Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2293839 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateAug 25, 1942
Filing dateJun 25, 1940
Priority dateJun 25, 1940
Publication numberUS 2293839 A, US 2293839A, US-A-2293839, US2293839 A, US2293839A
InventorsLinder Ernest G
Original AssigneeRca Corp
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Centimeter wave absorber
US 2293839 A
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Aug. 25, 1942. E. G. LINDER 7 2,293,339

CENTIMETER WAVE ABSORBER 7 Filed June 25, 1940 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I 11111 Patented Aug. 2, i942 STAES PTE oFFica CENTKMETER WAVE ABSORBER Ernest G. Linden, Philadelphia, Pa, assignor to Radio Corporation of America, a corporation of Delaware This invention relates to the absorption of ultra high frequency radio, energy, and has for its principal object the provision of means for preventing the reflection of radio frequency energy from objects, and for minimizing standing wave effects due to such reflections.

It is well known that ultra high frequency waves of radio energy, particularly those in the quasi-optical spectrum, are reflected from conducting and non-conducting surfaces in a manner similar to the reflection of light and sound energy. In a radio transmitter, for example, ultra high frequency energy is radiated from those parts which are at a high radio frequency potential. Some of this energy is-reflected back to the transmitter and induces currents in the various circuits which may be in or out of phase with the currents normally flowing therein, or which may have some intermediate phase, depending on the distance traveled by the reflected wave.

Where the frequency is very high, the distances involved may be" equal to many wavelengths. It will be appreciated, therefore, that the currents induced in the circuits by the reflected energy may modify the amplitude of the normal currents considerably. This effect is particularly serious where the signal source is frequency or amplitude modulated. In the former case a change of frequency changes the .phase of the reflected energy, and thus changes the amplitude of the resultant current in the transmitter circuit. The resultant amplitude modulation is not desirable. In the latter case,-the signal is seriously distorted since the effect of the reflected energy is different for each side band frequency. One solution to this difiiculty has been described in a copending application of Rene A. Braden, Serial No. 265,172, filed March 31, 1939, in which shields are placed very near all high frequency circuits so that there can be no substantial phase shift in the reflected energy. The present invention, however, proposes to accomplish the same result by covering reflecting surfaces with an absorbent material which produces a deadening efi'ect similar to that produced by acoustical absorbing materials.

view of an. absorbing panel;' and Figure 3 is a view of a construction brick having high frequency absorbing properties.

Referring now to Fig. 1, an ultra high frequency modulated oscillator 5, or other source of high frequency energy is mounted in a grounded metallic shielding box 1, closed on all sides, or substantially so, in the conventional manner. When the dimensions of the box are of the order of the wavelength, or larger, of the radio frequency oscillator, waves radiated from the oscillator will cause standing waves to be produced within the box. At certain frequencies electrical resonance is established with the result that a very high field intensity is produced within the enclosed space. This is called a resonant cavity condition, and is well known, The phenomena may be put .to many uses, but it is the purpose of the present invention to provide means for preventing such a condition from occurring when it is not desired, not meif'iely by detuning the cavity, since this is only e ective at a particular frequency, butby absorbing the energy.

For this purpose small masses of fibrous conducting material 9 are inserted more or less at random within the shield 1. It is not necessary to cover the entire inner surface of the shield with absorbing material, although this may be done, but a sufiicient amount should be used to insure the desired result. The absorbers themselves are loosely packed fibres of steel, copper,

' or other conducting mate-rial.- I have found that This invention will be better understood from the following descriptionwhen considered in connection with the accompanying drawing, and its scope is indicated by the appended claims.

Referring to the drawing, Figure 1 illustrates a. shielding compartment which includes a high frequency absorbing material to prevent resonant cavity effects; Figure 2 is a cross sectional container whose length may be varied. A volt meter is mounted within the container to indicate the field intensity therein. The ratio of the square'root of the maximum to the minimum field intensity is then determined as the container is adjusted through resonance and anti-resonance. Alternatively the frequency of the. signal may be varied to determine this ratio. This process is repeated as the absorbing material is added until there is substantially no like may be constructed. Test cages are used to shield radio receivers and the like from signals and electrical disturbance which would otherwise make measurements impossible. A cage constructed in the manner suggested would be free from reflections set up by the test apparatus it-'- self, and the absorbent material will also act as an effective shield against outside disturbances.

Another form herein proposed is illustrated in Fig. 3. In this case the absorbing fibres are embedded uniformly throughout a brick of insulating material such as Bakelite, styrol, or any of the well known plastics. The advantages of this arrangement are that the fibres are prevented from packing, they are protected from the moisture, which is particularly important where steel or iron fibres are used, and that the brick is permanent and easy to handle. The insulating material should have a dielectric constant as near as possible to that of air in order to minimize reflections which may occur directly from the surface of the brick. An alternative arrangement would be to coat the individual fibres with a protective coating of styrol to prevent rusting.

I have thus described a new system for reducing the reflection ofultra high frequency energy and for reducing standing waves in a shielding container. Many further modifications of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art. -This invention is not to be limited to the specific embodiments which have been herein described but only by the prior art and the spirit of the appended claims.

I claim as my invention:

1. In an ultra high frequency radio device, a container in which standing waves of ultra high radio frequency energy are formed and absorbing means comprising a mass oi. loosely packe. flbrousconductors positioned within said con tainer for minimizing said standing waves.

2. In an ultra high frequency radio device, container in which standing wavesof energy a1- formed, and an absorbing material in said con tainer for minimizing said standing waves, sail material comprising a mass of conducting fibres 3..In an ultra high frequency radio device, 9.! oscillator, shielding means for said oscillator, am a fibrous conducting material between said oscil lator and said shielding means for absorbing ra diations from said oscillator.

4..In a radio device, a source of ultra higl radio frequency oscillations, shielding means 1'0: said source, said means comprising a packed mas: of fibrous conductors.

5. Ina radio device, a source of ultra high ra- -dio frequency oscillations, shielding means fOl said source, and absorbing means between saic oscillator and said shield comprised of a loosel: packed mass of fibrous conducting material fol minimizing reflections from said shield.

6. A non-reflecting shielding material for ultra high radio frequencies comprising a continuum mass of fibrous conductors enclosin the object tc be shielded.

'1. An absorbent shield for ultra high radio frequencies comprising a continuous mass of fibrous conductors covered with an insulating material enclosing the object to be shielded.

8. In an ultra high frequency radio device, a container in which standing waves of energy are formed, and an absorbing material in said container for minimizing said standing waves. said material comprising a mass of conductin fibres of electromagnetic material.

9. In a radio device, a source of ultra high radio frequency oscillations, shielding means for said source, said means comprising a" packed .mass of fibrous conductors of electromagnetic material.

ERNEST G. LINDER.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2423461 *May 18, 1945Jul 8, 1947Gen ElectricAttenuator for ultra high frequencies
US2464006 *Apr 28, 1944Mar 8, 1949Philco CorpRadio wave absorption device
US2465719 *Apr 29, 1943Mar 29, 1949Rca CorpApplications of high loss dielectrics to wave guide transmission systems
US2474384 *Apr 28, 1944Jun 28, 1949Philco CorpHigh-frequency radiant energy absorbing device
US2478463 *Jul 28, 1947Aug 9, 1949Hartford Nat Bank & Trust CoBeacon transmitter
US2490782 *Apr 5, 1946Dec 13, 1949Collup Doyle EAntenna testing shield
US2497094 *Feb 28, 1945Feb 14, 1950Sperry CorpMicrowave apparatus
US2509045 *Nov 26, 1947May 23, 1950Collins Radio CoUltra high frequency radiation indicating system
US2531183 *Jan 23, 1945Nov 21, 1950Wisner Raymond RMeans for grounding cables
US2551398 *May 17, 1946May 1, 1951Sperry CorpApparatus for measuring ultra high frequency field distributions
US2587055 *Dec 6, 1946Feb 26, 1952Bell Telephone Labor IncElectrical cavity resonator for microwaves
US2591486 *Dec 31, 1949Apr 1, 1952Rca CorpElectromagnetic horn antenna
US2599944 *May 11, 1943Jun 10, 1952Us NavyAbsorbent body for electromagnetic waves
US2627600 *Aug 19, 1946Feb 3, 1953Robert H RinesMethod of and apparatus for producing visual likenesses with the aid of radio waves
US2656535 *Aug 6, 1945Oct 20, 1953Neher Leland KNonreflecting background for testing microwave equipment
US2805275 *Jul 11, 1951Sep 3, 1957Philips CorpShrouded electro-magnetic apparatus
US2918671 *Jan 15, 1946Dec 22, 1959Otto HalpernIdentifying reflector with reflection dissymmetry
US2923934 *Feb 2, 1960 Method and means for minimizing reflec-
US2951247 *Feb 19, 1946Aug 30, 1960Halpern OttoIsotropic absorbing layers
US2992425 *Oct 12, 1945Jul 11, 1961Du PontNondirectional, metal-backed, electromagnetic radiation-absorptive films
US3007160 *Nov 29, 1957Oct 31, 1961Halpern OttoMethod of reducing reflection of incident electromagnetic waves
US3142028 *May 31, 1962Jul 21, 1964Hughes Aircraft CoWaveguide stop-band filter utilizing hybrid circuit with lossy resonant cavities in branch arms
US3152328 *Nov 21, 1957Oct 6, 1964Mcmillan Corp Of North CarolinMicrowave radiation absorber comprising spaced parallel resistance discs
US3208013 *Jul 31, 1961Sep 21, 1965Avco CorpElectromagnetic wave absorber comprising inherently resonant filamentary fibers suspended in dielectric
US3328509 *Jul 20, 1966Jun 27, 1967Boeing CoApparatus for shielding against lowfrequency electromagnetic energy
US3406126 *Dec 7, 1966Oct 15, 1968Avco CorpConductive synthetic resin composition containing carbon filaments
US3568196 *Feb 6, 1969Mar 2, 1971Raytheon CoRadio frequency absorber
US4725490 *May 5, 1986Feb 16, 1988Hoechst Celanese CorporationHigh magnetic permeability composites containing fibers with ferrite fill
US4728554 *May 5, 1986Mar 1, 1988Hoechst Celanese CorporationFiber structure and method for obtaining tuned response to high frequency electromagnetic radiation
US4794396 *Apr 5, 1985Dec 27, 1988Sanders Associates, Inc.Antenna coupler verification device and method
US5075867 *Dec 23, 1988Dec 24, 1991Bull Hn Information Systems Inc.Method for limiting spurious resonant cavity effects in electronic equipment
US5099242 *Jan 4, 1990Mar 24, 1992The Trustees Of The University Of PennsylvaniaNovel shielding, reflection and scattering control using chiral materials
US5202688 *May 21, 1991Apr 13, 1993Brunswick CorporationBulk RF absorber apparatus and method
US5313371 *Jan 14, 1993May 17, 1994Motorola, Inc.Shielding apparatus for non-conductive electronic circuit packages
US5561428 *Feb 12, 1985Oct 1, 1996General AtomicsElectromagnetic radiation absorber and method for the production thereof
US7688246 *Sep 9, 2005Mar 30, 2010Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.Radio wave absorber, electromagnetic field measurement system and radiated immunity system
US8063812Mar 1, 2010Nov 22, 2011Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.Radio wave absorber, electromagnetic field measurement system and radiated immunity system
US8072366Mar 1, 2010Dec 6, 2011Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.Radio wave absorber, electromagnetic field measurement system and radiated immunity system
US8279104Jul 28, 2011Oct 2, 2012Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd.Radio wave absorber, electromagnetic field measurement system and radiated immunity system
WO1990004210A1 *Oct 6, 1989Apr 19, 1990Univ PennsylvaniaElectromagnetically non-reflective materials
WO2007037696A1 *Apr 11, 2006Apr 5, 2007Kongsberg Maritime AsSheltering device for radar type liquid level measuring apparatus
Classifications
U.S. Classification331/67, 174/388, 333/12, 342/1, 439/607.1, 333/17.1, 333/22.00R, 333/81.00B, 361/818, 336/84.00R, 333/227
International ClassificationH05K9/00
Cooperative ClassificationH05K9/009
European ClassificationH05K9/00M4F