|Publication number||US2419028 A|
|Publication date||Apr 15, 1947|
|Filing date||May 16, 1941|
|Priority date||Jan 31, 1941|
|Also published as||US2282203, US2340485|
|Publication number||US 2419028 A, US 2419028A, US-A-2419028, US2419028 A, US2419028A|
|Inventors||Norris Edward O|
|Original Assignee||Edward O Norris Inc|
|Export Citation||BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan|
|Patent Citations (6), Referenced by (6), Classifications (6)|
|External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet|
E. o. NoRRls PROCESS OF PRODUCNG MESH FABRIC STENCLS 2 sheets-'sheet 1 April 15, 1947.
Filed May 16, 1941 INVENTOR D Q /Vofi'ms ATTORNEY April 15, 1947. E. o. vNoRRls 2,419,023
PROCESS OF PRODUCING MESH FABRIC STENCILS Filed May 1e, 1941 2 sheets-sheet 2 INVENTOR DWARD O [V0/mls ATTORNEY Patented Apr. 15, 1947 PROCESS OF PRODUCING MESH FABRIC STENCILS Edward 0. Norris, Westport, Conn., assigner to Edward O. Norris, Inc., New York, lN. Y., a corporation of New York Application May 16, 1941, Serial No. 393,731
This application is a continuation-in-part of my copending application Ser. No. 376,769, filed January 31, 1941, now Patent No. 2,282,203, granted May 5, 1942.
The invention relates to screen stencils such as are used for making ink and paint impressions of designs, depositing adhesive in the form of a design for nook-printing, applying dyes to form a design, .and in general making impressions of a large variety of materials. More particularly, it relates to processes of producing stencils of the general character just described, so constructed that line lines of the design to be impressed or printed are clearly defined and unbroken, and the edges of larger areas are clearly demarked and are free from the ragged or saw-toothed appearance which often characterizes work done with the ordinars7 screen stencil. In referring to fine lines dots are included.
The objects will be presently more clearly brought out as the stencil itself` and the mode of constructing it are explained in connection with the drawings.
Referring to the drawings,
Fig. 1 is an isometric view showing a portion of stencil base which consists preferably of electroformed foraminous sheet. On the sheet is indicated an area in the form of an annulus which may be taken for purposes of illustration as the design that is to be printed or impressed;
Fig. 2 is an isometric view of a portion of the screen of Fig. 1 showing the screen of Fig.. 1 covered with three layers of materials partly broken away;
Figs. 3, 4, and 5 show successive steps in the production of the final stencil;
Fig. 6 illustrates a further step whereby the design is opened up through the stencil to permit free passage of the printing agent;
Fig. 7 shows the completed stencil;
Figs. 8, 9, 10, and 11 show a modiiied process of producing the stencil of Fig. '7.
YIt is to be realized that the drawings are on a vastly larger scale than would -be employed in practice. Usually the base screen would have in the order of from 25 to 100 meshes to theflinear inch, and as much as possible oi the area would be open, the limit of open area obviously being fixed by the strength of the material, the nature of the use to which the stencil is to be put, etc. In most cases the design woud be of a more elaborate nature than what I show in the drawings. However, the principle involved in my invention is the same regardless of the elaborateness of the design, and so I have selected a very z simple one by which to explain the process an the final product. l
#Referring specifically to the drawings,
f Fig.4 1 shows a portion of an electroformed screen consisting of the wires I 0 intersected normally by the wires II. Preferably, as stated above, the open areas l2 are as large as possible consistent with vsuitable structural strength. Such a .screen and a method of producing it are illustrated and described in my United States Pra-tent No. 2,166,366 issued July 18, 1939, and therefore it is not necessary to go into details as to how the screen itself is produced.
In using the term wires to describe the component parts of the screen structure, I am aware that the word is used in a sense somewhat beyond the usual. However, it is a fact that a true wire structure, such as woven wire screen, would serve my purposes, although, as I have found, not las satisfactorily as does the electroformed screen. In screen of the electroformed type, what I have termed wires are frequently known as landsf In general, such screen structures may be termed mesh fabric, which includes, in the ordinary accepted meaning of the term, not onlywoven fabric but also that which is punched, etched or electroformed as Well.
To make the process clear, I have shown on Fig. l in dotted lines an annular area which will correspond with the open area of the completed stencil, the remaining areas of the stencil of course being blocked out, as will be presently described, by imperforate sheet superimposed thereon.
In order to make clear the description it should be explained that Yit involves selective etchingi. e., the employment of etching agent-s that corrosively react on one material to the exclusion of another, and vto avoid complicated language it will be assumed that the material of the base screen is of nickel. On the nickel screen which will eventually serve as a backing for the layers of imperforater material to be laid thereon, is deposited a layer I3 of copper, the copper completely covering the base screen itself to a substantial thickness which, however, is not critical. This copper is applied preferably by electroplating, the bottom (with reference to the orientation of the screen as shown in the drawing) being suitably masked by covering it with adherent waxed paper or by other methods wellknown in the electroplating art. As an incident to the electroplating step`(unless the holes are rst lled with electrically non-conductive material), the copper not only overlies the base screen but it also extends into the holes. As will be apparent however, as the description goes on, it is merely necessary that the copper overlie the screen.
As an alternative to masking the bottom face of the screen and thenapplying the copper layer, the copper layer may. be applied to the screen before the latter has been removed from the matrix on which it has been electroformed. To explain, the matrix on which the electroforming operation takes place consists of a plate of metal to the surface off which is applied amultitude y of dots preferably in rows and columns, of electrically non-conductive material which correspond in pattern to the apertures in the screen, the exposed metal areas correspondingrto the lands of the screen. rI'he dots are thick enough to prevent deposition on the areas coveredjby them. Prior t-o the depositing step the. screen is covered with a thin stripping layer-for example, wax, which while it does not prevent electrodeposition renders the entireI surfaceof the matrix non-adherent to the deposit. screen be made in this fashion, the copper layer may obviously be applied to it beforeit has been removed from the matrix, and therefore no masking is necessary `since the copper deposit cannot reach the bottom face vof the screen but, onthe other. hand, will ll the apertures in the screen and overlie the face of thescreen.
The copper having been deposited, there is neXt laidon the copper, also preferably byelectroplating, a layer id of nickel. To the'layer l of nickel is then applied a coating l5 of glue or shellac rendered light-sensitive by the presence of ammonium bichromate. The well-known coatings known as Coldtop and Gluetop Iserve-the purpose very well. The particular type of coating is not however important as long as it is resistant to the etchingagent which is employed to etch the nickel, as will be explained.
The next step (see Fig; 3) is to photoprint the design on the light-sensitive coating, which is done by the Aplate S6; exhibiting a positive of the design indicated by shading in Fig; 3. In other words, the'shaded portion isopaque to light and the remaining portion is transparent. The printing being Completed, the result is that the area of the light-sensitive coat protected by the shaded area of the plate I6 from the light source is unaiected, while the remaining area is hardened and insoluble to the developer. The lightsensitive coat is then developed by washing in water if the glue top be used, consequently exposing. ,the nickel Hlas indicated ,at l1 (seeFig, 4)', where previouslyk covered by they design area. If light-sensitizedv shellac be used, it lwould be washedout with an alcoholic preparation sold under the trade name Vof Chemco Glascote Developer. thesensitized coat and the steps of developing and exposing the nickel tocorrespond with it are wellfknown and need no detailed or further description..
It might be added, however; that the developed coat. l5, if of the glue type, may be further hardened by baking, although that has not been found to be necessary.
The next step is to etchthrough the nickel layer Iii where itis exposed as a result of the developing step,v as indicated at lla. A suitable etching agent for the purpose is ferrie chloride for the reason that, while it attacks the nickel, it does notraiect the developed coating l5, and therefore the area of its corrosive action is accurately delimited bythe edges of the latter. Since this nickellayer will constitute the face of thecompleted stencil that'contacts with the material to be printed upon, it should be thick enough` to be not onlyA ,self-supporting but thick enoughto withstandv the printingpressure.v It isfoundthat, if this layer be roughly oneethird of the total thickness of the stencil itself', it is sunicient. Such, a nickel layer` is. thin enough .however so that, in etching, the area of corrosive If the The steps ofproducing the design on action does not materially spread beyond the confines of the coating. This .etchingfprocess is of course arrested as soon as it has continued long enough to etch through to the copper layer i3 or perhaps when it has progressed very slightly into the copper. The result of the foregoing etching stepis shown in Fig. 5, where the nickel has been etched completely through and the area itv of the copper surface below it is exposed.
The next step is to continue the etching with an agent that will act corrosively on the copper or" the layer i3 but will not affect the material of the layer is er the material of the base screen. A suitable etching agent for this purpose is chromic acid or a dilute mixture of sulfurie and chrornic acids which actively etches copper but which, since it has not-effect or appreciable effect on nickel, will not attack either the layer it or the base screen itself. This etching operation is continued until passages are opened from the open areas of the nickel through to the rear surface of the screen, the course of these passages being around the wires of the screen and through the apertures therein; so that ink or other substance to be forced through the stencil to print the desired design will freely travel through the conducting passages .between the screen and the copper and emerge in uniform volume and in a solid continuous mass on to the surface being printed. The general conformation of the ink passage is shown in Fig. 6, the spacing between the copper and the screen lands being indicated by the numeral i9. As an incident to this etching step the copper is undercut (see Fig. 6) slightly beneath the marginal area of the nickel leaving these areas overhanging. which makes apparent the necessity as before noted that the nickel layer be thick enough to withstand the printing pressures.
After removing the masking material, if any, from the bottom, the result is that in printing the design appears in a continuous unbroken line, the ink or other substance passing'through the stencil unobstructed by the lands of the screen. Prior to actually employing the stencil for printing purposes, thedevelopedfcoating l5 is removed by the application of a suitable agent, such, for example, as caustic potash. The completed stencil is shown in Fig. 7, its printing facei. e., the face that contacts with the work being uppermost as shown in the drawing.`
The advantages of the stencil can now be brought out more clearly than before. By referring back to Fig. l, it will be seen that, when the design includes line lines such as the annular gure which I am using as an illustration, the ordinary process of simply blocking out the stencil to form the design leaves these line lines in many cases overlying and blocked by portions of the lands. This is brought out in Fig. l, where, for example, a portion of the annular design traverses for a short distance the land I 0a as indicated. It also crosses various other lands and is blocked out by the land i la. Consequently, when a stencil of this simple form is used. for printing nne line gures, especially where the lines are about the width of a, screen unit or less, thc lines, when printed, appear broken, for the reason that the ink is not delivered at those portions where the design is blocked out by the screen lands'. By the term screen unit I mean the total width of a screen land and an adjacent'aperture. My stencil, however, is distinguished from the'standard construction which I have described in that in the former the fine line discharge orificefor .A nickel plate 25.
the ink is open Aat all points to the source of supply on the opposite or rear side of the stencil, and thus the ink or the like comes through freely, passing around the lands of the'screen and thence through the discharge orifice in uniform volume and in an unbroken mass. The stencil also has definite advantages even where an area covering many meshes of screen is open, in that the edges of the printed design do not p-resent a ragged or l saw-tooth appearance as they would and do Where they are partially cut into the screen lands.
Figs. 8-11, both inclusive, show a modification of the process. iin this case, as in the previous case, the base screen may be assumed to be of nickel with the copper deposit I 3 completely rilling the holes and covering the screen itself. From then on the process varies from the process previously described. Instead of applying to the copper a coat of nickel, then a sensitized coat, and printing with a positive of the design, the lightsensitized layer 20 is laid directly on the copper I3. Printing is then done by a plate 2l which is a negative oi the design, the shaded areas 22 being opaque and the unshaded area 23 in the form of the desired design being transparent. The result after printing and developing is shown in Fig. 9 in which the copper surface of the layer I3 is exposedV and there is superimposed thereon the hardened sensitized coat 24 conforming to the design.` The structure of Fig. 9 is then subjected to an electroplating operation, whereby the layer 25 of 'nickel is adherently laid on the copper. This layer of nickel, like the layer of nickel in the previous caseis preferably in the order of one-third of the thickness of the stencil, the point being that an unsupported marginal area shall be heavy enough to be not only self-supporting lbut strong enough to withstand printing pressures after the layer beneath it has been undercut, as will presently be described. The hardened coat 24 is then removed by the application of avsuitable agent such as caustic potash, leaving the area 26 of the copper surface exposed in the form of the design. The structure of Fig. 10 is then subjected to an etching process, the etching agent being of a characterr that does not affect the vnickel of the layer 25 or the material of the screen itself. As in the process of Figs. 1-7, this agent may be chromic acid and the etching is carried `through to the bottom of the plate,
creating a free passage for ink or the like from the -rear face to and out of the orifices in the As an incident to this etching operation, the copper is undercut beneath the marginal areas of the nickel as shown in Fig. 1l.
The ultimate result is the stencil of Fig. 11 in all essential respects similar in construction and mode of operation to the stencil of Fig. 7.
In explaining the invention I have up to this point preferred, nfor the sake of clarity, to name a combination of speciiic materials in describing ways in'which it may be carried out. However, it will be seen that the underlying principles do not necessarily involve the use of the specific materials that I have named. For example, if the base screen were of copper instead of nickel, the layer I3 could be of zincinstead of copper and the layer I4 of copper in place of nickel. In such case, however,v the' selection of etching agents would need to be adapted to bring about the selective-.actions that .are necessary. In' the case just supposed, for example, the photographic printing might be through a positive transparency of the design as shown in Fig. 3. The first etching agent could be ferrie chloride as before,
for the reason that, while it attacks the copper, it does not affect the developedV coating I5. This rst etching would remove or dissolve the copper and perhaps, to a very slight depth, the zinc. The next etching must, however, be of such a nature as to etch the zinc but not affect the copper, for the reason that the base screen, which is of copper, must be preserved and also the edges of the copper layer must remain intact. A suitable etching agent for this purpose is sulphuric acid diluted with water, which actively attacks zinc but does not affect copper.
If other combinations of metals than nickel or zinc and copper or other types of sensitized coating are used, it is necessary to select etching agents that will act selectively in accordancewith the foregoing principles. As to the combination of nickel and copper, I have selected them as preferable because they are adaptable for stencil purposes, are readily etched selectively are comparatively inexpensive, and lend themselves readily to electroforming process.
In applying the successive layers of metal in my several methods, electroplating acts most satisfactorily. Where etching is referred to, electrolytic deplating is included wherever the process is applicable.
'I have described above certain embodiments of my invention and a preferred process for vproducing it with certain modications thereof, but I wish it to be understood that these are illustrative and not limitative of my invention and that I reserve the right to make various changes in form, construction, and arrangement of parts, and also to make various changes in the process of manufacture, including the order in which the several steps shall be carried out,`falling within the spirit and scope of my invention as set forth in the claims.
l. The process of producing mesh fabric stencil, which comprises superimposing on a sheet of metal screen a solid adherent layer of material, superimposing on the said layer a second adherent layer of material substantially thinner than the first layer, the rst layer being reactive to an etchant to which the screen and the second layer are passive, blocking a design on the second layer by means of a resist passive to anetchant that reacts on the second layer, some of the areas of said design being narrower than the lands of the screen, etching the design through the second layer to the rst layer by means ofsaid etchant, etching through the rst layer by means ofV an etchant that is passive to the screen and to the second layer until communicating passages are established from the uncovered face of the screen through the interstices thereof and through the second layer to the open areas of the first layer.
2. The process of producing mesh fabric, stencil, which comprises superimpcsing on a sheet of metal screen a solid adherent layer of material and lling the interstices of the screen with the same, superimposing on the said layer a second adherent layer of material substantially thinner than the first layer, the rst layer being reactive to an etchant to which the screen and the second layer are passive, blocking a design on the second vlayer by means of a resist passive toanl etchant that reacts on the second layer, some o f the areas of said design being narrower than the lands of the screen, etching the design through the second layer to the first layer by means of said etchant, etching through the rst layer by means of an etchant A that fis'p'assive to the iscreenn'and to the second layer vuntil communicating passages are establishedfrom theiuncovered face of the screen through'the interstices thereof and through the second layertothe open-areas -of-the rst layer.
v3. iTheprocessof producing mesh fabric stencil, which comprises superimposing on a sheet of metalrscreen'a solid adherent layer-'of metal, superimposing -on the'said' layer a second adherent layer'o'fr metalsubstantially thinner than the first layer, the` rst ,layer being reactive to an etchant to which the screen and` the second layer are passive, blocking a design rcn-the second layer by means ofiaresist passive to an etchant that reacts -on the-second layer, some yof the areas of said design Abeing narrower than the lands of the screen, etching the design through the second layer-to the rstlayer'by means of said etchant, etching through the first layer by means of an etchant that is passive to the vscreen and to the second layer until communicating passages are established from the-uncovered face of the screen through the interstices thereof and through the second layer to the open areas of the first layer.
v4. The process of-producing mesh fabric stencil, which comprises ysuperimposing on a sheet of nickel screen a solid adherent layer of copper, superimposing on the copper layer a layer of nickel substantially thinner than the copper` layer, blocking a design on the layer of nickel by means of a resist that is passive to an etchant that reacts on the nickel, `some of theareas of said design beingnarrower than the lands-of the screen, etchingv the design through the nickel layer to the copper layer by means of said etchant,
etching through the copper layer by means of a second etchant that is passive to nickel until communicating passages are established from the uncovered face of the screen through .the interstices thereof and through the copper layer to the` open areasof the nickel layer.
A5. The process of producing mesh fabric stencil, which comprises superimposing on a sheet of nicke1 screen a solid adherent layer of copper, superimposing on the copper layer a layer of nickel substantially thinner than the copper layer, ,blocking a design on the `layer of nickel by means of a rresist that is passive to ferric chloridef'some of the areas of said design being narrower than the lands of the screen, etching the design through the nickel layer to the copper layer by means of ferrie chloride, etching through the copper layerby means cfa dilute mixture of sulphuric vand chromic acids until communicating passages are established from the uncovered face of the screen through the interstices thereof and through the copperlayer to the open areas of the nickel layer.
V6. vThe process of producing mesh fabric stencil, which comprises superimposing on a sheet of nickel screen a ,solid adherent layer of metal other than nickel, then superimposing on the said layer a second layer of material differing from thatofthe first layer substantially thinner'than the first layer, blocking a design on thesaid second layer bymaterialresistant to an etchant that acts on the second layer, some of the areas of said design being narrower than the lands of the layer 'by'means of said etchant, then etching through `the first layer'by means of a second etchant*tuwhihthesecond` layer and thel screen 8 are resistant-,until lpassages from the uncovered face of ,the fabric about the wires of the fabric .and thence to the etched areas of the second `layer are established.
7. The process of producing mesh fabric-stencil,
'which comprises superimposingon a sheet of screen of non-.cuprous metal a. solid layer of copper, then superimposing on the copper layer a second layer of non-cuprous metal substantially thinner than the first-mentioned layer, .blocking a design on the said second layer by` material resistant to an `etchant that'acts on the second layer, some of the areas of said design being narrower than the lands of the screen, etching the design through said second layer vby means of said etchant, 4thenetching through the copper layer lby means of a second etchant to Which the second layer and the screen are resistant until passages from the uncovered face of the fabric about the Wires of the fabric and thence to the etched areasof `the second layer are established.
8. The process of producing mesh fabric sten-cil, `which comprises superimposing on a sheet of nickel screen a solid adherent layer of metal other than nickel, filling the Ainterstices of the screen with the same metal, then superimposing on the said layer a second layer substantially thinner than the rst layer and of metal differing from thefirst layer, blocking a design on the said second layer by material resistant to an etchant that acts on the second layer, some of the areas of said design being narrower than the lands of the screen, etching the design through -said secondlayerby meansof said etchant, then etching through the first layerby means of a second etchantto ,which the second layer and the screen are resistant until passages from the uncovered face of the fabric about the Wires of the fabric and thence to the etched areas of the second layer are established. l
9. The process of producing mesh fabric stencil, which comprises superimposing on a sheet of nickel screen a solid adherent layer of copper, superimposing on said layer of copper a solid adherent layer of nickel substantially thinner than the iirst layer, blocking a design von the said layer of nickel, some of the areas of said design being narrower than the lands of the screen, etching said design through said layer of nickel by means of ferric chloride, then etching through the copper by means of chromic acid until the liquid conveying passages leading from the'uncovered face o-f the fabric, then about the wires of the fabric, and thence to the open areas of the layer of nickel are established.
EDWARD O. NORRIS.
REFERENCES CITED The following references are of record in the file of this patent:
' UNITED STATES PATENTS Number 'Name Date '758,108 Sachers Apr, 26, 1904 1,750,418 McFarland Mar. 11, 1930 1,821.561 McFarland Sept. 1, 1931 2,255,440 Sherman Sept. y9, 1941 v2,213,237 Brennan et al Sept.3, 1940 FOREIGN PAIENI'S Number Country Date
|Cited Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US758108 *||Feb 23, 1897||Apr 26, 1904||Jean A Wetmore||Art of planographic printing.|
|US1750418 *||Dec 5, 1928||Mar 11, 1930||Wadsworth Watch Case Co||Etching and decorating metal surfaces|
|US1821561 *||Jun 22, 1928||Sep 1, 1931||Wadsworth Watch Case Co||Method of decorating watch dials, etc.|
|US2213237 *||Dec 10, 1936||Sep 3, 1940||Brennan||Metal stencil|
|US2255440 *||Feb 20, 1939||Sep 9, 1941||Sherman Wilson R||Electroforming method of preparing stencils|
|FR835984A *||Title not available|
|Citing Patent||Filing date||Publication date||Applicant||Title|
|US2635534 *||Apr 30, 1948||Apr 21, 1953||Huebner Company||Process for preparing an electrographic reproduction instrumentality|
|US2874101 *||Sep 17, 1952||Feb 17, 1959||Farnsworth Res Corp||Method of making double-sided mosaic|
|US3610143 *||Jul 25, 1969||Oct 5, 1971||Hallmark Cards||Method of preparing rotary screen printing cylinder|
|US3783779 *||May 20, 1971||Jan 8, 1974||Hallmark Cards||Rotary screen printing cylinder|
|US5384007 *||Oct 13, 1993||Jan 24, 1995||Schablonentechnik Kuestein Ges. M.B.H.||Process for manufacturing a screen printing stencil|
|US5443677 *||Oct 6, 1994||Aug 22, 1995||Schablonentechnik Kufstein Ges. M.B.H.||Apparatus for manufacturing a screen printing stencil|
|U.S. Classification||216/33, 216/41, 216/105|