Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2302021 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateNov 17, 1942
Filing dateNov 6, 1941
Priority dateNov 6, 1941
Publication numberUS 2302021 A, US 2302021A, US-A-2302021, US2302021 A, US2302021A
InventorsHoward G Freeman
Original AssigneeRockwood Sprinkler Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Nozzle for generating fog
US 2302021 A
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

NOV. 17, 1942. F AN 4 2,302,021

NOZZLE FOR GENERATING FOG Filed Nov. 6, 1941 2 Sheets-Sheet l Fly. 5 V3 Fig.6 V4

V; I Vi Inventor I Viiifl-esxs Patented Nov. 17, 19420 NOZZLE FOR GENERATING FOG Howard G. Freeman, Worcester, Mass., assignor to Rockwood Sprinkler Company, Worcester, Mass, a corporation of Massachusetts 2 Application November 6, 1941, Serial No. 418,003

5 Claims.

The present invention relates to nozzles for generating a fine mist or fog, especially suitable for use in extinguishing fires.

Artificial fogs have been generated by the impingement of streams of water under such conditions that the streams break up into droplets. In general, it has been supposed that the impingement must be external of the body of metal forming the nozzle, and accordingly-such nozzles have been made with orifices or passages arranged to project streams of water which impact at a substantial distance from the surface. .This external impingement, as it may be called, has some disadvantages, particularly in that the passages must be formed with extreme precision in order that the streams may impinge accurately; otherwise, the device will not form a proper fog or will fail to give the desired pattern.

I have discovered that superior results are attained by using properly formed passages which allow an impact of streams primarily within the confines of the body of the nozzle. The fog produced by my improved nozzle is more satisfactory,

in that it consists of smaller and more uniform particles and may be projected farther for any given angle of impingement.

.It has been supposed that the initiation of a spray immediately adjacent to the surface of the nozzle will result in collection of large drops. This I have found to be true in some instances, but if the nozzles are properly constructed according to the present invention, as will hereinafter be described, there is substantially no tendency for large drops to form either in the process of break up or by coalescence on the sur-- face.

In the accompanying drawings, Fig. l is a side elevation in section, and Fig. 2 is a plan view in section of a nozzle according to the present-invention; Figs. 3, 4, 5 and 6 are diagrams illustrating the theory of operation; Fig. 7 is an end view of a multiple-nozzle head according to the present invention; Fig. 8 is a side elevation of the nozzle shown in Fig. '7; and Fig. 9 is a section on line 8-9 of Fig. 7.

The apparatus shown in Fig. 1 comprises a noz I zle head, consisting of a hollow metal body I0,

formed at the base I2 with threads for attaching to a pipe or hose. In the end face, the body is provided with two drilled passages I4, arranged at an angle with respect to each other, here illustrated as an angle of approximately 90. The

two passages M ar accurately drilled so that their centerlines intersect substantially at the surface of the metal body. Suiiicient space is pro excessive turbulence.

vided within the nozzle to allow the water to tively small particles which are projected substantially in a plane, as indicated in Fig. 1.

Fig.2 illustrates the same nozzle turned through an angle of so that the fog pattern is indicated in plan. The angle between the edges of the pattern may be called the angle of dispersion and is designated by This angle depends on the angle of impingement, which is designated as 0 in Fig. 1. In general, the larger the angle of impingement .the larger will be the angle of dispersion. It has been found that a definite relation exists between these two angles, regardless of the size of the passages.

It will be observed that the two passages l4 intersect in an ellipse; as viewed in Fig. 2, the intersection of the pasages is shown as an ellipse, or rather, a half ellipse included within the body of the nozzle head. Likewise, the intersection of each passage with the surface of the body isvan ellipse; that is, the head when viewed from the end exhibits an'opening of true elliptical shape.

The operation of the nozzle above described is not easily explainable. It is, however, possible to develop a theory that satisfactorily explains most of the phenomena of the present invention. This theory is illustrated in Figs. 3 to 6, and is described below. In Fig. 3 are shown two impinging streams I8 and a fog pattern 20 produced thereby. For the immediate purpose of this theory, the streams are shown as existing in space, without regard to the means for producing them. In Fig. 4 the streams are indicated in side view. Each particle of wa ter has a horizontal component of velocity V]. and a vertical component V2. The component V1 may be termed the velocity of pro ection, for reasons that will presently appear. When the streams impinge, the kinetic energy represented I by the velocity V2 is converted into pressure energy. A thin lamina 22 of water at the intersection of the streams may be considered to exist with an internal pressure determined from the' particles, represented at V3 in Fig. 5. By reason pressure was generated by conversion of the kinetic energy represented by V2. In general, the greater the component V2, that is, the greater the energy, the finer will be the break-up.

The foregoing theory also accounts for the fan-shaped dispersion pattern. All. of the particles have the velocity component iii, and the various velocities V3 around the circle may be considered as being uniformly distributed among the various particles. There will be all possible combinations of velocities resulting from the summation of the vector V1 and the several Vss. It will be obvious that such summations result in a fairly uniform distribution of velocities in a sectorial pattern.

In the foregoing analysis, the velocity V1 has been indicated as greater than the magnitude of the velocities V3, whereby the net movement of any particle is forward. For large angles of impingement, however, the converted velocities V3 may exceed the forward velocity V1 in magnitude, whereby some of the particles tend to be projected backward.

With nozzles working on the external impingement principle, where the impact of the streams is at a distance'from the surface of the nozzle head, there may therefore be an actual backward projection which will carry some particles against thev metal'surface. As a consequence, large drops tend to form and drop from the nozzle. Such drops are ,undesirable in fire fighting, not only because they indicate inefficient conversion of water into fog, but also because in the case of oil fires, the falling of drops on the surface of the oil causes splashes which tend to reignite easily.

In the present invention, wherein the nozzle operates under what may be called internal impingement, the lamina is confined around the rear half of its periphery by an elliptical web which is formed at the intersection of the passages M as illustrated in Fig. 2. The disruptive velocities cannot act over the whole circle, as in Fig. 5, but are restricted to a smaller angle, somewhat as indicated by the velocity vectors V4 in Fig. 6. These vectors V4 represent the velocities due to conversion of the internal pressure of the lamina. It is not certain that the vectors are uniformly distributed and are of equal magnitude, and Fig. 6 is not intended to represent the conditions accurately. However, it is clear from this diagram that for any value of internal pressure, the disruptive velocities V4 will begreater than the velocities V: of Fig. 5, because the same amount of energy spreads the particles in a narrower angular pattern. y

when the forward velocity component V1 is added to the various radial components V4, the resulting pattern will show a greater average forward velocity than' in the case of impingement in space. Taking all the factors into consideration, therefore, it has been found that for a given angle of impingement, the particles will be finer and will be projected at higher forward case of external impingement. It will be understood that a high forward velocity of projection of the entire pattern is not always desired, but the forward component Vi can always be reduced by increasing the impingement angle, and this will result in an even finer-break-up of the particles.

The same theoretical considerations indicate the practical necessity of forming the nozzle substantially as indicated in Figs. 1 and 2; namely, with the center lines of the passages intersecting substantially in the surface of the nozzle head. If the intersection is back of the surface, the web formed at the intersection of the passages Will not present a true half-elliptical shape but will include more than half an ellipse. The result will be that the sides of the pattern will be constricted. This constriction, if appreciable, tends to cause the formation of relatively large drops at the sides of the pattern.

If the intersection of the passages is ahead of the surface, the web presents less than a half ellipse, and therefore the velocity diagram of Fig. 6' is not realized. The conditions then theoretically approach those for external impingement, in that there will be some backward projection components in proximity to the metal surface. Since the surface is so close to the point of formation of the fog, the tendency for large drops to form may be actually greater than in the case of true external impingement; moreover, the pattern, insteadlof exhibiting clear velocity and in a narrower sector than in the edges, may become somewhat indefinite in shape.

Definiteness of pattern is one of the characteristi'cs of the present nozzle, and is highly advantageous, in that it permits design and use of several sprays to cover any desired angular spread, with reasonably uniform distribution of Water. In considering definiteness, it will'be understood that no'spray can maintain clear edges for large distances from the nozzle. Owing to friction between the fog particles and the atmosphere, the edges tend to diffuse at some distance from the nozzle, which distance is less, the smaller .the particles. But in any case, with proper construction according to the present invention, the pattern maintains clear edges for a substantial distance, far enough to permit accurate design and predictable performance. An example of a head with multiple nozzle is shown in Figs. '7 to 9, to be described later.

While the intersection of the passages does not have to lie exactly in the surface formed by the.

head of the nozzle, and some deviation therefrom may be permitted, it has been found that the tolerable deviation is notgreat and should preferably not exceed 5% of the diameter of the drilled holes.

With respect to the size of the particles. it will be understood that no method of fog generation will produce particles of exactly uniform size. In general, the'fog pattern will contain particles of a wide range of sizes, which sizes maybe considered as being distributed according to the normal law." Definition of size therefore requires, in any case, consideration of average or mean size. In general, the average particle size depends on the diameter of the passage, and on the water pressure, as well as on the angle of impingement. The greater the size of the passage, the larger will be the particles. For y iven passage, the greater the pressure (that tors being equal, increasing the angle of imof pressure inthe lamina at the intersection oi the streams.

The velocity of projection and the angle of dispersion likewise depend on the foregoing factors. Thus, the velocity or projection and the mean particle size may b .made substantially as desired, for any available water pressure, by proper choice of passage'diameter and angle oi impingement. The pattern may then be designed for any desired spread by combining any number 01 nozzles. Actually passages of different sizes may be usedin combination, as in the construction shown in Figs. -7 to 9. now to be described.

The head comprises a body 24, having threads 2! for attachment to a hose. The body is formed at its end with surfaces which, as viewed in Pig. 9, diverge from each other at an angle of about 25. As viewed in Fig. 8, each face 28 is curved. A set of nozzles is formed in each of the laces 2|. In end view, as indicated in Fig. 7, each face is provided with a large central nozzle 30 formed by intersecting 'pasages /4 inch in diameter, two end nozzl 32 formed by intersecting passages 1; inch in diameter, and intermediate is suilicient for practical purposes. The nozzles may be conveniently made by the method described in the co-pending application of Freeman nozzles ll formed by intersecting passages V, inch in diameter. As shown in Fig. '9, the nozzles are as previously described, with the center lines of their passages intersecting accurately at apoint in the-surface 28. Ridges 38 are formed in the 7 body in back of the end races to lead the water smoothly to the passages.

At the impingement angle indicated in Fig. 9, the several nozzles produce sprays with a spread of approximately 10", whereby each set of five nozzles produces a sectorial pattern or about 50 spread. The arrangement of nozzles as herein shown is illustrative only. In this particular construction the purpose of the large nozzles ill is to obtain a high projection velbcity at a consider-' able distance from the nozzle. The small nozzles 34 produce a fine iog. Nozzles 32 produce droplets of intermediate size, which serve to maintain definite edges of the pattern at a considerable distance from the nozzle. Under a water pressure in excess 0! 30'pounds per square inch, a true iog will be generated by each oi the nozzles, although the mean size or the droplets will vary for the diilerent nozzles.

This type of nozzle is useful as a general pur- Dose portable nozzle for fire fighting. The droplets oi. the several sizes contribute to produce the desired results. For example. with closely'spaced nozzles, the larger droplets from the homes II will tend In other c ses. different nozzle combinations maybeused. For-exampleJnstatlonary installations for oil fires, small nozaxes of uniform size may be preferred, in order to obtain a law oi fine particles with a low projection ,Inany case, the present invention ailords decided advantages over externalimp nsement. In addition to the advantages thereareanumberotpracflcalconslderationsin iavor or nozzles 01 the type described herein.

lnexternalimpingement,extremecaremustbe usedto'drllltheholeasineeevenaslightdevlationmaycamepartlalortotaliailurei mh v tocarr alongthesmalleriogparticleswhich-areemittediromthenozzles-IL and Henclnski, Serial No. 418,004, filed of even date herewith.

It has also been found that holes of the same diameter will pass about 20% less water for the same pressure" than external impingement nozzles. This means that for the same volume, the holes may be measurably increased in diameter, which is an important consideration where any cl ing diillculties are likely to be encountered,

Although the inventlon has been described as embodied in apparatus for generating a fog of water particleait will be understood that it may be applied to any liquid, particularly a liquid useful ior extinguishing fires.

Having thus described my invention, I claim:

l. A nozzle i'or tog generation comprising a hollow body having circular passages inclined from the surface of the body with their center lines intersecting substantially in said-surface to cause streams of liquid to impinge and thereby to break up into fine particles projected forwardly in a definite pattern, the body 0! the nozzle having an internal confining web-defined by the intersection iorwardly in a definite pattern, the body or the nozzle having an internal confining web defined by the intersection of the cylindrical walls of said Passages.

3. A nozzle ior iog generation comprising a a hollow body having drilled circular passages in clined from the surface of the bodywith their center lines intersecting substantially in said surface. said es intersecting substantially in a halt-ellipse included within the body of the nozzle, to cause streams of liquid to impinge and thereby to break upJnto fine particles projected i'orwardlyin a definite pattern.

4. A nozzle for tog generation comprising a hollow body having drilled circular passages inclined from the surface oi the b dy with their center lines intersecting substantially in said surlace, with a tolerable deviation not exceeding 5% or the diameteroi the passages, to cause streams of liquid to impinge and thereby to break up into flne particles projected iorwardly in a definite pattern, the bodyoi the nozzle having an internal confining 'webdefined by the intersection, of the cylindrical walls or said s a es.

' 5. A nozzle head for log generation comprising a hollow body having a plurality of nozzles, each noale comisting or two drilled circular passages with their center lines intersecting substantially in said surface, with a tolerable deviation not exoeedingifi of the diameter oi the es, to cause streams oi liquid to impinge and thereby tobreakupintofineparticlesprolectedi'orwardly previously'mentioned.

inadefinitepattemthebodyotthenczalehavinganinternalconfiningwebdefinedbytheintersection cylindrical walls of saidpassages. HOWARD G. mums.

whereas in the present case. ordinary precision

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2594373 *Mar 3, 1950Apr 29, 1952Christensen Machine CoSheet separator air blast nozzle
US2742326 *Nov 23, 1953Apr 17, 1956Florentino BorgesAtomizer heads
US2915252 *Jan 19, 1955Dec 1, 1959Ajem Lab IncFine droplet dispersing system
US2942790 *Jan 23, 1959Jun 28, 1960Gen ElectricAir-atomizing liquid spray nozzle
US3288372 *Aug 27, 1964Nov 29, 1966Gen ElectricNon-clogging dishwasher arm orifices forming a fan-like vena contracta spray pattern
US4974779 *Apr 12, 1989Dec 4, 1990Ishikzwajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co., Ltd.Screen forming apparatus and method
US5088649 *Jul 12, 1990Feb 18, 1992Par-Way GroupPump sprayable dispensing system for vegetable oil based pan coatings
US5358179 *Aug 18, 1993Oct 25, 1994The Procter & Gamble CompanyAtomization systems for high viscosity products
US5769327 *Jan 5, 1995Jun 23, 1998Kure Fastighets & Forvaltnings AbNozzle for spreading water fog
US7959088 *May 14, 2004Jun 14, 2011Methven Ltd.Method and apparatus for producing droplet spray
US20100084853 *Jan 21, 2008Apr 8, 2010Teknikbolaget K. Samuelsson AbNozzle means for extinguisher system
DE102011077072B3 *Jun 7, 2011Oct 4, 2012Lechler GmbhVollstrahldüse
EP2189224A1Nov 22, 2008May 26, 2010Grundfos Management A/SJet
WO1995018651A1 *Jan 5, 1995Jul 13, 1995Anders KjellbergNozzle for spreading water fog
WO2010057618A1 *Nov 18, 2009May 27, 2010Grundfos Management A/SNozzle
Classifications
U.S. Classification239/543, 239/557
International ClassificationB05B1/14, B05B1/26
Cooperative ClassificationB05B1/26, B05B1/14
European ClassificationB05B1/26, B05B1/14