Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2030524 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateFeb 11, 1936
Filing dateOct 12, 1933
Priority dateOct 12, 1933
Publication numberUS 2030524 A, US 2030524A, US-A-2030524, US2030524 A, US2030524A
InventorsLambert Raynor
Original AssigneeLambert Raynor
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Orthodontia molding device
US 2030524 A
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Feb. 11, 1936. R, LAMBERT 2,030,524\

ORTHODONTIA MOLDING DEVICE Filed OC. l2, 1955 Patented Feb. 11, 1936 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 3 Claims.

My invention relates to devices or apparatus to facilitate the duplication of models used*` in orthodontia. v

The main object is to provide simple, convenient and reliable means to facilitate the duplication of such models.

The standard form of model consists of a base plate usually of plaster and the duplication of the parts of the teeth and adjacent anatomy commonly formed of harder material called stone. On account of the shape and arrangement of teeth commonly found in this type of workit is very difficult to duplicate the models. It is therefore customary to form molds of a gelatinous or rubbery-like resilient compound which is fluid when heated and has a stiff jelly-like consistency when cold. On account of the character of this gelatinous mold it is necessary to handle the mold very carefully and even with the most careful handling the mold may become deformed or broken.

I have therefore sought to provide a frame for casting the mold which frame may in turn be employed to hold the mold when casting the duplicate of the model.

For this purpose I provide a frame which is essentially octagonal and formed of metal which is polished on its inner surface.

This frame is formed of two parts and provided with means for securing the two parts together in a definite relation. The inner walls are provided with projections so arranged as to interlock with the gelatinous mold and yet permit the separation and attachment without breaking the mold.

Figs. 1 and 2 show the frames for the models of upper and lower teeth respectively, and

Fig. 2 shows the original model in the position it would occupy in the frame when pouring the composition for the mold.

Fig. 3 is a sectional view on the plane of the line 3-3 of Fig. 2.

Fig. 4 is a sectional View showing the model with the gelatinous mold cast upon it but with the frame removed.

Fig. 5 is a sectional View showing the mold distorted and the model being withdrawn.

Fig. 6 is a plan view of the mold with the frame opened out and about to be reapplied toit.

Fig. '7 is a sectional View showing the frame applied to the mold ready for the pouring of the plaster for making the duplicate of the model.

The frame is formed of metal with the two parts I 0 and II which are duplicates of each other and adapted to be secured together for Cil two spring clips I4 having lrecesses or perfora- 10 Y tions to receive the ball shaped member I5. The spring clips I4 are carried by one end of the frame member I0 andthe ballV member of the catch is carried by the adjacent end of the other frame member II. This ballmember is preferably formed as an extension of the arm I6 which extends around the end of the member II into position to snap in between the clips I4 so as to yiedingly but tightly hold the parts together. To facilitate the separation or release of the 20 catch members I prefer to provide linger pieces such as I'I and I8 adjacent the ends of the frame members opposite the hinge pin I2.

The inside walls of the frame are provided with a number of inwardly projecting lugs such as I9, 20, 2I and 22 which are preferably wedgeshaped in section as shown in Fig. 3 and so shaped that they may be swung into and out of engagement with the gelatinous mold without tearing or breaking it. Y

The original model consists of the base vplate 25 with the projecting portions 26 which represent the teeth and gums. A recess 21 is provided within the periphery of the teeth models.

`To' form the mold the parts of the frame are 35 connected together as shown in Fig. 2v and the frame is placed on a smooth support as shown in Fig. 3. The original model is then centered within the frame leaving a substantial space all around the model. The gelatinous composition 40 in fluid form is then poured into the frame around and over the model and allowed to harden and form a mold body 28. The parts of the frame are then separated so that the mold and the model may be removed. 'Ihe imprint of the lugs 45 in the mold leaves the recesses 29.

The original model 25 is then carefully extracted by bending and twisting and loosening the resilient mold so as to leave the recess 30 which constitutes the impression from the original model. When the gelatinous mold is released it reassumes its form as originally cast upon the original model.

I1; will be noted that the angular arrangement 55 of the sides of the frame forms interior corners 3| and that the mold as cast has corresponding angular projections 32 which exactly t these corners.

When the original model has been removed from the mold the mold is again placed on the table or smooth plate of glass or the like in the position as shown in Fig. 6. The opened out frame is then laid upon the plate or table and the parts of the frame pressed together about the mold body.

The angular corners 3l are thus made to fit the corresponding corners 32 of the gelatinous mold and the lugs such as 2l are tted back into the corresponding recesses 29. It will be appreciated that by reason of the gelatinous character of the mold the repositioning of the frame about the mold must be done Very carefully so that the mold will not be distorted in any Way, as distortion would of course change the shape of the recess 3U.

After the frame has been reapplied to the mold as shown in Fig. '7 the plastic self-hardening composition is poured into the mold bit by bit and worked down into the smallest cavities by shaking and jarring the frame with the contained mold. The interlocking of the lugs 2 I; etc., with the material of the mold prevents the mold from being displaced or loosened or distorted in this shaking and settling action.

It will be seen from the foregoing that the lugs 2l, etc., should be smooth and wedge shaped in section as well as in plan so` that they will provide a maximum holding facility and at the. same time produce a minimum likelihood of fracture or cracking of the mold body.

These lugs may be either integrally formed with the material of the frame or soldered, riveted or otherwise secured thereto.

After the cavity 30 in the mold has been filled with the plastic composition, the composition is allowed to harden so as to form'the desired duplicate of the original model. The parts of the frame are then separated and the mold with the newly cast model removed. The mold is then removed from the model in the same manner as the original model was removed from the mold although of course if the mold is not to be used again it is not necessary to exercise the same degree of care in separating the mold from the duplicated model.

While it is possible to form the frame of sheet metal it should be quite heavy and substantially inflexible so that it will not become distorted in use and so that there is little likelihood of any pressure being brought to bear upon the gelatinous mold as would be possible if the frame were resilient o-r of variable size.

I have particularly shown and described the invention as applied to the formation of a duplicate model of an upper set of teeth. It will be understood that the frame shown in Fig. 1 is intended for the duplication of the models of lower teeth, the slight difference in form corresponding with the more or less standardized forms of models used in orthodontia.

The sides of the frame are preferably of uniform height and the lugs are located in the central plane so that the frame may be inverted or reversed with respect to the table and with respect to the mold itself. The frame should be enoughvlarger than the model to provide adequate side-wall-producing space for the gelatinous mold and yet not waste material which is rather expensive.

kI claim.:

l. A frame for duplicating dental models comprising rigid parts xedly hinged together and having walls of uniform height to enclose a model and leave space around the sides and over the teeth of the model for the reception of a gelatinous mold-forming substance, said frame having integral means for repositioning the mold after the model has been removed and said walls having a smooth inner surface, and integral inwardly projecting wedge shaped lugs on the inner surfaces of the walls adapted to hold the solidified mold when plaster is being poured and shaken in.

2. A frame for forming dental molds from elastic compositions comprising two angular parts xedly hinged together at one end of each and having a spring catch detachably connecting the opposite free ends, a finger piece connected to each free end adjacent the catch, said parts having smooth inner Walls of uniform height open at the top and bottom and reversible and having integrally formed and inwardly projecting Wedge shaped lugs arranged in the central plane of the frame and parallel with the top and bottom.

3. A frame for duplicating dental models comprising two rigid parts flXedly hinged together to enclose a model and leave space of substantially uniform width for the reception of a gelatinous mold-forming substance, said frame providing corners for repositioning the mold after the model has been removed, said parts having smooth inner surfaces and inwardly projecting integral lugs of wedge shape on said inner surfaces and between the corners adapted to hold the solidified mold when plaster is being poured i and shaken in.

RAYNOR LAMBERT.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2430224 *Jun 29, 1945Nov 4, 1947Stromberg Carlson CoMethod and apparatus for moistureproofing electrical devices
US2491046 *Feb 25, 1947Dec 13, 1949Anna HoraDental flask
US2554960 *Nov 2, 1949May 29, 1951Leo ScharfeDental flask
US2574593 *Dec 30, 1949Nov 13, 1951Leo ScharfeDental flask
US2574594 *Jul 10, 1950Nov 13, 1951Leo ScharfeInsert for dental flasks
US2948017 *Jul 16, 1957Aug 9, 1960Stephen Chase GeoffreyMeans for producing a plaster or like cast
US3161917 *Apr 12, 1963Dec 22, 1964Wiland LawrenceMolding flask for dental impressions
US3217067 *Feb 1, 1962Nov 9, 1965Tencate Raymond LProcess for forming dentures
US3353220 *Jan 28, 1964Nov 21, 1967Lenoble RaymondFlexible mold for molding a frame onto a pane
US4195046 *May 4, 1978Mar 25, 1980Kesling Peter CMethod for molding air holes into a tooth positioning and retaining appliance
US4365783 *Aug 13, 1981Dec 28, 1982Kesling Peter CMold for making a tooth positioning and retaining appliance with air holes
US6848898 *Aug 29, 2001Feb 1, 2005Itzhak ShoherAdaptation device for molding a dental material
US7578667 *Sep 6, 2007Aug 25, 2009Ivoclar Vivadent AgDental mold flask
Classifications
U.S. Classification425/175, 425/180, 425/DIG.440
International ClassificationA61C13/18
Cooperative ClassificationY10S425/044, A61C13/04
European ClassificationA61C13/04