Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2318435 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateMay 4, 1943
Filing dateAug 2, 1940
Priority dateAug 2, 1940
Publication numberUS 2318435 A, US 2318435A, US-A-2318435, US2318435 A, US2318435A
InventorsFrank R Prescott, Semon H Stupakoff
Original AssigneeStupakoff Lab Inc
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Glass-to-metal seal and eyelet for constructing the same
US 2318435 A
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

U 1943- s. H. STUPAKOFF E 2,318,435

GLASS-TO-METAL SEAL AND EYELET FOR CONSTRUCTING THE SAME Filed Aug. 2, 1940 INVENTORS Semon H Sfupa/roff Rani/2 Prams 2% r M zz Patented May 4, 1943 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE GLASS-TO-METAL SEAL AND EYELET FOR CONSTRUCTING THE SAME tion of Pennsylvania Application August 2, 1940, Serial No. 349,876

1 Claim.

This invention pertains to the art of making glass-to-metal seals, and is for an improved seal and for an eyelet-by means of which the seal may be made.

In various types of equipment, and particularly in electrical equipment, it is necessary to bring a wire through a metal casing, and to have a pneumatic seal which is also an insulated joint where the wire passes through the metal casing. Considerable difficulty has been encountered in constructing such seals, due to the fact that, when the seal is being made, the glass is ruptured or such strains are set up in the glass which forms the seal as are likely to produce a rupture at a later time. Such seals also fail due to the fact that forces are set up in the glass, suflicient to disrupt the glass, due to some subsequent mechanical strain, and due to the thermal expansion or contraction of the metal shell or casing on which the seal is mounted.

The present invention provides a seal which is designed to eliminate these common causes of failure, and it may be easily constructed and at relatively low cost.

According to the invention, a flanged eyelet is provided which may be brazed or welded directly to the metal shell or casing of the apparatus on which the seal is to be formed. This eyelet is provided with a sleeve through which a wir may pass, and a body of glass fused to the wire and fused to the eyelet forms the seal. The eyelet is formed with an annular wall portion between the sleeve and the flange, and such wall portion imparts sufficient resilience to the structure to absorb strains which are set up when the eyelet is heated to fuse or weld it to the casing on which it is mounted, and to absorb any strains which result from the expansion or contraction of the metal shell.

The invention may be fully understood by reference to the accompanying drawing in which Figure 1 is a transverse vertical section through an eyelet made in accordance with the present invention; and

Figure 2 is a transverse vertical section through the complete seal embodying my invention; and

Figure 3 is a view similar to Figure 2, illustrating a permissible modification.

Referring to the drawing, 2 designates generally an eyelet formed of a metal which glass will "wet" and to which glass will fuse, and which, moreover, has a coeflicient of thermal expansion equal to that of commercially available glass suitable for this purpose. One metal which may be used is a metal which is available commercially under the trade-mark Kovar, and which is of the composition disclosed in United States patent to Howard Scott No. 1,942,260. Glasses whose coefllcient of expansion is matched to Kovar are well known in the art, the so-called boro-silicate glasses being generally used. Other metals and glasses, however, are available and are known to those skilled in the art, and are disclosed in the copending application of Semon H. Stupakoff et 8.1., Serial No. 129,881, filed March 9, 1937, now Patent No. 2,220,690, issued Nov. 5, 1940. The eyelet is provided with a central sleeve portion 3 which is preferably in the form of an inverted truncated cone. Formed integrally with the body of the inverted cone and folded down from the base thereof, but in spaced relation thereto, is a circumferentially extending vertical flange 4 which terminates at its lower end in a radially extending lip or flange 5. The surrounding skirt or flange l is 'iointed to the upper rim of the sleeve 3, with an annular trough 5 between the upper portion of the sleeve and the skirt or flange I. As so embodied in the eyelet structure, the skirt or flange 4 provides a resilient strain-absorbing wall portion of the character above described.

In using the eyelet, a wire or other conductor 1 is passed through the sleeve of the eyelet. It is held centered within the sleeve, while the sleeve is partially secured with a fused mass of lass 8. The conductor 1 is preferably formed of a metal which will be wet by the glass, which is molten when the assembly is made, so that when the glass congeals it will fuse to both wire 1 and sleeve 3.

After the conductor has been sealed in the eyelet, the eyelet may be placed over an opening 9 in a relatively heavy metal body Ill. The metal body in may be the housing or casing of some piece of electrical equipment, such, for example, as a shell or case of a transformer or condenser. When the eyelet has been properly positioned over the opening 9, it is attached to the body III by any known and suitable method of welding, brazing or solderinga weld being indicated at H in Figure 2 of the drawing. The weld preferably extends continuously around the lip or flange 5 of the eyelet, so as to form a hermetic seal between the eyelet and the body on which it is mounted. By looping the metal of the eyelet in the manner indicated to form a depending skirt about the sleeve portion of the eyelet between the sleeve and the flange, the eyelet is made sufliciently resilient lojthat the local heating of the flange 5 in brazing or welding the joint cannot transmit compressive strains to the glass sufllcieut to damage the glass. Moreover, this same structure increases substantially the length of the grate through which the heat must travel from the flange to the glass, thus providing an additional protection against rupture of the glass when the eyelet is being welded to the supporting body. The intensity of the heat transmitted to the glass is not sulficient to set up harmful strains in the glass.

The looping of the metal in the eyelet also protects the assembly after the joint has been made. The expansion or contraction of the casing wall In, which in some cases may be of considerable magnitude, can be absorbed in the looped portion of the eyelet, without subjecting the glass to excessive pressure. Additionally, mechanical stress transmitted to the conductor 1 may be absorbed in the eyelet, and thus protect the glass from breaking.

Figure 3 is illustrative of a modified form of eyelet, in which the strain-absorbing wall portion 4a of the eyelet is arranged above the rim of the sleeve portion 311. As in the case of the wall portion 4 of the eyelet first described, the annular wall portion or skirt 4a of the modified structure is arranged between the sleeve portion that receives the glass seal 8 and the flange portion that is welded and sealed to the metal wall In, and, as the drawing shows, such wall portion or skirt is spaced laterally from the sleeve portion. However, there is this qualification to be noted: Whereas in the structure of Figures 1 and 2 the wall portion 4 is formed by turning (or otherwise shaping) the wall of the eyelet through one angle-an angle of approximately 180-irom the upper end of the sleeve portion 3, in the alternative structure of Figure 3 the wall portion 10 is formed by turning the wall of the eyelet through two angles from the upper end of the sleeve portionan angle 6a of approximately and an angle 6b of approximately 90. The good effects are enjoyed in both of the structures described.

While we have illustrated and described two particular embodiments of our invention, it will be understood that they are for purposes of iilustration, and that various changes and modificatlons may be made within the contemplation of our invention and within the scope of the following claim.

We claim as our invention:

A glass-to-metal seal of the class described comprising an eyelet having a sleeve portion and a flange portion and a reversely turned skirt portion between the flange and the sleeve and substantially perpendicular to the flange, a body of glass in the sleeve portion whose coeflicient of thermal expansion is matched to that of the eyelet, and a metal .body passing through the body of glass having its coefficient of thermal expansion matched to that of the glass and to which the glass is also fused, the body of glass forming both a hermetic seal and an insulator between the conductor and the sleeve.

FRANK R. PRESCOTT, SEMIQN' H. STUPAKOFF.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2442545 *Jun 26, 1945Jun 1, 1948Du Mont Allen B Lab IncConnector for vacuum tubes
US2508551 *Jun 18, 1946May 23, 1950Bell Telephone Labor IncShockproof terminal seal
US2584653 *Nov 28, 1945Feb 5, 1952Westinghouse Electric CorpWindow construction
US2784532 *Mar 5, 1952Mar 12, 1957IttMethod for making electrical terminals
US2903826 *Jul 26, 1954Sep 15, 1959Mycalex Electronics Corp Of AmMethod of making an electrode structure
US2944235 *Mar 21, 1957Jul 5, 1960Peters Melville FHigh temperature coil structure
US2948992 *Feb 21, 1958Aug 16, 1960Gen Electric Co LtdGlass compositions and glass-to-metal seals
US2982937 *Oct 1, 1957May 2, 1961Bendix CorpHigh temperature lead assembly
US3117179 *Jul 24, 1959Jan 7, 1964Clevite CorpTransistor capsule and header therefor
US3146301 *Mar 23, 1961Aug 25, 1964Bendix CorpSpark discharge device
US3225132 *Apr 12, 1961Dec 21, 1965Philips CorpDevitrified glass-to-metal compression seal
US3248679 *Dec 11, 1962Apr 26, 1966Ward Leonard Electric CoMetal alloy resistors
US3248680 *Dec 11, 1962Apr 26, 1966Ward Leonard Electric CoResistor
US4152540 *May 3, 1977May 1, 1979American Pacemaker CorporationFeedthrough connector for implantable cardiac pacer
US4518820 *Nov 4, 1982May 21, 1985Kyle James CTerminal assembly for heart pacemakers
US8552311 *Jul 15, 2010Oct 8, 2013Advanced BionicsElectrical feedthrough assembly
US20120012374 *Jul 15, 2010Jan 19, 2012Advanced Bionics LlcElectrical feedthrough assembly
Classifications
U.S. Classification174/152.0GM
International ClassificationH01J5/42
Cooperative ClassificationH01J5/42, H01J2893/0034
European ClassificationH01J5/42