is for a person or entity (such as a restaurant, entertainment venue or the like). For instance, an entry may include a field identifier 404 to identify the entry, a data value 406, the type 408 of the data, quality indicators such as relevance 410 and confidence 412 and a pointer or other link to applicable settings 414 in the settings table 416. The settings table 416 includes settings and parameters that control how entries in the data table 402 are used for matching and other purposes. The settings table 416 includes both user settings 418 and default and automated settings 426 that are established by the system (e.g., application software on a mobile device 100 or network server 302). The user may provide settings that control availability 420 of a data entry for various uses, whether a data entry may be used alone or must be aggregated 422 with other specified information before it can be used and other privacy settings 424. Default settings for each of these options may be established and stored in table 426. In addition, automated settings may be stored by the system in table 426 for options that cannot be changed by the user.
  • The following is a more detailed description of the data table 402 and examples of the types of entries that may be stored in the table. The data entries include a type 408 indicating how the data was collected or generated. Data types may include behavioral characteristics collected by the system based on the actions of the user, exogenous information collected from sources other than the user, and user-provided information. The data entry also includes indications of the quality and usefulness of the information. In the example shown in FIG. 4, both relevance 410 and confidence 412 can be associated with the data stored in the table. Relevance 410 and confidence 412 may be indicated by a numerical rating based on how the information was collected, generated and/or verified. For instance, relevance 410 may indicate whether behavioral characteristics or composite data was generated from a large sample size. For instance, if the data entry is based on the location of the user, it may only be generated when the user's location can be tracked (which can be controlled by the settings 416 for the device or may be limited by the range and availability of the positioning system). If a user's location is tracked extensively, this data entry may have more relevance as an indicator of the user's behavior. A match might be made, for example, between two people who get coffee at the same cafe every morning. This information could at least be used to serve as an icebreaker.
  • Confidence 412 may also be indicated. A high level of confidence may be associated with data entries generated from behavior that was tracked by the system, data provided in the form of a secure token, or information verified or rated by additional sources, as opposed to user-declared data.
  • The use of behavioral and exogenously generated information in the user profile can greatly enhance the quality of the matches and types of matches that can be made by the system. The following are example behavioral and exogenously generated characteristics that can be used to enhance a location-dependant matching engine included as part of application software on server 302 and/or mobile devices in accordance with embodiments of the invention.
  • Phone and Email Usage. Rather than relying on a flat contact list or requiring a user to categorize everyone in a contact list, the network server 302 or mobile device 100 may monitor actual phone, SMS, and/or email usage (and/or any other communications device or account or connected appliance, including PC) to infer who the user really knows as well as some information about the nature of the relationship (business vs. social); a system that collects all of this in an automated fashion will be richer than any system that requires constant manual inputs. If I talk to John Burns every day for an hour, it can be inferred that I know him very well. As a result, I would want to know if John Burns happens to be in the mall that I just entered (and vice versa), whereas I do not necessarily care to meet up with someone who happens to be in my contact list but whom I talked to once, years ago, for five minutes. (Alternatively, there may be situations where a user seeks out looser and more remote connections as these sometimes offer more value as they tend to be more numerous than close relationships and they extend the user's network farther afield, which can particularly be helpful when looking for a job, finding sales prospects, etc. There is a theory that many distant contacts are in fact more valuable, in a business sense, than a smaller group of very close contacts). This actual usage information, when used for matching, is richer than a flat contact list. It also adds a degree of reciprocity: I cannot claim that Gweneth Paltrow is a friend, even if she is somehow on my contact list, because I have never talked to her on the phone. Reciprocity and authenticity are important factors for second degree matching (i.e., two people connected via a mutual acquaintance) as it is important to connect people through a bona fide intermediary if you are going to leverage the instant trust that arises when two strangers find that they know someone in common. It is worth noting that behavioral information can be combined with user-entered information for greater richness. For example, when a user speaks to someone on the phone, a record of such conversation is logged automatically. This record can then be enriched with comments from the user annotating or rating said conversation and said contact.
  • This data may be entered in a user profile 400 by either network server 302 or mobile device 100 (or a mobile device that connects to a PC). For instance mobile device 100 may be a cell phone with a contact list in memory 106. The cell phone can track the frequency of calls, and amount of time spent on calls, to each person in the contact list. In addition, frequently dialed numbers (or the numbers of people who call you frequently) can be automatically added to the contact list and the data can be associated with the phone number even if other contact information is not available. A laptop computer or mobile email device (which may be the same or different device than the cell phone) can track the number of messages sent and received from various email addresses. This information can be tracked separately or associated with a contact list. The network server 302 and database storage system 304 may allow multiple mobile (or non-mobile) devices to be registered to the same user profile. In this way, both email usage and phone usage may be associated with a particular individual in the user's contact list. The contacts (or particular email addresses or phone numbers) with whom there are communications may be added as entries in the data table 402 of the user profile. For example, a field 404 may be added for a contact such as “John Burns” (which may be linked to other contact information for the person through the relational database). The value 406 may be a number representing the frequency and duration of communications. The type 408 would be classified as behavioral. The relevance 410 may be a number based on whether the sample size is large (has tracking been turned on and for how long) and whether both email and phone accounts have been registered with the system for tracking. Confidence 412 may be a number indicating whether the communications is tied to a full contact record (or just an email address or phone number), whether John Burns is also a registered user, whether he identifies the user as a friend and/or his contact information or communications usage information matches the information in the particular user profile, whether there is a history of physical proximity, or other factors indicating reliability of the data.
  • Physical Proximity. Just as with regular phone interaction between people, physical proximity can indicate a relationship as well as some degree of its closeness. Bluetooth-enabled mobile devices, for example, may automatically log time which two (or more) people spent together; this can be used to “authenticate” a relationship. This might include “time-shifted” proximity, that is, showing that two people may be in the same place but not at the same time; this can also be supplemental information that is helpful in establishing a relationship (for example, they live in the same dormitory or go to the same library on a regular basis, even if not always at the same time). Physical proximity can be used as a separate data entry or aggregated with telephone and email usage to generate an overall data value to use as a proxy for the level of relationship with others (whether or not registered users of the system).
  • Where You Go. In addition, the locations that a user visits may be used for matching or to enhance the confidence for other data entries. A field 404 may be added for frequently visited locations. The value 406 may be the coordinates for locations where significant time is spent by the user. This data may be separated by the days and times when those locations are visited to distinguish locations visited during working hours from those visited on the weekend or at night. Venues may also have wireless capabilities and provide tags or tokens with additional information about the places visited (such as a concert hall when a particular artist is performing, amusement park, sporting event, etc.). In addition to using this information for matching, it may be provided to users as potential icebreakers for conversation, for example, to let two people know that they're both Elvis Costello fans (by virtue of the fact that they've seen him in concert)—this is something they might like to discuss as a way of “breaking the ice”. It should be added that tokens can be used for verifiability of data if they are digitally signed or otherwise made hard to spoof.
  • “Where you go” information can also be used by advertisers and other businesses who might want to know more about you for marketing purposes. For example, a token that shows that you saw the same movie multiple times may be useful not just for matching purposes (to signal your interest to other similarly hardcore fans) but also to an advertiser. The Spider-Man marketers might want to hype the sequel by sending out a special message or promotion only to those people who verifiably watched the first movie (in a movie theater) at least three times. This is elaborated upon below.
  • The data may also be used to enhance the relevance 410 and confidence 412 of other data entries. For instance, if I go to 81 Red Sox games a year, it lends more weight to my interest in the Red Sox than a self-generated profile could. Also, this information does not need to be manually entered by the user. It can be recorded automatically by simply going to Fenway Park on game days (using a location-tracking device or by having my matching device “know” where I am by interacting with a transmitter or mating device at Fenway Park, or with other networked devices at the event). Unlike self-generated characteristics, which are subjective, facts about my location objective and verifiable and can be assigned a high value for confidence 412 in the data table 402. (It can be assumed that spoofing will be a problem as these devices and location- based matching systems become popular, threatening the trustworthiness and usefulness of the systems. Using an authenticating mechanism, like a digitally-signed token, can “prove” to people or other interested parties (such as an advertiser offering a special deal to the most avid fans) that you really were where you (or your profile) indicated you were.
  • Other Behavior. What cafes you frequent, what gym you go to (and how frequently), what time you wake up, whether you go to church every Sunday, what TV shows you record (or watch) on a digital video recorder (DVR), what websites you visit (and what you purchase, what cookies you have on your computer, or otherwise what you do online) and, for that matter, any behavior using trackable devices or appliances, or trackable activities, all speak to who you are. As such, they can enhance matching and complement or even trump what you might say about yourself in a profile; they are also easier for you to “enter” because it happens automatically (passively, from the user's perspective). These factors can be tracked based on the location/movement of the device and through other devices and systems that are connected (directly or indirectly) to the network server 302 or mobile device (such as a DVR service that tracks the TV shows recorded and watched or a cell phone network that tracks phone usage). It may be desirable to turn off monitoring of these kinds of activities, precisely because it is so easily obtained, to avoid embarrassment as well as to simply protect the user's privacy.
  • Feedback Systems. Feedback systems can also be used to provide information for generating data entries in the user profile 400. What happens when people have the ability to “tag” you with feedback? Do your ex-girlfriends despise you? If you have in your profile exogenously generated ratings about you, which you can not edit, it can help strangers size you up. As a result, it may lead to “better” behavior since you do not want people ruining your “personality credit rating”. In this way, it is similar to an EBay feedback rating, which can be useful to signal to a stranger whether someone can be trusted. In addition, it can also be a fun way to “collect” and show off “friendly behavior points”. There is a powerful karmic component to building and maintaining a positive interpersonal rating. These data entries have a different type 408 than the behavioral data entries described above which are tracked by the system. These entries may be tagged generally as exogenous data or more specifically as feedback from another user. The value 406 may be a rating in various categories and may include specific comments as well (which may be viewable to others or not, depending on the nature of the comments, who is seeking access, and other rules that can be applied to this powerful information). The relevance 410 may be based on the amount of feedback received and the confidence 412 may depend upon the person who is giving the feedback (does that person have a positive feedback rating herself?) and whether (through location or communications tracking) a relationship with that person can be verified.
  • Secure Tokens. Restaurants, bars, clubs, fraternities, churches, universities, and other venues or associations may give out authenticating (digitally signed) “tokens” that can be added to a user's profile. These tokens may generate new data entries 402 or may be used to raise the confidence 412 of an existing data entry. This would let people see if someone is “real”: are they really a member of the club, do they really belong to that gym, are they really a graduate of Villanova, did they really get an honorable discharge from the Army, are they really a Delta Platinum Medallion frequent flier? This can be useful in a matching situation: when a woman is at a bar and is open to meeting fellow alumni, it may be important to her to be sure that they are a bona fide graduate of her alma mater, not someone who says he is, or who may have spent some time there but didn't graduate.
  • People You Know. Contact lists can be a powerful way to match uses—using common acquaintances as intermediaries can be a powerful way to match users. Often the problem is that contact lists are a subset of your actual set of acquaintances. To maximize the effectiveness of contact lists as a matching method, entries (of people you know) may be generated based on ordinary contact lists as well as observed behavior as described above. These entries may also be manually entered by the user, with the confidence 412 augmented (or reduced) by behavioral characteristics (as described above) or exogenous information such as manual feedback from the acquaintance acknowledging the relationship (and its closeness level) or the existence of a corresponding entry in the acquaintance's user profile. As described further below, matches or alerts may be generated when a friend is nearby (based on location data and user profiles) or where a person with one or more common friends is nearby (or actually nearby and with a common friend). For example, the system may want to alert you that a good friend of your best friend happens to be walking past the cafe where you are eating.
  • Expanding on this theme, other information can be used to enrich your profile. Some examples: Purchases you make (online or offline) with digital cash or a credit card; the transaction details can be integrated into your profile. EBay feedback ratings can be appended to your profile and used “beyond EBay” (people might only want to date people, or hire people, or do business with people who have high EBay feedback ratings). What dating sites you belong to (and information pertaining to those sites) can be shared with your profile. Even ads you have seen (online or offline)—as well as ads that you responded to in some way—could be valuable to marketers who want to sell things to you. More generally, your credit ratings, police records, medical records, driving records, grades and work performance ratings, and other “scores” from various real-life activities can be integrated into your profile to help with matching, or for other purposes. (In some cases, digital tokens can be used for verifiability.) Uses for this information in your profile might include whether someone wants to date you, hire you, give you credit, offer you a special promotion or show you an advertisement (either online or offline, in the case of a dynamically targeted advertising method such as a changeable billboard).
  • All of this information can be powerful in helping people quickly learn about and trust strangers. It can also be valuable to businesses as past buying behavior can be a strong predictor of future purchases. Some of the same techniques being developed online, such as to offer ads for dentists to a person who has just done a search at Google for “dentists in Chicago”. In this case, by combining a rich array of behavioral data, such as what users search for online, what they buy with their credit cards or digital cash at the mall near their home, what movies they see, what restaurants they eat in, what television shows they record and/or watch, etc., there are quite powerful opportunities for marketers to make one-to-one matches between people and their products. Although we are proposing methods for making connections between people, matches between people and “inanimate entities”, such as businesses, are also a key component of this invention. A system that collects and processes behavioral data, including location data, has the ability to send alerts that are marketing in nature which appeal to users and which help businesses. An example is for a store to send an alert to you when you enter their competitor's store, luring you to their store instead perhaps by offering you a discount. Another is to have a billboard change dynamically depending on who is looking at it (and what is known about that user based on his profile). Another is to determine patterns that are useful to marketers, such as the fact that people who watch Red Sox games tend to eat at Dunkin' Donuts twice as frequently as people who don't. In this vein, it can be used to better determine the success (measured as a return on investment) for advertising campaigns. For example, what percentage of people who saw a billboard for Great Adventure alongside a particular highway (as determined by location tracking data) visited there within six months. The granularity of behavioral information discussed herein is far greater than anything that has ever been accomplished before. And while many people would not want their behaviors monitored and movements tracked and combined into a profile and shared with advertisers, they might want this information tracked for some of the social benefits outlined herein, such as meeting friends or being set up on dates with strangers who fit their target profiles. And once this data is being collected for one purpose, people may find that there are incentives to selectively sharing it with marketing companies. Just as gamblers share behavioral information with casinos in order to get complimentary perks, and just as travelers share their flying history with airlines in order to qualify for free flights and preferential treatment, people might appreciate the fact that because they spent $1000 at Prada that every other women's fashion store is sending them “alerts” once they enter a mall, offering special discounts to come into their store. Broadly speaking, incentives to share otherwise personal information with marketers may include (but are not limited to) cash payments, better targeted advertising messages that pertain to one's interests, special offers from companies eager to get their business, and free or subsidized devices or service fees for interacting with the matching system,. etc.
  • Of course, users may decide how, or whether, they want their information shared. In some cases, a user might want to share their otherwise private medical records in order to show that they were recently examined and did not have any sexually transmitted diseases (a signed and date-stamped token may be issued by the doctor or clinic to authenticate this information). In this case, they might stipulate that only a fraction of their medical records may be shared, and only in very specific circumstances. It is assumed that there may be a set of rules empowering users to control this information as they desire. The following describes a simple version of how these rules might apply; it should be understood that the rules have been simplified for practical purposes herein and that the system could be enhanced with more and/or different user controls.
  • Clearly, the robust and rich set of data that may be tracked and collected to generate user profiles raises privacy concerns. In order to manage the use of the data in the user profiles, a settings table 416 is provided. Each entry in the table may specify a number of settings and parameters to apply to data entries or to the collection of data. An entry in the table 416 may be associated with one or more data entries in data table 402. For instance, user settings 418 may be entered by a user through a mobile device or personal computer. The user may specify an availability 420 setting to indicate whether types or classes of data should be collected or made available for matching purposes. For instance, a user may specify that location data may be collected and used based on specific types of events (nightclubs, sporting events, concerts, etc.), but that other locations should not be tracked or used, such as adult nightclubs. A user may also specify that location data may be made available for matching with another user only if certain conditions are met (for example, using location-based data to alert you when you are within 100 feet of another member of your local Rotary Club, and 10 feet from a member of a different Rotary Club chapter). Similarly, rules may be established for providing a photo, email address, or phone number to another user, for example requiring that there be a mutual exchange of photos. The user may also specify certain times or days or other conditions that limit matching and notifications (e.g., permit matching only on Friday and Saturday nights). A user may also specify that a level of aggregation 422 must be used for matching based on a particular data entry. For instance, the user may not want to allow others to match solely based on an income level entered in the user profile. However, if the match is based on a large amount of aggregated data, or specific types of data with a high confidence, the user may allow income to be included in an abstracted or aggregated form for use by the matching engine (but not to be provided to the other user). Other privacy settings 424 may also be used to restrict the collection or use of data, to have it deleted after a certain period of time, or to restrict its use for matching or disclosure to other users. Just as it is easy for a user to have his behaviors monitored, it should be easy to de-activate recording of behavior when desired.
  • The user profile 400 may also include default and automated settings. For instance table 426 may specify that behavioral data types cannot be edited by the user, but can be deleted. Just as with EBay's feedback ratings, a user might be able to reset all feedback from other users, but can't simply edit out the feedback comments which he doesn't like. Similarly, it may be desirable to have the system use environmental filters. For example, if you are in a place where you are getting a large number of matches, the device you are using (or the server that it connects to) can apply a filter to send you alerts only for high-quality matches. Similarly, if you are traveling and getting no “hits”, the service might lower its thresholds either automatically by using location detection to recognize that you are in a foreign country, or simply by recognizing that you have been getting few (or no) matches during a given period of time.
  • In an example embodiment, the user may also specify one or more target profiles, (e.g., single women in their 20s with certain other characteristics), for determining whether there are matching users with a particular profile. In particular, a target profile may be used to identify other users who have matching characteristics and are within a certain distance of the user or another specified location. FIG. 5 is a logical diagram of a target profile 500 according to an example embodiment of the present invention. While FIG. 5 illustrates a data structure and the types of fields for an example target profile, it is understood that other databases, data structure and formats may be used to store and associate the desired data in the target profile. A mobile device 100 and/or network server 302 may store one or more target profiles 500 for purposes of matching. Target user profiles may also be imported from other systems, such as online dating services.
  • In addition to facilitating manually generated target profiles, the system may be able to develop global “matchmaking intelligence” through observing and learning from successes and failures among people who are looking for a mate. For example, the system may “see” a pattern that people who get up early and walk their dogs tend to get along well with other people who do the same and thus use this behavioral information to come up with a “computer-generated target profile for you”, different from what you might have chosen for yourself. While a computer would not necessarily be able to assess how people “get along” with each other per se, it can glean this information through direct user feedback, such as when people get married and convey this fact as feedback to the system. It can also infer successful matches by observing, through location-based tracking for example, that two people who met in January have been spending a great deal of time together ever since. With the richness of the data that can be collected and analyzed—exogenous, self-generated, behavioral, etc.—and with the increasing computational power of computers, combined with Bayesian algorithms, neural networks, and other artificial intelligence methods, computers could become good at setting people up, a very “human” skill.
  • The example target profile 500 may be stored in a relational database and may have associated tables for storing target data ranges 502 and programmable filters 518. The data range table 502 may include a plurality of entries for characteristics for the system to use in determining whether another user matches the target profile. If there is a match an action may be taken based on the settings 416 (e.g., beep or send a notice, or display information about the user or group of users who match). Each target characteristic may be stored as a row in the data range table 502. The entries may correspond to those used for the data table 402 (field 504, value range 506, type 508, relevance 510, and confidence 512), except that threshold values, ranges or wildcard values may be used to specify the requirements for a user profile to match the target profile. In addition, a weight 514 may be assigned to the entry to indicate the importance of that entry in determining whether there is a match. (It should be noted that the same may occur on an ad hoc basis between two devices in a way that requires no centralized database.)
  • Other filters 516 may also be applied to the entry for matching purposes. A pointer may link or otherwise associate one or more entries in the data range table 502 with programmable filters 518. The programmable filters 518 may specify other conditions for matching in general or for matching a particular entry. For instance, the filter may specify whether a particular entry must match and/or whether only a certain percentage of entries must match. Filters may be based on location 520, time 522, context 524, associations 526 or other conditions 528. Location 520 may be used to filter users who are within a certain distance of the user (e.g., within Bluetooth range or based on specific location data) or at particular locations or at particular events or venues. Location 520 may also be used to automatically adjust matching rules (e.g., when a user is far from home). For instance, if a user is traveling in a foreign country, the rules may only require matching with another user who speaks the same language (or who is from the same country). The user may also have a setting 416 indicating context 524 (e.g., whether the user is at work, at home, at a social event or traveling). Depending upon this context 524, a different target profile or profiles may be selected and used for matching. In addition, the criteria for matching may change automatically depending upon the context 524 (e.g., a user may be notified of any friend that is nearby when traveling, but not while at work). Time 522 may also be used to automatically adjust matching criteria (e.g., using different criteria on a Friday or Saturday night than on a Monday morning).
  • The system may develop “intelligence” by looking at rules and settings of other users at a given time and/or place and “figure out” certain environmental factors that saves the user from having to manually adjust his settings. For example, the system may be able to differentiate between a bar and a doctor's office through “location memory”. If a few users have “mapped” out a location by identifying the characteristics of a particular location (or location coupled with time, in the case of a multi-use facility), this information can be applied to other users who visit that location. In this case, the user might simply set his device to “turn off matching in doctor's offices” or “turn off matching in all places except bars” and the system could respond accordingly to his wishes.
  • Similarly, the system may learn through feedback: a certain kind of alert may be snoozed repeatedly, thus indicating that this “kind” of alert is unwelcome (whether based on time, place, or other factor). Alternatively, upon getting a match alert, the user might give feedback through the user interface of his device to the system to send “more like this, please”. More generally, the system should be trainable to know where's home, work, girlfriend's apartment, etc. so it can learn about you and “make sense” of your behavioral patterns. 100531 Associations 526 may be used to change the matching rules depending who you are with (e.g., your wife or your mistress) and/or who is nearby (e.g., more liberal matching for people who are with or near common friends) and/or who you have relationships with (e.g., whether you have common friends with a high level of relevance and confidence). The use of second degree contacts for matching can be both a criterion in the data range table 502 as well as a filter for determining how other criteria are applied. These entries and filters can be used to notify a user when a close second degree contact is within a certain range or distance (e.g., based on the location 570 filter). A venue or event may also be scanned (by making a request to network server 302) to determine how many friends and/or second degree contacts are at that location. In addition, if users' calendar information is incorporated into their profiles, this information could be used to predict who might be at a particular location in the future. For example, if you are planning to go to Miami for the weekend, you might want to scan the city not just to see who is there currently, but who (among your acquaintances or potential matches) is planning to be there when you will be. In this way, you could be “matched” with a suitable blind date who is flying to Miami from a different city.
  • A user can also make a specific request to “scan” a person with a mobile device at a particular location (e.g., the woman at the end of the bar) to see if the other person has any friends in common, or just to see her public profile. The network server may retrieve a user profile for the mobile device at the specified location or it may be obtained through a direct Bluetooth or infrared connection with the mobile device. This is especially powerful when combined with quality indicia for the matching information (such as relevance 410 and confidence 412) as it promotes quality second degree matches and filters out spoofers. This scanning process can also result in “icebreaker” conversation topics being identified, to help initiate an interaction between strangers, as described further below.
  • You can also use filters to block certain matches. For instance, you may be married and nonetheless want to send out “digital vibes” that you are open to discreet romantic approaches. In this case, you could use the matching engine to alert you to second degree connections where the intermediary is your spouse so as to avoid them. It could also selectively block the “vibe” from being sent to any of your spouse's friends, or couldbe sent anonymously only to people who have expressed similar wishes. This could be specified by using a filter based on associations 526 to modify the availability 420 settings for the mobile device.
  • Along the same lines, this could apply to people who are not necessarily married but who simply want an anonymous physical encounter, and therefore want to be alerted about other people with similar interests. People seeking such could include this preference in their profile and the system can incorporate this into its matching criteria. Someone seeking this kind of physical encounter would not need to simply go someplace where she is physically proximate to someone with similar desires—this can be done today with anonymous Bluetooth interactions—but could actually decide where to go out tonight based on where there is a high concentration of people with similar preferences. She could do this by scanning a bar, a neighborhood, even a city before she leaves her home. This “one-night stand” matching system could also be made more effective by combining it with other profile data mentioned above. For example, someone may be interested in a one-night stand but only with someone who spends most of his time outside of her town or neighborhood and who has a clean health record with respect to sexually transmitted diseases (this might be a motivation for someone to incorporate medical data in his profile, perhaps using a digital token issued by his doctor).
  • Mobile devices may also be used by businesses and specific filters may be established for these purposes. Businesses have myriad uses for authentic profile data. When you enter a Prada retail store, if the store knows you make a million dollars a year, or that you spend $1000 a month at a competitive store (because information is communicated and collected from use of your smart card, for example), it may treat you better than someone with no known buying history. Similarly, if you are walking the floor of a tradeshow and have in your profile jobs and even past performance reviews or other desirable characteristics like an electrical engineering degree from a certain school, you may get approached by companies seeking to hire you (especially if you have indicated in your profile that you are open to such overtures).
  • In certain situations, transfers of authenticated behavioral information can be beneficial to both businesses and consumers. In the example above, for example, the consumer at Prada benefits by getting VIP treatment and perhaps special offers based on proven her past purchasing history.
  • In addition, consumers can be empowered by exogenously generated data about businesses. Just as a consumer is believed to be a good prospect based on her past buying behavior, a restaurant may passively accumulate profile information about its “behavior”. In this case, the restaurant is the “entity” analog to a human user of the system. Every time someone eats at the restaurant, the mobile device may make it easy to rate that restaurant—for example, as you are paying the bill (perhaps with digital cash or a credit card) you are entitled to enter in a rating from 1-10. Your rating will be digitally associated with this restaurant in a user profile 400 for the restaurant (akin to how an ex-girlfriend might rate you). The next person entering (or walking nearby) the restaurant can see these ratings. This information could be stored in database storage system 304 or could be stored in a locally located, tamper resistant device at or near the restaurant (tamper-resistant so the restaurant can't delete or edit negative ratings).
  • Several key elements distinguish this from Zagat-style restaurant reviews. First, it is designed to be easy to rate a restaurant, right when you are there and the experience is fresh in your mind. Second, users can get high-quality ratings when they need it, i.e., when they are hungry and walking down the street looking for a place to eat, right from a device they're carrying (of course, they could access the same information at other times and places, too). Just as with people being matched with other people, a target profile can be established between a user and restaurants so that the mobile device can notify the user of good restaurant matches and provide ratings to help guide the user's decisions.
  • Another empowering application for consumers is the use of composite ratings. For instance, Fenway Park can compile aggregated and anonymous information about who goes to games. In this case, someone thinking of going to a Red Sox game can find out what “kind” of people attend games. This composite information may be useful when choosing a bar: what are the composite statistics of its patrons... age, gender ratio, income, ratio of locals to tourists, etc. (all of which would be based on data entries 402 in user profiles 400 of those at the bar). Someone may be interested in knowing what the composite of the crowd is like right now, on Friday nights versus Sunday nights, or just in general.
  • Group information need not only be aggregated and anonymous. It may be used to “scan” a bar, for example, to see if anyone you know—or any second degree contacts, women looking for a one-night stand, friends from work, etc.—are inside. One key benefit is the ability to do this remotely (e.g., by sending a query request to server 302), before you go to the bar, indeed, while you are still at home or work considering where to go. People may also find it useful to get remote composite data about the people who live in cities they may be thinking of moving to (or similarly about neighborhoods), companies they are considering working for, golf clubs they are thinking of joining, resorts they may want to visit, etc.
  • Embodiments of the present invention also enable a variety of additional applications.
  • Contests. It can be amusing when you're with friends to compete to see who encounters more acquaintances. With a location-aware matching engine, you do not need to “bump into” people per se—the matching engine will tell you if a friend is within a certain specified distance. The authenticity tests described herein may improve the contest (you can perhaps eliminate work-related acquaintances from the game, or stipulate that only “close friends” count for example, based on a confidence 412 rating).
  • Karma Points. When two people meet using you as an intermediary, you can earn digital karma points (a score or token in the user profile 400). Karma points may be fun to collect and may also provide a basis for matching (e.g., filtering those users who are good match makers or who have lots of second degree contacts). Inanimate entities can earn karma points as well, such as a neighborhood cafe, which has been “responsible” for a certain number of matches (that is, people being matched who are regulars at the cafe). When two people meet using you as an intermediary, you can be alerted that this has happened, and that you have just earned 10 “karma points”.
  • “Ringing Ears”. In addition to earning.karma points, when two people meet using you as an intermediary, you can be notified (by phone, text message, etc.) and be invited to join the interaction remotely or in person. The settings 416 on a mobile device 100 may cause the device to make a call or send a text message or email to the intermediary when a match is made among common friends. In addition, settings 416 may be used to cause server 302 to send a message to the intermediary.
  • Riddles and Games. Settings and filters allow creative, interactive matching criteria to be used. As mentioned above, people may have a public profile that is viewable to some or all other users. This profile may be accessed through a “scanning” act, meaning that someone could “point” his device at a person (or her device) and access her public profile. In this public profile, a woman may want to have fun by challenging men to answer a riddle when they approach her, or to sing her favorite song, buy her a margarita, hand her a certain kind of flower, etc. This can make it fun for both parties to break the ice. These preferences for approaches would be revealed when someone “scans” her looking to find a suitable icebreaker topic, or to search for a match “hit” (such as a mutual acquaintance). As a side point, there can be a record kept of every time someone is scanned. A woman may like to know that on a given night, 18 men found her alluring enough to “scan” her.
  • Digital Wake. Another setting 416 may be used to request notification when certain matches or events occur. A target profile and filter may be established to match users who have been at a nearby location recently (based on a match for a time stamped location entry in data table 402). For instance, the user may be alerted when someone the user knows (as indicated in an data entry in the user profile 400) has passed by the user's location within the last 5 minutes. In this case, he might call his friend to say hello and possibly arrange to circle back and meet nearby. A location 520 filter can also be used to relax this criteria for matching depending upon where the user is located. For instance, if the user is traveling in a foreign country, the user may want to be notified of any friend who has been nearby any time within the last several hours. A user may also want to be notified if a friend is at a prior location visited by the user (e.g., the restaurant where the user had lunch an hour ago).
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method for matching users according to an example embodiment of the present invention. A software application on device 100 or on server 302 may process the user profiles and target profiles to determine whether there is a match and the actions to take if there is a match. Any of the profile information and filters described above may be used and any of the actions described above may be taken based on the information in the user profiles and target profiles. As shown in at 602, location information may be generated or received by the mobile device 100 and processed locally by the device or may be sent to the server 302 for processing. The location information may request users at a specific location or event or within a certain range of the user or a specified location. As shown at 604, other users meeting this criteria are detected (either through direct communications as shown in FIG. 2 or through server 302). Based on availability settings 420, the device or server then determines whether user profiles (or at least those entries required for matching based on desired target profiles and filters) are available for the detected users. If the user profiles are available, they are retrieved and filters are applied to the user profiles and target profiles as shown at 608. As shown at 610, the user profiles are then compared to the filtered target profiles to determine if there is a match. If there is a match, the settings 614 are checked to determine appropriate notices, alerts and other actions to take. The appropriate notices, alerts and actions are then taken by the mobile device 100 and server 302 as shown at 616. As described above, these actions may include notifying the user of a match, notifying the target of a match and/or notifying an intermediary that two second degree contacts have been matched.
  • As described above, programmable filters 518 may specify whether individual criteria/entries must be satisfied or whether only a percentage of the criteria/entries must be satisfied for an overall match between the criteria and a user's profile. In an example embodiment, regular expressions or other logic may be used as part of the programmable filters and/or criteria. A score may be calculated to determine whether a threshold is met for an overall match and for determining whether to notify the user of the other users and user profiles that meet the threshold. There may be more than one threshold or a scale that is used to determine how to notify the user. If another user with a very high score is nearby, the mobile device may be caused to emit an audible alert or vibrate as well as provide an SMS text message with information from the other user's profile. If the other user has a lower score that is still high enough for some threshold, a text message might be sent without an audible alert. These are examples only and other combinations of notifications and thresholds may be used.
  • In example embodiments, some criteria may be necessary for a match, such as whether the target is a male or female. Other criteria may contribute to a matching score that exceeds some threshold, such as income level. These criteria may contribute either zero or a fixed number (for example, based on the Weight 514) toward the score in some cases. For example, a single Weight 514 could be added to the score if the target shares a common second level contact, such as a user or other person listed in contact lists associated with the profiles for both the user and the target. In some cases, the criteria may allow the Weight 514, or a portion of the Weight 514, to be added to the score a number of times based on the other user's profile. For example, additional points could be added to the score for each second level contact in common between the user and the target. The programmable filter 518 may specify a rule whereby the points decrease (eventually to zero) for each additional second level contact that is in common. The same approach may be used for other criteria, such as adding more points for higher income levels up to some maximum. Another example uses third order contacts (the user and the target each know someone who in turn knows a common person, which can be determined based on contact lists, or other factors as described above). Third order contacts may contribute some points to the score, but they may contribute fewer points (and have a lower weight) than second order contacts. Any of the other types of criteria and characteristics described above may also be factored into the score based on whether a logical criteria or rule is met and based on weights (whether fixed or scaled) that can be added to the score when the criteria or rule is met. A user interface with a dial, sliding bar or other adjustable setting may be used to adjust the weights for different criteria, which may include a setting making the criteria essential for matching, a setting (or scale of settings) for assigning weights/points that are contributed to the score, a setting indicating that a criteria will not used for matching and/or a setting indicating that a criteria disqualifies a target from matching. The threshold used for matching may also be adjusted by using a dial, sliding bar or other adjustable setting. If a user is getting too many matches or notices in a crowded location, the user can easily toggle the dial, sliding bar or other setting to raise the threshold score required for matching. If a user is in a location where matching is less likely (for example, traveling out of town or in a foreign country), the user can easily lower the threshold score required for matching. As described above, the threshold may also be automatically adjusted based on context, time of day, location or other factors determined by the system.
  • Similarly, scores and threshold may be used for entities, such as businesses, or venues or other objects to determine matching and whether to notify a user. In example embodiments, similar scores and thresholds may be combined with location based information to determine whether to send a promotional item, advertisement or coupon to a user. For example, a user may have a credit score or score based on purchases made or other criteria that meets a threshold. When a user with a score above the threshold is determined to be at a location near a store or business, a particular ad or electronic coupon may be sent to the user's mobile device. Scalable thresholds may also be used, where different ads or coupons are sent to users based on how much they exceed the threshold score. In some examples, directions to the location of a business or ads or coupons for a business may be sent to a user's mobile device, when the mobile device is determined to be near (or at) a competitor's business. Whether a user is near a location may be based on a pre-set radius or distance or may be weighted by different amounts as part of the score, depending upon how close the user is to the location.
  • While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes, and substitutions will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the invention. It should be understood that various alternatives to the embodiments of the invention described herein may be employed in practicing the invention. It is intended that the following claims define the scope of the invention and that methods and structures within the scope of these claims and their equivalents be covered thereby.

Claims (21)

1-36. (canceled)
37. A method comprising:
receiving, at a server, information identifying a plurality of devices detected at a location, each device associated with a user;
accessing, via the server, a user profile associated with each user associated with a detected device, each user profile comprising user information specific to each user;
extracting, via the server, user information from each user profile associated with a user of a detected device; and
creating, via the server, an entity profile for the location based on the extracted user information of each user associated with a detected device.
38. The method of claim 37, wherein the entity profile is a dynamic profile that adjusts to the user information extracted from the user profiles associated with the users of the detected devices.
39. The method of claim 37, further comprising:
communicating entity profile information comprised within the entity profile to each detected device.
40. The method of claim 39, wherein the entity profile information comprises positional information related to the location.
41. The method of claim 39, wherein the entity profile information comprises information related to an activity occurring at the location.
42. The method of claim 39, wherein the entity profile information comprises information related to past activities that occurred at the location.
43. The method of claim 41, wherein the entity profile information further comprises user profile information related to users associated with detected devices currently at the location.
44. The method of claim 42, wherein the entity profile information further comprises user profile information related to users associated with devices previously detected at the location.
45. The method of claim 39, wherein the entity profile information comprises historical data related to the location, the historical data based on the extracted user information.
46. The method of claim 45, wherein the entity profile information comprises frequency and patterns of visits to the location by each user associated with a detected device.
47. The method of claim 46, wherein the entity profile information comprises activities each user engaged in while at the location.
48. The method of claim 39, further comprising:
determining, for each user associated with a detected device, a desirability of the location based on the entity profile information.
49. The method of claim 48, further comprising:
communicating the desirability of the location to each detected device.
50. The method of claim 37, wherein the plurality of devices are detected by the server upon being within a proximity to the location.
51. A system comprising:
a database comprising stored user data;
a social network server in communication with the user data in the database, the social network server programmed to perform a plurality of operations, comprising:
receiving information identifying a plurality of devices detected at a location, each device associated with a user;
accessing a user profile associated with each user associated with a detected device, each user profile comprising user information specific to each user;
extracting user information from each user profile associated with a user of a detected device; and
creating an entity profile for the location based on the extracted user information of each user associated with a detected device.
52. The system of claim 51, wherein the entity profile is a dynamic profile that adjusts to the user information extracted from the user profiles associated with the users of the detected devices.
53. The system of claim 51, wherein the social network server is programmed to perform further operations comprising:
communicating entity profile information comprised within the entity profile to each detected device.
54. The system of claim 53, wherein the social network server is programmed to perform further operations comprising:
determining, for each user associated with a detected device, a desirability of the location based on the entity profile information.
55. The system of claim 54, wherein the social network server is programmed to perform further operations comprising:
communicating the desirability of the location to each detected device.
56. The system of claim 51, wherein the plurality of devices are detected by the social networking server upon being within a proximity to the location.
US13/186,711 2004-10-19 2011-07-20 Social network for location sensing Abandoned US20110282972A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/186,711 US20110282972A1 (en) 2004-10-19 2011-07-20 Social network for location sensing

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US62045604P 2004-10-19 2004-10-19
US11/253,848 US8019692B2 (en) 2004-10-19 2005-10-18 System and method for location based social networking
US13/186,711 US20110282972A1 (en) 2004-10-19 2011-07-20 Social network for location sensing

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/253,848 Continuation US8019692B2 (en) 2004-10-19 2005-10-18 System and method for location based social networking

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110282972A1 true US20110282972A1 (en) 2011-11-17

Family

ID=44912586

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/253,847 Active 2029-04-05 US11283885B2 (en) 2004-10-19 2005-10-18 System and method for location based matching and promotion
US13/186,753 Active 2028-06-21 US11272020B2 (en) 2004-10-19 2011-07-20 Social network for mapping gradations to target intent
US13/186,711 Abandoned US20110282972A1 (en) 2004-10-19 2011-07-20 Social network for location sensing

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/253,847 Active 2029-04-05 US11283885B2 (en) 2004-10-19 2005-10-18 System and method for location based matching and promotion
US13/186,753 Active 2028-06-21 US11272020B2 (en) 2004-10-19 2011-07-20 Social network for mapping gradations to target intent

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US11283885B2 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20120101898A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2012-04-26 Kendall Timothy A Presenting personalized social content on a web page of an external system
US20130156173A1 (en) * 2006-01-23 2013-06-20 Icall, Inc. System, method and computer program product for extracting user profiles and habits based on speech recognition and calling history for telephone system advertising
US20130294263A1 (en) * 2012-05-04 2013-11-07 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and Device for Monitoring Wireless Terminal Behavior According to Terminal Type
US8655987B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2014-02-18 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored-stories-unit creation from organic activity stream
US20140053242A1 (en) * 2012-08-15 2014-02-20 Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc. Management of private information
US20140289140A1 (en) * 2013-03-21 2014-09-25 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Systems and methods of opportunistically identifying networking prospects
US20140289031A1 (en) * 2004-12-06 2014-09-25 Capital One Financial Corporation Systems, methods and computer readable medium for wireless solicitations
US20150120814A1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2015-04-30 Yong Seog SON Mobile terminal and direct service providing method thereof
EP2798517A4 (en) * 2011-12-27 2015-08-12 Tata Consultancy Services Ltd A method and system for creating an intelligent social network between plurality of devices
WO2015126846A1 (en) * 2014-02-18 2015-08-27 Google Inc. Proximity detection
US9123079B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2015-09-01 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored stories unit creation from organic activity stream
US9270634B1 (en) * 2015-03-02 2016-02-23 Dewmobile, Inc. Building a proximate social networking database based on relative distance profiling of two or more operably coupled computers
EP3161734A1 (en) * 2014-06-24 2017-05-03 Martin Cudzilo A method for providing a mobile location based information service
US20170154051A1 (en) * 2015-12-01 2017-06-01 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Hashmaps
US20170230363A1 (en) * 2014-05-09 2017-08-10 Behaviometrics Ab Method, computer program, and system for identifying multiple users based on their behavior
US20170252657A1 (en) * 2011-09-22 2017-09-07 Empire Technology Development Llc Matching sponsored game content to location by genre and playability
US9767645B1 (en) * 2014-07-11 2017-09-19 ProSports Technologies, LLC Interactive gaming at a venue
US9787628B2 (en) * 2011-12-09 2017-10-10 Facebook, Inc. Mobile ad hoc networking
US9990652B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2018-06-05 Facebook, Inc. Targeting social advertising to friends of users who have interacted with an object associated with the advertising
US10068076B1 (en) * 2014-05-09 2018-09-04 Behaviometrics Ab Behavioral authentication system using a behavior server for authentication of multiple users based on their behavior
WO2018161105A1 (en) * 2017-03-10 2018-09-13 Paul David Lomas Shared contextual data transfer between preconfigured location devices
US20200112843A1 (en) * 2007-11-27 2020-04-09 Loyalblocks Ltd. Method, Device and System For Creating A Virtual Local Social Network
US11240220B2 (en) * 2018-06-13 2022-02-01 Paypal, Inc. Systems and methods for user authentication based on multiple devices

Families Citing this family (231)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7409685B2 (en) 2002-04-12 2008-08-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Initialization and update of software and/or firmware in electronic devices
US8479189B2 (en) 2000-11-17 2013-07-02 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Pattern detection preprocessor in an electronic device update generation system
US8590013B2 (en) 2002-02-25 2013-11-19 C. S. Lee Crawford Method of managing and communicating data pertaining to software applications for processor-based devices comprising wireless communication circuitry
US10706417B2 (en) * 2002-08-02 2020-07-07 Ncr Corporation System and method for execution of customer-specific marketing, discounts, and promotions
US8555273B1 (en) 2003-09-17 2013-10-08 Palm. Inc. Network for updating electronic devices
US7545784B2 (en) 2004-02-11 2009-06-09 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for wireless communication between previously known and unknown users
US7904895B1 (en) 2004-04-21 2011-03-08 Hewlett-Packard Develpment Company, L.P. Firmware update in electronic devices employing update agent in a flash memory card
SE528406C2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-11-07 Kenet Works Ab Method and communication platform to support communication between a service provider and a radio communication device
SE528405C2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2006-11-07 Kenet Works Ab Method and communication platform to support communication between a service provider and a radio communication device
US8526940B1 (en) 2004-08-17 2013-09-03 Palm, Inc. Centralized rules repository for smart phone customer care
US11283885B2 (en) 2004-10-19 2022-03-22 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. System and method for location based matching and promotion
WO2006044939A2 (en) * 2004-10-19 2006-04-27 Rosen James S System and method for location based social networking
US7725112B2 (en) * 2005-02-08 2010-05-25 Nokia Corporation System and method for provision of proximity networking activity information
US20070136657A1 (en) * 2005-03-25 2007-06-14 Daniel Blumenthal Process for Automatic Data Annotation, Selection, and Utilization.
US7761400B2 (en) 2005-07-22 2010-07-20 John Reimer Identifying events
US10015630B2 (en) 2016-09-15 2018-07-03 Proximity Grid, Inc. Tracking people
US10390212B2 (en) 2016-09-15 2019-08-20 Proximity Grid, Inc. Tracking system having an option of not being trackable
US20070050128A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2007-03-01 Garmin Ltd., A Cayman Islands Corporation Method and system for off-board navigation with a portable device
US7698061B2 (en) 2005-09-23 2010-04-13 Scenera Technologies, Llc System and method for selecting and presenting a route to a user
US8571999B2 (en) 2005-11-14 2013-10-29 C. S. Lee Crawford Method of conducting operations for a social network application including activity list generation
US20070117557A1 (en) * 2005-11-21 2007-05-24 Conopco Inc, D/B/A Unilever Parametric user profiling
US20080189292A1 (en) * 2007-02-02 2008-08-07 Jed Stremel System and method for automatic population of a contact file with contact content and expression content
US7827208B2 (en) 2006-08-11 2010-11-02 Facebook, Inc. Generating a feed of stories personalized for members of a social network
US7669123B2 (en) 2006-08-11 2010-02-23 Facebook, Inc. Dynamically providing a news feed about a user of a social network
US8225376B2 (en) 2006-07-25 2012-07-17 Facebook, Inc. Dynamically generating a privacy summary
US7809805B2 (en) 2007-02-28 2010-10-05 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for automatically locating web-based social network members
US8171128B2 (en) * 2006-08-11 2012-05-01 Facebook, Inc. Communicating a newsfeed of media content based on a member's interactions in a social network environment
US9183599B2 (en) * 2005-12-14 2015-11-10 Facebook, Inc. Mapping relationships between members in a social network
US7945653B2 (en) * 2006-10-11 2011-05-17 Facebook, Inc. Tagging digital media
US8549651B2 (en) * 2007-02-02 2013-10-01 Facebook, Inc. Determining a trust level in a social network environment
US8296373B2 (en) * 2007-02-02 2012-10-23 Facebook, Inc. Automatically managing objectionable behavior in a web-based social network
US8027943B2 (en) 2007-08-16 2011-09-27 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for observing responses to invitations by users in a web-based social network
US8402094B2 (en) * 2006-08-11 2013-03-19 Facebook, Inc. Providing a newsfeed based on user affinity for entities and monitored actions in a social network environment
US7797256B2 (en) * 2006-08-02 2010-09-14 Facebook, Inc. Generating segmented community flyers in a social networking system
US20090049127A1 (en) * 2007-08-16 2009-02-19 Yun-Fang Juan System and method for invitation targeting in a web-based social network
US8204952B2 (en) * 2007-02-02 2012-06-19 Facebook, Inc. Digital file distribution in a social network system
CN101366029A (en) * 2005-12-23 2009-02-11 费斯布克公司 Systems and methods for generating a social timeline
US9459622B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2016-10-04 Legalforce, Inc. Driverless vehicle commerce network and community
US7702685B2 (en) * 2006-01-20 2010-04-20 Microsoft Corporation Querying social networks
US9002754B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-04-07 Fatdoor, Inc. Campaign in a geo-spatial environment
US9071367B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-06-30 Fatdoor, Inc. Emergency including crime broadcast in a neighborhood social network
US9098545B2 (en) 2007-07-10 2015-08-04 Raj Abhyanker Hot news neighborhood banter in a geo-spatial social network
US9373149B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2016-06-21 Fatdoor, Inc. Autonomous neighborhood vehicle commerce network and community
US8965409B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-02-24 Fatdoor, Inc. User-generated community publication in an online neighborhood social network
US9064288B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-06-23 Fatdoor, Inc. Government structures and neighborhood leads in a geo-spatial environment
US9037516B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-05-19 Fatdoor, Inc. Direct mailing in a geo-spatial environment
US9070101B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2015-06-30 Fatdoor, Inc. Peer-to-peer neighborhood delivery multi-copter and method
US7702456B2 (en) * 2006-04-14 2010-04-20 Scenera Technologies, Llc System and method for presenting a computed route
EP2025095A2 (en) 2006-06-08 2009-02-18 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Device management in a network
US8752044B2 (en) 2006-07-27 2014-06-10 Qualcomm Incorporated User experience and dependency management in a mobile device
GB2435565B (en) 2006-08-09 2008-02-20 Cvon Services Oy Messaging system
US20080079539A1 (en) * 2006-08-15 2008-04-03 Daley Robert C Friends Finder Service for a Mobile Device in a Network
US20080082349A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Zackrison John W Using information about a financial transaction to augment information in an online social network
US8874465B2 (en) 2006-10-02 2014-10-28 Russel Robert Heiser, III Method and system for targeted content placement
EP3156959A1 (en) * 2006-10-02 2017-04-19 Segmint Inc. Personalized consumer advertising placement
US8108501B2 (en) 2006-11-01 2012-01-31 Yahoo! Inc. Searching and route mapping based on a social network, location, and time
US7917154B2 (en) 2006-11-01 2011-03-29 Yahoo! Inc. Determining mobile content for a social network based on location and time
US20080113674A1 (en) * 2006-11-10 2008-05-15 Mohammad Faisal Baig Vicinity-based community for wireless users
ES2397478T3 (en) * 2006-11-10 2013-03-07 Maeglin Software Methods and systems for the exchange of information at the community level through individual communication terminals
US20080115087A1 (en) * 2006-11-13 2008-05-15 Microsoft Corporation Tracking recent contacts
GB2436412A (en) 2006-11-27 2007-09-26 Cvon Innovations Ltd Authentication of network usage for use with message modifying apparatus
US9390396B2 (en) * 2006-12-04 2016-07-12 Excalibur Ip, Llc Bootstrapping social networks using augmented peer to peer distributions of social networking services
US20080235338A1 (en) * 2006-12-14 2008-09-25 Robert Cary Maleeny Apparatus, systems, and methods to facilitate the interaction between parties
US20090222330A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2009-09-03 Mind Metrics Llc System and method for determining like-mindedness
US20080144882A1 (en) * 2006-12-19 2008-06-19 Mind Metrics, Llc System and method for determining like-mindedness
US20080154895A1 (en) * 2006-12-23 2008-06-26 Carmony Kevin B System and method for anonymous dating compatibility determination
US7693953B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2010-04-06 Microsoft Corporation Providing Web services for wireless communication devices
WO2008094168A1 (en) * 2007-02-02 2008-08-07 Facebook, Inc. System and method for giving gifts and displaying assets in a social network environment
US8832556B2 (en) 2007-02-21 2014-09-09 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for implementation of a structured query language interface in a distributed database environment
US8396493B2 (en) 2007-02-28 2013-03-12 Yahoo! Inc. Network-based archiving for threaded mobile text messages
WO2008105766A1 (en) * 2007-02-28 2008-09-04 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for automatically locating web-based social network members
US20080222105A1 (en) * 2007-03-09 2008-09-11 Joseph Matheny Entity recommendation system using restricted information tagged to selected entities
US8136145B2 (en) 2007-03-13 2012-03-13 Facebook, Inc. Network authentication for accessing social networking system information by a third party application
US7827265B2 (en) * 2007-03-23 2010-11-02 Facebook, Inc. System and method for confirming an association in a web-based social network
US7974957B2 (en) * 2007-04-05 2011-07-05 Microsoft Corporation Assessing mobile readiness of a page using a trained scorer
US8156098B1 (en) * 2007-04-29 2012-04-10 Aol Inc. Generating and implementing A-lists to manage user relationships
US8935718B2 (en) 2007-05-22 2015-01-13 Apple Inc. Advertising management method and system
WO2008147564A1 (en) 2007-05-24 2008-12-04 Facebook, Inc. Systems and methods for providing privacy settings for applications associated with a user profile
AU2008257149A1 (en) 2007-05-24 2008-12-04 Facebook, Inc. Personalized platform for accessing internet applications
US8249943B2 (en) * 2007-05-31 2012-08-21 Facebook, Inc. Auction based polling
WO2008154648A1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2008-12-18 Facebook, Inc. Personalized social networking application content
US9430772B2 (en) * 2007-06-14 2016-08-30 Yahoo! Inc. Mobile contextual SMS advertising
US8892171B2 (en) * 2007-06-20 2014-11-18 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method for user profiling from gathering user data through interaction with a wireless communication device
US8886259B2 (en) * 2007-06-20 2014-11-11 Qualcomm Incorporated System and method for user profiling from gathering user data through interaction with a wireless communication device
US20090013051A1 (en) 2007-07-07 2009-01-08 Qualcomm Incorporated Method for transfer of information related to targeted content messages through a proxy server
US9392074B2 (en) 2007-07-07 2016-07-12 Qualcomm Incorporated User profile generation architecture for mobile content-message targeting
US20090048977A1 (en) * 2007-07-07 2009-02-19 Qualcomm Incorporated User profile generation architecture for targeted content distribution using external processes
US9235848B1 (en) 2007-07-09 2016-01-12 Groupon, Inc. Implicitly associating metadata using user behavior
US8732846B2 (en) 2007-08-15 2014-05-20 Facebook, Inc. Platform for providing a social context to software applications
US20090076904A1 (en) * 2007-09-17 2009-03-19 Frank David Serena Embedding digital values for digital exchange
US20090100136A1 (en) * 2007-10-15 2009-04-16 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Intelligent presence
US8503989B2 (en) 2007-10-22 2013-08-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dynamic contact list
US20090119327A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-07 Liang Holdings Llc R-smart person-centric networking
US9705998B2 (en) * 2007-11-14 2017-07-11 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and system using keyword vectors and associated metrics for learning and prediction of user correlation of targeted content messages in a mobile environment
US20090132365A1 (en) * 2007-11-15 2009-05-21 Microsoft Corporation Search, advertising and social networking applications and services
US9064019B2 (en) 2007-12-06 2015-06-23 Yahoo! Inc. Virtual billboard display on a mobile device
US20090150218A1 (en) * 2007-12-07 2009-06-11 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Mobile concierge system and method
US9497583B2 (en) 2007-12-12 2016-11-15 Iii Holdings 2, Llc System and method for generating a recommendation on a mobile device
US20090177530A1 (en) 2007-12-14 2009-07-09 Qualcomm Incorporated Near field communication transactions in a mobile environment
US20090157496A1 (en) * 2007-12-14 2009-06-18 Yahoo! Inc. Personal broadcast engine and network
US8010601B2 (en) 2007-12-21 2011-08-30 Waldeck Technology, Llc Contiguous location-based user networks
US10334397B2 (en) 2008-01-10 2019-06-25 Wireless Discovery Llc Interaction tracking and organizing system
US9357352B1 (en) 2008-01-10 2016-05-31 Wireless Discovery Llc Location-based discovery of network members by personal attributes using dynamic and static location data
US20090187466A1 (en) * 2008-01-23 2009-07-23 Maphook, Inc. Location-Based Information-Geo Retail Notification
US8417785B2 (en) 2008-02-19 2013-04-09 International Business Machines Corporation Device, system, and method of electronic communication to facilitate collaboration and meeting
US8239256B2 (en) 2008-03-17 2012-08-07 Segmint Inc. Method and system for targeted content placement
US8825520B2 (en) 2008-03-17 2014-09-02 Segmint Inc. Targeted marketing to on-hold customer
US11138632B2 (en) 2008-03-17 2021-10-05 Segmint Inc. System and method for authenticating a customer for a pre-approved offer of credit
US8234159B2 (en) * 2008-03-17 2012-07-31 Segmint Inc. Method and system for targeted content placement
US11120471B2 (en) 2013-10-18 2021-09-14 Segmint Inc. Method and system for targeted content placement
US11669866B2 (en) 2008-03-17 2023-06-06 Segmint Inc. System and method for delivering a financial application to a prospective customer
US11663631B2 (en) 2008-03-17 2023-05-30 Segmint Inc. System and method for pulling a credit offer on bank's pre-approved property
US10885552B2 (en) 2008-03-17 2021-01-05 Segmint, Inc. Method and system for targeted content placement
US8887066B1 (en) 2008-04-02 2014-11-11 Facebook, Inc. Communicating plans for users of a social networking system
US20100036720A1 (en) * 2008-04-11 2010-02-11 Microsoft Corporation Ubiquitous intent-based customer incentive scheme
US20090287544A1 (en) * 2008-05-14 2009-11-19 Neubardt Seth L Customer managed restaurant information system
US10163113B2 (en) * 2008-05-27 2018-12-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Methods and apparatus for generating user profile based on periodic location fixes
US8271516B2 (en) * 2008-06-12 2012-09-18 Microsoft Corporation Social networks service
US8655960B2 (en) * 2008-06-19 2014-02-18 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Location-aware instant messaging
US20090319648A1 (en) * 2008-06-24 2009-12-24 Mobile Tribe Llc Branded Advertising Based Dynamic Experience Generator
US8478692B2 (en) 2008-06-26 2013-07-02 Visa International Service Association Systems and methods for geographic location notifications of payment transactions
US9542687B2 (en) 2008-06-26 2017-01-10 Visa International Service Association Systems and methods for visual representation of offers
US20100030772A1 (en) * 2008-07-30 2010-02-04 Ran Zilca System and method for creating and using personality models for user interactions in a social network
RU2011116158A (en) 2008-09-25 2012-10-27 Виза Интернэшнл Сервис Ассосиэйшн (Us) METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SORTING WARNING MESSAGES AND OFFERS ON MOBILE DEVICE
US20100082674A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-04-01 Yahoo! Inc. System for detecting user input error
US8159327B2 (en) * 2008-11-13 2012-04-17 Visa International Service Association Device including authentication glyph
US10504126B2 (en) 2009-01-21 2019-12-10 Truaxis, Llc System and method of obtaining merchant sales information for marketing or sales teams
US20120004969A1 (en) * 2009-01-21 2012-01-05 Billshrink, Inc. System and method for providing a geo-enhanced savings opportunity in association with a financial account
US8600857B2 (en) 2009-01-21 2013-12-03 Truaxis, Inc. System and method for providing a savings opportunity in association with a financial account
US10594870B2 (en) 2009-01-21 2020-03-17 Truaxis, Llc System and method for matching a savings opportunity using census data
US8566197B2 (en) 2009-01-21 2013-10-22 Truaxis, Inc. System and method for providing socially enabled rewards through a user financial instrument
US20120004967A1 (en) * 2009-01-21 2012-01-05 Billshrink, Inc. System and method for providing a future reward through a user financial instrument
US8326270B2 (en) * 2009-02-02 2012-12-04 Lemi Technology, Llc Optimizing operation of a radio program
US8208943B2 (en) * 2009-02-02 2012-06-26 Waldeck Technology, Llc Anonymous crowd tracking
US8458177B2 (en) * 2009-02-02 2013-06-04 Yahoo! Inc. Automated search
US20120047087A1 (en) 2009-03-25 2012-02-23 Waldeck Technology Llc Smart encounters
US20100262487A1 (en) * 2009-04-06 2010-10-14 Globys Inc. Contextual targeting based upon customer occasions
US20120046995A1 (en) * 2009-04-29 2012-02-23 Waldeck Technology, Llc Anonymous crowd comparison
US8301495B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2012-10-30 Groupon, Inc. System and methods for discount retailing
US8650072B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2014-02-11 Groupon, Inc. System and methods for providing location based discount retailing
US8355948B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2013-01-15 Groupon, Inc. System and methods for discount retailing
US20100325290A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2010-12-23 Rooks Kelsyn D S System and method for coordinating human interaction in social networks
US20120135744A1 (en) 2009-07-21 2012-05-31 Kota Enterprises, Llc Systems and methods for generating and managing communication rules associated with geographic locations
US20110029360A1 (en) * 2009-07-29 2011-02-03 Prasad Gollapalli System and method for providing smart phone functionality for retailers to distribute sale and discount coupons
US8473512B2 (en) 2009-11-06 2013-06-25 Waldeck Technology, Llc Dynamic profile slice
US20110126132A1 (en) * 2009-11-20 2011-05-26 Tyler Robert Anderson System and methods of generating social networks in virtual space
US8782022B2 (en) * 2009-12-09 2014-07-15 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Method and apparatus for aggregating and translating real-time user information to update social network profiles
US20120063367A1 (en) 2009-12-22 2012-03-15 Waldeck Technology, Llc Crowd and profile based communication addresses
US20120066303A1 (en) * 2010-03-03 2012-03-15 Waldeck Technology, Llc Synchronized group location updates
BR112012028896A2 (en) 2010-05-10 2017-03-14 Segmint Inc "consumer-specific advertising presentation and offer library"
CN103098084A (en) 2010-05-10 2013-05-08 塞戈米特公司 Targeted marketing with CPE buydown
US8650186B2 (en) 2010-07-30 2014-02-11 Accenture Global Services Limited Systems and methods for analyzing requirements
JP5849953B2 (en) * 2010-08-06 2016-02-03 日本電気株式会社 Communication support device, communication support method, and program
US8510658B2 (en) 2010-08-11 2013-08-13 Apple Inc. Population segmentation
WO2012024421A2 (en) * 2010-08-17 2012-02-23 United Sample, Inc. Selecting and processing offers to complete tasks, research programs, and consumer rewards programs based on location
US20130018701A1 (en) * 2010-08-17 2013-01-17 Matthew Dusig Capturing and processing data responsive to a task associated with consumer research, survey, or poll
US20120066042A1 (en) * 2010-09-13 2012-03-15 Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland Gmbh Method of collection of information on awareness of consumers and/or users with respect to a good or service
US8612477B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2013-12-17 Aol Inc. Systems and methods for customized electronic communications
US9886727B2 (en) 2010-11-11 2018-02-06 Ikorongo Technology, LLC Automatic check-ins and status updates
US9753609B2 (en) * 2010-12-03 2017-09-05 Facebook, Inc. User interface with media wheel facilitating viewing of media objects
US10460078B2 (en) 2010-12-03 2019-10-29 Parallel 6, Inc. Systems and methods for remote demand based data management of clinical locations
US8856031B1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-10-07 Parallel 6, Inc. Systems and methods for obtaining and using targeted insights within a digital content and information sharing system
US9384289B2 (en) * 2010-12-23 2016-07-05 Excalibur Ip, Llc Method and system to identify geographical locations associated with queries received at a search engine
US8583471B1 (en) * 2011-06-13 2013-11-12 Facebook, Inc. Inferring household income for users of a social networking system
US9339727B2 (en) 2011-06-15 2016-05-17 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Position-based decision to provide service
US8700709B2 (en) 2011-07-29 2014-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Conditional location-based reminders
US20130045729A1 (en) * 2011-08-17 2013-02-21 Microsoft Corporation Location-based promotion of applications
WO2013052106A2 (en) * 2011-10-03 2013-04-11 Zoosk, Inc. System and method for validating users using social network or other information from a web site
US11252690B2 (en) 2011-10-11 2022-02-15 Match Group, Llc System and method for matching using location information
US10149267B2 (en) 2011-10-11 2018-12-04 Match Group, Llc System and method for matching using location information
US9665266B2 (en) * 2011-10-27 2017-05-30 Blackberry Limited Setting reminders from an instant messaging application
US9836721B2 (en) 2011-11-21 2017-12-05 Facebook, Inc. Defining future plans in connection with objects in a social networking system
US20130246175A1 (en) * 2011-12-05 2013-09-19 Qualcomm Labs, Inc. Selectively presenting advertisements to a customer of a service based on a place movement pattern profile
US9083728B1 (en) 2012-03-06 2015-07-14 Tal Lavian Systems and methods to support sharing and exchanging in a network
CN102811179B (en) * 2012-03-29 2015-11-25 北京淘友天下科技发展有限公司 Information providing method in a kind of social networks and system
US10664861B1 (en) 2012-03-30 2020-05-26 Groupon, Inc. Generating promotion offers and providing analytics data
US10304093B2 (en) 2013-01-24 2019-05-28 Groupon, Inc. Method, apparatus, and computer readable medium for providing a self-service interface
US10147130B2 (en) 2012-09-27 2018-12-04 Groupon, Inc. Online ordering for in-shop service
US10664876B1 (en) 2013-06-20 2020-05-26 Groupon, Inc. Method and apparatus for promotion template generation
US10304091B1 (en) 2012-04-30 2019-05-28 Groupon, Inc. Deal generation using point-of-sale systems and related methods
US9996859B1 (en) 2012-03-30 2018-06-12 Groupon, Inc. Method, apparatus, and computer readable medium for providing a self-service interface
US10255620B1 (en) 2013-06-27 2019-04-09 Groupon, Inc. Fine print builder
US10192243B1 (en) 2013-06-10 2019-01-29 Groupon, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining promotion pricing parameters
US11386461B2 (en) 2012-04-30 2022-07-12 Groupon, Inc. Deal generation using point-of-sale systems and related methods
US20130325494A1 (en) * 2012-05-30 2013-12-05 Getmyrx Llc Mobile Fulfillment Platform For Prescription Medications
US9342209B1 (en) * 2012-08-23 2016-05-17 Audible, Inc. Compilation and presentation of user activity information
US20140081761A1 (en) * 2012-09-20 2014-03-20 Jayaram Singonahalli Method and system for real-time social gifting
US10262330B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2019-04-16 PlaceIQ, Inc. Location-based analytic platform and methods
US8489596B1 (en) 2013-01-04 2013-07-16 PlaceIQ, Inc. Apparatus and method for profiling users
US9934523B1 (en) 2013-03-05 2018-04-03 Square, Inc. On-device directory search
US10380664B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2019-08-13 Glympse, Inc. Creation and use of public and private groups in a location sharing application
US10909590B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2021-02-02 Square, Inc. Merchant and item ratings
US20140280571A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 General Instrument Corporation Processing of user-specific social media for time-shifted multimedia content
US20140279045A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Turn Inc. Cross-domain id synchronization in online advertisement
US9875494B2 (en) * 2013-04-16 2018-01-23 Sri International Using intents to analyze and personalize a user's dialog experience with a virtual personal assistant
US10339610B2 (en) 2013-04-19 2019-07-02 Mastercard International Incorporated Method and system for making a targeted offer to an audience
US9344518B2 (en) 2013-05-10 2016-05-17 Globalfoundries Inc. Facilitation of social interactions
US9916289B2 (en) * 2013-09-10 2018-03-13 Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. Syndication of associations relating data and metadata
US10332154B2 (en) * 2013-10-21 2019-06-25 Shant Tchakerian Device, method and non-transitory computer readable storage medium for determining a match between profiles
US9894633B2 (en) * 2013-12-06 2018-02-13 Google Llc Reminders based on device proximity using bluetooth LE
US9439367B2 (en) 2014-02-07 2016-09-13 Arthi Abhyanker Network enabled gardening with a remotely controllable positioning extension
EP3120320A4 (en) * 2014-03-17 2017-08-09 Glympse Inc Creation and use of public and private groups in a location sharing environment
US9367631B2 (en) 2014-04-18 2016-06-14 Revolution Technologies, Inc. Dynamic directory and content communication
US9457901B2 (en) 2014-04-22 2016-10-04 Fatdoor, Inc. Quadcopter with a printable payload extension system and method
US9004396B1 (en) 2014-04-24 2015-04-14 Fatdoor, Inc. Skyteboard quadcopter and method
US9022324B1 (en) 2014-05-05 2015-05-05 Fatdoor, Inc. Coordination of aerial vehicles through a central server
US9441981B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2016-09-13 Fatdoor, Inc. Variable bus stops across a bus route in a regional transportation network
US9971985B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2018-05-15 Raj Abhyanker Train based community
CN104111981B (en) * 2014-06-27 2018-06-05 百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司 A kind of method and apparatus to release news for offer
US9451020B2 (en) 2014-07-18 2016-09-20 Legalforce, Inc. Distributed communication of independent autonomous vehicles to provide redundancy and performance
KR102307786B1 (en) 2014-12-19 2021-10-05 삼성전자주식회사 Electronic apparatus and user profile estimating method thereof
US20160180393A1 (en) * 2014-12-20 2016-06-23 Ebay Inc. Retargeting consumers in a physical realm
US20160378836A1 (en) * 2015-03-04 2016-12-29 Anuj Kumar Purwar Method and apparatus for characterizing human relationships using sensor monitoring
CN106156203A (en) * 2015-04-23 2016-11-23 程东玉 The extended method of social networks and system in social networks
US9654549B2 (en) 2015-05-18 2017-05-16 Somchai Akkarawittayapoom Systems and methods for creating user-managed online pages (MAPpages) linked to locations on an interactive digital map
US10296569B2 (en) 2015-05-18 2019-05-21 Somchai Akkarawittayapoom Systems and methods for creating user-managed online pages (MAPpages) linked to locations on an interactive digital map
CN106326289B (en) * 2015-06-30 2020-07-28 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 Contact person matching method and device
US20170032337A1 (en) * 2015-07-27 2017-02-02 Paypal, Inc. Pairing of transactional partners using associated data and identifiers
TWI570646B (en) * 2015-11-23 2017-02-11 財團法人資訊工業策進會 Location based community integration matchmaking system, method and computer readable recording media for optimizing sales
USD781311S1 (en) 2016-08-30 2017-03-14 Tinder, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface
USD781882S1 (en) 2016-08-30 2017-03-21 Tinder, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface of an electronic device
USD854025S1 (en) 2016-08-30 2019-07-16 Match Group, Llc Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface of an electronic device
USD780775S1 (en) 2016-08-30 2017-03-07 Tinder, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface of an electronic device
USD852809S1 (en) 2016-08-30 2019-07-02 Match Group, Llc Display screen or portion thereof with a graphical user interface of an electronic device
US20180330325A1 (en) 2017-05-12 2018-11-15 Zippy Inc. Method for indicating delivery location and software for same
JP7080079B2 (en) * 2018-03-19 2022-06-03 本田技研工業株式会社 Information providing device and its control method
JP7107037B2 (en) 2018-07-06 2022-07-27 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 Notification device and program
US20200193453A1 (en) * 2018-12-12 2020-06-18 Zebra Technologies Corporation Grouping associated customers with a connected customer
US11805160B2 (en) * 2020-03-23 2023-10-31 Rovi Guides, Inc. Systems and methods for concurrent content presentation
US11790364B2 (en) 2020-06-26 2023-10-17 Rovi Guides, Inc. Systems and methods for providing multi-factor authentication for vehicle transactions
US20220036397A1 (en) * 2020-07-31 2022-02-03 Rovi Guides, Inc. Systems and methods for providing an offer based on calendar data mining

Citations (41)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020013735A1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2002-01-31 Arti Arora Electronic matching engine for matching desired characteristics with item attributes
US20020068583A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2002-06-06 Murray Bradley A. Wireless communication system for location based schedule management and method therefor
US20020111172A1 (en) * 2001-02-14 2002-08-15 Dewolf Frederik M. Location based profiling
US20020111154A1 (en) * 2001-02-14 2002-08-15 Eldering Charles A. Location based delivery
US20020138433A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-26 Ncr Corporation Advertising terminal
US6486892B1 (en) * 1999-04-07 2002-11-26 Joseph L. Stern System and method for accessing, manipulating and viewing internet and non-internet related information and for controlling networked devices
US20030014373A1 (en) * 2001-07-13 2003-01-16 Damir Perge System and method for matching business partners
US20030063072A1 (en) * 2000-04-04 2003-04-03 Brandenberg Carl Brock Method and apparatus for scheduling presentation of digital content on a personal communication device
US6549768B1 (en) * 1999-08-24 2003-04-15 Nokia Corp Mobile communications matching system
US6571279B1 (en) * 1997-12-05 2003-05-27 Pinpoint Incorporated Location enhanced information delivery system
US6618593B1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2003-09-09 Rovingradar, Inc. Location dependent user matching system
US20030220982A1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2003-11-27 Luu Tran Dynamic location storage and retrieval in a wireless portal server
US20040002897A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Vishik Claire Svetlana In-store (on premises) targeted marketing services for wireless customers
US6701362B1 (en) * 2000-02-23 2004-03-02 Purpleyogi.Com Inc. Method for creating user profiles
US6741188B1 (en) * 1999-10-22 2004-05-25 John M. Miller System for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US6819919B1 (en) * 1999-10-29 2004-11-16 Telcontar Method for providing matching and introduction services to proximate mobile users and service providers
US20050032528A1 (en) * 1998-11-17 2005-02-10 Dowling Eric Morgan Geographical web browser, methods, apparatus and systems
US20050038876A1 (en) * 2003-08-15 2005-02-17 Aloke Chaudhuri System and method for instant match based on location, presence, personalization and communication
US20050048961A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-03-03 Jambo Networks, Inc. System and method for providing communication services to mobile device users
US20050131716A1 (en) * 2003-12-15 2005-06-16 Hanan Martin D. Method for determining compatibility
US20050165762A1 (en) * 2004-01-26 2005-07-28 Thinkbig, Inc., A California Corporation User event matching system and method
US20050177614A1 (en) * 2004-02-09 2005-08-11 Parallel-Pro, Llc Method and computer system for matching mobile device users for business and social networking
US20050174975A1 (en) * 2004-02-11 2005-08-11 Vicinity Messaging Corporation System and method for wireless communication between previously known and unknown users
US20050198305A1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2005-09-08 Peter Pezaris Method and system for associating a thread with content in a social networking environment
US20050210387A1 (en) * 2003-10-06 2005-09-22 Mcyyappan Alagappan System and method for the aggregation and matching of information
US20050228860A1 (en) * 2004-04-12 2005-10-13 Kimmo Hamynen Methods and apparatus for geographically based Web services
US20050256755A1 (en) * 2004-05-17 2005-11-17 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for providing automobile marketing research information
US20060047825A1 (en) * 2004-08-24 2006-03-02 Jack Steenstra Location based service (LBS) system and method for creating a social network
US7035863B2 (en) * 2001-11-13 2006-04-25 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method, system and program product for populating a user profile based on existing user profiles
US7043497B1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2006-05-09 Ncr Corp. System and method for capturing and storing web site visitor profile information in a data warehouse
US7071842B1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2006-07-04 Earthcomber, Llc System and method for locating and notifying a user of a person, place or thing having attributes matching the user's stated preferences
US20060195361A1 (en) * 2005-10-01 2006-08-31 Outland Research Location-based demographic profiling system and method of use
US7203674B2 (en) * 2002-02-15 2007-04-10 Morgan Cohen Method and system to connect and match users in an electronic dating service
US7243105B2 (en) * 2002-12-31 2007-07-10 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Method and apparatus for automatic updating of user profiles
US7346839B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2008-03-18 Google Inc. Information retrieval based on historical data
US7530021B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation Instant meeting preparation architecture
US7593740B2 (en) * 2004-05-12 2009-09-22 Google, Inc. Location-based social software for mobile devices
US7797390B2 (en) * 2004-08-12 2010-09-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for disappearing ink for text messaging
US7844283B2 (en) * 2003-06-10 2010-11-30 Yahoo! Inc. Method of providing location based information to a mobile terminal within a communications network
US7890581B2 (en) * 1996-12-16 2011-02-15 Ip Holdings, Inc. Matching network system for mobile devices
US8462048B2 (en) * 2001-12-31 2013-06-11 Rdpa, Llc Satellite positioning system and method for determining the demographics of individuals passing retail locations

Family Cites Families (145)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
IL90277A0 (en) 1989-05-12 1989-12-15 Shmuel Shapira System for locating compatible persons at a given locality
US5903454A (en) * 1991-12-23 1999-05-11 Hoffberg; Linda Irene Human-factored interface corporating adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus
US8352400B2 (en) * 1991-12-23 2013-01-08 Hoffberg Steven M Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore
US5493692A (en) * 1993-12-03 1996-02-20 Xerox Corporation Selective delivery of electronic messages in a multiple computer system based on context and environment of a user
US5555376A (en) * 1993-12-03 1996-09-10 Xerox Corporation Method for granting a user request having locational and contextual attributes consistent with user policies for devices having locational attributes consistent with the user request
US5893075A (en) * 1994-04-01 1999-04-06 Plainfield Software Interactive system and method for surveying and targeting customers
US5724567A (en) 1994-04-25 1998-03-03 Apple Computer, Inc. System for directing relevance-ranked data objects to computer users
US5948040A (en) * 1994-06-24 1999-09-07 Delorme Publishing Co. Travel reservation information and planning system
US5758257A (en) * 1994-11-29 1998-05-26 Herz; Frederick System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US5960173A (en) 1995-12-22 1999-09-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method enabling awareness of others working on similar tasks in a computer work environment
US6119114A (en) 1996-09-17 2000-09-12 Smadja; Frank Method and apparatus for dynamic relevance ranking
US6175831B1 (en) * 1997-01-17 2001-01-16 Six Degrees, Inc. Method and apparatus for constructing a networking database and system
US6091956A (en) 1997-06-12 2000-07-18 Hollenberg; Dennis D. Situation information system
US5963951A (en) 1997-06-30 1999-10-05 Movo Media, Inc. Computerized on-line dating service for searching and matching people
US6269369B1 (en) 1997-11-02 2001-07-31 Amazon.Com Holdings, Inc. Networked personal contact manager
US6112181A (en) * 1997-11-06 2000-08-29 Intertrust Technologies Corporation Systems and methods for matching, selecting, narrowcasting, and/or classifying based on rights management and/or other information
US6134532A (en) * 1997-11-14 2000-10-17 Aptex Software, Inc. System and method for optimal adaptive matching of users to most relevant entity and information in real-time
US6647257B2 (en) * 1998-01-21 2003-11-11 Leap Wireless International, Inc. System and method for providing targeted messages based on wireless mobile location
PT1080415T (en) 1998-05-21 2017-05-02 Equifax Inc System and method for authentication of network users
CA2337508A1 (en) * 1998-07-20 2000-01-27 Signalsoft Corp. Subscriber delivered location-based services
US6115709A (en) * 1998-09-18 2000-09-05 Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc. Method and system for constructing a knowledge profile of a user having unrestricted and restricted access portions according to respective levels of confidence of content of the portions
US6253202B1 (en) * 1998-09-18 2001-06-26 Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc. Method, system and apparatus for authorizing access by a first user to a knowledge profile of a second user responsive to an access request from the first user
US6513015B2 (en) * 1998-09-25 2003-01-28 Fujitsu Limited System and method for customer recognition using wireless identification and visual data transmission
US6446076B1 (en) * 1998-11-12 2002-09-03 Accenture Llp. Voice interactive web-based agent system responsive to a user location for prioritizing and formatting information
US6845370B2 (en) * 1998-11-12 2005-01-18 Accenture Llp Advanced information gathering for targeted activities
US6317718B1 (en) * 1999-02-26 2001-11-13 Accenture Properties (2) B.V. System, method and article of manufacture for location-based filtering for shopping agent in the physical world
US6965868B1 (en) * 1999-08-03 2005-11-15 Michael David Bednarek System and method for promoting commerce, including sales agent assisted commerce, in a networked economy
US6490519B1 (en) 1999-09-27 2002-12-03 Decell, Inc. Traffic monitoring system and methods for traffic monitoring and route guidance useful therewith
US7109869B2 (en) * 1999-09-28 2006-09-19 Clifford Sweatte Method and system for facility security
US6839680B1 (en) 1999-09-30 2005-01-04 Fujitsu Limited Internet profiling
US7630986B1 (en) 1999-10-27 2009-12-08 Pinpoint, Incorporated Secure data interchange
JP2001134581A (en) * 1999-11-02 2001-05-18 Nec Corp Method, device, and receiver for advertisement, and recording medium
US7418402B2 (en) * 1999-11-18 2008-08-26 First Aura, Llc Method and system for providing local information over a network
US6832245B1 (en) 1999-12-01 2004-12-14 At&T Corp. System and method for analyzing communications of user messages to rank users and contacts based on message content
US7284033B2 (en) * 1999-12-14 2007-10-16 Imahima Inc. Systems for communicating current and future activity information among mobile internet users and methods therefor
EP1247191A4 (en) * 1999-12-29 2007-12-12 Harry A Glorikian An internet system for connecting client-travelers with geographically-associated data
US6343317B1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2002-01-29 Harry A. Glorikian Internet system for connecting client-travelers with geographically-associated data
AU2001234456A1 (en) * 2000-01-13 2001-07-24 Erinmedia, Inc. Privacy compliant multiple dataset correlation system
US6587835B1 (en) * 2000-02-09 2003-07-01 G. Victor Treyz Shopping assistance with handheld computing device
US7437408B2 (en) 2000-02-14 2008-10-14 Lockheed Martin Corporation Information aggregation, processing and distribution system
US6611881B1 (en) 2000-03-15 2003-08-26 Personal Data Network Corporation Method and system of providing credit card user with barcode purchase data and recommendation automatically on their personal computer
US7181412B1 (en) * 2000-03-22 2007-02-20 Comscore Networks Inc. Systems and methods for collecting consumer data
US7822635B1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2010-10-26 International Business Machines Corporation Managing consumer preferences with a portable data processing system
US7725525B2 (en) 2000-05-09 2010-05-25 James Duncan Work Method and apparatus for internet-based human network brokering
US6542449B2 (en) * 2000-05-18 2003-04-01 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Disk drive apparatus
US6539232B2 (en) * 2000-06-10 2003-03-25 Telcontar Method and system for connecting mobile users based on degree of separation
US6542749B2 (en) * 2000-06-10 2003-04-01 Telcontar Method and system for connecting proximately located mobile users based on compatible attributes
US6542750B2 (en) * 2000-06-10 2003-04-01 Telcontar Method and system for selectively connecting mobile users based on physical proximity
US6542748B2 (en) * 2000-06-10 2003-04-01 Telcontar Method and system for automatically initiating a telecommunications connection based on distance
AUPQ830600A0 (en) 2000-06-23 2000-07-13 Hancock, John Comunet - a people networking system
AU2001277071A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-02-13 Triplehop Technologies, Inc. System and method for obtaining user preferences and providing user recommendations for unseen physical and information goods and services
US6647269B2 (en) * 2000-08-07 2003-11-11 Telcontar Method and system for analyzing advertisements delivered to a mobile unit
US6681108B1 (en) 2000-08-16 2004-01-20 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. Network and method for identifying entities sharing a common network location
US20020059092A1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2002-05-16 Hirohisa Naito Behavior data fee collection system
WO2002028125A2 (en) 2000-09-29 2002-04-04 Telefonaktiebolaget L.M. Ericsson (Publ) Method, system and computer program for identifying a compatible individual in a geographic area
US7185065B1 (en) 2000-10-11 2007-02-27 Buzzmetrics Ltd System and method for scoring electronic messages
US7197470B1 (en) 2000-10-11 2007-03-27 Buzzmetrics, Ltd. System and method for collection analysis of electronic discussion methods
DE10053825A1 (en) 2000-10-30 2002-05-16 E Plus Mobilfunk Gmbh & Co Kg Method for merging (matching) requirement profiles in real time with regard to content and / or geographical position using telecommunication networks
CN100426284C (en) * 2000-11-20 2008-10-15 英国电讯有限公司 Method of managing resources
US7246078B2 (en) * 2000-12-04 2007-07-17 Ncr Corporation System and methods for graphically representing purchase profiles and sales guidance to a customer service representative
US8023622B2 (en) * 2000-12-21 2011-09-20 Grape Technology Group, Inc. Technique for call context based advertising through an information assistance service
WO2002052798A2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2002-07-04 Research In Motion Limited Wireless router system and method
US6690918B2 (en) * 2001-01-05 2004-02-10 Soundstarts, Inc. Networking by matching profile information over a data packet-network and a local area network
US6795710B1 (en) * 2001-01-05 2004-09-21 Palmone, Inc. Identifying client patterns using online location-based derivative analysis
ATE321422T1 (en) * 2001-01-09 2006-04-15 Metabyte Networks Inc SYSTEM, METHOD AND SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING TARGETED ADVERTISING THROUGH USER PROFILE DATA STRUCTURE BASED ON USER PREFERENCES
US7343317B2 (en) * 2001-01-18 2008-03-11 Nokia Corporation Real-time wireless e-coupon (promotion) definition based on available segment
FI111781B (en) 2001-01-29 2003-09-15 Esa Runola Procedure for finding a partner
US20020138331A1 (en) * 2001-02-05 2002-09-26 Hosea Devin F. Method and system for web page personalization
AU2002240270A1 (en) * 2001-02-09 2002-08-28 Softcoin, Inc. Providing promotions over a network
US20020116330A1 (en) * 2001-02-21 2002-08-22 Hed Aharon Zeev Wireless communicating credit card
US20020147619A1 (en) * 2001-04-05 2002-10-10 Peter Floss Method and system for providing personal travel advice to a user
US6944447B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2005-09-13 Accenture Llp Location-based services
US7698228B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2010-04-13 Accenture Llp Tracking purchases in a location-based services system
US6848542B2 (en) * 2001-04-27 2005-02-01 Accenture Llp Method for passive mining of usage information in a location-based services system
GB2375921A (en) 2001-05-23 2002-11-27 Int Computers Ltd Location-based matching service
US7305350B1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2007-12-04 Aol Llc System for notifying an online client of a mobile vendor
US7813741B2 (en) * 2001-07-18 2010-10-12 Decarta Inc. System and method for initiating responses to location-based events
US7463890B2 (en) 2002-07-24 2008-12-09 Herz Frederick S M Method and apparatus for establishing ad hoc communications pathways between source and destination nodes in a communications network
US7454464B2 (en) 2001-09-10 2008-11-18 Intel Corporation Peer discovery and connection management based on context sensitive social networks
EP1442411A4 (en) 2001-09-30 2006-02-01 Realcontacts Ltd Connection service
US7219098B2 (en) * 2002-01-14 2007-05-15 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for processing data in a distributed architecture
US6822568B2 (en) * 2002-01-23 2004-11-23 Lucent Technologies Inc. Space area network
US6812840B2 (en) * 2002-01-23 2004-11-02 Lucent Technologies Inc. Object area network
US7167910B2 (en) 2002-02-20 2007-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Social mapping of contacts from computer communication information
US8095589B2 (en) * 2002-03-07 2012-01-10 Compete, Inc. Clickstream analysis methods and systems
US7680796B2 (en) * 2003-09-03 2010-03-16 Google, Inc. Determining and/or using location information in an ad system
EP1546951A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2005-06-29 Carlton, Stephen, J., c/o Terry Carlton A portable communication apparatus and methods for match-making with distributed memory
GB2388493A (en) 2002-05-08 2003-11-12 Charles Peter William Hornsby Location based matchmaking using mobile access devices
US8611919B2 (en) 2002-05-23 2013-12-17 Wounder Gmbh., Llc System, method, and computer program product for providing location based services and mobile e-commerce
US7254406B2 (en) * 2002-06-10 2007-08-07 Suman Beros Method and apparatus for effecting a detection of mobile devices that are proximate and exhibit commonalities between specific data sets, or profiles, associated with the persons transporting the mobile devices
US7263351B2 (en) * 2002-07-01 2007-08-28 Qualcomm Incorporated Wireless network optimization through remote device data
US7539697B1 (en) 2002-08-08 2009-05-26 Spoke Software Creation and maintenance of social relationship network graphs
US7974849B1 (en) 2002-08-12 2011-07-05 Oracle America, Inc. Detecting and modeling temporal computer activity patterns
US8224700B2 (en) * 2002-08-19 2012-07-17 Andrew Silver System and method for managing restaurant customer data elements
US6996394B2 (en) * 2002-08-30 2006-02-07 Qualcomm Incorporated Server processing in providing messages for a wireless device connecting to a server
WO2004023329A1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2004-03-18 Oni Adeboyejo A Enablement of collaborative and integrated decision-making
US20040122803A1 (en) 2002-12-19 2004-06-24 Dom Byron E. Detect and qualify relationships between people and find the best path through the resulting social network
US7177880B2 (en) * 2002-12-19 2007-02-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method of creating and displaying relationship chains between users of a computerized network
US7109859B2 (en) * 2002-12-23 2006-09-19 Gentag, Inc. Method and apparatus for wide area surveillance of a terrorist or personal threat
US7246067B2 (en) * 2002-12-26 2007-07-17 Better Dating Bureau, Inc. Secure online dating support system and method
US9742615B1 (en) 2002-12-31 2017-08-22 Aol Inc. Popularity index
US7295119B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2007-11-13 Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. System and method for indicating the presence or physical location of persons or devices in a site specific representation of a physical environment
US7472110B2 (en) 2003-01-29 2008-12-30 Microsoft Corporation System and method for employing social networks for information discovery
US9818136B1 (en) * 2003-02-05 2017-11-14 Steven M. Hoffberg System and method for determining contingent relevance
KR20040073803A (en) 2003-02-14 2004-08-21 한성구 system and method for searching favorite type using mobile
US20040162830A1 (en) * 2003-02-18 2004-08-19 Sanika Shirwadkar Method and system for searching location based information on a mobile device
US8554592B1 (en) * 2003-03-13 2013-10-08 Mastercard International Incorporated Systems and methods for transaction-based profiling of customer behavior
CA2519360A1 (en) 2003-03-17 2004-09-30 Spector & Associates, Inc Apparatus and method for broadcasting messages to selected group(s) of users
US20040205002A1 (en) * 2003-04-10 2004-10-14 Platinum Edge, Inc. System and method for enabling more informed relationship decisions
US20050015432A1 (en) 2003-05-13 2005-01-20 Cohen Hunter C. Deriving contact information from emails
US7069308B2 (en) 2003-06-16 2006-06-27 Friendster, Inc. System, method and apparatus for connecting users in an online computer system based on their relationships within social networks
US20040111360A1 (en) * 2003-07-14 2004-06-10 David Albanese System and method for personal and business information exchange
US7627334B2 (en) 2003-07-21 2009-12-01 Contextual Information, Inc. Systems and methods for context relevant information management and display
US20050054352A1 (en) * 2003-09-08 2005-03-10 Gyora Karaizman Introduction system and method utilizing mobile communicators
US20120150888A1 (en) 2003-09-10 2012-06-14 Geoffrey Hyatt Method and system for relationship management and intelligent agent
US8620732B2 (en) * 2003-09-11 2013-12-31 Catalina Marketing Corporation Method and system for presenting banners having direct link to user profile information
US8620733B2 (en) * 2003-09-11 2013-12-31 Catalina Marketing Corporation Method and system for electronic distribution of incentives having real-time consumer-based directions
US20060004631A1 (en) * 2003-09-11 2006-01-05 Roberts Gregory B Method and system for generating real-time directions associated with product promotions
US20050080861A1 (en) 2003-10-14 2005-04-14 Daniell W. Todd Selectively displaying email folders
US7831679B2 (en) 2003-10-15 2010-11-09 Microsoft Corporation Guiding sensing and preferences for context-sensitive services
US7392057B2 (en) * 2003-10-31 2008-06-24 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd Message service method for mobile communication terminal using position information
US7373109B2 (en) * 2003-11-04 2008-05-13 Nokia Corporation System and method for registering attendance of entities associated with content creation
US7039440B2 (en) * 2003-11-20 2006-05-02 International Business Machines Corporation Wireless rechargeable money card
US7606772B2 (en) 2003-11-28 2009-10-20 Manyworlds, Inc. Adaptive social computing methods
US7707039B2 (en) 2004-02-15 2010-04-27 Exbiblio B.V. Automatic modification of web pages
US7707122B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2010-04-27 Yahoo ! Inc. System and method of information filtering using measures of affinity of a relationship
US7269590B2 (en) 2004-01-29 2007-09-11 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for customizing views of information associated with a social network user
US20050187818A1 (en) 2004-02-20 2005-08-25 Zito David D. Computerized advertising offer exchange
US20050197846A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2005-09-08 Peter Pezaris Method and system for generating a proximity index in a social networking environment
US20050198031A1 (en) 2004-03-04 2005-09-08 Peter Pezaris Method and system for controlling access to user information in a social networking environment
GB0407369D0 (en) 2004-03-31 2004-05-05 British Telecomm Trust tokens
US20120030193A1 (en) 2004-04-14 2012-02-02 Sagi Richberg Method and system for connecting users
US8788592B1 (en) 2004-04-15 2014-07-22 Oracle America, Inc. System and method for customizable e-mail message notes
EP1747548A4 (en) 2004-05-17 2009-08-05 Visible Path Corp System and method for enforcing privacy in social networks
US20060031368A1 (en) * 2004-06-16 2006-02-09 Decone Ian D Presence management in a push to talk system
US7725463B2 (en) 2004-06-30 2010-05-25 Microsoft Corporation System and method for generating normalized relevance measure for analysis of search results
US7917587B2 (en) 2004-07-30 2011-03-29 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for prioritizing communications based on interpersonal relationships
US11283885B2 (en) * 2004-10-19 2022-03-22 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. System and method for location based matching and promotion
WO2006044939A2 (en) 2004-10-19 2006-04-27 Rosen James S System and method for location based social networking
US7324957B2 (en) * 2004-10-21 2008-01-29 Soundstarts, Inc. Proximal advertising using hand-held communication devices
US20060212931A1 (en) 2005-03-02 2006-09-21 Markmonitor, Inc. Trust evaluation systems and methods
US9516470B1 (en) 2007-03-08 2016-12-06 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System and method for providing advertising based on mobile device travel patterns
WO2011119859A2 (en) 2010-03-24 2011-09-29 Hameed Khan Proximity-based social networking
US9319390B2 (en) 2010-03-26 2016-04-19 Nokia Technologies Oy Method and apparatus for providing a trust level to access a resource
US8880555B2 (en) 2010-12-17 2014-11-04 Facebook, Inc. Ranking of address book contacts based on social proximity

Patent Citations (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7890581B2 (en) * 1996-12-16 2011-02-15 Ip Holdings, Inc. Matching network system for mobile devices
US6571279B1 (en) * 1997-12-05 2003-05-27 Pinpoint Incorporated Location enhanced information delivery system
US20050032528A1 (en) * 1998-11-17 2005-02-10 Dowling Eric Morgan Geographical web browser, methods, apparatus and systems
US6486892B1 (en) * 1999-04-07 2002-11-26 Joseph L. Stern System and method for accessing, manipulating and viewing internet and non-internet related information and for controlling networked devices
US6549768B1 (en) * 1999-08-24 2003-04-15 Nokia Corp Mobile communications matching system
US6741188B1 (en) * 1999-10-22 2004-05-25 John M. Miller System for dynamically pushing information to a user utilizing global positioning system
US6819919B1 (en) * 1999-10-29 2004-11-16 Telcontar Method for providing matching and introduction services to proximate mobile users and service providers
US6701362B1 (en) * 2000-02-23 2004-03-02 Purpleyogi.Com Inc. Method for creating user profiles
US20020013735A1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2002-01-31 Arti Arora Electronic matching engine for matching desired characteristics with item attributes
US20030063072A1 (en) * 2000-04-04 2003-04-03 Brandenberg Carl Brock Method and apparatus for scheduling presentation of digital content on a personal communication device
US6618593B1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2003-09-09 Rovingradar, Inc. Location dependent user matching system
US20020068583A1 (en) * 2000-12-04 2002-06-06 Murray Bradley A. Wireless communication system for location based schedule management and method therefor
US20020111154A1 (en) * 2001-02-14 2002-08-15 Eldering Charles A. Location based delivery
US20020111172A1 (en) * 2001-02-14 2002-08-15 Dewolf Frederik M. Location based profiling
US20020138433A1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2002-09-26 Ncr Corporation Advertising terminal
US20030014373A1 (en) * 2001-07-13 2003-01-16 Damir Perge System and method for matching business partners
US7035863B2 (en) * 2001-11-13 2006-04-25 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method, system and program product for populating a user profile based on existing user profiles
US7043497B1 (en) * 2001-11-16 2006-05-09 Ncr Corp. System and method for capturing and storing web site visitor profile information in a data warehouse
US8462048B2 (en) * 2001-12-31 2013-06-11 Rdpa, Llc Satellite positioning system and method for determining the demographics of individuals passing retail locations
US7203674B2 (en) * 2002-02-15 2007-04-10 Morgan Cohen Method and system to connect and match users in an electronic dating service
US20030220982A1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2003-11-27 Luu Tran Dynamic location storage and retrieval in a wireless portal server
US7071842B1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2006-07-04 Earthcomber, Llc System and method for locating and notifying a user of a person, place or thing having attributes matching the user's stated preferences
US20040002897A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Vishik Claire Svetlana In-store (on premises) targeted marketing services for wireless customers
US7243105B2 (en) * 2002-12-31 2007-07-10 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Method and apparatus for automatic updating of user profiles
US7844283B2 (en) * 2003-06-10 2010-11-30 Yahoo! Inc. Method of providing location based information to a mobile terminal within a communications network
US20050038876A1 (en) * 2003-08-15 2005-02-17 Aloke Chaudhuri System and method for instant match based on location, presence, personalization and communication
US20050048961A1 (en) * 2003-08-27 2005-03-03 Jambo Networks, Inc. System and method for providing communication services to mobile device users
US7346839B2 (en) * 2003-09-30 2008-03-18 Google Inc. Information retrieval based on historical data
US20050210387A1 (en) * 2003-10-06 2005-09-22 Mcyyappan Alagappan System and method for the aggregation and matching of information
US20050131716A1 (en) * 2003-12-15 2005-06-16 Hanan Martin D. Method for determining compatibility
US20050165762A1 (en) * 2004-01-26 2005-07-28 Thinkbig, Inc., A California Corporation User event matching system and method
US20050177614A1 (en) * 2004-02-09 2005-08-11 Parallel-Pro, Llc Method and computer system for matching mobile device users for business and social networking
US20050174975A1 (en) * 2004-02-11 2005-08-11 Vicinity Messaging Corporation System and method for wireless communication between previously known and unknown users
US20050198305A1 (en) * 2004-03-04 2005-09-08 Peter Pezaris Method and system for associating a thread with content in a social networking environment
US7530021B2 (en) * 2004-04-01 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation Instant meeting preparation architecture
US20050228860A1 (en) * 2004-04-12 2005-10-13 Kimmo Hamynen Methods and apparatus for geographically based Web services
US20130196690A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2013-08-01 Dennis P. Crowley Location-Based Social Software for Mobile Devices
US7593740B2 (en) * 2004-05-12 2009-09-22 Google, Inc. Location-based social software for mobile devices
US20050256755A1 (en) * 2004-05-17 2005-11-17 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for providing automobile marketing research information
US7797390B2 (en) * 2004-08-12 2010-09-14 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for disappearing ink for text messaging
US20060047825A1 (en) * 2004-08-24 2006-03-02 Jack Steenstra Location based service (LBS) system and method for creating a social network
US20060195361A1 (en) * 2005-10-01 2006-08-31 Outland Research Location-based demographic profiling system and method of use

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Kaasinen ("User Needs for Location-Aware Mobile Services." August 1, 2002. http://www.techkwondo.com/external/pdf/reports/user_need_for_location_mobile_svcs.pdf). *
Maass ("Location-aware Mobile Applications Based on Directory Services." 1998. https://impact.asu.edu/~cse591uc/papers/p157-maass.pdf). *
Munson ("Location-Based Notification as a General-Purpose Service." September 28, 2002. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=570713). *

Cited By (55)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10275787B2 (en) 2004-12-06 2019-04-30 Capital One Services, Llc Systems, methods and computer readable medium for wireless solicitations
US10332143B2 (en) * 2004-12-06 2019-06-25 Capital One Services, Llc Systems, methods and computer readable medium for wireless solicitations
US11157934B2 (en) 2004-12-06 2021-10-26 Capital One Services, Llc Systems, methods and computer readable medium for wireless solicitations
US20140289031A1 (en) * 2004-12-06 2014-09-25 Capital One Financial Corporation Systems, methods and computer readable medium for wireless solicitations
US20130156173A1 (en) * 2006-01-23 2013-06-20 Icall, Inc. System, method and computer program product for extracting user profiles and habits based on speech recognition and calling history for telephone system advertising
US9741055B2 (en) 2006-01-23 2017-08-22 Iii Holdings 1, Llc System, method and computer program product for extracting user profiles and habits based on speech recognition and calling history for telephone system advertising
US10311485B2 (en) 2006-01-23 2019-06-04 Iii Holdings 1, Llc System, method and computer program product for extracting user profiles and habits based on speech recognition and calling history for telephone system advertising
US11144965B2 (en) 2006-01-23 2021-10-12 Iii Holdings 1, Llc System, method and computer program product for extracting user profiles and habits based on speech recognition and calling history for telephone system advertising
US10607259B2 (en) 2006-01-23 2020-03-31 Iii Holdings 1, Llc System, method and computer program product for extracting user profiles and habits based on speech recognition and calling history for telephone system advertising
US9053496B2 (en) * 2006-01-23 2015-06-09 Iii Holdings 1, Llc System, method and computer program product for extracting user profiles and habits based on speech recognition and calling history for telephone system advertising
US8799068B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2014-08-05 Facebook, Inc. Social advertisements and other informational messages on a social networking website, and advertising model for same
US9984392B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2018-05-29 Facebook, Inc. Social advertisements and other informational messages on a social networking website, and advertising model for same
US10585550B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2020-03-10 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored story creation user interface
US8812360B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2014-08-19 Facebook, Inc. Social advertisements based on actions on an external system
US10068258B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2018-09-04 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored stories and news stories within a newsfeed of a social networking system
US9823806B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2017-11-21 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored story creation user interface
US9058089B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2015-06-16 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored-stories-unit creation from organic activity stream
US9098165B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2015-08-04 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored story creation using inferential targeting
US8775247B2 (en) * 2007-11-05 2014-07-08 Facebook, Inc. Presenting personalized social content on a web page of an external system
US9984391B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2018-05-29 Facebook, Inc. Social advertisements and other informational messages on a social networking website, and advertising model for same
US9123079B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2015-09-01 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored stories unit creation from organic activity stream
US8825888B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2014-09-02 Facebook, Inc. Monitoring activity stream for sponsored story creation
US8655987B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2014-02-18 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored-stories-unit creation from organic activity stream
US9740360B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2017-08-22 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored story user interface
US8775325B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2014-07-08 Facebook, Inc. Presenting personalized social content on a web page of an external system
US9645702B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2017-05-09 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored story sharing user interface
US8676894B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2014-03-18 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored-stories-unit creation from organic activity stream
US20120101898A1 (en) * 2007-11-05 2012-04-26 Kendall Timothy A Presenting personalized social content on a web page of an external system
US9742822B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2017-08-22 Facebook, Inc. Sponsored stories unit creation from organic activity stream
US11540103B2 (en) * 2007-11-27 2022-12-27 Wix.Com Ltd. Method, device and system for creating a virtual local social network
US20230188966A1 (en) * 2007-11-27 2023-06-15 Ido Gaver Method, Device and System For Creating A Virtual Local Social Network
US20200112843A1 (en) * 2007-11-27 2020-04-09 Loyalblocks Ltd. Method, Device and System For Creating A Virtual Local Social Network
US9990652B2 (en) 2010-12-15 2018-06-05 Facebook, Inc. Targeting social advertising to friends of users who have interacted with an object associated with the advertising
US20170252657A1 (en) * 2011-09-22 2017-09-07 Empire Technology Development Llc Matching sponsored game content to location by genre and playability
US9787628B2 (en) * 2011-12-09 2017-10-10 Facebook, Inc. Mobile ad hoc networking
US10142281B2 (en) 2011-12-09 2018-11-27 Facebook, Inc. Mobile ad hoc networking
EP2798517A4 (en) * 2011-12-27 2015-08-12 Tata Consultancy Services Ltd A method and system for creating an intelligent social network between plurality of devices
US20150120814A1 (en) * 2012-04-25 2015-04-30 Yong Seog SON Mobile terminal and direct service providing method thereof
US8838093B2 (en) * 2012-05-04 2014-09-16 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and device for monitoring wireless terminal behavior according to terminal type
US20130294263A1 (en) * 2012-05-04 2013-11-07 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Method and Device for Monitoring Wireless Terminal Behavior According to Terminal Type
US9202016B2 (en) * 2012-08-15 2015-12-01 Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc. Management of private information
US20140053242A1 (en) * 2012-08-15 2014-02-20 Verizon Patent And Licensing, Inc. Management of private information
US20140289140A1 (en) * 2013-03-21 2014-09-25 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Systems and methods of opportunistically identifying networking prospects
US10445325B2 (en) 2014-02-18 2019-10-15 Google Llc Proximity detection
WO2015126846A1 (en) * 2014-02-18 2015-08-27 Google Inc. Proximity detection
US20170230363A1 (en) * 2014-05-09 2017-08-10 Behaviometrics Ab Method, computer program, and system for identifying multiple users based on their behavior
US10440019B2 (en) * 2014-05-09 2019-10-08 Behaviometrics Ag Method, computer program, and system for identifying multiple users based on their behavior
US10068076B1 (en) * 2014-05-09 2018-09-04 Behaviometrics Ab Behavioral authentication system using a behavior server for authentication of multiple users based on their behavior
EP3161734A1 (en) * 2014-06-24 2017-05-03 Martin Cudzilo A method for providing a mobile location based information service
US9767645B1 (en) * 2014-07-11 2017-09-19 ProSports Technologies, LLC Interactive gaming at a venue
US9571444B2 (en) * 2015-03-02 2017-02-14 Dewmobile, Inc. Building a proximate social networking database based on relative distance profiling of two or more operably coupled computers
US9270634B1 (en) * 2015-03-02 2016-02-23 Dewmobile, Inc. Building a proximate social networking database based on relative distance profiling of two or more operably coupled computers
US20170154051A1 (en) * 2015-12-01 2017-06-01 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Hashmaps
WO2018161105A1 (en) * 2017-03-10 2018-09-13 Paul David Lomas Shared contextual data transfer between preconfigured location devices
US11240220B2 (en) * 2018-06-13 2022-02-01 Paypal, Inc. Systems and methods for user authentication based on multiple devices

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20060161599A1 (en) 2006-07-20
US11272020B2 (en) 2022-03-08
US20110282750A1 (en) 2011-11-17
US11283885B2 (en) 2022-03-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11005955B2 (en) Social network for monitoring user activity
US11283885B2 (en) System and method for location based matching and promotion
US11741490B2 (en) Verification of redemption of an electronic offer
US20210019786A1 (en) System for providing a service to venues where people perform transactions
US7788188B2 (en) System for providing a service to venues where people aggregate
US6542750B2 (en) Method and system for selectively connecting mobile users based on physical proximity
US6542749B2 (en) Method and system for connecting proximately located mobile users based on compatible attributes
US9564025B1 (en) Systems and methods for indicating a user state in a social network
US6542748B2 (en) Method and system for automatically initiating a telecommunications connection based on distance
US6539232B2 (en) Method and system for connecting mobile users based on degree of separation
US10382538B1 (en) System and method for creating a dynamic social network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: YAHOO HOLDINGS, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:YAHOO! INC.;REEL/FRAME:042963/0211

Effective date: 20170613

AS Assignment

Owner name: OATH INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:YAHOO HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:045240/0310

Effective date: 20171231

AS Assignment

Owner name: YAHOO! INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ROSEN, JAMES S.;REEL/FRAME:045490/0853

Effective date: 20070328

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION

AS Assignment

Owner name: VERIZON PATENT AND LICENSING INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:VERIZON MEDIA INC.;REEL/FRAME:057453/0431

Effective date: 20210801