Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2351726 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateJun 20, 1944
Filing dateMar 18, 1941
Priority dateJul 11, 1940
Publication numberUS 2351726 A, US 2351726A, US-A-2351726, US2351726 A, US2351726A
InventorsWilliam H Wallace
Original AssigneeEaton Mfg Co
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Coil spring
US 2351726 A
Abstract  available in
Images(2)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

June 20, 1944. w WALLACE 2,351,726

'coIL SPRING Original Filed July 11, 1940 2 Sheets-Sheet 1 INVENTOR. h/lLL lflll hf k FLLHCE.

ATTOR NEY5 June 20, 1944. w, WALLACE 2,351,726

COIL SPRING Original Filed July 11, 1940 2 Sheets-Sheet 2 1 INVENTOR. WILL MM. H. M/fiLl. HCE

BY 1 (Ml M ATTORNEYfi Patented June 20, 1944 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE.

William H. Wallace, Detroit, Mich, asslgnor to Eaton Manufacturing Ohio, a corporation of Ohio Company, Cleveland,

Original application July 11, 1940, Serial No. 345,019, now Patent No. 2,249,677, dated July Divided and this application March 18, 1941, Serial No. 383,989

1 Claim.

. are subjected to repeated fiexing stresses may be increased by the cold working of the fibers at and near the surfaces of the metal, as by shot-blasting, and efforts have heretofore been made to apply, this knowledge to the manufacture of coil springs by tumbling the springs in a barrel in which they are being subjected to a shot-blast. This method, however, has not been satisfactory because of lack of uniformity in the springs thus treated which results from the varying degrees of treatment that different springs received on account of the promiscuous manner in which different springs were presented to the blast of shot. In the case of larger coil springs such as those used in automobile suspensions, a better treatment hasbeen obtained by conveying the springs through a fan-shaped shot-stream with the axis of each spring parallel with the planes in which the stream is fanshaped, and rotating the springs about their axes while passing through the shot-stream. By this method the fibers on the outside of the coils are subjected to substantially uniform treatment but the fibers on the inside of the coils are treated to a much less extent because of the shielding effect of the portions of the coils which are directly in the path of the shot.

when a helical compression spring is put under compression the innermost surface fibers of the coils are subjected to an appreciably greater maximum stress than the fibers at the surface of the mean diameter of the coils, and the outermost surface fibers of'the coils are subject to less maximum stress than the surface fibers at the mean diameter and very substantially less maximum stress than the innermost surface fibers.

In my application Serial No. 345,019, filed July 11, 1940, now Patent No. 2,249,677, granted July 15, 1941, of which this application is a division, I have described and claimed my improved method and apparatus for shot-blasting coil springs so as to substantially and uniformly improve the life of springs by shot-blasting them in such a way that the effect of the shot-blasting on the fibers at and adjacent the inner and outer surfaces of the coils will be at least substantial y uniform, and preferably result in cold working the inner surfaces to a greater extent than the outer surfaces. of the coils, and thereby most eifectivelyincrease' the strength and durability of the springs by subjecting the fibers which are subjected to the maximum stresses to the maximum amount of cold working. The present application relates to the springs per se which, as the result of the improved method of shot-blasting, are given novel and highly useful characteristics.

In the accompanying drawings,

Fig. 1 is a side elevation of a helical spring of the type above referred to.

Fig. 2 is an end elevation thereof.

Fig. 3 is a diagrammatic perspective view of one form of apparatus for practicing my invention. i

Fig. 4 is a diagrammatic plan view of a coil spring with its axis inclined to the direction of movement through the shot-stream to minimize the shielding of the inner surfaces of the coils.

Fig. 5 is a diagram showing the manner in which thesprings are moved through the shotstream in the apparatus illustrated in Fig. 3.

Fig. 6 is a diagram showing the paths of particular points on the coils through the shotstream.

In Figs. 1 and 2 I show a coil spring, which has been initially formed of helically extending conventional wire stock of the kind used in the production of coil springs, and whose resistance to fatigue has been greatly increased as hereinafter explained. The fibers at the points I 0 represent the outermost fibers of the coils, those at the points II the innermost fibers, and those at the points I! are on'the mean diameter of the coils. Figs. 1 and 2 is compressed the innermost fibers. as at the points I l, are subjected to the maximum stress, and the outermost fibers, as at the points M, are subjected to a lower stress, whereas the fibers at points l2 on the mean diameter are stressed less than those at the points II but greater than those at the points l0. Therefore, in order to obtain the most effective results by cold working or shot-blasting the surface fibers of the coils it is essential that the innermost fibers receive, at least, as much treatment as the outermost fibers and, since the innermost fibers are subjected to a greater stress than the outer- When a spring of the type illustrated in most fibers, when the spring is stressed, it is desirable to give to the innermost fibers greater strength through an increased amount of cold working, and this is accomplished by the use of the method and apparatus which will now be described.

Referring to Fig. 3, I8 indicates a common form of shot-throwing wheel and i4 and It a pair of laterally adjustable spaced angle-iron supports for the ends of the coil springs 66 which are to be shot-blasted. A belt H is carried by pulleys i8 and it, at the .opposite ends of the of the path 24 withthe plane 28. Since the point tion 28 in the same time interval'that the point B apparatus, and one of these pulleys will be power driven to move the belt H .at the desired rate of speed. A series of suitably spaced fingers 20 are secured to the belt H and serve to move the springs i6 through the shot-stream which is indicated by the lines 2 I. In this connection it will be noted that the axis of the springs 'is substantially parallel with the axis of the shotthrowing wheel l3, and that the springs move through the shot-stream in a direction parallel to the planes in which the shot-stream is fanned out longitudinally of the belt ll. The angle irons M and i5 may be arranged horizontally or the right-hand end thereof, as viewed in Fig. 3, may be slightly elevated so that the springs will be rolled up-hill to some extent as they pass through the shot-stream.

Referring to Fig. 4, in which one of the springs I6 is illustrated, it will be noted that the axis of the spring is inclined to the direction of movement of the belt II, which is indicated by the arrow 22, so that the lower half of the coils of the spring will be substantially parallel to the direction in which the spring moves through the machine. This is accomplished by having the fingers 20 arranged at an angle to the direction of movement of the belt II. By thus positioning the springs with reference to their direction of translation through the shot-stream the inner surfaces of the lower halves of the coils will be shielded a minimum amount by the upper halves of the coils and, as will be noted from Fig. 4, the inner surfaces of the lower halves of the coils: will be directly exposed to the action of the shot which pass between the upper halves of the coils.

Referring to Figs. 5 and 6, and particularl to Fig. 6, it will be noted that, as the springs move through the shot-stream. every point on the sur faces of the coils will move in a cycloidal path. For instance, the point A will describe the path indicated by the line 23, whereas the point B will describe the path indicated by the line 24. If we assume that the shot particles are discharged'in a downward vertical direction by the wheel l3 it will be obvious that the point A will not be affected by the shot-stream until it moves to the point 25 which is at the intersection of the path 23 with the horizontal plane 26 through the axis of the .coil. In other words, the point 'A. will not be subjected to the shot-stream until the spring has rolled one-fourth of a revolution. In a similar manner the point B on the inner surface of the coil will not be affected by the shotstream until it reaches the point 21 where the path 24 intersects the plane 25;

After passing the intersection 25 the point A .will, theoretically, be subjected to the shot- While the point A is moving from the intersection 25 to the intersection 28 the point B will move from the intersection 21 to the intersection 29 A moves from the intersection 25 to the intersecmoves' from the intersection 21 to the intersection 28, it is obvious that the point A will be carried through the shot-stream at a much higher velocity than that of the point B and, because the point B, on the innermost surface of the spring.

moves through the shot-stream more slowly than the point A on the outermost surface it will be subjected to considerably more shot-blasting, while passing through any particular section of the shot-stream, than will the point A in passing through this same section of the shot-stream. Of course, on account of the shot-stream being fanned out, in the direction in which the springs are translated throughrit, the diflerent portions of the stream strike the coils at different angles but, considering any particular section of the shot-stream. the fibers on the inner surface of the coils will be shot-blasted more than the fibers on the outer surface of the coils because of their slower movement through this section of the shot-stream. The practical effect of this is that the inner surface of thecolls will be worked, by the shot-blast treatment, at least as much as the outer. surface, and, for the reasons stated, will probably be worked more and therefore will be given greater strength and durability because of a this shot-blast treatment.

It will be apparent that, in addition to the foregoing beneficial results of this method of moving the coils through the shot-stream. all of the springs will receive a uniform treatment and with the result that there will be greater uniformity in the strength and fatigue life .of the diflerent springs.

The improvement in the fatigue life of springs by this improved method of shot-blasting is indicated by the following table of tests in which internal combustion valve springs approximately 1%? in diameter and 2%" long were alternately compressed and released untfl fracture occurred:

Numberol Cycles for failure springs shim s 3. I:

was 0.551 a? The above table indicates the number of cycles of compression and release by the column headed "Cycles for. failure." There were three series of tests and thirty-three springs were tested in each series. In column #1 the springs were in the as coiled" condition or, in other words, ordinary springs that had been through all of the usual manufacturing operations except that they had not been shot-blasted after being formed. Column #2 relates to springs exactly the .same as those in column #1 except that they had been shot-blasted by the barrel method hereinabove referred to. Column #3 relates to springs that were exactly the same as those in column #1 except they had been shot-blasted in accordance with my improved method herein described.

These tests showed that most of the ordinary springs which had not been shot-blasted failed at between 40,000 and 60,000 cycles, whereas most of the springs that were shot-blasted by the barrel method failed at between 100,000 and 300,000 cycles, and most of the springs shot-blasted in accordance with my improved method failed at between 1,000,000 and 3,000,000 cycles. From these results it is apparent that my improved method of shot-blasting enormously increases the fatigue life of the springs and that, in comparison with springs which have not been shotblasted the average life is increased about fifty times, and in comparison with the springs shotbiasted by the barrel method the life has been increased at least ten times.

In the actual practice of my improved method, in an apparatus similar to that illustrated in Fig.

3 for shot-blasting springs of the kind referred to in the foregoing table, the shot-throwing wheel H was 19%" in diameter, 2 wide, and revolved at 2300 revolutions per minute. The belt I! traveled at the rate of about 12' per minute,

and the wheel l3 discharged about 250 pounds of shot per minute, the shot used being steel particles about .020" in diameter, this shot being designated in the trade as #40.

Having thus described my invention, I claim: A coil spring whose resistance to fatigue resulting from the application of repeated stresses thereto has been substantially increased, after the spring has been formed, by substantially uniformly cold working the fibers at and adjacent the exterior surface of the convolutions and substantially uniformly cold working the fibers at and adjacent the interior surface of the convolutions but to a greater degree than the cold working of the fibers at and adjacent to the exterior surface of the convolutions.

WILLIAM H. WALLACE.

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2698191 *Jul 7, 1951Dec 28, 1954Bowser IncReplaceable high pressure coupling
US4287740 *Sep 12, 1978Sep 8, 1981Rockwell International CorporationMethod of increasing the fatigue life of titanium alloy parts
US5052664 *Nov 1, 1989Oct 1, 1991Barnes Group Inc.Arcuate spring
US5464198 *Jan 27, 1995Nov 7, 1995Borg-Warner Automotive, Inc.Torsional vibration damper having helical torsion springs
US5577299 *Aug 26, 1994Nov 26, 1996Thompson; Carl W.Quick-release mechanical knot apparatus
EP0645462A1 *Aug 25, 1994Mar 29, 1995Hoesch Federn GmbHProcess for optimizing the force distribution in spring elements
Classifications
U.S. Classification267/166, 29/896.9, 29/DIG.360
International ClassificationB24C1/10, F16F1/02, B24C3/32, C21D7/06
Cooperative ClassificationB24C3/32, C21D7/06, Y10S29/036, B24C1/10, F16F1/02
European ClassificationF16F1/02, B24C1/10, B24C3/32, C21D7/06