Search Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »
Sign in
Screen reader users: click this link for accessible mode. Accessible mode has the same essential features but works better with your reader.

Patents

  1. Advanced Patent Search
Publication numberUS2385886 A
Publication typeGrant
Publication dateOct 2, 1945
Filing dateNov 5, 1942
Priority dateNov 5, 1942
Publication numberUS 2385886 A, US 2385886A, US-A-2385886, US2385886 A, US2385886A
InventorsShaff Ernest H
Original AssigneeCherry Rivet Company
Export CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
Rivet
US 2385886 A
Abstract  available in
Images(1)
Previous page
Next page
Claims  available in
Description  (OCR text may contain errors)

Patented Oel. 2, 1945 UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE ton, Dei., a corporation of Delaware No Drawing. tion Hatch 3l, 1943,

'l Claims. (Cl. ll--50 This invention relates to the production oi' fine denier filaments and multifilament yarns and threads composed of a synthetic linear polymer. More particularly, this invention relates to the production of such filaments. yarns and threads containing incorporated therein a nnely divided. inert material in an amount less than that which will produce a substantially visible delusterins cr dulling eifect. whereby the rupturing of the filaments or yarn. during the cold-drawing thereof, will be materially diminished.

The melt-spinning and cold-drawing (that is, drawing under tension in the solid state) of synthetic linear polymers is weil known in the art. Ihe U. S. patents to Carothers Nos. 2,071,250. 2,071,251, 2,071,253 and 2,130,040 all disclose the melt-spinning and cold-drawing of synthetic linear polymers including poiyamides, polyesters. polyethers and polyanhydrides as well as mixed polymers or interpolymers, for example polyamide-polyesters. Of these polymers. the most interesting and useful are the synthetic linear polyamides. more particularly described in the last two above mentioned patents. It is also well known that other synthetic vlinear polymers, for example vinylidene dichloride polymers, acrylonitrile polymers and interpolymers of vinyl acetate and vinyl chloride can be melt spun and cold-drawn.

The present invention in its broad aspects is applicable to the melt spinning and cold-drawing of any ber-forming synthetic linear polymer.

The cold drawing of synthetic linear polymer yarn is usually done by feeding the yarn from one pair of positively driven rollers to a second pair of positively driven rollers rotating at a suitably higher speed than said first pair. Preferably. the draw tension is concentrated at a. precise point between the pairs of rollers to prevent wandering of the draw-point.

As might be expected, the cold-drawing of yarns composed of fine denier filaments which involves the stretching of the filaments from 200% up to 500%, or more. presents many problems. One of these is the tendency of the filaments and in some cases the entire yarn to break with the consequent production of inferior yarn. As might be expected, this happens more frequently as the filament denier is decreased and as the degree of drawing is increased. In the production oi bright, i. e. substantially undelustered, synthetic linear polyamide hosiery yarn. the breakage of filaments and yarns has been so high as to be a cause of real concern.

It is therefore an object of this invention to produce bright, undrawn. fine denier filaments and multifilament yarns composed of a synthetic linear polymer which can be readily colddrawn without excessive breakage of yarns and filaments.

It is another obiect of this invention to improve the melt spinning of bright, fine denier nlaments and multiillament yarns from a synthetic linear polymer in such a manner as to reduce the breakage of said yarns and filaments in the subsequent cold-drawing thereof,

Other objects of the invention will appear hereinafter.

The objects of the invention may be accomplished, in general, lhy producing bright. colddrawable, iine denier filaments and multifilament yarns composed oi a synthetic linear polymer containing, homogeneously dispersed throughout the body thereof. a nnely divided. inert material in an amount substantially less than that which will produce a visible delustering effect. The preferred procedure for accomplishing this is to prepare a melt oi' a synthetic linear polyamide containing from 0.005% -to 0.05% by weight of the finely divided, inert material, for example titanium dioxide, and melt spinning the polyamide in a known manner.

The addition of finely divided. inert material, for example pigments and pigment-like material. to synthetic linear polymer filament-forming compositions is. of course. well known. Conventionally. this is done to produce opaque or low luster yarns (delustered yarns). With other yarns, it has however also been done for such purposes as to produce staple yarn having good cohesion, or to produce yarn having low running tension in textile equipment.

There is nothing in the above mentioned, previously known processes which would suggest that the addition of less than 0.05% of a finely divided. inert material to a synthetic linear polymer melt will. upon melt spinning. produce tllaments and yarns which can be cold-drawn with decidedly fewer filament and yarn breaks than in the absence of said finely divided, inert material. Buch a minute amount of inert material is definitely insuflicient to accomplish the objects and purposes of the above mentioned, previously known processes` It is known that the presence of finely divided. inert material such as titanium dioxide tends to weaken yarn. It is also known that the colddrawing operation. in view of the high tension employed, is very critical. It would, therefore, be supposed that the cold-drawing cf yam containing such a iinely divided, inert material would result in increased breakage oi' yarns and illaments.

The following speciilc examples are given to -illustrate preferred methods of carrying out the present invention. It is to be understood however that these examples are not to be considered Yas limitative of the scope of the invention.

Example I The yarn was not visibly deiustered.

A similar polyhexamethylene adipamide polymer of relative viscosity 33.5 (determined by the method described below). but containing no titanium dioxide was spun from melt to form a (l-filament yarn. The yarn was subsequently cold-drawn at a draw ratio of 4.40 to produce a 210 denier-60 iliament yarn with a tenacity o! 6.5 grams per denier and an elongation of 14%. In the drawing operation there were 2.0 complete yarn breaks per pound of yarn and a creei mirror test showed forty broken tllarnents per 1.000 yards oi' yarn.

Example Il Poiyhexamethylene adipamide polymer of rela.- tive viscosity 34 (determined by the method described below) and containing 0.05% by weight of titanium dioxide was spun from melt to form a e-nlament yarn which was subsequently colddrawn at adraw ratio or 4.40 to produce a 210 denier-89 iliament yarn with a tenacity or 6.2 vgrains per denier and an elongation of 15%. In the drawing operation there were 0.2 complete yam breaks per pound of yarn. and a creel mirror test showed two broken filaments r 1,000 yards oi' yarn. The yarn was not appreciably deiustered.

A similar polyhexamethylene adipamide of relative viscosity 34 (determined by the method described below). but containing no titanium dioxide was melt spun to form a 69iliament yarn ,which was subsequently cold drawn at a draw ratio oi 4.40 to produce a 210 denier-69 iliament yarn with a tenacity of 6.5 grams per denier and an elongation of 14%. In the drawing operation there were several complete yarn breaks and a creci mirror test showed seventy broken niaments per 1,000 yards of yarn.

A second sample oi the polymer mentioned in the previous paragraph was melt spun to form a Bil-filament yarn. The yarn was subsequently cold-drawn at a draw ratio ot 4.28 to produce a 210 denier-69 iiament yarn with a tenacity ot 5.5 grams per denier and an elongation of 19%. In the drawing operation there were several complete yarn breaks and a creci mirror test showed eightyeight broken iiiamente per 1,000 yards of yarn.

The above two examples show two very im portant advantages which follow the teachings ot the present invention. In the first place, the presence of a small amount o! titanium dioxide in the polymer as spun makes it possible to draw bright yarn without the occurrence. during the the production of a yarn having a higher elongation than would be II) the elongation went up and the tenacity down (which is a well recognised observation in the art), but the draw-twister breaks and broken ends were not decreased. Consequently, the titanium dioxide eil'ect is not a draw ratio eilect. Conversely, it shows that yarn containing small amounts of titanium dioxide can be drawn at a bisher draw ratio to end with the same (desired) elongation and therefore increase the productivity oi' the spinning machines.

While the examples show a preference for a relative viscosity oi' 33.5 to 34.0. the relative viscosity may be between l5 and 80.

The term "relative viscosity as used in this specification is, the ratio oi' absolute viscosity at of the solution of synin 00% formic acid (10% water and fox-mic acid) to the absolute viscosiw at 25 C. (in centlpoises) of the 90% formie acid. An 8.4% (by weight) solution of the synthetic linear polyamides which are com- -il0% iormic acid is used in this determination. Moisture content oi polyamides is disregarded in preparation ronnie acid test solutions spinning and cold-drawing of any liber-forming synthetic linear polymers and is particularly applicable to the melt spinning ot synthetic linear polyamides. Also, although the invention shows its greatest utility in the cold-drawing of melt spun illaments and yarn, it includes in its broader aspects the colddrawing ot polyamide filaments and yarns spun by other methods. e. g. from solution. The invention is substantially limited to momentous structures comprised of tine denier filaments, i. e. less than 20 denier per filament. since such structures are drawn in the atmosphere whereas materially larger filaments are drawn in water and therefore not particularly subject to breaklle.

oxide, calcium sulfate, barium sulfate. kaoiin. (barium sulfate and While it Ls not desired bounded by speculation, it is believed that any inert. discrete, solid. pigment-like particles dispersed in the polymer will result in the same phenomenon. Titanium dioxide is preferred since large quantities of lt

Referenced by
Citing PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitle
US2428165 *May 5, 1945Sep 30, 1947Cherry Rivet CompanyTool for setting blind rivets
US2465144 *Sep 18, 1946Mar 22, 1949Ind Sales CompanyBlind rivet expander
US2473913 *Sep 27, 1945Jun 21, 1949Cherry Rivet CompanyApparatus for upsetting blind rivets having right angle bend in stem
US2525117 *Feb 19, 1944Oct 10, 1950Campbell John BRivet
US2527307 *Jun 23, 1947Oct 24, 1950Huck Mfg CoRivet and method of riveting
US2787932 *May 18, 1955Apr 9, 1957Glenn L Martin CoBlind rivet having tapered expander pin therein
US2905045 *Apr 7, 1955Sep 22, 1959Lockheed Aircraft CorpBlind fastener having expansion ring beneath tapered pin head
US2978946 *Feb 11, 1957Apr 11, 1961Brown Line CorpGrooved pin with reformable collar to accommodate various thicknesses
US3683740 *Jan 28, 1971Aug 15, 1972Alan MartinThreaded blind fastener
US3878760 *Mar 5, 1973Apr 22, 1975Aerpat AgImproved blind fastener
US4447944 *Jun 16, 1982May 15, 1984The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The NavyMethod of forming a tubular rivet in fastening relation to a plurality of laminates
US4474517 *Jun 7, 1982Oct 2, 1984The Budd CompanyFastening device
US4637764 *Mar 24, 1983Jan 20, 1987Nissan Motor Company, LimitedBolt adapted for one-handed tightening by tightening tool
US5599147 *May 2, 1995Feb 4, 1997Allfast Fastening Systems, Inc.Blind rivet with a tapered locking mechanism
US5689873 *Nov 6, 1996Nov 25, 1997Allfast Fastening Systems, Inc.Tacking fastener
US6077009 *Apr 9, 1999Jun 20, 2000Huck International, Inc.Blind fastener with high strength blind head and high clamp and high shear load resistance
US6772500Nov 20, 2001Aug 10, 2004Allfast Fastening Systems, Inc.Method of forming holes for permanent fasteners
US8449234Jan 16, 2007May 28, 2013Harry E. TaylorBlind rivet
US20030093890 *Nov 20, 2001May 22, 2003Ralph LuhmTwo piece tack rivets and method of forming holes for permanent fasteners
US20040240963 *Jul 2, 2004Dec 2, 2004Ralph LuhmTwo piece tack rivets
US20080170926 *Jan 16, 2007Jul 17, 2008Taylor Harry EBlind rivet
USRE38664Nov 22, 1999Nov 30, 2004Allfast Fastening Systems, Inc.Method for creating a hole for a permanent fastener that replaces a tacking fastener
USRE39582Mar 6, 2002Apr 24, 2007Allfast Fastening Systems, Inc.Method for replacing a tacking fastener
WO1989008204A1 *Feb 14, 1989Sep 8, 1989Huck Manufacturing CompanyFastening system and fastener for shipping containers and the like
Classifications
U.S. Classification411/43, 470/110, 470/205
International ClassificationF16B19/04, B21J15/04, B21J15/00, F16B19/10
Cooperative ClassificationB21J15/043, F16B19/1054, F16B19/1072
European ClassificationF16B19/10B2B6, F16B19/10B2B2, B21J15/04B